[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 213 (Monday, November 8, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61708-61712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 713

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0421; FRL-8523-02-OCSPP]
RIN 2070-AK93


Response to Vacatur of Certain Provisions of the Mercury 
Inventory Reporting Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is revising 
regulations associated with persons who must report data to the 
Agency's mercury inventory established under the Toxic Substances 
Control Act (TSCA). Those reporting requirements were set forth in a 
final rule entitled ``Reporting Requirements for TSCA Mercury 
Inventory: Mercury'' (hereafter ``mercury inventory reporting rule''). 
These revisions implement an order issued by the United States Court of 
Appeals for the Second Circuit (Second Circuit), on June 5, 2020.

DATES: This final rule is effective on December 8, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0421, is available at 
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pollution Prevention 
and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone number for the 
Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the 
OPPT Docket is (202) 566-0280.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA 
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with 
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer 
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status 
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    For technical information contact: Thomas Groeneveld, Existing 
Chemicals Resource Management Division, Office of Pollution Prevention 
and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 566-1188; email 
address: [email protected].
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 
554-1404; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Executive Summary

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you import 
mercury-added products. The following list of North American Industrial 
Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, 
but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this 
document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include the 
following:
     Gold ore mining (NAICS code 212221).
     Lead ore and zinc ore mining (NAICS code 212231).
     All other metal ore mining (NAICS code 212299).
     Asphalt shingle and coating materials manufacturing (NAICS 
code 324122).
     Synthetic dye and pigment manufacturing (NAICS code 
325130).
     Other basic inorganic chemical manufacturing (NAICS code 
325180).
     All other basic organic chemical manufacturing (NAICS code 
325199).
     Plastics material and resin manufacturing (NAICS code 
325211).
     Pesticide and other agricultural chemical manufacturing 
(NAICS code 325320).
     Medicinal and botanical manufacturing (NAICS code 325411).
     Pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing (NAICS code 
325412).
     Biological product (except diagnostic) manufacturing 
(NAICS code 325414).
     Paint and coating manufacturing (NAICS code 325510).
     Adhesive manufacturing (NAICS code 325520).
     Custom compounding of purchased resins (NAICS code 
325991).
     Photographic film, paper, plate, and chemical 
manufacturing (NAICS code 325992).
     All other miscellaneous chemical product and preparation 
manufacturing (NAICS code 325998).
     Unlaminated plastics film and sheet (except packaging) 
manufacturing (NAICS code 326113).
     Unlaminated plastics profile shape manufacturing (NAICS 
code 326121).
     Urethane and other foam product (except polystyrene) 
manufacturing (NAICS code 326150).
     All other plastics product manufacturing (NAICS code 
326199).
     Tire manufacturing (NAICS code 326211).
     All other rubber product manufacturing (NAICS code 
326299).
     Iron and steel mills and ferroalloy manufacturing (NAICS 
code 331110).
     Rolled steel shape manufacturing (NAICS code 331221).

[[Page 61709]]

     Alumina refining and primary aluminum production (NAICS 
code 331313).
     Secondary smelting and alloying of aluminum (NAICS code 
331314).
     Nonferrous metal (except aluminum) smelting and refining 
(NAICS code 331410).
     Secondary smelting, refining, and alloying of nonferrous 
metal (except copper and aluminum) (NAICS code 331492).
     Iron foundries (NAICS code 331511).
     Steel foundries (except investment) (NAICS code 331513).
     Fabricated structural metal manufacturing (NAICS code 
332312).
     Industrial valve manufacturing (NAICS code 332911).
     Ammunition except small arms manufacturing (NAICS code 
332993).
     Small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories 
manufacturing (NAICS code 332994).
     All other miscellaneous fabricated metal product 
manufacturing (NAICS code 332999).
     Food product machinery manufacturing (NAICS code 333294).
     Office machinery manufacturing (NAICS code 333313).
     Other commercial and service industry machinery 
manufacturing (NAICS code 333319).
     Heating equipment (except warm air furnaces) manufacturing 
(NAICS code 333414).
     Air-conditioning and warm air heating equipment and 
commercial and industrial refrigeration equipment manufacturing (NAICS 
code 333415).
     Pump and pumping equipment manufacturing (NAICS code 
333911).
     Bare printed circuit board manufacturing (NAICS code 
334412).
     Semiconductor and related device manufacturing (NAICS code 
334413).
     Other electronic component manufacturing (NAICS code 
334419).
     Electromedical and electrotherapeutic apparatus 
manufacturing (NAICS code 334510). Search, detection, navigation, 
guidance, aeronautical, and nautical system and instrument 
manufacturing (NAICS code 334511).
     Automatic environmental control manufacturing for 
residential, commercial, and appliance use (NAICS code 334512).
     Instruments and related products manufacturing for 
measuring, displaying, and controlling industrial process variables 
(NAICS code 334513).
     Totalizing fluid meter and counting device manufacturing 
(NAICS code 334514).
     Instrument manufacturing for measuring and testing 
electricity and electrical signals (NAICS code 334515).
     Analytical laboratory instrument manufacturing (NAICS code 
334516).
     Watch, clock, and part manufacturing (NAICS code 334518).
     Other measuring and controlling device manufacturing 
(NAICS code 334519).
     Electric lamp bulb and part manufacturing (NAICS code 
335110).
     Commercial, industrial, and institutional electric 
lighting fixture manufacturing (NAICS code 335122).
     Other lighting equipment manufacturing (NAICS code 
335129).
     Electric house wares and household fan manufacturing 
(NAICS code 335211).
     Household vacuum cleaner manufacturing (NAICS code 
335212).
     Household cooking appliance manufacturing (NAICS code 
335221).
     Household refrigerator and home freezer manufacturing 
(NAICS code 335222).
     Household laundry equipment manufacturing (NAICS code 
335224).
     Other major household appliance manufacturing (NAICS code 
335228).
     Switchgear and switchboard apparatus manufacturing (NAICS 
code 335313).
     Relay and industrial control manufacturing (NAICS code 
335314).
     Primary battery manufacturing (NAICS code 335912).
     Current-carrying wiring device manufacturing (NAICS code 
335931).
     All other miscellaneous electrical equipment and component 
manufacturing (NAICS code 335999).
     Automobile manufacturing (NAICS code 336111).
     Light truck and utility vehicle manufacturing (NAICS code 
336112).
     Heavy duty truck manufacturing (NAICS code 336120).
     Motor home manufacturing (NAICS code 336213).
     Travel trailer and camper manufacturing (NAICS code 
336214).
     Other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing 
(NAICS code 336413).
     Boat building (NAICS code 336612).
     Motorcycles and parts manufacturing (NAICS code 336991).
     Surgical and medical instrument manufacturing (NAICS code 
339112).
     Costume jewelry and novelty manufacturing (NAICS code 
339914).
     Game, toy, and children's vehicle manufacturing (NAICS 
code 339932).
     Sign manufacturing (NAICS code 339950).
     Other chemical and allied products merchant wholesalers 
(NAICS code 424690).
     Research and development in the physical, engineering, and 
life sciences (except biotechnology) (NAICS code 541712).
     Hazardous waste treatment and disposal (NAICS code 
562211).
     Other nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal (NAICS 
code 562219).
     Materials recovery facilities (NAICS code 562920).
     National security (NAICS code 928110).

B. What action is the Agency taking?

    In June 2018, EPA finalized a rule to require reporting from 
persons who manufacture (including import) mercury or mercury-added 
products, or otherwise intentionally use mercury in a manufacturing 
process (Ref. 1). That rule was challenged in the Second Circuit by the 
Natural Resources Defense Council and several state attorneys general 
in July 2018. Oral arguments were held on November 20, 2019, and the 
court issued its decision on June 5, 2020. The petitioners argued that 
three exemptions to the reporting requirements violated the statutory 
mandate within TSCA section 8(b)(10). The Agency argued that the three 
exemptions were lawful because EPA determined certain reporting to be 
duplicative or burdensome per existing EPA or other mercury-related 
reporting requirements. Duplicative or overly burdensome reporting 
requirements are prohibited under TSCA section 8(a)(5). The Agency 
prevailed on two issues, but the Second Circuit vacated the exemption 
at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(2) for persons who import pre-assembled products 
that contain a mercury-added component (Ref. 2). As a result, such 
persons are now required to report pursuant to 40 CFR 713.7(b). This 
rule is effectuating the vacatur ordered by the Second Circuit by 
making necessary amendments to the corresponding text in 40 CFR 
713.7(b).

C. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    EPA is issuing this final rule pursuant to TSCA section 8(b)(10)(D) 
(15 U.S.C. 2607(b)(10)(D)), which authorizes EPA to require reporting 
in order to assist in preparing the inventory of mercury supply, use 
and trade in the United States. In addition, section 553 of the 
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), provides 
that, when an agency for good cause finds that notice and public 
procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an 
opportunity for public comment.

[[Page 61710]]

EPA has determined that there is good cause for revising these 
provisions without prior proposal and opportunity for comment, because 
these revisions simply undertake the ministerial task of implementing 
the court order vacating an exemption at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(2) and making 
the necessary amendments to corresponding text in 40 CFR 713.7(b). As a 
matter of law, the order issued by the Second Circuit on June 5, 2020 
vacated the reporting exemption for persons who manufacture (including 
import) a mercury-added product where that person is ``engaged only in 
the import of a product that contains a component that is a mercury-
added product.'' It is, therefore, unnecessary to provide notice and an 
opportunity for comment on this action, which merely carries out the 
court's order.

D. Which regulations is EPA removing and replacing?

    EPA is effectuating the Second Circuit vacatur of the exemption for 
persons who manufacture (including import) a mercury-added product 
where that person is ``engaged only in the import of a product that 
contains a component that is a mercury-added product.'' Therefore, the 
current text at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(2) will be removed and replaced (with 
appropriate textual and numbering updates) with the text currently 
found at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(3).

E. What are the estimated burdens associated with the removed and 
replaced regulations?

    EPA has prepared an economic analysis of the potential impacts 
associated with this rulemaking (Ref. 3). This economic analysis 
estimates and evaluates the total costs and benefits for additional 
reporters to the mercury inventory reporting rule due to this 
rulemaking (i.e., those that import products that contain a component 
that is a mercury-added product). EPA is considering an estimate of 756 
as the number of sites potentially subject to the amended rule, which, 
under the revised requirements, is now applicable to imports of 
products that contain a component that is a mercury-added product. EPA 
estimates that as many as 657 sites will submit reports due to the 
revised requirements. This is the incremental difference between the 
number of actual reporters to the mercury inventory reporting rule 
during the 2019 submission period, and the expected number of total 
reporters based on the number of entities that report to the Interstate 
Mercury Education & Reduction Clearinghouse (IMERC) or to EPA's 
Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) or Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). More 
details on the methodology used can be found in the Agency's economic 
analysis (Ref. 3).
    The chief benefit of the final rule is the collection of detailed 
data on mercury, which will serve as a basis to recommend actions to 
further reduce mercury use in the United States, as required at TSCA 
section 8(b)(10)(C). Another benefit is the use of information 
collected under the final rule to help the United States implement its 
obligations under the Minamata Convention, a multilateral environmental 
agreement that addresses specific human activities that are 
contributing to widespread mercury pollution. While there are no 
quantified benefits for the final rule, the statutory mandates at TSCA 
sections 8(b)(10)(C) and (D) (15 U.S.C. 2607(b)(10)(C) and (D)), 
specifically call for and authorizes a rule to support an inventory of 
mercury supply, use, and trade in the United States, to identify any 
manufacturing processes or products that intentionally add mercury, and 
to recommend actions to achieve further reductions in mercury use. As 
described in the Agency's economic analysis, unquantified benefits 
include providing increased information on mercury and assisting in the 
reduction of mercury use (Ref. 3). To the extent that the information 
gathered through this rule is used to reduce mercury use, benefits to 
society will result from a reduction in exposure.
     Benefits: The final rule will provide information on 
mercury and mercury-added products to which the Agency (and the public) 
does not currently have access. To the extent that the information 
gathered through this final rule is used to reduce mercury use, 
benefits to society will result from a reduction in risk.
     Costs: Total reporter (industry) costs the first year were 
estimated in 2020$ at $5.1 million, and $3.6 million in subsequent 
reporting years. Annualized over 10 years, the reporter costs are $1.5 
million at both 3% and 7% discount rates. Agency costs are $729 per 
report per year, for an annualized cost of $177,000 and $181,000 at 3% 
and 7% discount rates, respectively. Therefore, the total annualized 
costs are expected to be approximately $1.7 million at both 3% and 7% 
discount rates. The total burden of the rule is expected to be 
approximately 212,000 hours over the 10-year analysis period. These 
estimates include compliance determination, rule familiarization, CBI 
substantiation, electronic reporting, and recordkeeping, in addition to 
completing reporting requirements.
     Small Entity Impacts: The final rule will impact 203 
companies that meet the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) 
definitions for their respective NAICS classifications. Among the total 
657 sites regulated under the rule, EPA found that the costs of the 
rule exceed 3 percent of the value of sales for 2 small businesses, and 
an additional 3 small businesses may incur costs at between 1 and 3 
percent of the value of sales. EPA is unable to determine whether these 
5 small businesses actually import products that contain a component 
that is a mercury-added product.
     Environmental Justice and Protection of Children: The 
Agency believes that the information collected under this rule, if 
finalized, will assist EPA and others in determining the potential 
hazards and risks associated with elemental mercury and mercury 
compounds. Although not directly impacting environmental justice-
related concerns, this information will enable the Agency to better 
protect human health and the environment, including in low-income and 
minority communities. The rule is directed at all mercury-added 
products that are manufactured or imported into the United States. All 
consumers of these chemicals and the products made from them and all 
workers who come into contact with these chemicals could benefit if 
data regarding the chemicals' health and environmental effects were 
developed. Therefore, it does not appear that the costs and the 
benefits of the rule will be disproportionately distributed across 
different geographic regions or among different categories of 
individuals.
     Effects on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: 
Government entities are not expected to be subject to the rule's 
requirements, which apply to entities that manufacture (including 
import) mercury or mercury-added products, or otherwise intentionally 
use mercury in a manufacturing process. The final rule does not have a 
significant intergovernmental mandate, significant or unique effect on 
small governments, or have Federalism implications.

II. References

    The following is a listing of the documents that are specifically 
referenced in this document. The docket includes these documents and 
other information considered by EPA, including documents that are 
referenced within the documents that are included in the docket, even 
if the referenced document is not physically located in the docket. For 
assistance in locating these other documents, please consult

[[Page 61711]]

the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

1. EPA. ``Reporting Requirements for TSCA Mercury Inventory: 
Mercury;'' Final Rule. Federal Register (83 FR 30054, June 27, 2018) 
(FRL-9979-74).
2. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Natural 
Resources Defense Council, Inc. and State of Vermont v. United 
States Environmental Protection Agency, 961 F.3d 160 (2d. Cir. 
2020).
3. EPA. ``Economic Analysis for the Final Rule on Revisions to the 
Reporting Requirements for the TSCA Mercury Inventory.''

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders 
can be found at https://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was 
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) 
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    The revised information collection activities in this rule have 
been submitted for approval to OMB under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq., as part of a request to renew the existing approval under OMB 
Control No. 2070-0207. The renewal Information Collection Request (ICR) 
document that EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR No. 2567.04. You 
can find a copy of the ICR in the docket for this rule, and it is 
briefly summarized here. The revised information collection 
requirements are not enforceable until OMB approves them.
    The ICR renewal request explains the necessary adjustments related 
to the Second Circuit vacatur. Applying the reporting requirements 
identified in the 2018 final rule to persons who manufacture (including 
import) a mercury-added product will provide EPA with more complete 
information necessary to prepare and periodically update an inventory 
of mercury supply, use, and trade in the United States, as required by 
TSCA section 8(b)(10)(D). These reporting requirements will help the 
Agency to prepare subsequent, triennial publications of the inventory, 
as well as to carry out the requirement of TSCA section 8(b)(10)(C) to 
identify any manufacturing processes or products that intentionally add 
mercury and recommend actions, including proposed revisions of Federal 
law or regulations, to achieve further reductions in mercury use. EPA 
intends to use information collected under the rule to assist in 
efforts to reduce the use of mercury in products and processes and to 
facilitate reporting on implementation of the Minamata Convention by 
the United States. Respondents may claim some of the information 
reported to EPA under the final rule as CBI under TSCA section 14. TSCA 
section 14(c) requires a supporting statement and certification for 
confidentiality claims asserted after June 22, 2016.
    Respondents/affected entities: Manufacturers, importers, and 
processors of mercury and mercury-added products.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (15 U.S.C. 
2607(b)(10)(D)).
    Estimated number of respondents: 756.
    Frequency of response: Triennially.
    Total estimated annual burden: 17,348 hours (averaged over 3 
years). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated annual cost: $1,384,999 (averaged over 3 years), 
includes $0 annualized capital or operation and maintenance costs.
    Change in burden estimates: Based on the numbers of reporters of 
mercury data to the IMERC Mercury-added Products Database, as well as 
EPA's TRI program and CDR rule, there will be a change in manufacturers 
(including importers) or processors that could respond to this 
information collection. The annual public burden for this collection of 
information is estimated about 23 hours per respondent. This request 
represents a decrease of 9 hours per respondent from that currently in 
the OMB inventory, or a total decrease of 20,522 hours (from 72,567 to 
52,045 hours). This change reflects a decrease in rule familiarization 
burden, a decrease in form completion burden due to mercury export 
prohibitions, and changes in the number of estimated respondents.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the EPA 
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. When OMB approves 
the renewal ICR, the Agency will announce that approval in the Federal 
Register and publish a technical amendment to 40 CFR part 9 to display 
the OMB control number for the approved information collection 
activities contained in this final rule.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    This action is not subject to the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. The RFA 
applies only to rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking 
requirements under the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. This 
rule is not subject to notice and comment requirements because the 
Agency has invoked the APA ``good cause'' exemption under 5 U.S.C. 
553(b).

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or 
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531 through 1538, and does not 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. As such, the 
requirements of sections 202, 203, 204, or 205 of UMRA do not apply to 
this action.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications, as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the National Government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). It will not have 
any effect on tribal governments, on the relationship between the 
Federal government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 
power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian 
tribes, as specified in the Order. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not 
apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) 
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental 
health or safety risks that EPA has reason to believe may 
disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered 
regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This 
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not 
concern an environmental health risk or safety risk.

[[Page 61712]]

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 
28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not expected to affect energy 
supply, distribution, or use and has not otherwise been designated by 
the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 
as a significant energy action.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This action does not involve any technical standards. Therefore, 
section 12(d) of NTTAA, 15 U.S.C. 272 note, does not apply to this 
action.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 
February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an environmental 
health or safety standard. This action establishes an information 
requirement and does not affect the level of protection provided to 
human health or the environment.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a major 
rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 713

    Environmental protection, Exports, Imports, Manufacturing, Mercury, 
Trade practices.

Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.

    Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR 
Chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 713--REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TSCA INVENTORY OF MERCURY 
SUPPLY, USE, AND TRADE

0
1. The authority citation for part 713 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 2607(b)(10)(D).


0
2. In Sec.  713.7, paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  713.7   Persons who must report.

* * * * *
    (b) Any person who manufactures (including imports) a mercury-added 
product, except:
    (1) A person who does not manufacture (including import) a mercury-
added product with the purpose of obtaining an immediate or eventual 
commercial advantage; or
    (2) A person engaged only in the manufacture (other than import) of 
a product that contains a component that is a mercury-added product who 
did not first manufacture (including import) the component that is a 
mercury-added product; and
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-24209 Filed 11-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


