Page
1
of
52
UNITED
STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
WASHINGTON,
D.
C.
20460
OFFICE
OF
PREVENTION,
PESTICIDES
AND
TOXIC
SUBSTANCES
October
20,
2005
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
Pentachloronitrobenzene
(
PCNB).
Chronic
Dietary
Exposure
Assessments
for
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
(
RED).

PC
Code:
056502.
DP
Barcode:
D322231.

FROM:
Sherrie
L.
Kinard,
Chemist
Reregistration
Branch
2
Health
Effects
Division
(
7509C)

THROUGH:
Douglas
Dotson,
Chemist
(
RAB1)
Sheila
Piper,
Chemist
(
CEB)
Dietary
Exposure
Science
Advisory
Council
and
Alan
Nielsen,
Branch
Senior
Scientist
Reregistration
Branch
2
Health
Effects
Division
(
7509C)

TO:
Jill
Bloom,
Chemical
Review
Manager
Reregistration
Branch
2
Special
Review
and
Reregistration
Division
(
7508C)

Executive
Summary
A
revised
highly
refined
chronic
dietary
risk
assessment
has
been
conducted
for
pentachloronitrobenzene
(
PCNB)
using
the
Dietary
Exposure
Evaluation
Model
(
DEEMFCID
 
)
,
Version
2.03,
which
uses
food
consumption
data
from
the
USDA's
Continuing
Surveys
of
Food
Intakes
by
Individuals
(
CSFII)
from
1994­
1996
and
1998.
The
analyses
include
reduced
drinking
water
concentrations
attributable
to
proposed
mitigation
(
turf
restrictions
and
application
rate
reductions),
a
revised
diet
for
lactating
dairy
cows,
and
new
residue
estimates
for
milk
based
water.
These
analyses
were
performed
to
support
the
reregistration
eligibility
decision
(
RED).
Page
2
of
52
Acute
Dietary
Exposure
Characterization
No
adverse
effects
attributed
to
a
single
exposure
(
dose)
were
identified;
therefore,
no
acute
dietary
endpoint
was
selected
and
no
dietary
assessment
was
performed.

Chronic
Dietary
Exposure
Characterization
and
Results
This
chronic
dietary
risk
assessment
is
considered
to
be
a
highly
refined
assessment
using
all
available
monitoring
data,
percent
crop
treated
(%
CT)
information,
and
processing
factors.
However,
since
organizations
that
monitor
pesticide
levels
did
not
analyze
for
all
PCNB
metabolites
of
concern
(
84
identified
metabolites),
the
ratio
of
total
radioactive
residues
(
TRR)
to
PCNB
from
available
metabolism
studies
is
used
in
combination
with
available
monitoring
data
on
PCNB.
When
monitoring
data
were
unavailable
and
not
translatable,
the
TRR
values
were
used
directly
to
estimate
residues.

Two
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments
have
been
conducted.
The
first
one
includes
both
registered
and
unregistered
rotational
crop
commodities.
The
unregistered
rotational
crop
commodities
were
assessed
since
monitoring
data
demonstrate
a
considerable
number
of
detectable
residues
in
commodities
that
are
currently
unregistered.
The
detectable
residues
in
the
unregistered
commodities
are
believed
to
have
resulted
from
legal
applications
of
PCNB
to
registered
crops;
however,
due
to
the
unusually
long
half
life
of
1555
days
in
soil,
these
residues
are
believed
to
be
taken
up
by
the
rotational
crop.
This
issue
was
discussed
with
the
Chemistry
Science
Advisory
Council
(
ChemSAC)
which
has
concluded
that
rotational
crop
restrictions
to
registered
crops
beyond
1
year
is
not
enforceable.
Therefore,
there
is
no
practical
expectation
that
dietary
risks
from
PCNB
on
these
unregistered
crops
could
be
mitigated
by
further
use
of
rotational
crop
restrictions.
The
recommendation
from
the
ChemSAC
is
that
unregistered
crops
cannot
be
rotated
in
fields
where
PCNB
residues
may
exist.

The
assessment
include
that
includes
just
the
registered
commodities
of
PCNB
has
been
conducted
for
characterization
purposes
and
does
not
reflect
the
existing
total
dietary
risk
in
food
resulting
from
the
use
of
PCNB.

HED
notes
that
the
chronic
dietary
risk
estimates
reported
in
this
memorandum
are
subject
to
change
should
new
2004
monitoring
data
on
milk
samples
(
unavailable
yet)
from
United
States
Agriculture
Department,
Pesticide
Data
Program
(
USDA­
PDP)
indicate
higher
levels
of
PCNB
and
its
metabolites
than
what
has
been
assumed
in
this
assessment.

The
results
of
the
chronic
dietary
food
only
risk
assessments
show
that
the
risk
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
do
not
exceed
HED's
level
of
concern
(
100%
cPAD)
and
all
population
subgroups.
The
chronic
dietary
risk
estimates
to
registered
crops
only,
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
the
highest
exposed
population
subgroup,
children
1­
2
years
of
age,
were
10%
of
the
cPAD
and
26%
of
the
cPAD,
respectively.
The
chronic
dietary
risk
estimates
to
both
registered
and
unregistered
crops,
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
the
highest
exposed
population
subgroup,
children
1­
2
years
of
age,
were
12%
of
the
cPAD
and
34%
of
the
cPAD,
respectively.
Page
3
of
52
When
water
was
added
to
the
analysis,
the
dietary
risk
estimates
increased;
however,
did
not
exceed
HED's
level
of
concern
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
all
population
subgroups.
The
chronic
dietary
risk
estimates
to
registered
crops
and
water,
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
the
highest
exposed
population
subgroup,
all
infants
<
1
year
of
age,
were
32%
of
the
cPAD
and
77%
of
the
cPAD,
respectively.
The
chronic
dietary
risk
estimates
to
registered
and
unregistered
crops
and
water,
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
the
highest
exposed
population
subgroup,
all
infants
<
1
year
of
age,
were
33%
of
the
cPAD
and
79%
of
the
cPAD,
respectively.

Cancer
Dietary
Exposure
Characterization
HED's
Carcinogenicity
Peer
Review
Committee
(
CARC)
has
classified
PCNB
as
a
Group
C
­
possible
human
carcinogen
and
recommended
that
for
the
purpose
of
risk
characterization,
the
Reference
Dose
approach
be
used
for
quantification
of
the
human
cancer
risk.

I.
Introduction
Dietary
risk
assessment
incorporates
both
exposure
and
toxicity
of
a
given
pesticide.
For
acute
and
chronic
assessments,
the
risk
is
expressed
as
a
percentage
of
a
maximum
acceptable
dose
(
i.
e.,
the
dose
which
HED
has
concluded
will
result
in
no
unreasonable
adverse
health
effects).
This
dose
is
referred
to
as
the
population
adjusted
dose
(
PAD).
The
PAD
is
equivalent
to
the
Reference
Dose
(
RfD)
divided
by
the
special
FQPA
Safety
Factor.

For
acute
and
non­
cancer
chronic
exposures,
HED
is
concerned
when
estimated
dietary
risk
exceeds
100%
of
the
PAD.
References
which
discuss
the
acute
and
chronic
risk
assessments
in
more
detail
are
available
on
the
EPA/
pesticides
web
site:
"
Available
Information
on
Assessing
Exposure
from
Pesticides,
A
User's
Guide,"
6/
21/
2000,
web
link:
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
fedrgstr/
EPA­
PEST/
2000/
July/
Day­
12/
6061.
pdf
;
or
see
SOP
99.6
(
8/
20/
99).

The
most
recent
dietary
risk
assessment
for
PCNB
was
conducted
by
S.
Kinard
(
August
11,
2005,
D310084)
and
was
a
revision
of
a
previous
assessment
conducted
by
M.
Sahafeyan
(
March,
31,
2004).

II.
Residue
Information
PCNB
is
an
organochlorine
fungicide
registered
on
vegetables
(
cole
crops,
peppers,
beans,
peas)
and
field
crops
(
cotton,
peanuts,
potatoes).
PCNB
is
a
List
A
reregistration
chemical
that
was
the
subject
of
a
Registration
Standard
dated
6/
30/
86
and
a
Reregistration
Standard
Update
dated
6/
19/
90.
These
documents
summarized
regulatory
conclusions
on
the
available
residue
chemistry
data
and
specified
that
additional
data
were
required
for
the
purposes
of
reregistration.
Several
submissions
of
data
have
been
received
since
the
Reregistration
Standard
Update
was
issued.
Page
4
of
52
PCNB
Usage
Information
PCNB
formulations
are
currently
registered
to
Uniroyal
Chemical
Company
and
Amvac
Chemical
Corporation
for
use
on
food
and
feed
crops
as
a
flowable
concentrate
(
FlC),
water
dispersible
granular
(
WDG),
wettable
powder
(
WP),
emulsifiable
concentrate
(
EC),
granular
(
G),
dust
(
D),
and
as
ready­
to­
use
(
RTU)
formulations.
PCNB
products
are
sold
under
the
trade
name
QuintozeneTM.
These
products
may
be
applied
as
pre­
plant
soil
incorporated
applications,
infurrow
applications,
broadcast
applications,
banded
applications
using
ground
equipment,
and
as
seed
treatments.
The
maximum
total
application
rate
for
all
crops
ranges
from
1.5
lbs
ai/
A
for
hot
peppers
(
in­
furrow
application)
to
30
lbs
ai/
A
for
cole
crops
as
band,
broadcast,
or
row/
row
drench
type
of
application
(
draft
use­
closure
memo,
Jill
Bloom,
1/
23/
03).

Permanent
tolerances
for
PCNB
residues
have
been
established
in/
on
plant
raw
agricultural
commodities
(
RACs)
under
40
CFR
§
180.291,
and
"
interim
tolerances"
for
PCNB
residues
have
been
established
under
40
CFR
§
180.319.
A
permanent
tolerance
of
0.1
ppm
for
residues
of
PCNB
per
se
in/
on
cottonseed
has
been
established
[
40
CFR
§
180.291(
a)].
Permanent
tolerances
for
a
regional
registration
have
also
been
established
for
the
combined
residues
of
PCNB
and
its
metabolites,
pentachloroaniline
(
PCA)
and
methyl
pentachlorophenyl
sulfide
(
MPCPS,
also
abbreviated
as
PCTA)
in/
on
collards,
kale
and
mustard
greens
at
0.2
ppm
[
40
CFR
§
180.291(
b)].
"
Interim"
tolerances
for
residues
of
PCNB
per
se
have
also
been
established
at
0.1
ppm
in/
on
beans,
broccoli,
Brussels
sprouts,
cabbage,
cauliflower,
garlic,
peppers,
potatoes
and
tomatoes
and
at
1.0
ppm
in/
on
peanuts
[
40
CFR
§
180.319].
The
following
table
summarizes
tolerances
for
residues
of
PCNB.

Table
2.1.
Summary
of
Tolerances
Listed
in
the
Code
of
Federal
Regulations
Type
and
Magnitude
of
Tolerance
(
ppm)
Tolerance
Expression
Crop/
Commodity
40
CFR
Permanent,
0.1
ppm
PCNB
(
per
se)
cottonseed
180.291
(
a)

Regional
registration,
0.2
ppm
PCNB,
PCA,
MPCPS
(
also
known
as
PCTA)
collards,
kale,
mustard
greens
180.291
(
b)

Interim,
0.1
ppm
PCNB
(
per
se)
beans,
broccoli,
Brussels
sprouts,
cabbage,
cauliflower,
garlic,
peppers,
potatoes1,
tomatoes,
180.319
Interim,
1.0
ppm
PCNB
(
per
se)
peanuts
180.319
1.
The
only
potato
use
by
Uniroyal
is
as
a
Special
Local
Need
(
SLN).

The
Metabolism
Assessment
Review
Committee
(
MARC)
met
on
April
16th,
2003
to
determine
the
residues
of
concern
and
the
tolerance
expression
for
plants
and
livestock,
as
well
as
degradates
of
concern
in
water.
The
MARC
determined
that
the
residues
of
concern
are
all
metabolites
of
PCNB
identified
in
plant
and
livestock
metabolism
studies;
however,
the
tolerance
expression
for
PCNB
residues
of
concern
in
plant
and
livestock
commodities
includes
PCNB,
pentachloroaniline
Page
5
of
52
(
PCA),
and
pentachlorothioaniosle
(
PCTA)
[
Sahafeyan,
M.,
"
The
Outcome
of
the
HED
Metabolism
Assessment
Review
Committee
Held
on
April
16th,
2003
to
discuss
residues
of
concern
in
risk
assessment
and
tolerance
expression
of
Pentachloronitrobenzene
(
PCNB).
Chemical
056502,"
5/
27/
2003].

Residue
Data
Used
for
the
Refined
Chronic
Assessment
The
tolerance
expression
for
PCNB
residues
of
concern
in
plant
and
livestock
commodities
include
PCNB
as
well
as
the
metabolites
PCA
and
PCTA.
Of
the
two
major
food
residue
monitoring
programs,
only
Food
and
Drug
Administration
(
FDA)
routinely
analyzed
for
the
combined
residues
of
PCNB,
PCA,
and
PCTA.
PDP
only
randomly
analyzed
samples
for
residues
of
PCA
and
PCTA.
However,
since
MARC
concluded
that
PCNB
and
all
84
metabolites
are
of
concern,
and
the
monitoring
data
did
not
analyze
for
all
PCNB
metabolites
of
concern,
residues
have
been
estimated
using
TRR
from
the
available
metabolism
data
combined
with
the
available
monitoring
data
on
PCNB.
When
monitoring
data
were
unavailable
and
not
translatable,
the
TRR
values
were
used
directly
to
estimate
residues.

In
order
to
estimate
the
combined
total
residue
of
PCNB
and
its
84
metabolites
of
concern
from
residues
of
PCNB
alone
and/
or
from
residues
of
PCA,
an
approach
was
taken
to
use
the
total
radioactive
residue
(
TRR)
values
to
represent
the
total
toxic
residue
(
TTR)
so
as
not
to
underestimate
the
risk.
Had
there
been
a
metabolism
study
conducted
for
every
crop,
the
concentration
of
PCNB
and
all
its
identified
metabolites,
or
total
residues
of
concern
(
TTR),
would
potentially
be
equal
to
or
less
than
the
TRR
in
each
crop,
which
includes
extractable
as
well
as
unextractable
residues.
Another
reason
for
using
TRR
values
to
represent
TTR
is
that
the
unextractable
residues
of
PCNB
have
a
high
likelihood
of
having
a
polychlorinated
phenyl
structure
(
when
released
under
various
biochemical
enzymatic
reactions).
This
is
because
all
the
identified
extractable
metabolites
of
PCNB
were
found
to
be
of
the
polychlorinated
phenyl
nature,
and
therefore
were
considered
to
be
of
concern
by
the
MARC.
In
addition,
since
the
metabolism
study
for
each
crop
is
not
available,
the
metabolism
studies
for
PCNB
in/
on
potato,
peanut
and
cabbage
were
used
for
all
other
crops.
Table
2.2
below
contains
the
summary
of
the
results
of
metabolism
studies
in
peanut
and
potato.

Table
2.2.
Summary
of
Metabolism
Studies
for
Peanut
and
Potato.
PEANUT
(
5X
application
rate)
1
POTATO
(
1X
or
3X
application
rate)
2
Peanut
Nutmeat
Peanut
hay
1X
3X
PCNB
1.7
3.1
0.084
0.28
PCA
0
0
0.047
0.085
PCTA
0
8.7
0.039
0.096
total
Identified
1.7
15
0.722
2.13
total
characterized3
1.7
0.5
0.329
1.14
Total
extractable4
1.7
15.5
1.05
3.27
total
bound
0.02
0.9
0.075
0.351
TRR
1.72
16.3
1.12
3.54
TRR
/
PCNB
1.01
5.26
13.3
12.6
Page
6
of
52
TRR
/
PCA
­­­­­
­­­­
23.8
41.6
1.
Use
pattern
for
peanut:
two
banded
applications
of
[
14C]­
PCNB
totaling
10.0
lb
ai/
A
(
5X)
2.
Use
pattern
for
potato:
a
pre­
plant
incorporated
application
of
[
14C]­
PCNB
at
20
or
60
lb
ai/
A
(
1X
or
3X).
3.
Characterized
(
here)
=
sum
of
all
unidentified
extractable
residues
4.
Extractable
=
identified
+
characterized
In
this
dietary
risk
assessment,
the
ratio
of
TRR:
PCNB
from
the
potato
metabolism
study
is
used
for
most
of
the
crops.
This
is
because
the
TRR:
PCNB
ratio
from
the
potato
metabolism
study
does
not
depend
on
application
rate.
As
PCNB
application
is
almost
all
through
soil,
there
is
no
concern
about
the
difference
in
pre­
harvest
interval
between
the
crop
in
metabolism
study
and
the
translated
crops.

To
calculate
TRR,
the
ratio
of
TRR
to
PCNB
(
TRR:
PCNB)
from
metabolism
studies
and
PCNB
monitoring
data
(
from
PDP
or
FDA)
are
used
in
the
following
equation:

TRR/
PCNB
(
from
metabolism
studies)
X
PCNB
(
in
monitoring
samples)
=
TRR
(
in
monitoring
samples)

The
rationale
for
using
the
TRR:
PCNB
ratio
from
the
potato
metabolism
study
to
translate
to
other
crops,
except
Brassica
vegetables,
is
explained
below.

i)
Not
Using
TRR:
PCA
Ratio:
This
is
because
as
is
seen
in
table
2.2,
the
TRR:
PCA
ratio
in
the
potato
metabolism
study
increases
with
the
use
rate.
The
TRR:
PCA
ratio
is
24
for
a
1X
rate
whereas
the
ratio
is
42
for
a
3X
use
rate.
This
is
not
the
case
for
the
TRR:
PCNB
ratio
in
the
same
study
(
for
both
1X
and
3X
the
ratio
value
is
~
13).
This
information
gives
an
indication
that
the
same
trend
may
also
prevail
in
the
peanut
metabolism
study
where
this
information
cannot
be
verified
because
the
study
was
done
at
only
one
use
rate
(
the
TRR:
PCNB
may
be
independent
of
use
rate
whereas
the
TRR:
PCA
ratio
may
be
use
rate
dependent
in
the
peanut
metabolism
study).
The
dependence
of
the
TRR:
PCA
ratio
on
use
rate
makes
this
ratio
less
appropriate
for
translation
to
crops
with
application
rates
that
are
not
similar
to
peanut
or
potato.
As
PCNB
application
is
almost
all
through
soil
incorporation,
there
is
no
concern
about
the
difference
in
preharvest
interval
between
the
crop
in
the
metabolism
study
and
the
translated­
to
crops.

ii)
Not
Using
TRR:
PCNB
Ratio
from
the
Peanut
Metabolism
Study
Except
for
Peanut
Itself:
This
is
because
the
TRR:
PCNB
ratio
from
the
peanut
metabolism
study
(
peanut
and
hay)
is
lower
than
that
from
the
potato
metabolism
study
and
thus
it
is
a
less
conservative/
protective
approach.
In
addition,
the
ratio
from
the
cabbage
metabolism
study
cannot
be
obtained
for
comparison.

iii)
Not
Using
TRR:
PCNB
Ratio
for
Brassica
Crops:
For
Brassica
crops,
a
TRR
of
17.9
ppm
from
the
cabbage
metabolism
study
was
used.
This
is
because
the
submitted
cabbage
metabolism
study
lacks
estimates
for
residues
of
PCNB,
PCA
or
PCTA.
Since
the
use
rate
in
the
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
48
lb
ai/
A)
is
higher
than
the
registered
rate
for
cabbage
and
other
registered
Brassica
crops
(
30
lb
ai/
A),
the
estimated
TRR
of
17.9
ppm
is
not
expected
to
be
an
underestimate.
Processing
Factors
The
preliminary
review
of
submitted
processing
studies
(
DP
Barcode
D225392)
on
cottonseed
Page
7
of
52
indicates
that
these
studies
may
be
inadequate
or
inconclusive
due
to
a
high
LOQ
(
0.25
ppm
for
cotton
oil),
lack
of
recovery
data
(
for
crude
oil),
likelihood
of
PCA
presence,
and
presence
of
residues
in
untreated
control
samples.
Moreover,
PCA
residues
(
average
of
0.0064
ppm)
were
found
in
soapstock
which
is
commonly
added
to
cottonseed
meal.
While
these
studies
need
to
undergo
formal
review
for
a
definite
conclusion,
in
this
risk
assessment,
due
to
the
preliminary
indications
listed
above,
PCNB
and
its
metabolites
were
assumed
to
be
present
in
cottonseed
processed
commodities
and
default
DEEM
7.87
concentration
factors
were
used.

For
peanut
processed
commodities,
the
preliminary
review
of
submitted
processing
studies
(
DP
Barcode
D225392)
on
peanut
indicate
that
residues
of
PCNB
and
its
metabolites
concentrate
in
crude
oil
(
1.6X),
refined
oil
(
2.1X)
and
hulls
(
2.5X).
These
values,
based
on
preliminary
reviews,
were
used
for
this
risk
assessment
when
applicable.

For
potato
processed
commodities,
based
on
submitted
processing
studies
by
Uniroyal,
a
concentration
factor
of
5.4X
for
potato
with
peel
for
potato
wet
peels
was
used.
Although
processing
studies
by
Amvac
demonstrate
greater
concentration
of
PCNB
residues
in
potato
wet
peels
(
average
of
7X),
the
lower
concentration
factor
from
the
Uniroyal
potato
processing
studies
was
used
since
the
potato
peel
food
form
in
DEEM­
FCID
also
includes
potato
itself,
thus
lowering
the
concentration
of
residues.

For
tomato
processed
commodities,
based
on
the
submitted
processing
studies
on
dry
tomato
pomace
(
concentration
factor
of
63X),
a
concentration
factor
is
needed
for
dried
tomato;
however,
since
dry
pomace
has
a
different
texture
and
matrix
than
dried
tomato,
the
DEEM
7.87
default
value
(
14.3X)
for
dried
tomato
was
used.
Submitted
studies
indicate
that
residues
do
not
concentrate
in
tomato
puree
and
tomato
paste;
thus,
no
concentration
factor
was
used
for
these
tomato
food
forms.
Since
the
submitted
studies
for
tomato
puree
and
paste
indicate
that
residues
do
not
concentrate,
it
is
assumed
that
they
will
not
concentrate
in
juice.

Residue
Estimates
for
Registered
Crops
In
the
following
section,
residue
data,
ratios
of
TRR:
PCNB
from
metabolism
studies,
%
CT,
and
any
other
data
or
estimates
that
were
used
are
discussed
in
detail
for
individual
crops.
Table
2.5
at
the
end
of
this
section
summarizes
the
input
data
and
calculated
residues
for
each
crop.

Beans:
2000
and
2001
PDP
data
were
used
for
fresh
green
beans;
a
total
of
1427
samples
were
analyzed
for
PCNB
only
with
47
detectable
residues.
FDA
only
analyzed
one
bean
sample
(
Garbanzo
beans,
dried
or
paste)
for
PCNB.
The
1997­
1998
PDP
data
were
used
for
canned
and
frozen
green
bean.
The
ratio
of
TRR:
PCNB
(
13)
from
the
potato
metabolism
study
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern
based
on
the
amount
of
PCNB
residues
in
the
monitored
samples
and
the
average
%
CT
estimate
(
2%)
was
incorporated.

Brassica
Crops:
The
cabbage
metabolism
study
demonstrates
that
the
TRR
for
cabbage
is
17.9
ppm.
For
Brassica
crops,
(
i.
e.,
broccoli,
Brussels
sprouts,
cabbage,
cauliflower,
Chinese
broccoli,
Chinese
cabbage,
collards,
kale,
and
mustard
green)
a
TRR
of
17.9
ppm
was
used
directly
because
the
submitted
cabbage
metabolism
study
lacks
an
estimate
for
residues
of
PCNB,
PCA
or
PCTA.
Page
8
of
52
Since
the
use
rate
in
the
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
48
lb
ai/
A)
is
higher
than
the
registered
rate
for
cabbage
and
other
registered
Brassica
crops
(
30
lb
ai/
A),
the
estimated
TRR
of
17.9
ppm
is
not
expected
to
underestimate
the
risk.

The
average
%
CT
estimate
of
1%
was
used
for
broccoli,
cabbage,
Chinese
broccoli,
Chinese
cabbage,
collards,
kale
and
mustard
green,
and
13%
CT
and
2%
CT
estimates
were
used
for
Brussels
sprouts
and
cauliflower,
respectively
to
estimate
the
residue
values
used
in
this
assessment.

Cotton
:
No
monitoring
data
are
available
for
cotton
seed.
Consequently,
the
TRR
value
from
the
metabolism
studies,
after
correcting
for
the
difference
in
application
rate,
was
translated
to
cotton.
The
highest
TRR
value
per
application
rate
(
TRR/
rate)
was
determined
to
be
from
the
peanut
hay
metabolism
study
(
16.3/
10).
This
ratio
from
cabbage
or
potato
metabolism
study
is
17.8/
48
or
3.54/
60
respectively.
The
translated
TRR
from
the
peanut
hay
metabolism
study,
after
the
adjustment
for
the
application
rate
difference
(
16.3/
10
*
2.1),
was
3.3
ppm.
The
chronic
residue
estimate
was
calculated
using
the
adjusted
TRR
from
the
peanut
hay
metabolism
study
and
the
average
5%
CT.

Garlic:
No
monitoring
data
are
available
for
garlic.
Consequently,
the
TRR
value
from
the
metabolism
studies,
after
correcting
for
the
difference
in
application
rate,
was
translated
to
garlic.
The
highest
TRR
value
per
application
rate
(
TRR/
rate)
is
from
peanut
hay
metabolism
study
(
16.3/
10).
This
ratio
from
cabbage
or
potato
metabolism
study
is
17.8/
48
or
3.54/
60
respectively.
The
TRR
from
the
peanut
hay
metabolism
study,
after
the
adjustment
for
the
application
rate
difference
(
16.3/
10
*
20.6),
was
33
ppm.
The
chronic
residue
estimate
was
calculated
using
the
adjusted
TRR
from
the
peanut
hay
metabolism
study
and
the
average
%
CT
estimate
was
incorporated
(
1%).

Milk:
From
1996
to
1998,
inclusive,
PDP
analyzed
milk
samples;
a
total
of
1892
samples
were
analyzed
for
PCNB
only
with
a
LOD
of
0.001
ppm.
However,
unpublished
PDP
data
for
2004­
2005
did
analyze
for
residues
of
PCA
and
found
no
detectable
residues.
Although
no
detectable
residues
of
PCNB
were
found
in
the
published
1996­
1998
PDP
data,
this
data
could
not
be
used
in
this
dietary
assessment
for
milk
fat
since
the
published
1996­
1998
PDP
did
not
analyze
for
PCA
which
was
the
primary
residue
identified
in
milk
in
the
ruminant
metabolism
study
(
1989,
MRID
41341205,
MRID
41692802,
summarized
in
John
Abbots
memorandum,
DP
Barcode
158943,
4/
24/
96);
therefore,
to
estimate
secondary
residues
for
milk
fat,
the
TRR
value
from
the
ruminant
metabolism
study,
theoretical
dietary
burden,
and
%
CT
information
were
used.
A
25X
factor
(
the
milk
fat
portion
makes
up
4%
of
whole
milk)
was
incorporated
into
the
milk
fat
residue
estimate
to
account
for
the
assumption
that
PCNB
and
PCA
would
more
like
be
found
in
the
fat
than
in
the
water.
Further
discussion
of
residue
estimates
for
milk
fat
are
covered
under
livestock
commodities.

For
PCNB
residues
in
milk
based
water,
it
is
important
to
look
at
the
octanol­
water
coefficients
(
Kow)
and
solubility
of
both
PCNB
and
PCA
(
the
major
metabolite
found
in
milk).
Both
PCNB
and
PCA
have
high
Kows
and
are
insoluble
in
water;
therefore,
it
is
assumed
that
the
residues
would
be
present
in
milk
fat,
and
not
milk
water.
However,
PCNB
and
PCA
are
not
the
only
Page
9
of
52
residues
of
concern
and
we
cannot
assume
that
there
are
no
residues
of
concern
in
milk
based
water.
To
account
for
the
additional
minor
metabolites
that
may
be
present
in
milk
based
water,
an
assumption
of
the
PDP
LOD
(
0.001
ppm)
was
used.
This
assumption
was
based
on
the
fact
that
PDP
did
not
find
PCNB,
which
has
a
slightly
lower
Kow
and
is
more
soluble
in
water
than
the
major
metabolite
PCA;
therefore,
is
considered
to
be
a
conservative
estimate
for
milk
based
water.
Further
discussion
of
residue
estimates
for
milk
fat
are
covered
under
livestock
commodities.

Peanuts:
The
use
rate
for
peanuts
is
2­
10
lb
ai/
A
by
ground
or
aerial
application.
The
peanut
metabolism
study,
however,
was
done
with
PPI
application
of
10
lb
ai/
A.
The
PDP
analyzed
for
PCA
and
PCNB
in
peanut
butter
samples
during
the
year
2000.
Out
of
716
samples,
90
had
detectable
residues.
Out
of
the
90
detectable
residues,
89
samples
had
detectable
residues
of
PCA,
but
not
PCNB.
The
highest
residue
for
PCA
was
0.095
ppm
and
for
PCNB
was
0.02
ppm;
however,
these
monitoring
data
were
not
used
in
this
risk
assessment
because,
while
in
the
peanut
metabolism
study
there
was
no
detectable
residues
of
PCA,
it
is
PCA
that
is
detected
in
almost
all
of
the
samples
containing
residues
in
PDP
peanut
butter
data.
There
is
no
method
to
convert
the
PCA
residues
from
PDP
to
TRR.
The
reason
PCA
residues
appear
in
peanut
butter
monitoring
data
is
not
clear;
therefore,
they
were
not
used
for
peanuts.
To
estimate
the
chronic
residue
in
peanuts
for
this
assessment,
the
TRR
from
the
peanut
metabolism
study
was
adjusted
to
a
1X
rate
and
multiplied
by
the
average
%
CT
(
1.72/
5
X
1%
=
0.00344
ppm).
For
peanut
butter,
since
monitoring
data
are
available
(
PDP
2000),
the
average
of
the
monitoring
data
was
taken
after
summing
the
PCNB
and
PCA
residues
and
using
the
TRR:(
PCNB+
PCA)
ratio
for
peanut
nutmeat
(
5.3).
The
calculated
point
estimate
for
peanut
butter
is
0.0049
ppm.

Peppers,
sweet:
PDP
2000
and
2002
monitoring
data
are
available
for
sweet
bell
peppers.
A
total
of
924
samples
were
analyzed
for
PCNB
only
with
no
detectable
residues.
The
average
½
LOD
was
0.0021
ppm.
The
average
%
CT
(
1%)
was
incorporated
into
the
residue
estimate
for
sweet
peppers.
The
ratio
of
TRR/
PCNB
(
13)
from
the
potato
metabolism
study
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern
in
the
monitoring
samples.
The
application
method
in
the
potato
metabolism
study
and
the
registered
application
method
for
peppers
are
both
through
ground
application.

Pepper,
hot:
There
are
no
PDP
data
available
for
hot
peppers;
however,
limited
FDA
data
show
traces
of
total
PCNB
in
hot
peppers
imported
from
Mexico.
No
detectable
residues
were
found
in
the
FDA
data
for
domestic
hot
peppers.
Since
FDA
did
not
have
a
sufficient
number
of
samples
and
had
no
detectable
residues,
the
PDP
2000
and
2002
monitoring
data
for
sweet
pepper
were
translated
to
hot
peppers
(
924
samples
with
no
detectable
residues,
½
LOD
of
0.0021
ppm).
The
average
%
CT
estimate
(
3%)
and
the
TRR:
PCNB
ratio
(
13)
from
the
potato
metabolism
study
were
also
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern
in
the
monitoring
samples.
The
application
method
in
the
potato
metabolism
study
and
the
registered
application
method
for
peppers
are
both
through
ground
application.

Potato:
PDP
2000
and
2002
monitoring
data
are
available;
however,
the
samples
were
analyzed
for
PCNB
only.
Between
0.5%
to
1.9%
of
the
data
had
detectable
levels
of
PCNB
in
the
range
of
0.058
ppm
to
0.098
ppm.
The
average
%
CT
estimate
(
3%)
was
incorporated
and
the
ratio
of
Page
10
of
52
TTR/
PCNB
(
i.
e.,
the
value
of
13)
from
the
potato
metabolism
study
at
a
1X
rate
was
used
to
calculate
the
total
residue
of
concern
in
the
monitoring
samples.

Seed
Treated
Crops:
A
preliminary
review
of
the
submitted
studies
on
barley,
soybean,
corn,
wheat,
peas,
and
sugar
beets
indicates
that
PCNB
and/
or
some
of
its
metabolites
may
be
found
at
detectable
levels
in
some
crop
parts
grown
from
treated
seeds,
particularly
wheat
(
straw)
and
peas.
However,
there
were
also
detectable
residues
found
in
the
control
crops
(
those
grown
from
untreated
seeds).
This
observation
may
indicate
that
the
residues
seen
in
the
crops
grown
from
treated
seeds
may
be
due
to
rotational
crop
issues
associated
with
the
long
half­
life
of
PCNB
(
1555
days).
Because
of
this
uncertainty,
no
chronic
residue
estimates
were
made
due
to
the
seed
treatment
of
barley,
corn,
cotton,
oats,
peas,
rice,
safflower,
sorghum,
soybeans,
sugar
beets,
and
wheat.
This
provision
may
change
after
more
thorough
review
of
the
submitted
studies.

Tomatoes:
PDP
1998­
1999
monitoring
data
are
available
for
fresh
tomatoes;
however,
the
samples
were
analyzed
for
PCNB
only.
Out
of
the
1081
samples
that
were
analyzed,
only
2
had
detectable
residues.
PDP
1999­
2000
monitoring
data
for
canned
tomato
are
available;
again
only
PCNB
was
looked
for
in
those
samples.
There
were
no
detectable
residues
out
of
the
737
samples
analyzed.
PDP
2001
monitoring
data
for
tomato
paste
were
used
for
tomato
paste;
however,
unlike
the
other
tomato
commodities,
both
PCNB
and
PCA
were
analyzed
for
in
those
samples.
There
were
no
detectable
residues
out
of
the
369
samples
analyzed.
The
average
%
CT
estimate
(
1%)
was
incorporated
and
the
ratio
of
TRR/
PCNB
from
the
potato
metabolism
study
was
used
to
calculate
the
total
residue
of
concern
in
the
monitoring
samples.

Water:
Some
chemical­
specific
water
monitoring
data
are
available
but
they
are
limited
and
are
not
at­
the­
tap
data.
Therefore,
EDWCs
were
calculated
by
EFED
to
estimate
the
potential
contribution
to
the
acute
and
chronic
exposure
from
drinking
water.
For
these
chronic
dietary
exposure
assessments,
proposed
mitigated
water
numbers
(
0.0103
ppm)
are
used
from
the
cole
crop
use
(
Revised
Tier
II
Surface
Water
Exposure
Values
and
Terrestrial
Exposure
Values
for
PCNB
Based
on
Proposed
Lower
Application
Rates
(
Risk
Mitigation
Phase).
August
9,
2005).

Livestock
Commodities:
The
United
States
Department
of
Agriculture's
Food
Safety
and
Inspection
Service
(
FSIS)
is
responsible
for
monitoring
pesticides
in
poultry
and
livestock.
In
particular,
FSIS
tests
between
300
and
500
samples
of
more
than
20
types
of
livestock
each
year
for
chlorinated
hydrocarbons.
Although
FSIS
does
not
specifically
monitor
for
residues
of
PCNB
in
poultry
and
livestock,
FSIS
does
routinely
test
these
animals
using
a
broad
screening
GPC/
GC/
EC
method
to
detect
a
variety
of
chlorinated
hydrocarbons.
At
HED's
request,
FSIS
has
determined
that
residues
of
PCNB
and
PCA
would
be
detected
with
this
method
if
they
were
present.
The
exact
sensitivity
of
the
method
to
PCA
and
PCNB
is
not
known,
but
is
expected
to
be
similar
to
the
sensitivity
of
the
method
to
other
chlorinated
hydrocarbons,
which
is
approximately
0.01­
0.10
ppm.

In
routine
monitoring,
FSIS
reported
detectable
residues
of
PCA
in
one
hog
sample
in
1998
at
­

0.5
ppm;
however,
FSIS
has
not
reported
seeing
either
PCA
or
PCNB
in
more
recent
monitoring.
Therefore,
we
can
assume
that
there
are
little
to
no
PCA
and
PCNB
residues
in
livestock
commodities.
Because
FSIS
does
not
specifically
monitor
for
residues
of
PCNB
in
poultry
and
Page
11
of
52
livestock,
calculated
dietary
burdens,
animal
metabolism
studies,
feeding
studies,
and
%
CT
values
were
used
to
derive
residue
estimates
in
livestock
commodities.
Both
the
TRRs
in
registered
and
unregistered
rotational
crop
feed
items
were
used
for
estimating
the
dietary
burden.
The
unregistered
rotational
crop
commodities
were
used
since
monitoring
data
demonstrate
a
considerable
number
of
detectable
residues
in
commodities
that
are
currently
unregistered.
The
detectable
residues
in
the
unregistered
commodities
are
believed
to
have
resulted
from
legal
applications
of
PCNB
to
registered
crops;
however,
due
to
the
unusually
long
half
life
of
1555
days
in
soil,
these
residues
are
believed
to
be
taken
up
by
the
rotational
crops.
The
presence
of
PCNB
and/
or
its
metabolites
in
the
untreated
seeds
in
seed­
treatment
studies
also
demonstrate
that
PCNB
residues
left
in
the
soil
from
previously
treated
crops
may
transfer
to
the
rotational
crop
commodities.
The
calculation
of
dietary
burden
is
shown
in
table
2.4
below.

To
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern
in
feed
items,
livestock
diets
were
constructed.
The
diet
includes
registered
and
unregistered
feed
items.
Cultural
practice
and
geographical
data
have
also
been
considered
in
formulating
the
diets.
Since
cotton,
peanut
and
potato
are
the
only
registered
crops
with
potential
feed
items,
any
unregistered
crop
that
has
a
feed
item
and
is
rotated
after
potato,
cotton,
or
peanut
was
investigated.
A
review
of
the
cultural
practices
(
personal
communication
with
Bernard
Schneider,
HED
senior
plant
biologists)
revealed
that
this
is
in
fact
a
very
likely
scenario
since
potato
is
generally
rotated
to
sweet
corn,
soybeans
or
wheat,
and
peanut
is
usually
rotated
to
grass
crops
or
cereal
grains.
In
particular,
potatoes
can
be
rotated
to
major
crops
such
as
field
corn,
alfalfa,
and
wheat;
therefore,
the
available
rotational
crop
study
for
wheat
was
used
for
this
purpose.

In
a
submitted
rotational
crop
study
(
MRID
41562905),
the
levels
of
PCNB
and
its
metabolites
in
wheat
straw
planted
30
and
365
days
following
a
single
soil
application
of
[
14C]
PCNB
at
30
lb
ai/
A
were
quite
high
(
22.2­
25.9
ppm)
and
steady
during
the
one
year
plant­
back
interval
(
PBI).
The
total
radioactive
residues
in
wheat
forage,
straw,
and
grain
were
2.59,
22.9,
and
0.33
ppm,
respectively,
from
the
30­
day
PBI,
and
were
5.05,
25.9,
and
0.38
ppm,
respectively,
from
the
365­
day
PBI.
Comparison
of
the
TRR
in
peanut
nutmeat
and
peanut
hay
from
the
peanut
metabolism
study
also
reveals
that
PCNB
and
its
metabolites
concentrate
in
the
hay
part
of
peanut
crops.
This
information
can
be
used
directly
when
calculating
a
dietary
burden
composed
of
potato
culls,
peanut
hay,
and
wheat
straw
since
the
application
rate
used
in
the
rotational
crop
study
(
30
lb
ai/
A)
is
not
much
higher
than
the
maximum
label
rate
for
potato
(
20
lb
ai/
A);
30
lb
ai/
A
is
the
maximum
use
rate
for
Brassica
vegetables.

Table
2.3
below
shows
how
theoretical
dietary
burden
was
calculated.
Page
12
of
52
Table
2.3
­
Calculation
of
Chronic
Dietary
Burdens.

Feed
Commodity
1,
3
%
Dry
Matter
2
%
Diet
2
TRR
(
ppm)
3
Dietary
Burden
from
Registered
and
Unregistered
Crops
(
ppm)
3,4,
6
Dietary
Burden
from
Registered
Crops
(
ppm)
3,4,6
Beef
Cattle
potato
waste5
15
40
8.0
21.3
21.3
peanut
meal5
85
15
0.4
0.07
0.07
forage
(
wheat
source)
25
25
5.05
5.05
­­

straw
and
hay
(
wheat
source)
88
20
25.9
5.89
­­

TOTAL
BURDEN
100
32.31
21.37
Dairy
Cattle
wheat
grain
89
30
0.38
0.13
­­

potato
waste
15
10
8.0
16.0
16.0
peanut
meal
85
15
0.4
0.07
0.07
forage
(
wheat
source)
25
25
5.05
5.05
­­

straw
and
hay
(
wheat
source)
88
20
25.9
5.89
­­

TOTAL
BURDEN
100
27.14
16.07
Poultry
peanut
meal
N/
A
25
0.4
0.1
0.1
wheat
grain
89
75
0.38
0.285
0
TOTAL
BURDEN
100
0.385
0.1
Swine
potato
culls
N/
A
50
1.1
0.55
0.55
peanut
meal
N/
A
15
0.4
0.6
0.6
Other
feed
stuff
­­
35
0
0
0
TOTAL
BURDEN
100
1.15
1.15
1.
Diet
was
chosen
based
on
consultation
with
HED
scientists,
Jerry
Stokes
and
Bernard
A.
Schneider
in
Sept.
2005;
personal
communication.
2.
From
Table
1
of
residue
chemistry
860
guideline
series
(
August
1996).
3.
Residues
for
potato
waste
are
based
on
the
TRR
in
potato
metabolism
study
(
1.12
ppm)
and
average
concentration
factor
for
potato
wet
peel
in
Amvac
processing
study
(
7x)
and
those
for
peanut
meal
are
based
on
TRR
in
peanut
metabolism
study
(~
1.72/
5
to
get
TRR
for
1x
use
rate);
the
highest
combined
residues
of
PCNB,
PCA,
and
PCTA
from
potato
field
trials
is
1.01
ppm
(
for
2
lb/
gal
EC
in
in­
furrow
application
almost
equal
to
10
lb
ai/
12,400
linear
feet
of
row
with
PHI
of
89­
135
days),
that
for
peanut
nutmeat
from
field
trials
is
0.330
ppm
(
for
2
lb
ai/
gal
EC
for
total
application
rate
of
10
lb
ai/
A
with
PHI
of
45­
47
days),
and
for
peanut
hulls,
the
highest
combined
residues
of
PCNB,
PCA,
and
PCTA
from
field
trials
is
1.09
ppm
(
for
10%
G
formulation
in
total
application
rate
of
10
lb
ai/
A
and
PHI
of
43­
45
days).
The
closeness
of
TRR
from
metabolism
studies
and
field
trial
data
further
supports
use
of
TRR
values
and
that
this
value
for
potato
waste,
potato
culls,
and
peanut
meal
is
not
an
overestimate.
4.
Contribution
=
[
TRR
/
%
DM
(
if
cattle)]
X
%
diet).
5.
HED
notes
that
the
combination
of
potato
waste
and
peanut
meal
in
a
beef/
diary
cattle
diet
is
not
common
since
the
growing
regions
for
potato
and
peanut
are
different
and
shipping
of
potato
waste
or
peanut
meal
for
cattle
diet
is
Page
13
of
52
not
common.
It
is
done
here
in
the
interest
of
conservativeness.
6.
Dietary
burden
from
registered
and
unregistered
crops
for
beef
cattle/
dairy
includes
contribution
from
rotated
wheat
forage/
hay/
straw
which
contain
carried
over
residues
of
PCNB
and
its
metabolites
(
see
MRID
41562905).
Dietary
burden
from
registered
crops
assumes
stringent
rotational
crop
restriction
(
will
be
addressed
in
the
upcoming
RED)
will
make
the
unregistered
crops
to
be
PCNB
free.

The
results
in
Table
2.3
were
used
in
combination
with
feeding
studies
to
estimate
secondary
residues
in
livestock
commodities.
The
dose
administration
in
cattle
feeding
studies
were
0.1,
1,
10,
and
1000
ppm.
Cows
dosed
with
1000
ppm
were
sacrificed
after
1
month
of
dosing,
whereas
other
cows
were
sacrificed
after
12­
15
weeks.
Since
the
dietary
burden
calculated
in
the
above
table
is
more
than
10
ppm,
the
cows
dosed
with
1000
ppm
were
dosed
for
shorter
periods
of
time
than
the
cows
dosed
with
0.1,
1,
and
10
ppm,
and
all
metabolites
of
PCNB
that
are
not
analyzed
in
the
feeding
study
are
of
concern
with
no
reliable
approximation
for
the
rest
of
the
metabolites,
it
was
decided
to
use
the
goat
metabolism
study
instead
of
the
feeding
study
to
estimate
the
concentration
of
the
metabolites
of
concern
in
ruminants.
The
following
table
contains
all
the
data
used
to
estimate
the
secondary
PCNB
residues
in
livestock
commodities.
Since
two
estimates
for
the
dietary
burden
were
made
for
cattle
(
see
Table
2.3
above)
for
both
the
registered
as
well
as
the
registered
and
unregistered
assessments,
two
estimates
for
chronic
secondary
residues
were
also
made.

Table
2.4
Calculation
of
Secondary
Residues
of
PCNB
in
Livestock
Commodities.

Tissue
Theoretical
Dietary
Burden
(
Based
on
TRR
from
Table
2.3)
Tissue
:
Feed
(
Ratio
based
on
TRR
in
metabolism
study)
%
CT
Chronic
Secondary
Residue
[
TDB
X
(
T:
F)
X
%
CT]

Low
Bound
High
Bound
From
Registered
Crops
Only
From
Registered
and
Unregistered
Crops
Milk
Fat
16.07
ppm
27.14
ppm
8.11
/
1400
=
0.0058
3%
(
potato)
0.003
X
25
=
0.07
ppm
0.005
X
25
=
0.12
ppm
Goat
Kidney
21.37
ppm
32.31
ppm
49.1
:
1400
=
0.035
3%
(
potato)
0.02
0.03
Goat
Liver
21.37
ppm
32.31
ppm
45.5
:
1400
=
0.032
3%
(
potato)
0.02
0.03
Goat
Muscle
21.37
ppm
32.31
ppm
2.3
:
1400
=
0.0016
3%
(
potato)
0.001
0.002
Goat
Renal
Fat
21.37
ppm
32.31
ppm
32.8
:
1400
=
0.023
3%
(
potato)
0.015
0.02
Chicken
Egg
Yolk
0.1
0.385
5.75
:
512
=
0.11
1%
(
peanuts)
0.00011
0.0004
Table
2.4
Calculation
of
Secondary
Residues
of
PCNB
in
Livestock
Commodities.

Tissue
Theoretical
Dietary
Burden
(
Based
on
TRR
from
Table
2.3)
Tissue
:
Feed
(
Ratio
based
on
TRR
in
metabolism
study)
%
CT
Chronic
Secondary
Residue
[
TDB
X
(
T:
F)
X
%
CT]

Low
Bound
High
Bound
From
Registered
Crops
Only
From
Registered
and
Unregistered
Crops
Page
14
of
52
Chicken
Thigh
Muscle
0.1
0.385
0.71
:
512
=
0.0014
1%
(
peanuts)
0.0000014
0.0000054
Chicken
Fat
0.1
0.385
10.1
:
512
=
0.020
1%
(
peanuts)
0.00002
0.00008
Swine
Kidney
1.15
­­
0.035
(
goat
data)
3%
(
potato)
0.0012
0.0012
Swine
Liver
1.15
­­
0.032
(
goat
data)
3%
(
potato)
0.001
0.001
Swine
Muscle
1.15
­­
0.0016
(
goat
data)
3%
(
potato)
0.00006
0.00006
Swine
Fat
1.15
­­
0.023
(
goat
data)
3%
(
potato)
0.00080
0.00080
1
The
current
TRR
value
for
milk
(
8.1
ppm)
was
calculated
by
the
Dynamac
reviewer
assuming
that
the
reported
5.8
ppm
value
for
PCA
represented
72.0%
of
the
TRR
in
milk.
However,
there
is
some
question
as
to
the
extract
TRR
value
to
use
for
milk.
The
original
review
reported
TRRs
from
a
radioassay
of
24.0
and
58.5
ppm
in
milk
from
the
low­
and
high­
dose
goat,
respectively.
However,
calculated
TRR
values
of
8.3­
11.7
ppm
are
obtained
when
using
data
from
the
summary
table
of
the
previous
Agency
review
(
J.
Abbotts,
4/
24/
96).

Residue
Estimates
for
Non­
Registered
Crops
The
available
monitoring
data
(
1994­
2002
PDP
and
FDA)
demonstrate
detectable
residues
of
PCNB
and/
or
its
metabolites
in/
on
a
number
of
unregistered
crops.
The
1994­
2002
PDP
data
show
detectable
residues
of
PCNB
and/
or
PCA
on
winter
squash­
fresh,
carrots,
spinach,
cucumbers,
asparagus,
pears
and
celery
(
the
percent
of
detects,
with
the
exception
of
squash
for
which
one
out
of
one
had
detected
residues
of
PCNB
or
PCA,
was
from
5.9%
for
carrots
on
PCA­
1995
to
0.1%
for
celery
and
pears
in
1998
and
2001
for
PCNB
respectively).
The
1998­
2001
FDA
data
on
crops
with
domestic
origin
show
detectable
residues
of
"
Quintozene
(
total)"
which
includes
PCNB,
PCA,
and
PCTA
on
domestic
head
lettuce,
tilapia­
aquaculture
harvested
fish
(
FDA
produce
code
16X06),
squash,
carrot,
and
ginseng
(
FDA
produce
code
54F12)
but
tilapia
and
ginseng
had
trace
residues.
Tilapia
had
a
maximum
residue
of
0.01
ppm,
with
one
detect
in
four
samples.
Ginseng
had
a
maximum
residue
of
3.22
ppm
with
one
detect
in
100
samples.
The
1998­
2001
FDA
data
on
imported
commodities
also
show
a
number
of
unregistered
commodities
with
detectable
residues
of
"
Quintozene
(
total)"
in
squash,
carrots,
spinach,
ginger
root,
and
ginseng,
with
73%
of
ginseng
samples
(
and
58'%
in
FDA
survaillance
data)
imported
from
different
countries
having
detectable
residues
of
"
Quintozene
(
total)"
with
a
range
from
trace
to
17.44
ppm.
Besides
ginseng,
the
detectable
residues
of
PCNB
and/
or
its
metabolites
on
domestic
and
imported
commodities
can
be
Page
15
of
52
attributed
to
its
unusually
long
half
life
in
soil
as
the
available
studies
and
literature
suggests.
Therefore,
the
crops
which
have
a
considerable
number
of
detectable
residues
in
both
PDP
and
FDA
(
carrots,
spinach,
cucumber,
ginseng)
have
been
incorporated
into
this
chronic
dietary
risk
assessment.

As
was
mentioned
above,
the
detectable
residues
of
PCNB
and/
or
its
metabolites
in/
on
unregistered
crops
have
a
high
likelihood
of
coming
from
residues
in
soil
from
legal
registered
uses
of
PCNB.
Although
in
the
upcoming
RED,
the
rotation
of
crops
is
going
to
be
restricted
to
registered
crops,
available
studies/
literature
suggest
that
PCNB
can
last
as
long
as
a
few
years
in
soil
and
thus
be
taken
up
by
crops
planted
after
one
or
two
crop
rotations.
In
February
2004,
the
ChemSAC
decided
that
rotational
crop
limitations
to
registered
crops
for
4
years
or
more
are
impractical
and
unenforceable.
Consequently,
incorporation
of
unregistered
crops
which
have
detectable
residues
of
PCNB
and/
or
its
metabolites
in
dietary
risk
assessment
is
unavoidable.

The
other
observation
from
the
monitoring
data
is
that
percent
hit
(
percent
detect)
is
much
higher
for
PCA
than
PCNB
(
10­
20
fold
higher
for
carrots
and
spinach).
PCA
is
believed
to
be
more
typical
of
soil
metabolism
than
plant
metabolism
supporting
the
belief
that
these
residues
are
coming
from
previously
treated
crops.

The
following
unregistered
crops
were
incorporated
into
this
risk
assessment.
For
carrots,
cucumber,
and
spinach
PDP
monitoring
data
were
used
to
estimate
the
sum
of
the
concentration
of
PCNB
and
PCA.
This
was
done
by
taking
the
average
of
all
PCNB
and
PCA
residue
concentrations
separately
and
then
adding
them
together.
Realizing
that
this
is
an
underestimate
since
there
is
an
inherent
assumption
of
other
metabolites
being
at
zero
concentration,
no
method
is
available
at
this
time
to
account
for
the
TTR.
Use
of
plant
metabolism
studies
may
not
be
appropriate
since
the
residues
of
PCNB
an
its
metabolites
are
more
likely
due
to
crop
rotation
than
to
direct
application,
hence
the
ratios
of
TTR:
PCNB
or
TTR:
PCA
would
not
apply.
No
%
CT
values
could
be
incorporated
since
the
residues
are
believed
to
be
from
a
rotational
crop
effect;
direct
use
of
monitoring
data
including
their
zero
detectable
residues
was
thought
to
sufficiently
account
for
a
%
CT
estimate.

Spinach:
For
spinach
commodities,
the
1995
and
1996
PDP
data
were
used;
the
sum
of
the
averages
of
PCNB
and
PCA
residues
were
0.0003
ppm.

Carrots:
For
carrot
commodities,
the1994,
1995
and
1996
PDP
data
were
used;
the
sum
of
the
averages
of
PCNB
and
PCA
residues
were
0.0005
ppm.

Cucumber:
For
cucumber
commodities,
the
1999
and
2000
PDP
data
were
used;
the
sum
of
the
averages
of
PCNB
and
PCA
residues
were
0.00006
ppm.
Realizing
that
this
is
an
underestimate
since
there
is
an
inherent
assumption
of
other
metabolites
being
at
zero
concentration,
a
method
to
account
for
the
TTR
was
not
available.
Using
the
potato
metabolism
study
is
not
appropriate
since
the
residues
of
PCNB
and
its
metabolites
on
carrots
are
more
likely
due
to
rotational
crop
issues
than
direct
application.

Ginseng:
The
1998,
1999,
2001
FDA
data
were
used
to
estimate
the
combined
residues
of
PCNB
Page
16
of
52
and
PCA
in/
on
ginseng
commodities.
All
but
one
sample
were
from
foreign
countries.
The
1999
sample
had
combined
PCNB
and
PCA
residues
of
3
ppm
(
average
of
duplicate
samples).
The
average
PCNB
and
PCA
residues
on
imported
samples
was
3.6
ppm.
Taking
into
account
that
45%
of
consumption
of
ginseng
roots
in
the
U.
S.
is
from
imported
ginseng,
the
estimated
average
residue
on
ginseng
is
3.27
ppm
(
calculated
as:
(
3.6
X
.45)
+
(
3
X
0.55)
=
3.27
ppm).

Table
2.5
­
Summary
of
Residue
Data
for
Different
Commodities
Commodity
Data
Range
of
Detects
(
ppm)
Details
Used
to
Derive
Anticipated
Residues
%
CT
Chronic
Point
estimate
(
ppm);
Ratio
used
to
estimate
the
total
TRR
Data
Source
Sample
Date
(
year)
Num.
of
Samples
Num.
of
Detects
Num.
of
Data
Num.
of
Detects
Num.
of
½
LOD
Num.
of
Zeroes
Avg.
½
LOD
(
ppm)

Beans­
Greenfresh
(
and
Dry)
PDP
2000,
2001
1427
47
0.005
­
0.02
1427
47
0
1380
0.00221
2%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.00348
TRR:
PCNB
=
13
(
potato
metabolism
study)

Beans­
Greencanned
PDP
1997,
1998
857
0
 
100
0
2
98
0.002109
2%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.000548
TRR:
PCNB
=
13
(
potato
metabolism
study)

Beans­
Greenfrozen
PDP
1997,
1998
451
1
0.005
451
1
3
840
0.002109
2%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.000329
TRR:
PCNB
=
13
(
potato
metabolism
study)

Broccoli
Broccoli
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
17.9
ppm)
and
%
CT
(
1%);
i.
e.,
17.9
X
1%
=
0.179
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.179
ppm
Brussels
Sprout
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
17.9
ppm)
and
%
CT
(
13%);
i.
e.,
17.9
X
13%
=
2.33
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
13%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
2.33
ppm
Cabbage
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
17.9
ppm)
and
%
CT
(
1%);
i.
e.,
17.9
X
1%
=
0.179
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.179
ppm
Cauliflower
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
17.9
ppm)
and
%
CT
(
2%);
i.
e.,
17.9
X
2%
=
0.36
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
2%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.36
ppm
Table
2.5
­
Summary
of
Residue
Data
for
Different
Commodities
Commodity
Data
Range
of
Detects
(
ppm)
Details
Used
to
Derive
Anticipated
Residues
%
CT
Chronic
Point
estimate
(
ppm);
Ratio
used
to
estimate
the
total
TRR
Data
Source
Sample
Date
(
year)
Num.
of
Samples
Num.
of
Detects
Num.
of
Data
Num.
of
Detects
Num.
of
½
LOD
Num.
of
Zeroes
Avg.
½
LOD
(
ppm)

Page
17
of
52
Chinese
Broccoli
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
17.9
ppm)
and
%
CT
(
1%);
i.
e.,
17.9
X
1%
=
0.179
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.179
ppm
Chinese
Cabbage
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
17.9
ppm)
and
%
CT
(
1%);
i.
e.,
17.9
X
1%
=
0.179
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.179
ppm
Collards
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
17.9
ppm)
and
%
CT
(
1%);
i.
e.,
17.9
X
1%
=
0.179
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.179
ppm
Cotton
(
cottonseed
oil)
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
peanut
hay
metabolism
study
for
(
16.3
ppm),
adjusted
for
use
rate
difference
between
cotton
and
peanut,
and
%
CT
(
5%);
i.
e.,
[(
16.3
/
10)
X
2.1]
X
5%
=
0.165
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
5%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.165s
ppm
Garlic
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
peanut
hay
metabolism
study
(
16.3
ppm),
adjusted
for
use
rate
difference
between
garlic
and
peanut,
and
%
CT
(
1%);
i.
e.,
(
16.3
X
2)
X
1%
=
0.33
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.33
ppm
Kale
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
17.9
ppm)
and
%
CT
(
1%);
i.
e.,
17.9
X
1%
=
0.179
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.179
ppm
Milk
water
PDP
LOD
of
0.001
used
for
milk
water,
sugar,
and
nonfat
solids.
NA
PDP
LOD
=
0.001
ppm
Table
2.5
­
Summary
of
Residue
Data
for
Different
Commodities
Commodity
Data
Range
of
Detects
(
ppm)
Details
Used
to
Derive
Anticipated
Residues
%
CT
Chronic
Point
estimate
(
ppm);
Ratio
used
to
estimate
the
total
TRR
Data
Source
Sample
Date
(
year)
Num.
of
Samples
Num.
of
Detects
Num.
of
Data
Num.
of
Detects
Num.
of
½
LOD
Num.
of
Zeroes
Avg.
½
LOD
(
ppm)

Page
18
of
52
Mustard
Green
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
cabbage
metabolism
study
(
17.9
ppm)
and
%
CT
(
1%);
i.
e.,
17.9
X
1%
=
0.179
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.179
ppm
Peppers,
Hot
PDP
for
sweet
pepper
2000,
2002
924
0
 
100
0
3
97
0.002084
3%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.000813
TRR:
PCNB
=
13
(
potato
metabolism
study)

Peppers,
Sweet
PDP
for
sweet
pepper
2000,
2002
924
0
 
100
0
1
99
0.002084
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.000271
TRR:
PCNB
=
13
(
potato
metabolism
study)

Peanuts
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
TRR
from
peanut
metabolism
study
for
nutmeat
(
1.72
ppm),
adjusted
for
1X
rate
(
reduce
by
factor
5),
and
%
CT
(
1%);
i.
e.,
(
1.72
/
5)
X
1%
=
0.0034
ppm
;
See
text
for
more
information.

Concentration
factor
for
peanut
oil=
2.1
X
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.0034
Peanut
Butter
Peanut
Butter:
Chronic
point
estimate
was
calculated
based
on
average
of
all
2000
PDP
data
(
716
samples)
after
adding
PCNB
and
PCA
on
same
samples
and
using
TRR:(
PCNB+
PCA)
ratio
from
peanut
nutmeat
metabolism
study
(
5.3);
0.00092
ppm
X
5.3
=
0.0049
ppm
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.0049
Table
2.5
­
Summary
of
Residue
Data
for
Different
Commodities
Commodity
Data
Range
of
Detects
(
ppm)
Details
Used
to
Derive
Anticipated
Residues
%
CT
Chronic
Point
estimate
(
ppm);
Ratio
used
to
estimate
the
total
TRR
Data
Source
Sample
Date
(
year)
Num.
of
Samples
Num.
of
Detects
Num.
of
Data
Num.
of
Detects
Num.
of
½
LOD
Num.
of
Zeroes
Avg.
½
LOD
(
ppm)

Page
19
of
52
Potato
PDP
2001,
2002
1103
17
0.005­
0.05
1103
17
16
1070
0.0019
3%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.00335
TRR:
PCNB
=
13
(
potato
metabolism
study)

Concentration
factor
=
5.4
for
"
ptotato
w/
peel­
baby
food"

Tomato,
Fresh
PDP
1998,
1999
1081
2
0.005
1081
2
9
1070
0.0019
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.000330
TRR:
PCNB
=
13
(
potato
metabolism
study)

Concentration
factor:
14.3
for
dried
tomato.

Tomato,
Canned
PDP
1999,
2000
737
0
 
100
0
1
99
0.0017
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.000216
TRR:
PCNB
=
13
(
potato
metabolism
study)

Tomato,
Paste
PDP
2001
369
0
0
100
0
1
99
0.0015
1%
Estimated
residue
for
chronic
exposure
=
0.000195
TRR:
PCNB
=
13
(
potato
metabolism
study)
Page
20
of
52
III.
DEEM­
FCID
 
Program
and
Consumption
Information
PCNB
chronic
dietary
exposure
assessments
were
conducted
using
the
Dietary
Exposure
Evaluation
Model
software
with
the
Food
Commodity
Intake
Database
(
DEEM­
FCID
 
,
Version
2.30),
which
incorporates
consumption
data
from
USDA's
Continuing
Surveys
of
Food
Intakes
by
Individuals
(
CSFII),
1994­
1996
and
1998.
The
1994­
96,
98
data
are
based
on
the
reported
consumption
of
more
than
20,000
individuals
over
two
non­
consecutive
survey
days.
Foods
"
as
consumed"
(
e.
g.,
apple
pie)
are
linked
to
EPA­
defined
food
commodities
(
e.
g.
apples,
peeled
fruit
­
cooked;
fresh
or
N/
S;
baked;
or
wheat
flour
­
cooked;
fresh
or
N/
S,
baked)
using
publicly
available
recipe
translation
files
developed
jointly
by
USDA/
ARS
and
EPA.
For
chronic
exposure
assessment,
consumption
data
are
averaged
for
the
entire
U.
S.
population
and
within
population
subgroups,
but
for
acute
exposure
assessment
are
retained
as
individual
consumption
events.
Based
on
analysis
of
the
1994­
96,
98
CSFII
consumption
data,
which
took
into
account
dietary
patterns
and
survey
respondents,
HED
concluded
that
it
is
most
appropriate
to
report
risk
for
the
following
population
subgroups:
the
general
U.
S.
population,
all
infants
(<
1
year
old),
children
1­
2,
children
3­
5,
children
6­
12,
youth
13­
19,
adults
20­
49,
females
13­
49,
and
adults
50+
years
old.

For
chronic
dietary
exposure
assessment,
an
estimate
of
the
residue
level
in
each
food
or
foodform
(
e.
g.,
orange
or
orange
juice)
on
the
food
commodity
residue
list
is
multiplied
by
the
average
daily
consumption
estimate
for
that
food/
food
form.
The
resulting
residue
consumption
estimate
for
each
food/
food
form
is
summed
with
the
residue
consumption
estimates
for
all
other
food/
food
forms
on
the
commodity
residue
list
to
arrive
at
the
total
average
estimated
exposure.
Exposure
is
expressed
in
mg/
kg
body
weight/
day
and
as
a
percent
of
the
cPAD.
This
procedure
is
performed
for
each
population
subgroup.

IV.
Toxicological
Information
Generally,
PCNB
has
low
acute
toxicity,
with
most
study
results
in
Toxicity
Categories
III
or
IV.
Several
studies
indicate
that
PCNB
is
a
sensitizer
while
other
available
data
provide
conflicting
information
that
it
is
not
a
sensitizer.
These
differences
might
relate
to
differences
in
impurities
associated
with
variations
in
production
batches
and
manufacturing
sites,
and/
or
differences
in
testing
methodology.
Though
information
in
the
published
literature
indicates
that
PCNB
undergoes
extensive
biotransformation
in
mammals,
there
is
uncertainty
as
to
its
biological
halflife
and
thus,
as
to
its
potential
for
bioaccumulation.
Data
in
the
literature
suggest
that
its
half­
life
might
be
relatively
short
at
low
doses
and
higher
at
higher
doses.
The
registrants
have
been
asked
to
address
the
issue
of
biological
half­
life
and
therefore,
the
potential
for
bioaccumulation.
Page
21
of
52
Table
4.1.
Summary
of
Toxicological
Dose
and
Endpoints
for
PCNB
Exposure
Scenario
Dose
Used
in
Risk
Assessment,
UF
Special
FQPA
SF*
and
Level
of
Concern
for
Risk
Assessment
Study
and
Toxicological
Effects
Acute
Dietary
(
All
populations)
No
adverse
effects
attributed
to
a
single
exposure
(
dose)
were
identified.

Chronic
Dietary
(
All
populations)
NOAEL=
1.0
mg/
kg/
day
UF
=
100
Chronic
RfD
=
0.01
mg/
kg/
day
FQPA
SF
=
10X
cPAD
=
chronic
RfD
FQPA
SF
=
0.001
mg/
kg/
day
Chronic/
Oncogenicity
Study
­
rat
LOAEL
=
150
mg/
kg/
day
based
on
hepatocelluar
hypertrophy,
hepatocellular
hyperplasia,
and
thyroid
hypertrophy
Cancer
(
oral,
dermal,
inhalation)
HED's
Carcinogenicity
Peer
Review
Committee
(
CARC)
classified
PCNB
as
a
Group
C
­
possible
human
carcinogen
and
recommended
that
for
the
purpose
of
risk
characterization,
the
Reference
Dose
approach
should
be
used
for
quantification
of
human
risk.

UF
=
uncertainty
factor,
FQPA
SF
=
Special
FQPA
safety
factor,
NOAEL
=
no
observed
adverse
effect
level,
LOAEL
=
lowest
observed
adverse
effect
level,
PAD
=
population
adjusted
dose
(
a
=
acute,
c
=
chronic)
RfD
=
reference
dose,
MOE
=
margin
of
exposure,
LOC
=
level
of
concern,
NA
=
Not
Applicable
V.
Results/
Discussion
As
stated
above,
for
dietary
risk
assessments,
HED
is
concerned
when
dietary
risk
exceeds
100%
of
the
PAD.
The
DEEM­
FCID
 
analyses
estimate
the
dietary
exposure
of
the
U.
S.
population
and
various
population
subgroups.
The
results
reported
in
Table
5.1
are
for
the
general
U.
S.
Population,
all
infants
(<
1
year
old),
children
1­
2,
children
3­
5,
children
6­
12,
youth
13­
19,
females
13­
49,
adults
20­
49,
and
adults
50+
years.
Page
22
of
52
Table
5.1.
a
Result
of
Chronic
Dietary
Exposure
and
Risk
Estimates
to
Registered
Crops
for
PCNB.

Population
Subgroup
PAD,
mg/
kg/
day
Risk
from
Registered
Crops
(
No
Water)
Risk
from
Registered
Crops
Including
Water
Exposure,
mg/
kg/
day
%
cPAD
Exposure,
mg/
kg/
day
%
cPAD
U.
S.
Population
0.001
0.000099
9.9
0.000316
31.6
All
infants
(<
1
yr)
0.001
0.000062
6.2
0.000774
77.4
Children
1­
2
yrs
0.001
0.000261
26.1
0.000583
58.3
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.001
0.000192
19.2
0.000493
49.3
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.001
0.000123
12.3
0.000331
33.1
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.001
0.000082
8.2
0.000239
23.9
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.001
0.000080
8.0
0.000283
28.3
Adults
50+
yrs
0.001
0.000092
9.2
0.000305
30.5
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.001
0.000080
8.0
0.000282
28.2
1.
"
Risk
from
all
crops"
indicates
the
risk
from
oral
consumption
of
residues
found
in
the
food
chain
at
the
present
time,
whether
from
registered
or
unregistered
crops
(
for
details
see
discussion
under
residue
section).
2.
"
Risk
from
registered
crops"
indicates
the
risk
from
oral
consumption
of
residues
found
only
on
registered
crops.

Table
5.1.
b
Result
of
Chronic
Dietary
Exposure
and
Risk
Estimates
to
All
Crops
for
PCNB.

Population
Subgroup
PAD,
mg/
kg/
day
Risk
from
All
Crops
(
No
Water)
Risk
from
All
Crops
Including
Water
Exposure,
mg/
kg/
day
%
cPAD
Exposure,
mg/
kg/
day
%
cPAD
U.
S.
Population
0.001
0.000117
11.7
0.000334
33.4
All
infants
(<
1
yr)
0.001
0.000077
7.7
0.000788
78.8
Children
1­
2
yrs
0.001
0.000337
33.7
0.000660
66.0
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.001
0.000246
24.6
0.000548
54.8
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.001
0.000156
15.6
0.000364
36.4
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.001
0.000100
10.0
0.000257
25.7
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.001
0.000093
9.3
0.000296
29.6
Adults
50+
yrs
0.001
0.000102
10.2
0.000315
31.5
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.001
0.000092
9.2
0.000294
29.4
3.
"
Risk
from
all
crops"
indicates
the
risk
from
oral
consumption
of
residues
found
in
the
food
chain
at
the
present
time,
whether
from
registered
or
unregistered
crops
(
for
details
see
discussion
under
residue
section).
4.
"
Risk
from
registered
crops"
indicates
the
risk
from
oral
consumption
of
residues
found
only
on
registered
crops.

The
results
of
the
chronic
dietary
food
only
risk
assessments
show
that
the
risk
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
do
not
exceed
HED's
level
of
concern
(
100%
cPAD)
and
all
population
subgroups.
The
chronic
dietary
risk
estimates
to
registered
crops
only,
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
the
highest
exposed
population
subgroup,
children
1­
2
years
of
age,
were
10%
of
the
cPAD
and
26%
of
the
cPAD,
respectively.
The
chronic
dietary
risk
estimates
to
both
registered
and
unregistered
crops,
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
the
highest
exposed
population
subgroup,
children
1­
2
years
of
age,
were
12%
of
the
cPAD
and
34%
of
the
cPAD,
respectively.
Page
23
of
52
When
water
was
added
to
the
analysis,
the
dietary
risk
estimates
increased;
however,
they
did
not
exceed
HED's
level
of
concern
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
all
population
subgroups.
The
chronic
dietary
risk
estimates
to
registered
crops
and
water,
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
the
highest
exposed
population
subgroup,
all
infants
<
1
year
of
age,
were
32%
of
the
cPAD
and
77%
of
the
cPAD,
respectively.
The
chronic
dietary
risk
estimates
to
registered
and
unregistered
crops
and
water,
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
the
highest
exposed
population
subgroup,
all
infants
<
1
year
of
age,
were
33%
of
the
cPAD
and
79%
of
the
cPAD,
respectively.

VI.
Characterization
of
Inputs/
Outputs
In
these
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments,
the
major
portion
of
uncertainties
is
in
the
residue
estimates;
however,
they
are
not
believed
to
be
all
biased
to
one
side
(
i.
e.,
all
toward
underestimating
or
all
toward
overestimating
the
risk).
In
particular,
using
TRR:
PCNB
ratios
from
the
metabolism
study
in
combination
with
PCNB
residues
from
the
monitoring
data,
and
the
use
of
absolute
TRR
values
from
the
cabbage
metabolism
study
to
estimate
TTR
for
Brassica
vegetables
is
a
major
source
of
uncertainty.
In
addition,
uncertainties
in
calculation
of
secondary
residues
can
be
significant.
These
have
been
thoroughly
discussed
under
section
II.

Despite
the
lack
of
monitoring
data
on
all
PCNB
metabolites
and
data
gaps
in
the
cabbage
metabolism
study,
this
risk
assessment
is
still
considered
highly
refined
because
it
includes
extensive
residue
data,
%
CT
estimates,
and
processing
factor
information.
Future
refinements
of
this
risk
assessment
would
only
be
possible
if
monitoring
programs
like
USDA
PDP
use
validated
common­
moiety
methods
for
detection
of
PCNB
and
all
its
metabolites
in
supported
and
unsupported
commodities.

VII.
Conclusions
The
conclusions
of
the
chronic
dietary
food
only
risk
assessments
are
that
the
risk
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
all
population
subgroups
do
not
exceed
HED's
level
of
concern
(
100%
cPAD).
When
water
was
added
to
the
analysis,
the
dietary
risk
estimates
increased;
however,
did
not
exceed
HED's
level
of
concern
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
all
population
subgroups.
Page
24
of
52
VIII.
List
of
Attachments
Attachment
1:
DEEM
Output
File
(
Results)
for
PCNB
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
the
Registered
Crops
(
Water
Not
Included).

Attachment
2:
DEEM
Output
File
(
Results)
for
PCNB
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
the
Registered
Crops
(
Water
Included).

Attachment
3:
DEEM
Output
File
(
Results)
for
PCNB
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
All
Crops
(
Registered
and
Unregistered)
with
Detectable
Residues
(
Water
Not
Included).

Attachment
4:
DEEM
Output
File
(
Results)
for
PCNB
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
All
Crops
(
Registered
and
Unregistered)
with
Detectable
Residues
(
Water
Included).

Attachment
5:
DEEM
Input
File
for
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
All
the
Registered
Crops.

Attachment
6:
DEEM
Input
File
for
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
All
Crops
(
Registered
and
Unregistered).

Attachment
7:
Percent
Crop
Treated
Numbers
from
BEAD
cc:
S
Kinard
(
HED),
D.
Locke.
Page
25
of
52
Attachment
1:
DEEM
Output
File
(
Results)
for
PCNB
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
the
Registered
Crops
(
Water
Not
Included).

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
PCNB
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file
name:
C:\
MyFiles\
PCNB\
PCNB­
NoWater­
RegCrops­
032704.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
NOT
used.
Analysis
Date
09­
28­
2005/
10:
57:
08
Residue
file
dated:
09­
28­
2005/
10:
15:
21/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD,
Chronic)
=
.001
mg/
kg
bw/
day
===============================================================================
Total
exposure
by
population
subgroup
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Total
Exposure
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Population
mg/
kg
Percent
of
Subgroup
body
wt/
day
Rfd
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population
(
total)
0.000099
9.9%

U.
S.
Population
(
spring
season)
0.000097
9.7%
U.
S.
Population
(
summer
season)
0.000100
10.0%
U.
S.
Population
(
autumn
season)
0.000098
9.8%
U.
S.
Population
(
winter
season)
0.000099
9.9%

Northeast
region
0.000098
9.8%
Midwest
region
0.000098
9.8%
Southern
region
0.000094
9.4%
Western
region
0.000106
10.6%

Hispanics
0.000088
8.8%
Non­
hispanic
whites
0.000094
9.4%
Non­
hispanic
blacks
0.000119
11.9%
Non­
hisp/
non­
white/
non­
black
0.000138
13.8%

All
infants
(<
1
year)
0.000062
6.2%
Nursing
infants
0.000025
2.5%
Non­
nursing
infants
0.000076
7.6%
Children
1­
6
yrs
0.000209
20.9%
Children
7­
12
yrs
0.000117
11.7%

Females
13­
19
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000073
7.3%
Females
20+
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000086
8.6%
Females
13­
50
yrs
0.000082
8.2%
Females
13+
(
preg/
not
nursing)
0.000061
6.1%
Females
13+
(
nursing)
0.000088
8.8%

Males
13­
19
yrs
0.000090
9.0%
Males
20+
yrs
0.000083
8.3%
Seniors
55+
0.000091
9.1%

Children
1­
2
yrs
0.000261
26.1%
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.000192
19.2%
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.000123
12.3%
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.000082
8.2%
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.000080
8.0%
Adults
50+
yrs
0.000092
9.2%
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.000080
8.0%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Page
26
of
52
Attachment
2:
DEEM
Output
File
(
Results)
for
PCNB
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
the
Registered
Crops
(
Water
Included).

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
PCNB
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file
name:
C:\
MyFiles\
PCNB\
2PCNB­
WaterIncluded­
RegCrops­
032704.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
NOT
used.
Analysis
Date
09­
28­
2005/
08:
35:
31
Residue
file
dated:
09­
27­
2005/
13:
40:
21/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD,
Chronic)
=
.001
mg/
kg
bw/
day
===============================================================================
Total
exposure
by
population
subgroup
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Total
Exposure
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Population
mg/
kg
Percent
of
Subgroup
body
wt/
day
Rfd
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population
(
total)
0.000316
31.6%

U.
S.
Population
(
spring
season)
0.000312
31.2%
U.
S.
Population
(
summer
season)
0.000333
33.3%
U.
S.
Population
(
autumn
season)
0.000308
30.8%
U.
S.
Population
(
winter
season)
0.000309
30.9%

Northeast
region
0.000297
29.7%
Midwest
region
0.000317
31.7%
Southern
region
0.000301
30.1%
Western
region
0.000355
35.5%

Hispanics
0.000334
33.4%
Non­
hispanic
whites
0.000306
30.6%
Non­
hispanic
blacks
0.000325
32.5%
Non­
hisp/
non­
white/
non­
black
0.000404
40.4%

All
infants
(<
1
year)
0.000774
77.4%
Nursing
infants
0.000288
28.8%
Non­
nursing
infants
0.000958
95.8%
Children
1­
6
yrs
0.000512
51.2%
Children
7­
12
yrs
0.000314
31.4%

Females
13­
19
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000226
22.6%
Females
20+
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000303
30.3%
Females
13­
50
yrs
0.000292
29.2%
Females
13+
(
preg/
not
nursing)
0.000272
27.2%
Females
13+
(
nursing)
0.000389
38.9%

Males
13­
19
yrs
0.000249
24.9%
Males
20+
yrs
0.000278
27.8%
Seniors
55+
0.000304
30.4%

Children
1­
2
yrs
0.000583
58.3%
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.000493
49.3%
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.000331
33.1%
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.000239
23.9%
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.000283
28.3%
Adults
50+
yrs
0.000305
30.5%
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.000282
28.2%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Page
27
of
52
Attachment
3:
DEEM
Output
File
(
Results)
for
PCNB
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
All
Crops
(
Registered
and
Unregistered)
with
Detectable
Residues
(
Water
Not
Included).

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
PCNB
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file
name:
C:\
MyFiles\
PCNB\
PCNB­
NoWater­
AllCrops­
032704.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
NOT
used.
Analysis
Date
09­
28­
2005/
10:
58:
22
Residue
file
dated:
09­
28­
2005/
10:
57:
56/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD,
Chronic)
=
.001
mg/
kg
bw/
day
===============================================================================
Total
exposure
by
population
subgroup
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Total
Exposure
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Population
mg/
kg
Percent
of
Subgroup
body
wt/
day
Rfd
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population
(
total)
0.000117
11.7%

U.
S.
Population
(
spring
season)
0.000116
11.6%
U.
S.
Population
(
summer
season)
0.000118
11.8%
U.
S.
Population
(
autumn
season)
0.000117
11.7%
U.
S.
Population
(
winter
season)
0.000118
11.8%

Northeast
region
0.000119
11.9%
Midwest
region
0.000116
11.6%
Southern
region
0.000111
11.1%
Western
region
0.000125
12.5%

Hispanics
0.000110
11.0%
Non­
hispanic
whites
0.000112
11.2%
Non­
hispanic
blacks
0.000137
13.7%
Non­
hisp/
non­
white/
non­
black
0.000156
15.6%

All
infants
(<
1
year)
0.000077
7.7%
Nursing
infants
0.000028
2.8%
Non­
nursing
infants
0.000095
9.5%
Children
1­
6
yrs
0.000269
26.9%
Children
7­
12
yrs
0.000147
14.7%

Females
13­
19
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000088
8.8%
Females
20+
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000097
9.7%
Females
13­
50
yrs
0.000096
9.6%
Females
13+
(
preg/
not
nursing)
0.000078
7.8%
Females
13+
(
nursing)
0.000104
10.4%

Males
13­
19
yrs
0.000110
11.0%
Males
20+
yrs
0.000096
9.6%
Seniors
55+
0.000101
10.1%

Children
1­
2
yrs
0.000337
33.7%
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.000246
24.6%
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.000156
15.6%
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.000100
10.0%
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.000093
9.3%
Adults
50+
yrs
0.000102
10.2%
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.000092
9.2%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Page
28
of
52
Attachment
4:
DEEM
Output
File
(
Results)
for
PCNB
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
All
Crops
(
Registered
and
Unregistered)
with
Detectable
Residues
(
Water
Included).

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
PCNB
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file
name:
C:\
MyFiles\
PCNB\
PCNB­
NewMilkFat­
WaterIncluded­
AllCrops­
032704.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
NOT
used.
Analysis
Date
09­
27­
2005/
12:
53:
05
Residue
file
dated:
09­
27­
2005/
12:
51:
20/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD,
Chronic)
=
.001
mg/
kg
bw/
day
===============================================================================
Total
exposure
by
population
subgroup
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Total
Exposure
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Population
mg/
kg
Percent
of
Subgroup
body
wt/
day
Rfd
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population
(
total)
0.000334
33.4%

U.
S.
Population
(
spring
season)
0.000331
33.1%
U.
S.
Population
(
summer
season)
0.000351
35.1%
U.
S.
Population
(
autumn
season)
0.000327
32.7%
U.
S.
Population
(
winter
season)
0.000327
32.7%

Northeast
region
0.000317
31.7%
Midwest
region
0.000336
33.6%
Southern
region
0.000318
31.8%
Western
region
0.000374
37.4%

Hispanics
0.000356
35.6%
Non­
hispanic
whites
0.000324
32.4%
Non­
hispanic
blacks
0.000343
34.3%
Non­
hisp/
non­
white/
non­
black
0.000422
42.2%

All
infants
(<
1
year)
0.000788
78.8%
Nursing
infants
0.000292
29.2%
Non­
nursing
infants
0.000977
97.7%
Children
1­
6
yrs
0.000572
57.2%
Children
7­
12
yrs
0.000345
34.5%

Females
13­
19
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000241
24.1%
Females
20+
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000314
31.4%
Females
13­
50
yrs
0.000306
30.6%
Females
13+
(
preg/
not
nursing)
0.000289
28.9%
Females
13+
(
nursing)
0.000405
40.5%

Males
13­
19
yrs
0.000270
27.0%
Males
20+
yrs
0.000291
29.1%
Seniors
55+
0.000314
31.4%

Children
1­
2
yrs
0.000660
66.0%
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.000548
54.8%
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.000364
36.4%
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.000257
25.7%
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.000296
29.6%
Adults
50+
yrs
0.000315
31.5%
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.000294
29.4%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Page
29
of
52
Attachment
5:
DEEM
Input
File
for
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
the
Registered
Crops.

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
PCNB
1994­
98
data
Residue
file:
C:\
MyFiles\
PCNB\
PCNB­
NewMilkFat­
WaterIncluded­
AllCrops­
032704.
R98
Adjust.
#
2
NOT
used
Analysis
Date
09­
28­
2005
Residue
file
dated:
09­
27­
2005/
12:
51:
20/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD)
=
0.001
mg/
kg
bw/
day
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Food
Crop
Residue
Adj.
Factors
Comment
EPA
Code
Grp
Food
Name
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­­
06030300
6C
Bean,
black,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06020310
6B
Bean,
broad,
succulent
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06030320
6C
Bean,
broad,
seed
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06020330
6B
Bean,
cowpea,
succulent
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.000329
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030340
6C
Bean,
cowpea,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06030350
6C
Bean,
great
northern,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030360
6C
Bean,
kidney,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06020370
6B
Bean,
lima,
succulent
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
Page
30
of
52
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.000329
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030380
6C
Bean,
lima,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06030390
6C
Bean,
mung,
seed
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
233­
Cooked;
Dried;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030400
6C
Bean,
navy,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030410
6C
Bean,
pink,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06030420
6C
Bean,
pinto,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06010430
6A
Bean,
snap,
succulent
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.000329
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
Page
31
of
52
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06010431
6A
Bean,
snap,
succulent­
babyfood
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
21000440
M
Beef,
meat
0.002000
1.000
1.000
21000441
M
Beef,
meat­
babyfood
0.002000
1.000
1.000
21000450
M
Beef,
meat,
dried
0.002000
1.920
1.000
21000460
M
Beef,
meat
byproducts
0.030000
1.000
1.000
21000461
M
Beef,
meat
byproducts­
babyfood
0.030000
1.000
1.000
21000470
M
Beef,
fat
0.020000
1.000
1.000
21000471
M
Beef,
fat­
babyfood
0.020000
1.000
1.000
21000480
M
Beef,
kidney
0.030000
1.000
1.000
21000490
M
Beef,
liver
0.030000
1.000
1.000
21000491
M
Beef,
liver­
babyfood
0.030000
1.000
1.000
05010610
5A
Broccoli
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.179000
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.179000
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.179000
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.179000
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.179000
1.000
1.000
220­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.179000
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.179000
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.179000
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.179000
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010611
5A
Broccoli­
babyfood
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010620
5A
Broccoli,
Chinese
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010640
5A
Brussels
sprouts
2.330000
1.000
1.000
05010690
5A
Cabbage
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05020700
5B
Cabbage,
Chinese,
bok
choy
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010710
5A
Cabbage,
Chinese,
napa
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010720
5A
Cabbage,
Chinese,
mustard
0.179000
1.000
1.000
01010780
1AB
Carrot
0.000500
1.000
1.000
01010781
1AB
Carrot­
babyfood
0.000500
1.000
1.000
01010790
1AB
Carrot,
juice
0.000500
1.000
1.000
05010830
5A
Cauliflower
0.360000
1.000
1.000
40000930
P
Chicken,
meat
0.000005
1.000
1.000
40000931
P
Chicken,
meat­
babyfood
0.000005
1.000
1.000
40000940
P
Chicken,
liver
0.000005
1.000
1.000
40000950
P
Chicken,
meat
byproducts
0.000080
1.000
1.000
40000951
P
Chicken,
meat
byproducts­
babyfoo
0.000080
1.000
1.000
40000960
P
Chicken,
fat
0.000080
1.000
1.000
40000961
P
Chicken,
fat­
babyfood
0.000080
1.000
1.000
40000970
P
Chicken,
skin
0.000080
1.000
1.000
40000971
P
Chicken,
skin­
babyfood
0.000080
1.000
1.000
05021170
5B
Collards
0.179000
1.000
1.000
95001280
O
Cottonseed,
oil
0.165000
1.000
1.000
95001281
O
Cottonseed,
oil­
babyfood
0.165000
1.000
1.000
09021350
9B
Cucumber
0.000060
1.000
1.000
70001450
P
Egg,
whole
0.000400
1.000
1.000
70001451
P
Egg,
whole­
babyfood
0.000400
1.000
1.000
70001460
P
Egg,
white
0.000400
1.000
1.000
70001461
P
Egg,
white
(
solids)­
babyfood
0.000400
1.000
1.000
70001470
P
Egg,
yolk
0.000400
1.000
1.000
70001471
P
Egg,
yolk­
babyfood
0.000400
1.000
1.000
03001640
3
Garlic
0.330000
1.000
1.000
03001650
3
Garlic,
dried
0.330000
1.000
1.000
03001651
3
Garlic,
dried­
babyfood
0.330000
1.000
1.000
01011680
1AB
Ginseng,
dried
3.270000
1.000
1.000
23001690
M
Goat,
meat
0.002000
1.000
1.000
23001700
M
Goat,
meat
byproducts
0.030000
1.000
1.000
Page
32
of
52
23001710
M
Goat,
fat
0.020000
1.000
1.000
23001720
M
Goat,
kidney
0.030000
1.000
1.000
23001730
M
Goat,
liver
0.030000
1.000
1.000
24001890
M
Horse,
meat
0.002000
1.000
1.000
05021940
5B
Kale
0.179000
1.000
1.000
27002220
D
Milk,
fat
0.070000
1.000
1.000
27002221
D
Milk,
fat
­
baby
food/
infant
for
0.070000
1.000
1.000
27012230
D
Milk,
nonfat
solids
0.001000
1.000
1.000
27012231
D
Milk,
nonfat
solids­
baby
food/
in
0.001000
1.000
1.000
27022240
D
Milk,
water
0.001000
1.000
1.000
27022241
D
Milk,
water­
babyfood/
infant
form
0.001000
1.000
1.000
27032251
D
Milk,
sugar
(
lactose)­
baby
food/
0.001000
1.000
1.000
05022290
5B
Mustard
greens
0.179000
1.000
1.000
95002630
O
Peanut
0.003400
1.000
1.000
95002640
O
Peanut,
butter
0.004900
1.000
1.000
95002650
O
Peanut,
oil
0.003400
2.100
1.000
08002700
8
Pepper,
bell
0.000271
1.000
1.000
08002701
8
Pepper,
bell­
babyfood
0.000271
1.000
1.000
08002710
8
Pepper,
bell,
dried
0.000271
1.000
1.000
08002711
8
Pepper,
bell,
dried­
babyfood
0.000271
1.000
1.000
08002720
8
Pepper,
nonbell
0.000813
1.000
1.000
08002721
8
Pepper,
nonbell­
babyfood
0.000813
1.000
1.000
08002730
8
Pepper,
nonbell,
dried
0.000813
1.000
1.000
25002900
M
Pork,
meat
0.000060
1.000
1.000
25002901
M
Pork,
meat­
babyfood
0.000060
1.000
1.000
25002910
M
Pork,
skin
0.000060
1.000
1.000
25002920
M
Pork,
meat
byproducts
0.001200
1.000
1.000
25002921
M
Pork,
meat
byproducts­
babyfood
0.001200
1.000
1.000
25002930
M
Pork,
fat
0.000800
1.000
1.000
25002931
M
Pork,
fat­
babyfood
0.000800
1.000
1.000
25002940
M
Pork,
kidney
0.001200
1.000
1.000
25002950
M
Pork,
liver
0.001000
1.000
1.000
01032960
1C
Potato,
chips
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032970
1C
Potato,
dry
(
granules/
flakes)
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032971
1C
Potato,
dry
(
granules/
flakes)­
b
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032980
1C
Potato,
flour
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032981
1C
Potato,
flour­
babyfood
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032990
1C
Potato,
tuber,
w/
peel
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003400
5.400
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003400
5.400
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003400
5.400
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003400
5.400
1.000
01032991
1C
Potato,
tuber,
w/
peel­
babyfood
0.003400
5.400
1.000
01033000
1C
Potato,
tuber,
w/
o
peel
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01033001
1C
Potato,
tuber,
w/
o
peel­
babyfood
0.003400
1.000
1.000
60003010
P
Poultry,
other,
meat
0.000005
1.000
1.000
60003020
P
Poultry,
other,
liver
0.000080
1.000
1.000
60003030
P
Poultry,
other,
meat
byproducts
0.000080
1.000
1.000
60003040
P
Poultry,
other,
fat
0.000080
1.000
1.000
60003050
P
Poultry,
other,
skin
0.000080
1.000
1.000
26003390
M
Sheep,
meat
0.002000
1.000
1.000
26003391
M
Sheep,
meat­
babyfood
0.002000
1.000
1.000
26003400
M
Sheep,
meat
byproducts
0.030000
1.000
1.000
26003410
M
Sheep,
fat
0.020000
1.000
1.000
26003411
M
Sheep,
fat­
babyfood
0.020000
1.000
1.000
26003420
M
Sheep,
kidney
0.030000
1.000
1.000
26003430
M
Sheep,
liver
0.030000
1.000
1.000
04013550
4A
Spinach
0.000300
1.000
1.000
04013551
4A
Spinach­
babyfood
0.000300
1.000
1.000
08003750
8
Tomato
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
150­
Uncooked;
Cured
etc;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
Page
33
of
52
0.000330
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.000330
1.000
1.000
214­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried/
baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.000330
14.300
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000216
1.000
1.000
252­
Cooked;
Cured
etc;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
08003751
8
Tomato­
babyfood
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
08003760
8
Tomato,
paste
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000195
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000195
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000195
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.000195
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.000195
1.000
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.000195
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000195
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.000195
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000195
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000195
1.000
1.000
08003761
8
Tomato,
paste­
babyfood
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000195
1.000
1.000
08003770
8
Tomato,
puree
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.000330
1.000
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000216
1.000
1.000
252­
Cooked;
Cured
etc;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
08003771
8
Tomato,
puree­
babyfood
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
08003780
8
Tomato,
dried
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
14.300
1.000
130­
Uncooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
14.300
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
14.300
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
14.300
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
Page
34
of
52
0.000330
14.300
1.000
214­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried/
baked
0.000330
14.300
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.000330
14.300
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
14.300
1.000
231­
Cooked;
Dried;
Baked
0.000330
14.300
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.000330
14.300
1.000
08003781
8
Tomato,
dried­
babyfood
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
08003790
8
Tomato,
juice
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000216
1.000
1.000
50003820
P
Turkey,
meat
0.000005
1.000
1.000
50003821
P
Turkey,
meat­
babyfood
0.000005
1.000
1.000
50003830
P
Turkey,
liver
0.000080
1.000
1.000
50003831
P
Turkey,
liver­
babyfood
0.000080
1.000
1.000
50003840
P
Turkey,
meat
byproducts
0.000080
1.000
1.000
50003841
P
Turkey,
meat
byproducts­
babyfood
0.000080
1.000
1.000
50003850
P
Turkey,
fat
0.000080
1.000
1.000
50003851
P
Turkey,
fat­
babyfood
0.000080
1.000
1.000
50003860
P
Turkey,
skin
0.000080
1.000
1.000
50003861
P
Turkey,
skin­
babyfood
0.000080
1.000
1.000
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.010300
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.010300
1.000
1.000
Page
35
of
52
Attachment
7:
DEEM
Input
File
for
Chronic
Dietary
Assessment
for
All
Crops
(
Registered
and
Unregistered).

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
PCNB
1994­
98
data
Residue
file:
C:\
MyFiles\
PCNB\
2PCNB­
WaterIncluded­
RegCrops­
032704.
R98
Adjust.
#
2
NOT
used
Analysis
Date
09­
28­
2005
Residue
file
dated:
09­
27­
2005/
13:
40:
21/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD)
=
0.001
mg/
kg
bw/
day
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Food
Crop
Residue
Adj.
Factors
Comment
EPA
Code
Grp
Food
Name
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­­
06030300
6C
Bean,
black,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06020310
6B
Bean,
broad,
succulent
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06030320
6C
Bean,
broad,
seed
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06020330
6B
Bean,
cowpea,
succulent
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.000329
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030340
6C
Bean,
cowpea,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06030350
6C
Bean,
great
northern,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030360
6C
Bean,
kidney,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06020370
6B
Bean,
lima,
succulent
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
Page
36
of
52
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.000329
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030380
6C
Bean,
lima,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06030390
6C
Bean,
mung,
seed
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
233­
Cooked;
Dried;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030400
6C
Bean,
navy,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06030410
6C
Bean,
pink,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06030420
6C
Bean,
pinto,
seed
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
06010430
6A
Bean,
snap,
succulent
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003480
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003480
1.000
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.003480
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000329
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.000329
1.000
1.000
Page
37
of
52
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.003480
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000548
1.000
1.000
06010431
6A
Bean,
snap,
succulent­
babyfood
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000548
1.000
1.000
21000440
M
Beef,
meat
0.001000
1.000
1.000
21000441
M
Beef,
meat­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
21000450
M
Beef,
meat,
dried
0.001000
1.920
1.000
21000460
M
Beef,
meat
byproducts
0.020000
1.000
1.000
21000461
M
Beef,
meat
byproducts­
babyfood
0.020000
1.000
1.000
21000470
M
Beef,
fat
0.015000
1.000
1.000
21000471
M
Beef,
fat­
babyfood
0.015000
1.000
1.000
21000480
M
Beef,
kidney
0.020000
1.000
1.000
21000490
M
Beef,
liver
0.020000
1.000
1.000
21000491
M
Beef,
liver­
babyfood
0.020000
1.000
1.000
05010610
5A
Broccoli
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.179000
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.179000
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.179000
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.179000
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.179000
1.000
1.000
220­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.179000
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.179000
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.179000
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.179000
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010611
5A
Broccoli­
babyfood
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010620
5A
Broccoli,
Chinese
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010640
5A
Brussels
sprouts
2.330000
1.000
1.000
05010690
5A
Cabbage
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05020700
5B
Cabbage,
Chinese,
bok
choy
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010710
5A
Cabbage,
Chinese,
napa
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010720
5A
Cabbage,
Chinese,
mustard
0.179000
1.000
1.000
05010830
5A
Cauliflower
0.360000
1.000
1.000
40000930
P
Chicken,
meat
0.000001
1.000
1.000
40000931
P
Chicken,
meat­
babyfood
0.000001
1.000
1.000
40000940
P
Chicken,
liver
0.000020
1.000
1.000
40000950
P
Chicken,
meat
byproducts
0.000020
1.000
1.000
40000951
P
Chicken,
meat
byproducts­
babyfoo
0.000020
1.000
1.000
40000960
P
Chicken,
fat
0.000020
1.000
1.000
40000961
P
Chicken,
fat­
babyfood
0.000020
1.000
1.000
40000970
P
Chicken,
skin
0.000020
1.000
1.000
40000971
P
Chicken,
skin­
babyfood
0.000020
1.000
1.000
05021170
5B
Collards
0.179000
1.000
1.000
95001280
O
Cottonseed,
oil
0.165000
1.000
1.000
95001281
O
Cottonseed,
oil­
babyfood
0.165000
1.000
1.000
70001450
P
Egg,
whole
0.000110
1.000
1.000
70001451
P
Egg,
whole­
babyfood
0.000110
1.000
1.000
70001460
P
Egg,
white
0.000110
1.000
1.000
70001461
P
Egg,
white
(
solids)­
babyfood
0.000110
1.000
1.000
70001470
P
Egg,
yolk
0.000110
1.000
1.000
70001471
P
Egg,
yolk­
babyfood
0.000110
1.000
1.000
03001640
3
Garlic
0.330000
1.000
1.000
03001650
3
Garlic,
dried
0.330000
1.000
1.000
03001651
3
Garlic,
dried­
babyfood
0.330000
1.000
1.000
23001690
M
Goat,
meat
0.001000
1.000
1.000
23001700
M
Goat,
meat
byproducts
0.020000
1.000
1.000
23001710
M
Goat,
fat
0.015000
1.000
1.000
23001720
M
Goat,
kidney
0.020000
1.000
1.000
23001730
M
Goat,
liver
0.020000
1.000
1.000
24001890
M
Horse,
meat
0.001000
1.000
1.000
Page
38
of
52
05021940
5B
Kale
0.179000
1.000
1.000
27002220
D
Milk,
fat
0.120000
1.000
1.000
27002221
D
Milk,
fat
­
baby
food/
infant
for
0.120000
1.000
1.000
27012230
D
Milk,
nonfat
solids
0.001000
1.000
1.000
27012231
D
Milk,
nonfat
solids­
baby
food/
in
0.001000
1.000
1.000
27022240
D
Milk,
water
0.001000
1.000
1.000
27022241
D
Milk,
water­
babyfood/
infant
form
0.001000
1.000
1.000
27032251
D
Milk,
sugar
(
lactose)­
baby
food/
0.001000
1.000
1.000
05022290
5B
Mustard
greens
0.179000
1.000
1.000
95002630
O
Peanut
0.003400
1.000
1.000
95002640
O
Peanut,
butter
0.004900
1.000
1.000
95002650
O
Peanut,
oil
0.003400
2.100
1.000
08002700
8
Pepper,
bell
0.000271
1.000
1.000
08002701
8
Pepper,
bell­
babyfood
0.000271
1.000
1.000
08002710
8
Pepper,
bell,
dried
0.000271
1.000
1.000
08002711
8
Pepper,
bell,
dried­
babyfood
0.000271
1.000
1.000
08002720
8
Pepper,
nonbell
0.000813
1.000
1.000
08002721
8
Pepper,
nonbell­
babyfood
0.000813
1.000
1.000
08002730
8
Pepper,
nonbell,
dried
0.000813
1.000
1.000
25002900
M
Pork,
meat
0.000060
1.000
1.000
25002901
M
Pork,
meat­
babyfood
0.000060
1.000
1.000
25002910
M
Pork,
skin
0.000800
1.000
1.000
25002920
M
Pork,
meat
byproducts
0.001200
1.000
1.000
25002921
M
Pork,
meat
byproducts­
babyfood
0.001200
1.000
1.000
25002930
M
Pork,
fat
0.000800
1.000
1.000
25002931
M
Pork,
fat­
babyfood
0.000800
1.000
1.000
25002940
M
Pork,
kidney
0.001200
1.000
1.000
25002950
M
Pork,
liver
0.001000
1.000
1.000
01032960
1C
Potato,
chips
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032970
1C
Potato,
dry
(
granules/
flakes)
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032971
1C
Potato,
dry
(
granules/
flakes)­
b
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032980
1C
Potato,
flour
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032981
1C
Potato,
flour­
babyfood
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01032990
1C
Potato,
tuber,
w/
peel
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.003400
5.400
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.003400
5.400
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.003400
5.400
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.003400
5.400
1.000
01032991
1C
Potato,
tuber,
w/
peel­
babyfood
0.003400
5.400
1.000
01033000
1C
Potato,
tuber,
w/
o
peel
0.003400
1.000
1.000
01033001
1C
Potato,
tuber,
w/
o
peel­
babyfood
0.003400
1.000
1.000
60003010
P
Poultry,
other,
meat
0.000005
1.000
1.000
60003020
P
Poultry,
other,
liver
0.000080
1.000
1.000
60003030
P
Poultry,
other,
meat
byproducts
0.000080
1.000
1.000
60003040
P
Poultry,
other,
fat
0.000080
1.000
1.000
60003050
P
Poultry,
other,
skin
0.000080
1.000
1.000
26003390
M
Sheep,
meat
0.001000
1.000
1.000
26003391
M
Sheep,
meat­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
26003400
M
Sheep,
meat
byproducts
0.020000
1.000
1.000
26003410
M
Sheep,
fat
0.020000
1.000
1.000
26003411
M
Sheep,
fat­
babyfood
0.020000
1.000
1.000
26003420
M
Sheep,
kidney
0.030000
1.000
1.000
26003430
M
Sheep,
liver
0.030000
1.000
1.000
08003750
8
Tomato
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
150­
Uncooked;
Cured
etc;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.000330
1.000
1.000
214­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried/
baked
Page
39
of
52
0.000330
1.000
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
222­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.000330
14.300
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000216
1.000
1.000
252­
Cooked;
Cured
etc;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
08003751
8
Tomato­
babyfood
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
08003760
8
Tomato,
paste
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000195
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000195
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000195
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.000195
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.000195
1.000
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.000195
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000195
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.000195
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000195
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000195
1.000
1.000
08003761
8
Tomato,
paste­
babyfood
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000195
1.000
1.000
08003770
8
Tomato,
puree
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
213­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried
0.000330
1.000
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
221­
Cooked;
Frozen;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000216
1.000
1.000
252­
Cooked;
Cured
etc;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
08003771
8
Tomato,
puree­
babyfood
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
08003780
8
Tomato,
dried
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
14.300
1.000
130­
Uncooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
14.300
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
14.300
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
14.300
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.000330
14.300
1.000
214­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Fried/
baked
0.000330
14.300
1.000
215­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled/
baked
0.000330
14.300
1.000
230­
Cooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
Page
40
of
52
0.000330
14.300
1.000
231­
Cooked;
Dried;
Baked
0.000330
14.300
1.000
232­
Cooked;
Dried;
Boiled
0.000330
14.300
1.000
08003781
8
Tomato,
dried­
babyfood
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
08003790
8
Tomato,
juice
110­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
210­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000330
1.000
1.000
211­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Baked
0.000330
1.000
1.000
212­
Cooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Boiled
0.000330
1.000
1.000
240­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
0.000216
1.000
1.000
242­
Cooked;
Canned;
Boiled
0.000216
1.000
1.000
50003820
P
Turkey,
meat
0.000001
1.000
1.000
50003821
P
Turkey,
meat­
babyfood
0.000001
1.000
1.000
50003830
P
Turkey,
liver
0.000020
1.000
1.000
50003831
P
Turkey,
liver­
babyfood
0.000020
1.000
1.000
50003840
P
Turkey,
meat
byproducts
0.000020
1.000
1.000
50003841
P
Turkey,
meat
byproducts­
babyfood
0.000020
1.000
1.000
50003850
P
Turkey,
fat
0.000020
1.000
1.000
50003851
P
Turkey,
fat­
babyfood
0.000020
1.000
1.000
50003860
P
Turkey,
skin
0.000020
1.000
1.000
50003861
P
Turkey,
skin­
babyfood
0.000020
1.000
1.000
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.010300
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.010300
1.000
1.000
Page
41
of
52
Attachment
8:
Percent
Crop
Treated
Numbers
from
BEAD
Quantitative
Usage
Analysis
for
PCNB
Case
Number:
0128
Date:
10/
12/
2001
Analyst:
Tim
Kiely
Data
years:
1990
­
2000
PC
Code:
56502
Original
QUA
date:
01/
11/
99
QUA
last
edited:
10/
12/
2001
Filename:
PCNB2001.
wpd
Based
on
available
pesticide
survey
usage
information
for
the
years
of
1990
through
2000,
an
annual
estimate
of
PCNB's
total
domestic
usage
averaged
approximately
1,825,000
pounds
of
active
ingredient
(
a.
i.)
applied
to
794,000
acres.
PCNB
is
a
fungicide
with
its
largest
markets
in
terms
of
total
pounds
active
ingredient
allocated
to
turf
(
49%)
and
cotton
(
27%).
The
crops
with
the
highest
percentage
of
their
total
U.
S.
planted
acres
treated
with
PCNB
is
Brussel
Sprouts
(
13%),
cotton
(
5%),
and
potatoes
(
3%).
No
other
crop
has
more
than
2%
of
their
acreage
treated
with
PCNB.
Please
see
Table
1
for
estimates
of
usage
by
site.

Table
1.
Estimates
of
PCNB
Usage
by
site.

Site
Acres
Grown
(
000)
Acres
Treated
(
000)
%
of
Crop
Treated
Pounds
AI
Applied
(
000)
Average
Application
Rate
States
of
Most
Usage
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
lb
ai/

acre/
yr
#
appl
/
yr
lb
ai/

A/
appl
(%
of
total
lb
ai
used
on
this
site)

Apples
572
0*
0*
0*
0*
0*
0*
­­
­­
­­
­­

Pears
71
0*
0*
0*
0*
0*
0*
­­
­­
­­
­­

Bananas
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­

Strawberries
47
0*
0*
0%
0%
0*
0*
­­
­­
­­
­­

Garlic
40
0
0
0%
0%
0
0
­­
­­
­­
­­

Onions,
Dry
140
0
0
0%
0%
0
0
­­
­­
­­
­­

Eggplant/
Peppers
121
2
4
2%
3%
4
8
1.8
1.5
1.2
NM
NJ
100%
Site
Acres
Grown
(
000)
Acres
Treated
(
000)
%
of
Crop
Treated
Pounds
AI
Applied
(
000)
Average
Application
Rate
States
of
Most
Usage
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
lb
ai/

acre/
yr
#
appl
/
yr
lb
ai/

A/
appl
(%
of
total
lb
ai
used
on
this
site)

Page
42
of
52
Cole
Crops
/
1
303
3
5
1%
2%
16
32
6.1
1.0
6.1
OR
WA
OH
CA
AZ
91%

­
Mustard,
greens
9
0*
0*
0%
0%
0*
0*
­­
­­
­­
­­

­
Broccoli
126
1
2
0%
1%
2
4
3.6
1.0
3.6
CA
100%

­
Brussels
Sprouts
4
0
1
13%
17%
10
20
22.2
1.5
14.8
CA
100%

­
Cabbage
82
1
1
1%
2%
1
1
0.7
1.0
0.7
NC
WA
OR
97%

­
Chinese
Cabbage
12
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­

­
Cauliflower
53
1
2
2%
3%
3
7
3.7
1.0
3.7
CA
85%

­
Collards
14
0*
0*
0%
0%
0*
0*
­­
­­
­­
­­

Kale
4
0*
0*
0%
0%
0*
0*
­­
­­
­­
­­

Broccoli,
Chinese
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­

Beets
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­

Cucurbits
/
2
288
1
2
0%
1%
1
4
0.9
1.4
0.6
SC,
GA,
NC
93%

Lettuce
309
0*
0*
0%
0%
0*
0*
­­
­­
­­
­­

Potatoes
1,420
45
65
3%
5%
180
260
4.0
1.0
4.0
­­
Site
Acres
Grown
(
000)
Acres
Treated
(
000)
%
of
Crop
Treated
Pounds
AI
Applied
(
000)
Average
Application
Rate
States
of
Most
Usage
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
lb
ai/

acre/
yr
#
appl
/
yr
lb
ai/

A/
appl
(%
of
total
lb
ai
used
on
this
site)

Page
43
of
52
Tomatoes
477
0
1
0%
0%
1
2
2.2
1.0
2.2
FL
CA
100%

Beans/
Peas,
Dry
2,237
0
1
0%
0%
0
1
0.8
1.0
0.8
WA
90%

Beans/
Peas,
Green
708
15
20
2%
3%
15
20
1.0
1.1
0.9
FL
GA
NJ
NC
MD
MS
85%

Corn
71,433
0*
0*
0%
0%
0*
0*
­­
­­
­­
­­

Barley
8,190
0*
0*
0%
0%
0*
0*
­­
­­
­­
­­

Rice
3,175
0
0
0%
0%
0
1
2.0
1.0
2.0
AR
100%

Wheat
71,464
1
3
0%
0%
0
1
0.5
1.0
0.5
AR
DE
100%

Soybeans
66,533
4
18
0%
0%
6
25
1.5
1.3
1.1
MS
AR
TN
88%

Cotton
13,232
700
1,200
5%
9%
490
840
0.7
1.0
0.7
MS
AR
LA
TN
AL
NC
80%

Peanuts
1,515
10
23
1%
2%
17
36
1.7
1.2
1.4
TX
GA
OK
AL
AZ
81%

Sugar
Beets
1,434
0
2
0%
0%
0
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
MT
CA
83%

Tobacco
712
10
22
1%
3%
9
20
0.9
1.0
0.9
NC
VA
84%

Clover
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
 
Site
Acres
Grown
(
000)
Acres
Treated
(
000)
%
of
Crop
Treated
Pounds
AI
Applied
(
000)
Average
Application
Rate
States
of
Most
Usage
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
Wtd
Avg
Est
Max
lb
ai/

acre/
yr
#
appl
/
yr
lb
ai/

A/
appl
(%
of
total
lb
ai
used
on
this
site)

Page
44
of
52
Ginseng
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­

Coffee
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­

Turf
/
3
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
900
1,150
­­
­­
­­
­­

Ornamental
Plants
/
4
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
45
70
­­
­­
­­
­­

Seed
Treatment
/
5
­­
­­
­­
­­
­­
125
200
­­
­­
­­
­­

Total
793.8
1082
1824.7
2263
Page
45
of
52
NOTES
ON
TABLE
DATA
­
Usage
data
primarily
covers
1990
­
2000.
­
Wtd
Avg
=
Weighted
average­­
the
most
recent
years
and
more
reliable
data
are
weighted
more
heavily.
­
Est
Max
=
Estimated
maximum,
which
is
estimated
from
available
data.
­
Average
application
rates
are
calculated
from
the
weighted
averages.
­
Calculations
of
the
above
numbers
may
not
appear
to
agree
because
they
are
displayed
as
rounded
to
the
nearest
1000
for
acres
treated
or
lb.
a.
i.
(
therefore
0
=
<
500)
and
to
the
nearest
whole
percentage
point
for
%
of
crop
treated
(
Therefore
0%
=
<
0.5%).
­
0*
=
Available
EPA
sources
indicate
that
no
usage
is
observed
in
the
reported
data
for
this
site,
which
implies
that
there
is
little
or
no
usage.
­
A
double
dash
(­­)
indicates
that
information
on
this
site
is
NOT
available
in
EPA
sources
or
is
insufficient.

1.
Cole
Crops
include
broccoli,
Brussels
sprouts,
cabbage,
cauliflower,
mustard
greens,
collards
and
Chinese
cabbage.
2.
Cucurbits
includes
cucumber,
squash
and
pumpkins.
3.
Turf
includes
golf
courses,
sod
farms,
and
lawn
care
operators
(
with
applications
to
residential
turf
and
gardens).
4.
Ornamentals
include
nurseries
and
greenhouses.
5.
Seed
Treatment
includes
barley,
corn,
cotton,
peanut,
pea,
sorghum,
soybean,
oats,
safflower,
sugar
beet,
wheat,
rice.

Sources:
EPA
proprietary
data,
USDA
National
Agricultural
Service
Chemical
Use
Reports,
California
Department
of
Pesticide
Regulation
Pesticide
Use
Database,
and
National
Center
for
Food
and
Agricultural
Policy
pesticide
use
database.
Page
46
of
52
BEAD
Second
Memorandum:
Screening­
level
usage
data
The
tables
below
contain
"
screening
level"
usage
data
for
agricultural
crops.
This
information
is
retrieved
from
our
principal
agricultural
pesticide
usage
databases.
At
the
present
time
data
from
1997
to
2001
is
being
used.

All
numbers
reported
are
rounded.
'<
500'
indicates
less
than
500
pounds
of
active
ingredient.
'<
2.5'
indicates
less
than
2.5
percent
of
crop
is
treated.

'(
CA
only)'
indicates
information
was
available
only
for
California.
California
requires
reporting
of
all
agricultural
pesticide
use.
Their
database
may
indicate
small
amounts
of
usage
of
a
pesticide
on
crops
on
which
the
pesticide
is
not
registered.
Possible
reasons
for
this
include:
This
use
may
actually
have
occurred
either
as
an
unregistered
use
or
as
an
experimental
or
other
use
in
which
the
crop
was
not
intended
for
consumption.
Data
input
errors
may
have
occurred
and
either
the
crop
or
the
pesticide
is
incorrect
in
the
database.

Use
of
the
chemical
on
crops
for
which
only
California
use
is
reported
may
possibly
have
occurred
in
other
states.

In
some
cases
the
percent
crop
treated
column
is
blank.
This
is
because
information
on
acres
grown
was
not
readily
available.

Arthur
Grube
308­
8095
Page
47
of
52
SAS
Monday,
October
6,
2003
10:
16
1
Screening
Level
Estimates
of
Agricultural
Uses
of
pcnb
Sorted
Alphabetically
Pounds
of
Percent
Active
of
Crop
OBS
Crop
Ingredient
Treated
1
Apricots
(
CA
only)
<
500
2
Avocados
(
CA
only)
<
500
3
Barley
(
CA
only)
2,000
4
Beans
(
CA
only)
<
500
5
Beans,
Green
30,000
15
6
Beans/
Peas,
Dry
(
CA
only)
<
500
7
Beans/
Peas,
Vegetable
7,000
8
Broccoli
(
CA
only)
7,000
9
Brussels
Sprouts
7,000
10
10
Cabbage
20,000
<
2.5
11
Cauliflower
6,000
5
12
Cherries
(
CA
only)
<
500
13
Cotton
600,000
5
14
Grapefruit
<
500
15
Grapes
<
500
<
2.5
16
Nectarines
(
CA
only)
<
500
17
Oats
(
CA
only)
<
500
18
Onions
1,000
<
2.5
19
Oranges
(
CA
only)
<
500
20
Peaches
(
CA
only)
<
500
21
Peanuts
9,000
<
2.5
22
Peas,
Green
(
CA
only)
<
500
23
Pecans
(
CA
only)
<
500
24
Peppers
3,000
<
2.5
25
Potatoes
30,000
<
2.5
26
Safflower
(
CA
only)
<
500
27
Squash
(
CA
only)
<
500
28
Strawberries
<
500
<
2.5
29
Sudangrass
(
CA
only)
<
500
30
Tobacco
9,000
31
Tomatoes
(
CA
only)
<
500
_____________________________________

All
numbers
rounded.
Acreage
&
%
trted
not
available
for
all
crops
'<
500'
indicates
less
than
500
pounds
of
active
ingredient.
'<
2.5'
indicates
less
than
2.5
percent
of
crop
is
treated.
'(
CA
only)'
indicates
information
was
available
only
for
California.
Use
of
pcnb
may
have
occurred
in
other
states.

(
slua0001.
sas
pcnb
)
Page
48
of
52
SAS
Monday,
October
6,
2003
10:
16
2
Screening
Level
Estimates
of
Agricultural
Uses
of
pcnb
Sorted
Alphabetically
Pounds
of
Percent
Active
of
Crop
OBS
Crop
Ingredient
Treated
32
Wheat
1,000
______________________________________

All
numbers
rounded.
Acreage
&
%
trted
not
available
for
all
crops
'<
500'
indicates
less
than
500
pounds
of
active
ingredient.
'<
2.5'
indicates
less
than
2.5
percent
of
crop
is
treated.
'(
CA
only)'
indicates
information
was
available
only
for
California.
Use
of
pcnb
may
have
occurred
in
other
states.

(
slua0001.
sas
pcnb
)
Page
49
of
52
SAS
Monday,
October
6,
2003
10:
16
3
Screening
Level
Estimates
of
Agricultural
Uses
of
pcnb
Sorted
by
descending
quantity
of
pcnb
applied
to
each
crop
Pounds
of
Percent
Active
of
Crop
OBS
Crop
Ingredient
Treated
1
Cotton
600,000
5
2
Beans,
Green
30,000
15
3
Potatoes
30,000
<
2.5
4
Cabbage
20,000
<
2.5
5
Peanuts
9,000
<
2.5
6
Tobacco
9,000
7
Brussels
Sprouts
7,000
10
8
Beans/
Peas,
Vegetable
7,000
9
Broccoli
(
CA
only)
7,000
10
Cauliflower
6,000
5
11
Peppers
3,000
<
2.5
12
Barley
(
CA
only)
2,000
13
Onions
1,000
<
2.5
14
Wheat
1,000
15
Grapes
<
500
<
2.5
16
Strawberries
<
500
<
2.5
17
Apricots
(
CA
only)
<
500
18
Avocados
(
CA
only)
<
500
19
Beans
(
CA
only)
<
500
20
Beans/
Peas,
Dry
(
CA
only)
<
500
21
Cherries
(
CA
only)
<
500
22
Grapefruit
<
500
23
Nectarines
(
CA
only)
<
500
24
Oats
(
CA
only)
<
500
25
Oranges
(
CA
only)
<
500
26
Peaches
(
CA
only)
<
500
27
Peas,
Green
(
CA
only)
<
500
28
Pecans
(
CA
only)
<
500
29
Safflower
(
CA
only)
<
500
30
Squash
(
CA
only)
<
500
31
Sudangrass
(
CA
only)
<
500
______________________________________

All
numbers
rounded.
Acreage
&
%
trted
not
available
for
all
crops
'<
500'
indicates
less
than
500
pounds
of
active
ingredient.
'<
2.5'
indicates
less
than
2.5
percent
of
crop
is
treated.
'(
CA
only)'
indicates
information
was
available
only
for
California.
Use
of
pcnb
may
have
occurred
in
other
states.

(
slua0001.
sas
pcnb
)
Page
50
of
52
SAS
Monday,
October
6,
2003
10:
16
4
Screening
Level
Estimates
of
Agricultural
Uses
of
pcnb
Sorted
by
descending
quantity
of
pcnb
applied
to
each
crop
Pounds
of
Percent
Active
of
Crop
OBS
Crop
Ingredient
Treated
32
Tomatoes
(
CA
only)
<
500
______________________________________

All
numbers
rounded.
Acreage
&
%
trted
not
available
for
all
crops
'<
500'
indicates
less
than
500
pounds
of
active
ingredient.
'<
2.5'
indicates
less
than
2.5
percent
of
crop
is
treated.
'(
CA
only)'
indicates
information
was
available
only
for
California.
Use
of
pcnb
may
have
occurred
in
other
states.

(
slua0001.
sas
pcnb
)
Page
51
of
52
SAS
Monday,
October
6,
2003
10:
16
5
Screening
Level
Estimates
of
Agricultural
Uses
of
pcnb
Sorted
by
descending
percent
of
crop
treated
with
pcnb
Pounds
of
Percent
Active
of
Crop
OBS
Crop
Ingredient
Treated
1
Beans,
Green
30,000
15
2
Brussels
Sprouts
7,000
10
3
Cotton
600,000
5
4
Cauliflower
6,000
5
5
Potatoes
30,000
<
2.5
6
Cabbage
20,000
<
2.5
7
Peanuts
9,000
<
2.5
8
Peppers
3,000
<
2.5
9
Onions
1,000
<
2.5
10
Grapes
<
500
<
2.5
11
Strawberries
<
500
<
2.5
12
Tobacco
9,000
13
Beans/
Peas,
Vegetable
7,000
14
Broccoli
(
CA
only)
7,000
15
Barley
(
CA
only)
2,000
16
Wheat
1,000
17
Apricots
(
CA
only)
<
500
18
Avocados
(
CA
only)
<
500
19
Beans
(
CA
only)
<
500
20
Beans/
Peas,
Dry
(
CA
only)
<
500
21
Cherries
(
CA
only)
<
500
22
Grapefruit
<
500
23
Nectarines
(
CA
only)
<
500
24
Oats
(
CA
only)
<
500
25
Oranges
(
CA
only)
<
500
26
Peaches
(
CA
only)
<
500
27
Peas,
Green
(
CA
only)
<
500
28
Pecans
(
CA
only)
<
500
29
Safflower
(
CA
only)
<
500
30
Squash
(
CA
only)
<
500
31
Sudangrass
(
CA
only)
<
500
______________________________________

All
numbers
rounded.
Acreage
&
%
trted
not
available
for
all
crops
'<
500'
indicates
less
than
500
pounds
of
active
ingredient.
'<
2.5'
indicates
less
than
2.5
percent
of
crop
is
treated.
'(
CA
only)'
indicates
information
was
available
only
for
California.
Use
of
pcnb
may
have
occurred
in
other
states.

(
slua0001.
sas
pcnb
)
Page
52
of
52
SAS
Monday,
October
6,
2003
10:
16
6
Screening
Level
Estimates
of
Agricultural
Uses
of
pcnb
Sorted
by
descending
percent
of
crop
treated
with
pcnb
Pounds
of
Percent
Active
of
Crop
OBS
Crop
Ingredient
Treated
32
Tomatoes
(
CA
only)
<
500
___________________

All
numbers
rounded.
Acreage
&
%
trted
not
available
for
all
crops
'<
500'
indicates
less
than
500
pounds
of
active
ingredient.
'<
2.5'
indicates
less
than
2.5
percent
of
crop
is
treated.
'(
CA
only)'
indicates
information
was
available
only
for
California.
Use
of
pcnb
may
have
occurred
in
other
states.

(
slua0001.
sas
pcnb
)
