	
EPA Registration Division contact: Laura Nollen, 703-305-7390
Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4)
Petition Number 1E7864


EPA has received a pesticide petition, 1E7864, from Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ 08540 proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.599 by establishing a tolerance for residues of acequinocyl [2-(acetyloxy)-3-dodecyl-1,4-naphthalenedione] and its metabolite, 2-dodecyl-3-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone, expressed as acequinocyl equivalents in or on bean, succulent shelled at 0.15 parts per million (ppm); caneberry subgroup 13-07A at 4.5 ppm; cherry at 0.8 ppm; cowpea, forage at 9.0 ppm; cucumber at 0.15 ppm; melon subgroup 9A at 0.06 ppm; soybean, vegetable, succulent at 0.25 ppm; fruit, small vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit, subgroup 13-07F at 1.6 ppm; and berry, low growing, subgroup 13-07G at 0.4 ppm. The petitioner further requests to remove the existing tolerance entries for grape at 1.6 ppm and strawberry at 0.4 ppm, as they will be superseded by inclusion in subgroup 13-07F and 13-07G, respectively. EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.
A.	Residue Chemistry
 Plant metabolism. The nature of the residues of acequinocyl in plants is adequately understood based on three crops; apples, oranges and eggplant. The major residue in all plant metabolism studies is acequinocyl. A minor but significant metabolite is acequinocyl-OH (2-dodecyl-3-hydroxy-l,4-naphthoquinone). The proposed tolerance expression is the parent, acequinocyl and its hydroxy metabolite, acequinocyl-OH.
 Analytical method. The analytical method to quantitate residues of acequinocyl and acequinocyl-OH in/on food crops utilizes high pressure liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection (LC/MS/MS) all crops listed in the petition. The lowest level of method validation (LLMV) for acequinocyl and acequinocyl-OH varied with the crop matrix.
 Magnitude of residues. The proposed use of acequinocyl calls for a maximum of 2 applications per season at 0.3 lb a.i. per acre per application (maximum 0.6 lb a.i. per acre per season), with a 21-day interval between applications. The pre-harvest interval is 1 day for melon, cucumber, and caneberry; 7 days for cherry, and bean, succulent shelled. The maximum residue and lowest level for method validation (LLMV) for each commodity are shown in the following table.
                                       
Sample Type
                                  Acequinocyl
                       Maximum Residue (ppm)/LLMV (ppm)
                                Acequinocyl-OH
                       Maximum Residue (ppm)/LLMV (ppm)
Bean, succulent shelled 
                                   0.11/0.02
                                < 0.02/0.02
Caneberry
                                 2.28[1]/0.01
                                    NA/0.01
Cherry
                                   0.47/0.01
                                  0.036/0.01
Cowpea, forage
                                    2.6/.02
                                   0.43/0.02
Cucumber
                                 0.174[1]/0.01
                                    NA/0.01
Musk Melon (Cantaloupe)
                                 0.045[1]/0.01
                                    NA/0.01
[1] Highest sum of acequinocyl plus acequinocyl-OH from a single sample in a single field
The crop field trial data are adequate to support the proposed tolerances requested in Section F.
B.	Toxicological Profile
       1. Acute toxicity. Acequinocyl technical has low acute, dermal and inhalation toxicity in laboratory animals. The oral LD50 (M/F) in the rat and mouse was > 5000 mg/kg. The dermal LD50 (M/F) was > 2000 mg/kg. The inhalation LC50 was reported as > 0.84 mg/1. In the eye and dermal irritation studies, acequinocyl technical was not an eye or skin irritant to rabbits and was not a skin sensitizer in guinea pigs.
 Genotoxicty. Acequinocyl was found to be negative in the Ames reverse mutation, mouse lymphoma, Chinese hamster lung (CHL) chromosome aberration and mouse micronucleus assays.
 Reproductive and developmental toxicity. i. Rat teratology. Acequinocyl technical was administered by oral gavage to pregnant Sprague Dawley rats at dose levels of 0, 50,150, 500 or 750 mg/kg/day on gestation days 7-17. Common signs in the descendants included vaginal discharge, pallor, pale eyes, hypoactivity, piloerection, slow or irregular breathing, intra-uterine hemorrhage and blood stained stomach and/or intestinal contents. Maternal NOEL=150 mg/kg/day based on these signs. Developmental NOEL=500 mg/kg/day based on an increase in certain skeletal variants that may be attributed to the observed maternal toxicity.  

ii. Rabbit teratology. Groups of New Zealand white rabbits received acequinocyl technical by gavage at doses of 0, 30, 60 or 120 mg/kg/day. Maternal NOEL=60 mg/kg/day based on reduction in maternal body weight and 5 females were sacrificed at 120 mg/kg/day. Fetal NOEL=60 mg/kg/day due to skeletal variations in the thoracic-lumbar ribs. 

iii. Rat reproduction study. Acequinocyl technical was fed to two generations of male and female Sprague Dawley rats at dietary concentrations of 0,100, 800, or 1500 ppm (0, 7.3, 59 or 111 mg/kg/day for males and 0, 8.7, 69 or 134 mg/kg/day for females). Systemic and pup NOEL=100 ppm (7.3 and 8.7 mg/kg/day). Systemic: Hemorrhage and swollen body parts were seen at 800 and 1500 ppm in Fl males. At 800 and 1500 ppm, treatment related clinical signs, hemorrhagic effects, subcutaneous bleeding on body parts and/or cranium and/or brain were seen in the Fl pups. At 800 and 1500 ppm toxicity seen in F2 pups included subcutaneous bleeding on body parts and/or cranium and/or brain at weaning.
 Subchronic toxicity. i. Rat feeding study. Fischer rats received acequinocyl technical at dietary concentrations of 0, 100, 400, 1600 or 3200 ppm (0, 7.57, 30.4, 120, 253 mg/kg/day, respectively for males and 0, 8.27, 32.2,129, 286 mg/kg/day, respectively for females) for 13 consecutive weeks. Treatment related yellow brown urine in all animals of both sexes at 400 ppm suggested the presence of a metabolite of the test material. Macroscopic examination on the surviving animals revealed no treatment related abnormalities. At 3200 and 1600 ppm, macroscopic and microscopic examination of the mortalities revealed hemorrhaging of muscle and other organs. NOEL = 400 ppm (30.4 mg/kg/day for males and 32.2 mg/kg/day for females).
 ii. Mouse feeding study. Groups of CD-I (ICR) BR mice received acequinocyl technical by oral route at concentrations of 0, 100, 500, 1000 or 1500 ppm (0,16,81,151, 295 mg/kg/day respectively for males and 0, 21, 100, 231, 342 mg/kg/day respectively for females) for 13 weeks. At 100 ppm, there were hepatic histopathological lesions and an increase in relative liver weight. A clear NOEL for both sexes was not determined.  
iii. Dog feeding study. Acequinocyl technical was administered via gelatin capsule to male and female beagle dogs at dose levels of 0, 40, 160, 640 or 1000 mg/kg/day once a day 7 days a week for 13 weeks. At 40, 160 and 640 mg/kg/day colored feces were observed in both sexes.  At 160 and 640 mg/kg/day, treatment related decrease in body weight gain in males and an increase platelet count for females was observed. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations on the surviving animals revealed no treatment related abnormalities. A clear NOEL was not determined.  
iv. 28-day dermal toxicity. Groups of Sprague Dawley rats received daily dermal applications of acequinocyl technical at doses of 0, 40, 200 or 1000 mg/kg/day for 6 hours/day for 28 days followed by a 14 day treatment free period only in the high dose group. There were no macroscopic findings. Red staining occurred on the back of the animals and was only seen in the morning after dosing. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity. NOEL=1000 mg/kg/day.
 Chronic toxicity. i. Dog feeding study. Beagle dogs were dosed by capsule at 0,5,20, 80 or 320 mg/kg/day for 1 year with acequinocyl technical. Minor disturbances in platelet counts were observed in both sexes at 80 and 320 mg/kg/day. There were no treatment related macroscopic histopathological findings. Colored feces and/or abnormally stained sawdust were observed for all treatment groups. Varying degrees of discoloration of the urine was observed for animals receiving 20 mg/kg/day or more. The discoloration was considered to be attributable to a colored metabolite of the test substance. NOEL = 20 mg/kg/day.

ii Rat feeding/oncogenicity study. Groups of F344 rats received acequinocyl technical at dietary levels of 0, 50, 200, 800 or 1600 ppm (0, 2.25, 9.02, 36.4, 74.0 mg/kg/day for males and 0, 2.92, 11.6, 46.3, 93.6 mg/kg/day for females) for 2 years. The NOEL = 200 ppm (9.02 and 11.6 mg/kg/day for males and females, respectively). Corneal abnormalities and hypertrophy of the eye were observed in 800 ppm and 1600 ppm males and 1600 ppm females. At 800 ppm and 1600 ppm, PT was observed to be longer in males and shorter in females and APTT longer in females. Reddish brown urine was observed in both males and females. There was no incidence of tumors.

iii. Mouse oncogenicity study. Acequinocyl technical was administered in the diet of Crl:CD-l(ICR)BR mice at 0, 20, 50, 150 or 500 ppm for 80 weeks. NOEL=20 ppm (lowest dose tested equal to 2.7 and 3.5 mg/kg/day in males and females respectively), based on brown pigmented cells. At 50 and 500 ppm in both sexes, there was an increase incidence of fatty hepatocytes. Other associated findings were increased liver weight, slight increase in pale livers or pale areas within livers. Glomerular amyloidosis was statistically increased in the 150 and 500 ppm males. Yellow brown urine was consistently found in both sexes at high dose. There was no increase in the incidence of tumors.
6.	Animal metabolism. Sprague Dawley rats were dosed orally with acequinocyl labeled 14C-phenyl or 14C-dodecyl. Both labels were used in the single low dose (10 mg/kg) study. The high dose (500 mg/kg) and 14-day repeat dose studies (10 mg/kg/day) were conducted with 14C-phenyl acequinocyl only. Excretion was rapid, with most of the dose in the feces. Less than 15% of the radioactivity was found in the urine. Absorption was about 25-42% based on the bile duct cannulation studies, which found 20-33% of the administered dose in bile, plus 5-9% in urine plus cage wash. Acequinocyl was not detected in urine and was only a minor component (1-2%) in the feces. The major fecal metabolite (12-36%) was the 2-hydroxy-3-dodecyl-l, 4-naphthalenedione (acequinocyl-OH or designated Rl). Subsequent oxidation of the dodecyl chain yielded butanoic and hexanoic acids, the only measurable identified urinary metabolites. 2-(l, 2-dioxotetradecyl)-benzoic acid comprised 19-40% of the radioactivity in the feces. There were no remarkable differences in metabolite disposition due to gender and no effect of pre-dosing for 2 weeks. The large dose slowed transit time and reduced absorption.
       Metabolite toxicology. NA-Remove.
 Endocrine disruption. A standard battery of toxicity tests have been conducted on acequinocyl. No effects were seen to indicate that acequinocyl has an effect on the endocrine system.
C. Aggregate Exposure
1. Dietary exposure. The tolerances for bean, succulent shelled at 0.15 ppm; caneberry (Subgroup 13-07A) at 4.5 ppm; cherry at 0.08 ppm; cowpea, forage at 9.0 parts per million (ppm); cucumber at 0.15 ppm; melon (Subgroup 9A) at 0.06 ppm; and soybean, vegetable, succulent (edamame) at 0.25 ppm; low growing berry (Subgroup 13-07G) at 0.4 ppm; and small fruit vine, climbing, except fuzzy kiwi (Subgroup 13-07F) at 1.6 ppm along with the previously established tolerances for acequinocyl were incorporated into the aggregate exposure results presented below. An aggregate risk assessment was conducted to include the potential chronic dietary exposure from applications of acequinocyl on these crops. This chronic risk assessment was conducted to assess dietary exposures from acequinocyl in food using DEEM FCID[TM] and the following input parameters: tolerance level residues; consumption data from the USDA 1994-1996 and 1998 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII); 100 percent crop treated for all commodities; default processing factors for all commodities, if applicable; and a chronic toxicological endpoint of 2.7 mg/kg bw (NOAEL); 0.027 mg/kg bw (chronic RfD) from the chronic mouse study. Tolerance values used in the new Tier I DEEM analysis for current registered uses were obtained from the most recent HED human health assessments (FR Notice, April 2, 2008).  Please note that EPA has determined that there is no endpoint of concern attributable to a single dose and, therefore, an acute reference dose (aRfD) was not established. Therefore, no acute exposure assessment is necessary (FR, Vol. 69, No. 139, 7/21/04, page 43528).
      
      i. Food. The previous chronic dietary food exposure estimates to acequinocyl were all less than 100% of chronic RfD.  When the previous risk assessment is revised to include bean, succulent shelled; caneberry (Subgroup 13-07A); cherry; cucumber; melon (Subgroup 9A); soybean, vegetable, succulent (edamame); low growing berry (Subgroup 13-07G); and small fruit vine, climbing, except fuzzy kiwi (Subgroup 13-07F); the chronic dietary food exposure estimates to acequinocyl are still not a concern for the US population as a whole or for any population subgroup.  The new chronic dietary exposure estimate for the US population is 12.9% of the cPAD, indicating that there is plenty of room in the risk cup even with the addition of these proposed new crops.  The previous DEEM analysis without these new proposed IR-4 uses indicated 12.4% of the cPAD for the total US population (Levy, 2007).  The most highly exposed population subgroup is children aged 1-2 years old at 53.6% of the cPAD; this compares to 52.6% of the cPAD without the addition of the new proposed IR-4 uses.  

In order to determine which of the registered and proposed commodities were driving the revised dietary risk assessment; a critical commodity contribution analysis was conducted for two subpopulation groups, children 1-2 years old and children 3-5 years old.  This analysis identified (a) crop groups with greater than 5% of the total exposure contribution; and (b) those foods or food-forms within the crop groups contributing more than 1% of the total exposure.  For both of these subpopulations, the grape crop group (includes fresh grapes, grape juice and raisins) was the largest contributor.  For children 1-2, this food group contributed 32.9% of the total exposure; for children 3-5, the contribution was 29.5% of the total exposure.  The next highest contributor to the 1-2 year olds was the pome fruit grouping, with apple juice being the highest individual contributor.  The pome fruit group contributed 31.1% and 26.1% of total exposure for children aged 1-2 and 3-5, respectively.  The third highest crop group contributor was the fruiting vegetables, with fresh tomatoes, tomato sauce, and tomato puree being the highest individual food contributors within that crop group.  This group accounted for 21.4% and 27.4% of total exposure for children aged 1-2 and 3-5, respectively.

      ii. Drinking water. The available environmental fate data indicate that acequinocyl does not persist in the environment nor does it have the ability to leach into groundwater resources. Acequinocyl degrades rapidly in the environment. Aqueous photolysis, Tl/2 = 14 minutes, soil photolysis, Tl/2 = 2 days, aerobic soil metabolism (4 soils) Tl/2 = <3 days, aerobic aquatic metabolism Tl/2 = 0.39 day in water and sediment, hydrolysis Tl/2 = 74 days (pH 4), = 2.2 days (pH 7), =1.3 hours (pH 9). Acequinocyl shows low soil mobility.  Drinking water data was incorporated directly into the DEEM dietary assessment under "drinking water" for both direct and indirect sources using the chronic concentration of parent-only (acequinocyl) residues modeled from surface water using PRZM-EXAMS by EFED and used in their revised human health risk assessment (Levy, S., 2007).  This was a very conservative estimate because it was assumed that acequinocyl was stable to all routes of degradation.  As a result, this model produced the highest estimated drinking water concentration (EDWC), 2.73 ppb, which was considered to be the most protective.  Using these considerations, exposures to acequinocyl in drinking water do not pose a significant human health risk. 
iii. Non-dietary exposure. The proposed expansion of the registration for applications to bean, succulent shelled; caneberry (Subgroup 13-07A); cherry; cucumber; melon (subgroup 9A); and soybean, vegetable, succulent (edamame); requires evaluation of occupational handler and postapplication exposures in addition to dietary exposures for consumers.

      a. Occupational Handler Exposure: The following handler scenarios were evaluated:
      1. Mix/load liquid open-pour for groundboom applications
      2. Mix/load liquid open-pour for airblast applications
      3. Application by groundboom, open-cab
      4. Application by airblast, open-cab
Exposure data from PHED were used to assess dermal and inhalation risks.  Since the application rate for these new crops did not exceed the application rate of crops currently on the label, all short-term and intermediate-term occupational risks are acceptable (MOEs exceeded 100).Based on the anticipated occupational use patterns for acequinocyl products, long-term (several months to lifetime) exposures are not expected for occupational handlers of acequinocyl.

b. Occupational Postapplication Exposure: Since re-entry activities occur after the sprays have dried, post-application inhalation exposures are not assessed.  Post-application exposures to acequinocyl are expected to be of short-term duration only (1 to 30 days) based on the limited use pattern.  Short-term dermal post-application exposures were assessed against the NOAEL for short-term dermal exposures (200 mg/kg/day).  The risks are not of concern (MOEs > 100) on day 0 for all potential re-entry activities associated with the new proposed uses.  As such, the REI of 12 hours is appropriately protective.  .

      c. Residential Handler exposure: Residential handler risks were calculated by HED in the 2007 Human Health Risk Assessment document (Levy, S., 2007).  Two scenarios, mixing/loading and applying liquids by low-pressure hand-wand and mixing/loading and applying liquids with a hose-end sprayer, were identified and evaluated for short-term residential risks.  Based on the HED residential handler assessment, there are no risks of concern for residential handlers (MOEs > 100).  The lowest MOE, 2,900, was associated with dermal exposure when using the hose-end sprayer was used to calculate the short term aggregate risk assessment.  The value of the aggregate MOE is 2,600, considerably higher that the level of concern of 100, indicating acceptable risk.
      
      d. Residential Postapplication exposures: Current HED policy indicates that there is no significant post-application exposure to treated residential ornamentals; therefore, no residential re-entry risk assessment was performed.
In summary, all residential and occupational exposure scenarios are associated with a reasonable certainty of no harm for the US population and all subpopulations.

D.	Cumulative Effects
There is no information available to indicate that toxic effects produced by acequinocyl are cumulative with those of any other compound.
E.	Safety Determination
 U.S. population. . The chronic dietary food and drinking water exposure (including all current and proposed uses) to acequinocyl was estimated at 12.9% of the cPAD for the total US population. The calculated chronic dietary risks included contributions of modeled residues from drinking water (direct and indirect, all sources).  The groundwater EDWC for acequinocyl was estimated to be 0.0036 ppb, while surface water EDWCs were estimated to be 0.37 and 2.73 ppb, using two different approaches (Levy, 2007).  The most conservative value, 2.73 ppb, was chosen for use in the chronic dietary assessment. Acequinocyl concentrations in the source surface water are not expected to exceed 2.73 ppb in chronic scenarios due to the conservative high-end assumptions used in the model. The Tier 1 chronic dietary risk assessment took into account tolerance-level residues, 100% crop treated, and a drinking water modeled concentration of 2.73 ppb. The result of this assessment indicated exposures to the general US population were not of concern. 
 Infants and children. The chronic dietary food exposure to acequinocyl was estimated at 23.2% of cPAD for all infants (<1 year), and 53.7% of cPAD for children 1-2 years (most highly exposed). The calculated chronic dietary risks included contributions of modeled residues from drinking water (direct and indirect, all sources).  The most conservative value, 2.73 ppb obtained from PRZM-EXAMS surface water model, was chosen for use in the chronic dietary assessment. Acequinocyl concentrations in the source surface water are not expected to exceed the EDWC of 2.73 ppb in chronic scenarios due to the conservative high-end assumptions used in the model.  The Tier 1 chronic dietary risk assessment took into account tolerance-level residues, 100% crop treated, and a drinking water modeled concentration of 2.73 ppb. The result of this assessment indicated exposures to the most exposed subpopulation, children aged 1 to 2 years, were not of concern. 
F.	International Tolerances
      To date, no Codex, Canadian or Mexican tolerances exists for acequinocyl.


REFERENCES:
      1. Levy, Sarah.  Amendment to PP#s 6F7040 and #7F176.  Human Health Risk Assessment for the Proposed Uses of Acequinocyl on Grapes, the Tree Nut Crop Group, and Residential Sites (Ornamentals). December 12, 2007.
