1
Part
A:
Supporting
Statement
for
Information
Collection
Request
1887.03
1
(
a).
Title
ICR:
Detroit
Exposure
and
Aerosol
Research
Study
(
DEARS)

EPA
ICR
Number:
1887.03
OMB
Control
Number:
2080­
0058
1
(
b)
Short
Characterization/
Abstract
EPA's
Office
of
Research
and
Development
proposes
to
conduct
a
residential
and
personal
exposure
field
monitoring
study
in
the
city
of
Detroit
MI
over
a
three­
year
period
from
2004
to
2006.
The
primary
goal
of
the
study
is
to
evaluate
and
describe
the
relationship
between
air
toxics,
particulate
matter
(
PM),
PM
constituents,
and
PM
from
specific
sources
measured
at
a
central
site
monitor
and
measurements
of
residential
and
personal
concentrations.
An
emphasis
is
placed
on
understanding
the
impact
of
local
sources
(
point
and
mobile)
on
outdoor
residential
concentrations
and
the
impact
of
housing
type
and
house
operation
on
indoor
concentrations.
Personal
monitoring
will
be
conducted
to
determine
the
impact
of
time
spent
in
nonresidential
locations
and
personal
activities
on
exposure.
Approximately
120
persons
will
voluntarily
agree
to
wear
certain
personal
air
monitors
and
to
allow
their
homes
to
be
equipped
with
other
monitors
to
measure
indoor
air
quality.
Each
home
will
be
monitored
for
five
consecutive
days
in
the
summer
and
five
consecutive
days
in
the
winter.
The
study
is
an
expansion
of
previous
OMBapproved
studies
of
human
exposure
to
particles,
undertaken
in
response
to
recommendations
of
the
National
Academy
of
Sciences
(
EPA
ICR
1887.01
and
1887.02;
OMB
Approval
#
2080;
1997­
2003).
The
data
will
be
used
by
epidemiologists,
who
are
interested
in
using
central
site
monitoring
data
to
quantify
health
risks
to
PM
and
air
toxics.
The
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards
will
also
use
these
data
to
develop
standards
which
are
protective
of
human
health
for
PM,
PM
constituents,
and
air
toxics.

2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
2
(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
A
number
of
epidemiological
studies
have
linked
daily
mortality
and
morbidity
statistics
with
increased
particle
concentrations
measured
outdoors.
The
mortality
studies
have
taken
place
in
many
different
cities
around
the
world
and
appear
to
agree
surprisingly
well,
showing
an
increase
of
a
few
percent
in
deaths
per
50
µ
g/
m3
increase
in
outdoor
air
particles,
with
no
apparent
threshold
concentration.
Although
the
studies
have
often
included
other
outdoor
pollutants,
such
as
sulfur
dioxide,
sulfates,
and
nitrogen
oxides,
the
strongest
relationships
have
generally
been
found
to
be
with
particles.
Modeling
studies
have
often
suggested
that
it
is
the
fine
2
particles
(
less
than
2.5
or
3.5
micrometers
in
diameter)
that
are
the
more
likely
agent.
These
findings
have
led
the
US
EPA
to
propose
a
new
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard
(
NAAQS)
for
particles
less
than
2.5
micrometers
in
diameter
(
PM
2.5)
of
65
µ
g/
m3
for
24
hours
(
to
be
exceeded
no
more
than
once
per
year)
and
an
annual
standard
of
15
µ
g/
m3.
This
standard
was
upheld
by
the
US
Supreme
Court.

However,
a
number
of
studies
of
personal
exposure
to
particles
have
shown
limited
correlation
of
the
personal
exposure
with
concurrent
outdoor
air
concentrations.
This
has
led
to
concern
for
the
adequacy
of
the
scientific
underpinning
of
the
EPA
standard.
This
concern
was
recognized
by
Congress
in
FY
1998
and
resulted
in
their
providing
an
increased
budget
to
EPA
to
study
the
exposure
and
health
effects
of
particles.
Congress
specified
that
the
EPA
should
be
guided
in
its
research
by
the
recommendations
of
a
special
National
Academy
of
Sciences
study
of
research
needs.
The
resulting
NAS
report
laid
out
a
"
portfolio"
of
recommended
research
over
the
next
13
years.
In
particular,
the
NAS
report
found
that
the
relationship
of
the
exposure
of
the
high­
risk
subpopulations
to
outdoor
concentrations
was
unknown,
and
recommended
several
studies
in
different
areas
around
the
country
to
improve
our
knowledge
of
this
relationship.

A
first
set
of
these
studies
has
now
been
carried
out,
using
a
common
OMB­
approved
questionnaire,
in
about
200
homes
in
five
cities
around
the
country.
Early
results
have
been
summarized
in
two
EPA
reports
(
U.
S.
EPA,
2001;
U.
S.
EPA,
2003).
These
results
indicate
that
ozone,
PM
2.5
and
sulfates
tend
to
have
rather
uniform
concentrations
across
a
city,
whereas
CO
and
NO
2
are
less
uniform.
Therefore
estimates
of
exposure
to
pollutants
of
ambient
origin
using
the
central
monitoring
site
are
somewhat
better
for
the
first
three
pollutants
than
for
the
last
two.
However,
especially
for
PM
2.5,
indoor
sources
can
also
be
important,
and
therefore
estimates
of
total
exposure
are
sometimes
not
well
correlated
with
outdoor
measurements
at
the
central
site.

In
addition
to
particles
and
the
associated
criteria
air
pollutants
that
were
measured
in
this
first
set
of
studies,
another
set
of
pollutants
known
as
air
toxics
or
as
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
HAPS)
is
of
increasing
interest
to
EPA.
These
air
pollutants,
many
of
which
are
volatile
organic
compounds
(
VOCs)
such
as
1,3­
butadiene
and
acrolein,
are
not
easy
to
measure
and
little
information
exists
on
their
concentrations
in
cities.
However,
in
the
last
few
years,
methods
have
been
developed
to
measure
these
pollutants.
The
EPA
must
meet
certain
deadlines
in
the
Clean
Air
Act
for
determining
the
"
residual
risk"
associated
with
exposure
to
these
compounds
after
current
best
available
technologies
have
been
applied
to
reduce
emissions
from
regulated
sources.

Finally,
new
modeling
techniques
have
been
developed,
also
in
the
last
few
years,
that
will
track
sources
of
air
pollutants
more
precisely
than
before.
These
modeling
techniques
require
careful
measurement
of
several
indicator
compounds,
including
certain
semivolatile
organic
compounds
(
SVOCs)
for
which
measurement
methods
are
being
developed
in
EPA's
National
Exposure
Research
Laboratory
(
NERL).

The
next
step
in
following
the
National
Academy
of
Sciences
(
NAS)
13­
year
research
portfolio
is
to
combine
the
tested
methods
of
measuring
particle
mass
and
criteria
air
pollutants
with
new
methods
of
measuring
air
toxics
and
chemical
constituents
of
PM
and
new
data
analysis
3
methods
to
determine
not
only
the
relationship
of
personal
exposure
and
indoor
air
pollutants
with
outdoor
measurements
but
also
the
impact
on
personal
exposure
of
important
sources
of
pollution.

These
data
will
support
the
Agency's
long
term
goal
of
developing
exposure,
epidemiological,
toxicological,
and
clinical
data
for
improved
assessments
of
health
risks
associated
with
short­
term
exposure
to
PM.
In
addition,
these
data
will
meet
the
NERL's
goal
of
characterizing
exposure
and
exposure
factors
for
the
general
population
for
PM
constituents
and
co­
pollutants
from
various
sources
with
potential
for
short­
term
health
effects
using
exposure
measurements
and
modeling.
The
data
will
be
used
by
epidemiologists,
who
are
interested
in
using
central
site
monitoring
data
to
quantify
health
risks
to
PM
and
air
toxics.
The
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards
will
also
use
these
data
to
develop
standards
which
are
protective
of
human
health
for
PM,
PM
components,
and
air
toxics.
The
National
Center
for
Exposure
Assessment
(
NCEA)
will
use
this
data
in
the
next
PM
Criteria
Document.

2
(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data
The
data
will
show
for
a
number
of
target
pollutants:

1)
the
relationship
between
air
toxics,
PM,
PM
constituents,
and
PM
from
specific
sources
measured
at
a
central
site
monitor
and
measurements
of
residential
and
personal
concentrations,
2)
the
impact
of
local
sources
(
point
and
mobile)
on
outdoor
residential
concentrations,
3)
the
impact
of
housing
type
and
house
operation
on
indoor
air
concentrations,
and
4)
the
impact
of
time
spent
in
nonresidential
locations
and
personal
activities
on
exposure.

The
main
users
of
the
data
include
scientists
studying
personal
exposure
to
airborne
pollutants,
those
responsible
for
developing
regulations
and
reviewing
the
NAAQS,
epidemiologists
who
are
interested
in
using
central
site
monitoring
data
to
evaluate
health
risks,
and
the
exposure
modeling
community.

Within
EPA,
users
of
the
data
include
measurement
scientists
and
modelers
within
the
Office
of
Research
and
Development
(
ORD),
and
program
analysts
and
regulators
within
OAQPS.
Also
within
ORD,
the
office
responsible
for
preparing
the
Particulate
Matter
Criteria
Document,
the
National
Center
for
Exposure
Assessment
(
NCEA),
will
use
the
data
in
the
Criteria
Documents.
Epidemiologists
within
the
National
Health
Effects
and
Environmental
Research
Laboratory
(
NHEERL)
will
be
interested
in
the
data
to
evaluate
the
importance
of
the
central
site
monitor
in
determining
health
risks.

State
agencies
responsible
for
running
the
State
programs
on
monitoring
air
pollution
will
also
scrutinize
the
data
for
information
relevant
to
siting
their
stations.

In
the
private
sector,
members
of
the
regulated
community
such
as
the
Electric
Power
Research
Institute
(
EPRI)
will
use
the
data
to
study
the
impact
of
member
companies
on
outdoor
4
air
pollution
and
the
associated
impact
on
personal
exposure.

3(
a)
Non­
duplication
Only
a
few
studies
in
this
country
have
combined
measurements
of
personal
exposure,
indoor
air,
and
outdoor
air
concentrations
of
particles,
PM
species,
criteria
air
pollutants,
and
air
toxics.
One
such
study
was
sponsored
by
the
Mickey
Leland
Urban
Air
Toxics
Research
Center.
Persons
in
three
cities
were
monitored
for
exposure
to
particles,
CO,
NO
2,
and
several
air
toxics
including
benzene.
This
study
has
not
yet
been
published
in
the
peer­
reviewed
literature.
Although
the
study
is
expected
to
have
useful
findings,
measurements
were
not
included
for
1,3­
butadiene,
acrolein,
and
marker
SVOCs,
which
are
essential
and
will
be
monitored
in
the
Detroit
Exposure
and
Aerosol
Research
Study
(
DEARS).
This
study
had
a
limited
emphasis
on
the
impact
of
sources
on
exposure,
which
is
one
of
the
primary
goals
of
this
study.

A
second
study
known
as
the
Aerosol
Research
and
Inhalation
Epidemiological
Study
(
ARIES)
was
carried
out
in
Atlanta
by
the
Electric
Power
Research
Institute
(
EPRI).
Although
ARIES
did
not
originally
include
personal
exposures
in
its
planning,
EPA
collaborated
with
EPRI
to
add
personal
exposures
to
the
ARIES
study.
In
the
same
way,
EPA
is
carrying
on
conversations
with
EPRI
regarding
possible
collaboration
in
the
present
Detroit
study.
This
study
did
not
evaluate
the
spatial
and
temporal
effects
of
PM
concentrations
or
the
range
of
PM
species
and
air
toxics
that
will
be
monitored
in
this
study.

Other
studies
have
not
collected
data
in
a
systematic
way
that
can
be
used
to
determine
the
relationship
between
the
central
site
monitor
and
the
spatial
distribution
of
air
pollutants
across
a
non­
uniform
airshed
including
proximity
to
sources
and
specific
source
impacts.
This
study
will
examine
a
large,
non­
uniform
metropolitan
area
and
will
collect
real­
time
measurements
as
well
as
air
toxics
data.
The
DEARS
has
been
designed
to
select
homes
within
certain
preselected
areas
with
known
point
or
mobile
source
influences.
In
addition,
meteorological
influences
(
summer
vs
winter),
housing
characteristics
and
operations,
and
proximity
to
sources
and
source
impacts
are
key
components
of
this
study.

3(
b)
Public
Notice
EPA
solicited
public
comment
on
its
information
collection
plans
by
publishing
a
notice
in
the
Federal
Register
on
October
3,
2003
(
68
FR
57441).
A
copy
of
the
FR
notice
is
included
with
this
document.

3(
c)
Consultations
The
design
for
the
proposed
study
was
developed
in
consultation
with
many
experts
in
the
field
of
human
exposure.
Government
and
non­
government
individuals
have
been
involved
in
the
development
of
the
peer­
reviewed
study
design.
Their
expertise
was
critical
in
the
evaluating
the
study
objectives
and
meeting
the
study
goals.
The
persons
most
closely
associated
with
the
design
5
and
review
of
the
DEARS
are
listed
in
the
following
Table.

Responsibility
Individual
Affiliation
2003
External
Peer
Review
of
the
DEARS
Study
Design
J.
Penelope
Quintana,
Ph.
D
San
Diego
State
University
619­
594­
1688
Alison
S.
Geyh,
Ph.
D.
John
Hopkins
University
410­
955­
3546
Tina
Bahadori,
Ph.
D.
American
Chemical
Council
703­
741­
5214
Jeff
Brook,
Ph.
D.
Environment
Canada
416­
739­
4916
MaryAnn
Heindorf,
Ph.
D.
Michigan
Department
of
Environmental
Quality
517­
373­
7044
2003
Internal
Peer
Reviewers
of
the
DEARS
Study
Design
John
Langstaff,
Ph.
D.
U.
S.
EPA
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards
Chad
Bailey,
Ph.
D.
U.
S.
EPA
Office
of
Transportation
and
Air
Quality
Lucas
Neas,
Ph.
D.
U.
S.
EPA
National
Health
Effects
and
Environmental
Research
Laboratory
William
Wilson,
Ph.
D.
U.
S.
EPA
National
Center
for
Exposure
Assessment
3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
Repeated
data
collection
is
required
to
achieve
the
goals
of
this
study.
Previous
studies
have
shown
that
at
least
10
sampling
days
are
needed
to
evaluate
the
relationship
between
indoor
and
outdoor
concentrations
of
air
pollutants
in
individual
homes.
The
number
of
homes
in
each
of
the
seven
sampling
areas
was
selected
to
determine
if
there
is
at
least
a
25%
impact
due
to
local
sources.
The
effects
of
meteorology
and
housing
operation
will
be
determined
by
sampling
during
two
distinctly
different
seasons
(
summer
and
winter).
Logistically,
only
40
people
can
be
sampled
6
per
season,
so
it
is
necessary
to
continue
the
study
for
3
years
to
sample
120
people.
Less
frequent
data
collection
will
limit
the
study's
ability
to
achieve
it's
goals
and
objectives
and
will
limit
the
use
of
the
data
by
other
interested
parties
(
NHEERL,
NCEA,
OAQPS,
etc).

3(
e)
General
Guidelines
All
study
activities
will
adhere
to
OMB's
general
guidelines
for
information
collections.
Data
collection
activities
will
not
start
before
OMB
approval.
In
addition,
participation
is
voluntary.
Informed
consent
will
be
obtained
before
the
field
technicians
begin
any
data
collection
activities.
Participants
are
free
to
withdraw
their
consent
during
the
study.

Specifically,
study
participants
are
not
required
to
do
any
of
the
following:
°
Report
information
to
the
Agency
more
often
than
quarterly.
°
Prepare
a
written
response
to
a
collection
of
information
in
fewer
than
30
days
after
receipt
of
a
request.
°
Submit
more
than
an
original
and
two
copies
of
any
document.
°
Retain
records,
other
than
health,
medical,
government
contract,
grant­
in­
aid,
or
tax
records,
for
more
than
three
years.
°
Participate
in
a
statistical
survey
that
is
not
designed
to
produce
data
that
can
be
generalized
to
the
universe
of
the
study.
°
Utilize
a
statistical
data
classification
that
has
not
been
reviewed
and
approved
by
OMB.
°
Receive
a
pledge
of
confidentiality
that
is
not
supported
by
authority
established
in
statute
or
regulation,
that
is
not
supported
by
disclosure
and
data
security
policies
that
are
consistent
with
the
pledge,
or
which
unnecessarily
impedes
sharing
of
data
with
other
agencies
for
compatible
confidential
use.
°
Submit
proprietary,
trade
secret,
or
other
confidential
information
unless
the
Agency
can
demonstrate
that
it
has
instituted
procedures
to
protect
the
information's
confidentiality
to
the
extent
permitted
by
law.

3(
f)
Confidentiality
Assuring
respondents
of
the
confidentiality
of
their
data
is
a
key
to
obtaining
participation
and
continued
success
in
survey
data
collection.
Our
standard
procedures
cover
the
following
key
concerns:

°
Preventing
disclosure
of
information
containing
personal
or
organizational
identifiers
We
require
that
all
data
be
identified
with
unique
participant
identification
numbers.
Participant
identification
numbers
are
the
only
identifying
information
that
will
be
associated
with
the
respondent's
data,
responses
to
questionnaires,
or
the
results
of
the
analysis
of
samples
collected.
7
°
Storing
hardcopy
files
The
links
between
the
identification
numbers
and
personally
identifying
information,
addresses,
or
names
are
maintained
in
locked
file
cabinets,
with
access
limited
to
senior
project
staff.
Questionnaires,
consent
forms,
and
compensation
receipts
will
be
stored
by
the
Contractor
in
a
locked
file.

°
Assuring
computer
data
security
The
computer
data
generated
from
the
proposed
study
will
be
password­
protected.
Only
authorized
staff
members
will
have
access
to
the
data.
The
paper
document
and
hardcopies
of
the
computer
files
will
be
secured
in
locked
file
cabinets
in
locked,
limited­
access
rooms.

°
Disposing
of
completed
forms
that
are
outdated
At
the
conclusion
of
the
proposed
study,
the
EPA
Project
Officer
will
authorize
disposal
of
outdated,
completed
forms
by
a
qualified
commercial
Contractor
specialized
in
disposing
of
documents.
A
certificate
will
be
provided
by
the
Contractor
to
state
that
these
documents
were
properly
disposed
of.

3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
The
questionnaires
prepared
for
the
study
do
not
contain
any
questions
concerning
sexual
behavior
or
attitudes,
religious
beliefs,
or
other
matters
usually
considered
private.

4
Respondents
and
Information
Requested
4(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
Respondents
will
be
residents
of
Wayne
County,
Michigan,
meeting
certain
criteria
in
the
accompanying
Study
Design.
Respondents
will
live
in
one
of
seven
pre­
selected
areas,
and
will
be
contacted
via
consultations
with
local
community
groups.
These
areas
were
chosen
because
of
the
potential
impact
of
point
and
mobile
sources
on
residential
air
concentrations
in
these
locations.

4(
b)
Information
Requested
(
i)
Data
Items
The
data
items
requested
are
contained
in
the
attached
copy
of
the
questionnaires
and
the
associated
instructions.

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
8
Of
the
six
activities
listed
in
the
1995
PRA
Definition
of
"
Burden,"
(
3502.
(
2))
and
the
nine
activities
listed
in
OMB's
Definition
of
Burden
in
OMB's
Final
Rules
(
5
CFR
1320.3(
b)(
1)
only
the
following
three
are
relevant:

1.
Reviewing
instructions.

2.
Completing
and
reviewing
the
collection
of
information.

3.
Transmitting,
or
otherwise
disclosing
the
information.

Our
estimates
of
the
amount
of
time
it
will
take
each
respondent
for
each
of
these
three
activities
are
contained
in
our
tables
estimating
burden.
We
estimate
that
it
will
take
0.75
hr
per
day
to
respond,
or
7.5
hrs
per
year
for
each
participant.
These
activities
include
being
instructed
on
data
collection
procedures,
completing
daily
activity
diaries,
completing
follow­
up
questionnaires,
EPA
collection
of
personal
and
residential
air
samples,
and
the
EPA
collection
of
residence
and
participant
survey
information.

5
The
Information
Collected­­
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
5(
a)
Agency
Activities
Agency
activities
associated
with
the
proposed
study
include
the
following:
°
Instructing
respondents
on
data
collection
procedures
°
Recovering
and
validating
respondent
daily
activity
dairies
°
Recovering
and
validating
respondent
follow­
up
questionnaires
°
Recovering
and
validating
respondent
personal
and
residential
air
samples
°
Recovering
and
validating
residence
and
participant
surveys
5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
Similar
questionnaires
were
used
in
the
PM
Longitudinal
Panel
Studies
and
the
9­
person
Tampa
Asthmatic
Children's
Study.
The
questionnaires
were
modified
based
on
lessons
learned
from
these
studies.
The
time
required
to
answer
the
questions
was
recorded
and
forms
the
basis
of
the
estimates
in
the
attached
burden
tables.

A
table
describing
each
survey,
the
time
burden
on
the
participant,
and
why
the
information
is
being
collected
is
included
with
the
questionnaires.
All
surveys
will
be
collected
with
pen
and
paper
except
the
follow­
up
questionnaire,
which
is
computerized
and
administered
by
a
field
technician.

Data
will
be
keyed
into
IBM­
compatible
PCs.
The
questionnaires
were
designed
using
scannable
software
which
enables
the
data
to
be
scanned
and
electronically
validated.
Data
quality
9
checks
and
audits
provide
greater
than
90%
accuracy
in
this
process.

5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
Since
the
proposed
study
involves
voluntary
participation
on
the
part
of
the
participants
and
no
regulatory
efforts
are
involved,
small
entity
flexibility
is
not
applicable.

5(
d)
Collection
Schedule
The
residence
survey
and
participant
survey
are
administered
on
the
first
day
that
the
technicians
arrive
at
the
house.
The
daily
follow­
up
questionnaire
is
then
administered
on
each
day
that
the
technicians
perform
personal
monitoring.
The
respondent
will
be
monitored
for
5
consecutive
days
in
each
of
two
seasons.
The
exact
days
that
each
respondent
will
be
monitored
depends
on
the
schedule
of
the
monitoring
team
and
the
respondent,
and
cannot
be
provided
in
this
document.

6
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
6
(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
Table
1
provides
our
estimate
of
the
respondent
burden
according
to
the
three
relevant
categories
appearing
in
OMB's
final
rules:
receiving
instructions,
completing
daily
activity
diaries,
completing
the
follow­
up
questionnaire,
participating
in
EPA­
collected
air
monitoring,
and
participation
in
EPA­
collection
of
residence
and
participant
surveys.

For
receiving
instructions,
we
assumed
approximately
0.08
hrs/
day/
per
person.
Based
on
our
own
internal
experience,
we
found
that
the
time
to
complete
the
daily
activity
diary
was
approximately
12
minutes/
day;
but
we
have
allowed
for
0.5/
hrs
to
account
for
potentially
slower
responding
participants.
We
have
allowed
0.15
hrs/
day/
respondent
for
completing
the
daily
follow­
up
questionnaire.
The
participant
has
no
data
burden
responsibilities
(
0
hrs/
day)
associated
with
the
EPA­
collection
of
personal
and
residential
air
monitoring
beyond
simply
participating
(
wearing
monitoring
equipment
and
making
their
residence
available).
EPA's
contractors
are
responsible
for
the
collection
of
this
data
and
the
instructions
the
respondent
needs
to
participate
in
this
area
of
the
study
have
already
been
accounted
for
in
the
previously
listed
value
of
0.08
hrs/
day/
person.
There
are
however,
EPA
and
contractor
costs
associated
with
this
collection
and
it
is
therefore
listed
in
Table
1
to
indicate
its
presence
in
the
overall
data
collection
scheme.
A
participant
survey
and
residence
survey
will
be
filled
out
by
the
technician
which
may
require
some
participant
input.
We
estimate
this
to
be
0.02
hr/
day/
respondent.
Thus
we
estimate
the
total
time
burden
per
day
to
be
0.75
hrs/
per
respondent.
All
of
the
above
burden
estimates
are
listed
in
Table
1.

According
to
the
2000
Census
data,
residents
of
Wayne
County
make
an
average
of
$
20,058
per
year.
Since
we
are
not
collecting
information
on
socio­
economic
status
as
a
component
of
participant
recruiting,
we
have
used
the
county
average
to
estimate
the
cost
to
each
10
respondent.
This
income
level
equates
to
$
9.60
per
hour
based
upon
a
standard
2080
hour
work
year.
Therefore,
we
estimate
that
it
`
costs'
the
participant
$
7.20
per
day
or
$
72.00
per
year
to
fill
out
the
surveys
(
Table
1).
As
stated
in
the
DEARS
study
design,
we
will
provide
each
respondent
an
incentive
of
up
to
$
300.00
for
their
full
participation
(
10
days)
in
the
study.

6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs
The
only
respondent
cost
is
electricity
for
residentially­
placed
air
monitoring
equipment,
for
which
the
respondent
is
reimbursed.
Table
1
records
that
the
respondent
will
have
$
0.00
costs
associated
with
operation
and
maintenance
(
O&
M)
for
each
of
the
five
burden
activity
areas
listed
in
Section
5a.
There
are
no
capital/
start
up
costs
for
the
respondents
(
Table
1).

6(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
(
Table
4)

Labor,
capital
startup,
and
O&
M
values
for
the
contractor
portion
of
Table
4
(
Part­
1)
have
been
estimated
based
upon
confidential
business
information
related
to
the
Agency's
contractor
quoted
cost
estimates
for
performing
the
field
monitoring
portion
of
the
data
collection
(
estimate
as
of
11/
04
and
projected
out
to
2007).
Labor
costs/
hr
recorded
in
the
table
represent
those
from
off­
site
contract
employees
currently
expected
to
provide
Agency
support
in
the
data
collection
and
represent
loaded
costs
(
incorporating
labor,
overhead,
G&
A,
fringe,
fee).
Information
provided
in
Table
4
(
Part­
1)
relates
to
the
contractor's
estimated
amount
of
time
needed
to
prepare
for
interacting
or
directly
interacting
with
the
respondents
in
the
process
of
collecting
respondent
information.
Information
in
the
table
does
not
estimate
the
amount
of
either
contractor
and
Agency
cost
or
burden
associated
with
analyzing
and
summarizing
the
collected
data
which
does
not
involve
any
participant
involvement.
The
respondent
will
have
no
burden
(
beyond
participating)
or
cost
associated
with
the
collection
of
air
monitoring
measurements
as
a
part
of
this
study.
Information
pertaining
to
this
collection,
nevertheless,
has
been
included
in
the
table
to
document
this
portion
of
the
data
collection
labor/
costs
involving
the
respondent's
person
or
residence
since
it
occurs
at
the
same
time
using
the
same
personnel.
There
will
be
minimal
capital
start­
up
costs
associated
with
the
survey
and
the
questionnaire­
type
information
collection.
This
information
will
be
gathered
using
either
a
pen
and
paper
methodology
or
directly
recorded
on
an
electronic
notebook
in
real­
time
by
a
study
technician.
Therefore,
capital
start­
up
costs
are
generally
limited
to
the
cost
of
paper
supplies.

The
estimated
labor
cost
of
Agency
staff
to
prepare
for,
or
directly
interact
with,
involvement
with
respondents
in
the
collection
of
the
listed
data
categories
has
been
based
on
11/
04
GSA
pay
scales
(
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC­
locality)
and
is
listed
in
Table
4
(
Part­
2).
GS
rates
based
upon
grade
levels
of
GS­
15,
GS­
14,
GS­
13,
GS­
12,
and
GS­
9
(
all
step
4)
were
used
to
provide
the
estimates
using
the
1.6
time
rule
for
inclusion
of
fringe
benefit
costs.
Agency
labor
associated
with
the
direct
collection
of
respondent
data
and
the
direct
interaction
of
Agency
staff
with
respondents
in
the
collection
of
data
is
limited.
Contract
staff
(
whose
labor
has
been
estimated
in
the
table)
have
the
responsibility
of
performing
nearly
all
of
the
data
collection.
11
Agency
labor
is
associated
with
managing
the
contractor's
respondent
data
collection
portion
of
the
project
and
providing
needed
technical
expertise
and
support.
Because
this
is
a
contractorperformed
data
collection,
the
Agency
has
no
known
capital
start­
up
costs
associated
with
the
listed
data
collection
areas.

The
total
labor
and
capital
costs
associated
with
the
contractor
portion
of
the
study
has
been
estimated
to
be
$
19,704/
respondent/
year
(
Table
4­
Part
1).
The
Agency's
total
labor
and
capital
costs
for
this
same
metric
has
been
estimated
to
be
$
2400/
respondent/
year.
The
sum
of
this
being
$
22,104/
respondent/
year
(
Table
4­
Part
2).

6(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
The
daily
burden
per
respondent
is
0.75
hr
(
Table
1).
The
estimated
annual
burden
per
respondent
(
7.5
hr)
was
multiplied
by
the
number
of
respondents
(
120)
to
arrive
at
an
estimate
of
the
3­
year
total
of
900
hrs
(
Table
2).
The
total
aggregate
respondent
capital
and
other
non­
labor
expenditure
burdens
has
been
summarized
in
Table
3.
A
total
of
$
8641.20
has
been
estimated
as
the
total
of
these
cost
burdens
over
the
three­
year
course
of
the
proposed
data
collection.

6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
and
Cost
Tables
Information
from
Tables
2­
3
have
been
used
as
inputs
in
the
development
of
estimates
of
aggregated
costs
for
respondent
data
collection
components
of
the
study
(
Table
5).
Specifically,
the
respondent
time
burden
tally
was
estimated
to
be
7.5
hr/
year
and
$
72.00/
year
relative
to
their
participation.
These
numbers
equate
to
a
total
of
900
total
respondent
hours
(
300
hours
x
3
years)
listed
in
Table
2
and
a
total
of
$
8641.20
listed
in
Table
3
for
the
aggregated
cost
of
all
participants
over
a
three­
year
period.
Likewise,
data
from
Table
4
(
Part
1
and
Part
II)
have
been
used
to
develop
aggregate
costs
reported
in
Table
5
associated
with
EPA
and
contractor
burdens
and
costs.
In
particular,
it
should
be
noted
that
the
contractor's
estimated
operation
and
materials
costs
will
be
minimal
due
to
the
use
of
pen
and
paper
data
collection
techniques
for
a
majority
of
the
information.
Labor
costs
incorporated
into
Table
4
do
include
overhead
and
other
allowable
costs.
While
the
respondent
has
no
personal
reporting
burden
associated
with
the
collection
of
air
pollution
measurements,
the
majority
of
cost
associated
with
respondent
data
collection
is
associated
with
the
contractor's
collection
of
this
information.
It
is
provided
for
reasons
of
completeness.
These
costs
include
the
purchase
of
air
monitoring
media,
disposable
batteries,
calibration
equipment,
and
other
routine
supplies
required
for
successful
data
collection.
The
Agency
has
no
capital
or
(
O&
M)
costs
associated
with
the
data
collection
due
to
the
effort
being
performed
by
the
contractor
(
and
therefore
incorporated
into
their
cost
estimates).
The
annual
cost
per
respondent
for
both
contractor
and
Agency
capital
and
O&
M
costs
are
$
1630
and
$
0.00,
respectively
as
calculated
from
data
in
Table
5.
This
sum
is
comprised
of
$
590.00/
respondent
annual
costs
associated
with
contractor
capital
startup
costs
and
$
1040/
respondent
annual
costs
associated
with
contractor
O&
M
(
Table
5).
Considering
that
a
total
of
40
respondents
per
year
will
be
recruited,
this
would
equate
to
an
annual
total
of
$
65,200.00
in
total
capital
and
O&
M
costs.
The
annual
average
cost
incorporating
all
contractor
12
and
Agency
costs
(
including
labor)
associated
with
respondent
data
collection
has
been
estimated
to
be
$
23,144
(
Table
5).
It
is
anticipated
that
a
total
of
40
participants
a
year
(
for
three
years)
will
be
recruited
into
the
study.
This
will
yield
a
total
of
120
participants.
The
total
study
contractor
and
Agency
costs
associated
with
respondent
data
collection
portion
of
the
study
(
labor,
capital,
and
O&
M)
over
a
three­
year
period
is
estimated
to
be
$
2,778,480
and
is
reported
in
Table
5.

6(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
This
section
is
inapplicable
to
this
ICR.

6(
g)
Burden
Statement
The
annual
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
of
information
is
estimated
to
average
7.5
hours
per
response.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15.

To
comment
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques,
EPA
has
established
a
public
docket
for
this
ICR
under
Docket
ID
No.
ORD­
2003­
0010,
which
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
Office
of
Environmental
Information
Docket
in
the
EPA
Docket
Center
(
EPA/
DC),
EPA
West,
Room
B102,
1301
Constitution
Ave.,
NW,
Washington,
DC.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566­
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
Office
of
Environmental
Information
Docket
is
(
202)
566­
1752.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA
Dockets
(
EDOCKET)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.
Use
EDOCKET
to
submit
or
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
Once
in
the
system,
select
"
search,"
then
key
in
the
docket
ID
number
identified
above.
Also,
you
can
send
comments
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20503,
Attention:
Desk
Office
for
EPA.
Please
include
the
EPA
Docket
ID
No.
(
ORD­
2003­
0010)
and
OMB
control
number
(
2080­
0058)
in
any
correspondence.
13
References
US
EPA
(
2002).
Preliminary
particulate
matter
mass
concentrations
associated
with
longitudinal
panel
studies:
assessing
human
exposures
of
high­
risk
subpopulations
to
particulate
matter.
National
Exposure
Research
Laboratory,
Office
of
Research
and
Development,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Washington,
DC
20460.
EPA/
600/
R­
01/
086.

US
EPA
(
2003).
Exposure
of
high­
risk
subpopulations
to
particles
and
associated
co­
pollutants.
National
Exposure
Research
Laboratory,
Office
of
Research
and
Development,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Washington,
DC
20460.
EPA/
600/
R­
03/
012.
14
Table
1.
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost.

Information
Collection
Activity
Hours
per
day
Number
of
days
per
year
per
person
Total
hours
annual
per
respondent
Number
of
annual
respondents
Total
hours
per
year
for
all
respondents
Total
$
cost
per
year
per
respondent
Annual
capital
startup
and
O&
M
costs
($)

per
respondent
Being
instructed
on
data
collection
procedures
0.08
10
0.8
40
32
7.70
0.00
Completing
daily
activity
diary
0.5
10
5
40
200
48.00
0.00
Completing
daily
follow­
up
questionnaire
0.15
10
1.5
40
60
14.40
0.00
EPA
collection
of
air
samples
0
10
0
40
0.0
0.00
0.00
EPA
completion
of
residence
survey
and
participant
survey
0.02
10
0.2
40
8.0
1.90
0.00
Total
hours
0.75
7.5
300
Total
cost
72.00
0.00
Table
1
describes
the
annual
respondent
burden
for
the
Detroit
Exposure
and
Aerosol
Research
Study
(
DEARS).
EPA
has
conducted
numerous
OMBapproved
personal
exposure
research
studies
(
most
recently
in
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC;
Baltimore,
MD;
Fresno,
CA)
using
similar
forms.
Estimates
of
the
time
needed
to
fill
out
these
forms
is
based
on
our
experience
in
other
studies.
EPA
will
require
$
0.00
from
the
respondent
for
this
work.
No
materials
or
expenses
will
be
incurred
from
collecting
this
information.
This
study
will
monitor
40
people
for
10
days
per
year.
Each
respondent
will
spend
0.75
hrs
per
day
(
45
min)
receiving
instructions
and
filling
out
a
daily
time
activity
diary
and
the
technician
administered
follow­
up
questionnaire.
The
field
team
will
fill
out
a
participant
survey
and
residence
survey
once
for
each
respondent.
If
a
participant
completes
all
10
days
of
monitoring,
there
will
be
a
total
of
a
7.5.
hr
burden
on
the
respondent.
Over
3
years,
120
people
will
spend
an
aggregate
total
of
300
hrs.
The
annual
cost
per
day
per
respondent
was
calculated
based
on
the
2000
Census
data
indicating
that
the
average
annual
income
for
a
Wayne
county
resident
is
$
20,
058.
Based
on
a
40­
hr
work
week,
this
equates
to
$
9.60/
hr
or
a
respondent
cost
of
$
7.20
per
day
or
$
72.00
per
year.
There
are
no
respondent
capital
startup
or
O&
M
burdens
associated
with
the
data
collection.
15
Table
2.
Aggregate
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost.

Activity
Daily
burden
per
respondent
(
hr)
Annual
burden
per
respondent
(
hr)
Total
number
of
respondents
per
year
Total
number
of
study
years
Total
number
of
repondent
days
over
3
years
Total
hours
of
burden
over
3
years
Average
annual
burden
hours
Average
annual
burden
hours
per
repondent
Being
instructed
on
data
collection
procedures
0.08
0.8
40
3
1200
96.0
32.0
0.8
Competing
activity
diary
0.5
5
40
3
1200
600.0
200.0
5
Completing
follow­
up
questionnaire
0.15
1.5
40
3
1200
180.0
60.0
1.5
EPA
collection
of
air
samples
0.0
0.0
40
3
1200
0.0
0.0
0.0
EPA
completion
of
residence
survey
and
participant
survey
0.02
0.2
40
3
1200
24.0
8.0
0.2
Total
0.75
7.5
40
3
1200
900.0
300
7.5
Table
2
describes
the
aggregate
respondent
burden
and
cost
during
the
Detroit
Exposure
and
Aerosol
Research
Study
(
DEARS).
Each
respondent
will
spent
0.75
hrs
per
day
receiving
instructions,
filling
out
surveys
or
other
acts
associated
with
the
data
collection.
This
equates
to
7.5
hrs
per
year
(
10
sampling
days).

There
will
be
40
participants
in
the
study
each
year
for
3
years
(
different
people
each
year)
for
a
total
of
120
participants,
or
1200
respondent
days.
The
annual
average
burden
for
all
40
participants
is
300
hrs
or
7.5
hr
per
participant
per
year.
Over
the
course
of
the
entire
study,
this
equates
to
900
total
burden
hours.
16
Table
3.
Total
Aggregate
Respondent
Capital
and
Other
Non­
Labor
Expenditure
Burdens.

Burden
Activity
Total
number
of
study
subjects
per
year
Total
number
of
study
years
Total
respondent
cost
per
year
Total
annual
investment
in
equipment
Total
annual
investment
in
facilities
Total
annual
operation
costs
Total
annual
training
costs
Total
cost
of
training
materials
Total
of
all
capital
and
nonlabor
costs
Total
of
all
capital
nonlabor
and
labor
cost
s
over
3
years
(
120
total
participants)

Being
instructed
on
data
collection
procedures
40
3
7.70
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
924.00
Competing
activity
diary
40
3
48.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5760.00
Completing
follow­
up
questionnaire
40
3
14.40
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1729.20
EPA
collection
of
air
samples
40
3
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
EPA
completion
of
residence
survey
and
participant
survey
40
3
1.90
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
228.00
Total
40
3
72.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8641.20
The
total
respondent
cost
per
year
is
the
estimated
cost
of
a
respondents
time
spent
filling
out
surveys
or
otherwise
participating
based
on
the
Wayne
County
average
pay
of
$
9.60/
hr
in
Table
1.
The
respondent
will
not
be
required
to
expend
any
resources
to
collect
this
information
17
Table
4
(
Part
I).
Annual
Contractor
hours
and
costs
per
respondent.

Activity
Legal
$
165/
hr
Mgr.
(
P­
4)

$
165/
hr
Mgr.
(
P­
3)

$
78/
hr
Tech.
(
T­
3)

$
46/
hr
Cler.
$
35/
hr
Labor
Cost
per
year
Capital
startup
cost
$
Total
Labor
and
capital
cost
Being
instructed
on
data
collection
procedures
0.0
0.5
15.0
15.0
1.0
1978.0
10.0
1988.0
Collecting
daily
activity
diary
0.0
4.0
40.0
40.0
0.3
2908.0
20.0
2928.0
Collecting
follow­
up
questionnaire
0.0
4.0
40.0
40.0
0.3
2908.0
20.0
2928.0
Collection
of
air
samples
0.0
8.0
30.0
40.0
0.1
5504.0
500.0
6004.0
Collection
of
participant
survey
0.0
4.0
40.0
40.0
0.3
2908.0
20.0
2928.0
Collection
of
residence
survey
0.0
4.0
40.0
40.0
0.3
2908.0
20.0
2928.0
Total
0.0
24.5
205.0
215.0
2.1
$
19114.0
$
590.0
$
19704.0
18
Table
4
(
Part
II).
Annual
Agency
hours
per
respondent.

Activity
Legal
$
79/
hr
Mgr.
(
GS­
14)

$
67/
hr
Mgr.
(
GS­
13)

$
57/
hr
Scientist
(
GS­

12)
$
48/
hr
Cler.
(
GS­
9)

$
33/
hr
Labor
cost
per
year
($)
Capital
startup
cost
($)
Total
labor
and
capital
costs
($)

Being
instructed
on
data
collection
procedures
0
1
0.5
0.5
0.25
128
0.0
128
Collecting
daily
activity
diary
0
2
4
1
0.25
418
0.0
418
Collecting
follow­
up
questionnaire
0
2
4
1
0.25
418
0.0
418
Collection
of
air
samples
0
4
4
2
0.25
600
0.0
600
Collection
of
participant
survey
0
2
4
1
0.25
418
0.0
418
Collection
of
residence
survey
0
2
4
1
0.25
418
0.0
418
Total
0
13
20.5
6.5
1.5
$
2400
$
0.0
$
2400
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
(
Table
4)

Labor,
capital
startup,
and
operation
&
maintenance
(
O&
M)
values
for
the
contractor
portion
of
this
table
have
been
estimated
based
upon
confidential
business
information
related
to
the
Agency's
contractor
quoted
cost
estimates
for
performing
the
field
monitoring
portion
of
the
data
collection
(
estimate
as
of
11/
04
and
projected
out
to
2007).
Labor
costs/
hr
recorded
in
the
table
represent
those
from
off­
site
contract
employees
currently
expected
to
provide
Agency
support
in
the
data
collection
and
represent
loaded
costs
(
incorporating
labor,
overhead,
G&
A,
fringe,
fee).
Information
provided
in
the
table
relates
to
the
19
contractor's
estimated
amount
of
time
needed
to
prepare
for
interacting
or
directly
interacting
with
the
respondents
in
the
process
of
collecting
respondent
information.
Information
in
the
table
does
not
estimate
the
amount
of
either
contractor
and
Agency
cost
or
burden
associated
with
analyzing
and
summarizing
the
collected
data
which
does
not
involve
any
participant
involvement.
The
respondent
will
have
no
burden
(
beyond
participating)
or
cost
associated
with
the
collection
of
air
monitoring
measurements
as
a
part
of
this
study.
Information
pertaining
to
this
collection,
nevertheless,
has
been
included
in
the
table
to
document
this
portion
of
the
data
collection
labor/
costs
involving
the
respondent's
person
or
residence
since
it
occurs
at
the
same
time
using
the
same
personnel.
There
will
be
minimal
capital
start­
up
costs
associated
with
the
survey
and
the
questionnaire­
type
information
collection.
This
information
will
be
gathered
using
either
a
pen
and
paper
methodology
or
directly
recorded
on
an
electronic
notebook
in
real­
time
by
a
study
technician.
Therefore,
capital
startup
costs
are
generally
limited
to
the
cost
of
paper
supplies.

The
estimated
labor
cost
of
Agency
staff
to
prepare
for,
or
directly
interact
with,
involvement
with
respondents
in
the
collection
of
the
listed
data
categories
has
been
based
on
11/
04
GSA
pay
scales
(
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC­
locality).
GS
rates
based
upon
grade
levels
of
GS­
15,
GS­
14,
GS­
13,
GS­

12,
and
GS­
9
(
all
step
4)
were
used
to
provide
the
estimates
using
the
1.6
rule
for
inclusion
of
fringe
benefit
costs.
Agency
labor
associated
with
the
direct
collection
of
respondent
data
and
the
direct
interaction
of
Agency
staff
with
respondents
in
the
collection
of
data
is
limited.
Contact
staff
(
whose
labor
has
been
estimated
in
the
table)
have
the
responsibility
of
performing
nearly
all
of
the
data
collection.
Agency
labor
is
associated
with
managing
the
contractor's
respondent
data
collection
portion
of
the
project
and
providing
needed
technical
expertise
and
support.
Because
this
is
a
contractor­
performed
data
collection,

the
Agency
has
no
known
capital
start­
up
costs
associated
with
the
listed
data
collection
areas.

The
total
labor
and
capital
costs
associated
with
the
contractor
portion
of
the
study
has
been
estimated
to
be
$
19704/
respondent/
year.
The
Agency's
total
labor
and
capital
costs
for
this
same
metric
has
been
estimated
to
be
$
2400/
respondent/
year.
The
sum
of
this
being
$
22104/
respondent/
year.
20
Table
5.
Annual
and
Aggregate
Contractor
and
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
Annual
Cost
Per
Respondent
Total
Study
Data
Collection
Cost
Activity
Contractor
Labor
($)

Costs
Contractor
Capital
($)

costs
Contractor
O&
M
($)

costs
Agency
Labor
($)
costs
Agency
Capital
($)
costs
Agency
O&
M
($)

costs
Total
annual
cost
($)
per
respondent
Number
of
respondents
/
yr
Number
of
study
years
Total
Study
Cost
($)

Being
instructed
on
data
collection
procedures
1978
10
10
128
0.0
0.0
2126
40
3
255120
Collecting
daily
activity
diary
2908
20
10
418
0.0
0.0
3356
40
3
402720
Collecting
follow­
up
questionnaire
2908
20
10
418
0.0
0.0
3356
40
3
402720
Collection
of
air
samples
5504
500
1000
600
0.0
0.0
7604
40
3
912480
Collection
of
participant
survey
2908
20
10
418
0.0
0.0
3356
40
3
402720
Collection
of
residence
survey
2908
20
10
418
0.0
0.0
3356
40
3
402720
Total
$
19114
$
590
$
1040
$
2400
$
0.0
0.0
$
23144
40
3
$
2778480
Information
from
Table
5
has
been
used
as
inputs
in
the
development
of
estimates
of
aggregated
costs
for
respondent
data
collection
components
of
the
study.

In
particular,
it
should
be
noted
that
the
contractor's
estimated
operation
and
materials
costs
will
be
minimal
due
to
the
use
of
pen
and
paper
data
collection
techniques
for
a
majority
of
the
information.
Labor
costs
incorporated
into
Table
5
above
include
overhead
and
other
costs
which
are
not
reported
here.
While
the
respondent
has
no
personal
reporting
burden
associated
with
the
collection
of
air
pollution
measurements,
the
majority
of
cost
associated
with
respondent
data
collection
is
associated
with
the
contractor's
collection
of
this
information.
It
is
provided
for
reasons
of
completeness.
These
costs
include
the
purchase
of
air
monitoring
media,
disposable
batteries,
calibration
equipment,
and
other
routine
supplies
required
for
successful
data
collection.
The
Agency
has
no
capital
21
or
(
O&
M)
costs
associated
with
the
data
collection
due
to
the
effort
being
performed
by
the
contractor
(
and
therefore
incorporated
into
their
cost
estimates).

The
annual
average
cost
incorporating
all
contractor
and
Agency
costs
associated
with
respondent
data
collection
has
been
estimated
to
be
$
23144.
The
study
is
anticipated
of
recruiting
a
total
of
40
participants
a
year
(
for
three
years).
This
will
yield
a
total
of
120
participants.
The
total
study
contractor
and
Agency
costs
associated
with
respondent
data
collection
portion
of
the
study
over
a
three
year
period
is
estimated
to
be
$
2778480.
