A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
1
APPENDIX
J
Federal
Consistency
Report
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
2
This
Page
Intentionally
Left
Blank.
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
3
Peconic
Estuary
Program
Comprehensive
Conservation
and
Management
Plan
Federal
Consistency
Report
September
2000
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
5
This
Page
Intentionally
Left
Blank.
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
6
FEDERAL
CONSISTENCY
REPORT
FOR
THE
PECONIC
ESTUARY
PROGRAM
Background
The
National
Estuary
Program
(
NEP)
was
established
by
the
Water
Quality
Act
of
1987,
which
amended
the
Federal
Clean
Water
Act.
The
purpose
of
the
NEP
is
to
identify,
protect
and
restore
estuaries
of
national
significance.
The
Peconic
Estuary
was
nominated
for
the
NEP
by
the
Governor
of
New
York
in
1991.
In
1993,
the
Management
Conference
was
convened
to
oversee
development
of
a
Comprehensive
Conservation
and
Management
Plan
(
CCMP).

There
is
a
Federal
consistency
review
requirement
for
the
NEP.
This
is
distinct
from
the
Federal
consistency
requirement
of
the
Federal
Coastal
Zone
Management
Act,
conducted
as
part
of
the
State's
coastal
zone
management
program.

The
Federal
consistency
review
procedure
being
applied
for
the
Peconic
Estuary
is
explained
below.
The
procedure
was
originally
developed
by
the
Long
Island
Sound
Study
and
New
York
 
New
Jersey
Harbor
Estuary
Program
for
their
CCMPs.
The
State
of
New
York
has
decided
to
apply
this
procedure
to
the
Peconic
Estuary.

Purpose
of
Review
EPA
guidance
defines
the
goal
of
the
Federal
consistency
review
process
as
to
ensure
that
Federal
actions
do
not
adversely
affect
CCMP
goals,
and
that
they
support
actions
proposed
in
the
CCMP
where
possible.
In
addition,
under
an
agreement
between
the
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
and
the
National
Oceanic
and
Atmospheric
Administration
(
NOAA)
(
see
below),
CCMPs
are
submitted
for
determination
that
they
are
consistent
with
the
coastal
zone
management
plans
of
the
affected
State
or
States.
The
major
tasks
in
the
Federal
consistency
review
process
are:

 
Consistency
of
Federal
actions
with
the
CCMP:

1.
Development
of
an
inventory
of
Federal
programs
and
projects
to
be
reviewed
for
consistency
with
the
CCMP,
and
a
one­
time
assessment
of
these
programs/
projects
for
consistency
with
the
CCMP.

2.
Setting
up
and
implementing
a
process
to
continually
review
individual
Federal
projects
for
consistency
with
the
CCMP.

 
Consistency
of
the
CCMP
with
coastal
zone
management
plans:

3.
Determination
whether
the
CCMP
is
consistent
with
affected
State
CZM
plans.

4.
Concurrence
of
the
State
with
the
determination.
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
7
Consistency
of
Federal
Actions
with
the
CCMP
Activities
that
affect
the
quality
of
the
Peconic
Estuary
are
both
supported
and
regulated,
both
directly
and/
or
indirectly,
by
Federal,
State
and
local
agencies.
Because
government­
sponsored
activities
have
a
wide
variety
of
objectives,
it
is
possible
that
some
activities
may
be
inconsistent
with
the
goals
of
the
CCMP
for
the
Peconic
Estuary.

The
need
for
coordination
among
governmental
programs
and
program
goals
that
will
affect
the
Management
Conference
(
and
ultimately
the
CCMP)
has
been
addressed
in
Section
320(
b)(
7)
of
the
Clean
Water
Act,
as
amended.
"
Purpose
7"
states
that:

"
The
purpose
of
a
management
conference
shall
be
to
review
all
Federal
financial
assistance
programs
and
Federal
development
projects
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
Executive
Order
12372,
as
in
effect
on
September
17,
1983,
to
determine
whether
such
assistance
program
or
project
would
be
consistent
with
and
further
the
purposes
of
the
CCMP."

In
1992,
EPA
and
NOAA
entered
into
an
agreement
designed
to
avoid
conflicts
and
duplication
regarding
the
NEP
and
the
Coastal
Zone
Management
Program.
One
provision
is
that,
after
concurrence
by
the
State
Governor(
s)
and
approval
by
the
EPA
Administrator,
EPA
and
NOAA
will
encourage
and/
or
require,
to
the
extent
permitted
by
law,
that
the
CCMPs
be
submitted
for
incorporation
into
the
Coastal
Zone
Management
Program,
as
appropriate.

Therefore,
the
consistency
review
requirement
of
the
NEP
can
be
met
by
integrating
the
process
into
the
existing
State
Coastal
Management
Plan
(
CMP)
consistency
review
process
in
New
York.
PEP
would
be
available
to
participate,
as
appropriate
under
existing
appeal
and
mediation
procedures,
in
assisting
the
State
in
the
resolution
of
consistency
determinations.

Note
also
that
potential
inconsistencies
among
coastal
activities
can
be
addressed
through
the
Management
Conference
itself.
Under
Section
320(
b)(
7)
of
the
Clean
Water
Act,
as
amended,
the
Management
Conference
has
such
authority,
as
described
above.
However,
the
goal
of
the
review
process
established
under
purpose
7
is
to
complement
the
State's
existing
review
process
rather
than
duplicate
them,
and
PEP
would
be
best
served
by
using
the
existing
process.

The
appropriate
ongoing
review
program
in
the
State
of
New
York
has
the
staff
and
experience
necessary
to
perform
Federal
consistency
reviews,
whereas
the
costs
and
start­
up
time
in
addition
to
the
lack
of
experienced
personnel
could
make
the
undertaking
of
a
separate
Federal
consistency
review
prohibitive
to
the
PEP.
Concerns
have
also
been
raised
at
the
Management
Conference
regarding
the
review
of
non­
Federal
programs
for
consistency
with
the
CMP.
These
concerns
would
be
addressed
in
the
existing
State
review
programs,
which
require
the
review
of
certain
non­
Federal
activities
and
programs1
and
allow
the
review
of
activities
outside
the
coastal
zone
if
they
affect
the
coastal
zone2.

1
These
concerns
would
be
addressed
in
the
existing
State
CMP,
which
requires
the
activities
of
State
agencies
to
be
consistent
with
the
State's
coastal
policies
or,
in
the
case
of
the
Villages
of
Greenport
and
Sag
Harbor,
the
policies
of
their
State­
approved
Local
Waterfront
Revitalization
Programs.
2
In
New
York
State,
this
applies
only
to
Federal
activities.
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
8
Consistency
of
the
CCMP
with
Coastal
Management
Programs
Under
Section
307(
c)
of
the
Coastal
Zone
Management
Act
(
CZMA)
of
1972,
as
amended,
and
implementing
regulations
(
see
15
CFR
930)
consistency
with
an
approved
State
coastal
zone
management
program
is
required:
(
a)
for
direct
Federal
activities
and
development
projects;
(
b)
for
activities
requiring
Federal
licenses
or
permits;
and
(
c)
for
activities
receiving
Federal
financial
assistance.
In
New
York,
the
program
and
the
review
of
Federal
activities
consistency
with
the
State's
CMP
is
administered
by
the
New
York
State
Department
of
State.

The
1988
EPA/
NOAA
agreement
states
that:

"
CCMPs
developed
under
the
NEP
will
voluntarily,
as
a
matter
of
policy,
be
submitted
for
review
under
the
Federal
consistency
provisions
of
Section
307
(
c)
of
the
CZMA
of
1972,
as
amended."

The
State
of
New
York,
pursuant
to
the
Federal
and
State
consistency
provision
of
their
existing
coastal
management
program,
already
has
a
review
process
in
place.
Based
on
a
review
of
the
CCMP
and
a
consistency
review
submitted
by
EPA
Region
II,
the
State
reviews
the
overall
approval
and
adoption
of
the
CCMP,
and
each
proposal
within
it,
for
consistency
with
policies
of
their
CMP,
which
is
very
specific
with
respect
to
use
and
development
of
coastal
resources.

Area
to
be
included
for
Federal
Consistency
Review
The
study
area
for
the
Peconic
Estuary
Program
includes
the
waters
of
Peconic
Bay
to
an
imaginary
line
connecting
the
eastern
end
of
Plum
Island
and
Montauk
Point.
The
land­
based
area
includes
the
surface
water,
storm
water,
and
ground
water
contributing
areas.

Federal
Consistency
Review
for
the
PEP
in
New
York
The
Federal
consistency
review
requirement
under
Section
320(
b)(
7)
for
the
PEP
will
be
delegated
to
the
State
of
New
York
because
of
the
previously
mentioned
advantages
of
using
the
existing
process
under
the
State's
CMP,
rather
than
establishing
a
new
process
under
the
PEP.
Upon
acceptance
of
the
final
CCMP
for
the
Peconic
Estuary
Program
by
the
Administrator
of
EPA,
the
CMP
in
New
York
will
take
all
necessary
actions
to
include
the
enforceable
components
of
the
CCMP
in
the
CMP
and
its
existing
Federal
consistency
process.

To
accomplish
this
incorporation,
the
New
York
Department
of
State
(
NYDOS)
must
review
the
final
CCMP
and
the
consistency
determination
submitted
by
EPA
to
determine
its
consistency
with
New
York's
approved
CMP.
Having
New
York
CMP
program
staff
serve
on
the
CCMP
work
groups
and
the
Management
Committee
has
helped
to
ensure
that
consistency.
New
York's
Federally
approved
CMP
must,
if
necessary,
be
amended
and
approved
by
NOAA.
All
steps
must
be
in
accordance
with
NOAA's
established
regulatory
and
statutory
procedures,
including
public
review
and
comment.
Note
that
any
Federal
action
that
affects
New
York's
coastal
zone
can
be
reviewed
for
consistency
with
the
State's
CMP.
An
"
inconsistent"
decision,
however,
must
be
based
on
enforceable
coastal
policies
(
i.
e.,
those
that
are
based
on
existing
State
law
and
regulation).
New
York's
review
of
the
PEP
CCMP
indicates
that
all
of
the
committed
actions,
and
many
recommended
actions,
in
the
CCMP
applicable
to
New
York,
are
based
on
existing
State
law
and
regulation.
New
York's
review
also
did
not
indicate
the
need
for
New
York
to
enact
new
legislation
or
regulatory
authority
to
help
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
9
implement
any
recommended
CCMP
actions.
Thus,
most
of
the
CCMP
will
be
enforceable
under
New
York's
CMP.

The
PEP
Office
should
be
notified
of
Federal
activities
that
are
subject
to
Federal
consistency
review
with
regard
to
the
CCMP.
To
accomplish
this,
PEP
will
request
to
be
added
to
the
NYDOS
project
review
notification
list.
The
PEP
Office
may
comment
on
the
activities
and,
when
the
review
is
complete,
shall
be
notified
of
the
results.
If
the
PEP
office
comments
on
any
Federal
actions,
it
must
do
so
in
timely
manner
so
the
State
can
adhere
to
the
prescribed
time
frames
established
by
regulation
in
the
Federal
Register
by
NOAA
for
review/
approval.
As
part
of
the
consistency
review
determination
under
the
CMP,
New
York
will
ensure
that
each
action
is
consistent
with
the
enforceable
components
of
the
CMP.

If
necessary,
New
York
will
amend
its
CMP
to
incorporate
the
enforceable
components
of
the
CCMP
for
the
PEP.
The
review
process
shall
consider
all
Federal
financial
assistance
and
development
activities
as
well
as
all
other
Federal
actions
including
the
issuance
of
Federal
permits
which
are
listed
in
the
State's
CMP.
State
actions
not
requiring
Federal
consistency
review
are
often
subject
to
review
under
the
existing
State
consistency
review
process,
and
a
formal
or
informal
agreement
should
be
established
between
New
York
and
the
PEP
whereby
the
PEP
Office
is
notified
of
the
projects
that
may
affect
achieving
the
CCMP
goals,
strategies
and
proposed
actions
for
the
PEP.
The
PEP
will
be
best
served
by
utilizing
the
State's
existing
CMP
for
its
Federal
consistency
review
requirements.

For
the
CCMP
consistency
review
with
the
State
CMP
under
Section
307(
c)
of
the
CZMA,
EPA
will
send
a
formal
consistency
determination
to
the
NYDOS
at
the
same
time
that
the
final
CCMP
is
submitted
to
the
Governor
of
New
York
and
the
EPA
Administrator.
The
NYDOS
will
determine
the
consistency
of
the
PEP
CCMP
with
the
CMP
and
implement
enforceable
PEP
actions
that
are
consistent
with
the
CMP.

Federal
programs
and
activities
subject
to
consistency
review
by
New
York
State
are
identified
in
the
State's
CMP.
In
some
areas,
State
programs
are
reviewed
under
State­
approved
Waterfront
Revitalization
Plans.
The
inventory
of
Federal
programs
is
provided
in
Table
1.

Criteria
for
Consistency
The
general
criteria
for
determination
of
consistency
are
whether
programs
encourage
or
support
the
objectives
listed
in
the
CCMP.

More
specific
criteria
are
whether
the
programs
encourage
or
support
the
proposed
CCMP
actions
in
the
following
ways.
Programs
or
projects
are
inconsistent
if
they
inhibit
these
activities
or
harm
the
resources
that
they
seek
to
protect
or
restore.

 
Complies
with
existing
management
plans
or
supports
continued
development
of
management
plans
for
a
wide
variety
of
living
resources
and
habitats;

 
Encourages
development
of
tools
for
such
compliance,
including
GIS
and
community
classification
systems;
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
10
 
Encourages
or
provides
for
restoration
of
a
variety
of
valuable
habitats,
including
wetlands,
streams,
stream
corridors,
riparian
and
wetland
buffer
zones,
artificial
reefs,
oyster
reefs,
shorelines,
and
large
forested
upland
tracts;

 
Reduces
loss
of
wetlands;

 
Protects
shorelines;

 
Promotes
sustainable
development;

 
Reduces
NPS
pollution
and
protects
water
quality
and
quantity
through
watershed­
based
planning,
BMPs,
and
riparian
corridor
protection;

 
Promotes
improved
land
use
planning
to
protect
water
quality
and
reduce
sprawl;

 
Encourages
regional
coordination;

 
Encourages
redevelopment
and
compact
development;

 
Encourages
water
conservation
and
integrated
planning
for
water
supply
and
wastewater;

 
Promotes
better
coordination
and
planning
for
dredging,
including
dredge
material
disposal;

 
Encourages
development
and
use
of
pump­
out
facilities;

 
Improves
public
access
to
the
estuary;

 
Encourages
wise
use
of
chemicals
by
residents
and
businesses;

 
Supports
development
and
implementation
of
toxics
water
quality
criteria;

 
Helps
to
identify
sources
of
contaminated
sediments
and
identify
control
measures;

 
Promotes
regional
information
sharing
and
development
of
Geographic
Information
Systems;

 
Supports
private
sector
efforts
to
achieve
all
these
objectives
and
activities;

 
Supports
public
education
activities,
including
newsletters,
other
outreach
materials,
ecotourism
promotion,
hands­
on
activities
for
volunteers,
and
curricula
development;
and,

 
Supports
existing
and
expanded
monitoring
plans,
including
volunteer
monitoring.
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
11
Table
1.
Inventory
of
Federal
Programs
for
Consistency
with
the
Peconic
Estuary
Plan.

Catalog
of
Federal
Domestic
Assistance*
Program
Title
Agency**
Potential
to
support
PEP
CCMP
Potential
to
conflict
with
PEP
CCMP
Priority?
10.200
Grants
for
Agricultural
Research,
Special
Research
Grants
USDA­
ES
X
 
 
10.069
Conservation
Reserve
Program
USDA­
FSA
X
 
 
10.072
Wetlands
Reserve
Program
USDA­
NRCS
X
 
 
10.901
Resource
Conservation
and
Development
USDA­
NRCS
X
X
 
10.902
Soil
and
Water
Conservation
USDA­
NRCS
X
 
 
10.903
Soil
Survey
USDA­
NRCS
X
 
 
10.904
Watershed
Protection
and
Flood
Prevention
USDA­
NRCS
X
 
 
10.906
Watershed
Surveys
and
Planning
USDA­
NRCS
X
 
 
10.912
Environmental
Quality
Incentives
Program
USDA­
NRCS
X
 
X
10.913
Farmland
Protection
Program
USDA­
NRCS
X
 
 
10.914
Wildlife
Habitat
Incentive
Program
USDA­
NRCS
X
 
X
10.768
Business
and
Industry
Loans
USDA­
RB­
CS
X
X
 
10.769
Rural
Development
Grants
USDA­
RB­
CS
X
X
 
10.854
Rural
Development
Loans
and
Grants
USDA­
RB­
CS
X
X
 
10­
410
Very
Low
to
Moderate
Income
Housing
Loans
USDA­
RHS
X
X
 
10­
411
Rural
Housing
Site
Loans
and
Self­
Help
Housing
Land
Development
Loans
USDA­
RHS
X
X
 
10­
433
Rural
Housing
Preservation
Grants
USDA­
RHS
X
 
 
10­
766
Community
Facilities
Loans
and
Grants
USDA­
RHS
X
X
 
10.760
Water
and
Wastewater
Disposal
Systems
for
Rural
Communities
USDA­
RUS
X
X
 
10.762
Solid
Waste
Management
Grants
USDA­
RUS
X
X
 
10.770
Water
and
Waste
Disposal
Loans
and
Grants
USDA­
RUS
X
X
 
11.300
Grants
for
Public
Works
and
Economic
Development
DOC­
EDA
X
 
 
11.302
Economic
Development­
Support
for
Planning
Organizations
DOC­
EDA
X
 
 
11.307
Economic
Adjustment
Assistance
DOC­
EDA
X
X
 
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
12
Table
1.
Inventory
of
Federal
Programs
for
Consistency
with
the
Peconic
Estuary
Plan.
(
continued)

Catalog
of
Federal
Domestic
Assistance*
Program
Title
Agency**
Potential
to
support
PEP
CCMP
Potential
to
conflict
with
PEP
CCMP
Priority?
11.405
Anadromous
Fish
Conservation
Act
Program
NOAA
X
 
 
11.407
Interjurisdictional
Fisheries
Act
of
1986
NOAA
X
 
X
11.417
Sea
Grant
Support
NOAA
X
 
X
11.419
Coastal
Zone
Management
Administration
Awards
NOAA
X
 
X
11.420
Coastal
Zone
Management
Estuarine
Research
Reserves
NOAA
X
 
 
11.426
Financial
Assistance
for
National
Centers
for
Coastal
Ocean
Science
NOAA
X
 
 
11.427
Fisheries
Development
and
Utilization
Research
and
Development
Grants
and
Cooperative
Agreements
Program
NOAA
X
 
 
11.429
Marine
Sanctuary
Program
NOAA
X
 
 
11.433
Marine
Fisheries
Initiative
NOAA
X
 
 
11.441
Regional
Fishery
Management
Councils
NOAA
X
 
 
11.444
Aquaculture
Program
NOAA
X
X
 
11.463
Habitat
Conservation
NOAA
X
 
 
11.473
Coastal
Services
Center
NOAA
X
 
 
11.474
Atlantic
Coastal
Fisheries
Cooperative
Management
Act
NOAA
X
 
 
11.477
Fisheries
Disaster
Relief
NOAA
X
 
 
11.478
Center
for
Sponsored
Coastal
Research
­
Coastal
Ocean
Program
NOAA
X
 
X
12.100
Aquatic
Plant
Control
ACOE
X
 
 
12.101
Beach
Erosion
Control
Projects
ACOE
X
X
 
12.102
Emergency
Rehabilitation
of
Flood
Control
Works
or
Federally
Authorized
Coastal
Protection
Works
ACOE
X
 
 
12.104
Flood
Plain
Management
Services
ACOE
X
 
 
12.105
Protection
of
Essential
Highways,
Highway
Bridge
Approaches
and
Public
Works
ACOE
X
X
 
12.106
Flood
Control
Projects
ACOE
X
X
 
12.107
Navigation
Projects
ACOE
X
X
 
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
13
Table
1.
Inventory
of
Federal
Programs
for
Consistency
with
the
Peconic
Estuary
Plan.
(
continued)

Catalog
of
Federal
Domestic
Assistance*
Program
Title
Agency**
Potential
to
support
PEP
CCMP
Potential
to
conflict
with
PEP
CCMP
Priority?
12.109
Protection,
Clearing
and
Straightening
Channels
ACOE
X
X
 
12.110
Planning
Assistance
to
States
ACOE
X
 
 
12.111
Emergency
Advance
Measures
for
Flood
Protection
ACOE
X
X
 
12.300
Basic
and
Applied
Scientific
Research
ONR
X
 
 
12.301
Basic
and
Applied
Scientific
Research
ONR
X
 
 
12.600
Community
Economic
Adjustment
DOD­
OEA
X
X
 
12.607
Community
Economic
Adjustment
Planning
Assistance
DOD­
OEA
X
X
 
12.612
Community
Base
Reuse
Plans
DOD­
OEA
X
X
 
12.613
Growth
Management
Planning
Assistance
DOD­
OEA
X
X
 
14.218
Community
Development
Block
Grants/
Entitlement
Grants
HUD­
CPD
X
X
 
14.2246
Community
Development
Block
Grants/
Economic
Development
Initiative
HUD­
CPD
X
X
 
15.605
Sport
Fish
Restoration
FWS
X
 
 
15.611
Wildlife
Restoration
FWS
X
 
 
15.614
Coastal
Wetlands
Planning,
Protection
and
Restoration
Act
FWS
X
 
 
15.615
Cooperative
Endangered
Species
Conservation
Fund
FWS
X
 
 
15.616
Clean
Vessel
Act
FWS
X
 
X
15.618
Administrative
Grants
for
Federal
Aid
in
Sport
Fish
and
Wildlife
Restoration
FWS
X
 
 
15.623
North
American
Wetlands
Conservation
Fund
FWS
X
 
 
15.805
Assistance
to
State
Water
Resources
Research
Institutes
USGS
X
 
 
15.976
Migratory
Bird
Banding
and
Data
Analysis
USGS
X
 
 
15.916
Outdoor
Recreation
­
Acquisition,
Development
and
Planning
NPS
X
X
 
15.918
Disposal
of
Federal
Surplus
Real
Property
for
Parks,
Recreation,
and
Historic
Monuments
NPS
X
X
 
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
14
Table
1.
Inventory
of
Federal
Programs
for
Consistency
with
the
Peconic
Estuary
Plan.
(
continued)

Catalog
of
Federal
Domestic
Assistance*
Program
Title
Agency**
Potential
to
support
PEP
CCMP
Potential
to
conflict
with
PEP
CCMP
Priority?
15.919
Urban
Park
and
Recreation
Recovery
Program
NPS
X
 
 
15.925
National
Maritime
Heritage
Grants
NPS
X
 
 
20.005
Boating
Safety
Financial
Assistance
USCG
X
 
 
20.006
State
Access
to
the
Oil
Spill
Liability
Trust
Fund
USCG
X
 
 
20.007
Bridge
Alteration
USCG
X
X
 
20.205
Highway
Planning
and
Construction
FHA
X
X
 
20.219
Recreational
Trails
Program
FHA
X
X
X
20.312
High
Speed
Ground
Transportation
­
Next
Generation
High
Speed
Rail
Program
FRA
X
X
 
20.500
Federal
Transit­
Capital
Investment
Grants
FTA
X
X
 
20.505
Federal
Transit­
Metropolitan
Planning
Grants
FTA
X
X
 
20.507
Federal
Transit­
Formula
Grants
FTA
X
X
 
20.509
Formula
Grants
for
Other
than
Urbanized
Areas
FTA
X
X
 
20.514
Transit
Planning
and
Research
FTA
X
X
 
20.515
State
Planning
and
Research
FTA
X
X
 
20.801
Development
and
Promotion
of
Ports
and
Intermodal
Transportation
DOT­
MA
X
X
 
66.419
Water
Pollution
Control­
State
and
Interstate
Program
Support
EPA
X
 
X
66.433
State
Underground
Water
Source
Protection
EPA
X
 
 
66.454
Water
Quality
Management
Planning
EPA
X
 
X
66.456
National
Estuary
Program
EPA
X
 
X
66.458
Capitalization
Grants
for
State
Revolving
Funds
EPA
X
 
X
66.460
Nonpoint
Source
Implementation
Grants
EPA
X
 
X
66.461
Wetlands
Protection­
Development
Grants
EPA
X
 
 
66.463
National
Pollutant
Discharge
Elimination
System
Related
State
Program
EPA
X
 
 
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
15
Table
1.
Inventory
of
Federal
Programs
for
Consistency
with
the
Peconic
Estuary
Plan.
(
continued)

Catalog
of
Federal
Domestic
Assistance*
Program
Title
Agency**
Potential
to
support
PEP
CCMP
Potential
to
conflict
with
PEP
CCMP
Priority?
66.500
Environmental
Protection­
Consolidated
Research
EPA
X
v
 
66.600
Environmental
Protection
Consolidated
Grants
Program
Support
EPA
X
 
 
66.605
Performance
Partnership
Grants
EPA
X
 
X
66.606
Surveys,
Studies,
Investigations
and
Special
Purpose
Grants
EPA
X
 
X
66.608
One
Stop
Reporting
EPA
X
 
 
66.609
Children's
Health
Protection
EPA
X
 
 
66.700
Consolidated
Pesticide
Enforcement
Cooperative
Agreements
EPA
X
 
 
66.701
Toxic
Substances
Compliance
Monitoring
Cooperative
Agreements
EPA
X
 
 
66.604
Environmental
Justice
Grants
to
Small
Community
Groups
EPA
X
 
 
66.710
Environmental
Justice
Community/
University
Partnership
Grants
Program
EPA
X
 
 
66.713
State
and
Tribal
Environmental
Justice
EPA
X
 
 
66.801
Hazardous
Waste
Management
State
Program
Support
EPA
X
 
 
66.802
Superfund
State
Site­
Specific
Cooperative
Agreements
EPA
X
 
 
66.804
State
and
Tribal
Underground
Storage
Tanks
Program
EPA
X
 
 
66.805
Leaking
Underground
Storage
Tank
Trust
Fund
Program
EPA
X
 
 
66.806
Superfund
Technical
Assistance
Grants
for
Citizen
Groups
at
Priority
Sites
EPA
X
 
 
66.807
Superfund
Innovative
Technology
Evaluation
Program
EPA
X
 
 
66.808
Solid
Waste
Management
Assistance
EPA
X
 
 
66.809
Superfund
State
Core
Program
Cooperative
Agreements
EPA
X
 
 
66.810
CEPP
Technical
Assistance
Grants
Program
EPA
X
 
 
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
16
Table
1.
Inventory
of
Federal
Programs
for
Consistency
with
the
Peconic
Estuary
Plan.
(
continued)

Catalog
of
Federal
Domestic
Assistance*
Program
Title
Agency**
Potential
to
support
PEP
CCMP
Potential
to
conflict
with
PEP
CCMP
Priority?
66.811
Brownfield
Pilots
Cooperative
Agreements
EPA
X
 
 
66.708
Pollution
Prevention
Grants
Program
EPA
X
 
 
83.536
Flood
Mitigation
Assistance
FEMA
X
X
 
83.537
Community
Disaster
Loans
FEMA
X
X
 
83.548
Hazard
Mitigation
Grant
FEMA
X
X
 
83.551
Project
Impact­
Building
Disaster
Resistant
Communities
FEMA
X
X
 
*
2000
Catalog
of
Federal
Domestic
Assistance,
Executive
Office
of
the
President,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
**
Agency
Names:

ACOE
 
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
DOC
 
Department
of
Commerce
DOC­
EDA
 
Department
of
Commerce
­
Economic
Development
Administration
DOD­
OEA
 
Department
of
Defense
­
Office
of
Economic
Adjustment
DOT­
MA
 
Department
of
Transportation
­
Maritime
Administration
EPA
 
Environmental
Protection
Agency
FEMA
 
Federal
Emergency
Management
Agency
FHA
 
Federal
Highway
Administration
FRA
 
Federal
Railroad
Administration
FTA
 
Federal
Transit
Administration
FWS
 
Fish
and
Wildlife
Service
HUD­
CPD
 
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development
 
Community
Planning
and
Development
NOAA
 
National
Oceanic
and
Atmospheric
Administration
NPS
 
National
Park
Service
ONR
 
Office
of
Naval
Research
USCG
 
U.
S.
Coast
Guard
USDA
 
U.
S.
Department
of
Agriculture
USDA­
ERS
 
USDA
Economic
Research
Service
USDA­
ES
 
USDA
Cooperative
State
Research,
Education
and
Extension
Service
USDA­
FSA
 
USDA
Farm
Services
Agency
USDA­
NRCS
 
USDA
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
USDA­
RB­
CS
 
USDA
Rural
Business­
Cooperative
Service
USDA­
RHS
 
USDA
Rural
Housing
Service
USDA­
RUS
 
USDA
Rural
Utilities
Service
USGS
 
U.
S.
Geological
Survey
Peconic
Estuary
Program
CCMP
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
J
J­
17
This
Page
Intentionally
Left
Blank.
