
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31055-31056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14096]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0729; FRL-9961-05]


Registration Review Proposed Interim Decisions for Aliphatic 
Esters, Mepiquat Chloride and Mepiquat Pentaborate, Propylene Glycol 
and Dipropylene Glycol, Triethylene Glycol, Bromuconazole, and Case 
Closures for ADAO, DMHMP, and Nuosept 145; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's proposed 
interim registration review decisions and opens a 60-day public comment 
period on the proposed interim decisions. Registration review is EPA's 
periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each 
pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, 
that is, that the pesticide can perform its intended function without 
unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. 
Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's 
registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge, 
including its effects on human health and the environment.
    This document also announces the closure of the registration review 
cases for Amines, C10-16-alkyldimethyl, N-oxides (ADAO) (Case 5003, and 
Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0616); 1H-Pyrazole-1-methanol, 3,5-
dimethyl (DMHMP) (Case 5035, and Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-
0619); and Nuosept (Cosan) 145 (Case 3052, and Docket ID Number: EPA-
HQ-OPP-2008-0335) because all of the registrations in the U.S. have 
been cancelled.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 5, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the docket 
identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest 
provided in the table in Unit II, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business 
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information, 
contact: The Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest 
identified in the table in Unit II.
    For general information on the registration review program, 
contact: Dana Friedman, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), 
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 
(703) 347-8827; email address: friedman.dana@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of 
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human 
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; 
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, 
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be 
interested, the

[[Page 31056]]

Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may 
be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the 
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the 
Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the 
table in Unit II.

B. What should I consider as i prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or 
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting 
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. What action is the agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability 
of EPA's proposed interim registration review decisions for the 
pesticides shown in the following table, and opens a 60-day public 
comment period on the proposed interim decisions.

                      Table 1--Registration Review Proposed Interim Decisions Being Issued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Registration review case name and                                                  Chemical review manager and
                 No.                                  Docket ID No.                      contact information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aliphatic Esters, Case 4005.........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0084                           Brian Kettl,
                                                                                      kettl.brian@epa.gov, 703-
                                                                                      347-0535.
Mepiquat Chloride and Mepiquat        EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0083                           Caitlin Newcamp,
 Pentaborate, Case 2375.                                                              newcamp.caitlin@epa.gov,
                                                                                      703-347-0325.
Propylene Glycol and Dipropylene      EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0218                           Megan Block,
 Glycol, Case 3126.                                                                   block.megan@epa.gov, 703-
                                                                                      347-0671.
Triethylene Glycol, Case 3146.......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0219                           Megan Block,
                                                                                      block.megan@epa.gov, 703-
                                                                                      347-0671.
Bromuconazole, Case 7035............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0535                           Thomas Harty,
                                                                                      harty.thomas@epa.gov, 703-
                                                                                      347-0338.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This document also announces the closure of the registration review 
case for Amines, C10-16-alkyldimethyl, N-oxides (ADAO) (Case 5003, and 
Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0616); 1H-Pyrazole-1-methanol, 3,5-
dimethyl (DMHMP) (Case 5035, and Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-
0619); and Nuosept (Cosan) 145 (Case 3052, and Docket ID Number: EPA-
HQ-OPP-2008-0335) because all of the registrations in the U.S. have 
been cancelled.
    The registration review docket for a pesticide includes earlier 
documents related to the registration review case. For example, the 
review opened with a Preliminary Work Plan, for public comment. A Final 
Work Plan was placed in the docket following public comment on the 
Preliminary Work Plan.
    The documents in the dockets describe EPA's rationales for 
conducting additional risk assessments for the registration review of 
the pesticides included in the table in Unit II, as well as the 
Agency's subsequent risk findings and consideration of possible risk 
mitigation measures. These proposed interim registration review 
decisions are supported by the rationales included in those documents.
    Following public comment, the Agency will issue interim or final 
registration review decisions for the pesticides listed in the table in 
Unit II.
    The registration review program is being conducted under 
congressionally mandated time frames, and EPA recognizes the need both 
to make timely decisions and to involve the public. Section 3(g) of the 
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 
136a(g)) required EPA to establish by regulation procedures for 
reviewing pesticide registrations, originally with a goal of reviewing 
each pesticide's registration every 15 years to ensure that a pesticide 
continues to meet the FIFRA standard for registration. The Agency's 
final rule to implement this program was issued in August 2006 and 
became effective in October 2006, and appears at 40 CFR part 155, 
subpart C. The Pesticide Registration Improvement Act of 2003 (PRIA) 
was amended and extended in September 2007. FIFRA, as amended by PRIA 
in 2007, requires EPA to complete registration review decisions by 
October 1, 2022, for all pesticides registered as of October 1, 2007.
    The registration review final rule at 40 CFR 155.58(a) provides for 
a minimum 60-day public comment period on all proposed interim 
registration review decisions. This comment period is intended to 
provide an opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating 
any necessary amendments to the proposed interim decision. All comments 
should be submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES, and must be 
received by EPA on or before the closing date. These comments will 
become part of the docket for the pesticides included in the table in 
Unit II. Comments received after the close of the comment period will 
be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late 
comments.
    The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the 
closing date and may provide a ``Response to Comments Memorandum'' in 
the docket. The interim registration review decision will explain the 
effect that any comments had on the interim decision and provide the 
Agency's response to significant comments.
    Background on the registration review program is provided at: 
http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: May 23, 2017.
Yu-Ting Guilaran,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide 
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2017-14096 Filed 7-3-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


