
[Federal Register: September 16, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 179)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 56472-56477]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16se10-4]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 790

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0894; FRL-8832-8]
RIN 2070-AJ59

 
Amendments to Enforceable Consent Agreement Procedural Rules

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is revising the procedures for developing Enforceable 
Consent Agreements (ECAs) to generate test data under the Toxic 
Substances Control Act (TSCA). The main features of the ECA process 
that EPA is changing include when and how to initiate negotiations and 
inserting a firm deadline at which negotiations will terminate. EPA is 
also deleting, modifying, or consolidating several sections of 40 CFR 
part 790 to place the ECA provisions in one section and the Interagency 
Testing Committee (ITC) provisions in a separate section, to make it 
clearer that there is one ECA negotiation procedure applicable to all 
circumstances when an ECA would be appropriate, and to make conforming 
changes in other sections that reference the ECA procedures.

DATES: This final rule is effective October 18, 2010.

[[Page 56473]]


ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0894. All documents in the 
docket are listed in the docket index available at http://
www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is 
not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain 
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the 
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. 
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic 
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard 
copy, at the OPPT Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA Docket 
Center (EPA/DC) at Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution Ave., 
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of operation 
are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is 
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 
566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic 
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor 
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and 
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must 
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: 
Jessica Barkas, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 
(202) 250-8880; e-mail address: barkas.jessica@epa.gov.
     For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 
554-1404; e-mail address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture 
(defined by statute to include import) or process chemical substances 
or mixtures (defined as ``chemical'' in 40 CFR part 790). Potentially 
affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Manufacturers (defined by statute to include importers) of 
chemical substances (NAIC codes 325 and 324110), e.g., chemical 
manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
     Processors of chemical substances (NAIC codes 325 and 
324110), e.g., chemical manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides 
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this 
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be 
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining 
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any 
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular 
entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.

II. Background

A. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 4 of TSCA authorizes EPA to require manufacturers and 
processors of chemical substances and mixtures to test these chemical 
substances to generate data that is relevant to determining whether the 
chemical substances present an unreasonable risk. Section 4(a) of TSCA 
empowers the Agency to promulgate rules which require such testing. 
Section 4 of TSCA provides implied authority to enter into ECAs 
requiring testing where such agreements provide procedural safeguards 
equivalent to those that apply where testing is conducted by rule.

B. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA is finalizing a rule revising the procedures for initiating and 
negotiating an ECA. ECAs are enforceable agreements between EPA and one 
or more chemical manufacturers or processors to conduct specific 
testing on a particular chemical substance. These agreements are 
designed to provide EPA with data identified as necessary to evaluate a 
particular chemical substance without the need for EPA to first make 
the risk- or exposure-based findings for, or promulgate, a TSCA section 
4 test rule, and without introducing delays inherent in the rulemaking 
process. ECAs were intended to permit EPA to obtain test data more 
quickly than test rules, while preserving opportunity for input from 
the public and the affected manufacturer(s).
    The main features of the ECA process that EPA is changing include 
when and how to initiate negotiations and inserting a firm deadline at 
which negotiations will terminate. EPA is also deleting, modifying, or 
consolidating several parts of 40 CFR part 790 to place the ECA 
provisions in one section and the ITC provisions in a separate section, 
to make it clearer that there is one ECA negotiation procedure 
applicable to all circumstances when an ECA would be appropriate, and 
to make conforming changes in other sections that reference the ECA 
procedures.
    The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register of February 
19, 2010 (75 FR 7428) (FRL-8802-6). Additional detail about ECAs, the 
specific changes, and the rationale for those changes can be found in 
that Federal Register document. One comment was received on the 
proposed rule. No changes have been made to the rule since it was 
proposed.

C. What Was EPA's Response to Comment?

    The comment period for the proposed rule ended on March 22, 2010. 
One comment was received, from the American Chemistry Council (ACC). 
The ACC comments indicated support for the ECA procedural changes, and 
had a few specific suggestions:
    Comment 1: EPA should include in the ECA rule what ``office or 
program and level of management within EPA will have the organizational 
authority to officially speak on behalf of the Agency on such perceived 
[testing] needs, and how EPA will communicate this request to industry 
and through what vehicle.''
    EPA response: Under the current delegation, the EPA Assistant 
Administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention (OCSPP) (formerly the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and 
Toxic Substances (OPPTS)) has the authority to make the final decision 
on whether testing is necessary under TSCA section 4. As explained in 
the preamble to the proposed rule, EPA will invite testing proposals 
through Federal Register documents, EPA's website, and other forms of 
public communication. Depending on the circumstances (e.g., the size 
and geographical distribution of the group potentially required to 
conduct testing), EPA may use more than one of these methods, as 
necessary to reach the affected companies. For instance, one of the 
public forms of communication that EPA may use is speeches or 
presentations by Agency officials at industry conferences, where 
representatives from individual companies and trade associations will 
be present, and able to pass the word along to their companies and 
members. Of course, individual companies, trade associations and other 
organizations, and their representatives can always

[[Page 56474]]

contact EPA, using the contact information provided in the Federal 
Register document, EPA website, or other public communication of 
testing needs, with questions about specific testing requirements and 
other details for individual chemical substances.
    Comment 2: EPA should describe in greater detail what EPA believes 
should be contained in the proposed consent agreement.
    EPA response: The testing needs, timeline, and other details will 
necessarily vary for each individual chemical substance, so it is 
impossible for EPA to generalize about what will form an adequate 
proposal in each circumstance. The standard provisions that must be 
included in all consent agreements are listed in 40 CFR 790.60, 
``Contents of consent agreements,'' which this action will not change. 
Again, individual companies, trade associations, and other 
organizations, and their representatives can always contact EPA, using 
the contact information provided in the Federal Register document, EPA 
website, or other public communication of testing needs, with questions 
about specific testing requirements and other details for individual 
chemicals. In addition, as stated in the rule, ``EPA may request 
additional clarifications of or revisions to the proposal(s).'' This 
statement in the rule makes it explicit that submitters will have an 
opportunity to clarify, correct, and otherwise revise their 
proposal(s), if EPA decides that clarification is needed, or the 
proposal needs expansion or elaboration to adequately meet testing 
needs.
    Comment 3: The ECA procedures should include a provision that would 
permit the Agency to agree to an ECA where some or most, but not all, 
data needs might be filled.
    EPA response: There is nothing in the original or revised ECA 
procedural rules that would prohibit EPA from agreeing to an ECA that 
covers some, but not all, needed testing, then pursuing a test rule or 
follow-up ECA, to fill remaining data needs--if no other interested 
parties submit a timely written objection, and if EPA concludes that 
such a multi-part process is likely to be an efficient and successful 
means of obtaining the needed test data.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Regulatory Review

    Under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and 
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) has determined that this final rule is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' subject to review under Executive Order 12866, 
because it does not meet the criteria in section 3(f)(4) of the 
Executive Order. Accordingly, EPA did not submit this final rule to OMB 
for review under Executive Order 12866.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden, 
because the development of the ECA regulations does not involve 
information collection activities as defined by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. However, the information collection 
requirements contained in an ECA are already approved by OMB pursuant 
to PRA under OMB control number 2070-0033 (EPA ICR No. 1139). Under 
PRA, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, an information collection request unless it displays a 
currently valid control number assigned by OMB. The OMB control numbers 
for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 
9, and will be included in the individual ECAs.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), after considering the potential economic 
impacts of this final rule on small entities, the Agency hereby 
certifies that this final rule would not have a significant adverse 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and 
small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts 
of this final rule on small entities, small entity is defined as:
    1. A small business as defined by the Small Business 
Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR 121.201.
    2. A small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a 
city, county, town, school district, or special district with a 
population of less than 50,000.
    3. A small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which 
is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
    This action will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. In determining whether a final 
rule has a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities, the impact of concern is any significant adverse economic 
impact on small entities, since the primary purpose of regulatory 
flexibility analysis is to identify and address regulatory alternatives 
``which minimize any significant economic impact of the rule on small 
entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. Thus, an agency may certify that a 
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities if the final rule relieves regulatory burden, 
or otherwise has a positive economic effect on all of the small 
entities subject to the final rule.
    The changes discussed in this document are expected to streamline 
and improve the ECA procedures in a way that will benefit all 
participants. EPA has therefore concluded that this final rule will not 
have any adverse impacts on affected small entities. EPA did not 
receive any comments on the proposed rule regarding the impact on small 
entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any 
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538). Therefore, this action 
is not subject to the requirements of UMRA.

E. Federalism

    Pursuant to Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999), EPA has determined that this final rule does 
not have ``federalism implications,'' because it will not have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as 
specified in Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does 
not apply to this final rule.

F. Tribal Implications

    Under Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination 
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), EPA has 
determined that this final rule does not have tribal implications 
because it will not have any effect on tribal governments, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in the Order. Thus, 
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Children's Health Protection

    Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from 
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 
1997), does not apply to this action because this is not designated as 
an

[[Page 56475]]

``economically significant'' regulatory action as defined by Executive 
Order 12866 (see Unit III.A.), nor does this action establish an 
environmental standard that is intended to have a disproportionate 
effect on children. To the contrary, this action will revise procedures 
which will facilitate the development of data and information that EPA 
and others can use to assess the risks of chemical substances, 
including potential risks to children.

H. Energy Effects

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled 
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because this action 
is not expected to affect energy supply, distribution, or use.

I. Technology Standards

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note), directs EPA to 
use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless 
to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise 
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards 
(e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and 
business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary 
consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, 
through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available 
and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
    This final rule does not involve technical standards. Therefore, 
EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus standards.

J. Environmental Justice

    This action does not involve special considerations of 
environmental justice related issues as delineated by Executive Order 
12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in 
Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 
16, 1994).

IV. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 790

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.


    Dated: September 8, 2010.
Stephen A. Owens,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution 
Prevention.

0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 790--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 790 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603.


Sec.  790.1  [Amended]

0
2. Section 790.1 is amended by removing the last sentence of paragraph 
(c) and by removing paragraph (d).
0
3. Section 790.20 is revised to read as follows:


Sec. 790.20  Recommendation, recommendation with an intent to 
designate, and designation of testing candidates by the ITC.

    (a) ITC recommendations and recommendations with intent to 
designate. The ITC has advised EPA that it will discharge its 
responsibilities under section 4(e) of TSCA in the following manner:
    (1) When the ITC identifies a chemical substance or mixture that it 
believes should receive expedited consideration by EPA for testing, the 
ITC may add the substance or mixture to its list of chemicals 
recommended for testing and include a statement that the ITC intends to 
designate the substance or mixture for action by EPA in accordance with 
section 4(e)(1)(B) of TSCA.
    (2) Chemical substances or mixtures selected for expedited review 
under paragraph (a)(1) of this section may, at a later time, be 
designated for EPA action within 12 months of such designation. The 
ITC's subsequent decision would be based on the ITC's review of TSCA 
sections 8(a) and 8(d) data and other relevant information.
    (3) Where the ITC concludes that a chemical substance or mixture 
warrants testing consideration but that expedited EPA review of testing 
needs is not justified, the ITC will add the substance or mixture to 
its list of testing recommendations without expressing an intent to 
designate the substance or mixture for EPA action in accordance with 
section 4(e)(1)(B) of TSCA.
    (4) The ITC reserves its right to designate any chemical substance 
or mixture that it determines the Agency should, within 12 months of 
the date first designated, initiate a proceeding under section 4(a) of 
TSCA.
    (b) Preliminary EPA evaluation of ITC recommendations with intent 
to designate. Following receipt of an ITC report containing a 
recommendation with an intent to designate, EPA will use the following 
procedure for completing a preliminary evaluation of testing needs on 
those chemical substances that the ITC has recommended with intent to 
designate:
    (1) EPA will publish the ITC report in the Federal Register and 
announce that interested persons have 30 days to submit comments on the 
ITC's testing recommendations.
    (2) EPA will publish a Federal Register document adding all ITC-
recommended chemicals to the automatic reporting provisions of its 
rules under sections 8(a) and 8(d) of TSCA (40 CFR parts 712 and 716).
    (3) EPA will hold a public ``focus meeting'' to discuss the ITC's 
testing recommendations and obtain comments and information from 
interested parties.
    (4) EPA will evaluate submissions received under TSCA sections 8(a) 
and 8(d) reporting requirements, comments filed on the ITC's 
recommendations, and other information and data compiled by the Agency.
    (5) EPA will make a preliminary staff determination of the need for 
testing and, where testing appears warranted, will tentatively select 
the studies to be performed.
    (6) EPA will hold a public meeting to announce its preliminary 
testing determinations.
    (c) EPA response to ITC designations and recommendations--(1) Where 
a chemical substance or mixture is designated for EPA action under 
section 4(e)(1)(B) of TSCA, the Agency will take either one of the 
following actions within 12 months after receiving the ITC designation:
    (i) Initiate rulemaking proceedings under section 4(a) of TSCA. 
Where the testing recommendations of the ITC raise unusually complex 
and novel issues that require additional Agency review and opportunity 
for public comment, the Agency may initiate rulemaking by publishing an 
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM).
    (ii) Publish a Federal Register notice explaining the Agency's 
reasons for not initiating such rulemaking proceedings. EPA may 
conclude that rulemaking

[[Page 56476]]

proceedings under section 4(a) of TSCA are unnecessary if it determines 
that the findings specified in section 4(a) of TSCA cannot be made or 
if the Agency entered into a consent agreement requiring the testing 
identified by the ITC.
    (2) Where a chemical substance or mixture has been recommended for 
testing by the ITC, whether with or without an intent to designate, EPA 
will use its best efforts to act on the ITC's recommendations as 
rapidly as possible consistent with its other priorities and 
responsibilities. EPA may respond to the ITC's recommendations with 
action such as:
    (i) Initiating rulemaking proceedings under section 4(a) of TSCA,
     (ii) Publishing a Federal Register notice explaining the Agency's 
reasons for concluding that testing is unnecessary, or
    (iii) Entering into a consent agreement in accordance with this 
subpart.
0
4. Section 790.22 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  790.22  Procedures for developing consent agreements.

    (a) Preliminary EPA evaluation of proposed consent agreement. Where 
EPA believes that testing of a chemical substance or mixture may be 
needed, and wishes to explore whether a consent agreement may satisfy 
the identified testing needs, EPA will invite manufacturers and/or 
processors of the affected chemical substance or mixture to submit a 
proposed consent agreement to EPA. EPA will evaluate the proposal(s) 
and may request additional clarifications of or revisions to the 
proposal(s).
    (b) Negotiation procedures for consent agreements. If, after 
evaluating the proposed consent agreement(s), EPA believes it is likely 
that proceeding with negotiation of a consent agreement would be an 
efficient means of developing the data, EPA will use the following 
procedures to conduct such negotiations:
    (1) In the Federal Register, EPA will give notice of the 
availability of the proposal(s) that is the basis for negotiation, 
invite persons interested in participating in or monitoring 
negotiations to contact the Agency in writing, set a deadline for 
interested parties to contact the Agency in writing, and set a date for 
the negotiation meeting(s).
     (2) The Agency will meet with interested parties at the 
negotiation meeting(s) for the purpose of attempting to negotiate a 
consent agreement. Only the submitter(s) of the proposal(s) that is the 
basis for negotiation and those persons who submit written requests to 
participate in or monitor negotiations by the deadline established 
under paragraph (b)(1) of this section will be deemed ``interested 
parties'' for purposes of this section.
    (3) All negotiation meetings will be open to members of the public, 
but only interested parties will be permitted to participate in 
negotiations. The minutes of each meeting will be prepared by EPA. 
Meeting minutes, the proposed consent agreement(s), background 
documents, and other materials distributed at negotiation meetings will 
be placed in an Internet-accessible public docket established by EPA.
    (4) If EPA concludes at any time that negotiations are unlikely to 
produce a final agreement, EPA will terminate negotiations and may 
proceed with rulemaking. If EPA terminates negotiations, no further 
opportunity for negotiations will be provided. EPA will notify all 
interested parties of the termination.
    (5) The period between the first negotiation meeting and final 
agreement, if any (``the negotiation period''), will be no longer than 
6 months, unless extended prior to its expiration in accordance with 
paragraph (b)(7) of this section. This period will include all 
negotiation meetings, and the processes discussed in paragraphs (b)(6) 
and (b)(9) of this section. If the negotiation period passes without 
the production of a final agreement, negotiations and development of 
the subject ECA will terminate automatically.
    (6) EPA will circulate a draft of the consent agreement to all 
interested parties if EPA concludes that such draft is likely to 
achieve final agreement. A period of 30 days will be provided for 
submitting comments or written objections under paragraph (b)(8)(i)(B) 
of this section.
    (7) If, prior to the expiration of the negotiation period, final 
agreement has not been reached, EPA may at its discretion provide one 
or more extensions, each of which may be up to 60 days, if it seems 
likely to EPA that a final agreement will be reached during that time. 
EPA will notify all interested parties of any extension(s).
    (8) (i) EPA will enter into consent agreements only where there is 
a consensus among the Agency, one or more manufacturers and/or 
processors who agree to conduct or sponsor the testing, and all other 
interested parties who identify themselves in accordance with paragraph 
(b)(2) of this section. EPA will not enter into a consent agreement in 
either of the following circumstances:
    (A) EPA and affected manufacturers and/or processors cannot reach a 
consensus in the timeframe described in paragraph (b)(5) of this 
section.
    (B) A draft consent agreement is considered inadequate by other 
interested parties who have submitted timely written objections to the 
draft consent agreement, which provide a specific explanation of the 
grounds on which the draft agreement is objectionable.
    (ii) EPA may reject objections described in paragraph (b)(8)(i)(B) 
of this section only where the Agency concludes the objections:
    (A) Are not made in good faith;
    (B) Are untimely;
    (C) Do not involve the adequacy of the proposed testing program or 
other features of the agreement that may affect EPA's ability to 
fulfill the goals and purposes of TSCA; or
    (D) Are not accompanied by a specific explanation of the grounds on 
which the draft agreement is considered objectionable.
    (iii) The unwillingness of some manufacturers and/or processors to 
sign the draft consent agreement does not, in itself, establish a lack 
of consensus if EPA concludes that those manufacturers and/or 
processors who are prepared to sign the agreement are capable of 
accomplishing the testing to be required and that the draft agreement 
will achieve the purposes of TSCA in all other respects.
    (9) Where a consensus exists, as described in paragraph (b)(8) of 
this section, concerning the contents of a draft consent agreement, the 
draft consent agreement will be circulated to EPA management and the 
parties that are to conduct or sponsor testing under the agreement, for 
final approval and signature.
    (10) Upon final approval and signature of a consent agreement, EPA 
will publish a Federal Register document announcing the availability of 
the consent agreement and codifying (in subpart C of 40 CFR part 799) 
the name of the chemical substance(s) and/or mixture(s) to be tested 
and the citation to the Federal Register document.


Sec. Sec.  790.24, 790.26, and 790.28   [Removed]

0
5. Remove Sec. Sec.  790.24, 790.26, and 790.28.


Sec.  790.68   [Amended]

0
6. Remove the cross-reference ``Sec.  790.24'' in ``Sec.  
790.68(a)(2)'' and add in its place ``Sec.  790.22(b)(8).''

[[Page 56477]]

Appendix A to subpart E of part 790   [Removed]

0
7. Remove Appendix A to subpart E of part 790.

[FR Doc. 2010-23131 Filed 9-15-10 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S

