EPA REGISTRATION DIVISION COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR

PESTICIDE PETITIONS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER

EPA Registration Division contact: Cynthia Giles-Parker – Branch
Chief,

Fungicide Branch

July 30, 2009

[9E7606]

EPA has received a pesticide petition ([9E7606]) from [Syngenta

Crop Protection, Inc], [410 Swing Road, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC
27419-

8300] proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act

(FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.

(Options (pick one)

1. by establishing a tolerance for residues of

“NA Remove”

[isopyrazam (SYN520453)] in or on the raw agricultural commodity
[banana] at

[0.05] parts per million (ppm). EPA has determined that the petition
contains data or

information regarding the elements set forth in section 408 (d)(2) of
FDDCA; however,

EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at
this time or whether

the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be
needed before EPA

rules on the petition.

A. Residue Chemistry

1. Plant metabolism. [SYN520453 has been studied on wheat, grapes, and

lettuce. The metabolic routes of SYN520453 in all three crops were the
same and

the parent molecule was the primary constituent of the total radioactive
residue

(TRR) in all three matrices. The most significant metabolite identified
in plant was

the primary alcohol, the metabolites CSCD459488 and CSCD459489 (syn and
anti

2

forms respectively).

Based on the results of the metabolism studies conducted, it was
concluded that the

definition of the residue for tolerance enforcement purposes should be
parent

isopyrazam only (SYN534968 plus SYN534969); however the
residue-of-concern for

risk assessment purposes includes parent isopyrazam (SYN534968 plus
SYN534969)

plus the metabolite CSCD459488.]

2. Analytical method. [An adequate, validated method (GRM006.01B) is

available for enforcement purposes for the determination of residues of
isopyrazam,

analyzed as the isomers SYN534968 and SYN534969, in crop samples. The
limit of

quantification has been set at 0.005 mg/kg for each isomer (0.01mg/kg
for

SYN520453 in total). Samples are extracted by homogenization with

acetonitrile:water (80:20 v/v for most crops and 50:50 v/v for straw).
Extracts are

centrifuged and aliquots (equivalent to 0.2 g) are diluted with
methanol:water

(50:50 v/v). Final determination is by LC-MS/MS. An analytical method
suitable

for the determination of residues of the metabolites CSCD459488 and
CSCD459489

(syn and anti forms respectively) in crop samples using an external
standardization

procedure is also available (GRM006.03A). The limit of quantification
(LOQ) has

been set at 0.005 mg/kg for both analytes. Samples are extracted by
homogenization

with acetonitrile:water (80:20 v/v). Extracts are centrifuged and
aliquots (equivalent

to 0.09 g) are hydrolyzed with 0.1 M HCl at 60°C for 3 hours. Aliquots
are then

diluted with acetonitrile and ultra pure water. Final determination is
by LCMS/

MS. ]

3. Magnitude of residues. [Twelve residue trials were conducted in Latin

America to determine the magnitude of the residue of SYN520453 in or on
bananas.

The targeted treatment regime consisted of five applications at a rate
of 75 grams

a.i./hectare with a 10-day retreatment interval. Bananas were harvested
after the

last application was made (0-day PHI).

Banana peel, pulp and whole fruits were analyzed for residues of parent
SYN520453

[analyzed as SYN534968 (anti) and SYN534969 (syn)], and for residues of
its

metabolite [analyzed as CSCD459489 (anti) and CSCD459488 (syn)]. The
limit of

quantitation for each analyte was 0.005 ppm. Mean procedural recoveries
of all

analytes on all matrices were between the acceptable range of 70-110%.

The maximum residue levels of SYN520453 (summed SYN534968 and SYN534969)

were 0.084, 0.046 and 0.048 ppm in banana bagged peel, unbagged fruit
and

unbagged peel, respectively. The highest residue levels of CSCD459488
were 0.010,

0.014 and 0.016 ppm in banana bagged peel, unbagged fruit and unbagged
peel,

respectively.]

B. Toxicological Profile

1. Acute toxicity. [SYN520453 is of low acute oral toxicity. Three (of
the five)

acute oral studies conducted focused on the isomeric proportions of
SYN520453.

3

The LD50 for isomeric mixtures containing more than 50% of the syn
isomer of

isopyrazam was >2000 mg/kg.]

2. Genotoxicty. [In vitro, both specifications of SYN520453 (Tox Reserve
and

70:30) were negative for bacterial reverse mutation, in vitro
cytogenetics, and

mammalian cells gene mutation (L5178Y TK+/- mouse lymphoma). The L5178
TK+/-

assay, which is also able to detect chromosomal damage, was negative for

clastogenicity. In the in vitro cytogenetic assay using primary human
lymphocyte

cultures, neither specification of SYN520453 induced chromosomal
aberrations. In

vivo, SYN520453 (Tox Reserve specification) was found to be
non-clastogenic in the

rat bone marrow micronucleus assay and there was also no evidence for
any

indication of DNA damage or repair in the rat liver UDS (unscheduled DNA

synthesis) assay.]

3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. [SYN520453 was assessed for

reproductive toxicity in a multi-generation reproduction study in the
rat at dietary

inclusion levels of 0, 100, 500 or 3000 ppm SYN520453. The parental
toxicity

NOAEL was 100 ppm based on decreased body weight and food consumption in

females at 500 ppm, and increased liver weight and hepatocyte
hypertrophy in F0

and F1 animals at 500 ppm. The offspring NOAEL was 100 ppm based on

increased liver weights in F1 and F2 pups at 500 ppm. No treatment
related

reproductive parameters were affected due to treatment with SYN520453;
thus the

reproductive NOAEL was the top dose 3000 ppm, and a LOAEL was not

established. There is no indication of increased sensitivity of
offspring to

SYN520453 in a multi-generation reproduction study in rats.

Two developmental toxicity studies were conducted in the rat: one with
Tox Reserve

material and the other with 70:30 material. In the study with Tox
Reserve, rats

were given oral doses of SYN520453 at 0, 20, 75 or 250 mg/kg/day on
gestation days

5 to 21. The maternal NOAEL was 75 mg/kg/day based on mortality,
decreased

body weight gain and food consumption and clinical signs of toxicity at
250

mg/kg/day. The fetal NOAEL was 75 mg/kg/day based on increased
postimplantation

loss, a reduced number of live fetuses, decreased fetal weight and

reduced ossification at 250 mg/kg/day. The fetal effects were considered
to be

secondary to maternal toxicity.

In the rat developmental toxicity study with 70:30 material, rats were
given oral

doses of SYN520453 at 0, 20, 75 or 200 mg/kg/day. The fetal and maternal
NOAEL

was 20 mg/kg/day based on decreased fetal body weight and delayed
ossification;

and decreases in maternal body weight gain at 75 and 200 mg/kg/day. The
fetal

effects were considered to be secondary to maternal toxicity.

In rabbits, two preliminary developmental toxicity studies were
conducted in the

Himalayan rabbit and a preliminary and regulatory study were conducted
in the

New Zealand White (NZW) rabbit. All studies were conducted using the Tox

Reserve material.

4

In the first preliminary study, Himalayan rabbits were given oral doses
of 0, 100,

200 or 400 mg/kg/day. Mean maternal food consumption was decreased
throughout

treatment at 400 mg/kg/day. The only fetal effect possibly related to
treatment was

the observation of 2 fetuses at 400 mg/kg/day with the variation of
“eyes small,

slight.”

In the second preliminary study, Himalayan rabbits were given oral doses
of 0, 600,

800 or 1000 mg/kg/day. Maternal food consumption was slightly decreased
at 1000

mg/kg/day. There was a small effect on male fetal body weights and a
higher

incidence of flexed or malrotated limbs at 1000 mg/kg/day. The main
treatment

related fetal finding was the observation, eyes of smaller than expected
size, which

occurred either as an abnormality or variation. The combined incidence
of small

eyes (abnormality and variation) was increased in all dose groups, but
not in a doserelated

manner. It was concluded that administration of SYN520453 at 600-1000

mg/kg/day was associated with effects in the eye consistent with
microphthalmia.

A preliminary rabbit developmental toxicity study was conducted in NZW
rabbits

at doses of 0, 400, 700 or 1000 mg/kg/day. Maternal toxicity was noted
at all dose

levels tested, evident as decreased food consumption and decreased
maternal weight

gain throughout the treatment period. The effects were sufficient to
produce

moribundity and/or abortion in animals from each dose group. Maternal
liver

weight was increased at all doses and hypertrophy and vacuolation were
observed

histopathologically. At 1000 mg/kg/day, there was an increase in the
incidence of

microphthalmia which was associated with the variations hemorrhagic ring
around

the iris and/or reddened or red areas around the eyes.

In the regulatory developmental toxicity study, NZW rabbits were dosed
at 0, 30,

150 or 500 mg/kg/day. The maternal NOAEL was 30 mg/kg/day based on
clinical

signs of toxicity (days 13-19), decreased food consumption, increased
liver weights,

and hepatocellular hypertrophy and vacuolation at 150 and 500 mg/kg/day.
The

fetal NOAEL was 150 mg/kg/day based only on the single incidence of

microphthalmia observed at 500 mg/kg/day. The single incidence of

microphthalmia at 500 mg/kg/day was within the historical control range
for the

laboratory. However, based on the data from the NZW range-finding study,
which

was conducted in the same laboratory, an association between treatment
and the

single incidence of microphthalmia at 500 mg/kg/day cannot be excluded.]

4. Subchronic toxicity. [Subchronic testing was conducted in the mouse,
rat,

and dog via the oral route of exposure, including evaluation of the
effect of isomer

content of SYN520453. Three 28-day studies conducted in rats showed
similar

findings and confirmed that the liver was the systemic target organ for
SYN520453.

Liver effects were evident at doses of 500 ppm and above, with no liver
effects

observed at 300 ppm (approximately 28.1 mg/kg/day). The only other
evidence of

systemic toxicity was the observed decrease in body weight gain compared
to

controls, which tended to occur at dose levels of 2000 ppm and above,
and which

were observed in conjunction with decreased food utilization. The study
conducted

with pure syn and anti-isomers demonstrated equivalent toxicological
properties

5

from both a qualitative and quantitative perspective.

Two 90-day dietary studies in rats demonstrated similar toxicological
findings to the

28-day studies. The NOAELs from the two 90-day studies were similar: a
NOAEL

of 300 ppm (21.3 mg/kg/day) in the Tox Reserve study, and a NOAEL of 250
ppm

for both Tox Reserve and 70:30 specification materials in the
comparative study,

based on decreased body weight/weight gain, clinical chemistry changes,
increased

liver weight, and hepatocellular hypertrophy and vacuolation at 1500 and
2000 ppm

respectively.

The 90-day dietary study in mice was conducted with Tox Reserve material
at 0,

500, 2500 or 7000 ppm. The systemic toxicity findings in this study were
decreased

body weight/weight gain observed at 2500 and 7000 ppm. Increased liver
weight

was seen at all dose levels and hepatocyte hypertrophy was seen in both
sexes at

2500 and 7000 ppm. Minimal hypertrophy was seen in males at 500 ppm.

Two 90-day oral toxicity studies were conducted in dogs; one was
conducted using

Tox Reserve and the other with 70:30 material. In the first 90-day study
with Tox

Reserve material, dogs were dosed orally at 0, 30, 100 or 300 mg/kg/day.
In the

second 90-day study with 70:30 material, dogs were dosed orally at 0,
10, 30 or 250

mg/kg/day. The findings were similar. An overall NOAEL of 30 mg/kg/day
was

based on initial body weight loss and/or decreased weight gain and
decreased food

consumption, and increased liver weights (males only) at 100 and 250
mg/kg/day.

One male dog at the mid-dose of 100 mg/kg/day also displayed abnormal
clinical

signs/behavior, some of which were evident throughout the study.]

5. Chronic toxicity. [SYN520453 was evaluated for chronic toxicity in
the dog

and rat, and for carcinogenic potential in the rat and the mouse.

In the 1 year dog study with Tox Reserve, dogs were dosed orally by
capsule at 0, 25,

100 or 250 mg/kg/day. The NOAEL was 25 mg/kg/day based on decreased body

weight gain and minor changes in clinical chemistry, and increased liver
weight

(males only) at 100 and 250 mg/kg/day. No clinical signs of toxicity
were observed in

the 1 year dog study up to a dose level of 250 mg/kg/day.

In a 2 year rat combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study
conducted at dietary

inclusion levels of 0, 100, 500 or 3000 ppm, there were no treatment
related effects

on survival. The NOAEL for the chronic toxicity phase of the study was
100 ppm

and the NOAEL for neoplastic findings was 500 ppm (27.6 and 34.9
mg/kg/day in

males and females respectively) based on increased incidence of
hepatocellular

adenoma and uterine carcinoma observed as a consequence of excessive
dosing in

females at 3000 ppm. The overall NOAEL was 100 ppm (5.5 and 6.9
mg/kg/day in

males and females respectively) based on decreased body weight/weight
gain in

females at 500 ppm, and minor changes in clinical chemistry and
non-neoplastic

findings in the liver at 500.

In a carcinogenicity study in the mouse, mice were fed diets containing
0, 70, 500 or

6

3500 ppm SYN520453 for a period of up to 80 weeks. There were no
treatment

related effects on survival. Apart from an increased incidence of
„discharge from

‟ in males at 3500 ppm, there were no effects on the clinical
condition of the

animals. There were no treatment-related neoplastic micropathology
findings. The

NOAEL for this study was 70 ppm (7.8 mg/kg/day in males and 9.9
mg/kg/day in

females) based on reduced food utilization in females at 500 ppm, and

hepatocellular hypertrophy and increased liver weight at 500 ppm.]

6. Animal metabolism. [SYN520453 was extensively metabolized by rats via

oxidation to give a range of hydroxy, dihydroxy, acid and hydroxy acid
metabolites.

Oxidation of the N-desmethyl metabolite of SYN520453 produced an
equivalent

range of N-desmethyl metabolites. Incubation of SYN534969 (pure syn)
with rat

liver microsomes resulted in oxidative biotransformation to the tertiary
alcohol

CSCD459488; quantities decreased with increased incubation time,
demonstrating

that the metabolite CSCD459488 is a short-liver metabolite. The major
routes of

biotransformation appeared to be independent of dose level and sex and
also

appeared to be the same for both syn and anti isomers of the parent
molecule. All

metabolites accounting for >5% of the dose and the majority of minor
metabolites

were identified. Therefore in total, greater than 90% of the
administered dose was

accounted for by identified metabolites.]

7. Metabolite toxicology. [Acute oral toxicity testing was performed
with two

metabolites, resulting in LD50 >2000 mg/kg for both CSCD465008 and

CSCD459488. Genotoxicity testing (bacterial reverse mutation, in vitro
cytogenetics,

and mammalian cell gene mutation (mouse lymphoma) with metabolites

CSCD465008 and CSCD459488 indicated no genotoxicity. Subchronic toxicity

studies (28 day dietary in the rat) were conducted with metabolites
CSCD465008

and CSCD459488. CSCD465008 is toxicologically benign and is of lower
toxicity

than parent SYN520453. The metabolite CSCD459488 is considered to have

equivalent toxicity to parent SYN520453, with both compounds having a
NOAEL of

300 ppm (equivalent to approximately 27-28 mg/kg/day), and both
compounds

having a primary effect upon xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in the
liver with

accompanying liver enlargement and centrilobular hypertrophy.]

8. Endocrine disruption.

The endocrine system includes the reproductive hormones estrogen and
androgens

as well as the thyroid hormone system. There is no evidence of any
consistent

treatment related effects with SYN520453 that could be considered as
perturbation

of endocrine homeostasis. There were no adverse affects related to
female

reproductive function or on reproduction in the multi-generation
reproductive

toxicity study, and there were no micropathology changes in the organs
that had

altered weight effects. Overall, the database does not suggest that
SYN520453 is an

endocrine disruptor.

C. Aggregate Exposure

1. Dietary exposure. [Tier I acute and chronic dietary exposure
assessments

7

were performed for isopyrazam (a mixture of
3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-

[(1RS,4SR,9RS)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9-isopropyl-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5-

yl]pyrazole-4-carboxamide (syn-isomer, also called SYN534968) and 3-

(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-[(1RS,4SR,9SR)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9-isopropy
l-1,4-

methanonaphthalen-5-yl]pyrazole-4-carboxamide (anti-isomer, also called

SYN534969)) using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM-FCIDTM),

version 2.16 from Exponent for a proposed use on imported bananas. There
are no

current or pending uses for isopyrazam. The definition of the residue
for tolerance

enforcement purposes is parent isopyrazam only (SYN534968 plus
SYN534969);

however the residue-of-concern for risk assessment purposes includes
parent

isopyrazam (SYN534968 plus SYN534969) plus the metabolite CSCD459488. An

import tolerance for bananas of 0.05 ppm is proposed using the EPA/PMRA

tolerance tool (PRO2008-02, ”Guidance for Setting Pesticide Maximum
Residue

Limits Based on Field Trial Data - Revised,” PMRA, April 4, 2008),
based upon

residue field trial data on unbagged bananas treated at the maximum
labeled

application rate and harvested at the minimum pre-harvest interval (PHI)
of 0-days.

In these risk assessments, the EPA/PMRA tolerance tool was used to
develop an

upper-bound residue-of-concern estimate of 0.07 ppm from the same 0-day
PHI

unbagged bananas to account for residues of both parent isopyrazam plus
the

metabolite CSCD459488. Default DEEM processing factors were assumed for
dried

bananas (3.9X). Percent of crop treated (%CT) was conservatively assumed
to be

100%. Since the proposed use on imported bananas will not result in
transfer of

residues to livestock via consumption of treated feedstuffs, residues of
isopyrazam in

meat, milk, or egg commodities were not anticipated. Additionally, since
there are

no registered uses for isopyrazam in the United States, dietary
exposures via

drinking water (surface water and/or ground water) were also not
considered. All

consumption data for these assessments were taken from the USDA‟s
Continuing

Survey of Food Intake by individuals (CSFII) with the 1994-96
consumption

database and the Supplemental CSFII children‟s survey (1998)
consumption

database.]

i. Food. [Acute dietary (food only) risk assessments for parent
isopyrazam

plus metabolite CSCD459488 were performed for all population sub-groups
using

an acute reference dose (aRfD) of 0.30 mg/kg-bw/day, based upon a 90-day
study in

dogs with a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 30 mg/kg-bw/day
and an

uncertainty factor of 100X. The 100X safety factor includes intra- and
inter-species

variations; no additional FQPA safety factor was applied. For the
purpose of

aggregate risk assessment, the exposure values were expressed in terms
of margin of

exposure (MOE), which was calculated by dividing the NOAEL by the
exposure for

each population subgroup. In addition, exposure was expressed as a
percent of the

acute reference dose (%aRfD). At the 95th percentile, acute (food only)
exposure to

the U.S. population resulted in a MOE of 210,328 (0.1% of the RfD of
0.30 mg/kgbw/

day). The most exposed sub-population was all infants <1 year old, with
a MOE

of 43,765 (0.2% of the RfD of 0.30 mg/kg-bw/day). Since the benchmark
MOE for

this assessment was 100 and since the EPA generally has no concern for
exposures

above the benchmark or below 100% of the reference dose, Syngenta
believes that

8

there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from dietary
(food only)

exposure to residues arising from the proposed use on imported bananas.

Chronic dietary (food only) risk assessments for parent isopyrazam plus
metabolite

CSCD459488 were performed for all population sub-groups using a chronic

reference dose of 0.055 mg/kg-bw/day, based upon a 2-year study in rats
with a no

observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 5.5 mg/kg-bw/day and an
uncertainty

factor of 100X. The 100X safety factor includes intra- and inter-species
variations;

no additional FQPA safety factor was applied. For the purpose of
aggregate risk

assessment, the exposure values were expressed in terms of margin of
exposure

(MOE), which was calculated by dividing the NOAEL by the exposure for
each

population subgroup. In addition, exposure was expressed as a percent of
the

chronic reference dose (%cRfD). Chronic (food only) exposure to the U.S.

population resulted in a MOE of 218,995 (0.0% of the cRfD of 0.055
mg/kg-bw/day).

The most exposed sub-population was children (1-2 years old) with a MOE
of 42,933

(0.2% of the cRfD of 0.055 mg/kg-bw/day). Since the benchmark MOE for
this

assessment was 100 and since the EPA generally has no concern for
exposures above

the benchmark or below 100% of the reference dose, Syngenta believes
that there is

a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from dietary (food only)
exposure to

residues arising from the proposed use on imported bananas.

A cancer dietary assessment was not conducted.]

ii. Drinking water. [Since the proposed use on imported bananas will not

result in contributions of SYN520453 or its metabolite(s) to surface or
ground water

in the United States, a drinking water exposure assessment was not
conducted.]

2. Non-dietary exposure. [There are no currently registered residential
uses

for SYN520453, so a non-dietary residential exposure assessment was not

conducted.]

D. Cumulative Effects

[Cumulative Exposure to Substances with a Common Mechanism of

Toxicity, Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v), requires that when considering
whether to

establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider
“available

‟s residues

and “other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity”.
Syngenta did

not perform a cumulative risk assessment as part of this tolerance
action for

isopyrazam because HED has not yet determined that there are any other
chemical

substances that have a mechanism of toxicity common with that of
isopyrazam.]

E. Safety Determination

1. U.S. population. [Using the conservative assumptions described above,
and

based on the completeness and reliability of the toxicity data, the
acute aggregate

9

(food only) exposure calculation for the proposed use of isopyrazam on
imported

bananas resulted in a MOE of 210,328 for the U.S. population. The
chronic

aggregate (food only) exposure analysis showed that exposure from the
proposed

use of isopyrazam on imported bananas resulted in a MOE of 218,995 for
the U.S.

population. Since the worst case aggregate MOE of 210,328 (acute
aggregate

exposure) exceeds the benchmark MOE of 100, Syngenta believes that there
is a

reasonable certainty that no harm will occur to the U.S. Population from
acute and

chronic aggregate exposures arising from the proposed use of isopyrazam
on

imported bananas.]

2. Infants and children. [Using the conservative assumptions described
above,

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

A

›

ð

Y

¦

¨

½

™

¡

¦

¨

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

	㜀$␸䠀$摧汓ᰀ

B*

B*

B*

B*

B*

and based on the completeness and reliability of the toxicity data, the
acute

aggregate (food only) exposure calculation for the proposed use of
isopyrazam on

imported bananas resulted in a MOE of 43,765 for infants <1 year old.
The chronic

aggregate (food only) exposure analysis showed that exposure from the
proposed

use of isopyrazam on imported bananas resulted in a MOE of 42,933 for
children 1-

2 years old. Since the worst case aggregate MOE of 42,933 (chronic
aggregate

exposure) exceeds the benchmark MOE of 100, Syngenta believes that there
is a

reasonable certainty that no harm will occur to infants and children
from acute and

chronic aggregate exposures arising from the proposed use of isopyrazam
on

imported bananas.]

F. International Tolerances

[There are no Codex Alimentarius MRLs set for isopyrazam.]

