				

Reregistration

Eligibility Decision for Aldicarb

Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Document

for Aldicarb

List A

Case Number 0140

Approved by:							Date:  

		Steven Bradbury, Ph.D.

			Director

			Special Review and Reregistration Division

		

Table of Contents

  TOC \f \h \z    HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410752"  Aldicarb Reregistration
Eligibility Decision Team	  PAGEREF _Toc178410752 \h  5  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410753"  Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations	 
PAGEREF _Toc178410753 \h  6  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410754"  Abstract	  PAGEREF _Toc178410754 \h  8  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410755"  I. Introduction	  PAGEREF _Toc178410755
\h  9  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410756"  II. Chemical Overview	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410756 \h  11  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410757"  A. Chemical Identity	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410757 \h  11  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410758"  B. Regulatory History	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410758 \h  12  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410759"  C. Use and Usage Profile	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410759 \h  12  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410760"  D. Tolerances	  PAGEREF _Toc178410760 \h
 13  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410761"  III. Aldicarb Human Health and
Environmental Fate and Effects Risk Assessments	  PAGEREF _Toc178410761
\h  14  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410762"  A. Human Health	  PAGEREF _Toc178410762
\h  14  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410763"  B. Environmental Fate and Effects	 
PAGEREF _Toc178410763 \h  14  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410764"  IV. Risk Management, Reregistration
Decision, and Tolerance Reassessment Decisions	  PAGEREF _Toc178410764
\h  18  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410765"  A. Determination of Reregistration
Eligibility	  PAGEREF _Toc178410765 \h  18  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410766"  B. Public Comments and Responses	 
PAGEREF _Toc178410766 \h  18  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410767"  C. Regulatory Position	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410767 \h  19  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410768"  1. Food Quality Protection Act Findings	
 PAGEREF _Toc178410768 \h  19  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410769"  a. "Risk Cup" Determination	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410769 \h  19  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410770"  b. Determination of Safety to U.S.
Population (Including Infants and Children)	  PAGEREF _Toc178410770 \h 
19  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410771"  c. Endocrine Disruptor Effects	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410771 \h  19  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410772"  d. Cumulative Risks	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410772 \h  20  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410773"  2. Tolerance Summary	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410773 \h  20  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410774"  D. Regulatory Rationale	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410774 \h  22  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410775"  1. Human Health Risk Management and
Mitigation	  PAGEREF _Toc178410775 \h  22  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410776"  a. Dietary Risk Mitigation (Food and
Drinking Water)	  PAGEREF _Toc178410776 \h  22  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410777"  b. Aggregate Risk Mitigation	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410777 \h  23  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410778"  c. Occupational Risk Mitigation	 
PAGEREF _Toc178410778 \h  23  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410779"  2. Ecological Risk Management and
Mitigation	  PAGEREF _Toc178410779 \h  23  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410780"  a. Terrestrial and Aquatic Organisms	 
PAGEREF _Toc178410780 \h  23  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410781"  3. Mitigation Summary and Crop-Specific
Analyses	  PAGEREF _Toc178410781 \h  24  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410782"  Citrus	  PAGEREF _Toc178410782 \h  25  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410783"  Cotton	  PAGEREF _Toc178410783 \h  27  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410784"  Dry Bean	  PAGEREF _Toc178410784 \h  30 


  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410785"  Peanut	  PAGEREF _Toc178410785 \h  31  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410786"  Potato	  PAGEREF _Toc178410786 \h  34  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410787"  Soybean	  PAGEREF _Toc178410787 \h  36  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410788"  Sugar Beet	  PAGEREF _Toc178410788 \h 
37  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410789"  Sweet Potato	  PAGEREF _Toc178410789 \h 
40  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410790"  4. Other Labeling Requirements	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410790 \h  41  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410791"  5. Threatened and Endangered Species
Considerations	  PAGEREF _Toc178410791 \h  41  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410792"  V. What Registrants Need to Do	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410792 \h  43  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410793"  A. Manufacturing-Use Products	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410793 \h  43  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410794"  1. Additional Generic Data Requirements	
 PAGEREF _Toc178410794 \h  43  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410795"  2. Labeling for Manufacturing-Use
Products	  PAGEREF _Toc178410795 \h  43  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410796"  B. End-Use Products	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410796 \h  44  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410797"  1. Additional Product-Specific Data
Requirements	  PAGEREF _Toc178410797 \h  44  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410798"  2. Labeling for End-Use Products	 
PAGEREF _Toc178410798 \h  44  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410799"  Appendix A. Aldicarb Uses and
Use-Patterns Eligible for Reregistration	  PAGEREF _Toc178410799 \h  58 


  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410800"  Appendix B. Table of Generic Data
Requirements and Studies Used to Make the Reregistration Decision	 
PAGEREF _Toc178410800 \h  68  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410801"  Appendix C. Technical Support Documents	
 PAGEREF _Toc178410801 \h  75  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410802"  Appendix D. Citations Considered to be
Part of the Database Supporting the Reregistration Decision
(Bibliography)	  PAGEREF _Toc178410802 \h  77  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410803"  Appendix E. Generic Data Call-In (GDCI)	
 PAGEREF _Toc178410803 \h  183  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410804"  Appendix F. Product-Specific Data
Call-In (PDCI)	  PAGEREF _Toc178410804 \h  184  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410805"  Appendix G. EPA’s Batching of Aldicarb
Products for Meeting Data Requirements for Reregistration	  PAGEREF
_Toc178410805 \h  185  

  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc178410806"  Appendix H. List of Available Related
Documents and Electronically Available Forms	  PAGEREF _Toc178410806 \h 
187  

 Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision Team  TC "Aldicarb
Reregistration Eligibility Decision Team" \f C \l "1"  

EPA Office of Pesticide Programs

Special Review and Reregistration Division

Sherrie Kinard

Anne Overstreet

Robert McNally

Health Effects Division

Jeff Dawson

Felicia Fort

Michael Metzger

Linda Taylor

Environmental Fate and Effects Division

Jonathan Angier

Tom Bailey

Jeanette Martinez

Dana Spatz

Biological and Economic Analysis Division

Derek Berwald

Angel Chiri

Colwell Cook

Arnet Jones

Monisha Kaul 

Timothy Kiely

Istanbul Yusuf

Nicole Zinn

Registration Division

Joanne Edwards

John Hebert

Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations  TC "Glossary of Terms and
Abbreviations" \f C \l "1"  

AGDCI	Agricultural Data Call-In

ai	Active Ingredient

aPAD	Acute Population Adjusted Dose

BCF 	Bioconcentration Factor

CFR	Code of Federal Regulations

cPAD	Chronic Population Adjusted Dose

CSF	Confidential Statement of Formulation

CSFII	USDA Continuing Surveys for Food Intake by Individuals

DCI	Data Call-In

DEEM	Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model

DFR	Dislodgeable Foliar Residue

DNT	Developmental Neurotoxicity

EC	Emulsifiable Concentrate Formulation

EDWC	Estimated Drinking Water Concentration

EEC	Estimated Environmental Concentration

EPA	Environmental Protection Agency

EUP	End-Use Product

FDA	Food and Drug Administration

FIFRA	Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act

FFDCA	Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

FQPA	Food Quality Protection Act

GLN	Guideline Number

IR	Index Reservoir

LC50	Median Lethal Concentration.  A statistically derived concentration
of a substance that can be expected to cause death in 50% of test
animals.  It is usually expressed as the weight of a substance per
weight or volume of water, air, or feed, e.g., mg/l, mg/kg, or ppm. 

LD50	Median Lethal Dose.  A statistically derived single dose that can
be expected to cause death in 50% of the test animals when administered
by the route indicated (oral, dermal, inhalation).  It is expressed as a
weight of substance per unit weight of animal, e.g., mg/kg.

LOC	Level of Concern

LOAEL	Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level

MATC	Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration

µg/g	Micrograms Per Gram

µg/L	Micrograms Per Liter

mg/kg/day	Milligram Per Kilogram Per Day

mg/L	Milligram Per Liter

MOE	Margin of Exposure

MRID	Master Record Identification Number. EPA's system for recording and
tracking studies submitted.

MUP	Manufacturing-Use Product

NOAEL	No Observed Adverse Effect Level

OPP	EPA Office of Pesticide Programs

OPPTS	EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances

PAD	Population Adjusted Dose

PCA	Percent Crop Area

PDP	USDA Pesticide Data Program

PHED	Pesticide Handler's Exposure Data

PHI	Pre-harvest Interval

ppb	Parts Per Billion

PPE	Personal Protective Equipment

ppm	Parts Per Million

PRZM/EXAMS

	Pesticide Root Zone Mode/Exposure Analysis Modeling System, Tier II
Surface Water Computer Model

Q*	The Carcinogenic Potential of a Compound, Quantified by the EPA’s
Cancer Risk Model

RAC	Raw Agriculture Commodity

RED	Reregistration Eligibility Decision

REI	Restricted-Entry Interval

RfD	Reference Dose

RQ	Risk Quotient

SCI-GROW2	Tier I Ground Water Computer Model

SAP	Science Advisory Panel

SF	Safety Factor

SLC	Single Layer Clothing

TGAI	Technical Grade Active Ingredient

USDA	United States Department of Agriculture

USGS	United States Geological Survey

UF	Uncertainty Factor

UV	Ultraviolet

WPS	Worker Protection Standard



Abstract  TC "Abstract" \f C \l "1"  

	This document presents the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s
or the Agency’s) decision regarding the reregistration eligibility of
the registered uses of the active ingredient aldicarb.  The Agency has
conducted human health and environmental fate and effects risk
assessments for aldicarb and has assessed whether the aldicarb
tolerances are safe from an individual-chemical standpoint (considering
all issues other than cumulative exposures to other n-methyl carbamate
pesticides).  The Agency has determined that, with label amendments and
changes as specified in this document, aldicarb can be used without
resulting in unreasonable adverse effects on the environment, and that
there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general
U.S. population, infants, children, or other major identifiable
population subgroups, from the use of aldicarb (considering all issues
other than cumulative exposures to other n-methyl carbamate pesticides).
 The Agency has therefore determined that products containing the active
ingredient aldicarb are eligible for reregistration provided that the
risk mitigation measures outlined in this document are adopted and label
amendments are made to reflect these measures.

EPA has identified potential human health risks of concern associated
with the current registered uses of aldicarb from drinking water
exposure, and potential environmental risks of concern to birds, mammals
and fish.  To reduce these potential exposures and to address current
risks of concern, the Agency, in agreement with the technical registrant
of aldicarb, will implement label restrictions (increase drinking water
well set-backs when certain criteria are triggered) for application to
peanuts in the southeastern coastal plains for ground water
contamination concerns.  Additionally, application rate reductions,
state limitations, application restrictions, label amendments, and
termination of certain uses will also be implemented to reduce
environmental concerns.  The Agency is also requiring appropriate data
to confirm the decisions presented in this Reregistration Eligibility
Decision.

I. Introduction  TC "I. Introduction" \f C \l "1"  

	

The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) was
amended in 1988 to accelerate the reregistration of products with active
ingredients registered prior to November 1, 1984.  The amended Act calls
for the development and submission of data to support the reregistration
of an active ingredient, as well as a review of all data submitted to
the Environmental Protection Agency (hereafter referred to as EPA or the
Agency).  Reregistration involves a thorough review of the scientific
database underlying a pesticide’s registration.  The purpose of the
Agency’s review is to reassess the potential hazards arising from the
currently registered uses of a pesticide, to determine the need for
additional data on health and environmental effects, and to determine
whether or not the pesticide meets the “no unreasonable adverse
effects” standard of FIFRA.

On August 3, 1996, the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) was signed
into law.  This Act amended FIFRA and the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to require reassessment of all existing tolerances
for pesticides in food.  EPA decided that, for those chemicals that have
tolerances and are undergoing reregistration, tolerance reassessment
would be accomplished through the reregistration process.  Under FQPA,
in reassessing these tolerances, the Agency must consider, among other
things, aggregate risks from non-occupational sources of pesticide
exposure, whether there is increased susceptibility among infants and
children, and the cumulative effects of pesticides that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.  In determining whether aldicarb tolerances can
be reassessed as safe, the Agency has concluded that the risks from
aggregate exposure to aldicarb are acceptable, and that the tolerances
can be reassessed as safe if they are acceptable when viewed in light of
the cumulative assessment of n-methyl carbamate pesticides.

	The intentional dosing human toxicity study (the Inveresk study) used
in the human health risk assessment for aldicarb has been reviewed by
EPA’s Human Studies Review Board, as required by EPA’s Human
Subjects Protections rule.  The Agency presented the Inveresk study to
the HSRB at a meeting on April 2 – 4, 2006.  The HSRB discussed the
study extensively and concluded that the cholinesterase data from the
aldicarb human study were reliable for use in the aldicarb single
chemical, aggregate risk assessment from both a science and ethical
standpoint.  The final report of the HSRB is available at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/files/april2006mtgfinalreport62606.pdf" 
http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/files/april2006mtgfinalreport62606.pdf 

Risks summarized in this document are for aldicarb only.  FQPA requires
EPA to consider available information concerning the cumulative effects
of a particular pesticide's residues and "other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity" when considering whether to establish,
modify, or revoke a tolerance.  Potential cumulative effects of
chemicals with a common mechanism of toxicity are considered because
low-level exposure to multiple chemicals causing a common toxic effect
by a common mechanism could lead to the same adverse health effect as
would a higher level of exposure to any one of these individual
chemicals.  Aldicarb is a member of the N-methyl carbamate class of
pesticides.  The Agency has classified the N-methyl carbamate pesticides
and their common degradates as having a common mechanism of toxicity.  

A cumulative risk assessment, which evaluates exposures based on a
common mechanism of toxicity, was conducted to evaluate risk from food,
drinking water, residential use, and other non-occupational exposures
resulting from registered uses of N-methyl carbamate pesticides,
including aldicarb.  EPA has concluded that the cumulative risks
associated with the N-methyl carbamate pesticides are below the
Agency’s level of concern.  With this determination, the Agency has
concluded the  reassessment process for aldicarb tolerances mandated by
section 408(q) of the FFDCA. For additional information, refer to the
document, Revised N-methyl Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment, which
is available in the EPA docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0935 and on the website, 
 HYPERLINK "http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/" 
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/ .

This document presents EPA's revised human health and environmental fate
and effects risk assessments, its progress toward tolerance
reassessment, and the reregistration eligibility decision for aldicarb. 
The document consists of six sections.  Section I contains the
regulatory framework for reregistration and tolerance reassessment. 
Section II provides a description of the chemical and a profile of the
use and usage of the chemical.  Section III references the revised human
health and environmental fate and effects risk assessments attached as
Appendices to this document.  Section IV presents the Agency's risk
management, reregistration eligibility, and tolerance reassessment
decisions.  Section V summarizes the data requirements necessary to
confirm the reregistration eligibility decision as well as specific
label changes and language necessary to implement the risk mitigation
measures outlined in Section IV.  Section VI, the Appendices, provides
related information and supporting documents.  The preliminary and
revised risk assessments for aldicarb are available in the public docket
EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 located on-line in the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov" 
http://www.regulations.gov .

II. Chemical Overview  TC "II. Chemical Overview" \f C \l "1"  

	A. Chemical Identity  TC "A. Chemical Identity" \f C \l "2"  



Chemical Structure:	



Empirical Formula:	  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 C7H14N2O2S



Common Name:	

Aldicarb



CAS Name:	

2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O- (methylcarbamoyl)oxime



CAS Registry Number:	

116-06-3



OPP Chemical Code:	

098301



Case Number:	

0140



Technical Registrant:	

Bayer CropSciences

Degradates:	

Aldicarb sulfoxide:  2-Methyl-2-(methylsulfinyl)propionaldehyde
O-(methyl carbamoyl) oxime, and Aldicarb sulfone: 
2-Methyl-2-(methylsulfonyl)propionaldehyde O-(methyl carbamoyl) oxime 



The regulated residues are the combined residues of aldicarb and its two
cholinesterase-inhibiting metabolites, aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb
sulfone.  Aldicarb sulfoxide is considered to have similar potency to
the parent in terms of toxicity, while aldicarb sulfone is less potent. 
Aldicarb and the sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites are the residues of
concern in both the tolerance expression and the reregistration
decision.

	Aldicarb is registered for use as a systemic insecticide and nematicide
on agricultural crops.  Aldicarb is absorbed by the root system, and is
subsequently translocated throughout the plant.  Aldicarb is a
restricted use pesticide and there are no aldicarb products intended for
sale to homeowners or for use in residential settings.  Aldicarb is
currently sold in the United States by Bayer CropScience, the basic
producer, under the trade name of Temik®. 

Regulatory History  TC "B. Regulatory History " \f C \l "2"  

	Aldicarb was first registered in 1970.  Marketing of aldicarb was
stopped in Long Island in 1980 due to high levels of aldicarb degradates
found in ground water there.  In 1981, aldicarb was classified as a
restricted use pesticide and in 1984 was placed under Special Review. 
Aldicarb is currently under Special Review because of concerns regarding
ground water contamination.  Position Documents (PD’s) 1 and 2/3 were
published on 7/11/84 (49 FR 28320) and 6/29/88 (53 FR 24630),
respectively.  A Special Review Data Call-In-Notice (DCI) was issued
6/3/89 requiring the registrant to submit additional ground water data. 
In addition, because a National Food Survey identified discrepancies
between anticipated residues in foods and actual residues from food
survey samples, the Special Review required a variety of studies related
to use on potatoes and citrus crops.  In 1990, the sale of aldicarb on
potatoes was voluntarily suspended due to detection of
tolerance-exceeding aldicarb residues on individual potatoes.  The
registrant agreed to dietary risk reduction actions involving voluntary
cancellation of use on bananas and registration amendments for uses on
potatoes, sweet potatoes, oranges and grapefruit.  The registrant
subsequently submitted extensive field residue and commercial storage
and processing data showing that more controlled application techniques
would ensure residues below the established tolerance and would not pose
any increased dietary risk.  The use on potatoes was re-instated in the
states of FL, ID, WA and OR, after new application methods demonstrated
significantly lower residues in potatoes.  Although dietary risk
concerns relating to use on potatoes have been resolved, aldicarb
remains in EPA's Special Review process because of concerns about risks
of ground water contamination.  In 1998,  the Agency issued a proposal
as part of Special Review to manage risks due to ground water concerns
through national measures consisting of the prohibition of aldicarb use
within 300 feet of a drinking water well, and geographically specific
measures consisting of the requirement for State Management Plans.  The
Agency will begin the process to close out the Special Review of
aldicarb in the near future.

	C. Use and Usage Profile  TC "C. Use and Usage Profile " \f C \l "2"  

The following is information on the currently registered uses of
aldicarb.  Sections IV and V include information on those currently
registered uses which are eligible for reregistration and Appendix A
provides a detailed table of those uses which are eligible for
reregistration.  

 Type of Pesticide:	Aldicarb is a systemic insecticide, acaricide and
nematicide used to control the following pests:  a number of nematode
species (suppression); leaf phylloxera; bud moth;; aphids; mites; white
flies; thrips; fleahoppers, leafminers; leafhoppers; overwintering boll
weevil; lygus; cotton leaf perforator; seedcorn maggot; Mexican bean
beetle; flea beetles; Colorado potato beetle; greenbug; chinch bug;
three cornered alfalfa hopper (suppression); and sugar beet root maggot.





Formulations:	Aldicarb is formulated and marketed solely as a granular
pesticide under the trade name Temik®.  The granulars (5, 10 and 15%
a.i.) consist of aldicarb adhered to a corn cob grit or gypsum
substrate, which are formulated to produce less dust than typical clay
substrates used for granular pesticides.  The gypsum granular is
available in closed loading systems.  



Methods of Application:	End-use products containing aldicarb are
restricted use and can only be applied by a certified applicator. 
Typically, aldicarb is applied early in the growing season, either
pre-plant, at-planting, or early post-emergent, using ground application
equipment.  Positive displacement application equipment and immediate
soil incorporation are required.  Aldicarb is also applied as a
split-season use to peanuts.  It is applied as a broadcast (at-pegging)
to the canopy of the peanut plant for nematode control.  



Use Sites:	No aldicarb products are intended for sale to homeowners or
for use by professional applicators in residential environments. 
Aldicarb is currently registered for use on agricultural crops including
citrus, cotton, dry beans, peanuts, pecans, potatoes, sorghum, soybeans,
sugar beets, sugarcane, sweet potatoes, and seed alfalfa (CA).  In
addition, aldicarb may be applied to field grown ornamentals (CA),
tobacco, and on coffee grown in Puerto Rico.  



Application Rates:	The maximum application rates range from 1.05 pounds
(lbs) active ingredient (ai) per acre (A) for sorghum to 10.05 lbs ai/A
for pecans.



Estimated Usage:	Approximately 4.5 million pounds of  aldicarb  are used
annually.  Aldicarb is used mostly on cotton (approximately 64% of total
aldicarb use).  Other high use crops include peanuts, potatoes, sugar
beets, and citrus.



	D. Tolerances  TC "D. Tolerances" \f C \l "2"  

Tolerances for aldicarb are expressed in terms of the combined residues
of aldicarb and its cholinesterase-inhibiting metabolites aldicarb
sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone in plant, livestock, and processed food
and feed commodities [40 CFR §180.269, §185.150 (a), and §186.150]. 
Section IV includes a summary of the tolerance reassessment decision for
aldicarb and lists those tolerances the Agency will propose to revoke,
decrease, increase, maintain, reassign, and establish.

III.  Aldicarb Human Health and Environmental Fate and Effects Risk
Assessments  TC "III. Aldicarb Human Health and Environmental Fate and
Effects Risk Assessments " \f C \l "1"  

Human health effects and environmental fate and effects risk assessments
have been performed for aldicarb.  These assessments demonstrate
potential human health risks of concern for ground water contamination
in the southeastern coastal plains resulting from the use on peanuts,
and environmental risks of concern to both terrestrial and aquatic
organisms resulting from all uses of aldicarb.  A summary of potential
risk concerns are presented below.  For additional information and the
risk assessments in their entirety, please refer to the revised human
health and environmental fate and effects risk assessments for aldicarb,
dated February 26, 2007, and November 30, 2005, respectively.  These
documents are also available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163
located on-line at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov" 
http://www.regulations.gov .

Human Health  TC "A. Human Health " \f C \l "2"  

	As discussed in Section 5.2 of the human health risk assessment (found
at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov./" 
http://www.regulations.gov./ ), there are risk estimates that exceed
EPA’s level of concern from aggregate dietary exposure to residents
living in the U.S. southeastern coastal plain who consume water from
rural ground water wells.

	Four drinking water (from ground water sources) concentration scenarios
were modeled for aldicarb:  three ground water scenarios for use on
peanuts/cotton in Georgia with an assumption of a 300 ft., 500 ft., and
1000 ft. setback, as well as an additional scenario in Florida for
aldicarb use on citrus with a 1000 ft. setback.  The estimated risks at
the 99.9th percentile are below the Agency’s level of concern for all
four scenarios, and for all population subgroups except for infants
under the Georgia 300ft. scenario (139% - 147% of the acute population
adjusted dose (aPAD)).  For all other scenarios, risk are not of concern
to the Agency.

Environmental Fate and Effects  TC "B. Environmental Fate and Effects "
\f C \l "2"  

There are multiple lines of evidence, including studies in the open
literature and registrant submitted data, clearly demonstrating that
aldicarb is very highly toxic to both aquatic and terrestrial non-target
organisms (e.g., a single granule of TEMIK® 15G can kill a small bird).
 However, the degree to which there is exposure to aldicarb or its
degradates in the terrestrial and aquatic environments is much more
uncertain.  This is due in part to the physical properties (e.g., color,
size, and solubility) of the aldicarb granule, the variety of
application techniques, amounts applied, number of applications,
application intervals, and timing of applications.  Typically, the
aldicarb granules are spread on the surface and incorporated into the
soil by “shanking in”, “working into the soil”, “covering with
soil”, and/or “wetting in”.  Applications directly “in-furrow”
are also performed for some crops (e.g., sweet potato), but may be
followed by later applications that are less effectively
soil-incorporated.  The ecological risk assessment was conducted
assuming that the aldicarb granules are incorporated into the soil with
efficiencies ranging from 85 to 99 percent, leaving just 1 to 15 percent
of the applied granules on the soil surface available to terrestrial
organisms or to runoff to surface water (resulting in exposure to
aquatic organisms).  Certain application techniques, specifically,
in-furrow applications and banded applications that utilize
state-of-the-art methods (such as positive displacement and immediate
soil incorporation), may theoretically result in incorporation
efficiencies of 99 percent.  Other types of applications may result in
incorporation efficiencies closer to 85 percent.  Because of this
uncertainty, both scenarios were addressed in the ecological risk
assessment.  In addition to this, risk quotients were calculated for
both maximum labeled rates and typical application rates, showing the
range of expected outcomes.

There are two aldicarb degradates of concern, aldicarb sulfoxide and
aldicarb sulfone, that are also considered in the assessment.  These
degradates appear to form primarily in the shallow subsurface (although
some may also form within plant tissue) and are potentially more mobile
and persistent than the parent.  As a conservative assumption, all three
forms (parent aldicarb, sulfoxide, and sulfone) are considered as a
single constituent for aquatic exposure estimates because of the longer
degradate half-lives.  Parent only is considered for terrestrial
exposure because of its higher toxicity to animals, the likelihood that
most exposure would be to whole granules, and because only small amounts
of the degradates, relative to the parent, are expected to be present
directly on the surface.

Given the methods of application of the aldicarb granule (i.e., ground
application and incorporation into the soil), its high water solubility,
low vapor pressure, and low bioaccumulation potential, terrestrial
exposure to aldicarb is primarily confined to the treated field. 
Off-site terrestrial exposure to aldicarb would be limited to cases
where, 1) a granule is re-deposited to lower-lying areas affected by
aldicarb runoff from nearby fields, or 2) a granule in the gut or on a
prey item such as a small bird or mammal is consumed by a predator.  The
series of events that would need to transpire in order to result in
off-site exposure are considered unlikely.

Summarizing the risk to terrestrial organisms, the acute risk level of
concern for birds and mammals is exceeded for all target crops at both
maximum allowed label rates and typical use rates.  The levels of
concern are consistently exceeded by a factor of greater than 100X and
are frequently exceeded by more than 1000X.  These results consider both
85 and 99 percent incorporation efficiencies.  The granules left exposed
on the surface appear to be the main source of exposure, but other
sources such as residues taken up by plants and soil invertebrates
(e.g., earthworms) may also serve as a means of exposure.

The following tables (Table 1 and Table 2) provide risk quotients that
were calculated based on maximum labeled application rates and the
average or typical application rates taken from the Biological and
Economic Analysis Division’s Quantitative Usage Analysis dated August
9, 2004, as well as label-indicated band widths and row spacing. 
Granule incorporation efficiency was set at 85 percent (Table 1) or 99
percent incorporation (Table 2).  Based on this information, it is
evident that risk levels of concern are exceeded even at rates that are
less than the application rates allowed by the product labels and at
granule incorporation efficiencies approaching 100 percent. 

Table 1.  Ranges of acute risk quotients for small, medium, and large
birds and mammals exposed to maximum label rate and typical application
rates at 85% incorporation efficiency.  TC "Table 1.  Ranges of Acute
Avian and Mammalian Risk Quotients" \f E \l "1"  

Crop

(max. rate/typical rate in lbs ai/acre)	Maximum Rate

Avian RQs	Typical Rate

Avian RQs	Maximum Rate

Mammalian RQs	Typical Rate

Mammalian RQs

Citrus (4.95/3.7)	9 - 771	6 - 577	11 – 261	8 - 195

Cotton (4.05/0.6)	71 - 6396	11 - 948	93 – 2161	14 - 320

Dry Beans (2.1/1.0)	29 – 2620	13 - 1248	38 – 885	18 - 422

Peanuts (3.0/0.9)	31 - 2807	9 - 842	41 - 948	12 - 285

Pecans (10.05/3.1)	17 – 1566	5 - 483	23 – 529	7 - 163

Potatoes (3.0/2.7)	33 – 2963	30 - 2667	43 – 1001	39 - 901

Soybeans (3.0/0.7)	26 – 2339	6 - 546	34 – 790	8 - 184

Sugar beets (4.95/1.8)	32 – 2831	11 - 972	41 – 956	14 - 328

Alfalfa (3.0/NA)	5 - 451	not available	7 - 158	not available

Coffee (4.4/NA)1	246 – 22,110	not available	332 - 7738	not available

Sugarcane (3.0/NA)	50 – 4512	not available	68 – 1579	not available

Tobacco (3.0/NA)	20 – 1805	not available	27 – 632	not available

Ornamental (5.0/NA)	0.6 - 52	not available	0.8 – 18	not available

1 No incorporation assumed based on product label directions.

Table 2.  Ranges of acute risk quotients for small, medium, and large
birds and mammals exposed to maximum label rate and typical application
rates at 99% incorporation efficiency.  TC "Table 2.  Ranges of Acute
Avian and Mammalian Risk Quotients" \f E \l "1"  

Crop

(max. rate/typical rate in lbs ai/acre)	Maximum Rate

Avian RQs	Typical Rate

Avian RQs	Maximum Rate

Mammalian RQs	Typical Rate

Mammalian RQs

Citrus (4.95/3.7)	0.6 - 52	0.4 - 39	0.8 – 17	0.6 - 13

Cotton (4.05/0.6)	5 – 428	0.7 - 63	6 - 145	0.9 - 21

Dry Beans (2.1/1.0)	2 – 175	0.9 - 84	3 - 59	1 - 28

Sorghum (1.05/0.4)	2 - 193	0.8 - 73	3 - 65	1 - 25

Peanuts (3.0/0.9)	2 - 188	0.6 - 56	2.7 - 64	0.8 - 19

Pecans (10.05/3.1)	1 – 105	0.4 - 32	2 – 35	0.5 - 11

Potatoes (3.0/2.7)	2 – 198	2 - 179	3 – 67	3 - 60

Soybeans (3.0/0.7)	2 - 157	0.4 - 37	2 - 53	0.5 - 12

Sugar beets (4.95/1.8)	2 – 190	0.7 - 65	3 - 64	0.9 - 22

Sweet potatoes (3.0/1.4)	1 – 125	0.7 - 58	2 – 42	0.8 - 20

Ornamental (5.0/NA)	0.6 - 52	not available	0.8 – 18	not available



The potential for mortality to birds has been an area of initial focus,
given aldicarb’s mode of action and very high acute toxicity.  Chronic
risk to birds has not yet been quantitatively assessed.  However, based
on inference from mammalian data, which involved comparing magnitudes of
LD50s between the mallard duck (1.0 mg/kg-bw) and rat (0.9 mg/kg-bw) and
then using this information together with the chronic information
available for the laboratory rat (reproductive NOAEL = 0.7 – 0.9
mg/kg-bw), the Agency expects that birds (as well as mammals) that
survive acute exposure to aldicarb may suffer adverse reproductive
(chronic) effects.  The Agency is requesting additional data to confirm
this hypothesis.

While there are some exceedences of acute levels of concern for aquatic
species, risk from chronic exposure to aldicarb and its degradates
appears to be more significant.  The chronic level of concern is
exceeded for several uses at maximum application rates and 99 percent
incorporation efficiency for freshwater fish and invertebrates, as well
as for estuarine/marine fish and invertebrates.  However, under typical
application rates, these risks for the most part are mitigated.  In
addition to risk based on exposure estimates from aquatic exposure
modeling, there were also exceedences of the Agency levels of concern
based on EECs derived from monitoring data.

There have been 29 incidents related to aldicarb reported in the
Environmental Incident Information System database (reported to the
Agency from 1988 to 2005).  Of these 29 incidents, 16 were from misuse,
11 were of undetermined use, and 2 were registered agricultural uses. 
Approximately 17 of the 29 incidents reported included bird kills. 
Fourteen bird kill incidents were from intentional misuse, and 3 were of
undetermined use.  Eight of these incidents also resulted in mammal
kills (all misuse or undetermined use).

When evaluating incident data, it is important to note that currently,
no systematic or reliable mechanism exists for the accurate monitoring
and reporting of wildlife kill incidents to the Agency.  Moreover,
before a pesticide incident can be reported or investigated, the dead
animals must first be found.  In the absence of monitoring following
pesticide applications, kills are not likely to be noticed in
agro-environments which are generally away form human activity.  It is
likely that poisoned birds may fly from the use sites, succumbing
outside of the area or scavengers may remove carcasses before they can
be observed, significantly reducing the chance  of detection. 

IV. Risk Management, Reregistration, and Tolerance Reassessment
Decisions  TC "IV. Risk Management, Reregistration Decision, and
Tolerance Reassessment Decisions" \f C \l "1"  

	A. Determination of Reregistration Eligibility  TC "A. Determination of
Reregistration Eligibility" \f C \l "2"  

	Section 4(g)(2)(A) of FIFRA calls for the Agency to determine, after
submission of relevant data concerning an active ingredient, whether or
not products containing the active ingredient are eligible for
reregistration.  The Agency has previously identified and required the
submission of the generic (technical grade) data required to support
reregistration of products containing aldicarb as an active ingredient. 
The Agency has completed its review of these generic data, and has
determined that the data are sufficient to support reregistration of all
products containing aldicarb provided the registrations are amended in a
manner consistent with this document.

	The Agency has completed its review of submitted data and its
assessment of the dietary (both food and drinking water), occupational,
and ecological risks associated with the use of pesticide products
containing the active ingredient aldicarb.  Based on these data and
public comments received on the Agency's assessments for the active
ingredient aldicarb, the Agency has sufficient information on the human
health and ecological effects of aldicarb to make a decision as part of
the tolerance reassessment process under FFDCA and reregistration
process under FIFRA, as amended by FQPA.  

	Based on its evaluation of aldicarb, the Agency has determined that
products containing the active ingredient aldicarb, unless labeled and
used as specified in this document, would present risks inconsistent
with FIFRA and FFDCA.  Accordingly, should a registrant fail to
implement any of the risk mitigation measures identified in this
document, the Agency may take appropriate regulatory action to address
the risk concerns from the use of aldicarb.  If all changes outlined in
this document are incorporated into the product labels, then all current
risks for aldicarb will be adequately addressed for the purposes of this
determination under FIFRA.  Once a comprehensive endangered species
assessment is completed, further changes to these registrations may be
necessary as explained in Section IV.D.4 of this document below.

	B. Public Comments and Responses  TC "B. Public Comments and Responses"
\f C \l "2"  

	Through the Agency's public participation process, EPA worked with
stakeholders and the public to reach these regulatory decisions for
aldicarb.  The Phase 3 public comment period on the risk assessments,
opened on May 17, 2006, and the Phase 5 public comment period on the
risk assessments and solicitation for additional input to use/usage
opened on November 14, 2006.  The Agency received comments from several
stakeholders (including stakeholders from public interest groups), and
the technical registrant, Bayer CropScience.  A complete listing of
these comments can be found at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.regulations.gov./"  http://www.regulations.gov./ 

These comments were reviewed and taken into consideration in preparing
the revised risk assessments and their supporting documents, including
this aldicarb RED.  The comments are available in their entirety in the
public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 located on-line at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.regulations.gov./"  http://www.regulations.gov./ .  The
Agency's responses to substantive comments are available in memoranda in
the public docket and the revised assessments available in the public
docket reflect these responses.

	C. Regulatory Position  TC "C. Regulatory Position" \f C \l "2"  

		1. Food Quality Protection Act Findings  TC "1. Food Quality
Protection Act Findings" \f C \l "3"  

a. “Risk Cup” Determination  TC "a. \"Risk Cup\" Determination" \f C
\l "4"  

	As part of the FQPA tolerance reassessment process, EPA assessed the
risks associated with aldicarb.  The Agency has concluded that, with the
risk mitigation measures outlined in this document, the aggregate risk
from food and drinking water exposures to aldicarb is within its own
“risk cup.”  The Agency has determined that the human health risks
from these combined exposures are within acceptable levels and that,
considering every issue other than the cumulative impacts of exposure to
other n-methyl carbamate pesticides,  the established tolerances for
aldicarb, with label amendments and changes as specified in this
document, meet the safety standards under the FQPA amendments to Section
408(b)(2)(C) and 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA.  In reaching these
determinations, EPA has considered the available information on the
special sensitivity of infants and children.

b. Determination of Safety to U.S. Population (Including Infants and
Children)  TC "b. Determination of Safety to U.S. Population (Including
Infants and Children)" \f C \l "4"  

	The Agency has determined that there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result to the general U.S. population, infants, children, or
other major identifiable subgroups of consumers, from the use of
aldicarb.  The safety determination considers factors such as the
toxicity, use practices and exposure scenarios, and environmental
behavior of aldicarb.  In determining whether or not infants and
children are particularly susceptible to toxic effects from exposure to
residues of aldicarb, the Agency considered the completeness of the
hazard database for developmental and reproductive effects, the nature
of the effects observed, and other information. 

The Agency determined it was necessary to retain a 2X FQPA database
uncertainty factor for aldicarb residues in the dietary human health
risk assessment because magnitude of the brain cholinesterase inhibition
was approximately 2-fold greater in the young rat compared to the adult
rat at similar acute doses.  For specific information relating to the
Agency’s decision on the FQPA factor, refer to section 3.4 in the
February 26, 2007 Human Health Revised Risk Assessment found at  
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov./"  http://www.regulations.gov./ 

			c. Endocrine Disruptor Effects  TC "c. Endocrine Disruptor Effects"
\f C \l "4"  

EPA is required under the FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, to develop a
screening program to determine whether certain substances (including all
pesticide active and other ingredients) “may have an effect in humans
that is similar to an effect produced by a naturally occurring estrogen,
or other such endocrine effects as the Administrator may designate.” 
Following the recommendations of its Endocrine Disruptor Screening and
Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC), EPA determined that there were
scientific bases for including, as part of the program, androgen and
thyroid hormone systems, in addition to the estrogen hormone system. 
EPA also adopted EDSTAC’s recommendation that the Program include
evaluations of potential effects in wildlife.  When the appropriate
screening and/or testing protocols being considered under the Agency’s
Endocrine Disrupter Screening Program (EDSP) have been developed and
vetted, aldicarb may be subjected to additional screening and/or testing
to better characterize possible effects related to endocrine disruption.

			d. Cumulative Risks  TC "d. Cumulative Risks" \f C \l "4"  

	FFDCA Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) requires that the Agency consider
“available information” concerning cumulative effects of a
particular pesticides residues and “other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity” when considering whether to establish,
modify, or revoke a tolerance for pesticide residues in food.  EPA
considers cumulative effects from pesticides and other substances
because low-level exposures to multiple chemical substances causing a
common effect by a common mechanism could lead to the same adverse
health effect as would a higher level of exposure to each individual
substance.  

Aldicarb is a member of the N-methyl carbamate class of pesticides,
which share a common mechanism of toxicity by affecting the nervous
system via cholinesterase inhibition.  A cumulative risk assessment,
which evaluates exposures based on a common mechanism of toxicity, was
conducted to evaluate risk from food, drinking water, residential use,
and other non-occupational exposures resulting from registered uses of
N-methyl carbamate pesticides, including aldicarb.  EPA has concluded
that the cumulative risks associated with the N-methyl carbamate
pesticides are below the Agency’s level of concern.  For additional
information, refer to the document, Revised N-methyl Carbamate
Cumulative Risk Assessment, which is available in the EPA docket
EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0935 and on the website,   HYPERLINK
"http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/" 
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/ .

		2. Tolerance Summary  TC "2. Tolerance Summary" \f C \l "3"  

	The tolerance summary and tolerance reassessment decision is presented
for aldicarb in Table 3 below.  Currently there are forty tolerances
listed in 40 CFR §180.269,  40 CFR §185.150, and 40 CFR §186.150 for
residues of aldicarb on raw and agricultural commodities and livestock
commodities.

The available aldicarb residue chemistry data are considered adequate to
reassess most tolerances.  The Agency will propose establishing a citrus
fruit crop group tolerance of 0.3 ppm.  

Some commodities with established tolerances must be revised to reflect
the correct commodity definition.  Additional data are needed to
determine appropriate tolerances for residues in/on cottonseed and
cotton gin by-products.  

The established tolerance for residues in peanut hulls should be revoked
since this raw agricultural commodity is no longer considered to be
significant livestock feed items (OPPTS Series 860.1000, Table 1, 8/96).
 The Agency recommends classification of residues in livestock
commodities under 40 CFR §180.6(a)(3); therefore, tolerances for
residues in livestock commodities should be revoked.  

Table 3. Tolerance Reassessment Summary for Aldicarb and Aldicarb
Sulfone and Aldicarb Sulfoxide.  TC "Table 3.  Tolerance Reassessment
Summary for Aldicarb and Aldicarb Sulfone and Aldicarb Sulfoxide " \f E
\l "1"  

Commodity	Current Tolerance

(ppm)	Tolerance

Reassessment (ppm)	Comment/

[Correct Commodity Definition]

Tolerances Listed Under 40 CFR 180.269:

Barley, hay	-	3.0	Rotational crop tolerances recommended by HED.

Barley, grain	-	0.02

	Barley, straw	-	0.1

	Beans (dry)	0.1	0.1	[bean, dry, seed]

Beets, sugar	0.05	0.05	[beet, sugar, roots]

Beets, sugar, tops	1	1	[beet, sugar, tops]

Cattle, fat	0.01	Revoke	There is no reasonable expectation of finite
residues.

Cattle, mbyp	0.01



Cattle, meat	0.01



Coffee beans	0.1	0.1	[coffee, green bean, import tolerance only]

Cottonseed	0.1	0.1	[cotton, undelinted seed]

Goats, fat	0.01	Revoke	There is no reasonable expectation of finite
residues.

Goats, mbyp	0.01



Goats, meat	0.01



Grapefruits	0.3	0.3	The registrant has proposed a crop group tolerance
of 0.3 ppm for fruit, citrus, group.

Lemons	0.3	0.3

	Limes	0.3	0.3

	Oranges	0.3	0.3

	Hogs, fat	0.01	Revoke	There is no reasonable expectation of finite
residues.

Hogs, mbyp	0.01



Hogs, meat	0.01



Horses, fat	0.01



Horses, mbyp	0.01



Horses, meat	0.01



Milk	0.002



Peanut	0.05	0.05

	Peanut, hulls	0.5	Revoke	Peanut hulls are not considered to be a
significant livestock feed item.

Pecan	0.5	Revoke	Revoke

Potato	1	0.2	The available data reflecting the supported use pattern
indicate the established tolerance should be reduced.

Sheep, fat	0.01	Revoke	There is no reasonable expectation of finite
residues.

Sheep, mbyp	0.01



Sheep, meat	0.01



Sorghum, stover (fodder)	0.5	Revoke

	Sorghum, grain	0.2	Revoke

	Soybean	0.02	0.02	soybean, seed 

Sugarcane	0.02	Revoke	[import tolerance only]

Sugarcane, fodder	0.1	Revoke	These commodities are not considered to be 
significant livestock feed items.

Sugarcane, forage	0.1	Revoke

	Sweet potatoes	0.1	0.1	sweet potato, root

Wheat, forage	-	1.0	Rotational crop tolerances recommended by HED.

Wheat, grain	-	0.02

	Wheat, straw	-	0.1

	Wheat, hay	-	3.0

	Required Tolerances to be Listed Under 40 CFR §180.269

Cotton, gin byproducts	--	TBD a

	Tolerances Listed Under 40 CFR §186.150:

Citrus pulp, dried	0.6	Revoke	Commodity covered by the raw agricultural
commodity tolerance.

Cottonseed, hulls	0.3	Revoke	Commodity covered by the raw agricultural
commodity tolerance.

a Data depicting the magnitude of aldicarb residues of concern in cotton
gin byproducts are required in accordance with Table 1 of OPPTS Series
860 Residue Chemistry Test Guidelines, 8/96.

	D. Regulatory Rationale  TC "D. Regulatory Rationale" \f C \l "2"  

	The Agency has determined that products containing the active
ingredient aldicarb are eligible for reregistration provided that the
risk mitigation measures outlined in this document are adopted and label
amendments are made to reflect these measures.  The following is a
summary of the risk mitigation measures and EPA’s rationale for the
decision for managing risks associated with the use of aldicarb.  Where
labeling revisions are warranted, label changes and language are
specified in Section V.

		1. Human Health Risk Management and Mitigation  TC "1. Human Health
Risk Management and Mitigation" \f C \l "3"  

			a. Dietary Risk Mitigation (Drinking Water)  TC "a. Dietary Risk
Mitigation (Food and Drinking Water)" \f C \l "4"  

As discussed in Section 5.2 of the human health risk assessment (found
at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov./" 
http://www.regulations.gov./ ), there are risk estimates that exceed
EPA’s level of concern from aggregate dietary exposure to residents
living in the U.S. southeastern coastal plain who consume water from
rural ground water wells in specific vulnerable areas.

Four ground water scenarios were modeled for aldicarb.  The estimated
risks at the 99.9th percentile are below the Agency’s level of concern
for all four scenarios, and for all population subgroups except for
infants under the Georgia 300 feet peanut scenario.  For all other
scenarios, risk are not of concern to the Agency.

Therefore, in order to mitigate potential drinking water concerns in the
peanut growing regions in the states of Georgia, Alabama, South
Carolina, and Florida, an increased well set-back from 300 to 500 feet
is required for wells not encased to a depth of 100 feet in vulnerable
soils, and a shallow depth to ground water (less than 25 feet). 

	The determination for this buffer was based upon both monitoring data
and modeling.  The Agency utilized the Natural Resource Conservation
Service’s (NRCS) criteria for high leaching potential soils for
Florida and encourages the technical registrant, Bayer CropScience to
use the same criteria when determining vulnerable soils for other
states.  The Agency’s review of “A Retrospective Ground Water
Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and Its Metabolites in the Southeastern
United States; Mississippi Delta; Texas; California; and Pacific
Northwest”, dated July 24, 2007, and found at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.regulations.gov./"  http://www.regulations.gov./  contains
the reference to the NRCS criteria.

b. Aggregate Risk Mitigation

  TC “b. Aggregate Risk Mitigation” \f C \l “4”  

As previously discussed, food and drinking water are below the
Agency’s level of concern with the mitigation for ground water in the
Southeastern states of Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida. 
There are no residential exposures, therefore, no additional mitigation
is needed to address aggregate risk.  Label changes and language
necessary for reregistration are specified in Table 5 in Section V.

 		c. Occupational Risk Mitigation  TC “c. Occupational Risk
Mitigation” \f C \l “4”  

As discussed in Section 10 of the human health risk assessment there are
no risks of concern to workers performing tasks such as mixing, loading,
and applying, based on current labeling.  Moreover, since aldicarb is
applied to soil when little foliage is present, there are no re-entry
risks, given the current Restricted-Entry Intervals (REIs).  Therefore,
no additional mitigation is necessary.

2. Ecological Risk Management and Mitigation  TC “2. Ecological Risk
Management and Mitigation” \f C \l “3”  

As discussed in the environmental fate and effects risk assessment,
ecological risks (direct adverse acute effects) to non-target aquatic
and terrestrial organisms are of concern from the use of aldicarb. 
Additionally, there are chronic risks to aquatic invertebrates
(freshwater and estuarine/marine) and freshwater fish.  Aldicarb is also
a potential ground water, and possibly surface water, contaminant.  The
ecological risk assessments exhibit RQ values which exceed the various
target levels of concern.  Risks are much higher, as evidenced by higher
RQ values, for terrestrial organisms, especially to birds.  In addition
to the mitigation outlined below, the Agency intends to require
additional confirmatory data which are listed in Table 4 of Section V.

Terrestrial and Aquatic Organisms  TC “a. Terrestrial and Aquatic
Organisms ” \f C \l “4”  

Terrestrial

The Agency’s assessment suggests the potential for acute effects to
terrestrial organisms for all application scenarios.  Aldicarb is highly
toxic to birds, mammals, honeybees, and earthworms; however, due to
aldicarb’s granular formulation and, in most cases, immediate
incorporation into the soil, risks from exposure (undissolved granules
left on the surface) to birds and mammals are lessened.  In summary, the
Agency is concerned with all use patterns for acute effects to birds and
mammals.  As appropriate under FIFRA, the Agency has weighed the
potential risk with the expected benefits of continued use.  These
conclusions are presented below.

Aquatic

The Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse
effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.  Adverse effects include
reduced survival and reduced reproduction when exposed to aldicarb
and/or its metabolites (aldicarb sulfoxide, aldicarb sulfone) as a
result of labeled use.  Aquatic plants are also subject to adverse
effects (reduced survival) when exposed to aldicarb and/or its
metabolites (aldicarb sulfoxide, aldicarb sulfone) as a result of
labeled use. 

For potential risk to aquatic species, the chronic level of concern is
exceeded for several uses at maximum application rates and 99 percent
incorporation efficiency for freshwater fish and invertebrates, as well
as for estuarine/marine fish and invertebrates.  However, under typical
application rates, these risks for the most part are mitigated.  Direct
application of aldicarb to streams, lakes, and ponds is forbidden by
product labels; however, following a rain event, aldicarb may reach
aquatic environments from areas of application in sheet and channel-flow
runoff, because aldicarb is moderately persistent in terrestrial
environments and soluble in water.  It is unlikely that aquatic
organisms will be directly exposed to granules, both because of the
highly soluble nature of the compound (whole granules will dissolve
rather than be transported intact) and because of the application
methods (directly onto field).  Aquatic organisms could also be exposed
to aldicarb residues and degradates from ground water that is
subsequently discharged into a surface water body.

	3.  Mitigation Summary and Crop-Specific Analyses  TC “3. Mitigation
Summary and Crop-Specific Analyses ” \f C \l “3”  

The Agency has worked with the technical registrant, Bayer CropScience,
to reduce potential exposure of aldicarb to wildlife and aquatic life. 
Subsequently, Bayer has agreed to voluntarily cancel all current
registrations on the following crops:  

Coffee

Ornamentals

Pecans

Sugarcane

Sorghum 

Tobacco

Alfalfa grown for seed

These proposals for cancellation will be announced in the Federal
Register (FR).  A subsequent FR Notice will finalize the cancellation
absent significant comment to change the Agency’s position.  As part
of the Agency’s mitigation plan, labels will be amended shortly to
remove these uses.

To further reduce ecological concerns, the Agency has determined that
the label changes (as specified in Table 5 in Section V), as agreed upon
by the technical registrant Bayer CropScience, and discussed with
stakeholders for specific scenarios and crops, are appropriate and
required for reregistration eligibility.  Listed below are the specific
crop use sites/patterns for aldicarb along with corresponding RQs of
concern for birds and mammals, stakeholder input on use,
alternatives/benefits, mitigation, and EPA’s decision regarding
reregistration eligibility.  As a general matter, the Agency has
determined that although there is potential for harm to wildlife because
of use of aldicarb, that harm will generally be limited in time and
space.  The Agency also determined that these risks are often outweighed
by the benefits expected from use of aldicarb instead of existing
alternatives.  The Agency was also mindful in this analysis that
aldicarb does not pose risks of concerns to pesticide applicators or to
farm workers generally.  

  

Citrus  TC “Citrus ” \f C \l “4”  

Current Use Pattern

	Aldicarb is used on citrus in Florida and Texas only.  Application
currently consists of a side-dress application and is usually applied
along the side of the tree row in furrow and immediately covered with
soil.  The maximum application rate for use on citrus is currently 4.95
lbs ai/A.  Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied to citrus (2
inches in depth), the Agency has assumed that 85% of the aldicarb
applied is covered with soil, and that 15% may remain on the surface for
potential terrestrial organism exposure. 

	Because of acute toxicity and ground water contamination concerns,
anyone who applies aldicarb in Florida is required to obtain a permit
from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for
each application to be made.  This permitting process involves the
collaborative efforts of the registrant, state officials and growers to
ensure that every application of aldicarb is permitted and recorded. 
For additional information on the aldicarb permitting system in
Florida’s State Division of Agricultural Environmental Services,
please see   HYPERLINK "http://www.flaes.org/temik/" 
http://www.flaes.org/temik/ .

Risks of Concern Assuming 85% Soil Incorporation

RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 9 to 771.  RQs
modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 6 to 577. 
RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 11 to 261.  RQs
modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 8 to 195. 
Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also
suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and
fish.  

	Stakeholder Involvement/Input on Citrus

During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition
to the written comments received from respondents as listed in section
IV. B. above, the Agency met with and received comments from Bayer
CropScience, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
(FDACS), Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association (FFVA), USDA, and many
other interested stakeholders with specific knowledge relating to
aldicarb use on citrus.  These stakeholders have provided additional
information regarding aldicarb usage (application methods and rates) and
the use of aldicarb in citrus production.  In particular, these
stakeholders noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant growth,
resulting in increased yields when used on citrus. Subsequent meetings,
site visits and teleconference calls with Bayer, FDACS, and FFVA have
led to the Agency’s understanding of the aldicarb permitting process
in Florida.  

Alternatives and Benefits

	  Aldicarb is a recommended insecticide for mites, the Asian Citrus
Psyllid (AsCP), and nematode control.  Citrus greening is a severe
vascular disease transmitted by the Asian citrus psyllid.  The psyllid
is a relatively new pest that now ranges throughout all the citrus
producing areas in Florida and Texas.  Greening is a disease that slowly
weakens and kills all types of citrus trees, and causes fruit to become
lopsided and taste bitter.  No cure exists for a tree that contracts the
disease.  As of 2006, greening had been found in more than 440 different
locations in at least 11 Florida counties.  Although the AsCP has been
found in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, citrus greening has not been
found there at this time.

	There are several alternatives to aldicarb for control of mites, but
there appears to be no feasible alternative to aldicarb for nematode
control.  Estimated yield losses in Florida without aldicarb are 5 to 10
percent, which corresponds to an annual loss of about $4.6 to $9.3
million for oranges and grapefruit combined.  There are no alternatives
for control of AsCP, the vector for citrus greening. 

	For nematode control specifically, aldicarb is used to control the
citrus and burrowing nematodes although it does not effectively control
the burrowing nematode as aldicarb only remains in the shallow part of
the root zone.  Other nematodes with limited economic importance in
Florida are the sting nematode and lesion nematode.  

	EPA’s analysis concludes that the absence of aldicarb for use on
citrus acreage for controlling both nematodes and other insects can
result in yield losses of 5 to 10 percent.  Therefore, the cost to
growers will be quite high.  A 5 to 10 percent yield loss to the
“average” grower in Florida corresponds to a $97 to $193 in lost
revenue per acre.  For the grapefruit grower, a 5 to 10 percent yield
loss corresponds to a loss in revenue of $109 to $218 per acre.  If the
loss to nematodes increased over time, as nematode populations increase,
these losses may get worse.  The 2000/2001 – 2004/2005 value of orange
production in Florida was about $1.1 billion and the value of grapefruit
production was approximately $209 million.  A 10 percent reduction on
the 7 percent of acreage treated with aldicarb would result in a loss of
approximately $3.9 to $7.8 million annually to Florida orange growers,
and $0.7 to $1.5 million to Florida grapefruit growers.

	

For additional information, refer to the Agency’s complete
alternative/quantitative impact memo for citrus and the BEAD response to
Phase 3 comments for citrus, cotton and pecans which are available in
the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163  and located on-line at  
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/"  http://www.regulations.gov/ . 

	Mitigation 

	To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency, in agreement with the
technical registrant of aldicarb, has developed several mitigation
measures to help address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

Label clarifications to specify application of granules in 3 to 6
furrows beside individual trees, that are 2 inches deep and spaced on
approximately 12 inch centers, immediately covering with soil.

Label modifications to help reduce the amount of aldicarb left on the
surface of the soil making it less available for the wildlife
potentially at risk.  For specific label language, please refer to Table
5 in Section V.

EPA Decision

Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals
and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of
aldicarb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how
aldicarb is soil incorporated, actual exposure of potentially affected
populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overestimated. 
Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the
treated fields where wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that
are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. 
Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is
expected to be limited.  The Agency recognizes, however, that actual
exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.    

Additionally, the Agency also acknowledges that, although risks were
calculated assuming 85% soil incorporation, actual aldicarb granules
available on or just under the soil’s surface for potential
consumption by birds or mammals is unlikely, given the methods of
application including positive displacement (mechanized placement of
granules beneath the soil) and lock-and-load containers which minimize
potential spillage of product.    

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on
citrus and, as quantified above, losing its use would involve additional
costs to growers.  Aldicarb has advantages to citrus growers for which
EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management,
confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected
infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full range of
pests and duration of control.  

	Aldicarb provides control against insects, including nematodes, in
portions of citrus production areas.  Because of its long residual
activity, in many cases growers can apply one treatment of aldicarb,
rather than multiple treatments of other chemicals for equivalent insect
control.  Also, potential worker risks from multiple foliar applications
of these alternative products are not insignificant.  Therefore, the use
on citrus is eligible for reregistration.

Cotton  TC “Cotton ” \f C \l “4”  

	Current Use Pattern

Aldicarb is used on cotton primarily for control of thrips, although it
controls other insect pests.  In addition, there is also evidence of
aldicarb use to control nematodes on cotton.  Aldicarb is applied
at-plant or as a side-dress application.  The at planting application is
administered in the furrow with the cotton seed and immediately covered
with soil.  Greater than 97% of the use on cotton is this at-plant
application.  The side-dress application is usually administered after
the cotton has emerged from the soil and is applied along the side of
the plant row (8 inches from the plants, two or three inches deep) in
furrow and immediately covered with soil.  The maximum application rate
for use on cotton is currently 4.05 lbs ai/A.  Due to the nature of how
aldicarb is applied to cotton (at a depth greater than 2 inches), the
Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with
soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial
organism exposure. 

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation

RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 5 to 428.  RQs
modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.7 to 63. 
RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 6 to 145.  RQs
modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 0.9 to 21. 
Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also
suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and
fish.  

Stakeholder Involvement /Input on Cotton

During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition
to the written comments received from respondents as listed in section
IV. B. above, the Agency met with and received comments from Bayer, the
National Cotton Council of America, Cotton Growers Association, Georgia
Cotton Commission, USDA, as well as many other interested stakeholders
with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on cotton.  In
particular, these stakeholders noted that aldicarb appears to effect
plant growth, resulting in increased yields when used on cotton. 

	Alternatives and Benefits

The Agency acknowledges that the use of aldicarb has benefits to cotton
growers. Although thrips and other insects are targeted, aldicarb is
applied to cotton in Texas and the Southeast to control nematodes as
well.  Based on EPA proprietary data, an annual average of about 1.4
million acre treatments (about 38% of total applications) of aldicarb
have targeted nematodes between 2002 and 2006. The state with the most
acre treatments against nematodes is Georgia, with an annual average of
about 360,000 acres, followed by Texas (about 270,000 acres annually)
and North Carolina (about 200,000 acres annually).  

For thrip control, no one chemical could replace aldicarb, but a
combination of chemicals could be used effectively.  This combination
for insect control was more expensive than aldicarb: the Agency
estimates that chemical costs alone would be about $2 per acre higher in
Mississippi and $22 per acre higher in California.  These chemicals also
do not share the advantages of aldicarb which are a longer period of
effectiveness and control over multiple pests, including nematodes.  If
nematodes are considered a target pest, as they are in Texas and the
Southeast, growers have fewer alternatives to aldicarb.  The best
control for nematodes would be 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D).  The
additional cost for replacing aldicarb with 1,3-D, along with the
combination of chemicals to provide control of thrips is about $38 per
acre.  Of that figure, $36 per acre is based on the chemical cost of
1,3-D.  If it were assumed that these acres were treated with 1,3-D
instead, the additional costs are over $50 million annually.  

For additional information, refer to the Agency’s complete
alternative/quantitative impact memo for cotton which is available in
the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163  and located on-line at  
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/_"  http://www.regulations.gov/ .

Mitigation

To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the
registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help
address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

At-plant application rate will be reduced to a maximum of 1.5 lbs ai/A. 
This equates to a 63% reduction in rate as compared to the current
label.

Side-dress application rate will be reduced to 2.1 lbs ai/A.  This
equates to a 30% reduction as compared to the current label.

Per-season application rate is limited to 3.6 lbs ai/A.  This equates to
a 63% reduction as compared to the current label.

Label specifications to clarify the depth at which aldicarb is applied. 
Additionally, modifications in label language to help reduce the amount
of aldicarb left on the surface of the soil, making it less available
for wildlife potentially at risk.  For specific label language, please
refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision

Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals
and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of
aldicarb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how
aldicarb is soil incorporated, actual exposure of potentially affected
populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overestimated. 
Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the
treated fields where wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that
are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. 
Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is
expected to be limited.  The Agency recognizes, however, that actual
exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.   

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on
cotton and, as specified above, losing its use would involve additional
costs to growers, some of which can be quantified directly.  Aldicarb
has advantages to cotton growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar
values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the level of
control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost effectiveness
when considering the full range of pests and duration of control.  

Aldicarb provides control of insects, including nematodes, in portions
of cotton production areas.  Alternative pesticides, which can be used 
to control insect pests (e.g., thrips), are not effective in controlling
multiple pests.  Aldicarb also provides protection for a longer period
of time than any of the alternatives.  As stated above, because of its
long residual activity, in many cases growers can apply one treatment of
aldicarb, rather than multiple treatments of other chemicals for
equivalent insect control.  Also, potential worker risks from multiple
foliar applications of these alternative products are not insignificant.
 Therefore, the use on cotton is eligible for reregistration.

Dry Bean  TC “Dry Bean ” \f C \l “4”  

	Current Use Pattern

Aldicarb application to dry beans currently consist of an at-plant
application.  The at- planting application is administered in the furrow
with the dry bean seed and immediately covered with soil at a depth
greater than 2 inches.  The maximum application rate for use on dry bean
is currently 2.1 lbs ai/A.  Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied
to dry bean, the Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied
is covered with soil and that only 1% remains on the surface for
potential terrestrial organism exposure. 

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation

RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 175.  RQs
modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.9 to 84. 
RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 3 to 59.  RQs
modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 1 to 28. 
Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also
suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and
fish.  

Stakeholder Involvement/Input for Dry Bean

During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition
to the written comments from respondents as listed in section IV. B.
above, the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer
CropScience, USDA, as well as many other interested stakeholders with
specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on dry bean.  

	Alternatives and Benefits

The Agency understands that aldicarb use on dry bean is of benefit to
dry bean growers in the states of Idaho, Michigan, Oregon and
Washington.  Aldicarb use in dry bean production is a valuable tool for
controlling aphids, leafhoppers, the Mexican bean beetle, and several
species of nematodes.  There are both foliar and seed treatment
alternatives, such as thiamethoxam, but only aldicarb provides season
long control at planting, and growers do not have to spray multiple
times.  In Michigan, aldicarb is also used to control the root-lesion
nematode, which can cause 10% yield reduction and is present in 50% of
the dry bean acreage if left uncontrolled.  On the acreage with
nematodes that is not treated, growers expect lower yields.

As with other crops, the main value of aldicarb as an insecticide is
that a single at-plant treatment will protect the seedling and young
plant for several weeks from attack by nematodes and several insect
pests, some of which are vectors of plant viruses.  Although
alternatives (such as esfenvalerate, dimethoate, propargite, and others)
exist for use against all insect pests controlled by aldicarb, it would
likely take at least two applications of foliar insecticides to provide
the same level of protection afforded by an at-plant aldicarb treatment.
 Where nematodes are also a problem, it would also take a pre-plant
application with a soil fumigant, such as 1,3-D.  While aldicarb
alternatives exist, the Agency believes that the economic impact on dry
bean growers of shifting to such alternatives for nematode control are
likely to be cost prohibitive, in which case the likely result of loss
of aldicarb would be that growers would face a financial penalty from
reduced yield because of nematodes. 

	Mitigation

To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the
registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help
address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

Geographically restricting the use to Idaho, Michigan, Oregon, and
Washington.

Modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of aldicarb
left on the surface of the soil, thereby making it less available for
wildlife potentially at risk.  For the label language modifications,
please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision

Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals
and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of
aldicarb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how
aldicarb is soil incorporated, actual exposure of potentially affected
populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overestimated. 
Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the
treated fields where wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that
are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. 
Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is
expected to be limited.  The Agency recognizes, however, that actual
exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.      

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on dry
bean and that losing its use would involve additional costs to growers. 
Aldicarb has advantages to dry bean growers for which EPA cannot
estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in
the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost
effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of
control.  Therefore, the use on dry bean is eligible for reregistration.
 

Peanut  TC “Peanut ” \f C \l “4”   

	Current Use Pattern

	Aldicarb is applied when peanuts are planted, or can be used as a split
treatment, where aldicarb is applied at-plant and also applied later in
the season when the plants are forming pegs, which develop into peanuts.
 This application is referred to as “at-pegging”.  Aldicarb is
generally used to control nematodes and thrips on peanuts, primarily in
the southern States, as well for the suppression of leafhoppers and
spider mites.  To better understand the potential risk and resulting
mitigation, these two use patterns are discussed in more detail below.

At Planting

Aldicarb is applied to peanuts at planting for protection against thrips
and several species of nematodes (e.g. root-knot, lesion, stubby root,
sting).  For thrips control the granules are applied in the seed furrow
and then covered with soil.  The peanut seed is then planted into the
treated zone.  When used for nematode control, aldicarb granules are
applied in a 6 to 12 inch band over an open furrow and covered with soil
to a depth of 2 to 4 inches.  Due to the nature of how aldicarb is
applied to peanuts at planting (at a depth greater than 2 inches), the
Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with
soil and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial
organism exposure. 

	Risks of Concern for the At-Plant Application Method Assuming 99% Soil
Incorporation

RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 188.  RQs
modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.6 to 56. 
RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 2.7 to 64.  RQs
modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 0.8 to 19. 
Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also
suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and
fish.  

At Pegging

	Aldicarb can also be applied later in the season when the plants are
forming pegs (at-pegging), which develop into peanuts.  In this case,
aldicarb is typically applied at the initiation of pegging, in a 12 to
18 inch band over the peanut row.  Unlike other aldicarb application
practices, soil incorporation does not occur because the plant has
already formed pegs (which develop into peanuts) just under the surface
of the soil.  Attempts to incorporate the granules would damage the
roots of the plants and any pegs that have formed.  Due to the nature of
how aldicarb is applied to peanuts at pegging (without any mechanical
means of soil incorporation), the Agency has assumed that 100% of the
aldicarb applied remains on the surface for potential terrestrial
organism exposure. 

	Risks of Concern for the At-Pegging Application Method 

RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 31 to 2,807.  RQs
modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 9 to 842. 
RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 41 to 948.  RQs
modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 12 to 285. 
Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also
suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and
fish.  

Stakeholder Involvement/Input for Peanuts

During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition
to the written comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above,
the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, the National
Peanut Board, Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association, Florida
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, USDA, and other
interested stakeholders with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use
on peanuts.  

  

Alternatives and Benefits

	For the at-plant use of aldicarb, early season control of nematodes may
be achieved with a pre-plant soil fumigation with 1,3-D; however, it
would require one or more other insecticides (primarily ethoprop) to
address other pests.  Therefore, for the at-plant use of aldicarb, there
are no chemical or non-chemical alternatives that can provide both
insect and nematode control on peanuts during the first month after
plant emergence.  

	For the at-pegging use of aldicarb, multiple treatments of the
alternatives may be required, and none of those alternatives also
control nematodes.  Because of aldicarb’s ability to control both
nematodes and insect pests, alternatives to aldicarb will consist of at
least one insecticide application for thrips control and one nematicide
application in areas where both pests exist. 

	Based upon data reviewed by the Agency, withholding the at-pegging
aldicarb treatment caused a yield decrease of 56%.  Applying this loss
to dollars per acre, it is estimated that without the aldicarb
at-pegging use, revenues would fall from $290 to $227 per acre.

	Another important factor considered by the Agency was that nematode
damage to peanut plants does not stop with yield damage, but also causes
damage to the peanuts that are harvested.  The Agency is aware that,
potentially, this damage could correspond to a discount of about 10
cents per pound.  Therefore, revenue loss from reduced quality could be
as high as losses from reduced yields.

	In conclusion, without aldicarb, costs to growers from the yield losses
due to nematode damage alone are estimated to exceed $15 million a year
in Georgia, and up to $22 million a year nationwide.  It is clear to the
Agency that without the use of aldicarb there would be substantial costs
to growers who are currently using aldicarb approximately 30-45 days
after plant (at-pegging); up to $300 per acre based upon data from field
trials performed in Georgia.  

For additional information, refer to the Agency’s complete
alternative/quantitative impact memo for peanuts which is available in
the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163  and located on-line at  
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/"  http://www.regulations.gov/ . 

Mitigation

	To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the
registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help
address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

For the split-season, at-pegging use of aldicarb, application must be
made late in the afternoon or early evening and immediately followed by
irrigation, and completed within 24 hours which will help dissolve
granules thereby making them unavailable for wildlife.

Label clarifications for post-emergent use:  apply granules in a band 12
to 18 inches wide on the row and into the plant canopy.  Ensure that
plant foliage is dry prior to application.  Dislodge granules from
foliage by suitable means that will not damage the plant.

Label clarifications to ensure that at-planting applications are done
over an open furrow which is 4 to 6 inches in width, known as
“T-band” applications.  

For the specific label language for the application modifications,
please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision

Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals
and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of
aldicarb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how
aldicarb is soil incorporated, actual exposure of potentially affected
populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overestimated. 
Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the
treated fields where wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that
are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. 
Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is
expected to be limited.  The Agency recognizes, however, that actual
exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.      

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on
peanut (both the at-planting and at-pegging use) and that losing its use
would involve additional costs to growers, as quantified above. 
Aldicarb also has advantages to peanut growers for which EPA cannot
estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in
the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost
effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of
control.  Therefore, the use on peanut is eligible for reregistration.

Potato  TC “Potato ” \f C \l “4”  

Current Use Pattern

Aldicarb is currently registered for use on potatoes only in Oregon,
Idaho, Washington, Montana, northern Florida, and parts of Utah and
Nevada.  Aldicarb is used primarily to control green peach aphid,
Colorado potato beetle, and also provides some protection against
several species of nematodes.  Other pests controlled include
leafhoppers and flea beetles.   

Aldicarb application to potatoes typically consists of an at-plant or
pre-plant application using positive displacement equipment.  Aldicarb
granules are applied within the row furrow and buried along with the
seed potato at planting to a depth of four to eight inches.  The potato
plant absorbs aldicarb through its roots, and once in the plant, the
residual activity of aldicarb protects the treated plant against pest
nematodes and insects for six to eight weeks.  The maximum application
rate for use on potato is currently 3.0 lbs ai/A.   Due to the nature of
how aldicarb is applied to potatoes (at a depth of 4 to 8 inches), the
Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with
soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial
organism exposure. 

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation

RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 198.  RQs
modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 2 to 179. 
RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 3 to 67.  RQs
modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 3 to 60. 
Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also
suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and
fish.  

Stakeholder Involvement and Input for Potatoes

During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition
to the written comments received from respondents listed in section IV.
B. above, the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, the
National Potato Council, USDA and other interested stakeholders with
specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on potatoes.  These
stakeholders have provided additional information regarding aldicarb
usage (application methods and rates) and the need for aldicarb use to
remain in potato production.  In particular, these stakeholders noted
that aldicarb appears to effect plant growth, resulting in increased
yields when used on potatoes. 

   

	Alternatives and Benefits

The Agency has determined that the benefits to growers of aldicarb use
on potatoes are very high in certain states (Washington, Oregon, Idaho
and Florida) and that losing its use would involve substantial costs to
growers.  There are also concerns with the potential for resistance if
aldicarb were not available.  Several nematodes, including the root-knot
nematode, the root lesion nematode, and the stubby root nematode are
major pests of potatoes and have wide host ranges, making management
with crop rotation difficult and relatively ineffective, although they
can be controlled by fumigants.  Aldicarb may also be used to reduce
root-knot nematode populations that remain high after soil fumigation.  

	There are several alternatives for the use of aldicarb on potatoes, but
none of these will be an adequate substitute.  Even if aldicarb is
applied specifically to target nematodes, it is inappropriate to ignore
the beneficial effect of controlling insect pests, as well.  For this
reason, an analysis of alternatives to aldicarb considered multiple
chemicals so that both nematodes and insects can be targeted.  

	Because of aldicarb’s ability to control both nematodes and insect
pests, alternatives to aldicarb will consist of multiple chemicals used
to target multiple pests.  The estimates of additional costs for using
alternatives to aldicarb range from $77 – 257 per acre in the Pacific
Northwest, and $77 – 218 in Florida.  It is clear that alternatives
will involve significant costs to growers who are currently using
aldicarb.

	For nematode control, the Agency believes that the most likely
alternative to aldicarb is the use of a fumigant, such as 1,3-D,
although additional chemicals would be required to control insect pests.
 While synthetic insecticides remain the most effective means for its
control, resistance by the Colorado potato beetle to all classes of
insecticides has been documented in many U.S. potato-producing regions. 
 Widespread and locally diverse esfenvalerate and phosmet resistance was
 detected in all counties in southern and eastern Idaho. 

For additional information, refer to the Agency’s complete
alternative/quantitative impact memo for potatoes which is available in
the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163  and located on-line at  
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/"  http://www.regulations.gov/ .

	Mitigation

To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the
registrant has agreed, to develop the mitigation below to help address
the above mentioned concerns:

Modifications in label language to clarify the manner in which aldicarb
is applied to potatoes, and immediately covering with soil.  For the
label language modifications, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision

Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals
and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of
aldicarb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how
aldicarb is soil incorporated, actual exposure of potentially affected
populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overestimated. 
Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the
treated fields where wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that
are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. 
Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is
expected to be limited.  The Agency recognizes, however, that actual
exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.      

As discussed above, the Agency has determined that there are benefits of
aldicarb use on potatoes and that losing its use would involve
substantial costs to growers.  Aldicarb also has advantages to potato
growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity
of management, confidence in the level of control in the face of
unexpected infestation, and  cost effectiveness when considering the
full range of pests and duration of control.  Therefore, the Agency
finds the use on potatoes eligible for reregistration.

Soybean  TC “Soybean ” \f C \l “4”  

	Current Use Pattern

Aldicarb is applied to soybean at planting.  Aldicarb granules are
applied within the row furrow and buried along with the soybean seed at
planting.  The maximum application rate for use on soybean is currently
3.0 lbs ai/A.  Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied to soybean
(at a depth greater than 2 inches), the Agency has estimated that 99% of
the aldicarb applied is covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on
the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure. 

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation

RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 157.  RQs
modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.4 to 37. 
RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 2 to 53.  RQs
modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 0.5 to 12. 
Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also
suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and
fish.  

Stakeholder Involvement/Input for Soybean

During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition
to the written comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above,
the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, USDA and
soybean growers in Georgia, Minnesota and South Carolina with specific
knowledge relating to aldicarb use on soybeans.  

Alternatives and Benefits

Aldicarb is used as a nematicide in late maturity soybean varieties
grown in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.  Because there are
few late maturity soybean varieties that are resistant to nematodes
(root-knot, reniform, and Columbian lance), growers of such varieties
depend more on aldicarb than growers of early maturity soybean
varieties, for which nematode resistant varieties exist.  In South
Carolina, approximately 60% of the soybean acreage has nematode
problems.  The only available aldicarb alternative for nematode control,
1,3-D, is too expensive for soybean production.  Without aldicarb,
soybean growers in the affected states would stop growing soybeans or
shift to very long rotations with other crops.  Aldicarb, therefore, is
a critical tool for soybean growers.

Mitigation

To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the
registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help
address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

Limiting the use to the following states:  Georgia, North Carolina, and
South Carolina.  

Reducing the application rate from 3.0 lbs ai/A to 1.5 lbs ai/A.  This
equates to a 50% reduction when compared to the current label.  

Modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of aldicarb in
use and left on the surface of the soil (i.e., clarifications in the use
of positive displacement technology), making it less available for the
wildlife potentially at risk.  For the label language modifications,
please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision

Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals
and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of
aldicarb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how
aldicarb is soil incorporated, actual exposure of potentially affected
populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overestimated. 
Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the
treated fields where wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that
are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. 
Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is
expected to be limited.  The Agency recognizes, however, that actual
exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.      

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on
soybeans in Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina, and that losing
its use would involve additional costs to growers.  Aldicarb also has
advantages to soybean growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar
values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the level of
control in the face of unexpected infestation, and  cost effectiveness
when considering the full range of pests and duration of control. 
Therefore, the  Agency finds the use on soybeans eligible for
reregistration.

Sugar Beet  TC “Sugar Beet ” \f C \l “4”  

	Current Use Pattern

Aldicarb application to sugar beets currently consists of an at-plant
and a side-dress application.  The at planting application is
administered with the sugar beet seed and immediately covered with soil.
 The side-dress application is usually administered after the sugar beet
has emerged from the soil and is applied along the side of the plant row
in furrow and immediately covered with soil.  

Aldicarb is used to manage sugar beet root maggot, nematode,
particularly sugar beet cyst nematode, beet leafminer, beet leafhopper,
aphids, flea beetles, wireworms, and cutworms, primarily in Idaho.   

The maximum application rate for use on sugar beet is currently 4.95 lbs
ai/A.  Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied to sugar beet (at a
depth greater than 2 inches), the Agency has estimated that 99% of the
aldicarb applied is covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on the
surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure. 

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation

RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 190.  RQs
modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.7 to 65. 
RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 3 to 64.  RQs
modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 0.9 to 22. 
Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also
suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and
fish.  

Stakeholder Involvement and Input for Sugar Beet

During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition
to the written comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above,
 the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, American
Sugarbeet Growers Association, Western Sugar Cooperative, NYSSA-NAMPA
Beet Growers Association, USDA, and other interested stakeholders with
specific knowledge relating to sugar beet production.  These
stakeholders have provided additional information regarding aldicarb
usage (application techniques and application rates) and the need for
aldicarb use to remain in sugar beet production.  In particular, these
stakeholders also noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant growth,
resulting in increased yields when used on sugar beet. 

	Alternatives and Benefits

The Agency understands that aldicarb use on sugar beet is of great
benefit to the sugar beet industry, particularly in Western states, and
that losing its use would involve substantial costs to growers in those
states.  The available usage data indicate 75 percent of the sugar beet
acreage in Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington was treated with
aldicarb in 2005.  Aldicarb is used primarily to manage sugar beet root
maggot and nematodes on sugar beets, which are major pests of sugar
beets.  If left uncontrolled, yield losses from sugar beet root maggot
can be as much as 80%.  Yield losses from nematodes can be equally as
devastating to a sugar beet crop.  

For insect control, sugar beet root maggot is a major pest of sugar
beets and aldicarb effectively controls both adults and larvae.   If
aldicarb were not available for the control of sugar beet maggot,
growers would likely use terbufos which is not as effective on both the
adult fly and larvae.  Additionally, EPA has required, and the terbufos
registrant has agreed, to a phased approach that will ultimately reduce
sales of terbufos by 55% by 2008.  Other pesticides available and used
to a lesser extent than aldicarb and terbufos include phorate,
chlorpyrifos, and carbofuran.  Phorate controls larvae but is mostly
used in areas with low pest pressure.  Carbofuran was available in Idaho
and Oregon under 24c labels to control larvae but does not have a long
residual value.  Further, the Agency expects to initiate action in the
near future to cancel all uses of carbofuran.  Esfenavalerate and
zeta-cypermethrin control adult flies but another insecticide would need
to be used to control larvae.  For nematodes, only fumigants are
available for control besides aldicarb but are significantly more
expensive than aldicarb.

For nematode control specifically, only fumigants are available as
alternatives, such as 1,3-D.  A major disadvantage to using 1,3-D is the
chemical cost relative to aldicarb (see below).  Another disadvantage of
using 1,3-D is that growers must wait for the soil to warm before
fumigating, and then wait for the gas to dissipate before planting,
shortening the growing season.  Growers would also need to consider the
added costs due to different application equipment using 1,3-D.

The estimates of costs for using aldicarb alternatives are more than $20
per treatment per acre to control the sugar beet root maggot and
approximately $88 to control nematodes. For comparison, the cost of
aldicarb is about $40 per acre. This assumes that the alternatives are
equally efficacious.  Although the alternatives for control of the sugar
beet root maggot appear to be less expensive, other considerations may
preclude their use. If the alternatives are less effective than
aldicarb, yield or quality impacts could also occur. In addition, if
multiple pests targeted by aldicarb are present, multiple
chemicals/applications may be needed to achieve a similar level of
control.

	For additional information, refer to the Agency’s response to Phase 5
comments found EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163  and located on-line at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.regulations.gov/"  http://www.regulations.gov/ .

Mitigation

To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the
registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help
address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

Limit use to the following states:  California, Colorado, Idaho,
Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming.

Modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of aldicarb
left on the surface of the soil (i.e., clarifications in the use of
positive displacement technology) and making it less available for the
wildlife potentially at risk.  For the label language modifications,
please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision

Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals
and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of
aldicarb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how
aldicarb is soil incorporated, actual exposure of potentially affected
populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overestimated. 
Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the
treated fields where wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that
are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. 
Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is
expected to be limited.  The Agency recognizes, however, that actual
exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.        

As discussed above, the Agency has determined that there are benefits of
aldicarb use on sugar beets in certain states (California, Colorado,
Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming) and that
losing its use would involve substantial costs to growers.  Aldicarb
also has advantages to sugar beet growers for which EPA cannot estimate
dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the level
of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and  cost
effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of
control.  Therefore, the Agency finds the use on sugar beet eligible for
reregistration.

Sweet Potato  TC “Sweet Potato” \f C \l “4”  

	Current Use Pattern

Aldicarb application to sweet potato typically consists of an at-plant
application using positive displacement equipment.  Aldicarb granules
are applied within the row furrow and buried along with the seed piece
at planting to a depth of four to eight inches.  The sweet potato plant
absorbs aldicarb through its roots and once in the plant, the residual
activity of aldicarb protects the treated plant against pest nematodes
and insects for six to eight weeks.  The maximum application rate for
use on sweet potato is currently 3.0 lbs ai/A.   Due to the nature of
how aldicarb is applied to sweet potatoes (at a depth of 4 to 8 inches),
the Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered
with soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential
terrestrial organism exposure. 

	Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation

RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 1 to 125.  RQs
modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.7 to 58. 
RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 2 to 42.  RQs
modeled for mammals using typical rates range from  0.8 to 20. 
Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also
suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and
fish.  

	Stakeholder Involvement and Input for Sweet Potato

During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition
to receiving written comments from respondents listed in section IV. B.
above, the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, USDA,
and other interested stakeholders relating to aldicarb use on sweet
potato.  These stakeholders have provided additional information
regarding aldicarb usage (application and application rates) and the
need for aldicarb use to remain in sweet potato production.  

Alternatives and Benefits

	The Agency understands that aldicarb use on sweet potatoes is of
benefit in the states of Louisiana and Mississippi and that losing
aldicarb’s use would involve substantial cost to growers.  It is a
very important tool for sweet potato growers where nematode pressure is
present.  Alternatives include 1,3-D, oxamyl and ethoprop, but they do
not, however, control a particular pest, the reniform nematode, as well
as aldicarb.  This nematode causes smaller, misshapen sweet potatoes
that cannot be marketed and aldicarb is the only tool which completely
controls this pest species.  Not controlling nematodes may result in
100% yield loss, and partial control can yield poor quality sweet
potatoes, which if sold on the processing market, will only bring 10% of
the prices of marketable sweet potatoes.  

Mitigation

To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the
registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help
address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

Limit application of aldicarb to:  Louisiana and Mississippi only.

Addition of label language specifying granules be applied in a 12-inch
band within an open furrow and covered immediately during bed forming by
mechanically hilling 8 to 10 inches.

Slight modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of
aldicarb left on the surface of the soil (i.e., clarifications in the
use of positive displacement technology) and making it less available
for the wildlife potentially at risk.  For the label language
modifications, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision

Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals
and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of
aldicarb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how
aldicarb is soil incorporated, actual exposure of potentially affected
populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overestimated. 
Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the
treated fields where wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that
are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. 
Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is
expected to be limited.  The Agency recognizes, however, that actual
exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.     

As discussed above, the Agency has determined that there are benefits of
aldicarb use on sweet potatoes in certain states (Louisiana and
Mississippi) and that losing its use would involve substantial costs to
growers.  Aldicarb also has advantages to sweet potato growers for which
EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management,
confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected
infestation, and  cost effectiveness when considering the full range of
pests and duration of control.  Therefore, the Agency finds the use on
sweet potatoes eligible for reregistration.

	4. Other Labeling Requirements  TC “4. Other Labeling Requirements”
\f C \l “3”  

	In order to be eligible for reregistration, additional aldicarb
information needs to be included in the labeling of all end-use products
containing aldicarb.  Uses and use patterns need to be clarified as
indicated in Table 5 below to reflect and better describe actual use
patterns for aldicarb.  For the specific label statements and a list of
additional data requirements necessary to confirm this decision, refer
to Section V of this IRED document.

		5. Threatened and Endangered Species Considerations

  TC “5. Threatened and Endangered Species Considerations” \f C \l
“3”  

	The Agency’s screening level risk assessment for endangered and
threatened species concluded that use of aldicarb has direct adverse
effects on listed species in the following taxonomic groups: terrestrial
invertebrates, birds, terrestrial phase amphibians, reptiles, mammals,
freshwater fish, freshwater invertebrates, estuarine/marine
invertebrates, and estuarine/marine fish.  There is also the potential
for indirect adverse effects for listed species in multiple taxonomic
groups that are dependent upon species that do experience direct adverse
effects.  These findings are based solely on EPA’s screening level
assessment and do not constitute “may affect” findings under the
Endangered Species Act.

	The Agency has developed the Endangered Species Protection Program to
identify pesticides whose use may cause adverse impacts on threatened
and endangered species and to implement mitigation measures that address
these impacts.  The Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to
ensure that their actions are not likely to jeopardize listed species or
adversely modify designated critical habitat.  To analyze the potential
of registered pesticide uses that may affect any particular species, EPA
uses basic toxicity and exposure data developed for REDs and considers
it in relation to individual species by evaluating important ecological
parameters, pesticide use information, the geographic relationship
between specific pesticide uses and species locations, and biological
requirements and behavioral aspects of the particular species.  When
conducted, this species-specific analysis will take into consideration
any risk mitigation measures that are being implemented at the time as a
result of this RED.

	Following this future species-specific analysis, a determination that
there is a likelihood of potential effects to a listed species or its
critical habitat may result in further limitations on use of aldicarb,
other measures to mitigate any potential effects, or consultations with
the Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries as
appropriate.  If the Agency determines use of aldicarb “may affect”
listed species or their designated critical habitat, EPA will employ the
provisions in the Services regulations (50 CFR Part 402).  Until a
species-specific analysis is completed, the risk mitigation measures
being implemented through this RED (e.g., rate reductions and geographic
restrictions) will reduce the likelihood that endangered and threatened
species may be exposed to aldicarb at levels of concern.  EPA is not
requiring specific aldicarb label language at the present time relative
to threatened and endangered species.  If, in the future, specific
measures are necessary for the protection of listed species, the Agency
will implement them through the Endangered Species Protection Program.

	EPA is currently engaging in informal consultations with the Fish and
Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service, which is a
part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.  This means
that the Agencies are working together to conduct a full endangered
species assessment for aldicarb, which is separate from this RED.  The
likelihood of potential impacts to endangered species will need to be
assessed for all counties in which: 1) crops registered for aldicarb use
are grown; and 2) contain habitat for at least one listed species.

V. What Registrants Need to Do  TC “V. What Registrants Need to Do”
\f C \l “1”  

	The Agency has determined that products containing the active
ingredient aldicarb are eligible for reregistration provided that the
risk mitigation measures outlined in this document are adopted and label
amendments are made to reflect these measures.  The Agency intends to
issue DCIs for generic (technical grade) data and product-specific data.
 Generally, registrants will have 90 days from receipt of a generic DCI
to complete and submit response forms or request time extension and/or
waiver requests with a full written justification.  The DCIs will
include specific requirements and instructions on how to respond.  Table
4 below presents the additional generic data the Agency intends to
require for aldicarb to confirm the decision that products containing
the active ingredient aldicarb are eligible for reregistration.  For
product-specific DCIs, registrants will have eight months from receipt
of the DCI to submit data and to submit amended labels.  In order for
products containing the active ingredient aldicarb to be eligible for
reregistration, all product labels must be amended to incorporate the
specific changes and language presented in Table 5 below.  Table 5 also
describes how the required language should be incorporated.

	A. Manufacturing-Use Products  TC “A. Manufacturing-Use Products”
\f C \l “2”  

	

1. Additional Generic Data Requirements  TC “1. Additional Generic
Data Requirements” \f C \l “3”  

The generic database supporting the reregistration of aldicarb has been
reviewed and determined to be substantially complete.  However, EPA is
requiring the following additional data to confirm the decisions
presented in this RED.  The Agency intends to issue a generic DCI for
this data.

Table 4. Data requirements for the reregistration of aldicarb.  TC
"Table 4. Data requirements for the reregistration of aldicarb " \f E \l
"1"  

Data Requirement	New OPPTS Guideline Number (GLN)

Magnitude of the Residue in Plant Studies

Data depicting the magnitude of aldicarb residues of concern in cotton
gin byproducts are required in accordance with Table 1 of OPPTS Series
860 Residue Chemistry Test Guidelines, 8/96.

	860.1500

Terrestrial Plant Toxicity – Tier 1 (seedling emergence)	850.4100

Terrestrial Plant Toxicity – Tier 1 (vegetative Vigor)	850.4150

Aquatic Plant toxicity Test – using Lemna spp. – Tiers I and II
850.4400

Avian Reproduction Study in Quail

Avian Reproduction Study in Duck

	850.2300

UV/Visible Aborption	830.7050

Comparative Cholinesterase Assay	Special Study



		2. Labeling for Manufacturing-Use Products  TC "2. Labeling for
Manufacturing-Use Products" \f C \l "3"  

	To ensure compliance with FIFRA, labeling for all manufacturing-use
products (MUPs) should be revised to comply with all current EPA
regulations, PR Notices, and applicable policies.  The MUP labeling
should bear the specific language presented in Table 5 below.

	B. End-Use Products  TC "B. End-Use Products" \f C \l "2"  

		1. Additional Product-Specific Data Requirements  TC "1. Additional
Product-Specific Data Requirements" \f C \l "3"  

	Section 4(g)(2)(B) of FIFRA calls for the Agency to obtain any needed
product-specific data regarding the pesticide after a determination of
eligibility has been made.  The registrant must review previous data
submissions to ensure they meet current EPA acceptance criteria and if
not, commit to conduct new studies.  If a registrant believes that
previously submitted data meet current testing standards, then the study
MRID numbers can be cited according to the instructions in the
Requirement Status and Registrations Response Form provided for each
product.  The Agency intends to issue a separate product-specific DCI
outlining specific data requirements.

		2. Labeling for End-Use Products  TC "2. Labeling for End-Use
Products" \f C \l "3"  

	To be eligible for reregistration, labeling changes are necessary to
implement measures outlined in Section IV above.  The specific changes
and language are presented in Table 5 below.  Generally, conditions for
the distribution and sale of products bearing old labels/labeling will
be established when the label changes are approved.  However, specific
existing stocks time frames will be established case-by-case, depending
on the number of products involved, the number of label changes, and
other factors.

Table 5. Summary of Required Labeling Changes for Aldicarb Products. 
TC "Table 5. Summary of Required Labeling Changes for Aldicarb Products
" \f E \l "1"  

Description	

Amended Labeling Language for Manufacturing Use Products	

Placement on Label



For all Manufacturing Use Products	

 “Only for formulation into an insecticide/nematicide for the
following uses:  citrus, cotton, dry bean, peanuts, potatoes, soybean,
sugar beets, sweet potatoes.”

“Only formulation into low dust granular products such as products
that use a vinyl binder coating to adhere the aldicarb to either a corn
cob grit or a gypsum substrate.  Binding aldicarb to clay substrate is
prohibited.” 	

Directions for Use



Note to Registrant	

This product may not be used to formulate products for use on alfalfa
grown for seed, coffee, ornamentals, pecans, sorghum, sugarcane, and
tobacco.

	

One of these statements may be added to a label to allow reformulation
of the product for a specific use or all additional uses supported by a
formulator or user group	

 “This product may be used to formulate products for specific uses not
listed on the MP label if the formulator, user group, or grower has
complied with U.S. EPA submission requirements regarding support of such
uses.”

“This product may be used to formulate products for any additional
uses not listed on the MP label if the formulator, user group, or grower
has complied with U.S. EPA submission requirements regarding support of
such uses.”	

Directions for Use



Environmental Hazards Statements 	

 “This pesticide is extremely toxic to birds and mammals. This
pesticide is toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates.  Do not discharge
effluent containing this product into lakes, streams, ponds, estuaries,
oceans, or other waters unless in accordance with the requirements of a
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and the
permitting authority has been notified in writing prior to discharge. 
Do not discharge effluent containing this product to sewer systems
without previously notifying the local sewage treatment plant authority.
 For guidance contact your State Water Board or Regional Office of the
EPA.”	

Precautionary Statements



End Use Products Intended for Occupational Use



Restricted Use Pesticide	

 “Restricted Use Pesticide”

“Due to acute oral toxicity and to ground water contamination.  For
retail sale to and use only by Certified Applicators or persons under
the direct supervision of a Certified Applicator, and only for those
uses covered by the Certified Applicator’s certification.”	

This statement must appear at the very top of the label's front panel
[see 40 CFR 156.10(j)(2)(i) for more information].  No other wording or
symbols should appear above the RUP statement.





PPE Requirements Established by the RED1 for low- dust granular
formulations that are packaged in closed loading and application systems
(e.g., Lock ‘n Load, Smartbox)	

 “Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)”

“Some materials that are chemical-resistant to this product are”
(registrant inserts correct chemical-resistant material).   “If you
want more options, follow the instructions for category” [registrant
inserts A,B,C,D,E,F,G,or H] “on an EPA chemical-resistance category
selection chart."

“All loaders, applicators, and other handlers must wear;

> long-sleeved shirts and long pants, 

> shoes plus socks. 

In addition, loaders and handlers cleaning equipment or spills must
wear: 

> chemical-resistant gloves made of any waterproof material, and

> chemical-resistant apron.

See engineering controls section for additional requirements.”	

Immediately following/below 

Precautionary Statements:  Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals.



PPE Requirements Established by the RED1 for granular low- dust
formulations that are not packaged in a closed loading and application
system.  	

 “Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)”

“Some materials that are chemical-resistant to this product are”
(registrant inserts correct chemical-resistant material).   “If you
want more options, follow the instructions for category” [registrant
inserts A,B,C,D,E,F,G,or H] “on an EPA chemical-resistance category
selection chart."

“All loaders, applications and other handlers must wear at a minimum:

> coveralls over long-sleeved shirts and long pants, 

> chemical-resistant gloves made of any waterproof material,

> chemical-resistant footwear plus socks, and

> protective eyewear. 

In addition, loaders and handlers cleaning equipment or spills must
wear:

> chemical-resistant apron, and  

> a NIOSH-approved respirator with a dust/mist filter with MSHA/ NIOSH
approval number prefix TC-21C or any N, R, P, or HE filter.”

“See engineering controls for additional options.”	

Immediately following/below 

Precautionary Statements:  Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals.



User Safety Requirements	

 “Follow manufacturer's instructions for cleaning/maintaining PPE.  If
no such instructions for washables exist, use detergent and hot water. 
Keep and wash PPE separately from other laundry.”	

Precautionary Statements:  Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals
immediately following the PPE requirements.



Engineering Controls 

for granular low- dust formulations that are packaged in closed loading
and application systems (e.g., Lock ‘n Load, Smartbox)	

“Engineering Controls”

“This product is formulated into a (registrant inserts the trade name
of the closed system in which the product is marketed, such as Lock ‘N
Load or SmartBox) system that meets the definition of a closed loading
and application system in the Worker Protection Standard for
Agricultural Pesticides [40 CFR 170.240(d)(4)]. Loaders and applicators
using the closed-system packaging must:

--  wear the personal protective equipment required in the PPE section
of this labeling for loaders during loading, and

--  wear the personal protective equipment required in the PPE section
of this labeling for applicators during applying, and

-- be provided, have immediately available, and use in an emergency,
such as a broken package, spill, or equipment breakdown:
chemical-resistant gloves, chemical-resistant apron, chemical-resistant
footwear, protective eyewear, and a NIOSH-approved respirator with a
dust/mist filter with MSHA/NIOSH approval number prefix TC-21C or any N
R, P, or HE filter.”	

Precautionary Statements:  Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals  
(Immediately following PPE and User Safety Requirements.)



Engineering Controls: Enclosed Cabs for Ground Applicators

	

 “Engineering Control Options for Enclosed Cabs:

Applicators using an enclosed cab that meets the definition in the
Worker Protection Standard for Agricultural Pesticides [40 CFR
170.240(d)(5)] may wear reduced personal protective equipment, provided
they: 

 -- wear a long-sleeve shirt, long pants, shoes, and socks

-- are provided, have immediately available, and use in an emergency,
such as a broken package, spill, or equipment breakdown:
chemical-resistant gloves, chemical-resistant apron, chemical-resistant
footwear, protective eyewear, and a NIOSH-approved respirator with a
dust/mist filter with MSHA/NIOSH approval number prefix TC-21C or any N
R, P, or HE filter. 

-- take off any PPE that was worn in the treated area before reentering
the cab, and

-- store all such PPE in a chemical-resistant container, such as a
plastic bag, to prevent contamination of the inside of the cab.”	

Precautionary Statements:  Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals  
(Immediately following PPE and User Safety Requirements.)



User Safety Recommendations	

“User Safety Recommendations”

“Users should wash hands before eating, drinking, chewing gum, using
tobacco, or using the toilet.

Users should remove clothing/PPE immediately if pesticide gets inside. 
Then wash thoroughly and put on clean clothing.

Users should remove PPE immediately after handling this product.  Wash
the outside of gloves before removing.  As soon as possible, wash
thoroughly and change into clean clothing.”	

Precautionary Statements under:  Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals
immediately following Engineering Controls

(Must be placed in a box.)



Environmental Hazards 	“This pesticide is extremely toxic to birds and
wildlife.  Birds feeding on exposed granules may be killed.  Cover or
immediately soil incorporate granules spilled during loading.”

“This pesticide is toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates.  Run-off
from treated areas may be hazardous to fish in neighboring areas.  Do
not apply directly to water, to areas where surface water is present or
to inter-tidal areas below the mean high water mark.  Do not contaminate
water when disposing of equipment wash waters.”

“This product is toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment. Do not
apply this product while bees are actively visiting the treatment
area.”

“Aldicarb is known to leach through soil into ground water under
certain conditions as a result of labeled use.  Use of this chemical in
areas where soils are permeable, particularly where the water table is
shallow, may result in ground-water contamination.”

“See use directions for individual crops for additional ground water
restrictions.  See soil tables.” 	

Precautionary Statements immediately following the User Safety
Recommendations



Environmental Hazards Statements Required by the RED and Agency Label
Policies	

“Under the Endangered Species Act, it is a Federal Offense to use any
pesticide in a manner that results in the death of a member of an
endangered species.  

This Act protects Attwater's Greater Prairie Chicken in the Texas
counties of Aransas, Austin, Brazoria, Colorado, Galveston, Goliad,
Harris, Refugio, and Victoria.

Prior to making applications in these counties, the user must determine
that this species is not located in or immediately adjacent to the area
to be treated. If the user is in doubt whether or not the above named
endangered species may be affected, he should contact either the
regional U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service office (Endangered Species
Specialist) or personnel of the State Fish and Game office.”	

Precautionary Statements



Restricted-Entry Interval for products with directions for use within
scope of the Worker Protection Standard for Agricultural Pesticides
(WPS)	

 “Do not enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the
restricted entry interval (REI) of 48 hours.”

“Exception: If the product is soil-incorporated or soil-injected, the
Worker Protection Standard, under certain circumstances, allows workers
to enter the treated area if there will be no contact with anything that
has been treated.” 	

Agricultural Use Requirements Box



Early Entry Personal Protective Equipment for products with directions
for use within the scope of the WPS	

 “PPE required for early entry to treated areas that is permitted
under the Worker Protection Standard and that involves contact with
anything that has been treated, such as plants, soil, or water, is:

* coveralls worn over long-sleeve shirt and long pants,

* chemical-resistant gloves made of any waterproof material,

* chemical-resistant footwear plus socks, and

* protective eyewear.”	

Direction for Use

Agricultural Use Requirements box



Double notification requirement	

 “Notify workers of the application by warning them orally and by
posting warning signs at entrances to treated areas.”	

Agricultural Use Requirements Box



General Application Restrictions	“

“Do not apply this product in a way that will contact workers or other
persons, either directly or through drift.  Only protected handlers may
be in the area during application.”	

Place in the Direction for Use directly above the Agricultural Use Box. 



Other Application Restrictions for all products	

 “Application must be made using a motorized ground spreader. 
Application using aircraft, handheld, backpack spreaders, or push-type
spreaders is prohibited.”	

Directions for Use Associated with the

Specific Use Pattern



Other Application Restrictions for products with directions for use on
Citrus

(Note: The maximum allowable application rate and maximum allowable
seasonal rate must be listed as pounds or gallons of formulated product
per acre, not just as pounds active ingredient per acre.)  	

CITRUS

The maximum single application rate is 4.95 lbs ai/A.

Do not make more than one application per tree per use season.

Do not allow livestock to graze in treated area.

The Preharvest Interval is 30 days.

All application must be made with granular applicators which use
Positive Displacement Metering Units.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

Granules must be place into bottom of the seed furrow and immediately
covered with at least 2 inches of soil by mechanical means.

For Mature Citrus Trees: “apply in a band along the drip line on both
sides of tree row. Apply granules in 3 to 6 furrows that are 2 to 3
inches deep and spaced on approximately 12 inch centers. Immediately
cover with soil by mechanical means. The width of each band should equal
1/4 the tree row spacing.”

OR

For furrow irrigation applications to mature citrus, “apply granules 2
to 3 inches deep in the irrigation furrow using 2 shanks per furrow.”

For Immature Citrus Trees (1-2 years old): “0.3 oz ai/tree (do not
exceed 4.95 lbs ai/acre).  Apply granules in a furrow beside individual
trees and cover with at least 2 inches of soil.”	

Directions for Use Associated with the

Specific Use Pattern

Other Application Restrictions for products with directions for use on
Cotton

(Note: The maximum allowable application rate and maximum allowable
seasonal rate must be listed as pounds or gallons of formulated product
per acre, not just as pounds active ingredient per acre.)  	

COTTON

The maximum single at-plant application rate is 1.5 lbs ai/A.

The maximum single side-dress (post-emergence) application rate is 2.1
lbs ai/A.

Do not exceed a total of  3.6 lbs ai/A per year.

Do not make more than one at-plant application and one post-emergence
application per crop.

Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.

Do not feed cotton forage to livestock or allow livestock to graze in
treated area.

If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below
ground surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below
ground surface.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

At Planting:  “Apply granules in the seed furrow and immediately cover
with soil by mechanical means.

OR

If rate exceeds 1.05 lbs ai/A on 40 inch rows, “apply granules in a 4
to 6 inch band (T-band) over open seed furrow and immediately cover by
mechanical means.”

At First Squaring:  “Apply side dress granules in a furrow that is 6
to10 inches to one or both sides of the plant row to a depth of 2 to 3
inches.”	

Directions for Use Associated with the

Specific Use Pattern



Other Application Restrictions for products with directions for use on
Dry Bean

(Note: The maximum allowable application rate and maximum allowable
seasonal rate must be listed as pounds or gallons of formulated product
per acre, not just as pounds active ingredient per acre.)  	

DRY BEANS (other than soybeans)

For use in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Michigan only.

Do not exceed a total of 2.1 lbs ai/A/season.

Do not make more than one application per crop.

Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.

Do not feed green forage, hay, or straw to livestock.

Do not allow livestock to graze in treated areas before harvest.

Do not use green pods as food for humans.

If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below
ground surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below
ground surface.

Immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.

For all applications, except for where furrow irrigation is used:
“Apply granules in seed furrow and immediately cover with soil by
mechanical means.

OR

Apply in a furrow that is 2 to 3 inches to the side of seed row and 2 to
3 inches deep in seed furrow and immediately cover with soil by
mechanical means.

OR

Apply granules on a 4 to 6 inch band over open furrow and immediately
cover with soil by mechanical means.  Plant into treated zone.”

When furrow irrigation is used: “apply granules 3 to 4 inches deep and
3 inches from the seed row on the water furrow side and immediate cover
with soil by mechanical means.”	

Directions for Use Associated with the

Specific Use Pattern



Other Application Restrictions for products with directions for use on
Peanut

(Note: The maximum allowable application rate and maximum allowable
seasonal rate must be listed as pounds or gallons of formulated product
per acre, not just as pounds active ingredient per acre.)  	

PEANUT

Do not exceed a total of 3.0 lbs ai/A/season

Do not harvest within 90 days of application.

Do not hog-off treated fields.

Do not allow livestock to graze in treated areas before harvest.	

Do not feed hay or vines to livestock.

Post-emergence applications can only be used in fields where overhead
irrigation is available.

Do not make more than one application per crop in states other than
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, and
Virginia.

Do not make the split application to Spanish peanuts or other short
season varieties (a minimum of 90 days is required between pegging
applications and harvest).

If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in AL, GA and SC and a vulnerable soil
is present and the water table is less than 25 feet below ground
surface, do not apply within 500 feet of a drinking water well unless
wells are either cased to 100 feet below ground level or a minimum of 30
feet below the water table. If it is not known whether the water table
is greater than 25 feet below ground surface, assume that the water
table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.

If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in Florida and a vulnerable soil is
present (see soils listed below), and the water table is less than 25
feet below ground surface, do not apply within 500 feet of a drinking
water well unless wells are either cased to 100 feet below ground level
or a minimum of 30 feet below the water table. In Florida, it is the
responsibility of the applicator to document the construction of wells
claimed not to be shallow. This must consist of: (a) a copy of the well
completion report issued by the appropriate water management district;
or (b) a statement certified as to accuracy by a licensed well
contractor. The U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service which
serves your county can tell you if the soils on your farm fall within
the following types of vulnerable soils. If it is not known whether the
water table is greater than 25 feet below ground surface, assume that
the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

Thrips At Planting: “Apply granules in seed furrow and immediately
cover with soil by mechanical means to a depth of 2 to 4 inches.”

Nematodes At Planting:  “Apply granules in a 4-6 inch band over open
seed furrow (T-band) and immediately cover with soil by mechanical means
to a depth of 2 to 4 inches.

OR

Apply granules in a 6 to 12 inch band and immediately cover with soil by
mechanical means to a depth of 2 to 4 inches. Plant seed into treated
zone.”

At Pegging: “Apply granules in a band 12 to 18 inches wide on the row
and into the plant canopy. Ensure that plant foliage is dry prior to
application. Dislodge granules from foliage by suitable means that will
not damage the plant.  Application must be made late in the afternoon or
early evening, immediately followed by irrigation, and completed within
24 hours unless rainfall is received.”	

Directions for Use Associated with the

Specific Use Pattern



Other Application Restrictions for products with directions for use on
Potato

(Note: The maximum allowable application rate and maximum allowable
seasonal rate must be listed as pounds or gallons of formulated product
per acre, not just as pounds active ingredient per acre.)  	

POTATOES

For use only in the states of Florida, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and
Washington; in Utah in the counties of Beaver, Boxelder, Cache, Carbon,
Davis, Duchesne, Iron, Millard, Plute, Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier,
Ulntah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber; and in Nevada in the
counties of Humboldt and Pershing.

Do not exceed 3.0 lbs ai/A/season.

All applications must be made with Positive Displacement Applicators
such as Horstine Microband® or Gandy PDM® or with other Positive
Displacement Applicators approved under the Bayer CropScience Equipment
Certification Program. The applicator must be certified through the
Bayer CropScience Stewardship program.

Do not harvest within 100 days of application for potatoes grown in
Florida and within 150 days of application for potatoes grown in the
Pacific Northwest (Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and certain
counties in Nevada and Utah).

Do not apply after planting.

Do not make more than one application per crop.  If replanting is
necessary, do not retreat the second crop with (registrant insert brand
name).

Do not allow livestock to graze in treated areas before harvest.

In state other than Florida, do not use furrow irrigation on
aldicarb-treated potatoes.

Do not use this product on potatoes in any state other than those
immediately listed above.

If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below
ground surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below
ground surface.

Immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.

At Planting:  “Apply granules in a 6 inch band and immediately cover
with 4 to 8 inches of soil by mechanical means. Plant seed pieces into
treated zone.

OR

Apply granules in furrow with seed piece. Immediately cover with 4 to 8
inches of soil by mechanical means.”	

Directions for Use Associated with the

Specific Use Pattern



Other Application Restrictions for products with directions for use on
Soybean

(Note: The maximum allowable application rate and maximum allowable
seasonal rate must be listed as pounds or gallons of formulated product
per acre, not just as pounds active ingredient per acre.)  	

SOYBEAN

For use on soybeans grown only in Georgia, North Carolina, and South
Carolina.

Do not exceed a total of 1.5 lbs ai/A/season.

Do not make more than one application per crop.

Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.

Do not allow livestock to graze in treated areas before harvest.

Do not feed green forage, hay or straw to livestock.

If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below
ground surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below
ground surface.

Immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.

At Planting:  “Apply granules in seed furrow and immediately cover
with soil by mechanical means.

OR

If rate exceeds 0.9 lbs ai/A on 30 inch rows, “Apply a 4 to 6 inch
band over open seed furrow and immediately cover with soil by mechanical
means.”

 	

Directions for Use Associated with the

Specific Use Pattern



Other Application Restrictions for products with directions for use on
Sugar Beet

(Note: The maximum allowable application rate and maximum allowable
seasonal rate must be listed as pounds or gallons of formulated product
per acre, not just as pounds active ingredient per acre.)  	

SUGAR BEETS

For use only in California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon,
Washington, and Wyoming.

The total maximum rate per crop cycle is 4.95 lbs ai/A.

Do not make more than one at-planting application and two post-emergence
applications per crop.

Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.

If tops are to be fed to livestock, do not apply within 120 days of
harvest.”

Do not use tops as food to humans.

If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below
ground surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below
ground surface.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

Nematodes At Planting: “Apply granules in a 4 to 6 inch band and
immediately cover with soil by mechanical means. Plant seed into or
above treated zone.

OR

where furrow irrigation is employed for seed germination, drill granules
3 to 4 inches deep and 3 inches from seed row on water furrow side.”

Aphids, Leafminers and Leafhoppers At Planting:  “Drill granules 1 to
3 inches below seedline.”

Sugar Beet Root Maggot At Planting:  “Apply granules in a 2 to 3 inch
band over seed row and immediately cover with soil by mechanical means.

OR

where furrow irrigation is employed for seed germination, drill granules

2 inches deep and 2 inches from seed row on water furrow side.

For the 7 lb. rate, apply granules in a 1 to 2 inch band in front of the
press wheel as the furrow is closing.”

Post-emergence:  “Apply granules to both sides of plant row and
immediately cover with soil by mechanical means.

OR

for furrow irrigation side-dress granules 4 to 8 inches to water furrow
side of plant row at furrow depth. Irrigate soon after application.
Apply within 60 days after planting.”

	

Directions for Use Associated with the

Specific Use Pattern



Other Application Restrictions for products with directions for use on
Sweet Potato

(Note: The maximum allowable application rate and maximum allowable
seasonal rate must be listed as pounds or gallons of formulated product
per acre, not just as pounds active ingredient per acre.)  	

SWEET POTATOES

For use in Louisiana and Mississippi only.

Maximum application rate is 3 pounds ai/A/crop.

Do not make more than one application per crop.

Do not harvest within 120 days of application.

Do not feed sweet potato vines to livestock.

Application must be made with granular applicators which use Positive
Displacement Metering Units. Apply granules in a 12-inch band open
furrow.  Immediately cover granules by mechanical hilling soil at least
8 to 10 inches. 

If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below
ground surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below
ground surface.

Immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.

Pre-plant or At Planting: “Apply granules in a 12-inch band open
furrow or soil surface and cover immediately during bed forming by
mechanically hilling up 8 to 10 inches. Place transplant in center of
treated zone.”	

Directions for Use Associated with the

Specific Use Pattern

1 PPE that is established on the basis of Acute Toxicity of the end-use
product must be compared to the active ingredient PPE in this document. 
The more protective PPE must be placed in the product labeling.  For
guidance on which PPE is considered more protective, see PR Notice
93-7.Appendix A. Aldicarb Uses and Use-Patterns Eligible for
Reregistration  TC " Appendix A. Aldicarb Uses and Use-Patterns Eligible
for Reregistration" \f C \l "2"  

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 SITE NAME	LIMITATIONS

	Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate)
Max. Single Appl.

 Rate	Form

Code(s)	Max.

Seasonal

Rate 	Max. # 

Apps/

cc & yr 	M R I 	R E I 	PHI/PGI/PSI

Use Limitations (May not

apply to all Reg. #s)

CITRUS

(Oranges, Grapefruit, Lemons, and Limes only)	30 day(s) preharvest
interval.

All application must be made with granular applicators which use
Positive Displacement Metering Units.

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.

Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is
present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for
drinking water.  More restrictive setbacks may apply.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of
equipment wash waters.

Do not contaminate water, food or feed.

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.

Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.

Do not graze livestock in treated areas.

Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.

Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.

Endangered species restriction.

For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where
surface water is present or to inter-tidal areas below the mean high
water mark.

Ground water restriction.

Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.

Proper ventilation required.

Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in
neighboring areas.

This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.

This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following
exceptions:  Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops
within 6 months after the last application.  Do not plant corn,
cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last
application.

Geographic disallowable:  CA, CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or
in Curry County, OR.

Foliar

Soil in-furrow treatment /Soil shanking treatment /Soil treatment.

Granule applicator.	4.95 

lb ai/A	G 

	4.95  

lb ai/A

4.95  

lb ai/cc	1/1 cc 

	NS 

	48 h 

	COTTON (UNSPECIFIED)	 90 day(s) preharvest interval.

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.

Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is
present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. 

Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for
drinking water.  More restrictive setbacks may apply.

Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of
equipment wash waters.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.

Do not contaminate water, food or feed.

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not
feed forage to livestock or allow livestock to graze in treated areas.

Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.

Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.

Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.

Endangered species restriction.

For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where
surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high
water mark.

Ground water restriction.

Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.

Proper ventilation required.

Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in
neighboring areas.

This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.

This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following
exceptions:  Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops
within 6 months after the last application.  Do not plant corn,
cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last
application.

Geographic disallowable:  CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in
Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Band treatment /Soil band treatment /Soil drill treatment /Soil
in-furrow treatment.

Granule applicator. 	1.5 

lb ai/A	G 	

lb ai/A

3.6

lb ai/cc	2/cc	NS 	48 h 

	At first squaring

Soil sidedress treatment.Granule applicator. 	2.1 

lb ai/A	G 

	

lb ai/A

3.6

lb ai/cc	2/cc

	NS 

	48 h 



	Squaring through early bloom

Soil in-furrow treatment /Soil sidedress treatment.

Granule applicator. 	2.1 

lb ai/A	G 	

lb ai/A

3.6

lb ai/cc	2/cc	NS 	48 h 

	BEANS, DRIED-TYPE	 90 day(s) preharvest interval.

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.

Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is
present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for
drinking water.  More restrictive setbacks may apply.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of
equipment wash waters.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.

Do not contaminate water, food or feed.

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.

Do not feed green forage, hay, or straw to livestock.

Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.

Do not graze livestock in treated areas.

Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.

Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.

Do not use green pods as food for humans.

Endangered species restriction.

For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where
surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high
water mark.

Ground water restriction.

Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.

Proper ventilation required.

Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in
neighboring areas.

This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.

This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following
exceptions:  Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops
within 6 months after the last application.  Do not plant corn,
cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last
application.

Geographic allowable:  ID, MI, OR, WA only.

Geographic disallowable:  CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in
Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band treatment /Soil in-furrow treatment.

Granule applicator. 	2.1 

lb ai/A 	G 

	2.1 

lb ai/A

2.1

lb ai/cc	1/1 cc	NS 

	48 h 



	PEANUTS (UNSPECIFIED)	 90 day(s) preharvest interval.

Do not make more than one application per crop in states other than AL,
FL, GA, NC, OK, TX, and VA.

Do not make split application to Spanish peanuts or other short season
varieties.

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.

Do not allow livestock to graze treated areas before harvest. 

Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is
present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for
drinking water.  More restrictive setbacks may apply.

Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of
equipment wash waters.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste. 

Do not contaminate water, food or feed.

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.

Do not feed hay or vines to livestock.

Do not feed treated hay or vines to livestock.

Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.

Do not graze livestock in treated areas.

Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.

Do not hog down treated fields.

Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden. 

Drift and runoff may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring
areas.

Endangered species restriction.

For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where
surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high
water mark.

Ground water restrictions:  If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in AL, GA
and SC and a vulnerable soil is present and the water table is less than
25 feet below ground surface, do not apply within 500 feet of a drinking
water well unless wells are either cased to 100 feet below ground level
or a minimum of 30 feet below the water table. If it is not known
whether the water table is greater than 25 feet below ground surface,
assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface. 
If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in Florida and a vulnerable soil is
present (see soils listed below), and the water table is less than 25
feet below ground surface, do not apply within 500 feet of a drinking
water well unless wells are either cased to 100 feet below ground level
or a minimum of 30 feet below the water table. In Florida, it is the
responsibility of the applicator to document the construction of wells
claimed not to be shallow. This must consist of: (a) a copy of the well
completion report issued by the appropriate water management district;
or (b) a statement certified as to accuracy by a licensed well
contractor. The U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service which
serves your county can tell you if the soils on your farm fall within
the following types of vulnerable soils. If it is not known whether the
water table is greater than 25 feet below ground surface, assume that
the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.

Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.

Keep out of lakes, streams, and ponds.

Proper ventilation required.

Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in
neighboring areas.

This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.

This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following
exceptions:  Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops
within 6 months after the last application.  Do not plant corn,
cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last
application.

Geographic disallowable:  CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in
Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band treatment /Soil in-furrow treatment.

Granule applicator 	3 

lb ai/A

	G 

	3 

lb ai/A 

3

lb ai/cc	2/cc

 

	NS 

	48 h 

	



At pegging

Soil band 	1.5

lb ai/A	G 	3 

lb ai/A

3

lb ai/cc	2/cc	NS 	48 h 	Geographic allowable: AL, FL, GA, NC, OK, TX,
and VA only.

Do not make split application to Spanish peanuts or other short season
varieties.

Ensure that plant foliage is dry prior to application. Dislodge granules
from foliage by suitable means that will not damage the plant. Irrigate
immediately after application and complete within 24 hours unless
rainfall is received

POTATO	100 day(s) preharvest interval for potatoes grown in FL.

150 day(s) preharvest interval for potatoes grown in ID, MT, OR, WA, and
certain counties in NV (Humbolt and Pershing) and UT (Beaver, Boxelder,
Cache, Carbon, Davis, Duchesne, Iron, Millard, Plute, Salt Lake,
Sanpete, Sevier, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber).

All application must be made with granular applicators which use
Positive Displacement Metering Units.

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.

Do not allow livestock to graze treated areas before harvest.

Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is
present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for
drinking water.  More restrictive setbacks may apply.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of
equipment wash waters.

Do not contaminate water, food or feed.

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.

Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.

Do not graze livestock in treated areas.

Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.

Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.

Endangered species restriction.

For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where
surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high
water mark.

Ground water restriction.

Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.

Proper ventilation required.

Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in
neighboring areas.

This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.

This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following
exceptions:  Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops
within 6 months after the last application.  Do not plant corn,
cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last
application.

Geographic allowable: FL, ID, MT, OR, WA, and certain counties in NV
(Humbolt and Pershing) and UT (Beaver, Boxelder, Cache, Carbon, Davis,
Duchesne, Iron, Millard, Plute, Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier, Uintah,
Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber).

Geographic disallowable:  CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in
Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band treatment /Soil drill treatment /Soil in-furrow treatment.

Granule applicator. 	3

lb ai/A 	G 	3

lb ai/A

3

lb ai/cc	1/cc	NS 	48 h 

	SOYBEANS (UNSPECIFIED)	 90 day(s) preharvest interval.

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.

Do not allow livestock to graze treated areas before harvest.

Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is
present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for
drinking water.  More restrictive setbacks may apply.

Do not apply to any body of water.

Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of
equipment wash waters.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.

Do not contaminate water, food or feed.

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.

Do not feed green forage, hay, or straw to livestock. 

Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.

Do not graze livestock in treated areas.

Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.

Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.

Endangered species restriction.

For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where
surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high
water mark.

Ground water restriction.

Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.

Proper ventilation required.

Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in
neighboring areas.

This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.

This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following
exceptions:  Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops
within 6 months after the last application.  Do not plant corn,
cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last
application.

Geographic allowable: GA, NC, and SC only.

Geographic disallowable:  CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in
Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band treatment /Soil drill treatment /Soil in-furrow treatment.

Granule applicator /Not on label. 	1.5

lb ai/A 	G 

	1.5

lb ai/A

1.5

lb ai/cc	1/cc

	NS 

	48 h 

	



SUGAR BEET	 120 day(s) preharvest interval if the tops are to be fed to
livestock.

 90 day(s) preharvest interval.

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.

Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is
present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for
drinking water.  More restrictive setbacks may apply.

Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of
equipment wash waters.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.

Do not contaminate water, food or feed.

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.

Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.

Do not graze livestock in treated areas.

Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.

Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.

Do not use tops as food for humans.

Endangered species restriction.

Ground water restriction.

Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.

Proper ventilation required.

Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in
neighboring areas.

This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.

This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following
exceptions:  Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops
within 6 months after the last application.  Do not plant corn,
cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last
application.

Geographic allowable: CA, CO, ID, MT, NE, OR, WA, and WY only.

Geographic disallowable:  CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in
Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

Preplant

Soil band treatment /Soil drill treatment.

Granule applicator. 	4.95 

lb ai/A 	G 	4.95 

lb ai/A

4.95 

lb ai/cc	3/cc

 	NS 	48 h 

	At planting

Soil band treatment /Soil drill treatment /Soil in-furrow treatment
/Soil incorporated treatment by irrigation /Soil sidedress treatment.

Granule applicator. 	4.95 

lb ai/A	G 	4.95 

lb ai/A

4.95 

lb ai/cc	3/cc	NS 	48 h 

	Postemergence

Soil in-furrow treatment /Soil incorporated treatment by irrigation
/Soil sidedress treatment /Soil treatment.

Granule applicator. 	4.05 

lb ai/A

	G 

	4.95 

lb ai/A

4.95 

lb ai/cc 	3/cc 	NS 

	48 h 



	SWEET POTATO	 120 day(s) preharvest interval.

All application must be made with granular applicators which use
Positive Displacement Metering Units.

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.

Do not allow the feeding of vines or grazing of foliage by livestock.

Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is
present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for
drinking water.  More restrictive setbacks may apply.

Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of
equipment wash waters.

Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.

Do not contaminate water, food or feed.

Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.

Do not feed treated vines to livestock.

Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.

Do not graze livestock in treated areas.

Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.

Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.

Endangered species restriction.

For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where
surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high
water mark.

Ground water restriction.

Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.

Proper ventilation required.

Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in
neighboring areas.

This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.

This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.

For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or
elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of
soil.

10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following
exceptions:  Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops
within 6 months after the last application.  Do not plant corn,
cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last
application.

Geographic allowable: LA and MS only.

Geographic disallowable:  CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in
Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band treatment.

Granule applicator. 	3 lb ai/A 	G 	3 lb ai/A

3 lb ai/cc 	1/cc	NS 	48 h 

	Appendix B. Table of Generic Data Requirements and Studies Used to
Make the Reregistration Decision  TC " Appendix B. Table of Generic Data
Requirements and Studies Used to Make the Reregistration Decision " \f C
\l "2"  

Guide to Appendix B

Appendix B contains listing of data requirements which support the
reregistration for active ingredients within case #0140 (aldicarb)
covered by this RED.  It contains generic data requirements that apply
to aldicarb in all products, including data requirements for which a
"typical formulation" is the test substance.

The data table is organized in the following formats:

Data Requirement (Column 1).  The data requirements are listed in the
order in which they appear in 40 CFR part 158.  The reference numbers
accompanying each test refer to the test protocols set in the Pesticide
Assessment Guidance, which are available from the National technical
Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161 (703)
487-4650.

Use Pattern (Column 2).  This column indicates the use patterns for
which the data requirements apply.  The following letter designations
are used for the given use patterns.

A.  Terrestrial food

Terrestrial feed

Terrestrial non-food

Aquatic food

Aquatic non-food outdoor

Aquatic non-food industrial 

Aquatic non-food residential

Greenhouse food

Greenhouse non-food

Forestry

Residential

Indoor food

Indoor non-food

Indoor medical

Indoor residential

Bibliographic Citation (Column 3).  If the Agency has acceptable data in
its files, this column list the identify number of each study.  This
normally is the Master Record Identification (MIRD) number, but may be a
"GS" number if no MRID number has been assigned.  Refer to the
Bibliography appendix (Appendix D) for a complete citation of the study.

New Guideline Number	Old Guideline Number	Requirement	Use Pattern
Bibliographic Citation(s)

Product Chemistry

830.1550	61-1	Product Identity and Composition	A,B,C	00152095 letter
dated 8/12/86

830.1600	61-2a	Start. Mat. & Mfg. Process	A,B,C	00152095  

830.1620	61-2b	Description of Production Process	A,B,C	00152095  

830.1670	61-2b	Discussion of Impurities	A,B,C	00152095  

830.1700	62-1	Preliminary Analysis	A,B,C	00152095  

830.1750	62-2	Certification of limits	A,B,C	00152095 letter dated
8/12/86

830.1800	62-3	Analytical Method	A,B,C	00152095 letter dated 8/12/86

830.6302	63-2	Color	A,B,C	00152095  

830.6303	63-3	Physical State	A,B,C	00152095  

830.6304	63-4	Odor	A,B,C	00152095  

830.6313	63-13	Stability temp and ions	A,B,C	00152095  

830.6314	63-14	Oxidation and Reduction	A,B,C	00152095  

830.6315	63-15	Flammability	A,B,C	00152095  

830.6316	63-16	Explodability	A,B,C	00152095  

830.6317	63.17	Storage stability	A,B,C	00152095  

830.6319	63-19	Miscibility	A,B,C	00152095  

830.6320	63-20	Corrosion Characteristics	A,B,C	00152095  

830.7000	63-12	pH	A,B,C	00152095  

830.7050	N/A	UV/Visible absorption	A,B,C	00152095  Data Gap

830.7100	63-18	Viscosity	A,B,C	00152095  

830.7200	63-5	Melting point/melting range	A,B,C	00152095  

830.7220	63-6	Boiling point/range	A,B,C	00152095  

830.7300	63-7	Density	A,B,C	00152095  

830.7370	63-10	Dissociation Constants in Water	A,B,C	00152095  

830.7550	63-11	Partial Coefficient, shake flask method 	A,B,C	00152095  

830.7840	63-8	Water Solubility	A,B,C	00152095  

830.7950	63-9	Vapor Pressure	A,B,C	00152095  

Environmental Fate

835.2120	161-1	Hydrolysis	A,B,C	aldicarb:  00053377  00096547  00102011 
00102048  00102057  00102072  00102065

sulfoxide:  00102066

835.2240	161-2	Photodegradation Water	A,B,C	aldicarb:  00102067 
00102068  42498201

835.2410	161-3	Photodegradation Soil and Air	A,B,C	aldicarb:  Waived

sulfoxide:  Waived

sulfone:  Waived

835.4100	162-1	Aerobic Soil Metabolism	A,B,C	aldicarb:  00029989 
00093641  00096968  00102050  00101915  00102051  00102054  00035365 
00101934  00102071  00053366  00080820  00093640  00093642  43805702 
44005001  

sulfone:  00053370  

835.4400	162-3	Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	A,B,C	aldicarb:  43805701  

sulfoxide:  45592110

sulfone:  45592111

835.4300	162-4	Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	A,B,C	aldicarb:  N/A  

sulfoxide:  45592108

sulfone:  45592109

835.1240	163-1	Leaching/Adsorption/Desorption	A,B,C	aldicarb:  00053380 
00053381  00053385  00101915  00101939  00102079  42498202 

sulfoxide:   43560301

sulfone:  43560302

835.6100	164-1	Terrestrial Field Dissipation	A,B,C	aldicarb:  00036313 
00053364  00068252  00080815  00101910  00101923  00101935  00101937 
00102064  00101936  00101968  00102061  00102078  

835.6200	164-2	Aquatic Field Dissipation	A,B,C	aldicarb:  00094799 
00101940  

Environmental Fate – Drinking Water Monitoring Data

835.7100	166-1	Prospective Ground water Monitoring Study	A,B,C	46793702 
46793703  46793704  46793705  46793706  

Ecological Effects

850.2100	71-1a	Avian Oral LD50 Quail/Duck	A,B,C	BOWOAL02  107398 
(Beavers/1979)

850.2200	71-2a	Avian Dietary LC50 Quail	A,B,C	00102132  1096727 
(Beavers/1979)

850.2200	71-2b	Avian Dietary LC50 Quail	A,B,C	096397  0022923 
(Hill/1975)

850.2300	71-4a	Avian Reproduction Quail	A,B,C	Data Gap

850.2300	71-4b	Avian Reproduction Duck	A,B,C	Data Gap

850.1075	72-1a	Freshwater Fish LC50 Bluegill (warm water)	A,B,C	40098001
 3503 (Mayer and Ellersieck 1986)

850.1075	72-1c	Freshwater Fish LC50 Rainbow trout (cold water)	A,B,C
40098001  (Mayer and Ellersieck 1986)

850.1010	72-2a	Freshwater Invertebrate LC50 Daphnia magna	A,B,C	Acc #
096683  (Vilkas/1977)  Foran et al. 1985

850.1045	72-3a	Estuarine/Marine Fish LC50	A,B,C	40228401  (USEPA/1986)

850.1025	72-3b	Estuarine/Marine Mollusk EC50	A,B,C	40228401 
(USEPA/1986)  00066341  (USEPA/1981)

850.1035	72-3c	Estuarine/Marine Shrimp EC50	A,B,C	40228401  (USEPA/1986)

850.1400	72-4a	Fish Early Life-Stage (freshwater)	A,B,C	44598601 
(Pickering and Gilliam 1982)  66341 (USEPA/1981)

850.1400	72-4a	Fish Early Life-Stage (estuarine/marine)	A,B,C	44598601 
(Pickering and Gilliam 1982)  66341 (USEPA/1981)

850.1300	72-4b	Aquatic Invertebrate Life-Cycle (freshwater)	A,B,C
00066341  (USEPA/1981)

850.1350	72-4b	Aquatic Invertebrate Life-Cycle (estuarine/marine)	A,B,C
00066341  (USEPA/1981)

	123-2	Aquatic Plant Growth	A,B,C	40228401  (USEPA/1986)

850.4100	N/A	Terrestrial Plant Toxicity

(seedling emergence)	A,B,C	Data Gap

850.4150	N/A	Terrestrial Plant Toxicity  (vegetative vigor)	A,B,C	Data
Gap

850.4400	122-2	Aquatic Plant Growth (Tier 2)	A,B,C	Data Gap

850.3020	141-1	Honey Bee Acute Contact LD50	A,B,C	00036935 
(Atkins/1975)

N/A	N/A	OECD, Section 2 #207

Earthworm Acute Toxicity Test	A,B,C	Mosleh (2003)

Residue Chemistry

860.1300	171-4a	Nature of Residue in Plants	A,B,C	  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1
00053358  00053364  00053366  00053368  00085455  00101929  00101930 
00101931  00101977  00101996  00102009  00102178  42436602-42436606 
43902401

860.1300	171-4b	Nature of Residue in Livestock	A,B,C	00053371  00053373 
00080697  00080813  00101933  00101967  00159570  43084101  SEQ CHAPTER
\h \r 1 

860.1340	171-4c	Residue Analytical Method plant	A,B,C	00025167  00036315
 00069739  00069740  00101973  00101978  00101992  00101993  00101997 
00101998  00101999  00102004  00102005  00102007  00104553  00135031 
00140487  42436501

860.1340	171-4d	Residue Analytical Method livestock	A,B,C	00101924 
00101990  00101991

860.1340	171-4d	Residue Analytical Method water/fish	A,B,C	  SEQ CHAPTER
\h \r 1 N/A

860.1360	171-4m	Multiple Residue Methods	A,B,C	PAM Volume I Section 302
and 401

860.1380	171-4e	Storage Stability Data	A,B,C	PP#0F1008  PP#9F0798 
PP#3F1414  PP#7E1996  PP#6F1953  PP#7F1995  PP#8F2107  PP#8F0637 
PP#9F2201  PP#6E1792  PP#8F2096  FAP#6H5108  00159571  42467301 
42467302  43844701  43842401 43299005  43299006

860.1400	171-4h	Nature and Magnitude of the Residue in Water, Fish and
Irrigated Crops	A,B,C	  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 N/A

860.1460	171-4i	Magnitude of the Residue in Food Handling Establishments
A,B,C	N/A

860.1480	171-4j	Milk and the Fat, Meat, and Meat Byproducts of Cattle,
Goats, Hogs, Horses, and Sheep	A,B,C	00053372  00101967  PP#3F1414

860.1480	171-4j	Eggs and the Fat, Meat, and Meat Byproducts of Poultry
A,B,C	00053373

860.1500	171-4k	Magnitude of Residue (potato)	A,B,C	00080815  00102012 
00102014  00102172  00164424  42827802-42827804  43299002  43385001

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (sugar beet, roots)	A,B,C	00035368
 00035369  00101966

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (sweet potato)	A,B,C	PP#7F1995 
42722301

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (sugar beet, tops)	A,B,C	00035368 
00035369  00101966

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (beans, dry)	A,B,C	00135031

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (soybean, seed and aspirated grain
fractions)	A,B,C	00135031

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (soybean, forage and soybean, hay)
A,B,C	N/A

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (grapefruit)	A,B,C	00102129 
00148971

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (lemon)	A,B,C	00102129

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 lime)	A,B,C
00102129

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (orange)	A,B,C	00036313  00102075 
00102115  00102174  42004401  42016901  43110601

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (pecan)	A,B,C	00140487

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (sorghum, grain and aspirated
grain fractions)	A,B,C	PP#8F2107 

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (sorghum, forage and sorghum,
stover (fodder))	A,B,C	PP#8F2107  

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 coffee,
bean)	A,B,C	00102024  PP#7F1953

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 cotton,
seed and cotton gin by-products)	A,B,C	00101977  00102061  PP#7F1995 
PP#9F0798  Data Gap

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 peanut,
nutmeat and peanut, hulls)	A,B,C	00102013  PP#3F1414

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 sugarcane)
A,B,C	00101923  PP#2F1188

860.1500	171-4k	 Magnitude of Residue (tobacco)	A,B,C	00102179  00102180

860.1520	171-4l	Processed Food/Feed (citrus)	A,B,C	00102114  00102130 
00140001

860.1520	171-4l	Processed Food/Feed (coffee, bean)	A,B,C	PP#7F1953 
00162562

860.1520	171-4l	Processed Food/Feed (cottonseed)	A,B,C	00101977 
00102061

860.1520	171-4l	Processed Food/Feed (peanut)	A,B,C	00102123  PP#3F1414

860.1520	171-4l	Processed Food/Feed (potato)	A,B,C	00080815  00102012 
00102014  00102172  00164424  00159572  42305801  42827801  43299004

860.1520	171-4l	Processed Food/Feed (sorghum)	A,B,C	PP#8F2107

860.1520	171-4l	Processed Food/Feed (soybean)	A,B,C	00135031  00159573  
40884601

860.1520	171-4l	Processed Food/Feed (sugar beet)	A,B,C	00035368 
00035369  00101966

860.1520	171-4l	Processed Food/Feed (sugarcane)	A,B,C	00101923 
PP#2F1188

860.1850	165-1	Confined rotational crops	A,B,C	42226201

860.1900	165-2	Field rotational crops	A,B,C	42226201

Toxicology

870.1100	81-1	Acute Oral Toxicity Rat	A,B,C	00057333

870.1200	81-2	Acute Dermal Toxicity Rabbit/Rat	A,B,C	00091241  00069916

870.1300	81-3	Acute Inhalation Toxicity Rat	A,B,C	00069916  00057333

870.2400	81-4	Primary Eye Irritation Rabbit	A,B,C	00069916

870.2500	81-5	Primary Skin Irritation	A,B,C	00069916

870.2600	81-6	Dermal Sensitization	A,B,C	N/A

870.3150	82-1b	13-Day Dietary Dog	A,B,C	41919901

870.3700a	83-3a	Developmental Toxicity (Teratogenicity) Rat	A,B,C
41004501

870.3700b	83-3b	Developmental Toxicity (Teratogenicity) Rabbit	A,B,C
0132668

870.3800	83-4	2-Generation Reproduction Rat	A,B,C	42148401

870.4100a	83-1	Chronic Toxicity Rat	A,B,C	43045401

870.4100b	83-1	Chronic Toxicity Dog	A,B,C	40695401  42191501

870.4200	83-2	Carcinogenicity Rat	A,B,C	43045401

870.4300	83-5	Chronic Toxicity/Carcinogenicity Mouse and Rat	A,B,C
00044732  00044733  00044734

870-5300

Gene Mutation	A,B,C	00148168

870.5385	84-2	Mammalian Cytogenetics: Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration 
A,B,C	41661301  41663102

870.5550	84-2	Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells	A,B,C
00141673

870.6200a

Acute Neurotoxicity Screening Battery	A,B,C	43442301

870.6200b

Subchronic Neurotoxicity Screening Battery	A,B,C	43829602

870.6300

Developmental Neurotoxicity	A,B,C	43829601

870.7485

Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics	A,B,C	00102022  00102023

N/A	N/A	Rat Dominant Lethal Study	A,B,C	43575101

N/A	N/A	Special Neurotoxicity Studies:

Moser VC	A,B,C	45068601 (1999)  TAP 157 94-106

N/A	N/A	Acute Oral Study  (Human) Inveresk	A,B,C	42373001 (1992)

46131001 (supplementary report)

Special Study	N/A	Comparative Cholinesterase Assay	A, B,C	Data Gap

Occupational/Residue Exposure

N/A	N/A	Aldicarb Specific Study	A,B,C	43852501

N/A	N/A	Terbufos Study	A,B,C	44793301

Appendix C. Technical Support Documents   TC " Appendix C. Technical
Support Documents" \f C \l "2"  

Additional documentation in support of this RED is maintained in the OPP
docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0253.  This docket may be accessed in the OPP
docket room located at Room S-4900, One Potomac Yard, 2777 S. Crystal
Drive, Arlington, VA.  It is open Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.  All documents may be
viewed in the OPP docket room or downloaded or viewed via the Internet
at the following site:     HYPERLINK "http://www.epa.gov/REDs/" 
http://www.regulations.gov .

The docket initially contained preliminary risk assessments, supporting
documents, and technical (or manufacturing-use) registrant error
comments for aldicarb as of November 14, 2006.  After a sixty-day public
comment period, EPA considered the public comments that were submitted
to the docket and revised the risk assessments as necessary.  The
revised risk assessments, any supporting documents that needed to be
revised, impact assessments, and memos describing the the Biological and
Economic Assessment Division (BEAD), Environmental Fate and Effects
Division (EFED), and Health Effects Division (HED) response to public
comments will be added to the docket on September 26, 2006.

The Agency documents in the docket include:

Federal Register Notice: Aldicarb Interim Reregistration Eligibility
Decision; Notice of Availability.

Reader’s Guide to the Aldicarb E-Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163.

Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Document for Aldicarb.

BEAD Response to Comments Submitted to Docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163.

	

Quantitative Impact Analysis for At-peg Application of Aldicarb to
Peanuts (DP 337549).

Significance of Aldicarb Use in the Production of Dry Beans, Soybeans,
Pecans, Sweet Potatoes, Cotton and Citrus.			September 20, 2007 –
Derek Berwald and Angel Chiri

EFED Response to Public Comments for Aldicarb RED: Docket ID#
Opp-2005-0163-0176.

Aldicarb - Ecological risk results for alternative application rate and
incorporation efficiencies.

Use of Aldicarb for Lygus Bug Suppression, Aphids, and Mites on Alfalfa
Grown for Seed Production.

Use of Aldicarb for Leaf Minors on Coffee, for Nematodes on Coffee and
Sugarcane, and for Aphids and Flea Beatles on Tobacco.

Review of “A Retrospective Ground Water Monitoring Study for Aldicarb
and Its Metabolites in the Southeastern United States (MRID 467937-06);
Mississippi Delta (MRID 467937-05); Texas (MRID 467937-04); California
(MRID 467937-03); and Pacific Northwest (MRID 467937-02).

ADDENDUM to:  Aldicarb - Ecological risk results for alternative
application rate and incorporation efficiencies

Aldicarb (List A Case 0140, Chemical ID No. 098301).  HED Response to
Comments Received During the Public Comment Period.  

HED Revised Human Health Risk Assessment for the Reregistration
Eligibility Decision Document (RED).  

Appendix D. Citations Considered to be Part of the Database Supporting
the Reregistration Decision (Bibliography)   TC " Appendix D. Citations
Considered to be Part of the Database Supporting the Reregistration
Decision (Bibliography)" \f C \l "2"  

Guide to Appendix D

Contents of Bibliography.  This bibliography contains citations of all
studies considered relevant by EPA in arriving at the positions and
conclusions stated elsewhere in the Reregistration Eligibility Document.
 Primary sources for studies in this bibliography have been the body of
data submitted to EPA and its predecessor agencies in support of past
regulatory decisions.  Selections from other sources including the
published literature, in those instances where they have been
considered, are included.

Units of Entry.  The unit of entry in this bibliography is called a
"study."  In the case of published materials, this corresponds closely
to an article.  In the case of unpublished materials submitted to the
Agency, the Agency has sought to identify documents at a level parallel
to the published article from within the typically larger volumes in
which they were submitted.  The resulting "studies" generally have a
distinct title (or at least a single subject), can stand alone for
purposes of review and can be described with a conventional
bibliographic citation.  The Agency has also attempted to unite basic
documents and commentaries upon them, treating them as a single study.

Identification of Entry.  The entries in this bibliography are sorted
numerically by Master Record Identifier, or "MRID” number.  This
number is unique to the citation, and should be used whenever a specific
reference is required.  It is not related to the six-digit "Accession
Number" which has been used to identify volumes of submitted studies
(see paragraph 4(d)(4) below for further explanation).  In a few cases,
entries added to the bibliography late in the review may be preceded by
a nine character temporary identifier.  These entries are listed after
all MRID entries.  This temporary identifying number is also to be used
whenever specific reference is needed.

Form of Entry.  In addition to the Master Record Identifier (MRID), each
entry consists of a citation containing standard elements followed, in
the case of material submitted to EPA, by a description of the earliest
known submission.  Bibliographic conventions used reflect the standard
of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), expanded to provide
for certain special needs.

Author.  Whenever the author could confidently be identified, the Agency
has chosen to show a personal author.  When no individual was
identified, the Agency has shown an identifiable laboratory or testing
facility as the author.  When no author or laboratory could be
identified, the Agency has shown the first submitter as the author.

Document date.  The date of the study is taken directly from the
document.  When the date is followed by a question mark, the
bibliographer has deduced the date from the evidence contained in the
document.  When the date appears as (1999), the Agency was unable to
determine or estimate the date of the document.

Title. In some cases, it has been necessary for the Agency
bibliographers to create or enhance a document title.  Any such
editorial insertions are contained between square brackets.

Trailing parentheses. For studies submitted to the Agency in the past,
the trailing parentheses include (in addition to any self-explanatory
text) the following elements describing the earliest known submission:

Submission date.  The date of the earliest known submission appears
immediately following the word "received."

Administrative number.  The next element immediately following the word
"under" is the registration number, experimental use permit number,
petition number, or other administrative number associated with the
earliest known submission.

Submitter.  The third element is the submitter. When authorship is
defaulted to the submitter, this element is omitted.

Volume Identification (Accession Numbers).  The final element in the
trailing parentheses identifies the EPA accession number of the volume
in which the original submission of the study appears.  The six-digit
accession number follows the symbol "CDL," which stands for "Company
Data Library."  This accession number is in turn followed by an
alphabetic suffix which shows the relative position of the study within
the volume.

Bibliography

6300	Hiddleson, L.; Bishop, J.P. (1966) Report No. 074566-045.
(Unpublished study received Mar 24, 1976 under 359-620; submitted by
Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Monmouth Junction, N.J.; CDL:095197-I) 

6606	Butts, R.F.; Simpson, G.W. (1969) Zolone EC--Potatoes: Final Report
No. BB 69-60. (Unpublished study received Dec 7, 1972 under 3F1337;
prepared in cooperation with Univ. of Maine, Entomology Dept., submitted
by Rhodia, Inc., New Brunswick, N.J.; CDL: 094849-AD) 

6618	Wang, D.; Bacon, O.G. (1971) Zolone EC--Potatoes: Final Report No.
FW 71-52. (Unpublished study received Dec 7, 1972 under 3F1337; prepared
in cooperation with Univ. of California--Davis, Dept. of Entomology,
submitted by Rhodia, Inc., New Brunswick, N.J.; CDL:094849-AR) 

6848	Stafford, E. (1966) Report No. PA 66-46. (Unpublished study
received Jul 5, 1968 under 8F0668; submitted by Chipman Chemical Co.,
Inc., Burlingame, Calif.; CDL:092027-BG) 

6962	Pollet, D.K.; Aitken, J.B. (1977) Pest control for kernal pecans.
Pecan South (Apr):138-140. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jun 9,
1977 under 359-620; submitted by Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Monmouth Junction,
N.J.; CDL:230375-T) 

7727	Jenkins, L.E. (1974) Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of
Insects on Dry Beans, 1974. (Unpublished study received Mar 31, 1975
under 201-347; prepared by Colorado State Univ., Bay Farm Experiment
Station, Dept. of Zoology-Entomology, submitted by Shell Chemical Co.,
Washington, D.C.; CDL:223468-AK) 

7741	Reynolds, H.T. (1971) Biological Effects of Lannate and Fundal/
Galecron Applied to Cotton for Residue Analysis. (Unpublished study
received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by Univ. of
California--Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural
Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology; submitted by Shell Chemical
Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:232404-P) 

7750	Pfrimmer, T.R. (1974) Results of Insecticide Tests with Materials
Furnished by the Shell Chemical Company. (Unpublished study received Jun
29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service,
Delta States Agricultural Research Center, Bioenvironmental Insect
Control Laboratory, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:232404-AI) 

7808	Reed, J.A. (1969) Potato Plots--1969. (Unpublished study received
Feb 28, 1972 under 352-342; prepared by Rutgers Univ., submitted by E.I.
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL: 003033-L) 

7816	Watson, T.F.; Barnes, K.K.; Fullerton, D.G.; et al. (1970) Field
and Laboratory Investigations on Cotton Insects in Arizona: 1970.
(Summary report prepared for Cotton Insects Research and Control
Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, Jan 12 and 13, 1971. Unpublished study
received Apr 18, 1972 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of Arizona,
Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours &
Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003040-I) 

7828	Evans, A.W.; Pate, T. (1966) Thrips Infestations, Average Plant
Heights, Average Stand Counts, Rates of Technical Materials in Ounces,
Type of Treatments and Insecticides Used in Thrips Test at Clarksdale,
Mississippi during 1966: Table 1. (Unpublished study received Oct 15,
1968 under 352-342; prepared in cooperation with Mississippi State
Univ., submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.;
CDL:003003-D) 

8096	Brodie, B.B. (1968) The Effects of Nematicidesic Treatments on
Yield of Flue-Cured Tobacco, Tifton, Georgia 1968. (Unpublished study
received Apr 22, 1969 under 352-342; prepared by U.S. Dept. of
Agriculture, Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station, submitted by E.I.
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003007-F) 

8129	Watson, T.F. (1972) Field and Laboratory Investigations on Cotton
Insects in Arizona. (Summary report prepared for Cotton Insect Research
and Control Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, Jan 9 and 10, 1973;
unpublished study received May 24, 1976 under 352-342; submitted by E.I.
du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:225098-K) 

8256	Todd, J. (1970) Protection of Seedling Soybeans from Damage by
Lesser Cornstalk Borer and/or Three-Cornered Alfalfa Hopper with
Granular Insecticides. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976 under
201-347; prepared by Georgia Experiment Station, submitted by Shell
Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:232405-AL) 

8298	Bacon, O.G.; McCalley, N. (1966) Control of the Potato Tuberworm.
(Unpublished study received Jan 21, 1970 under 0F0886; prepared by Univ.
of California--Davis, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.,
Wilmington, Del.; CDL:091530-R) 

8317	Reed, J.P. (1969) Potato Insect Control Test. (Unpublished study
received Jan 21, 1970 under 0F0886; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of
Entomology and Zoology, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.,
Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:091530-AH) 

8606	Radcliffe, E.B. (1973) 1973 Potato Insecticide Trials, Rosemount,
Minnesota. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1977 under 352-342;
prepared by Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Entomology, Fisheries, and
Wildlife, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.;
CDL:231911-E) 

8639	Bacon, O.G.; McCalley, N. (1966) Green Peach Aphid Populations
Occurring on Potato Foliage in Plots Treated for Control of the Potato
Tuberworm. (Unpublished study received Nov 16, 1971 under 352-342;
prepared by Univ. of California--Davis, submitted by E.I. du Pont de
Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL: 003031-O) 

8924	Polles, S.G. (1973) Results of Efficacy Studies Using Lannate and
Various Insecticides on Pecan Trees. (Unpublished study received Sep 21,
1976 under 352-342; submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.,
Wilmington, Del.; CDL:095289-H) 

9073	Stier, E.F. (1969) Flavor Evaluation Report on Potatoes.
(Unpublished study received Jan 21, 1970 under 0F0886; prepared by
Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Food Science, submitted by E.I. du Pont de
Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:091530-H) 

9103	Thurston, R. (1968) Effect of Granular and Foliar Insecticides on
Leaf Damage by Tobacco Hornworms: Table 4. (Unpublished study received
Feb 12, 1970 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of Kentucky, submitted by
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003013-E) 

9247	Morishita, P. (1973) Thrips Control with Systemics. (Unpublished
study received Aug 25, 1976 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of
California--Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural
Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by E.I. du Pont de
Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:227322-M) 

10163	Wells, J.C. (1970) Peanut Nematocide Test--1970. (Unpublished
study including letter dated Oct 22, 1970 from J.C. Wells to Bill
Wilner, received Oct 5, 1973 under 3G1359; prepared by North Carolina
State Univ., Agricultural Extension Service, Dept. of Plant Pathology,
submitted by PPG Industries, Inc., Chemical Div., Pittsburgh, Pa.;
CDL:093629-I) 

11390	Schulz, J.T.; Kamali, K.; Ehart, R. (1971) Biology, Ecology and
Control of Sunflower Insects. (Unpublished study received Jun 4, 1974
under 100-501; prepared by North Dakota State Univ., Agricultural
Experiment Station, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:094016-G) 

11418	Pollet, D.K. (1975) Pecan Demonstration Orchard Treatments, 1975.
(Unpublished study including letter dated Dec 17, 1976 from D.K. Pollet
and J.B. Aitken to Steve Dumford, received Dec 22, 1977 under 100-501;
prepared by Clemson Univ., Cooperative Extension Service, Dept. of
Entomology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:232600-G) 

11419	Pollet, D.K. (1976) Control of pecan weevil shuckworm and aphid in
South Carolina. Pecan South (Jun):408-411. (AlsoInunpublished submission
received Dec 22, 1977 under 100-501; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232600-H) 

11873	Mistric, W.J. (1966) Report of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Regarding
Cigarette Smoke Tests Made on Samples of Cured Tobacco from Field
Experiments in 1965: Table 2. (Unpublished study including letters dated
Dec 3, 1965 from R. Wenger to Walter J. Mistric and Sep 20, 1965 from to
Thomas D. Lowman, received Dec 28, 1971 under 100-501; prepared by North
Carolina State Univ. in cooperation with R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.,
submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:000539-L) 

11893	Armbrust, E.J.; Cothran, W.R.; Wood, T.K.; et al. (1966) Early
Spring Insecticide Applications for Alfalfa Weevil Control. (Unpublished
study received Oct 22, 1972 under 100-501; prepared by Cornell Univ.,
Dept. of Entomology and Limnology, Div. of Forage and Cereal Insect
Investigations, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:000536-G) 

12428	Gerhardt, P.D. (1965) Insect Control Investigations on Potatoes:
Project 418. (Unpublished study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323;
prepared by Univ. of Arizona, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-D) 

12435	Wells, A.; Wagner, D. (1967) Insecticide Evaluation on
Potatoes-1967. (Unpublished study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323;
submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-O) 

12438	Radcliffe, E.B. (1965) 1965 Potato Data. (Unpublished study
received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; prepared by Univ. of Minnesota,
Dept. of Entomology, Fisheries, and Wildlife, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-R) 

12440	Radcliffe, E.B. (1968) Control of Insect Pests of Potato with
Various Rates and Formulations of Several Insecticides: Table 1.
(Unpublished study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-T) 

12444	Reed, J.P.; Stier, E.F. (1965) Potato Insect Control Tests--1965.
(Unpublished study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; prepared by
Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Entomology and Economic Zoology, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-X) 

12539	Bacon, O.G. (1965) Ecology, Biology and Control of Insects and
Mites Affecting the Seed Production of Alflafasic, Clovers and Other
Small Seeded Legumes in California: Project No. H1735. (Unpublished
study received May 8, 1970 under 0F0892; prepared by Univ. of
California--Davis, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology,
submitted by Geigy Chemical Corp., Ardsley, N.Y.; CDL:091543-J) 

12561	Lawatsch, D.J.; Buchholz, C. (1968) Alfalfa Weevil Test.
(Unpublished study including letter dated Jun 26, 1968 from D.J.
Lawatsch to A.A. Di Edwardo, received May 8, 1970 under 0F0892;
submitted by Geigy Chemical Corp., Ardsley, N.Y.; CDL:091543-AQ) 

12933	Heald, C.M.; Thames, W.H. (1969) Effect of Nematicides on Yield of
Cotton Infected withRotylenchulus reniformis. (Unpublished study
including letters dated Nov 17, 1969 from C.M. Heald to Clyde W. McBeth
and Dec 2, 1969 from J.M. McBride to R.B. Boren, received Oct 5, 1971
under 201-119; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Crops
Research Div., submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:000777-E) 

12948	Jorgenson, E.C. (1968) Yield of Treated Sugarbeets. (Unpublished
study including letters dated Dec 6, 1968 from E.C. Jorgenson to Stanley
T. Ichikawa and Jan 20, 1969 from J.L. Reed to Supervisor, New York
Agricultural Chemicals Div., Pesticide Development Dept., Agronomics
Herbicides, Nematocides and Fungicides, received Oct 5, 1971 under
201-119; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Crops Research
Div., Crops Research Laboratory, submitted by Shell Chemical Co.,
Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-X) 

12950	Ruppel, R.F.; Fogg, R.; Gomulinski, M.S.; et al. (1968) Sugar Beet
Nematode, Granules, 1968. (Unpublished study received Oct 5, 1971 under
201-119; submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:000777-Z) 

12959	Thomas, W.O.; Green, H.B. (1967) Insecticidal Control of Insects
Attacking Southern Peas: Project No. SZ-10. (Unpublished study including
letter dated Feb 10, 1969 from R. Boren to Supervisor, New York,
Agricultural Chemicals Div., Pesticide Development, Agronomic
Insecticides, received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by
Mississippi State Univ., Truck Crops Branch Experiment Station,
submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 000777-AI) 

12960	Thomas, W.O.; Green, H.B. (1967) Control of Soil Insects Attacking
Sweet Potatoes: Project No. SZ-11. (Unpublished study received Oct 5,
1971 under 201-119; prepared by Mississippi State Univ., Truck Crops
Branch Experiment Station, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington,
D.C.; CDL:000777-AJ) 

12978	Brodie, B.B. (1966) Evaluation of Potential Properitary sic
Chemicals for Root-Knot Control of Tobacco--1966. (Unpublished study
received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by U.S. Agricultural
Research Service, Crops Research Div., Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment
Station, Nematology Investigations, submitted by Shell Chemical Co.,
Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-BC) 

13020	Miller, P.M. (1963) Tobacco Cyst Nematode Control. (Unpublished
study received on unknown date under 2139-76; prepared by Connecticut
Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by Nor-Am Agricultural
Products, Inc., Woodstock, Ill.; CDL:025254-G) 

13076	Martin, W.J.; Birchfield, W. (1968) Meloidogyne incognitaGroup.
(Unpublished study received Oct 6, 1969 under 464-379; submitted by Dow
Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Mich.; CDL:003591-E) 

13077	Martin, W.J.; Birchfield, W. (1968) Rotylenchulus reniformis:
Efficacy of Nematocides on Sweet Potatoes: #8714. Unpublished study. 27
p. 

13079	Martin, W.J.; Birchfield, W. (1968)Meloidogyne incognitaGroup and
Streptomyces ipomoea. (Unpublished study received Oct 6, 1969 under
464-379; submitted by Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Mich.; CDL:003591-H)


13090	Graham, T.W. (1968) 1968 Field Nematocide Tests for Control of
Tobacco Nematodes. (Unpublished study including letter dated Sep 12,
1968 from T.W. Graham to Cooperators, received Oct 6, 1969 under
464-379; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Tobacco
Breeding and Disease Investigations, submitted by Dow Chemical U.S.A.,
Midland, Mich.; CDL:003590-T) 

13794	Thompson, H.E. (1966) Elm Leaf Beetle Control in Kansas:
1961-1966. (Unpublished study including letter dated Feb 2, 1967 from
H.E. Thompson to J.J. Mauget Co., received Nov 21, 1967 under 7946-1;
prepared by Kansas State Univ., Dept. of Entomology, submitted by J.J.
Mauget Co., Burbank, Calif.; CDL:008103-AC) 

13797	Arnett, W.H. (1965) Elm Leaf Beetle Control with Systemic
Chemicals: Report No. 18098. (Unpublished study received Nov 21, 1967
under 7946-1; prepared by Univ. of Nevada for Chemagro Corp., submitted
by J.J. Mauget Co., Burbank, Calif.; CDL: 008103-AM) 

13962	Walton, R.R.; Burton, R.L. (1963) The Use of Systemic Insecticides
for the Control of the Nantucket Pine Moth, Rhyacionia
frustrana(Comst.), on Pines in Oklahoma, 1962-63. (Unpublished study
received Jun 26, 1967 under 201-229; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ.,
Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:000938-W) 

13987	Brooks, R.F. (1968) Spiral Aphid: Test No.: RF 58. (Unpublished
study including letter dated Nov 25, 1968 from R.F. Brooks to Jack T.
Reinhardt, received Feb 3, 1977 under 201-274; prepared by Univ. of
Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Citrus Experiment
Station, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:095827-H) 

14394	Stier, E.F. (1965) Flavor Evaluation Report on Potatoes.
(Unpublished study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-CF) 

14455	Brodie, B.B.; Dukes, P.D. (1966) Field Performance of Selected
Nematocides and Soil Fumigants: Line Project No.: CR f2-16. (Unpublished
study received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by U.S. Agricultural
Research Service, Crops Research Div., Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment
Station, Nematology Investigations, submitted by Shell Chemical Co.,
Washington, D.C.; CDL: 000777-BB) 

14458	North Carolina State University, Research on Wheels (1965) Tobacco
Summary Report of 1965 Data. Raleigh, N.C.: NCSU. (Plant pathology
information note no. 133; alsoInunpublished submission received Nov 11,
1966 under 464-240; submitted by Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Mich.;
CDL:003480-A) 

14927	Schaefer, R.; Koehler, C.; Kirby, M. (1975) Control of Greenhouse
Whiteflies with Multiple Applications. (Unpublished study received Jul
12, 1977 under 239-EX-67; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of
California--Berkeley, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Chevron Chemical
Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:233115-E) 

14949	Sleesman, J.P. (1972) Vegetable Insect Control Experiments.
Wooster: Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Dept. of
Entomology. (Ent. misc. publication 73-1; report no. 36258; pp.
1-6,11-17 only; also In unpublished submission received Jul 24, 1973
under 4F1424; submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Agricultural Div.,
Kansas City, Mo.; CDL:094861-I) 

15140	Cooledge, C.Y.; Murphy, D.W.; Mau, R.F.L. (1978) Orthene Use on
Various Plants. (Unpublished study received Dec 21, 1978 under 239-2427;
prepared in cooperation with Univ. of Hawaii, Agricultural Experiment
Station, submitted by Chevron Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.;
CDL:236631-M) 

15141	Murphy, D.W.; Oetting, R. (1977) Mealybug, Greenhouse Foliage
Plants, Compressed Air Spray, One Application. (Unpublished study
received Dec 21, 1978 under 239-2427; prepared in cooperation with Univ.
of California--Riverside, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Chevron
Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL: 236631-N) 

15285	Goyer, R. (1972) Orthene 75 S: Artificial Diet. (Unpublished study
received Jun 30, 1975 under 239-2443; prepared in cooperation with
Cornell Univ., Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Chevron Chemical Co.,
Richmond, Calif.; CDL:222345-D) 

15973	Bass, M.H.; Guthrie, C.D.; Cobb, P.P.; et al. (1972) Annual Report
for Period Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 1972: Biology and Control of Insect Pests
of Soybeans and Peanuts: Ala-274, RRF Ala-295, S-74. (Unpublished study
received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by Auburn Univ.,
Zoology-Entomology Dept., submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington,
D.C.; CDL:232408-N) 

16013	Sorensen, K.A. (1973) Fruit and Vegetable Insects. (Unpublished
study received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by North Carolina
State Univ., submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:232410-V) 

20129	Riverside Chemical Company (1967) Effect of Combinations of
Herbicides and Systemic Insecticides on Cotton Planted April 24, 1967.
(Unpublished study received Sep 26, 1968 under 9779-93; CDL:227188-P) 

20600	Arnold, E.; Wells, A. (1967) Report No. C 67-42. (Unpublished
study received Dec 8, 1967 under 8F0668; submitted by Chipman Chemical
Co., Inc., Burlingame, Calif; CDL:092961-H) 

22444	Waddill, V. (1977) Evaluation of insecticides for control of
insect pests of tomatoes, 1977. Insecticide and Avaricide Tests 3: 109.
(AlsoInunpublished submission received Mar 26, 1979 under 352-342;
submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.;
CDL:237888-I) 

25162	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1979) Magnitude of
the Residue. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264330;
CDL:099219-A) 

25163	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1976) Nature of the
Residue. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264330;
CDL:099219-B) 

25164	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1975) Safety to the
Consumer. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264330;
CDL:099219-C) 

25165	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1978) Description of
the Analytical Methods. Summary of studies 099219-E and 099219F.
(Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264-330; CDL:099219-D) 

25166	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1978) A Method for
the Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Grapes. Method
Aldicarb-FPD-General dated Aug 1978. (Unpublished study received Jan 23,
1980 under 264-330; CDL:099219-E) 

25167	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1977) A Confirmatory
Procedure for the Identification of Aldicarb Residues by Gas
Chromatography Utilizing a Non-polar Column. Method
AldicarbFPD-Confirmatory dated Feb 1977. (Unpublished study received Jan
23, 1980 under 264-330; CDL:099219-F) 

25168	Cox, J.A.; Jubb, G.L., Jr.; Taschenberg, E.F.; et al. (1978)
Efficacy Data. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264330;
prepared in cooperation with Pennsylvania State Univ., Vineyard
Experiment Station and others, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:099220-A) 

25487	Allen, W.W.; Johnson, R.; Morishita, F.S.; et al. (1979) Efficacy
and Phytotoxicity. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under MN
80/1; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California--Berkeley, Dept.
of Entomology and others, submitted by state of Minnesota for Penick
Corp., Lyndhurst, N.J.; CDL: 241667-A) 

25511	Back, R.C. (1979) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: The Long Island Water
Situation. (Unpublished study received Jan 30, 1980 under 101669;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 241702-A) 

28644	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1980) Aldicarb
Pesticide Mechanism of Action and Therapy: Part II. (Unpublished study
received Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330; CDL:241639-A) 

28645	Maronpot, R.R. (1980) Effect of a Single Peroral Dose of Aldicarb
on Cholinesterase Inhibition and Recovery in the Rat: Project Report
43-2. (Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330; prepared
by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, submitted by Union
Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:241639-B) 

28646	Maronpot, R.R. (1980) Effect of a Single Peroral Dose of Aldicarb
on Cholinesterase Inhibition and Recovery in the Rabbit: Project Report
43-3. (Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330; prepared
by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, submitted by Union
Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa; CDL:241639-C) 

28647	Maronpot, R.R. (1980) Effect of a Single Oral Dose of Aldicarb on
Cholinesterase Inhibition and Recovery in the Dog: Project Report 43-4.
(Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264330; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:241639-D) 

28648	Panasevich, R.E.; Matthews, R.J. (1980) The Effects of Aldicarb #2
DEQ-85 upon Endogenous and Exogenous Acetylcholine When Administered at
Threshold Doses: Study No. PH-234-OC-001-79. (Unpublished study received
Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by Pharmakon Laboratories,
submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.;
CDL:241639-E) 

28811	Landis, B.J.; Jemmett, D.; Onsager, ; et al. (1971) Efficacy Data
for Control of Wireworms in Potatoes. (Unpublished study including test
nos. SI-25-P-72, SI-26-P-72, SI-96-P-71..., received Nov 20, 1972 under
476-1995; prepared in cooperation with U.S. Agricultural Research
Service, Entomology Research Div. and others, submitted by Stauffer
Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:003842-K) 

28813	Sullivan, P.; Wright, J.; Gold, L.; et al. (1972) Soil Insecticide
Field Test Data: Test No. I-336-JW-72. (Unpublished study including test
nos. I-334-JW-72, I-333-JW-72, I-332-JW-72..., received Nov 20, 1972
under 476-1995; prepared in cooperation with United States Sugar Corp.
and others, submitted by Stauffer Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.;
CDL:003842-M) 

29290	Union Carbide Corporation (1967) Performance Data Temik
10G--Cotton. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69;
CDL:005587-A) 

29291	Union Carbide Corporation (19) The Name, Chemical, Identity, and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik. (Unpublished study
received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-B) 

29292	Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Determination of Technical Temik
2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl) oxime and
Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide by Infrared Analysis. Method 64C-21V5-K46
dated Oct 25, 1968. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under
1016-69; CDL:005587-C) 

29293	Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Full Reports of Investigations
Made with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik.
(Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-D) 

29294	Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Metabolism and Toxicity of
Metabolites. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69;
CDL:005587-E) 

29295	Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Toxicity of the Formulated
Product Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Feb 6,
1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-F) 

29296	Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Metabolism in Plants.
(Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-G) 

29297	Beckham, C.M.; Brooks, O.; Cowan, C.B.; et al. (1968)
Introduction. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69;
prepared in cooperation with Univ. of Georgia and others, submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:005587-H) 

29298	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Cotton Foliage and Systemic
Activity. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69;
CDL:005587-I) 

29299	Clarkson, V.A.; Fronek, F.; Bariola, L.A. (1968) Residue Data for
Temik in Soil. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69;
prepared in cooperation with Grower Services, Inc. and U.S. Dept. of
Agriculture, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:005587-J) 

29300	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Description of Analytical Methods.
(Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL: 005587-K) 

29301	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Practical Methods for Removing
Residues That Exceed Any Proposed Tolerance: Temik. (Unpublished study
received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-L) 

29302	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Reasonable Grounds in Support of
the Petition: Temik. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under
1016-69; CDL:005587-M) 

29323	Bass, M.H.; Johnson, S.J.; Chiu, P. (1974) Biology and Control of
Insect Pests of Soybeans and Peanuts: Report No. 43781. (Unpublished
study including submitter summary, received Jul 1, 1975 under 3125-163;
prepared by Auburn Univ., submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas
City, Mo.; CDL:115279-D) 

29943	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb
(A), Aldicarb Sulfoxide (ASO), Aldicarb Sulfone (ASO2) and a 1:1 Mixture
of ASO:ASO2 Two Year Feeding in the Diet of Rats: Special Report 35-82.
(Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1980 under 1016-69; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:241658-A) 

29986	Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.
(Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-C) 

29987	Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik Aldicarb Granular
Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:
097162-D) 

29988	Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide:
Assay and Analysis for Impurities. (Unpublished study received Jun 30,
1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-E) 

29989	Smith, F.F.; Maitlen, J.C.; McDonough, L.M.; et al. (1978) Report
of Residue Analysis: PCY-68-11. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978
under 1016-78; prepared in cooperation with U.S. Agricultural Research
Service, Entomology Research Div., Pesticide Chemicals Research Branch
and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:097162-G) 

29990	Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Description of Analytical
Methods. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:
097162-H) 

29991	Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Determination of Total Toxic
Aldicarb Residues in Tomatoes by Gas Chromatography. Method dated Aug
1977. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 101678;
CDL:097162-I) 

29993	Union Carbide Corporation (1978) Practical Method for Removing
Toxic Aldicarb Pesticide Residues from Tomatoes. (Unpublished study
received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-J) 

29994	Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of
the Petition: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under
1016-78; CDL:097162-K) 

29995	Lyons, R.; Lindquist, ; Sorensen, ; et al. (1977) Residues from
Aldicarb on Tomatoes. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under
1016-78; prepared by Michigan State Univ. and others, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:097162-L) 

29996	Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Confirmatory Procedure for the
Identification of Aldicarb Residues Utilizing a Non-polar GLC Column.
Method dated Feb 1977. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under
1016-78; CDL:097162-M) 

30423	Field, W.E.; Mellott, M.J. (1979) Oral LDI50^ in Rabbits: Study
No. CDC-UC-007-79. (Unpublished study received Feb 28, 1980 under
264-330; prepared by CDC Research, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:242164-A) 

30424	Field, W.E.; Mellott, M.J. (1979) Acute Dermal Toxicity in Rats:
Study No. CDC-UC-008-79. (Unpublished study received Feb 28, 1980 under
264-330; prepared by CDC Research, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 242164-B) 

30425	Field, W.E.; Mellott, M.J. (1979) Acute Dermal Toxicity in
Rabbits: Study No. CDC-UC-009-79. (Unpublished study received Feb 28,
1980 under 264-330; prepared by CDC Research, Inc., submitted by Union
Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa; CDL: 242164-C) 

31311	Nigh, E.L., Jr.; Thomason, I.J.; Caveness, F.E.; et al. (1968)
Quick Summary Reference of Performance of Temik 10G on Insects, Mites,
Nematodes Attacking Cotton (Includes Data 1964 thru 1967). (Unpublished
study received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared in cooperation with
Univ. of Arizona, Dept. of Plant Pathology and others, submitted by
Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:091942-A) 

31547	Allen, W.W.; Johnson, R.; Morishita, F.S.; et al. (1979) Efficacy
and Phytotoxicity. (Unpublished study received Jan 11, 1980 under IL
80/1; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California, Div. of
Entomology, submitted by Illinois, Dept. of Agriculture, Plant & Apiary
Protection for Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, N.J.; CDL:241606-A) 

31565	Wilson, W.L.; Todd, F.A.; Leake, P.H. (1976) Sensory Evaluation of
Cigarettes Made from Tobacco Treated with Standak 75% Wettable Powder
Sulfocarb Pesticide (1974-1976). (Unpublished study received Feb 28,
1978 under 1016-79; prepared in cooperation with Imperial Tobacco, Ltd.
and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:232983-B) 

31763	Blackmon, C.W.; Farrar, L.L.; Smith, F.H.; et al. (1973) Addition
to Synopsis of Biological Performance and Phytotoxicity on Cotton and
Soybeans. (Unpublished study received Jan 3, 1974 under 3125-213;
prepared in cooperation with Clemson Univ.; Edisto Experiment Station
and others, submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, Mo.;
CDL:094066-A) 

32245	Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide.
(Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-B) 

32246	Sleesman, J.P.; Hofmaster, R.N.; Waterfield, R.L.; et al. (1978)
Discussion of Performance of Temik: Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished
study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; prepared in cooperation with
Ohio State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station and others, submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:097163-A) 

32505	Allen, W.W.; Morishita, F.S.; Koranski, D.S.; et al. (1979)
Efficacy and Phytotoxicity. (Unpublished study received Apr 24, 1980
under DE 80/5; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of
California--Berkeley, Div. of Entomology and others, submitted by
Delaware, Dept. of Agriculture, Div. of Production and Promotion for
Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, N.J.; CDL:242353-A) 

35363	Union Carbide Corporation (1971) Ingestion of Aldicarb by Human
Volunteers: A Controlled Study of the Effects of Aldicarb on Man.
Includes undated methods entitled: Blood cholinesterase determination by
a radiometric method; Aldicarb: The determination of residues in human
urine. (Unpublished study including letter dated Feb 5, 1971 from C.U.
Dernehl to R.C. Back, received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; CDL:091747-A) 

35364	Union Carbide Corporation (1970) Response to Comments on Pesticide
Petition 0F1008: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971
under 1F1008; CDL:091747-B) 

35365	Bull, D.L.; Stokes, R.A.; Coppedge, J.R.; et al. (1970) Further
studies of the fate of Aldicarb in soil. Journal of Economic Entomology
63(4):1283-1289. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jul 26, 1971
under 1F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:091747-C) 

35366	Coppedge, J.R.; Ridgway, R.L.; Bull, D.L. (1968) A Preliminary
Report on the Movement and Persistence of Aldicarb in Soil. (U.S.
Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., unpublished
study; CDL:091747-D) 

35367	Thomason, I.J. (1970) Efficacy Study Using Sugar Beets.
(Unpublished study including letter dated Dec 29, 1970 from I.J.
Thomason to Robert G. Haines, received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008;
prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California--Riverside, Citrus
Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of
Nematology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:091747-E) 

35368	Lange, W.H.; Phillips, I.L. (1971) Residue Study Using Sugar
Beets. (Unpublished study including letter dated Dec 9, 1970 from W.H.
Lange to Robert Haines, received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared in
cooperation with Univ. of California--Davis, Agricultural Experiment
Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-F) 

35369	Yun, Y.M.; Ellis, K.C. (1970) Residue Study Using Sugar Beets.
(Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared in
cooperation with Great Western Sugar Co., submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-H) 

35370	Union Carbide Corporation (1970) Full Reports of Investigations
Made with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik.
(Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; CDL:091747-J) 

35371	Weil, C.S.; Condra, N.I.; White, C. (1969) Temik Sulfoxide and
Temik Sulfone Single Rabbit Skin Penetration Studies: Special Report
32-78. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared
by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:091747-K) 

35372	Carpenter, C.P.; Adams, J.T. (1969) Miscellaneous Toxicity
Studies: Special Report 32-84. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971
under 1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 091747-L) 

35373	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R. (1970) Temik: Result of
Feeding in the Diets of Rats for 7 Days: Special Report 33-5.
(Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-M) 

35374	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) 1:1
Temik: Temik Sulfone--Results of Feeding in the Diets of Mice for 7
Days: Special Report 33-6. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971
under 1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-N) 

35375	Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.A.; Baughman, J.A. (1970) Temik and Other
Materials--Miscellaneous Single Dose Peroral and Parenteral LDI50^
Assays and Some Joint Action Studies: Special Report 33-7. (Unpublished
study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon
Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington,
D.C.; CDL:091747-O) 

35376	Weil, C.S. (1970) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report
33-18. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared
by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-P) 

35377	Woodside, M.D.; Chin, B.H.; Tallant, M.J. (1969) Temik 10GV
2Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methyl carbamoyl)oxime: Peroral
Dosing of a Hereford Heifer with Notes on Cholinesterase Inhibition:
Special Report 32-82. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under
1F1008; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-Q) 

35378	Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.A.; Baughman, J.L. (1970) Comparative Skin
Penetration Toxicity of Temik 10GV and 15 Other Pesticide Formulations
as Marketed: Special Report 33-15. (Unpublished study received Jul 26,
1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-R) 

35379	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R. (1969)
2-Methyl-2(methylsulfinyl)propanol-1: Results of Feeding in the Diets of
Rats for One Week: Special Report 32-73. (Unpublished study received Jul
26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 091747-S) 

35380	Schlinke, J.C. (1969) Toxicologic effects of five soil nematocides
in cattle and sheep. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical
Association 155(8):1364-1366. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jul
26, 1971 under 1F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington,
D.C.; CDL:091747-T) 

36307	Union Carbide Corporation (1975) The Name, Chemical Identity, and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study
received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-B) 

36308	Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide: UCC
No. 1-21V5-1.8a. Includes methods UCC no. 1B-21V5-1.1d dated Apr 21,
1975. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689;
CDL:096440-C) 

36309	Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide
Assay and Analysis for Impurities. (Unpublished study received Oct 10,
1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-D) 

36310	Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Nature of the Residues.
(Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-E) 

36311	McDonough, L.M.; Maitlen, J.C. (1967) Report of Residue Analysis:
Report No. PCY-67-5. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology
Research Div., Pesticide Chemicals Research Branch, unpublished study;
CDL:096440-F) 

36312	Iley, J.R.; Baines, ; Gunther, ; et al. (19) Magnitude of the
Residue. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; prepared
in cooperation with Applied Ag. Research, Inc. and others, submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:096440-G) 

36313	Gunther, F.A.; Carman, G.E.; Baines, R.C.; et al. (1975) Aldicarb
(Temik^(R)I) Residues in Oranges, Orange Leaves, and Soil after Soil
Application in an Orange Grove. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975
under 6G1689; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of
California--Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural
Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology and others, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 096440-H) 

36314	Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Description of Analytical
Methods: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under
6G1689; CDL:096440-I) 

36315	Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Determination of Total Toxic
Aldicarb Residues in Citrus Fruit. Method Aldicarb-FPD-General dated Jul
1975. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689;
CDL:096440-J) 

36316	Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Reasonable Grounds in Support of
the Petition: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under
6G1689; CDL:096440-K) 

41448	Union Carbide Corporation (1973) The Name, Chemical Identity, and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study
received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-A) 

41449	Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Nature and Magnitude of the
Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under
1016-78; CDL:097162-F) 

42482	Godek, E.G.; Matthews, R.J.; Naismith, R.W.; et al. (1980) Ames
Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test: (Aldicarb): PH 301-UC-004-80.
(Unpublished study received Sep 2, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by
Pharmakon Laboratories, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243142-A) 

44731	Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Chronic Toxicity Studies
(Carinogenic and Oncogenic Effects). Summary of studies 096503-B through
096503-D and 096503-G. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under
6E1792; CDL:096503-A) 

44732	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb:
18 Month Feeding in Diet of Mice: Special Report 35-70. (Unpublished
study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792, prepared by Carnegie-Mellon
Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
Va.; CDL:096503-B) 

44733	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1974) Aldicarb:
18-Month Feeding in the Diet of Mice, Study II: Special Report 37-98.
(Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research, submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 096503-C) 

44734	Weil, C.S. (1976) Reanalysis of Tumor Incidence Data of Aldicarb
18-Month Mouse Feeding Studies: Special Report 39-55. (Unpublished study
received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-D) 

44735	Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Studies Using Aldicarb. Summary
of studies 096503-F. Summary of studies 096503-F through 096503-I.
(Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; CDL:096503-E) 

44736	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1974) Aldicarb:
Inclusion in the Diet of Rats for Three Generations and a Dominant
Lethal Mutagenesis Test: Special Report 37-90. (Unpublished study
received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-F) 

44737	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1974) Aldicarb:
Inclusion in the Diets of Dogs for Three Months: Special Report 37-12.
(Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-G) 

44739	Moorefield, H.H.; Myers, R.C.; Weil, C.S. (1975) Temik 10G BC
(Coal); 10G and 15G (Gypsum); 15G (Corn Cob): Comparative Toxicity
Studies via Peroral, Dermal, and Inhalation Routes: Special Report
38-141. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared
by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-I) 

44740	Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Reasonable Grounds in Support of
the Petition: Temik. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under
6E1792; CDL:096503-J) 

51212	Bussian, R.A. (1980) Letter sent to H.H. Moorefield dated Oct 3,
1980: Temik TSX sample analysis. (Unpublished study received Oct 23,
1980 under 264-319; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-E) 

51314	Back, R.C. (1980) Letter sent to Charles T. Mitchell dated Mar 5,
1980 Temik 10% granular Aldicarb pesticide: Report on Welton Parker
death. (Unpublished study received Mar 14, 1980 under 264-322; submitted
by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243366-A) 

51315	Back, R.C. (1980) Letter sent to Charles T. Mitchell dated Mar 5,
1980: Report on Paul Keller Case. (Unpublished study received Mar 14,
1980 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243367-A) 

53127	Union Carbide Corporation (1980) Aldicarb Residue Analytical Data:
Suffolk County EUP. (Reports by various sources; unpublished study
received Oct 3, 1980 under 264-EX-58; CDL:243417-A) 

53341	Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity
Studies on Temik
(2-Methyl-2-methylthiopropionaldehyde-N-methylcarbamoyloxime) and
Related Carbamates: Special Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received
Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical
Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228976-D) 

53342	Striegal, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C. (1963) Special Report:
Comparison of the Acute Toxicity of Compound 21149 with Several of Its
Analogues: Report 26-29. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under
1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-E) 

53343	Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.A.; Baughman, J.A. (1970) Temik and Other
Materials: Miscellaneous Single Dose Peroral and Parenteral LDI50 Assays
and Some Joint Action Studies: Special Report 33-7. (Unpublished study
received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon
Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-F) 

53345	Johnson, H.E.; Sullivan, L.J.; McGee, M.A. (1968) Studies on an
Effective Therapy for Overdoses of Temik, Temik sulfoxide, and Temik
sulfone in the Rat: Special Report 31-139. (Unpublished study received
Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical
Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228976-H) 

53346	Chin, B.H.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) Toxicity of Carbamate to Rats.
Pages 1-14,InPesticide Subdivision Agriculture & Food Chemistry
Division, 156th ACS National Meeting; Sep 9-13, 1968, Atlantic City, New
Jersey. N.P. (Paper #121; AlsoInunpublished submission received Jan 18,
1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228976-I) 

53348	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) Temik
(T), Temik Sulfoxide (TSO), Temik Sulfone (TSOI2), 1:1 TSO:TSOI2:
Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for 7 Days: Special Report 33-81.
(Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-K) 

53350	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb
(A), Aldicarb Sulfoxide (ASO), Aldicarb Sulfone (ASOI2) and a 1:1
Mixture of ASO:ASOI2: Two Year Feeding in the Diet of Rats: Special
Report 35-82. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228976-M) 

53353	Clarkson, V.A.; Hensley, W.H. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Toxicity
of Temik, Temik sulfoxide and Temik sulfone to Bluegill Sunfish: Project
No. 111B32. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228975-C) 

53355	Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Metabolism and Toxicity of
Metabolites. Summary of studies 228975-J through 228975-N and 228976-D.
(Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016EX-37; CDL:228975-H) 

53356	Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity
Studies on the Probable Non-Carbamate Plant Metabolites of Temik
(2-Methyl-2-methylthiopropionaldehyde-N-methylcarbamoyloxime): Special
Report 31-30. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228975-J) 

53358	Bartley, W.J.; Andrawes, N.R.; Chancey, E.L.; et al. (1970)
Metabolism of Temik Aldicarb pesticide
(2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime) in the
cotton plant. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemicals 18(3):446-453.
(Also In unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX37;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228975-L) 

53362	Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Nature of the Residue: Metabolism
in Animals. Summary of studies 229879-K through 228979-O. (Unpublished
study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; CDL: 228979-B) 

53363	Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Nature of the Residue:
Environmental Fate of Sulfocarb. Summary of studies 228979-J and
228979-P through 228979-AA. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977
under 1016-EX-37; CDL:228979-C) 

53364	Bull, D.L. (1968) Metabolism of UC-21149
(2-Methyl-2-(methythio)propionaldehyde o -(methylcarbamoyl)oxime) in
cotton plants and soil in the field. Journal of Economic Entomology
61(6):15981602. (Also In unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977
under 1016-Ex-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228979-D) 

53366	Coppedge, J.R.; Lindquist, D.A.; Bull, D.L.; et al. (1967) Fate of
2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde o (Methylcarbamoyl) oxime (Temik)
in cotton plants and soil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15(5):902-910. (Also in unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977
under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228979-F) 

53368	Metcalf, R.L.; Fukuto, T.R., Collins, C.; et al. (1966) Metabolism
of 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)-propionaldehyde o -(Methylcarbamoyl)oxime in
plant and insect. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14(6):579-584. (Also in unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977
under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228979-H) 

53369	Ridgway, R.L.; Jones, S.L.; Coppedge, J.R.; et al. (1968) Systemic
activity of
2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehydeo(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (UC-21149)
in the cotton plant with special reference to the boll weevil. Journal
of Economic Entomology 61 (6):1705-1712. (AlsoInunpublished submission
received Jan 18, 1977 under 1015-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-I) 

53370	Hirsh, D.H.; Sheets, K.P.; Holsing, G.C. (1976) Sulfocarb: Fate in
Aerobic and Anaerobic Soils. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977
under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228979-J) 

53371	Dorough, H.W.; Ivie, G.W. (1968) Temik-S metabolism in a lactating
cow. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16(3):460-464. (Also in
unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-K) 

53372	Dorough, H.W.; Davis, R.B.; Ivie, G.W. (1970) Fate of
Temik-Carbon14 in lactating cows during a 14-day feeding period. Journal
of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 18(1):135-142. (Also in unpublished
submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37: submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-L) 

53373	Hicks, B.W.; Dorough, H.W.; Mehendale, H.M. (1972) Metabolism of
Aldicarb pesticide in laying hens. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry 20(1):151-156. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jan 18,
1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228979-M) 

53374	Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; Kozbelt, S.J.; et al. (1968) The
Excretion of C^14I Equivalents of
2-Methyl-2-(methylsulfonyl)propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl)oxime by
the Rat after a Single Peroral Dose: Special Report 31-130. (Unpublished
study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon
Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-N) 

53375	Sullivan, L.J.; Eldridge, J.M.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1968)
Urinary Metabolic Profiles as Determined by Silica Gel Chromatography of
Urines from Rats and Dogs Dosed with Temik sulfone: Special Report
31-138a. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-O) 

53377	Andrawes, N.R.; Holsing, G.C. (1976) Hydrolysis of UC-21865
Sulfocarb Pesticide in Aqueous Buffer Solutions: Project No. 111A14.
(Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-Q) 

53378	Borash, A.J.; Kramer, J.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1973)
Experiments Designed To Trace Movements of Aldicarb in Soil: Project No.
111B13. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-R) 

53379	Bromilow, R.H. (1973) Breakdown and fate of Oximecarbamate
nematicides in crops and soils. Annals of Applied Biology 75(3):473479.
(AlsoInunpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-S) 

53380	Richey, F.A., Jr.; Bartley, W.J. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide:
Water Leaching of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, Aldicarb Sulfone and
Internal Standard Chloride Ion in Columns of Four Soil Types: Project
No. 111A12. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-U) 

53381	Richey, F.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1972) Temik--Aldicarb
Pesticide: Upward Movement of Aldicarb through soil during Water
Evaporation: Project No. 111A12. (Unpublished study received Jan 18,
1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228979-V) 

53382	Romine, R.R.; Meeker, R.L. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide:
Leaching of Aldicarb into Sandy Soil with Irrigation of a Temik Treated
Sugar Beet Field: Project No. 111A13. (Unpublished study received Jan
18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
Va.; CDL:228979-W) 

53383	Romine, R.R.; Meeker, R.L. (1973) Accumulation of Aldicarb
Residues in Fish Tissue from Chronic Exposure to Aldicarb, Aldicarb
sulfoxide and Aldicarb sulfone in Aquaria Water: Project No. 111A13.
(Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-X) 

53384	Copeland, G.L.; Fink, R. (1973) Final Report: Acute and Chronic
Exposure of Bluegill Sunfish to Aldicarb Carbamate Residues: Project No.
400-612. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
prepared by Environmental Sciences Corp., submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-Y) 

53385	Romine, R.R.; Halstead, C.B.; Gibson, C.E.; et al. (1968) Temik
Insecticide: Leaching Characteristics of Temik 10G in Soils: Project No.
111A13. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-Z) 

53386	Spurr, H.W., Jr.; Sousa, A.A. (1974) Potential interactions of
Aldicarb and its metabolites on nontarget organisms in the environment.
Journal of Environmental Quality 3(2):130-133. (Also Inunpublished
submission received jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX37; submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228979-AA) 

54410	Weil, C.S. (1977) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Temik: Special
Report 33-18. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:231509-S) 

54413	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) 1:1
Temik: Temik Sulfone: Results of Feeding in the Diets of Mice for 7
Days: Special Report 33-6. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under
1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical
Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:231509-V) 

54442	Weil, C.S.; Condra, N.I.; Geary, D.L.; Jr.; et al. (1974) Temik
Aldicarb Pesticide 10G and 15G: Range Finding Toxicity Studies: Special
Report 37-39. (Unpublished study received Aug 31, 1977 under 1016-69;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical
Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:231462-A) 

55533	Myers, R.C.; Carpenter, C.P.; Calisti, L.J.; et al. (1977) Temik/
Terrazole/Terraclor Mixture (2:1:4) Range Finding Toxicity Studies:
Project Report 40-126. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under
264-319; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research,
Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 243546-D) 

55534	Wolfe, G.W; Bristol, K.L. (1980) Final Report: Primary Eye
Irritation Study in Rabbits: Project No. 400-634. (Unpublished study
received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories
America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-F) 

55535	Wolfe, G.W.; Wentz, K.L. (1980) Final Report: Primary Dermal
Irritation Study in Rabbits: Project No. 400-633. (Unpublished study
received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories
America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-G) 

55536	Wolfe, G.W.; Bristol, K.L. (1980) Final Report: Acute Oral
Toxicity Study in Rats: Project No. 400-631. (Unpublished study received
Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America,
Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-H) 

55537	Dauvin, E.M.; Wolfe, G.W.; Voelker, R.W.; et al. (1980) Final
Report: Acute Dermal Toxicity Study in Rabbits: Project No. 400632.
(Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by
Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 243546-I) 

57332	Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity
Studies on Temik
(2-Methyl-2-methylthiopropionaldehyde-M-methylcarbamoyloxime) and
Related Carbamates: Special Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received
Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-D) 

57333	Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C. (1963) Special Report:
Comparison of the Acute Toxicity of Compound 21149 with Several of Its
Analogues: Report 26-29. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under
1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-E) 

57335	Johnson, H.E.; Sullivan, L.J.; McGee, M.A. (1968) Studies on an
Effective Therapy for Overdoses of Temik, Temik sulfoxide, and Temik
sulfone in the Rat: Special Report 31-139. (Unpublished study received
Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228152-H) 

57336	Chin, B.H.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) Toxicity of Temik on the Rat,
Dog and Rabbit. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under
1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228152-I) 

57337	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1968) Temik
sulfone: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for Six Months and Dogs
for Three Months: Special Report 31-142. (Unpublished study received Jan
18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228152-J) 

57338	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) Temik
(T), Temik sulfoxide (TSO), Temik sulfone (TSOI2), 1:1 TSO:TSOI2:
Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for 7 Days: Special Report 33-81.
(Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-K) 

57339	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R. (1974) UC 21865: Results
of Feeding in the Diet of Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 37-89.
(Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228152-L) 

57340	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb
(A), Aldicarb sulfoxide (ASO), Aldicarb sulfone (ASOI2) and a 1:1
Mixture of ASO:ASOI2: Two Year Feeding in the Diet of Rats: Special
Report 35-82. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:228152-M) 

57341	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Peterson, L.G.; et al. (1975) Aldicarb
sulfoxide and Aldicarb sulfone Cholinesterase Inhibition Results after
Periods of One to Fifty-Six Days of Inclusion in the Diets of Rats:
Special Report 38-115. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under
1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research,
Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-N) 

58625	Carpenter, C.P.; West, J.S.; McGee, M.A.; et al. (1966) Single
Dose Toxicity Studies on Tranid: Report 29-41. (Unpublished study
received Jun 13, 1966 under 1016-EX-19; prepared by Mellon Institute,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 126464-A) 

58631	Weil, C.S.; Bernard, J.; Woodside, M.D.; et al. (1966) Insecticide
Temik: Teratogenic Potential in Rats: Report 29-81. (Unpublished study
received Oct 8, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon Institute,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126491-A) 

58632	Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.I.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G
(10.5% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149) 15-Day Dermal
Applications to Rabbits: Report 29-80. (Unpublished study received Oct
8, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 126491-B) 

58633	Stansbury, H.A., Jr. (1967) Letter sent to Frank J. McFarland
dated Jul 10, 1967 Information on feeding of Temik-treated potatoes to
livestock. Summary of study 126491-D. (Unpublished study received Jul
13, 1967 under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
Va.; CDL:126491-C) 

58634	Dorough, H.W.; Ivie, G.W. (1967) Metabolism and Elimination of
Temik-S^35I by a Lactating Cow. (Unpublished study received Jul 13, 1967
under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Dept. of Entomology,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126491-D) 

58635	Stansbury, H.A., Jr. (1967) Letter sent to Frank J. McFarland
dated Jun 28, 1967 Decomposition of Temik in potatoes. (Unpublished
study received Jul 3, 1967 under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126491-E) 

58636	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Formula for Temik 10G Granular
Pesticide. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-EX-24;
CDL:126491-F) 

59356	Moorefield, H.H. (1979) Annotated Bibliography of
N-Nitrosoaldicarb (Chronological Sequence). Summary of studies 241324-B
through 241324-H. (Unpublished study received Nov 14, 1979 under 101669;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 241324-A) 

59357	Hirsh, D.H.; Sheets, K.P.; Holsing, G.C. (1978) Temik aldicarb
Pesticide Stability of N-Nitrosoaldicarb: Project No. 810C21. Method
dated Apr 28, 1978. (Unpublished study received Nov 14, 1979 under
1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:241324-F)


60193	Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Full Reports of Investigations
Made with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik.
Summary of studies 093778-B through 093778-E. (Unpublished study
received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL: 093778-A) 

60194	Weil, C.S. (1972) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report
35-41. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; prepared
by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:093778-B) 

60195	Weil, C.S.; DeMary, L.J.; Soo, V. (1971) Comparative Skin
Penetration Toxicity of Temik 10GV, Temik 15GV and 5 Other Pesticide
Formulations as Marketed: Special Report 34-76. (Unpublished study
received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; prepared by CarnegieMellon Univ.,
Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 093778-C) 

60196	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1973) Aldicarb
(A), Aldicarb sulfoxide (ASO), Aldicarb sulfone (ASOI2) and a 1:1
Mixture of ASO:ASOI2: Two Year Feeding in the Diet of Rats: Special
Report 35-82. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:093778-D) 

60197	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Chin, B.H.; et al. (1973) Aldicarb:
2-Methylthio-2-methylpropionaldehyde N-methylcarbamoyloxime: Seven-Day
Inclusion in Diet of Dogs: Special Report 36-33. (Unpublished study
received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:093778-E) 

60554	West, J.S.; McGee, M. (1965) Special Report: The Single Dose
Peroral Toxicity of Compounds 20299, 21149, 19786 and 20047A for White
Leghorn Cockerels: Special Report 28-30. (Unpublished study received Jun
1, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:128692-F) 

60555	Borash, A.J. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide Agricultural
Products. (Unpublished study received Jun 1, 1965 under unknown admin.
no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:128692-G) 

60556	Cope, O.B. (1964) Letter sent to Robert G. Harris dated Oct 30,
1964 Toxicity of various pesticides to rainbow trout and bluegill
sunfish. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish-Pesticide Research
Laboratory; unpublished study; CDL:128692-H) 

61078	Mulla, M.S. (1964) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Oct 20, 1964
Information on toxicity of some compounds against mosquito fish.
(Unpublished study received Oct 20, 1964 under unknown admin. no.;
prepared by Univ. of California--Riverside, Div. of Agricultural
Sciences, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station,
Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:131936-A) 

61079	Union Carbide Corporation (1969) Toxicity of the Formulated
Product Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study received on
unknown date under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131936-C) 

61080	Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Effect on Wildlife. Summary of
studies 131936-A, 131936-B and 131936-H. (Unpublished study received on
unknown date under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131936-E) 

61081	Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Metabolism and Toxicity of
Metabolites. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown
admin. no.; CDL:131936-F) 

61082	Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Acute Toxicity Studies.
(Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin. no.;
CDL:131936-G) 

61087	Carpenter, C.P.; Goldberg, M.E.; Johnson, H.E.; et al. (1966)
Special Report: Recapitulation of Acute Toxicity and Pharmacodynamic
Studies on Dessin (Compound 19786): Report 29-47. (Unpublished study
received Sep 1, 1966 under 1016-EX-18; prepared by Mellon Institute,
Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:126458-D) 

61089	Borash, A.J.; Bryant, H.M., Jr. (1965) Test Report on Union
Carbide Agricultural Products. (Unpublished study received Jun 10, 1965
under 1016-EX-18; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:126458-K) 

62512	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Human Exposure Experience.
(Unpublished study received Oct 20, 1964 under unknown admin. no.;
CDL:131936-D) 

63184	Union Carbide Corporation (1968) The Name, Chemical Identity, and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemicals. (Unpublished study received Jun
14, 1978 under 1016-81; CDL:234234-A) 

63185	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Manufacturing Process. (Unpublished
study received Jun 14, 1978 under 1016-81; CDL:234234-B) 

63186	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Specification: Temik TSX Granular
Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Jun 14, 1978 under 1016-81;
CDL:234234-C) 

63187	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Specification Methods: Temik TSX
Granular Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Jun 14, 1978 under
1016-81; CDL:234234-D) 

64115	Natoff, I.L. (1976) The effects of antidotes in experimental
animals intoxicated by carbomate and organophosphorus cholinesterase
inhibitors. Pages 53-64,InMed. Prot. Chem.-Warf. Agents, Pap. Symp.. By 
Stockholm, Sweden: Almquist & Wiksell. (AlsoInunpublished submission
received Jul 20, 1980 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL: 234481-A) 

64811	Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of
the Application for Registration of Standak 75WP Sulfocarb Pesticide for
Use on Tobacco and Cotton. (Reports by various sources; unpublished
study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; CDL:231504-G) 

65956	Johnson, H.E.; McGee, M.A.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) Studies on an
Effective Therapy for Overdoses of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide, and Temik
Sulfone in the Rat: Special Report 31-139. (Unpublished study received
Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical
Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:229032-H) 

66341	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research
Laboratory (1981) Acephate, Aldicarb, Carbophenothion, DEF, EPN,
Ethoprop, Methyl Parathion, and Phorate: Their Acute and Chronic
Toxicity, Bioconcentration Potential, and Persistence as Related to
Marine Environments: EPA-600/4-81-023. (Unpublished study) 

66588	Chin, B.H.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) (Some Biomedical Considerations
of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone). (Unpublished paper #121
presented at the 156th ACS National Meeting, Agr. & Food Chemistry Div.,
Pesticide Subdivision; Sept 9-13, 1968, Atlantic City, N.J.; unpublished
study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:229032-I) 

66769	Peoples, S.A.; Maddy, K.T.; Smith, C.R. (1977) Occupational
Exposure to Temik (Aldicarb) As Reported by Physicians in California for
the Years 1974 through 1976. (California, Dept. of Food and Agriculture,
Worker Health and Safety Unit; unpublished study; CDL:232634-A) 

66770	Natoff, I.L.; Reiff, B. (1973) Effect of oximes on the acute
toxicity of anticholinesterase carbamates. Toxicology and Applied
Pharmacology 25:569-575. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec
23, 1977 under unknown admin. no.; submitted by California, Dept. of
Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, Calif.; CDL:232634-B) 

67477	Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Efficacy of Various Chemicals on
Potatoes and Various Crops. (Compilation; unpublished study, including
published data, received Nov 13, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093780-A) 

68243	Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Nature of the Residue. Summary of
studies 231503-B through 231503-Z. (Unpublished study received Aug 4,
1977 under 1016-79; CDL:231503-A) 

68248	Borash, A.J.; Kramer, J.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1973)
Experiments Designed to Trace Movements of Aldicarb in Soil: UCC Project
Report No. 17959. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231503-P) 

68249	Coppedge, J.R.; Ridgway, R.L.; Bull, D.L. (1968) A Preliminary
Report on the Movement and Persistence of Aldicarb in Soil. (U.S.
Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., unpublished
study; CDL:231503-R) 

68250	Richey, F.A., Jr.; Bartley, W.J. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide:
Water Leaching of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, Aldicarb Sulfone and
Internal Standard Chloride Ion in Columns of Four Soil Types: UCC
Project Report No. 16669. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under
1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231503-S)


68251	Richey, F.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1972) Temik-Aldicarb
Pesticide: Upward Movement of Aldicarb through Soil during Water
Evaporation: UCC Project Report No. 17526. (Unpublished study received
Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
Va.; CDL:231503-T) 

68252	Romine, R.R.; Meeker, R.L. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide:
Leaching of Aldicarb into Sandy Soil with Irrigation of a Temik Treated
Sugar Beet Field: UCC Project Report No. 17079. (Unpublished study
received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:231503-U) 

69644	Union Carbide Corporation (1981) Reassessment of the Acceptable
Daily Intake Values for Temik^(R)I (Aldicarb) and Metabolites in the
Human. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 264-330;
CDL:244421-A) 

69736	Dernehl, C.U. (1974) Letter sent to Richard C. Back dated Jan 21,
1974 Human consumption of potatoes containing 1 ppm of aldicarb.
(Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:098300-A) 

69738	Quick, Q.; Lovell, C.M. (1966) Temik Sulfoxide and Sulfone
Stability: File No. 6135. (Unpublished study received on unknown date
under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:098300-C) 

69739	Union Carbide Corporation (1973) A Method for the Determination of
Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Potato Tubers by Gas Chromatography.
Method designation ALDICARB-FPD-POT dated Feb 1973. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300-D) 

69740	Union Carbide Corporation (1973) A Method for the Determination of
Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Peanuts by Gas Chromatography. Method
designation ALDICARB-FPD-PNUT dated Feb 1973. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300-E) 

69741	Union Carbide Corporation (1973) The Name, Chemical Identity, and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL:098300-F) 

69742	Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide.
(Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300-G)


69743	Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide
Assay and Analysis for Impurities: File No. 300-21V5. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300-H) 

69744	Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Reasonable Grounds in Support of
the Petition: (Temik 10G). (Unpublished study received on unknown date
under 3F1414; CDL:098300-J) 

69745	Weil, C.S., ed. (1972) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special
Report 35-41. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:098300-K) 

69914	Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Introduction: Temik. Summary of
studies 131905-B, 131905-F and 131905-G. (Unpublished study received Sep
8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131905-A) 

69915	Smyth, H.F., Jr. (1965) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jun 4,
1965 Toxicity information on compound 21149. Summary of studies 131905-C
through 131905-G. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown
admin. no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-B) 

69916	Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C.; et al. (1962) Range
Finding Tests on Compound 21149: Report 25-53. (Unpublished study
received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon
Institute of Industrial Research, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-C) 

69917	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1963) Results of
Three Months of Inclusion of Compound 21149 in the Diet of Rats: Report
26-47. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.;
prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 131905-D) 

69918	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1964) Results of
a Three Generation Reproduction Study on Rats Fed Compound UC21149 in
Their Diet: Report 27-158. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under
unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-E) 

69919	Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.; McGee, M.A. (1965) A 4-hour Test for
Evaluation of Comparative Skin Penetration Hazard: Report 28-34.
(Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.;
prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-F) 

69920	Pozzani, U.C.; Kinkead, E.R. (1965) The Mechanical Attrition of
Some Granular Pesticide Formulations: Report 28-35. (Unpublished study
received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon
Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-G) 

69921	Heywood, D.L. (1965) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jul 28, 1965
Data on metabolism of UC 21149 in animals and opinion on metabolic fate
of UC 21149 in plants and animals. (Unpublished study received Sep 8,
1965 under unknown admin. no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-H) 

69922	Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C. (1963) Comparison of the
Acute Toxicity of Compound 21149 with Several of Its Analogues: Report
26-29. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.;
prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 131905-I) 

70515	Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1980)
Pesticide Residues in Food--1979: Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO
Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and
the WHO Expert Group on Pesticide Residues Held in Geneva, 3-12 December
1979. By FAO and World Health Organization. Rome, Italy: FAO. (Pages
iii-iv,vi,17-20 only; FAO plant production and protection paper 20;
available from: Distribution and Sales Section, FAO, Via delle Terme di
Caracalla, Rome 00100, Italy; published study; CDL:244431-A) 

70984	Sontag, J.M. (1978) Minutes: Thirteenth Meeting of the Data
Evaluation/Risk Assessment Subgroup of the Clearinghouse on
Environmental Carcinogens. (U.S. National Institutes of Health, National
Cancer Institute, Div. of Cancer Cause and Prevention; unpublished
study; CDL:237727-D) 

73205	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1980)
Acute Toxicity of Temik TSX Granular Formulation. Summary of studies
243546-B through 243546-I. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980
under 264-319; CDL:243546-A) 

73207	Ercegovich, C.D.; Rashid, K.A. (1977) Mutagenesis Induced in
Mutant Strains ofSalmonella typhimuriumby Pesticides. (Unpublished
study, including letter dated Sep 22, 1977 from C.D. Ercegovich to Tom
Evrard, received Aug 24, 1979 under 1258-812; prepared by Pennsylvania
State Univ., Pesticide Research Laboratory, submitted by Olin Corp.,
Stamford, Conn.; CDL:240890-C) 

73306	Quarles, J.M.; Schenley, C.K.; Tennant, R.W. (1975) Use of a
transplacental host-mediated culture system for assay of transformation
by Nitroso compounds. IRCS Medical Science (Supplement) 3(10):22.
(AlsoInunpublished submission received Nov 14, 1979 under 1016-69;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:241324-B) 

73307	Lijinsky, W.; Elespuru, R.K. (1975) Mutagenicity and
Carcinogenicity of N-Nitroso Derivatives of Carbamate Insecticides.
(Unpublished study, including published data, received Nov 14, 1979
under 1016-69; prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Univ. of
Tennessee, Oak Ridge Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 241324-C)

 

73308	Blevins, R.D.; Lijinsky, W., Regan, J.D. (1977) Nitrosated
Methylcarbamate insecticides: Effect on the DNA of human cells. Mutation
Research 44:1-7. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Nov 14, 1979
under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:241324-D) 

73309	Lijinsky, W.; Schmahl, D. (1978) Carcinogenicity of N-Nitroso
derivatives of N-Methylcarbamate insecticides in rats. Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety 2:413-419. (AlsoInunpublished submission received
Nov 14, 1979 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
Va.; CDL:241324-H) 

73345	Kimmerle,  (1971) Letter sent to PF-ATEA Product Development dated
Jan 25, 1971: Disyston and Temik granular: Report No. 29378.
(Unpublished study received Dec 15, 1976 under 3125-58; prepared by
Bayer, W. Germany, submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, Mo.;
CDL:095640-E) 

75794	West, J.S.; McGee, M. (1965) The Single Dose Peroral Toxicity of
Compounds 20299, 21149, 19786 and 20047A for White Leghorn Cockerels:
Report 28-30. (Unpublished study received Aug 8, 1966 under 7G0529;
prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., South Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090633-G) 

75801	Carpenter, C.P.; Goldberg, M.E.; Johnson, H.E.; et al. (1966)
Recapitulation of Acute Toxicity and Pharmacodynamic Studies on Dessin
(Compound 19786): Report 29-47. Summary of studies 090633-C through
090633-I. (Unpublished study received Aug 8, 1966 under 7G0529; prepared
by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., South Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090633-S) 

76065	Knott, W.; Beliles, R.P. (1966) UC-21149: Acute Toxicity in
Sunfish. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-69;
prepared by Woodard Research Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:231174-A) 

76066	Woodard Research Corporation (1965) UC-21149: Safety Evaluation on
Fish and Wildlife: (Bobwhite Quail and Rainbow Trout). (Unpublished
study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231174-B) 

76067	Beliles, R.P.; Knott, W.; Wright, L. (1966) UC-21149 10%: Summary
of Safety Evaluation on Fish and Wildlife. Summary of studies 231174-A
and 231174-B. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-69;
prepared by Woodard Research Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:231174-D) 

76100	Dernehl, C.U. (1966) Letter sent to J.S. Leary, Jr. dated Jul 12,
1966 Acute poisoning report by UC 21149. (Unpublished study received Jul
26, 1966 under unknown admin. no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:102773-A) 

79137	Enfield, C.G.; Carsel, R.F.; Cohen, S.Z.; et al. (1980) Methods of
Approximating Transport of Organic Pollutants to Groundwater.
(Unpublished study received Jun 24, 1981 under 100-607; prepared by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Hazard
Evaluation Div. and Computer Science Corp., submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:245315-B) 

79162	Wacker Chemie GmbH (1979) Toxicology Data for Butocarboxime and
Drawin 4E: Summary. Summary of studies 245338-D through 245338AB.
(Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1981 under 35902-EX-1; CDL:245338-C)


79566	Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H., Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity
Studies on Temik and Related Carbamates: Special Report 3148.
(Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by
Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:229032-D) 

79604	Wacker Chemie GmbH (1974) The Metabolism of Butocarboxime.
(Unpublished study received 1975 under 35902-1; CDL:227600-A) 

79867	Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Evaluation of Toxicological Data
for Registration of Temik, Brand of Pesticide (UC-21149) Submitted with
Letter of October 3, 1966. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1966 under
1016-EX-24; CDL:106627-A) 

80223	Abdalla, N.A. (1981) Letter sent to J. Steve Lovell dated Jul 23,
1981: Grain sorghum fractionation studies. (Unpublished study received
Jul 31, 1981 under 8F2107; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
Va.; CDL:070212-A) 

80696	Smyth, H.F., Jr. (1966) Letter sent to H.A. Stansbury, Jr. dated
Dec 1, 1966 Summary of toxicity information on compound 21149. Summary
of studies 090072-C through 090072-E, 090072-G, 090072-H, 090072-N,
090072-Q, 090072-R and 090072-T. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967
under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-A) 

80697	Andrawes, N.R.; Dorough, H.W.; Lindquist, D.A. (1966) Degradation
and Elimination of Temik 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde
O-(Methylcarbamoyl)oxime in Rats. (Unpublished study received Mar 2,
1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Dept. of Entomology,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-B) 

80698	West, J.S.; Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.; et al. (1966) Temik (Compound
21149, Technical, 2-Methylthio-2-methylpropionaldehyde
N-Methylcarbamoyloxime) Joint Action with Selected Organic Phosphate and
Carbamate Pesticides: Report 29-98. (Unpublished study received Mar 2,
1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston,
W.Va.; CDL:090072-A) 

80699	Johnson, H.E.; McGee, M.A.; King, J.M. (1966) Temik (Technical
Grade Compound 21149) Demyelination Potential in Chickens: Report 29-90.
(Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-D) 

80700	Johnson, H.E. (1966) Temik (Technical Grade Compound 21149):
Comparative Behavioral Effect in Rats: Report 29-89. (Unpublished study
received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL: 090072-E) 

80701	Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.I.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G
(10.5% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149): 15-day Dermal
Applications to Rabbits: Report 298-80. (Unpublished study received Mar
2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-G) 

80702	Sexton, R.J. (1966) Toxicity of Temik^(R)I. (Unpublished study
received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-J) 

80703	Ketcham, N.H. (1966) Agricultural Chemicals: Analyses of Urine
Specimens for Metabolite of UC21149: Project No. 299A20. (Unpublished
study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-K) 

80704	Peele, R.E. (1966) Industrial Hygiene--Air Pollution Evaluation of
Hazards Associated with the Production of Compound 21149 & Formulation
of Temik 10-G Insecticide: Report No. 66-IH-158-I-1. Includes methods
dated Apr 26, 1966 and Jun 17, 1964. (Unpublished study received Mar 2,
1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.V.;
CDL:090072-L) 

80705	Williams, F. (1966) Letter sent to J.T. Adams, R.C. Back, D.F.
Braun, et al. dated Jun 2, 1966: Human exposure study in the field
application of Temik 10G on cotton. (Unpublished study received Mar 2,
1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.;
CDL:090072-M) 

80706	Beliles, R.P.; Knott, W.; Wright, L. (1966) UC-21149: Safety
Evaluation on Fish and Wildlife: (Bobwhite Quail and Rainbow Trout).
(Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by
Woodard Research Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston,
W.Va.; CDL:090072-O) 

80707	Knott, W.; Beliles, R.P. (1966) UC-21149: Acute Toxicity in
Sunfish. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared
by Woodard Research Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston,
W.Va.; CDL:090072-P) 

80708	West, J.S.; Condra, N.I. (1966) Miscellaneous Acute Toxicity Data,
Olefins Division: Report 28-140. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967
under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston,
W.Va.; CDL:090072-S) 

80709	Knaak, J.B.; Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1965)
Metabolism of UC 21149 in the Rat: Report 28-138. (Unpublished study
received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by CarnegieMellon Univ.,
Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-T) 

80710	Carpenter, C.P.; Goldberg, M.E.; Johnson, H.E.; et al. (1965)
Recapitulation of Pharmacodynamic and Acute Toxicity Studies on Temik
(Compound 21149): Report 28-78. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967
under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston,
W.Va.; CDL:090072-V) 

80808	Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Introduction: Temik: Toxicity.
Summary of study 090525-B. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966
under 6G0473; CDL:090525-A) 

80809	Smyth, H.F., Jr. (1966) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jan 25,
1966 Summary of toxicity reports on compound 21149. Summary of studies
090525-C through 090525-G, 090525-J through 090525-N and 090527-J.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by
Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.;
CDL:090525-B) 

80810	Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C.; et al. (1963) Range
Finding Tests on Compound 21149 (2-Methylthio-2-methylpropionaldehyde
N-Methylcarbamoyloxime): Report 25-53. (Unpublished study received Jan
25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute of Industrial
Research, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New
York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-C) 

80811	Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.; McGee, M.A. (1965) A 4-hour Test for
Evaluation of Comparative Skin Penetration Hazard: Report 28-34.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1965 under 6G0473; prepared by
Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-F) 

80812	West, J.S.; McGee, M. (1965) The Single Dose Peroral Toxicity of
Compounds 20299, 21149, 19786 and 20047A for White Leghorn Cockerels:
Report 28-30. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473;
prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL: 090525-J) 

80813	Knaak, J.B.; Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1965)
Metabolism of UC 21149 in the Rat: Report 28-138. (Unpublished study
received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute,
Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.;
CDL:090525-L) 

80814	Carpenter, C.P. (1966) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jan 25,
1966: 2 year feeding of UC 21149 (409-RD-89 reference 14LK90) to dogs.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-N) 

80815	Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Residue Data: UC 21149.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473;
CDL:090525-O) 

80816	Romine, R.R. (19) The Determination of Residues of
2-Methyl-2(methylthio) Propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl) Oxime,
Systemic Insecticide UC 21149, in Agricultural Crops. Undated method.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-P) 

80817	Crowder, R.A.; Johnson, H.E.; Romine, R.R. (1965) Letter sent to
J.T. Adams; D.L. Heywood; R.C. Back; et al. dated Jul 14, 1965: The
response of Temik metabolites and related materials to the method of
analysis employed for Temik systemic insecticide. (Unpublished study
received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-Q) 

80818	Stansbury, H.A.; Johnson, D.P. (1964) Agricultural Chemicals,
Residue Analysis: Stability of 3-Chloro-5(or
6)-endo-cyanobicyclo(2.2.1)heptan-2-one N-Methylcarbamoyloxime (20047)
and 2Methyl-2-methylthiopropionaldehyde N-Methylcarbamoyloxime (21149)
in Animal Diets: Project No. 143B15. (Unpublished study received Jan 25,
1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.;
CDL:09525-R) 

80819	Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Metabolism of 21149 in Cotton and
Potatoes. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473;
CDL:090525-S) 

80820	Coppedge, J.R.; Lindquist, D.A. (19) Preliminary Studies on the
Fate of Radiolabeled Union Carbide 21149 in Soil and Cotton Plants.
(U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div.;
unpublished study; CDL:09525-T) 

80821	Romine, R.R. (1966) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jan 11, 1966
Interpretation of analytical results obtained by Temik residue method
for agricultural crops. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under
6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-U) 

80822	U.S. Public Health Service (1966) Report of Illness Associated
with Use of the Experimental Insecticide, Temik. (Communicable Disease
Center, Western Pesticides Research Laboratory; unpublished study;
CDL:090527-B) 

80823	Herrett, R.A.; Borash, A.J. (1967) Temik Insecticide: Root Uptake,
Distribution, and Disappearance of Temik in Spearmint and Bean: Project
No. 111B16. (Unpublished study, including letters dated Feb 7, 1967 from
R.A. Herrett to H.A. Stansbury and May 20, 1967 from H.A. Stansbury, Jr.
to Harry W. Hays, received Mar 11, 1968 under 6G0473; submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090527-C) 

80824	Durham, W.F. (1967) Letter sent to Chief, Office of Pesticides
dated Jan 7, 1967: Quarterly memorandum of research progress, Western
Pesticides Research Laboratory, for period October-December, 1966. (U.S.
Public Health Service, Communicable Disease Center, Office of
Pesticides, Western Pesticides Research Laboratory; unpublished study;
CDL:090527-D) 

80825	Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.I.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G
(10.5% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149): 15-day Dermal
Applications to Rabbits: Report 29-80. (Unpublished study received Mar
11, 1968 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp, New York, N.Y.;
CDL:090527-I) 

81182	Interregional Research Project Number 4 (1977) Reasonable Grounds
in Support of the Petition: (Temik). (Unpublished study received Aug 10,
1977 under 7E1996; CDL:097784-A) 

81413	Weil, C.S.; Mazzoni, M.; Condra, N.I.; et al. (1966) Results of
Long-term Tests for Mouse Skin Carcinogenicity of Three Process
Residues, One Epoxide and Three Compounds: Report 29-34. (Unpublished
study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon
Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:126498-A) 

81414	Knaak, J.B.; Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1965)
Metabolism of UC 21149 in the Rat: Report 28-138. (Unpublished study
received Jan 14, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon Institute,
Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:126498-B) 

81415	Pozzani, U.C.; Haun, C.C.; Kinkead, E. (1963) A Basis for
Projecting the Probable Inhalation Hazards of UC 21149 to Humans under
Field Use Conditions: Report 26-38. (Unpublished study received Jan 14,
1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
CDL:126498-C) 

81550	Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (1978) Ethylene Dibromide and Its
Pesticidal Aternatives--Toxicity, Persistence, and Plant Residues.
(Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1979 under 5785-18; CDL:097779-Q) 

81880	Stansbury, H.A.; Johnson, D.P. (1964) Stability of ... (20047) and
... (21149) in Animal Diets: File No. 2323. (Unpublished study received
Jun 6, 1966 under 5G0452; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York,
N.Y.; CDL:090493-X) 

81883	Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Toxicity to Fish and Wildlife.
(Compilation; unpublished study received May 10, 1965 under 5G0452;
CDL:090494-B) 

85455	Herrett, R.A.; Bagley, W.P. (1966) Insecticide Temik: Metabolism
and Distrubution in Potato: 855-31107-8020. (Unpublished study received
Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston,
W.Va.; CDL:090072-F) 

85456	Weil, C.S.; Bernard, J.; Woodside, M.D.; et al. (1966) Insecticide
Temik: Teratogenic Potential in Rats: Report 29-81. (Unpublished study
received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL: 090072-H) 

85457	Bartley, W.J.; Heywood, D.L. (1966) Insecticide, Temik:
Radiosynthesis of 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio) propionaldehyde
o-(MethylC^14I-carbamoyl)oxime and Its Corresponding Sulfoxide:
85531106-8048. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-I) 

85458	Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1966) Two-year
Feeding of Compound 21149 in the Diet of Dogs: Report 29-5. (Unpublished
study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon
Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-Q) 

85460	Weil, C.S.; King, J.M.; Woodside, M.D.; et al. (1965) Two-year
Feeding of Compound 21149 in the Diet of Rats: Report 28-123.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by
Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-K) 

85461	Pozzani, U.C.; McGee, M.A.; Kinkead, E.R.; et al. (1966) Response
of Rats Living for 28 Days on Topsoil Treated with UC21149 10G1: Report
29-2. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by
Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-M) 

86606	Andrawes, N.A. (1981) The Results of Tests on the Amount of
Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method
Used: Temik. (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330;
submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.;
CDL:070447-A) 

86607	Myers, W.R.; Harrison, S.L. (1981) Residues: Temik^(R)I/Grapes:
Project No. 813C50. (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1981 under
264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
Ambler, Pa.; CDL:070447-B) 

86608	Union Carbide Corporation (1978) Determination of Total Toxic
Aldicarb Residues in Grapes by Gas Chromatography. Method
Aldicarb-FPD-general dated Aug 1978. (Unpublished study received Nov 2,
1981 under 264-330; CDL:070447-C) 

86609	Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Confirmatory Procedure for the
Identification of Aldicarb Residues Utilizing a Non-polar GLC Column.
Method Aldiccarb-FPD-confirmatory dated Feb 1977. (Unpublished study
received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330; CDL: 070447-D) 

86610	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1981)
Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik. (Unpublished study
received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330; CDL: 070446-A) 

90570	Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Temik(TM) 10G Experimental
Systemic Pesticide: (Active Ingredient--UC 21149): F-40977C.
(Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-30; CDL:131932-A)


90572	Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Available Toxicity Data.
(Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.;
CDL:131945-A) 

90573	Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Results of Tests Conducted by and
under the Supervision of Federal and State Agencies with UC 21149
Formulations on Ornamental Plant Pest Control--1962-1964. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.;
CDL:131945-B) 

91233	Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Summary of Selected Performance
of UC 21149 on Various Pests on Cotton and Potatoes 1964-1965.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473;
CDL:090526-C) 

91234	Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Summary and Discussion: Temik.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473;
CDL:090526-D) 

91235	Stansbury, H.A.; Wright, M.P. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Standard
Samples for Residue Analyses: 855-31106-7965. (Unpublished study
received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-F) 

91236	Williams, F. (1966) Letter sent to J.T. Adams, N.H. Ketcham, R.C.
Back and others dated Jun 2, 1966: Human exposure study in the field
application of Temik 10G on cotton. (Unpublished study received Jul 26,
1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.;
CDL:090526-J) 

91237	Union Carbide Corporation (19) Cholinesterase. Undated method.
(Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL: 090526-K) 

91238	Peele, R.E. (1966) Industrial Hygiene--Air Pollution Evaluation of
Hazards Associated with the Production of Compound 21149 & Formulation
of Temik 10-G Insecticide: Report No. 66-IH-158-I-1. Includes method
38C-21V5-R2.1 dated Apr 26, 1966 and method 38C-22M2-22 dated Jun 17,
1966. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-L) 

91239	Ketcham, N.H. (1966) Agricultural Chemicals: Analyses of Urine
Specimens for Metabolite of UC21149: File No. 5882. (Unpublished study
received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-M) 

91240	Sexton, R.J. (1966) Toxicity of Temik^(R)I. (Unpublished study,
including letter dated Jul 11, 1966 from R.J. Sexton to L.B. Weddell,
received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-N) 

91241	West, J.S.; Condra, N.I. (1966) Miscellaneous Acute Toxicity Data:
Report 28-140. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473;
prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-R) 

91242	Dernehl, C.U. (1966) Letter sent to J.S. Leary, Jr. dated Jul 12,
1966 Human poisoning by UC 21149, Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received
Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York,
N.Y.; CDL:090526-W) 

91958	Ridgway, R.L.; Cowan, C.B. (1966) A Report on Laboratory and Field
Studies on the Effect of Several Insecticides on Beneficial Arthropods
in 1966: Mobay 20268. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology
Research Div., Cotton Insects Systemic Chemicals Investigations and
Southwestern Cotton Insects Investigations; unpublished study;
CDL:120463-D) 

92405	Borash, A.J. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide Agricultural
Products. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin.
no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131946-A) 

92605	Abdellatif, M.A.; Hermanson, H.P.; Reynolds, H.T. (1967) Effect of
soil clay and organic matter content upon systemic efficacy of two
carbamate insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology 60 (5):1445-1450.
(Also In unpublished submission received Sep 25, 1968 under 8F0711;
submitted by FMC Corp., Middleport, N.Y.; CDL:091231-C) 

92769	Lin, S.C.; Funke, B.R.; Schulz, J.T. (1972) Effects of some
organophosphate and carbamate insecticides on nitrification and legume
growth. Plant and Soil 37:489-496. (Also in unpublished submission
received Mar 30, 1977 under 279-2712; submitted by FMC Corp.,
Philadelphia, Pa.; CDL:229241-E) 

93021	Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Temik 10G Experimental Systemic
Pesticide (Active Ingredient--UC 21149). New York, N.Y.: Union Carbide.
(F-40977C, Mar 1966; also in unpublished submission received Oct 20,
1967 under 1016-EX-30; CDL:131932-A) 

93628	Union Carbide (1967) Summary: Toxicological Studies on Temik.
Summary of study 090714-C. (Unpublished study received on unknown date
under 8F0637; CDL:090714-A) 

93629	Union Carbide (1967) Summary and Discussion: Temik Residue
Studies. Includes methods dated Aug 18, 1967. (Compilation; unpublished
study received on unknown date under 8F0637; CDL: 090714-D) 

93630	Union Carbide (1966) Summary of Data on Metabolism of Temik in the
Cotton Plant. Summary of study 090714-G. (Unpublished study received Dec
29, 1966 under 8F0637; CDL:090714-F) 

93631	Union Carbide (1967) Performance Data: Temik 10G--Cotton.
(Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under 8F0637;
CDL:090714-H) 

93632	Haines, R.G. (1967) Temik^(TM)I 10G Experimental Systemic
Pesticide: F-40977D. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under
8F0637; submitted by Union Carbide, South Charleston, W.Va.;
CDL:090714-I) 

93640	Coppedge, J.R.; Lindquist, D.A.; Bull, D.L.; et al. (1966) A
Report on 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehydeO(methylcarbamoyl)oxime
(Temik) in Cotton Plants and Soil. (Unpublished study received Feb 27,
1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Agricultural
Experiment Station, Entomology Research Div., submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090741-B) 

93641	Borash, A.J. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Relative Soil Persistence
of Sulfide, Sulfoxide, and Sulfone: Status Report 855-311078157.
(Unpublished study received Feb 27, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL: 090741-C) 

93642	Coppedge, J.R. (1967) Fate of
2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehydeO-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (Temik)
in Plants and Soil. Master's thesis, Texas A & M Univ. (Unpublished
study received Feb 27, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090741-D) 

93643	Stansbury, H.A.; Wright, M.P. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Standard
Samples for Residue Analyses: Status Report 855-31106-7965. (Unpublished
study received Feb 27, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090741-E) 

93644	Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Summary and Discussion of Results
of Tests with Temik 10G on Potatoes 1965-1966. (Compilation; unpublished
study received Feb 27, 1967 under 7F0573; CDL: 090741-F) 

93645	Bull, D.L.; Lindquist, D.A.; Coppedge, J.R. (1966) A Report on
Metabolism of
2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehydeO-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (Temik)
in Insects. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research
Div., Cotton Insects Systemic Chemicals Investigations; unpublished
study; CDL:090741-G) 

93913	Westlake, G.E.; Bunyan, P.J.; Martin, A.D.; et al. (1981)
Carbamate poisoning: Effects of selected carbamate pesticides on plasma
enzymes and brain esterases of Japanese quail (Coturnix cotornix
japonica). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 29(4):779-784.
(AlsoInunpublished submission received Jan 26, 1982 under 239-2471;
submitted by Chevron Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:246657-J) 

94799	Ivie, D.A. (1981) Letter sent to Donald Stubbs dated Oct 28, 1981
Concerning the use of Aldicarb to control citrus nematodes in grapefruit
orchards. (Texas, Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural & Environmental
Sciences Div., unpublished study, including undated letter from E.L.
Johnson to David A. Ivie; CDL: 246256-A) 

95927	Dorough, H.W. (1970) Metabolism of insecticidal methylcarbamates
in animals. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 18(6): 1015-1022.
(AlsoInunpublished submission received Jan 18, 1971 under 9F0843;
submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:093138-AC) 

96543	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1982)
Monitoring Aldicarb Residues in Soil and Water, 1981. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330; CDL:246960-A) 

96544	Hansen, J.L.; Hendrix, C.D. (1982) Comments on Intera and Cornell
Aldicarb Transport Simulation for Eastern Long Island: File No. 29840.
(Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264330; submitted by Union
Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:246960-B) 

96545	Andrawes, N.R. (1982) Response to EPA's Conclusions Relative to
Aldicarb Environmental Fate: Project No. 813C51. (Unpublished study
received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 246960-C) 

96546	Andrawes, N.R.; Heintzelman, R.W. (1982) Plant Uptake of
Temik^(R)I Aldicarb Pesticide from Soil: File No. 29920. (Unpublished
study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 246960-D) 

96547	Spiegel, M.H.; Conway, R.A. (1982) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb,
Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and Aldicarb Sulfone: Project III. (Unpublished
study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:246960-E) 

96548	Hansen, J.L. (1982) Letter sent to R.C. Back dated Feb 19, 1982:
Hydrolysis interpolations: Project IIIa. (Unpublished study received Mar
9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:246960-F) 

96549	Technicon Industrial Systems (1981) Preliminary Method for the
Determination of Aldicarb and Its Oxidative Methabolities (sic) in
Potable Water as Total Aldicarb Sulfone Equivalence. (Unpublished study,
including letters dated Nov 16, 1981 from T.M. Martin to K.A. Mede and
Nov 18, 1981 from J.C. Daly to T.M. Martin, received Mar 9, 1982 under
264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 246960-G) 

96550	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1982) A
Rating System for Predicting the Appearance of Aldicarb Residues in
Potable Water. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1981 under 264-330;
CDL:246960-J) 

96557	Myers, W.R.; Harrison, S.L. (1982) Residues: Temik^(R)I/Tomatoes:
File No. 29948. Includes method dated Aug 1977. (Unpublished study
received Mar 9, 1982 under 8F2096; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, Va.; CDL:070711-A) 

98468	Stauffer Chemical Company (1980) Comparison of Acute Oral Avian
Toxicology between Dyfonate^(R)I 20-G Insecticide and Other Corn
Granular Insecticides. (Unpublished study received Oct 24, 1980 under
476-2028; CDL:243582-A) 

100230	Clarkson, V.A.; Haines, R.G.; Hennsley, W.H.; et al. (1969)
Report on Additional Field Tests with Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on
the Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study received Oct
27, 1969 under 1016-EX-30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
Va.; CDL:126506-B) 

100231	Lund, R.C.; Haines, R.G. (1969) Field Evaluation of Temik 10G
Aldicarb Pesticide Potential Hazard to White-tail Deer and Cottontail
Rabbits from Simulated Spills. (Unpublished study received Oct 27, 1969
under 1016-EX-30; prepared in cooperation with New Jersey, Fish and Game
Commission, Black River State Game Field Station, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126506-C) 

100232	Back, R.C. (1969) Letter sent to Harold G. Alford dated Aug 22,
1969: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide--First periodic report. (Unpublished
study received Aug 25, 1969 under 1016-EX-30; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126506-D) 

100296	Clarkson, V.A.; Hensley, W.H. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Toxicity
of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide, and Temik Sulfone to Bluegill Sunfish: File
No. 10493. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096727-B) 

100381	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Feeding in the Diet of Rats for Three
or Six Months: Report 31-142. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978
under 1016-79; CDL:096728-A) 

100382	Striegel, J.; Condra, N.; Haun, C. (1963) Acute Toxicity of
Compound (21865): Special Report 26-29. (Unpublished study received Jan
25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096728-B) 

100383	Weil, C.; Condra, N.; White, C. (1969) Temik Sulfone: Single
Rabbit Skin Penetration Studies: Special Report 32-78. (Unpublished
study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Mellon Institute,
Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-C) 

100384	Nycum, J.; Kinkead, E.; Lauffer, J.; et al. (1968) Toxicity
Studies on Temik (Sulfone): Special Report 31-48. (Unpublished study
received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Mellon Institute,
Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-D) 

100385	Weil, C.; Condra, N.; Geary, D.; et al. (1973) UC 21865;
Technical ... Range Finding Toxicity Studies: Special Report 36-26.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096728-E) 

100386	Weil, C. (1974) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: UC 21865: Special
Report 37-10. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical
Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096728-F) 

100387	Babish, J.; Salerno, A. (1977) Neurotoxicity Evaluation of UC
21865 in White Leghorn Hens (Gallus domesticus): Laboratory No. 5233.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Food
and Drug Research Laboratories, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-M) 

100388	Woodside, M.; Weil, C.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1977) Aldicarb
Sulfone: 18-month Feeding in the Diet of Mice: Project Report 4038.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096728-O) 

100389	Weil, C. (1970) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Temik: Special
Report 33-18. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096728-T) 

100390	Weil, C.; McGee, M.; Baughman, J. (1970) Sulfocarb: Miscellaneous
Single Dose Peroral and Parenteral LD50 Assays and Some Joint Action
Studies: Special Report 33-7. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978
under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-U) 

100391	Weil, C. (1970) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Temik: Special
Report 33-92. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096728-V) 

100392	Weil, C.; Condra, N.; Geary, D.; et al. (1973) UC 21865
Formulation 22RZB-75-B; 50W: Range Finding Toxicity Studies: Special
Report 36-24. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical
Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096728-X) 

100393	Weil, C.; Burton, D.; Calisti, L. (1974) UC 21865 Technical, UC
21865--75% WP, Peroral Intubation of Rats with or without Subsequent
Dose(s) of Atropine: Special Report 37-60. (Unpublished study received
Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by CarnegieMellon Univ., Div. of
Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-AA) 

100394	Nycum, J.; Kinkead, E.; Lauffer, J.; et al. (1968) Toxicity
Studies on the Probable Non-carbamate Plant Metabolites of Temik:
Special Report 31-30. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under
1016-79; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-AB) 

100398	Frazier, H. (1977) Sulfocarb Formulation Study. (Unpublished
study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-AH) 

100401	Stier, E. (1971) Summary on Sensory Evaluation of Potato Samples:
Temik. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 101679; prepared
by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Food Science, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-C) 

100402	Stier, E. (1972) Sensory Evaluation Report on Peanuts.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by
Rutgers Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096734-D) 

100403	Holland, R. (1976) Letter sent to A. Dawson dated Oct 5, 1976:
Taste test: Effect of experimental pesticide on Valencia orange flavor.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 101679; prepared by
Sunkist Growers, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096734-E) 

100404	Foremost Foods Co. (1977) Difference Testing: Kidney Beans:
Control Versus Temik Treated. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978
under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096734-F) 

100405	Foremost Research Center (1977) Difference Testing: Fresh
Tomatoes--Control Versus Temik Treated: Tomato Juice--Control Versus
Temik Treated: Tomato Paste--Control Versus Temik Treated. (Unpublished
study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-G)

 

100406	Vieira, M. (1977) Letter sent to P. Schroeder dated Jul 19, 1977
Efficacy of Temik in coffee beans. (Unpublished study received Jan 25,
1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Union Carbide de Brasil S.A., submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-H) 

100407	Ough, C. (1977) Letter sent to P. Darst dated Feb 1, 1977 Results
of wine tasting: Temik treated grapes. (Unpublished study received Jan
25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Univ. of California--Davis, Dept. of
Viticulture and Enology, Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-I) 

100408	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Animal Feeding Acceptance: Temik 10G.
Summary of study 096734-K. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978
under 1016-79; CDL:096734-J) 

100409	Haines, R. (1970) Field Evaluations of Potential Hazard of Temik
10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants: Trial
Two. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-K) 

100694	Intera Environmental Consultants, Inc. (1982) Effects of Varying
Input Load and Degradation Rates on Simulated Regional Movement of
Aldicarb in Ground Water in Long Island. Rev. (Unpublished study
received May 5, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL: 247403-A) 

101902	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) The Name, Chemical Identity and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69; CDL: 005151-A) 

101903	Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Efficacy of Temik on Various Crops.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69;
CDL:005151-B) 

101904	Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Temik 10G Experimental Systemic
Pesticide (Active Ingredient--UC 21149): Technical Information for
Testing Purposes: F-40977C. Summary of studies 005593-A through 005593-C
and 005594-B. (Unpublished study received Jul 19, 1966 under 1016-69;
CDL:005592-A) 

101905	Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Transfer of Aldicarb from Temik 10G to
Untreated Corn Cob Grits under Varied Temperature and Humidity
Conditions. (Unpublished study received Nov 24, 1969 under 1016-69;
CDL:024305-A) 

101906	Union Carbide Corp. (19) Shelf Life of Temik 10G. (Unpublished
study received Oct 29, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:024310-C) 

101907	Ridgway, R.; Stokes, R.; Coppedge, J. (1969) Laboratory
Evaluations of Release Characteristics of Various Carbon Based Granular
Formulations of Aldicarb (Temik). (U.S. Agricultural Research Service,
Entomology Research Div.; unpublished study; CDL:024310-D) 

101908	Back, R. (1969) Netherlands and Germany: Temik 10G Marketing:
Summary Report. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under
1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:024310-E) 

101909	Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: The
Potential Hazard from Ingestion of Treated Plant Tissue. (Unpublished
study received Nov 5, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:024310-F) 

101910	Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Residues: Temik 10G and Temik 15G.
(Unpublished study received Jun 21, 1974 under 1016-78; CDL: 026641-A) 

101911	Haines, R. (1971) Ingestion of Aldicarb by Human Volunteers: A
Controlled Study of the Effects of Aldicarb on Man. (Unpublished study
received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:050847-A) 

101912	Union Carbide Corp. (1971) (Toxicity Studies of Temik 10G on
Humans). (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under
1016-69; CDL:050847-B) 

101913	Dernehl, C. (1971) Letter sent to R. Back dated Mar 30, 1971
Temik use on ornamentals. (Unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under
1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:050847-C) 

101914	Weil, C.; McGee, M.; Baughman, J. (1970) Comparative Skin
Penetration Toxicity of Temik 10GV and 15 Other Pesticide Formulations
As Marketed: Special Report 33-15. (Unpublished study received Apr 12,
1971 under 1016-69; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:050847-D) 

101915	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Nature
and Magnitude of Residues in Certain Ornamental Plants, Greenhouse Soils
and Water. (Unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69;
CDL:050847-E) 

101916	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Full Reports of Investigations Made
with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik 10G. Summary
of studies 091000-B through 091000-F. (Unpublished study received May 3,
1972 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-A) 

101917	Weil, C. (1971) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report
33-92. (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-B) 

101918	Weil, C.; Woodside, M.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1970) Temik: Results
of Feeding in the Diet of Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 33-59.
(Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-C) 

101919	Weil, C.; Woodside, M.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1970) Temik (T),
Temik Sulfoxide (TSO), Temik Sulfone (TSO2), 1:1 TSO:TSO2: Results of
Feeding in the Diet of Rats for 7 Days: Special Report 33-81.
(Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; prepared by
Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-D) 

101920	Dorough, H. (1970) Effect of Temik on Methyl Parathion Toxicity
to Mice: PR-2771. (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188;
prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Texas Agricultural Experiment Station,
Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC;
CDL:091000-E) 

101921	Schlinke, J. (1970) Toxicologic effects of five soil nematocides
in chickens. American Journal of Veterinary Research 31(6): 1119-1121.
(Also In unpublished submission received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-F) 

101922	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb.
Summary of study 091000-H. (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under
2F1188; CDL:091000-G) 

101923	Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Magnitude of the Residues: Aldicarb.
(Compilation; unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188;
CDL:091000-I) 

101924	Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Temik
Residues in Beef Liver by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study
received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-J) 

101925	Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Summary
of Performance Data--Sugarcane and Sweet Potatoes (Louisiana Only).
(Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-K) 

101926	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Residue Studies of Temik.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798;
CDL:091371-A) 

101928	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Residue Studies of Temik in Plants and
Animals. Summary of studies 091372-B through 091372-Q. (Unpublished
study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL: 091372-A) 

101929	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Metabolism of
C14Temik in Cotton Plants under Field Conditions: File No. 10492.
(Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-D) 

101930	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Degradation of Temik
... in Potato Foliage: File No. 10495. (Unpublished study received Apr
18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY;
CDL:091372-F) 

101931	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Metabolism and
Associated Residues of Temik in Spearment and Lettuce: File No. 10496.
(Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL: 091372-G) 

101932	Dorough, H. (1968) Continual Feeding of Radio-labeled Temik to
Lactating Dairy Cows. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
9F0798; prepared by Texas A and M Univ., submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-H) 

101933	Dorough, H. (1968) Continuous Feeding of Radiolabeled Temik to
Laying Hens. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798;
prepared by Texas A and M Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New
York, NY; CDL:091372-I) 

101934	Bull, D.; Coppedge, J.; Ridgway, R. (19) Fate of Temik in Soil
with Special Reference to Chemical Changes, Movement, and
Volatilization. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research
Div., Cotton Insects Systemic Chemicals Investigations; unpublished
study; CDL:091372-J) 

101935	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Temik Metabolism:
Fate of C14-Temik in Cultivated Soil: File No. 9218. (Unpublished study
received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
New York, NY; CDL:091372-K) 

101936	Clarkson, V.; Weiden, M. (1968) Temik Insecticide: The
Persistence of Temik in an Agricultural Soil As Indicated by Field and
Laboratory Bioassay: File No. 10490. (Unpublished study received Apr 18,
1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY;
CDL:091372-L) 

101937	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Temik Metabolism:
Degradation and Carry-over Properties of ... (Temik) in Soil: File No.
10494. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL: 091372-M) 

101938	Spurr, H.; Chancey, E. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Interactions
between Temik and Microorganisms and Their Importance to Ecological
Relationships in Soil: File No. 9208. (Unpublished study received Apr
18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY;
CDL:091372-N) 

101939	Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R.; et al. (1968) Temik
Insecticide: Field Evaluation of the Persistence and Movement of Temik
and Its Carbamate Metabolites in Soil: File No. 10485. (Unpublished
study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-O) 

101940	Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R. (1968) Temik Insecticide:
Field Evaluation of the Persistence of Temik and Its Carbamate
Metabolites in Pond Water and Their Effect on Pond Fauna: File No.
10491. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-Q) 

101941	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Full Reports of Investigations Made
with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik. Summary of
studies 005593-C, 005594-B, 091373-B through 091373D, 091373-F through
091373-J, 091373-L, 091373-N through 091373-P, 091373-R through
091373-U, 091373-W, 091373-Y, 091373-Z, 091373-AB, 091373-AC, 126467-A,
126484-D, 126486-A, 126494-A, 131933-A. (Unpublished study received Apr
18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY;
CDL:091373-A) 

101942	Weil, C.; Condra, N.; White, C.; et al. (1968) Temik 10 G-V
(10.3% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149): Acute and 14-day
Applications to Rabbits: Special Report 31-137. (Unpublished study
received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared by Mellon Institute,
Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY;
CDL:091373-D) 

101943	Pozzani, U.; Kinkead, E.; Geary, D.; et al. (1968) Temik 10G and
Temik 10G-V: Response of Rats to Saturated Vapors Generated under
Simulated Greenhouse Conditions: Special Report 31-173. (Unpublished
study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared by Mellon Institute,
Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York,
NY; CDL:091373-F) 

101944	Williams, F. (1964) Agricultural Chemicals Compound 21149: Air
Sampling While Formulating at Chemical Formulators, Inc. (Unpublished
study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-G) 

101945	Williams, F. (1964) Agricultural Chemicals Compound 21149: Air
Sampling during Second Formulations at Chemical Formulators, Inc.
(Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-H) 

101946	Williams, F. (1965) Air Sampling Report for Agricultural Chemical
Compound 21149. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL: 091373-I) 

101947	Peele, R. (1966) Industrial Hygiene--Air Pollution Evaluation of
Hazards Associated with the Production of Compound 21149 & Formulation
of Temik 10-G Insecticide: Report No. 66-IH-158-I-1. (Unpublished study
received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
New York, NY; CDL:091373-J) 

101948	Union Carbide Corp. (1966) (Toxicity of Temik to Humans).
(Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL:091373-L) 

101952	Weil, C.; Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1968) The Toxicity of Temik
and Its Metabolites in Mint and Lettuce: Special Report 31-156.
(Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared by
Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-R) 

101953	Johnstone, V. (1967) Alleged Temik--Cherry Poisoning Incident,
Wenatchee, Washington. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-S) 

101954	Union Carbide Corp. (1967) Waddell Case: Toxicity of Temik to
Humans. (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
9F0798; CDL:091373-T) 

101955	Dernehl, C. (1969) Letter sent to R. Haines dated Jan 9, 1969
Consideration of possible hazard to humans handling cotton plants
treated with Temik. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-U) 

101956	Back, R. (1968) Temik 10G Granular Pesticide: Field Evaluation of
Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study received Apr 18,
1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY;
CDL:091373-AB) 

101957	Lavoie, K. (1963) Bioassay Record: UC-21149: Peromyscus: Test No.
R-14. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver Wildlife Research Center;
unpublished study, CDL:091373-AC) 

101958	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Efficacy of Temik 10G on Cotton.
(Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798;
CDL:092003-A) 

101959	Lund, R.; Haines, R. (1969) Field Evaluation of Temik 10G
Aldicarb Pesticide: Potential Hazard to White-tail Deer and Cottontail
Rabbits from Simulated Spills. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970
under 0F1008; prepared in cooperation with New Jersey, Fish and Game
Commission, Black River State Game Field Station, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-B) 

101960	Clarkson, V.; Haines, R.; Hennsley, W.; et al. (1969) Report on
Additional Field Tests with Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on the
Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study received Aug 20,
1970 under 0F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC;
CDL:091748-C) 

101961	Haines, R. (1970) Field Evaluation of Potential Hazard of Temik
10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants: Trial
I. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-D) 

101962	Haines, R. (1970) Field Evaluations of Potential Hazard of Temik
10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants: Trial
II. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-E) 

101963	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Discussion of Performance: Temik
10G-Sugar Beets. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970
under 0F1008; CDL:091748-F) 

101964	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Metabolism in Plants: Temik. Summary
of studies 091748-H through 091748-J and 091748-L. (Unpublished study
received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:091748-G) 

101965	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1970) Metabolism of Temik
Aldicarb Pesticide ... in Sugar Beets. (Unpublished study received Aug
20, 1970 under 0F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC;
CDL:091748-I) 

101966	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Magnitude of the Residues: Aldicarb in
Sugar Beets. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under
0F1008; CDL:091748-K) 

101967	Dorough, H. (1970) Extraction of Radioactive Residues from Liver
of Cow Fed 1.2 ppm Aldicarb-Aldicarb Sulfone-C14 in the Diet for 14
Days. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; prepared by
Univ. of Kentucky, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-L) 

101968	Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Soil: Decline of Aldicarb.
(Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:091748-M) 

101969	Union Carbide Corp. (1967) Continual Feeding of Radio-labeled
Temik to Lactating Dairy Cows. (Unpublished study received on unknown
date under 7F0573; CDL:092861-A) 

101970	Maitlen, J.; McDonough, L.; Beroza, M. (1966) Determination of
2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl) oxime, Its
Sulfoxide and Sulfone, by Gas Chromatography. (U.S. Agricultural
Research Service, Entomology Research Div.; unpublished study;
CDL:092861-B) 

101971	Union Carbide Corp. (1967) Efficacy Studies of Temik on Potatoes.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 22, 1967 under 7F0573;
CDL:092861-E) 

101972	Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Study of the Chemical Temik 10G.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 23, 1967 under 7F0573;
CDL:092861-F) 

101973	Romine, R. (1966) Determination of Temik Residues in Potatoes.
(Unpublished study received Feb 23, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, WV; CDL:092861-G) 

101974	Romine, R. (1966) Determination of Temik Residues in Soil.
(Unpublished study received Feb 23, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, WV; CDL:092861-H) 

101975	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Continual Feeding of Radiolabeled
Temik to Chickens. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under
8F0637; CDL:092931-A) 

101976	Romine, R. (1967) Determination of Temik Residues in Cottonseed:
(A Total Toxic Residues Method). (Unpublished study received on unknown
date under 8F0637; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., South Charleston,
WV; CDL:092931-C) 

101977	Andrawes, N.; Romine, R.; Bagley, W. (1973) Metabolism and
residues of Temik aldicarb pesticide in cotton foliage and seed under
field conditions. J. Agr. Food Chem. 21(3):379-386. (Also In unpublished
submission received Jul 24, 1973 under 9F0798; submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-A) 

101978	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Determination of Total Toxic Temik
Residues in Cottonseed by Gas Chromatography: Basic Cottonseed Method:
UC 21149-III-COTS. (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 under
9F0798; CDL:093106-B) 

101979	Back, R. (1970) Letter sent to G. Rohwer dated Jul 22, 1970:
Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide for use on cotton only. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
New York, NY; CDL:093106-C) 

101980	Dernehl, C. (1970) Letter sent to R. Back dated Jul 13, 1970
Possible Temik poisoning of humans. (Unpublished study received on
unknown date under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York,
NY; CDL:093106-D) 

101981	Back, R. (1970) Letter sent to H. Hays dated May 12, 1970: Temik
10G aldicarb pesticide for use on cotton only. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
New York, NY; CDL:093106-E) 

101982	Romine, R. (1969) Letter sent to H. Alford dated Nov 12, 1969:
Temik 10G, aldicarb pesticide for cotton pest control. (Unpublished
study received on unknown date under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-G) 

101983	Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: The
Potential Hazard from Ingestion of Treated Plant Tissue. (Unpublished
study received on unknown date under 9F0798; CDL:093106-H) 

101984	Back, R. (1969) Letter sent to H. Alford dated Oct 29, 1969:
Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide. (Unpublished study received Oct 29, 1969
under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY;
CDL:093106-I) 

101985	Herrett, R. (1967) Letter sent to H. Stansbury dated Feb 7, 1967
Results of studies on the uptake of Temik by spearmint and tendergreen
bean. (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-L) 

101986	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Dermal Toxicity of Formulated Products
to Rats: (Four Hour Skin Penetration). (Unpublished study received on
unknown date under 9F0798; CDL:093106-N) 

101987	Union Carbide Corp. (19) Protocol for Evaluation of Exposure
Hazard to Greenhouse Operators Using Temik 10G. (Unpublished study
received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL:093106-O) 

101988	Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Study of the Chemical Temik.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 14, 1969 under 9F0798;
CDL:093106-R) 

101989	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the
Petition: Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 under
9F0798; CDL:093106-V) 

101990	Union Carbide Technical Center (19) Determination of Total Toxic
Temik Residues in Milk by Gas Chromatography: UC 21149-III-Milk.
(Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL: 093318-B) 

101991	Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Determination of Total Toxic Temik
Residues in Beef Liver by Gas Chromatography: UC 21149-IIILiver.
(Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:093318-C) 

101992	Union Carbide Technical Center (19) Determination of Total Toxic
Temik Residues in Sugar Beet Roots by Gas Chromatography: UC
21149-III-SBR. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1970 under 0F1008;
CDL:093318-D) 

101993	Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Determination of the Total Toxic Temik
Residue in Sugar Beet Tops: UC 21149-III-SBT. (Unpublished study
received Jun 29, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:093318-E) 

101994	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the
Petition: Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1970 under
0F1008; CDL:093318-F) 

101995	Union Carbide Corp. (1972) Response to EPA Comments on Pesticide
Petition 2F1188: Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Aug 6, 1971
under 2F1188; CDL:093511-A) 

101996	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1971) Metabolism of ...
(Temik aldicarb pesticide) in potato plants. J. Agr. Food Chem.
19(4):731-737. (Also In unpublished submission received Aug 6, 1971
under 2F1188; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC;
CDL:093511-B) 

101997	Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb
Residues in Sugarcane Stalk by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study
received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; CDL:093511-F) 

101998	Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb
Residues in Sweet Potato Root by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study
received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; CDL:093511-G) 

101999	Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Residues
in Sugarcane Leaves by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received
Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; CDL:093511-H) 

102000	Weil, C. (1974) Summary of Interpretation of Previously Presented
Toxicity Data and Safety-factor Calculations for Aldicarb. (Unpublished
study received on unknown date under 3F1414; prepared in cooperation
with Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC;
CDL:093775-A) 

102001	Meeker, R. (1974) Response to EPA Letter of December 19, 1973
(Items 1,2 and 3) Regarding Pesticide Petition 3F1414 and Subsequent
Discussion between EPA and UCC, January 11, 1974. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
New York, NY; CDL:093775-D) 

102002	Williams, C. (1973) Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.
(Telephone conversation with R. Back; unpublished study received on
unknown date under 3F1414; prepared in cooperation with U.S. ABPR,
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL: 093775-F) 

102003	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Efficacy Study of Temik on Various
Crops. (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under
3F1414; CDL:093775-G) 

102004	Union Carbide Corp. (19) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb
Residues in Peanuts by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received
Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093775-H) 

102005	Union Carbide Corp. (19) Determination of Total Aldicarb Residues
in Potato Tubers by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Jun
25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093775-I) 

102006	Union Carbide Corp. (1973) The Name, Chemical Identity, and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study
received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093775-J) 

102007	Union Carbide Corp. (1973) The Results of Tests on the Amount of
Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Methods
Used: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973
under 3F1414; CDL:093776-A) 

102008	Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb.
Summary of studies 093511-B, 093776-D through 093776-F. (Unpublished
study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093776-B) 

102009	Andrawes, N.; Moorefield, H. (1972) The Metabolism and Terminal
Residues of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in Peanut Plants under Field
Conditions: Project No. 111A12; File No. 17613. (Unpublished study
received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Washington, DC; CDL:093776-D) 

102011	Lykins, H. (1969) Temik Insecticide: The Effect of Temperature
and pH on the Stability of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone in
Water: Project No. 111A13. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973
under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC;
CDL:093776-G) 

102012	Union Carbide Corp. (1972) Residue Data for Aldicarb on Potatoes
and Potato Chips. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973
under 3F1414; CDL:093777-A) 

102013	Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Residue Data for Aldicarb: Peanuts.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414;
CDL:093777-B) 

102014	Union Carbide Corp. (1972) Summary and Discussion of Results of
Tests with Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on Potatoes. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093779-A) 

102015	Hodges, L. (1973) Letter sent to L. Terbush dated Nov 13, 1973:
Aldicarb pesticide for use on potatoes and peanuts. (Unpublished study
received Nov 13, 1973 under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Washington, DC; CDL:093781-A) 

102016	Reed, J.; Stier, E. (1969) Flavor Evaluation Report on Potatoes
Treated with Aldicarb Pesticides. (Unpublished study received Nov 13,
1973 under 3F1414; prepared by Rutgers Univ., submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093781-B) 

102017	Union Carbide Corp. (1975) The Name, Chemical Identity, and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study
received Oct 1, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:095060-A) 

102018	Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Aldicarb: Residues in Meat, Milk, Soil
and Various Crops. (Compilation; unpublished study received Oct 1, 1975
under 6G1689; CDL:095060-B) 

102019	Union Carbide Corp. (1975) The Name, Chemical Identity, and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study
received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL:096130-A) 

102020	Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Discussion of Temik Performance
against Nematode and Insect Pests of Coffee. (Compilation; unpublished
study received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL:096130-B) 

102021	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the
Petition: Temik. (Unpublished study received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69;
CDL:096130-C) 

102022	Andrawes, N.; Dorough, H.; Lindquist, D. (1967) Degradation and
elimination of Temik in rats. Journal of Economic Entomology
60(4):979-987. (Also In unpublished submission received May 6, 1977
under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Co., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096131-O) 

102023	Knaak, J.; Tallant, M.; Sullivan, L. (1966) The metabolism of
2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methyl-carbamoyl)oxime in the
rat. J. Agr. Food Chem. 14(6):573-578. (Also In unpublished submission
received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096131-P) 

102024	Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Residue Studies of Aldicarb on Coffee.
(Compilation; unpublished study received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69;
CDL:096131-T) 

102025	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Discussion of Performance: Temik
Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 13,
1976 under 1016-69; CDL:096175-A) 

102026	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb.
(Unpublished study received Aug 9, 1977 under 1016-78; CDL: 096302-B) 

102027	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 9, 1977 under 101678;
CDL:096302-U) 

102028	Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the
Petition: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Aug 9,
1977 under 1016-78; CDL:096302-V) 

102029	Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Alleged Overexposure Cases Reported
from Use of Temik Formulations. (Unpublished study received Aug 9, 1977
under 1016-78; CDL:096302-W) 

102031	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Efficacy of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide
on Pecan Aphids. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 10, 1977
under 1016-78; CDL:096319-A) 

102035	Abdalla, N. (1977) Letter sent to F. Sanders dated Oct 19, 1977
Efficacy of Temik on various crops. (Unpublished study received Oct 26,
1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096396-A) 

102036	Heitmuller, T. (1972) Letter sent to S. Ichikawa dated Jan 7,
1972 Toxicity of Temik to grass shrimp. (U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Gulf Breeze Laboratory; unpublished study; CDL:096397-B) 

102037	Shell Chemical Co. (1971) Toxicity Testing: Temik. (Unpublished
study received Oct 26, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096397-C) 

102038	Hudson, R.; Tucker, R.; Haegele, M. (1972) Effect of age on
sensitivity: Acute oral toxicity of 14 pesticides to mallard ducks of
several ages. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (22):556561. (Also In
unpublished submission received Oct 26, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096397-E) 

102047	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Aldicarb: Residues in Citrus.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 12, 1976 under 6F1829;
CDL:096526-B) 

102048	Lykins, H.; Meeker, R. (1971) Aldicarb Pesticide: Stability of
Aldicarb in Water: Project No. 111A13, File No. 16060. (Unpublished
study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-C) 

102049	Payne, L.; Stansbury, H.; Weiden, M. (1966) The synthesis and
insecticidal properties of some cholinergic trisubstituted acetaldehyde
O-(methylcarbamoyl)oximes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14(4):356-365. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977
under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096670-D) 

102050	Quraishi, M. (1972) Edaphic and water relationships of aldicarb
and its metabolites. Canadian Entomologist 104(Aug):1191-1196. (Also In
unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-E) 

102051	Richey, F.; Moorefield, H. (1972) Temik--Aldicarb Pesticide:
Metabolism by Soils: Laboratory Studies: Project No. 111A12, File No.
17507. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-H) 

102052	Richey, F.; Bartley, W.; Sheets, K. (1977) Laboratory studies on
the degradation of (the pesticide) aldicarb in soils. Journal of
Agricultural and Food Chemistry 25(1):47-51. (Also In unpublished
submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-I) 

102053	Romine, R.; Meeker, R. (1973) Accumulation of Aldicarb Residues
in Fish Tissue from Chronic Exposure to Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and
Aldicarb Sulfone in Aquaria Water: Project No. 111A13, File No. 19009.
(Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-K) 

102054	Sheets, K.; Hirsh, D.; Meeker, R. (1976) Temik Aldicarb
Pesticide: Metabolism of Aldicarb in Anaerobic Muskingum Silt Loam Soil:
Project No. 111A13, File No. 22196. (Unpublished study received Dec 6,
1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096670-M) 

102055	Skrentny, R.; Ellis, J. (1970) Control of Aphis fabae on broad
beans (Vicia faba) by the systemic action of gamma-BHC, thionazin and
aldicarb. Pestic. Sci. 1(Mar-Apr):45-48. (Also In unpublished submission
received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-N) 

102056	Spengler, H.; Griffith, J.; Tamplin, W. (1968) Temik and Temik
Metabolites: Vapor Pressure Data: Project No. 111A12, File No. 10819.
(Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-O) 

102057	Stephen, J.; Durden, J. (1969) A Study of the Decomposition of
Temik, Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone in Water at 100 (degrees):
Project No. 111A28, File No. 11815. (Unpublished study received Dec 6,
1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096670-Q) 

102058	Supak, J. (1972) The Volatilization, degradation, adsorption, and
desorption characteristics of aldicarb ... in soils and clays. Taken
from: Dissertation Abstracts 33(3):982. (Order no. 72-24, 336; also In
unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-R) 

102059	Verstraete, W.; Voets, J. (19) Impact in sugarbeet crops of some
important pesticide treatment systems on the microbial and enzymatic
constitution of the soil. Source unknown p.1263-1277. (Also In
unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-S) 

102060	Tobler, E.; Johnson, H. (1970) Temik--Aldicarb Pesticide: Thermal
Decomposition and Baseand Acid-hydrolysis of Temik: Project No. 116A16,
File No. 14185. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-T) 

102061	Woodham, D.; Edwards, R.; Reeves, R.; et al. (1973) Total toxic
aldicarb residues in soil, cottonseed, and cotton lint following a soil
treatment with the insecticide on the Texas high plains. J. Agr. Food
Chem. 21(2):303-307. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 9,
1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096670-V) 

102062	Khasawinah, A. (1977) Environmental Chemistry of Aldicarb.
Summary of studies 091000-H, 091372-C, 091372-E, 091372-O, 091372-Q,
091373-F, 096671-B through 096671-I, 096671-M, 096671-P, 096671-R
through 096671-Y. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-A) 

102064	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1971) Fate and carryover
properties of Temik aldicarb pesticide
2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime in soil.
Agricultural and Food Chemistry 19(4):727-730. (Also In unpublished
submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-C) 

102065	Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Temik Aldicarb
Pesticide in Aqueous Buffer Solutions: Project No. 111A13, File No.
22263. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096671-D) 

102066	Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Aldicarb Sulfoxide
in Aqueous Buffer Solutions: Project No. 111A13, File No. 223226.
(Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-E) 

102067	Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Photochemical Transformation of
Aldicarb: Project No. 111A13, File No. 22335. (Unpublished study
received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-F) 

102068	Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Photostability of Aldicarb
Sulfoxide: Project No. 111A13, File No. 22325. (Unpublished study
received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-G) 

102069	Borash, A.; Kramer, V.; Moorefield, H. (1973) Experiments
Designed To Trace Movements of Aldicarb in Soil: Project No. 111B13,
File No. 17959. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096671-H) 

102070	Myers, R.; Weil, C.; Condra, N.; et al. (1975) Temik 10G BC
(Coal); 10G and 15G (Gypsum); 15G (Corn Cob): Comparative Toxicity
Studies via Peroral, Dermal, and Inhalation Routes: Special Report
38-141. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; prepared
by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096671-M) 

102071	Coppedge, J.; Bull, D.; Ridgeway, R. (1977) Movement and
persistence of aldicarb in certain soils. Archives of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology 5(2):129-141. (Also In unpublished
submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-P) 

102072	Bartley, W.; Heywood, D. (1965) Metabolism Studies: Hydrolytic
Stability of UC 21149: 855-31101-7073. (Unpublished study received Dec
6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096671-R) 

102073	Hirsh, D.; Sheets, K.; Holsing, G. (1977) Aldicarb Subsequent
Crop Residues: File No. 23520. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977
under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096671-S) 

102074	Hough, A.; Thomason, I; Farmer, W. (1975) Behavior of aldicarb in
soil relative to control of Heterodera schachtii. Journal of Nematology
7(3):214-221. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under
1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-T) 

102075	Iwata, Y.; Westlake, W.; Barkley, J.; et al. (1977) Aldicarb
residues in oranges, citrus by-products, orange leaves, and soil after
an aldicarb soil-application in an orange grove. J. Agric. Food Chem.
25(4):933-937. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977
under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096671-U) 

102076	Jones, A. (1976) Metabolism of aldicarb by five soil fungi. J.
Agric. Food Chem. 24(1):115-117. (Also In unpublished submission
received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-V) 

102077	Kaufman, D. (1970) Pesticide metabolism. Pages 73-86, In
Pesticides in the Soil: Ecology, Degradation and Movement: International
Symposium on Pesticides in the Soil; Feb 25-27, 1970, East Lansing, MI.
S.l.: s.n.. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under
1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-W) 

102078	Kearby, W.; Ercegovich, C.; Bliss, M. (1970) Residue studies on
aldicarb in soil and Scotch pine. Journal of Economic Entomology
63(4):1317-1318. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977
under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096671-X) 

102079	Leistra, M.; Smelt, J.; Lexmond, T. (1976) Conversion and
leaching of aldicarb in soil columns. Pestic. Sci. 7:471-482. (Also In
unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-Y) 

102086	Stier, E. (1971) Summary on Sensory Evaluation of Potato Samples.
(Unpublished study received Dec 19, 1977 under 1016-69; prepared by
Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Food Science, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096682-A) 

102087	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Sensory Evaluation of Cigarettes Made
from Tobacco Treated with Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Dec 19, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL:096682-C) 

102088	Foremost Foods Co. (1977) Difference Testing--Kidney Beans:
Control versus Temik Treated: Project No. 1387-RI(2). (Unpublished study
received Dec 19, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:096682-E) 

102089	Foremost Research Center (1977) Difference Testing: Fresh
Tomatoes--Control versus Temik Treated; Tomato Juice--Control versus
Temik Treated; Tomato Paste--Control Versus Temik Treated: Project No.
1387-RI(1). (Unpublished study received Dec 19, 1977 under 1016-69;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096682-F) 

102090	Brasil, Secretaria da Agricultura (1977) Flavor Test in Coffee
Treated with Temik 10G at the Rate of 60 Gr. of Formulation per Mat.
(Coordenacao de Assistencia Tecnica Integral, Departamento de
Assistencia Supletiva; unpublished study; CDL:096682-G) 

102091	Union Carbide Corp. (1978) Efficacy of Temik on oranges.
(Unpublished study received Jan 17, 1978 under 1016-69; CDL: 096715-A) 

102104	Atkins, E.; Kellum, D.; Atkins, K. (1977) Repellent Additives to
Reduce Pesticide Hazards to Honey Bees: Maximizing the Effectiveness of
Bees as Pollinators of Agricultural Crops: Project No. 3565-RR (W-139).
Final rept. (Unpublished study received Jan 27, 1978 under 10182-17;
prepared by Univ. of California-Riverside, Citrus Research Center and
Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by ICI
Americas, Inc., Wilmington, DE; CDL:096765-N) 

102113	Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Efficacy Studies of Aldicarb on
Oranges. (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under
1016-EX-34; CDL:097217-A) 

102114	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Fate of Aldicarb Residues (ppm) in
Oranges under Commercial Processing: Complete Data from 3 Fractionation
Lots: Report No. 1. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under
1016-EX-34; CDL:097217-B) 

102115	Johnson, D. (1976) Aldicarb Residues in Valencia Oranges: Report
No. 2. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-EX-34;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:097217-C) 

102116	Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Discussion of Performance: Temik.
Summary of study 097272-B. (Unpublished study received Aug 14, 1978
under 1016-78; CDL:097272-A) 

102117	Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Studies on the Efficacy of Sorghum
Nematicides. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 14, 1978 under
1016-78; CDL:097272-B) 

102118	Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Residues of Aldicarb in Meat, Milk,
and Other Subjects. (Unpublished study received Oct 19, 1978 under
1016-EX-51; CDL:097628-B) 

102119	Union Carbide Corp. (1978) Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Oct 19, 1978 under 1016-EX-51;
CDL:097628-C) 

102120	Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Studies on the Efficacy of Temik on
Grapes. (Compilation; unpublished study received Oct 19, 1978 under
1016-EX-51; CDL:097628-D) 

102121	Union Carbide Corp. (1978) The Results of Tests on the Amount of
Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used
and Environmental Chemistry: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study
received Aug 14, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097271-C) 

102122	Interregional Research Project No. 4. (1976) Nature of the
Residue: (Aldicarb). (Unpublished study received Aug 10, 1977 under
7E1996; CDL:097785-A) 

102123	Interregional Research Project No. 4. (1977) (Residue Studies for
Aldicarb in or on Pecans). (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug
10, 1977 under 7E1996; CDL:097785-U) 

102127	Romanko, R. (1979) Aldicarb Insecticide for Control of Hop Pests.
(Unpublished study received Feb 8, 1979 under 38338-EX-4; prepared by
Southwest Research & Extension Center, submitted by Univ. of Idaho, Twin
Falls, ID; CDL:098220-A) 

102128	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1977) Nature of
the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Apr 27, 1979 under
9F2201; CDL:098223-A) 

102129	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Residue Data
for Aldicarb in Lemons, Limes and Grapefruit. (Unpublished study
received Apr 27, 1979 under 9F2201; CDL:098223-B) 

102130	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Residue Data
for Temik in Citrus Juices. (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr
27, 1979 under 9F2201; CDL:098223-C) 

102131	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Case of Tony Huerta, Allegedly
Poisoned with Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 21,
1970 under 1016-69; CDL:100338-A) 

102132	Fink, R.; Beavers, J.; Brown, R. (1979) Final Report: Eight-day
Dietary LC50--Bobwhite Quail: Technical Grade Aldicarb: Project No.
142-118. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1979 under 1016-78;
prepared by Wildlife International Ltd., submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-B) 

102133	Schneider, C. (1979) The Acute Toxicity of Aldicarb Technical to
the Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri Richardson): UCES Proj. No.
11504-14-03. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1979 under 1016-78;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-C) 

102134	Schneider, C. (1979) The Acute Toxicity of Aldicarb Technical to
the Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque): UCES Proj. No.
11504-14-04. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1979 under 1016-78;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-D) 

102135	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Discussion on Residues of Aldicarb
Remaining in Plants and Soil from Treatments of Temik 10G to Ornamental
Plants. (Unpublished study received Jun 3, 1969 under 1016-69;
CDL:101541-A) 

102136	Union Carbide Corp. (19) Mortality of Temik-dosed Mice.
(Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin. no.;
CDL:102776-A) 

102137	Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Criteria Measured at 6-month Kill, or
to Date, 5-26-71, on Two-year Rat Feeding Study. (Unpublished study
received Jun 11, 1971 under unknown admin. no.; CDL: 102785-A) 

102138	Bartley, W. (1965) Letter sent to R. Haines dated Nov 22, 1965
Summary of work in plant metabolism on Temik. (Unpublished study
received Nov 26, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Tarrytown, NY; CDL:123009-A) 

102139	Union Carbide Corp. (1964) Summary and Discussion of Results of
Residue Analyses of Raw Agricultural Crops Treated with UC 21149,
1963-1964. (Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 1, 1966 under
unknown admin. no.; CDL:123032-B) 

102140	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Discussion of Performance Tests: UC
21149. (Compilation; unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under
unknown admin. no.; CDL:126441-A) 

102141	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Summary and Discussion of Results of
Residue Analyses of Raw Agricultural Crops Treated with UC 21149,
1963-1964. (Compilation; unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under
unknown admin. no.; CDL:126443-B) 

102142	Stansbury, H.; Johnson, D. (1964) Stability of ... (20047) and
... (21149) in Animal Diets: Status Report: Project No. 143B15.
(Unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under unknown admin. no.;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126443-C) 

102143	Weil, C.; DeMary, L.; Soo, V. (1971) Comparative Skin Penetration
Toxicity of Temik 10GV, Temik 15GV and 5 Other Pesticide Formulations As
Marketed: Special Report 34-76. (Unpublished study received on unknown
date under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126446-A) 

102144	Dernehl, C. (1972) Letter sent to R. Back dated Apr 28, 1972
Toxicity of Temik 10G in humans. (Unpublished study received on unknown
date under unknown admin. no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:126446-B) 

102145	Borash, A.; Bryant, H. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide
Agricultural Products: (Toxicity to Goldfish). (Unpublished study
received Sep 9, 1965 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126467-A) 

102146	Lovell, C.; Quick, Q. (1967) Temik Insecticide: Determination of
Temik by Infrared Spectroscopy: Project No. 111A25, File No. 7135.
(Unpublished study received May 8, 1967 under 1016EX-22; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126474-A) 

102147	McDermott, W.; Quick, Q. (1966) Insecticide Temik: Determination
of Acetone in Temik 10G and Ambush 2G: Project No. 299A20, File No.
6549. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1967 under 1016EX-22; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126474-C) 

102148	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Results of Tests Conducted by and
under the Supervision of Federal and State Agencies with UC 21149
Formulations on Ornamental Plant Pest Control--1962-1964. (Unpublished
study received Sep 9, 1965 under 1016-EX-22; CDL: 126475-A) 

102149	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Summary of Selected Performance of UC
21149 on Various Pests on Cotton and Potatoes--1964-1965. (Unpublished
study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; CDL: 126479-A) 

102150	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Petition Proposing Temporary Tolerance
for Residue of UC 21149 on and in Cottonseed and Potatoes. (Unpublished
study received Feb 1, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; CDL: 126480-A) 

102151	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Efficacy Studies of Carbamate
Insecticides on Cotton. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 26,
1966 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126481-B) 

102152	Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Accidental Poisoning Report: Temik
10G. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1966 under 1016-EX-24;
CDL:126483-A) 

102153	Stansbury, H. (1966) Letter sent to G. Downard dated Oct 3, 1966:
Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1966 under 1016EX-24;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126483-B) 

102154	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Efficacy Studies of Insecticides on
Various Crops. (Compilation; unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965
under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126484-B) 

102155	Ketcham, N. (1966) Analyses of Urine Specimens for Metabolite of
UC21149: Project No. 299A20, File No. 5882. (Unpublished study received
Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:126494-A) 

102156	Stansbury, H.; Wright, M. (1966) Area III--Agricultural Products
Insecticide Temik: Standard Samples for Residue Analyses:
855-31106-7965. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under
1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:126494-B) 

102157	Romine, R. (1966) Summary and Discussion: Temik. (Unpublished
study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126496-B) 

102158	Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Determination of Temik Sulfoxide in
Human Urine. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24;
CDL:126496-C) 

102159	Anderson, H. (1969) Letter sent to J. Harry dated May 21, 1969:
Livestock poisoning involving Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received May
28, 1969 under 1016-EX-30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
VA; CDL:126507-A) 

102160	United States of America Standards Institute (1969) Common Name
for the Pest Control Chemical ... Aldicarb. New York, NY: USASI. (USAS
K62.77-168; also In unpublished submission received Jul 14, 1969 under
1016-EX-30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:126507-B) 

102161	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Efficacy Study of Temik on Plants.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Mar 11, 1969 under 1016-EX-30;
CDL:126507-C) 

102162	Union Carbide Corp. (19) Metabolic Pathway of Temik in Animals
and Acute Toxicity of Metabolites. (Unpublished study received on
unknown date under 1016-EX-24; CDL:127018-A) 

102163	Haines, R. (1968) Temik 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide:
F40977E. (Unpublished study received May 1, 1968 under unknown admin.
no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:130982-A) 

102164	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Summary and Discussion of Results of
Residue Analyses of Raw Agricultural Crops Treated with UC 21149,
1963-1964. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin.
no.; CDL:130984-A) 

102165	Union Carbide Corp. (1964) UC 21149
Acaricide/Insecticide/Nematocide: F-40977A. (Unpublished study received
Mar 1, 1964 under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131906-A) 

102166	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) UC 21149--Experimental
Nematocide/Acaricide/Insecticide: F-40977B. (Unpublished study received
Feb 1, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131907-A) 

102167	Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Temik 10G Insecticide: Field
Evaluation of Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study
received Dec 5, 1968 under 1016-EX-30; CDL:131937-A) 

102169	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Handling and Safety Guide for Temik
10G Aldicarb Pesticide. S.l.: UCC. (Also In unpublished submission
received May 18, 1970 under 1016-69; CDL:220187-A) 

102170	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Information for Physicians on Therapy
of Poisoning by Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study
received May 18, 1970 under 1016-69; CDL:220187-B) 

102171	Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Efficacy of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide.
(Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-78;
CDL:223960-A) 

102172	Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Treated
with Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date
under 1016-78; CDL:223960-B) 

102173	Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Efficacy of Temik Compounds on
Oranges, Cotton and Other Crops for Control of Various Pests.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 15, 1977 under 1016-69;
CDL:228048-A) 

102174	Iwata, Y. (19) Residue Study of Aldicarb in New Growth Orange
Leaves. (Unpublished study received Feb 15, 1977 under 101669; prepared
by Univ. of California--Riverside, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 228048-B) 

102177	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb.
(Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69; CDL: 232221-A) 

102178	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1970) Metabolism and
Associated Residues of Temik (2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde
O-(Methylcarbamoyl)-oxime) in Sugar Beet Plants: Project No. 111B19,
File No. 12694. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:232221-K) 

102179	Andrawes, N.; Moorefield, H. (1972) Metabolism and Terminal
Residues of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in Flue Cured Tobacco: Project No.
111A12, File No. 17805. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under
1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:232221-M) 

102180	Khasawinah, A.; Hirsh, D.; Meeker, R. (1976) Temik Aldicarb
Pesticide: Metabolism of Aldicarb in Green and Cured Tobacco and
Pyrolysis Products in Smoke: Project No. 111A13, File No. 21978.
(Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:232221-N) 

102181	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb
Studies on Tobacco. (Compilation; unpublished study received Sep 21,
1976 under 1016-69; CDL:232221-O) 

102188	Supak, J. (1972) The Volatilization, Degradation, Adsorption, and
Desorption Characteristics of Aldicarb 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)
Propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl) Oxime in Soils and Clays.
(Dissertation; unpublished study received Oct 23, 1978 under 1016-78;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 235942-A) 

102189	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1979) Alleged
Temik Human Over-exposure Cases Reported in the U.S. (November 1976-July
1979). Summary of studies 238958-C through 238958-F. (Unpublished study
received Aug 16, 1979 under 264-322; CDL: 238958-A) 

102190	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1977) Pesticide
Incident Investigation Record--Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-B) 

102191	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Pesticide
Incident Investigation Record: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-C) 

102192	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Pesticide
Incident Investigation Record: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-D) 

102193	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1979) Pesticide
Incident Investigation Record: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-E) 

102194	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1979) Pesticide
Incident Investigation Record: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-F) 

102195	Moorefield, H. (1979) Aldicarb Pesticide: Mechanism of Action and
Therapy: Studies on Cholinesterase Inhibition by Aldicarb Pesticide.
Summary of studies 050847-A, 096131-P, 235615-C, 241454-B through
241454-F, 241454-H, 241454-J through 241454-N and 241454-P through
241454-S. (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322;
submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA;
CDL:241454-A) 

102196	Weiden, M. (1968) Insecticidal carbamoyloximes. J. Sci. Fd
Agric., Suppl. P19-31. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 11,
1979 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-B) 

102197	Yu, C.; Kearns, C.; Metcalf, R. (1972) Acetylcholinesterase
inhibition by substituted phenyl N-alkyl carbamates. J. Agr. Fd. Chem.
20(3):537-540. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979
under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-C) 

102198	Hastings, F.; Main, A.; Iverson, F. (1970) Carbamylation and
affinity constants of some carbamate inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase
and their relation to analogous substrate constants. J. Agr. Food Chem.
18(3):497-502. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979
under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-D) 

102199	Reiner, E. (1971) Spontaneous reactivation of phosphorylated and
carbamylated cholinesterases. Bull Wld Hlth Org. 44:109-112. (Published
study; CDL:241454-E) 

102200	Reiner, E.; Simeon-Rudolf, V. (1966) The kinetics of inhibition
of erythrocyte cholinesterase by monomethylcarbamates. Biochem. J.
98:501-505. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979 under
264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-F) 

102201	Chin, B.; Sullivan, L. (19) (Temik: Toxicity to Dogs).
(Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared by
Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-H) 

102202	Weil, C. (19) (Toxicity of Aldicarb Pesticides to Rats).
(Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared by
Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-J) 

102203	Johnson, H.; Sullivan, L.; McGee, M. (1968) Temik (UC 21149):
Antidotal Therapy in Rats following Administration of Multiple Lethal
Doses: Special Report 31-146. (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979
under 264-322; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-M) 

102204	Gordon, J.; Leadbeater, L.; Maidment, M. (1978) The protection of
animals against organophosphate poisoning by pretreatment with a
carbamate. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 43:207-216. (Also In
unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by
Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-P)


102206	Goldberg, M.; Johnson, H. (1962) Pharmacodynamic Effects of Cmpd.
21149. (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared
by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-R) 

102207	Striegel, J.; Condra, N.; Haun, C.; et al. (1962) Pharmacodynamic
Effects: (Compound 21149): Report 25-53. (Unpublished study received Dec
11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union
Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-S) 

104551	Abdalla, N. (1977) Letter sent to F. Sanders dated Dec 5, 1977
Environmental chemistry of Temik. Summary of study 096732-B.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-A) 

104552	Khasawinah, A. (1977) Environmental Chemistry of Aldicarb.
Summary of studies 096732-C through 096732-AW. (Unpublished study
received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-B) 

104553	Union Carbide Corp. (19) Determination of Total Toxic Temik
Residues in Sugar Beet Fractions by Gas Chromatography: UC
21149-III-SBF. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
CDL:096732-C) 

104555	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1971) Fate and carryover
properties of Temik aldicarb pesticide ... in soil. Agricultural and
Food Chemistry 19(4):727-730. (Also In unpublished submission received
Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research
Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-E) 

104556	Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Temik Aldicarb
Pesticide in Aqueous Buffer Solutions: File No. 22263. (Unpublished
study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-F) 

104557	Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Aldicarb Sulfoxide
in Aqueous Buffer Solutions: File No. 22326. (Unpublished study received
Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research
Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-G) 

104558	Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R.; et al. (1968) Field
Evaluation of the Persistence and Movement of Temik and Its Carbamates
in Soil: File No. 10485. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under
1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
CDL:096732-P) 

104559	Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R.; et al. (1968) Field
Evaluation of the Persistence of Temik and Its Carbamate Metabolites in
Pond Water and Their Effect on Pond Fauna: File No. 10491. (Unpublished
study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-Q) 

104560	Kaufman, D. (19) Pesticide metabolism. Pages 73-86, In Pesticides
in the Soil: Ecology, Degradation and Movement. By  S.l.: s.n.. (Also In
unpublished submission received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-Y) 

104561	Lin, S.; Funke, B.; Schulz, J. (1972) Effects of some
organophosphate and carbamate insecticides on nitrification and legume
growth. Plant and Soil 37(3):489-496. (Also In unpublished submission
received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AB) 

104562	Lykins, H. (1969) The Effect of Temperature and pH on the
Stability of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone in Water.
(Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AC) 

104563	Lykins, H.; Meeker, R. (1971) Stability of Aldicarb in Water:
File No. 16060. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
CDL:096732-AD) 

104564	Quraishi, M. (1972) Edaphic and water relationships of aldicarb
and its metabolites. Canadian Entomologist 104(3):1191-1196. (Also In
unpublished submission received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AF) 

104565	Richey, F.; Bartley, W.; Singh, R. (1972) Water Leaching of
Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, Aldicarb Sulfone and Internal Standard
Chloride Ion in Columns of Four Soil Types: File No. 16669. (Unpublished
study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-AG) 

104566	Richey, F.; Moorefield, H. (1972) Upward Movement of Aldicarb
through Soil during Water Evaporation: File No. 17526. (Unpublished
study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-AH) 

104567	Romine, R.; Meeker, R.; Roever, K.; et al. (1972) Leaching of
Aldicarb into Sandy Soil with Irrigation of a Temik Treated Sugar Beet
Field: File No. 17079. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under
1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
CDL:096732-AK) 

104568	Romine, R.; Meeker, R.; Gibson, C.; et al. (1973) Accumulation of
Aldicarb Residues in Fish Tissue from Chronic Exposure to Aldicarb,
Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone in Aquaria Water: File No.
19009. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AL) 

104569	Romine, R.; Halstead, C.; Gibson, C.; et al. (1968) Leaching
Characteristics of Temik 10G in Soils: File No. 10902. (Unpublished
study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-AN) 

104570	Sheets, K.; Hirsh, D.; Meeker, R. (1976) Metabolism of Aldicarb
in Anaerobic Muskingum Silt Loam Soil: File No. 22196. (Unpublished
study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AO) 

104571	Skrentny, R.; Ellis, J. (1970) Control of Aphis fabae on broad
beans ... by the systemic action of gamma-BHC, thionazin and aldicarb.
Pestic. Sci. 1(Mar/Apr):45-48. (Also In unpublished submission received
Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research
Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AP) 

104572	Tobler, E.; Johnson, H. (1970) Thermal Decomposition and Baseand
Acid-hydrolysis of Temik: File No. 14185. (Unpublished study received
Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research
Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AV) 

105062	Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (1980) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb,
Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpublished study received
Jun 15, 1982 under 264-318; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:247685-A) 

107125	Flanagin, R. (1977) Third Quarterly Report on Temik 15G.
(Unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-EX-34; submitted
by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:237152-A) 

107395	Vilkas, A. (1977) The Acute Toxicity of Aldicarb Technical to the
Water Flea ...: UCES Proj. #11504-14-01. (Unpublished study received Dec
19, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
CDL:096683-A) 

107397	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb.
(Unpublished study received Aug 14, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097271-B) 

107398	Fink, R.; Beavers, J.; Brown, R. (1979) Final Report: Acute Oral
LD50--Mallard Duck: Technical Grade Aldicarb: Project No. 142119.
(Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1979 under 1016-78; prepared by
Wildlife International, Ltd., submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-A) 

107399	Hall, K.; Le-minh, N. (1976) Shelf-stability of 2 Lb/US Gal
Permethrin EC: Report Series TMU0191/76A. (Unpublished study received
Dec 2, 1976 under 10182-EX-3; submitted by ICI Americas, Inc.,
Wilmington, DE; CDL:229013-B) 

110506	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1982) The Results
of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of
the Analytical Method Used: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study
received May 4, 1982 under 2F2679; CDL: 070835-A) 

110512	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1981) (Temik Efficacy
Support Data and Residue Documentation for Use in Soybean Protection
from Nematodes). (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 19, 1982
under IL 82/4; CDL:247347-A) 

111923	Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb.
(Unpublished study received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL: 096131-A) 

114335	Coate, W.; Mense, M.; Hardy, R.; et al. (1982) Subacute
Inhalation Toxicity Study of a Pesticide Residue in Dogs: T3,T6, and to
Type Cigarettes: Project No. 400-636. Final rept. (Unpublished study
received Sep 3, 1982 under 264-330; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories
America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 248307-A) 

115237	Mayberry, R.; Savage, J. (1978) Mutagenic activity of several
pesticides using the salmonella test and saccharomyces D3 system. Taken
from: Am. Soc. Microbiol, Abstracts on the Annual Meeting. S.l.: s.n..
(Abstract H 126; p. 125; also In unpublished submission received Oct 1,
1982 under 432-482; submitted by Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, NJ;
CDL:248482-B) 

115301	Hill, E.; Camardese, M. (1981) Subacute toxicity testing with
young birds: Response in relation to age and interest variability of
LC50 estimates. Avian and Mammalian Wildlife Toxicology 2:41-65. (Also
In unpublished submission received Oct 7, 1982 under 201-142; submitted
by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, DC; CDL:248514-U) 

115963	Bartley, W.; Heywood, D. (1965) Insecticide 21149: Metabolism
Studies, Hydrolytic Stability of UC 21149: UCC Status Report
855-31101-7073. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
CDL:096732-T) 

117840	Johansen, C.; Eves, J. (1967) Bee Research Investigations, 1967.
(Unpublished study received Oct 13, 1969 under 0F0897; prepared by
Washington State Univ., submitted by Fisons Corp., Wilmington, MA;
CDL:091551-H) 

122315	Fisons, Inc. (1977) Bendiocarb: Occupational Safety Information.
(Unpublished study received Sep 9, 1977 under unknown admin. no.;
CDL:231544-B) 

124047	Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Effectiveness Data: Temik.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Oct 1, 1975 under 6G1689;
CDL:095061-A) 

126065	Wilkinson, C.; Babish, J.; Lemley, A.; et al. (1983) A
Toxicological Evaluation of Aldicarb and Its Metabolites in Relation to
the Potential Human Health Impact of Aldicarb Residues in Long Island
Ground Water. (Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1983 under 264-330;
prepared in cooperation with FMC Corp. and others, submitted by Union
Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC;
CDL:249416-A) 

126500	Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Human Monitoring Study of Field
Application of Temik 15G. (Unpublished study received Apr 9, 1974 under
1016-EX-31; CDL:249763-A) 

126688	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Effectivness
Data: Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 25, 1983 under
264-330; CDL:071499-A) 

127874	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983)
Environmental Data: Aldicarb Pesticide: Soil and Water. (Compilation;
unpublished study received Apr 15, 1983 under 264-330; CDL:250012-A) 

128132	Weil, C.; DeMary, L.; Soo, V. (1971) Comparative Skin Penetration
Toxicity of Temik 10GV, Temik 15GV and 5 Other Pesticide Formulations as
Marketed: Special Report 34-76. (Unpublished study received Oct 27, 1971
under 1016-EX-31; prepared by CarnegieMellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research
Triangle Park, NC; CDL:249766-A) 

129300	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Results of
Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the
Analytical Method Used: (Aldoxycarb in or on Vegetable Crops).
(Compilation; unpublished study received May 17, 1983 under 264-401;
CDL:071609-E) 

129660	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983)
Environmental Effects of Temik and Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished
study received Aug 2, 1983 under 264-330; CDL:250888-A) 

129661	Oshima, R.; Torres, G.; Nelson, S.; et al. (1980) Monitoring
Selected Ground Water Basins for the Presence of Aldicarb: A Cooperative
California Interagency Study. (Unpublished study received Aug 2, 1983
under 264-330; prepared by California Dept. of Food and Agriculture and
Others, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:250888-B) 

129662	Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (1980) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb,
Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpublished study received
Aug 2, 1983 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:250888-C) 

131661	Schardein, J.; Leng, J. (1983) Teratology Study in Rabbits:
Aldicarb: 369-107. (Unpublished study received Oct 18, 1983 under
264-330; prepared by International Research and Development Corp.,
submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research
Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251510-A) 

132500	Jones, R. (1982) Letter sent to J. Lovell dated Nov 16, 1982:
Data on movement of aldicarb in soil--impact of irrigation. (Unpublished
study received Nov 18, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC;
CDL:248850-A) 

132501	Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (19) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb,
Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpublished study received Nov
18, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:248851-A) 

132647	Weil, C. (1971) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: (Sevin and Other
Compounds on Rats): Special Report 34-71. (Unpublished study received
Nov 3, 1983 under 264-324; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC;
CDL:251719-G) 

132668	Schardein, J.; Leng, J.; Aldridge, D.; et al. (1983) Teratology
Study in Rabbits: Aldicarb: 369-107. (Unpublished study received Oct 19,
1983 under 264-330; prepared by International Research and Development
Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251731-A) 

132989	Ashton, A.; Jackson, W. (1983) Letter sent to Union Carbide dated
Nov 18, 1983: Temik field trial (Michigan): Effects on wildlife.
(Unpublished study received Dec 13, 1983 under 264-330; prepared by
Bowling Green State Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251947-A) 

133377	Enfield, C.; Carsel, R.; Cohen, S.; et al. (1980) Methods of
Approximating Transport of Organic Pollutants to Groundwater.
(Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1983 under 100-617; prepared by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development,
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, NC; CDL: 072211-N) 

133485	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1983) Tile-drained Corn: 1983 Studies
Conducted in Michigan and Indiana. (Unpublished study received Dec 13,
1983 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251946-A) 

133499	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1983) Temik and Standak Tobacco Field
Studies: 0352G. (Unpublished study received Dec 13, 1983 under 264318;
submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research
Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251971-A) 

134490	Hays, H.W.; Drill, V.A.; Friess, S.L.; et al. (1980) Temik^(R)I
Aldicarb Pesticide Review of Toxicological Data and Determination of
Acceptable Daily Intake. (Unpublished study received Sep 26, 1980 under
unknown admin. no.; prepared by Drill, Friess, Hays, Loomis and Shaffer,
Inc. and Johns Hopkins Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:243334-A) 

135030	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1976) The Name,
Chemical Identity and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb in
Dry Beans and Soybeans. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 10,
1976 under 6F1849; CDL:096405-A) 

135031	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1976) The Results
of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of
the Analytical Method Used: Aldicarb in Dry Beans and Soybeans.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 10, 1976 under 6F1849;
CDL:096405-B) 

135437	Romine, R. (1979) Letter sent to J. Lovelli; P. Schroeder dated
Jul 11, 1979 Methodology for determination of residues: Standak.
(Unpublished study received Jul 18, 1979 under 1016-79; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 098391-C) 

135901	Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Efficacy of Temik 10G Pesticide.
(Compilation; unpublished study received Dec 16, 1970 under 1016-69;
CDL:005150-A) 

135902	Haines, R. (1972) Letter sent to J. Touhey dated Mar 4, 1972:
Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide: Amend to combine cotton and sugar beet
directions for use. (Unpublished study received Mar 3, 1972 under
1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
CDL:005152-A) 

136597	Carpenter, C.; Condra, N.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G
(10.5% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149): 15-Day Dermal
Applications to Rabbits: Report 29-80. (Unpublished study received Oct
8, 1966 under 1016-69; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union
Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:005580-A) 

137875	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1980) Residue:
Aldicarb in Water. (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 13, 1984
under 264-330; CDL:252965-A) 

137876	Hansen, J.; Romine, R.; Jones, R. (1984) Long-term Hydrolysis
Studies of Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpublished study
received Apr 13, 1984 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC;
CDL:252966-A) 

138037	Union Carbide Corporation (1964) UC 21149--Experimental
Nematocide/ Acaricide/Insecticide: F-40977B. (Unpublished study received
Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL:090526-A) 

139863	Clarkson, V.A.; Hensley, W.H. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Toxicity
of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide, and Temik Sulfone Bluegill Sunfish. Project
No. 111B32. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;
submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:238153-C) 

139865	Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity
Studies on Temik:
(2-Methyl-2-methylthiopropionaldehyde-N-methylcarbamoyloxime) and
Related Carbamates: Special Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received
Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:238153-I) 

140001	Romine, R.R. (1976) Letter sent to R.S. Flanagin dated Jan 16,
1976: Citurs fractionation. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975
under 6G1689; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.;
CDL:096440-A) 

140367	Back, R.C. (1970) Letter sent to Harold G. Alford dated Mar 2,
1970: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide--Third and final periodic report.
(Unpublished study received Mar 3, 1970 under 1016-EX30; submitted by
Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 126506-A) 

140487	Interregional Research Project No. 4 (1977) The Results of Tests
on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the
Analytical Method Used: Aldicarb in Pecans. (Compilation; unpublished
study received Aug 10, 1977 under 7E1996; CDL: 097371-A) 

142079	Cimino, M.; Galloway, S.; Ivett, J. (1984) Mutagenicity
Evaluation of Aldicarb Technical 93.47% in the Mouse bone marrow
cytogentic Assay: Final Report: Project No. 22202. Unpublished study
prepared by Litton Bionetics, Inc. 21 p. 

142080	Sansebastian, J. (1984) CHO Metaphase Analysis In Vitro
Chromosome Aberration Analysis in Chinese Hamster ovary cells:
Aldoxycarb Technical: Study No. PH 320-UC-005-83. Unpublished study
prepared by Pharmakon Research International, Inc. 33 p. 

142081	Godek, E. (1984) Rat Hepatocyte Primary Culture/DNA Repair Test:
Aldicarb Technical: Study No. PH 311-UC-005-83. Unpublished study
prepared by Pharmakon Research International, Inc. 48 p. 

142082	Dejonckheere, W. (19) Leaching in Soil and Uptake Bij Sugarbeets
of Aldicarb and Thiofanox. Unpublished study prepared by state Uni. Of
Gent (Belgium). 25 p. 

142083	Hirsh, D.; Sheets, K. (1977) Aldicarb Subsequent Crop Residues:
Project No. 812C20. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 12
p. 

142084	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Monitoring of Aldicarb and
Aldoxycarb Residues on North Carolina and Virginia Tobacco Fields:
VO352g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Inc. 23 p. 

142085	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Monitoring of Aldicarb Residues in
Michigan and Indiana Tile-drained corn Fields: 0332g/015g. Unpublished
study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 19 p. 

142086	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Degradation and movement of Aldicarb
and Aldoxycarb Residues in Arizona cotton: V4639. Unpublished study
prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 17 p. 

142088	Romine, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Aldicarb Oxidation
Mechanism Studies: 0596g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 13 p. 

142089	Romine, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Aldicarb Sulfoxide and
Aldicarb Sulfone Groundwater Degradation Mechanism Studies: V4654.
Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc. 11 p. 

142090	Bussain, R. (1984) (Temik Residues in Soil). Unpublished study
prepared by Union Carbide Agr. Prod. Co., Inc. 24 p. 

142091	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) (Temik
Residues in Water). Unpublished study. 41 p. 

142092	Jones, R.; Rourke, R.; Hansen, J. (1984) Effect of Application
Methods on Movement and Degradation of Aldicarb Residues in Maine Potato
Fields: 0436g. Unpublished study. 28 p. 

142093	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Degradation And Transport of
Aldoxycarb Residues in Southern Florida: V4637. Unpublished study
prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 14 p. 

142094	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) (Temik
Residues in Soil): 0400g. Unpublished compilation. 10 p. 

142095	Poter, K.; Lemley, A.; Hughes, H.; et al. (1984) Developing
Information. On Aldicarb Levels in Long Island Groundwater: 0483g.
Unpublished study prepared by Cornell University and Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 40 p. 

142096	Hughes, H.; Trautmann, N.; Porter, K. (1984) Tracking Aldicarb
Residues in Long Island Ground Water: Interim Results. Unpublished study
prepared by Cornell University. 32 p. 

144970	Jackson, W. (1984) Letter sent to T. DeWitt dated June 21, 1984:
[A Field study to evaluate the hazard to birds in Corn Fields treated
with Temik. 6 p. 

144971	Supak, J.; Swoboda, A.; Dixon, J. (1977) Volatilization and
Degration Losses of Aldicarb From Soil. J. Environ. Qual. 6(4):413417. 

145704	Union Carbide Corporation (1979)[Efficacy Data Temik 10% Granular
Aldicarb Pesticide]. Unpublished compilation. 291 p. 

147055	Eisler, M. (1966) Adaptation of the Liver to Heptachlor and Its
Epoxide. Unpublished study prepared by Velsicol Chemical Corporation. 6
p. 

148168	Stankowski, L. (1985) CHO/HGPRT Mammalian Cell Forward Mutation
Assay: Aldicarb: PH 314-UC-003-84. Unpublished study prepared by
Pharmakon Research International, Inc. 35 p. 

148685	Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Eichler, A. (1977) Temik 10G--Gypsum
Formulation (Blue): Wildlife Surveys following Application to Four Sugar
Beet and Four Potato Fields: UNC 57/774581. Unpublished study prepared
by Huntingdon Research Centre. 255 p. 

148686	Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1978) A Comparison of the
Palatability to the Ring-necked Pheasant of Three Formulations of Temik
10 G with Other Granular Pesticides: UNC/69C/78938. Unpublished study
prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 23 p. 

148687	Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1978) A Comparison of the
Palatability to the Zebra Finch of Two Formulations of Temik: UNC 69
G/78398. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 16 p.


148688	Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1978) A Comparison of the
Palatability to the Ring-necked Pheasant of Two Formulations of Temik:
UNC 69 G/78399. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research
Centre. 14 p. 

148689	Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1979) The Effect of Granule
Size on the Toxic Hazard to Passeriformes of Temik 10G: UNC 69B/ 78721.
Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 16 p. 

148690	Stickel, W. (1979) Letter sent to R. Back dated May 29, 1979:
[Comments on "Report on palatability studies and trials regarding the
acute toxicity of the plant protection products Temik 10 G and Temik 10
GGF (gypsum) with Japanese quails, chickens and sparrows"]. Prepared by
the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. 3
p. 

148691	Tait, F. (1972) Aldicarb: Wild Life Survey 1972. Unpublished
study prepared by Duphar-Midox Ltd. 28 p. 

148692	United Kingdom, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, Pest
Infestation Control Laboratory (1974) A Study of the Effects of Aldicarb
or Wildlife. Unpublished study. 65 p. 

148693	Brown, P.; Bunyan, P.; Stanley, P.; et al. (1975) Field
Surveillance of the Possible Wildlife Hazards Associated with the Use of
the Nematicide, Aldicarb: Chemistry Department Report No. 17.
Unpublished study prepared by U.K. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries
and Food, Pest Infestation Control Laboratory. 57 p. 

148694	Spencer, D. (1985) A Review of the Research Conducted on the
Toxicity and Potential Hazard of Granular Formulations of Aldicarb
(Temik) to Bird Life. Unpublished study. 32 p. 

148695	Balcomb, R.; Stevens, R.; Bowen, C. (1984) Toxicity of 16
granular insecticides to wild-caught songbirds. Bulletin of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 33:302-307. 

148696	Back, R. (1968) Temik 10G Granular Pesticide: Field Evaluation of
Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. Unpublished study prepared by Union
Carbide Corp. 15 p. 

148697	Benjamini, L. (1981) The efficacy of seed treatment with aldicarb
to establish conditioned aversion in birds to sprouting sugar beets.
Phytoparasitica 9(1):3-9. 

148698	Benjamini, L. (1981) Testing aldicarb as a bird repellent in a
sprouting sugar beet field. Phytoparasitica 9(2):89-94. 

148699	Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B. (1970) Temik Insecticide: Field
Evaluations of the Toxic Hazard of Temik Formulations 10G, 10GV, 10GC
and 10GVB4 to Bobwhite Quail: Project No. 111B32: File No. 12676.
Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 15 p. 

148700	Haines, R. (1970) Temik 10G Granular Pesticide: Field Evaluations
of Potential Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and
Ring-necked Pheasants in Sugar Beet Plantings: Trial III. Unpublished
study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 8 p. 

148701	Haines, R. (1971) Continued Field Evaluations on the Potential
Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ringnecked
Pheasants in a Cotton Planting. Unpublished study prepared by Union
Carbide Corp. 7 p. 

148702	Haines, R. (1971) Continued Field Evaluations on the Potential
Hazards of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Bob White Quail in Cotton
Plantings. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 7 p. 

148703	Hill, E.; Camardese, M. (1984) Toxicity of anticholinesterase
insecticides to birds: Technical grade versus granular formulations.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 8:551-563. 

148704	Hilbig, V.; Westphal, D.; Lucas, K.; et al. (1979) Vergleichende
Untersuchungen zur Vogeltoxizitaet mit Zwei Granulatformulierungen des
Nematizides Temik [Comparative Studies of the Toxicity to Birds of Two
Granulated Formulations of Temik Nematocides]: Vetmed-Berichte 2/1979.
Unpublished study prepared by Institute of Veterinary Medicine. 24 p. 

148705	Lund, R. (1970) Summary of Field Observations: Potential Hazard
of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Ring-necked Pheasant ... from
Simulated Spills. Unpublished study prepared by State of New Jersey,
Dept. of Conservation and Economic Development, Black River Wildlife
Management Area. 2 p. 

148706	Medd, R.; Roberts, N. (1972) Palatability and Acceptability of
Temik (Corn Cob and Coal Formulations) to the Pheasant and the Pigeon:
5419/72/815. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre.
31 p. 

148707	Medd, R.; Burrows, I.; Roberts, N.; et al. (1972) The
Determination of the Single Dose Oral LD50 (24 Hour Value) and Residual
Levels of Temik (Coal) in the Pheasant: Amended: 5355/72/751.
Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 28 p. 

148708	Relton, J. (1970) Wild Life Survey: Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide
on Sugar Beets: Suffolk, England, 1970. Unpublished study. 11 p. 

148709	Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1977) A Comparison of the
Acute Oral Toxicity (LD50) of Three Formulations of Temik to the
Japanese Quail: UNC 68 W/771042. Unpublished study prepared by
Huntingdon Research Centre. 12 p. 

148963	Jones, R.; Rourke, R.; Hansen, J. (1985) Effect of Application
Methods on Movement and Degradation of Aldicarb Residues in Maine Potato
Fields:0830g. Unpublished study prepared by the University of Maine in
cooperation with Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 30 p. 

148964	Jones, R.; Hansen, J.; Romine, R. (1984) Unsaturated Zone Studies
on the Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb Residues:
Preliminary Draft:0702g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 69 p. 

148965	Jones, R. (1985) Field, Laboratory, and Modeling Studies on the
Degradation and Transport of Aldicarb Residue in Soil and
Groundwater:0886g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Company, Inc. 19 p. 

148966	Hansen, J.; Romine, R.; Jones, R. (1984) Long-term Hydrolysis
Studies of Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone:Draft: 0167g.
Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc. 20 p. 

148967	Romine, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Aldicarb Oxidation
Mechanism Studies:Preliminary Draft:0596g. Unpublished study prepared by
Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. 13 p. 

148968	Jones, R.; Hansen, J. (1984) Central California Studies on the
Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb Residues:Preliminary Draft: 0729g.
Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc. 29 p. 

148969	Otten, R. (1985) Letter sent to J. Lovell dated April 18, 1985:
[Two Week Dose Rangefinding Study in Beagle Dogs with Aldicarb
Technical]: Project NO. 400-705. Prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Company, Inc. 9 p. 

148970	Wisconsin Association of Manufacturers and Commerce (1985) A
Review and Critique of Proposed Groundwater Standards under NR140 as
Submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services.
Unpublished study. 81 p. 

148971	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. (1985) New
Registration Data Submitted for Aldicarb Special Review: Residue
[Grapefruit]. Unpublished study. 5 p. 

149696	Johansen, C.; Mayer, D.; Eves, J.; et al. (1983) Pesticides and
bees. Environ. Entomology 12(5):1513-1518. 

149699	Hays, H. (1980) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide Review of Toxicological
Data and Determination of Acceptable Daily Intake. Unpublished study
prepared by Drill, Friess, Hays, Loomis and Shaffer, Inc. 31 p. 

150006	Obrist, J. (1984) Comparison of Leaching Behavior of NEMACUR and
Temik: Rept. No. 86288. Unpublished study prepared by Mobay Chemical
Corp. 5 p. 

150181	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1984) Aldicarb Residues
in Forage, Fodder and Grain from Field Corn Treated with Temik 15G.
Unpublished study. 31 p. 

151820	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1985) Aldicarb
Residues in Grape Products from Simulated Commercial Wine Processing.
Unpublished compilation prepared in cooperation with Morse Laboratories.
22 p. 

152095	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1984) The Names,
Chemical Identity and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical [Aldicarb
and Various Formulations). Unpublished compilation. 79 p. 

154893	Myers, W. (1985) The Determination of the Anticipated Residue
Values of Aldicarb in Potatoes and Citrus. Unpublished study prepared by
Union Carbide Agricultural Products, Inc. 76 p. 

156961	Lightfoot, E.; Thorne, P.; Jones, R.; et al. (1986) Laboratory
Studies on the Degradation Mechanisms of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide,
and Aldicarb Sulfone. Unpublished study prepared by University of
Wisconsin and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 73 p. 

156962	Jones, R. (1986) Central California Studies on the Degradation
and Movement of Aldicarb Residues: Preliminary Draft. Unpublished study
prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 66 p. 

156963	Dierberg, F.; Given, C. (1986) Aldicarb studies in ground waters
from Florida citrus groves and their relation to ground-water
protection. Ground Water 24(1):16-22. 

156964	Porter, K.; Wagenet, R.; Hughes, H.; et al. (1986) Field Research
on Aldicarb Management Practices for Upstate New York: [Degradadation of
Aldicarb in Soils and Ground Waters--Field Studies]. Unpublished study
prepared by Cornell University and Union Carbide Agricultural Products
Co., Inc. 26 p. 

156965	Jones, R.; Black, G.; Estes, T.; et al. (1986) Comparison of
Computer Model Predictions with Unsaturated Zone Field Data for Aldicarb
and Aldoxycarb. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Inc. 20 p. 

156966	Hegg, R.; Shelley, W.; Jones, R.; et al. (1986) Movement and
Degradation of Aldicarb Residues in South Carolina Loamy Sand Soil.
Unpublished study prepared by Clemson University and Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 28 p. 

156967	Carsel, R.; Parrish, R.; Jones, R.; et al. (1986) Characterizing
the Uncertainty of Pesticide Leaching in Agricultural Soils. Unpublished
study prepared by US Environmental Protection Agency and Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 49 p. 

156968	Jones, R.; Anderson, M.; Hornsby, A.; et al. (1986) Saturated
Zone Movement and Degradation of Aldicarb Residues on the Florida Ridge:
Preliminary Draft. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc., University of Wisconsin, and University
of Florida. 274 p. 

157027	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1986) Advisory: Temik
Aldicarb Residues in Potable Water. Unpublished compilation. 94 p. 

157987	Thomas, P. (1986) 34 Day Immunotoxicology Study of Aldicarb in
Mice: Final Report: IITRI Project L08125. Unpublished study prepared by
IIT Research Institute. 339 p. 

158262	Crisp, C. (19) The Molecular Design of Systemic Insecticides and
Organic Functional Groups in Translocation. Unpublished study prepared
by US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and
Range Experiment Station, Berkley, CA. 54 p. 

158572	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. Inc. (1986) Temik Brand
Aldicarb Pesticide: [Residue Data and Associated Human Illness].
Unpublished compilation. 96 p. 

159569	Lee, R.; Andrawes, N. (1986) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide:
Aldicarb Anaerobic Aquatic Degradation: Project No. 803R10. Unpublished
study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 26 p. 

159570	Andrawes, N.; Lee, R. (1986) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide:
Aldicarb Metabolism in Lactating Goats: Project No. 803R10. Unpublished
study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 52 p. 

159571	Hudson, J.; Romine, R. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Stability
of Residues in Frozen Milk and Beef Liver: Project No. 803R12.
Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc. 24 p. 

159572	Hudson, J.; Romine, R. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Potato
Processing Study: Project No. 803R12. Unpublished study prepared by
Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 23 p. 

159573	Myers, W. (1986) Letter sent to J. Lovell dated Feb 28, 1986:
Temik/soybean processing study. Prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Inc. 5 p. 

160086	Back, R. (1985) A Review of Tests for Temik Aldicarb Pesticide
Residues in Drinking Water Samples by State, USA and Canada, 19791984.
Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
Inc. 9 p. 

161701	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) Experimental
Determination of the Degradation Rate of Aldicarb Residues in Long
Island Groundwater. Unpublished study. 21 p. 

161702	Wyman, J.; Jensen, J.; Curwen, D.; et al. (1983) Effects of
Application Procedures and Irrigation on Degradation and Movement of
Aldicarb Residues in Soil. Unpublished study prepared by University of
Wisconsin and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. Inc. 49 p. 

161703	Wyman, J.; Curwen, D.; Hansen, J. (1984) Wisconsin Aldicarb and
Aldoxycarb: Environmental Monitoring Study. Unpublished study prepared
by University of Wisconsin and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.
19 p. 

161704	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Studies on
Temik and Standak Tobacco Fields. Unpublished study prepared by Union
Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 19 p. 

161705	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Tile-drained corn 1983 Studies
Conducted in Michigan and Indiana. Unpublished study prepared by Union
Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 16 p. 

161706	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study:
Temik and Standak Treated Arizona Cotton. Unpublished study prepared by
Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 17 p. 

161707	Waggonet, R.; Porter, K.; Hansen, J.; et al. (1984) Environmental
Monitoring Study on Temik Treated New York Potato Fields. Unpublished
study prepared by Cornell University and Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co., Inc. 15 p. 

161708	Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study on
Temik Treated Washington Potato Fields. Unpublished study prepared by
Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 13 p. 

161709	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) Fate of
Aldicarb in Florida Citrus Soils. Unpublished compilation. 102 p. 

161733	Rourke, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring
Study on Temik Treated Maine Potato Fields: Preliminary Draft.
Unpublished study prepared by University of Maine and Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 22 p. 

161734	Myers, W. (1984) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue
Remaining, including a Description of the Analytical Method Used:
[Aldicarb on Grapes]. Unpublished compilation. 67 p. 

162562	Romine, R. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide Residue in Instant
Coffee: Laboratory Project Id.: 803R12. Unpublished study prepared by
Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. and General Foods Corp. 39 p. 

162745	McCann, J.; Teeters, W.; Urban, D.; et al. (1981) A short-term
dietary toxicity test on small mammals. P. 132-142 of the Second
Conference of Avian and Mammalian Wildlife Toxicology; published in
American Society for Testing and Materials; 1981. 

163274	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1986) Temik
Aldicarb Pesticide: Rotational Crop Residues: [Summary]. Unpublished
study. 39 p. 

163275	Maitlen, J. (1982) Persistence of aldicarb in soil relative to
the carry-over of residues into crops. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30(3):
589-592. 

163276	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1986) Temik/Plant
Back: Registration Analytical Chemistry Project Outline 1986: [Protocol
To Determine Magnitude of Aldicarb Residue in Plantback Crops]: Project
No. T86-000-R06. Unpublished compilation. 12 p. 

164424	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1967) Summary and
Discussion [of Temik Residues in and on Potatoes and Soil]. Unpublished
compilation. 107 p. 

164934	Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Residue Data on UC 21149 Attached to
and Constituting a Part of an Application for Temporary Permit To Ship
Temik 10G. Unpublished compilation. 84 p. 

165576	Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Summaries of Performance Data: Temik
10G Ornamental Plants. Unpublished compilation. 343 p. 

5008199	Iverson, F. (1976) Binding constants for tetramethylammonium ion
determined with irreversible inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase.
Canadian Journal of Biochemistry 54(10):918-920. 

5008363	Hudson, R.H.; Haegele, M.A.; Tucker, R.K. (1979) Acute oral and
percutaneous toxicity of pesticides to mallards: correlations with
mammalian toxicity data. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
47(3):451-460. 

5008444	Baron, R.L. (1978) Terminal residues of carbamate insecticides.
Pure and Applied Chemistry 50(5):505-509. 

5008717	Dorough, H.W. (1977) Metabolism of Carbamate Insecticides.
Research Triangle Park, N.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Health Effects Research Laboratory. (EPA report no. EPA-600/1-77-012;
available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB-266 223) 

5008720	Rodell, S.; Funke, B.R.; Schulz, J.T. (1977) Effects of
insecticides on acetylene reduction byAzotobacter vinelandiiand soybean
nodules. Plant and Soil 47(2):375-381. 

5010222	Worthing, C.R. (1969) Performance of some new insecticides
againstMyzus persicae(Sulzer) andTetranychus urticae(Koch) on year-round
chrysanthemums. Journal of Horticultural Science 44(3):235-246. 

5010817	Coppage, D.L. (1977) Anticholinesterase action of pesticidal
carbamates in the central nervous system of poisoned fishes. Pages
93-102,InPhysiological Responses of Marine Biota to Pollutants,
Proceedings of a Symposium; Nov, 1975, Milford, Connecticut. Edited by
F.J. Vernberg, A. Calabrese, F.P. Thurberg and W.B. Vernberg. New York:
Academic Press. 

5010818	Harvey, J., Jr. (1975) Metabolism of Aldicarb and methomyl.
Pages 389-393,InPesticides: International Union of Pure and Applied
Chemistry Third International Congress; Jul 3-9, 1974, Helsinki,
Finland. Edited by F. Coulston and F. Korte. Stuttgart, West Germany:
George Thieme. (Environmental quality and safety supplement, vol. III) 

5016283	Lindquist, R.K.; Spadafora, R.R. (1974) Insecticides for
greenhouse whitefly control on poinsettias. Pages 5-6,InOhio Florists'
Association Bulletin No. 536. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio Florists'
Association. 

5017001	Gaikawad, S.T.; Samantaray, R.N.; Patnaik, S. (1973) Effect of
soil application of biocides on N, P, K availability and C, N
transformations in flooded rice soils. Journal of the Indian Society of
Soil Science 21(3):263-269. 

5018266	Lijinsky, W.; Schmaehl, D. (1978) Carcinogenicity of N-nitroso
derivatives of N-methylcarbamate insecticides in rats. Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety 2(3/4):413-419. 

5018267	Quarles, J.M.; Sega, M.W.; Schenley, C.K.; Lijinsky, W. (1979)
Transformation of hamster fetal cells by nitrosated pesticides in a
transplacental assay. Cancer Research 39(11):4525-4533. 

40065500	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1987) Toxicology
Data Submitted in Support of Temik Brand 15 G Aldicarb Pesticide.
Compilation of 2 studies. 

40065501	Trutter, J. (1987) Aldicarb Foodborne Residue Toxicity Study in
Monkeys--Watermelon: Laboratory Project Identification: HLA 400-720.
Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 95 p. 

40065502	Trutter, J. (1987) Aldicarb Foodborne Residue Toxicity in
Monkeys--Bananas: Laboratory Project Identification: HLA 400-720.
Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 92 p. 

40166600	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1987) Submission
of Toxicity Data in Support of Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study. 

40166601	Hamada, N. (1987) Two-week Dose Range-finding Oral Toxicity
Study in Beagle Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Lab Project ID: 400-717.
Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 94 p. 

40216900	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1987) Submission of
Environmental Fate Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 3 studies. 

40216901	Pacenka, S.; Porter, K.; Jones, R.; et al. (1987) Changing
Aldicarb Residue Levels in Soil and Groundwater, Eastern Long Island,
New York: 8661y. Unpublished study prepared by Cornell Univ., Center for
Environmental Research. 32 p. 

40216902	Jones, R.; Marquardt, T. (1987) Monitoring of Aldicarb Residues
in Long Island, New York Potable Wells: 8660y; 1234g. Unpublished study
prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 18 p. 

40216903	Jones, R. (1987) The Aldicarb Experience: Results of Monitoring
and Research Programs: 1309g; 8662y. Unpublished compilation prepared by
Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 48 p. 

40232600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1987) Submission of Residue Data for
Aldicarb in/on Foods in Grocery Markets. Transmittal of 1 study. 

40232601	Petersen, B.; Gregorio, C. (1987) Aldicarb Acute Dietary
Exposure Analysis: Interim Report. Unpublished study prepared by
Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 429 p. 

40390700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1987) Submission of Data in Response to
Aldicarb Special Review. Transmittal of 1 study. 

40390701	Anonymous (1987) Aldicarb National Food Survey (Supplemental
Data for Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis Interim Report).
Unpublished compilation prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 143 p. 

40493300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of Temik Aldicarb. Transmittal of 23 studies. 

40493301	Jones, R. (1988) Summary of Aldicarb Research and Monitoring
Update. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 8 p. 

40493302	Jones, R. (1987) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement in a Massachusetts Potato Field. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 34 p. 

40493303	Jones, R. (1987) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 34 p. 

40493304	Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement for Winter Application to Grapes. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 85 p. 

40493305	Jones, R. (1987) Volusia County Fernery Data Tables.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 7 p. 

40493306	Jones, R. (1987) Florida Shallow Monitoring Wells Data Tables.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 35 p. 

40493307	Jones, R.; Hornsby, A.; Rao, P.; et al. (1987) Movement and
degradation of aldicarb residues in the saturated zone under citrus
groves on the florida ridge. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 1(1987):
265-285. 

40493308	Jones, R. (1987) Central california studies on the degradation
and movement of aldicarb residues. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
1(1987):287-298. 

40493309	Lightfoot, E.; Thorne, P.; Jones, R.; et al. (1987) Laboratory
studies on mechanisms for the degradation of aldicarb, aldicarb
sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
6:377-394. 

40493310	Jones, R.; Estes, T. (1987) Modeling unsaturated zone movement
of aldicarb residues from applications to potatoes in eastern canada.
Water Pollution Resource Journal of Canada 22(1):99-106. 

40493311	Jones, R. (1987) Aldicarb environmental fate studies conducted
in the western united states. P. 105-108 in Fate of Pesticides in
Environment by J. Bigger and J. Seiber, Publication 3320. 

40493312	Jones, R.; Kirkland, S.; Chancey, E. (1987) Measurement of the
environmental fate of aldicarb residues in a nebraska sand hills soil.
Applied Agricultural Research 2(3):177-182. 

40493313	Jones, R.; Marquardt, T. (1987) Monitoring of aldicarb residues
in long island, new york potable wells. Archives of Environemental
Contaminant and Toxicology 16:643-647. 

40493314	Wyman, J.; Jones, R.; Medina, J.; et al. (1987) Environmental
fate studies of aldicarb and aldoxycarb applications to wisconsin
potatoes. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2:61-72. 

40493315	Pacenka, S.; Porter, K.; Jones, R.; et al. (1987) Changing
aldicarb residue levels in soil and groundwater, eastern Long Island,
New York. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2:73-91. 

40493316	Carsel, R.; Parrish, R.; Jones, R.; et al. (19) Characterizing
the Uncertainty of Pesticide Leaching in Agricultural Soils. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. 28 p. 

40493317	Carsel, R.; Jones, R.; Hansen, J.; et al. (19) A Simulation
Procedure for Groundwater Quality Assessments of Pesticides. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency and University of Wisconsin. 28 p. 

40493319	Jones, R. (1987) The Aldicarb Experience: 1. Conduct and Impact
of Monitoring and Research Programs. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 24 p. 

40493322	Jones, R.; Hornsby, A.; Rao, P. (1987) Degradation and Movement
of Aldicarb Residues in Florida Citrus Soils. Unpublished study prepared
by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with University of Florida. 30 p.


40493323	Carsel, R.; Jones, R. (19) Use of Soil and Meterologic Data
Bases for Application of Unsaturated Zone Models for Evaluating
Pesticide Transport and Transformation. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. 26 p. 

40521600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Residue Summary Data
to Support Data Regarding Aldicarb Import Tolerances. Transmittal of 1
study. 

40521601	Gunderson, E. (1987) Summary of FY 87 Field Assignment
"Pesticides in Imported Fresh Bananas". Unpublished study prepared by
Food and Drug Administration. 9 p. 

40542500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support the
Registration of Temik (Aldicarb Pesticide): Dissipation Studies.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

40542501	Bostian, A.; Jones, R. (1988) Temik Brand Aidicarb Pesticide:
Limited Drinking Water Well Survey. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 54 p. 

40551800	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1988) Submission of Data in Support of
Aldicarb Residue Tolerances. Transmittal of 1 study. 

40551801	Petersen, B.; Gregorio, C. (1988) Aldicarb Acute Dietary
Exposure Analysis: Final Report. Unpublished compilation prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 1972 p. 

40607500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Toxicological Data to
Support the Continued Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G Alidicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 4 studies. 

40607501	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Executive Summary: Application of
Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb to Three Major Crops: A Terrestrial Vertebrate
Field Study and the Supplemental Report: Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide Granule Incorporation Study. Unpublished study. 14 p. 

40607502	Fletcher, D. (1988) Application of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb to
Three Major Crops: A Terrestrial Verbebrate Field Study: BLAL Study No.
87 FV 3. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Life Associates, Ltd. 536 p. 

40607503	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide
Granule Incorporation Study. Unpublished study. 71 p. 

40607504	Spencer, D. (1985) A Review of the Research Conducted on the
Toxicity and Potential Hazard of Granular Formulations of Aldicarb
(TEMIK) to Bird Life. Unpublished study. 34 p. 

40636500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data to Support the Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 2 studies. 

40636501	Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 89 p. 

40636502	Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 36 p. 

40645600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission Environmental Data in
Support of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study. 

40645601	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues
Second Quarter Wisconsin Sampling. Unpublished study. 33 p. 

40676700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Residue Data (Market Basket Survey)
submitted To Support Aldicarb Registration. Transmittal of 1 study. 

40676701	Peterson, B. (1988) Summary of the Review of the Aldicarb
National Food Survey. Unpublished compilation prepared by Technical
Assessment Systems, Inc. 51 p. 

40677300	US EPA (1981) EPA Compiled Documents Received from the PM for
Addition to the Carbaryl Registration Standard. Transmittal of 2
studies. 

40677302	Dorough, H. (1973) Metabolism of Carbamate Insecticides: Report
No. EPA-650/1-74-002. Unpubllished study prepared by Univ. of Kentucky,
Dept. of Entomology. Available from NTIS: PB-231596. 255 p. 

40685700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support the
Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide: Residue Data.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

40685701	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues
Second Quarter Wiscousin Sampling (Second Batch). Unpublished study. 12
p. 

40695900	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Toxicity Data submitted To Support
Aldicarb Registration. Transmittal of 1 study. 

40695901	Hamada, N. (1988) One-year Chronic Oral Toxicity Study in
Beagle Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Project ID. 400-706. Unpublished
study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 617 p. 

40815800	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Environmental Residue
Data to Support the Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

40815801	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues:
Third Quarter Wisconsin Sampling. Unpublished study. 44 p. 

40816600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support
Registration of Temik (Granular Aldicarb): Environmental Fate and
Residue Chemistry Data. Transmittal of 12 studies. 

40816601	Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 51 p. 

40816602	Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 99 p. 

40816603	Jones, R. (1988) Field Measurements of Water Samples in Volusia
County Ferney: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag
Co. 7 p. 

40816604	Jones, R. (1988) Florida Shallow Monitoring Wells (Data
Tables): Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 37
p. 

40816605	Ou, L.; Rao, P.; Edvardsson, K.; et al. (1987) Aldicarb
Degradation in Sandy Soils from Different Depths. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 14 p. 

40816607	Carsel, R.; Jones, R.; Hansen, J.; et al. (1987) A Simulation
Procedure for Groundwater Quality Assessments of Pesticides: Aldicarb.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 16 p. 

40816608	Jones, R.; Rao, P. (1988) Reflections on Validation and
Applications of Unsaturated Zone Models: Aldicarb. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 11 p. 

40816609	Jones, R.; Gibb, J.; Hank, R. (1988) Review of Unsaturated Zone
Laeching Models from a User's Perspective: Aldicarb. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 14 p. 

40816610	Jones, R. (1988) The Aldicarb Experience: 1. Conduct and Impact
of Monitoring and Research Programs. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 23 p. 

40816611	Jones, R. (1988) The Aldicarb Experience: 2. Results of
Monitoring and Research Programs. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 50 p. 

40816612	Jones, R. (1988) Pesticides in Groundwater: Conduct of Field
Research Studies: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc
Ag Co. 35 p. 

40884600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support
Registration of Temik: Residue Chemistry Data. Transmittal of 1 study. 

40884601	Romine, R. (1988) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Aldicarb
Residues in Soybean Products: Project ID; 803R10; File No. 40429.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co., and Texas A&M
University. 74 p. 

40925800	U.S. EPA (1984) Standardized Transmittal Document for PDMS
Entry of OPP Administrative Records: Aldicarb Registration Standard.
Transmittal of 1 document. 

40925801	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1984) GS140: Aldicarb:
Registration Standard. Unpublished study. 1775 p. 

40987300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Degradation and
Movement Data to Support the Registration for Temik Brand Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 4 studies. 

40987301	Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 109 p. 

40987302	Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 53 p. 

40987303	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues:
Summary of Potable Well Monitoring Data for 1988. Unpublished study. 4
p. 

40987304	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues
Fourth Quarter Wisconsin Second Sampling. Unpublished study. 11 p. 

41004500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Toxicity Data to
Support the Continued Registration of Temik Granular Pesticide Products.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

41004501	Neeper-Bradley, T.; Tyl, R. (1988) Developmental Toxicity
Evaluation of Aldicarb Administered by Gavage to CD (Sprague-Dawley)
Rats: Laboratory Project ID BRRC 51-551: RPAC 40293. Unpublished study
prepared by Union Carbide Bushy Run Research Center. 351 p. 

41020300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Environmental Data to
Support the Registration Standard for Temik Brand 10% Granular Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies. 

41020301	Jones, R. (1989) Rhone-Poulenc Potable Well Survey Program
Conducted During 1987: Additional Site Specific Data. Unpublished
compilation. 335 p. 

41020302	Jones, R. (1989) Buffer Zone Criteria for United States Soils.
Unpublished compilation prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 308 p. 

41023000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Residue Data to
Support the Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41023001	Romine, R. (1988) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide...Residues in
Rotational Crops: Project No. 803R10: 40455. Unpublished study prepared
by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with Analytical Development Corp.
278 p. 

41054600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Toxicity Data in
Support of Temik. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41054601	IIT Research Institute (1989) Immunotoxicology Study of
Aldicarb in Mice: Phase II: Final Report: IITRI Project No. L08181.
Unpublished study. 254 p. 

41075500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1989) Submission of Chemistry Data in
Support of Temik Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41075501	Helfant, L. (1989) TEMIK brand Aldicarb Pesticide Product
Chemistry. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 15 p.


41088600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data to Support the Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 2 studies. 

41088601	Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulence Ag Co. 27 p. 

41088602	Jones, R. (1989) The Aldicarb Experience: 2. Results of
Monitoring and Research Programs. Unpublished study prepared by
RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 49 p. 

41139500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Aldicarb Residue
Data. Transmittal of 2 studies. 

41139501	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues
Second Quarter 1989 Wisconsin First Sampling. Unpublished study. 41 p. 

41139502	Jones, R. (1989) Progess Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field.
Unpublished study. 54 p. 

41189600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of Temik brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal 

41189601	Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 55 p. 

41216000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Fate Data in Support
of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide EPA Reg No. 264-330 and 264426.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

41216001	Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 19 p. 

41255500	U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Submission of Toxicity
Data. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41255501	U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Biological Opinion on
Selected Pesticides. Unpublished study. 891 p. 

41290700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Data on Residues from
Potable Wells in Wisconsin. Transmittal of 2 studies. 

41290701	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues:
Third Quarter 1989 Wisconsin Second Sampling. 17 p. 

41290702	Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 59 p. 

41363700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data in Support of
Temik 15G and 10G Aldicarb Pesticides Data Call-in: Aldicarb National
Food Survey Interim Report. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41363701	Romine, R. (1990) First Interim Report for the Aldicarb Data
Callin: Temik Residues in National Food Survey Samples. Unpublished
compilation prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 29 p. 

41377100	U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1990) Submission of Biological
Opinion Data for Selected Pesticides. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41377101	U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Biological Opinion Log
on Selected Pesticides. Unpublished study. 677 p. 

41378500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2
studies. 

41378501	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues
Fourth Quarter 1989 Wisconsin First Sampling. Unpublished study. 16 p. 

41378502	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues
Fourth Quarter 1989 Wisconsin Second Sampling. Unpublished study. 12 p. 

41392900	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Data in
Response to the Aldicarb Data Call-in. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41392901	Romine, R. (1990) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Reanalysis of
ANFS Samples: Lab Project Number: EC-89-062: 40720. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 52 p. 

41482200	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support
Registration of Aldicarb Pesticide (Granular): Residue Chemistry Study.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

41482201	Jones, R. (1990) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb
Degradation and Movement for Winter Application to Grapes. Unpublished
study prepared by Phone-Poulenc Ag Co. 129 p. 

41509200	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Data to
Support the Continued Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

41509201	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Aldicarb Residue Data from Potato
Producing Companies. Unpublished study. 19 p. 

41554200	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Summary Data in
Support of Temik Brand 15G Granular Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1
study. 

41554201	Florida Department of Agriculture (1990) Aldicarb Citrus
Monitoring Data. Unpublished study. 7 p. 

41575800	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support
Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide: Residue Chemistry
Study. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41575801	Trama, T. (1990) Letter Sent to Letter sent to J. Craig dated
July 19, 1990: Temik residue analyses by season and variety. 5 p. 

41608700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data in
Support of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal
of 1 study. 

41608701	Hazleton Laboratories. (1990) Aldicarb Interim Cholinesterase
Data and Incidence Summary: 5 Week Dog (2 Week Evaluation): Lab Project
Number: HLA 656162. Unpublished study. 14 p. 

41611100	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data in
Support of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal
of 1 study. 

41611101	Hazleton Laboratories. (1990) Aldicarb Interim Cholinesterase
Data and Incidence Summary: 5 Week Dog (2 Week Evaluation). Unpublished
study. 14 p. 

41656800	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data to
Support the Registration of Temik. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

41656801	Charles, J. (1990) Interim Data for Aldicarb 5 Week Dog
Cholinesterase Evaluations: Lab Project Number: HLA/656162. Unpublished
study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories Inc. 15 p. 

41659700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support the
Application for Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide:
Groundwater Monitoring Studies. Transmittal of 3 studies. 

41659701	Davis, W. (1990) Letter Sent to Letter sent to B. Kapner dated
Oct 12, 1990: Ground water monitoring study: TEMIK Brand Aldicarb
Pesticide. 3 p. 

41659702	Rourke, R.; Jones, R. (1990) Potable Well Monitoring for
Aldicarb: Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 18 p. 

41659703	Jones, R. (1990) Rhone-Poulenc and Wiscousin Department of
Natural Resources Well Monitoring for Aldicarb. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 27 p. 

41661300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data to
Support the Registration of Temik. Transmittal of 2 Studies. 

41661301	Ivett, J. (1990) Single Acute Exposure Dose Selection Study on
Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 12010/0/459/PO. Unpublished study prepared
by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 15 p. 

41661302	Ivett, J. (1990) Mutagenicity Test on Aldicarb Technical in the
Mouse Bone Marrow Cytogenetic Assay: Lab Project Number: 12010/ 0/451.
Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 57 p. 

41662500	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Data to
Support the Registration of the Temik Brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
Study. 

41662501	Ayers, A.; Jones, R. (1990) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide
Limited Aldicarb Drinking Water Well Survey-II. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 335 p. 

41668300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support
Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Residue Chemistry Study.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

41668301	Craig, J. (1990) Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer
Services Sampling of Citrus for Residues of Aldicarb. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 7 p. 

41708600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support Temik
Brand Aldicarb Registration: Avian Toxicology Response Studies.
Transmittal of 4 studies. 

41708601	Hobson, J. (1990) Aldicarb: Toxicity to Avian Species: A
Position Statement. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.
22 p. 

41708602	Hobson, J.; Fish, J. (1990) Aldicarb: Response to the Review by
the Ecological Effects Branch of the 1987 Temik Brand Aldicarb Granular
Incorporation Study Conducted by J. Fish. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 16 p. 

41708603	Hobson, J. (1990) Aldicarb: Response to the Review by the
Ecological Effects Branch of the 1987 Temik Terrestrial Vertebrate Field
Study. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 20 p. 

41708604	Kendall, R. (1990) Behavior, Survivability and Biochemical
Response of Wild Mourning Doves (Zenaida macroura) Dosed with Aldicarb:
Final Research Report Phase I: Lab Project Number: 08035. Unpublished
study prepared by Clemson Univ., Institute of Wildlife and Environ.
Toxicology. 29 p. 

41739900	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Exposure Data In
Support of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1
Study. 

41739901	Jones, P. (1990) Worker Exposure to Dichoromethane While
Simulating The Loading of Temik Brand 15G for Application to Citrus: Lab
Project Number: EF-89-27: 91C-4708. Unpublished study prepared by
Research Triangle Institute. 206 p. 

41749400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Study In
Support of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1
Study. 

41749401	Chancey, E. (1990) Wisconsin Aldicarb Potable Well Sampling:
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 27 p. 

41844700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Progress Report June
1989 in Response to Data Call-In for Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide
Registration. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

41844701	Harrison, S. (1991) Aldicarb Data Call-In Progress Report.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 17 p. 

41845700	Mycogen Corp. (1991) Submission of efficacy data to support the
registration of M-One Plus Bioinsecticide. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41845701	Sorenson, K.; Boylan-Pett, W. (1990) Efficacy data on M-One
Plus Bioinsecticide. Unpublished study prepared by North Carolina Ag.
Extension, Michigan State Univ. and Univ. of Wisconsin. 104 p. 

41865800	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support
Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb: Metabolism Study. Transmittal of 1
study. 

41865801	Tyl, R.; Marr, M.; Myers, C. (1991) Preliminary Evaluation of
Aldicarb Excretion in the Milk of Lactating CD Rats Exposed to Aldicarb
in the Diet: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 60C/4752. Unpublished
study prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 130 p. 

41919900	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1991) Submission of toxicity data in
support of reregistration of aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41919901	Hamada, N. (1991) Subchronic Toxicity Study in Dogs with
Aldicarb Technical: Lab Project Number: 656-162. Unpublished study
prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 320 p. 

41956100	Rhone-Poulenc (1991) Submission of toxicity data in support of
reregistration of Aldicarb technical. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41956101	Hamada, N. (1991) Subchronic Toxicity Study in Dogs with
Aldicarb Technical: Lab Project Number: 656-162. Unpublished study
prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 320 p. 

41971800	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of product benefits data
in support of registration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study. 

41971801	Rhone-Poulenc Co. (1991) The Benefits to Agriculture of
Pesticide Products Containing Aldicarb. Unpublished study. 282 p. 

42002100	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Incident Report on
Aldicarb for Section 6(a)(2) Requirements. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42002101	Davis, W. (1991) Section 6(a)(2) Reporting on Aldicarb
^Overexposure Incident. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
Co. 5 p. 

42004300	FMC Corp. (1991) Submission of Toxicological data to support
the registration of AMMO Insecticides (Cypermethrin). Transmittal of 1
study. 

42004301	Palmieri, M. (1991) Aquatic Mesocosm Study of Pesticide
Products Containing the Active Ingredient Cypermethrin: Progress Report
13: Lab Project Number A89-2847. Unpublished study prepared by Wildlife
International, Ltd. and FMC Corp. 5 p. 

42004400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1991) Submission of residue data to
support the registration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 3 studies. 

42004401	Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: In-Orchard Variation of the Magnitude
and Character of Aldicarb Residues in Oranges: Lab Project Number:
EC-91-141. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 54 p. 

42004402	Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: Comparison of GLC and HPLC Methods
for Determining Residues of Aldicarb and It's Metabolites in Potatoes:
Lab Project Number: EC-90-094. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 55 p. 

42004403	Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: Effects of Microwave Cooking on
Residues of Aldicarb and It's Metabolites in Potatoes: Lab Project
Number EC-90-094. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 71
p. 

42016900	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of residue data in
support of registration of Temik brand aldicarb pesticide. Transmittal
of 1 study. 

42016901	Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: In-Orchard Variartion of the
Magnitude and Character of Aldicarb Residues in Oranges and Grapefruit
and Stability of These Residues in Commercial Storage: Lab Project
Number: EC-90-093. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 95
p. 

42017400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of environmental fate
data in support of registration of Temik. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42017401	Stratton, G. (1986) Metabolism of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide
and Aldicarb Sulfone in Potato Plants and in Plant Callus Tissue
Cultures of Potato Tuber and Citron Fruit. Unpublished study prepared by
University of Florida. 280 p. 

42040600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of residue data to
support the registration standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42040601	Tew, E. (1991) Aldicarb: Magnitude of the Residues in Bananas
Treated with Temik 15G: Lab Project Number: EC-90-123. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 62 p. 

42073400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support
Section 6(a)(2) FIFRA Requirements: Chronic Toxicity Study of Aldicarb
on Rat. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42073401	Davis, W. (1991) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated October 29,
1991: Concerning a chronic rat study being conducted on Aldicarb.
Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 1 p. 

42073600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1991) Submission of metabolism data to
support the registration standard for Aldicarb in Temik 15G. Transmittal
of 1 study. 

42073601	Hunt, T. (1991) Determination of Rate of Degradation of
Aldicarb Carbamate Residues in Potatoes Stored under Simulated
Commercial Conditions: Lab Project Number: EC-89-085: 40986. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Company. 39 p. 

42121500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag. (1991) Submission of Section 6(a)(2) Data in
Response to Request for Additional Factual Information Regarding Temik
Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Unreasonable Adverse Effects: Groundwater
Monitoring Study. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42121501	Chaney, E. (1991) Rhone-Poulenc Analyses of Water Sample from
Wisconsin Wells for the Period August to October 1991. Unpublished study
prepared Rhone-Poulenc Ag. 21 p. 

42148400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Temik
Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Registration: Additional Factual Toxicology
Information Regarding Unreasonable Adverse Effects Under Section
6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study. 

42148401	Lemen, J. (1991) Two-Generation Reproduction Study in Rats with
Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 656-157. Unpublished study prepared by
Hazleton Washington, Inc. 1946 p. 

42154300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support
Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb: Toxicology (Exposure) Study.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

42154301	Peterson, H.; McPheeters, B.; et al. (1991) Preliminary Results
of Rhone-Poulenc's Review of Goldman et al. "Aldicarb Food Poisoning in
California 1985-1988: Toxicity Estimates for Humans" 45 Archives of
Environmental Health 141 (1990). Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 64 p. 

42180600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Company (1991) Submission of information in
pursuant of Section 6(a)(2) of FIFRA reporting a potential overexposure
of a 14 month old girl to a cookie treated with Temik and an unknown
pelleted rodenticide. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42180601	Davis, W. (1991) Letter Sent to S. Haddad, December 10, 1991:
(Letter concerning exposure of a child to Temik and an unknown
rodenticide). Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 1 p. 

42191500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support
Registration of Temik (Aldicarb): Toxicology Study. Transmittal of 1
study. 

42191501	Hamada, N.; Thakur, A. (1991) One-Year Chronic Oral Toxicity
Study in Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Addendum to Final Report: Lab
Project Number: 400-706. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton
Washington, Inc. 13 p. 

42226200	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support Temik
Brand 15G (Aldicarb Pesticide) Registration for Label Amendments: Field
Crop Accumulation Study. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42226201	Hunt, T. (1992) Field Accumulation Study on Rotational Crops
Temik/Plant-Back Residue Program: Lab Project Number: EC/R-89-002.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.; Stewart Agricultural
Research, Inc.; Chemalysis Lab.; et al. 628 p. 

42243300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of additional adverse
effects data and incident reports concerning Temik (Aldicarb) under
FIFRA 6(a)(2) status. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42243301	W. Davis (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated February 19,
1992: Concerning deaths of an ocelot, two oppossums, and four raccoons
at Atascosa Wildlife Refuge in Rio Hondo, Texas. Prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 1 p. 

42243400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support FIFRA
6(A)(2) Requirements for Temik Brand Aldicarb Adverse Effects.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

42243401	Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated February 24,
1992: Concerning Florida drinking potable water monitoring aldicarb.
Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 3 p. 

42247200	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support Temik
Brand Aldicarb Registration: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1
study. 

42247201	Tew, E. (1992) Determination of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes
Treated with Temik 15G Under Furrow and Under Overhead Irrigation
Practices in the Pacific Northwest: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
EC-90-115: 41095. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 132
p. 

42275700	Rhone-Poulenc (1992) Submission of toxicity data in support of
registration of Temik (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 study. 

42275701	Lemen, J. (1992) Pilot Reproduction Study in Rats with
Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 656-156. Unpublished study prepared by
Hazleton Labs., America, Inc. 425 p. 

42293700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue data in
support of the registration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42293701	Gustafson, D. (1992) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb
in Wisconsin: Results for all Wells Sampled in 1991: Final Summary
Report: Lab Project Number: 41194. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 62 p. 

42305800	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support
Aldicarb Registration Standard: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of
1 study. 

42305801	Romine, R. (1989) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Aldicarb
Residues in Dried Potato Products: Lab Project Number: 803R10: 40479.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag., Co. 72 p. 

42307500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support FIFRA
6(a)(2) Requirements for Aldicarb: Residue in drinking water.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

42307501	Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated April 28, 1992:
(Concerning aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide and sulfone residues in a
drinking water well). Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p. 

42316000	Univ. of Georgia (1992) Submission of an incident report
involving Furadan 4-F: Data submitted under FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal
of 1 study. 

42316001	Smith, K. (1992) Clinical Necropsy report on three red-tailed
hawks found near Edgefield, South Carolina. Prepared by Univ. of Ga.,
College of Veterinary Med. 2 p. 

42316100	Univ. of Georgia (1992) Submission of an incident report
involving Temik in the wildlife kill of a gray fox. Data submitted under
FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study. 

42316101	Smith, K. (1992) Clinical Necropsy Report on a Gray Fox Found
near Edgefield, South Carolina. Unpublished study prepared by Univ. of
Georgia, College of Veterinary Med. 2 p. 

42316200	Univ. of Georgia (1992) Submission of an incident report
involving Temik in a wildlife kill of raccoons. Data submitted under
FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study. 

42316201	Smith, K. (1992) Clinical Necropsy Record on a Raccoon Found
near Edgefield, South Carolina. Unpublished study prepared by Univ. of
Ga., College of Veterinary Med. 2 p. 

42316500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1992) Submission of incident reports
under FIFRA 6(a)(2) Status (Adverse effects and incident report) to
support the reregistration of Temik (Aldicarb) pesticide. Transmittal of
1 study. 

42316501	Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated May 11, 1992:
Death of dogs and cats in two separate incidents related to Temik
(Aldicarb). 2 p. 

42372300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. (1992) Submission of Literature Review
in Support of Registration for Temik brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
study. 

42372301	Cole, P.; Pastides, H.; Rothman, K. (1992) The Epidemiologh of
Aldicarb Exposure in Humans: A Critique of the Literature with emphasis
on its Application to Risk Assessment: . Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 26 p. 

42373000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of safety data in
support of the registration standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
study. 

42373001	Wyld, P.; Watson, C.; Nimmo, W.; et al. (1992) A Safety and
Tolerability Study of Aldicarb at Various Dose Levels in Healthy Male
and Female Volunteers: Lab Project Number: 003237. Unpublished study
prepared by Inveresk Clinical Research. 372 p. 

42436500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue analytical
methods data in support of TEMIK brand Aldicarb pesticide registration. 

42436501	Ver Hey, M. (1992) Testing of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfone and
Aldicarb Sulfoxide through Protocol E: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
1181. Unpublished study prepared by Colorado Analytical Research &
Development Corp. 35 p. 

42436600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Supplemental submission of residue
data in support of the data call-in for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 6
studies. 

42436601	Honeycutt, R.; Andrawes, N. (1992) Summary Report on the Nature
of Residues of carbon 14-Aldicarb in Plants: Final Report: Lab Project
Number: 92-102. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 70 p.


42436602	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1992) Metabolism and Associated
Residues of Temik (2-methyl-2-(methylthio) propionaldehyde
O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (TEMIK) in Sugar Beet Plants: Lab Project
Number: 111B19: 12694. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 52 p. 

42436603	Andrawes, N. (1992) The Metabolism and Terminal Residues of
Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in Peanut Plants under Field Conditions: Lab
Project Number: 111A12: 17613. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C.
47 p. 

42436604	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1992) Degradation of
2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (TEMIK)
in Potato Foliage: Reformatted: Lab Project Number: 111B19: 10495.
Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 44 p. 

42436605	Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1992) Metabolism of
2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (TEMIK
Aldicarb Pesticide) in Potato Plants: Reformatted. Unpublished study
prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 60 p. 

42436606	Andrawes, N.; Romine, R.; Bagley, W. (1992) Metabolism and
Residues of TEMIK Aldicarb Pesticide in Cotton Foliage and Seed under
Field Conditions: Reformatted. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C.
82 p. 

42446500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of toxicity data to
support the registration standard for Temik (aldicarb). Transmittal of 1
study. 

42446501	Kendall, R. (1992) Behavior, Survivability and Biochemical
Response of Wild Northern Bobwhites (Colinus virginianus) Dosed with
Temik: Lab Project Number: 08034. Unpublished study prepared by Clemson
Univ., Inst. of Wildlife and Environ. Tox. 34 p. 

42456000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of fate data in support
data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements of Temik brand Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42456001	Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to Sepehr Haddad dated August 10,
1992 concerning residues of aldicarb sulfone and aldicarb sulfoxide in
two Florida wells. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 2 p. 

42456100	Rhone-Poulenc (1992) Submission of fate data in support of
FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for Temik Brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
study. 

42456101	Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to Office of Pesticide Programs
dated August 28, 1992 concerning Aldicarb in a well in Maine. Prepared
by Rhone-Poulenc. 1 p. 

42456200	Rhone-Poulenc (1992) Submission of fate data in support of
FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for Temik brand Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

42456201	Gustafson, D. (1992) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb
in the United States: Results for Samples Analyzed 1Q, 1992 (Exclusive
of Long Island, NY): Lab Project Number: 41206: EC-92-182. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 55 p. 

42467300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue chemistry
data to support Aldicarb reregistration. Transmittal of 2 studies. 

42467301	Tew, E. (1992) Aldicarb: Stability of Residue on Frozen Potato
Processed Fractions: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-201.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 62 p. 

42467302	Tew, E. (1992) Aldicarb: Stability of Residues on Frozen
Soybean Processed Fractions: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
EC-92-200. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 54 p. 

42487600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue survey data
to support registration of TEMIK products. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42487601	Rogers, C. (1992) Aldicarb Survey 1991: Texas. Unpublished
study prepared by Texas Water Commission. 9 p. 

42498200	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submittal of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of the Aldicarb Data Call-in. Transmittal of 2 studies. 

42498201	Das, Y. (1990) Photodegradation of (S-Methyl-carbon 14)
Aldicarb in Aqueous Solution Buffered at pH 5 under Artificial Sunlight:
Lab Project Number: 90021. Unpublished study prepared by Innovative
Scientific Services, Inc. 91 p. 

42498202	Dykes, J. (1990) Soil Adsorption/Desorption with Carbon
14Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 37352. Unpublished study prepared by
Analytical Bio-Chemistry Laboratories, Inc. 326 p. 

42509400	Rhone Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submittal of chronic oncogenicity
data on Aldicarb in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study. 

42509401	Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated
September 29, 1992 Regarding the Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Feeding
Study in Rats. Prepared by Rhone Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p. 

42515700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of TEMIK residue
chemistry data under FIFRA 6(a)(2) to support TEMIK products
registration. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42515701	Davis, W. (1992) Letter sent to S. Haddad dated Oct. 9, 1992:
TEMIK brand Aldicard pesticide residues in Florida drinking water wells.
Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p. 

42523400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1992) Submission of product chemistry
data to support a formulation amendment for Temik (Aldicarb).
Transmittal of 1 study. 

42523401	Crownover, R. (1992) Aldicarb Solution, Technical Product
Identity and Composition...: Lab Project Number: AC-92-009: 41264.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. 13 p. 

42561200	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. (1992) Submission of residue survey in
support of registration for Aldicarb (Temik). Transmittal of 4 studies. 

42561201	Harrison, S.; Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1992) Aldicarb Orange
Monitoring Survey Outline. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc
Ag Comp. and Technical Assessment Systems Inc. 25 p. 

42561202	Brown, E. (1992) Procedures for Florida Orange Processing.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. 6 p. 

42561203	Tomerlin, J.; Petersen, B. (1992) Summary of Aldicarb
Monitoring in Florida as of October 23, 1992. Unpublished study prepared
by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 17 p. 

42561204	Benell, N. (1991) Monitoring Data for Aldicarb in Grapefruit
and Oranges. Unpublished study prepared by Technical Assessment Systems,
Inc. 48 p. 

42643900	Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of environmental data in
support of the registration for Temik 15G Aldicarb pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

42643901	Spare, W. (1993) Soil Photolysis of Aldicarb: Lab Project
Number: 1515. Unpublished study prepared by Agrisearch Inc. 175 p. 

42659500	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1993) Submission of residue chemistry
data concerning Temik under FIFRA 6(A)2. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42659501	Davis, W. (1993) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated on Feb. 2,
1993: Preliminary results from residue trial studies concerning Temik.
Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 4 p. 

42687100	Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of environmental fate data in
support of the registration of TEMIK 15G Brand Aldicarb Pesticides.
Transmittal of 2 studies. 

42687101	Gustafson, D. (1993) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb
in the United States: Results for Samples Analyzed 2Q, 1992 (Exclusive
of Long Island, NY): (Quarterly Phase Report): Lab Project Number:
41267: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 81
p. 

42687102	Gustafson, D. (1993) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb
in the United States: Results for Samples Analyzed 3Q, 1992 (Exclusive
of Long Island, NY): (Quarterly Phase Report): Lab Project Number:
41308: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 140
p. 

42722300	Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of residue data in support of
the registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1
study. 

42722301	Tew, E. (1993) Temik: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Sweet
Potatoes: Lab Project Number: USA92T02: 41382. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 164 p. 

42725800	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1993) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for TEMIK brand Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

42725801	Davis, W. (1993) Letter sent to S. Haddad dated March 23, 1993
reporting results from sampling of Florida drinking water wells from the
Dept. of Environmental Regulation. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 5 p. 

42749600	Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of residue data in support of
registration for Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study. 

42749601	Petersen, B. (1993) Estimation of Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb
in Sweet Potatoes. Unpublished study prepared by Technical Assessment
Systems, Inc. 9 p. 

42796000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1993) Submission of product chemistry
data in support of the registration for Temik brand aldicarb pesticide.
Transmittal of 2 studies. 

42796001	McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D.; Young, K. (1987) Aldicarb Vapor
Pressure Evaluation: Lab Project Number: 803P15: 40052. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 8 p. 

42796002	McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D.; Young, K. (1987) Aldicarb: Design and
Validation of High Flow Apparatus for Vapor Pressure Determinations: Lab
Project Number: 40182: 8710020. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 20 p. 

42797900	Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of environmental fate data in
support of the FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
study. 

42797901	Davis, W. (1993) Letter sent to Office of Pesticide Programs
dated May 26, 1993: Aldicarb drinking water detection in Florida, Maine
and Wisconsin. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 4 p. 

42827800	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1993) Submission of residue data in
support of the registration for TEMIK. Transmittal of 4 studies. 

42827801	Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in
Processed Potatoes: Potato Fractions: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
EC-92-211: 44121. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 229
p. 

42827802	Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Determination of Variation in Magnitude
and Character of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes from Temik-Treated
Fields: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-90-092: EC-90-117: 41207.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 618 p. 

42827803	Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in
Potatoes Grown from Seed Pieces Injected with Aldicarb Sulfoxide at 1.0
PPM: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-208: 41354. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 90 p. 

42827804	Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in
Potatoes Grown with Available Overhead Irrigation in 1992: Final Report:
Lab Project Number: EC-92-180: 41395. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 283 p. 

42935000	Rohm and Haas Company (1993) Submission of Toxicity Data,
Residue Chemistry Data, Environmental Fate Data and Product Chemistry
Data for Triazamate in Support of an Experimental Use Permit and
Petition for Temporary Tolerance on Apples. Transmittal of 71 Studies. 

42935042	Parkin, D. (1991) Comparison of IC-50 and T 1/2 of Aldicarb and
RH-7988 on Human Plasma Cholinesterase: Lab Project Number: 89P-141:
89R-141. Unpublished study prepared by Rohm and Haas Company, Toxicology
Department. 40 p. 

43045400	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1993) Submission of toxicology data in
support of registration for TEMIK 15G brand Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

43045401	Trutter, J. (1993) Combined Chronic Toxicity and Oncogenicity
Study in Rats with Aldicarb Technical: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
656/151: HWA/656/151. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Washington,
Inc. 3532 p. 

43084100	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1994) Submittal of Residue Data in
Support of Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study. 

43084101	Byrd, J. (1994) A Nature of the Residue Study with (carbon
14)-Aldicarb in Laying Hens: Lab Project Number: 9285C: 819: EC-91-221.
Unpublished study prepared by Southwest Bio-Labs, Inc. 348 p. 

43110600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submittal of Residue Data in
Support of Registration of TEMIK brand Aldicarb Pesticide for Citrus.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

43110601	Tew, E.; Peterson, B.; Barraj, L.; et al. (1994) Aldicarb
Fresh-Market Orange Monitoring Study: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
EC-92-216. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. and Morse
Labs, Inc. 154 p. 

43138500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of residue data in
support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for TEMIK 15G brand Aldicarb.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

43138501	Davis, W. (1994) Letter Sent to Office of Pesticide Programs
dated Feb. 17, 1994 concerning monitoring of wells in Florida for
possible aldicarb residues. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 9 p. 

43143800	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1994) Submission of ground water
monitoring data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for aldicarb.
Transmittal of 1 study. 

43143801	Jones, R. (1994) Site Specific Information Related to Aldicarb
Well Monitoring Conducted by Rhone-Poulenc AG Company. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 26 p. 

43154400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submittal of Residue Data in
Support of Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal
of 1 study. 

43154401	Dean, P. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in
the United States: Results for Samples Analyzed 4Q, 1992 and 1Q, 1993
(Exclusive of Long Island, NY): Lab Project Number: 44124: EC-92-182.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 169 p. 

43193600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of residue data in
support of registration for TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal
of 1 study. 

43193601	Chancey, E. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb
in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis April 1
through December 31, 1993 (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): Lab Project
Number: 44306: EC/92/182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
Co. 175 p. 

43277100	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1994) Submission of residue data in
support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
study. 

43277101	Davis, W. (1994) Letter Sent to Office of Pesticide Programs
dated June 21, 1994: (Concerning Aldicarb residues above the 10 ppb MCL
found in well samples in Florida and Wisconsin). Prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 15 p. 

43299000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of the Conditional Registration of TEMIK 15G. Transmittal of 6
Studies. 

43299001	Fish, J. (1994) Comparison of Application Characteristics of
Positive Displacement Granular Applicators and Gravity Flow Granular
Applicators: Lab Project Number: 44303: USAATG9301. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Clayton Research Station. 78 p. 

43299002	Tew, E. (1994) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in
Potatoes Resulting from Application Using Gravity Flow and Positive
Displacement Application Equipment: Final Study Report: Lab Project
Number: USA93T70: 44412: 93-001. Unpublished study prepared by
Phone-Poulenc Ag Co. 3255 p. 

43299003	Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary
Exposure Analysis: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 94-01. Unpublished study
prepared by Techniacl Assessment Systems, Inc. 56 p. 

43299004	Rao, K. (1994) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in
Processed Potato Fractions: Addendum: Chain of Custody Records for
Processed Samples: Lab Project Number: EC-92-211. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 10 p. 

43299005	Rao, K. (1994) Determination of Variation in Magnitude and
Character of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes from Temik-Treated Fields:
Addendum: Summary of Sample Storage Intervals: Lab Project Number:
EC-90-092: EC-90-117. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.
6 p. 

43299006	Rao, K. (1994) Aldicarb--Stability of Residues on Frozen Potato
Processed Fractions: Addendum: Quantitative Data Tables & Example
Chromatograms: Lab Project Number: EC-92-201. Unpublished study prepared
by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 70 p. 

43325400	DuPont Agricultural Products (1994) Submission of environmental
fate data in support of registration standard for methomyl. Transmittal
of 3 studies. 

43325402	Smelt, J.; Dekker, A.; Leistra, M.; et al. (1983) Conversion of
four carbamoyloximes in soil samples from above and below the soil water
table. Pesticide Science 14:173-181. 

43325403	Bromilow, R.; Briggs, G.; Williams, M. et al. (1986) The role
of ferrous ions in the rapid degradation of oxamyl, methomyl, and
aldicarb in anaerobic soils. Pesticide Science 17:535-547. 

43346700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of Residues in the
Environment Data in Support of TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Registrations.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43346701	Jones, R. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in
the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis April 1
Through June 30, 1994: (Quarterly Phase Report): Lab Project Number:
EC-92-182: 44462. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 103
p. 

43385000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of residue and exposure
data in support of registration for TEMIK. Transmittal of 2 studies. 

43385001	Tew, E. (1994) TEMIK: Magnitude and Distribution of Aldicarb
Residues in Potatoes From the Mid-Row Areas of 1993 Florida Test Plots
Established with Positive Displacement Application (PDA) Equipment:
Final Report: Lab Project Number: US94T02R: 44514. Unpublished study
prepared by Morse Lab., Inc. 157 p. 

43385002	Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary
Exposure Analyses: Revised Report: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB/94/01.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 56 p. 

43442300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of toxicity data in
support of Data Call-in for Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal
of 5 studies. 

43442301	Robinson, K.; Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1994) An Acute Study of
the Potential Effects of Orally Administered Aldicarb, Technical Grade,
on Behavior and Neuromorphology in Rats: Lab Project Number: 97235.
Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 712 p. 

43442302	Robinson, K.; Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1994) A Time of Peak
Behavioral Effects Study of a Single Oral Administration of Aldicarb,
Technical Grade, in Rats: Lab Project Number: 97236. Unpublished study
prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 278 p. 

43442303	Robinson, K.; Broxup, B. (1994) An Acute Benchmark-Dose
Toxicity Study of Orally Administered Aldicarb, Technical Grade, in
Rats: Lab Project Number: 97277. Unpublished study prepared by
Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 65 p. 

43442305	Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1994) An Acute Study of the Time Course
of Cholinesterase Inhibition by Aldicarb Technical, Aldicarb Sulfoxide
and Aldicarb Sulfone in the Rat: Lab Project Number: 97352. Unpublished
study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 358 p. 

43453800	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmission of 1 Study. 

43453801	Jones, R. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in
the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis July 1
Through September 30, 1994: Lab Project Numbers: EC-92-182: 44559.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 100 p. 

43575100	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Toxicity Data in
Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43575101	Tyl, R.; Marr, M.; Myers, C. (1995) Modified Dominant Lethal
Evaluation of Aldicarb Administered in the Feed to CD (Sprague-Dawley)
Rats: Final Report: Lab Project Numbers: 65C-5880. Unpublished study
prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 323 p. 

43591700	E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (1995) Submission of Pesticide
Fate & Residues in the Environment and Exposure/Risk to Non-Target
Organisms Data in Support of the Atrazine, Simazine, and Cyanazine
Registration Standards. Transmittal of 13 Studies. 

43591710	Georgia Agribusiness Council. (1995) What's in a number EPA
needs to return to the basics: Well sampling by county. The Predicate.
p. 1. 

43599300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Exposure Data in
Support of Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 3 Studies. 

43599301	Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary
Exposure Analyses: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 94-01. Unpublished study
prepared by TAS, Inc. 56 p. 

43599302	Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary
Exposure Analyses: Revised Report: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 94-01.
Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 56 p. 

43599303	Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1995) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary
Exposure Analyses. Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 18 p. 

43608800	Monsanto Co. (1995) Submission of Residue in the Environment
Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Alachlor and Atrazine. Transmittal
of 1 Study. 

43608801	Weppelman, R. (1995) Letter sent to Office of Pesticide
Programs dated April 6, 1995 transmitting a report from the Tennessee
Dept. of Agriculture describing the results of their ground water
monitoring program for 1994. Prepared by Monsanto, The Agricultural
Group. 7 p. 

43617800	Ciba-Geigy Corp. (1995) Submission of Residues in the
Environment and Hazard to Aquatic Organisms Data in Support of FIFRA
6(a)(2) for Diazinon. Transmittal of 9 Studies. 

43617801	Ross, L. (1991) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River
Study: March and April, 1991: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl,
Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of
California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 17 p. 

43617802	Ross, L. (1992) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River
Study: Summer 1991: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate,
and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California,
Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 15 p. 

43617803	Ross, L. (1992) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River
Study: Winter 1991-2: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate,
and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California,
Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 17 p. 

43617804	Ross, L. (1993) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River
Study: Spring 1992: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate,
and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California,
Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 14 p. 

43617805	Ross, L. (1993) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River
Study: Summer 1992: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate,
and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California,
Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 15 p. 

43617806	Ross, L. (1993) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River
Study: Winter 1992-3: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate,
and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California,
Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 16 p. 

43617808	Nordmark, C. (1994) Four River Monitoring Protocol: Revised:
(Includes "Preliminary Results of the Four River Study, Sacramento
River, Winter/Spring 1993-1994"). Unpublished study prepared by
California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 13 p. 

43623700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residues in the
Environment Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43623701	Denny, J.; Jones, R. (1995) Potable Well Water Monitoring for
Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for
Analysis October 1 Through December 31, 1994: Lab Project Number:
EC-92-182: 44683. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 60
p. 

43628100	Ciba-Geigy Corp. (1995) Submission of Residues in the
Environment Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Various Pesticides
Registered to Ciba. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43628101	Shahane, A. (1994) Pesticide Detections in Surface Waters of
Florida. Unpublished study prepared by Florida Dept. of Agriculture and
Consumer Services. 9 p. 

43633400	E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (1995) Submission of
Toxicology and Residue Data in Support of the Special Review for
Atrazine, Simazine and Cyanazine. Transmittal of 5 Studies. 

43633401	Heindel, J.; Chapin, R.; Gulati, D. et al. (1993) Assessment of
the reproductive and developmental toxicity of pesticide/fertilizer
mixtures based on confirmed pesticide contamination in California and
Iowa groundwater. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 22:605-621. 

43649200	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Pesticide Misuse and
Toxicity Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Temik (Aldicarb).
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43649201	Davis, W. (1995) Letter Sent to D. Edwards dated May 13, 1995:
TEMIK 15G brand Aldicarb pesticide: (three dog poisoning incidents and
summary of 13 week oral neurotoxicity test in rats preliminary
information). Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p. 

43681500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of risk/exposure data in
support of reregistration for TEMIK 15G (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1
study. 

43681501	Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1995) Estimation of the Potential
Exposure To Aldicarb in Foods: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 95-01.
Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 22 p. 

43702800	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Exposure Data in
Support of Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43702801	Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1995) Estimation of the Potential
Exposure to Aldicarb in Foods: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 95-01.
Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 28 p. 

43761500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residues in the
Environment Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43761501	Denny, J.; Jones, R. (1995) Potable Well Water Monitoring for
Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for
Analysis January 1 through June 30, 1995: (Exclusive of Long Island):
Lab Project Number: EC-92-182: 44815: 92682. Unpublished study prepared
by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 57 p. 

43805700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of the Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal
of 2 Studies. 

43805701	Skinner, W.; Jao, N. (1995) Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism of
(Carbon 14)-Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 468W-1: 468W: EC-94-275.
Unpublished study prepared by PTRL West, Inc. 138 p. 

43805702	Skinner, W. (1995) Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism of (Carbon
14)-Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 467W-1: 467W: EC-94-274. Unpublished
study prepared by PTRL West, Inc. 141 p. 

43829600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Toxicology Data in
Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) and the Registration Standard for Aldicarb.
Transmittal of 2 Studies. 

43829601	Weiler, M. (1995) Developmental Neurotoxicity Study with
Aldicarb in Rats: Final Report: Lab Project Number: HWI 6224-213.
Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Wisconsin, Inc. 891 p. 

43829602	Robinson, K.; Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1995) A 13-Week Study of
the Potential Effects of Orally Administered Aldicarb Technical on
Behavior, Neurochemistry and Neuromorphology in Rats: Lab Project
Number: 97234. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Labs, Ltd. 825
p. 

43842000	FMC Corp. (1995) Submission of Residue and Exposure: Reentry
Protection Data in Support of the Registration Standard for Carbofuran.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43842001	Carlson, D. (1995) Soil Residue Dissipation, Dermal Passive
Dosimetry Exposure and Inhalation Passive Dosimetry Exposure--Potatoes:
Justification for Waiver of Carbofuran Data Call-In. Unpublished study
prepared by FMC Corp. 71 p. 

43842400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43842401	Gillings, O. (1995) Storage Stability of Aldicarb Residues in
Green Coffee Beans, Roasted Coffee Beans, and Instant Coffee: Lab
Project Number: EC-94-293: 44916. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 226 p. 

43844700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43844701	Andrawes, N.; Smitley, C. (1995) Aldicarb--Stability of
Residues on Frozen Soybean Processed Fractions: Addendum: Quantitative
Data Tables & Example Chromatograms: Lab Project Number: EC-92-200:
SOP-90025. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 55 p. 

43852500	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Exposure Data in
Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43852501	Rosenheck, L.; Schuster, L. (1995) Worker Loader and Applicator
Exposure to Temik 15G: Lab Project Number: 94388. Unpublished study
prepared by ABC Labs, Inc., Pan-Ag Div. 344 p. 

43902400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Fate in Plants Data
in Support of the Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
Study. 

43902401	Hathcock, T.; Kimmel, E.; Ruzo, L. (1996) A Metabolism Study
with (Carbon 14)-Aldicarb in Citrus (Lemon Trees): Lab Project Number:
478W-1: 478W: EC-94-278. Unpublished study prepared by PTRL West, Inc.
234 p. 

43961100	U.S. EPA (1996) Submission of Toxicity Data on 17 Pesticides.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43961101	McCann, J.; Teeters, W.; Urban, D. et al. (1981) A short-term
dietary toxicity test on small mammals. p. 132-142 of the Second
Conference of Avian and Mammalian Wildlife Toxicology, Lamb, D.; Kenaga,
E. Eds.; Published in American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM
STP 757; 1981. 

43970000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Residue Chemistry
Data in Support of TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Registration
Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43970001	Wells-Knecht, M.; Andrawes, N. (1996) (Carbon 14)-Aldicarb
Metabolism in Citrus (Lemon Trees): Supplemental Report to MRID No.
43902401: Lab Project Number: EC-95-320. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 286 p. 

43988300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Pesticide Fate in the
Environment Data in Support of Reregistration of TEMIK Brand 15G
Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43988301	Jones, R. (1996) Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and
Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes: Lab Project Number: 45049.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 131 p. 

43994400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Pesticide Fate &
Residues in the Environment Data in Support of Registration Standard for
TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

43994401	Denny, J.; Jones, R. (1996) Potable Well Water Monitoring for
Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for
Analysis July 1 through December 31, 1995: (Exclusive of Long Island,
NY): Lab Project Number: 44991: EC-92-182: SOP 90009. Unpublished study
prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 58 p. 

44005000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1
Study. 

44005001	Das, Y. (1990) Metabolism of (S-Methyl-(carbon 14))Aldicarb
Under Aerobic Soil Conditions: Lab Project Number: EC-90-099: 90020.
Unpublished study prepared by Innovative Scientific Services, Inc. 85 p.


44196700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of the Amended Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G NW Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44196701	Tew, E. (1996) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Pacific
Northwest Potatoes Harvested 120 Days After an At-Planting, In-Furrow
Application of TEMIK 15G at 3 lb ai/Acre: Final Report: Lab Project
Number: 96T10525: 45187: 10525-01. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag co. 414 p. 

44204900	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure/Risk Data in
Support of the Amended Registrations of Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb
Pesticide and Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide Lock 'n Load Closed
Handling System. Transmittal of 2 Studies. 

44204901	Barraj, L. (1996) Assessing the Impact of Reducing the PHI for
Aldicarb on Potatoes to 120 Days: Comparison of the Potential Exposure
to Aldicarb Using Monitoring Data and Data from the 120 Day PHI Field
Trial Study. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 14 p. 

44204902	Barraj, L. (1996) Using the 1996 Florida and PNW Monitoring
Data to Estimate the Potential Exposure to Aldicarb on Potatoes.
Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 15 p. 

44209000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of the Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44209001	Tew, E. (1997) Temik: Pacific Northwest Potato Farmgate Study:
Amended Final Report: Lab Project Number: 96T11379: 45217. Unpublished
study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 194 p. 

44244700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of the Amended Registration for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44244701	Tew, E. (1997) Temik: Magnitude of Residues in Potatoes from
Regions V and IX Harvested 120 Days After an At-Planting Application of
Temik 15G at 3 lb ai/acre: Lab Project Number: 96T11218: 45257:
11218-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 447 p. 

44287600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure and Risk
Assessment Data in Support of the Reregistration of TEMIK Brand Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44287601	Barraj, L. (1997) Estimating the Potential Dietary Exposure to
Aldicarb in Foods: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 97-03. Unpublished study
prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 24 p. 

44335700	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure/Risk Data in
Support of the Label Amendments and Crop Group Petition for Temik Brand
15G Aldicarb Pesticides in/on Citrus. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44335701	Barraj, L. (1997) Estimating the Potential Aggregate Exposure
to Aldicarb in Food and Water: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 97-04.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 28 p. 

44338600	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure/Risk Data in
Support of the Label Amendment for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44338601	Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1997) Assessing the Impact of the
Temik Label Expansion on the Potential Exposure to Aldicarb in Potatoes:
Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 97-02. Unpublished study prepared by
Novigen Sciences, Inc. 18 p. 

44341800	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of the Amended Registration for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide and Tolerance Petition for Aldicarb in/on Citrus. Transmittal
of 1 Study. 

44341801	Tew, E. (1997) Temik: Florida Potato Farmgate Study: Lab
Project Number: 97T12422: 45366. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 287 p. {OPPTS 860.1500} 

44524600	Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1998) Submission of Exposure and Risk
Assessment Data in Support of the Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44524601	Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1998) Using the Elapsed Time Approach
to Estimate the Potential Aggregate Exposure to Aldicarb in Food and
Water: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 98-01. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 30 p. 

44580900	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Residue Chemistry
Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
Study. 

44580901	Jones, R.; Scarborough, T. (1998) Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company
Response to April 9, 1998 EFED Requests for Information on Aldicarb: Lab
Project Number: AS-98-01: RTP-2162. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone
Poulenc Ag Co. 111 p. 

44585400	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Submission of
Environmental Fate, Toxicity, and Exposure Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Organophosphorus and Carbamate Compounds. Transmittal
of 16 Studies. 

44585406	Bischoff, A.; Linn, J.; Hagen, H. (1970) Evaluations of Pest
Control Programs: Lab Project Number: FW-1-R-8: I-4. Unpublished study
prepared by Shell Development Co., Union Carbide Company, State
Department of Public Health and Mosquito Abatement Districts. 12 p. 

44598600	US EPA (1998) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb and Fonofos. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44598601	Pickering, Q.; Gilliam, W. (1982) Toxicity of aldicarb and
fonofos to the early-life-stage of the fathead minnow. Arch. Environ.
Contam. Toxicol. 11:699-702. 

44598700	Hercules, Inc. (1998) Submission of Toxicity, Product
Chemistry, Exposure and Risk Assessment Data in Support of the Petition
for Tolerance of (inert ingredients). Transmittal of 9 Studies. 

44598701	van Straten, S. (1998) Volatile Compounds in Food (Naturally
Occurring (inert ingredients)). Unpublished study prepared by TNO. 15 p.


44598702	The Committee of Flavour Experts of the Council of Europe.
(1998) Monographs for (inert ingredients). Natural Flavouring
Substances, Their Sources, and Added Artificial Flavouring Substances
(5)4:2-3. 

44598703	Opdyke, D. (1978) Fragrance raw material monographs for (inert
ingredients). Food and Cosmetics Toxicology (16):853-861. 

44598704	Palazzolo, R. (1963) Acute Toxicity Studies on (inert
ingredients): (Acute Oral Toxicity and Eye Irritation) (in Rats and
Rabbits): Lab Project Number: 92-2F. Unpublished study prepared by
Industrial Bio-Test Labs., Inc. 12 p. 

44598705	Nelson, L.; Kundzin, M. (1968) Three-Month Dietary Feeding in
Albino Rats: (inert ingredients): Lab Project Number: 92-2A. Unpublished
study prepared by Hazleton Labs., Inc. 52 p. 

44598706	Kohn, F. (1963) 90-Day Subacute Oral Toxicity of (inert
ingredients) in Albino Rats: Lab Project Number: 92-2E. Unpublished
study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs, Inc. 50 p. 

44598707	Kohn, F. (1964) Two-Year Chronic Oral Toxicity Study of (inert
ingredients) in Albino Rats: Lab Project Number: 92-2C. Unpublished
study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs., Inc. 114 p. 

44598708	Cervenka, H. (1964) Two-Year Chronic Oral Toxicity of (inert
ingredients) in Beagle Dogs: Lab Project Number: 92-2D. Unpublished
study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs., Inc. 83 p. 

44598709	Safe, S. (1994) Environmental and dietary (inert ingredients)
and human health: is there a problem Environmental Health Perspectives
13(103):346-351. 

44613200	Rhone-Poulenc (1998) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in
Support of the Registration of Temik 15G Brand Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44613201	Norris, F. (1998) Aldicarb: Mobility in Soil After Application
to Florida Ridge Soils Under the Best Management Plan: Lab Project
Number: 96T09666: 45613: 95-199-001. Unpublished study prepared by
HydroScience, Inc. and Agvise Laboratories, Inc. 1586 p. 

44636100	Rhone Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Toxicity Data in
Support of the Registration of Temik 15 G. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44636101	Tyl, R.; Ross, W.; Myers, C. (1998) Assessment of
Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats Following Topical Application of
Temik 15G Grit for Three Weeks: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
65C-7202. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 160
p. {870.3200} 

44678000	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Environmental
Fate and Residue Chemistry Data in Support of the Reregistration of the
Aldicarb Containing Product Temik 15G Brand Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44678001	Norris, F.; Pickrell, S. (1998) Aldicarb: Mobility in Soil
After Application to Florida Ridge Soils Under the Best Management Plan:
Final Report: Lab Project Number: 96T09666: 45640: 95-119-001.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company, and
HydroScience, Inc. 1917 p. 

44699600	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Submission of
Toxicity, and Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 3 Studies. 

44699601	Goldman, L.; Beller, M.; Jackson, R. (1990) Aldicarb food
poisonings in California, 1985-1988: toxicity estimates for humans.
Archives of Environmental Health 45(3): 141-147. 

44699602	Goldman, L.; Smith, D.; Neutra, R. et al. (1990) Pesticide food
poisoning from contaminated watermelons in California, 1985 (Aldicarb).
Archives of Environmental Health 45(4): 229-236. 

44699603	Hirsch, G.; Mori, B.; Morgan, B. et al. (1987) Report of
illnesses caused by aldicarb-contaminated cucumbers. Food Additives and
Contaminants 5(2): 155-160. 

44719300	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Risk Assessment
and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb
Containing Products Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide, and Temik
Brand 15G CP Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44719301	Barraj, L.; Watters, J. (1998) Assessment of the Potential
Acute Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Food and Water: Lab Project
Number: ALDICARB 98-02. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
Company. 99 p. 

44734900	Rhone-Poulenc AG Company (1999) Submission of Toxicity Data in
Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik
15G Grit. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44734901	Tyl, R.; Ross, W.; Myers, C. (1998) Assessment of
Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats Following Topical Application of
Temik 15G for Three Weeks: Amended Final Report: Lab Project Number:
65C-7202: RT98-GRIT: RTI-671. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 164 p. {OPPTS 870.3200} 

44845100	Carbamate Market Basket Survey Task Force (1999) Submission of
Residue Chemistry Data in Support of the Registration of Carbamate.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44845101	Carringer, S. (1999) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket
Survey: Interim Study Report: Lab Project Number: TCI-99-001: CARDC
1336: ML98-0768-CMB. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences,
Inc. and Morse Laboratories, Inc. 471 p. 

44847400	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1999) Submission of Product
Chemistry, Toxicity, Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in Support of the
Petition for Tolerance of Aldicarb in/on Bananas. Transmittal of 5
Studies. 

44847401	Helfant, L. (1999) Product Chemistry: Banana In-Plant System:
Lab Project Number: 98005LJH. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 58 p. {OPPTS 830.1550, 830.1620, 830.1670,
830.1800, 830.6302, 830.6304, 830.6315, 830.7300, 830.7000} 

44847402	Carringer, S. (1998) Temik 15 GG: Magnitude of Total Aldicarb
Residues in Banana RAC from Stem Injection Treatment (Central and South
America): Final Study Report: Lab Project Number: 97T112971: 45655:
12971-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. and
McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 417 p. {OPPTS 860.1500} 

44847403	Carringer, S. (1998) Temik 15 GG: Magnitude of Total Aldicarb
Residues in Banana Processed Fractions from Stem Injection Treatment
(Central and South America): Lab Project Number: 97TI13621: 45656:
13621-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. and
McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 268 p. 

44847404	Szuter, S. (1998) Aldicarb: Storage Stability of Total Aldicarb
Residues in Banana RAC Pulp and Peel and the Processed Fractions of
Puree and Chips: Interim Study Report: Lab Project Number: MK12-97:
90021. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. and McKenzie
Laboratories, Inc. 327 p. {OPPTS 860.1380} 

44847405	Barraj, L. (1999) Assessment of the Potential Acute Dietary
Exposure to Aldicarb in Water and Foods, Including Bananas: Lab Project
Number: 99-01. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 118
p. 

44860100	Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1999) Submission of Reduced-Risk
Pesticide Rationale for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44860101	Aldridge, K.; Ortego, L.; Rieth, J. et al. (1999) Reduced Risk
and Organophosphate (OP) Replacement Rationale for Aldicarb Use on
Bananas-the Banana In-Plant System: Lab Project Number: AS-07-99.
Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 251 p. 

44929700	Carbamate Market Basket Survey Task Force (1999) Submission of
Residue Data in Support of the Registrations of the Aldicarb, Carbaryl,
Methomyl, Oxamyl, and Thiodicarb Containing Products Temik 15G CP, Temik
15G Lock'n Load, Temik 15G Lock'n Load-CA, Temik 15G NW, Sevin 4F, Sevin
80WSP, Sevin XLR Plus, Lannate LV, Lannate SP, Vydate C-LV, Vydate L,
and Larvin 3.2. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44929701	Carringer, S. (1999) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket
Survey: Interim Study Report-No.2: Lab Project Number: TCI-99-001:
ML98-0768-CMB: TCI-99-001/CARDC 133. Unpublished study prepared by
Novigen Sciences, Inc.; Morse Laboratories, Inc.; Colorado Analytical
Research and Development Corporation. 546 p. 

44985600	Carbamate Market Basket Survey Task Force (1999) Submission of
Residue Chemistry Data in Support of the Reregistration of Carbamate
Containing Products Temik 15G, 15G Lock'n Load, 15G Lock'n Load and 15G
NW, Sevin 4F, 80WSP and XLR Plus, Lannate LV and SP, Vydate C-LV and L
and Larvin 3.2. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

44985601	Carringer, S. (1999) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket
Survey: Interim Report-No. 3: Lab Project Number: TCI-99-001.
Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc., and Morse
Laboratories, Inc. 642 p. 

45068600	U.S. EPA (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the
Registration of Aldicarb and Methamidophos. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

45068601	Moser, V. (1999) Comparison of Aldicarb and Methamidophos
Neurotoxicity at Different Ages in the Rat: Behavior and Biochemical
Parameters. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 157:94-106. 

45068700	U.S. EPA (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the
Registration of Aldicarb and Methamidophos. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

45068701	U.S. EPA (1999) Letters to the Editor. Toxicology and Applied
Pharmacology 161:302-305. 

45079700	Aventis CropSciences (2000) Submission of Product Chemistry,
and Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb
Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 15G
Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Citrus Only, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide
for Use on Potatoes Only, and Temik Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 6 Studies. 

45079701	Tobia, A. (2000) Aldicarb: Absence of Justification for
Requiring a FQPA Factor for Aldicarb: Toxicology. Unpublished study
prepared by Aventis CropScience. 54 p. 

45079702	Tobia, A. (2000) Aldicarb: Response to FIFRA SAP Report of
February, 1999: Toxicology. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis
CropScience. 31 p. 

45079703	Lunchick, C.; Tobia, A. (2000) Rebuttal to the Aldicarb Data
Evaluation Record for the 21-Day Dermal Toxicity Study Assessment of
Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats Following Topical Applications of
Temik 15G Grit for Three Weeks MRID# 44636101. And Rebuttal to EPA
10/01/99 Review of: Additional Aldicarb 5 Day Rat Dermal Toxicity Study
Protocol (D259834 Aldicarb (098301)): Lab Project Number:
01ALD00/ADVENTIS: D259834 ALDICARB: 098301. Unpublished study prepared
by Aventis CropScience. 24 p. 

45079704	Tyl, R.; Ross, W.; Myers, C. (2000) Assessment of
Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats Following Topical Applications of
Temik 15G Grit for One Week: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
65C-07594: RTI-749. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle
Institute. 128 p. {OPPTS 870.3200} 

45079705	Tyl, R.; Anderson, S. (2000) The Toxicokinetics of Peripheral
Cholinesterase Inhibition from Orally Administered Aldicarb in Adult
Male CD Rats: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 65C-07532-100:
65C-07532-200: RTI-726. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle
Institute. 108 p. {OPPTS 870.8500} 

45079706	Linchick, C.; Powell, G. (2000) Temik Brand 15G-Quality Control
Data on Dust Control of Gypsum and Grit Formulations: Lab Project
Number: 02ALD00/AVENTIS. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis Crop
Science. 101 p. 

45150700	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Submission of
Toxicity Data in Support of the Registration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of
1 Study. 

45150701	Moser, V. (1999) Aldicarb Replication Study. Unpublished study
prepared by US EPA, National Health and Environmental Effects Research
Lab. 403 p. 

45164701	Carringer, S. (2000) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket
Survey: Final Report: Lab Project Number: TCI-99-001: METH-118: 98-03.
Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. and Morse
Laboratories. 3359 p. 

45167200	Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Risk Assessment and
Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Ethoprop. Transmittal
of 1 Study. 

45167201	Urtizberea, M. (1999) Worker Exposure Study During Application
in Banana Plantation with Temik 10G: Lab Project Number: SA 98337:
RPS/ALD/98072. Unpublished study prepared by ADME Bioanalyses. 156 p.
{OPPTS 875.1000} 

45178000	Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2
Studies. 

45178001	Ramanarayanan, T. (2000) Kinetics Modeling of Degradation of
Aldicarb and its Metabolites in Anaerobic Aquatic Condition: Lab Project
Number: B002970. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 30
p. 

45178002	Holmsen, J. (2000) Response to EPA Aldicarb Data Evaluation
Record 2, Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism of (carbon-14) Aldicarb
(Agency/EFED Review dated May 18, 2000): Lab Project Number: B002980.
Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 21 p. 

45181800	Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Product Chemistry Data
in Support of the Petition for Tolerance of Aldicarb in/on Bananas.
Transmittal of 3 Studies. 

45181801	Szuter, S. (2000) Aldicarb: Storage Stability of Total Aldicarb
Residues in Banana RAC Pulp and Peel and the Processed Fractions of
Puree and Chips: Final Report: Lab Project Number: MK12-97. Unpublished
study prepared by McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 415 p. {OPPTS 860.1380} 

45181802	Carringers, S. (2000) TEMIK 15GC: Magnitude of Total Aldicarb
Residues in Banana RAC from Stump Implant Treatment, Year 2 (Central and
South America): Final Report: Lab Project Number: 97T15173: B002854:
15173-01. Unpublished study prepared by McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 312
p. {OPPTS 860.1500} 

45181803	Gough, S. (2000) Aldicarb/Banana/ Residue Decline/ 1998-99:
Final Study Report: Lab Project Number: 46028: 98T16299: 16299-01.
Unpublished study prepared by McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 223 p. 

45185000	Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in
Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

45185001	Weiler, M. (2000) Addendum to Developmental Neurotoxicity Study
with Aldicarb in Rats: Lab Project Number: 03ALD000/AVENTIS. Unpublished
study prepared by Covance Laboratories, Inc. 413 p. {OPPTS 870.6300} 

45205500	Aventis CropScience. (2000) Submission of Exposure Data in
Support of the Petition for Tolerance of Aldicarb in/on Bananas.
Transmittal of 1 Study. 

45205501	Vergnon, J. (2000) Worker Exposure Study During Application in
Banana Plantation with Aldicarb Banana In-Plant System Sachets: Lab
Project Number: RPS/ALD/99051: 99011 HI. Unpublished study prepared by
Aventis Cropscience. 176 p. 

45433200	FIFRA Environmental Model Validation Task Force (2001)
Submission of Exposure Assessment Data in Support of the Validation of
PRZM. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

45433201	Jones, R.; Russell, M. (2001) FIFRA Environmental Model
Validation Task Force: Final Report. Unpublished study prepared by FIFRA
Environmental Model Validation Task Force. 768 p. 

45451400	Aventis CropSciecne (2001) Submission of Toxicity, Risk
Assessment and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of
Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

45451401	Tobia, A. (2001) Scientific Response to Issues Raised in the
EPA's February 8, 2001 HED HIARC Report on the Re-Evaluation of
Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 289 p. 

45467500	Aventis CropScience (2001) Submission of Toxicity Data in
Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

45467501	Tyl, R. (2000) Responses to: Health Effects Division Data
Evaluation Records (DER No. 013268: Aldicarb, TEMIK 15G Grit 21-Day
Dermal Toxicity Study and DER 014169: Aldicarb, TEMIK 15G Grit 5-Day
Dermal Toxicity Study): Lab Project Number: 01GSP2001. Unpublished study
prepared by Aventis CropScience. 19 p. 

45529100	Aventis CropScience (2001) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
Study. 

45529101	Hodges, L. (2001) Review of the Reregistration Eligibility
Decision Draft Chapter on Environmental Fate and Ecological Effects:
Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 94 p. 

45592100	Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Pesticide Use,
Environmental Fate, Toxicity and Product Chemistry Data in Support of
the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G
Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for
Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Citrus Only,
and Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potato. Transmittal
of 17 Studies. 

45592101	Scarborough, T. (2001) 1999-2000 TEMIK User Studies.
Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 78 p. 

45592102	McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D. (1987) Aldicarb Vapor Pressure: Lab
Project Number: 40052: 803P15. Unpublished study prepared by
Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 9 p. 

45592103	McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D. (1987) Design and Validation of High
Flow Apparatus for Vapor Pressure Determinations: Lab Project Number:
40182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. 20 p. 

45592106	Allan, J. (2001) The Route and Rate of Degradation of
(s-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb in Two Soils under Laboratory Aerobic
Conditions at 25 (Degrees Celcius): Interim Report: Lab Project Number:
601YT: B003572. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 120
p. 

45592107	Jesudason, P. (2001) Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism of
(S-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb Under Laboratory Conditions at 25
Degrees Celcius: Lab Project Number: 602YT: B003556. Unpublished study
prepared by Aventis CropScience and AGVISE Laboratories, Inc. 127 p. 

45592200	US EPA (2002) Submission of Exposure, Risk, Pesticide Use,
Toxicity, Safety, Residue, and Environmental Fate Data. Transmittal of
50 Studies. 

45592235	People, S.; Maddy, K.; Smith, C. (1978) Occupational Exposure
to Temik (Aldicarb) as Reported by California Physicians for 1974-1976.
Veterinary and Human Toxicology 20:321-324. 

45602900	Aventis Cropscience (2002) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing
Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb
Pesticide for Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on
Citrus Only, Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide and Temik Brand 15G NW
Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potato. Transmittal of 4 of 21 Studies. 

45602901	Lemley, A.; Zhong, W. (1983) Kinetics of Aqueous Base and Acid
Hydrolysis of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. Journal
of Environmental Science Health B18(2):189-206. 

45602902	Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (1983) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb,
Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. Environmental Toxicology and
Chemistry 2:147-153. 

45602903	Lemley, A.; Zhong, W. (1984) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb,
Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone at Parts per billion Levels in
Aqueous Mediums. Journal Agricultural Food Chemistry 32:714-719. 

45602904	Lightfoot, E.; Thorne, P.; Jones, R. et al. (1987) Laboratory
Studies on Mechanisms for the Degradation of Aldicarb, Aldicarb
Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
6:377-394. 

45632500	Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Product Chemistry Data
in Support of the Amended Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide, TEMIK Brand 15G CP Aldicarb Pesticide, TEMIK Brand 15G
Aldicarb Pesticide for Sale and Use in California Only and TEMIK Brand
15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 4 Studies. 

45632501	Helfant, L. (2002) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Product
Chemistry: Lab Project Number: 021802LJH: B003770. Unpublished study
prepared by Aventis CropScience. 33 p. {OPPTS 830.1550, 830.1650} 

45649100	Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Product Chemistry Data
in Support of the Registration of TEMIK Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide and
TEMIK Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide for Agricultural Use. Transmittal of
1 Study. 

45649101	Helfant, L. (2002) TEMIK Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide Product
Chemistry: Lab Project Number: 040102LJH. Unpublished study prepared by
Aventis CropScience. 21 p. {OPPTS 830.1550 and 830.1650} 

45739800	Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing
Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb
Pesticide for Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on
Citrus Only, Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide and Temik Brand 15G NW
Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potatoe. Transmittal of 2 Studies. 

45739801	Allan, J. (2002) The Route and Rate of Degradation of
(S-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb in 2 Soils Under Laboratory Aerobic
Conditions at 25 Degrees C: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 601YT:
B003965. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 167 p. 

45739802	Allan, J. (2002) The Route and Rate of Degradation of
(S-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb Sulfone in 2 Soils Under Laboratory
Aerobic Conditions at 25 Degrees C: Lab Project Number: 607YT: B003573.
Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 101 p. 

45906800	Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Environmental Fate Data
in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products
Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb
Pesticide for Agriculture Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on
Citrus Only, Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Sale and Use in
California Only, Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on
Potatoes. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

45906801	Allan, J. (2002) The Route and Rate of Degradation of
(S-Methyl-Carbon 14)-Aldicarb Sulfone in Two Soils Under Laboratory
Aerobic Conditions at 25 (Degrees) C (Amended Report to Study 607YT,
Document Number B003573): Lab Project Number: B004162: 607YT: B003573.
Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 102 p. 

46065200	Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Product Chemistry, Risk
and Exposure Data in Support of the Registration of Temik Brand 15G
Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

46065201	Helfant, L.; Ligon, R. (2003) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide Product Chemistry. Project Number: PC030417, B004379, CM/62.
Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 82 p.

46065203	Fish, J. (2003) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Formulation
Development Importance of Formulation on Application Uniformity, Worker
Safety and Customer Satisfaction. Project Number: JDF2003/1. Unpublished
study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 12 p.

46065204	Ligon, R. (2001) Three Year Storage Evaluation of Temik 15 G
Gypsum. Project Number: WOODBINE/061501. Unpublished study prepared by
Bayer Cropscience LP. 25 p.

46100300	Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Product Chemistry Data
in Support of the Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.
Transmittal of 1 Study.

46100301	Lunchick, C. (2003) Bayer CropScience Comments Regarding Dust
Content of Bayer Brand Aldicarb Formulations and Its Relationship to
Operator Exposure Potential. Project Number: WOODBINE/08180, CL072003.
Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 68 p.

46131000	Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support
of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand
15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for
Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Citrus Use, Temik
Brand 15G Aldicarb for Sale and Use in California Only, and Temik Brand
15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potatoe. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46131001	Cameron, A. (2003) Supplementary Report to: A Safety and
Tolerability Study of Aldicarb at Various Dose Levels in Healthy Male
and Female Volunteers: Final Report. Project Number: 003237,
SOP/REC/030. Unpublished study prepared by Inveresk Research
International and BCG (Europe) Ltd. 136 p.

46340600	Bayer CropScience LP (2004) Submission of Residue, Risk and
Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal
of 1 Study.

46340601	Barraj, L.; Tomerlin, J.; Daniels, C. (2001) Assessment of the
Potential Acute Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Water and Foods,
Including Bananas. Project Number: ALDICARB/01/01, 12971/01, 12971/02.
Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 168 p.

46427600	Bayer CropScience LP (2004) Submission of Exposure and Risk
Data in Support of the Registration of Carbamate Products. Transmittal
of 1 Study.

46427601	Pandian, M. (2004) USDA Pesticide Data Program (PDP) Monitoring
Data for Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment. Project Number:
DAL119/04. Unpublished study prepared by Infoscientific.Com, Inc. 86 p.

46466400	Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Residue Data in
Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik
Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46466401	Movassaghi, S.; Daussin, S.; Hanzas, J. (2005) Surface Water
Monitoring for Residues of Aldicarb in High Use Areas in the United
States: Final Study Report. Project Number: 00T30605, B004894.
Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer Corp. and
Agvise Inc. 1553 p.

46542800	Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk
Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
Study.

46542802	Hodges, L. (2005) Review of the Preliminary Environmental Fate
and Ecological Effects (EFED) Risk Assessment for the Aldicarb
Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer
CropScience LP. 66 p.

46571300	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Submission of
Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal
of 1 Study.

46571301	U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National
Cancer Institute (1979) Bioassay of Aldicarb for Possible
Carcinogenicity: NCI/CG/TR/136. Bethesda, MD: US National Institutes of
Health. 119 p. NIH Publication no. 79-1391.

46579100	Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk
Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb and Isoproturon.
Transmittal of 2 Studies.

46579101	Urtizberea, M. (1999) Worker Loader and Applicator Exposure
Study During Application in Citrus Plantation with Temik 10G. Project
Number: R009475, SA/98148. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer
Cropscience. 175 p.

46613000	Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk
Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
Study.

46613001	Tobia, A. (2005) Bayer Cropscience Response to EPA Request for
Clarification Concerning the 1992 Wyld et al. Aldicarb Study with Human
Volunteers. Project Number: BCS/003237/1, 003237. Unpublished study
prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 59 p.

46618000	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Submission of
Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal
of 1 Study.

46618001	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997) NHEERL/EPA Study
with Aldicarb: Initial Measurements of ChE Activity in Rat Brain (AE1).
Unpublished study. 2 p.

46627800	Bayer CropScience (2005) Submission of Exposure, Risk and
Safety Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of
3 Studies.

46627801	Hodges, L. (2005) Response to the Phase 3 Environmental Fate
and Ecological Effects (EFED) Risk Assessment for the Aldicarb
Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer
CropScience LP. 70 p.

46627802	Hall, L.; Shaw, R.; Fish, J.; et. al. (2005) Temik 15G Brand
Aldicarb: Product Usage and Methods of Application: Revised Version.
Project Number: G201361. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience
LP. 34 p.

46627803	Hovis, A. (2005) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Product
Stewardship Review. Project Number: AH81005. Unpublished study prepared
by Bayer CropScience LP. 13 p.

46638100	Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Risk and Exposure
Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1
Study.

46638101	Barraj, L.; Daniels, C. (2004) Drinking Water Consumption
Survey. Project Number: 04/01, 8/000/B0F0/0904/0001. Unpublished study
prepared by Exponent. 40 p.

46655400	Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk
Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2
Studies.

46655401	Moore, D.; Thompson, R.; Purbrick, S. (2005) Problem
Formulation for the Refined Aquatic Risk Assessment of Aldicarb. Project
Number: 201373, 88380. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox
Environmental Inc. 31 p.

46655402	Moore, D.; Purbrick, S.; Thompson, R. (2005) Problem
Formulation for the Refined Wildlife Risk Assessment of Aldicarb.
Project Number: 201374, 88380. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox
Environmental Inc. 37 p.

46765100	Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1980) Submission of
Toxicity Data in Support of the Registration of Temik 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

46765101	Godek, E.; Dolak, M.; Matthews, R.; et. al. (1980) Ames
Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test: Aldicarb Sulfoxide. Project Number:
PH/301/UC/002/80. Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Laboratories.
14 p.

46765102	Godek, E.; Dolak, M.; Matthews, R.; et. al. (1980) Ames
Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test: Aldicarb Sulfone. Project Number:
PH/301/UC/003/80. Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Laboratories.
14 p.

46792600	Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Pesticide Use in
Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik
15G. Transmittal of 1 Study. 

46792601	Hall, L. (2006) Temik Brand 15G Aldicab Pesticide Crop and
Geographical Usage Information (A Reference Provided for an Endangered
Species Assessment of Aldicarb). Project Number: G201481. Unpublished
study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 76 p.

46793700	Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product
Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 5 Studies. 

46793701	Jones, R.; Ramanarayanan, T. (2006) Temik Brand15G Aldicarb
Pesticide: Summary of Five Retrospective Ground Water Monitoring Studies
Conducted for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in the Pacific Northwest,
California, Texas, Mississippi Delta and the Southeast Regions fo the
United States in 2005. Project Number: RAVY010. Unpublished study
prepared by Bayer Corp. 27 p.

46793702	Freeseman, P.; Jones, R.; Lee, R.; et. al. (2006) A
Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and its
Metabolites in the Pacific Nothwest: (Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb). Project
Number: RAAVY005, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer
Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 1033 p.

46793704	Mosier, D.; Jones, R.; Nandihalli, U.; et. al. (2006) A
Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and its
Metabolites in Texas: (Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide). Project
Number: RAAVY007, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer
Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 749 p.

46793705	Wyatt, D.; Jones, R.; Nandihalli, U.; et. al. (2006) A
Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and its
Metabolites in the Mississippi Delta Region: (Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide). Project Number: RAAVY008, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished
study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 690 p.

46793706	Lee, R.; Jones, R.; Wyatt, D.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective
Groundwater Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in the
Southeastern United States. Project Number: RAAVY009, YT/01/01, B003390.
Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc.
2955 p.

46796100	Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Toxicity, Exposure
and Risk Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb
Containing Product Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 3
Studies.

46796101	Ramanarayanan, T. (2006) Refined Aquatic Ecological Exposure
Assessment for Total Carbamate Residues From Aldicarb. Project Number:
MEAVY006. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. 75 p.

46796102	Moore, D.; Thompson, R.; Purbrick, S. (2006) Refined Aquatic
Risk Assessment for Aldicarb. Project Number: 201482. Unpublished study
prepared by Cantox Environmental Inc. 234 p.

46796103	Moore, D.; Purbrick, S.; Teed, R.; et. al. (2006) Refined
Wildlife Risk Assessment for Aldicarb. Project Number: 201483, 88390.
Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental Inc. 493 p.

46796600	Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Exposure and Risk
Data in Support of the Reregistration Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2
Studies. 

46796601	Young, B.; Mihlan, G.; Lantz, J.; et. al. (2006)
CARES-compatible Dietary Minute Module (DMM) Version 2.2 Build 7.8.9
(3/14/06). Project Number: G201503. Unpublished study prepared by
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. and Infoscientific.Com. 38 p.

46796602	Kelly, I.; Lantz, J.; Mihlan, G.; et. al. (2006)
CARES-compatible Dietary Minute Module (DMM) Version 2.2 Build 7.8.9
(3/14/2006): Technical Manual. Project Number: G201504. Unpublished
study prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 27 p.

46819500	Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Environmental Fate
Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product
Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46819501	Lenz, M.; Jones, R.; Wyatt, D.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective
Groundwater Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and Its Metabolites in
California. Project Number: RAAVY006, 004/11333/00, YT/01/01.
Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc.
767 p.

46834000	Interregional Research Project No. 4 (2006) Submission of Fate
Data in Support of the Registration of Citrus Fruits Group 10.
Transmittal of 1 Study.

46834001	Chen, H. (2006) Crop Grouping Petition Citrus Fruits Group 10,
Technical Amendment to 40 CFR 180.41 (c)(10) and 180.1 (h). Unpublished
study prepared by Interregional Research Project No. 4 and U.S. Dept. of
Agriculture. 303 p.

46857900	Interregional Research Project No 4 (2006) Submission of
Residue Data. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46857901	Chen, H. (2006) Crop Grouping Petition Pome Fruit Group 11,
Technical Amendment. Project Number: A/27200/16/06. Unpublished study
prepared by Interregional Research Project No. 4. 390 p.

46873100	Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Exposure and Risk
Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb Product Containing
Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46873101	Best, L.; Brewer, L.; Klaine, S.; et. al. (2006) Refined
Ecological Risk Assessment for Aldicarb Expert Peer Review Panel Process
and Comments. Project Number: EPR/32306. Unpublished study prepared by
Bayer CropScience LP. 10 p.

46891400	Bayer CropScience (2006) Submission of Risk and Exposure Data
in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 5 studies.

46891401	Tobia, A.; Blacker, A. (2006) Bayer CropScience's Assessment
and Rebuttal of the Reference Dose as Proposed by EPA in the Health
Effects Division Revised Preliminary Human Helath Risk Assessment for
Aldicarb Issued on May 12, 2006. Project Number: G201557. Unpublished
study prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 16 p.

46891402	Lantz, J.; Young, B.; Jones, R.; *et. al. (2006) Aldicarb Acute
Dietary Risk Assessment Including Food and Drinking Water Volume 1.
Project Number: G201350. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Crop
Science LP. 219 p.

46891403	Kelly, I.; Lantz, J.; Mihlan, G.; *et. al. (2006) Incorporating
Rapid Reversibility into the Dietary Risk Assessment for Aldicarb.
Project Number: G201550. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Crop
Science LP. 33 p.

46891405	Hall, L. (2006) The Benefits to Agriculture of Temik Brand 15G
Aldicarb Pesticide. Project Number: G201529. 126 p.

46891406	Fischer, D.; Ramanarayanan, T.; Jones, R. (2006) Response to
the EPA Environmental Risk Assessment for the Aldicarb Reregistration
Eligibility Decision. Project Number: G201560. Unpublished study
prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 23 p.

46898900	Bayer CropScience (2006) Submission of Efficacy Data in Support
of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46898901	Blacker, A.; Jones, R.; Kelly, I.; et. al.; (2006) Aldicarb:
Human Health Risk Assessment for Use on Currently Registered and Pending
Registrations as of May 2006. Project Number: G201555. Unpublished study
prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 86 p.

47061700	Interregional Research Project NO.4. (2007) Submission of
Residue Data in Support of the Petition for Tolerance of Stone Fruits
Group. Transmittal of 1 Study.

47061701	Chen, H. Crop Grouping Petition-Stone Fruit Group 12, Technical
Amendment To 40 CFR 180.41 (C) 12 And 180.1 (h). Project Number: 09896.
Unpublished study prepared by Interregional Research Project No. 4. 304
p.

47124600	Bayer CropScience (2007) Submission of Risk and Exposure Data
in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

47124601	Fisher, D.; Ramanarayanan, T.; Moore, D.; et. al.; (2007)
Effects Determination for California Red-Legged Frog Potentially Exposed
to Aldicarb. Project Number: 88380, 201692. Unpublished study prepared
by Cantox Environmental, Inc. 138 p.

47164600	Croplife America (2007) Submission of Environmental Fate and
Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Preservation of the California
Red Legged Frog. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

47164601	Moore, D.; Breton, R.; Rodney, S.; et. al.; (2007) Generic
Problem Formulation for California Red-Legged Frog. Project Number:
89320, 05232007. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental Inc.
87 p.

47164602	Holmes, C.; Vamshi, R. (2007) Data and Methodology Used for
Spatial Analysis of California Red Legged Frog Observations and
Proximate Land Cover Characteristics. Project Number: 3152007,
WEI/252/03. Unpublished study prepared by Waterborne Environmental, Inc.
(WEI). 19 p.

Appendix E. Generic Data Call-In (GDCI)   TC " Appendix E. Generic Data
Call-In (GDCI)" \f C \l "2"  

Note that a complete generic DCI, with all pertinent instructions, will
be sent to registrants under separate cover.

Appendix F. Product-Specific Data Call-In (PDCI)   TC " Appendix F.
Product-Specific Data Call-In (PDCI)" \f C \l "2"  

Note that a complete product-specific DCI, with all pertinent
instructions, will be sent to registrants under separate cover. 

Appendix G. EPA’s Batching of Aldicarb Products for Meeting Data
Requirements for Reregistration  TC " Appendix G. EPA’s Batching of
Aldicarb Products for Meeting Data Requirements for Reregistration" \f C
\l "2"  

In an effort to reduce the time, resources and number of animals needed
to fulfill the acute toxicity data requirements for reregistration of
products containing ALDICARB as the active ingredient, the Agency has
batched products which can be considered similar for purposes of acute
toxicity. Factors considered in the sorting process include each
product's active and inert ingredients (identity, percent composition
and biological activity), type of formulation (e.g., emulsifiable
concentrate, aerosol, wettable powder, granular, etc.), and labeling
(e.g., signal word, use classification, precautionary labeling, etc.). 
Note that the Agency is not describing batched products as
"substantially similar" since some products within a batch may not be
considered chemically similar or have identical use patterns.

Using available information, batching has been accomplished by the
process described in the preceding paragraph. Notwith-standing the
batching process, the Agency reserves the right to require, at any time,
acute toxicity data for an individual product should the need arise. 

Registrants of products within a batch may choose to cooperatively
generate, submit or cite a single battery of six acute toxicological
studies to represent all the products within that batch. It is the
registrants' option to participate in the process with all other
registrants, only some of the other registrants, or only their own
products within a batch, or to generate all the required acute
toxicological studies for each of their own products.  If a registrant
chooses to generate the data for a batch, he/she must use one of the
products within the batch as the test material.  If a registrant chooses
to rely upon previously submitted acute toxicity data, he/she may do so
provided that the data base is complete and valid by today's standards
(see acceptance criteria attached), the formulation tested is considered
by EPA to be similar for acute toxicity, and the formulation has not
been significantly altered since submission and acceptance of the acute
toxicity data. Regardless of whether new data is generated or existing
data is referenced, registrants must clearly identify the test material
by EPA Registration Number. If more than one confidential statement of
formula (CSF) exists for a product, the registrant must indicate the
formulation actually tested by identifying the corresponding CSF.

In deciding how to meet the product specific data requirements,
registrants must follow the directions given in the Data Call-In Notice
and its attachments appended to the RED. The DCI Notice contains two
response forms which are to be completed and submitted to the Agency
within 90 days of receipt.  The first form, "Data Call-In Response,"
asks whether the registrant will meet the data requirements for each
product.  The second form, "Requirements Status and Registrant's
Response," lists the product specific data required for each product,
including the standard six acute toxicity tests.  A registrant who
wishes to participate in a batch must decide whether he/she will provide
the data or depend on someone else to do so.  If a registrant supplies
the data to support a batch of products, he/she must select one of the
following options: Developing Data (Option 1), Submitting an Existing
Study (Option 4), Upgrading an Existing Study (Option 5) or Citing an
Existing Study (Option 6). If a registrant depends on another's data,
he/she must choose among: Cost Sharing (Option 2), Offers to Cost Share
(Option 3) or Citing an Existing Study (Option 6). If a registrant does
not want to participate in a batch, the choices are Options 1, 4, 5 or
6. However, a registrant should know that choosing not to participate in
a batch does not preclude other registrants in the batch from citing
his/her studies and offering to cost share (Option 3) those studies.

Six products were found which contain Aldicarb as the active ingredient.
 These products have been placed into two batches in accordance with the
active and inert ingredients and type of formulation. 

	

Batching Instructions:

NOTE: The technical acute toxicity values included in this document are
for informational purposes only.  The data supporting these values may
or may not meet the current acceptance criteria.

Batch 1	

          EPA Reg. No.	

              Percent Active Ingredient



	264-330	15.0

	264-417	15.0

	264-426	15.0

	264-523	15.0



Batch 2 	

          EPA Reg. No.	

              Percent Active Ingredient

	264-322	10.0

	264-331	10.0



Appendix H. List of Available Related Documents and Electronically
Available Forms  TC " Appendix H. List of Available Related Documents
and Electronically Available Forms" \f C \l "2"  

Pesticide Registration Forms are available at the following EPA internet
site:  http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/.	

Pesticide Registration Forms (These forms are in PDF format and require
the Acrobat reader) 

Instructions:

Print out and complete the forms. (Note: Form numbers that are bolded
can be filled out on your computer then printed.)

The completed form(s) should be submitted in hardcopy in accord with the
existing policy.

Mail the forms, along with any additional documents necessary to comply
with EPA regulations covering your request, to the following address for
the Document Processing Desk:

			Document Processing Desk (distribution code)*

			Office of Pesticide Programs (7504P)

			Environmental Protection Agency		

		1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

		Washington, DC 20460-0001

* Distribution Codes are as follows:

(APPL) Application for product registration

(AMEND) Amendment to existing registration

(CAN) Voluntary Cancellation

(EUP) Experimental Use Permit

(DIST) Supplemental Distributor Registration

(SLN) Special Local Need

(NEWCO) Request for new company number

(NOTIF) Notification

(PETN) Petition for Tolerance

(XFER) Product Transfer

DO NOT fax or e-mail any form containing “Confidential Business
Information” or “Sensitive Information.”

If you have any problems accessing these forms, please contact Nicole
Williams at (703) 308-5551 or by e-mail at
williams.nicole@epamail.epa.gov.  If you want these forms mailed or
faxed to you, please contact Lois White, white.lois@epa.gov or Floyd
Gayles, gayles.floyd@epa.gov.

If you have any questions concerning how to complete these forms, please
contact OPP’s ombudsperson for conventional pesticide products: Linda
Arrington, (703) 305-5446

The following Agency Pesticide Registration Forms are currently
available via the Internet at the following locations:

8570-1	Application for Pesticide Registration/Amendment
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-1.pdf

8570-4	Confidential Statement of Formula
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-4.pdf

8570-5	Notice of Supplemental Registration of Distribution of a
Registered Pesticide Product 
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-5.pdf



8570-17	Application for an Experimental Use Permit
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-17.pdf

8570-25	Application for/Notification of State Registration of a
Pesticide To Meet a Special Local Need 
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-25.pdf



8570-27	Formulator's Exemption Statement
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-27.pdf

8570-28	Certification of Compliance with Data Gap Procedures 
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-28.pdf



8570-30	Pesticide Registration Maintenance Fee Filing 
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-30.pdf

8570-32	Certification of Attempt to Enter into an Agreement with other
Registrants for Development of Data 
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-32.pdf

8570-34	Certification with Respect to Citations of Data  (in PR Notice
98-5)	http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices/pr98-5.pdf

8570-35	Data Matrix  (in PR Notice 98-5)
http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices/pr98-5.pdf

8570-36	Summary of the Physical/Chemical Properties  (in PR Notice 98-1)
http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices/pr98-1.pdf

8570-37	Self-Certification Statement for the Physical/Chemical
Properties  (in PR Notice 98-1)
http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices/pr98-1.pdf



Pesticide Registration Kit
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/registrationkit/

Dear Registrant:

	For your convenience, we have assembled an on-line registration kit
which contains the following pertinent forms and information needed to
register a pesticide product with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP):

The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) as Amended by the Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996.

Pesticide Registration (PR) Notices

a.	83-3 Label Improvement Program-Storage and Disposal Statements

b.	84-1 Clarification of Label Improvement Program 

c.	86-5 Standard Format for Data Submitted under FIFRA 

d.	87-1 Label Improvement Program for Pesticides Applied through
Irrigation Systems (Chemigation)

e.	87-6 Inert Ingredients in Pesticide Products Policy Statement

f.	90-1 Inert Ingredients in Pesticide Products; Revised Policy
Statement 

g.	95-2 Notifications, Non-notifications, and Minor Formulation
Amendments 

h.	98-1 Self Certification of Product Chemistry Data with Attachments 
(This document is in PDF format and requires the Acrobat reader.) 

Other PR Notices can be found at http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices.

Pesticide Product Registration Application Forms (These forms are in PDF
format and will require the Acrobat reader.)

a.	EPA Form No. 8570-1, Application for Pesticide Registration/Amendment

b.	EPA Form No. 8570-4, Confidential Statement of Formula 

c.	EPA Form No. 8570-27, Formulator's Exemption Statement 

d.	EPA Form No. 8570-34, Certification with Respect to Citations of Data


e.	EPA Form No. 8570-35, Data Matrix

General Pesticide Information (Some of these forms are in PDF format and
will require the Acrobat reader.)

Registration Division Personnel Contact List

Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) Contacts

Antimicrobials Division Organizational Structure/Contact List

53 F.R. 15952, Pesticide Registration Procedures; Pesticide Data
Requirements (PDF format)

40 CFR Part 156, Labeling Requirements for Pesticides and Devices (PDF
format)

40 CFR Part 158, Data Requirements for Registration (PDF format)

50 F.R. 48833, Disclosure of Reviews of Pesticide Data (November 27,
1985) 

	Before submitting your application for registration, you may wish to
consult some additional sources of information.  These include: 

The Office of Pesticide Programs' Web Site

The booklet "General Information on Applying for Registration of
Pesticides in the United States", PB92-221811, available through the
National Technical Information Service (NTIS) at the following address: 

			National Technical Information Service (NTIS)

		5285 Port Royal Road

		Springfield, VA 22161 

The telephone number for NTIS is (703) 605-6000. Please note that EPA is
currently in the process of updating this booklet to reflect the changes
in the registration program resulting from the passage of the FQPA and
the  reorganization of the Office of Pesticide Programs. We anticipate
that this publication will become available during the Fall of 1998. 

The National Pesticide Information Retrieval System (NPIRS) of Purdue
University's Center for Environmental and Regulatory Information
Systems. This service does charge a fee for subscriptions and custom
searches. You can contact NPIRS by telephone at (765) 494-6614 or
through their website.

The National Pesticide Telecommunications Network (NPTN) can provide
information on active ingredients, uses, toxicology, and chemistry of
pesticides. You can contact NPTN by telephone at (800) 858-7378 or
through their website:  http://npic.orst.edu

	

The Agency will return a notice of receipt of an application for
registration or amended registration, experimental use permit, or
amendment to a petition if the applicant or petitioner encloses with his
 submission a stamped, self-addressed postcard. The postcard must
contain the following entries to be completed by OPP: 

Date of receipt 

EPA identifying number 

Product Manager assignment 

Other identifying information may be included by the applicant to link
the acknowledgment of receipt to the specific application submitted. EPA
will stamp the date of receipt and provide the EPA identifying File
Symbol or petition number for the new submission. The identifying number
should be used whenever you contact the Agency concerning an application
for registration, experimental use permit, or tolerance petition.

To assist us in ensuring that all data you have submitted for the
chemical are properly coded and assigned to your company, please include
a list of all synonyms, common and trade names, company experimental
codes, and other names which identify the chemical (including "blind"
codes used when a sample was submitted for testing by commercial or
academic facilities). Please provide a CAS number if one has been
assigned.

 PAGE   

Page   PAGE  11  of   NUMPAGES  191 

Page   PAGE  20  of   NUMPAGES  191 

Page   PAGE  67  of   NUMPAGES  191 

 PAGE   

Page  PAGE   73  of   NUMPAGES  191 

