Supporting
Statement
for
a
Request
for
OMB
Review
under
The
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
1
IDENTIFICATION
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
1(
a)
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection
TITLE:
PCBs:
Consolidated
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
Requirements
EPA
ICR
No.:
1446.07
OMB
Control
No:
2070
­
0112
1(
b)
Short
Characterization
Section
6(
e)(
1)
of
the
Toxic
Substances
Control
Act
(
TSCA),
15
USC
2605(
e),
directs
EPA
to
regulate
the
marking
and
disposal
of
PCBs.
Section
6(
e)(
2)
bans
the
manufacturing,
processing,
distribution
in
commerce,
and
use
of
PCBs
in
other
than
a
totally
enclosed
manner.
Section
6(
e)(
3)
establishes
a
process
for
obtaining
an
exemption
from
the
prohibitions
on
the
manufacture,
processing,
and
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs.
This
provision
requires
that
EPA
must
make
a
finding
by
rule
that
such
activities
will
not
present
an
unreasonable
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.
In
addition,
good
faith
efforts
must
have
been
made
by
the
petitioner
to
develop
a
chemical
substance
that
does
not
present
an
unreasonable
risk
to
replace
the
PCBs.
Exemptions
may
be
granted
for
a
period
not
to
exceed
one
year.
Since
1978,
EPA
has
promulgated
numerous
rules
addressing
all
aspects
of
the
life
cycle
of
PCBs
as
required
by
the
statute.

These
regulations
have
been
codified
in
the
various
subparts
of
40
CFR
761,
as
shown
in
Table
1­
1.

Appendix
A
contains
a
copy
of
the
statute
and
Appendix
B
is
a
copy
of
the
regulations.

RECEIVED
OPPT
NCIC
2003
July
25
9:
56AM
OPPT­
2003­
0044­
0002
1­
2
TABLE
1­
1
SUBPARTS
AND
SECTIONS
OF
40
CFR
761
Subpart
Section
Numbers
Subpart
Title
Subpart
A
§
§
761.1
­
.19
General
Subpart
B
§
§
761.20
­
.35
Manufacturing,
Processing,
Distribution
in
Commerce,
and
Use
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
Subpart
C
§
§
761.40
­
.45
Marking
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
Subpart
D
§
§
761.50
­.
79
Storage
and
Disposal
Subpart
E
§
§
761.80
Exemptions
Subpart
F
§
§
761.91
­
.99
Transboundary
Shipments
of
PCBs
for
Disposal
Subpart
G
§
§
761.120
­
.135
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
Subparts
J
§
§
761.180
­
.193
General
Records
and
Reports
Subpart
K
§
§
761.202
­
.218
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
Subpart
M
§
§
761.240
­
.257
Determining
a
PCB
Concentration
for
Purposes
of
Abandonment
or
Disposal
of
Natural
Gas
Pipeline;
Selecting
Sample
Sites,
Collecting
Surface
Samples,
and
Analyzing
Standard
PCB
Wipe
Samples
Subpart
N
§
§
761.260
­
.274
Cleanup
Site
Characterization
Sampling
for
PCB
Remediation
Waste
in
Accordance
with
40
CFR
761.61(
a)(
2)

Subpart
O
§
§
761.280
­
.298
Sampling
to
Verify
Completion
of
Self­
Implementing
Cleanup
and
On­
Site
Disposal
of
Bulk
PCB
Remediation
Waste
and
Porous
Surfaces
in
Accordance
with
§
761.61(
a)(
6)

Subpart
P
§
§
761.300
­
.316
Sampling
Non­
Porous
Surfaces
for
Measurement­
Based
Use,
Reuse,
and
On­
Site
or
Off­
Site
Disposal
Under
§
§
761.61(
a)(
6)
and
761.79(
b)(
3)

Subpart
Q
§
§
761.320
­
.326
Self­
Implementing
Alternative
Extraction
and
Chemical
Analysis
Procedures
for
Non­
Liquid
PCB
Remediation
Waste
Samples
TABLE
1­
1,
continued
SUBPARTS
AND
SECTIONS
OF
40
CFR
761
Subpart
Section
Numbers
Subpart
Title
1­
3
Subpart
R
§
§
761.340
­
.359
Sampling
Non­
Liquid,
Non­
Metal
PCB
Bulk
Product
Waste
for
Purposes
of
Characterization
for
PCB
Disposal
in
Accordance
with
§
761.62,
and
Sampling
PCB
Remediation
Waste
Destined
for
Off­
Site
Disposal,
in
Accordance
with
§
761.61
Subpart
S
§
§
761.360
­
.378
Double
Wash/
Rinse
Method
for
Decontaminating
Non­
Porous
Surfaces
Subpart
T
§
§
761.380
­
.398
Comparison
Study
for
Validating
a
New
Performance­
Based
Decontamination
Solvent
Under
40
CFR
971.79(
d)(
4)

This
Supporting
Statement
is
a
consolidation
of
six
Information
Collection
Requests
(
ICRs)
as
follows:

#
ICR
857
 
PCB
Manufacturing,
Processing,
and
Distribution
in
Commerce
Exemptions
(
OMB#
2070­
0021).

#
ICR
1000
 
PCB
Use
in
Electrical
Equipment
and
Transformers
(
OMB#
2070­
0003).

#
ICR
1001
 
PCB
Exclusions,
Exemptions,
and
Use
Authorizations
(
OMB
#
2070.0008).

#
ICR
1012
 
PCB
Disposal
Permitting
Regulation
(
OMB#
2070­
0011).

#
ICR
1446
 
Notification
and
Manifesting
for
PCB
Waste
Activities
(
OMB#
2070­
0112),
(
which
incorporates
ICR
583
 
PCB
Use,
Storage,
and
Disposal
Recordkeeping
Requirements
(
OMB#
2070­
0061)).
This
collection
has
also
been
amended
to
address
thirdparty
notifications
and
to
address
a
change
in
the
burden
associated
with
EPA's
proposed
Reclassification
Rule.

#
ICR
1729
 
Final
Regulations
Amending
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
761
(
OMB#
2070­
0159).

Note
that
EPA
had
OMB
clearance
to
collect
PCB
waste
import
notices
through
April
1999,
as
per
ICR
1770
 
Import
of
PCB
Wastes
for
Disposal
(
OMB#
2070­
0149).
The
Agency
will
not
renew
this
c
learance
because
on
July
7,
1997,
the
U.
S.
Court
of
Appeals
for
the
Ninth
Circuit
overturned
the
March
18,
1996
Import
for
Disposal
Rule
(
61
FR
11096)
that
would
have
allowed
the
import
of
PCB
waste
$
50
ppm
under
certain
conditions.
1­
4
There
are
approximately
100
specific
reporting,
third­
party
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
requirements
covered
by
the
ICRs
consolidated
into
this
document.
Some
examples
of
significant
reporting
and
thirdparty
reporting
requirements
included
at
40
CFR
761
follow:

#
Submitting
reports/
certifications
to
qualify
for
the
exclusion
from
the
manufacturing
ban,
thus
allowing
the
manufacture
or
importation
of
chemical
products
that
contain
inadvertently
generated
trace
PCB
impurities.

#
Registering
PCB
Transformers
with
EPA
(
reporting)
and
building
owners
(
third­
party
reporting).

#
Submitting
annual
reports
concerning
the
storage
and
disposal
of
PCBs.

#
Notifying
EPA
to
obtain
approval
to
exceed
the
time
limits
for
storing
equipment
slated
for
reuse
or
to
exceed
the
current
1­
year
limitation
on
storing
equipment
for
disposal.

#
Notifying
EPA
(
i.
e.,
reporting)
and
State
and
local
officials
(
i.
e.,
third­
party
reporting)
of
selfimplementing
PCB
remediation
activities
and
changes
to
these
activities,
and
providing
certification
that
all
records
of
remediation
activities
are
on
file.
#
Requesting
EPA
approval
to
operate
facilities
which
dispose
or
commercially
store
PCBs.

#
Submitting
Unmanifested
Waste
Reports.

#
Sending
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
generators
of
PCB
waste
(
third­
party
reporting).

Examples
of
recordkeeping
requirements
under
40
CFR
761
include:

#
Maintaining
records
of
PCB
Transformers
and
transformer
inspections,
Voltage
Regulators,
and
Large
Capacitors.

#
Maintaining
records
of
PCB
equipment
stored
for
reuse.

#
Keeping
records
of
remediation
activities.

#
Preparing
and
maintaining
plans
for
handling
PCB
spills
[
i.
e.,
Spill
Prevention,
Control,
and
Countermeasure
(
SPCC)
plans].

#
Preparing
and
maintaining
annual
document
logs
for
incineration
facilities,
chemical
waste
landfills,
and
high
efficiency
boilers.

#
Maintaining
monitoring
records
of
the
manufacture,
import,
processing,
distribution
in
commerce,
or
use
of
chemicals
containing
inadvertently
generated
or
recycled
PCBs.
1­
5
#
Maintaining
records
associated
with
the
transfer,
storage,
and
disposal
of
PCBs
and
PCB
equipment;
the
processing
and
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs;
and
the
decontamination
of
PCB
Items.

Information
required
by
these
regulations
is
used
by
EPA's
Regional
Administrators,
the
Office
of
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Assurance
(
OECA),
or
the
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxic
Substances
(
OPPTS),
as
appropriate.
Much
of
the
information
is
maintained
as
part
of
the
public
docket.

Confidential
business
information
(
CBI)
submitted
to
EPA
to
qualify
for
the
chemic
al
manufacturing
exclusions
is
maintained
by
OPPTS
in
the
CBI
docket.
Data
collected
under
the
transformer
registration
program
ultimately
will
be
provided
to
the
EPA
Regional
Offices
and
other
environmental
offices,
on
an
as
requested
basis
(
e.
g.,
State
environmental
agencies,
fire
response
personnel,
etc.),
and
it
will
be
accessible
on­
line,
as
well.

All
of
the
information
collection
activities
associated
with
the
final
PCB
regulations
found
at
40
CFR
761
have
been
approved
by
OMB.
The
total
hourly
and
cost
burdens
associated
with
the
requirements
discussed
in
this
consolidated
ICR
include
time
needed
to
conduct
the
following
tasks:

#
Review
regulations
and
determine
their
applicability.

#
Develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technologies
for
managing
information
collection,
validation,
disclosure,
and
maintenance.

#
Train
personnel
for
responding
to
information
collection
requirements.

#
Search
data
sources.

#
Collect
and
review
required
information.

#
Transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

EPA
will
use
the
information
collected
by
the
40
CFR
761
requirements
to
ensure
PCBs
are
managed
in
an
environmentally
safe
manner
and
that
activities
are
being
conducted
in
compliance
with
the
PCB
regulations.
Specific
uses
of
the
information
collected
include
determining
the
efficacy
of
a
disposal
technology;
evaluating
exemption
requests
and
exclusion
notices;
targeting
compliance
inspections
(
e.
g.,

determining
if
operational
criteria
for
disposal
facilities
are
being
met);
and
ensuring
adequate
storage
capacity
for
PCB
waste.
2­
1
2
NEED
FOR
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTION
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
The
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
of
this
consolidated
ICR
are
implemented
under
the
TSCA
authorities
15
USC
2605
section
6(
e).
To
meet
its
statutory
obligations,
EPA
must
obtain
sufficient
information
to
conclude
that
the
specified
activities
do
not
result
in
an
unreasonable
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.
The
regulations
are
intended
to
prevent
the
improper
handling
and
disposal
of
PCBs
and
to
minimize
the
exposure
of
human
beings
or
the
environment
to
PCBs.

To
assist
EPA
in
achieving
these
goals,
the
information
collected
by
these
requirements
will
update
the
Agency's
knowledge
of
ongoing
PCB
activities,
ensure
that
individuals
using
or
disposing
of
PCBs
are
held
accountable
for
their
activities,
and
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
PCB
regulations.
Tables
2­
1,
2­
2,

and
2­
3
(
located
at
the
end
of
this
section)
provide
specific
regulatory
citations
for
each
reporting,
third­
party
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
requirement,
respectively,
as
well
as
the
use
for
each
requirement,
which
is
provided
in
response
to
Section
2(
b)
of
this
report.
Item
numbers
and
EPA
ICR
numbers
in
the
first
column
of
the
tables
are
included
for
ease
of
reference
to
the
numerous
requirements
and
are
carried
through
to
other
sections
and
tables
throughout
this
document.

There
are,
however,
certain
PCB
requirements
that
are
exempt
from
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
(
PRA).
In
defining
"
collection
of
information,"
OMB's
PRA
regulations
explicitly
exempt
public
disclosures
where
all
the
information
required
to
be
displayed
is
supplied
by
the
government.
The
last
sentence
of
5
CFR
1320.3(
c)(
2)
states,
"
The
public
disclosure
of
information
originally
supplied
by
the
Federal
Government
to
the
recipient
for
the
purpose
of
disclosure
to
the
public
is
not
included
within
this
definition"
(
emphasis
added).
This
exemption
is
reflected
in
OMB's
February
3,
1997
draft,
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
of
1995:
Implementing
Guidance,
p.
20,
n.
88
(
giving
the
example
of
cigarettes
displaying
the
specified
Surgeon
General's
warning).

EPA's
PCB
marking
requirements
at
§
§
761.40
and
.45
supply
all
the
information
required
by
EPA
to
be
displayed
on
items
containing
PCBs,
except
for
§
§
761.45(
a)
and
.40(
j)(
2).
All
the
information
required
to
be
disclosed
for
compliance
with
these
two
provisions
is
not
provided
by
EPA,
however,
the
requirements
do
not
negate
the
above
conclusion.
2­
2
For
§
761.45(
a),
the
mark
prompts
the
recipient
to
add
information
identifying
the
name
and
telephone
number
of
a
person
to
contact
beyond
the
contact
information
already
supplied
by
EPA's
mark
itself.
(
The
mark
gives
an
emergency
800
number
at
the
U.
S.
Coast
Guard
in
case
of
accidents
or
spills,
and
states,
"
for
disposal
information
contact
the
nearest
U.
S.
EPA
office.")
However,
OMB's
PRA
regulations
state
at
5
CFR
1320.3(
h)(
1)
that
the
definition
of
"
information"
does
not
generally
include
"
affidavits,
oaths,

affirmations,
certifications,
receipts,
changes
of
address,
consents,
or
acknowledgments;
provided
that
they
entail
no
burden
other
than
that
necessary
to
identify
the
respondent,
the
date,
the
respondent's
address,
and
the
nature
of
the
instrument."
According
to
OMB's
draft
PRA
Guidance
(
p.
24),
this
exemption
"
is
to
be
used
only
to
identify
an
individual
in
a
routine,
non­
intrusive,
non­
burdensome
way."
Thus,
requiring
the
recipient
to
display
merely
the
name
and
phone
number
of
a
contact
person
falls
outside
OMB's
definition
of
"
information"
and
therefore
does
not
require
OMB
approval
or
negate
the
exemption,
under
5
CFR
1320.3(
c)(
2),
for
the
PCB
marking
requirements.

The
second
exemption
is
that
§
761.40(
j)(
2)
allows
the
use
of
marks
other
than
that
prescribed
by
EPA
at
§
761.45
for
PCB
Transformers
(
provided,
among
other
things,
that
(
i)
those
marks
were
in
use
before
August
15,
1985,
(
ii)
before
August
15,
1985,
the
primary
fire
department
accepted
the
alternative
mark,
(
iii)
the
EPA
Regional
Administrator
(
RA)
was
informed
in
writing
of
the
alternative
mark
by
October
3,
1988,
and
(
iv)
the
EPA
RA
approved
the
alternative
mark
within
30
days
of
receipt).
This
exception
applies
only
to
the
discrete
universe
of
individuals
who
were
already
using
alternative
markings
before
August
15,
1985,
and
received
EPA's
approval
to
continue
using
it.
At
that
time,
the
PRA
did
not
apply
to
Agency
requirements
that
regulated
entities
disclose
information
to
third
parties
or
the
pubic
rather
than
to
the
Agency
itself,
Dole
v.
United
Steelworkers
of
America,
110
S.
Ct.
929,
938
(
1990),
such
as
a
requirement
to
display
a
marking
on
PCB
Transformers.

There
are
three
main
types
of
possible
violations
for
these
PCB
marking
requirements:
PCB
Transformers
with
(
1)
no
labels,
(
2)
unapproved
alternative
labels,
or
(
3)
inadequate
labels
with
missing
or
incorrect
information.
Those
persons
who
fail
to
use
any
mark
and
never
submitted
an
application
for
an
alternative,
and
those
persons
who
are
using
an
unapproved
alternative
mark,
cannot
assert
the
PRA
as
an
affirmative
defense,
because
they
are
required
to
use
the
mark
specified
in
§
761.45,
which,
according
to
5
CFR
1320.3(
c)(
2)
does
not
constitute
the
collection
of
information.
2­
3
2(
b)
Use
of
the
Data
EPA
will
use
the
information
collected
by
the
40
CFR
761
requirements
to
ensure
PCBs
are
managed
in
an
environmentally
safe
manner
and
that
activities
are
conducted
in
compliance
with
the
PCB
regulations.

Tables
2­
1,
2­
2,
and
2­
3
contain
information
on
the
specific
use
of
the
data
for
each
information
collection.
2­
4
TABLE
2­
1
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e),
40
CFR
761
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
40
CFR
761
Subpart
A
 
General
1/
1001
§
761.1(
f)(
1),
(
2),
and
(
3)
Comply
with
reporting
requirements
of
Subpart
J
(
§
§
761.185
­
.187)
as
a
condition
to
be
exempt
from
the
manufacturing
ban
of
Subpart
B,
for
persons
who:
inadvertently
manufacture
or
import
PCBs
generated
as
unintentional
impurities
in
excluded
manufacturing
processes;
process,
distribute
in
commerce,
or
use
products
containing
PCBs
generated
in
excluded
manufacturing
processes;
or
process,
distribute
in
commerce,
or
use
products
containing
recycled
PCBs,
as
per
§
761.1(
f)(
1)
to
(
3).
Provide
means
for
Agency
to
verify
that
individuals
who
claim
manufacturing
exclusions
are
generating
only
allowed
quantities
of
PCBs
in
the
products
that
leave
their
manufacturing
sites.
Provide
data
used
to
establish
who
is
generating
new
PCBs,
where
these
PCBs
are
being
generated,
and
in
what
quantities.
Identify
sites
for
compliance
inspections
of
those
facilities
that
have
reported
unusually
high
amounts
of
PCBs
released
to
products,
air,
or
water.
Provide
quality
control
in
that
the
regulation
encourages
manufacturers
to
audit
their
operations,
quantify
their
PCB
releases,
and
maintain
their
particular
PCB
releases
within
prescribed
limits.
(
Also
see
#
42
&
43.)

Subpart
B
 
Use
2/
857
§
§
7
6
1
.
2
0
(
b
)
and
(
c)(
1)
and
(
3)
Submit
an
exemption
petition
as
per
TSCA
section
6(
e)(
3)
to
manufacture
(
import),
process,
or
distribute
in
commerce
(
export)
PCBs,
unless
otherwise
authorized.
Implement
statutory
mandate
that
these
activities
will
not
res
ult
in
an
unreasonable
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.
(
Also
see
#
34
and
39.)

3/
1729
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)
(
vi),
(
vii),
and
(
xv)(
D)
Register
PCB
Transformers.
(
See
Appendix
C
for
Form
7720­
12).
Provide
EPA
and
building
owners
with
key
information
about
transformer
locations.

4
§
761.30(
a)(
2)
(
v)
Obtain
EPA
approval
to
use
alternate
method
to
simulate
loaded
conditions
for
in­
service
use
of
transformers
for
reclassifying
transformers.
Provide
EPA
with
adequate
information
to
respond
to
request
for
relief
from
regulatory
requirement.
TABLE
2­
1,
continued
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e),
40
CFR
761
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
5
5/
1729
§
761.30(
i)(
1)
(
iii)(
A)(
1)
Submit
a
description,
at
the
request
of
the
RA,
of
a
natural
gas
pipeline
system
owned
or
op
erated
by
a
seller
or
distributor
of
natural
gas
that
contains
>
50
ppm
PCBs.
Keep
regions
informed
of
the
operation
of
a
natural
gas
pipeline
system
that
contains
PCBs.

6/
1729
§
761.30(
t)(
3)
Obtain
EPA
approval
for
the
use
of
PCBs
in
other
gas
or
liquid
systems.
Ensure
that
the
wide
variety
and
sometimes
rare
cases
of
PCB­
contaminated
gas
or
liquid
systems
are
identified
and
cleaned
to
<
50
ppm.

7/
1729
§
761.35(
b)
Obtain
EPA
approval
for
an
extended
storage
for
reuse
period.
Prevent
indefinite
storage
of
equipment
in
areas
not
designed,
constructed,
or
operated
in
compliance
with
toxic/
hazardous
waste
storage
requirements
(
e.
g.,
TSCA
§
761.65(
b)
or
RCRA
3004
or
3006
facilities).

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
8/
1012
§
761.60(
e),
(
i)(
2);
.70(
a),
(
b),
and
(
d);
.75(
b)(
7),
(
b)(
8)(
ii),
and
(
c)
Submit
permit
application
and,
when
applicable,
a
demo
plan
for
obtaining
approval
to
operate
a
PCB
disposal
facility
(
i.
e.,
alternative
method
of
disposal,
incinerator,
chemical
waste
landfill).
Submit
requests
for
approval
of
R&
D
for
PCB
disposal
for
persons
not
following
selfimplementing
requirements.
Determine
if
applications
meet
the
technical
and
operational
criteria
for
a
disposal
or
R&
D
facility
to
prevent
PCB
releases
into
the
environment.

9/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)
(
i)
Notify
EPA
to
obtain
an
identification
number
for
conducting
R&
D
on
PCB
disposal
activities.
(
See
Appendix
D
for
Form
7710­
53).
Ensure
EPA
is
knowledgeable
of
PCB
R&
D
activities
(
i.
e.,
a
waste
handling
activity)
to
prevent
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.
(
Also
see
#
44.)

10/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)
(
ii)
Notify
EPA
(
as
well
as
State,
and
local)
environmental
officials
of
PCB
disposal
R&
D
activities.
Keep
relevant
regional
authorities
informed
of
PCB
waste
handling
activities
in
their
area.
TABLE
2­
1,
continued
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e),
40
CFR
761
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
6
11/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
2)
Obtain
EPA's
approval
to
exceed
allowable
volume
of
PCB
material,
maximum
concentration
of
PCBs,
total
amount
of
pure
PCBs
or
duration
of
an
R&
D
activity.
Ensure
the
PCB
R&
D
disposal
activities
will
not
cause
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.

12/
1729
§
§
761.61(
a)
(
3)(
i)
and
(
ii)
Notify
EPA
(
as
well
as
State,
Tribal,
and
local)
officials
of
self­
implementing
remediation
activity,
including
a
summary
of
the
procedures
used
to
sample
contaminated
areas
and
sample
collection
and
analysis
data;
submit
additional
information
as
requested;
and
certify
that
records
of
remediation
activity
are
on
file
at
the
location
designated
in
the
certificate.
Allow
for
flexibility
in
self­
implementing
remediation
by
keeping
proper
authorities
informed
of
remediation
activities.

13/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
3)
(
ii)
Notify
EPA
of
changes
to
notification
of
selfimplementing
activities.
Allow
for
flexibility
in
self­
implementing
remediation
by
keeping
proper
authorities
informed
of
remediation
activities.

14/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
3)
(
iii)
Request
a
waiver
of
the
notification
requirement
for
conducting
cleanup
of
PCB
remediation
waste.
Allow
for
flexibility
in
self­
implementing
remediation
by
keeping
proper
authorities
informed
of
remediation
activities.

15/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
8)
(
i)(
B)
Submit
certification
to
EPA
that
the
deed
notation
required
by
§
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)(
A)
has
been
recorded.
Ensure
proper
notification
to
potential
land
owners
of
PCB
history
at
the
site.

16/
1729
§
761.61(
c)(
1)
Apply
for
risk­
based
disposal
of
PCB
remediation
wastes.
Submit
additional
information
as
requested
by
EPA.
Allow
EPA,
on
an
as­
requested
basis,
to
assess
proposed
disposal
option
and
ensure
that
it
will
not
present
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.

17/
1729
§
761.62(
c)(
1)
Obtain
approval
for
risk­
based
disposal
or
storage
of
PCB
bulk
product
waste.
Provide
additional
information
and
periodic
progress
reports,
as
requested
by
EPA.
Allow
EPA,
on
an
as­
requested
basis,
to
assess
proposed
disposal
or
storage
option
and
ensure
that
it
will
not
present
a
risk
of
injury
to
health
and
the
environment.
TABLE
2­
1,
continued
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e),
40
CFR
761
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
7
18/
1729
§
761.65(
a)(
2)
Provide
notification
that
continuing
attempts
to
dispose
of
or
secure
disposal
for
PCB
waste
within
the
1­
year
time
frame
have
been
unsuccessful,
for
which
EPA
may
grant
an
automatic
1­
year
extension.
Show
good
faith
attempts
to
secure
disposal
of
PCB
wastes.
Allow
EPA
to
evaluate
whether
the
1­
year
time
frame
for
storage
should
be
extended
and
ensure
that
appropriate
treatment
and
disposal
options
are
being
pursued.

19/
1729
§
761.65(
a)(
3)
Submit
requests
for
additional
extensions
beyond
the
initial
1­
year
extension,
including
justification
and
information
on
measures
taken
to
secure
disposal.
Ensure
that
appropriate
treatment
and
disposal
options
are
being
pursued.

20/
1729
§
761.65(
a)(
4)
Submit
request
for
modifications
to
TSCA
approval
to
allow
for
extended
storage
period.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
whether
a
facility
is
likely
to
present
an
unreasonable
risk
of
injury
as
a
result
of
being
granted
approval
to
extend
the
storage
timeframes
for
the
disposal
of
PCB
waste.

21/
1729
§
761.65(
c)(
6)
(
i)(
C)
Demonstrate
to
the
RA
and
other
appropriate
regulatory
authorities
(
i.
e.,
NRC,
DOE,
or
DOT),
that
the
use
of
other
containers
for
the
storage
of
liquid
and
non­
liquid
PCB/
radioactive
wastes
is
protective
of
health
and
the
environment.
Allow
flexibility
in
using
unique
container
designs
that
meet
the
criteria
for
containers
used
to
store
liquid
or
non­
liquid
PCB/
radioactive
waste.

22/
1446
§
7
6
1
.
6
5
(
d
)
;
(
e)(
1),
(
6),
and
(
8);
and
(
f)
Prepare
application
for
commercial
storage
approval,
including
qualifications
of
key
employees,
closure
plan,
and
closure
cost
estimate.
Commercial
storer
must
also
notify
EPA
of
facility
modification,
closure
schedule,
and
completion
of
closure
activities.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
operational
capabilities,
to
determine
whether
storers/
disposers
of
PCB
wastes
have
the
ability
to
close
their
facilities
in
a
safe
manner,
and
to
prohibit
intermediate
handlers
of
PCBs
who
are
financially
unable
to
close
their
facilities
from
becoming
potential
Superfund
sites.

23
§
761.65(
e)(
4)
Submit
a
written
request
to
the
RA
to
modify
a
storage
approval
to
amend
the
closure
plan,
when
there
are
changes
in
ownership,
changes
in
expected
dates
of
closure,
and/
or
unexpected
events.
Ensure
proper
management
of
storage
facilities.

24/
1729
§
761.65(
g)(
9)
Notify
issuing
authority
of
modifications
to
commercial
storage
facilities.
Ensure
financial
assurance
mechanism
is
adequately
funded.
TABLE
2­
1,
continued
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e),
40
CFR
761
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
8
25/
1729
§
§
761.65(
j)
Demonstrate
that
a
new
owner
of
a
commercial
storage
facility
has
established
financial
assurance
for
closure.
Submit
new
or
amended
commercial
storage
application
as
a
result
of
change
in
ownership.
Ensure
proper
management
of
storage
facilities
and
handling
of
PCB
wastes
prior
to
approving
changes
in
ownership.

26
§
§
761.70(
a)
(
8),
(
9);
and
(
d)(
5)
Obtain
approval
of
alternate
measures
when
regulatory
requirements
cannot
be
met
for
operating
a
PCB
incinerator.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
adequacy
of
alternate
procedures
for
use
at
incinerators.

27
§
§
761.70(
d)
(
8);
761.75
(
c)
(
7)
Notify
EPA
of
change
in
ownership
of
disposal
facility
(
i.
e.,
incinerators
and
landfills).
Allow
EPA
to
determine
whether
transfer
will
present
risk
of
injury
to
health
and
environment.

28/
1729
§
§
761.71(
a)(
2)
and
(
b)(
2)
Notify
EPA
prior
to
initial
use
of
high
efficiency
boiler
t
o
burn
mineral
oil
dielectric
fluid.
Seek
approval
to
burn
liquids,
other
than
mineral
oil
dielectric
fluid
in
a
HEB.
Ensure
that
the
operation
of
high
efficiency
boilers
will
not
present
a
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.

29/
1729
§
§
761.72(
c)(
2)
Notify
EPA
as
a
scrap
metal
recovery
oven
or
smelter
used
to
dispose
of
PCBs
and
comply
with
the
reporting
requirements
of
Subparts
J
and
K.
Ensure
that
the
operation
of
industrial
furnaces
will
not
present
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.
(
Also
see
#
44.)

30/
1729
§
761.72(
c)(
3)
Submit
written
request
to
RA
based
on
site­
specific
risk
assessments,
in
lieu
of
meeting
requirements
listed
in
§
761.72.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
whether
scrap
metal
recovery
oven
and/
or
smelter
operation
will
present
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.

31/
1729
§
§
761.77(
a)
(
1)(
i),(
a)(
1)(
ii)(
A)(
1)
and
(
C),
and
.77(
a)(
2)
Submit
a
notification
to
the
RA
for
coordinated
approval
and
additional
information,
as
requested
by
EPA.
Submit
an
application
for
TSCA
disposal
approval,
if
the
RA
denies
the
request
for
a
coordinated
approval
or
determines
that
the
conditions
of
the
coordinated
approval
are
not
being
met.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
whether
facilities
seeking
coordinated
approval
properly
manage
PCB
wastes
and
recognize
the
Federal
or
State
waste
management
documents
governing
the
properly
managed
facilities,
thus
contributing
to
more
efficient
use
of
limited
resources.
TABLE
2­
1,
continued
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e),
40
CFR
761
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
9
32/
1729
§
761.77(
a)(
3)
Notify
EPA
of
changes
in
waste
management
requirements
in
the
non­
TSCA
waste
management
document
used
to
obtain
TSCA
PCB
coordinated
approvals.
Ensure
the
proper
handling
of
PCB
wastes.

33/
1729
§
§
761.79(
h)
Submit
requests
for
approvals
of
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
decontamination
or
sampling
methods,
for
any
person
decontaminating
porous
surfaces
other
than
concrete,
as
per
paragraph
(
b)(
4),
or
non­
porous
surfaces
covered
with
a
porous
surface,
as
per
paragraph
(
b)(
3)
or
(
c)(
6),
and/
or
by
using
a
self­
implementing
procedures
other
than
prescribed
in
paragraph
(
c).
EPA
may
request
additional
information.
Allow
EPA,
on
an
as­
requested
basis,
to
ensure
that
decontamination
methods
will
not
pose
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.

Subpart
E
 
Exemptions
34/
857
1729
§
§
761.80(
e)(
1)
and
(
i)(
1)
Submit
petition
to
qualify
for
the
class
exemptions
for
manufacturing
PCBs
for
disposal
R&
D
and
for
the
manufacture,
import,
processing,
distribution,
and
export
of
PCBs
and
analytical
reference
samples
derived
from
PCB
waste
for
R&
D.
Allow
EPA,
on
an
as­
requested
basis,
to
assess
whether
a
facility
meets
the
criteria
for
being
granted
an
exemption.
Minimize
negative
impacts
from
the
relatively
time­
consuming
statutory
process
for
individual
companies
seeking
an
exemption
from
the
prohibition
on
manufacturing,
processing,
and
distributing
in
commerce
of
PCBs.
[
Statutory
requirement]
(
Also
see
#
2
and
39).

35/
857
1729
§
761.80(
e),
(
i)(
2)
and
(
n)
Submit
requests
for
renewal
of
the
class
exemptions.
Allow
EPA,
on
an
as­
requested
basis,
to
ensure
that
facility
operations
will
not
pose
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.

36/
1729
§
§
761.80(
e)
(
3),
(
g)(
2),
and
(
i)(
4)
Obtain
approval
from
EPA
to
exceed
limits
of
the
exemption.
Allow
EPA,
on
an
as­
requested
basis,
to
ensure
that
facility
operations
will
not
pose
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.

37/
1729
§
761.80(
e)(
4)
Notify
EPA
before
beginning
R&
D
activities
that
include
the
manufacture
of
PCBs.
Ensure
that
facility
operation
will
not
pose
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.
TABLE
2­
1,
continued
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e),
40
CFR
761
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
10
38
§
761.80(
n)
Submit
a
petition
for
certain
exemptions
to
address
increases
in
the
amount
of
PCBs
to
be
processed
and
distributed,
imported
(
manufactured),
or
exported,
or
changes
in
the
manner
of
processing
and
distributing,
importing
(
manufacturing),
or
exporting
PCBs.
Allow
EPA,
on
an
as­
requested
basis,
to
ensure
that
facility
operations
will
not
pose
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.

Subpart
F
 
Transboundary
Shipments
of
PCBs
for
Disposal
39/
1729
§
§
761.93(
a)
and
.97(
a)
Submit
an
exemption
petition
as
per
TSCA
section
6(
e)(
3)
to
import
PCBs
or
PCB
Items
for
disposal.
Allow
EPA,
on
an
as­
requested
basis,
to
ensure
that
the
import
and
export
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
will
not
pose
a
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.
[
Required
by
Statute.]
(
See
#
2.)

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
40/
1729
§
761.125(
a)(
1)
(
i)
to
(
iii)
Report
certain
spills
of
PCBs
to
EPA.
Request
guidance
from
the
RA
in
completing
statistical
sampling
of
the
spill
area
to
establish
spill
boundaries,
where
there
are
no
visible
traces
of
contamination.
Make
reporting
consistent
with
CERCLA
requirements
and
facilitate
cleanup
of
PCBs,
to
prevent
exposure
to
PCBs.

Subpart
J
 
General
Records
and
Reports
41/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.180(
b)
(
3)
and
(
c)(
5)
Submit
annual
reports
for
the
operation
of
PCB
incinerators,
chemical
waste
landfills,
high
efficiency
boilers,
and
commercial
storage
facilities,
including
facilities
that
dispose
of
the
PCB
wastes
they
generate.
Report
suspension
of
operations.
Fill
gaps
in
EPA's
knowledge
of
how
PCB
wastes
are
being
handled
and
allow
the
Agency
to
respond
to
public
and
Congressional
inquiries.
Enable
EPA
to
more
effectively
target
disposal
facilities
for
inspection
and
compliance
monitoring.

42/
1001
§
§
761.185
Notify
EPA
and
certify
low
level
PCB
product
contamination
to
be
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
Subpart
B,
regarding
processes
inadvertently
generating
PCBs
and
imports
of
products
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs.
Certification
must
be
repeated
if
the
previous
certification
is
no
longer
valid.
Ensure
products
do
not
reach
U.
S.
markets
with
unacceptably
high
levels
of
PCBs.
TABLE
2­
1,
continued
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e),
40
CFR
761
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
11
43
§
761.187
Notify
EPA
when
PCB
releases
exceed
limits,
to
be
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
Subpart
B,
for
products,
manufactured
or
imported
with
inadvertently
generated
PCBs.
Ensure
that
facility
operations
will
not
pose
risk
of
injury
to
health/
environment.

Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
44/
1446
§
§
761.202(
a);
205(
a)
to
(
c)
Notify
EPA
of
waste
handling
activities,
for
generators,
commercial
storers
,
transporters,
or
disposers
of
PCB
waste.
Inform
EPA
of
generators,
storers,
transporters,
and
disposers
of
PCB
waste
so
that
the
Agency
can
ensure
compliance
with
applicable
regulations.

45/
1729
§
761.205(
f)
Report
changes
in
notifications
previously
submitted
by
PCB
waste
handlers
(
i.
e.,
amended
notification).
Ensure
that
PCB
waste
handlers
are
operating
within
the
proper
criteria.

46/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.208(
a)
(
4)
and
.215(
b)
to
(
d)
Submit
Exception
Reports
to
EPA
when
PCB
waste
generators,
disposers,
and/
or
commercial
storers
do
not
receive
confirmation
that
a
shipment
of
a
PCB
waste
has
been
properly
disposed
of.
Track
the
movement
of
PCB
waste
to
ensure
they
arrive
at
intended
storage
or
disposal
site.

47/
1446
§
761.210(
b)
Submit
Discrepancy
Reports
and
copies
of
manifests
to
EPA
when
the
PCB
waste
received
by
a
disposer
is
significantly
different
from
the
description
on
the
manifest
that
accompanies
it,
and
the
discrepancy
is
not
resolved
within
15
days
after
receiving
the
PCB
waste.
Enable
EPA
to
investigate
potential
violations
and
prevent
further
environmental
contamination.
Target
companies
for
inspection.

48
§
§
761.211(
b)
Notify
RA
of
unmanifested
PCB
waste,
for
owners/
operators
of
commercial
storage
facilities
who
cannot
contact
the
generator
of
the
PCB
waste.
Enable
EPA
to
investigate
potential
violations
and
prevent
further
environmental
contamination.
Target
companies
for
inspection.
TABLE
2­
1,
continued
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e),
40
CFR
761
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
12
49/
1446
§
761.211(
c)
Submit
Unmanifested
Waste
Reports
(
e.
g.,
waste
description,
volume,
disposition;
date
received;
ID
#
s
of
waste
handlers
for
that
waste)
to
EPA
when
disposers
accept
a
shipment
of
PCB
waste
without
an
accompanying
manifest.
Enable
EPA
to
investigate
potential
violations
and
prevent
further
environmental
contamination.
Target
companies
for
inspection.

Subpart
T
 
Comparison
Study
for
Validating
a
New
Performance­
Based
Decontamination
Solvent
under
§
761.79(
d)(
4)

50
§
§
761.395
and
398(
a)
Submit
results
of
analysis
and
validation
study
to
the
Director,
National
Program
Chemicals
Division
(
NPCD).
Allow
EPA
to
confirm
and
publish
findings
in
the
Federal
Register
of
new
decontamination
procedures.
2­
13
TABLE
2­
2
THIRD­
PARTY
NOTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
40
CFR
761
Subpart
B
 
Use
51
§
§
761.20(
e)(
3)
(
ii);.
30(
i)(
5)
(
ii);
and
.60(
b)
(
5)(
iv)(
B)
Burner
of
used
oil
must
provide
a
1­
time
certification
to
the
marketer
that
he
is
in
compliance
with
notification
requirement
at
§
761.71(
a)(
2).
Limits
distribution
of
used
oil
containing
PCBs
to
authorized
burners.

52/
1000,
1729
§
§
761.30(
a)
(
1)(
xi)
and
(
xv)(
A);
30(
h)(
1)
(
ii)(
B)
Report
PCB
Transformers
and
Voltage
Regulator
fire
incidents
to
the
NRC.
Provide
Federal
officials
with
notice
of
individual
and
the
environmental
exposure
to
PCBs.

53
§
761.30(
a)(
1)
(
xiv)
Notify
owner
of
PCB
Transformer
that
equipment
may
pose
risk
of
exposure
to
food
or
feed.
Allow
determination
to
be
made
regarding
risk
of
exposure
to
food
and
feed.

54
§
761.30(
a)(
1)
(
xv)(
D)
Register
PCB
Transformers
with
the
building
owner
within
30
days
of
discovery
Provide
local
notice
of
the
existence
of
PCBs.

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
55/
1729
§
761.60(
a)(
3)
(
ii)
Provide
information
to
chemical
waste
landfills
that
liquids
do
not
exceed
500
ppm
and
are
not
ignitable.
Prevent
release
of
PCBs
and
provide
flexibility
in
disposal
options
for
incidental
liquids,
making
the
rule
consistent
with
RCRA
land
ban
restrictions.

56/
1729
§
761.60(
b)(
5)
(
i)(
A)(
1)
Include
abandoned
natural
gas
pipes
that
contain
PCBs
in
public
service
notification
programs.
Prevent
exposure
to
PCBs.

57/
1446
§
761.60(
f)(
1)
(
i)
Provide
State
and
local
officials
with
notification
prior
to
the
first
use
of
an
approved
chemical
waste
landfill,
incinerator,
or
alternate
PCB
disposal
technology.
Inform
relevant
authorities
of
the
operation
of
a
PCB
disposal
facility
in
their
region.
TABLE
2­
2,
continued
THIRD­
PARTY
NOTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
14
58
§
761.60(
f)(
1)
(
ii)
Provide
annual
notice
of
the
quantities
and
general
description
of
the
PCBs
disposed
of
during
the
year,
at
the
request
of
any
State
or
local
government.
Keep
relevant
authorities
informed
of
PCB
activities
in
their
region.

59/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)
(
ii)
Notify
State,
and
local
environmental
officials
(
as
well
as
EPA)
of
PCB
disposal
R&
D
activities.
Keep
relevant
regional
authorities
informed
of
PCB
waste
handling
activities
in
their
area.

60
§
761.60(
j)(
1)
(
vii)
Manifest,
pursuant
to
Subpart
K,
all
PCB
wastes
that
are
generated
by
R&
D
on
PCB
disposal
and
transported
from
the
R&
D
facility
to
a
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility,
unless
the
residuals
or
unused
samples
are
returned
to
the
site
of
generation.
Ensure
proper
handling
and
disposal
of
PCB
wastes.

61/
1729
§
§
761.61(
a)
(
3)(
i)
Notify
State,
and
local
environmental
officials
(
as
well
as
EPA)
of
self­
implementing
remediation
activity.
Allow
for
flexibility
in
self­
implementing
remediation
by
keeping
proper
authorities
informed
of
remediation
activities.

62/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
5)
(
i)(
B)(
2)(
iv)
Notify
offsite
non­
TSCA
facility
of
pending
shipment
of
remediation
waste.
Ensure
proper
handling
of
PCB
wastes.

63/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
8)
(
i)(
A)
Attach
a
notation
to
the
deed
for
property
at
which
remediation
projects
require
a
permanent
fence
or
cap.
Ensure
potential
buyer
is
aware
property
is
site
of
PCB
remediation.

64/
1729
§
§
761.62(
b)
(
4)(
i)
and
(
ii)
Provide
notification
to
a
receiving
facility
that
does
not
have
a
commercial
PCB
storage
or
disposal
approval
before
the
first
shipment
of
a
PCB
bulk
product
wast
e
stream.
In
addition,
for
certain
waste
this
notice
must
be
provided
with
each
shipment
thereafter.
Ensure
proper
storage
and
disposal
for
PCB
bulk
product
waste.
(
See
also
§
§
761.357
and
761.359.)

65
§
761.65(
c)(
1)
and
(
8)
Attach
a
notation
to
a
PCB
Item
or
PCB
Container
containing
the
item
indicating
the
date
the
Item
was
removed
from
service.
Facilitate
the
proper
storage
and
disposal
of
PCB
Items
and
Containers.
TABLE
2­
2,
continued
THIRD­
PARTY
NOTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTED
DATA:
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
15
66/
1446
§
761.65(
i)(
3)
Send
information
regarding
the
sample
collector,
the
lab,
date
of
shipment,
quantity,
and
description
of
sample,
when
sending
PCB
samples
to
a
laboratory
for
testing.
Inform
workers
of
appropriate
contact
information
to
ensure
proper
handling
of
PCBs.

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
67/
1729
§
761.125(
a)(
1)
Report
certain
spills
of
PCBs
to
the
NRC.
Make
reporting
consistent
with
CERCLA
requirements
and
facilitate
cleanup
of
PCBs,
to
prevent
exposure
to
PCBs.

68
§
761.125(
c)
(
2)(
ii)
Place
label
or
notice
of
PCB
contamination
at
cleanup
site.
Inform
personnel
of
presence
of
low
level
PCB
contamination.

Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
69/
1446
§
§
761.207(
a)
and
.208(
a)(
2)
and
(
3)
Prepare
manifests
and
provide
generator­
initiated
manifests
of
PCB
waste
to
each
transporter
or
designated
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility.
Ensure
proper
tracking
of
PCB
waste
shipments.

70/
1446
§
§
761.208(
c)
(
1)(
iv)
and
(
c)(
2)(
iv)
Storer
or
disposer
send
a
copy
of
the
manifest
or
shipping
paper
to
the
generator.
Ensure
proper
tracking
of
PCB
waste
shipments.

71/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.218(
a)
and
(
b)
Send
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
generators
of
PCB
waste
when
disposal
of
each
item
is
complete
for
a
manifested
PCB
waste
shipment.
Enable
generators
to
confirm
that
each
PCB
Item
in
a
shipment
has
been
disposed
of
legally.
Assure
generator
that
the
PCB
waste
has
been
disposed
of
and
is
in
the
final
step
of
the
cradle­
to­
grave
monitoring
of
PCB
waste.
2­
16
TABLE
2­
3
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
DATA:
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
40
CFR
761
Subpart
A
 
General
72/
1001
§
761.1(
f)
Comply
with
recordkeeping
requirements
of
Subpart
J
(
§
761.185
­
.193)
as
a
condition
of
the
exclusion
from
the
manufacturing,
processing,
distribution
in
commerce,
and
use
bans
of
Subpart
B,
for
persons
who
inadvertently
manufacture
or
import
PCBs
generated
as
unintentional
impurities
in
excluded
manufacturing
processes,
or
generate
PCBs
in
excluded
manufacturing
process
or
products
with
recycled
PCBs,
as
defined
in
§
761.3.
Provide
quality
control
that
encourages
manufacturers
to
audit
their
operations,
to
quantify
their
PCB
releases,
and
to
maintain
their
particular
PCB
releases
within
the
limits
that
will
assure
that
they
have
generated
only
trace
amounts
of
PCBs.
(
See
#
100.)

Subpart
B
 
Manufacturing,
Processing,
Distribution
in
Commerce,
and
Use
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
73/
1729
§
§
761.20(
e)
(
4)(
i)
and
(
ii);
.30(
i)(
5)(
ii);
and
.60(
b)(
5)(
iv)
(
B)
Marketer
who
first
claims
used
oil
does
not
contain
detectable
PCBs
must
retain
records
supporting
the
claim
and
a
copy
of
each
certification
notice
received
or
prepared
relating
to
transactions
involving
PCBcontaining
used
oil.
Burners
must
include
among
the
records
a
copy
of
each
certification
notice
that
has
been
provided
to
a
marketer
of
PCB­
containing
used
oil.
Allow
EPA
to
verify
compliance
with
the
used
oil
provisions.

74/
1000,
1729
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)
(
xii)
and
(
xiv)
Maintain
records
of
inspection
and
maintenance
history
for
at
least
3
years
after
the
disposal
of
a
PCB
Transformer,
including
records
of
registration,
as
per
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)(
C).
Allow
EPA
to
verify
compliance
with
the
regulations
and
that
PCB
equipment
was
registered.

75/
1446
§
§
761.30(
a)
(
2)(
v),
.30(
h)(
2)(
vi)
and
.180(
a)
Maintain
records
at
the
facility
where
electrical
transformers
and
voltage
regulators
have
been
reclassified
to
a
lower
PCB
concentration.
Assist
EPA
in
tracking
the
ultimate
disposition
of
PCB
equipment.
TABLE
2­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
DATA:
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
17
76/
1729
§
§
761.30(
i)(
1)
(
iii)(
B)
and
(
C).
Keep
records
of
data
collected
on
natural
gas
pipeline
systems
that
do
not
include
sources
of
PCB
contamination
(
e.
g.,
natural
gas
compressors,
natural
gas
scrubbers,
and
natural
gas
filters)
but
contain
$
50
ppm
PCB.
Retain
data
and
records
of
actions
taken
to
reduce
PCB
contamination
by
owners
or
operators
of
natural
gas
pipeline
systems.
Be
able
to
demonstrate
the
reduction
of
PCB
levels
in
a
natural
gas
pipeline
system.

77/
1729
§
761.35(
a)(
2)
Keep
records
of
equipment
stored
for
reuse.
Ensure
the
proper
handling
of
equipment
stored
for
reuse.

Subpart
C
 
Marking
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
78/
1729
§
761.40(
c)(
2)
(
ii)
and
(
k)
Keep
records
of
the
protected
location
of
PCB
Large
Low
and
High
Voltage
Capacitors,
in
lieu
of
marking.
Have
information
available
for
preventing
exposure
to
PCBs
and
allow
flexibility
in
compliance
with
marking
requirement.

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
79/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)
(
ix)
Keep
records
of
R&
D
for
disposal
activities.
Have
information
ensuring
the
proper
management
of
R&
D
for
disposal
activities.
TABLE
2­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
DATA:
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
18
80/
1729
§
§
761.61(
a)
(
3)(
i)(
E);
and
(
a)(
6)
Retain
records
of
the
sampling
plans,
sample
collection
procedures,
sample
preparation
procedures,
extraction
procedures,
and
instrumental/
chemical
analysis
procedures
used
to
assess
or
characterize
the
PCB
contamination
at
the
cleanup
site,
and
certification
that
these
records
are
on
file
at
the
location
designated
in
the
certificate.
Keep
records
of
comparison
studies
for
any
alternate
method
used
that
meet
or
exceed
the
requirements
of
§
761.326.
Keep
records
of
sampling
and
sample
analysis
to
verify
cleanup
and
on­
site
disposal
of
bulk
PCB
remediation
wastes
and
porous
surfaces,
as
per
Subpart
O,
§
761.295.
Allow
EPA
inspectors
to
ensure
the
proper
operation
of
PCB
remediation
activities.
(
See
also
§
§
761.295.)

81/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
3)
(
iii)
Retain
the
original
written
waiver
of
the
30­
day
notification
requirement
for
conducting
a
cleanup
activity
of
PCB
remediation
waste.
Allow
EPA
to
track
administrative
decisions
regarding
self­
implementing
remediation
projects.

82/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
9)
Keep
records
in
accordance
with
§
761.125(
c)(
5)
for
(
a)(
3),
(
a)(
4),
and
(
a)(
5)
of
this
part.
Ensure
that
a
remediation
site
has
been
properly
decontaminated.
(
See
#
97.)

83/
1729
§
761.62(
b)(
5)
Maintain
a
written
record
of
all
sampling
and
analysis
of
PCBs
or
notifications
made
under
this
part
for
3
years
from
the
date
of
its
creation
and
make
available
to
EPA
upon
request.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
whether
PCB
bulk
product
wastes
are
properly
handled.

84/
1729
§
§
761.65(
a)
(
2)(
ii)
and
(
a)(
3)
Keep
a
written
record
of
attempts
to
secure
disposal
capacity.
If
requested,
keep
records
of
PCB
wastes
stored
beyond
the
1­
year
storage
extension.
Ensure
that
PCB
wastes
stored
beyond
the
1­
year
storage
extension
do
not
pose
unreasonable
risk
of
injury
to
health
and
the
environment.
TABLE
2­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
DATA:
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
19
85/
1729
§
761.65(
c)(
1)
(
iv)
Prepare/
modify
Spill
Prevention,
Control,
and
Countermeasure
Plans
to
address
liquid
PCBs
>
500
ppm,
to
be
able
to
temporarily
store
PCB
Containers
containing
liquid
PCBs
in
areas
that
do
not
comply
with
the
storage
requirements
of
§
761.65.
Ensure
that
adequate
remediation
measures
have
been
defined
and
can
be
taken
to
avoid
exposure
to
PCBs
in
the
event
of
a
PCB
spill.

86
§
761.65(
c)(
7)
(
ii)
Prepare
a
Spill
Prevention,
Control,
and
Countermeasure
Plan
(
SPCC)
when
using
large
stationary
storage
containers,
as
per
29
CFR
1910.106,
for
liquid
PCBs.
Ensure
that
adequate
remediation
measures
have
been
defined
and
can
be
taken
to
avoid
exposure
to
PCBs
in
the
event
of
a
PCB
spill.

87/
1729
§
761.65(
c)(
8)
Keep
records
of
the
quantity
and
the
date
of
each
batch
added
to
the
stationary
storage
container.
Allow
EPA
to
monitor
content
of
stationery
storage
containers.

88
§
§
761.65(
c)
(
10)
Establish
and
maintain
records
as
per
§
761.180
for
the
storage
and
disposal
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
$
50
ppm.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
whether
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
are
being
properly
stored
for
disposal.
(
See
#
99.)

89
§
§
761.70(
a)
(
3),
(
4)
and
(
7);
(
c);
and
761.180(
c)
Maintain
for
incinerators
records
of
quantities,
feed
rates,
temperatures,
combustion
products,
and
operations,
and
special
records,
as
per
§
761.180(
c).
Allow
monitoring
of
incinerator
operations.

90/
1729
§
§
761.71(
a)
(
1)(
vi)
and
(
vii),
(
a)(
4),
(
b)(
1)(
vi­
vii),
and
(
b)(
5);
and
.180(
e)
Record
feed
rate,
carbon
dioxide
emissions,
the
quantity
of
low
concentration
PCB
liquid
burned
in
a
high
efficiency
boiler
each
month,
and
the
analysis
of
the
waste
burned
in
high
efficiency
boilers
and
retain
the
records
for
5
years.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
whether
a
high
efficiency
boiler
has
operated
according
to
the
required
specifications.

91/
1729
§
761.72(
a)(
9)
and
(
b)(
6)
Record
and
retain
records
of
temperature
readings
from
scrap
metal
recovery
ovens.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
whether
scrap
metal
recovery
ovens
and
smelters
are
operated
according
to
the
required
specifications.
TABLE
2­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
DATA:
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
20
92
§
§
761.75(
b)
(
6)(
iii)
and
(
b)(
8)(
iv);
761.180(
d)
Maintain
records
for
all
PCB
disposal
operations
at
chemical
waste
landfills,
including
PCB
concentration
in
liquid
wastes,
the
three­
dimensional
burial
coordinates
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items,
water
sampling
and
analysis,
and
additional
records
as
required
in
§
761.180.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
whether
disposal
facilities
are
operating
in
compliance
with
regulatory
requirements.

93/
1729
§
761.79(
d)(
4)
and
Subpart
T
Retain
test/
validation
results
of
performance­
based
organic
decontamination
fluids
(
PODFs)
and
verified
aqueous
decontamination
fluids
(
VADFs).
Allow
EPA
to
ensure
that
a
decontamination
activity
used
proper
decontamination
fluids.

94/
1729
§
§
761.79(
f)(
1)
and
(
2)
Keep
records
for
3
years
of
confirmatory
sampling
and
sampling
locations/
results
for
decontamination
activities
and
compliance
with
self­
implementing
procedures.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
whether
a
decontamination
activity
was
properly
implemented.

Subpart
E
 
Exemptions
95/
1729
§
§
761.80(
e)
(
5)
and
(
i)(
7)
Keep
records
of
activities
associated
with
manufacture/
processing/
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs
or
PCB
reference
samples
derived
from
waste
materials
for
R&
D;
retain
records
for
3
years
after
operations
cease.
Ensure
accountability
for
PCB
activities
otherwise
banned
by
statute.

96
§
761.80(
g)(
1)
Keep
records
of
activities
associated
with
the
processing
and
distribution
in
commerce
of
small
quantities
of
PCBs
for
R&
D.
Ensure
accountability
for
PCB
activities
otherwise
banned
by
statute.

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
97
§
§
761.125(
b)
(
3)
and
(
c)(
5);
.61(
a)(
9)
Maintain
records
of
cleanup
and
certification
of
decontamination
for
5
years,
for
low­
and
highconcentration
spills.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
compliance
with
requirements
and
pursue
enforcement
actions,
when
appropriate.
TABLE
2­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
DATA:
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
21
98
§
761.125(
c)
(
1)
Maintain
records
documenting
delay
in
spill
cleanup
activities
and
areas
of
visible
contamination.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
compliance
with
requirements
and
pursue
enforcement
action,
when
appropriate.

Subpart
J
 
General
Records
and
Reports
99/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.180(
a),
(
a)(
4),
(
b)
and
(
f);
761.65(
c)
(
5)
Maintain
annual
records
and
written
annual
document
log
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
for
5
years
after
facility
ceases,
including
signed
manifests,
Certificates
of
Disposal,
records
of
inspections
and
cleanups,
facility
and
Item
identification
information,
total
number
of
Items,
telephone
records,
and
PCB
Item
transfer
information,
for
owners/
operators
of
storage
and
disposal
facilities.
Collect
and
maintain
documents,
correspondence,
and
data
pertaining
to
storage/
disposal
of
PCBs
that
have
been
provided
to
as
well
as
received
from
any
State
or
local
government
agency
and
any
application/
correspondence
submitted
to
local,
State,
or
Federal
permitting
authorities.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
compliance
with
requirements
and
pursue
enforcement
action,
when
appropriate.

100/
1001
§
§
761.185(
c)
(
2),
(
d)
and
.193
(
a)
and
(
b)
Maintain
theoretical
analysis
or
monitoring
records
by
persons
who
import,
manufacture,
process,
distribute
in
commerce,
or
use
products
containing
inadvertently
generated
or
recycled
PCBs,
pursuant
to
§
761.1(
f)(
1)
to
(
3).
Maintain
letter
certifying
compliance
with
§
761.1(
f),
for
excluded
manufacturing
processes.
Allow
EPA
to
ensure
the
proper
management
of
PCB
activities.
TABLE
2­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
AUTHORIZED
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
AND
USE
OF
THE
DATA:
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
2(
a)
and
2(
b)

Ref/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
2(
b)
Use
of
Collected
Information
2­
22
101/
1446
§
§
761.208
and
.209
File
and
maintain
manifests
initiated
or
received
by
a
PCB
waste
handling
facility
(
i.
e.,
generators,
transporters,
commercial
storers
and
disposers)
and
maintain
records
of
all
telephone
and
other
conversations
regarding
manifest
communications,
which
are
to
be
included
in
the
annual
log
in
accordance
with
§
761.180.
Provide
a
record
of
the
fate
of
each
waste
shipment
sent
to
a
disposal
site,
allowing
EPA
to
determine
if
a
waste
had
been
properly
or
improperly
disposed.

102/
1446
§
761.218(
c)
Maintain
a
copy
of
each
Certificate
of
Disposal
received
from
disposers,
for
generators
and
commercial
storers
of
PCB
waste.
Provide
a
record
of
the
disposal
of
a
waste
shipment,
allowing
EPA
to
determine
if
a
waste
has
been
properly
or
improperly
disposed.

Subpart
T
 
Comparison
Study
for
Validating
a
New
Performance­
Based
Decontamination
Solvent
under
§
761.79(
d)(
4)

103/
1729
§
761.398(
c)
Record
testing
parameters
and
experimental
conditions
in
standard
operating
procedures
(
SOP).
Results
of
validation
study
are
to
be
affixed
as
an
appendix.
Allow
EPA
to
assess
compliance
with
requirements
and
pursue
enforcement
action,
when
appropriate.
3­
1
3
NON­
DUPLICATION,
CONSULTATIONS,
AND
OTHER
COLLECTION
CRITERIA
3(
a)
Non­
Duplication
TSCA
section
6(
e)
assigns
the
responsibility
for
regulating
the
manufacture,
processing,
distribution
in
commerce,
use,
storage,
and
disposal
of
PCBs
to
the
EPA
administrator.
All
of
the
information
requested
under
this
ICR
is
required
by
the
statute
and
the
implementing
regulations
at
40
CFR
761
and
is
not
available
from
other
sources.
The
information
collection
requirements
addressed
in
these
ICRs
are
not
duplicative
of
any
other
Federal
agency
legislation.
No
other
Federal
agency
requires
respondents
to
report
or
maintain
information
on
the
manufacturing,
processing,
or
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs.

For
example,
the
notification
and
recordkeeping
requirements
of
§
§
761.185,
.187,
and
.193
(
ICR
1001),
comprise
the
sole
source
of
information
EPA
relies
on
to
identify
the
manufacturing
sites
that
inadvertently
manufacture
PCBs,
for
example,
and
to
verify
that
the
members
who
have
certified
their
eligibility
for
the
exclusion
are
not
exceeding
the
prescribed
limits
on
PCB
releases.
Over
time,
reviewers
of
the
PCB
ICRs
have
suggested
that
the
TSCA
PCB
requirements
are
duplicative
of
TSCA
inventory
Form
U
reports,
EPCRA
Tier
I
and
II
reports,
and
Customs
records
that
presumably
could
be
used
by
EPA
to
identify
a
product's
PCB
concentration
(
§
§
761.185
and
.187);
that
RCRA,
CWA,
CAA,
and
CERCLA
could
be
used
by
EPA
to
address
air
and
water
emissions
and
process
waste
concerns
(
§
761.187);
and
that
EPCRA
reporting
requirements
could
be
used
by
EPA
to
identify
locations
of
PCB
Transformers
and
PCB
releases
(
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)
and
.187).
However,
none
of
these
requirements
begin
to
address
the
concerns
that
are
being
tracked
under
the
TSCA
PCB
regulations.
For
example,
Customs
records
collect
information
on
importation
(
i.
e.,
chemical
products,
points
of
entry,
and
quantities,
not
products
with
de
minimis
levels
of
PCBs).
The
EPCRA
and
TSCA
inventory
reports
do
not
gather
information
at
the
levels
that
would
be
useful
under
the
PCB
regulations
(
i.
e.,
triggers
under
those
provisions
measure
releases
of
10,000
pounds
of
hazardous
substances
or
500
pounds
of
extremely
hazardous
substances
versus
the
TSCA
PCB
trigger
of
annual
emissions
exceeding
10
pounds).
Finally,
the
RCRA,
CWA,
CAA,
and
CERCLA
provisions
cannot
be
used
to
monitor
PCB
concentrations
in
consumer
products
or
to
prescribe
disposal
procedures
for
PCBs.
3­
2
3(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
In
proposing
to
renew
this
ICR,
EPA
provided
a
60­
day
public
notice
and
comment
period
that
ended
on
March
10,
2000
(
65
FR
1366,
January
10,
2000).
EPA
received
no
comments
during
the
comment
period.

3(
c)
Consultations
On
numerous
occasions
during
the
course
of
regulating
PCBs,
the
Agency
has
consulted
with
the
regulated
community
and
the
public.
These
consultations
have
been
held
directly
with
industry
officials
and,

on
an
ongoing
basis,
with
owners
and
operators
of
regulated
facilities,
during
EPA
enforcement
activities
and
facility
inspections.
For
example,
when
developing
the
rules
pertaining
to
PCB
Transformer
use
(
ICR
1000),

EPA
consulted
with
the
Department
of
Agriculture,
U.
S.
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services,
and
the
Small
Business
Administration.
To
obtain
information
on
the
numbers
of
transformers
subject
to
the
requirements,
EPA
consulted
with
the
Edison
Electric
Institute,
Equitable
Life
Assurance,
and
the
Building
Owners
and
Managers
Association.
As
a
result
of
the
promulgated
Electrical
Equipment
Use
Rule,
EPA
has
consulted
with
various
organizations
and
agencies
on
an
ongoing
basis.
EPA
also
meets
annually
with
representatives
from
more
than
50
utilities
and
electric
cooperatives
who
have
verified
the
burden
estimates
related
to
inspection
recordkeeping
requirements
for
PCB
Transformers.

For
the
Final
PCB
Disposal
Rule
promulgated
June
29,
1998
(
63
FR
35384),
covered
by
ICR
1729,

the
Agency
has
consulted
with
the
regulated
community
and
the
public
on
all
aspects
of
the
rulemaking.
In
addition,
informal
meetings
were
held
with
the
American
Gas
Association
(
AGA),
Interstate
Natural
Gas
Association
of
America
(
INGAA),
Utilities
Solid
Waste
Activities
Group
(
USWAG),
and
the
Environmental
Technology
Council
(
ETC).
Interagency
meetings
conducted
jointly
by
OMB
and
EPA
regarding
the
provisions
of
this
rule
were
attended
by
several
Federal
agencies,
including
the
Department
of
Defense
(
DOD),
the
Department
of
Energy
(
DOE),
the
Department
of
Transportation
(
DOT),
and
the
Tennessee
Valley
Authority
(
TVA).
3­
3
For
this
Consolidated
ICR,
a
small­
scale
data
gathering
effort
was
conducted
to
update
burdens,

costs,
and
numbers
of
respondents
for
the
information
collection
requirements
and
to
develop
estimates
for
activities
not
reflected
in
any
of
the
existing
ICRs.
Some
of
these
limited
surveys
were
conducted
only
for
those
requirements
for
which
a
basis
for
projecting
burdens
did
not
exist.
That
is,
data
were
not
gathered
for
items
that
are
similar
to
requirements
and
associated
estimates
already
contained
in
any
of
the
original
ICRs.

The
small­
scale
surveys
covered
nine
or
fewer
organizations,
associations,
or
individuals
per
unique
requirements.
The
responses
were
compiled
and
analyzed
to
ensure
that
the
data
were
reliable
and
representative
of
the
information
sources.
This
analysis
was
performed
within
the
context
of
the
limitations
mentioned
above.
It
is
noted
that
the
responses
regarding
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burdens
are
variable.

Appendix
E
contains
a
copy
of
the
Data
Gathering
Report
for
the
Consolidated
ICR
Supporting
Statement
Covering
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
761,
which
summarizes
the
findings
of
the
small­
scale
surveys,
suggests
estimates
for
revised
burdens,
costs,
and
number
of
respondents,
and
includes
a
complete
list
of
sources.

3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
EPA
has
judged
that
the
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
of
these
ICRs
are
the
minimum
amount
necessary
to
prevent
injury
to
health
and
the
environment.
These
requirements
ensure
adequate
oversight
by
EPA
over
the
use
of
PCBs
and
PCB
equipment
and
the
storage
and
disposal
of
PCB
wastes.

If
these
activities
were
conducted
less
frequently,
the
mismanagement
and
improper
storage
and
disposal
of
PCBs
would
likely
cause
subsequent
environmental
contamination.

There
are
several
examples
of
one­
time
PCB
information
collection
requirements.
One
example
is
the
notification
and
certifications
requirements
of
§
761.185
(
ICR
1001),
which
are
supported
by
relevant
sampling
data
or
by
theoretical
analysis.
Only
when
processes
are
modified
are
importers
and
manufacturers
required
to
renotify.
The
notification
requirements
regarding
installation
of
PCB
Transformers
in
emergency
situations,
and
for
owners
who
elect
not
to
install
enhanced
electrical
protection
on
lower
voltage
secondary
transformers
were
one­
time
notifications
that
were
to
be
completed
by
October
1,
1990.
Another
example
are
the
reports
on
total
PCB
releases
of
§
761.187
which
need
only
be
submitted
if
the
PCB
levels
in
the
products
exceed
the
specified
annual
average
of
25
ppm,
or
when
releases
to
air
and
water
exceed
the
regulatory
thresholds.
Also,
EPA
requires
one­
time
notifications
for
owners
to
register
their
PCB
3­
4
Transformers
(
see
EPA
Form
7720­
12,
PCB
Transformer
Registrations
at
Appendix
C)
and
for
individuals
to
notify
the
Agency
of
their
PCB
waste
handling
activities
(
see
EPA
Form
7710­
53,
Notification
of
PCB
Activity
at
Appendix
D);
both
notifications
can
be
accomplished
by
completing
a
simple
form,
although
use
of
the
form
is
optional
when
registering
PCB
Transformers.

3(
e)
General
Guidelines
Most
of
the
information
requested
by
this
ICR
is
consistent
with
OMB's
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
Guidelines.
Some
exceptions
are
as
follows.

Under
the
information
collection
requirements
of
§
§
761.185
and
761.193
(
ICR
1001),
manufacturing
and
monitoring
records
that
document
PCB
levels
in
products
and
analyses
that
support
the
one­
time
notification
and
certification
of
compliance
for
the
process
must
be
retained
for
either
3
years
after
the
certified
process
ceases
operations
or
7
years,
whichever
is
shorter.
The
content
of
the
file
most
likely
would
not
change
over
the
7­
year
period,
so
the
burden
of
keeping
the
file
is
substantially
mitigated
by
its
limited
contents.
Likewise,
entities
that
monitor
for
actual
PCB
concentrations
in
the
products
they
manufacture,

use,
process,
distribute
in
commerce,
or
recycle
must
also
maintain
monitoring
data
records
under
§
761.193
for
either
a
3­
year
period
after
the
operation
ceases
or
up
to
7
years.
The
effect
of
this
provision
is
to
impose
an
equal
retention
period
for
sampling
data
on
all
those
who
deal
with
inadvertently
generated
PCBs
in
products,
whether
the
PCBs
result
from
excluded
manufacturing
processes
or
recycling.

To
comply
with
the
storage
and
disposal
requirements
of
Subpart
D
(
ICR
1446),
disposers
and
commercial
storers
must
retain
records
for
at
least
3
years
after
the
facility
is
no
longer
used
for
the
storage
or
disposal
of
PCB
wastes,
except
that
chemical
waste
landfills
must
maintain
records
for
at
least
20
years
after
the
facility
no
longer
accepts
PCB
wastes.
The
reason
for
requiring
records
retention
for
landfills
in
excess
of
3
years
is
that
a
leak
from
a
chemical
waste
landfill
could
take
years
to
develop
into
a
noticeable
environmental
problem.
Landfill
records
are
the
only
mechanism
to
accurately
trace
the
source
of
the
contamination.
Also,
certain
operational
records
maintained
by
the
owner/
operator
of
incineration
facilities
and
high
efficiency
boilers
must
be
retained
for
5
years
from
the
date
of
collection.
This
enables
facilities
to
demonstrate
to
enforcement
officials
that
the
facility
has
consistently
complied
with
relevant
technical
requirements
and
conditions
specified
in
the
disposal
permit.
3­
5
The
Final
Disposal
Amendments
Rule
(
ICR
1729)
contains
several
provisions
that
require
recordkeeping
for
5
years
or
more.
These
provisions
include
§
761.61(
a)(
9),
which
requires
the
notifications
and
remediation
site
cleanup
activity
documentation,
pursuant
§
§
761.61(
a)(
3),
(
4),
and
(
5),
to
be
maintained
for
5
years.
Section
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)(
A)
requires
a
notice
be
permanently
affixed
to
the
deed
of
any
property
where
a
remediation
project
has
resulted
in
the
installation
of
a
fence
or
ground
cover
cap
to
increase
protection
from
exposure
to
PCBs.
These
measures
were
taken
to
enable
adequate
oversight
of
remediation
projects
by
environmental
officials
and
to
provide
adequate
notice
to
potential
new
owners
of
property
where
remediation
projects
were
undertaken.

There
are
a
number
of
provisions
in
Part
761
that
require
reporting
within
15
or
30
days
of
the
occurrence
of
a
specific
event.
For
example,
the
third­
party
notification
requirements
of
§
§
761.61(
a)(
5)(
B)(
2)(
iv)
and
761.62(
b)(
4)(
i)
and
(
ii)
require
generators
to
provide
notice
to
certain
off­
site
facilities
at
least
15
days
prior
to
shipping
certain
wastes.
These
reporting
requirements
are
not
triggered
by
the
calendar
(
i.
e.,
they
are
not
required
quarterly
or
at
more
frequent
intervals).
Therefore,
the
Agency
does
not
believe
that
these
provisions,
or
the
following
30­
day
reporting
requirements,
need
special
justification:

#
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)(
A)(
1)
requires
owners
of
PCB
transformers
to
register
the
transformer
with
EPA
within
30
days
of
discovery.

#
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ii)
requires
EPA,
State,
and
local
environmental
protection
agencies
to
be
notified
of
the
commencement
of
pilot­
scale
PCB
R&
D
disposal
activity.

#
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)
requires
EPA,
State
or
Tribal,
and
county
or
local
environmental
protection
agencies
to
be
notified
of
the
location
of
a
remediation
waste
cleanup
project.

#
§
761.65(
a)(
2)(
i)
requires
EPA
to
be
notified
of
intent
to
store
waste
beyond
the
1­
year
limit
30
days
prior
to
the
expiration
of
the
1­
year
time
frame
when
disposal
cannot
be
accomplished
within
that
period.

#
§
761.70(
b)(
8)
requires
EPA
to
be
notified
30
days
prior
to
transferring
ownership
of
an
incinerator.
3­
6
#
§
761.75(
c)(
7)
requires
EPA
to
be
notified
30
days
prior
to
transferring
ownership
of
a
landfill.

#
§
761.80(
e)
requires
EPA
to
be
notified
30
days
prior
to
commencing
PCB
R&
D
disposal
activity
when
using
manufactured/
imported
PCBs
obtained
under
this
exemption.

#
§
761.180(
c)(
5)
requires
EPA
to
be
notified
within
30
days
of
suspension
of
incineration
operations.

#
§
761.205(
f)
requires
EPA
to
be
notified
within
30
days
of
changes
to
previous
PCB
Notification.

#
§
761.207(
c)(
1)(
iv)
requires
commercial
storers/
disposal
facilities
to
send
copy
of
manifest
to
generators
within
30
days
of
receipt
of
waste.

#
§
761.218(
b)
requires
disposers
to
send
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
generator
within
30
days
of
disposing
of
his
waste.

3(
f)
Confidentiality
Petitioners
or
permit
applicants
may
claim
that
all
or
part
of
any
information
given
to
EPA,
such
as
process
design
information,
is
confidential
business
information
(
CBI).
EPA
handles
claims
of
confidentiality
pursuant
to
established
CBI
procedures,
as
found
at
section
14
of
TSCA,
40
CFR
750.16
and
750.36,
and
the
Agency's
TSCA
CBI
Manual.
Confidential
Business
Information
is
also
protected
under
the
Freedom
of
Information
Act
(
5
USC
section
525).
Most
of
the
information
requested
in
the
reporting
or
recordkeeping
requirements
of
these
collections
is
not
of
a
confidential
nature.

3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
3­
7
EPA
asks
no
questions
of
a
sensitive
nature.
4­
1
4
THE
RESPONDENTS
AND
THE
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
4(
a)
Respondents/
SIC/
NAICS
Codes
EPA's
PCB
regulations
could
affect
entities
in
all
industrial
categories,
regardless
of
size,
that
currently
possess
PCB
Items,
PCB­
contaminated
equipment,
or
other
PCB
waste.
These
entities
include
those
in
both
the
public
and
private
sectors,
and
may
include
not­
for­
profit
organizations
as
well
as
for­
profit
entities.
Entities
that
generate
PCB
wastes
comprise
the
following
classes:

#
Electric
utility
industry
(
SIC
4911,
NAICS
2211),
including
municipal
and
county
electric
systems,
and
other
publicly
owned
systems,
such
as
irrigation
districts.
It
has
been
estimated
that
70
percent
of
PCBs
produced
were
used
in
dielectric
fluid
for
transformers
and
capacitors.
Thus,
such
high­
voltage
equipment
represents
a
significant
use
of
PCBs
and
therefore
a
major
source
of
PCB
waste
generation.
EPA
studies
of
the
numbers
of
such
equipment
in
use
assumed
that
utilities
owned
30
percent
of
the
askarel
transformers,
80
percent
of
the
mineral
oil
transformers,
and
85
percent
of
the
large
PCB
Capacitors,
with
the
remainder
owned
by
non­
utility
industrial
enterprises.
It
is
estimated
that
there
are
about
2,900
small
entities
in
the
electric
utility
industry.
Privately
owned
small
utilities
are
defined
as
those
with
less
than
4
million
megawatt­
hours
of
electricity
sales
per
year.
Small
publicly
owned
utilities
are
those
owned
by
government
bodies
with
less
than
50,000
in
population.

#
Non­
utility
entities
with
privately­
owned
electric
equipment,
such
as:

­­
oil
and
gas
producers
(
SIC
1311,
NAICS
211111)
­­
manufacturers
(
SIC
20­
39,
NAICS
31­
33)
­­
line­
haul
railroads
(
SIC
4011,
NAICS
48211)
­­
telecommunications
(
SIC
4810,
NAICS
513)
­­
refuse
systems
(
SIC
4953,
NAICS
562111)

EPA
studies
have
shown
that
these
entities
account
for
more
than
90
percent
PCB
waste
generated
by
the
non­
utility
private
sector.
Hospitals
(
SIC
8062,
NAICS
62211)
and
colleges/
universities
(
SIC
8221,
NAICS
61131)
are
also
likely
to
have
high­
voltage
electrical
equipment
of
the
type
associated
with
PCB
use
and
contamination.

#
Entities
with
PCB
ballasts
from
fluorescent
light
fixtures,
including
manufacturing
and
industrial
entities,
government
bodies
and
school
districts
that
have
such
lighting
equipment.

#
Entities
operating
natural
gas
pipelines.

#
Entities
engaged
in
bulk
solid
waste
operations,
such
as
automobile
shredders.
4­
2
#
Entities
involved
in
remediating
PCB
wastes,
such
as
Superfund
and
other
hazardous
waste
sites.

#
PCB
disposal
facilities
that
must
obtain
approval
from
EPA
to
operate
(
e.
g.,
incinerators,
chemical
waste
landfills,
alternate
disposal
technologies).
This
would
include
individuals,
businesses,
Federal
agencies,
and
State/
local
governments
engaged
in
PCB
waste
management
activities.
The
SIC
code,
4953
(
NAICS
562111),
hazardous
waste
material
disposal
site,
may
be
applicable.

#
Other
primary
respondents
include:

­­
trucking
and
warehousing
(
storage)
(
SIC
4200,
NAICS
484)
­­
sanitary
services
(
incinerators,
landfills)
(
SIC
4950,
NAICS
5622)
­­
steam
suppliers
[
high
efficiency
boilers
(
HEB)]
(
SIC
4960,
NAICS
22133)
­­
Administrators
of
Environmental
Quality
Programs
(
SIC
9510,
NAICS
924)

#
All
chemical
manufacturers
(
and
importers
of
products)
who
wish
to
qualify
excluded
processes
and
continue
the
legal
manufacture
(
or
importation)
of
trace
amounts
of
PCBs;
the
processing,
distribution
in
commerce,
or
use
of
chemical
products
that
contain
the
PCBs
generated
in
excluded
manufacturing
processes;
and
the
processing,
distribution
in
commerce,
or
use
of
products
containing
"
recycled
PCBs"
(
§
761.3)
must
comply
with
appropriate
notification
and
recordkeeping
requirements.
These
respondents
are
classified
in
Industry
Groups
SIC
283,
284,
286,
and
287
(
NAICS
3254,
325611,
325,
3253),
which
are
drugs;
soap,
cleaners,
and
toilet
goods
;
industrial
organic
chemicals;
and
agricultural
chemicals,
respectively.
Other
affected
industries
may
include:

­­
alkalies
and
chlorine
(
SIC
2812,
NAICS
325181)
­­
inorganic
pigments
(
SIC
2816,
NAICS
325131)
­­
plastic
materials
and
resins
(
2821,
NAICS
325211)
­­
synthetic
rubber
(
SIC
2822,
NAICS
325212)
­­
organic
fibers
non­
cellulosic
(
SIC
2824,
NAICS
325222)
­­
other
chemicals
and
allied
products
(
SIC
2800,
NAICS
3259981)
­­
adhesives
and
sealants
(
SIC
2891,
NAICS
32552)
­­
printing
ink
(
SIC
2893,
NAICS
32591)
­­
chemical
preparations
(
SIC
2899,
NAICS
325998)
­­
rubber
and
miscellaneous
plastic
products
(
SIC
30,
NAICS
326)

#
Respondents
who
petition
the
Agency
for
exemption
from
the
prohibitions
and
restrictions
on
the
manufacture,
processing,
and
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs
may
include
general
manufacturing
industries
(
SIC
categories
20
­
39,
NAICS
31
­
33)
and
Electric
Equipment
Manufacturing
(
SIC
categories
40
­
49,
NAICS
335)
(
ICR
857).
4­
3
4(
b)
Information
Requested
(
i)
Data
Items.

A
number
of
information
collection
data
elements
have
been
consolidated
in
this
combined
ICR.

Many
of
these
requirements
are
triggered
only
by
an
individual's
need
to
address
a
particular
PCB
scenario,

while
other
requirements
apply
to
the
universe
of
individuals
who
use,
process,
distribute
in
commerce,
or
dispose
of
PCBs.
EPA
anticipates
that
no
one
individual
would
be
subject
to
all
of
the
requirements
listed
below.
The
reporting,
third­
party
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
data
items
contain
the
reference
number
used
throughout
this
document,
the
existing
ICR
number,
a
description
of
the
requirement,
and
the
regulatory
citation,
and
are
organized
according
to
the
subparts
of
40
CFR
761.

(
A)
Notifications/
Reports.
Respondents
are
required
to
submit
information
to
EPA
to
accomplish
the
following
reporting
tasks.
(
Refer
to
Tables
2­
1,
2­
2,
and
2­
3
for
summaries
of
the
reporting,

third­
party
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
requirements
of
this
consolidated
ICR).

40
CFR
761
Subpart
A
 
General
(#
1/
1001)
Certification
Notification
for
Excluded
Manufacturers:
The
primary
reporting
requirement
for
manufacturers
who
inadvertently
generate
PCBs
and
importers
of
products
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs
is
a
certified
notification
to
EPA.
The
notification
(
1)
identifies
the
manufacturing
processes
that
generate
PCBs
in
products
at
levels
above
2
parts
per
million
(
ppm);
(
2)
certifies
compliance
with
all
PCB
release
conditions
on
excluded
processes;
and
(
3)
states
whether
the
certification
is
based
on
actual
monitoring
data
or
on
theoretical
analysis
of
the
chemical
reaction(
s)
involved
in
the
manufacturing
process.

Additionally,
manufacturers
and
importers
must
report
to
EPA
data
on
their
processes
during
periods
of
unusually
high
generation
or
releases
of
PCBs.
Reports
are
required
in
any
calendar
year
where
total
quantities
of
PCBs
in
manufactured
products
exceed
0.0025%
of
a
manufacturing
site's
rated
capacity,
or
the
total
quantity
of
PCBs
imported
exceeds
0.0025%
of
the
average
for
PCB­
containing
products
that
were
imported
during
the
1978­
1982
timeframe.
Also,
reporting
is
required
when
total
PCB
releases
to
air
or
water
exceed
10
pounds
during
the
year
at
any
site,
and
certification
must
be
repeated
whenever
process
conditions
are
significantly
modified
[
§
§
761.1
(
f)(
1)
­
(
3);
Subpart
J;
also
see
the
entries
for
#
42
and
#
43].
4­
4
Subpart
B
 
Manufacturing,
Processing,
Distribution
in
Commerce,
and
Use
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
(#
2/
857)
Exemption
Petitions:
Individuals
seeking
exemptions
to
manufacture
(
import),
process,
or
distribute
in
commerce
(
export)
PCBs
as
per
TSCA
section
6(
e)(
3),
must
submit
exemption
petitions
unless
otherwise
authorized
[
§
761.20(
b)
and
(
c)(
1)
and
(
3)].

(#
3/
1729)
Transformer
Registration:
Owners
of
PCB
Transformers
are
required
to
register
their
transformers
with
EPA.
The
registration
program
is
intended
to
provide
State
officials
and
emergency
response
personnel
information
in
order
to
provide
a
significantly
higher
degree
of
protection
in
emergency
situations.
This
information
will
also
be
used
to
address
future
requirements
of
international
environmental
programs
to
identify
sources
and
reduce
or
eliminate
the
reliance
on
PCBs.
Information
that
must
be
included
in
the
notification
consists
of
the
following:
transformer
address
(
i.
e.,
location);
number
of
PCB
Transformers,

including
total
weight
in
kilograms;
and
the
name,
address,
telephone
number,
and
signature
of
the
owner,

operator,
or
other
authorized
representative
certifying
the
accuracy
of
the
submitted
information.
The
use
of
a
form
is
optional,
as
is
information
on
whether
the
unit(
s)
contains
a
flammable
liquid.
A
copy
of
EPA
Form
7720­
12,
which
can
be
used
for
submitting
this
information
[
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)],
is
included
in
this
report
as
Appendix
C.
Note
that
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xv)(
D)
removes
the
requirement
to
register
PCB
Transformers
with
the
fire
department,
but
retains
the
requirement
to
register
the
transformers
with
building
owners.
Also,

§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
iv)(
C)
required
owners
of
lower
secondary
voltage
PCB
Transformers
in
or
near
commercial
buildings
not
located
in
sidewalk
vaults
and
not
equipped
with
electrical
protection
to
register
these
transformers
with
the
Regional
Administrator
(
RA)
by
October
1,
1990
[
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
iv)(
C),
(
vi),
and
(
vii);

(
xv)(
D)].
Since
registration
pursuant
to
this
provision
was
required
by
October
1,
1990,
the
burden
for
this
reporting
requirement
is
not
reflected
in
this
ICR.

(#
4)
Transformer
Reclassification:
Persons
wishing
to
use
alternate
methods
to
simulate
loaded
(

inservice
conditions
for
transformers
for
the
purpose
of
reclassifying
transformers
must
obtain
EPA
approval
to
do
so
[
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v)].
Therefore,
EPA
requires
information
on
the
process
that
is
being
considered
as
well
as
transformer
identification
information.
4­
5
(#
5/
1729)
Use
of
Natural
Gas
Pipelines
and
Other
Gas
or
Liquid
Systems:
Owners/
operators
of
natural
gas
pipelines
who
sell
or
distribute
natural
gas
are
authorized
to
use
natural
gas
pipelines
that
have
been
contaminated
with
PCBs
in
concentrations
$
50
ppm,
if
they
take
certain
actions
to
identify
sources
of
contamination
and
reduce
levels
to
<
50
ppm
PCBs.
Owner/
operators
of
these
pipelines
must
submit
a
written
description
of
the
general
nature
and
location
of
PCB
contamination
in
concentrations
$
50
ppm
if
requested
by
EPA.
This
description
would
be
sent
to
the
RA
or
the
Director,
National
Program
Chemicals
Division
(
NPCD),
at
EPA,
if
the
contaminated
pipe
is
located
in
more
than
one
Region.
EPA
expects
the
reporting
burden
to
be
minimized
as
the
regulations
allow
for
the
use
of
historical
data
regarding
these
requirements
(
e.
g.,
sampling
and
analyses
data
and
reports
of
actions
taken
to
reduce
PCB
levels)

[
§
761.30(
i)(
1)(
iii)(
A)(
1)].

(#
6/
1729)
EPA
Approval
for
Uses
of
PCBs
in
Other
Gas
or
Liquid
Systems:
The
use
of
#
50
ppm
PCBs
in
"
other"
gas
or
liquid
transmission
systems
is
authorized.
Operators
with
systems
with
PCBs
at
concentrations
of
$
50
ppm
must
obtain
written
consent
from
the
Director,
National
Program
Chemicals
Division,
who
may
then
specify
conditions
necessary
to
reduce
the
levels
of
PCBs
in
the
system.
It
is
not
apparent
that
systems
not
otherwise
authorized
under
the
regulations
exist.
Therefore,
EPA
expects
this
authorization
to
be
rare
and
has
no
basis
for
developing
a
burden
for
this
notification
requirement.
Without
this
authorization,
however,
use
of
such
gas
or
liquid
systems
with
PCBs
$
50
ppm
would
be
prohibited
[
§
761.30(
t)(
3)].

(#
7/
1729)
Exceeding
Storage
Limitations
for
PCB
Articles
Stored
for
Reuse:
EPA
has
limited
the
storage
for
reuse
of
PCB
Articles
in
areas
not
meeting
the
TSCA
approved
storage
standards
in
§
761.65
to
a
period
of
5
years.
However,
RAs
may
grant
extensions
beyond
5
years
with
conditions,
if
a
request
explaining
the
rationale
for
the
extension
is
submitted
6
months
prior
to
the
expiration
date
[
§
761.35(
b)].

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
(#
8/
1012)
Permit
Applications
and
Demonstration
Plans
for
Disposal
Facilities:
The
application
must
contain
the
following
types
of
information,
if
applicable:
(
1)
name,
address,
and
phone
number
of
the
unit's
principal
manager;
(
2)
location
of
the
facility
where
the
unit
will
be
tested
and
the
location
where
the
unit
will
be
stored
and
serviced
when
not
engaged
in
testing;
(
3)
detailed
description
of
the
unit
including
general
plans
4­
6
and
design
drawings;
(
4)
engineering
report
or
other
information
on
the
anticipated
performance
of
the
unit;

(
5)
sampling
and
quality
assurance
plan;
(
6)
waste
volumes
expected
to
be
handled,
process
design
capacity,

process
control,
reagent­
to­
waste
feed
ratios,
and
safety
features;
(
7)
local,
State,
or
Federal
permits
or
approvals;
(
8)
schedules
and
plans
for
complying
with
the
approval
requirements;
(
9)
contingency
plan
which
describes
steps
taken
in
case
of
process
failure,
spill,
or
overflow;
and
(
10)
environmental
impact,
including
process
emissions,
toxicity
and
disposal
of
process
products,
site
relationships,
and
steps
taken
to
protect
the
health
of
the
operator.

Following
receipt
of
the
application,
EPA
may
require
additions
or
modifications
to
the
application,

disapprove
the
application,
or
determine
that
a
process
demonstration
is
required
and
will
notify
the
person
who
submitted
the
application.
The
following
information
is
requested
of
persons
who
are
asked
to
demonstrate
their
process
for
the
Agency:
(
1)
time,
date,
and
location
of
the
process
demonstrations;
(
2)

quantity
and
type
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
to
be
processed;
(
3)
parameters
to
be
monitored
and
location
of
sampling
points;
(
4)
sampling
plan
and
quality
assurance
plan,
including
sampling
frequency,
methods,
and
schedules
for
sampling
analysis;
and
(
5)
names,
addresses,
and
qualifications
of
persons
who
review
the
analytical
results
and
other
pertinent
data
and
who
will
perform
a
technical
evaluation
of
the
effectiveness
of
the
process
demonstration.
Following
receipt
of
the
process
demonstration
plan,
EPA
will
either
approve
the
plan,
require
additions
or
modifications
to
the
plan,
such
as
additional
testing
or
analysis
to
help
the
reviewing
officials
determine
the
safety
and
efficiency
of
the
process,
or
disapprove
the
plan.

Any
person
who
is
required
to
incinerate
any
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
and
who
can
demonstrate
that
an
alternative
method
of
destroying
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
can
achieve
a
level
of
performance
equivalent
to
an
approved
incinerator
or
high
efficiency
boiler,
as
per
§
§
761.70
or
.71,
respectively,
must
submit
a
written
request
to
EPA
for
a
waiver
from
the
incinerator
or
high
efficiency
boiler
(
HEB)
requirements.
[
§
§
761.60(
e),

(
i)(
2);
.70(
a),(
b),(
d);
.75(
b)(
7),
(
b)(
8)(
ii),
and
(
c)].

(#
9
­
11/
1729)
Notification
about
PCB
Research
and
Development
Activities
(
R&
D):
Individuals
engaged
in
R&
D
for
disposal
under
§
761.60(
j)
must
notify
the
RA,
and
State
and
local
environmental
officials
30
days
before
conducting
the
R&
D
for
disposal
activity
[
§
761.60(
j)(
1)].
The
notification
must
provide
the
EPA
identification
number
for
the
location
of
the
R&
D
activity
[
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
i)],
quantity
of
PCBs
to
be
processed,
type
of
R&
D,
physical
and
chemical
properties
of
the
material
being
treated,
and
an
estimate
of
4­
7
the
duration
of
the
R&
D
activities
[
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ii)].
[
NOTE:
After
reviewing
the
submitted
information,

EPA
may
determine,
based
on
potential
unreasonable
risks
to
health
or
the
environment,
to
impose
additional
conditions
on
the
R&
D
project
in
the
form
of
an
Approval.]
[
§
§
761.60(
j)(
1)
and)
(
2)].
4­
8
Additionally,
requests
to
exceed
the
specified
limits
for
the
quantities
of
PCBs
used,
the
maximum
concentration
of
PCBs,
the
total
amount
of
pure
PCBs,
or
the
duration
of
the
R&
D
activities
must
be
submitted
to
the
RA.
Each
request
shall
specify
the
quantity
or
concentration
requested
or
additional
time
needed
and
include
a
justification
for
each
increase.
For
extensions
to
the
duration
of
the
R&
D
for
PCB
disposal
activity,
the
request
shall
also
include
a
report
on
the
accomplishments
and
progress
of
the
previously
authorized
R&
D
activity
for
which
the
extension
is
sought
[
§
761.60(
j)(
2)].

This
notification
is
intended
to
identify
those
individuals
who
do
research
on/
with
PCBs,
their
locations
and
the
type
of
activities
they
perform.
By
establishing
a
small
quantity
exemption
for
R&
D,
EPA
is
reducing
the
burden
previously
associated
with
the
existing
requirement
that
individuals
who
engage
in
R&
D
into
PCB
disposal
technologies
obtain
a
TSCA
R&
D
Approval.
EPA
does
not
require
this
information
to
be
submitted
on
a
specific
form
or
in
a
specific
format.
By
requiring
individuals
to
write
a
letter
to
the
RA,
EPA
is
providing
maximum
flexibility
to
the
respondent
to
minimize
the
burden
associated
with
this
notification
provision.

(#
12
­
15/
1729)
Self­
implementing
Remediation:
Owners
of
remediation
sites
are
required
to
notify,

in
writing,
the
RA
and
the
appropriate
State
(
or
tribal),
county
(
or
local)
environmental
agencies
at
least
30
days
prior
to
conducting
remediation
activities.
The
notification
must
include
the
following
information:
the
nature
of
the
contamination;
a
summary
of
the
procedures
used
to
sample
contaminated
and
adjacent
areas;

a
table
or
cleanup
site
map;
the
location
and
extent
of
PCB
contaminated
areas,
including
topographic
maps;

and
a
cleanup
plan
for
the
site
[
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)].
Once
the
remediation
project
has
been
initiated,
any
proposed
deviation
from
the
notification
previously
submitted
must
be
reported
to
EPA
no
less
than
14
days
prior
to
the
proposed
implementation
of
the
change
[
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
ii)].
Any
person
conducting
a
cleanup
activity
may
obtain
a
waiver
of
the
30­
day
notification
requirement,
if
they
receive
a
separate
waiver,
in
writing,
from
each
of
the
agencies
they
are
required
to
notify
under
this
section
[
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
iii)].

Additionally,
under
the
self­
implementing
provision,
persons
must
submit
a
written
certification
to
the
RA
that
the
sampling
plans,
sample
collection
and
preparation
procedures,
extraction
procedures,
and
instrumental/

chemical
analysis
procedures
used
to
assess
or
characterize
the
cleanup
site
are
on
file
at
the
location
designated
in
the
certificate
and
are
available
for
EPA
inspection.
Persons
using
alternate
methods
for
chemical
extraction
and
chemical
analysis
for
site
characterization
must
include
in
the
certificate
a
statement
that
indicates
that
such
a
method
will
be
used
and
that
a
comparison
study
that
meets
or
exceeds
the
4­
9
requirements
of
§
761.269(
c)
of
Subpart
Q,
for
which
records
are
on
file,
has
been
completed
prior
to
verification
sampling
[
§
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)(
E)
and
761.274].
Additionally,
persons
conducting
remediation
waste
projects
that
require
the
use
of
a
fence
or
cap,
must
record
a
notation
on
the
deed
to
notify
potential
purchasers
of
the
property
(
i.
e.,
a
third­
party
notification)
and
submit
to
EPA
a
certification
that
the
property
deed
has
a
notation
to
that
effect
[
§
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)].

(#
16/
1729)
Risk­
based
Remediation:
Any
person
wishing
to
clean
up,
store,
or
dispose
of
PCB
remediation
waste
in
a
manner
other
than
prescribed
in
the
self­
implementing
or
performance­
based
disposal
options
must
apply
in
writing
to
the
RA.
Each
application
must
contain
information
as
described
in
§
761.61(
a)(
3)
(
e.
g.,
nature
and
extent
of
the
contamination,
sample
procedure,
cleanup
plan,
and
certification
that
records
have
been
maintained).
The
EPA
may
request
the
submission
of
other
information
it
believes
necessary
to
evaluate
the
application
[
§
761.61(
c)(
1)].

(#
17/
1729)
Risk­
based
Cleanup
Approval
for
PCB
Bulk
Product
Waste:
Any
person
wishing
to
sample
or
dispose
of
or
store
PCB
bulk
product
waste
in
a
manner
other
than
prescribed
in
paragraphs
(
a)

or
(
b),
or
store
the
waste
other
than
prescribed
by
§
761.65,
must
apply
in
writing
to
the
EPA
RA
or
Director,

NPCD.
Each
application
must
contain
information
indicating
that
the
proposed
storage
and
disposal
methods
or
locations
will
not
pose
an
unreasonable
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment.
EPA
may
request
the
submission
of
other
information
it
believes
necessary
to
evaluate
the
application.[
§
761.62(
c)(
1)].

(#
18
­
20/
1729)
Exceeding
Storage
Limitations
for
PCB
Wastes:
A
mechanism
has
been
established
for
automatically
extending
the
1­
year
storage
for
disposal
deadline
for
another
year
based
on
an
adequate
justification.
Any
person
storing
PCB
waste
that
is
subject
to
the
1­
year
time
limit
for
storage
and
disposal
may
provide
written
notification
to
the
RA
that
their
continuing
attempts
to
dispose
of
or
secure
disposal
for
their
waste
within
the
1­
year
time
limit
have
been
unsuccessful.
For
the
automatic
extension
of
the
1­
year
time
frame,
EPA
must
receive
the
notification
at
least
30
days
before
the
initial
1­
year
time
limit
expires
and
the
notice
must
identify
the
storer;
the
types,
volumes,
and
locations
of
the
waste,
and
the
reasons
for
failure
to
meet
the
initial
1­
year
time
limit
[
§
761.65(
a)(
2)].

For
subsequent
extensions
of
the
time
frame
for
storing
PCB
wastes,
the
requestor
must
submit
specific
justifications
and
indicate
measures
he
or
she
is
taking
to
secure
disposal
or
reasons
why
disposal
4­
10
could
not
occur
during
the
prior
extension.
EPA
may
require
specific
actions
as
conditions
to
granting
the
extension,
including
marking,
inspection,
recordkeeping,
or
financial
assurance
to
ensure
that
the
waste
does
not
pose
an
unreasonable
risk
of
injury
to
health
or
the
environment
[
§
761.65(
a)(
3)]
or
the
submission
of
periodic
progress
reports
[
§
761.65(
a)(
4)].

(#
21/
1729)
Storage
Containers
for
PCB/
Radioactive
Waste:
Containers
prescribed
by
the
American
National
Standard
Institute
(
ANSI)
for
nuclear
criticality
safety
may
be
used
for
PCB/
radioactive
waste.

However,
other
containers
may
be
used
if
the
users
are
able
to
demonstrate
to
EPA
and
other
appropriate
regulatory
authorities
[
i.
e.,
the
Nuclear
Regulatory
Commission
(
NRC),
the
Department
of
Energy
(
DOE),

or
the
Department
of
Transportation
(
DOT)]
that
such
containers
are
protective
of
public
health
and
safety
and
the
environment
[
§
761.65(
c)(
6)(
i)(
C)].

(#
22/
1446)
Preparing
Application
for
Commercial
Disposal
Approval:
Applicants
for
commercial
storage
approval
shall
submit
a
written
application
that
includes
any
relevant
information
bearing
upon
the
qualifications
of
the
facility.
The
application
shall
identify
the
facility
owner/
operator
and
include
information
on
the
technical
qualifications
of
the
person
in
charge
of
operations,
any
past
violations,
and
waste
handling
experience
of
the
company
and
employees,
estimates
of
maximum
waste
quantity
that
can
be
handled,
the
certification
of
compliance,
the
financial
assurance
instrument,
a
closure
plan
and
closure
cost
estimate,
and
a
demonstration
of
financial
responsibility
for
closure.
The
applicant
must
also
revise
and
update
the
closure
plan
when
certain
changes
occur
at
the
facility,
and,
within
30
days
after
the
facility
closes,
submit
certification
that
the
facility
has
been
closed
in
accordance
with
the
approved
plan
[
§
§
761.65(
d),
(
e)(
1),
(
6),

and
(
8);
and
(
f)].

(#
23)
Request
to
Amend
the
Storage
Closure
Plan:
Owners/
operators
of
storage
facilities
must
submit
requests
to
the
RA
to
amend
the
closure
plan,
when
there
are
changes
in
ownership,
changes
in
expected
date
of
closure,
and/
or
unexpected
events
[
§
761.65(
e)(
4)].

(#
24/
1729)
Modifications
to
Commercial
Storage
Facilities:
To
ensure
that
the
owner/
operator
of
these
facilities
have
made
adjustments
to
their
financial
assurance
mechanisms
when
modifications
will
increase
the
storage
capacity
of
the
facility,
EPA
is
requiring
that
the
these
individuals
notify
the
Federal
or
State
issuing
authority
in
writing
that
they
have
revised
the
financial
assurance
mechanism
and
activated
it
4­
11
within
30
days
of
the
completion
of
the
modification
[
§
761.65(
g)(
9)].
EPA
does
not
require
the
information
to
be
submitted
on
a
specific
form
or
in
a
specific
format.

(#
25/
1729)
Change
of
Ownership
for
Storage
Facilities:
EPA
will
approve
of
the
transfer
of
ownership
or
operational
control
of
a
commercial
storage
facility
if
the
transferee
has
established
financial
assurance
for
the
closure
and
the
transferor
or
transferee
has
resolved
any
deficiencies
(
e.
g.,
with
technical
operations,
closure
plans,
cost
estimates,
etc.)
that
the
Agency
has
identified
in
the
transferor's
new
or
amended
application
[
§
761.65(
j)].

(#
26)
Approval
of
Alternate
Measures
for
Operating
Incinerators:
Owners/
operators
of
incinerators
that
burn
PCBs
must
submit
a
contingency
plan
of
alternate
measures
for
operating
the
facility
when
regulatory
requirements
cannot
be
met.
The
plan
must
indicate
what
alternative
measures
the
owner/
operator
would
take
if
there
is
a
failure
of
regulatory
monitoring
requirements
or
PCB
rate
and
quantity
measuring
and
recording
equipment,
or
if
excess
oxygen
falls
below
the
percentages
specified
in
paragraph
(
a)(
1)
of
this
section
[
§
§
761.70(
a)(
8)
and
(
9);
and
(
d)(
5)].

(#
27)
Notification
of
Changes
in
Disposal
Facility
Ownership:
Owners/
operators
of
incinerators
and
chemical
waste
landfills
that
dispose
of
PCBs
must
notify
EPA
at
least
30
days
before
transferring
ownership
of
the
facility.
The
notice
must
include
a
notarized
affidavit
signed
by
the
transferee,
which
states
that
the
transferee
will
abide
by
the
transferor's
EPA
incinerator
approval
[
§
§
761.70(
d)(
8);
.75(
c)(
7)].

(#
28/
1729)
High
Efficiency
Boiler
Approval:.
Thirty
days
before
any
person
burns
mineral
oil
dielectric
fluid
in
high
efficiency
boilers,
the
person
must
give
a
one­
time
written
notice
to
the
RA,
including
information
on
the
owner
and
location
of
the
boiler,
boiler
specifications,
and
associated
equipment.
To
burn
liquids
other
than
mineral
oil
dielectric
fluids,
at
a
PCB
concentration
of
50
to
500
ppm,
boiler
owners
must
first
obtain
an
approval
of
the
EPA
RA
for
the
EPA
Region
in
which
the
boiler
is
located.
The
request
to
the
RA
must
include
at
least
the
following:
name
and
address
of
owner/
operator
of
boiler
and
address
of
boiler,
boiler
rating
in
units
of
BTU/
hour,
carbon
monoxide
concentration
and
oxygen
percentage
in
the
stack
when
boiler
is
operated,
type
of
equipment
and
procedures
used
to
control
feed
and
monitor
emissions,
type
of
waste
to
be
burned,
concentration
of
PCBs
and
other
chlorinated
hydrocarbons
in
the
waste,
estimate
of
the
amount
of
waste
to
be
burned
in
a
30­
day
period,
and
an
explanation
of
the
procedures
to
be
followed
to
4­
12
insure
that
the
burning
of
the
waste
will
not
adversely
affect
the
operation
of
the
boiler
such
that
combustion
efficiency
will
decrease
[
§
§
761.71(
a)(
2)
and
(
b)(
2)].

(#
29
­
30/
1729)
Disposal
by
Scrap
Metal
Recovery
Ovens
and
Smelters:
Owners
of
scrap
metal
recovery
ovens
disposing
of
drained
PCB­
Contaminated
electrical
equipment,
natural
gas
pipelines
and
nonporous
surfaces
must
notify
EPA
as
disposers
of
PCBs
and
are
required
to
comply
with
existing,
applicable
disposal
facility
reporting
requirements
in
Subparts
J
and
K
[
§
§
761.72(
c)(
2)].
In
lieu
of
meeting
the
operating
requirements,
an
owner
or
operator
of
a
scrap
metal
recovery
oven
or
smelter
can
submit
a
written
request
to
the
RA
for
a
determination
that
the
industrial
furnace
poses
no
unreasonable
risk,
based
on
a
site­
specific
risk
assessment
[
§
761.72(
c)(
3)].

(#
31
­
32/
1729)
TSCA
Coordinated
Approval:
Persons
seeking
a
TSCA
PCB
coordinated
approval
may
submit
a
request
for
approval
to
the
RA
at
the
same
time
they
seek
a
permit
approval
or
other
action
for
a
PCB
waste
management
activity
under
any
other
Federal
or
State
authority.
The
request
for
coordinated
approval
shall
include
a
copy
of
the
confirmation
of
the
EPA
identification
number,
information
regarding
a
point
of
contact
at
the
other
permitting
authority,
description
of
the
waste
activities
to
be
conducted
(
or
a
copy
of
the
waste
management
document,
if
one
has
been
issued),
and
a
certification
that
the
requestor
will
adhere
to
the
TSCA
PCB
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
[
§
761.77(
a)(
1)].
The
RA
may
request
additional
information
to
remedy
a
deficiency
in
the
waste
management
activities
[
§
761.77(
a)(
1)(
ii)(
A)(
1)].
If
the
RA
determines
that
conditions
of
the
coordinated
approval
are
not
being
met,

the
RA
may
require
the
person
to
whom
the
coordinated
approval
was
issued
to
submit
an
application
for
a
TSCA
PCB
approval
[
§
761.77(
a)(
2)].
Any
person
with
a
coordinated
approval
must
notify
the
RA
in
writing
within
5
calendar
days
of
changes
relating
to
PCB
waste
requirements
in
the
non­
TSCA
waste
management
documents
that
serve
as
the
basis
for
the
coordinated
approval
[
§
761.77(
a)(
3)].

(#
33/
1729)
Approvals
for
Alternative
Decontamination
and
Sampling
Methods:
Any
person
wishing
to
decontaminate
material
described
in
a
manner
other
than
prescribed
in
§
761.79(
b)
or
(
c),
or
sample
material
other
than
prescribed
in
§
761.79(
f)
must
apply
in
writing
to
the
EPA
RA.
Each
decontamination
application
must
describe
the
material
to
be
decontaminated
and
the
proposed
decontamination
method,
and
must
demonstrate
that
the
proposed
method
is
capable
of
decontaminating
the
material
to
the
applicable
level
set
out
in
§
761.79(
b)(
1)
through
(
4).
Each
application
must
describe
in
writing
the
material
to
be
4­
13
decontaminated
and
the
proposed
self­
implementing
decontamination
method,
and
must
include
a
proposed
validation
study
to
confirm
performance
of
the
method.
Each
sampling
application
must
contain
a
description
of
the
material
to
be
decontaminated,
the
nature
and
PCB
concentration
of
the
contaminating
material
(
if
known),
the
decontamination
method,
the
proposed
sampling
procedure,
and
a
justification
for
how
the
proposed
sampling
is
equivalent
to
or
more
comprehensive
than
the
sampling
procedure
required
under
§
761.79(
f)
of
this
section.
EPA
may
request
additional
information
it
believes
to
be
necessary
to
evaluate
the
application
[
§
761.79(
h)(
1)
to
(
4)].

Subpart
E
 
Exemptions
(#
34
­
37/
857/
1729)
Class
Exemptions,
Manufacture,
Processing,
Distribution
of
PCBs
for
R&
D:

Individuals
seeking
exemptions
from
the
PCB
prohibitions
are
required
by
statute
[
15
USC
2601
section
6(
e)(
3)(
B)]
to
submit
exemption
petitions
to
EPA.
The
information
provided
to
EPA
in
an
exemption
petition
includes:
name,
address
and
telephone
number
of
the
petitioner;
description
of
the
exemption
being
requested
for
the
manufacture/
processing/
distribution
in
commerce
activity;
location;
length
of
time
desired
(
1­
year
maximum);
amount
of
PCBs
to
be
manufactured
processed
and/
or
distributed
in
commerce,
rationale
regarding
no
unreasonable
risk
and
substitutes
criteria
of
section
6(
e)(
3)(
B)(
i)
and
(
ii),
and
the
economic
consequences
of
an
EPA
denial.
Provisions
regarding
class
exemptions
for
manufacturers
of
PCBs
and
processors/
distributors
of
PCBs
or
analytical
reference
samples
derived
from
PCB
waste
material
require
a
petition
be
submitted
60
days
prior
to
engaging
in
the
activity
[
§
761.80(
e)(
1)
and
(
i)(
1)].
Section
761.80(
e)(
2)
and
(
i)(
2)
and
.80(
n)
require
individuals
seeking
renewals
of
class
exemptions
to
submit
requests
for
renewal
as
per
§
§
750.11
and
.31.
If
persons
need
to
exceed
the
annual
quantity
limits,
they
must
request
approval
from
EPA
[
§
§
761.80(
e)(
3),
(
g)(
2),
and
(
i)(
4)].
The
owner
or
operator
of
the
facility
also
must
notify
the
RA
in
writing
30
days
prior
to
beginning
R&
D
activities
which
require
the
manufacturing
or
import
of
PCBs,
unless
the
owner
has
obtained
a
PCB
R&
D
approval
from
EPA,
pursuant
to
§
761.60(
a)
or
(
i)(
2),

or
.70(
b),
that
allows
the
manufacture
of
PCBs
[
§
761.80(
e)(
4)].

(#
38/)
Manufacturing,
Processing,
and
Distribution
in
Commerce,
Exemptions
When
a
facility
holding
a
certain
type
of
exemption
plans
to
increase
the
amount
of
PCBs
to
be
processed
and
distributed,
imported
(
manufactured),
or
exported,
or
to
change
the
manner
or
processing
and
distribution,
import
(
manufacture),

or
export
of
PCBs,
the
owner/
operator
of
the
facility
must
submit
a
new
exemption
petition
to
EPA,
which
4­
14
will
be
addressed
through
an
exemption
rulemaking.
The
petitioners
must
provide
the
following
information
to
extend
manufacturing
exemptions,
as
per
§
§
750.11:
(
1)
the
identity,
telephone
number,
and
address
of
the
petitioner;
(
2)
description
of
the
PCB
exemption
being
requested,
including
items
to
be
manufactured,
and
the
nature
of
the
manufacturing
process;
(
3)
location(
s)
of
manufacturing
sites
requiring
exemption;
(
4)
length
of
time
requested
for
exemption;
(
5)
amount
of
PCBs
to
be
manufactured
or
used
during
the
requested
exemption
period
and
the
manner
of
release
of
PCBs
to
the
environment
associated
with
such
manufacture
or
use;
(
6)
basis
for
meeting
section
6(
e)(
3)(
B)(
i)
criteria
for
"
unreasonable
risk;"
(
7)
basis
for
meeting
section
6(
e)(
3)(
B)(
ii)
criteria
for
"
PCB
substitutes;"
and
(
8)
quantification
of
the
economic
consequences
of
EPA
denying
the
petition
and
an
explanation
of
the
manner
of
computation.

Persons
interested
in
obtaining
processing
or
distribution
in
commerce
exemptions
must
provide
information
listed
above
as
items
(
1),
(
4),
(
6),
(
7)
and
(
8).
In
addition,
as
per
§
750.31,
they
must
provide:
a
description
of
the
PCB
processing
or
distribution
in
commerce
exemption
being
requested,
including
a
description
of
the
chemical
substances,
mixtures,
or
items
to
be
processed
or
distributed
in
commerce,
and
if
processing
is
involved,
the
nature
of
the
processing;
location(
s)
of
processing
sites
requiring
exemption;
the
estimated
amount
of
PCBs
to
be
processed
or
distributed
in
commerce
or
used
during
the
requested
exemption
period;
and
the
manner
of
release
of
PCBs
to
the
environment
associated
with
such
processing,

or
distribution
in
commerce.
EPA
also
requires
specific
information
on
the
description,
number,
and/
or
location
of
PCB
equipment
to
be
serviced
and
the
description
of
the
uses
of/
exposures
to
PCB­
contaminated
substances
or
mixtures
that
are
to
be
used
for
petitions
filed
under
paragraphs
§
750.31(
a)(
1)­(
9)

[
§
761.80(
n)].

Subpart
F
 
Transboundary
Shipments
of
PCBs
for
Disposal
(#
39/
1729)
Import
and
Export
for
Disposal:
By
Statute,
no
person
may
import
or
export
PCBs
or
PCB
Items
for
disposal
without
an
exemption
issued
under
the
authority
of
TSCA
section
6(
e)(
3)

[
§
§
761.93(
a)
and
.97(
a)].

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
4­
15
(#
40/
1729)
Reporting
of
PCB
Spills:
Parties
responsible
for
the
following
types
of
PCB
spills
must
notify
EPA
to
obtain
cleanup
guidance:
spills
that
directly
contaminate
surface
waters,
sewers,
or
drinking
water
supplies;
spills
that
directly
contaminate
grazing
lands
or
vegetable
gardens;
spills
that
exceed
10
pounds
of
PCBs
by
weight
[
§
§
761.125(
a)(
1)(
i)
to
(
iii)].

Subpart
J
 
General
Records
and
Reports
(#
41/
1446
and
1729)
Annual
Reports
for
Waste
Disposed
of
by
the
Waste
Generator:

Owners/
operators
of
PCB
disposal
facilities,
including
owners/
operators
who
dispose
of
PCB
waste
generated
at
his/
her
own
facilities,
and
owners
of
commercial
storage
facilities,
shall
submit
annual
reports
to
the
RA.
The
reports
shall
summarize
the
records
and
annual
document
logs
required
to
be
maintained
and
prepared
under
§
761.180(
b)(
1)
and
(
b)(
2)
of
this
section.
Within
30
days
of
suspending
the
operation
of
any
incinerator,
the
owner/
operator
of
the
facility
must
submit
a
document
to
EPA
that
includes
the
date
and
time
of
the
suspension
and
an
explanation
of
the
circumstances
causing
the
suspension
of
operations
[
§
§
761.180(
b),
(
b)(
3),
and
(
c)(
5)].

(#
42/
1001)
Notification/
Certification
of
Product
Contamination
by
Inadvertent
PCBs
:
Manufacturers
with
processes
inadvertently
generating
PCBs
and
importers
of
products
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs
must
report
to
EPA
within
90
days
any
excluded
manufacturing
process
or
imports
for
which
the
concentration
of
PCBs
in
products
leaving
the
manufacturing
site
or
imported
is
>
2
ug/
g
(
roughly
2ppm)
for
any
resolvable
gas
chromatographic
peak.
Manufacturers
who
must
submit
the
report
must
transmit
a
letter
notifying
EPA
of
the
number,
type,
and
location
of
the
excluded
manufacturing
process.
Persons
must
also
certify
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
§
761.1(
f),
specify
whether
the
compliance
is
determined
by
actual
monitoring
or
theoretical
assessments;
and
maintain
determinations
of
compliance.
Facilities
with
compliance
based
on
theoretical
assessment
must
also
notify
EPA
of
the
estimated
PCB
concentration
levels
generated
and
released
[
§
761.185].

(#
43)
Notification
When
PCB
Releases
Exceed
Limits:
Owners/
operators
of
excluded
manufacturing
processes
must
report
to
EPA
the
total
quantity
of
inadvertently
generated
PCBs
released
into
the
air
and
or
water
from
these
processes
when
the
total
quantity
of
each
type
of
release
in
any
calendar
year
exceeds
10
pounds
[
§
761.187].
4­
16
Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
(#
44/
1446)
Notify
EPA
of
PCB
Waste
Activity:
All
generators
with
on­
site
storage,
commercial
storers,
transporters,
and
disposers
of
PCBs
shall
notify
EPA
of
their
PCB
waste
activity
by
filing
EPA
Form
7710­
53
(
See
Appendix
D)
prior
to
engaging
in
PCB
waste­
handling
activities.
EPA
recently
revised
this
form
to
include
individuals
engaged
in
R&
D
and
treatability
studies
and
owners
of
scrap
metal
recovery
ovens/
smelters
and
HEBs.
This
one­
time
notification
form
asks
for
a
statement
of
the
type
of
activity
taking
place
at
the
facility,
the
location
of
the
facility,
name
and
address
of
the
owner,
and
the
facility
point­

ofcontact
EPA
will
issue
an
identification
number
or
verify
an
existing
RCRA
identification
number
[
§
§
761.202(
a);
205(
a)
to
(
c)].

(#
45/
1729)
Changes
in
Waste
Handling
Activities:
Individuals
who
make
changes
in
their
wastehandling
activities
(
e.
g.,
relocating
or
assuming
additional
activities)
are
required
to
submit
an
amended
notification
form
30
days
after
the
change
in
activity
occurs.
The
information
is
collected
using
a
1­
page
form
(
EPA
Form
7710­
53)
that
has
previously
been
approved
by
OMB
(#
2070­
0159)
and
requires
minimal
effort
to
complete
[
§
761.205(
f)].

(#
46/
1446/
1729)
Exception
Reports:
When
a
generator
uses
an
independent
transporter,
he
or
she
must
confirm
by
telephone
or
other
convenient
means
that
the
commercial
storer
or
disposer
actually
received
the
manifested
waste.
If
the
disposal
facility
did
not
receive
the
waste,
the
generator
shall
contact
the
transporter
to
determine
the
disposition
of
the
waste.
If
the
generator
has
not
received
a
manifest
from
the
disposal
facility,
the
generator
shall
submit
an
exception
report
to
the
EPA
RA
A
disposer
shall
submit
a
One­
Year
Exception
Report
to
EPA
within
45
days
from
the
end
of
the
1­
year
storage
for
disposal
date
when
the
facility
receives
the
PCBs
on
a
date
more
than
9
months
from
the
date
when
the
PCBs
were
removed
from
service
for
disposal
or
when
the
facility
can
no
longer
dispose
of
the
PCBs
within
the
1­
year
date
due
to
contractual
commitments
or
other
factors
affecting
the
facility's
disposal
capacity.
Generators
or
commercial
storers
shall
submit
One­
Year
Exception
Reports
when
they
transferred
PCB
wastes
within
9
months
from
the
date
of
removal
from
service
for
disposal,
when
the
facility
has
not
received
a
Certificate
of
Disposal
within
13
months
from
the
date
the
waste
was
removed
from
service,
or
has
received
a
Certificate
of
Disposal
more
that
1
year
after
the
date
the
waste
was
removed
from
service
[
§
§
761.208(
a)(
4);
.215(
b)
to
(
d)].
4­
17
(#
47/
1446)
Discrepancy
Reporting:
Upon
discovering
a
significant
discrepancy,
the
owner/
operator
of
the
designated
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility
shall
attempt
to
reconcile
the
discrepancy
with
the
waste
generator
or
transporter.
If
the
discrepancy
is
not
resolved
within
15
days
after
receiving
the
PCB
waste,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
immediately
submit
to
the
RA
a
letter
describing
the
discrepancy
and
attempts
to
reconcile
it,
and
a
copy
of
the
manifest
or
shipping
paper
at
issue
[
§
761.210(
b)].

(#
48
­
49/
1446)
Unmanifested
Waste
Reports:
Disposers
must
submit
unmanifested
waste
reports
to
EPA
when
they
accept
a
shipment
of
PCB
waste
without
an
accompanying
manifest.
If
an
owner
or
operator
of
a
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility
cannot
contact
the
generator
of
the
PCB
waste,
he
or
she
shall
notify
the
RA
so
that
the
RA
can
determine
whether
further
actions
are
required
before
the
owner
or
operator
may
store
or
dispose
of
the
unmanifested
PCB
waste
[
§
761.211(
b)].
Within
15
days
after
receiving
the
unmanifested
PCB
waste,
the
owner/
operator
shall
prepare
a
report
to
the
RA
of
the
Region
where
the
storage
or
disposal
facility
is
located
and
the
Region
in
which
the
PCB
waste
originated.
The
report
shall
include
the
EPA
facility
identification
numbers,
facility
information,
date
the
waste
was
received,

description
of
the
waste,
explanation
why
the
waste
was
unmanifested,
if
the
waste
was
stored
or
disposed,

if
the
generator
was
identified,
if
a
manifest
was
subsequently
supplied,
and
if
and
when
the
waste
was
sent
back
to
the
generator
[
§
761.211(
c)].

Subpart
T
 
Comparison
Study
for
Validating
a
New
Performance­
Based
Decontamination
Solvent
Under
§
761.79(
d)(
4)

(#
50)
Results
of
Analysis
and
Decontamination
Validation
Studies:
Persons
using
the
selfimplementing
criteria
for
validating
the
conditions
for
the
performance­
based
decontamination
of
solvents
must
submit
validation
study
results
to
EPA
[
§
§
761.395
and
.398].

(
B)
Third­
Party
Reports.
Respondents
are
required
to
submit
information
to
entities
other
than
EPA
headquarters
or
the
RA,
such
as
to
State,
Tribal,
county
or
local
officials,
waste
generators,

transporters,
storers,
and
disposers,
or
the
public.
4­
18
40
CFR
761
Subpart
B
 
Manufacturing,
Processing,
Distribution
in
Commerce,
and
Use
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
(#
51)
Certification
for
Burners
of
Used
Oil:
Before
the
first
shipment
of
used
fuel
oil
containing
detectable
PCBs,
the
burner
of
the
oil
must
provide
a
one­
time
written
certification
to
the
marketer
of
the
oil
that
the
incinerator
is
in
compliance
with
the
notification
requirements
of
§
761.71(
a)(
2)
or
40
CFR
279,

Subpart
G.
This
regulation
also
applies
to
marketing
or
burning
for
energy
recovery
liquids
containing
PCBs
at
concentrations
<
50
ppm
at
the
time
of
removal
from
a
natural
gas
pipeline
system
[
§
§
761.20(
e)(
3)(
ii);

.30(
i)(
5)(
ii);
and
.60(
b)(
5)(
iv)(
B)].

(#
52/
1000,
1729)
Transformer
and
Voltage
Regulator
Fire
Emergency
Notification:
Owners
of
PCB
Transformers
and
PCB
Voltage
Regulators
(
containing
$
500
ppm
PCBs)
must
report
any
fire­
related
incidents
involving
this
equipment
and
the
release
of
PCBs
to
the
National
Response
Center.
Information
must
be
provided
regarding
the
type
of
PCB
Transformer
installation
involved
in
the
incident
(
e.
g.,
high
or
low
secondary
voltage
network
transformer,
high
or
low
secondary
voltage
radial
system,
expanded
radial
system,
primary
selective
system,
primary
loop
system,
or
secondary
selective
system)
and
the
readily
ascertainable
cause
of
the
fire
(
e.
g.,
high
current
fault
in
the
primary
or
secondary
or
low
current
fault
in
secondary).
The
NRC
notifies
the
appropriate
Regional
Administrator
[
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xi)
and
(
xv)(
A);

(
h)(
1)(
ii)(
B)].

(#
53)
Notification
to
Owners
of
PCB
Transformers:
Users
of
a
PCB
Transformer
in
use
or
stored
for
reuse
that
may
pose
an
exposure
risk
to
food
or
feed
must
notify
the
owner
of
the
Transformer
[
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xiv)].

(#
54)
Registering
Newly
Discovered
PCB
Transformers:
In
the
event
that
a
mineral
oil
transformer
assumed
to
contain
<
500
ppm
PCBs
is
tested
and
found
to
be
contaminated
at
$
500
ppm,
the
owner
of
the
PCB
Transformer
must
register
the
equipment
with
the
building
owner
and
EPA
within
30
days
of
discovery
[
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xv)(
D)].

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
4­
19
(#
55/
1729)
Documentation
About
and
Disposal
Approval
for
PCB­
Contaminated
Liquids:
Prior
to
any
chemical
waste
landfill
disposing
of
PCB­
Contaminated
liquids
from
incidental
sources
associated
with
non­
liquid
PCB
waste,
the
landfill
owner/
operator
must
be
provided
with
documentation
that
shows
that
the
waste
does
not
exceed
500
ppm
PCBs,
that
it
is
not
an
ignitable
waste
as
described
in
§
761.75(
b)(
8)(
iii),
and
that
disposal
does
not
violate
40
CFR
§
268.32(
a)(
2)
and
§
268.42(
a)(
1),
which
list
specific
hazardous
wastes
prohibited
from
land
disposal,
including
liquid
hazardous
wastes
containing
PCBs
>
50
ppm
[
§
761.60(
a)(
3)(
ii)].

(#
56/
1729)
Inclusion
of
Abandoned
Natural
Gas
Pipes
in
Public
Service
Notification
Programs:
One
disposal
option
for
natural
gas
pipeline
systems
containing
PCBs
at
any
concentration
but
no
free­
flowing
liquids,
and
having
a
nominal
inside
diameter
of
#
4
inches,
is
to
seal
each
end
closed,
abandon
the
pipes
in
the
place
where
they
were
used
to
transport
natural
gas,
and
include
them
in
a
public
service
notification
program,

such
as
a
one­
call
system
under
49
CFR
192.614(
a)
and
(
b).
One­
call
systems
are
programs
run
by
utility
companies
to
inform
landowners
that
they
should
contact
the
utility
companies
before
beginning
any
excavation
work
on
their
property
to
avoid
disturbing
underground
utility
pipes
[
§
761.60(
b)(
5)(
i)(
A)(
1)].

(#
57/
1446)
Notification
about
Approved
PCB
Disposal
Facilities:
Each
operator
of
a
chemical
waste
landfill,
incinerator,
or
approved
alternative
disposal
technology
meeting
the
incineration
standard
must
notify
State
and
local
officials
at
least
30
days
prior
to
the
first
use
of
the
facility.
[
§
761.60(
f)(
1)(
i)].

(#
58)
Annual
Notification
about
PCBs
Disposed
of:
If
requested
by
State
and
local
officials,
each
operator
of
a
chemical
waste
landfill,
incinerator,
or
approved
alternative
to
incineration
must
provide
annual
information
about
the
quantities
and
types
of
PCBs
disposed
of
[
§
761.60(
f)(
1)(
ii)].

(#
59/
1729)
Notification
to
State
and
Local
Officials
of
PCB
Activities:
Any
person
may
conduct
R&
D
for
PCB
disposal
without
prior
written
approval
from
EPA,
if
they
meet
certain
conditions,
one
of
which
is
to
notify
State
and
local
environmental
agencies
at
least
30
days
prior
to
beginning
the
activities.
Each
written
notification
must
contain
the
EPA
identification
number
for
the
site,
the
quantity
of
PCBs
to
be
treated,
the
type
of
R&
D
technology
to
be
used,
the
physical
and
chemical
properties
of
the
materials
being
treated,
and
an
estimation
of
the
duration
of
the
activities
[
§
761.60(
j)(
i)(
ii)].
4­
20
(#
60)
Manifest
R&
D
PCB
Wastes:
Research
facilities
must
use
manifests,
pursuant
to
Subpart
K,

for
all
R&
D
PCB
wastes
being
transported
from
the
R&
D
facility
to
an
approved
PCB
storage
or
disposal
facility
for
disposal.
Manifests
are
not
needed
if
the
residuals
are
returned
to
the
site
of
generation
[
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
vii)].

(#
61/
1729)
Self­
implementing
Remediation:
Owners
of
remediation
sites
are
required
to
notify,
in
writing,
the
appropriate
State
(
or
tribal),
county
(
or
local)
environmental
agencies
at
least
30
days
prior
to
conducting
remediation
activities.
The
notification
must
include
the
following
information:
the
nature
of
the
contamination,
a
summary
of
the
procedures
used
to
sample
contaminated
and
adjacent
areas,
a
table
or
cleanup
site
map,
the
location
and
extent
of
PCB
contaminated
areas,
including
topographic
maps,
and
a
cleanup
plan
for
the
site
[
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)].

(#
62/
1729)
Notification
of
Pending
PCB
Shipments:
Generators
of
bulk
PCB
remediation
waste
must
provide
written
notice
to
each
off­
site
facility
where
the
waste
is
destined
that
is
not
subject
to
a
TSCA
PCB
disposal
approval
about
the
quantity
and
the
highest
concentration
of
PCBs
shipped,
at
least
15
days
before
the
first
shipment
of
the
waste
from
each
cleanup
site
[
§
761.61(
a)(
5)(
i)(
B)(
2)(
iv)].

(#
63/
1729)
Deed
Restrictions
On
Property
Where
Remediation
Projects
Have
Been
Conducted:

Within
60
days
of
completion
of
a
cleanup
activity
and
in
accordance
with
State
law,
site
owners
must
record
a
notation
on
the
deed
to
the
property,
or
on
some
other
instrument
that
is
normally
examined
during
the
title
search,
that
will
in
perpetuity
notify
any
potential
purchaser
of
the
property
that
the
land
has
been
used
for
disposal
of
PCB
remediation
waste,
the
site
is
restricted
for
use,
and
the
fence
or
cap
must
be
maintained,

as
well
as
the
applicable
cleanup
levels
left
at
the
site.
This
notice
is
to
become
a
permanent
attachment
to
the
deed
[
§
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)(
A)].

(#
64/
1729)
Disposal
of
PCB
Bulk
Product
Waste:
Any
person
disposing
off
site
of
PCB
bulk
product
waste
under
paragraph
(
b)(
1)
at
a
waste
management
facility
not
having
a
commercial
PCB
storage
or
disposal
approval,
must
provide
written
notification
to
the
receiving
facility
a
minimum
of
15
days
in
advance
of
the
first
shipment
from
the
same
disposal
waste
stream.
The
notice
shall
state
that
the
waste
may
include
components
containing
PCBs
at
$
50
ppm
and
that
the
waste
is
known
or
presumed
to
leach
<
10
ug/
L
PCBs.
The
objective
of
the
notification
is
to
alert
the
waste
facilities
and
prevent
the
generator
from
sending
4­
21
a
waste
to
a
facility
that
may
be
restricted
from
receiving
PCBs,
based
on
a
State­
issued
permit
[
§
§
761.62(
b)(
4)(
i)
and
761.357].
Any
person
disposing
off
site
of
PCB
bulk
product
waste
under
paragraph
(
b)(
2)
at
the
same
type
of
facility
must
comply
with
the
same
notification
requirements,
except
that
the
notice
shall
state
that
the
waste
is
known
or
presumed
to
leach
$
10
ug/
L
PCBs
[
§
§
761.62(
b)(
4)(
i)
and
(
ii);
761.357
and
.359].

(#
65)
Notations
on
PCB
Items
and
Containers:
To
store
PCB
Items,
either
for
disposal
or
temporarily
in
areas
that
do
not
comply
with
§
761.65(
b)
for
up
to
30
days
from
the
date
of
an
Item's
removal
from
service,
owners
of
the
Items
must
place
on
the
Item
the
date
it
is
removed
from
service.
Items
that
can
be
temporarily
stored
include
non­
leaking
PCB
Articles
and
PCB
Equipment;
leaking
PCB
Articles
and
Equipment
if
the
PCB
Items
are
placed
in
a
non­
leaking
PCB
Container;
PCB
Containers
containing
nonliquid
PCBs;
or
PCB
Containers
containing
liquid
PCBs
at
concentrations
$
50
ppm
in
areas
with
SPCC
plans
[
§
§
761.65(
c)(
1)
and
(
8)].

(#
66/
1446)
Notification
of
Shipping
Laboratory
Samples:
To
qualify
for
the
exemption
from
manifesting
laboratory
sampling
wastes,
as
per
§
761.65(
i)(
2)(
i)
and
(
ii),
the
sample
collector
shipping
the
samples
to
a
laboratory
and
a
laboratory
returning
samples
to
a
sample
collector
must
comply
with
applicable
DOT
requirements
found
at
49
CFR
173.345
and
U.
S.
Postal
Service
regulations,
652.2
and
652.3.

Information
on
the
sample
collector,
the
laboratory,
and
date
of
shipment
must
accompany
a
PCB
sample
when
it
is
shipped
to
the
testing
laboratory
or
back
to
the
sample
collector
[
§
761.65(
i)(
3)].

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
(#
67/
1729)
Requirements
for
the
Spill
Cleanup
Policy:
Spills
involving
1
pound
or
more
by
weight
of
PCBs
must
be
reported
to
the
National
Response
Center.
Because
spill
reporting
is
already
required
under
CERCLA,
this
change
to
the
TSCA
regulations
will
not
generate
any
new
activity
[
§
761.125(
a)(
1)].

(#
68)
Notification
of
PCB
Contamination
at
a
Cleanup
Site:
Parties
responsible
for
cleaning
up
PCB
spills
as
per
the
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
can
cleanup
the
site
to
50
ppm
PCBs
by
weight
(
as
opposed
to
25
ppm)

provided
that
a
label
or
notice
is
visibly
placed
in
the
area
[
§
761.125(
c)(
2)(
ii)].
4­
22
Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
(#
69)
Manifests
for
PCB
Wastes:
Generators
who
relinquish
control
over
PCB
wastes
by
transporting,
or
offering
for
transport,
PCB
waste
for
commercial
off­
site
storage
or
disposal
shall
prepare
a
manifest
(
EPA
Form
8700­
22),
which
specifies
the
identity
of
the
waste,
the
earliest
date
of
removal
from
service
for
disposal,
the
weight
in
kilograms
of
the
waste,
the
unique
identifying
number
of
a
PCB
Article
Container
or
PCB
Container,
the
serial
number
or
other
identification
of
PCB
Articles
not
in
containers
[
§
761.207(
a)].
For
bulk
shipments
within
the
United
States
transported
solely
by
water,
waste
generators
are
required
to
provide
three
copies
of
the
dated
and
signed
manifests
to
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
designated
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility
[
§
761.208(
a)(
2)].
For
rail
shipments
of
PCB
wastes
that
originate
at
the
site
of
generation,
the
generator
shall
send
at
least
three
copies
of
the
manifest
to
the
next
non­
rail
shipper,
if
any,
and
the
designated
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility,
if
transported
solely
by
rail
[
§
761.208(
a)(
3)].

(#
70)
Send
Manifest
to
Generator:
When
a
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility
receives
an
offsite
shipment
of
PCB
waste
accompanied
by
a
manifest,
the
owner/
operator
of
the
facility
must
send
a
copy
of
the
manifest
to
the
generator
within
30
days
after
the
delivery.
When
a
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility
receives
a
PCB
waste
from
a
rail
or
water
(
bulk
shipment)
transporter
accompanied
by
a
shipping
paper
containing
all
the
information
required
on
the
manifest
except
the
EPA
identification
number,

generator's
certification,
and
signatures,
the
owner/
operator
of
the
facility
shall
send
a
copy
of
the
manifest
or
shipping
paper
to
the
generator
[
§
761.208
(
c)(
1)(
iv)
and
(
c)(
2)(
iv)].

(#
71/
1446
and
1729)
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
Waste
Generators:
Owners
or
operators
of
disposal
facilities
must
send
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
generators
of
PCB
wastes
identified
on
the
manifests
that
accompany
each
shipment.
The
Certificates
must
be
sent
within
30
days
of
the
date
that
the
disposal
of
each
item
of
PCB
waste
identified
on
the
manifest
was
completed,
unless
the
generator
and
the
disposer
agree
to
another
time
frame.
The
Certificate
of
Disposal
shall
identify
the
disposal
facility
and
waste
affected
by
the
certificate
and
include
a
statement
certifying
the
date
of
disposal
and
disposal
process
for
the
identified
PCB
waste
[
§
761.218(
a)
and
(
b)].
4­
23
(
C)
Records.
Respondents
are
required
to
maintain
records
as
follows:

40
CFR
761
Subpart
A
 
General
(#
72/
1001)
Recordkeeping
of
Excluded
Manufacturing
Processes
and
Certification:
Chemical
manufacturers
and
importers
of
products
that
contain
inadvertently
generated
PCBs
(
i.
e.,
excluded
manufacturing
processes)
must
maintain
the
monitoring
data
(
or
other
analyses)
that
were
used
to
support
the
determination
of
compliance
with
the
conditions
of
§
761.3,
and
copies
of
the
signed
certification
of
compliance.
These
recordkeeping
requirements
expire
under
their
own
terms,
either
three
years
after
the
manufacturer
has
ceased
operating
the
process
that
necessitated
notification,
or
after
seven
years,
whichever
is
a
shorter
retention
period.
Monitoring
records
must
contain
the
method
of
analysis;
the
results
of
the
analysis,
including
data
from
the
Quality
Assurance
Plan;
a
description
of
the
sample
matrix,
the
name
of
the
analyst
or
analysis;
the
date
and
time
of
the
analysis;
and
numbers
for
the
lots
from
which
the
samples
are
taken
[
§
§
761.1(
f)(
1),
.185(
c)(
2)
and
(
d),
and
.193].

Subpart
B
 
Manufacturing,
Processing,
Distribution
in
Commerce,
and
Use
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
(#
73/
1729)
Records
of
Marketing
Used
Oil:
Marketers
who
first
claim
used
oil
does
not
contain
detectable
levels
of
PCBs
must
retain
records
supporting
the
claim
and
a
copy
of
each
certification
notice
received
or
prepared
relating
to
transactions
involving
PCB­
containing
used
oil.
Burners
must
include
among
the
records
a
copy
of
each
certification
notice
that
has
been
provided
to
a
marketer
of
PCB­
containing
used
oil.
These
requirements
also
apply
to
persons
who
market
or
burn
for
energy
recovery
liquid
containing
PCBs
at
concentrations
<
50
ppm
PCBs
at
the
time
of
removal
from
a
natural
gas
pipeline
system
[
§
§
761.20(
e)(
4)(
i)

and
(
ii);
.30(
i)(
5)(
ii);
and
.60(
b)(
5)(
iv)(
B)].

(#
74/
1000/
1729)
Records
of
PCB
Transformer
Registration,
Inspection,
and
Maintenance:

Individuals
are
required
to
retain
a
copy
of
the
transformer
registration
and
the
return
receipt
signed
by
the
EPA
and
records
of
inspection
and
maintenance
history
for
a
period
of
3
years
after
the
disposal
of
the
transformer(
s).
The
records
also
shall
contain
information
of
the
location
of
each
transformer;
inspection
4­
24
dates;
date
of
discovery
of
any
leaks;
inspector's
name;
location
of
any
leaks;
estimate
of
the
amount
of
dielectric
fluid
leaked;
date
and
description
of
any
cleanup,
containment,
repair,
or
replacement;
the
results
of
any
containment
and
daily
inspection
required
for
uncorrected
active
leaks;
and
any
transfer
of
ownership
of
PCB
Items
[
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)(
C),
(
xii),
and
(
xiv)].

(#
75/
1446)
Records
of
Reclassified
PCB
Transformers
and
Voltage
Regulators:
Owners
of
reclassified
PCB
Transformers
and
PCB
Voltage
Regulators
must
maintain
records
at
the
facility
where
the
transformers
or
voltage
regulators
have
been
reclassified
to
a
lower
PCB
concentration.
These
records,

generated
during
the
normal
course
of
the
reclassification
procedure,
include
the
pre­
and
post­
reclassification
concentration
of
the
unit
and
the
reclassification
process
employed
by
the
owner
[
§
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v),

.30(
h)(
2)(
vi)
and
.180(
a)].

(#
76/
1729)
Natural
Gas
Pipeline
Data:
PCBs
at
concentrations
of
$
50
ppm
are
authorized
for
use
in
natural
gas
pipelines
if
certain
actions
are
taken
to
characterize
the
concentration
and
extent
of
contamination,
as
well
as
remedial
measures
taken
to
reduce
the
PCB
concentrations
below
regulated
levels.

Records
of
the
results
of
the
sampling
and
analysis
as
well
as
any
actions
taken
or
not
taken
to
reduce
the
PCB
concentrations
must
be
kept
for
3
years
after
the
PCB
concentrations
have
been
reduced
to
below
regulated
levels.
EPA
expects
the
recordkeeping
burden
to
be
minimal
as
the
regulations
allow
for
use
of
historical
data.
Owners
or
operators
of
natural
gas
pipeline
systems
that
do
not
include
sources
of
PCB
contamination
(
e.
g.,
natural
gas
compressors,
natural
gas
scrubbers,
and
natural
gas
filters)
containing
$
50
ppm
PCBs
also
must
comply
with
the
recordkeeping
requirements
[
§
§
761.30(
i)(
1)(
iii)(
B)
and
(
C)].

(#
77/
1729)
Records
of
Equipment
Stored
for
Reuse:
Owners
of
PCB
Articles
stored
for
reuse
must
maintain
records
starting
at
and
indicating
the
time
the
PCB
Article
is
removed
from
use
or
starting
from
August
28,
1998,
if
the
date
it
was
removed
from
use
is
not
known.
The
records
must
also
include
the
projected
location
and
the
future
use
of
the
PCB
Article,
and,
if
applicable,
the
date
the
PCB
Article
is
scheduled
for
repair
or
servicing
[
§
761.35(
a)(
2)].

Subpart
C
 
Marking
4­
25
(
#
78/
1729)
Records
for
Identifying
PCB
Large
Low
Voltage
Capacitors:
Owners
or
operators
of
PCB
Large
Capacitors
located
in
protected
locations
must
maintain
a
record
for
identifying
the
PCB
Capacitors,
but
only
if
they
choose
not
to
mark
each
capacitor
individually
[
§
§
761.40(
c)(
2)(
ii)
and
(
k)].

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
(#
79/
1729)
Records
of
Disposal
for
R&
D
Facilities:
The
self­
implementing
provisions
under
§
761.60(
j)
allow
individuals
to
conduct
research
and
development
for
PCB
disposal.
One
of
the
provisions
is
that
R&
D
facilities
must
comply
with
existing
recordkeeping
requirements
in
§
761.180
(
e.
g.,
maintain
the
annual
document
log
and
annual
records)
and
the
applicable
storage
and
disposal
requirements
in
Subpart
D.

This
is
not
a
new
requirement,
but
may
affect
R&
D
facilities
that
conduct
treatability
studies
[
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ix)].

(#
80/
1729)
Records
of
Remediation
Activities:
Individuals
conducting
self­
implementing
remediation
projects
are
required
to
maintain
records
of
the
sampling
plans,
sample
collection
procedures,
sample
preparation
procedures,
extraction
procedures,
and
instrumental/
chemical
analysis
procedures
used
to
assess
or
characterize
the
PCB
contamination
at
the
cleanup
site.
Persons
using
alternate
methods
for
chemical
extraction
and
chemical
analysis
for
site
characterization
must
keep
on
file
records
of
a
comparison
study
that
meets
or
exceeds
the
requirements
of
§
761.269(
c)
[
§
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)(
E)
and
(
a)(
6),
and
Subparts
O
and
Q].

(#
81/
1729)
Waivers
of
the
Notification
Requirement:
Under
the
self­
implementing
remediation
provisions
of
§
761.61,
individuals
who
receive
a
waiver
of
the
30­
day
notification
requirement
must
maintain
the
original
written
waivers
received
from
each
of
the
agencies
they
are
required
to
notify
under
this
section
(
i.
e.,
the
RA,
State
and
county
(
or
local)
environmental
offices)
[
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
iii)].

(#
82/
1729)
Records
of
Remediation
Cleanup
Activities:
For
the
cleanup
of
bulk
PCB
remediation
waste,
non­
porous
surfaces,
porous
surfaces,
and
liquids,
site
owners
must
keep
records
as
per
§
761.125(
c)(
5)
for
a
period
of
5
years.
The
records
must
identify
the
source
of
the
spill
and
include
information
on
the
estimated
or
actual
date
of
the
spill,
the
date
cleanup
was
completed
or
terminated,
a
brief
description
of
spill
location
and
the
nature
of
the
materials
contaminated,
pre­
cleanup
sampling
data
used
to
establish
spill
boundaries,
a
brief
description
of
the
solid
surfaces
cleaned,
the
approximate
depth
of
soil
4­
26
excavation
and
the
amount
of
soil
removed,
post
cleanup
verification
sampling
data,
and
a
brief
description
of
the
sampling
methodology
[
§
761.61(
a)(
9)].

(#
83/
1729)
Records
of
Sampling
and
Analysis
of
PCB
Bulk
Product
Waste:
Persons
disposing
of
PCB
bulk
product
waste
in
solid
waste
landfills
must
keep
records
of
the
sampling
and
analysis
of
PCB
bulk
product
waste
as
well
as
required
notifications.
The
records
must
be
maintained
for
3
years
from
the
date
of
their
creation
and
made
available
to
EPA
upon
request
[
§
761.62(
b)(
5)].

(#
84/
1729)
Attempts
to
Secure
Disposal
:
The
regulations
include
a
provision
which
would
grant
individuals
an
automatic
1­
year
extension
to
store
waste
beyond
the
1­
year
deadline
for
disposal
if
certain
conditions
are
met.
One
of
the
conditions
is
that
the
individual
must
maintain
a
written
record
of
his
efforts
to
secure
disposal
capacity
until
the
waste
is
disposed.
These
records
must
be
made
available
for
inspection
by
the
EPA
[
§
§
761.65(
a)(
2)(
ii),
and
(
3)].

(#
85,
86/
1729)
Spill
Prevention,
Control,
and
Countermeasure
(
SPCC)
Plan:
Owners/
operators
of
facilities
using
PCB
storage
containers,
as
per
29
CFR
1910.106,
must
prepare
SPCC
plans.
SPCC
plans
are
also
necessary
to
temporarily
store
containers
of
PCB
liquids
>
50
ppm.
An
SPCC
plan
will
be
necessary
when
an
individual
has
not
previously
stored
liquid
PCBs
on
a
temporary
basis.
[
§
§
761.65(
c)(
1)(
iv)
and
(
7)(
ii)].

(#
87/
1729)
Records
of
PCB
Items
in
Stationery
Storage
Containers:
PCB
Items
shall
be
dated
when
removed
from
service
for
disposal.
For
each
batch
of
PCBs
added
to
storage
containers,
as
per
§
761.65(
c)(
7),
owners
of
the
containers
shall
maintain
a
record
that
includes
the
quantity
of
the
batch
and
date
the
batch
was
added
to
the
container.
The
record
shall
also
include
the
date,
quantity,
and
disposition
of
any
batch
of
PCBs
removed
from
the
container
[
§
761.65(
c)(
8)].

(#
88)
Records
of
Storage
for
Disposal
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items:
Owners/
operators
of
commercial
storage
facilities
must
establish
and
maintain
records,
as
per
§
761.180,
for
the
storage
and
disposal
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
$
50
ppm
[
§
§
761.65(
c)(
10)
and
.180].
4­
27
(#
89)
Incinerator
Records:
Owners
and
operators
of
incinerators
must
keep
records
of
the
quantity
of
PCBs
fed
into
the
incinerator
and
the
rate
at
which
the
PCBs
are
fed,
the
temperature
of
the
incineration
process,
the
results
of
continuous
monitoring
of
combustion
products
for
oxygen
and
carbon
monoxide,
at
a
frequency
specified
by
EPA,
and
information
on
the
weight
of
solid
residue
generated
by
the
incinerator
[
§
§
761.70(
a)(
3),
(
4),
and
(
7);
(
c);
and
.180(
c)].

(#
90/
1729)
High
Efficiency
Boiler
(
HEB)
Feed
Rate
and
Emissions
Record
Retention:
Persons
burning
liquids
other
than
mineral
oil
dielectric
fluid,
containing
PCBs
between
50
and
500
ppm,
in
an
approved
HEB
must
retain
the
following
records:
the
quantity
of
low
concentration
PCBs
burned
in
the
boiler
each
month,
monthly
waste
analysis
records,
and
the
data
required
in
§
§
761.71(
b)(
1)(
vi)
and
(
b)(
1)(
vii),
which
includes
the
carbon
monoxide
concentration
and
excess
oxygen
percentage
in
the
stack
gas;
the
fuel
feed
rate;
waste
fluid
feed
rate;
and
the
quantities
of
fuel
and
waste
fluid
fed
to
the
boiler
[
§
§
761.71(
a)(
1)(
vi)
and
(
vii),
(
a)(
4),
(
b)(
1)(
vi)
and
(
b)(
1)(
vii),
(
b)(
5),
and
.180(
e)].

(#
91/
1729)
PCB
Disposal
Using
Scrap
Metal
Recovery
Ovens
and
Smelters:
The
use
of
scrap
metal
recovery
ovens
and
smelters
is
authorized
for
disposing
of
PCB­
contaminated
items
when
the
equipment
meets
certain
operating
parameters
and
conditions.
One
of
these
parameters
addresses
the
temperature
of
the
hearth
(
i.
e.,
at
least
1,000
°
C
when
charged
with
PCB
Items).
Operators
are
required
to
record
the
temperature
and
retain
the
data
at
the
facility
for
3
years
from
the
date
each
charge
is
introduced.
Because
these
devices
are
considered
disposal
units,
owners
of
the
equipment
must
meet
all
applicable
recordkeeping
requirements
in
40
CR
761
Subparts
J
and
K
(
e.
g.,
maintain
annual
document
log
and
annual
records)
[
§
§
761.72(
a)(
9)
and
(
b)(
6)].

(#
92)
Chemical
Waste
Landfill
Records:
Owners/
operators
of
chemical
waste
landfills
that
dispose
of
PCBs
must
maintain
records
of
all
PCB
disposal
operations,
including
PCB
concentration
in
liquid
wastes,

the
three­
dimensional
burial
coordinates
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items,
water
sampling
and
analysis
(
i.
e.,
samples
of
surface
and
ground
water
at
locations
and
frequencies
specified
by
EPA
in
their
approvals),
and
additional
records.
The
samples
must
be
analyzed
for
PCBs,
pH,
specific
conductance,
and
chlorinated
organics
[
§
§
761.75(
b)(
6)(
iii)
and
(
b)(
8)(
iv)
and
.180(
d)].

(#
93,
94/
1729)
Decontamination
Activities:
If
individuals
follow
self­
implementing
decontamination
procedures
(
and
maintain
the
required
records),
they
will
not
need
to
obtain
a
PCB
disposal
approval,
as
is
4­
28
currently
the
case,
to
decontaminate
for
continued
use
or
distribution
in
commerce
items
that
had
been
contaminated
with
PCBs.
Test
and
validation
results
of
performance­
based
decontamination
activities
using
PODFs
and
VADFs
must
be
retained
[
Subpart
T,
§
761.79(
d)(
4)].
Also,
individuals
that
conduct
PCB
decontamination
activities
must
maintain
records
of
sampling
activities
that
show
sampling
locations,
analytical
results,
and
information
about
the
wastes
generated
by
a
decontamination
process.
These
records
must
be
retained
at
the
site
of
decontamination
for
a
period
of
3
years
for
inspection
by
EPA
[
§
§
761.79(
f)(
1)
and
(
2)].

Subpart
E
 
Exemptions
(#
95,
96/
1729)
Manufacture
of
PCBs
and
Processing/
Distributing
of
Limited
Quantities
of
PCBs
or
PCBs
in
Waste
Materials
for
R&
D:
Under
the
class
exemptions
for
manufacturers
of
PCBs
and
processors
and
distributors
of
limited
quantities
of
PCBs
and
PCB
analytical
reference
samples
derived
from
waste
materials
for
purposes
of
research
and
development,
facilities
seeking
the
exemption
must
maintain
records
on
the
source(
s)
of
PCBs,
the
person(
s)
to
whom
the
PCBs
were
shipped,
and
the
amount(
s)
of
PCBs
received,
processed
and
distributed
in
commerce
annually.
These
records
must
be
retained
for
a
period
of
either
3
years
after
ceasing
the
processing
and/
or
distributing
operations
or
5
years
[
§
§
761.80(
e)(
5),
(
g)(
1),

and
(
i)(
7)].

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
(#
97,
98)
Records
of
Spill
Cleanup
and
Delays:
Parties
responsible
for
cleaning
up
PCB
spills
must
maintain
documentation
of
the
cleanup
activities
and
certification
of
the
documentation
for
five
years.

Owners
of
PCB
spills
who
have
delayed
cleanup
because
of
circumstances
such
as
civil
emergency;

hurricane,
tornado,
or
other
similar
adverse
weather
conditions;
lack
of
access
due
to
physical
impossibility;

or
emergency
operating
conditions,
must
keep
records
documenting
the
fact
that
circumstances
precluded
rapid
response
[
§
§
761.125(
b)(
3),
(
c)(
1)
and
(
c)(
5)
and
.61(
a)(
9)].

Subpart
J
 
General
Records
and
Reports
(#
99/
1446,
1729)
The
Annual
Document
Log
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items:
Owners/
operators
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
in
service
or
projected
for
disposal
must
maintain
annual
records
and
a
written
annual
4­
29
document
log
for
5
years
after
the
facility
ceases.
The
records
must
include
signed
manifests,
Certificates
of
Disposal,
records
of
inspections
and
cleanups,
facility
and
Item
identification
information,
total
number
of
Items,
telephone
records,
and
Item
transfer
information.
Individuals
must
also
collect
and
maintain
documents,
correspondence,
and
data
pertaining
to
storage/
disposal
of
PCBs
that
have
been
provided
to
as
well
as
received
from
any
State
or
local
government
agency
and
any
application/
correspondence
submitted
to
local,
State,
or
Federal
permitting
authorities
[
§
§
761.180(
a),
(
a)(
4),
(
b),
and
(
f);
and
761.65(
c)(
5)].

(#
100/
1001)
Recordkeeping
of
Monitoring
Data
for
Inadvertently
Generated
PCBs
:
Any
importers
of
or
manufacturers
generating
PCBs
in
excluded
manufacturing
process
must
maintain
for
a
period
of
3
years
after
ceasing
process
operations
or
importation,
or
for
7
years,
whichever
is
shorter,
monitoring
or
analytical
data
used
to
determine
compliance
of
import,
manufacture,
process,
distribution
in
commerce,
or
use
of
chemicals
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs.
The
manufacturers'
records
must
include
the
reaction(
s)
believed
to
be
generating
PCBs,
the
levels
of
PCBs
generated,
and
the
levels
of
PCBs
released.

Importer
records
must
include
the
reaction(
s)
believed
to
be
generating
PCBs,
the
levels
of
PCBs
generated,

the
basis
for
all
estimations
of
PCB
concentrations,
and
the
name
and
qualifications
of
the
person
performing
the
analyses.
Monitoring
data
must
include
the
method
of
analysis,
the
results
of
the
analysis,
description
of
the
plan
matrix,
names
of
the
analysts,
date
and
time
of
the
analysis,
and
number
for
the
lots
from
which
the
samples
were
taken
[
§
§
761.185(
c)(
2),
(
d),
and
.193(
a)
and
(
b)].

Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
(#
101,
102/
1446)
Recordkeeping
of
Manifests
and
Certificates
of
Disposal:
PCB
waste
generators
must
retain
a
written
record
of
all
manifests
and
telephone
and
other
confirmations
regarding
manifesting
communications,
which
are
to
be
included
in
the
annual
document
log,
in
accordance
with
§
761.180
[
§
761.208(
a)].
Each
transporter,
storer,
and
disposer
must
retain
one
copy
of
each
manifest
or
shipping
paper
[
§
§
761.208(
b)
and
(
c)].
Each
PCB
waste­
handling
facility
that
initiates
or
receives
a
manifest
must
file
and
maintain
a
copy
of
each
manifest.
The
generator
of
PCB
waste
shall
keep
a
copy
of
each
manifest
until
the
generator
receives
a
signed
copy
from
the
designated
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility
that
received
the
PCB
waste.
The
generator,
transporter,
and
owners/
operators
of
the
storage
and
disposal
facilities
shall
keep
a
copy
signed
by
the
storer
or
disposer
for
at
least
3
years
from
the
date
the
PCB
waste
was
accepted
4­
30
by
the
initial
transporter.
[
§
761.209(
a)
to
(
d)].
Generators
and
commercial
storers
of
PCB
waste
must
also
maintain
a
copy
of
each
Certificates
of
Disposal
received
from
disposers
[
§
761.218(
c)].
4­
31
Subpart
T
 
Comparison
Study
for
Validating
a
New
Performance­
Based
Decontamination
Solvent
Under
§
761.79(
d)(
4)

(#
103)
Results
of
Validation
Studies:
Persons
conducting
studies
to
validate
a
new
performancebased
decontamination
solvent
must
record
the
testing
parameters
and
experimental
procedures
in
standard
operating
practices
and
must
affix
in
an
appendix
the
results
of
the
validation
study
[
§
761.398(
c)].

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
Typical
respondents
include:
manufacturers,
processors,
distributors
of
PCBs
in
commerce;
owners
of
PCB­
contaminated
equipment
and
PCB
Items;
PCB
waste
generators,
transporters,
commercial
storers,

and
disposers
(
i.
e.,
PCB
waste
handlers);
owners/
operators
of
laboratories;
and
other
users
of
PCBs.
All
respondents
must
read
the
rule
and
determine
which
provisions
are
applicable
to
their
operations;
plan
and
modify
their
procedures
to
come
into
compliance
with
the
rule;
provide
training
to
appropriate
staff;
process,

compile,
and
review
information
for
accuracy
and
appropriateness;
and
record,
disclose,
and/
or
report
the
required
information.
Specific
responsibilities
for
each
type
of
respondent
are
as
follows:

Manufacturers,
Processors,
Distributors
in
Commerce
of
PCBs.
Individuals
who
are
included
in
the
manufacturing
exclusions
must
gather
and
document
data
on
raw
materials
and
intermediates
used
in
the
manufacturing
process;
analyze
the
reactions
and
conditions
at
issue;
survey
the
facility
site
and
specific
equipment
to
determine
and
document
where
and
to
what
extent
PCBs
could
be
released
into
air,
water,
and
end
products.
Individuals
who
seek
exemptions
from
the
manufacturing,
processing,
or
distribution
in
commerce
bans
must
document
the
amount
of
PCBs
affected
by
the
exemption
request;
describe
the
manufacturing/
processing/
distribution
in
commerce
processes;
comply
with
additional
statutory
requirements
of
TSCA
section
6(
e)(
3)(
B);
quantify
the
economic
consequences
of
an
exemption
denial;
and
provide
specifics
about
servicing
and
use
activities,
develop
certification
statements,
and
complete
other
paperwork.

Owners
of
PCB
Items
and
PCB­
Contaminated
Equipment.
There
are
various
requirements
for
owners
of
the
many
different
types
of
PCB
Items.
Owners
of
PCB
Transformers
must
register
their
Transformers
with
EPA,
providing
information
on
the
number
of
PCB
Transformers,
their
locations,
and
his
or
her
name,
address,
telephone
number
and
signature,
or
that
of
the
authorized
representative,
which
certifies
4­
32
the
accuracy
of
the
submitted
information.
Owners
of
PCB
Transformers
must
record
inspection
and
maintenance
information
and
file
and
maintain
the
data.
Owners
of
PCB
Transformers
also
must
maintain
information
in
the
annual
log
about
any
transfer
of
ownership
of
a
PCB
Transformer.
A
proposed
requirement
for
owners
of
reclassified
transformers
is
to
keep
records
of
the
initial
concentration
of
the
transformer
and
the
chosen
reclassification
procedure
and
a
copy
of
the
analysis
indicating
the
final
concentration
in
the
unit.

Individuals
who
discover
fire­
related
incidents
that
result
from
a
rupture
of
a
PCB
Transformer
or
PCB
Voltage
Regulator
must
report
the
incident
to
the
National
Response
Center.
Owners
of
PCB
Items
distributed
in
commerce
for
reuse
must
retain
records
in
the
annual
document
log
of
any
transfers
of
ownership.
Owners
of
large
capacitors
located
in
protected
locations
who
choose
not
to
mark
these
units
individually
must
maintain
records
for
identifying
the
Capacitors.

Owners
of
PCB
Articles
stored
for
reuse
must
maintain
records
of
the
Articles.
Some
owners
of
PCB
Items
may
want
to
obtain
approval
to
store
equipment
for
disposal
beyond
the
current
1­
year
limit,
or
to
exceed
the
5­
year
limit
for
the
storage
of
equipment
for
purposes
of
reuse.
In
those
cases,
they
would
be
required
to
contact
the
appropriate
RA
and
compile
and
submit
the
requisite
information.
Utilities
and
other
owners
of
PCB­
Contaminated
equipment
must
create
or
modify
their
Spill
Prevention,
Control,
and
Countermeasure
Plan
(
SPCC)
if
temporarily
storing
PCB
liquids.
Owners
of
PCB
Items
(
in
addition
to
PCB
Transformers)
are
also
required
to
record
and
maintain
records
of
inspection,
maintenance
activities,
cleanup,

disposal,
and
certain
decontamination
activities.
When
PCB
Items
are
removed
from
service
for
disposal,

the
owners
of
the
Items
must
place
the
date
on
the
item.

When
owners
of
PCB
Items
generate
wastes
that
must
be
handled
as
a
PCB
remediation
or
bulk
product
waste,
they
will
need
to
determine
which
of
the
available
disposal
options
(
i.
e.,
self­
implementing,

performance­
based,
or
risk­
based
options)
should
be
used
to
address
their
disposal
needs.
These
disposal
options
will
require
compliance
with
various
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements.

PCB
Waste
Handlers.
PCB
waste
handlers
must
respond
to
the
notification
requirements
by
filling
out
a
brief
one­
time
form
(#
7710­
53)
(
see
Appendix
D)
and
filing
and
maintaining
the
information.
Individuals
who
handle
PCB­
Contaminated
liquid
wastes
must
notify
chemical
waste
landfill
owners
of
the
certain
4­
33
specified
properties
of
the
waste,
and
the
landfill
must
obtain
written
approval
from
the
RA
before
disposing
of
these
wastes.
Individuals
disposing
of
PCB
waste,
such
as
in
a
high
efficiency
boiler,
must
notify
the
RA
about
the
activity.

Waste
handlers
attempting
to
secure
disposal
must
maintain
records
of
these
attempts
to
be
granted
an
automatic
one­
year
extension
to
store
wastes
beyond
the
one­
year
deadline
for
disposal.
If
waste
handlers
change
their
waste­
handling
activities,
they
are
also
required
to
file
an
amended
TSCA
PCB
notification
form
(#
7710­
53,
Appendix
D),
which
provides
information
on
the
amended
activity.

To
handle
PCB
remediation
wastes
under
the
self­
implementing
option,
site
owners
must
notify
the
RA
and
other
authorities
about
the
remediation
activities
and
submit
a
written
certification
to
the
RA
that
site
sampling
and
waste
characterization
plans
are
on
file
at
a
specified
location.
Generators
of
bulk
PCB
remediation
waste
must
provide
written
notice
to
off­
site
waste
handling
facilities
about
the
quantities
that
will
be
shipped
to
the
facilities
and
the
highest
concentration
of
PCBs
in
the
shipment.
Property
owners
with
remediation
sites
that
require
the
use
of
a
fence
or
a
cap
must
submit
to
EPA
a
certification
that
the
property
deed
has
a
notation
to
that
effect.
The
recordkeeping
activities
for
individuals
using
the
self­
implementing
remediation
provisions
for
disposing
of
PCB
remediation
waste
include
retaining
written
waivers
received
from
EPA
or
other
authorities
for
5
years,
maintaining
records
of
sampling
plans
and
characterization
procedures,
recording
in
the
deed
any
sites
that
require
the
use
of
a
fence
or
cap,
and
keeping
records
of
cleanup
activities
for
5
years.
PCB
waste
handlers
are
required
to
record
and
maintain
records,
such
as
calculations
used
and
validation
and
sampling
results,
on
certain
decontamination
activities.

Any
person
using
the
risk­
based
disposal
option
to
dispose
of
PCB
bulk
product
waste
must
apply
in
writing
to
EPA
to
do
so.
Persons
handling
PCB
bulk
product
waste
must
maintain
records
of
sampling
and
analysis
for
3
years.
Any
person
with
a
spill
involving
one
pound
or
more
of
PCBs
must
report
the
spill
to
the
National
Response
Center.

PCB
waste
generators
must
provide
manifests
and/
or
shipping
papers
that
will
accompany
the
waste
shipment
to
the
transporters
and
to
the
disposers.
When
a
generator
uses
an
independent
transporter,
he
or
she
must
confirm
either
by
phone
or
some
other
convenient
means
that
the
receiving
PCB
storage
and/
or
disposal
facility
actually
received
the
wastes.
Generators,
storers,
transporters,
and
disposers
must
sign
and
4­
34
retain
copies
of
the
manifests
when
they
handle
a
shipment
of
PCB
waste.
Generators
must
submit
exception
reports
to
EPA
when
they
fail
to
receive
confirmation
from
the
disposer
that
a
shipment
of
PCB
waste
has
been
properly
disposed
of.

Persons
seeking
coordinated
approval
for
their
waste­
handling
activities
are
required
to
submit
requests
for
approval
to
the
RA.
These
individuals
are
required
to
adhere
to
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements,
submit
additional
information
as
required
by
EPA,
or
submit
an
application
for
a
TSCA
PCB
approval,
and
notify
the
RA
of
any
changes
relating
to
the
waste
management
documents
that
serve
as
the
basis
for
the
coordinated
approval.

Owners
and
Operators
of
PCB
Disposal
Facilities.
These
respondents
are
expected
to
complete
the
EPA
approval
process:
develop
a
description
and
a
plan
for
a
demonstration
of
the
system;
conduct
demonstration
and
complete
an
analytical
assessment
of
the
results;
and
record/
disclose
information;
submit
a
demonstration
report;
and
develop
standard
operating
procedures,
a
closure
plan
and
financial
assurance
which
cover
the
closure
costs
of
the
facility.
Operators
of
approved
chemical
waste
landfills,
incinerators,

or
alternate
PCB
disposal
technologies
must
also
notify
State
and
local
officials
prior
to
the
first
use
of
the
technology,
and
if
requested
by
a
State
or
local
government,
provide
annual
notice
of
the
quantities
and
types
of
PCBs
disposed
of
during
the
year.

Owners/
operators
of
incinerators
must
keep
records
regarding
the
PCBs
fed
into
the
incinerator
and
the
operating
conditions
of
the
equipment.
Owners
of
chemical
waste
landfills
must
collect
and
analyze
samples
of
surface
and
ground
water
at
EPA­
approved
locations.
To
dispose
of
residual
PCB
waste
in
a
scrap
metal
recovery
oven
or
smelter,
the
owner
must
obtain
a
permit
or
have
the
unit
approved
by
the
RA,

and
comply
with
applicable
reporting
requirements
of
Subparts
J
and
K,
such
as
recording
operating
temperatures.
Persons
burning
PCB
liquids
in
high
efficiency
boilers
must
retain
records
of
the
quantities
burned,
waste
analysis
results,
and
operational
conditions
of
the
boiler.

Owners
and
operators
of
PCB
disposal
facilities
are
required
to
submit
annual
reports
to
EPA.
PCB
waste
disposers
must
submit
unmanifested
waste
reports
to
EPA
when
they
accept
a
shipment
of
PCB
waste
without
an
accompanying
manifest.
Disposers
also
must
submit
discrepancy
reports
when
the
PCB
waste
they
receive
for
disposal
does
not
match
the
description
of
the
manifest
that
accompanies
it.
4­
35
Owners/
operators
of
disposal
facilities
must
submit
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
waste
generators
when
a
disposal
is
complete
for
each
item
on
a
manifested
waste
shipment.
The
disposers
must
maintain
all
of
the
above
records.
Owners/
operators
of
PCB
disposal
facilities
also
are
required
to
attempt
to
contact
the
generator
when
they
receive
a
shipment
of
PCB
waste
that
does
not
include
a
manifest.

Owners/
Operators
of
Commercial
Storage
Facilities.
These
respondents
must
complete
the
EPA
approval
process;
i.
e.,
submit
closure
plans
and
financial
assurances
to
EPA
.
They
must
notify
the
appropriate
RA
when
it
is
necessary
to
exceed
the
1­
year
storage
limitation,
to
modify
the
facility,
or
amend
the
financial
assurance
mechanism.
For
subsequent
extensions
to
the
storage
limitations,
the
requestor
must
submit
specific
justification
for
the
extension
and
indicate
measures
he
is
taking
to
secure
disposal.
Owners
of
commercial
storage
facilities
must
record
and
maintain
records
associated
with
PCB
equipment
inspections
and
cleanups.
They
must
also
submit
a
summary
report
to
EPA
of
the
type
and
quantity
of
PCB
wastes
that
were
managed
at
the
facility
during
the
preceding
year.
Commercial
storers
of
PCB
wastes
must
submit
Exception
Reports
when
they
transfer
the
PCBs
or
PCB
Items
to
the
disposer
within
9
months
from
the
date
of
removal
of
the
Item
from
service
or
when
they
have
not
received
within
13
months
from
the
date
of
removal
from
service
for
disposal
a
Certificate
of
Disposal
confirming
the
disposal
of
the
Item,
as
applicable.

Users
of
PCB
waste
storage
containers
can
use
containers
other
than
those
prescribed
by
ANSI
for
nuclear
criticality
safety
if
the
user
demonstrates
that
such
containers
are
protective
of
human
health
and
the
environment.
Managers
of
large
bulk
PCB
storage
containers
shall
have
a
record
that
includes
for
each
batch
of
PCBs
the
quantity
of
the
batch
and
the
date
the
batch
was
added
to
the
container.

If
owners
of
storage
facilities
change
their
waste­
handling
activities,
they
would
also
be
required
to
file
an
amended
TSCA
PCB
notification
form.
EPA
will
approve
changes
in
ownership
of
storage
facilities
if
the
transferee
has
established
financial
assurance
for
closure
and
the
transferor
has
resolved
any
deficiencies,
such
as
with
operations,
closure
plans,
and
cost
estimates.

Owners/
operators
of
PCB
commercial
storage
facilities
are
required
to
attempt
to
reconcile,
with
either
the
generator
and/
or
transporter
any
significant
discrepancy
in
the
manifest.
Owners/
operators
of
PCB
commercial
storage
facilities
are
required
to
attempt
to
contact
the
generator
when
they
receive
a
shipment
of
PCB
waste
that
doesn't
include
a
manifest.
4­
36
Laboratories.
Persons
conducting
R&
D
on
PCB
disposal
are
required
to
obtain
an
EPA
identification
number
and
notify
EPA
and
other
authorities
before
conducting
the
R&
D
activities.
R&
D
facilities
must
also
manifest
wastes,
as
applicable,
and
submit
requests
to
EPA
when
exceeding
the
specified
limits
for
the
PCBs
used.
R&
D
facilities
can
also
submit
requests
for
extensions
in
the
duration
of
the
activity.
Facilities
can
submit
exemption
petitions
to
qualify
for
the
class
exemptions
to
manufacture
PCBs
for
disposal­
related
R&
D
activities
or
to
process
or
distribute
PCBs
or
PCB
analytical
reference
samples
derived
from
waste
materials.

Facilities
seeking
the
exemption
must
maintain
records
of
the
activities
for
the
annual
log.
Laboratories
conducting
self­
implementing
R&
D
for
disposal
activities
must
maintain
annual
records,
as
well.

R&
D
facilities
seeking
coordinated
approvals
may
submit
requests
for
approval
to
the
RA.
They
are
required
to
adhere
to
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements,
submit
additional
information
as
required
by
EPA
or
submit
an
application
for
a
TSCA
PCB
approval,
and
notify
the
RA
of
any
changes
relating
to
the
waste
management
documents
that
serve
as
the
basis
for
the
coordinated
approval.

Operators
of
laboratories
who
wish
to
exceed
quantity
limitations
for
the
manufacture,
processing,

or
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs
will
have
to
submit
requests
to
EPA.

Other
Individuals
(
i.
e.,
Users
of
PCBs).
Owners
of
PCB­
Contaminated
natural
gas
pipeline
systems
who
sell
or
distribute
natural
gas,
can
use
these
systems
if
they
keep
records
of
sampling
and
analysis
results
and
actions
taken
to
reduce
the
PCB
concentrations
to
below
regulated
levels
and
submit
a
description
of
the
system
to
EPA,
if
requested.
Owners
of
natural
gas
pipelines
must
also
include
the
system
in
public
service
notification
programs,
which
inform
landowners
that
they
should
contact
the
utilities
before
beginning
any
excavation
work
on
their
property.
Owners
of
other
PCB­
contaminated
gas
liquid
systems
must
obtain
the
consent
of
the
EPA
(
Director,
National
Program
Chemicals
Division)
to
use
the
systems.

Persons
burning
for
energy
recovery
used
oil
or
liquids
containing
PCBs
<
50
ppm
from
a
natural
gas
pipeline
system
must
keep
records
of
each
certification
notice,
and
marketers
of
these
liquids
must
retain
records
related
to
transactions
which
they
claim
do
not
contain
detectable
PCBs.
Other
users
of
PCBs
may
have
to
deal
with
remediation
waste
or
PCB
bulk
waste
disposal
issues.
In
that
event,
they
will
need
to
determine
which
of
the
available
options
(
i.
e.,
self­
implementing,
performance­
based,
leachability
or
risk­
4­
37
based)
could
be
used
to
address
their
disposal
needs.
These
disposal
options
will
require
compliance
with
various
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements.
5­
1
5
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
 
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES,
COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY,
AND
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
5(
a)
Agency
Activities
EPA
resources
are
devoted
to
reviewing
and
analyzing
data
submissions,
compiling
and
recording
data,
maintaining
hard­
copy
files
of
submitted
data,
inspecting
facilities,
producing
inspection
reports,

responding
to
public
inquiry,
providing
regulatory
interpretations
and
developing
rulemakings.
OPPT
staff
do
not
print
or
otherwise
prepare
collection
instruments,
compile
mailing
lists,
or
publish
results.
Although
a
web
site
has
been
established,
EPA
plans
to
continue/
expand
its
review
of
the
use
of
the
Internet
to
facilitate
the
transfer
of
information
from
EPA
to
the
public.
More
specific
Agency
activities
are
discussed
below.

Data
submitted
to
EPA
for
consideration
in
granting
or
denying
requests
for
exemptions
are
reviewed
(
ICR
857),
analyzed
for
confidentiality
and
appropriate
protection,
and
placed
in
the
docket.
EPA
makes
determinations
of
whether
to
grant
exemptions
and
develops
rulemakings
in
response
to
the
requests
for
exemptions.
Agency
staff
also
receives,
analyzes
and
reviews
requests
to
exceed
quantity
limitations
imposed
by
class
exemptions
(
ICR
1729).

Under
the
self­
implementing
procedures
of
the
PCB
regulations,
data
are
submitted
to
EPA
to
qualify
for
the
exclusion
for
processes/
products
containing
low
levels
of
PCBs
from
the
statutory
bans
on
the
manufacture
(
including
import),
processing,
and
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs
(
ICR
1001).
These
data
are
reviewed
and
stored
pursuant
to
confidentiality
requirements,
when
appropriate,
and
placed
in
the
docket
for
public
review
(
sanitized
documents
only);
inspections
are
conducted
as
prescribed
by
the
enforcement
policy.
The
information
is
used
by
EPA
to
identify
manufacturers
and
importers
of
products
containing
low
levels
of
PCBs,
as
well
as
for
compliance
monitoring
and
enforcement
purposes.

Pursuant
to
the
use
authorization
for
PCB
Transformers,
EPA
staff
process
PCB
Transformer
registrations
and
have
created
a
PCB
Transformer
Database
(
ICR
1729).
On
an
"
as
requested
basis,"
EPA
resources
will
provide
information
from
the
PCB
Transformers
Database
to
environmental
and
emergency
response
officials.
EPA
also
has
placed
this
data
on
the
Internet.
5­
2
EPA
staff
also
proc
ess
both
new
and
amended
PCB
notifications
of
waste
handling
activities
and
update
the
PCB
Activity
Database
System
(
PADS)
on
PCB
waste
handlers
(
ICR
1446).
These
data
are
currently
available
on
the
Internet.

Information
from
annual
reports
that
are
submitted
by
storers
and
disposers
of
PCB
waste
enables
the
Agency
to
respond
to
public
and
Congressional
inquiries,
target
inspections,
and
conduct
compliance
monitoring
and
other
enforcement
activities
(
ICR
1446).
To
produce
the
inspection
reports,
EPA
inputs/
indexes/
files
data
that
are
obtained
during
inspections
and
prepares/
reviews/
revises
the
inspection
reports
(
ICR
1000).

Activities
routinely
conducted
by
EPA
in
processing
requests
for
permits
to
operate
a
PCB
disposal
facility
(
ICR
1012)
are
as
follows:

#
Review/
analyze
applications
to
determine
whether
facilities
have
adequate
technical
plans
and
financial
capabilities
to
operate
and
maintain
the
facility.

#
Attend
demonstrations.

#
Grant/
deny
approval.

#
Store
the
data.

Engineers
in
EPA's
Chemical
Management
Division
as
well
as
staff
in
regional
offices
review
the
PCB
disposal
applications.
The
adequacy
of
the
data
contained
in
these
application
is
evaluated
during
a
thorough
review
of
the
data
and
calculations
and
the
assessment
of
subsequent
demonstrations.
In
addition
to
disposal
approvals,
the
Agency
receives,
analyzes,
and
reviews
applications
for
commercial
storage
approvals
(
ICR
1446)
and
coordinated
approvals
(
ICR
1729);
as
well
as
requests
to
exceed
R&
D
and
storage
limitations
(
ICR
1729)
and
to
use
alternate
disposal
methods
(
ICR
1729).
For
commercial
storage
approvals,

EPA
must
also
determine
if
the
facility
will
be
able
to
close
in
an
environmentally
safe
manner
(
ICR
1446).
5­
3
5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
Currently,
all
of
the
PCB
information
collections
are
done
in
hard
copy
form.
Although
the
content
of
these
various
collections
has
been
specified,
the
majority
do
not
require
the
use
of
a
specific
form
or
format.
Therefore,
electronic
submission
and
manipulation
of
the
data
are
not
feasible
at
this
time.
Two
of
the
collections,
however,
are
on
a
form.
EPA
plans
to
review
the
efficiency
of
using
an
electronic
bulletin
board
or
the
Internet
to
facilitate
the
transfer
of
information
(
such
as
reporting
forms)
between
EPA
and
potential
respondents.

Requests
for
disposal
approval
may
be
submitted
in
the
form
most
convenient
to
the
applicant.

Because
of
the
nature
of
the
information
(
i.
e.,
engineering
blueprints),
most
of
the
information
is
generally
submitted
on
paper,
rather
than
electronically.
Where
appropriate,
EPA
accepts
data
in
electronic
format.

There
is
no
requirement
for
the
information
to
be
submitted
in
an
automated,
electronic,
mechanical,
or
other
technological
information
format.
Records
are
maintained
at
EPA
by
the
staff
overseeing
the
review
of
permit
applications.
Applications
are
retained
for
the
duration
of
the
disposal
facilities
operating
approval.

The
public
may
access
the
non­
confidential
portions
of
applications.

5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
Small
businesses
are
not
exempt
from
the
PCB
regulations
under
TSCA,
and
the
information
collections
will
affect
all
entities,
regardless
of
size,
that
own
or
use
PCBs
or
PCB­
containing
equipment
and
generate
PCB
waste.
The
potential
health
ramifications
necessitate
equal
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
for
all
persons,
and
due
to
heightened
awareness
and
concern
for
proper
PCB
disposal
practices,
the
potential
human
and
environmental
risk
necessitates
equal
disclosure
by
all
applicants
regardless
of
size.
While
all
practical
steps
have
been
taken
to
minimize
the
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burdens,
the
requirements
imposed
are
the
minimum
necessary
to
maintain
proper
accountability
for
the
disposition
of
the
PCBs.
These
requirements
assist
EPA
in
meeting
its
statutory
obligation
to
make
a
finding
of
no
unreasonable
risk
for
an
authorized
activity
and
determining,
for
example,
whether
a
petitioner
is
eligible
to
receive
the
benefit
of
an
approval,
exemption,
or
exclusion.
In
general,
the
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
are
no
more
burdensome
than
standard
business
procedures
currently
in
place.
5­
4
Small
organizations
will
usually
handle
smaller
volumes
of
PCBs
than
larger
entities,
thereby
minimizing
their
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burdens.
The
complexity
of
toxic
material
disposal
and
the
required
financial
assurance
to
ensure
against
environmental
liabilities
seem
to
deter
smaller
businesses
from
engaging
in
disposal
facility
enterprises
(
e.
g.,
it
is
economically
infeasible).
For
example,
the
vast
majority
of
PCB
Transformers
subject
to
these
requirements
are
located
in
large
industrial
and
utility
locations.

Therefore,
very
few
small
businesses
are
likely
to
own
PCB
Transformers
because
of
the
significant
costs
associated
with
the
initial
purchase
of
the
equipment
and
the
long
term
expense
for
operation
and
maintenance.

In
another
example,
the
manufacturing
exclusion
of
ICR
1001
was
designed
to
minimize
the
burdens
of
the
TSCA
Section
6(
e)
bans
on
chemical
manufacturers.
This
rule
has
relieved
small
business
manufacturers
from
the
burdens
of
filing
annual
petitions
for
exemption
from
the
manufacturing,
processing,

and
distribution
in
commerce
bans,
as
required
under
Section
6(
e)(
3).
Further,
to
minimize
the
burdens
of
information
collection
on
small
organizations,
EPA
allows
significant
flexibility
in
its
information
collection
requirements
so
that
manufacturers
have
options
available
to
them
for
supporting
their
requests
for
exclusion.

One
option
avoids
the
need
for
repeated
sampling
and
reporting
by
allowing
manufacturers
to
conduct
theoretical
analyses
rather
than
actual
sampling
of
process
streams
to
estimate
the
levels
of
PCBs
generated
by
the
processes.
If
the
basis
for
the
theoretical
analysis
is
sound,
the
manufacturer
may
certify
compliance
on
the
basis
of
that
analysis,
until
and
unless
he
or
she
engages
in
a
new
process
or
significantly
alters
the
reported
process.
Additional
flexibility
is
available
for
estimating
the
levels
of
PCBs
generated
and
released.

Rather
than
specifying
any
one
sampling
regime
or
method
of
theoretical
analysis,
the
reports
require
only
that
petitioners
support
the
estimates
by
any
defensible
basis.
For
example,
sampling
results
may
be
accompanied
by
a
description
of
the
sample
matrix
and
any
data
from
a
quality
assurance
plan.

(
i)
Small
Entities
Affected
by
the
PCB
Regulations
The
small
business
entities
may
include
those
in
both
the
public
and
private
sectors,
and
not­
for­
profit
organizations
as
well
as
for­
profit
entities.
The
Regulatory
Flexibility
Act
identifies
three
classes
of
small
entities
of
special
concern:
5­
5
#
Small
for­
profit
businesses
as
defined
by
the
Small
Business
Administration's
(
SBA)
Table
of
Size
Standards.

#
Small
governments,
defined
as
governmental
jurisdictions,
such
as
cities,
towns,
counties,
or
school
districts,
with
a
population
less
than
50,000.

#
Small
organizations,
defined
as
not­
for­
profit
enterprises
which
are
independently
owned
and
not
dominant
in
their
fields.

Entities
generating
PCB
wastes
comprise
the
following
classes:

#
Electric
utility
industry:
PCB­
oil
and
contaminated
mineral
oil
from
electrical
equipment
such
as
transformers
and
large
capacitors.
Included
in
this
category
are
publicly­
owned
entities
such
as
municipal
and
county
electric
systems
as
well
as
other
public
power
systems
such
as
irrigation
districts.

#
Non­
utility
entities
with
privately­
owned
electrical
equipment,
such
as
PCB
Transformers
and
Capacitors
and
other
PCB­
Contaminated
electrical
equipment.
This
group
includes
those
entities
that
own
high­
voltage
transformers
and
large
capacitors.
A
1989
EPA
report
identified
such
entities
as
most
likely
to
be
in
oil
and
gas
production,
manufacturing,
railroads,
and
telecommunication
industries.
Not­
for­
profit
entities
such
as
colleges
and
universities
and
hospitals
are
also
to
be
included
in
this
group
(
EPA,
1989).
Public­
sector
operations
such
as
prisons
might
also
possess
this
type
of
equipment.

#
Entities
with
PCB
ballasts
from
fluorescent
light
fixtures.
Due
to
the
widespread
use
of
fluorescent
lighting,
any
entity
operating
out
of
a
fixed
location
built
prior
to
the
late
1970s
is
a
possible
candidate
for
inclusion
in
this
class
of
waste
generators.
Included
are
government
bodies,
such
as
school
districts,
that
have
such
lighting
equipment.

#
Entities
operating
natural
gas
pipelines
may
have
PCB­
contaminated
pipeline
equipment
resulting
from
the
contact
of
condensate
with
PCB­
contaminated
oils
used
in
pipeline
compressors.

#
PCBs
have
been
found
in
electrical
components
of
appliances
and
in
automobiles,
and
disposal
operations
such
as
automobile
or
appliance
shredding
may
generate
PCBcontaminated
materials.

#
Cleanup
of
Superfund
sites
and
other
hazardous
waste
sites
may
generate
PCBcontaminated
materials.

Electric
Utilities.
It
has
been
estimated
that
60
to
70
percent
of
the
PCBs
produced
were
used
in
dielectric
fluid
for
transformers
and
capacitors.
Thus,
such
high­
voltage
equipment,
including
askarel
and
5­
6
mineral
oil
transformers
and
large
PCB
Capacitors,
represents
a
major
source
of
PCB
waste
generation.

EPA
studies
of
the
numbers
of
such
equipment
in
use
assumed
that
utilities
owned
30
percent
of
the
askarel
5­
7
transformers,
80
percent
of
the
mineral
oil
transformers,
and
85
percent
of
the
large
PCB
capacitors,
with
the
remainder
owned
by
non­
utility
industrial
enterprises
(
EPA,
1989).

Electric
utility
operating
data
collected
and
reported
by
the
Energy
Information
Administration
(
EIA,

Form
861)
were
used
to
determine
the
number
of
small
entities
in
this
industry
(
EIA,
1995).
The
SBA
smallentity
definition
for
the
electric
utility
industry
includes
entities
producing
4
million
megawatt­
hours
of
electricity
sales
or
less.
The
EIA
data
permit
identification
of
private
sector
small
utilities
as
well
as
of
municipal
and
other
publicly
owned
utilities.
Such
utilities
owned
by
small
governments
(
less
than
50,000
in
population)
were
identified
through
U.
S.
Census
population
data
for
cities,
towns,
and
counties.

Other
Industrial
Sectors.
The
available
evidence
suggests
that
PCB
waste
generation
related
to
contaminated
electrical
equipment,
fluorescent
light
ballasts,
and
other
PCB
wastes,
is
common
throughout
a
number
of
industrial
sectors.
The
1989
EPA
study,
based
on
Arkansas,
New
York,
and
California
state
information
about
PCB
waste
generators,
identified
oil
and
gas
production
(
SIC
1311,
NAICS
211111),

manufacturing
(
SIC
20­
39,
NAICS
31­
33),
line­
haul
railroads
(
SIC
4011,
NAICS
48211),
telephone
communications
(
SIC
4810,
NAICS
513),
and
refuse
systems
(
SIC
4953,
NAICS
562111)
as
accounting
for
over
90
percent
of
the
non­
utility,
private
sector
PCB
waste
generators.
Recent
information
on
PCB
waste
generators
for
New
York
and
California
(
New
York
Department
of
Environmental
Conservation,
1995;

California
Department
of
Toxic
Substances,
1995)
indicate
that
a
large
proportion
of
non­
utility
PCB
waste
generators
fall
within
SICs
13,
20­
39,
40,
and
49
(
NAICS
211,
31­
33,
335,
and
562).
These
industries
are
expected
to
account
for
most
of
the
PCB
wastes
associated
with
the
disposal
of
electrical
equipment.

Hospitals
(
SIC
8062,
NAICS
62211)
and
colleges
and
universities
(
SIC
8221,
NAICS
61131)
are
also
likely
to
have
high­
voltage
electrical
equipment
of
the
type
associated
with
PCB
contamination
and
thus
should
be
included
within
the
class
of
PCB
waste
generators
associated
with
such
equipment.
This
assumption
is
corroborated
by
the
inclusion
of
such
establishments
among
the
New
York
hazardous
waste
generators
listed
as
disposing
of
PCB
transformers
and
capacitors.
The
specific
description
of
the
wastes
for
each
generator
provided
by
the
New
York
data
also
confirms
the
belief
that
wastes
associated
with
fluorescent
light
ballasts
are
generated
by
establishments
throughout
the
private
and
public
sectors.

EPA
used
this
information
about
the
industrial
pattern
of
PCB
waste
generation
to
develop
industryspecific
estimates
of
the
number
of
establishments
that
might
have
PCB
and
PCB­
Contaminated
Electrical
5­
8
Equipment.
Based
on
a
previous
study
of
the
electric
utility
industry,
EPA
estimated
that
0.3
percent
of
electric
utility
customers
receive
power
at
high
voltage
levels
(
ERG,
1993).
High­
voltage
customers
in
most
cases
have
transformers,
capacitors,
and
other
equipment
necessary
to
transform
the
voltages
and
distribute
electricity
within
their
premises.
That
study
also
estimated
that
85
percent
of
such
establishments
own
their
own
high­
voltage
transformation
equipment,
the
remainder
using
transformation
equipment
provided
or
leased
to
them
by
their
utility
company.

According
to
the
1994
County
Business
Patterns,
there
are
approximately
6.4
million
establishments
in
the
private
sector,
exclusive
of
agriculture
(
SICs
01
and
02,
NAICS
11
and
112)
and
line­
haul
railroads
(
SIC
40,
NAICS
48211)
(
Bureau
of
the
Census,
1997).
Using
the
assumption
that
0.3
percent
of
these
establishments
receive
high­
voltage
electricity
service,
16,333
(
adjusting
for
the
share
that
lease
equipment
from
the
utility)
would
be
expected
to
have
transformers
and
capacitors
that
might
be
contaminated
with
PCBs
(
6.4
million
x
0.3
percent
x
85
percent
that
own
their
equipment).
EPA
distributed
this
estimate
of
the
number
of
establishments
with
high
voltage
equipment
among
2­
digit
industries
using
two
criteria.
First,

industries
were
stratified
according
to
whether
they
would
include
a
substantial
number
(
high
prevalence),

relatively
few
(
low
prevalence),
or
a
negligible
number
of
high­
voltage
users.
Second,
high­
prevalence
industries
were
judged
to
account
for
two­
thirds
of
the
list
of
high­
voltage
users.
Thus,
10,900
of
the
510,300
establishments
in
the
high­
prevalence
industries
and
5,400
of
the
4.7
million
establishments
in
the
lowprevalence
industries
are
estimated
to
own
high­
voltage
electrical
equipment.
These
establishments
were
then
distributed
among
industries
within
these
two
groups
on
the
basis
of
the
overall
distribution
of
establishments.

Some
small
entities
(
as
defined
by
the
SBA
criteria)
are
expected
to
be
among
the
high­
voltage
users
and,
therefore,
might
be
owners
of
PCB
and
PCB­
Contaminated
Electrical
Equipment.
Also,
small
entities
are
assumed
to
be
as
likely
to
own
high­
voltage
equipment
as
larger
firms,
an
assumption
that
may
result
in
an
overstatement
of
the
actual
number
of
small
entities
that
own
such
equipment.
The
results
of
this
distribution
methodology
are
shown
in
the
Cost
Impacts
of
the
Final
Regulation
Amending
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
Part
761
(
U.
S.
EPA,
1998b)
which
are
attached
as
Appendix
F,
"
Distribution
of
PCB
Electrical
Equipment
Among
Small
Entities."
5­
9
5(
d)
Collection
Schedule
Most
of
the
reporting
activities
are
triggered
by
specific
events
or
on
an
as
needed
basis
rather
than
by
specific
dates,
as
shown
on
Table
5­
1
and
5­
2.
5­
10
TABLE
5­
1
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
40
CFR
761
Subpart
A
 
General
1/
1001
§
761.(
f)(
1)(
2),
and
(
3)
Submit
new
reports
or
modifications
to
existing
reports
to
qualify
for
manufacturing/
import
exclusions,
pursuant
to
compliance
with
the
reporting
requirements
of
Subpart
J.
Within
90
days
of
initiating
a
manufacturing
process/
import.
Subsequent
submission
of
information
is
required
if
a
manufacturer
significantly
alters
a
production
process,
or
to
report
periods
of
unusually
high
generat
ion
or
release
of
PCBs.
(
See
#
42
and
43)

Subpart
B
 
Use
2/
857
§
§
761.20(
b)
and
(
c)(
1)
and
(
3)
Submit
an
exemption
petition
as
per
TSCA
Section
6(
e)(
3)
to
manufacture
(
import),
process,
or
distribute
in
commerce
(
export)
PCBs,
unless
otherwise
authorized.
On
an
as
needed
basis.

3/
1729
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)
and
(
vii);
(
xv)(
D)
Register
PCB
Transformers.
To
have
been
completed
by
December
28,
1998
or
within
30
days
of
identifying
Transformer.

4
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v)
Submit
requests
to
reclassify
equipment
using
alternate
methods.
On
an
as
needed
basis.

5/
1729
§
761.30(
i)(
1)(
iii)
(
A)(
1)
For
gas
pipeline
systems
owned/
operated
by
a
seller
or
distributor
of
natural
gas,
submit
a
description
of
the
systems
that
contain
>
50
ppm
PCBs.
Upon
request
of
the
RA.

6/
1729
§
761.30(
t)(
3)
Obtain
EPA
approval
for
the
use
of
PCBs
in
other
gas
or
liquid
systems.
When
planning
use
of
system.
TABLE
5­
1,
continued
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
5­
11
7/
1729
§
761.35(
b)
Obtain
RA
approval
for
an
extended
storage
for
reuse
period.
6
months
prior
to
expiration.

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
8/
1012
§
§
761.60(
e)
and
(
i)(
2),
.70(
a),
(
b),
and
(
d),
and
.75(
b)(
7),
(
b)(
8)(
ii),
and
(
c)
Submit
disposal
permit
applications,
when
appropriate,
and
demonstration
plans.
Applications
are
submitted
as
needed.
Once
an
approval
is
granted,
the
permittee
must
notify
the
Agency
prior
to
the
expiration
date
if
a
renewal
of
the
approval
is
desired.
If
no
changes
or
modifications
have
been
made
to
the
disposal
process
in
the
year
preceding
expiration,
the
permittee
must
simply
redemonstrate
the
process.

9/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
i)
Obtain
an
identification
number
for
PCB
R&
D
disposal.
When
planning
R&
D
for
disposal.

10/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ii)
Notify
EPA
(
as
well
as
State
and
local
environmental
officials)
of
PCB
disposal
R&
D
activities.
30
days
prior
to
initiating
R&
D
activity.

11/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
2)
Obtain
a
waiver
to
increase
the
volume
or
concentration
of
PCBs
or
duration
of
an
R&
D
activity.
R&
D
disposal
approval
may
be
required
by
RA.
When
needed.

12/
1729
§
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)
and
(
ii)
Notify
EPA
(
as
well
as
State
and
local
environmental
officials)
of
self­
implementing
remediation
activity.
Additional
information
may
be
requested.
30
days
prior
to
remediation
TABLE
5­
1,
continued
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
5­
12
13/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
ii)
Notify
EPA
of
changes
to
self­
implementing
remediation
activities.
Within
the
30­
day
notification
period.

14/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
iii)
Request
a
waiver
of
the
notification
requirement.
If
remediation
is
needed.

15/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)(
B)
Submit
certification
that
the
deed
notation
for
properties
requiring
a
fence
or
cap
has
been
recorded
and
includes
the
cap/
fence
notice.
Within
60
days
of
completion
of
remediation.

16/
1729
§
761.61(
c)(
1)
Apply
for
risk­
based
disposal
of
PCB
remediation
wastes.
Submit
additional
information
as
requested
by
EPA.
Before
alternative
activity
takes
place.

17/
1729
§
761.62(
c)(
1)
Obtain
approval
for
risk­
based
disposal
or
storage
of
PCB
bulk
product
waste.
Provide
additional
information
and
periodic
progress
reports,
as
requested
by
EPA
Before
activity
takes
place.

18/
1729
§
761.65(
a)(
2)
Provide
information
on
continuing
attempts
to
secure
disposal.
Request
a
1­
year
storage
extension.
30
days
prior
to
disposal
deadline.

19/
1729
§
761.65(
a)(
3)
Submit
request
for
additional
extensions
beyond
the
initial
1­
year
extension,
including
justification
and
information
on
measures
taken
to
secure
disposal.
When
needed.

20/
1729
§
761.65(
a)(
4)
Submit
request
for
modifications
to
TSCA
approval
to
allow
for
extended
storage
period.
Before
extension
expires.
TABLE
5­
1,
continued
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
5­
13
21/
1729
§
761.65(
c)(
6)(
i)(
C)
Demonstrate
that
other
containers
for
storage
of
PCB/
radioactive
wastes
are
protective
of
health
and
the
environment.
When
needed.

22/
1446
§
§
761.65(
d);
(
e)(
1),
(
6),
and
(
8);
and
(
f)
Prepare
application
for
commercial
storage
approval.
Notify
EPA
of
facility
modification,
impending
closure,
and
completion
of
closure.
When
needed;
60
days
before
final
is
scheduled
to
begin;
within
60
days
of
completion
of
closure.

23
§
§
761.65(
e)(
4)
Submit
a
written
request
to
the
RA
to
modify
a
storage
approval
to
amend
the
closure
plan,
when
there
are
changes
in
ownership,
changes
in
expected
dates
of
closure,
and/
or
unexpected
events.
When
needed.

24/
1729
§
761.65(
g)(
9)
Notify
EPA
of
modifications
to
commercial
storage
facilities.
Within
30
days
of
facility
modification.

25/
1729
§
§
761.65(
j)
Demonstrate
that
a
new
commercial
storage
facility
owner
has
established
financial
assurance
for
closure.
As
of
the
date
of
final
EPA
approval.
Submit
new
or
amended
commercial
storage
application
as
a
result
of
change
in
ownership.

26
§
§
761.70(
a)(
8),
(
9);
and
(
d)(
5)
Obtain
approval
of
alternate
measures
when
regulatory
requirements
cannot
be
met
for
operating
an
incinerator
used
for
incinerating
PCBs.
When
needed.

27
§
§
761.70(
d)(
8);
761.75(
c)(
7)
Notify
EPA
of
change
in
ownership
of
disposal
facility
(
i.
e.,
for
incinerators
and
landfills).
Within
30
days
of
transferring
ownership.

28/
1729
§
§
761.71(
a)(
2)
and
(
b)(
2)
Notify
EPA
of
high
efficiency
boiler
information,
(
e.
g.,
HEB
owner,
address,
and
specifications).

Seek
approval
to
burn
liquids,
other
than
mineral
oil
dielectric
fluid
in
a
high
efficiency
boiler.
One­
time
notification
30
days
before
initially
burning
mineral
oil
dielectric
fluid
(
MODEF)
in
the
boiler.

One­
time
approval
prior
to
burning
liquids.
TABLE
5­
1,
continued
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
5­
14
29/
1729
§
761.72(
c)(
2)
Notify
EPA
as
a
scrap
metal
recovery
oven
or
smelter
used
to
dispose
of
PCBs.
Before
burning
PCBs.
(
Also
see
#
44)

30/
1729
§
761.72(
c)(
3)
Request
approval
to
dispose
of
PCBs
in
an
oven
or
smelter
based
on
site­
specific
risk
assessments,
in
lieu
of
meeting
requirements
listed
in
§
761.72.
Before
use
of
unit.

31/
1729
§
§
761.77(
a)(
1)(
i),
(
a)(
1)(
ii)(
A)(
1)
and
(
C),
and
.77(
a)(
2)
Submit
a
notification
to
the
RA
for
coordinated
approval
and
additional
information,
as
requested
by
EPA.
Submit
an
application
for
TSCA
disposal
approval,
if
the
RA
denies
the
request
for
a
coordinated
approval
or
determines
that
the
conditions
of
the
coordinated
approval
are
not
met.
When
seeking
coordinated
approval;
when
requested
by
the
RA.

32/
1729
§
761.77(
a)(
3)
Notify
EPA
of
changes
in
PCB
waste
management
requirements
in
the
document(
s)
used
to
obtain
TSCA
PCB
coordinated
approvals.
Within
5
days
of
when
changes
are
made.

33/
1729
§
761.79(
h)
Request
approval
of
alternative
decontamination
or
sampling
methods.
When
needed.

Subpart
E
 
Exemptions
34/
857,
1729
§
§
761.80(
e)(
1)
and
(
i)(
1)
Submit
R&
D
exemption
petition
to
qualify
for
the
class
exemption
for
manufacturing
PCBs
for
disposal
and
for
processing
and
distributing
PCBs
and
analytical
reference
samples
derived
from
PCB
waste.
60
days
prior
to
activities.

35/
857,
1729
§
761.80(
e),
(
i)(
2)
and
(
n)
Submit
certified
letter
to
request
renewal
of
certain
exemptions.
6
months
prior
to
expiration.
TABLE
5­
1,
continued
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
5­
15
36/
1729
§
§
761.80(
e)(
3),
(
g)(
2)
and
(
i)(
4)
Obtain
approval
to
exceed
limits
of
the
exemption.
60
days
before
manufacture
of
PCBs.

37/
1729
§
761.80(
e)(
4)
Notify
EPA
in
writing
when
R&
D
activities
will
include
the
manufacture
of
PCBs.
30
days
prior
to
beginning
R&
D
activities.

38
§
§
761.80(
n)
Submit
a
petition
for
certain
exemptions
to
address
increases
in
the
amount
of
PCBs
to
be
processed
and
distributed,
imported
(
manufactured),
or
exported,
or
changes
in
the
manner
of
processing
and
distributing,
importing
(
manufacturing),
or
exporting
PCBs.
When
needed.

Subpart
F
 
Transboundary
Shipments
of
PCBs
for
Disposal
39/
1729
§
§
761.93(
a)
and
.97(
a)
Submit
an
exemption
petition
to
import
or
export
PCBs
or
PCB
Items
for
disposal.
When
needed.
(
See
#
2)

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
40/
1729
§
761.125(
a)(
1)(
i)
to
(
iii)
Report
all
spills
to
certain
areas
of
10
pounds
or
more
to
EPA
(
and
spills
involving
1
pound
of
PCBs
to
the
NRC).
Within
24
hours
of
discovery.

Subpart
J
 
General
Records
and
Reports
41/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.180(
b),
(
b)(
3),
and
(
c)(
5)
Submit
annual
reports
for
PCB
wastes
disposed
of
in
a
PCB
disposal
facility
(
including
wastes
disposed
of
by
waste
generators),
and
for
wastes
stored
by
commercial
storage
facilities.
By
July
15
of
each
year
for
the
previous
calendar
year.
TABLE
5­
1,
continued
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
5­
16
42/
1001
§
761.185
Notify
EPA
and
certify
low
level
PCB
product
contamination
to
be
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
Subpart
B,
regarding
processes
inadvertently
generating
PCBs
and
imports
of
products
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs.
Certification
must
be
repeated
if
the
previous
certification
is
no
longer
valid.
Within
90
days
of
having
processes
or
imports
for
which
such
reports
are
required.

43
§
761.187
Notify
EPA
when
PCB
releases
exceed
limits,
to
be
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
Subpart
B,
for
products,
manufactured
or
imported
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs.
When
limits
are
exceeded.

Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
44/
1446
§
§
761.202(
a);
205(
a)
to
(
c)
Notify
EPA
of
waste
handling
activities,
for
generators,
commercial
storers,
transporters,
or
disposers
of
PCB
waste.
Prior
to
engaging
in
PCB
waste
handling
activities.

45/
1729
§
761.205(
f)
Report
changes
in
notifications
previously
submitted
by
PCB
waste
handlers.
Within
30
days
of
making
a
change.

46/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.208(
a)(
4)
and
.215(
b)
to
(
d).
Submit
Exception
Reports
to
EPA,
as
specified
in
§
761.215(
b)
to
(
d),
when
PCB
waste
generators,
disposers,
and/
or
commercial
storers
do
not
receive
confirmation
that
a
shipment
of
a
PCB
waste
has
been
properly
disposed
of.
Within
45
days
of
the
events
that
trigger
the
report.
TABLE
5­
1,
continued
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
5­
17
47/
1446
§
761.210(
b)
Submit
Discrepancy
Reports
along
with
a
copy
of
the
manifest
to
EPA
when
the
PCB
waste
received
by
a
disposer
is
significantly
different
from
the
description
on
the
manifest,
and
the
discrepancy
is
not
resolved
after
receiving
the
waste.
Within
15
days
after
receiving
the
unmanifested
PCB
waste.

48
§
761.211(
b)
Notify
RA
of
unmanifested
PCB
waste,
for
owners/
operators
of
commercial
storage
facilities
who
cannot
contact
the
generator
of
the
PCB
waste.
Upon
receiving
unmanifested
waste
and
unable
to
contact
the
generator.

49/
1446
§
761.211(
c)
Submit
Unmanifested
Waste
Reports
(
e.
g.,
waste
description,
volume,
disposition;
date
received;
ID
#
s
of
waste
handlers
for
that
waste)
to
EPA
when
disposers
accept
a
shipment
of
PCB
waste
without
an
accompanying
manifest.
Within
15
days
after
receiving
the
unmanifested
PCB
waste.

Subpart
T
 
Comparison
Study
for
Validating
a
New
Performance­
Based
Decontamination
Solvent
under
§
761.79(
d)(
4)

50
§
§
761.395
and
761.398
Submit
results
of
analys
is
and
validation
study
to
the
Director,
National
Program
Chemicals
Division
(
NPCD).
Prior
to
the
first
use
of
a
new
solvent
for
alternate
decontamination
5­
18
TABLE
5­
2
THIRD­
PARTY
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
40
CFR
761
Subpart
B
 
Use
51
§
§
761.20(
e)(
3)(
ii);
.30(
i)(
5)(
ii);
and
.60(
b)(
5)(
iv)(
B)
Burner
of
used
oil
must
provide
a
1­
time
certification
to
the
marketer
that
he
is
in
compliance
with
notification
requirement
at
§
761.71(
a)(
2).
Before
accepting
the
first
shipment
of
used
oil.

52/
1000,
1729
§
§
761.30(
a)(
xi)
and
(
xv)(
A)
and
.30(
h)(
1)(
ii)(
B)
Notify
NRC
of
PCB
Transformer
and
PCB
Voltage
Regulator
fires.
Immediately
upon
discovery
of
an
incident.

53
§
761.30(
a)(
1)
(
xiv)
Notify
owner
of
PCB
Transformer
that
equipment
may
pose
risk
of
exposure
to
food
or
feed.
When
discovering
potential
exposure
to
food
or
feed.

54
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xv)(
D)
Register
PCB
Transformers
with
the
building
owner.
Within
30
days
of
discovery
of
the
PCB
Transformer.

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
55/
1729
§
761.60(
a)(
3)(
ii)
Provide
information
to
chemical
waste
landfills
that
liquids
do
not
exceed
500
ppm
and
are
not
ignitable.
Prior
to
disposal
in
the
landfill.

56/
1729
§
761.60(
b)(
5)(
i)
(
A)(
1)
Include
natural
gas
pipes
that
contain
PCBs
in
public
service
notification
programs.
Before
abandoning
natural
gas
pipes.
TABLE
5­
2,
continued
THIRD­
PARTY
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
5­
19
57/
1446
§
761.60(
f)(
1)(
i)
Notify
State
and
local
officials
of
PCB
disposal
in
chemical
waste
landfill,
incinerator,
or
an
alternate
PCB
disposal
technology.
At
least
30
days
before
a
facility
is
first
used.

58
§
761.60(
f)(
1)(
ii)
Provide
annual
notice
to
State
and
local
governments
about
PCBs
disposed
of
during
the
year.
At
the
request
of
the
State
or
local
governments.

59/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ii)
Notify
State
and
local
environmental
officials
(
as
well
as
EPA)
of
PCB
disposal
R&
D
activities.
30
days
prior
to
initiating
R&
D
activity.

60
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
vii)
Manifest
wastes
generated
by
R&
D
on
PCB
disposal
that
are
transported
from
the
R&
D
facility
to
a
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility,
unless
the
residuals
or
unused
samples
are
returned
to
the
site
of
generation.
Upon
transport
of
waste.

61/
1729
§
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)
Notify
State
and
local
environmental
officials
(
as
well
as
EPA)
of
self­
implementing
remediation
activity.
30
days
prior
to
remediation
and
when
additional
information
is
requested.

62/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
5)(
i)
(
B)(
2)(
iv)
Notify
offsite
non­
TSCA
facility
of
pending
shipment
of
PCB
remediation
waste.
15
days
prior
to
[
first]
shipment.

63/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)
(
A)
Attach
a
notation
to
the
deed
for
property
at
which
remediation
projects
require
a
permanent
fence
or
cap.
Within
60
days
of
completion
of
the
cleanup
activity.

64/
1729
§
§
761.62(
b)(
4)(
i)
and
(
ii)
(
See
also
§
§
761.357
and
359)
Provide
notification
to
a
receiving
facility
that
does
not
have
a
commercial
PCB
storage/
disposal
approval
of
a
pending
shipment
of
remediation
or
bulk
product
waste.
15
days
in
advance
of
the
first
shipment
and
with
each
shipment
thereafter.
TABLE
5­
2,
continued
THIRD­
PARTY
REPORTING
SCHEDULE
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTIONS
5(
d)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
5­
20
65
§
§
761.65(
c)(
1)
and
(
8)
Attach
a
notation
to
a
PCB
Item
or
PCB
Container
containing
the
item
indicating
the
date
the
Item
was
removed
from
service
for
disposal,
to
be
able
to
temporarily
store
the
item/
container
in
an
area
that
does
not
comply
with
the
storage
requirements
of
paragraph
(
b)
of
this
section.
When
removed
from
service
for
disposal.

66/
1446
§
761.65(
i)(
3)
Send
information,
instead
of
manifest,
regarding
the
sample
collector,
laboratory,
and
date
of
sample
shipment
with
sample.
When
sending
PCB
samples
to
a
laboratory
for
testing.

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
67/
1729
§
761.125(
a)(
1)
Report
spills
involving
1
pound
or
more
by
weight
of
PCBs
to
the
NRC
(
and
all
spills
to
certain
areas
or
of
10
pounds
or
more
to
EPA).
Within
24
hours
of
discovery.

68
§
761.125(
c)
(
2)(
ii)
Place
label
or
notice
of
PCB
contamination
at
cleanup
site.
When
contaminated
soil
is
cleaned
up
to
50
ppm
PCBs
and
not
25
ppm.

Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
69
§
§
761.207(
a)
and
.208(
a)(
2)
and
(
3)
Send
manifests
to
the
next
non­
rail
transporter
and
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
designated
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility.
When
generators
ship
PCB
wastes
by
rail
or
in
bulk.

70
§
§
761.208(
c)(
1)(
iv)
and
(
c)(
2)(
iv)
Send
a
copy
of
the
manifest
or
shipping
papers
to
the
generator.
Within
30
days
after
delivery.
Ref.
#

/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Collection
Schedule
6­
1
71/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.218(
a)
and
(
b)
Send
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
generators
of
PCB
waste
when
disposal
of
each
item
is
complete
for
a
manifested
PCB
waste
shipment.
Within
30
days
after
the
disposal
date.

6
ESTIMATING
THE
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
THE
COLLECTION
6(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
Several
sources
of
data
were
used
for
estimating
the
total
number
of
respondents
and
hourly
burdens
for
the
requirements
of
this
Consolidated
ICR.
The
sources
include,
the
Cost
Impacts
of
the
Final
Regulations
Amending
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
Part
761
(
U.
S.
EPA,
1998b)
and
a
cost
analysis
for
the
proposed
PCB
reclassification
rule,
PCB
Reclassification
Rule:
Small
Entity
Impacts,

Environmental
Justice
Impacts,
and
Unfunded
Mandates
Analysis
(
U.
S.
EPA,
1998d).

The
data
estimates
appearing
in
this
Support
Statement
were
also
reviewed
and
updated
directly
for
this
report,
as
necessary,
by
telephoning
industry
representatives
(
less
than
10
entities
per
PCB
handling
category)
knowledgeable
about
specific
regulations
and
the
associated
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements.
Entities
contacted
include
owners/
operators
of
incinerators
and
chemical
waste
landfills,
6­
2
alternate
disposal
permit
holders,
commercial
storers
of
PCB
waste,
electric
utility
providers,
other
PCB
waste
handlers,
and
chemical
manufacturers.
This
information
is
summarized
in
the
Data
Gathering
Report
for
the
Consolidated
ICR
Supporting
Statement
Covering
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
761
and
is
included
in
this
Statement
as
Appendix
E
(
U.
S.
EPA,
1998a).

Response
to
Comments
on
the
ICR
for
the
PCB
Disposal
Amendments.
Commenters
on
the
ICR
that
was
prepared
for
the
PCB
Disposal
Amendments
and
ultimately
approved
by
OMB
(
2070­
0159)

indicated
that
EPA
had
failed
to
consider
the
time
to
locate
and
identify
equipment
that
would
be
subject
to
the
recordkeeping
requirements
at
§
761.35
for
the
storage
of
PCB
Articles
(
i.
e.,
any
manufactured
article,

other
than
a
PCB
Container,
that
contains
PCBs
and
whose
surface
has
been
in
direct
contact
with
PCBs)

intended
for
subsequent
reuse;
that
the
time
to
create
a
record
for
each
item
was
grossly
underestimated;
and
that
the
cost
to
the
electric
utility
industry
was
underestimated.

However,
prior
to
the
discussion
of
EPA's
burden/
cost
estimates,
these
commenters
indicate
that
the
"[
E]
lectric
utilities
typically
maintain
an
inventory
of
electrically­
sound
capacitors,
transformers,
bushings
and
some
other
types
of
equipment
in
storage,
awaiting
reuse
to
replace
units
that
fail."[
emphasis
added]

The
commenters
assert
later
that
"...
the
equipment
is
stored
in
restricted
areas
to
which
only
authorized
personnel
have
access"
and
that
"...
utilities
keep
their
equipment
in
restricted
access
areas
under
lock
and
key."
[
emphasis
added]

Commenters
agreed
with
EPA's
estimate
regarding
the
universe
of
equipment
that
would
be
subject
to
the
recordkeeping
provision
(
i.
e.,
"
likely
to
fall
around"
189,225
units).
However,
they
estimated
it
would
take
each
utility
487
hours,
on
average,
just
to
find
and
identify
the
subject
equipment.
Then
it
would
take
1.25
hours,
rather
than
the
0.15
hours
suggested
by
EPA
to
record
each
piece
of
equipment
(
i.
e.,
9
minutes,

which
were
miscalculated
by
the
commenters
as
5
minutes).
Hourly
wage
rates
were
estimated
by
commenters
to
range
between
$
38
to
$
47
rather
than
the
rate
of
$
44/
hour
for
technical
personnel
as
suggested
by
EPA.
However,
when
the
commenters'
hourly
rates
are
averaged
[($
38
+
$
47)
÷
2],
the
resulting
hourly
rate
is
$
42.50,
which
is
less
than
the
EPA
rate.
Nonetheless,
using
the
range
in
hourly
rates
suggested
by
commenters,
the
costs
associated
with
strictly
locating
and
identifying
equipment
subject
to
§
761.35
would
range
from
$
18,506
to
$
22,889
per
facility.
Using
EPA's
estimate
for
investor­
owned
utilities
6­
3
(
i.
e.,
265
utilities),
commenters
projected
the
cost
for
this
aspect
of
the
requirement
would
range
from
$
4,904,090
to
$
6,065,585.

In
order
to
complete
the
recordkeeping
requirement,
commenters
estimated
the
cost
to
create
each
record
would
range
between
$
47.50
to
$
58.75
[($
38
or
$
47)
x
1.25
hours]
resulting
in
an
estimated
industry
cost
of
$
13.9
million
to
$
17.2
million
($
47.50
or
$
58.75
x
189,225
+
265
x
$
18,506
or
$
22,889),
versus
EPA's
estimate
of
$
1.3
million.

EPA
questions
the
validity
of
claims
that
suggest
the
Agency
is
underestimating
the
cost
associated
with
maintaining
records,
which
commenters
readily
admit
are
currently
being
maintained
in
some
fashion
for
PCB
Articles
that
have
been
placed
into
storage
for
reuse.
Also,
given
the
restricted
access
that
is
accorded
this
equipment
(
i.
e.,
access
is
limited
to
authorized
personnel
in
areas
under
lock
and
key),
it
is
prudent
to
assume
that
knowledge
currently
exists
about
the
location
and
identity
of
equipment
that
are
subject
to
the
recordkeeping
provisions
of
§
761.35
and
that
the
costs
attributed
to
this
requirement
are
minimal.
Therefore,

EPA
is
not
modifying
its
estimate
of
the
costs
for
maintaining
records
on
the
storage
of
PCB
Articles
intended
for
reuse.

A
review
of
EPA's
calculations
did
reveal
however
that
the
factor
used
for
calculating
the
burden
and
costs
for
this
recordkeeping
requirement
was
transposed;
i.
e.,
0.15
hour
was
used
to
calculate
the
costs
and
1.5
hours
was
used
to
calculate
the
burden.
This
factor
should
have
been
the
same
in
both
instances;

i.
e.,
0.15
hour.
As
a
result,
the
burden
previously
estimated
by
EPA
for
this
recordkeeping
requirement
is
being
reduced
from
283,838
hours
to
28,384
hours.

Response
to
Comments
on
ICR
1446,
PCBs:
Notification
&
Manifesting
of
PCB
Waste
Activities
and
Records
of
PCB
Storage
and
Disposal.
A
number
of
comments
were
submitted
to
the
Agency
regarding
some
of
the
information
collection
assumptions
for
this
ICR.
It
appears
that
several
commenters
relied
on
the
brief
discussion
found
in
the
Federal
Register
(
FR)
notice
rather
than
reviewing
the
ICR
itself.
The
Agency
publishes
a
FR
notice
to
alert
interested
parties
when
a
renewal
of
an
ICR
supporting
statement
has
been
forwarded
to
the
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
for
review.
Among
the
comments
received
were
claims
that
EPA
had
underestimated
the
amount
of
time
required
to
satisfy
the
record
retention
requirements
associated
with
§
761.180(
a),
covering
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
in
service
or
projected
for
disposal.
The
burden
6­
4
associated
with
this
provision
was
estimated
by
EPA
to
be
29
hours
annually
per
respondent.
Although
commenters
overall
provided
insufficient
information
for
the
purpose
of
adjusting
EPA's
estimate
of
the
burden,
the
data
gathering
effort,
as
reported
in
Appendix
E,
revealed
that
the
time
to
conduct
the
recordkeeping
for
the
annual
log
averages
52
hours
per
year
for
companies
that
handle
limited
amounts
of
PCB
wastes,
and
1,040
hours
per
year
(
20
hours
per
week)
for
major
handlers
of
PCBs.

One
commenter
also
questioned
EPA's
burden
estimate
for
maintaining
records
of
manifests,
which
EPA
estimated
as
10
minutes
per
manifest.
Therefore,
if
one
respondent
frequently
accumulates
and
disposes
of
PCB
wastes,
his
burden
for
maintaining
manifest
records
would
exceed
the
burden
for
a
respondent
who
manages
a
smaller
volume
of
PCB
waste.
Because
manifesting
requirements
imposed
under
State
and/
or
RCRA
regulations
pre­
date
the
TSCA
PCB
manifesting
requirement
and
focus
on
the
same
universe
of
respondents,
EPA
did
not
attribute
the
burden
associated
with
that
activity
to
the
PCB
requirements.
Based
on
discussions
with
a
limited
number
of
industry
representatives,
there
remains
no
justification
for
revising
the
estimate
of
10
minutes
per
manifest
(
see
Appendix
E).

Finally,
EPA
received
comments
concerning
the
burden
for
compiling
and
submitting
the
annual
report
[
i.
e.,
§
§
761.180(
b)
and
(
b)(
3)].
EPA
had
adjusted
the
burden
associated
with
this
activity
to
84
hours
per
respondent
based
on
a
review
of
the
requirements
and
discussions
with
consultants
during
the
effort
to
prepare
the
Cost
Impacts
of
the
Final
Regulations
Amending
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
Part
761
(
U.
S.
EPA,
1998b).
Based
on
the
data
gathering
effort
for
the
Consolidated
ICR
(
Appendix
E),
the
estimate
was
further
adjusted
to
59
hours
per
respondent.

Burden
summary.
The
total
estimated
time
for
respondents
to
comply
with
the
reporting,
third­
party
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
requirements
of
this
Consolidated
ICR
is
741,261
hours.
The
annual
burden
associated
with
respondents
complying
with
the
reporting
requirements
of
this
Consolidated
ICR
is
estimated
to
average
62,859
hours,
industry
wide.
The
total
third­
party
reporting
burden
is
estimated
to
average
52,344
hours,
industry
wide,
and
the
total
recordkeeping
burden
of
this
Consolidated
ICR
is
estimated
to
average
626,058
hours,
industry
wide.
The
average
hourly
estimates
and
total
number
of
respondents
for
each
reporting,
third­
party
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
burden
are
explained
on
Tables
6­
1
to
6­
3,
respectively.

Note
that
the
burdens
associated
with
requirement
numbers
1,
2,
6,
7,
11,
19,
20,
26,
30,
33,
36,
39,
40,
47,
51,

53
­
55,
58,
59,
61,
64,
66,
67,
72,
and
73
will
either
have
negligible
impacts
to
the
requirements
or
were
costed
6­
5
with
other
requirements
as
indicated
on
the
tables,
and
thus
no
estimates
were
included
for
these
requirements.
Also
note
that
requirement
numbers
74c,
d
and
75
refer
to
the
burden
for
the
Reclassification
Rule
and
are
included
in
the
burden
total.
(
This
Consolidated
ICR
may
be
submitted
to
OMB
prior
to
OMB's
Executive
Order
review
of
the
Final
Reclassification
Rule.)
To
simplify
the
presentation
of
the
numerous
hourly
burden
and
cost
estimates,
the
data
are
arrayed
according
to
reporting,
third­
party
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
requirements
for
each
section
of
the
regulation,
consistent
with
the
presentation
of
the
information
in
the
tables
of
Sections
2
and
5,
rather
than
to
rearrange
and
present
the
data
by
respondent
type.

EPA
anticipates
that
no
one
individual
would
be
subject
to
all
of
the
requirements
40
CFR
Part
761.
Refer
to
Section
4
for
a
complete
description
of
the
activities
listed
on
Tables
6­
1
to
6­
3.
6­
6
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
40
CFR
761
Subpart
A
 
General
1/
1001
§
761.1(
f)(
1),
(
2),
and
(
3)
Submit
new
reports
or
modifications
to
existing
reports
to
qualify
for
manufacturing/
import
exclusions,
pursuant
to
compliance
with
the
reporting
requirements
of
Subpart
J.
 
 
Burdens
are
reported
under
§
§
761.185
and
§
761.187.
See
#
s
42
and
43.

Subpart
B
 
Use
2/
857
§
§
761.20(
b)
and
(
c)(
1)
and
(
3)
Submit
an
exemption
petition
as
per
TSCA
section
6(
e)(
3)
to
manufacture
(
import),
process,
or
distribute
in
commerce
(
export)
PCBs,
unless
otherwise
authorized.
 
 
Burdens
are
reported
under
§
§
761.80(
e)
and
(
i).
See
#
s
34
and
39.

3/
1729
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)
and
(
vii);
(
xv)(
D)
Register
PCB
Transformers,
as
appropriate,
within
30
days
of
discovery.
1
hour
500
PCB
transformers
Deadlines
of
12/
1/
85
and
12/
28/
98
have
passed.
Requirements
now
applicable
only
to
new
disclosures.
Refer
to
Appendix
E
for
more
details
on
how
the
estimate
for
the
tot
al
number
of
transformers
was
reduced.

4
§
761.30(
a)(
2)
(
v)
Obtain
EPA
approval
to
use
alternate
method
to
simulate
loaded
conditions
for
in­
service
use
of
transformers
for
reclassifying
transformers.
20
hours
38
requests
Newly
captured
burden
based
on
recent
EPA
tally
of
number
of
submissions
(
see
Appendix
E).

5/
1729
§
761.30(
i)(
1)(
iii)
(
A)(
1)
Submit
a
description
of
a
natural
gas
pipeline
system
that
contains
>
50
ppm
PCBs,
if
requested
by
EPA.
20
hours
5
systems
EPA
expects
this
to
be
a
rare
occurrence.
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
7
6/
1729
§
761.30(
t)(
3)
Obtain
approval
for
the
use
of
PCBs
in
other
gas
or
liquid
systems.
20
hours
0
No
respondents
anticipated.

7/
1729
§
761.35(
b)
Obtain
approval
for
PCB
Articles
stored
for
reuse
for
>
5
years
in
a
facility
that
does
not
comply
with
§
761.65(
b).
0.083
hour
(
5
minutes
per
piece
of
equipment)
0
It
is
anticipated
that
there
will
be
no
respondents
to
this
regulation
during
the
clearance
period
of
this
ICR,
assuming
that
individuals
are
complying
with
§
761.35(
a),
which
grants
a
5­
year
storage
period.
ICR
1729
estimated
that
storage
of
6,525
pieces
of
equipment
would
require
approval.

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
8/
1012
§
§
761.60(
e)
and
(
i)(
2);
.70(
a),
(
b),
and
(
d);
.75(
b)(
7),
(
b)(
8)(
ii),
and
(
c)
Submit
permit
application
and,
when
applicable,
a
demo
plan
for
obtaining
approval
to
operate
a
PCB
disposal
facility
(
i.
e.,
alternative
method
of
disposal,
incinerator,
chemical
waste
landfill).
Submit
requests
for
approval
of
R&
D
for
PCB
disposal
for
persons
not
following
selfimplementing
requirements.
990
hours
average
per
submission;
15
applications
per
year.
Total
number
of
applicants
drops
from
26
to
15
in
that
§
761.60(
j)
for
self­
implementing
R&
D
eliminates
the
need
to
submit
certain
requests
for
disposal
approval
and
that
there
are
roughly
10
commercial
disposers
who
could
come
in
for
renewal
of
their
approvals
during
the
3­
year
ICR
clearance
period.
Also,
each
year,
some
applicants
start
the
disclosure
process
and
later
withdraw
their
application
or
conduct
an
unsuccessful
demonstration.
Because
of
the
difficulty
in
estimating
the
burden
for
these
partial
applications
and
based
on
an
EPA
analysis
conducted
for
this
report,
the
hourly
burdens
from
the
existing
ICR
and
the
Data
Gathering
Report
(
Appendix
E)
have
been
revised,
as
follows:

EPA
estimates
that
of
the
15
approval
requests
that
may
be
received
by
EPA,
about
half
(
7)
will
likely
be
renewal
requests
of
an
existing
disposal
approval
(
i.
e.,
8
hours
to
prepare;
EPA
estimate);
a
quarter
(
4)
may
be
for
thermal
destruction/
incineration
technologies
(
i.
e.,
the
most
burdensome
to
prepare
at
3,000
hours;
see
Appendix
E);
and
the
remainder
(
4)
may
be
for
process
changes
or
non­
thermal
technologies
under
§
761.60(
e)
(
i.
e.,
the
least
burdensome
application
at
an
estimated
700
hours
to
prepare,
as
per
ICR
1012
and
Appendix
E).
The
weighted
average
for
these
submissions
thus
becomes
990
hours:
[(
8
x
7)
+
(
3,000
x
4)
+
(
700
x
4)]/
15.
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
8
9/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
i)
Notify
EPA
to
obtain
an
identification
number
for
conducting
R&
D
on
PCB
disposal
activities.
1.5
hours
25
facilities
Also
see
#
44.

10/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ii)
Notify
EPA
(
as
well
as
State,
and
local)
officials
prior
to
conducting
R&
D
on
PCB
disposal
activities.
6
hours
20
facilities
Burden
reported
here
for
both
EPA
and
third­
party
notification
at
Table
6­
2.

11/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
2)
Submit
permit
application
and,
when
applicable,
a
demo
plan
for
obtaining
approval
to
operate
a
PCB
disposal
facility
(
i.
e.,
alternative
method
of
disposal,
incinerator,
chemical
waste
landfill).
Submit
requests
for
approval
of
R&
D
for
PCB
disposal
for
persons
not
following
selfimplementing
requirements,
as
per
paragraph
(
j)
of
this
section.
20
hours
0
No
respondents
anticipated.

12/
1729
§
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)
and
(
ii).
Notify
EPA
(
as
well
as
State,
Tribal,
and
local)
officials
of
self­
implementing
remediation
activity,
including
a
summary
of
the
procedures
used
to
sample
contaminated
areas
and
sample
collection
and
analysis
data;
submit
additional
information
as
requested;
and
certify
that
records
of
remediation
activity
are
on
file
at
the
location
designated
in
the
certificate.
100
hours
90
sites
90
percent
of
the
100
total
remediation
sites;
10
percent
will
request
a
waiver
of
the
notification
requirements,
as
per
#
14.
Burden
is
reported
here
for
this
requirement
and
is
listed
on
Table
6­
2.
(
ICR
1729
reported
100
respondents.)

13/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
ii)
Notify
EPA
of
changes
to
notification
of
selfimplementing
activities.
2
hours
10
sites
10
percent
of
the
100
total
remediation
sites.
Hourly
estimate
is
based
on
the
time
estimate
to
prepare
other
notifications
for
the
self­
implementing
remediation
requirements,
as
presented
in
the
Cost
Impact
Statement
for
the
Final
Rule
(
EPA,
1998b).
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
9
14/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
iii)
Request
a
waiver
of
the
notification
requirement
for
conducting
cleanup
of
PCB
remediation
waste.
20
hours
10
sites
10
percent
of
the
100
remediation
sites.
90
percent
will
notify
as
above
(
see
#
12).
Hourly
estimate
was
revised
from
the
Cost
Impact
Statement
of
the
Final
Rule
(
EPA,
1998b)
based
on
further
review
of
the
requirement.

15/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)
(
B)
Submit
certification
of
recording
the
deed
notation
required
under
paragraph
(
a)(
8)(
i)(
A)
of
this
section
has
been
recorded.
4
hours
100
sites.
 
16/
1729
§
761.61(
c)(
1)
Apply
for
risk­
based
disposal
of
PCB
remediation
wastes.
Submit
additional
information
as
requested.
1,600
hours
5
Number
of
respondents
may
grow
as
individuals
become
familiar
with
this
provision,
but
there
has
been
limited
response
to
date.
Previous
estimate
was
that
there
would
be
no
respondents.

17/
1729
§
761.62(
c)(
1)
Obtain
approval
for
risk­
based
disposal
or
storage
of
PCB
bulk
product
waste.
Provide
additional
information.
1,600
hours
5
Number
of
respondents
may
grow
as
individuals
become
familiar
with
this
provision,
but
there
has
been
limited
response
to
date.
Previous
estimate
was
that
there
would
be
no
respondents.

18/
1729
§
761.65(
a)(
2)
Notify
of
continuing
attempts
to
secure
disposal
and
to
request
a
1­
year
storage
extension.
3
hours
38
waste
storers
Combined
for
#
s
18,
19,
and
20.

19/
1729
§
761.65(
a)(
3)
Submit
request
for
additional
extensions
beyond
the
initial
1­
year
extension,
including
justification
and
information
on
measures
taken
to
secure
disposal.
 
 
See
#
18,
above.

20/
1729
§
761.65(
a)(
4)
Submit
request
for
modifications
to
TSCA
approval
to
allow
for
extended
storage
period.
 
 
See
#
18,
above.
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
10
21/
1729
§
761.65(
c)(
6)(
i)
(
C)
Demonstrate
that
other
containers
for
storage
of
PCB/
radioactive
wastes
are
protective
of
health
and
the
environment.
40
hours
1
Hourly
estimate
reduced
from
the
Cost
Impact
Statement
of
the
Final
Rule
(
EPA,
1998b)
based
on
further
review
of
the
requirement.
DOE
is
likely
to
become
a
respondent
to
this
provision.
Previous
estimate
was
that
there
would
be
no
respondents.

22/
1446
§
761.65(
d);
(
e)(
1),
(
6),
and
(
8);
and
(
f)
Prepare
application
for
commercial
storage
approval,
including
qualifications
of
key
employees,
closure
plan,
and
closure
cost
estimate.
Commercial
storer
must
also
notify
EPA
of
facility
modification,
closure
schedule,
and
completion
of
closure
activities.
392
hours
3
applications
Revised
EPA
estimate
is
that
there
will
be
3
applications
per
year
(
reduced
from
10
per
year
as
presented
in
ICR
1446).

23
§
761.65(
e)(
4)
Submit
a
written
request
to
the
RA
to
modify
a
storage
approval
to
amend
the
closure
plan,
when
there
are
changes
in
ownership,
changes
in
expected
dates
of
closure,
and/
or
unexpected
events.
2
hours
10
times
Estimates
based
on
recent
discussion
with
industry
consultant,
as
reported
in
the
Data
Gathering
Report
(
Appendix
E).
Newly
captured
burden.

24/
1729
§
761.65(
g)(
9)
Notify
issuing
authority
of
modifications
to
commercial
storage
facilities.
2
hours
10
storage
facilities
Hourly
estimate
slightly
increased
by
0.5
hours
based
on
further
review
of
the
requirement.

25/
1729
§
§
761.65(
j)
Demonstrate
that
a
new
owner
of
a
commercial
storage
facility
has
established
financial
assurance
for
closure.
Submit
new
or
amended
commercial
storage
application
as
a
result
of
change
in
ownership.
120
hours
3
applications
Total
number
of
respondents
was
increased
from
none
to
3
to
be
consistent
with
the
total
number
of
applications
for
commercial
storage
approval,
as
per
#
22,
above.

26
§
§
761.70(
a)(
8),
(
9);
and
(
d)(
5)
Obtain
approval
of
alternate
measures
when
regulatory
requirements
cannot
be
met
for
operating
a
PCB
incinerator.
1,910
hours
0
No
respondents
anticipated.
It
was
assumed
that
if
a
facility
does
not
meet
the
performance
criteria,
it
will
not
accept
PCB
waste.
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
11
27
§
§
761.70(
d)(
8);
761.75(
c)(
7)
Notify
EPA
of
change
in
ownership
of
disposal
facility
(
i.
e.,
for
incinerators
and
landfills).
8
hours
2
facilities
Note
that
the
hourly
estimate
includes
only
a
cursory
review
of
the
existing
permits
by
the
new
owner,
not
a
thorough
review,
as
reported
in
the
Data
Gathering
Report
(
Appendix
E).
Newly
captured
burden.

28/
1729
§
§
761.71(
a)(
2)
and
(
b)(
2)
Notify
EPA
prior
to
initial
use
of
a
high
efficiency
boiler
to
burn
mineral
oil
dielectric
fluid.
Seek
approval
to
burn
liquids,
other
than
mineral
oil
dielectric
fluid
in
a
HEB.
1.5
hours
to
notify
EPA
of
HEB
information;
40
hours
to
prepare
approval
request
letter
to
the
RA.
20
respondents
to
notify;
none
to
request
approval
EPA
revised
estimate
assuming
there
would
be
2
HEBs
per
EPA
region.

29/
1729
§
761.72(
c)(
2)
Notify
EPA
as
a
scrap
metal
recovery
oven
or
smelter
used
to
dispose
of
PCBs
and
comply
with
the
reporting
requirements
of
Subparts
J
and
K.
1.5
hours
20
EPA
revised
estimate
assuming
there
would
be
2
ovens
or
smelters
per
EPA
region.

30/
1729
§
761.72(
c)(
3)
Request
approval
to
disp
ose
of
PCBs
in
an
oven
or
smelter
based
on
site­
specific
risk
assessments,
in
lieu
of
meeting
requirements
listed
in
§
761.72.
1,600
hours
0
No
respondents
anticipated.

31/
1729
§
§
761.77(
a)(
1)(
i),
(
a)(
1)(
ii)(
A)(
1)
and
(
C),
and
.77(
a)(
2)
Submit
a
notification
to
the
RA
for
coordinated
approval
and
additional
information,
as
requested
by
EPA.
Submit
an
application
for
TSCA
disposal
approval,
if
the
RA
denies
the
request
for
a
coordinated
approval
or
determines
that
the
conditions
of
the
coordinated
approval
are
not
being
met.
36
hours
(
notification);
480
hours
(
approval
application).
36
notifications;
0
approval
applications
Total
number
of
respondents
is
25%
of
the
total
number
of
PCB
commercial
storage
and
disposal
facilities
identified
in
the
PADS
database
(
145)
(
EPA,
1998b).
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
12
32/
1729
§
761.77(
a)(
3)
Notify
EPA
of
changes
in
waste
management
requirements
in
the
non­
TSCA
waste
management
document
used
to
obtain
TSCA
PCB
coordinated
approvals.
8
hours
5
waste
disposers
 
33/
1729
§
761.79(
h)
Prepare
requests
for
decontamination
approvals
of
alternative
decontamination
or
sampling
methods.
EPA
may
request
additional
information.
1,600
hours
5
Number
of
respondents
increased
from
none
to
5
(
and
this
number
may
grow
further)
because
it
is
anticipated
that
there
will
be
increased
interest
in
this
provision.
There
has
been
limited
response
to
date,
however.

Subpart
E
 
Exemptions
34/
857,
1729
§
§
761.80(
e)(
1)
and
(
i)(
1)
Submit
R&
D
exemption
petition
to
qualify
for
the
class
exemptions
to
mfg.
PCBs
for
disposal
R&
D
and
to
mfg,
import,
process,
distribute,
and
export
PCBs
and
analytical
reference
samples
derived
from
PCB
waste
for
the
purpose
of
R&
D.
40
hours
27
companies
Estimates
are
combined
for
#
34
and
36.
Estimate
is
also
cumulative
of
ICRs
857
and
1729
numbers
of
respondents.
See
Appendix
E
for
further
discussion.

35/
857,
1729
§
761.80(
e)(
2)
and
(
i)(
2)
Submit
requests
for
renewal
of
the
exemptions
as
per
§
§
750.11
and
31.
(
Renewals
to
companyspecific
exemptions
can
be
handled
following
the
same
procedures.)
1
hour
3
requests
See
Appendix
E.

36/
1729
§
§
761.80(
e)(
3),
(
g)(
2),
and
(
i)(
4)
Obtain
approval
from
EPA
to
exceed
limits
of
the
exemption.
 
 
See
#
34,
above.

37/
1729
§
761.80(
e)(
4)
Notify
EPA
before
beginning
R&
D
activities
that
include
the
manufacture
of
PCBs.
20
hours
3
notifications
Hourly
estimate
was
increased
from
Cost
Impact
of
the
Final
Rule
(
EPA,
1998b)
based
on
further
data
gathering
(
see
Appendix
E).
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
13
38
§
761.80(
n)
Submit
a
petition
for
certain
exemptions
to
address
increases
in
the
amount
of
PCBs
to
be
processed
and
distributed,
imported
(
manufactured),
or
exported,
or
changes
in
the
manner
of
processing
and
distributing,
importing
(
manufacturing),
or
exporting
PCBs.
(
See
#
35
for
renewals.)
40
hours
3
requests
Newly
captured
burden.
Total
requests
is
based
on
recent
EPA
tally.

Subpart
F
 
Transboundary
Shipments
of
PCBs
for
Disposal
39/
1729
§
§
761.93(
a)
and
.97(
a)
Submit
an
exemption
petition
to
import
or
export
PCBs
or
PCB
Items
for
disposal.
___
___
Burden
is
reported
at
§
§
761.20(
b)
and
(
c)(
1)
and
(
3).
See
#
2.

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
40/
1729
§
§
761.125(
a)(
1)
(
i)
to
(
iii)
Report
certain
spills
of
PCBs
to
the
EPA.
0.167
hours
(
10
minutes)
0
No
respondents
anticipated.
Requirement
also
listed
on
Table
6­
2.

Subpart
J
 
General
Records
and
Reports
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
14
41/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.180(
b),
(
b)(
3),
and
(
c)(
5)
Submit
annual
reports
for
the
operation
of
PCB
incinerators,
chemical
waste
landfills,
high
efficiency
boilers,
and
commercial
storage
facilities,
including
facilities
that
dispose
of
the
PCB
wastes
they
generate.
Report
suspension
of
operations.
59
hours
265
facilities
This
hourly
estimate
was
revised
based
on
the
data
gathering
effort
discussed
in
the
Appendix
E.
This
estimate
had
been
increased
from
the
1
hour
reported
in
ICR
1446
and
decreased
from
the
84
hours
reported
in
ICR
1729.
The
estimate
for
number
of
facilities
was
generated
by
using
the
existing
estimate
of
230
facilities,
which
was
confirmed
by
EPA
to
be
accurate,
and
increasing
it
by
15
percent
to
reflect
the
additional
facilities
that
will
be
covered
under
the
new
regulation
(
i.
e.,
those
facilities
that
also
dispose
of
the
wastes
that
they
generate).

42/
1001
§
761.185
Notify
EPA
and
certify
low
level
PCB
product
contamination
to
be
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
Subpart
B,
regarding
processes
inadvertently
generating
PCBs
and
imports
of
products
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs.
Certification
must
be
repeated
if
the
previous
certification
is
no
longer
valid.
20
hours
10
companies
Submissions
will
report
about
new,
modified,
or
import
activities
or
about
excess
releases.
Number
is
declining
because
companies
with
exclusions
have
identified
themselves
in
the
initial
group
of
submissions.
Total
number
of
respondents
is
based
on
the
average
number
of
submissions
EPA
received
from
February
1996
to
February
1999.

43
§
761.187
Notify
EPA
when
PCB
releases
exceed
limits,
to
be
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
Subpart
B,
for
products,
manufactured
or
imported
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs.
20
hours
1
company
Hourly
estimate
is
based
on
time
to
review
the
monitoring
log
and
compile
information
into
the
notification,
as
discussed
in
the
Data
Gathering
Report
(
Appendix
E).
Newly
captured
burden.
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
15
Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
44/
1446
§
§
761.202(
a);
205(
a)
to
(
c)
Notify
EPA
of
waste
handling
activities,
for
generators,
commercial
storers,
transporters,
or
disposers
of
PCB
waste.
1.5
hours
100
waste
handlers
Roughly
6,500
notices
have
been
received;
relatively
few
"
new"
submissions
are
anticipated.
Also
see
#
s
9,
28,
and
29,
above.

45/
1729
§
761.205(
f)
Report
changes
in
notifications
previously
submitted
by
PCB
waste
handlers.
1.5
hours
200
waste
handlers
 
46/
1446,
1729
§
761.208(
a)(
4)
and
§
§
761.215(
b)
to
(
d).
Submit
Exception
Reports
to
EPA,
as
specified
in
§
761.215(
b)
to
(
d),
when
PCB
waste
generators,
disposers,
and/
or
commercial
storers
do
not
receive
confirmation
that
a
shipment
of
a
PCB
waste
has
been
properly
disposed
of.
2
hours
25
reports
Estimate
represents
roughly
10
percent
of
the
226
calls
that
needed
to
be
made
to
resolve
discrepancies
that
were
not
resolved
by
phone.
Combined
for
#
s
46
and
47.

47/
1446
§
761.210(
b)
Submit
Discrepancy
Reports
along
with
a
copy
of
the
manifest
to
EPA
when
the
PCB
waste
received
by
a
disposer
is
significantly
different
from
the
description
on
the
manifest,
and
the
discrepancy
is
not
resolved
after
receiving
the
waste.
 
 
See
#
46,
above.

48
§
761.211(
b)
Notify
RA
of
unmanifested
PCB
waste,
for
owners/
operators
of
commercial
storage
facilities
who
cannot
contact
the
generator
of
the
PCB
waste.
0.5
hours
25
notifications
Newly
captured
burden.
TABLE
6­
1
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a),
continued
Ref.
/
EPA
ICR
#
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
16
49/
1446
§
761.211(
c)
Submit
Unmanifested
Waste
Reports
(
e.
g.,
waste
description,
volume,
disposition;
date
received;
ID
#
s
of
waste
handlers
for
that
waste)
to
EPA
when
disposers
accept
a
shipment
of
PCB
waste
without
an
accompanying
manifest.
2
hours
50
reports
EPA
estimated
average
number
of
reports,
based
on
3
Regions
each
receiving
3
to
5
reports
per
year
and
1
region
receiving
6
to
12
reports
per
year.

Subpart
T
 
Comparison
Study
for
Validating
a
New
Performance­
Based
Decontamination
Solvent
under
§
761.79(
d)(
4)

50
§
§
761.395
and
761.398
Submit
results
of
analysis
and
validation
study
to
the
Director,
National
Program
Chemicals
Division
(
NPCD).
16
hours
5
studies
Hourly
estimate
for
conducting
the
study
and
preparing
the
report
is
discussed
further
in
the
Data
Gathering
Report
(
Appendix
E).
Estimate
for
the
total
number
of
respondents
is
5
percent
of
the
estimated
100
decontamination
sites.
Also
refer
to
#
93,
Table
6­
3.
Newly
captured
burden.
6­
17
TABLE
6­
2
THIRD­
PARTY
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e):
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
40
CFR
761
Subpart
B
 
Use
51
§
§
761.20(
e)(
3)(
ii);
.30(
i)(
5)(
ii);
and
.60(
b)(
5)(
iv)(
B)
Burner
of
used
oil
must
provide
a
1­
time
certification
to
the
marketer
that
he
is
in
compliance
with
notification
requirement
at
§
761.71(
a)(
2).
1
hour
 
No
respondents
anticipated.
Refer
to
Appendix
E
for
more
details.

52/
1000,
1729
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xi)
and
(
xv)(
A);
.30(
h)(
1)(
ii)(
B)
Report
PCB
Transformers
and
Voltage
Regulator
fire
incidents
to
the
NRC.
0.167
hour
(
10
minutes)
5
calls
Transformers;
5
calls
VRs
Based
on
3­
year
average
for
PCB
Transformers
and
assuming
that
the
total
number
of
PCB
Voltage
Regulator
fires
is
about
the
same
as
for
PCB
Transformers
(
See
EPA,
1998b).

53
§
761.30(
a)(
1)
(
xiv)
Notify
owner
of
PCB
Transformer
that
equipment
may
pose
risk
of
exposure
to
food
or
feed.
 
 
No
burden.
All
notifications
were
to
have
been
made
by
October
1,
1985,
although
notification
could
occur
if
a
mineral
oil
transformer
in
a
location
near
food
or
feed
is
discovered
to
contain
$
500
ppm
PCBs.

54
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xv)
(
D)
Register
PCB
Transformers
with
the
building
owner
within
30
days
of
discovery
 
 
Burden
reported
on
Table
6­
1.

Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
55/
1729
§
761.60(
a)(
3)(
ii)
Provide
information
to
chemical
waste
landfills
that
liquids
do
not
exceed
500
ppm
and
are
not
ignitable.
20
hours
 
No
respondents
anticipated.

56/
1729
§
761.60(
b)(
5)(
i)
(
A)(
1)
Include
abandoned
natural
gas
pipes
that
contain
PCBs
in
public
service
notification
programs.
0.25
hour
(
15
minutes)
50
pipes
 
TABLE
6­
2,
continued
THIRD­
PARTY
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
18
57/
1446
§
761.60(
f)(
1)(
i)
Provide
State
and
local
officials
with
notification
prior
to
first
use
of
an
approved
chemical
waste
landfill,
incinerator,
or
alternate
PCB
disposal
technology.
0.50
hour
(
30
minutes).
600
notifications
Based
on
recent
discussion
with
industry
representatives,
it
was
estimated
that
mobile
equipment
will
be
used
at
about
300
unique
sites
per
year,
as
follows:
200
substations
per
year
will
use
mobile
equipment
to
clean
PCB
Transformers;
about
50
remediation
sites
will
use
solvent
extraction
units;
5
sites
will
use
mobile
incinerators,
vitrification
units,
or
physical
separation
units,
and
45
sites
will
use
other
existing
or
newly
permitted
equipment.

58
§
761.60(
f)(
1)(
ii)
Provide
annual
notice
of
the
quantities
and
description
of
the
PCBs
disposed
of
to
State
or
local
governments,
at
their
request.
0.5
hour
 
Since
the
annual
reporting
requirement
t
o
State/
local
governments
would
be
initiated
at
the
State
or
local
government
level,
EPA
has
no
way
of
estimating
this
total
burden.

59/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ii)
Notify
State
and
local
officials
(
as
well
as
EPA)
of
PCB
R&
D
disposal
activities.
 
 
Total
burden
for
EPA
and
third­
party
reporting
requirements
are
reported
on
Table
6­
1.

60
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
vii)
Use
manifests,
pursuant
to
Subpart
K,
for
all
R&
D
PCB
wastes
being
transported
from
the
R&
D
facility
to
an
approved
PCB
storage
or
disposal
facility.
1
hour
25
facilities
Estimate
is
based
on
one
shipment
per
year
for
each
facility.
Newly
captured
burden.

61/
1729
§
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)
Notify
State
and
local
officials
(
as
well
as
EPA)
of
self­
implementing
remediation
activity.
 
 
Total
burden
for
EPA
and
third­
party
reporting
requirements
is
reported
on
Table
6­
1.

62/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
5)(
i)
(
B)(
2)(
iv)
Notify
offsite
non­
TSCA
facility
of
pending
shipment
of
remediation
waste.
2
hours
100
waste
shippers
Combined
for
remediation
and
bulk
product
wastes
(#
s
62
and
64).

63/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)
(
A)
Attach
a
notation
to
the
deed
for
property
at
which
remediation
projects
require
a
permanent
fence
or
cap.
3
hours
100
sites.
 
TABLE
6­
2,
continued
THIRD­
PARTY
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
19
64/
1729
§
§
761.62(
b)(
4)(
i)
and
(
ii)
(
See
also
§
§
761.357
and
359)
Provide
notification
to
a
receiving
facility
that
does
not
have
a
commercial
PCB
storage
or
disposal
approval
before
the
first
shipment
of
a
PCB
bulk
product
waste
stream.
In
addition,
for
certain
waste
this
notice
must
be
provided
with
each
shipment
thereafter.
 
 
See
#
62,
above.

65
§
§
761.65(
c)(
1)
and
(
8)
Attach
a
notation
to
a
PCB
Item
or
PCB
Container
containing
the
item
indicating
the
date
the
Item
was
removed
from
service
for
disposal,
to
be
able
to
temporarily
store
the
item/
container
in
an
area
that
does
not
comply
with
the
storage
requirements
of
paragraph
(
b)
of
this
section.
0.083
hours
(
5
minutes)
380,000
Items,
Containers,
and
Article
Containers
This
estimate
is
based
on
an
estimated
270,000
PCB
Articles,
as
reported
in
the
Cost
Impact
Statement
for
the
Final
Rule
(
EPA,
1998b).
It
assumes
that
at
any
given
time,
there
will
be
just
as
many
PCB
Containers
and
Article
Containers
as
Articles,
making
the
total
number
of
PCB
Items
540,000.
For
example,
there
may
be
instances
where
contaminated
soil
from
one
PCB
Article
spill
may
fill
50
containers
or
that
the
oil
drained
from
one
PCB
Transformer
fills
4
containers.
The
time
estimate
for
these
requirements
considers
that
all
Items
must
be
dated
when
removed
from
service
for
disposal,
whether
or
not
the
Item
will
be
placed
in
temporary
storage
or
not.
Refer
to
the
Appendix
E
for
more
information
on
this
newly
captured
burden.

66/
1446
§
761.65(
i)(
3)
Send
information
regarding
the
sample
collector,
the
lab,
date
of
shipment,
quantity,
and
description
of
sample,
when
sending
PCB
samples
to
a
laboratory
for
testing.
4
hours
 
Since
EPA
has
no
way
of
estimating
the
number
of
samples
that
would
be
sent
off­
site
annually
for
testing,
or
the
frequency
with
which
the
samples
are
sent
to
an
off­
site
lab,
EPA
cannot
estimate
the
total
annual
burden
associated
with
this
requirement.

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
TABLE
6­
2,
continued
THIRD­
PARTY
REPORTING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
20
67/
1729
§
761.125(
a)(
1)
Report
certain
spills
of
PCBs
to
the
NRC.
0.167
hours
(
10
minutes)
0
No
respondents
anticipated.
Requirement
also
listed
on
Table
6­
1.

68
§
761.125(
c)
(
2)(
ii)
Place
label
or
notice
of
PCB
contamination
at
cleanup
site.
1
hour
6,780
sites
Estimate
assumes
that
there
will
be
about
12
spills
per
year
at
565
large
utilities,
disposers,
and
storers.
The
capital
costs
for
placing
the
sign
is
assumed
to
be
$
50
per
site
(
i.
e.,
for
posts,
labels,
etc.)
Refer
to
Appendix
E
for
more
details
on
how
this
newly
captured
burden
was
estimated.

Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
69
§
§
761.207(
a)
and
208(
a)(
2)
and
(
3)
Prepare
manifests
and
provide
generator­
initiated
manifests
of
PCB
waste
to
each
transporter
or
designated
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility.
0.167
hours
(
10
minutes)
22,577
reports
Existing
estimate
to
prepare
manifest
was
confirmed
through
discussion
with
industry
consultants
and
representatives
(
Appendix
E).

70
§
§
761.208(
c)(
1)
(
iv)
and
(
c)(
2)(
iv)
Storer
or
disposer
sends
a
copy
of
the
manifest
or
shipping
paper
to
the
generator.
0.167
hours
(
10
minutes)
22,577
reports
Revised
estimate
takes
into
consideration
that
the
manifest
is
already
prepared
at
this
point.

71/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.218(
a)
and
(
b)
Send
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
generators
of
PCB
waste
when
disposal
of
each
item
is
complete
for
a
manifested
PCB
waste
shipment.
0.25
hour
(
15
minutes)
average
22,577
reports.
The
estimate
is
for
submitting
1
report
per
manifest.
The
15­
minute
time
estimate
used
in
the
existing
ICRs
has
been
validated
by
the
data
gathering
effort
conducted
for
this
report
(
Appendix
E).
The
new
information
confirmed
that
even
when
a
facility
must
input
data
for
each
Item,
most
of
the
required
information
will
be
readily
available
for
a
majority
of
cases.
6­
21
TABLE
6­
3
RECORDKEEPING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
40
CFR
761
Subpart
A
 
General
72/
1001
§
§
761.1(
f)
Comply
with
recordkeeping
requirements
of
Subpart
J
[
§
§
761.185(
c)(
2)
and
(
d),
and
.193]
as
a
condition
of
the
exclusion
from
the
PCB
bans,
for
persons
who
inadvertently
manufacture
or
import
PCBs
generated
as
unintentional
impurities
in
excluded
manufacturing
processes
or
generate
PCBs
in
excluded
manufacturing
process
or
products
with
recycled
PCBs.
 
 
Burden
is
reported
at
§
§
761.185(
c)(
2)
and
(
d),
and
.193(
a).
See
#
100.

Subpart
B
 
Manufacturing,
Processing,
Distribution
in
Commerce,
and
Use
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
73/
1729
§
§
761.20(
e)
(
4)(
i)
and
(
ii);
.30(
i)(
5)(
ii);
and
.60(
b)(
5)(
iv)(
B)
Marketer
who
first
claims
used
oil
does
not
contain
detectable
PCBs
must
retain
records
supporting
the
claim
and
a
copy
of
each
certification
notice
received
or
prepared
relating
to
transactions
involving
PCB­
containing
used
oil.
Burners
must
include
among
the
records
a
copy
of
each
certification
notice
that
has
been
provided
to
a
marketer
of
PCB­
containing
used
oil.
0.25
hours
(
15
minutes)
 
No
significant
burden
anticipated,
as
discussed
in
Appendix
E.
TABLE
6­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
22
74a,
b/
1000,
1729
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)
(
xii)
and
(
xiv)
Maintain
records
of
inspection
and
maint
enance
history
for
at
least
3
years
after
the
disposal
of
a
PCB
Transformer,
including
records
of
registration,
as
per
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)(
C).
0.05
hour
(
3
minutes)
to
track
inspection
data;
0.033
(
2
minutes)
to
file
and
maintain
data
312,080
PCB
Transformers;
50
percent
(
156,040)
are
inspected
annually
and
50
percent
are
inspected
quarterly
Estimate
represents
the
312,080
PCB
Transformers
estimated
to
be
in
existence
in
1997
(
as
reported
in
an
EPA
report
on
the
small
entity
impacts
of
the
PCB
Reclassification
Rule:
EPA,
1998d).
Time
estimate
includes
the
average
time
for
a
technician
to
track
the
data
(
3
minutes)
and
for
a
clerk
to
file
and
maintain
the
data
(
2
minutes),
based
in
part
on
a
study
reported
in
ICR
1000
by
the
Edison
Electric
Institute.
This
report
does
not
account
for
actual
inspection
time.
The
calculations
for
this
estimate
account
for
the
differences
in
burden
between
annual
and
quarterly
inspections.
It
is
assumed
that
the
time
to
maintain
records
for
the
disposed
transformers
is
insignificant.

74c,
d/
1000,
1446
§
§
761.30(
a)(
1)
(
xii)
and
(
xiv)
Maintain
records
of
inspection
and
maintenance
history
for
at
least
3
years
after
the
disposal
of
a
PCB
Transformer,
including
records
of
registration,
as
per
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)(
C).
Accounts
for
the
reduced
number
of
Transformers
that
will
be
subject
to
this
requirement
based
on
the
implementation
of
the
Reclassification
Rule,
§
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v)
and
(
vi).
0.05
hour
(
3
minutes)
to
track
inspection
data;
0.033
(
2
minutes)
to
file
and
maintain
data
­
7826
PCB
Transformers;
50
percent
(­
3,913)
are
inspected
annually
and
50
percent
are
inspected
quarterly
Please
note
that
when
the
Reclassification
Rule
is
implemented
(
see
#
75a
and
b),
the
total
number
of
transformers
that
will
be
subject
to
the
inspection
recordkeeping
requirement
will
be
reduced.
As
indicated
in
the
small
entity
impact
analysis
(
EPA,
1998d),
13
percent
of
the
60,200
pieces
of
equipment
that
will
be
reclassified
are
PCB
Transformers
(
7,826).
Using
the
same
calculation
method
as
indicated
above
for
#
74
a
and
b,
this
requirement
shows
the
estimated
savings
for
the
reduced
number
of
Transformers
that
will
be
subject
to
this
requirement.
Refer
to
Section
6(
e)
for
more
details.
TABLE
6­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
23
75/
1446
§
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v),
.30(
h)(
2)(
vi)
and
.180(
a)
Maintain
records
at
the
facility
where
electrical
transformers
and
voltage
regulators
have
been
reclassified
to
a
lower
PCB
concentration.
0.25
(
15
minutes)
60,200
transformers
Total
number
of
transformers
is
based
on
two
EPA
analyses.
One
study
conducted
for
the
proposed
Reclassification
Rule
estimated
that
301,000
transformers
containing
>
50
ppm
PCBs
could
potentially
be
retrofilled.
An
estimate
from
the
cost
analysis
for
the
Final
Rule
was
that
20
percent
of
all
PCB
Articles
will
be
retrofilled
(
EPA,
1998b).
Thus,
60,200
transformers
will
be
retrofilled
each
year
(
301,000
x
20%).
As
per
the
small
entity
impacts
analysis
of
the
PCB
Reclassification
Rule,
it
is
assumed
that
it
will
take
15
minutes
to
maintain
the
records
on
pre­
and
post
reclassification
concentration
of
the
transformer
(
EPA,
1998d).

76/
1729
§
§
761.30(
i)(
1)
(
iii)(
B)
and
(
C)
Keep
records
of
data
collected
on
certain
natural
gas
pipeline
systems
with
$
50
ppm
PCBs
and
records
of
actions
taken
to
reduce
PCB
contamination
for
3
years
after
PCBs
reduced
to
<
50
ppm.
4
hours
100
systems
It
is
not
anticipated
that
new
records
will
need
to
be
developed;
historical
data
can
be
used.
TABLE
6­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
24
77/
1729
§
761.35(
a)(
2)
Keep
records
of
equipment
stored
for
reuse.
0.15
hour
189,225
pieces
of
equipment.
Total
pieces
of
equipment
that
require
recordkeeping
is
based
on
information
reported
in
the
cost
analysis
for
the
Final
Rule
(
EPA.
1998b).
It
was
reported
in
the
cost
analysis
that
equipment
owners
will
store
182,700
PCB
Articles
for
<
5
years
in
areas
that
do
not
comply
with
§
761.35(
b)
and
6,525
PCB
Articles
for
>
5
years,
with
compliance
with
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements,
for
a
total
of
189,225
pieces
of
equipment
for
this
requirement.

Subpart
C
 
Marking
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
78/
1729
§
761.40(
c)(
2)(
ii)
and
(
k)
Keep
records
of
the
protected
location
of
PCB
large
capacitors
where
owner
chooses
not
to
mark
individually
(
optional).
0.1
hour
(
6
minutes)
200,000
pieces
of
equipment
 
Subpart
D
 
Storage
and
Disposal
79/
1729
§
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ix)
Keep
records
of
R&
D
for
disposal
activities.
12
hours
25
facilities
 
TABLE
6­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
25
80/
1729
§
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)(
E);
and
(
a)(
6)
Retain
records
of
the
sampling
plans,
sample
collection
procedures,
sample
preparation
procedures,
extraction
procedures,
and
instrumental/
chemical
analysis
procedures
used
to
assess
or
characterize
the
PCB
contamination
at
the
cleanup
site,
and
certification
that
these
records
are
on
file
at
the
location
designated
in
the
certificate.
Keep
records
of
comparison
studies
for
any
alternate
method
used
that
meet
or
exceed
the
requirements
of
§
761.326.
Keep
records
of
sampling
and
sample
analysis
to
verify
cleanup
and
on­
site
disposal
of
bulk
PCB
remediation
wastes
and
porous
surfaces,
as
per
Subpart
O,
§
761.295.
1
hour
100
sites
Number
of
respondents
was
increased
in
this
report
to
account
for
all
sites
(
100
sites),
not
just
the
sites
using
alternate
methods
(
10
sites).
Also
see
§
761.295.

81/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
3)(
iii)
Retain
original
waivers
from
the
selfimplementing
remediation
requirements
received
from
the
RA,
State,
and
local
agencies.
0.167
hour
(
10
minutes)
100
sites
Time
estimate
was
slightly
increased
to
be
consistent
with
similar
activities.

82/
1729
§
761.61(
a)(
9)
Keep
records
in
accordance
with
§
761.125(
c)(
5)
for
(
a)(
3),
(
a)(
4),
and
(
a)(
5)
of
this
part.
20
hours
100
sites
(
Also
see
#
97.)

83/
1729
§
761.62(
b)(
5)
Maintain
a
written
record
of
all
sampling
and
analysis
of
PCBs
or
notifications
made
under
this
part
and
make
available
upon
request.
4
hours
26
sites
Estimate
is
15
percent
of
170
total
number
of
affected
sites.

84/
1729
§
§
761.65(
a)(
2)(
ii)
and
(
a)(
3)
Keep
a
written
record
of
attempts
to
secure
disposal
capacity.
Records
may
be
required
for
periods
of
extended
storage.
4
hours
38
waste
storers
 
TABLE
6­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
26
85/
1729
§
761.65(
c)(
1)(
iv)
Prepare/
modify
Spill
Prevention,
Control
and
Countermeasure
Plans
to
address
liquid
PCBs
>
500
ppm,
to
be
able
to
temporarily
store
PCB
Containers
containing
liquid
PCBs
at
$
50
ppm
in
areas
that
do
not
comply
with
the
storage
requirements
of
§
761.65.
60
hours/
new
plan;
2
hours/
adapted
plan
5
new
respondents;
10
to
adapt
existing
plan
It
is
estimated
that
only
5
waste
generation
facilities
will
be
required
to
prepare
plans
from
scratch,
whereas
10
facilities
will
be
required
to
adapt
existing
plans.
See
Appendix
E.

86
§
761.65(
c)(
7)(
ii)
Prepare
a
Spill
Prevention,
Control,
and
Countermeasure
Plan
(
SPCC),
when
using
stationary
storage
containers,
as
per
29
CFR
1910.106,
for
liquid
PCBs.
60
hours
5
facilities
It
is
not
foreseen
that
many
facilities
will
enter
into
the
PCB
storage
business
each
year,
as
discussed
in
Appendix
E.

87/
1729
§
761.65(
c)(
8)
Keep
records
of
the
quantity
and
the
date
of
each
batch
added
to
the
stationary
storage
container.
0.083
hours
(
5
minutes)
30,000
batches
Refer
to
Appendix
E
for
a
detailed
discussion
of
this
increased
estimation.

88
§
§
761.65(
c)(
10)
and
.180
Establish
and
maintain
records
as
per
§
761.180
for
storing
for
disposal
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
$
50
ppm.
843
hours
110
commercial
storers
This
newly
captured
burden
assumes
that
the
recordkeeping
systems
are
already
established.
The
total
number
of
storers
was
obtained
from
the
EPA
list
of
TSCA
Commercial
Storers,
March
29,
1999.
Refer
to
Appendix
E
for
more
details.

89
§
§
761.70(
a)(
3),
(
4)
and
(
7);
(
c);
and
761.180(
c)
Maintain
for
incinerators
records
of
quantities,
feed
rates,
temperatures,
combustion
products,
and
operations,
and
special
records,
as
per
§
761.180(
c).
843
hours
5
incinerators
Refer
to
Appendix
E
for
more
details
on
this
newly
captured
burden.

90/
1729
§
§
761.71(
a)(
1)
(
vi)
and
(
vii),
(
a)(
4),
(
b)(
1)(
vi
­
vii),
(
b)(
5);
761.180(
e)
Record
and
retain
monthly
HEB
operation
data.
12
hours
20
HEBs
Note
that
5
of
these
HEBs
(
from
EPA
Region
VI)
are
used
intermittently,
so
that
total
hourly
burden
may
actually
be
less
than
indicated
in
this
report.
Also,
total
number
of
HEBs
is
based
on
EPA
estimate
of
2
per
region.

91/
1729
§
§
761.72(
a)(
9)
and
(
b)(
6)
Record
and
retain
records
of
temperature
readings
from
scrap
metal
recovery
ovens.
3
hours
100
ovens
 
TABLE
6­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
27
92
§
§
761.75(
b)(
6)
(
iii)
and
(
b)(
8)
(
iv);
761.180(
d)
Maintain
records
for
all
PCB
disposal
operations
at
chemical
waste
landfills,
including
PCB
concentration
in
liquid
wastes,
the
threedimensional
burial
coordinates
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items,
water
sampling
and
analysis,
and
additional
records
as
required
in
§
761.180.
843
hours
8
landfills
Refer
to
Appendix
E
for
a
more
detailed
discussion
on
these
newly
captured
burdens.

93/
1729
§
761.79(
d)(
4)
and
Subpart
T
Retain
test/
validation
results
of
PODFs
and
VADFs.
0.5
hour
5
facilities
Estimate
is
5
percent
of
the
100
decontamination
sites,
with
a
burden
slightly
reduced
from
ICR
1729.

94/
1729
§
§
761.79(
f)(
1)
and
(
2)
Keep
records
of
confirmatory
sampling
and
sampling
locations/
results
for
decontamination
activities
and
compliance
with
self­
implementing
decontamination
procedures.
2
hours
100
sites.
Slightly
reduced
burden
from
ICR
1729.

Subpart
E
 
Exemptions
95/
1729
§
761.80(
e)(
5)
and
(
i)(
7)
Keep
records
of
activities
associated
with
manufacture/
processing/
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs
or
PCB
reference
samples
derived
from
waste
materials
for
R&
D.
12
hours
25
facilities
 
96
§
761.80(
g)(
1)
Keep
records
of
PCB
processing
and
distribution
in
commerce
activities,
for
facilities
that
process
and
distribute
small
quantities
of
PCBs
for
R&
D.
12
hours
15
facilities
Total
number
of
facilities
is
based
on
an
EPA
list
of
Pending
TSCA
PCB
Exemption
Petitions,
as
of
August
14,
1998.

Subpart
G
 
PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
97
§
§
761.125(
b)(
3)
and
(
c)(
5);
.61(
a)(
9)
Maintain
records
of
cleanup
and
certification
of
decontamination.
8
hours
6,780
sets
of
records
Refer
to
Appendix
E
for
an
explanation
of
this
calculation.

98
§
761.125(
c)(
1)
Maintain
records
documenting
delay
in
spill
cleanup
activities
and
areas
of
visible
contamination.
0.5
hours
339
sites
It
is
anticipated
that
5
percent
of
the
total
number
of
spills,
as
reported
above,
would
face
delays
in
cleanup.
TABLE
6­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
28
Subpart
J
 
General
Records
and
Reports
99/
1446,
1729
§
§
761.180(
a),
(
a)(
4),
(
b)
and
(
f);
761.65(
c)(
5)
Maintain
annual
records
and
document
log
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
for
5
years
after
facility
ceases,
including
manifests,
CDS,
records
of
inspections
and
cleanups,
facility
and
Item
ID
information,
number
of
Items,
phone
records,
and
Item
transfer
information,
for
owners/
operators
of
storage
and
disposal
facilities.
Collect
and
maintain
documents,
correspondence,
and
data
pertaining
to
storage/
disposal
of
PCBs
that
have
been
provided
to
as
well
as
received
from
any
State/
local
agency
and
any
application/
correspondence
submitted
to
permitting
authorities.
52
hours
6,270
waste
handlers
The
time
to
keep
the
annual
log
varies
widely,
based
on
the
level
of
PCB
activity
taking
place
and
the
volume
of
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
handled.
To
keep
the
annual
log
takes
from
1
hour
to
over
40
hours
each
week.
Total
number
of
facilities
is
the
total
number
of
PCB
waste
handlers
minus
the
total
number
of
commercial
storers
and
disposers
(
230
facilities).
Refer
to
the
Appendix
E
for
more
details
on
this
increased
burden.

100/
1001
§
§
761.185(
c)(
2),
(
d)
and
.193(
a)
and
(
b)
Maintain
theoretical
analysis
or
monitoring
records
by
persons
who
import,
manufacture,
process,
distribute
in
commerce,
or
use
products
containing
inadvertently
generated
or
recycled
PCBs,
pursuant
to
§
761.1(
f)(
1)
to
(
3).
Maintain
letter
certifying
compliance
with
§
761.1(
f),
for
excluded
manufacturing
processes.
5
hours
to
file
records;
5
hours
to
maintain
previous
reports
25
new
respondents;
10
previous
respondents
Total
number
of
respondents
is
based
on
1999
EPA
tally
from
February
1996
to
February
1999
that
shows
that
21
companies
are
submitting
these
notices.

Subpart
K
 
PCB
Waste
Disposal
Records
and
Reports
101/
1446
§
§
761.208
and
.209
File
and
maintain
manifests
initiated
or
received
by
the
PCB
generator
and
any
subsequent
PCB
waste
handler.
0.167
hour
(
10
minutes)
22,577
manifests
 
TABLE
6­
3,
continued
RECORDKEEPING
BURDENS
UNDER
TSCA
SECTION
6(
e)
FOR
ICR
PART
A,
SECTION
6(
a)

Ref.
#
/
ICR
Regulatory
Section(
s)
Collection
Requirement
Time
Estimate
Total
#
Respondents
Per
Year
Comments
6­
29
102/
1446
§
761.218(
c)
Maintain
a
copy
of
each
Certificate
of
Disposal
received
from
disposers,
for
generators
and
commercial
storers
of
PCB
waste.
0.167
hour
(
10
minutes)
22,577
certificates
Estimates
are
based
on
the
estimates
used
for
a
similar
requirement,
#
101,
above.

Subpart
T
 
Comparison
Study
for
Validating
a
New
Performance­
Based
Decontamination
Solvent
under
§
761.79(
d)(
4)

103
§
761.398(
c)
Record
testing
parameters
and
experimental
conditions
in
SOP.
Results
of
validation
study
are
to
be
affixed
in
an
appendix.
16
hours
5
facilities
Refer
to
Appendix
E
for
more
details
on
this
calculation.
6­
30
6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs
Tables
6­
4,
6­
5,
and
and
6­
6
show
the
annual
respondent
hourly
burden
and
cost
estimates
for
the
reporting,
third­
party
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
requirements
of
the
Consolidated
ICR.
For
the
labor
rate
estimates
used
in
the
ICRs,
EPA
relied
on
the
Comprehensive
Assessment
and
Information
Rule
(
CAIR)

economic
analysis,
which
measured
costs
to
the
same
industries
affected
by
these
collections
at
hourly
labor
rates
as
follows
(
including
benefits
and
overhead):
legal
@
$
80.69;
managerial
@
$
60.42;
scientific
@
$
52.39;

technical/
foreman
@
$
43.80;
engineering
technician
(
line
employee)
@
$
31.41;
and
clerical
@
$
21.73
(
rounded
to
the
nearest
dollar:
$
81;
$
60,
$
52;
$
44,
$
31,
and
$
22,
respectively).
The
cost
for
using
the
services
of
consulting
engineers
was
estimated
to
be
$
72
per
hour.
The
engineering
technician
wage
rate
was
judged
to
be
appropriate
for
compliance
activities
performed
by
non­
supervisory
personnel.
It
corresponds
to
the
weekly
wage
for
engineering
technicians,
Level
IV,
as
estimated
by
the
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
(
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics,
1997).
That
wage
rate
was
multiplied
by
1.64
to
capture
standard
OPPT
assumptions
about
labor
fringe
benefits
and
overhead
rates.
Note
that
no
requirement
was
found
to
use
legal
or
scientific
services.

There
are
no
new
capital
or
training
costs
anticipated
to
the
affected
industries
or
the
Federal
government
associated
with
responding
to
the
information
collections
that
are
subject
to
renewal
(
i.
e.,
ICRs
583,
857,
1000,
1001,
1012,
and
1446),
nor
have
there
been
any
Federal
costs
associated
with
printing
or
mailing.
Costs
associated
with
reading
the
rule,
providing
training,
and
updating
procedures
to
comply
with
the
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
for
the
Final
PCB
Disposal
Rule
(
63
FR
35384,
62/
19/
88;
ICR
1729)
have
been
accounted
for
by
taking
10
percent
of
the
total
cost
of
each
requirement
and
annualizing
the
costs
over
the
OMB
3­
year
clearance
period
using
a
factor
of
0.3811.
The
new
one­
time
requirements
of
the
Final
PCB
Disposal
Rule
(
ICR
1729)
were
also
annualized
for
a
3­
year
period,
as
indicated
on
Tables
6­

3and
6­
4.
Because
operations
and
maintenance
costs
for
these
information
collections
(
i.
e.,
costs
associated
with
telephone
calls,
photocopying,
and
other
general
office
overhead
expenses)
have
been
estimated
to
be
relatively
low
and
within
the
range
of
the
estimation
error,
there
are
no
added
costs
for
these
activities.
Also
note
that
variations
in
some
of
the
totals
on
the
tables
are
due
to
rounding.
6­
31
TABLE
6­
4
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
HOURLY
BURDEN
AND
COST
ESTIMATE
­
REPORTING
Ref
#
Regulatory
Citation
Information
Collection
Activity
Hours
and
Costs
Per
Respondent
Total
Hours
and
Costs
Eng.
@
$
72/
Hour
Mgr.
@
$
60/
Hour
Tech.
@
$
44/
Hour
Cler.
@
$
22/
Hour
Hours/
Respond
./
Year
(
1)
Labor
Cost/
Year
(
2)
Training
/
Startup
Costs
(
3)
Total
#
of
Respond
.
Total
Hours/
Year
(
4)
Total
Cost/
Year
(
5,
6)

Subpart
B
3
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi),
(
vii),
(
xv)(
D)
Register
newly
discovered
PCB
Transformers
­
1
­
­
1
$
60
$
2
500
500
$
11,869
(
6)

4
761.30(
a)(
2)(
iv)
Obtain
app.
to
use
alt.
meth.
to
simulate
loaded
conditions
for
reclassifying
transformers
­
8
10
2
20
$
964
$
0
38
750
$
13,960
(
6)

5
761.30(
i)(
1)(
iii)(
A)(
1)
Submit
descriptions
of
gas
pipeline
systems
­
8
10
2
20
$
964
$
37
5
100
$
1,907
(
6)

Subpart
D
8
761.60(
e),
(
i)(
2);
761.70(
a),
(
b),
(
d)(
2);
761.75(
b)(
7),
(
b)(
8)(
ii),
(
c)
Submit
disposal
permit
applications
910
­
­
80
900
$
67,280
$
0
15
14,850
$
384,606
(
6)

9
761.60(
j)(
1)(
i)
Obtain
identification
number
for
R&
D
­
­
1.5
­
1.5
$
66
$
3
25
38
$
653
(
6)

10
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ii)
Notify
officials
of
R&
D
activities
­
­
4
2
6
$
220
$
8
20
120
$
4,568
12
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i),(
ii)
Notify
officials
of
self­
imp.
remediation
­
30
50
20
100
$
4,440
$
169
90
9,000
$
414,829
13
761.61(
a)(
3)(
ii)
Notify
EPA
of
self­
imp.
remediation
­
­
2
­
2
$
88
$
3
10
20
$
914
14
761.61(
a)(
3)(
iii)
Request
waiver
of
notification
requirement
­
2
16
2
20
$
868
$
33
10
200
$
9,011
15
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)(
B)
Certify
recording
of
deed
notation
­
­
4
­
4
$
176
$
7
100
400
$
18,271
16
761.61(
c)(
1)
Apply
for
risk­
based
disposal
approval
for
remediation
waste
1,480
­
­
120
1,600
$
109,20
0
$
4,162
5
8,000
$
216,011
(
6)

17
761.62(
c)(
1)
Apply
for
risk­
based
disposal
or
storage
approval
for
bulk
PCB
product
waste
1,480
­
­
120
1,600
$
109,20
0
$
4,162
5
8,000
$
216,011
(
6)

18
761.65(
a)(
2),
(
3),
(
4)
Notify
of
attempts
to
secure
disposal
­
­
2
1
3
$
110
$
4
38
114
$
4,339
21
761.65(
c)(
6)(
i)(
C)
Demonstrate
that
storage
containers
for
PCB/
rad
waste
are
protective
of
health/
env.
32
­
­
8
40
$
2,480
$
95
1
40
$
981
(
6)

22
761.65(
d),(
e)(
1),(
e)(
6­
Prepare
storage
approval
application
­
­
392
­
392
$
17,248
$
657
3
1,176
$
20,471
(
6)

23
761.65(
e)(
4)
Submit
RA
request
to
modify
storage
­
1.5
­
0.5
2
$
101
$
0
10
20
$
1,010
24
761.65(
g)(
9)
Notify
EPA
of
changes
to
storage
facilities
­
­
1.5
0.5
2
$
77
$
3
10
20
$
799
25
761.65(
j)
Demonstrate
financial
assurance
for
closure
80
20
­
20
120
$
7,400
$
0
3
360
$
8,460
(
6)

27
761.70(
d)(
8);
761.75(
c)(
7)
Notify
EPA
of
changes
in
disposal
facility
ownership
­
7
­
1
8
$
442
$
0
2
16
$
884
28
761.71(
a)(
2)
and
(
b)(
2)
Notify
EPA
prior
to
initial
use
of
HEB
­
­
1.5
­
1.5
$
66
$
3
20
30
$
1,370
TABLE
6­
4
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
HOURLY
BURDEN
AND
COST
ESTIMATE
­
REPORTING
Ref
#
Regulatory
Citation
Information
Collection
Activity
Hours
and
Costs
Per
Respondent
Total
Hours
and
Costs
Eng.
@
$
72/
Hour
Mgr.
@
$
60/
Hour
Tech.
@
$
44/
Hour
Cler.
@
$
22/
Hour
Hours/
Respond
./
Year
(
1)
Labor
Cost/
Year
(
2)
Training
/
Startup
Costs
(
3)
Total
#
of
Respond
.
Total
Hours/
Year
(
4)
Total
Cost/
Year
(
5,
6)

6­
32
29
761.72(
c)(
2)
Notify
EPA
as
a
scrap
metal
recovery
oven
or
smelter
­
­
1.5
­
1.5
$
66
$
3
20
30
$
1,370
31
761.77(
a)(
1)(
i),
(
a)(
1)
(
ii)(
A)(
1),
(
C),
(
a)(
2)
Request
coordinated
approval
­
8
20
9
36
$
1,536
$
59
36
1,296
$
57,403
32
761.77(
a)(
3)
Notify
EPA
of
changes
to
coord.
appr.
­
6
­
2
8
$
404
$
15
5
40
$
2,097
Subpart
E
34
761.80(
e)(
1);
(
i)(
1)
Qualify
for
R&
D
exemptions
­
32
­
8
40
$
2,096
$
80
25
1,000
$
54,397
35
761.80(
e)(
2)
and
(
i)(
1)
Submit
requests
for
renewal
of
the
class
exemptions
­
1
­
­
1
$
60
$
2
2
2
$
125
37
761.80(
e)(
4)
Notify
EPA
of
PCB
mfg.
before
R&
D
­
2
16
2
20
$
868
$
33
3
60
$
2,703
38
761.80(
n)
Request
approval
for
changes
in
class
exemption
as
per
750.11,
750.31
­
32
­
8
40
$
2,096
$
80
3
120
$
6,528
SUBPART
J
41
761.180(
b),
(
b)(
3),
(
c)(
5)
Prepare/
submit
annual
reports
on
storage/
disposal
­
56
­
3
59
$
3,426
$
0
265
15,635
$
907,890
42
761.185
Notify
EPA
for
exclusion
for
inadvertent
generation
of
PCBs
­
6
11
3
20
$
426
$
0
10
200
$
4,260
43
761.187
Notify
EPA
when
exceed
limits
for
inadvertent
generation
of
PCBs
­
6
11
3
20
$
426
$
0
1
20
$
426
SUBPART
K
44
761.202(
a),
761.205(
a­
e)
Notify
EPA
of
PCB
waste
activity
­
1
­
0.5
1.5
$
71
$
0
100
150
$
7,100
45
761.205(
f)
Report
changes
in
waste
handler
­
1
­
0.5
1.5
$
71
$
3
200
300
$
14,741
46
761.208(
a)(
4),
761.215(
b­
d)
Submit
Exception
and
Discrepancy
Reports
to
EPA
­
­
1.5
0.5
2
$
77
$
0
25
50
$
1,925
48
761.211(
b)
Notify
EPA
of
unmanifested
waste
­
­
0.5
­
0.5
$
22
$
0
25
13
$
550
49
761.211(
c)
Submit
Unmanifested
Waste
Reports
­
­
1.5
0.5
2
$
77
$
0
50
100
$
3,850
SUBPART
T
50
761.395,
761.398
Submit
results
of
validation
study
analysis
to
EPA
­
1
14
1
16
$
698
$
0
5
80
$
3,490
TOTALS
62,859
$
2,399,77
Notes:
(
1)
Sum
of
staff
hours.
6­
33
(
2)
Sum
of
staff
hours
x
labor
rates.
(
3)
10%
of
total
labor
costs,
annualized
for
3­
year
period,
using
0.3811
annualization
factor.
(
4)
Hours/
respondent/
year
x
total
number
of
respondents.
(
5)
(
Labor
+
training
costs)/
respondent
x
total
number
of
respondents.
Totals
may
not
add
due
to
rounding.
(
6)
Total
costs
are
annualized
(
x
0.3811)
for
one­
time
requirements.
6­
34
TABLE
6­
5
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
HOURLY
BURDEN
AND
COST
ESTIMATE
­
THIRD­
PARTY
REPORTING
Ref
#
Regulatory
Citation
Information
Collection
Activity
Hours
and
Costs
Per
Respondent
Total
Hours
and
Costs
Mgr.
@
$
60/
Hour
Tech.
@
$
44/
Hour
Cler.
@
$
22/
Hour
Hours/
Respond
./
Year
(
1)
Labor
Cost/
Year
(
2)
Training
/
Startup
Costs
(
3)
Total
#
of
Respond
.
Total
Hours/
Year
(
4)
Total
Cost/
Year
(
5,
6)

Subpart
B
52
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xi),
(
xv)(
A);
(
h)(
1)(
ii)(
B)
Report
PCB
transformer
and
voltage
regulator
fires
to
NRC
­
0.167
­
0.167
$
7
$
0
10
2
$
73
Subpart
D
56
761.60(
b)(
5)(
i)(
A)(
1)
Include
gas
pipes
in
notification
programs
­
0.25
­
0.25
$
11
$
0.419
50
13
$
571
57
761.60(
f)(
1)(
i)
Notify
state/
local
gov'ts
of
PCB
disposal
­
0.333
0.167
0.5
$
18
$
0
600
300
$
10,996
60
761.60(
j)(
1)(
vii)
Manifest
R&
D
PCB
wastes
­
1
­
1
$
44
$
0
25
25
$
1,100
62
761.61(
a)(
5)(
i)(
B)(
2)(
iv
)
Notify
offsite
non­
TSCA
facility
of
pending
shipment
of
remediation
or
bulk
waste
­
2
­
2
$
88
$
3
100
200
$
9,135
63
761.61(
a)(
8)(
i)(
A)
Certify
deed
notation
recording
­
3
­
3
$
132
$
5
100
300
$
13,703
65
761.65(
c)(
1),
(
8)
Attach
date
notation
on
PCB
Items
and
Containers
­
0.083
­
0.083
$
4
$
0
380,000
31,540
$
1,387,76
0
Subpart
G
68
761.125(
c)(
2)(
ii)
Place
notice
of
PCB
contamination
at
cleanup
site
­
1
­
1
$
44
$
0
6,780
6,780
$
113,690
(
6)

SUBPART
K
69
761.207(
a);
761.208(
a)(
2),
(
3)
Prepare
manifests
for
each
PCB
waste
transporter
and
disposer
0.167
­
­
0.167
$
10
$
0
22,577
3,770
$
226,222
70
761.208(
c)(
1)(
iv),
Storer/
disposer
sends
manifest
to
generator
0.167
­
­
0.167
$
10
$
0
22,577
3,770
$
226,222
71
761.218(
a),
(
b)
Send
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
generators
­
0.25
­
0.25
$
11
$
0
22,577
5,644
$
248,347
TOTALS
52,344
$
2,237,81
Notes:
(
1)
Sum
of
staff
hours.
(
2)
Sum
of
staff
hours
x
labor
rates.
(
3)
10%
of
total
labor
costs,
annualized
for
3­
year
period,
using
0.3811
annualization
factor.
(
4)
Hours/
respondent/
year
x
total
number
of
respondents.
(
5)
(
Labor
+
training
costs)/
respondent
x
total
number
of
respondents.
Totals
may
not
add
due
to
rounding.
(
5)
Total
costs
are
annualized
(
x
0.3811)
for
one­
time
requirements.
6­
35
TABLE
6­
6
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
HOURLY
BURDEN
AND
COST
ESTIMATE
­
RECORDKEEPING
Ref
#
Regulatory
Citation
Information
Collection
Activity
Hours
and
Costs
Per
Respondent
Total
Hours
and
Costs
Mgr.
@
$
60/
Hour
Tech.
@
$
44/
Hour
Cler.
@
$
22/
Hour
Hours/
Respond
./
Year
(
1)
Labor
Cost/
Year
(
2)
Training
/
Startup
Costs
(
3)
Total
#
of
Respond
.
Total
Hours/
Year
(
4)
Total
Cost/
Year
(
5,
6)

Subpart
B
74a
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xii)
Maintain
PCB
Transformer
inspection
data
(
annual)
­
0.05
0.033
0.083
$
3
$
0
156,040
12,951
$
456,573
74b
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xii)
Maintain
PCB
Transformer
inspection
data
­
0.2
0.133
0.333
$
12
$
0
156,040
75051,
$
1,829,725
74c
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xii)
Maintain
PCB
Transformer
inspection
data
(
annual)
­
0.05
0.033
0.083
$
3
$
0
(
3,913)
(
325)
($
11,499)

74d
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xii)
Maintain
PCB
Transformer
inspection
data
­
0.2
0.133
0.333
$
12
$
0
(
3,913)
(
1,303)
($
45,884)

75
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v);
761.180(
a)
Maintain
records
of
retrofilled
equipment
­
0.167
0.083
0.25
$
9
$
0.35
60,200
15,050
$
573,322
76
761.30(
i)(
1)(
iii)(
B),
(
C)
Keep
records
of
gas
pipeline
system
data
1
2
1
4
$
170
$
6
100
400
$
17,648
77
761.35(
a)(
2)
Keep
records
of
equipment
stored
for
reuse
­
0.15
­
0.15
$
7
$
0.252
189,225
28,384
$
1,296,480
78
761.40(
c)(
2)(
ii)
and
(
k)
Keep
large
capacitor
records
(
optional)
­
0.1
­
0.1
$
4
$
0.168
200,000
20,000
$
913,537
Subpart
D
79
761.60(
j)(
1)(
ix)
Keep
R&
D
for
disposal
records
­
12
­
12
$
528
$
20
25
300
$
13,703
80
761.61(
a)(
3)(
i)(
E);
(
a)(
6);
761.295
Keep
remediation
sampling/
analysis
records
­
1
­
1
$
44
$
2
100
100
$
4,568
81
761.61(
a)(
3)(
iii)
Retain
waivers
from
self­
impl.
Remed.
projects
­
0.167
­
0.167
$
7
$
0.28
100
17
$
291
(
6)

82
761.61(
a)(
9)
Keep
records
accd.
to
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
4
12
4
20
$
856
$
33
100
2,000
$
88,862
83
761.62(
b)(
5)
Maintain
sampling/
analysis
records
for
bulk
product
wastes
1
3
­
4
$
192
$
7
26
104
$
1,975
(
6)

84
761.65(
a)(
2)(
ii),
(
a)(
3)
Keep
records
of
attempts
to
secure
disposal
­
4
­
4
$
176
$
7
38
152
$
6,943
85a
761.65(
c)(
1)(
iv)
Prepare
SPCC
plans
5
45
10
60
$
2,500
$
95
5
300
$
4,945
(
6)

85b
761.65(
c)(
1)(
iv)
Prepare
SPCC
plans
for
liquid
PCBs
>=
500
ppm
0.5
1
0.5
2
$
85
$
3
10
20
$
882
86
761.65(
c)(
7)(
ii)
Prepare
SPCC
plans
for
facilities
using
storage
containers
5
45
10
60
$
2,500
$
0
5
300
$
4,764
(
6)

87
761.65(
c)(
8)
Keep
records
of
the
quantity/
date
of
each
batch
added
to
a
stationary
storage
container
­
0.083
­
0.083
$
4
$
0
30,000
2,490
$
109,560
88
761.65(
c)(
10)
Establish
and
maintain
annual
log
records
as
per
761.180
for
PCB
storage
facilities
24
­
819
843
$
19,458
$
0
110
92,730
$
2,140,380
89
761.70(
a)(
3),
(
4),
(
7);
(
c);
761.180
Maintain
incinerator
records
48
260
535
843
$
26,090
$
0
5
4,215
$
130,450
90
761.71(
a)(
a)(
vi),
(
vii);
(
b)(
1)(
vi),
(
vii),
(
b)(
5);
761.180(
e)
Retain
monthly
HEB
operating
data
­
12
­
12
$
528
$
20
20
240
$
10,962
TABLE
6­
6
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
HOURLY
BURDEN
AND
COST
ESTIMATE
­
RECORDKEEPING
Ref
#
Regulatory
Citation
Information
Collection
Activity
Hours
and
Costs
Per
Respondent
Total
Hours
and
Costs
Mgr.
@
$
60/
Hour
Tech.
@
$
44/
Hour
Cler.
@
$
22/
Hour
Hours/
Respond
./
Year
(
1)
Labor
Cost/
Year
(
2)
Training
/
Startup
Costs
(
3)
Total
#
of
Respond
.
Total
Hours/
Year
(
4)
Total
Cost/
Year
(
5,
6)

6­
36
91
761.72(
a)(
9),
(
b)(
6)
Record
and
retain
scrap
metal
recovery
oven
temperature
records
­
3
­
3
$
132
$
5
100
300
$
13,703
92
761.75(
b)(
6)(
iii),
(
b)(
8)(
iv);
761.180(
d)
Maintain
chemical
waste
landfill
records
24
­
819
843
$
19,458
$
0
8
6,744
$
155,664
93
761.79(
d)(
4)
Retain
PODF/
VADF
validation
results
­
0.5
­
0.5
$
22
$
1
5
3
$
44
(
6)

94
761.79(
f)(
1),
(
2)
Keep
decontamination
sampling
records
­
2
­
82
$
88
$
3
100
200
$
3,481
(
6)

Subpart
E
95
761.80(
e)(
5);
(
i)(
7)
Keep
records
of
PCB
mfg/
proc/
dist.
in
comm.
R&
D
activities
­
12
­
12
$
528
$
20
25
300
$
13,703
96
761.80(
g)(
1)
Keep
records
of
PCB
mfg/
proc/
dist.
in
comm.
of
small
quantities
of
PCBs
for
R&
D
activities
­
12
­
12
$
528
$
20
15
180
$
8,222
97
761.125(
b)(
3),
(
c)(
5)
Maintain
records
of
cleanup
and
certification
of
decontamination
1
5
2
8
$
324
$
0
6,270
54,240
$
2,196,720
98
761.125(
c)(
1)
Maintain
records
documenting
delay
in
cleanup
­
­
0.5
0.5
$
11
$
0
339
170
$
3,729
SUBPART
J
99
761.180(
a),
(
a)(
4),
(
f);
761.65(
c)(
5)
Maintain
annual
records
and
log
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
12
­
40
52
$
1,600
$
0
6,270
326,04
0
$
10,032,00
0
100a
761.185(
c)(
2)
and
761.193(
a),
(
b)
Maintain
monitoring
data
of
inadvertent
generation
of
PCBs
­
5
­
5
$
220
$
0
25
125
$
5,500
100b
761.185(
c)(
2)
and
761.193(
a),
(
b)
Maintain
previous
records
of
monitoring
data
of
inadvertent
generation
of
PCBs
­
­
5
5
$
110
$
0
10
50
$
1,100
101
761.208(
a),
(
b),
(
c);
761.209(
a­
d)
File
and
maintain
manifests
­
­
0.167
0.167
$
4
$
0
22,577
3,770
$
82,948
102
761.218(
c)
Maintain
Certificates
of
Disposal
­
­
0.167
0.167
$
4
$
0
22,577
3,770
$
82,948
SUBPART
T
103
761.398(
c)
Record
test
parameters
and
SOP
conditions
for
decontamination
validation
studies
­
16
­
16
$
704
$
0
5
80
$
3,520
TOTALS
626,05
$
20,151,51
Notes:
(
1)
Sum
of
staff
hours.
(
2)
Sum
of
staff
hours
x
labor
rates.
(
3)
10%
of
total
labor
costs,
annualized
for
3­
year
period,
using
0.3811
annualization
factor.
(
4)
Hours/
respondent/
year
x
total
number
of
respondents.
6­
37
(
5)
(
Labor
+
training
costs)/
respondent
x
total
number
of
respondents.
Totals
may
not
add
due
to
rounding.
(
6)
Total
costs
are
annualized
(
x
0.3811)
for
one­
time
requirements.
6­
38
6(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
The
estimated
Agency
burden
associated
with
this
Consolidated
ICR
is
shown
on
Table
6­
7
with
comments
indicated
on
the
table.
The
detailed
costs
associated
with
the
Agency
burden
is
shown
in
Table
6­
8.
The
hourly
rates
for
EPA
staff
were
based
on
a
composite
management
level
at
GS­
15/
5
($
43.80,

rounded
to
$
44);
technical
support
at
GS­
12/
5
($
26.50,
rounded
to
$
27),
and
clerical
support
at
GS­
7/
5
($
14.94,

rounded
to
$
15),
using
the
January
1999
salary
table
for
the
Washington,
DC,
locality.
(
Note
that
Tables
6­
7
and
6­
8
appear
at
the
end
of
section
6(
d)).

6(
d)
Bottom
Line
Burden
and
Costs
(
i)
Respondent
Tally
As
indicated
on
Tables
6­
4,
the
total
respondent
reporting
burden
is
62,859
hours
and
$
2,399,778.
As
indicated
on
Tables
6­
5,
the
total
respondent
third­
party
reporting
burden
is
52,344
hours
and
$
2,237,818.
As
indicated
on
Table
6­
6,
the
total
respondent
recordkeeping
burden
is
626,058
hours
and
$
20,151,519.
Table
6­
9
summarizes
the
respondent
burdens
and
costs
for
each
applicable
subpart
of
40
CFR
761.
As
shown
on
the
table,
the
total
paperwork
burden
for
this
Consolidated
ICR
is
741,261
hours
and
$
24,789,115.

(
ii)
Agency
Tally
As
indicated
on
Table
6­
8,
the
Agency
annual
burden
is
1,114,772
hours
and
$
30,076,825.

(
iii)
Variations
in
the
Annual
Bottom
Line
This
section
does
not
apply.
There
are
no
anticipated
significant
variations
in
the
annual
respondent
reporting
or
recordkeeping
burden
or
cost
over
the
course
of
the
requested
clearance
period
for
either
industry
or
the
Federal
Government.
6­
39
TABLE
6­
7
ANNUAL
AGENCY
HOURLY
BURDEN
FOR
THE
CONSOLIDATED
ICR
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
COVERING
THE
PCB
REGULATIONS
AT
40
CFR
761
ICR
Collection
Activities
Burden
Hrs/
Year
Respondent
s/
Year
Comments
857,
1729
Review/
analyze
data
submissions
(
i.
e.,
new
exemptions
and
renewal
data);
develop
rulemakings
in
response
to
the
petitions
for
exemption;
publish
rulemakings
in
the
Federal
Register;
index
and
file
the
data
in
the
public
docket.
203
hours
5
renewal
petitions:
2
new
petitions
Federal
Register
publication
costs
add
approximately
$
1,500
to
the
annual
cost
of
this
collection
activity.

1000
Review
preliminary
PCB
Transformer
inspection
reports;
input
data;
index/
file
data.
20
hours
500
inspections
The
total
time
to
conduct
inspections
equals
4
days.

1001
Review
exclusion
submissions;
record/
enter
submissions;
analyze
requests
for
confidentiality
and
provide
appropriate
protection;
store
data.
6
hours
8
submissions
 
1012
Review
technology­
based
disposal
applications;
attend
demonstrations
(
EPA
engineers
and
contractor
analytical
chemists);
develop
(
i.
e.,
grant/
deny)
approval;
maintain
files.
660
hours
15
submissions
Costs
vary
depending
on
number
and
type
of
applications
received.

1446
Review
facility
records,
including
annual
reports.
2
hours
per
review
1,100
inspections
Based
on
Compliance
Monitoring
Plan,
maximum
number
of
inspections
for
all
10
Regions
combined
is
1,100/
year.

Review
applications
for
commercial
storage
approval,
with
contractual
support.
72­
125
hours/
application;
98.5
hours,
average,
rounded
to
100
3.3
applications/
year
average,
rounded
to
3
Review
time
varies
based
on
the
number
of
deficiencies
initially
discovered
and
any
supplemental
information
that
is
submitted
to
correct
the
deficiencies.
EPA
uses
contractual
support
to
review
applications.
TABLE
6­
7,
continued
ANNUAL
AGENCY
HOURLY
BURDEN
FOR
THE
CONSOLIDATED
ICR
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
COVERING
THE
PCB
REGULATIONS
AT
40
CFR
761
ICR
Collection
Activities
Burden
Hrs/
Year
Respondent
s/
Year
Comments
6­
40
1729
Process
PCB
notification
forms;
update
PADS;
respond
to
inquires
regarding
these
submissions;
maintain
hardcopy
files
of
these
submissions;
and
provide
contractor
oversight.
520
hours
 
These
activities
will
be
conducted
at
EPA
Headquarters
only.
The
hourly
figures
represent
the
time
allocation
to
handle
all
respondents.

Process
PCB
Transformer
registrations.
520
hours
 
These
activities
will
be
conducted
at
EPA
Headquarters
only.
The
hourly
figures
represent
the
time
allocation
to
handle
all
respondents.
Create
PCB
Transformer
database
260
hours
 
Respond
to
numerous
requests
for
regulatory
interpretations
and
inquiries
regarding
the
PCB
notification
and
Transformer
Registration
Programs..
1,850
hours
 
Maintain
official
files
of
all
requests
for
approvals
and
EPA's
responses.
675
hours
 
See
comment
above.

Review
requests
for
risk­
based
disposal
and
coordinated
approvals
and
alternate
decontamination
or
sampling
methods;
issue
approvals
or
waivers;
maintain
files.
23,675
hours
46
submissions
Costs
vary
depending
on
number
and
types
of
applications
received.
6­
41
TABLE
6­
8
ANNUAL
AGENCY
HOURLY
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
WORKSHEET
2)

ICR
Collection
Activities
Hours
and
Costs
Per
Respondent
Total
Hours
and
Costs
Mgmt
.@
$
44/
Hour
Tech.
@
$
27/
Hour
Cler.
@
$
15/
Hour
Agency
Hours/
Year
(
1)
Labor
Cost/
Year
(
2)
Capital/
Startup
Costs
(
3)
Total
#
of
Respond
.
Total
Hours/
Year
(
4)
Total
Cost/
Year
(
5,
6)

857
Review/
analyze
new
exemption
petitions
and
renewal
data
1
28
­
29
$
800
­
7
203
$
5,600
857
Develop
rulemakings
3
160
8
171
$
4,572
­
1
171
$
4,572
857
Index/
file
data
­
­
2
2
$
30
­
1
2
$
30
857
FR
publication
­
24
8
33
$
812
$
1,500
1
33
$
2,312
857
SUBTOTAL
409
$
12,514
1000
Review
preliminary
inspection
report
­
8
­
8
$
216
­
500
4,000
$
108,000
1000
Review
reformatted
report
­
4
­
4
$
108
­
500
2,000
$
54,000
1000
Review/
input
data
­
4
­
4
$
108
­
500
2,000
$
54,000
1000
Index/
file
data
­
­
4
4
$
60
­
500
2,000
$
54,000
1000
SUBTOTAL
10,000
$
246,000
1001
Review
exclusion
request
submissions
­
2
­
2
$
54
­
8
16
$
432
1001
Record/
enter
submissions
­
1
­
1
$
27
­
8
8
$
216
1001
Analyze
requests
for
confidentiality
and
provide
appropriate
protection
­
1
­
1
$
27
­
8
8
$
216
1001
Store
data
­
2
­
2
$
54
­
8
16
$
432
1001
SUBTOTAL
48
$
1,296
1012
Review
applications
­
312
­
312
$
8,424
­
15
4,680
$
126,360
1012
Attend
demonstrations
­
156
­
156
$
4,212
­
15
2,340
$
63,180
1012
Contractor
support
for
demonstrations
­
140
­
140
$
3,780
­
15
2,100
$
56,700
1012
Develop
(
grant/
deny)
approval
2
30
­
32
$
898
­
15
480
$
13,470
1012
Maintain
files
­
1
­
1
$
27
­
15
15
$
405
1012
SUBTOTAL
9,615
$
260,115
1446
Record
and
retain
scrap
metal
recovery
oven
temperature
records
­
2
­
2
$
54
­
1,100
2,200
$
59,400
1446
Maintain
chemical
waste
landfill
records
­
100
­
100
$
2,700
­
3
300
$
8,100
1446
SUBTOTAL
2,500
$
67,500
1729
Process
notification
forms;
update
PADS
­
520
­
520
$
14,040
­
1
520
$
14,040
1729
Process
PCB
Transformer
registrations
­
520
­
520
$
14,040
­
1
520
$
14,040
1729
Create
PCB
Transformer
database
­
260
­
260
$
7,020
­
1
260
$
7,020
TABLE
6­
8
ANNUAL
AGENCY
HOURLY
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
WORKSHEET
2)

ICR
Collection
Activities
Hours
and
Costs
Per
Respondent
Total
Hours
and
Costs
Mgmt
.@
$
44/
Hour
Tech.
@
$
27/
Hour
Cler.
@
$
15/
Hour
Agency
Hours/
Year
(
1)
Labor
Cost/
Year
(
2)
Capital/
Startup
Costs
(
3)
Total
#
of
Respond
.
Total
Hours/
Year
(
4)
Total
Cost/
Year
(
5,
6)

6­
42
1729
Review
requests
for
risk­
based
disposal
and
coordinated
approvals
and
alternative
decontamination
or
sampling
methods;
issue
approvals,
waivers
or
letters
of
approval;
maintain
files
of
requests
for
approval
­
23,67
5
­
23,675
$
639,22
5
­
46
1,089,05
0
$
29,404,35
0
1729
Respond
to
requests
for
regulatory
interpretations
­
1,850
­
1,850
$
49,950
­
1
1,850
$
49,950
1729
SUBTOTAL
1,092,20
$
29,489,40
TOTALS
1,114,77
$
30,076,82
Notes:
(
1)
Sum
of
staff
hours.
(
2)
Sum
of
staff
hours
x
labor
rates.
(
3)
EPA
estimates.
(
4)
Total
number
of
respondents
x
Agency
hours/
year.
(
5)
Labor
+
training
costs
x
respondent
x
total
number
of
respondents.
(
6)
Totals
may
not
add
due
to
rounding.
6­
43
TABLE
6­
9
SUMMARY
OF
RESPONDENT
BURDENS
AND
COSTS
BY
SUBPART
Subparts
Total
#
of
Resp.
Total
Hrs
Per
Year
Total
Hrs
Per
Resp.
(
1)
Total
Cost
Per
Year
Total
Cost
Per
Hours
(
2)

Reporting
Subpart
B
543
1,360
2,505
$
27,736
$
20
Subpart
D
428
43,770
102
$
1,364,058
$
31
Subpart
E
33
1,182
36
$
63,752
$
54
Subpart
J
276
15,855
57
$
912,576
$
58
Subpart
K
400
613
2
$
28,166
$
46
Subpart
T
5
80
16
$
3,490
$
44
Subtotal
Reporting
1,685
62,859
$
2,399,778
$
38
Third­
Party
Reporting
Subpart
B
10
2
0.167
$
73
$
44
Subpart
D
380,875
32,378
0.085
$
1,423,265
$
44
Subpart
G
6,780
6,780
1.000
$
113,690
$
17
Subpart
K
67,731
13,185
0.195
$
700,790
$
53
Subtotal
Third­
Party
Reporting
455,396
52,344
$
2,237,818
$
43
Recordkeeping
Subpart
B
753,779
127,119
0.169
$
5,029,951
$
40
Subpart
D
30,757
110,214
3.583
$
2,691,177
$
24
Subpart
E
40
480
12.000
$
21,925
$
46
Subpart
G
7,119
54,410
7.643
$
2,200,449
$
40
Subpart
J
51,459
333,756
6.000
$
10,204,496
$
31
Subpart
T
5
80
16.000
$
3,520
$
44
Subtotal
Recordkeeping
843,159
626,058
$
20,151,519
$
32
Totals
1,300,240
741,261
$
24,789,115
$
33
Notes:
6­
44
(
1)
Total
hours
per
year/
total
number
of
respondents
(
2)
Total
cost
per
year/
total
hours
per
year
6­
45
6(
e)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
The
burden
in
OMB's
inventory
for
the
various
existing
ICRs
(
based
on
Notices
of
OMB
Action)

is
2,007,618
hours,
as
follows:

#
ICR
857
 
18
hours
(
expires
5/
31/
00)
#
ICR
1000
 
32,936
hours
(
expires
3/
31/
00)
#
ICR
1012
 
10,688
hours
(
expires
6/
30/
00)
#
ICR
1001
 
1,030
hours
(
expires
2/
28/
00)
#
ICR
1770
 
1,340
hours
(
expired
4/
30/
99)
#
ICR
1446
 
175,453
hours
(
expires
10/
30/
01)
#
ICR
1729
 
1,786,153
hours
(
expires
9/
30/
01)

The
total
burden
hours
for
the
Cons
olidated
ICR
is
741,261
hours.
In
preparing
this
Consolidated
ICR,
the
information
collection
requirements
captured
by
each
of
the
ICRs
listed
above
were
compared
against
the
Code
of
Federal
Regulations.
Even
though
the
Consolidated
ICR
captures
an
additional
205,573
burden
hours
for
requirements
that
were
overlooked
by
the
various
individual
ICRs
and
an
additional
13,427
burden
hours
associated
with
the
Reclassification
Rule,
the
burden
for
the
PCB
collections
has
been
reduced.
When
the
"
newly
captured"
requirements
and
those
of
the
Reclassification
Rule
are
included
in
the
comparison,
the
reduction
is
1,266,357
hours
(
2,007,618
­
741,261).
However,
program
changes
and
adjustments
to
the
hourly
burdens,
revised
estimates
regarding
the
total
number
of
respondents
resulting
from
new
data
gathered
for
the
consolidated
ICR
effort
(
as
reported
in
Appendix
E
and
Tables
6­
1
through
6­
6
of
this
report),
updated
Agency
analyses,
and
estimate
adjustments
that
were
made
for
consistency
with
more
recent
Agency
reports
all
impacted
the
reduction
in
burden.
The
cumulative
result
of
these
program
changes
and
adjustments
was
a
reduction
of
1,447,626
hours,
as
shown
on
Table
6­
10
and
in
the
following
discussion.
6­
46
TABLE
6­
10
CHANGES
IN
BURDEN
HOURS
TO
EXISTING
PCB
ICR
TOTALS
ICR
Change
in
Burden
Hours
ICR
857
+
822
hours
ICR
1000
+
31,976
hours
ICR
1001
­
655
hours
ICR
1012
+
4,162
hours
ICR
1446
+
180,772
hours
(+
62,
­
90;
­
528;
+
166,511;
and
+
14,817)

ICR
1729
­
1,663,363
hours
(­
1,237,259;
­
154,550;
­
550
hours;
­
255,454;
­
35,080;
­
8,604;
and
+
28,134)

ICR
1770
­
1,340
hours
Reclassification
Rule
+
13,427
hours
(­
1,623;
and
+
15,050)

Total
­
1,434,199
hours
(
overall
savings)

Total
without
Reclassificatio
n
Rule
­
1,447,626
hours
[­
1,434,199
hours
­
13,427
hours]

The
major
revisions
made
to
the
total
burden
in
each
ICR
are
discussed
below.
The
newly
captured
burdens
and
those
of
the
Reclassification
Rule
are
also
discussed.
The
burden
shown
in
parentheses
represents
the
burden
currently
in
OMB's
inventory.
The
reference
numbers
found
in
Column
1
of
Tables
6­
1
through
6­
6
are
cited
throughout
this
discussion.

#
ICR
857
(
18
hours)
(
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
s
2,
34,
35,
36,
and
39)
 
Publication
of
the
Final
PCB
Disposal
Rule
(
ICR
1729)
created
a
program
change,
adding
two
new
R&
D
class
exemptions.
To
qualify
for
these
R&
D
exemptions,
individuals
must
file
an
exemption
petition.
Both
ICR
857
and
1729
include
burdens
for
developing
exemptions
and
submitting
renewal
requests.
These
estimates
have
ranged
from
2
to
9
hours
to
develop
a
petition
and
to
do
renewals.
Based
on
the
data
gathering
effort
(
Appendix
E),
EPA
has
learned
that
it
takes
about
40
hours
to
prepare
exemption
requests
and
1
hour
to
request
renewals.
EPA's
estimate
of
the
number
of
requests
for
exemptions
and
renewals
remains
unchanged
(
i.
e.,
25
6­
47
individuals
may
be
interested
in
obtaining
an
exemption
primarily
under
these
new
class
exemption
provisions,
2
individuals
may
request
exemptions
outside
the
class
exemptions,
and
3
individuals
may
request
renewals).
Therefore
the
1,083­
hour
burden
reflected
in
the
Consolidated
ICR
represents
a
program
adjustment
increase
of
822
hours,
as
follows:
[
1,083
­
(
18
+
243)].
(+
822­
hour
program
adjustment)

#
ICR
1000
(
32,936
hours)
(
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6,
#
74,
a,
b)
 
The
increase
in
the
burden
for
keeping
records
of
transformer
inspections
and
maintenance
history
represents
an
adjustment
and
is
based
on
several
changes
in
how
the
burden
was
estimated.
First,
the
estimated
number
of
PCB
Transformers
that
will
be
inspected
increased
from
150,000
to
312,080
transformers,
based
on
more
recent
data
from
a
March
1998,
Agency
analysis
of
the
Reclassification
Rule
(
U.
S.
EPA,
1998d).
Second,
this
report
provides
estimates
only
for
the
recordkeeping
elements
but
not
the
inspection
elements
of
the
requirement,
to
maintain
consistency
with
how
other
inspection
and
inspection
recordkeeping
requirements
of
the
Disposal
Amendments
were
addressed
in
the
more
recent
ICR
1729
(
such
as
for
voltage
regulators,
PCB
Articles
and
Items
in
storage,
caps
on
remediated
sites,
and
non­
porous
surfaces).
In
ICR
1000,
the
estimates
for
inspecting
transformers
and
keeping
records
were
8
minutes
(
0.133
hour)
for
stand­
alone
transformers,
10
minutes
(
0.167
hour)
for
transformers
in
banks
of
2,
and
12
minutes
(
0.2
hour)
for
transformers
in
banks
of
4.
Subtracting
the
estimates
for
conducting
inspections,
5
from
8
minutes
for
standalones
7
from
10
for
banks
of
2,
and
9
from
12
for
banks
of
4
transformers,
the
estimate
to
keep
track
of
transformer
records
comes
to
3
minutes
per
transformer,
whether
or
not
the
transformers
stand
alone
or
in
groups.
Thus,
for
this
report,
3
minutes
was
used
as
the
average
time
it
takes
a
technician
to
prepare
data
forms
and
track
inspection
data
per
Transformer.
The
time
for
clerks
to
file
and
maintain
the
data
remains
the
same
at
2
minutes
(
0.33
hour)
per
transformer.
As
per
ICR
1000,
it
was
assumed
that
50
percent
(
156,040)
of
the
transformers
are
inspected
annually
and
50
percent
are
inspected
quarterly.
Based
on
these
different
calculation
methods
and
total
number
of
transformers,
the
burden
increases
by
31,976
hours
(
64,912
hours
­
32,936
hours).
(+
31,976­
hour
program
adjustment)

#
ICR
1001
(
1,030
hours)
(
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
42;
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6,
#
s
72
and
100)
 
Based
on
information
collected
for
this
report
(
U.
S.
EPA,
1998a),
the
Agency
received
30
exclusion
certifications
from
February
1996
through
February
1999
(
36
months),
for
an
average
of
0.83
requests
per
month
or
10
new
certifications
per
year.
The
previous
estimate
reflected
6
certifications
per
year.
This
ICR
also
includes
an
estimated
burden
for
previous
respondents
(
previously
estimated
at
176
respondents)
who
are
required
to
retain
their
records
for
a
maximum
period
of
7
years.
Although
this
number
is
subject
to
fluctuation
due
to
a
variety
of
reasons,
for
the
purpose
of
calculating
this
burden,
EPA
assumes
the
number
of
respondents
who
are
required
to
maintain
records
remains
constant
and
is
no
greater
than
25.
(
EPA
has
observed
that
these
certifications
are
filed
by
about
21
companies;
therefore
the
number
of
respondents
will
not
be
the
same
as
the
total
number
of
notices
received.
In
addition,
facility/
operations
may
have
ceased
or
the
maximum
retention
period
may
have
been
reached
and
the
respondent
is
no
longer
6­
48
subject
to
the
recordkeeping
requirement.)
The
net
difference
in
burden
in
this
ICR
represents
an
adjustment
and
is
estimated
to
result
in
an
annual
savings
of
655
hours
(
20
hours
to
notify/
certify
x
10
reports
=
200
hours;
5
hours
to
file
those
10
reports
=
50
hours;
and
5
hours
to
maintain
records
of
historical
filings
x
25
reports
=
125
hours,
for
a
total
of
375);
(
1,030
hours
­
375
hours).
(­
655­
hour
program
adjustment)

#
ICR
1012
(
10,688
hours)
(
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
8)
 
The
change
in
burden
is
due
to
an
adjustment
of
the
weighted
average
for
various
disposal
approval
requests.
There
is
also
a
decrease
in
the
number
of
respondents
who
request
disposal
approvals,
based
largely
on
changes
to
the
regulations
that
no
longer
require
approval
for
certain
disposal
activities
and
decontamination
procedures
(
e.
g.,
§
§
761.60(
b)(
6)(
iii)
and
.60(
j);
and
.79).
Due
to
these
changes,
requests
for
R&
D
disposal
and
decontamination
approvals
will
be
rare.
Requests
for
new
commercial
disposal
facilities
will
also
be
less
likely
under
the
new
requirements,
although
owners
of
existing
facilities
will
continue
to
require
Agency
approval
of
process
changes
and/
or
to
renew
their
approvals.
When
the
clearance
for
this
ICR
was
completed
in
1997,
EPA
estimated
a
decrease
in
the
burden
for
applying
for
PCB
disposal
approvals
(
from
940
hours
to
334
hours
weighted
average).
This
reduction
was
attributed
to
the
large
number
of
R&
D
disposal
applications.
However,
based
on
a
recent
limited
survey
of
regulated
entities,
combined
with
data
from
the
1997
clearance
for
this
ICR,
EPA
estimated
a
weighted
average
of
990
burden
hours
for
complying
with
the
paperwork
requirements
for
a
commercial
disposal
approval
and
reduced
the
total
number
of
respondents
by
about
half.
This
results
in
a
net
increase
of
4,162
hours
[(
990
hours
x
15
respondents)
­
(
334
hours
x
32
respondents)].
(+
4,162­
hour
program
adjustment)

#
ICR
1446
(
175,453
hours)
 
Various
changes
in
the
annual
burden
that
are
reflected
in
this
ICR
represent
adjustments
to
previous
EPA
estimates
for
provisions
contained
in
ICRs
1446
and
1729.

<
The
hours
initially
reported
and
approved
under
ICR
1446
(
i.
e.,
238
hours)
for
notifying
State
and
local
officials
prior
to
the
first
use
of
an
disposal
facility
or
alternate
technology
was
revised
to
300
hours
(
30
minutes
for
each
of
600
notifications).
This
results
in
a
program
adjustment
of
62
hours.
(+
62­
hour
program
adjustment)

(
1)
EPA
had
previously
estimated
it
would
receive
300
notifications
annually
of
waste
handling
activities
annually.
Relatively
few
"
new"
submissions
are
anticipated
for
generators,
commercial
storers,
transporters,
and
disposers.
Thus,
the
number
of
respondents
was
decreased
from
300
to
100
(
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
44).
The
burden
estimate
was
increased
from
50
minutes
to
1.5
hours,
however,
to
maintain
consistency
with
similar
provisions.
This
results
in
a
program
adjustment
and
a
savings
of
100
hours
[(
300
respondents
x
.833
hours)
­
(
100
respondents
x
1.5
hours)].
Additionally,
a
burden
estimate
of
50
hours
for
filing
and
maintaining
a
copy
of
the
notification
of
waste
handling
activities
was
previously
included
in
ICR
6­
49
1446.
The
burden
for
filing
and
maintaining
these
notifications
is
captured
by
#
44.
This
results
in
a
program
adjustment
and
reduces
the
burden
by
50
hours.
Program
revisions
made
under
ICR
1729
to
require
individuals
to
obtain
an
identification
number
for
burning/
using
PCBs
in
high
efficiency
boilers
and
scrap
metal
recovery
ovens
and
smelters
(
Table
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
s
28,
and
29)
create
a
program
adjustment
of
an
additional
60
hours
(
40
respondents
x
1.5
hours),
whereas
the
estimate
for
the
number
of
facilities
who
must
notify
EPA
regarding
R&
D
on
PCB
disposal
activities
remains
the
same
at
25
respondents
(
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
9).
These
revisions
result
in
a
savings
and
program
adjustment
savings
of
90
hours
[(­
100
+
­
50)
+
60].
(­
90­
hour
program
adjustment)

(
2)
The
requirements
for
submitting
Exception,
Discrepancy,
and
Unmanifested
Waste
Reports
(
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
s
46,
47,
49)
were
also
revised.
The
estimate
in
ICR
1446
was
678
hours
(
3
hours
for
226
respondents)
and
the
estimate
in
ICR
1729
added
no
additional
burden.
The
estimate
in
this
report
is
150
hours
total
(
i.
e.,
2
hours
to
submit
25
Exception
and
Discrepancy
Reports,
and
2
hours
to
submit
50
Unmanifested
Waste
Reports).
The
revised
number
of
Exception
and
Discrepancy
Reports
that
will
need
to
be
submitted
was
reduced
to
represent
roughly
10
percent
of
the
total
226
telephone
calls
that
disposers
will
make
to
resolve
discrepancies
(
that
is,
about
90
percent
of
the
calls
that
disposers
make
to
resolve
discrepancies
are
resolved
and
do
not
require
the
submission
of
a
report,
but
10
percent
of
the
discrepancies
do
not
get
resolved
by
phone
and
must
be
written
up
in
a
report
and
submitted
to
EPA).
The
total
number
of
Unmanifested
Waste
Reports
was
estimated
based
on
EPA
Regional
averages.
These
revisions
result
in
a
program
adjustment
and
savings
of
528
hours
(
678
­
150).
(­
528­
hour
program
adjustment)

(
3)
The
burden
for
maintaining
annual
records
has
been
revised
based
on
additional
data
gathering
for
this
report
(
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6,
#
99).
The
original
estimate
was
that
5,501
facilities
each
spend
29
hours
annually
(
159,529)
compiling
the
log,
whereas
this
report
estimates
that
6,270
waste
handlers
spend
52
hours
per
year
(
326,040)
on
this
task.
The
burden
has
been
increased
by
166,511
hours.
(+
166,511­
hour
program
adjustment)

(
4)
The
requirement
to
submit
the
annual
report
was
reported
in
both
ICR
1446
and
1729
(
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
41).
The
requirement
was
originally
estimated
to
be
230
hours
(
1
hour
x
230
respondents).
The
estimate
in
ICR
1729
was
588
hours
(
84
hours
x
7
new
respondents).
Based
on
the
data
gathering
effort
for
this
report,
the
burden
was
revised
to
59
hours
per
respondent
and
the
number
of
facilities
was
revised
to
265
to
reflect
additional
facilities
that
will
be
covered
under
the
new
regulation
(
i.
e.,
generators
of
waste
who
also
dispose
of
the
wastes
they
generate)
Thus,
the
burden
was
increased
to
15,635
hours
(
59
hours
x
265
facilities),
6­
50
creating
an
increase
and
a
program
adjustment
of
14,817
hours
[
15,635
­
(
230
+
588)].
(+
14,817­
hour
program
adjustment)

#
ICR
1729
(
1,785,543
hours)
 
A
number
of
revisions
were
made
to
the
estimate
for
requirements
in
ICR
1729.

(
1)
A
major
change
for
estimating
the
paperwork
burden
associated
with
the
PCB
requirements
is
that
the
training
burden
for
this
Consolidated
ICR
represents
only
the
information
collection
requirement
burdens,
exclusive
of
the
burden
associated
with
complying
with
the
PCB
regulations
overall.
The
existing
ICR
for
the
Disposal
Amendments
included
a
training
burden
for
all
the
requirements
of
that
rule;
i.
e.,
1,246,480
hours
annually.
In
this
Consolidated
ICR
1729,
EPA
accounts
for
this
training
burden
by
taking
10%
of
the
burden
for
each
new
information
collection,
or
9,221
hours
annually.
(
See
Tables
6­
4
to
6­
6
for
requirements
that
are
associated
with
training
burdens.
Total
burden
for
training
was
obtained
by
adding
10
percent
of
the
hours
for
each
of
the
requirements
where
training
is
a
factor.)
Thus,
this
revision
results
in
a
program
adjustment
and
a
reduction
of
1,237,259
hours
(
1,246,480
­
9,221).
Note
that
since
the
bulk
of
the
information
requirements
have
not
changed
since
1989,
EPA
assumes
there
is
less
of
a
need
to
train
staff
on
those
provisions.
(­
1,237,259­
hour
program
adjustment)

(
1)
Another
program
adjustment
relates
to
the
transformer
registration
requirement
(
Table
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
3).
ICR
1729
estimated
that
the
owners
of
62,500
PCB
Transformers
used
by
industry
must
spend
2
hours
per
transformer
by
12/
28/
98
to
register
this
equipment
and
that
3,005
utility
managers
would
spend
10
hours
each
registering
their
PCB
Transformers
for
an
industry
total
of
155,050
burden
hours.
Because
this
deadline
has
past,
it
is
now
assumed
that
only
500
PCB
Transformers
will
be
subject
to
registration
requirements
each
year
at
1
hour
per
unit.
This
provides
an
industry­
wide
savings
of
154,550
hours.
(­
154,550­
hour
program
adjustment)

(
1)
A
program
adjustment
is
being
made
to
account
for
the
requirement
that
the
owner
of
a
facility
must
notify
EPA
when
he
wants
to
exceed
the
5­
year
storage
for
reuse
limitation.
ICR
1729
contained
a
burden
of
550
hours
for
industry
to
notify
EPA
regarding
PCB
Articles
stored
for
reuse.
However,
the
Consolidated
ICR
anticipates
that
there
will
be
no
respondents
for
this
requirement
during
the
initial
3­
year
clearance
period
for
this
Consolidated
ICR
(
e.
g.,
2002),
because
it
is
assumed
that
individuals
complying
with
§
761.35(
a),
which
grants
a
5­
year
storage
period,
would
not
need
to
request
extended
storage
beyond
2003.
(
See
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
4,
#
7.)
(­
550­
hour
program
adjustment)
6­
51
(
1)
A
program
adjustment
is
required
to
correct
an
error
in
computing
the
recordkeeping
burden
for
storage
for
reuse
(
Table
6­
3
and
6­
6,
#
77).
As
explained
in
Section
6(
a)
of
this
supporting
statement,
the
estimate
reported
in
the
original
ICR
(
i.
e.,
283,838
hours)
should
have
read
28,384
hours.
This
revision
results
in
an
additional
savings
of
255,454
hours.
(­
255,454­
hour
program
adjustment)

(
1)
Based
on
consultation
with
industry
representatives
and
consultants
(
see
Appendix
E),
the
estimate
for
preparing
SPCC
plans
for
temporary
storage
of
certain
PCBs
in
containers
was
revised
(
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6,
#
85).
The
revised
estimate
is
that
5
new
respondents
will
spend
60
hours
each
and
10
respondents
will
spend
2
hours
each
adapting
plans,
for
a
total
of
320
hours.
The
previous
estimate
was
based
on
500
new
respondents
and
2,700
facility
owners
who
would
need
to
adapt
plans
during
the
first
year
(
particularly
utility
owners
who
still
possessed
equipment
that
contained
PCBs),
and
50
respondents
in
subsequent
years,
for
a
total
of
35,400
hours
at
the
same
60­
and
2­
hour
rates.
This
program
adjustment
equals
a
savings
of
35,080
hours.
(­
35,080­
hour
program
adjustment)

(
1)
Estimates
related
to
the
reporting
and
recordkeeping
for
voltage
regulators
(
i.
e.,
6,804
hours)
are
included
as
part
of
the
estimate
for
all
regulated
electrical
equipment
and
are
accounted
for
under
#
41,
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
4,
and
#
99,
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6.
Likewise,
the
burden
for
maintaining
annual
records
for
equipment
transfers,
§
761.180(
a)(
2)(
ix)
(
i.
e.,
1,800
hours)
is
also
now
accounted
for
under
#
99,
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6.
Note
that
the
estimates
under
#
s
41
and
99
include
estimates
for
the
annual
reporting
and
recordkeeping
for
all
regulated
entities,
not
solely
voltage
regulators
and
equipment
transfers.
This
results
in
a
program
change
and
savings
of
8,604
hours.
(­
8,604­
hour
program
change)

(
2)
Additional
changes
to
ICR
1729
based
on
the
data
gathering
effort
as
well
as
recent
Agency
analysis
(
not
accounted
for
in
the
above
discussion)
equal
a
net
increase
in
28,134
hours.
These
changes
are
discussed
on
Tables
6­
1
to
6­
6,
#
s
12,
16,
17,
21,
22,
24,
25,
33,
37,
52,
80,
81,
87,
90,
93,
and
99,
and
in
Appendix
E.
(+
28,134­
hour
program
adjustment)

#
ICR
1770
(
1,340
hours)
 
EPA
allowed
this
information
collection
to
lapse
since
the
Import
for
Disposal
Rule
was
overturned
by
the
Courts.
By
not
renewing
this
information
collection,
the
information
collection
burden
is
reduced
by
1,340
hours.
(­
1,340­
hour
program
change)

#
Reclassification
Rule
(
not
in
inventory)
 
The
actual
burden
for
handling
the
recordkeeping
requirements
for
PCB
Transformers
will
decrease
upon
implementation
of
the
Reclassification
Rule
because
owners
of
reclassified
PCB
Transformers
will
no
longer
be
subject
to
the
inspection
and
recordkeeping
requirements
for
this
reclassified
equipment.
As
indicated
in
the
Small
Entity
Impact
6­
52
Analysis
for
the
Reclassification
Rule
(
U.
S.
EPA,
1998d),
13
percent
of
the
estimated
60,200
pieces
of
equipment
that
will
be
reclassified
are
PCB
Transformers
(
7,826).
It
is
assumed
that
50
percent
of
these
transformers
(
3,913)
are
inspected
annually
and
50
percent
are
inspected
quarterly.
Thus,
the
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
equipment
is
1,623
hours
[(
0.083
x
3,913)
+
(
0.083
x
3,913
x
4)].
(
see
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6,
#
74a­
d
and
75).
This
decrease
in
burden
is
the
result
of
a
program
change
associated
with
the
final
Reclassification
Rule.
It
is
estimated
to
be
a
savings
of
1,623
hours
annually.
(­
1,623­
hour
program
change)

The
estimate
in
the
proposed
ICR
for
keeping
records
of
reclassified
transformers
reflects
the
greatest
possible
number
of
hours
that
could
be
attributed
to
reclassifying
one­
third
of
an
estimated
2,000,000
PCB
and
PCB­
Contaminated
Transformers
over
a
3­
year
period
(
total
hours
=
166,667
hours).
Information
gathered
for
this
report,
however,
indicates
that
only
60,200
transformers
are
likely
to
be
reclassified
(
U.
S.
EPA,
1998a).
Using
the
assumptions
made
in
the
small
entity
impact
analysis
for
the
final
rule
(
EPA,
1998d),
the
burden
for
keeping
reclassification
records
is
15
minutes
per
piece
of
equipment.
Therefore,
EPA
estimates
the
burden
for
keeping
records
of
equipment
reclassifications
to
be
15,050
hours
(
see
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6,
#
75).
This
burden
represents
an
increase
to
the
PCB
information
collections
as
a
result
of
a
program
change
associated
with
the
final
Reclassification
Rule.
(+
15,050­
hour
program
change)

#
The
Consolidated
ICR
also
includes
burden
estimates
for
existing
information
collections
that
were
never
captured
by
previous
ICRs.
This
total
comes
to
205,573
hours
(
see
Tables
6­
1
to
6­
6,
#
s
4,
23,
27,
38,
43,
48,
50,
60,
65,
68,
69,
70,
86,
88,
89,
92,
96,
97,
98,
and
103).
Some
of
the
"
newly
captured"
requirements
are
as
follows.
Establishing
and
maintaining
records
for
storing
PCB
Items
for
disposal
(
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6,
#
88)
was
accounted
for
by
estimating
it
would
take
110
commercial
storers
843
hours
each
to
comply
with
this
requirement,
for
a
total
of
92,730
hours.
Maintaining
records
of
cleanup
and
certification
of
decontamination
(
Tables
6­
3
and
6­
6,
#
97)
was
accounted
for
by
assuming
it
would
take
8
hours
for
each
of
6,780
sets
of
records,
for
a
total
of
54,240
hours.
Attaching
a
notation
to
PCB
Items
and
Containers
was
accounted
for
by
estimating
it
would
take
5
minutes
each
for
380,000
PCB
Items,
Containers,
and
Article
Containers,
for
a
total
of
31,540
hours
(
Table
6­
2
and
6­
5,
#
65).
Placing
a
label
or
notice
of
PCB
contamination
at
cleanup
sites
was
estimated
to
take
1
hour
at
each
of
6,780
sites
(
Table
6­
5,
#
68).
(+
205,573­
hour
program
adjustment)

The
changes
to
the
burden
hours
between
the
existing
ICRs
and
the
Consolidated
ICR
are
summarized
in
Table
6­
11.
To
accurately
compare
the
burden
for
the
requirements
presented
in
the
Consolidated
ICR
to
the
combined
totals
of
the
original
ICRs,
it
is
necessary
to
subtract
the
total
hours
for
the
newly
captured
burdens
and
the
Reclassification
Rule
from
the
total
for
the
Consolidated
ICR
because
these
hours
have
never
been
represented
in
any
of
the
existing
ICRs.
The
modifications
due
to
program
6­
53
changes
and
adjustments
for
requirements
within
OMB's
inventory
burdens
can
then
be
determined.
The
decrease
to
the
total
burden
based
on
program
changes
and
adjustments
(
i.
e.,
­
1,447,626
hours,
Table
6­
10)

represents
about
97.5
percent
of
the
1,485,357­
hour
net
decrease
in
the
OMB
inventory:
[(­
1,447,626
÷
1,485,357)
x
100].
The
remainder
of
the
difference
(
37,731
hours)
can
be
attributed
to
both
rounding
off
of
figures
generated
by
the
spreadsheets
of
Tables
6­
4
through
6­
6,
as
well
as
a
margin
of
error
associated
with
the
vast
number
of
calculations
that
have
been
factored
into
this
analysis.
6­
54
TABLE
6­
11
SUMMARY
OF
CHANGES
IN
BURDEN
HOURS
BETWEEN
THE
EXISTING
PCB
ICRS
AND
THE
CONSOLIDATED
ICR
Burden
Totals
and
Differences
Hours
Comments/
Calculations
Total
burden
of
existing
ICRs
in
OMB's
inventory
2,007,618
hours
(
18
hours
+
32,936
hours
+
10,688
hours
+
1,030
hours
+
1,340
hours
+
175,453
hours
+
1,786,153
hours)
in
OMB
inventory
Total
burden
Consolidated
ICRs
741,261
hours
Includes
burden
not
previously
included
in
existing
ICRs
as
well
as
the
burden
associated
with
the
Reclassification
Rule.
See
Table
6­
9.

Initial
difference
in
burden
1,266,357
hours
(
2,007,618
hours
­
741,261
hours)
This
number
includes
the
205,573
newly
captured
hours,
13,427
hours
associated
with
the
Reclassification
Rule,
as
well
as
differences
based
on
program
adjustments
and
changes.

Total
burden
for
newly
captured
requirements
and
the
Reclassification
Rule
219,000
hours
The
hours
for
the
newly
captured
requirements
and
the
Reclassification
Rule
must
be
subtracted
from
the
total
burden
hours
for
the
existing
and
Consolidated
ICRs,
because
they
are
not
in
OMB's
inventory
(
205,573
+
13,427).
Differences
based
on
program
changes
and
adjustments
(
i.
e.,
based
on
new
analyses)
can
then
be
compared.

Adjusted
burden
for
Consolidated
ICR
522,261
hours
(
741,261
hours
­
219,000
hours)
Excludes
the
newly
captured
requirements
and
those
of
the
Reclassification
Rule.

Adjusted
difference
in
burden
between
OMB's
inventory
and
the
Consolidated
ICR
­
1,485,357
hours
(
savings)
(
2,007,618
hours
­
522,261
hours)

Total
change
in
ICR
burden
based
on
recent
data
gathering
and
analyses
­
1,447,626
hours
(
savings)
(­
1,434,199
hours
­
13,427
hours)
See
Table
6­
10.

Percent
change
accounted
for
based
on
recent
data
gathering
and
analysis
97.5%
[(
1,447,626
÷
1,485,357)
x
100]
The
remaining
difference
of
37,731
hours
(
1,485,357
­
1,447,626)
can
be
attributed
to
differences
in
rounding
as
well
as
the
margin
of
error
originating
from
the
vast
number
of
calculations
that
were
required
for
this
analysis.
6­
55
6(
f)
Burden
Statement
The
annual
public
burden
for
this
collection
of
information,
which
is
approved
under
OMB
Control
No.
2070­
0112,
is
estimated
to
average
0.57
hours
per
response.
According
to
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act,

"
burden"
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,

or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
For
this
collection
it
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;

complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
number
for
this
information
collection
appears
above.
In
addition,
the
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations,
after
initial
display
in
the
final
rule,
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9.

Send
comments
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
through
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques
to
the
Director,
Collection
Strategies
Division,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
Mail
Code
2822),
Ariel
Rios
Building,
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
N.
W.,
Washington,
D.
C.
20460.

Include
the
OMB
control
number
in
any
correspondence,
but
do
not
submit
the
requested
information
to
this
address.
The
requested
information
should
be
submitted
in
accordance
with
the
instructions
accompanying
the
form,
or
as
specified
in
the
corresponding
regulation.
R­
1
REFERENCES
Hoffman,
A.
1997.
Memo
re:
Additional
Comments
on
ICR
entitled
"
PCBs
Used
in
Electrical
Equipment
and
Transformers"
[
OMB
Control
#
2070­
0003;
EPA
ICR
#
1000.06].
March
14.

Eastern
Researc
h
Group.
1993.
Assessment
of
the
Benefits
of
the
Proposed
Standard
on
Electric
Power
Generation,
Transmission,
and
Distribution.
Prepared
for
the
Occupational
Safety
and
Health
Administration.

U.
S.
Bureau
of
the
Census,
1997.
U.
S.
Bureau
of
the
Census.
Country
Business
Patterns,
1994.

U.
S.
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics.
1997.
Occupational
Pay
in
the
United
States,
November.
1995.

U.
S.
EIA,
1995.
U.
S.
Energy
Information
Administration.
1995
Annual
Electric
Utility
Data
(
EIA­
861).

U.
S.
EPA.
1998a.
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxics.
Data
Gathering
Report
for
the
Combined
ICR
Supporting
Statement
Covering
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
750
and
761.
August
17.

U.
S.
EPA.
1998b.
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxics.
Cost
Impacts
of
the
Final
Regulations
Amending
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
Part
761.
April
30.

U.
S.
EPA.
1998c.
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxics.
ICR
Supporting
Statement
for
the
Final
Regulations
Amending
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
761
(
ICR
1729).

U.
S.
EPA.
1998d.
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxics.
PCB
Reclassification
Rule:
Small
Entity
Impacts,
Environmental
Justice
Impacts,
and
Unfunded
Mandates
Analysis.
March
3.

U.
S.
EPA.
1989.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Toxic
Substances.
Regulatory
Impact
Analysis
of
Proposed
Options
for
Notification
and
Manifesting
of
PCB­
Containing
Wastes.
EPA
Contract
No.
68­
02­
4235.
July
28.

U.
S.
EPA.
Supporting
Statement.
Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
(
PCBs):
Manufacturing,
Processing,
and
Distribution
in
Commerce
Exemptions;
ICR
857.

U.
S.
EPA.
Supporting
Statement.
PCB
Use
in
Electrical
Equipment
and
Transformers;
ICR
#
1000;
OMB#
2070­
0003.

U.
S.
EPA.
Supporting
Statement.
Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
(
PCBs);
Exclusions,
Exemptions,
and
Use
Authorizations;
ICR
#
1001;
OMB
#
2070.1001.06.

U.
S.
EPA.
Supporting
Statement.
PCB
Disposal
Permitting
Regulation;
EPA
ICR
#
1012.
U.
S.
EPA.
Supporting
Statement.
Combination/
renewal
of
two
existing
ICRS:
Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
(
PCBs)
Use,
Storage,
and
Disposal
Recordkeeping
Requirements;
EPA
ICR
#
583
and
PCBs:
Notification
and
Manifesting
for
PCB
Waste
Activities;
EPA
ICR
#
1446.

U.
S.
EPA.
Supporting
Statement.
Combination/
renewal
of
two
existing
ICRS:
Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
(
PCBs)
Us
e,
Storage,
and
Disposal
Recordkeeping
Requirements;
EPA
ICR
#
583
and
PCBs:
Notification
and
Manifesting
for
PCB
Waste
Activities;
EPA
ICR
#
1446,
amended
to
address
the
new
Paper
work
Reduction
Act
(
PRA)
requirements
for
third­
party
notifications.

U.
S.
EPA.
Supporting
Statement.
Combination/
renewal
of
two
existing
ICRS:
Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
(
PCBs)
Use,
Storage,
and
Disposal
Recordkeeping
Requirements;
EPA
ICR
#
583
and
PCBs:
Notification
and
Manifesting
for
PCB
Waste
Activities;
EPA
ICR
#
1446.
Reflects
change
in
burden
association
with
EPA's
proposed
Reclassification
Rule.

U.
S.
EPA.
Supporting
Statement.
Import
of
PCB
Wastes
for
Disposal,
EPA
ICR
#
1770.01;
OMB
2070.0149.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX
A
Toxic
Substances
Control
Act,
Section
6(
e),
15
USC
2605(
e)

APPENDIX
B
40
CFR
761:
Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
(
PCBs)
Manufacturing,
Processing,
Distribution
in
Commerce
and
Use
Prohibitions
APPENDIX
C
EPA
Form
7720­
12:
PCB
Transformer
Registration
APPENDIX
D
EPA
Form
7710­
53:
Notification
of
PCB
Activity
APPENDIX
E
Data
Gathering
Report
for
the
Consolidated
ICR
Supporting
Statement
Covering
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
761
APPENDIX
F
Distribution
of
PCB
Electrical
Equipment
among
Small
Entities
APPENDIX
A
Toxic
Substances
Control
Act,
Section
6(
e)

15
USC
2605(
e)
APPENDIX
B
40
CFR
761
Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
(
PCBs)
Manufacturing,
Processing,
Distribution
in
Commerce,
and
Use
Prohibitions
APPENDIX
C
EPA
Form
7720­
12
PCB
Transformer
Registration
APPENDIX
D
EPA
Form
7710­
53
Notification
of
PCB
Activity
APPENDIX
E
Data
Gathering
Report
For
the
Consolidated
ICR
Supporting
Statement
Covering
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
761
DATA
GATHERING
REPORT
FOR
THE
CONSOLIDATED
ICR
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
COVERING
THE
PCB
REGULATIONS
AT
40
CFR
761
May
18,
1999
Prepared
for:

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxics
Washington,
DC
20460
Prepared
by:

Eastern
Research
Group,
Inc.
Contract
No:
68­
W6­
0022
Work
Assignment
No:
3­
13
Amendment
2
1To
contact
more
than
nine
respondents
requires
clearance
from
the
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB).
1.0
INTRODUCTION
This
report
summarizes
the
information
gathered
for
the
Consolidated
ICR
Supporting
Statement
Covering
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
761.
This
effort
was
necessary
to
update
data
initially
contained
in
the
Information
Collection
Requests
(
ICRs)
that
are
being
incorporated
into
the
consolidated
ICR.
The
report
draws
conclusions
regarding
the
data
previously
used
and
their
suitability
for
continued
use
in
the
consolidated
report.
These
ICRs
are
as
follows:

#
ICR
583
 
PCB
Use,
Storage,
and
Disposal
Recordkeeping
Requirements
#
ICR
857
 
PCB
Manufacturing,
Processing,
and
Distribution
in
Commerce
Exemptions
#
ICR
1000
 
PCB
Use
in
Electrical
Equipment
and
Transformers
#
ICR
1001
 
PCB
Exclusions,
Exemptions,
and
Use
Authorizations
#
ICR
1012
 
PCB
Disposal
Permitting
Regulation
#
ICR
1446
 
Notification
and
Manifesting
for
PCB
Waste
Activities
#
ICR
1729
 
Final
Regulations
Amending
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
761
This
report
also
summarizes
new
information
collected
for
the
paperwork
requirements
in
40
CFR
761
for
which
no
estimates
of
burden
were
available.

1.1
Data
Gathering
Approach
ERG
reviewed
all
of
the
underlying
burden
and
cost
assumptions
of
the
various
reporting
and
recordkeeping
activities
from
the
existing
ICRs
and
determined
that
much
of
the
data
are
still
valid.
For
the
data
that
require
validation
or
updating
and
for
new
data
required,
EPA
determined
that
industry
representatives
should
be
contacted
to
the
extent
necessary
to
gain
a
greater
understanding
of
the
issues
at
hand.
Thus,
ERG
contacted
up
to
nine
respondents
from
each
PCB
handling
group
(
such
as
disposers
operating
landfills
or
incinerators;
disposers
holding
alternate
disposal
permits;
commercial
storers;
equipment
owners;
and
manufacturers
with
exemptions
and
exclusions)
who
have
had
experience
with
the
particular
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
under
discussion.
1
Data
were
gathered
during
July
1998
for
the
preparation
of
the
draft
consolidated
ICR
and
during
March
and
April
1999
for
preparing
the
final
report.

ERG
is
aware
that
data
gathered
from
this
type
of
limited
effort
can
be
quite
variable
and
might
not
represent
all
industry
views.
1.2
Information
Sources
Industry
contacts
were
selected
from
EPA
lists
of
companies
that
have
submitted
commercial
storage
applications
and
those
that
have
been
granted
commercial
permits
to
dispose
of
PCBs
(
EPA,
1998a
and
b).

ERG
also
contacted
electric
utility
representatives
and
ERG
consultants
who
have
provided
expert
information
in
the
past,
including
individuals
contacted
by
ERG
during
the
preparation
of
the
Cost
Impacts
of
the
Final
Regulation
Amending
the
PCB
Regulations
at
40
CFR
761
(
EPA,
1998c).
Some
individuals,
such
as
those
who
work
for
companies
that
are
both
approved
disposers
and
commercial
storers,
were
able
to
respond
to
several
of
the
questions.
Another
sector
contacted
included
companies
that
have
submitted
requests
for
extensions
to
PCB
exemptions.

In
addition
to
industry
contacts,
ERG
extracted
data
from
several
current
EPA
reports.
Several
OPPT
staff
members,
who
work
closely
with
information
submitted
by
PCB
waste
handlers,
also
provided
up­
to­
date
information
for
this
effort.

1.3
Contents
of
this
Report
This
report
contains
a
list
of
the
questions
asked
to
industry
representatives
and
a
discussion
of
the
information
collected
for
each
item.
A
list
of
respondents
also
is
included.

2.0
SMALL­
SCALE
SURVEY
QUESTIONS
The
following
shaded
area
lists
the
questions
discussed
with
industry
representatives
and
EPA
staff.

The
questions
are
organized
according
to
the
industry
groups
affected
and
include
a
summary
of
the
regulation
in
question.
They
also
indicate
from
which
ICR
the
questions
were
generated,
when
applicable.
E­
2
SURVEY
QUESTIONS
FOR
THE
CONSOLIDATED
ICR
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
COVERING
THE
PCB
REGULATIONS
AT
40
CFR
761
July
1998
and
March
­
April
1999
Note:
Survey
will
locate
respondents
already
familiar
with
the
regulatory
requirements
and
compliance
actions
at
hand.

1.
Disposers
 
PCB
Incinerators,
Chemical
Waste
Landfills,
and
Commercial
Storers
Disposal
Permit
Application
 
Sections
761.60(
e),
.70(
d),
and
.75(
c)
require
disposal
facilities
to
submit
applications
and,
and
in
some
instances,
demonstration
plans
to
obtain
approval
to
operate
a
facility.
(
ICR
1012
 
PCB
Disposal
Permitting
Regulation)

How
much
does
it
cost
to
prepare
an
application
for
a
permit
to
dispose
of
PCB
wastes?

How
many
hours
would
it
take
to
prepare
an
application
by
technical
staff?

State/
Local
Notifications
 
§
761.60(
f)(
1)(
i)
requires
disposal
facilities
to
notify
State
and
local
officials
prior
to
the
first
use
of
an
approved
disposal
technology
(
i.
e.,
prior
to
the
first
use
of
a
mobile
unit
at
each
site).
(
ICR
1446
 
Notification
and
Manifesting
for
PCB
Waste
Activities)

Does
your
company
have
any
permitted
mobile
disposal
units?

Can
you
estimate
at
how
many
sites
a
mobile
unit
typically
operates
each
year?

Certificates
of
Disposal
 
Effective
August
28,
1998,
§
761.218(
b)
clarifies
that
PCB
waste
disposers
are
required
to
send
Certificates
of
Disposal
to
waste
generators
when
disposal
of
each
item
on
a
manifested
waste
shipment
is
completed.
(
ICR
1446
 
Notification
and
Manifesting
for
PCB
Waste
Activities)

Is
each
item
in
a
shipment
indicated
on
the
Certificates
of
Disposal?

How
long
does
it
takes
to
complete
each
Certificate
of
Disposal?

The
Annual
Log
and
Report
 
§
§
761.70(
a)(
3),
(
4)
and
(
7);
(
c);
and
761.180(
c)
require
owners/
operators
of
incinerators
to
maintain
records
of
quantities,
feed
rates,
temperatures,
combustion
products,
and
operations.
Sections
§
761.75(
b)(
6)(
iii),
(
b)(
8)(
iv),
and.
180(
d)
require
owners/
operators
of
chemical
waste
landfills
to
maintain
records
for
all
PCB
disposal
operations,
including
PCB
concentration
in
liquid
wastes,
the
three­
dimensional
burial
coordinates
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items,
water
sampling
and
analysis,
and
additional
records
as
required
in
§
761.180.
Sections
761.180(
b),
(
b)(
3),
and
(
c)(
5)
require
owners/
operators
of
PCB
incinerators,
chemical
waste
landfills,
high
efficiency
boilers,
and
commercial
storage
facilities
to
submit
annual
reports
for
their
PCB
operations.

How
long
does
it
take
to
compile
information
for
the
annual
log?
E­
3
How
long
does
it
take
to
compile
the
information
from
the
log
into
the
annual
report?

2.
PCB
Waste
Handlers
The
Manifest
 
§
§
761.207(
a)
and
208(
a)(
2)
and
(
3)
require
PCB
waste
generators
to
prepare
manifests
and
generators
and
transporters
to
provide
the
generator­
initiated
manifests
to
each
transporter
or
designated
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility.
(
ICR
1446
 
Notification
and
Manifesting
for
PCB
Waste
Activities)

How
long
does
it
take
to
prepare
a
manifest?

The
Annual
Log
 
§
§
761.180(
a),
(
a)(
4),
and
.65(
c)(
5)
require
owners/
operators
of
facilities
other
than
commercial
storage
and
disposal
facilities
to
maintain
annual
records
and
a
written
annual
document
log
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items
for
5
years
after
facility
ceases,
including
signed
manifests,
Certificates
of
Disposal,
records
of
inspections
and
cleanups,
facility
and
Item
identification
information,
total
number
of
Items,
telephone
records,
and
Item
transfer
information.

How
long
does
it
take
to
compile
information
for
the
annual
log?

3.
Commercial
storers,
only
Commercial
Storage
Approval
Applications
 
§
761.65(
d)
requires
owners/
operators
of
commercial
storage
facilities
to
prepare
and
submit
an
application
for
approval
to
operate
the
facility.
(
ICRs
583,
1446
 
PCB
Use,
Storage,
and
Disposal
Recordkeeping
Requirements
and
Notification
and
Manifesting
of
PCB
Waste
Activities.)

Can
you
estimate
how
many
hours
it
takes
to
compile
an
application
for
commercial
storage
approval?

How
long
does
it
take
to
develop
a
closure
plan
and
financial
assurance
information?

How
long
does
it
take
to
revise
a
closure
plan?

The
Spill
Prevention,
Control,
and
Countermeasure
(
SPCC)
Plan
 
§
761.65(
c)(
1)(
iv)
requires
commercial
storers
to
modify
their
Spill
Prevention,
Control,
and
Countermeasure
Plans
to
address
liquid
PCBs
>
500
ppm,
to
be
able
to
temporarily
store
liquid
PCBs
in
areas
that
do
not
comply
with
the
storage
requirements
of
§
761.65.
Section
761.65(
c)(
7)(
ii)
requires
owners/
operators
of
facilities
using
large
PCB
storage
containers,
as
per
29
CFR
1910.106,
to
prepare
a
SPCC
Plan.

How
long
did
it
take
you
to
prepare
your
Spill
Prevention,
Control,
and
Countermeasure
(
SPCC)
Plan?

If
you
have
you
revised
your
SPCC
Plan,
how
long
did
this
take,
including
the
preparation
of
the
revised
closure
cost
estimates?
E­
4
4.
Electric
Utilities
PCB
Transformers
 
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)
requires
owners
of
PCB
Transformers
to
register
the
equipment
with
EPA.
Section
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vii)(
C)
requires
PCB
Transformer
owners
to
retain
registration
data
for
3
years
after
disposal
of
the
units,
and
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xii)
requires
owners
of
PCB
Transformers
to
maintain
records
of
inspection
and
maintenance
history
for
at
least
3
years
after
disposal
of
the
units.
(
ICR
1000
 
PCB
Use
in
Electrical
Equipment
and
Transformers).

How
long
does
it
take
to
do
the
recordkeeping
for
PCB
Transformer
inspections
and
maintenance?

Transformer
Reclassification
 
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v)
specifies
the
process
to
be
used
for
the
reclassification
of
PCB
Transformers.
The
citation
requires
owners
of
reclassified
equipment
to
comply
with
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements.
(
ICR
1446
 
Notification
and
Manifesting
for
PCB
Waste
Activities.)

Can
you
estimate
how
many
PCB
Transformers
your
company
reclassifies
each
year?

5.
National
Response
Center
Transformer
Fire
Emergency
Notification
 
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xi)
requires
PCB
Transformer
owners
to
report
any
fire­
related
incidents
immediately
to
the
National
Response
Center.
(
ICR
1000
 
PCB
Use
in
Electrical
Equipment
and
Transformers.)

How
many
notifications
does
the
NRC
receive
each
year
regarding
PCB
Transformer
fires?

Can
you
conduct
a
data
search
for
this
information?

6.
Handlers
of
Used
PCB
Oil
(
i.
e.,
such
as
Transformer
Disposal
Companies)

Marketing
and
Burning
of
Used
Oil
 
§
§
761.20(
e)(
3)(
ii)
and
(
4)(
i)
and
(
ii)
and
.60(
b)(
5)(
iv)(
B)
allow
used
oil
containing
any
quantifiable
levels
of
PCBs
to
be
marketed
for
energy
recovery
when
the
burners
provide
a
one­
time
certification
to
the
marketers
that
they
are
in
compliance
with
the
notification
requirement
at
§
761.71(
a)(
2);
and
the
marketers
keep
certifications
of
the
analysis
documenting
the
claims
that
the
PCBs
concentration
is
<
2
ppm.

Are
you
involved
in
the
marketing
of
used
oil
containing
<
50
ppm
PCBs?

How
long
does
it
take
to
do
the
notifications/
certifications
required
to
market
used
oil
containing
no
detectable
PCBs?
E­
5
7.
Chemical
Manufacturers
Association
and
Chemical
Manufacturers
R&
D
Exemption
Petitions,
Notifications
and
Recordkeeping
 
§
§
761.80(
e)(
1)
and
(
i)(
1)
require
manufacturers,
processors,
distributors,
and
exporters
of
PCBs
and
analytical
reference
samples
derived
from
PCB
waste
that
are
to
be
used
for
the
purpose
of
R&
D
to
submit
an
exemption
petition
to
qualify
for
one
of
the
class
exemptions
to
conduct
these
activities.
Section
761.80(
n)
covers
the
submission
of
the
requests
for
renewal
of
the
class
exemption,
as
per
§
§
750.11(
e)
and
.31(
e).
Section
761.80(
e)(
4)
requires
R&
D
facilities
to
notify
EPA
before
beginning
R&
D
activities
that
include
the
manufacture
of
PCBs.
Sections
761.80(
e)(
5)
and
(
i)(
7)
require
the
recordkeeping
of
activities
associated
with
the
manufacture,
processing,
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs
or
PCB
reference
samples
derived
from
PCB
waste
materials
for
R&
D.
Section
761.80(
g)(
1)
requires
owners
of
facilities
that
process
and
distribute
small
quantities
of
PCBs
for
R&
D
to
keep
records
of
their
PCB
processing
and
distribution
in
commerce
activities.
(
ICR
857
 
PCB
Manufacturing,
Processing,
and
Distribution
in
Commerce
Exemptions)

How
many
hours
did
it
take
to
prepare
an
R&
D
exemption
request?

How
long
does
it
takes
to
prepare
and
submit
a
certification
letter
requesting
exemption
extensions?

How
long
does
it
take
to
conduct
the
required
recordkeeping
activities?

Certification
Notification
for
Manufacturing
Exclusion
 
§
761.1,
and
Subpart
J,
§
§
761.185(
a)
and
(
b)
and
.187
require
manufacturers
who
inadvertently
generate
PCBs
and
importers
of
products
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs
to
notify
EPA
and
certify
that
the
processes
comply
with
all
PCB
release
conditions
on
excluded
processes.
(
ICR
1001
 
PCB
Exclusions,
Exemptions,
and
Use
Authorizations.)

How
long
does
it
take
to
prepare
a
certified
notification
to
establish
eligibility
for
the
exclusion
to
manufacture
chemical
products
whose
manufacture
inadvertently
generates
trace
quantities
of
PCBs,
as
per
§
760.185
and
.187?

8.
Industry
Consultant
An
industry
consultant
was
contacted
concerning
issues
associated
with
obtaining
approval
for
using
alternate
methods
to
operate
incinerators
[
§
§
761.70(
a)(
8),
(
9);
(
d)(
5)];
notifying
EPA
of
changes
in
ownership
of
a
disposal
facility
[
§
§
761.70(
d)(
8)
and
.75(
c)(
7)];
notifying
EPA
when
releases
of
PCBs
exceed
limits,
as
per
§
761.187,
for
products
manufactured
or
imported
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs;
submitting
results
of
analysis
and
decontamination
validation
studies
to
EPA
[
§
§
761.395
and
.398];
attaching
a
notation
to
a
PCB
Item
or
PCB
Container
indicating
the
date
the
Item
was
removed
from
service
for
disposal
or
to
temporarily
store
the
Item
[
§
§
761.65(
c)(
1)
and
(
c)(
8)];
tracking
the
quantity
and
the
date
of
each
batch
added
to
a
stationary
storage
container
[
§
761.65(
c)(
8)];
maintaining
the
records
of
cleanup
and
certification
of
decontamination
at
a
site
d
pursuant
to
the
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
[
§
§
761.125(
b)(
3)
and
(
c)(
5)];
maintaining
records
documenting
delays
in
spill
cleanup
activities
[
§
761.125(
c)(
1)];
registering
newly
discovered
PCB
Transformers
[
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v)];
and
using
alternate
methods
to
reclassify
transformers
[
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v)].
E­
6
3.0
DISCUSSION
The
following
discussion
summarizes
the
information
gathered
from
this
survey.
In
some
cases,

respondents
provided
information
on
past
work
loads.
Other
respondents
anticipated
future
work
loads
and
explained
the
basis
for
the
estimations.
Information
on
both
past
and
upcoming
work
will
be
used
to
revise
the
estimates
of
the
paperwork
burdens
in
the
consolidated
ICR.

3.1
Disposal
Permit
Applications
Sections
761.60(
e),
.70(
d),
and
.75(
c)
require
disposal
facilities
to
submit
applications
and,
in
some
instances,
demonstration
plans
to
obtain
approvals
for
operating
incinerators,
chemical
waste
landfills,
and
alternate
technologies.
Several
respondents
suggested
that
there
probably
is
a
broad
range
in
application
costs,
which
are
influenced
by
the
size
of
the
company,
the
disposal
technology
proposed,
and
the
nature
of
the
wastes
being
disposed
(
Kuntz,
1998
and
Zayatz,
1998).
They
also
indicated
that
application
costs
are
likely
to
be
substantial,
due
to
the
complexity
and
volume
of
the
material
that
must
be
submitted.

A
representative
from
H.
E.
L.
P.
E.
R,
Inc,
a
company
that
holds
a
permit
to
process
PCB
electrical
cable
from
Navy
vessels
for
metal
recovery,
estimated
that
his
company
spent
roughly
"
thousands
of
hours"

preparing
its
disposal
permit
application,
including
conducting
onsite
demonstration
tests
(
Shafer,
1998).
The
process
took
about
four
years
to
complete
and
included
several
modifications
and
amendments
requested
by
EPA
to
address
identified
deficiencies
in
order
to
enable
the
Agency
to
make
the
finding
that
the
technology
did
not
pose
an
unreasonable
risk.
The
permitting
manager
from
Chemical
Waste
Management
Services,
in
Model
City,
NY,
said
it
took
his
company
about
two
years
to
put
its
application
together,
which
is
ten
volumes
long
(
Hino,
1999).
Modifying
the
application,
however,
normally
takes
about
one
hour.
Kuntz
estimated
that
it
costs
from
$
100,000
to
$
500,000
($
300,000
average)
and
over
4,000
man­
hours
at
a
rate
of
$
72
per
hour
for
the
owners
of
an
incinerator
to
apply
for
an
approval
to
dispose
of
PCBs,
including
the
costs
of
conducting
a
trial
burn.
The
$
72
rate
was
the
one
used
in
ICR
1012.

The
original
estimate
contained
in
ICR
1012
for
preparing
a
disposal
application
was
940
hours
for
managers,
technical
staff,
and
consulting
engineers
to
conduct
the
work
at
a
composite
rate
of
$
72
per
hour.

These
hours
represent
the
average
time
it
takes
to
prepare
the
two
types
of
disposal
permits,
those
for
conducting
research
and
development
into
PCB
disposal,
and
those
to
conduct
commercial
disposal
of
PCBs.
E­
7
In
ICR
1012,
the
range
of
hours
to
prepare
the
commercial
applications
was
700
to
1,060
hours,
and
40
to
80
hours
for
R&
D
approvals.
Based
on
this
data
collection
effort,
it
seems
reasonable
to
raise
the
upper
end
of
the
estimate
for
commercial
disposal
approvals
to
3,000
hours,
whereas
the
estimate
used
for
R&
D
approvals
is
consistent
with
the
estimate
used
in
the
cost
analysis
for
the
Final
Rule
(
EPA,
1998c).
Adding
these
R&
D
approval
requirements
to
the
range
generates
on
estimate
of
740
to
3,080
hours,
and
a
revised
average
of
1,910
hours.
At
a
rate
of
$
72
per
hour,
it
would
cost
an
average
of
$
137,520
to
prepare
an
application
for
a
disposal
permit.

An
industry
consultant
anticipated
that
no
respondents
would
spend
an
estimated
2,000
hours
seeking
approval
to
use
alternate
measures
for
operating
incinerators,
as
per
§
761.70(
a)(
8),
(
9),
and
(
d)(
5),
because
it
was
assumed
that
if
a
facility
does
not
meet
the
performance
criteria,
it
simply
will
not
accept
the
PCB
waste
(
Kuntz,
1999).

3.2
State/
Local
Notifications
Section
761.60(
f)(
1)(
i)
requires
disposal
facilities
to
notify
State
and
local
officials
prior
to
the
first
use
of
an
approved
disposal
technology
(
i.
e.,
prior
to
the
first
use
of
a
mobile
unit
at
each
site).
The
alternate
technologies
that
require
and
have
received
EPA
approval
to
operate
in
all
ten
EPA
Regions
(
i.
e.,
the
technologies
considered
to
be
mobile)
are
incineration,
alternate
thermal
destruction,
chemical
dechlorination,

physical
separation,
and
pipeline
removal.
[
Another
mobile
technology,
pipeline
and
compressor
system
decontamination,
has
also
been
approved
by
EPA,
but
this
technology
no
longer
requires
approval,
as
per
the
Final
PCB
Disposal
Rule
(
63
FR
35384,
6/
29/
98),
§
761.79(
c)(
5),
and
owners
of
this
type
of
equipment
are
not
required
to
notify
State/
local
authorities
in
this
regard].
The
companies
employing
these
approved
technologies
are
discussed
below.
In
general,
respondents
indicated
that
because
mobile
units
vary
from
onsite
incinerators
to
trucks
that
are
used
to
pump
out
the
liquids
from
PCB
Transformers,
the
units
can
remain
at
a
site
from
several
hours
to
several
years,
and
the
total
number
of
times
per
year
a
unit
is
situated
at
a
new
site
can
vary
from
none
to
several
hundred
(
Hunnicut,
1998;
Kuntz,
1998;
and
Reno,
1998).

EPA
presently
permits
one
company,
Weston,
to
operate
a
mobile
incinerator
(
EPA,
1998a).
Mobile
incinerators
typically
remain
at
a
site
for
about
one
year
(
Kuntz,
1998).
Geosafe
Corporation
holds
the
only
EPA
permit
to
operate
a
vitrification
unit
(
i.
e.,
thermal
destruction
unit),
which
also
remains
onsite
for
about
one
year
(
EPA,
1998a
and
Haass,
1998).
E­
8
ENSR
Operations
is
permitted
to
operate
mobile
units
that
dechlorinate
PCB
Transformers
(
EPA,

1998a).
The
length
of
time
the
equipment
remains
at
a
site
varies
from
1
day
to
2
weeks
(
Reno,
1998).

ENSR
presently
has
about
25
contracts
which
are
supported
by
2
mobile
units.
For
these
contracts,
each
unit
operates
at
a
varying
number
of
sites,
and
specific
totals
per
contract
were
not
provided.
A
total
of
4
sites
per
unit
(
i.
e.,
8
sites
per
contract;
200
total
sites
for
ENSR
per
year)
was
estimated
for
this
effort.
In
the
past,
the
company
had
about
135
contracts
and
4
mobile
units.
The
decline
in
the
total
number
of
contracts
is
attributed
to
the
reduction
in
the
number
of
PCB
Transformers
still
in
use
or
storage.
The
company
representative
stated
that
ENSR
is
the
only
company
presently
operating
this
type
of
equipment,
although
several
other
firms
hold
permits
to
do
so
(
EPA,
1998a
and
Reno,
1998).

Terra­
Kleen
Response
Group,
Inc.
holds
a
permit
to
operate
two
soil
washing/
solvent
extraction
units
(
i.
e.,
physical
separation
units)
(
EPA,
1998a).
Each
unit
remains
at
a
site
for
about
one
year
(
Cash,
1998).

General
Electric
also
holds
a
permit
to
operate
physical
separation
units
(
EPA,
1998a).

A
representative
from
Environmental
Technologies
Unlimited
Corporation,
a
company
permitted
to
operate
mobile
pipeline
and
air
compressor
decontamination
equipment,
stated
that
mobile
solvent
extraction
units
typically
remain
at
a
site
for
about
18
to
24
months
(
EPA,
1998a
and
Hunnicut,
1998).
The
representative
estimated
that
this
technology
will
be
used
at
about
300
sites
nationwide,
the
approximate
number
of
sites
that
contain
PCBs
on
the
National
Priorities
List.
He
also
suggested
that
the
disposal
of
some
contaminated
components
from
dismantled
Navy
vessels
may
be
handled
via
mobile
units.

An
environmental
coordinator
with
Texas
Gas
Transmission
Company
said
that
although
his
and
other
natural
gas
companies
have
received
permits
to
dispose
of
PCBs
in
all
ten
EPA
Regions,
these
permits
cover
the
wipe
sampling
of
segments
of
pipe
that
are
being
replaced
for
various
reasons,
such
as
to
upgrade
pipes
for
a
new
development
or
to
improve
pipes
under
roads
that
are
being
widened
(
Webster,
1998).
These
activities
do
not
require
State/
local
notification.

It
was
estimated
for
the
Consolidated
ICR
that
there
will
be
about
300
unique
sites
where
mobile
units
will
operate,
an
increase
in
the
ICR
1446
estimate,
which
was
about
200
sites.
The
revised
estimate
assumes
that
the
mobile
incinerator,
vitrification
unit,
and
physical
separation
units
will
operate
at
1
site
each
per
year
for
a
total
of
5
sites;
dechlorination
units
for
PCB
Transformers
will
operate
at
about
200
substations
per
year;

solvent
extraction
units
will
be
located
at
about
50
sites;
and
there
might
be
about
45
additional
E­
9
sites
that
will
be
cleaned
up
using
newly
permitted
mobile
technologies.
Thus
there
will
be
600
notifications
sent
to
State
and
local
authorities
when
each
of
the
mobile
units
operates
at
a
new
site
(
2
per
site;
1
for
the
State
authority
and
1
for
the
local
authority).

Respondents
suggested
that
with
form
letters,
the
time
to
prepare
each
notification
is
about
15
minutes
(
Decker,
1998
and
Hunnicut,
1998).
Note
that
one
respondent
estimated
that
it
can
take
several
hours
to
complete
a
notification
for
a
local
authority,
if
it
must
first
be
determined
within
which
jurisdiction
a
remote
site
(
substation)
is
located
(
Reno,
1998a).
To
account
for
the
notifications
that
will
require
some
research,
it
was
estimated
that
the
time
to
prepare
each
notification
would
take
about
½
hour
 
20
minutes
for
a
compliance
specialist
(
technical
staff)
to
gather
the
information
and
10
minutes
for
a
clerk
to
complete
the
notification.
This
estimate
provides
a
more
detailed
approximation
for
the
State
and
local
notification
requirement
than
the
one
provided
in
ICR
1446,
which
grouped
all
third­
party
notification
activities
into
one
overall
time
estimate
of
1.4
hours.
The
revised
annual
burden
for
this
provision
is
thus
estimated
to
be
300
hours
and
$
10,996
[(
0.167
hours
x
600
x
$
22/
hour)
+
(
0.333
hours
x
600
x
$
44/
hour)].

3.3
The
Manifest
Sections
761.207(
a)
and
208(
a)(
2)
and
(
3)
require
PCB
waste
generators
to
prepare
manifests
and
generators
and
transporters
to
provide
the
generator­
initiated
manifests
to
each
transporter
or
designated
commercial
storage
or
disposal
facility.
Industry
representatives
said
it
takes
from
a
few
minutes
to
about
one
hour
to
complete
a
manifest,
depending
on
the
nature
of
the
waste
and
the
familiarity
with
the
process.

For
example,
the
manifest
for
a
straightforward
shipment
of
one
type
of
waste
can
be
completed
quickly
whereas
a
manifest
for
a
shipment
that
includes
some
combination
of
transformers,
capacitors,
ballasts,

containerized
units,
and
the
like,
will
take
longer
to
complete.
Likewise,
it
will
take
a
person
familiar
with
the
process
just
a
few
minutes
to
complete
a
manifest,
while
it
would
take
a
person
unfamiliar
with
the
process
about
one­
half
hour
or
more.
(
Chambers,
1999;
Daniel,
1999;
Kelly,
1999;
Lombard,
1999;
Trower,
1999;
and
Yokum,
1999).
In
comments
submitted
to
EPA
and
OMB,
Florida
Power
Corporation
said
that
it
takes
them
10
hours
per
year
to
complete
manifests
(
Gridley,
1995).
This
would
be
less
than
one
hour
each
month.

Based
on
this
data
gathering
effort,
there
is
no
justification
for
revising
the
estimate
of
10
minutes
per
manifest,
as
included
in
ICR
1446.
E­
10
3.4
Certificates
of
Disposal
Effective
August
28,
1998,
§
761.218(
b)
clarifies
that
PCB
waste
disposers
are
to
send
Certificates
of
Disposal
(
CDS)
to
waste
generators
within
30
days
of
disposal
of
each
item
on
a
manifested
waste
shipment.
Respondents
suggested
that
it
could
take
from
five
minutes
to
about
one­
half
hour
to
fill
out
CDS
(
Kuntz,
1998;
Yocum,
1998;
and
Zayatz,
1998).
The
variance
in
time
is
due
to
the
different
ways
the
manifest
information
is
formatted
and
presented
to
the
disposer.
An
environmental
compliance
specialist
at
H.
E.
L.
P.
E.
R.,
Inc,
stated
that
it
takes
up
to
one­
half
hour
per
item
if
all
the
relevant
data
must
be
entered
on
the
CD
(
Yocum,
1998).
As
per
§
761.218(
a),
this
information
includes
the
name/
address/
identification
number
of
the
disposal
facility;
identification
of
the
waste/
waste
manifest
number;
a
statement
with
the
date/
process
of
disposal;
and
certification.
When
the
format
of
a
manifest
is
such
that
the
disposed
item
can
be
checked
off
a
list,
it
takes
very
little
time
to
complete
the
CD
per
item.

A
representative
from
Chemical
Waste
Management,
in
Model
City,
NY,
and
a
PCB
industry
consultant,
also
suggested
that
the
time
it
takes
to
fill
out
a
CD
is
dependent
on
the
complexity
of
the
waste
streams
(
Zayatz,
1998
and
Kuntz,
1998,
respectively).
They
suggested
that
the
time
to
complete
the
form
will
vary
widely
with
circumstances.

This
data
collection
effort
shows
that
even
when
a
facility
must
input
data
for
each
item,
most
of
the
required
information
will
be
readily
available
for
a
majority
of
cases.
Thus,
the
existing
estimate
used
in
ICR
1446
to
complete
a
CD
(
i.
e.,
15
minutes)
will
be
retained.

3.5
The
Annual
Log
and
Report
Sections
761.70(
a)(
3),
(
4)
and
(
7);
(
c);
and
761.180(
c)
require
owners/
operators
of
incinerators
to
maintain
records
of
quantities,
feed
rates,
temperatures,
combustion
products,
and
operations.
Sections
761.75(
b)(
6)(
iii),
(
b)(
8)(
iv),
and
.180(
d)
require
owners/
operators
of
chemical
waste
landfills
to
maintain
records
for
all
PCB
disposal
operations,
including
PCB
concentration
in
liquid
wastes,
the
three­
dimensional
burial
coordinates
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items,
water
sampling
and
analysis,
and
additional
records
as
required
in
§
761.180.
Sections
761.180(
a),
(
a)(
4),
(
f),
and
.65(
c)(
5)
require
PCB
waste
handlers
other
than
commercial
storers
and
disposers
to
maintain
annual
records
and
a
written
annual
document
log
for
PCBs
and
PCB
Items.
Sections
761.180(
b),
(
b)(
3),
and
(
c)(
5)
require
owners/
operators
of
PCB
incinerators,

chemical
waste
landfills,
high
efficiency
boilers,
and
commercial
storage
facilities
to
submit
annual
reports
E­
11
for
their
PCB
operations.

All
companies
contacted
for
this
survey
used
a
computerized
tracking
system
for
recordkeeping.
The
Compliance
Officer
for
Safety­
Kleen
PCB
Services
Division
in
Twinsburg,
OH,
said
that
four
of
the
company's
five
facilities
employ
two
full­
time
recordkeepers,
and
one
facility
(
i.
e.,
in
Tucker,
GA)
employs
one
full­
time
recordkeeper
to
track
PCB
information.
Each
of
these
facilities
are
relatively
small.
For
example,
their
facility
in
Ashtabula,
OH,
employs
a
total
of
25
people
(
Chambers,
1999).
It
takes
each
facility
about
3
months
to
compile
the
annual
log
(
520
hours
per
year).
There
are
2,000
pieces
of
paper
to
print
out
and
review.
It
takes
from
3
to
5
days
to
do
the
annual
report
(
24
to
40
hours;
32
hours
average).
The
recordkeeper
for
Safety­
Kleen
PCB
Services
in
Tucker,
GA,
said
that
she
spends
10
hours
per
week
transferring
the
required
information
into
an
annual
document
log
(
520
hours/
year)
(
Daniel,
1999).
She
spends
an
additional
10
hours
each
week
over
a
four
month
period
creating
the
annual
report
(
173
hours
per
year).

The
recordkeeper
for
Chemical
Waste
Management
Chemical
Services
(
CWM),
in
Model
City,
NY,

enters
information
into
the
PCB
log
every
day.
Two
people
work
on
the
log
4
hours
each
day
for
a
company
total
of
8
hours
per
day,
or
40
hours
per
week
and
2,080
hours
per
year.
In
general,
the
recordkeeping
is
faster
now
because
the
task
is
partially
computerized.
The
Environmental
Officer
for
CWM's
chemical
waste
landfill
in
Emelle,
AL,
said
that
in
1997,
this
facility
handled
153,767
tons
of
waste
total,
63
percent
(
102,710
tons)
of
which
contains
PCBs
(
Goodwin,
1999).
Some
of
the
data
for
the
annual
log
is
entered
into
the
company's
system
when
the
waste
arrives,
such
as
drum
number
and
weight.
In
addition,
the
Emelle
facility
has
two
full­
time
recordkeepers,
so
that
the
staff
at
this
facility
spends
about
11
hours
total
each
day
tracking
information
for
the
PCB
annual
log
(
i.
e.,
63
percent
of
16
hours).
Based
on
11
hours
each
day
total,

recordkeepers
spend
55
hours
per
week
(
2,860
hours
per
year)
entering
information
in
the
PCB
annual
log.

One
of
the
recordkeepers
said
that
it
takes
about
one
week
to
compile
the
annual
report
(
40
hours)
(
Oliver,

1999).
The
information
comes
from
monthly
reports,
which
takes
about
one
hour
each
month
to
generate.

The
staff
of
the
chemical
waste
landfill
run
by
the
Environmental
Quality
Company
in
Belleville,
MI,

spend
60
hours
per
quarter
(
i.
e.,
240
hours
per
year;
4.6
hours
per
week)
generating
the
annual
log
and
73
hours
per
year
generating
the
annual
report
(
Baker,
1999).
The
time
to
produce
the
annual
report
includes
33
hours
to
print
out
the
information
and
40
hours
to
audit
it.
At
Transformer
Consultants
in
Talmadge,
OH,

it
takes
one
person
a
few
hours
a
day
to
compile
data
for
the
annual
log
(
520
hours/
year)
(
Kelly,
1999).
The
E­
12
Plant
Supervisor
at
Hevi­
Duty
Electric,
in
Berwick,
PA,
said
it
takes
about
one­
half
hour
each
day
doing
the
annual
log
or
130
hours
per
year
(
Vezendy,
1999).
The
company's
central
office
generates
the
annual
report.

Table
1
shows
the
total
number
of
hours
per
facility
for
compiling
the
annual
log
and
report
and
the
average
number
of
hours
for
the
facilities
contacted
for
this
survey.

The
information
collected
for
this
small
survey
confirms
that
the
time
to
compile
the
annual
log
and
report
varies
widely.
To
interpret
this
information,
the
facilities
were
divided
into
the
two
groups:
(
1)
the
230
major
handlers
who
are
permitted
to
commercially
store
and
dispose
of
PCBs,
and
(
2)
the
remainder
of
the
6,500
facilities
that
hold
EPA
identification
numbers
(
6,270
waste
handlers)
and
typically
handle
PCB
wastes
less
frequently
and
in
lesser
quantities.
Based
on
this
survey,
commercial
storers/
disposers
(
Group
1)
require
an
average
of
16.21
hours
per
week
or
843
hours
per
year
to
compile
the
annual
log
(
see
Table
1).
It
was
also
judged
that
the
over
6,000
minor
waste
handlers
(
Group
2)
are
not
well
represented
by
the
data
provided
by
the
commercial
storers
and
disposers
contacted
for
this
survey.
It
was
assumed
that
the
time
for
these
facilities
to
compile
the
annual
log
could
vary
from
occasional
recordkeeping
to
a
few
hours
each
week,
for
an
average
of
1
hour
per
week
(
52
hours
per
year).

Based
on
this
study,
EPA
increased
the
total
hours
for
preparing
the
annual
log
from
29
hours
per
year,
as
reported
in
ICR
1446,
to
a
range
of
52
to
843
hours
per
year,
for
minor
and
major
waste
handlers,

respectively.
The
average
number
of
hours
to
compile
the
annual
report
is
59
hours.
This
time
is
decreased
from
the
84
hours
reported
for
this
task
in
the
Cost
Analysis
for
the
Final
Rule
(
EPA,
1998c).
E­
13
TABLE
1
AVERAGE
TIME
TO
COMPILE
ANNUAL
LOG
AND
ANNUAL
REPORT
BY
PCB
COMMERCIAL
STORERS
AND
DISPOSERS
Facility
Total
Hours
Annual
Log
Total
Hours
Annual
Report
Chemical
Waste
Management
Chemical
Services,
Emelle,
AL
55
hours/
week;
2,860
hours/
year
40
hours/
year
Chemical
Waste
Management
Chemical
Services,
Model
City,
NY
40
hours/
week;
2,080
hours/
year
Not
provided
Environmental
Quality
Company,
Belleville,
MI
4.6
hours/
week;
240
hours/
year
73
hours/
year
Hevi­
Duty
Electric,
Berwick,
PA
2.5
hours/
week;
130
hours/
year
Not
provided
Safety­
Kleen,
Tucker,
GA
10
hours/
week;
520
hours/
year
173
hours/
year
Safety­
Kleen,
Kansas
City,
MO
10
hours/
week:
520
hours/
year
24
to
40
hours
(
32
hours
average)

Safety­
Kleen,
Astabula,
OH
10
hours/
week:
520
hours/
year
24
to
40
hours
(
32
hours
average)

Safety­
Kleen,
Twinsburg,
OH
10
hours/
week:
520
hours/
year
24
to
40
hours
(
32
hours
average)

Safety­
Kleen,
Philadelphia,
PA
10
hours/
week:
520
hours/
year
24
to
40
hours
(
32
hours
average)

Transformer
Consultants,
Talmadge,
OH
10
hours/
week;
520
hours/
year
Not
provided
Average
Number
of
Hours
(
per
week
and
per
year)
16.21
hours/
week;
843
hours/
year
for
10
facilities
59.14
hours/
year
for
7
facilities
E­
14
3.6
Commercial
Storage
Approval
Applications
and
the
SPCC
Plan
Section
761.65(
d)
requires
owners/
operators
of
commercial
storage
facilities
to
prepare
and
submit
an
application
for
approval
to
operate
the
facility.
A
representative
from
H.
E.
L.
P.
E.
R
estimated
that
the
company
spent
several
hundred
hours
(
i.
e.,
about
$
10,000)
developing
the
closure
plan
and
financial
assurance
mechanisms
and
used
additional
funds
to
maintain
the
financial
assurances
(
Shafer,
1998).

A
representative
from
Heritage
Environmental,
a
permitted
commercial
storer,
estimated
that
his
company
spent
from
30
to
40
hours
(
i.
e.,
about
$
2,500)
preparing
its
application,
including
the
closure
plan
and
financial
assurance
information
(
MacNamara,
1998).
A
smaller
facility
would
bear
lower
costs
to
prepare
an
application
for
commercial
storage
approval
and
a
more
complex
facility
would
likely
spend
more.

Environmental
Enterprises,
an
approved
PCB
commercial
storage
facility,
spent
about
$
17,000,

in­
house,
preparing
its
application
for
commercial
storage
approval,
including
about
$
2,000
to
prepare
the
closure
plan
and
financial
assurance
mechanisms
(
Davis,
1998).
The
company
representative
estimated
it
would
have
cost
about
$
25,000
for
an
outside
consultant
to
prepare
the
application.
He
also
stated
that
the
company
spends
about
$
3,000
per
year
to
update
its
financial
assurance
mechanisms
and
maintain
its
letter
of
credit.

An
industry
consultant
suggested
that
it
takes
about
2
man­
months
(
400
managerial
and
technical
hours)
to
gather
the
required
paperwork,
including
the
financial
assurance
information
(
Kuntz,
1998).
The
representative
estimated
that
the
paperwork
to
get
financial
assurance
represents
about
10
to
15
pages
of
information,
some
of
which
must
be
included
on
the
general
application,
as
well.
It
costs
an
estimated
$
50,000
to
$
100,000
to
have
an
engineering
firm
prepare
a
closure
plan.
Storage
facilities
spend
from
$
10,000
to
$
20,000
per
year
maintaining
financial
assurance.

A
representative
from
Chemical
Waste
Management
suggested
that
there
is
a
broad
range
in
costs
to
prepare
a
commercial
storage
application.
She
also
suggested
that
with
the
passage
of
the
Final
PCB
Disposal
Rule
facilities
will
be
able
to
store
PCB
Items
beyond
the
1­
year
deadline
for
disposal,
if
extended
storage
becomes
necessary,
when
approved
by
EPA
[
see
§
761.65(
a)(
2)]
(
EPA,
1998d
and
Zayatz,
1998).

Zayatz
also
suggested
that
the
overall
cost
to
prepare
an
application
is
determined
by
the
extent
of
the
storage
E­
15
that
will
take
place
(
i.
e.,
the
larger
the
facility,
the
greater
the
expense
in
compiling
a
commercial
storage
application).
Based
on
this
data
collection
effort,
there
is
insufficient
justification
for
adjusting
the
estimate
contained
in
ICR
1446
of
392
hours
to
prepare
an
application
for
commercial
storage
approval.

Section
761.65(
c)(
1)(
iv)
requires
anybody
who
wishes
to
temporarily
store
PCB
containers
with
>
500
ppm
of
liquid
PCB
waste
in
areas
that
do
not
comply
with
the
storage
requirements
of
§
761.65(
b)
to
modify
their
Spill
Prevention,
Control
and
Countermeasure
Plans
so
that
the
SPCC
plans
address
this
type
of
waste.

Section
761.65(
c)(
7)(
ii)
requires
owners/
operators
of
facilities
using
containers
meeting
the
requirements
of
29
CFR
1910.106
for
the
storage
of
PCB
wastes
to
prepare
a
SPCC
Plan.

The
Compliance
Officer
for
H.
E.
L.
P.
E.
R
said
that
it
takes
him
one
day
to
revise
the
SPCC
plan,

when
necessary
(
Yokum,
1999).
The
Permitting
Manager
for
Chemical
Waste
Management
Chemical
Services
at
Model
City,
NY,
stated
that
it
takes
two
hours
to
do
a
simple
revision
to
a
plan
involving
a
simple
change
at
the
facility
(
Hino,
1999).
This
estimate
includes
the
time
to
send
it
to
a
consulting
professional
engineer
(
PE)
to
review
and
certify
the
plan.
If
the
facility
undergoes
a
more
significant
change,
such
as
adding
a
new
process,
it
takes
eight
hours
to
revise
the
plan,
including
the
certifying
PE's
time.
The
company
works
with
a
consultant
who
is
already
familiar
with
their
facility.
The
Vice
President
of
Transformer
Disposal
Specialists
in
Tonkawa,
OK,
said
that
the
company
modified
their
SPCC
plan
one
and
one­
half
years
ago.
It
took
about
five
hours
to
modify
the
plan
(
Trower,
1999).
Judging
that
most
modifications
to
storage
areas
will
require
simple
revisions
to
SPCC
plans,
it
was
estimated
for
the
Consolidated
ICR
that
it
will
take
an
average
of
two
hours
to
revise
the
plans.
An
industry
consultant
estimated
that
there
will
be
about
ten
such
revisions
each
year
(
Kuntz,
1999).
He
estimated
that
only
five
facilities
industry
wide
will
prepare
new
plans,
as
per
§
761.65(
c)(
6)(
ii).

3.7
Records
of
PCB
Transformer
Inspection
Section
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)
requires
owners
of
PCB
Transformers
to
register
the
equipment
with
EPA.

As
of
December
28,
1998,
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
vi)(
C)
requires
PCB
Transformer
owners
to
retain
registration
data
for
three
years
after
disposal
of
the
units,
and
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xii)
requires
owners
of
PCB
Transformers
to
maintain
records
of
inspection
and
maintenance
history
for
at
least
three
years
after
disposal
of
the
units.
An
industry
representative
estimated
that
it
takes
five
minutes
or
less
to
conduct
the
recordkeeping
for
transformers
that
have
not
leaked
(
Kuntz,
1998).
The
recordkeeping
requirements
are
more
extensive
for
those
transformers
that
have
leaked.
Recordkeepers
must
indicate
the
date
the
leak
was
discovered;
the
E­
16
location
of
the
leak;
an
estimate
of
the
amount
of
dielectric
fluid
released
from
any
leak;
the
date
of
any
cleanup,
containment,
repair
or
replacement;
a
description
of
any
cleanup,
containment,
or
repair
performed;

and
the
results
of
any
containment
and
daily
inspection
required
for
uncorrected
active
leaks.

A
regulatory
compliance
officer
for
an
electric
cooperative
in
Colorado
said
he
spends
about
30
seconds
doing
the
recordkeeping
for
PCB
Transformers
not
found
to
be
leaking
and
3
hours
to
conduct
the
paperwork
requirements
for
PCB
Transformers
found
to
be
leaking
(
Orrell,
1998).
A
review
of
the
discussions
ERG
staff
held
with
industry
representatives
for
analyzing
the
costs
associated
with
implementing
the
Final
PCB
Disposal
Rule
(
EPA,
1998c)
confirms
statements
that
utility
technicians
take
only
a
few
minutes
to
inspect
each
transformer,
including
doing
the
paperwork
when
no
leaks
have
occurred
(
Faulds,

1997;
Hansen,
1997;
and
Marston,
1997).
The
estimates
used
in
ICR
1000
of
two
minutes
to
file
and
maintain
inspection
data
will
be
retained.
It
is
likely
that
this
estimate
will
reflect
both
the
very
brief
time
it
takes
to
record
information
in
a
majority
of
cases
(
i.
e.,
for
non­
leaking
equipment)
and
the
more
lengthy
requirements
for
recording
information
for
a
small
population
of
leaking
equipment.

3.8
Transformer
Reclassification
Section
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v)
specifies
the
process
for
reclassifying
PCB
Transformers
for
owners
of
reclassified
equipment.
In
a
1998
analysis,
EPA
estimated
that
potentially
301,000
transformers
containing
>
50
ppm
PCBs
could
be
reclassified
each
year
(
EPA,
1998e).
Using
an
estimate
from
OPPT's
cost
analysis
for
the
Final
PCB
Disposal
Rule
that
20
percent
of
PCB
Articles
are
retrofilled
each
year,
it
is
estimated
for
the
Consolidated
ICR
that
60,200
transformers
(
301,000
transformers
x
20
percent)
will
be
retrofilled
annually
and
will
require
relevant
recordkeeping
(
OPPT,
1998c).

Included
in
the
20
percent
estimate
is
the
fact
that
electric
cooperatives
and
municipal
utilities
are
more
likely
to
retrofill
transformers
and
larger
utilities
are
more
likely
to
dispose
and
replace
PCB
Transformers
(
Kuntz,
1998).
Also,
many
utility
representatives
contacted
for
analyzing
the
costs
of
the
PCB
Disposal
Rule
(
EPA,
1998c)
indicated
that
their
organizations
prefer
to
dispose
of
PCB
Transformers
rather
than
retrofill
them
to
eliminate
any
potential
liabilities
associated
with
PCB
equipment
(
Faulds,
1997
and
1998;

Marston,
1997
and
1998
and
Sternberg,
1997).
E­
17
The
process
for
reclassifying
transformers
also
includes
an
option
for
owners
of
electrical
equipment
who
cannot
comply
with
the
reclassification
requirements;
this
option
is
referred
to
as
an
alternate
method
of
simulating
in­
service
use.
EPA
reported
that
between1993
to
1998,
the
average
number
of
companies
that
submitted
requests
for
approval
to
use
alternate
methods
to
simulate
loaded
(
in­
service)
conditions
for
reclassifying
transformers
was
38
per
year
(
i.
e,
46
requests
­
1993;
43
­
1994;
37
­
1995;
31
­
1996;
46
­
1997;

27
­
1998)
[
§
761.30(
a)(
2)(
v)].
It
is
estimated
that
these
requests,
each
averaging
two
pages
in
length
and
containing
information
on
the
transformer
size,
serial
number,
location,
and
details
on
the
test
procedure,
take
approximately
20
hours
to
prepare.

A
final
rule,
currently
under
development,
will
reduce
the
burden
associated
with
reclassifying
electrical
equipment
since
the
approval
process
will
no
longer
be
required
and
reclassified
equipment
will
no
longer
be
subject
to
the
recordkeeping
(
i.
e.,
Annual
Document
Log)
and
reporting
(
i.
e.,
Annual
Report)

requirements
for
PCB
equipment
(
EPA,
1993
and
EPA,
1998e).

3.9
Transformer
Fire
Emergency
Notification
Section
761.30(
a)(
1)(
xi)
requires
PCB
Transformer
owners
to
report
any
fire­
related
incidents
immediately
to
the
National
Response
Center.
Existing
data
from
ICR
1000
indicated
that
there
was
a
twoyear
average
of
six
PCB
fire­
related
incidents
reported
each
year
to
the
National
Response
Center.
A
1997
NRC
report
of
PCB
release
incidents
indicated
that
in1996
there
were
only
two
PCB
releases
that
involved
fires
(
NRC,
1997).
Incorporating
the
additional
year
into
the
average
brings
the
total
of
fire­
related
incidents
to
five
per
year.
Research
conducted
for
the
Economic
Analysis
for
the
Final
Rule
suggests
that
it
takes
about
ten
minutes
to
complete
one
NRC
notification
(
EPA,
1998b).

3.10
Marketing
and
Burning
Used
Oil
Sections
761.20(
e)(
3)(
ii)
and
(
4)(
i)
and
(
ii)
and
.60(
b)(
5)(
iv)(
B)
allow
used
oil
containing
any
quantifiable
levels
of
PCBs
to
be
marketed
for
energy
recovery
when
the
burners
provide
a
one­
time
certification
to
the
marketers
that
they
have
complied
with
the
notification
requirement
at
§
761.71(
a)(
2).
The
marketers
also
must
keep
certifications
of
the
analysis
documenting
the
claims
that
the
PCBs
concentration
is
<
2
ppm
PCBs.
E­
18
A
representative
of
Safety­
Kleen
PCB
Services
of
Tucker,
GA,
said
that
their
chemical
dechlorination
facility
sells
used
oil
after
it
is
treated
to
facilities
that
use
it
in
their
manufacturing
process
or
to
make
electricity.
He
is
not
aware
of
any
paperwork
burdens;
all
of
the
company's
one­
time
notifications
have
been
completed
(
Lombard,
1999).
A
representative
of
the
company's
transformer
decommissioning
facility
said
that
their
Kansas
City,
MO,
facility
also
markets
used
oil,
but
all
the
marketing
is
to
repeat
customers
that
have
been
using
the
oil
for
a
long
time
(
Chambers,
1999).
It
is
not
likely
that
the
company
will
pursue
new
customers.
The
Vice
President
of
Transformer
Disposal
Specialists,
in
Tonkawa,
OK,
said
that
the
company
used
to
sell
used
oil
but
that
burners
do
not
want
it
anymore
because
the
current
price
of
crude
oil
has
been
so
low.
He
concluded
that
there
is
no
market
for
used
oil
today
(
Trower,
1999).
For
the
Consolidated
ICR,
it
was
estimated
that
any
burdens
associated
with
the
marketing
of
used
oil
are
insignificant.

3.11
Exemption
Requirements
Sections
761.80(
e)(
1)
and
(
i)(
1)
require
manufacturers,
processors,
distributors,
and
exporters
of
PCBs
and
analytical
reference
samples
derived
from
PCB
waste
that
are
to
be
used
for
the
purpose
of
R&
D
to
submit
an
exemption
petition
in
order
to
qualify
for
one
of
the
class
exemptions
to
conduct
these
activities.

Section
761.80(
e)(
4)
requires
R&
D
facilities
to
notify
EPA
before
beginning
R&
D
activities
that
include
the
manufacture
of
PCBs.
Sections
761.80(
e)(
5)
and
(
i)(
7)
require
recordkeeping
for
activities
associated
with
the
manufacture,
processing,
or
distribution
in
commerce
of
PCBs
or
PCB
reference
samples
derived
from
PCB
waste
materials
for
R&
D.
Section
761.80(
g)(
1)
requires
facilities
that
process
and
distribute
small
quantities
of
PCBs
for
R&
D
to
keep
records
of
the
PCB
processing
and
distribution
in
commerce
activities.

Sections
760.80(
e),
(
i),
and
(
n)
require
the
submission
of
a
certification
letter
for
extending
an
exemption
for
manufacturing,
processing,
or
distributing
PCBs
in
commerce.

The
Director
of
Chemical
Standards
and
Immunoassay
Products
for
Restek,
Inc.,
a
firm
that
holds
an
exemption
to
process
and
export
small
quantities
of
PCBs
for
R&
D,
stated
that
his
firm
required
about
40
hours
to
compile
the
exemption
petition
about
9
years
ago
(
Steindl,
1999).
This
estimate
is
half
the
time
allotted
for
this
task
in
ICR
857.
The
company
routinely
tracks
product
sales
and
all
PCB
recordkeeping
is
extracted
from
their
computer­
based
database.
He
does
not
consider
the
recordkeeping
requirements
to
be
a
significant
burden.
The
average
number
of
petitions
submitted
to
EPA
is
three
per
year,
which
is
an
increase
from
the
previous
estimate
of
one
per
year
(
ICR
857).
E­
19
The
renewal
process
is
not
difficult
(
Steindl,
1999).
A
review
of
several
of
the
certification
letters
EPA
has
received
over
the
past
few
years
confirms
that
the
brief
form
letters
can
be
updated
each
year
in
about
one
hour
(
one­
half
hour
for
a
manager
to
compile
and
review
the
information
and
one­
half
hour
for
a
clerk
to
prepare
and
submit
the
letter).
Based
on
this
information,
it
was
estimated
that
it
will
take
an
average
of
40
hours
to
compile
the
exemption
petition,
20
hours
to
notify
EPA
before
beginning
R&
D
activities,
a
process
presumed
to
be
less
involved
than
compiling
the
exemption
petition,
and
1
hour
to
request
the
renewal
of
an
exemption.

3.12
Certification
Notification
for
Manufacturing
Exclusion
Sections
761.1
and
Subpart
J,
§
§
761.185(
a)
and
(
b)
and
.187,
require
manufacturers
who
inadvertently
generate
PCBs
and
importers
of
products
containing
inadvertently
generated
PCBs
to
notify
EPA
and
certify
that
the
processes
comply
with
all
PCB
release
conditions
on
excluded
processes.
Sections
761.185(
c)
and
(
d)
and
.193
also
contain
record
retention
requirements
for
a
period
of
three
years
after
the
operations
cease.
It
was
judged
that
it
would
take
24
hours
per
year
(
6
hours
per
quarter)
to
notify
EPA
when
releases
of
PCBs
exceed
limits,
based
on
the
time
needed
to
review
the
monitoring
log
and
create
the
reports,
if
any
are
required
(
Kuntz,
1999).
A
review
of
the
brief
letters
submitted
to
EPA
from
companies
wishing
to
establish
eligibility
for
the
exclusion
indicates
that
there
is
no
justification
for
modifying
the
estimate
of
25
hours
contained
in
ICR
1001.
All
of
these
hours
were
allocated
for
meeting
the
reporting
requirements.

The
Consolidated
ICR
will
allocate
an
additional
1
hour
to
comply
with
recordkeeping
requirements
(
i.
e.,
store,

file,
and
maintain
the
information).

3.13
Additional
Requirements
Several
additional
reporting,
third­
party
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
requirements
were
discussed
with
an
industry
consultant
to
generate
estimates
for
other
requirements
(
Kuntz,
1999).
Notifying
EPA
of
changes
in
ownership
of
a
disposal
facility
and
submitting
the
notarized
affidavit
[
§
§
761.70(
d)(
8)
and
.75(
c)(
7)]
are
estimated
to
take
two
hours
and
that
there
would
be
two
of
these
notifications
submitted
to
EPA
each
year.
Submitting
results
of
analysis
and
validation
studies
to
EPA
[
§
§
761.395
and
.398]
is
estimated
to
take
16
hours,
which
includes
setting
up
the
equipment,
decontaminating
the
surfaces,
setting
up
and
conducting
the
wipe
samples,
and
converting
the
results
into
a
report.
E­
20
It
was
estimated
that
about
500
PCB
Transformers
would
be
discovered
and
require
registration
each
year
[
§
761.30(
a)(
1)(
iv)
and
(
vii);
(
xv)(
D)].
(
Note
that
if
the
newly
discovered
PCB
Transformer
is
situated
in
a
location
that
has
already
been
registered
with
EPA,
registration
is
not
required).
This
number
is
approximately
0.02
percent
of
the
270,900
total
number
of
PCB
Transformers
in
existence,
as
reported
in
the
Small
Entity
Impacts
Analysis
for
the
PCB
Reclassification
Rule
(
EPA,
1998e).

Another
third­
party
reporting
requirement
is
to
attach
a
notation
to
a
PCB
Item
or
PCB
Container
indicating
the
date
the
Item
was
removed
from
service
for
disposal
and
placed
into
storage
for
disposal
[
§
§
761.65(
c)(
1)
and
(
c)(
8)].
As
reported
in
the
Cost
Analysis
of
the
Final
Rule
(
EPA,
1998c),
there
are
about
190,000
PCB
Article
removed
from
service.
Kuntz
estimated
that
at
any
given
time,
there
would
be
just
as
many
containers
and
article
containers
removed
from
service
that
are
filled
with
such
materials
as
contaminated
soil
from
leaking
Articles
or
oil
from
drained
PCB
Transformers,
making
a
total
of
380,000
PCB
Items
or
PCB
Containers
that
must
be
dated.
It
is
estimated
to
take
five
minutes
to
date
each
item
when
removed
from
service
for
disposal.

There
is
a
recordkeeping
requirement
to
track
the
quantity
and
the
date
of
each
batch
added
to
a
stationary
storage
container
[
§
761.65(
c)(
8)].
To
generate
an
estimate
of
the
number
of
times
a
batch
was
added
to
a
container,
Kuntz
assumed
that
each
of
the
265
facilities
estimated
(
in
the
Economic
Analysis
for
the
Final
Rule)
to
be
PCB
disposers
and
commercial
storers
have
one
stationery
storage
container
(
EPA,

1998c).
Ten
percent
of
the
facilities
(
27
facilities)
add
items
to
their
containers
daily
(
260
times
per
year);

40
percent
(
106
facilities)
add
to
their
containers
weekly
(
52
times
per
year);
and
50
percent
(
133
facilities)

add
to
their
containers
monthly
(
12
times
per
year).
Additionally,
all
of
the
300
large
utilities
add
to
their
stationary
storage
containers
once
per
week.
This
estimate
takes
into
consideration
that
not
all
large
utilities
have
PCBs
or
stationary
storage
containers,
but
that
some
of
the
smaller
facilities
do.
The
estimate
for
yearly
totals
is
as
follows:
[(
27
facilities
x
260
times
per
year)
+
[(
106
+
300
facilities)
x
52
times
per
year]
+
(
133
facilities
x
12
times
per
year)],
for
a
total
of
29,728
times
(
rounded
to
30,000)
that
PCB
batches
would
be
added
to
stationery
storage
containers.
It
is
estimated
that
it
takes
5
minutes
to
track
the
required
information
each
time
a
batch
is
added
to
a
container,
for
a
total
of
2,500
hours
per
year.

It
was
estimated
that
it
takes
8
hours
to
maintain
the
records
of
cleanup
and
certification
of
decontamination
at
a
site
cleaned
up
pursuant
to
the
Spill
Cleanup
Policy
[
§
§
761.125(
b)(
3)
and
(
c)(
5)],
and
that
there
would
be
6,780
cleanups
per
year,
assuming
12
per
year
at
each
of
the
estimated
565
large
utilities,
E­
21
disposers,
and
commercial
storers
(
i.
e.,
for
a
total
of
54,240
hours
annually).
This
estimate
takes
into
consideration
that
not
all
large
utilities
have
PCBs,
PCB
spills,
or
12
spills
per
year,
but
that
some
of
the
smaller
facilities
do.
Finally,
it
was
estimated
that
it
would
take
one­
half
hour
to
maintain
records
documenting
delay
in
spill
cleanup
activities
[
§
761.125(
c)(
1)],
and
that
5
percent
of
the
6,780
sites
(
339
sites)
would
face
such
delays.

4.0
REFERENCES
Abel,
A.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Al
Abel,
Senior
Vice
President,
Commodore
Remediation
Technologies,
Inc.
Colombus,
OH,
(
614­
297­
0365)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
24.

Baker,
J.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
(
via
voice
mail)
between
Jennifer
Baker,
Environmental
Quality
Company,
Belleville,
MI,
(
734­
699­
6230)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
April
6.

Cash,
A.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Alan
Cash,
President,
Terra­
Kleen
Response
Group,
Inc.,
San
Diego,
CA,(
619­
558­
8762)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
27.

Cassick,
D.
Telephone
conversation
between
Donna
Cassick,
Recordkeeper,
Chemical
Waste
Management
Chemical
Services,
Model
City,
NY
(
716­
754­
8231)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
26.

Chambers,
W.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Walter
Chambers,
Compliance
Officer,
Safety­
Kleen
PCB
Services,
Twinsburg,
OH,
(
330­
425­
3825)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
24.

Daniel,
A.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Amy
Daniel,
Recordkeeper,
Safety­
Kleen
PCB
Services,
Tucker,
GA
(
770­
934­
0902
ext.
6562)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
24.

Davis,
G.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Gary
Davis,
Vice
President,
Environmental
Enterprises,
Cincinnati,
OH,
(
513­
541­
1823)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group,
July
20.

Decker,
F.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Fred
Decker,
Vice
President,
Vector
Group,
Inc,
Cincinnati,
OH,
(
513­
752­
8988)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
27.

Egan,
P.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Peter
Egan,
Environmental
Compliance
Officer,
Clean
Harbors,
Inc.
Braintree,
MA
(
781­
849­
1800)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
26.

Faulds,
C.
1997
and
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Charles
Faulds,
Director
of
Environmental
Services,
Texas
Electric
Cooperatives,
Inc.,
Austin,
TX,
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
June
5
and
November
10,
1997,
and
January
9
and
12,
and
February
9,
1998.
E­
22
Gary,
J.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
James
Gary,
Chemical
Waste
Management,
Port
Arthur,
TX,
(
409­
736­
4176)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
20.

Goodwin,
P.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Polly
Goodwin,
Environmental
Office,
Chemical
Waste
Management,
Emelle,
AL,
(
205­
652­
9721)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
26.

Gridley,
J.
1995.
Correspondence
from
Juliet
A.
Gridley,
Environmental
Engineer,
Florida
Power
Corporation,
St.
Petersburg,
FL,
to
Sandy
Farmer,
U.
S.
EPA,
and
Tim
Hunt,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget.
August
21.

Gunzelman,
G.
1995.
Correspondence
from
Gregory
L.
Gunzelman,
Environmental
Scientist,
Baltimore
Gas
&
Electric
Company,
Baltimore,
MD,
to
Sandy
Farmer,
U.
S.
EPA,
and
Tim
Hunt,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget.
July
24.

Hansen,
B.
1997
and
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Bruce
Hansen,
Safety
and
Environmental
Director,
Eastern
Iowa
Light
and
Power
Cooperative,
Wilton,
IO,
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
June
5
and
November
10,
1997
and
January
9,
February
6,
and
July
27,
1998.

Haass,
M.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Matt
Haass,
Senior
Business
Development
Engineer,
Geosafe
Corporation,
Richland,
WA,
(
509­
375­
0710)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
27.

Hargraves,
K.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Kelly
Hargraves,
Chemical
Waste
Management,
Port
Arthur,
TX,
(
409­
736­
2821)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
20.

Hino,
J.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
John
Hino,
Permitting
Manager,
Chemical
Waste
Management
Chemical
Services,
Model
City,
NY,
(
716­
754­
8231)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
26.

Ho,
P.
1995.
Correspondence
from
Patrick
A.
Ho,
Manager
Environmental
Planning,
Tampa
Electric,
Tampa,
FL.,
to
Sandy
Farmer,
U.
S.
EPA,
and
Tim
Hunt,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget.
August
4.

Hunnicut,
L.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Lyle
Hunnicut,
Operations
Manager,
Environmental
Technologies
Unlimited
Corp.,
Leland,
NC,
(
910­
371­
2007)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
27.

Kelly,
J.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Joe
Kelly,
Environmental
Officer,
Transformer
Consultants,
Division
of
S.
D,
Myers,
Inc.
Tallmadge,
OH,
(
800­
444­
9580)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
24.

Kuntz,
G.
1999.
Telephone
conversations
between
Glenn
Kuntz,
Principle,
Plexus
Engineering,
Arlington,
VA,
(
703­
578­
6868)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
19
and
22.

Kuntz,
G.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Glenn
Kuntz,
Principle,
Plexus
Engineering,
Arlington,
VA,
(
703­
578­
6868)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
22.
E­
23
Lombard,
E..
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Eric
Lombard,
Technical
Sales
Representative
for
the
Southeast
Region,
Safety­
Kleen
PCB
Services,
Tucker,
GA,
(
770­
934­
0902)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
24.

MacNamara,
J.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
John
MacNamara,
Environmental
Compliance
Specialist,
Heritage
Environmental,
Williston,
VT,
(
802­
860­
1200)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
20.

Marston,
P.
1997
and
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Peter
Marston,
Manager,
Transmission
Construction
Test
and
Maintenance,
Northeast
Utilities
Service
Company,
Hartford,
CT,
(
860­
665­
6615)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
June
9
and
November
10,
1997,
and
January
12,
1998.

National
Response
Center.
1997.
NRC
PCB
incident
reports
NRC
number:
85537.
U.
S.
Coast
Guard.

Oliver,
D.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Dorothy
Oliver,
Recordkeeper,
Chemical
Waste
Management,
Emelle,
AL
(
205­
652­
9721)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
26.

Orrell.
J.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
John
Orrell,
Regulatory
Compliance
Officer,
Yampa
Valley
Electric
Association,
Steamboat
Springs,
CO,
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
23.

Reno,
R.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Robert
Reno,
Compliance
Manager,
ENSR
Operations,
Canton,
OH,
(
330­
452­
0837)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
27.

Shafer,
J.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
James
Shafer,
Environmental
Compliance
Specialist,
H.
E.
L.
P.
E.
R.
Inc.,
Madison,
SD,
(
605­
256­
6254)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
20.

Steindl,
E.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Eric
Steindl,
Director
Chemical
Standards
and
Immunoassay,
Restek
Corp.,
Bellefonte,
PA
,
(
814­
353­
1300)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
26.

Sternberg.
1997.
Telephone
conversation
between
Dick
Sternberg,
Energy
Department,
National
Rural
Electric
Cooperative
Association,
Arlington,
VA,
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
June
9
and
November
10.

Trower,
R.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Rod
Trower,
Vice
President,
Transformer
Disposal
Specialists,
Inc.,
Tonkawa,
OK,
(
580­
628­
5371)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
24.

U.
S.
EPA.
1998a.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
Commercially
permitted
PCB
disposal
companies,
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxics.
July
9.

U.
S.
EPA.
1998b.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
Commercial
storage
applications.
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxics.
www.
epa.
gov/
opptintr/
pcb/
comstor.
html.
June
29.
E­
24
U.
S.
EPA.
1998c.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
Cost
impact
of
the
final
regulation
amending
the
PCB
regulations
at
40
CFR
761.
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxics.
April
30.

U.
S.
EPA.
1998d.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
Disposal
of
polychlorinated
biphenyls;
final
rule.
Federal
Register.
Volume
63:
No.
124:
35384­
35474.
June
29.

U.
S.
EPA.
1998e.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
PCB
Reclassification
Rule:
small
entity
impacts,
environmental
justice
impacts,
and
unfunded
mandates
analysis.
Office
of
Pollution
Prevention
and
Toxics.
March
3.

U.
S.
EPA.
1997.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
PADS
database.
September
2.

U.
S.
EPA.
1993.
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
PCB
Reclassification
Rule.
Federal
Register.
Volume
58:
60970.
November
18.

Vezendy,
M.
1999.
Telephone
conversation
between
Mike
Vezendy,
Plant
Supervisor,
Heavy
Duty
Electric,
Berwick,
PA
(
717­
752­
1955)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
March
26.

Webster,
D.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Doug
Webster,
Environmental
Coordinator,
Texas
Gas
Transmission
Corporation,
Owensboro,
KY,
(
502­
926­
8686)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
27.

Yocum,
M.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Michael
Yocum,
Environmental
Compliance
Specialist,
H.
E.
L.
P.
E.
R.
Inc.,
Madison,
SD,
(
605­
256­
6254)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
20.

Zayatz.
B.
1998.
Telephone
conversation
between
Becky
Zayatz,
Environmental
Engineering
Manager,
Chemical
Waste
Management,
Model
City,
NY,
(
716­
754­
8231)
and
Carol
Wendel,
Eastern
Research
Group.
July
21.
E­
25
APPENDIX
F
Distribution
of
PCB
Electrical
Equipment
among
Small
Entities
