United
States
Prevention,
Pesticides
EPA
xx­
x­
xx­
xxx
Environmental
Protection
and
Toxic
Substances
September
2005
Agency
(
7508C)

Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
for
Napropamide
Case
No.
2450
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
for
Napropamide
Case
No.
2450
Approved
By:

___________________________
Debra
Edwards,
Ph.
D.
Director,
Special
Review
and
Reregistration
Division
___________________________
Date
Table
of
Contents
Napropamide
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
Team
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
i
Glossary
of
Terms
and
Abbreviations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ii
Executive
Summary
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
iv
I.
Introduction
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
II.
Chemical
Overview
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
A.
Regulatory
History
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
B.
Chemical
Identification
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
C.
Use
Profile
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4
D.
Estimated
Usage
of
Pesticide
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5
III.
Summary
of
Napropamide
Risk
Assessments
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
A.
Human
Health
Risk
Assessment
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
1.
Toxicity
of
Napropamide
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
a.
Acute
Toxicity
Profile
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7
b.
Developmental
&
Reproductive
Toxicity/
FQPA
Safety
Factor
7
c.
Carcinogenicity
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7
d.
Endocrine
Effects
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
e.
Toxicological
Endpoints.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
2.
Dietary
Exposure
and
Risk
from
Food
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9
a.
Exposure
Assumptions
(
Food)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9
b.
Exposure
Assumptions
(
Water)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9
c.
Population
Adjusted
Dose
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
10
d.
Chronic
Dietary
Risk
Estimates
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
10
3.
Residential
Exposure
and
Risk
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
10
a.
Residential
Exposure
and
Duration
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
11
b.
Residential
Handler
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
11
c.
Residential
Handler
Risk
Estimates
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
12
d.
Residential
Post­
Application
Risk
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.12
e.
Post­
Application
Risk
Estimates
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.13
4.
Aggregate
Exposure
and
Risk
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
14
a.
Short­
Term
Aggregate
Risk
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.14
b.
Chronic
Aggregate
Risk
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.14
5.
Cumulative
Risk
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
15
6.
Occupational
Risk
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
15
a.
Occupational
Toxicity
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
15
b.
Occupational
Handler
Exposure
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
16
c.
Occupational
Handler
Risk
Summary
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
16
d.
Occupational
Handler
Risk
Estimate
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
17
e.
Occupational
Post­
Application
Risk
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
17
7.
Human
Incident
Data
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
17
B.
Environmental
Risk
Assessment
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
18
1.
Environmental
Exposure
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
18
a.
Environmental
Fate
and
Transport
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
18
b.
Aquatic
Organism
Exposure
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
19
c.
Terrestrial
Organism
Exposure
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
20
d.
Non­
target
Terrestrial
Plant
Exposure
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
22
2.
Environmental
Effects
(
Toxicity)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
23
a.
Toxicity
to
Aquatic
and
Terrestrial
Organisms
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
23
b.
Ecological
Risk
Estimation
(
RQs)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
24
a.
Risk
to
Aquatic
Organisms
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
25
b.
Risk
to
Non­
target
Terrestrial
Organisms
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
26
c.
Ecological
Incidents
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
28
d.
Endangered
Species
Concerns
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
28
e.
Risk
Characterization
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
29
IV.
Risk
Management,
Reregistration,
and
Tolerance
Reassessment
Decision
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
30
A.
Determination
of
Reregistration
Eligibility
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
30
B.
Public
Comments
and
Responses
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
31
C.
Regulatory
Position
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
31
1.
Food
Quality
Protection
Act
Findings
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
31
a.
"
Risk
Cup"
Determination
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
31
b.
Determination
of
Safety
to
the
U.
S.
Population
Including
Infants
and
Children
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
32
c.
Endocrine
Disruptor
Effects
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
32
d.
Cumulative
Risks
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
32
D.
Tolerance
Reassessment
Summary
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
33
a.
Codex
Harmonization
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
35
E.
Regulatory
Rationale
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
35
1.
Human
Health
Mitigation
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
35
a.
Dietary
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
35
b.
Residential
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
35
c.
Aggregate
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.35
d.
Occupational
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
35
2.
Environmental
Risk
Mitigation
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.36
3.
Significant
of
Napropamide
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.38
4.
Endangered
Species
Considerations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.38
F.
Other
Labeling
Requirements
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
39
1.
Spray
Drift
Management
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.39
V.
What
Registrants
Need
to
Do
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
40
A.
Manufacturing
Use
Products
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
40
1.
Generic
Data
Requirements
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
40
2.
Labeling
for
Manufacturing­
Use
Products
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
41
B.
End­
Use
Products
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
41
1.
Additional
Product­
Specific
Data
Requirements
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
41
2.
Labeling
for
End­
Use
Products
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
41
G.
Labeling
Changes
Summary
Table
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
42
VI.
Appendices
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Appendix
A.
Food/
Feed
Use
Patterns
Subject
to
Reregistration
for
Napropamide
.
.
Appendix
B.
Data
Supporting
Guideline
Requirements
for
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Appendix
D.
Citations
Considered
to
Be
Part
of
the
Data
Base
Supporting
the
Reregistration
Decision
(
Bibliography)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Appendix
E.
Generic
Data
Call­
In
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Appendix
F.
Product
Specific
Data
Call­
In
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Appendix
G.
EPA's
Batching
of
Napropamide
Products
for
Meeting
Acute
Toxicity
Data
Requirements
for
Reregistration
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Appendix
H.
List
of
Registrants
Sent
this
Data
Call­
In
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Appendix
I.
List
of
Available
Related
Documents
and
Electronically
Available
Forms
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
i
Napropamide
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
Team
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs:

Biological
and
Economic
Analysis
Assessment
Elisa
Rim
Monisha
Kaul
Nicole
Zinn
Sunil
Ratnayake
Environmental
Fate
and
Effects
Risk
Assessment
Fred
Jenkins
Jim
Breithaupt
Shannon
Borges
Endangered
Species
Arty
Williams
Health
Effects
Risk
Assessment
Danette
Drew
John
Liccione
Seyed
Tadayon
Susan
Stanton
Registration
Support
Joanne
Miller
ii
Risk
Management
Demson
Fuller
Tom
Brennan
Glossary
of
Terms
and
Abbreviations
ai
Active
Ingredient
aPAD
Acute
Population
Adjusted
Dose
AR
Anticipated
Residue
BCF
Bioconcentration
Factor
CCA
Comparative
Cholinesterase
Assay
CFR
Code
of
Federal
Regulations
cPAD
Chronic
Population
Adjusted
Dose
CSF
Confidential
Statement
of
Formula
CSFII
USDA
Continuing
Surveys
for
Food
Intake
by
Individuals
DCI
Data
Call­
In
DEEM
Dietary
Exposure
Evaluation
Model
DFR
Dislodgeable
Foliar
Residue
DNT
Developmental
Neurotoxicity
DWLOC
Drinking
Water
Level
of
Comparison.
EC
Emulsifiable
Concentrate
Formulation
EC
Engineering
Control
EDWC
Estimated
Drinking
Water
Concentration
EEC
Estimated
Environmental
Concentration
EPA
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EUP
End­
Use
Product
FDA
Food
and
Drug
Administration
FIFRA
Federal
Insecticide,
Fungicide,
and
Rodenticide
Act
FFDCA
Federal
Food,
Drug,
and
Cosmetic
Act
FQPA
Food
Quality
Protection
Act
FOB
Functional
Observation
Battery
G
Granular
Formulation
GLN
Guideline
Number
HAFT
Highest
Average
Field
Trial
IR
Index
Reservoir
LC50
Median
Lethal
Concentration.
A
statistically
derived
concentration
of
a
substance
that
can
be
iii
expected
to
cause
death
in
50%
of
test
animals.
It
is
usually
expressed
as
the
weight
of
substance
per
weight
or
volume
of
water,
air
or
feed,
e.
g.,
mg/
l,
mg/
kg
or
ppm.
LD50
Median
Lethal
Dose.
A
statistically
derived
single
dose
that
can
be
expected
to
cause
death
in
50%
of
the
test
animals
when
administered
by
the
route
indicated
(
oral,
dermal,
inhalation).
It
is
expressed
as
a
weight
of
substance
per
unit
weight
of
animal,
e.
g.,
mg/
kg.
LOC
Level
of
Concern
LOD
Limit
of
Detection
LOAEL
Lowest
Observed
Adverse
Effect
Level
MATC
Maximum
Acceptable
Toxicant
Concentration
µ
g/
g
Micrograms
Per
Gram
µ
g/
L
Micrograms
Per
Liter
mg/
kg/
day
Milligram
Per
Kilogram
Per
Day
mg/
L
Milligrams
Per
Liter
MOE
Margin
of
Exposure
MRID
Master
Record
Identification
(
number).
EPA's
system
of
recording
and
tracking
studies
submitted.
MUP
Manufacturing­
Use
Product
NA
Not
Applicable
NAWQA
USGS
National
Water
Quality
Assessment
NPDES
National
Pollutant
Discharge
Elimination
System
NR
Not
Required
NOAEL
No
Observed
Adverse
Effect
Level
OPP
EPA
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs
OPPTS
EPA
Office
of
Prevention,
Pesticides
and
Toxic
Substances
PAD
Population
Adjusted
Dose
PCA
Percent
Crop
Area
PDP
USDA
Pesticide
Data
Program
PHED
Pesticide
Handler's
Exposure
Data
PHI
Preharvest
Interval
ppb
Parts
Per
Billion
PPE
Personal
Protective
Equipment
ppm
Parts
Per
Million
PRZM/
EXAMS
Tier
II
Surface
Water
Computer
Model
Q1*
The
Carcinogenic
Potential
of
a
Compound,
Quantified
by
the
EPA's
Cancer
Risk
Model
RAC
Raw
Agriculture
Commodity
RED
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
REI
Restricted
Entry
Interval
RfD
Reference
Dose
RQ
Risk
Quotient
SCI­
GROW
Tier
I
Ground
Water
Computer
Model
SAP
Science
Advisory
Panel
SF
Safety
Factor
SLN
Special
Local
Need
(
Registrations
Under
Section
24
©
)
of
FIFRA)
TGAI
Technical
Grade
Active
Ingredient
TRR
Total
Radioactive
Residue
USDA
United
States
Department
of
Agriculture
USGS
United
States
Geological
Survey
UF
Uncertainty
Factor
UFdb
Database
Uncertainty
Factor
UV
Ultraviolet
WPS
Worker
Protection
Standard
iv
Executive
Summary
The
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
has
concluded
its
reregistration
eligibility
decision
for
napropamide
and
determined
that
the
chemical
is
eligible
for
reregistration
provided
that
(
1)
current
data
gaps
and
additional
data
needs
are
addressed
and
(
2)
the
risk
mitigation
measures
outlined
in
this
document
are
adopted
and
label
amendments
are
made
to
implement
these
measures.
EPA
has
also
reassessed
the
27
tolerances
for
napropamide
under
section
408(
q)
of
FFDCA,
as
amended
by
FQPA.

EPA
has
completed
its
review
of
public
comments
on
the
revised
napropamide
risk
assessments
and
is
issuing
its
risk
management
decision.
The
revised
risk
assessments
are
based
on
review
of
the
required
data
supporting
the
use
patterns
of
currently
registered
products
and
additional
information
received.
After
considering
the
risks
identified
in
the
revised
risk
assessment,
comments,
and
mitigation
suggestions
from
interested
parties,
EPA
developed
its
risk
management
decision
for
uses
of
napropamide
that
posed
potential
risks
of
concern.

Napropamide
is
an
herbicide
registered
to
control
broadleaf
weeds
and
annual
grasses
on
numerous
food/
feed
and
non­
food/
feed
use
sites,
including
fruits
and
nuts,
vegetables,
ornamentals,
turf/
lawns,
forestry
sites
and
tobacco.
Napropamide
was
first
registered
in
1972.
Approximately
368,000
pounds
of
napropamide
active
ingredient
are
applied
annually.
Sites
on
which
napropamide
has
the
highest
percent
of
crop
treated
include
cranberries
(
30%),
pepper
and
strawberries
(
15%),
eggplant,
tobacco,
and
tomatoes
(
10%).

Dietary
Risk
v
Acute
dietary
risk
was
not
assessed
as
there
were
no
toxicological
endpoints
of
concern
attributable
to
a
single
exposure.
The
chronic
dietary
risk
(
food
+
water)
of
napropamide
is
well
below
the
Agency's
level
of
concern
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
all
population
subgroups.
The
most
highly
exposed
subgroup
was
children,
1­
2
years
old,
with
the
estimated
exposure
at
1.8%
of
the
cPAD.
Therefore,
no
mitigation
is
warranted
at
this
time
for
dietary
risks.

Residential
Risk
The
estimated
residential
handler
risks
for
all
scenarios
do
not
exceed
the
Agency's
level
of
concern.
The
MOEs
ranged
from
19,000
to
190,000.
Residential
post­
application
risks
were
also
below
EPA's
level
of
concern
(
the
short
term
total
MOE
is
265).
Therefore,
no
mitigation
is
warranted
at
this
time
for
residential
risks.

Aggregate
Risk
Short­
and
long
term
(
chronic)
aggregate
risks
assessments
were
conducted
for
napropamide.
The
short­
term
assessment
considered
both
dietary
(
food
+
water)
and
residential
exposures.
The
long­
term
assessment
considered
dietary
exposure
only,
since
the
current
uses
of
napropamide
are
not
expected
to
result
in
long­
term
residential
exposure.

Short­
term
aggregate
risk
is
below
EPA's
level
of
concern
for
napropamide.
Estimated
short­
term
aggregate
risk
MOEs
for
adults
and
children
(
toddlers)
are
14,340
and
260,
respectively.
The
chronic
aggregate
risk
estimates
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
all
subgroups
are
<
2%
of
the
cPAD
and,
therefore,
are
also
below
the
Agency's
level
of
concern.
Therefore,
no
risk
mitigation
is
warranted
at
this
time
for
aggregate
risks.

Occupational
Risk
The
Agency
identified
several
occupational
scenarios
where
exposure
might
occur.
The
occupational
handler
exposures
estimated
for
all
scenarios
do
not
exceed
the
Agency's
level
of
concern
(
i.
e.,
MOEs
>
100).
Therefore,
no
risk
mitigation
is
warranted
at
this
time
for
occupational
risks.

Cumulative
Risk
Unlike
other
pesticides
for
which
EPA
has
followed
a
cumulative
risk
approach
based
on
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity,
EPA
has
not
made
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
finding
as
to
napropamide
and
any
other
substances,
and
napropamide
does
not
appear
to
produce
a
toxic
metabolite
produced
by
other
substances.
For
the
purposes
of
this
tolerance
action,
therefore,
EPA
has
assumed
that
napropamide
does
not
share
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
with
other
substances.
For
information
regarding
EPA's
efforts
to
determine
which
chemicals
have
a
vi
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
and
to
evaluate
the
cumulative
effects
of
such
chemicals,
see
the
policy
statements
released
by
EPA's
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs
concerning
common
mechanism
determinations
and
procedures
for
cumulating
effects
from
substances
found
to
have
a
common
mechanism
of
EPA's
website
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
pesticides/
cumulative/.

Ecological
Risk
Based
on
high­
end
estimated
environmental
concentrations,
chronic
levels
of
concern
(
LOCs)
were
exceeded
for
mammals
that
feed
on
all
food
types
the
Agency
assesses
(
i.
e.,
short
grass,
tall
grass,
broadleaf
plants
and
small
insects,
fruits/
pods/
large
insects)
for
all
modeled
use
rates.
Risk
quotient
(
RQ)
estimates
ranged
up
to
21
(
LOC=
1).
For
terrestrial
and
wetland/
riparian
plants
(
monocot
and
dicot),
RQs
for
seedling
emergence
in
areas
adjacent
to
treated
fields
exceeded
LOCs
at
all
modeled
application
rates.
RQ
estimates
ranged
up
to
12.
EPA
believes
the
risks
can
be
substantially
reduced
through
the
implementation
of
the
following
mitigation
measures:
1)
requiring
application
rate
reductions;
and
2)
cancelling
use
on
a
number
of
crops.

Endangered
Species
Based
on
EPA's
screening
level
assessment,
RQs
for
napropamide
exceed
acute
levels
of
concern
for
direct
effects
to
endangered
species
of
mammals,
mollusks,
marine/
estuarine
crustaceans,
aquatic
vascular
plants
and
terrestrial
and
semi­
aquatic
plants
(
both
dicots
and
monocots).
RQs
were
also
exceeded
for
chronic
direct
effects
to
mammals.
Further,
based
on
screening
level
assessments
of
potential
direct
effects
to
these
taxa,
the
potential
for
indirect
effects
to
all
taxa
of
listed
species
can
not
be
precluded
at
this
time.
These
findings
are
based
solely
on
EPA's
screening
level
assessment
and
do
not
constitute
"
may
affect"
finding
under
the
Endangered
Species
Act.

Next
Steps
The
Agency
is
issuing
this
RED
document
for
napropamide
as
announced
in
a
Notice
of
Availability
published
in
the
Federal
Register.
In
the
near
future,
EPA
will
issue
generic
DCI
for
additional
data
necessary
to
confirm
the
conclusions
of
this
RED
for
the
active
ingredient
napropamide.
EPA
will
also
issue
a
product
specific
DCI
for
data
necessary
to
complete
product
reregistration
for
products
containing
napropamide.
Page
1
of
150
I.
Introduction
The
Federal
Insecticide,
Fungicide,
and
Rodenticide
Act
(
FIFRA)
was
amended
in
1988
to
accelerate
the
reregistration
of
products
with
active
ingredients
registered
prior
to
November
1,
1984.
The
amended
Act
calls
for
the
development
and
submission
of
data
to
support
the
reregistration
of
an
active
ingredient,
as
well
as
a
review
of
all
submitted
data
by
the
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
referred
to
as
EPA
or
"
the
Agency").
Reregistration
involves
a
thorough
review
of
the
scientific
database
underlying
a
pesticide's
registration.
The
purpose
of
the
Agency's
review
is
to
reassess
the
potential
risks
arising
from
the
currently
registered
uses
of
the
pesticide;
to
determine
the
need
for
additional
data
on
health
and
environmental
effects;
and
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
pesticide
meets
the
"
no
unreasonable
adverse
effects"
criteria
of
FIFRA.

On
August
3,
1996,
the
Food
Quality
Protection
Act
of
1996
(
FQPA)
was
signed
into
law.
This
Act
amends
FIFRA
and
the
Federal
Food
Drug
and
Cosmetic
Act
(
FFDCA)
to
require
reassessment
of
all
existing
tolerances
for
pesticides
in
food.
FQPA
also
requires
EPA
to
review
all
tolerances
in
effect
on
August
2,
1996
by
August
3,
2006.
In
reassessing
these
tolerances,
the
Agency
must
consider,
among
other
things,
aggregate
risks
from
non­
occupational
sources
of
pesticide
exposure,
whether
there
is
increased
susceptibility
to
infants
and
children,
and
the
cumulative
effects
of
pesticides
with
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity.
When
a
safety
finding
has
been
made
that
aggregate
risks
are
not
of
concern
and
the
Agency
concludes
that
there
is
a
reasonable
certainty
of
no
harm
from
aggregate
exposure,
the
tolerances
are
considered
reassessed.
EPA
decided
that,
for
those
chemicals
that
have
tolerances
and
are
undergoing
reregistration,
tolerance
reassessment
will
be
accomplished
through
the
reregistration
process.
Page
2
of
150
As
mentioned
above,
FQPA
requires
EPA
to
consider
"
available
information"
concerning
the
cumulative
effects
of
a
particular
pesticide's
residues
and
"
other
substances
that
have
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity"
when
considering
whether
to
establish,
modify,
or
revoke
a
tolerance.
Potential
cumulative
effects
of
chemicals
with
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
are
considered
because
low­
level
exposures
to
multiple
chemicals
causing
a
common
toxic
effect
by
a
common
mechanism
could
lead
to
the
same
adverse
health
effect
as
would
a
higher
level
of
exposure
to
any
one
of
these
individual
chemicals.
For
information
regarding
EPA's
efforts
to
determine
which
chemicals
have
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
and
to
evaluate
the
cumulative
effects
of
such
chemicals,
see
the
policy
statements
released
by
the
EPA's
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs
concerning
common
mechanism
determinations
and
procedures
for
cumulating
effects
from
substances
found
to
have
a
common
mechanism
on
EPA's
website
at
http://
epa.
gov/
pesticides/
cumulative/.]

Unlike
other
pesticides
for
which
EPA
has
considered
cumulative
risk
based
on
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity,
EPA
has
not
made
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
finding
for
napropamide.
The
Agency
has
found
no
information
indicating
napropamide
shares
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
with
other
substances.
Napropamide
does
not
appear
to
produce
a
toxic
metabolite
produced
by
other
substances.
Therefore,
for
the
purposes
of
tolerance
reassessment
and
a
decision
on
reregistration
eligibility,
EPA
has
assumed
that
napropamide
does
not
share
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
with
other
compounds.
In
the
future,
if
additional
information
suggests
napropamide
shares
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
with
other
compounds,
additional
testing
may
be
required
and
a
cumulative
assessment
may
be
necessary.

This
document
presents
EPA's
revised
human
health
and
ecological
risk
assessments
and
the
reregistration
eligibility
decision
for
napropamide.
This
document
consists
of
six
sections
and
appendices.
Section
I
contains
the
regulatory
framework
for
reregistration/
tolerance
reassessment.
Section
II
provides
a
profile
of
the
use
and
usage
of
the
chemical.
Section
III
gives
an
overview
of
the
revised
human
health
and
environmental
effects
risk
assessments
based
on
data,
public
comments,
and
other
information
received
in
response
to
the
preliminary
risk
assessments.
Section
IV
presents
the
Agency's
reregistration
eligibility
and
risk
management
decisions.
Section
V
summarizes
label
changes
necessary
to
implement
the
risk
mitigation
measures
outlined
in
Section
IV.
The
appendices
in
Section
VI
list
related
and
supporting
documents,
studies
submitted
to
support
EPA's
data
requirements
for
reregistration,
and
generic
and
product
Data
Call­
Ins
(
DCIs),
and
provide
information
on
how
to
access
related
documents.
The
preliminary
and
revised
risk
assessments
for
napropamide
are
available
in
the
Public
Docket,
under
docket
number(
s)
OPP­
2004­
0162
and
on
the
Agency's
web
page,
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edockets.
Page
3
of
150
Page
4
of
150
O
CH
3
O
N
CH
3
CH
3
II.
Chemical
Overview
A.
Regulatory
History
Napropamide
has
been
registered
in
the
United
States
since
1972
for
use
as
a
herbicide.
A
Data
Call­
In
(
DCI)
was
issued
in
1989
requiring
the
submission
of
additional
data
on
product
and
residue
chemistry,
toxicity,
environmental
fate,
and
ecological
effects.
Subsequent
DCIs
were
issued
in
1991,
1994
and
1995
which
required
additional
product
chemistry,
environmental
fate,
processing
and
residue
crop
field
trial
studies.
This
Registration
Eligibility
Decision
(
RED)
reflects
a
reassessment
of
all
data
which
were
submitted
in
response
to
the
DCIs.

B.
Chemical
Identification
Common
Name:
Napropamide
Trade
Name:
Devrinol
®
.

Chemical
Name:
N,
N­
diethyl­
2­(
1­
naphthalenyloxy)
propanamide
Chemical
Family:
Amide
Case
Number:
2450
CAS
Registry
Number:
15299­
99­
7
OPP
Chemical
Code:
103001
Molecular
weight:
271.4
Empirical
Formula:
C
17
H
21
NO
2
Basic
Manufacturers:
United
Phosphorus
Inc.
Page
5
of
150
Table
1:
Physicochemical
Properties
of
Napropamide
Parameter
Value
Melting
point
68­
70
°
C
pH
8.9
at
22
°
C
Density,
bulk
density,
or
specific
gravity
0.584
g/
mL
at
22
°
C
Water
solubility
74
mg/
L
at
25
°
C
Solvent
solubility
at
20
°
C
Miscible
with
acetone,
chlorobenzene,
ethanol,
and
dichloromethane
4.5
g/
100
mL
in
kerosene
17.7
g/
100
mL
in
n­
octanol
55.5
g/
100
mL
in
xylene
Vapor
pressure
1.7
x
10­
7
torr
or
2.3
x
10­
5
Pa
at
25
°
C
Dissociation
constant,
pKa
Not
applicable;
napropamide
is
neither
an
acid
nor
a
base.

Octanol/
water
partition
coefficient
2.1
x
103
(
log
KOW
=
3.3)

UV/
visible
absorption
spectrum
Neutral
(
201.8
nm):
A=
1.1144,
0
=
58560mol­
1
Acidic
(
215nm):
A=
1.1198,
0=
58844mol­
1cm­
1
Basic:
unstable
in
alkaline
solution
C.
Use
Profile
The
following
is
information
on
the
currently
registered
uses,
including
an
overview
of
use
sites
and
application
methods.

Type
of
Pesticide:
Herbicide
Target
organism(
s):
Napropamide
is
registered
to
control
numerous
broadleaf
weeds
and
annual
grasses.

Mode
of
action:
Napropamide
controls
weeds
by
preventing
root
cell
elongation,
thus
disrupting
the
growth
process
during
germination.

Use
Sites:

Food
uses:

°
Berries/
small
fruit
(
blackberry,
boysenberry,
loganberry,
raspberry,
blueberry,
strawberry,
cranberry,
currant,
grape)
°
Brassica
and
leafy
vegetables
(
broccoli,
Brussels
sprouts,
cabbage,
cauliflower,
asparagus)
°
Citrus
(
grapefruit,
lemon,
orange,
tangerine,
tangelo)
°
Fruiting
vegetables
(
eggplant,
pepper,
tomato)
Page
6
of
150
°
Nuts
(
almond,
pistachio,
pecan,
filbert,
walnut)
°
Pome
Fruit
(
apple,
pear)
°
Stone
Fruit
(
apricot,
cherry,
nectarine,
peach,
plum,
prune)
°
Tropical
Fruit
(
kiwi,
persimmon,
avocado,
pomegranate)
°
Additional
Crops
(
artichoke,
fig,
mint,
olive,
rhubarb,
sweet
potato)

Non­
Food,
Greenhouse
&
Residential
Uses:

°
Tobacco
°
Trees/
Ornamentals
(
conifer,
shade
tree,
ornamental
tree,
ground
cover,
herbaceous,
plants,
woody
shrubs,
vines,
lawns,
turf,
potting
soil)

Use
Classification:
General
Use
Pesticide
Formulation
Types:
Napropamide
is
formulated
as
dry
flowable,
granular
and
liquid
formulations.

Application
Methods:
Aerial
application,
ground
boom,
hand­
held
sprayers,
granular
application
equipment,
and
chemigation
equipment.

Application
Rates:
Napropamide
is
applied
at
rates
between
2
and
6
pounds
active
ingredient
per
acre
(
lbs
a.
i/
A)
on
all
crops/
sites
except
cranberries,
where
applications
at
up
to
15
lbs
a.
i./
A
are
allowed.
Aerial
applications
are
allowed
for
cranberries
only.
Applications
for
all
other
uses
are
made
using
ground
equipment,
including
groundboom
and
hand­
held
sprayers,
granular
application
equipment,
and
chemigation
equipment.

Application
Timing:
Timing
ranges
across
different
stages
of
plant
development
in
both
agricultural
and
ornamental
plant
settings.

D.
Estimated
Usage
of
Pesticide
Table
2
below
summarizes
the
best
available
estimates
for
the
pesticide
usage
of
napropamide
with
"
screening
level"
usage
data
for
agricultural
crops.
This
information
was
retrieved
from
EPA's
principal
pesticide
usage
databases
using
current
estimates.
In
addition,
this
table
reflects
only
the
highest
usage
sites.
Based
on
Agency
data,
the
average
total
annual
domestic
usage
of
napropamide
was
approximately
368,000
pounds.
The
predominant
usage
is
in
California.
The
highest
usage,
by
crop,
is
on
cranberries
with
30%
crop
treated.

Table
2:
Napropamide
Crop
Usage
Summary
Crop
Lbs.
A.
I.
%
Crop
Treated
Cranberrries
50,000
30
Strawberries
30,000
15
Crop
Lbs.
A.
I.
%
Crop
Treated
Page
7
of
150
Tomatoes
60,000
10
Peppers
20,000
15
Tobacco
40,000
10
Eggplant
<
500
10
III.
Summary
of
Napropamide
Risk
Assessment
The
purpose
of
this
summary
is
to
assist
the
reader
by
identifying
the
key
features
and
findings
of
these
risk
assessments,
and
to
help
the
reader
better
understand
the
conclusions
reached
in
the
assessments.
The
human
health
and
ecological
risk
assessment
documents
and
supporting
information
listed
in
Appendix
C
were
used
to
reach
the
safety
finding
and
regulatory
decision
for
napropamide.
While
the
risk
assessments
and
related
addenda
are
not
included
in
this
document,
they
are
available
from
the
OPP
Public
Docket
OPP­
2004­
0162
and
may
be
accessed
on
the
Agency's
website
at
http://
epa.
gov/
edockets.
Paper
copies
of
these
documents
may
be
found
in
the
OPP
Public
Docket
under
the
above
docket
number.
The
OPP
public
docket
is
located
in
Room
119,
Crystal
Mall
II,
1801
South
Bell
Street,
Arlington,
VA,
and
is
open
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
Federal
holidays,
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
00
p.
m.

A.
Human
Health
Risk
Assessment
EPA
released
its
preliminary
risk
assessments
for
napropamide
for
public
comment
on
March,
16,
2005
(
Phase
3
of
the
public
participation
process).
During
the
public
comment
period,
the
registrant
(
United
Phosphorus,
Inc.)
proposed
reducing
the
maximum
application
rate
for
cranberries.
United
Phosphorus
also
indicated
that
the
company
will
not
support
existing
tolerances
for
cucurbit
vegetables
and
coffee.
The
changes
proposed
by
the
registrant
would
result
in
lower
estimates
of
dietary
and
non­
dietary
exposure
to
napropamide.
However,
because
the
estimated
risks
based
on
the
Agency's
previous
exposure
assessments
are
well
below
EPA's
level
of
concern,
a
revised
risk
assessment
reflecting
the
proposed
changes
is
not
warranted
and
has
not
been
conducted.

1.
Toxicity
of
Napropamide
The
available
toxicity
data
on
napropamide
are
adequate
to
assess
the
chemical's
hazard
potential.
The
most
common
effect
in
animal
studies
(
dogs,
mice
and
rats)
from
long­
term
oral
exposure
was
a
decrease
in
body
weight
or
body
weight
gain,
with
females
being
more
sensitive
than
males
to
effects
on
body
weight.
Technical
napropamide
has
low
acute
toxicity
(
category
III/
IV)
via
the
oral,
dermal
and
inhalation
routes
of
exposure.
It
is
moderately
irritating
to
the
eye
(
category
II)
but
does
not
cause
skin
irritation
or
dermal
sensitization.

Further
details
on
the
toxicity
of
napropamide
can
be
found
in
the
"
Napropamide:
Revised
HED
Chapter
of
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
(
RED),"
dated
February
23,
2005
.
Page
8
of
150
a.
Acute
Toxicity
Profile
Table
3
below
lists
the
acute
toxicity
categories
for
the
different
routes
of
exposure.

Table
3:
Acute
Toxicity
Data
for
Napropamide
Guideline
No.
Study
Type
MRID(
s)
Results
Toxicity
Category
870.11
Acute
oral
[
rat]
40362902
LD50
=
>
5000
mg/
kg
IV
870.12
Acute
dermal
[
rabbit]
40362902
LD50
=
>
2000
mg/
kg
III
870.13
Acute
inhalation
[
rat]
42231501
LC50
=
>
4.8
mg/
L
IV
870.24
Acute
eye
irritation
[
rabbit]
40362902
moderate
II
870.25
Acute
dermal
irritation
[
rabbit]
40362902
none
IV
870.26
Skin
sensitization
[
guinea
pig]
40362903
negative
Nonsensitizing
b.
Developmental
&
Reproductive
Toxicity/
FQPA
Safety
Factor
The
Federal
Food
Drug
and
Cosmetic
Act
(
FFDCA)
as
amended
by
the
Food
Quality
Protection
Act
(
FQPA)
directs
the
Agency
to
use
an
additional
tenfold
(
10X)
safety
factor
to
take
into
account
potential
pre­
and
post­
natal
toxicity
and
completeness
of
the
data
with
respect
to
exposure
and
toxicity
to
infants
and
children.
FFDCA
authorizes
the
Agency
to
modify
the
tenfold
safety
factor
only
if
reliable
data
demonstrate
that
the
resulting
level
of
exposure
would
be
safe
for
infants
and
children.

Napropamide
did
not
cause
developmental
toxicity
in
fetuses
from
either
rats
or
rabbits
and
did
not
adversely
affect
reproductive
parameters
in
rats
over
three
generations.
There
is
no
quantitative
or
qualitative
evidence
of
increased
susceptibility
of
rat
or
rabbit
fetuses
after
in
utero
and/
or
postnatal
exposure
to
napropamide
in
the
developmental
and
reproduction
studies.
Doseresponse
relationships
are
well­
characterized
and
clear
NOAELs/
LOAELs
have
been
identified
for
the
critical
effects.
No
evidence
of
neurotoxicity
was
observed
in
any
study.
Based
on
the
weight
of
evidence,
a
developmental
neurotoxicity
(
DNT)
study
is
not
required
for
napropamide,
and
adequate
chemical
specific
data,
surrogate
data,
and
modeling
outputs
are
available
to
assess
dietary
and
residential
exposures.
EPA
has
high
confidence
that
results
do
not
under
estimate
exposure.
Therefore,
the
special
FQPA
safety
factor
can
be
reduced
to
1X.

c.
Carcinogenicity
No
evidence
for
carcinogenicity
was
seen
in
mice
or
rat
studies.
Napropamide
has
been
classified
a
Group
"
E"
carcinogen
(
no
evidence
of
carcinogenicity).
Therefore,
a
cancer
assessment
was
not
conducted.
Page
9
of
150
d.
Endocrine
Effects
EPA
is
required
under
the
FFDCA,
as
amended
by
FQPA,
to
develop
a
screening
program
to
determine
whether
certain
substances
(
including
all
pesticide
active
and
other
ingredients)
"
may
have
an
effect
in
humans
that
is
similar
to
an
effect
produced
by
a
naturally
occurring
estrogen,
or
other
such
endocrine
effects
as
the
Administrator
may
designate."
Following
recommendations
of
its
Endocrine
Disruptor
and
Testing
Advisory
Committee
(
EDSTAC),
EPA
determined
that
there
was
a
scientific
basis
for
including,
as
part
of
the
program,
the
androgen
and
thyroid
hormone
systems,
in
addition
to
the
estrogen
hormone
system.
EPA
also
adopted
EDSTAC's
recommendation
that
the
Program
include
evaluations
of
potential
effects
in
wildlife.
For
pesticide
chemicals,
EPA
will
use
FIFRA
and,
to
the
extent
that
effects
in
wildlife
may
help
determine
whether
a
substance
may
have
an
effect
in
humans,
FFDCA
authority
to
require
the
wildlife
evaluations.
As
the
science
develops
and
resources
allow,
screening
of
additional
hormone
systems
may
be
added
to
the
Endocrine
Disruptor
Screening
Program
(
EDSP).

In
the
available
toxicity
studies
on
napropamide,
there
was
no
estrogen,
androgen,
and/
or
thyroid
mediated
toxicity.
Future
testing
with
appropriate
screening
and/
or
testing
protocols
could
better
characterize
effects
related
to
endocrine
disruption.

e.
Toxicological
Endpoints
for
Risk
Assessment
The
toxicological
endpoints
used
in
the
human
health
risk
assessment
for
napropamide
are
listed
in
Table
4.
The
safety
factors
used
to
account
for
interspecies
extrapolation,
intraspecies
variability
and
the
FQPA
safety
factor
are
also
described
in
Table
4.
No
toxicological
endpoint
was
selected
for
the
acute
dietary
exposure
scenario,
since
an
endpoint
attributable
to
a
single
exposure
was
not
identified
from
the
available
database.
Therefore,
no
acute
dietary
assessment
was
performed.

Table
4:
Summary
of
the
Toxicology
Endpoint
Selection
Chronic
Dietary
Endpoint
Exposure
Scenario
Dose
&
Uncertainty
Factors
Endpoint
Study
Chronic
Dietary
NOAEL=
12
mg/
kg/
day
Decreased
weight
gain
in
females
and
an
increased
incidence
of
liver
lesions
in
males
at
a
LOAEL
of
48/
55
mg/
kg/
day
(
m/
f)
Rat
Chronic/
Oncogenicity
Study.
MRID
Nos.
42189102
&
43068801
UF
=
100x
FQPA
Safety
Factor
=
1x
Chronic
PAD
=
0.12
mg/
kg/
day
Exposure
Scenario
Dose
&
Uncertainty
Factors
Endpoint
Study
Page
10
of
150
Incidental
Oral
Short­
Term
(
1­
30
days)
&
Incidental
Oral
Intermediate
(
1­
6
month)
NOAEL
=
30
mg/
kg/
day
Based
on
decreased
body
weight
in
adult
females,
adult
males,
and
pups
at
a
LOAEL
=
100
mg/
kg/
day
Reproductive
Toxicity
­
Rat.
MRID
No.
92125069
UF
=
100x
FQPA
Safety
Factor
=
1x
MOE
of
Concern
=
100
Inhalation
Short­
Term
(
1­
30
days)
&
Inhalation
Intermediate­
Term
(
1­
6
months)
Oral
Study
NOAEL
=
30
mg/
kg/
day
(
Inhalation
absorption
rate=
100%)
Based
on
decreased
body
weight
in
adult
male,
adult
female,
and
pups
at
a
LOAEL
=
100
mg/
kg/
day
Reproductive
Toxicity
­
Rat.
MRID
No.
92125069
UF
=
100x
FQPA
Safety
Factor
=
1x
MOE
of
Concern
=
100
Cancer
(
oral,
dermal,
inhalation)
Classification:
No
evidence
of
Carcinogenicity
2.
Dietary
Exposure
and
Risk
from
Food
and
Drinking
Water
a.
Exposure
Assumptions
(
Food)

The
chronic
dietary
exposure
and
risk
analysis
for
napropamide
was
conducted
using
the
Lifeline
 
Model
Version
2.0,
which
uses
food
consumption
data
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Agriculture's
(
USDA's)
Continuing
Surveys
of
Food
Intakes
by
Individuals
(
CSFII)
from
1994­
1996
and
1998.
In
this
analysis,
the
chronic
dietary
exposure
and
risk
estimates
resulting
from
food
intake
were
determined
for
the
general
U.
S.
population
and
various
population
subgroups.
The
chronic
analysis
assumed
100%
crop
treated
and
tolerance­
level
residues
(
Tier
1)
for
all
commodities.
As
such,
this
is
considered
an
unrefined
assessment
(
Tier
1).

b.
Exposure
Assumptions
(
Drinking
Water)

The
Tier
II
screening
models,
Pesticide
Root
Zone
Model
and
Exposure
Analysis
Modeling
System
(
PRZM­
EXAMS),
with
the
Index
Reservoir
and
Percent
Crop
Area
adjustment
(
IR­
PCA
PRZM/
EXAMS),
were
used
to
estimate
napropamide
residues
in
surface
water
used
for
drinking
water.

Estimated
ground
water
concentrations
are
based
on
the
Screening
Concentration
in
Ground
Water
(
SCI­
GROW)
model,
which
is
a
Tier
1
assessment
that
provides
a
high­
end
estimate.
The
SCI­
GROW
model
generates
a
single
Estimated
Drinking
Water
Concentration
Page
11
of
150
(
EDWC)
value
of
pesticide
concentration
in
ground
water
used
for
drinking
water
and
provides
a
ground
water
screening
concentration
for
use
in
determining
potential
risk
to
human
health
from
drinking
water
contaminated
with
a
pesticide.

Napropamide
is
persistent
but
not
particularly
mobile,
and
therefore,
is
not
expected
to
pose
a
significant
risk
of
ground
water
contamination.
Surface
water
contamination
is
possible
through
run­
off
from
treated
fields.
Estimated
concentration
from
napropamide
in
ground
water
is
4.5
ppb.
From
the
original
drinking
water
assessment
("
Drinking
Water
Assessment
for
Napropamide
for
Terrestrial
Uses",
dated
August
17,
2004),
the
estimated
concentration
is
0.5
ppb
in
surface
water.
The
highest
estimated
chronic
drinking
water
concentration
(
4.5
ppb)
from
ground
water
modeling
was
used
for
the
dietary
analysis.

In
a
memo,
"
Revised
Drinking
Water
Assessment
for
Napropamide"
dated
November
12,
2004,
the
Agency
revised
the
chronic
estimate
for
surface
water
(
5.1
ppb).
The
revised
chronic
surface
water
estimate
of
5.1
ppb
is
slightly
higher
than
the
drinking
water
estimate
used
in
this
assessment
(
4.5
ppb);
however,
because
of
the
minimal
impact
the
revised
estimate
would
be
expected
to
have
on
overall
dietary
(
and
aggregate)
risk,
the
Agency
determined
that
a
new
dietary
assessment
was
not
warranted.

c.
Population
Adjusted
Dose
Chronic
dietary
risk
is
calculated
by
using
the
average
consumption
values
for
foods
and
average
residue
values
on
those
foods.
A
risk
estimate
that
is
less
than
100%
of
the
chronic
Population
Adjusted
Dose
(
cPAD)
(
the
dose
at
which
an
individual
could
be
exposed
over
the
course
of
a
lifetime
and
no
adverse
health
effects
would
be
expected)
is
below
the
Agency's
level
of
concern.
An
uncertainty
factor
of
100x
was
applied
to
the
chronic
dietary
assessment
for
interand
intraspecies
variations,
and
the
FQPA
safety
factor
was
reduced
to
1x
as
discussed
in
the
dietary
risk
section.

d.
Chronic
Dietary
Risk
Estimates
The
Tier
1
chronic
dietary
assessment
indicates
that
the
combined
exposure
to
napropamide
from
food
and
water
is
well
below
the
Agency's
level
of
concern,
with
estimated
exposures
representing
<
2%
of
the
cPAD
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
all
population
subgroups,
including
infants
and
children.
Please
note
that
this
is
a
Tier
1
assessment;
and
therefore,
risks
are
considered
to
be
upper
end
estimates.

3.
Residential
Exposure
and
Risk
Residential
exposure
assessment
considers
all
potential
non­
occupational
pesticide
exposures,
other
than
exposure
due
to
residues
in
foods
or
in
drinking
water.
Exposure
may
occur
during
and
after
application
on
lawns
and
turf
and
ornamental
plants.
Each
route
of
exposure
(
oral,
dermal,
inhalation)
is
assessed,
where
appropriate,
and
risk
is
expressed
as
a
Page
12
of
150
Margin
of
Exposure
(
MOE),
which
is
the
ratio
of
estimated
exposure
to
an
appropriate
No
Observed
Adverse
Effect
Level
(
NOAEL)
dose.
Napropamide
products
are
marketed
for
homeowner
use
on
residential
lawns
and
landscape
ornamental
plants.
Napropamide
containing
products
are
also
marketed
for
use
by
professional
applicators
(
Lawn
Control
Operators
[
LCOs])
on
residential
turf,
golf
courses,
other
turf
such
as
recreational/
commercial
areas,
and
on
ornamental
plantings.
Based
on
these
uses,
napropamide
has
been
assessed
for
the
residential
mixing/
loading/
applicator
(
or
"
handler")
exposure
and
for
children's
post­
application
exposure
that
may
occur
from
turf
contact
and
hand­
to­
mouth
transfer.

Further
details
on
residential
exposure
and
risk
of
napropamide
can
be
found
in
the
"
Napropamide:
Revised
HED
Chapter
of
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
(
RED)",
dated
February
23,
2005
and,
"
Napropamide:
Revised
Occupational
and
Residential
Exposure
Assessment
and
Recommendations
for
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
Document"
dated
February
20,
2005.

a.
Residential
Exposure
&
Duration
Short­
or
intermediate­
term
dermal
exposures
or
risks
were
not
assessed
for
napropamide,
since
an
appropriate
dermal
toxicological
endpoint
was
not
identified.
EPA
assessed
short­
term
inhalation
exposure
for
handlers
and
short­
term
incidental
oral
postapplication
exposure
for
children
in
treated
areas.
Since
exposure
scenarios
for
napropamide
are
only
considered
to
be
short­
term
in
nature
due
to
the
episodic
use
patterns,
EPA
does
not
anticipate
long­
term
exposures.
Therefore,
no
long­
term
dermal
or
inhalation
exposures
or
risks
were
assessed.
The
toxicological
endpoints
used
for
the
residential
risk
assessment
are
provided
in
the
Table
4.

b.
Residential
Handler
1.
Exposure
Scenarios,
Data,
and
Assumptions
There
is
a
potential
for
exposure
in
residential
settings
during
the
application
process
for
homeowners
who
use
products
containing
napropamide.
Homeowner­
use
products
are
available
in
granular
form.
Napropamide
can
be
applied
by
hand
or
by
using
shaker
cans,
push­
type
spreaders,
and
belly
grinders.
A
number
of
standard
assumptions,
such
as
adult
body
weight
and
area
treated
per
application,
are
made
by
the
Agency
for
residential
risk
assessment.
Also,
note
that
residential
handlers
are
addressed
somewhat
differently
than
occupational
handlers
in
that
homeowners
are
assumed
to
complete
all
elements
of
an
application
(
mix/
load/
apply)
without
use
of
protective
equipment
(
assessments
are
based
on
an
assumption
that
individuals
will
be
wearing
short
pants,
short­
sleeved
shirts,
shoes
and
socks).
This
is
to
ensure
that
EPA
does
not
underestimate
potential
risks.

The
quantitative
exposure/
risk
assessment
developed
for
residential
handlers
is
based
on
these
scenarios:
Page
13
of
150
(
1)
Applying
granulars
by
hand
application
(
2)
Applying
granulars
with
a
shaker
can
(
3)
Loading/
applying
granulars
with
a
belly
grinder
application
(
4)
Loading/
applying
granulars
with
a
push
type
spreader
application
Chemical­
specific
data
to
assess
the
above
exposure
scenarios
were
not
submitted
to
the
Agency
in
support
of
reregistration.
Instead,
exposure
estimates
for
these
scenarios
are
derived
from
the
Pesticide
Handlers
Exposure
Database
(
PHED,
Version
1.1
August
1998)
which
is
used
to
assess
handler
exposures
when
chemical­
specific
monitoring
data
are
not
available.
In
addition
to
PHED
data,
this
risk
assessment
relies
on
data
from
the
Outdoor
Residential
Exposure
Task
Force
(
ORETF)
and
proprietary
studies.

The
following
assumptions
were
used
in
the
exposure
calculations:

C
Maximum
application
rates
allowed
by
labels
were
used
to
conduct
the
risk
assessment.

C
Residential
risk
assessments
calculations
were
based
on
what
would
reasonably
be
treated
by
homeowners
such
as
the
size
of
a
lawn,
or
the
size
of
a
garden.

c.
Residential
Handler
Risk
Estimates
A
Margin
of
Exposure
(
MOE)
greater
than
or
equal
to
100
(
10x
for
interspecies
extrapolation
and
10x
for
intraspecies
variation)
is
considered
adequately
protective
for
this
assessment.
As
noted
above,
only
handler
inhalation
risks
were
assessed
since
no
appropriate
dermal
endpoint
was
identified
in
the
toxicity
database
for
napropamide.
The
estimated
risks
for
all
scenarios
do
not
exceed
the
Agency's
level
of
concern
for
inhalation
risk
assessments.
The
MOEs
ranged
from
28,000
to
190,000.

Table
5:
Napropamide
Short­
Term
Residential
Handler
Risk
Exposure
Scenario
Crop
or
Target
Application
Ratea
(
lb
ai/
unit)
Amount
Handled
Daily
Inhalation
Dose
(
mg/
kg/
day)
Inhalation
MOE
Mixer/
Loader/
Applicator
Applying
Granulars
for
Hand
application
(
1)
ornamentals
6
0.023
0.0011
28000
Applying
Granulars
for
Shaker
can
application
(
2)
ornamentals
6
0.023
0.0011
28000
Loading/
Applying
Granulars
for
Belly
Grinder
application
(
3)
turf
3
0.5
0.0016
19000
Loading/
Applying
Granulars
for
Push­
type
spreader
application
(
4)
turf
3
0.5
0.00016
190000
d.
Residential
Post­
application
Risk
Different
segments
of
the
population,
including
toddlers
and
adults,
can
be
exposed
to
napropamide
by
various
activities
in
a
residential
setting.
The
scenarios
chosen
in
the
risk
assessment
represent
these
activities,
and
are
considered
to
represent
upper­
end
estimates
of
Page
14
of
150
exposure.
For
the
purpose
of
this
assessment,
it
was
assumed
that
both
children
and
adults
may
be
exposed
following
applications
of
napropamide
to
treated
areas,
with
toddlers
having
the
greatest
potential
exposure.
An
MOE
of
100
(
or
more)
is
below
the
Agency's
level
of
concern
for
this
assessment.

The
Standard
Operating
Procedures
for
Residential
Exposure
Assessment
define
several
scenarios
that
apply
to
uses
specified
in
the
current
napropamide
labels.
The
Agency
used
this
guidance
to
define
the
toddler
exposure
scenarios
included
in
this
post­
application
exposure
assessment.

The
quantitative
exposure/
risk
assessment
for
post­
application
risk
to
children
is
based
on
these
scenarios:

°
Hand­
to­
mouth
transfer
from
treated
turf:
Post­
application
exposure
to
children
from
the
"
incidental"
ingestion
of
pesticide
residues
on
treated
turf
from
hand­
tomouth
transfer
(
i.
e.,
those
residues
that
end
up
in
the
mouth
from
children
touching
turf
and
then
putting
their
hands
in
their
mouth).

°
Object­
to­
mouth
transfer
from
treated
turf:
Post­
application
exposure
to
children
from
incidental
ingestion
of
pesticide
residues
on
treated
turf
from
object­
to­
mouth
transfer
(
i.
e.,
those
residues
that
end
up
in
the
mouth
from
a
child
mouthing
objects
that
contact
of
treated
turf).

°
Soil
ingestion
activity:
Post­
application
exposure
to
children
from
incidental
ingestion
of
soil
in
a
treated
area.

Inhalation
risks
were
not
assessed
for
postapplication
scenarios
because
inhalation
exposure
is
considered
negligible
given
the
low
vapor
pressure
of
napropamide.
As
noted
above,
no
appropriate
dermal
endpoint
was
identified.
Therefore,
only
incidental
oral
exposures
were
assessed.

Napropamide
may
be
applied
as
granular
product
to
turf,
and
episodic
ingestion
of
these
granules
by
children
may
occur
which
would
be
considered
on
acute
exposure.
An
episodic
granular
ingestion
assessment
for
children
was
not
performed
since
no
acute
dietary
endpoint
of
concern
was
identified
for
napropamide.

e.
Post­
application
Risk
Estimates
For
napropamide,
MOEs
greater
than
or
equal
to
100
do
not
exceed
the
Agency's
level
of
concern.
This
incorporates
the
standard
uncertainty
factors
of
10x
for
interspecies
variability
and
10x
for
intraspecies
variability.
Risks
were
calculated
for
incidental
oral
hand­
to­
mouth,
object
to
mouth
and
soil
ingestion
pathways.
The
estimated
short
term
total
MOE
is
265,
and
risk
is,
therefore,
below
EPA's
level
of
concern.
Page
15
of
150
Table
6:
Short­
Term
(
Aggregate)
Napropamide
Residential
Scenarios
for
Post­
Application
Risk
Estimates
Exposure
Scenario
Margins
of
Exposure
(
MOEs)
(
UF=
100)
Dermal
Oral
(
Non­
Dietary)
Total
Non­
Dietary
Riska
Short­
term
Exposures
Toddler
Turf:
6
lb
ai/
A
Hand
to
Mouth
N/
A
335
265
Object
to
Mouth
N/
A
1340
Incidental
Soil
Ingestion
N/
A
10000
4.
Aggregate
Exposure
and
Risk
The
Food
Quality
Protection
Act
amendments
to
the
Federal
Food,
Drug,
and
Cosmetic
Act
(
FFDCA,
Section
408(
b)(
2)(
A)(
ii))
require
"
that
there
is
a
reasonable
certainty
that
no
harm
will
result
from
aggregate
exposure
to
pesticide
chemical
residue,
including
all
anticipated
dietary
exposures
and
other
exposures
for
which
there
is
reliable
information."
Aggregate
exposure
will
typically
include
exposures
from
food,
drinking
water,
residential
uses
of
a
pesticide,
and
other
non­
occupational
sources
of
exposure.

A
toxicological
endpoint
of
concern
attributable
to
a
single
dose
has
not
been
identified
for
napropamide.
Therefore,
an
acute
aggregate
risk
assessment
has
not
been
conducted.
Intermediate
term
exposure
durations
are
not
expected
for
napropamide
use
pattern.
Therefore,
an
intermediate
aggregate
assessment
has
not
been
conducted.

a.
Short­
Term
Aggregate
Risk
Short­
term
aggregate
exposure
takes
into
account
residential
exposure
plus
average
exposure
levels
from
residues
of
napropamide
in
food
and
water.
The
MOE
level
of
concern
for
short­
term
aggregate
risk
is
100.
Since
the
estimated
short­
term
aggregate
risk
MOE
for
the
most
highly
sensitive
population
(
children
1
to
2
years
old)
is
260,
short­
term
aggregate
risk
is
below
EPA's
level
of
concern
for
napropamide.

Table
7:
Napropamide
Short­
Term
Aggregate
Risk
Population
Short
­
Term
Scenario
NOAEL
mg/
kg/
day
Level
of
Concern
Max
Exposure
mg/
kg/
day
Average
Food
+
Water
Exposure
mg/
kg/
day
Residential
Exposure
mg/
kg/
day
Aggregate
MOE
(
food
and
residential)

Children,
1­
2
yrs.
old
30
MOE
#
100
0.3
0.00222
0.113
260
b.
Chronic
Aggregate
Risk
The
chronic
aggregate
risk
assessment
considered
exposures
from
food
and
water
only
because
there
are
no
residential
uses
expected
to
result
in
chronic
exposures
for
this
chemical.
Page
16
of
150
The
chronic
aggregate
risk
estimates
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
all
subgroups
are
<
2%
of
the
cPAD
and,
therefore,
below
the
Agency's
level
of
concern.

5.
Cumulative
Risk
Unlike
other
pesticides
for
which
EPA
has
followed
a
cumulative
risk
approach
based
on
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity,
EPA
has
not
made
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
finding
as
to
napropamide
and
any
other
substances,
and
napropamide
does
not
appear
to
produce
a
toxic
metabolite
produced
by
other
substances.
For
the
purposes
of
this
tolerance
action,
therefore,
EPA
has
assumed
that
napropamide
does
not
share
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
with
other
substances.
For
information
regarding
EPA's
efforts
to
determine
which
chemicals
have
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
and
to
evaluate
the
cumulative
effects
of
such
chemicals,
see
the
policy
statements
released
by
EPA's
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs
concerning
common
mechanism
determinations
and
procedures
for
cumulating
effects
from
substances
found
to
have
a
common
mechanism
of
EPA's
website
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
pesticides/
cumulative/.

6.
Occupational
Risk
Workers
can
be
exposed
to
a
pesticide
through
mixing,
loading,
and/
or
applying
a
pesticide,
or
re­
entering
treated
sites.
Occupational
handlers
of
napropamide
include
workers
in
agricultural
areas
and
workers
applying
napropamide
on
ornamental
plants.
Occupational
risk
for
all
of
these
potentially
exposed
populations
is
measured
by
a
Margin
of
Exposure
(
MOE)
which
determines
how
close
the
occupational
exposure
comes
to
a
No
Observed
Adverse
Effect
Level
(
NOAEL).
In
the
case
of
napropamide,
risk
estimates
resulting
in
MOEs
greater
than
100
do
not
exceed
the
Agency's
level
of
concern.

Occupational
risk
is
assessed
for
exposure
at
the
time
of
application
(
termed
"
handler"
exposure)
and
exposure
following
application
(
termed
post­
application
exposure).
Application
parameters
are
generally
defined
by
the
physical
nature
of
the
formulation
(
e.
g.,
formula
and
packaging),
the
equipment
required
to
deliver
the
chemical
to
the
use
site,
and
the
application
rate
required
to
achieve
an
efficacious
dose.
Post­
application
risk
is
assessed
for
activities
such
as
scouting,
irrigating,
pruning,
and
harvesting
and
is
based
primarily
on
dermal
exposure
estimates.

For
more
information
on
the
assumptions
and
calculations
of
potential
risk
of
napropamide
to
workers,
see
the
"
Napropamide:
Revised
Occupational
and
Residential
Exposure
Assessment"
dated
February
20,
2005.

a.
Occupational
Toxicity
No
short­
or
intermediate­
term
occupational
dermal
endpoint
of
concern
was
identified
for
napropamide.
The
short
and
intermediate­
term
occupational
inhalation
endpoint
of
concern
exposure
was
selected
from
a
reproduction
study
in
rats.
A
profile
of
the
toxicity
and
endpoints
for
napropamide
is
outlined
above
in
Table
4.
Page
17
of
150
b.
Occupational
Handler
Exposure
Occupational
handler
risk
estimates
have
been
assessed
for
both
short­
and
intermediateterm
exposure
durations.
Napropamide
exposures
may
occur
over
a
single
day
or
up
to
two
weeks
at
a
time.
For
many
use­
patterns
intermittent
exposures
over
several
weeks
also
may
occur.
However,
long­
term
(
i.
e.,
>
6
months)
handler
exposures
are
not
expected.

Occupational
handler
assessments
are
conducted
using
increasing
levels
of
protection.
The
Agency
typically
evaluates
all
exposures
with
minimal
or
baseline
protection
and
then
considers
additional
protective
measures
using
a
tiered
approach
(
going
from
minimum
to
maximum
levels
of
protection)
until
predicted
risks
are
below
EPA's
level
of
concern.
In
the
case
of
napropamide,
MOEs
for
every
occupational
exposure
scenario
are
above
100
at
baseline
PPE
(
long­
sleeved
shirt,
long
pants,
socks,
and
shoes).
While
the
generic
assessment
for
napropamide
does
not
indicate
a
need
for
additional
PPE,
evaluation
of
end­
use
product
toxicity
data
may
require
additional
protection.
End­
use
product
PPE
will
be
determined
on
a
product­
by­
product
basis.

c.
Occupational
Handler
Risk
Summary
The
Agency
has
determined
that
there
are
potential
exposures
to
workers
who
mix,
load,
apply,
and
otherwise
handle
napropamide
consistent
with
the
usual
napropamide
use
patterns.
Fifteen
major
occupational
handler
exposure
scenarios
were
identified
as
follows:

(
1)
mixing/
loading
dry
flowables
for
groundboom
applications;
(
2)
mixing/
loading
dry
flowables
for
chemigation
application;
(
3)
mixing/
loading
granulars
for
tractor­
drawn
spreaders
applications;
(
4)
mixing/
loading
granulars
for
aerial
applications;
(
5)
mixing/
loading
liquids
for
chemigation
application;
(
6)
mixing/
loading
liquids
for
groundboom
application;
(
7)
mixing/
loading
liquids
for
high­
pressure
handwand
application;
(
8)
applying
sprays
for
groundboom
application;
(
9)
applying
sprays
for
high­
pressure
handwand
application;
(
10)
applying
granulars
with
a
tractor­
drawn
spreader;
(
11)
applying
granulars
for
aerial
application;
(
12)
loading/
applying
granulars
for
belly­
grinder
applications;
(
13)
loading/
applying
granulars
for
push­
type
spreader
application;
(
14)
mixing/
loading/
applying
liquid
for
handgun
(
lawn)
application;
(
15)
flagging
for
granular
application.

Occupational
Handler
Exposure
Assumptions
and
Data
Page
18
of
150
Chemical­
specific
data
to
assess
the
exposure
scenarios
were
not
available
for
napropamide.
Analyses
were
completed
using
acceptable
surrogate
exposure
data.
Several
handler
assessments
were
completed
using
data
from
the
Pesticide
Handler
Exposure
Database
(
PHED
version
1.1).
Some
handler
assessments
(
i.
e.,
handheld
handgun
equipment,
push­
type
spreader)
were
completed
using
data
from
the
Outdoor
Residential
Exposure
Task
Force
(
ORETF).

The
following
assumptions
and
factors
were
used:

°
The
average
body
weight
of
an
adult
female
handler
(
i.
e.,
60
kg)
is
used
to
complete
the
risk
assessment.

°
Risk
are
assessed
at
maximum
label
rates.

°
The
occupational
workday
was
8
hours.

°
The
daily
treatment
areas
treated
are
defined
for
each
handler
scenario
by
determining
the
amount
that
can
be
reasonably
treated
in
a
single
day.

d.
Occupational
Handler
Risk
Estimates
Short­
and
intermediate­
term
inhalation
Margin
of
Exposure
estimates
for
occupational
handler
scenarios
are
greater
than
100
at
the
baseline
level
of
protection
(
i.
e.,
long­
sleeved
shirt,
long
pants,
shoes
plus
socks,
no
respirator).
Short­
and
intermediate­
term
inhalation
MOEs
range
from
200
to
more
than
33,000.
Therefore,
short­
and
intermediate­
term
occupational
risks
are
not
of
concern.

e.
Occupational
Post­
application
Risk
Since
no
dermal
endpoint
has
been
identified
for
systemic
toxicity,
and
post­
application
inhalation
exposure
is
expected
to
be
negligible,
no
occupational
post­
application
exposure
and
risk
assessment
is
warranted.

7.
Human
Incident
Data
Relatively
few
incidents
of
illness
have
been
reported
due
to
napropamide.
However,
it
appears
to
be
irritating
to
eyes
and
skin
and
has
been
associated
with
difficulty
breathing
when
used
in
enclosed
spaces.
The
following
data
bases
have
been
consulted
for
the
poisoning
incident
data
on
the
active
ingredient
napropamide.

The
Agency's
Incident
Data
System
(
IDS)
contains
reports
of
incidents
from
various
sources
since
1992.
These
reports
represent
anecdotal
reports
or
allegations
only,
unless
otherwise
stated.
Typically
no
conclusions
can
be
drawn
implicating
the
pesticide
as
a
cause
of
Page
19
of
150
the
reported
health
effect.
In
the
case
of
napropamide,
IDS
reported
2
incidents.
One
user
accidentally
ingested
the
product
and
reportedly
had
symptoms
of
oral
burns,
laryngeal
swelling,
and
excess
secretions.
The
other
user
was
exposed
working
in
a
greenhouse
and
had
difficulty
breathing
and
pain
in
the
chest.
No
further
information
on
the
disposition
of
either
case
was
reported.

A
total
of
six
exposures
were
reported
to
Poison
Control
Centers
for
the
nine
year
period
1993­
2001.
Three
of
these
cases
reported
minor
symptoms,
primarily
dermal
irritation.
20
cases
were
reported
to
the
California
Pesticide
Illness
Surveillance
Program
(
1998­
2002).
In
nine
of
these
cases,
napropamide
was
determined
to
be
the
primary
cause
of
illness.
The
principle
symptoms
reported
involved
irritation
of
the
eyes.

For
the
National
Institute
of
Occupational
Safety
and
Health,
out
of
the
4,221
reported
cases
from
1998­
2002,
just
two
involved
napropamide
alone.
In
a
Florida
case,
the
worker
splashed
napropamide
on
himself
and
developed
blisters.
A
Texas
case
reported
a
user
having
difficulty
breathing
when
using
napropamide
in
an
enclosed
area.
Both
cases
were
considered
probable
with
no
more
than
moderate
severity.

No
recommendations
are
being
made
on
napropamide
incidents,
based
on
the
very
limited
data
available
for
this
pesticide.

B.
Environmental
Risk
Assessment
A
summary
of
the
Agency's
environmental
risk
assessment
for
napropamide
is
presented
below.
More
detailed
information
associated
with
the
environmental
risk
from
the
use
of
napropamide
can
be
found
in
the
"
EFED
Risk
Assessment
for
the
Napropamide
Reregistration
Eligibility
Document,
dated
August
15,
2005.
In
a
memorandum
entitled
"
EFED
RED
Chapter
for
Napropamide
Chronic
Risk
Recalculation
for
Mammals"
dated
September
21,
2005,
the
Agency
corrected
a
toxicity
endpoint
that
resulted
in
lower
chronic
mammal
RQs.
However,
this
change
had
little
impact
on
the
ecological
risk
conclusion.
This
RED
reflects
the
changes
outlined
in
the
memo.
The
complete
environmental
risk
assessment
and
the
memo
mentioned
above
may
be
accessed
in
the
OPP
Public
Docket
OPP­
2004­
0162
and
on
the
Agency's
website
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
pesticides/
reregistration/
status.
htm.

1.
Environmental
Exposure
a.
Environmental
Fate
and
Transport
The
environmental
hazard
and
fate
database
is
sufficient
to
characterize
the
environmental
risks
associated
with
napropamide
use.
However,
EPA
intends
to
issue
a
DCI
following
this
RED
to
require
submission
of
additional
data
for
napropamide
to
address
areas
of
uncertainty.
These
data
are
expected
to
confirm
the
conclusions
of
this
environmental
risk
assessment
and
the
Agency's
reregistration
eligibility
decision.
Page
20
of
150
Based
on
laboratory
studies,
it
is
expected
that
napropamide
will
be
persistent
in
the
terrestrial
environment
resulting
in
the
potential
for
the
chemical
to
reach
the
aquatic
environment
by
runoff.
Additionally,
because
laboratory
metabolism
studies
demonstrate
a
half­
life
of
approximately
446
days,
there
is
a
potential
for
napropamide
to
accumulate
in
the
soil
with
repeated
applications.
However,
field
dissipation
studies
(
where
napropamide
was
soil
incorporated
in
various
countries)
indicate
much
faster
dissipation
rates
on
the
order
of
17
to
24
days
(
US)
46
to
131
days
(
W.
Germany),
15
to
51
days
(
Canada).
Although
napropamide
can
photodegrade
in
water,
this
route
of
degradation
is
expected
to
be
slowed
when
soil
incorporation
occurs
at
time
of
application.
In
addition,
any
napropamide
that
reaches
surface
water
will
tend
to
partition
to
suspended
soils
and
sediment,
thereby
reducing
the
amount
available
to
undergo
photolysis.
Napropamide
is
not
expected
to
be
bioaccumulative.
The
major
terminal
degradate
in
terrestrial
environments
is
carbon
dioxide,
but
photodegradation
in
aquatic
systems
creates
isomers
of
the
parent
compound.

Napropamide
is
expected
to
have
moderate
to
low
mobility
in
soil
based
upon
batch
equilibrium
studies
showing
adsorption
coefficient
values
between
3
to
15
ml/
g.
Adsorption
of
napropamide
to
soil
increases
with
increasing
clay
content,
organic
carbon
content,
and
pH.
Napropamide
is
not
expected
to
volatilize
from
dry
soil
surfaces
based
upon
its
vapor
pressure
of
1.7
x
10­
7
mm
Hg.

Napropamide
photodegrades
on
soil
with
a
half­
life
of
28
days.
The
major
degradate
is
carbon
dioxide.
However,
it
is
important
to
note
that
napropamide
must
be
incorporated
into
the
soil
within
one
to
21
days
of
application
in
order
to
be
efficacious;
therefore,
photodegradation
on
soil
may
not
be
a
major
route
of
dissipation.

In
water,
napropamide
is
expected
to
adsorb
to
suspended
solids
and
sediment.
Napropamide
is
stable
to
hydrolysis
at
pH
5,
7,
and
9,
but
undergoes
rapid
direct
photolysis
in
water
with
a
half­
life
of
6.8
minutes
for
the
parent
compound
napropamide.
Identified
degradates
were
Isomer
I
and
Isomer
II
(
propionamide).
The
two
isomers
also
degrade
rapidly,
as
the
total
residue
(
napropamide
plus
Isomers
I
and
II)
half­
life
in
the
photodegradation
in
water
study
was
only
26
minutes.
Because
of
light
attenuation,
aqueous
photolysis
will
be
an
important
pathway
only
in
shallow,
clear
water
bodies.
Binding
to
suspended
solids
and
sediment
can
also
diminish
the
role
photolysis
plays
in
the
degradation
of
napropamide.
Neither
volatilization
from
water
nor
bioconcentration
are
expected
to
be
important
fate
processes.

b.
Aquatic
Organism
Exposure
For
exposure
to
aquatic
fish
and
invertebrates,
EPA
considers
surface
water
only,
since
most
aquatic
organisms
are
not
found
in
ground
water.
Surface
water
models
are
used
to
estimate
exposure
to
freshwater
aquatic
animals.
The
modeling
results
used
in
risk
calculations
for
napropamide
are
detailed
in
the
EFED
chapter.

Unlike
the
drinking
water
assessment
described
in
the
human
health
risk
assessment
Page
21
of
150
section
of
this
document,
the
ecological
water
resource
assessment
does
not
include
the
Index
Reservoir
(
IR)
and
Percent­
Crop
Area
(
PCA)
factor
refinements.
The
IR
and
PCA
factors
represent
a
drinking
water
reservoir,
not
the
variety
of
aquatic
habitats,
such
as
ponds
adjacent
to
treated
fields,
relevant
to
a
risk
assessment
for
aquatic
animals.
Therefore,
the
EEC
values
used
to
assess
exposure
to
aquatic
animals
are
not
the
same
as
the
values
used
to
assess
human
dietary
exposure
from
drinking
water.

The
Agency
modeled
surface
water
exposure
using
the
Tier
II
Surface
Water
Computer
model
PRZM­
EXAMS.
Using
PRZM­
EXAMS,
the
Agency
modeled
a
variety
of
crops
where
scenarios
existed,
use
data
were
available,
maximum
application
rates
were
highest,
and
geographical
distribution
of
the
crops
were
covered.
Because
the
label
does
not
specifically
require
soil
incorporation
at
the
time
of
application,
EECs
in
the
aquatic
environment
were
determined
assuming
both
soil
incorporation
and
no
soil
incorporation
at
the
time
of
application.
The
modeled
surface
water
scenarios
addressed
the
geographical
distribution
of
specific
crops
in
the
US
and
the
associated
weather
extremes.
For
example,
citrus
was
modeled
both
in
California
and
Florida,
and
apples
were
modeled
in
Oregon,
North
Carolina
and
Pennsylvania.
Berries
(
e.
g.
blackberries
and
raspberries)
were
modeled
in
Oregon
(
Pacific
Northwest).
Pecans
were
modeled
in
Georgia,
which
created
the
highest
estimates
of
water
concentrations
(
See
Table
8).
EPA
modeled
cranberries
based
on
a
model
designed
to
evaluate
water
concentrations
for
rice.
See
the
EFED
risk
assessment
for
a
complete
listing
of
scenarios
which
were
modeled.
The
resulting
estimated
environmental
concentrations
(
EECs)
from
PRZM­
EXAMS
are
presented
in
the
table
below
Table
8:
Estimated
Environmental
Concentrations
(
EECs)
of
Napropamide
in
Surface
Water
Crop/
Scenario
EECs
of
Napropamide
in
Surface
Water
(
ppb)

Peak
21­
day
Average
60­
day
Average
GA
Pecan
(
6
lbs
ai/
A
x1)
209.4
17.8
6.7
GA
Pecan
(
4
lbs
ai/
A
x
2)
156
12.1
4.7
GA
Pecan
(
2
lbs
ai/
A
x
1)
Banded
69.7
5.9
1.6
GA
Pecan
(
1
lbs
ai/
A
x
2)
Banded
52.3
4.0
1.6
c.
Terrestrial
Organism
Exposure
The
Agency
assessed
exposure
to
terrestrial
organisms
by
first
predicting
the
amount
of
napropamide
residues
found
on
animal
food
items
and
then
by
determining
the
amount
of
pesticide
consumed
by
using
information
on
typical
food
consumption
by
various
species.
Terrestrial
wildlife
exposure
estimates
are
typically
calculated
for
birds
and
mammals,
Page
22
of
150
emphasizing
a
dietary
exposure
route
for
uptake
of
pesticide
active
ingredients.
These
exposures
are
considered
as
surrogates
for
terrestrial­
phase
amphibians
as
well
as
reptiles.
For
exposures
to
terrestrial
organisms,
such
as
birds
and
mammals,
pesticide
residues
on
food
items
are
estimated
based
on
the
assumption
that
organisms
are
exposed
to
a
single
pesticide
residue
in
a
given
exposure
scenario.
The
application
methods
for
napropamide
are
ground
applications
only
(
ground
spray,
chemigation,
and
granular
broadcast).
Because
the
label
does
not
require
immediate
soil
incorporation
at
the
time
of
application
(
up
to
3
weeks),
EECs
in
the
terrestrial
organisms
were
determined
assuming
both
soil
incorporation
and
no
soil
incorporation
at
the
time
of
application.

Granular
Applications
Napropamide
is
applied
to
crops
in
granular
form.
Birds
may
be
exposed
to
granular
pesticides
by
ingesting
granules
when
foraging
for
food
or
grit.
However,
an
avian
risk
assessment
was
not
performed
for
napropamide
because
the
avian
toxicity
profile
showed
that
napropamide
is
not
toxic
to
birds.
Mammalian
species
may
be
exposed
by
walking
on
exposed
granules
or
drinking
water
contaminated
by
granules.
However,
EPA
does
not
currently
assess
chronic
risks
to
mammals
from
granular
applications
because
the
Agency
assumes
that
granular
formulations
disperse
and
disintegrate
over
a
short
period
of
time.

Spray
Applications
and
Residues
For
napropamide
spray
applications,
estimation
of
pesticide
concentrations
in
wildlife
food
items
focuses
on
quantifying
possible
dietary
ingestion
of
residues
on
vegetative
matter
and
insects.
The
residue
estimates
are
based
on
a
nomogram
that
relates
food
item
residues
to
pesticide
application
rate.
The
estimated
environmental
concentrations
(
EECs)
are
generated
from
a
spreadsheet­
based
model
(
T­
REX)
that
calculates
the
decay
of
a
chemical
applied
to
foliar
surfaces
for
single
or
multiple
applications.

The
terrestrial
exposure
assessment
is
based
on
the
methods
of
Hoerger
and
Kenaga
(
1972)
as
modified
by
Fletcher
et
al.
(
1994).
Terrestrial
EECs
for
liquid
formulations
were
derived
for
representative
major
crops
using
current
application
rates
and
intervals
between
applications
where
applicable.

The
EECs
on
food
items
may
be
compared
directly
with
dietary
toxicity
data
(
as
is
the
case
for
birds
­
acute
and
chronic
RQ
calculations;
chronic
RQ
calculations
for
mammals)
or
converted
to
an
oral
dose
(
as
is
the
case
for
and
small
mammals).
The
screening­
level
risk
assessment
for
napropamide
uses
upper
bound
predicted
residues
as
the
measure
of
exposure.
The
predicted
maximum
residues
of
napropamide
that
may
be
expected
to
occur
on
selected
avian
or
mammalian
food
items
immediately
following
application
are
presented
in
table
9.

Table
9:
Upper
Bound
EECs
of
Napropamide
on
Mammalian
Food
Items
Page
23
of
150
Application
rate
Estimated
Environmental
Concentration
(
EEC)
(
ppm)

Short
grass
Tall
grass
Broadleaf
plants/
small
insects
Fruits/
pods/
large
insects
6
lbs
ai/
A
x
1
(
broadcast)
1140
660
810
90
6
lbs
ai/
A
x
1
(
banded)
480
220
270
30
4
lbs
ai/
A
x
2
(
broadcast)
1253
574
705
78
4
lbs
ai/
A
x
1
(
broadcast)
960
440
540
60
3
lbs
ai/
A
x
2
(
broadcast)
939
431
528
59
2
lbs
ai/
A
x
2
(
broadcast)
480
220
270
30
2
lbs
ai/
A
x
1
(
banded)
160
73
90
10
1.33
lbs
ai/
A
x
2
(
banded)
a
137
64
78
9
1
lbs
ai/
A
x
1
(
broadcast)
b
240
110
135
15
a
Application
interval
of
60
days
bAverage
napropamide
use
rate
on
tobacco
EECs
for
avian
diets
are
not
presented
because
napropamide
is
essentially
non­
toxic
to
birds.

d.
Non­
target
Terrestrial
Plant
Exposure
Terrestrial
plants
in
dry
and
semi­
aquatic
(
wetland)
areas
may
be
exposed
to
pesticides
from
runoff
and/
or
spray
drift.
EPA
used
the
TERRPLANT
model
to
estimate
napropamide
residues
in
areas
adjacent
to
the
treated
field
(
sheet
runoff),
wetland
areas
(
channelized
runoff),
and
from
spray
drift.

Screening
level
TERRPLANT
modeling
uses
the
maximum
single
application
rate
of
the
different
types
of
uses
(
orchards
and
vineyards
at
6
lbs
ai/
A,
vineyards
at
6
lbs
ai/
A,
and
row
crops
at
2
and
4
lbs
ai/
A),
as
well
as
the
lowest
average
napropamide
use
rate
of
1
lb
ai/
A
(
tobacco).
Napropamide
products
(
both
granular
and
liquid)
specify
incorporation
by
either
wetting
in
or
mechanical
means.
Consequently,
the
Agency
modeled
risk
to
terrestrial
plants
assuming
incorporation
of
2
to
4
inches
of
depth
to
bracket
potential
exposure.
These
depths
are
specified
in
labels
as
being
minimum
depths
to
incorporate
applied
napropamide.
Incorporation
to
4­
inch
depth
resulted
in
slightly
lowered
EECs
as
compared
to
the
2­
inch
incorporation.
Selected
results
are
included
in
Table
10.
For
additional
estimates,
please
see
the
environmental
risk
assessment.
Page
24
of
150
Table
10:
Napropamide
Terrestrial
Plant
EECs
for
Non­
Target
Vascular
Plants
Crop/
scenario
Form
Application
Adjacent
Area
Runoff
Wetland
Area
Runoff
Spray
Drift
ppb
6
lbs
ai./
acre
Liquid
Ground
Unincorp.
0.18
1.26
0.06
Ground
Incorp.
(
2
in.)
0.12
0.66
0.06
Spray
Chemigation
0.37
1.2
0.3
Granular
Ground
Unincorp
0.12
1.2
N/
A
Ground
Incorp.
(
2
in.)
0.06
0.6
N/
A
Ground
Incorp.
(
4
in.)
0.03
0.30
N/
A
1.33
lbs
ai/
acre
Liquid
Ground
Unincorp
0.04
0.28
0.01
Ground
Incorp.
(
2
in.)
0.03
0.15
0.01
Spray
Chemigation
0.08
0.23
0.07
Granular
Ground
Unincorp
0.03
0.30
N/
A
Ground
Incorp.
(
2
in.)
0.013
0.13
N/
A
Ground
Incorp.
(
4
in.)
0.007
0.07
N/
A
2.
Environmental
Effects
(
Toxicity)

a.
Toxicity
to
Aquatic
and
Terrestrial
Organisms
Napropamide
is
classified
as
practically
non­
toxic
to
avian
species
on
both
an
acute
oral
and
subacute
dietary
basis;
is
practically
non­
toxic
to
mammalian
species
on
an
acute
oral
basis;
is
moderately
toxic
to
freshwater
fish;
is
slightly
toxic
to
freshwater
invertebrates;
is
slightly
toxic
to
estuarine/
marine
fish;
and
is
moderately
toxic
to
estuarine/
marine
invertebrates.
Page
25
of
150
Table
11:
Summary
of
Napropamide
Acute
Aquatic
Toxicity
Data
Species
Acute
Toxicity
Chronic
Toxicity
LC50
or
EC50
(
mg
ai/
L)
MRID
LOAEC/
NOAEC
(
mg/
L)
MRID
Rainbow
Trout
Oncorhynchys
mykiss
6.4
115313
1.9/
1.1
464591­
09
Water
Flea
Daphnia
magna
14.3
88064
57805
2.2/
1.1
464787­
04
Sheepshead
Minnow
Cyprinodon
variegatus
14
416102­
06
NO
DATA
NO
DATA
Eastern
Oyster
Crassostrea
virginica
1.4
416671­
01
NO
DATA
NO
DATA
Mysid
Shrimp
Americamysis
bahia
4.2
416102­
07
NO
DATA
NO
DATA
Table
12:
Summary
of
Napropamide
Acute
and
Chronic
Terrestrial
Organism
Toxicity
Data
Species
Acute
Toxicity
Chronic
Toxicity
Oral
Toxicity
LD50
(
mg
ai/
kg)
MRID
Subacute
Dietary
LC50
(
mg
ai/
kg)
MRID
NOAEC
(
mg
ai/
kg)
MRID
Affected
Endpoints
Mallard
Duck
Anas
platyrhynchos
>
4640
229652
>
5620
258393
1138201
1000
79548
and
795551
NA2
Laboratory
Rat
Rattus
norvegicus
>
5000
230602
NA
NA
30
40362902
growth
&
reproduction
Honey
Bee
(
Apis
mellifera)
>
113.5
ug
ai/
bee
464591­
15
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1
Accession
number
2
The
effect
demonstrated
on
body
weight
was
deemed
not
related
to
the
toxicant
effects
of
napropamide.

Table
13:
Summary
of
Napropamide
Most
Sensitive
Plant
Toxicity
Endpoints
Page
26
of
150
Species
Toxicity
EC25
/
EC05
NOAEC
(
ppm)
Affected
Endpoint
(
MRID)

Green
alga
Selenastrum
capricornutum
(
TGAI)
3.4
(
ppm)
NA
Cell
Density
(
416102­
10)

Blue­
green
alga
Anabaema
sp.
(
TGAI)
EC50
=
3.4
EC50
=
1.8
(
ppm)
5.05
Cell
Density
(
464591­
12
Aquatic
Vascular
Plant
Lemna
Minor
(
TGAI)
EC50
=
0.35
EC50
=
0.036
(
ppm)
0.071
Biomass
(
464591­
11)

Terrestrial
plants
2.1­
0.095
(
lbs
ai/
A)
<
0.017
Percent
emergence
and
dry
weight
b.
Ecological
Risk
Estimation
(
RQs)

The
Agency's
ecological
risk
assessment
compares
toxicity
endpoints
from
ecological
toxicity
studies
to
estimated
environmental
concentrations
(
EECs)
based
on
environmental
fate
characteristics
and
pesticide
use
data.
To
evaluate
the
potential
risk
to
non­
target
organisms
from
the
use
of
napropamide
products,
the
Agency
calculates
a
Risk
Quotient
(
RQ),
which
is
the
ratio
of
the
EEC
to
the
most
sensitive
toxicity
endpoint
values,
such
as
the
median
lethal
dose
(
LD
50
)
or
the
median
lethal
concentration
(
LC
50
).
These
RQ
values
are
then
compared
to
the
Agency's
levels
of
concern
(
LOCs),
given
in
Table
14,
which
indicate
whether
a
pesticide,
when
used
as
directed,
has
the
potential
to
cause
adverse
effects
on
non­
target
organisms.
When
the
RQ
exceeds
the
LOC
for
a
particular
category
(
e.
g.,
endangered
species),
the
Agency
presumes
a
risk
of
concern
to
that
category.
These
risks
of
concern
may
be
addressed
by
further
refinements
of
the
risk
assessment
or
mitigation.
Use,
toxicity,
fate,
and
exposure
are
considered
when
characterizing
the
risk,
as
well
as
the
levels
of
certainty
and
uncertainty
in
the
assessment.
EPA
further
characterizes
ecological
risk
based
on
any
reported
incidents
to
non­
target
terrestrial
or
aquatic
organisms
in
the
field
(
e.
g.,
fish
or
bird
kills).

Table
14:
EPA's
Levels
of
Concern
and
Associated
Risk
Presumptions.

If
RQ
>
LOC
value
given
below......
Then
EPA
presumes
.......

Terrestrial
Organisms
Aquatic
Organism
s
Plants
Risk
Presumption
0.5
0.5
1
Acute
Risk
­
there
is
potential
for
acute
risk;
regulatory
action
may
be
warranted
in
addition
to
restricted
use
classification.
If
RQ
>
LOC
value
given
below......
Then
EPA
presumes
.......

Terrestrial
Organisms
Aquatic
Organism
s
Plants
Risk
Presumption
Page
27
of
150
0.2
0.1
N/
A
Acute
Restricted
Use
­
there
is
potential
for
acute
risk,
but
may
be
mitigated
through
restricted
use
classification.

0.1
0.05
1
Acute
Endangered
Species
­
endangered
species
may
be
adversely
affected;
regulatory
action
may
be
warranted.

1
1
N/
A
Chronic
Risk
­
there
is
potential
for
chronic
risk;
regulatory
action
may
be
warranted.

For
a
more
detailed
explanation
of
the
ecological
risks
posed
by
the
use
of
napropamide,
refer
to
EFED
Risk
Assessment
for
the
Napropamide
Reregistration
Eligibility
Document,
dated
August
15,
2005.

1.
Risk
to
Aquatic
Organisms
Fish
and
Aquatic
Invertebrates
Acute
RQ
values
for
estuarine/
marine
invertebrates
were
all
<
0.16.
The
highest
RQs
were
estimated
for
Florida
citrus
and
Georgia
pecan
scenarios.
No
LOCs
were
exceeded
for
chronic
risks
to
aquatic
organisms
based
on
limited
data.
EPA
has
determined
that
additional
chronic
toxicity
data
should
be
submitted
because
of
the
potential
environmental
persistence
of
napropamide
which
may
cause
chronic
exposure
to
aquatic
organisms.

Table
15:
Acute
Risk
Quotients
(
RQ)
for
Estuarine/
Marine
Animals
Crop
Scenario
Application
Estuarine/
Marine
Invertebrates
RQ
FL
Citrus
4
lbs
ai/
A
x
2
(
broadcast)
0.16
GA
Pecan
4
lbs
ai/
A
x
2
(
broadcast)
0.111
6
lbs
ai/
A
x
1
(
broadcast)
0.15
Aquatic
Plants
RQs
calculated
for
algae
and
non­
listed
aquatic
vascular
plants
did
not
exceed
EPA's
level
of
concern
for
any
uses
of
napropamide.

2.
Risk
to
Non­
target
Terrestrial
Organisms
Page
28
of
150
Birds
Toxicity
data
classify
napropamide
as
practically
nontoxic
to
birds.
Therefore,
avian
environmental
dietary
exposure
to
napropamide
is
not
expected
to
cause
significant
acute
and
chronic
risks
to
birds.

Mammals
Acute
RQs
for
mammals
were
below
the
Agency's
level
of
concern.
Chronic
RQs
exceeded
LOCs
for
mammals
of
all
weights
assessed.
The
majority
of
exceedences
occurred
for
scenarios
that
evaluate
mammals
feeding
on
short
grass,
tall
grass,
and
broadleaf
plants/
small
insects.
However,
a
few
exceedences
were
estimated
for
mammals
that
feed
on
fruits/
pods/
large
insects
when
the
higher
application
rates
are
considered.

Table
16:
Mammalian
Chronic
RQ
Values
for
Napropamide
Application
rate
Mammalian
Chronic
Risk
Quotients
Short
grass
Tall
grass
Broadleaf
plants/
small
insects
Fruits/
pods/
large
insects
6
lbs
ai/
A
x
1(
broadcast)
9.5
­
21
4.4
­
9.5
5.4
­
12
0.6
­
1.3
6
lbs
ai/
A
x
1(
banded)
3.2
­
6.9
1.5
­
3.2
1.8
­
3.9
0.2
­
0.4
4
lbs
ai/
A
x
2
(
broadcast)
8.3
­
18
3.8
­
8.3
4.7
­
10
0.5
­
1.1
4
lbs
ai/
A
x
1(
broadcast)
6.4
­
14
2.9
­
6.4
3.6
­
7.8
0.4
­
0.9
3
lbs
ai/
A
x
2
(
broadcast)
6.2
­
14
2.8
­
6.2
3.5
­
7.6
0.4
­
0.8
2
lbs
ai/
A
x
1(
broadcast)
3.2
­
6.9
1.5
­
3.2
1.8
­
3.9
0.2
­
0.4
2
lbs
ai/
A
x
1(
banded)
1.1
­
2.3
0.5
­
1.1
0.6
­
1.3
0.07
­
0.1
1.33
lbs
ai/
A
x
2
(
banded)
0.9
­
2.0
0.4
­
0.9
0.5
­
1.1
0.06
­
0.1
1
lb
ai/
A
x
13(
broadcast)
1.6
­
3.5
0.7
­
1.6
0.9
­
2.0
0.1­
0.22
1Lowest
average
use
rate
(
tobacco)
exceedances
indicated
in
bold
Non­
Target
Insects
EPA
currently
does
not
routinely
quantify
risks
to
terrestrial
non­
target
insects;
therefore,
risk
quotients
are
not
calculated
for
these
organisms.
Since
napropamide
is
pratically
non­
toxic
to
honey
bees
(
LD
50
>
113.5
ug
ai/
bee)
the
potential
for
napropamide
to
have
adverse
effects
on
pollinators
and
other
beneficial
insects
is
low.

Non­
target
Terrestrial
Plants
Page
29
of
150
Terrestrial
plant
risks
were
evaluated
by
RQ
calculation
for
seedling
emergence
for
nonendangered
terrestrial
and
wetland/
riparian
plants
(
monocot
and
dicot)
from
sheet
and
channelized
run­
off.
Vegetative
vigor
risks
were
evaluated
for
non­
endangered
terrestrial
and
wetland/
riparian
plant
(
monocot
and
dicot)
from
spray
drift
calculations.
The
Agency's
plant
LOC
of
1.0
was
exceeded
at
all
application
rates
evaluated
(
6,
4,
2,
1
lb
and
1.33
ai/
A)
with
dicots
generally
showing
more
sensitivity
than
monocots.
RQs
for
plants
in
areas
adjacent
to
treated
fields
exceeded
LOCs
at
all
modeled
application
rates
at
different
depths
of
incorporation
with
RQs
ranging
up
to
12.

For
endangered
species,
wetland
plant
risks
were
identified
at
all
application
rates
and
application
methods
modeled,
with
one
exception
(
1
lb
ai/
A
liquid
application,
incorporated
to
4
inches).
Plant
risks
were
identified
under
all
scenarios
for
the
highest
application
rates
modeled
(
6
lbs
ai/
A
and
4
lbs
ai/
A),
with
the
exception
of
monocots
exposed
to
granular
applications
incorporated
to
4
inches.

For
a
complete
listing
of
other
rates,
please
refer
to
EFED
Risk
Assessment
for
the
Napropamide
Reregistration
Eligibility
Document,
dated
August
15,
2005
3.
Ecological
Incidents
EPA
completed
a
review
of
the
EIIS
database
for
ecological
incidents
involving
napropamide.
There
were
two
reported
incidents.
The
first
incident
involved
adverse
effects
on
fish
(
incident
#
1000799­
04).
Napropamide
and
chlorpyrifos
residues
were
identified
in
soil
in
the
vicinity
of
a
fish
pond.
The
report
deemed
chlorpyrifos
as
a
more
probable
reason
for
the
incident
than
napropamide
due
to
chlorpyrifos'
high
toxicity
to
fish.
Napropamide
is
only
slightly
to
moderately
toxic
to
fish.
The
second
incident
report
involved
damage
to
seven
acres
of
planted
Douglas
fir
trees.
The
report
concluded
that
napropamide
was
not
likely
the
cause
of
the
damage
because
it
had
only
been
applied
once
to
the
area.
Oryzalin,
which
was
used
in
the
vicinity
of
the
tree
damage,
was
determined
to
be
the
likely
cause
of
the
damage;
the
oryzalin
label
specifically
warns
that
it
could
damage
Douglas
fir
trees.

4.
Endangered
Species
Concerns
EPA's
ecological
risk
assessment
concludes
that
RQs
did
not
exceed
an
acute
LOC
for
direct
effects
(
no
effect)
from
uses
of
napropamide
to
the
following
listed
species:
insects,
birds,
terrestrial
phase
amphibians,
reptiles,
freshwater
fish,
aquatic
phase
amphibians,
freshwater
crustaceans
and
marine/
estuarine
fish.
Further,
RQs
did
not
exceed
a
chronic
LOC
for
direct
effects
(
no
effect)
for:
insects,
birds,
terrestrial
phase
amphibians,
reptiles,
freshwater
fish,
aquatic
phase
amphibians,
and
freshwater
crustaceans.
Based
on
EPA's
screening
level
assessment
and
as
noted
below,
RQs
for
napropamide
exceed
acute
levels
of
concern
for
direct
effects
to
endangered
species
of
mammals,
mollusks,
marine/
estuarine
crustaceans,
aquatic
vascular
plants
and
terrestrial
and
semi­
aquatic
plants
(
both
dicots
and
monocots).
RQs
were
also
exceeded
for
Page
30
of
150
chronic
direct
effects
to
mammals.
While
there
are
no
chronic
data
on
which
to
assess
the
potential
for
chronic
effects
to
mollusks,
marine/
estuarine
fish
and
marine/
estuarine
crustaceans,
chronic
NOAECs
could
be
estimated
for
marine/
estuarine
fish
and
crustaceans
using
acute
to
chronic
ratios
derived
using
acute
and
chronic
rainbow
trout
and
daphnia
toxicity
results.
These
estimates
would
indicate
the
potential
for
21­
day
EEC's
to
exceed
LOC's
for
chornic
concerns.

The
screening
level
assessment
for
napropamide
resulted
in
acute
endangered
species
risks
RQs
above
EPA's
level
of
concern
for
marine/
estuarine
mollusks
under
several
scenarios
including
Florida
citrus,
Oregon
filbert,
Pennsylvania
apple,
North
Carolina
apple,
Georgia
pecan,
Florida
tomato,
and
Florida
pepper.
Listed
species
RQs
for
aquatic
invertebrates
exceeded
the
LOC
in
only
one
scenario
for
marine/
estuarine
crustaceans
(
Florida
citrus,
4
lbs
ai/
A
applied
twice).
Also,
the
LOC
is
exceeded
for
endangered
vascular
aquatic
plants
under
several
scenarios.
Chronic
mammalian
RQ
values
exceeded
the
LOC
on
grasses,
broadleaf
plants,
and
small
insects
at
all
modeled
rates.
Listed
wetland
plant
risks
were
identified
at
all
application
rates
and
application
methods
modeled,
with
one
exception
(
1
lb
ai/
A
liquid
application,
incorporated
to
4
inches).
In
addition,
listed
terrestrial
plant
risks
were
identified
under
all
scenarios
for
the
highest
application
rates
modeled
(
6
lbs
ai/
A
and
4
lbs
ai/
A),
with
the
exception
of
monocots
exposed
to
granular
applications
incorporated
to
4
inches.
At
lower
application
rates
(
2,
1.33,
and
1
lb
ai/
A),
exceedances
occurred
for
listed
terrestrial
plants
under
most
scenarios.
Additionally,
there
is
a
potential
for
indirect
effects
on
any
listed
species
that
is
either
dependent
upon
mammals
and
/
or
dependent
upon
terrestrial
and
semi­
aquatic
plants,
aquatic
vascular
plants,
mollusks,
and
marine/
estuarine
crustaceans
and
occurs
within
areas
where
exposure
is
sufficient
to
produce
adverse
effects
on
these
species
mammals
and/
or
terrestrial
plants.

5.
Risk
Characterization
The
environmental
risks
for
napropamide
were
based
on
a
screening­
level
assessment
to
both
terrestrial
and
aquatic
environments
from
labeled
uses
of
the
chemical.
The
assessment
was
performed
on
geographic
areas
where
the
highest
use
rates
and
expected
exposures
are
likely
to
occur.
Results
show
some
concerns
for
terrestrial
and
wetland/
riparian
plants
(
which
are
not
unexpected
due
to
the
herbicidal
nature
of
the
compound),
as
well
as
some
chronic
risks
to
mammals.
This
is
a
screening­
level
assessment,
and
therefore,
results
should
be
considered
conservative
in
nature.
For
example,
upper­
end
risk
values
estimated
in
the
assessment
do
not
take
into
account
some
key
cultural
practices,
such
as
banded
applications,
which
greatly
reduce
the
total
amount
of
napropamide
applied
per
acre.
Also,
this
assessment
does
not
account
for
the
common
technique
of
using
plastic
tarpaulins
to
cover
the
area
directly
below
the
crop
to
keep
fruit
and
vegetables
from
contacting
the
soil.
These
tarpaulins
likely
reduce
the
extent
of
napropamide
exposure
to
mammals
following
application
of
both
granular
and
liquid
formulations.

Additionally,
where
data
were
not
available
for
evaluation,
the
Agency
used
conservative
assumption
values
to
calculate
residue
estimates
for
ecological
assessment.
Laboratory
data
indicated
napropamide
persistence,
but
field
dissipation
data
from
outside
the
United
States,
Page
31
of
150
indicated
dissipation
of
approximately
two
months
or
less.
Also,
no
foliar
dissipation
data
were
available,
so
a
default
half­
life
of
35
days
was
used
to
predict
foliar
residues
for
chronic
risk
calculations.

EPA
modeled
an
application
interval
of
60
days
for
all
scenarios
with
multiple
applications.
The
use
of
60
days
is
in
accordance
with
labels
for
napropamide
applied
to
turf
and
ornamentals.
The
Agency
also
believes
that
the
60­
day
interval
is
appropriate
for
the
other
crops
with
multiple
applications.

The
Agency
recognizes
that
in
many
situations
pre­
emergence
herbicides
such
as
napropamide
may
be
banded
instead
of
broadcasted
to
an
entire
field.
Therefore,
EPA
modeled
potential
exposure
to
plant
and
animals
using
both
the
maximum
labeled
rate(
s)
and
"
typical"
banded
rates
(
1.33
lbs
ai/
A).
The
1.33
pound
rate
came
from
the
4
pound
ai/
A
rate
divided
by
3
to
account
for
banding
treatment
in
the
field.

The
cranberry
scenario
resulted
in
exceedances
of
the
Agency's
LOCs
from
peak
estimates
for
aquatic
animals
and
plants.
However,
the
concentration
of
napropamide
in
water
degrades
within
1
hour.
Therefore,
flood
water
released
into
the
surrounding
aquatic
habitats
is
not
expected
to
pose
a
significant
risk
to
aquatic
organisms
in
these
environments.

Avian
risk
assessments
were
not
conducted
for
napropamide
use
because
acute
toxicity
studies
classified
napropamide
as
practically
nontoxic
to
birds.
Furthermore,
no
chronic
avian
endpoint
of
concern
was
identified
from
available
studies.

IV.
Risk
Management,
Reregistration,
and
Tolerance
Reassessment
Decision
A.
Determination
of
Reregistration
Eligibility
Section
4(
g)(
2)(
A)
of
FIFRA
calls
for
the
Agency
to
determine,
after
submission
of
relevant
data
concerning
an
active
ingredient,
whether
or
not
products
containing
the
active
ingredient
are
eligible
for
reregistration.
The
Agency
has
previously
identified
and
required
the
submission
of
the
generic
(
i.
e.,
active
ingredient­
specific)
data
to
support
reregistration
of
products
containing
napropamide
as
an
active
ingredient.
The
Agency
has
completed
its
review
of
these
generic
data,
and
has
determined
that
the
data
are
sufficient
to
support
reregistration
of
all
products
containing
napropamide.

The
Agency
has
completed
its
assessment
of
the
dietary,
residential,
occupational,
and
ecological
risk
associated
with
the
use
of
pesticide
products
containing
the
active
ingredient
napropamide
from
all
sources.
Based
on
a
review
of
these
data
and
on
public
comments
on
the
Agency's
assessments
for
the
active
ingredient
napropamide,
the
Agency
has
sufficient
information
on
the
human
health
and
ecological
effects
of
napropamide
to
make
decisions
as
part
of
the
tolerance
reassessment
process
under
FFDCA
and
reregistration
process
under
FIFRA,
as
amended
by
FQPA.
The
Agency
has
determined
that
napropamide
containing
products
are
Page
32
of
150
eligible
for
reregistration
provided
that:
(
i)
the
risk
mitigation
measures
outlined
in
this
document
are
adopted;
and
(
ii)
label
amendments
are
made
to
reflect
these
measures.
Label
changes
are
described
in
Section
V.
Appendix
A
summarizes
the
uses
of
napropamide
that
are
eligible
for
reregistration.
Appendix
B
identifies
the
generic
data
requirements
necessary
as
part
of
the
Agency's
determination
of
reregistration
eligibility
of
napropamide,
and
lists
the
submitted
studies
that
the
Agency
reviewed
and
found
acceptable.
Data
gaps
are
identified
as
generic
data
requirements
that
have
not
been
satisfied
with
acceptable
data.

Based
on
its
evaluation
of
napropamide,
the
Agency
has
determined
that
napropamide
products,
unless
labeled
and
used
as
specified
in
this
document,
would
present
risks
inconsistent
with
FIFRA
and
FQPA.
Accordingly,
should
a
registrant
fail
to
implement
any
of
the
risk
mitigation
measures
identified
in
this
document,
the
Agency
may
take
regulatory
action
to
address
the
risk
concerns
from
the
use
of
napropamide.
If
all
changes
outlined
in
this
document
are
incorporated
into
the
product
labels,
then
all
current
risks
for
napropamide
will
be
adequately
reduced
for
the
purposes
of
this
reregistration
determination
under
FIFRA.
Once
an
Endangered
Species
assessment
is
completed,
further
changes
to
these
registrations
may
be
necessary
as
explained
in
section
IV,
number
4
below.

B.
Public
Comments
Through
the
Agency's
public
participation
process,
EPA
worked
extensively
with
stakeholders
and
the
public
to
reach
its
regulatory
decisions
for
napropamide.
During
Phase
3
of
the
public
comment
period
on
the
risk
assessments,
which
closed
on
May
5,
2005,
the
Agency
received
comments
from
the
registrant,
grower
groups
and
a
private
citizen.
The
comments
pertained
to
the
importance
of
particular
uses
and
urged
the
Agency
to
consider
how
it
regulated
these
commodities.
For
example,
the
Northern
California
Mint
Growers
submitted
comments
on
the
importance
of
napropamide
for
mint,
and
Walters
Garden,
Inc.
outlined
how
it
uses
napropamide
to
reduce
its
need
for
the
fumigant
methyl
bromide.
These
comments
in
their
entirety,
and
the
Agency's
response,
are
available
in
the
public
docket
(
OPP­
2004­
0162)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edockets.

The
RED
and
technical
supporting
documents
for
napropamide
are
available
to
the
public
through
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
and
comment
system,
EPA
Dockets,
under
docket
identification
(
ID)
number
OPP­
2004­
0162.
The
public
may
access
EPA
Dockets
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edockets.
In
addition,
the
napropamide
RED
document
may
be
downloaded
or
viewed
throught
the
Agency's
website
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
pesticides/
reregistration/
status.
htm.

C.
Regulatory
Position
1.
Food
Quality
Protection
Act
Findings
a.
"
Risk
Cup"
Determination
Page
33
of
150
As
part
of
the
FQPA
tolerance
reassessment
process,
EPA
assessed
the
risks
associated
with
this
pesticide.
EPA
has
determined
that
risk
from
dietary
(
food
and
water)
exposure
to
napropamide
is
within
its
own
"
risk
cup."
An
aggregate
assessment
was
conducted
for
exposures
to
napropamide
through
food,
drinking
water,
and
residential
uses.
The
Agency
has
determined
that
the
human
health
risks
from
these
combined
exposures
to
napropamide
are
within
acceptable
levels.
In
other
words,
EPA
has
concluded
that
the
tolerances
for
napropamide
meet
FQPA
safety
standards.

b.
Determination
of
Safety
to
U.
S.
Population
(
including
Infants
and
Children)

The
Agency
has
determined
that
the
established
tolerances
for
napropamide,
with
amendments
and
changes
as
specified
in
this
document,
meet
the
safety
standards
under
the
FQPA
amendments
to
section
408(
b)(
2)(
D)
of
the
FFDCA,
and
that
there
is
a
reasonable
certainty
no
harm
will
result
to
the
general
population
or
any
subgroup
from
the
use
of
napropamide.
In
reaching
this
conclusion,
the
Agency
has
considered
all
available
information
on
the
toxicity,
use
practices
and
exposure
scenarios,
and
the
environmental
behavior
of
napropamide.

c.
Endocrine
Disruptor
Effects
EPA
is
required
under
the
FFDCA,
as
amended
by
FQPA,
to
develop
a
screening
program
to
determine
whether
certain
substances
(
including
all
pesticide
active
and
other
ingredients)
"
may
have
an
effect
in
humans
that
is
similar
to
an
effect
produced
by
a
naturally
occurring
estrogen,
or
other
endocrine
effects
as
the
Administrator
may
designate."
Following
recommendations
of
its
Endocrine
Disruptor
Screening
and
Testing
Advisory
Committee
(
EDSTAC),
EPA
determined
that
there
was
a
scientific
basis
for
including,
as
part
of
the
program,
the
androgen
and
thyroid
hormone
systems,
in
addition
to
the
estrogen
hormone
system.
EPA
also
adopted
EDSTAC's
recommendation
that
EPA
include
evaluations
of
potential
effects
in
wildlife.
For
pesticides,
EPA
will
use
FIFRA
and,
to
the
extent
that
effects
in
wildlife
may
help
determine
whether
a
substance
may
have
an
effect
in
humans,
FFDCA
authority
to
require
the
wildlife
evaluations.
As
the
science
develops
and
resources
allow,
screening
of
additional
hormone
systems
may
be
added
to
the
Endocrine
Disruptor
Screening
Program
(
EDSP).

In
the
toxicity
studies
on
napropamide,
there
was
no
estrogen,
androgen,
and/
or
thyroid
mediated
toxicity.
When
additional
appropriate
screening
and/
or
testing
protocols
being
considered
under
the
Agency's
EDSP
have
been
developed,
napropamide
may
be
subjected
to
further
screening
and/
or
testing
to
better
characterize
effects
related
to
endocrine
disruption.

d.
Cumulative
Risks
Risks
summarized
in
this
document
are
those
that
result
only
from
the
use
of
napropamide.
The
Food
Quality
Protection
Act
(
FQPA)
requires
that
the
Agency
consider
available
information
concerning
the
cumulative
effects
of
a
particular
pesticide's
residues
and
Page
34
of
150
other
substances
that
have
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity.
The
reason
for
consideration
of
other
substances
is
due
to
the
possibility
that
low­
level
exposures
to
multiple
chemical
substances
that
cause
a
common
toxic
effect
by
a
common
toxic
mechanism
could
lead
to
the
same
adverse
health
effect
as
would
a
higher
level
of
exposure
to
any
of
the
substances
individually.
Unlike
other
pesticides
for
which
EPA
has
followed
a
cumulative
risk
approach
based
on
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity,
EPA
has
not
made
a
common
mechanism
of
toxicity
finding
for
napropamide.

D.
Tolerance
Reassessment
Summary
The
napropamide
tolerances
listed
under
40
CFR
§
180.328(
a)
and
(
b)
are
expressed
in
terms
of
N,
N­
diethyl­
2­(
1­
naphthalenyloxy)
propionamide.
The
tolerance
expression
is
adequate.
A
summary
of
the
tolerance
reassessment
and
recommended
modifications
in
commodity
definitions
for
napropamide
is
presented
in
Table
18.

Although
additional
data
are
required
to
confirm
the
existing
tolerance
levels
in/
on
the
following
commodities,
the
Agency
has
no
dietary,
drinking
water
or
residential
risk
concerns
associated
with
these
tolerances
and
considers
them
reassessed:
blackberry,
blueberry,
boysenberry,
loganberry,
raspberry,
kiwi
fruit,
almonds,
pecan,
filbert,
persimmon,
and
grape.

Napropamide
Table
18:
Tolerance
Reassessment
Summary
for
Napropamide
Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(
ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(
ppm)
Comment/
[
Correct
Commodity
Definition]

Tolerances
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§
180.328(
a)

Almond,
hulls
0.1
(
N)*
0.1
Artichoke,
globe
0.1
Proposed
Revocation
This
use
is
being
proposed
for
cancellation.

Asparagus
0.1
0.1
Avocado
0.1
Proposed
Revocation
This
use
is
being
proposed
for
cancellation
by
the
registrant.

Basil
0.1
0.1
Marjoram
0.1
0.1
Rosemary
0.1
0.1
Savory,
summer
0.1
0.1
Savory,
winter
0.1
0.1
Coffee
bean
0.1
(
N)
0.1
Although
the
registrant
stated
that
they
do
not
intend
to
support
this
use
because
there
are
no
U.
S.
registration
for
coffee
bean,
EPA
intends
to
maintain
this
tolerance
for
import
uses
only.
Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(
ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(
ppm)
Comment/
[
Correct
Commodity
Definition]

Page
35
of
150
Fig
0.1
(
N)
Proposed
Revocation
This
use
is
being
proposed
for
cancellation.

Fruit,
citrus
0.1
(
N)
Proposed
Revocation
[
Fruit,
citrus,
group
10]
These
uses
are
being
proposed
for
cancellation.

Fruit,
pome
0.1
(
N)
Proposed
Revocation
These
uses
are
being
proposed
for
cancellation.

Fruit,
small
0.1
(
N)
TBD**
The
established
group
tolerance
on
"
fruit,
small"
is
based
on
an
obsolete
crop
grouping.
EPA
is
now
recommending
that
upon
submission
of
additional
field
trial
data,
the
tolerance
for
"
fruit,
small"
be
revoked
concomitant
with
the
establishment
of
a
separate
tolerance
for
Berry
group
13,
cranberry,
grape,
and
strawberry.
[
Berry,
group
13]

Fruit,
stone
0.1
(
N)
Proposed
Revocation
These
uses
are
being
proposed
for
cancellation.

Kiwifruit
0.1
TBD
Additional
residue
field
trial
data
are
required.

Mint
0.1
0.1
[
peppermint,
tops
and
spearmint,
tops]

Nut
0.1
(
N)
TBD
Additional
field
trial
data
are
required
for
almonds,
pecans,
and
filbert.
The
remaining
uses
on
nuts
are
being
proposed
for
cancellation.***

Olive
0.1
Proposed
Revocation
This
use
is
being
proposed
for
cancellation.

Persimmon
0.1
TBD
Additional
data
are
required.

Pistachio
0.1
Proposed
revocation
This
use
is
being
proposed
for
cancellation.

Rhubarb
0.1
0.1
Sweet
potato,
roots
0.1
0.1
Vegetable,
brassica,
leafy,
group
5
0.1
0.1
Vegetable,
cucurbit,
group
9
0.1
Revoke
There
are
presently
no
registered
uses
of
napropamide
on
cucurbit
vegetables.
Unless
the
basic
registrants
or
other
interested
parties
support
these
uses
and
develop
supporting
data,
the
established
tolerance
will
be
revoked.

Vegetable,
fruiting
0.1
(
N)
0.1
[
Vegetable,
fruiting,
group
8]

Tolerances
to
be
Established
Under
CFR
§
180.328(
a)
Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(
ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(
ppm)
Comment/
[
Correct
Commodity
Definition]

Page
36
of
150
Berry,
group
13
­­
TBD
The
established
group
tolerance
on
"
fruit
small"
is
based
on
an
obsolete
crop
grouping.
EPA
is
now
recommending
that
the
tolerance
for
"
fruit,
small"
be
revoked
concomitant
with
the
establishment
of
separate
tolerances
for
cranberry
and
strawberry,
and
upon
submission
of
additional
field
trial
data,
for
Berry
group
13
and
grape.
Cranberry
­­
0.1
Grape
­­
TBD
Strawberry
­­
0.1
Tolerances
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§
180.328(
b)

Pomegranate
0.1
Proposed
Revocation
This
use
is
being
proposed
for
cancellation.

*
Negligible
Residues
**
TBD
­
To
be
determined
following
review
of
the
data
being
required
herein.
***
The
use
on
walnut
will
be
cancelled
Uses
on
almonds,
pecan,
and
filbert
will
remain
a.
Codex
Harmonization
No
Codex
or
Canadian
MRLs
have
been
established
for
residues
of
napropamide.

E.
Regulatory
Rationale
The
following
is
a
summary
of
the
rationale
for
the
mitigation
measures
necessary
for
reregistration
eligibility
and
for
managing
risks
associated
with
the
use
of
napropamide.
Where
labeling
revisions
are
warranted,
specific
language
is
set
forth
in
the
summary
table
of
Section
V
(
Table
20
of
this
RED
document).

1.
Human
Health
Risk
Management
a.
Dietary
(
Food
and
Water)
Risk
Mitigation
Acute
dietary
risk
was
not
assessed
because
there
were
no
toxicological
endpoints
attributable
to
a
single
exposure.
Chronic
dietary
(
food
and
water)
exposure
and
risk
from
napropamide
are
below
Agency's
level
of
concern;
therefore,
no
additional
mitigation
is
required.

b.
Residential
Risk
Mitigation
Residential
exposures
do
not
pose
a
risk
of
concern.
Therefore,
no
additional
mitigation
measures
to
address
residential
risks
are
required
for
napropamide.

c.
Aggregate
Risk
Mitigation
Page
37
of
150
Short
term
and
chronic
aggregate
risks
were
below
the
Agency's
level
of
concern.
Therefore,
no
additional
mitigation
measures
are
required.

d.
Occupational
Risk
Mitigation
Short­
and
intermediate­
term
inhalation
risks
to
occupational
handlers
scenarios
are
below
the
Agency's
level
of
concern
(
i.
e.,
MOE
>
100).
Therefore,
no
additional
mitigation
is
needed.
EPA
did
not
assess
occupational
postapplication
risks
to
agricultural
workers
following
treatments
to
agricultural
crops
with
napropamide,
since
no
dermal
endpoint
of
concern
was
identified
and
because
post
application
inhalation
exposure
is
expected
to
be
negligible
once
sprays
and
dusts
have
settled.
Therefore,
no
mitigation
measures
are
required.
As
a
result,
the
general
12
hour
REI,
as
established
by
the
Worker
Protection
Standard,
applies
to
all
napropamide
agricultural
use
products.

2.
Environmental
Risk
Mitigation
No
risks
of
concern
(
acute
or
chronic)
are
predicted
for
aquatic
organisms;
however,
chronic
toxicity
data
are
limited
and
will
be
required
as
a
follow­
up
to
this
RED.
Napropamide
is
essentially
non­
toxic
to
birds.
There
were
no
exceedences
for
acute
risk
to
mammals.
However,
the
Agency
has
determined
that
napropamide
may
pose
risks
to
mammals
and
plants.
The
Agency's
screening
level
risk
assessment
on
napropamide
shows
chronic
risk
to
mammals
feeding
on
short
grass,
tall
grass,
broadleaf
plants,
small
insects,
fruits,
pods,
and
large
insects.
At
all
modeled
application
rates,
terrestrial
and
wetland/
riparian
plants
exceed
the
Agency's
level
of
concern.
The
following
mitigation
will
reduce
ecological
risks:

°
Cancellation
of
the
following
uses:
pistachio,
walnut,
grapefruit,
lemon,
nectarine,
orange,
tangerine,
tangelo,
apricot,
cherry,
peach,
plum,
prune,
apple,
pear,
fig,
avocado,
pomegranate,
artichoke,
and
olive.

°
Limitation
of
the
number
of
applications
permitted
to
once
per
year
for
all
remaining
uses
(
except
ornamentals).

°
A
decrease
in
the
maximum
application
rate
for
almonds
(
8
to
4
lbs
per
year),
pecans
(
8
to
4
lbs
per
year),
cranberries
(
15
to
9
lbs
per
year),
grapes
(
8
to
4
lbs
per
year),
kiwi
fruit
(
8
to
4
lbs
per
year),
persimmons
(
8
to
4
lbs
per
year)
,
and
turf
(
6
to
2
lbs
per
year).

Table
19
identifies
all
remaining
uses
that
will
be
permitted
after
the
mitigation
measures
are
put
in
place:

Table
19:
Napropamide:
Remaining
Uses
and
Application
Rates
Page
38
of
150
Site
New
Maximum
Rate
(
lb
ai/
A)
No
App/
year
Max
Load/
Yea
r
(
lb
ai/
A)

Tree
Nuts
Almond
4
1
4
Pecan
4
1
4
Filbert
4
1
4
Brassica
Crops
Broccoli
2
1
2
Brussels
sprouts
2
1
2
Cabbage
2
1
2
Cauliflower
2
1
2
Asparagus
2
1
2
Berries
Blackberry
4
1
4
Blueberry
4
1
4
Boysenberry
4
1
4
Loganberry
4
1
4
Raspberry
4
1
4
Strawberry
4
1
4
Cranberry
9
1
9
Tropical
Fruits
Kiwi
Fruit
4
1
4
Persimmon
4
1
4
Fruiting
Vegetables
Eggplant
2
1
2
Pepper
2
1
2
Tomato
2
1
2
Additional
Crops
Grapes
4
1
4
Site
New
Maximum
Rate
(
lb
ai/
A)
No
App/
year
Max
Load/
Yea
r
(
lb
ai/
A)

Page
39
of
150
Sweet
Potato
4
1
4
Tobacco
2
1
2
Basil
4
1
4
Marjoram
4
1
4
Mint
4
1
4
Rosemary
4
1
4
Savory
4
1
4
Ornamentals
Ornamentals*
6
2
12
Turf
2
1
2
Italicized
crops
denote
changes
in
use
rates
*
Includes
shade
trees/
ornamental
trees(
field
and
container
grown),
ground
cover,
herbaceous
plants,
woody
shrubs,
vines,
dichondra
at
seeding
3.
Significance
of
Napropamide
Use
Napropamide
is
an
important
herbicide
with
key
uses
in
several
agricultural
sectors.
For
ornamentals,
it
is
significantly
important
in
the
Pacific
Northwest.
Although
napropamide
is
only
used
on
1
percent
of
ornamentals
nationally,
in
Washington
it
is
used
on
97
percent
of
the
nursery­
grown
rhododendron
and
azalea
crop.
It
also
provides
a
critical
niche
for
tomatoes
and
peppers
since
many
alternatives
are
not
labeled
for
pre­
plant
incorporated
treatments
that
are
needed
for
these
production
activities.
It
provides
a
niche
for
eggplant
and
tobacco
to
control
weeds
where
other
alternatives
do
not
give
adequate
control.
In
addition,
for
a
number
of
crops,
napropamide
is
important
to
growers
as
they
transition
away
from
methyl
bromide.

As
already
discussed
in
this
RED
document,
the
environmental
risks
for
napropamide
were
based
on
a
screening­
level
assessment
for
both
terrestrial
and
aquatic
environments.
Results
indicate
some
concerns
for
acute
risks
to
terrestrial
and
wetland/
riparian
plants
(
which
are
not
unexpected
due
to
the
herbicidal
nature
of
the
compound),
as
well
as
some
chronic
risks
to
mammals.
In
order
to
address
these
ecological
risks,
the
Agency
will
require
napropamide
registrants
to
reduce
the
total
napropamide
used
while
still
preserving
many
of
the
important
uses
of
this
chemical.
Reduction
of
use,
and
subsequent
reduction
of
ecological
exposure,
will
result
from
a
combination
of
voluntary
cancellations,
lowering
the
use
rate
of
several
crops
and
limiting
the
number
of
applications
per
year
for
most
crops
(
See
Table
19
for
specifics
on
the
new
uses
and
use
rates).
As
a
result
of
these
mitigation
measures,
the
amount
of
napropamide
exposure
to
Page
40
of
150
plant,
animal,
and
water
resources
is
lowered
therefore,
limiting
the
amount
that
is
released
into
the
environment.

4.
Endangered
Species
Considerations
Based
on
EPA's
screening
level
assessment,
RQs
for
napropamide
exceed
acute
levels
of
concern
for
direct
effects
to
endangered
species
of
mammals,
mollusks,
marine/
estuarine
crustaceans,
aquatic
vascular
plants
and
terrestrial
and
semi­
aquatic
plants
(
both
dicots
and
monocots).
RQs
were
also
exceeded
for
chronic
direct
effects
to
mammals.
Further,
based
on
screening
level
assessments
of
potential
direct
effects
to
these
taxa,
the
potential
for
indirect
effects
to
all
taxa
of
listed
species
can
not
be
precluded
at
this
time.
These
findings
are
based
solely
on
EPA's
screening
level
assessment
and
do
not
constitute
"
may
affect"
finding
under
the
Endangered
Species
Act.

The
Agency
has
developed
the
Endangered
Species
Protection
Program
to
identify
pesticides
whose
use
may
cause
adverse
impacts
on
endangered
and
threatened
species,
and
to
implement
mitigation
measures
that
address
these
impacts.
The
Endangered
Species
Act
requires
federal
agencies
to
ensure
that
their
actions
are
not
likely
to
jeopardize
listed
species
or
adversely
modify
designated
critical
habitat.
To
analyze
the
potential
of
registered
pesticide
uses
to
affect
any
particular
species,
EPA
puts
basic
toxicity
and
exposure
data
developed
for
reregistration
eligibility
decisions
into
context
for
individual
listed
species
and
their
locations
by
evaluating
important
ecological
parameters,
pesticide
use
information,
the
geographic
relationship
between
specific
pesticide
uses
and
species
locations
and
biological
requirements
and
behavioural
aspects
of
the
particular
species.
When
conducted,
this
analysis
will
consider
regulatory
changes
recommended
in
this
RED
that
are
being
implemented
at
that
time.
A
determination
that
there
is
a
likelihood
of
potential
impact
to
a
listed
species
may
result
in
limitations
on
use
of
the
pesticide,
other
measures
to
mitigate
any
potential
impact,
or
consultations
with
the
Fish
and
Wildlife
Service
or
National
Marine
Fisheries
Service
as
necessary.
If
the
Agency
determines
use
of
napropamide
"
may
affect"
listed
species
or
their
designated
critical
habitat,
EPA
will
employ
the
provisions
in
the
Services
regulations
(
50
CFR
Part
402).

EPA
is
not
requiring
specific
napropamide
label
language
at
the
present
time
relative
to
threatened
and
endangered
species.
If
in
the
future,
specific
measures
are
necessary
for
the
protection
of
listed
species,
the
Agency
will
implement
them
through
the
Endangered
Species
Protection
Program.
Until
that
species
specific
analysis
is
completed,
the
risk
mitigation
measures
being
implemented
through
this
RED
will
reduce
the
likelihood
that
endangered
and
threatened
species
may
be
exposed
to
napropamide
at
levels
of
concern.

F.
Other
Labeling
Requirements
In
order
to
be
eligible
for
reregistration,
various
use
and
safety
information
will
be
included
in
the
labeling
of
all
end­
use
products
containing
napropamide.
For
the
specific
labeling
statements
and
a
list
of
outstanding
data,
refer
to
Section
V
of
this
RED
document.
Page
41
of
150
1.
Spray
Drift
Management
The
Agency
has
been
working
closely
with
stakeholders
to
develop
improved
approaches
for
mitigating
risks
to
human
health
and
the
environment
from
pesticide
spray
and
dust
drift.
As
part
of
the
reregistration
process,
EPA
will
continue
to
work
with
all
interested
parties
on
this
important
issue.

From
its
assessment
of
napropamide,
as
summarized
in
this
document,
the
Agency
concludes
that
no
additional
drift
mitigation
measures
are
needed
for
napropamide.
In
the
future,
napropamide
product
labels
may
need
to
be
revised
to
include
additional
or
different
drift
label
statements.

V.
What
Registrants
Need
to
Do
The
Agency
has
determined
that
napropamide
is
eligible
for
reregistration
provided
that:
(
i)
additional
data
are
submitted
to
confirm
this
decision;
(
ii)
the
risk
mitigation
measures
outlined
in
this
document
are
adopted;
and
(
iii)
label
amendments
are
made
to
reflect
these
measures.
To
implement
the
risk
mitigation
measures,
the
registrants
will
be
required
to
amend
their
product
labeling
to
incorporate
the
label
statements
set
forth
in
the
Label
Summary
Table
in
Section
C
below.
In
the
near
future,
the
Agency
intends
to
issue
Data
Call­
In
Notices
(
DCIs)
requiring
label
amendments,
product
specific
data
and
additional
generic
(
technical
grade)
data.
Generally,
registrants
will
have
90
days
from
receipt
of
a
DCI
to
complete
and
submit
response
forms
or
request
time
extension
and/
or
waiver
requests
with
a
full
written
justification.
For
product
specific
data,
the
registrant
will
have
eight
months
to
submit
data
and
amended
labels.
For
generic
data,
due
dates
can
vary
depending
on
the
specific
studies
being
required.
Below
are
additional
generic
data
and
label
amendments
that
the
Agency
intends
to
require
for
napropamide.

A.
Manufacturing­
Use
Products
1.
Generic
Data
Requirements
The
generic
data
base
supporting
the
reregistration
of
napropamide
for
the
above
eligible
uses
has
been
reviewed
and
determined
to
be
substantially
complete.
However,
the
data
listed
below
are
necessary
to
confirm
the
reregistration
eligibility
decision
documented
in
this
RED.

860.1340
Residue
Analytical
Method
­
Plants.

860.1500
Crop
Field
Trials
are
required
for
the
following
commodities:
berries,
tree
nuts,
grape,
kiwi
fruit,
and
persimmon.

860.1520
Magnitude
of
Residue
in
Processed
Food/
Feed
(
Coffee
and
Mint).
Page
42
of
150
830.1550
Product
Identity
and
Disclosure
of
Ingredients
(
composition
and
chemical
identity)

830.1600
Starting
Materials
&
Manufacturing
Process
(
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
Used
to
Produce
the
Product)

830.1620
Description
of
the
Production
Process
830.1700
Preliminary
Analysis
830.1750
Certified
Limits
(
Certification
of
Limits)

830.1800
Enforcement
Analytical
Method
(
Analytical
methods
to
verify
certified
limits)

830.6313
Stability
to
Normal
and
Elevated
Temperatures,
Metals
and
Metal
Ions
(
stability)

850.1300
Daphnid
Chronic
Toxicity
Test
(
early
life
stage
in
fish)

850.1350
Mysid
(
Shrimp)
Chronic
Toxicity
Test
(
life
cycle
in
aquatic
invertebrates)

850.1500
Fish
Life
Cycle
Study
850.4400
Aquatic
Plant
Toxicity
Test
Using
the
Following
Species:
Lemna
gibba,
Skeletonema
costatum,
Anabaena
flos­
aquae,
and
a
freshwater
diatom
such
as
Navicula
pelliculosa.

2.
Labeling
for
Manufacturing­
Use
Products
To
ensure
compliance
with
FIFRA,
manufacturing
use
product
(
MUP)
labeling
should
be
revised
to
comply
with
all
current
EPA
regulations,
PR
Notices,
and
applicable
policies.
The
MUP
labeling
should
bear
the
labeling
contained
in
Table
20.

B.
End­
Use
Products
1.
Additional
Product­
Specific
Data
Requirements
Section
4(
g)(
2)(
B)
of
FIFRA
calls
for
the
Agency
to
obtain
any
needed
product­
specific
data
regarding
the
pesticide
after
a
determination
of
eligibility
has
been
made.
Registrants
must
review
previous
data
submissions
to
ensure
that
they
meet
current
EPA
acceptance
criteria
and
if
not,
commit
to
conduct
new
studies.
If
a
registrant
believes
that
previously
submitted
data
meet
current
testing
standards,
then
the
study
MRID
numbers
should
be
cited
according
to
the
instructions
in
the
Requirement
Status
and
Registrants
Response
Form
provided
for
each
product.
The
Agency
intends
to
issue
a
separate
product­
specific
data
call­
in
(
PDCI),
outlining
specific
data
requirements.
Page
43
of
150
2.
Labeling
for
End­
Use
Products
To
be
eligible
for
reregistration,
labeling
changes
are
necessary
to
implement
measures
outlined
in
Section
IV
above.
Specific
language
to
incorporate
these
changes
is
specified
in
Table
22.
Generally,
conditions
for
the
distribution
and
sale
of
products
bearing
old
labels/
labeling
will
be
established
when
the
label
changes
are
approved.
However,
specific
existing
stocks
time
frames
will
be
established
case­
by­
case,
depending
on
the
number
of
products
involved,
the
number
of
label
changes,
and
other
factors.
D.
Labeling
Changes
Summary
Table
In
order
to
be
eligible
for
reregistration,
amend
all
product
labels
to
incorporate
the
risk
mitigation
measures
outlined
in
Section
IV.
The
following
table
(
Table
20)
describes
how
language
on
the
labels
should
be
amended.

In
order
to
be
eligible
for
reregistration,
amend
all
product
labels
to
incorporate
the
risk
mitigation
measures
outlined
in
Section
IV.
The
following
table
describes
how
language
on
the
labels
should
be
amended.
Page
44
of
150
Labeling
Changes
Summary
Table
In
order
to
be
eligible
for
reregistration,
amend
all
product
labels
to
incorporate
the
risk
mitigation
measures
outlined
in
Section
IV.
The
following
table
describes
how
language
on
the
labels
should
be
amended.

Table
11:
Summary
of
Labeling
Changes
for
Napropamide
Description
Amended
Labeling
Language
Placement
on
Label
Manufacturing
Use
Products
One
of
these
statements
may
be
added
to
a
label
to
allow
reformulation
of
the
product
for
a
specific
use
or
all
additional
uses
supported
by
a
formulator
or
user
group
"
Only
for
formulation
into
a
dry
flowable,
granular,
and
liquid
herbicide
for
the
following
use(
s)
[
fill
blank
only
with
those
uses
that
are
being
supported
by
MP
registrant]."
Directions
for
Use
"
This
product
may
be
used
to
formulate
products
for
specific
use(
s)
not
listed
on
the
MP
label
if
the
formulator,
user
group,
or
grower
has
complied
with
U.
S.
EPA
submission
requirements
regarding
support
of
such
use(
s)."

"
This
product
may
be
used
to
formulate
products
for
any
additional
use(
s)
not
listed
on
the
MP
label
if
the
formulator,
user
group,
or
grower
has
complied
with
U.
S.
EPA
submission
requirements
regarding
support
of
such
use(
s)."
Directions
for
Use
Table
11:
Summary
of
Labeling
Changes
for
Napropamide
Description
Amended
Labeling
Language
Placement
on
Label
Page
45
of
150
Environmental
Hazards
Statements
Required
by
the
RED
and
Agency
Label
Policies
"
Do
not
discharge
effluent
containing
this
product
into
lakes,
streams,
ponds,
estuaries,
oceans,
or
other
waters
unless
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
a
National
Pollution
Discharge
Elimination
System
(
NPDES)
permit
and
the
permitting
authority
has
been
notified
in
writing
prior
to
discharge.

Do
not
discharge
effluent
containing
this
product
to
sewer
systems
without
previously
notifying
the
local
sewage
treatment
plant
authority.
For
guidance
contact
your
State
Water
Board
or
Regional
Office
of
the
EPA."
Precautionary
Statements
Table
11:
Summary
of
Labeling
Changes
for
Napropamide
Description
Amended
Labeling
Language
Placement
on
Label
Page
46
of
150
End
Use
Products
Intended
for
Occupational
Use
PPE
Requirements
Established
by
the
RED1
for
products
"
Personal
Protective
Equipment
(
PPE)"

"
Mixers,
loaders,
applicators,
and
other
handlers
must
wear:

Long­
sleeved
shirt
and
long
pants
Chemical
Resistant
Gloves
Shoes
plus
socks."
Immediately
following/
below
Precautionary
Statements:

Hazards
to
Humans
and
Domestic
Animals
Engineering
Controls
for
Aerial
Applicators
Pilots
must
use
an
enclosed
cockpit
that
meets
the
requirements
in
the
Worker
Protection
Standard
User
Safety
Requirements
"
Follow
manufacturer's
instructions
for
cleaning/
maintaining
PPE.
If
no
such
instructions
for
washables
exist,
use
detergent
and
hot
water.
Keep
and
wash
PPE
separately
from
other
laundry."
Precautionary
Statements:

Hazards
to
Humans
and
Domestic
Animals
(
Immediately
following
PPE
Requirements.)

User
Safety
Recommendations
User
Safety
Recommendations
Users
should
wash
hands
before
eating,
drinking,
chewing
gum,
using
tobacco,
or
using
the
toilet.

Users
should
remove
clothing/
PPE
immediately
if
pesticide
gets
inside.
Then
wash
thoroughly
and
put
on
clean
clothing.

Users
should
remove
PPE
immediately
after
handling
this
product.
Wash
the
outside
of
gloves
before
removing*.
As
soon
as
possible,
wash
thoroughly
and
change
into
clean
clothing."
Precautionary
Statements
immediately
following
User
Safety
Requirements
(
Must
be
placed
in
a
box.)
Table
11:
Summary
of
Labeling
Changes
for
Napropamide
Description
Amended
Labeling
Language
Placement
on
Label
Page
47
of
150
Environmental
Hazards
"
Do
not
apply
directly
to
water,
or
to
areas
where
surface
water
is
present
or
to
intertidal
areas
below
the
mean
high
water
mark.
Do
not
contaminate
water
when
disposing
of
equipment
washwater
or
rinsate."

Note:
May
need
to
be
modified
based
on
toxicity
and
use.
Precautionary
Statements
immediately
following
the
User
Safety
Recommendations
Table
11:
Summary
of
Labeling
Changes
for
Napropamide
Description
Amended
Labeling
Language
Placement
on
Label
Page
48
of
150
Restricted­
Entry
Interval
"
Do
not
enter
or
allow
worker
entry
into
treated
areas
during
the
restricted
entry
interval
(
REI)
of
24"
Directions
for
Use,

Agricultural
Use
Requirements
Box
Early
Re­
entry
Personal
Protective
Equipment
established
by
the
RED.
"
PPE
required
for
early
entry
to
treated
areas
that
is
permitted
under
the
Worker
Protection
Standard
and
that
involves
contact
with
anything
that
has
been
treated,
such
as
plants,
soil,
or
water,
is:

*
coveralls,

*
shoes
plus
socks
*
chemical­
resistant
gloves
made
of
any
waterproof
material
*
Eye
wear
Spray
Drift
Directions
for
Use
General
Precautions
and
Restrictions
"
Do
not
apply
this
product
in
a
way
that
will
contact
workers
or
other
persons,
either
directly
or
through
drift.
Only
protected
handlers
may
be
in
the
area
during
application."
Directions
for
Use
Table
11:
Summary
of
Labeling
Changes
for
Napropamide
Description
Amended
Labeling
Language
Placement
on
Label
Page
49
of
150
Application
Restrictions
End
use
product
labels
must
be
revised
to
delete
all
references
to
and
use
directions
for
the
following
cancelled
uses:
pistachio,
walnut,
grapefruit,
lemon,
nectarine,
orange,
tangerine,
tangelo,
apricot,

cherry,
peach,
plum,
prune,
apple,
pear,
fig,
avocado,
pomegranate,
artichoke,
and
olive.

The
following
risk
mitigation
measures
must
be
reflected
in
the
Directions
for
Use:

Almonds
"
Maximum
application
rate
per
crop
cycle:
4
pounds
active
ingredient
per
acre."

"
Apply
a
maximum
of
one
application
per
year."

Pecans
"
Maximum
application
rate
per
crop
cycle:
4
pounds
active
ingredient
per
acre."

"
Apply
a
maximum
of
one
application
per
year."

Cranberries
"
Maximum
application
rate
per
crop
cycle:
9
pounds
active
ingredient
per
acre."

"
Apply
a
maximum
of
one
application
per
year."

Grapes
"
Maximum
application
rate
per
crop
cycle:
4
pounds
active
ingredient
per
acre."

"
Apply
a
maximum
of
one
application
per
year."

Kiwi
Fruit
"
Maximum
application
rate
per
crop
cycle:
4
pounds
active
ingredient
per
acre."

"
Apply
a
maximum
of
one
application
per
year."

Persimmons
"
Maximum
application
rate
per
crop
cycle:
4
pounds
active
ingredient
per
acre."

"
Apply
a
maximum
of
one
application
per
year"
Place
in
the
Directions
for
Use
under
Application
Instructions
for
Each
Crop
Table
11:
Summary
of
Labeling
Changes
for
Napropamide
Description
Amended
Labeling
Language
Placement
on
Label
Page
50
of
150
End
Use
Products
Intended
Primarily
for
Use
by
Homeowners
Application
Restrictions
"
Do
not
apply
this
product
in
a
way
that
will
contact
ay
person,
pet,
either
directly
or
through
drift.

Keep
people
and
pets
out
of
the
area
during
application."
Directions
for
Use
under
General
Precautions
and
Restrictions
Entry
Restriction
Liquid:

"
Do
not
allow
people
or
pets
to
enter
the
treated
area
until
sprays
have
dried."

Dry:

"
Do
not
allow
people
or
pets
to
enter
the
treated
area
until
dusts
have
settled.
[
If
watering­
in
is
required
after
the
application,
do
not
enter
or
allow
others
to
enter
the
treated
areas
(
except
those
involved
in
the
watering)
until
the
watering­
in
is
complete
and
the
surface
is
dry."
Directions
for
Use
under
General
Precautions
and
Restrictions
Application
Equipment
Restrictions
For
turf,
the
maximum
application
rate
per
application:
2
pounds
active
ingredient
per
acre.
Can
only
apply
a
maximum
of
one
application
per
year.
Directions
for
Use
under
General
Precautions
and
Restrictions
Instructions
in
the
Labeling
section
appearing
in
quotations
represent
the
exact
language
that
should
appear
on
the
label.

Instructions
in
the
Labeling
section
not
in
quotes
represents
actions
that
the
registrant
should
take
to
amend
their
labels
or
product
registrations.

1
PPE
that
is
established
on
the
basis
of
Acute
Toxicity
of
the
end­
use
product
must
be
compared
to
the
active
ingredient
PPE
in
this
document.
The
more
protective
PPE
must
be
placed
in
the
product
labeling.
For
guidance
on
which
PPE
is
considered
more
protective,
see
PR
Notice
93­
7.
Page
51
of
150
2
If
the
product
contains
oil
or
bears
instructions
that
will
allow
application
with
an
oil­
containing
material,
the
"
N"
designation
must
be
dropped.
[
This
footnote
is
not
needed
if
a
respirator
is
not
required]

*
Text
"
Wash
the
outside
of
gloves
before
removing"
in
User
Safety
Recommendations
may
not
be
needed
if
gloves
are
not
required.
Page
52
of
150
Appendix
A:
Use
Patterns
Eligible
for
Reregistration
Application
Type,

Equipment
Formulation
Max.
Single
App.

Rate
(
lbs
ai/
A)
Seasonal
Max
(
lbs
ai/
A/
Yr)
PHI
(
days)
REI
(
Hours)
Restrictions/
Comments
Almond
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
35
12
Asparagus
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
35
12
Two
applications
are
allowed
per
year
for
asparagus.

Basil
Band
Treatment,

Broadcast,
Chemigation
Soil
Incorporation
50%
DF
4
4
12
There
is
currently
no
registered
uses
of
napropamide
on
basil.
The
registrant
(
United
Phosphorus
Inc.)
has
indicated
that
they
will
propose
the
inclusion
of
basil
on
the
product
label
for
the
50%
DF
formulation
(
70506­
36).

Blackberry
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
90
12
Blueberry
Application
Type,

Equipment
Formulation
Max.
Single
App.

Rate
(
lbs
ai/
A)
Seasonal
Max
(
lbs
ai/
A/
Yr)
PHI
(
days)
REI
(
Hours)
Restrictions/
Comments
Page
53
of
150
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
90
12
Boysenberry
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
90
12
Broccoli
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
90
12
Two
applications
are
allowed
per
year
for
broccoli.

Brussels
sprouts
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
90
12
Two
applications
are
allowed
per
year
for
Brussels
Sprouts.

Cabbage
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
90
12
Two
applications
are
allowed
per
year
for
cabbage.

Cauliflower
Application
Type,

Equipment
Formulation
Max.
Single
App.

Rate
(
lbs
ai/
A)
Seasonal
Max
(
lbs
ai/
A/
Yr)
PHI
(
days)
REI
(
Hours)
Restrictions/
Comments
Page
54
of
150
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
90
12
Two
applications
are
allowed
per
year
for
cauliflower.

Cranberry
Aerial,
Ground
Spray
10%
G
[
70506­
34
]
9
9
90
12
Eggplant
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
90
12
Two
applications
are
allowed
per
year
for
eggplant.

Filbert
Broadcast,
Chemigation
50%
4
4
35
12
Grape
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
35
12
Kiwi
Fruit
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
35
12
Loganberry
Application
Type,

Equipment
Formulation
Max.
Single
App.

Rate
(
lbs
ai/
A)
Seasonal
Max
(
lbs
ai/
A/
Yr)
PHI
(
days)
REI
(
Hours)
Restrictions/
Comments
Page
55
of
150
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
90
12
Majoram
Band
Treatment,

Broadcast,
Chemigation
Soil
Incorporation
50%
DF
4
4
90
12
There
is
currently
no
registered
uses
of
napropamide
on
marjoram.
The
registrant
(
United
Phosphorus
Inc.)
has
indicated
that
they
will
propose
the
inclusion
of
marjoram
on
the
product
label
for
the
50%
DF
formulation
(
70506­
36).

Ornamentals
(
Trees­
field
&
Container,
Herbaceous
Plants,
Woody
Shrubs,
Vines)

Band
Treatment,

Directed
Spray,
Ground
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
38
]
6
6
N/
A
12
Pecan
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
35
12
Pepper
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporated,
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
90
12
Two
applications
are
allowed
per
year
for
pepper.

Persimmon
Application
Type,

Equipment
Formulation
Max.
Single
App.

Rate
(
lbs
ai/
A)
Seasonal
Max
(
lbs
ai/
A/
Yr)
PHI
(
days)
REI
(
Hours)
Restrictions/
Comments
Page
56
of
150
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
180
12
Raspberry
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
90
12
Rhubarb
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporation,
Broadcast
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
90
12
Rosemary
Band
Treatment,

Broadcast,
Chemigation
Soil
Incorporation
50%
4
4
90
12
There
is
currently
no
registered
uses
of
napropamide
on
rosemary.
The
registrant
(
United
Phosphorus
Inc.)
has
indicated
that
they
will
propose
the
inclusion
of
rosemary
on
the
product
label
for
the
50%
DF
formulation
(
70506­
36).

Savory
Band
Treatment,

Broadcast,
Chemigation
Soil
Incorporation
50%
4
4
90
12
There
is
currently
no
registered
uses
of
napropamide
on
savory.
The
registrant
(
United
Phosphorus
Inc.)
has
indicated
that
they
will
propose
the
inclusion
of
savory
on
the
product
label
for
the
50%
DF
formulation
(
70506­
36).

Strawberry
Application
Type,

Equipment
Formulation
Max.
Single
App.

Rate
(
lbs
ai/
A)
Seasonal
Max
(
lbs
ai/
A/
Yr)
PHI
(
days)
REI
(
Hours)
Restrictions/
Comments
Page
57
of
150
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Irrigation
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
4
4
35
12
Sweet
Potato
Broadcast,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporation,
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
90
12
Two
applications
are
allowed
per
year
for
sweet
potato.

Tobacco
Broadcast,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporation
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
N/
A
12
Tomato
Chemigation,
Band
Treatment,
Soil
Incorporation,
Directed
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
36
]
2
2
90
12
Two
applications
are
allowed
per
year
for
tomato.

Turf
Band
Treatment,

Directed
Spray,
Ground
Spray
50%
DF
[
70506­
38
]
2
2
N/
A
12
Page
58
of
150
APPENDIX
B
Data
Supporting
Guideline
Requirements
for
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide
REQUIREMENT
USE
PATTERN
CITATION(
S)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
New
Guideline
Number
Old
Guideline
Number
830.1550
61­
1
Product
Identity
and
Composition
All
41222501,
41222502,
43160601
830.1600
61­
2A
Start.
Mat.
&
Mnfg.
Process
All
41222501,
42013001
830.1670
61­
2B
Formation
of
Impurities
All
40491301,
41222501,
42013001
830.1700
62­
1
Preliminary
Analysis
All
40924701,
41222502,
43160601,
43160602
830.1750
62­
2
Certification
of
limits
All
41222502
830.1800
62­
3
Analytical
Method
All
41222502,
42013002,
42275201,
42679201,
43160601
830.6302
63­
2
Color
All
41222503
830.6303
63­
3
Physical
State
All
41222503
830.6304
63­
4
Odor
All
41222503
830.7200
63­
5
Melting
Point
All
41222503
830.7300
63­
7
Density
All
41222503
830.7840
830.7860
63­
8
Solubility
All
41222503
830.7950
63­
9
Vapor
Pressure
All
41222503
830.7550
63­
11
Octanol/
Water
Partition
Coefficient
All
41222503
830.7000
63­
12
pH
All
41222503
830.6313
63­
13
Stability
All
41222503
830.6317
63­
17
Storage
Stability
All
41222503,
42013003,
4207801
830.6320
63­
20
Corrosion
characteristics
All
41222503,
42013003
ECOLOGICAL
EFFECTS
850.2100
71­
1A
Avian
Acute
Oral
Toxicity
B,
C,
K
00160000
850.2200
71­
2A
Avian
Dietary
Toxicity
­
Quail
B,
C,
K
00022923
850.2200
71­
2B
Avian
Dietary
Toxicity
­
Duck
B,
C,
K
00022923
850.1075
72­
1A
Fish
Toxicity
Bluegill
B,
C,
K
40098001
850.1075
72­
1C
Fish
Toxicity
Rainbow
Trout
40098001
Data
Supporting
Guideline
Requirements
for
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide
REQUIREMENT
USE
PATTERN
CITATION(
S)

Page
59
of
150
850.1010
72­
2A
Invertebrate
Toxicity
B,
C,
K
41257101
None
72­
3A
Estuarine/
Marine
Toxicity
­
Fish
40228401
850.1025
72­
3B
Estuarine/
Marine
Toxicity
­
Mollusk
40228401
850.1035
72­
3C
Estuarine/
Marine
Toxicity
­
Shrimp
40228401
850.3020
141­
1
Honey
Bee
Acute
Contact
00036935
850.3030
141­
2
Honey
Bee
Residue
on
Foliage
05000837
TOXICOLOGY
870.1100
81­
1
Acute
Oral
Toxicity­
Rat
ALL
41222504
870.1200
81­
2
Acute
Dermal
Toxicity­
Rabbit/
Rat
ALL
41222505
870.1300
81­
3
Acute
Inhalation
Toxicity­
Rat
ALL
00138933
870.2400
81­
4
Primary
Eye
Irritation­
Rabbit
ALL
41222506
870.2500
81­
5
Primary
Skin
Irritation
ALL
41222507
870.2600
81­
6
Dermal
Sensitization
ALL
41377902,
42981001
870.6100
81­
7
Acute
Delayed
Neurotoxicity
­
Hen
00079791,
41905901
870.6200
81­
8
Acute
Neurotoxicity
Screen
42912501
870.3100
82­
1A
Subchronic
Oral
Toxicity
Test
(
90­
Day
Feeding
­
Rodent)
B,
L
43371201
870.3250
82­
3
90­
day
Subchronic
Dermal
Toxicity
Test,
Rat
41342001
870.4100
83­
1A
Chronic
Feeding
Toxicity
­
Rodent
B,
L
00112525,
42980901
870.4100
83­
1B
Chronic
Feeding
Toxicity
­
Non­
Rodent
B,
L
00077819,
42679401
870.4200
83­
2A
Oncogenicity
­
Rat
B,
L
00117443,
42980901
870.4200
83­
2B
Oncogenicity
­
Mouse
B,
L
00117443,
00126039
870.3700
83­
3A
Developmental
Toxicity
­
Rat
B,
L
40152701,
4250101
870.3700
83­
3B
Developmental
Toxicity
­
Rabbit
B,
L
00127831
870.3800
83­
4
2­
Generation
Reproduction
­
Rat
B,
L
00077802,
42054301
870.5140
84­
2A
Gene
Mutation
(
Ames
Test)
B,
C,
K,
L,
M
41222508
870.5375
84­
2B
Structural
Chromosomal
Aberration
B,
C,
K,
L,
M
41312901
None
84­
4
Other
Genotoxic
Effects
B,
C,
K,
L,
M
42156401
870.7485
85­
1
General
Metabolism
B,
L
41988401
870.7600
85­
2
Dermal
Penetration
42111501
Data
Supporting
Guideline
Requirements
for
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide
REQUIREMENT
USE
PATTERN
CITATION(
S)

Page
60
of
150
870.7200
86­
1
Domestic
(
Companion)
Animal
Safety
40436601,
41810101,
41810102
OCCUPATIONAL/
RESIDENTIAL
EXPOSURE
875.1200
233
Estimation
of
Dermal
Exposure,
Indoor
Sites
45519601,
45528801
875.1400
234
Estimation
of
Inhalation
Exposure,
Indoor
Sites
45519601,
45528801
875.2400
133­
3
Dermal
Passive
Dosimetry
Exposure
42622301,
45485501
875.2500
133­
4
Inhalation
Passive
Dosimetry
Exposure
42622301
ENVIRONMENTAL
FATE
None
160­
5
Chemical
Identity
ALL
41222501,
41222502,
43160601
835.2120
161­
1
Hydrolysis
ALL
41929101
835.4100
162­
1
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
B,
C,
K
00077821,
42082401
835.1240
163­
1
Leaching/
Adsorption/
Desorption
B,
C,
K
41681301
None
164­
A­
SS
Dissipation
of
Residues
in
Excrement
42848501
RESIDUE
CHEMISTRY
860.1300
171­
4B
Nature
of
Residue
­
Livestock
B
00116020,
00117354,
00120147,
00120204,
42828801,
42828802,
42828803
860.1340
171­
4C
Residue
Analytical
Method
­
Plants
B
00038458,
00077812,
00077814,
00077816,
00115939,
00116020,
00116553,
00117329,
00117340,
00117351,
00117354,
00117389,
00118265,
00120147,
00120200,
00120205,
00120206,
00120229,
00130705,
00133913,
05004211
Data
Supporting
Guideline
Requirements
for
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide
REQUIREMENT
USE
PATTERN
CITATION(
S)

Page
61
of
150
860.1340
171­
4D
Residue
Analytical
Method
­
Animals
B
00038458,
00077812,
00077814,
00077816,
00115939,
00116020,
00116553,
00117329,
00117340,
00117351,
00117354,
00117389,
00118265,
00120147,
00120200,
00120205,
00120206,
00120229,
00130705,
00133913,
05004211
860.1380
171­
4E
Storage
Stability
B
00117329,
00117354,
00117361,
00117389,
00133913
860.1480
171­
4J
Magnitude
of
Residues
­
Meat/
Milk/
Poultry/
Egg
B
00038458,
00084189,
00115939,
00117298,
00117298,
00117339,
00117340,
00117354,
00117389,
00118265,
00120200,
00120206,
00120225,
00120227,
05006630
Page
62
of
150
Appendix
C.
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT
DOCUMENTS
Additional
documentation
in
support
of
this
RED
is
maintained
in
the
OPP
docket,
located
in
Room
119,
Crystal
Mall
#
2,
1921
Jefferson
Davis
Highway,
Arlington,
VA.
It
is
open
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays,
from
8:
30
am
to
4
pm.

The
docket
initially
contained
preliminary
risk
assessments
and
related
documents
as
of
August
10,
1998.
Sixty
days
later
the
first
public
comment
period
closed.
The
EPA
then
considered
comments,
revised
the
risk
assessment,
and
added
the
formal
"
Response
to
Comments"
document
and
the
revised
risk
assessment
to
the
docket
on
June
16,
1999.

All
documents,
in
hard
copy
form,
may
be
viewed
in
the
OPP
docket
room
or
downloaded
or
viewed
via
the
Internet
at
the
following
site:

www.
epa.
gov/
pesticides/
op
These
documents
include:

HED
Documents:

°
Napropamide:
REVISED
HED
Chapter
of
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
Document
(
RED).
2/
23/
05
Stanton,
Susan
°
Napropamide.
Chronic
Dietary
Exposure
Assessments
for
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision.
10/
29/
04.
Stanton,
Susan
°
Napropamide:
Revised
Occupational
and
Residential
Exposure
Assessment
and
Recommendations
for
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
Document.
2/
20/
05.
Tadayon,
Nadar
Page
63
of
150
°
Revised
Product
Chemistry
Considerations.
2/
15/
05.
Drew,
Danette
°
Napropamide.
Revised
Residue
Chemistry
Considerations
for
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision.
2/
18/
05.
Drew,
Danette
°
Review
of
Napropamide
Incident
Reports.
11/
4/
04.

Blondell,
Jerome
°
Outcome
of
the
3/
16/
93
Meeting
of
HED
Metabolism
Committee.
4/
7/
93.

Knizner,
Steven
°
Napropamide:
Final
HED
Chapter
of
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
(
RED)
Document.
7/
7/
05.
Stanton,
Susan
EFED
Documents:

1.
EFED
Risk
Assessment
for
Napropamide
Registration
Eligibility
Document.
3/
1/
05.
Breithaupt,
James
&
Jenkins,
Fred
2.
Drinking
Water
Assessment
for
Napropamide
for
Terrestrial
Uses
8/
17/
04.
Breithaupt,
James
3.
Drinking
Water
Assessment
for
Napropamide.
11/
12/
04.

Breithaupt,
James
4.
Guidance
for
selecting
Input
parameters
in
Modeling
the
Environmental
Fate
&
Transport
of
Pesticides.
2/
28/
02.
US
EPA
(
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs
(
OPP)
Environmental
Fate
and
Effects
Divsion.

5.
EFED
Risk
Assessment
for
the
Napropamide
Reregistration
Eligibility
Document.
8/
15/
05.
Borges,
Shannon
&
Breithaupt,
James.

6.
EFED
Response
to
"
Error
Only"
and
Public
Comments
for
the
Napropamide
RED.
8/
16/
05.
Breithaupt,
James
7.
EFED
RED
Chapter
for
Napropamide
Chronic
Risk
Recalculations
for
Mammals.
9/
22/
05.
Randall,
Donna
Page
64
of
150
8.
EFED
RED
Chapter
for
Napropamide
Chronic
Risk
Recalculation
Spreadsheet
Supporting
Documentation
for
Mammals.
9/
22/
05
Randall,
Donna
Appendix
D.
Citations
Considered
to
Be
Part
of
the
Data
Base
Supporting
the
Rereregistration
Decision
(
Bibliography)

Bibliography
61­
1
Chemical
Identity
MRID
40137
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Formula
Dislosure
(
Percent
Weight):
Waylay
50­
WP.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
20,
1971
under
2F1194;
CDL:
095554­
D)

79332
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1981)
Confidential
Statement
of
Formula:
Devrinol^(
R)
I
10­
G
Ornamental
Selective
Herbicide.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jun
24,
1981
under
476­
2176;
CDL:
245343­
A)

16213
4
Yu
Farina,
L.
(
1986)
Characterization
of
Devrinol
Selective
Herbi­
cide:
Report
No.
RRC
86­
30.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
42
p.
Page
65
of
150
41943
301
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Supplemental
Information:
Lab
Project
No.
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
12
p.

43928
602
Smith,
J.
(
1996)
Product
Chemistry
for
Napropamide­
Oxidiazon
4­
2
Granules:
Lab
Project
Number:
96­
1.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Platte
Chemical
Co.
13
p.

44409
301
Crowther,
H.
(
1997)
Napropamide:
Product
Identity,
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
and
Manufacturing
Process
and
Discussion
of
the
Formation
of
Impurities
for
Napropamide
Technical
(
TGAI)
Produced
by
United
Phosphorus
at
Sandbach
UK:
Lab
Project
Number:
RAD1822.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products.
93
p.

44409
302
Kennedy,
D.;
Robson,
C.
(
1997)
Napropamide:
Preliminary
Analysis,
Certification
of
Limits
and
Methods
of
Analysis
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
for
Napropamide
Technical
(
TGAI)
Produced
by
United
Phosphorus
at
Sandbach
UK:
Lab
Project
Number:
702371:
CGR10/
97:
WRC­
88­
76.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Specialities.
57
p.

61­
2
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
and
Manufacturing
Proces
MRID
40135
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
The
Name,
Chemical
Identity
and
Composition
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical:
Waylay^(
TM)
I.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Aug
20,
1971
under
2F1194;
CDL:
095554­
B)
Page
66
of
150
57802
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Manufacturing
Process
for
Devri­
nol.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
27,
1977
under
476­
2174;
CDL:
230294­
B)

61724
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Manufacturing
Process
for
Devri­
nol.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1977
under
476­
2175;
CDL:
229649­
B)

72689
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
?
Chemistry
of
Devrinol|.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Apr
27,
1981
under
0F2319;
CDL:
070040­
D)

113818
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1976)
?
Chemical
Study:
Devrinol|.
(
Compila­
tion;
unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1977
under
476­
2173;
CDL:
229749­
A)

126778
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1983)
Devrinol
Technical
Selective
Herbi­
cide.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Apr
4,
1983
under
476­
2221;
CDL:
249917­
A)

137595
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1984)
?
Chemistry
of
Devrinol
50
DF|.
(
Com­
pilation;
unpublished
study
received
Feb
7,
1984
under
476­
2229;
CDL:
252427­
A)

40362901
Javdani,
K.
(
1987)
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
and
Manufac­
turing
Process
and
Discussion
of
the
Formation
of
Impurities
for
Devrinol
Technical:
RRC
No.
87­
87.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
59
p.

41943301
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Supplemental
Information:
Lab
Project
No.
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
12
p.

43928602
Smith,
J.
(
1996)
Product
Chemistry
for
Napropamide­
Oxidiazon
4­
2
Granules:
Lab
Project
Number:
96­
1.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Platte
Chemical
Co.
13
p.

44006501
Javdani,
K.;
Lee,
E.
(
1993)
Second
Addendum
to
Report
Rrc
87­
87
(
MRID
40362901):
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
and
Manufacturing
Process
and
Discussion
of
the
Formation
of
Impurities
for
DEVRINOL
Technical:
Supplement
to
MRID
Nos.
40362901,
41067801
and
41943301:
Lab
Project
Number:
RR
93­
041B:
72­
62­
7820­
01.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Western
Research
Center.
25
p.

44409301
Crowther,
H.
(
1997)
Napropamide:
Product
Identity,
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
and
Manufacturing
Process
and
Discussion
of
the
Formation
of
Impurities
for
Napropamide
Technical
(
TGAI)
Produced
by
United
Phosphorus
at
Sandbach
UK:
Lab
Project
Number:
RAD1822.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products.
93
p.

92125001
Javdani,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
40362901.
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
and
Manufacturing
Process
and
Discussion
of
the
Formation
of
Impurities
for
Devrinol
Technical:
RRC
87­
87;
Summary
ID
No.
RR­
90­
239B.
Prepared
by
WESTERN
RESEARCH
CENTER/
ICI
AMERICAS.
20
p.

61­
3
Discussion
of
Formation
of
Impurities
MRID
40362901
Javdani,
K.
(
1987)
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
and
Manufac­
turing
Process
and
Discussion
of
the
Formation
of
Impurities
for
Devrinol
Technical:
RRC
No.
87­
87.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
59
p.
Page
67
of
150
41943301
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Supplemental
Information:
Lab
Project
No.
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
12
p.

43928602
Smith,
J.
(
1996)
Product
Chemistry
for
Napropamide­
Oxidiazon
4­
2
Granules:
Lab
Project
Number:
96­
1.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Platte
Chemical
Co.
13
p.

44006501
Javdani,
K.;
Lee,
E.
(
1993)
Second
Addendum
to
Report
Rrc
87­
87
(
MRID
40362901):
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
and
Manufacturing
Process
and
Discussion
of
the
Formation
of
Impurities
for
DEVRINOL
Technical:
Supplement
to
MRID
Nos.
40362901,
41067801
and
41943301:
Lab
Project
Number:
RR
93­
041B:
72­
62­
7820­
01.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Western
Research
Center.
25
p.

44409301
Crowther,
H.
(
1997)
Napropamide:
Product
Identity,
Description
of
Beginning
Materials
and
Manufacturing
Process
and
Discussion
of
the
Formation
of
Impurities
for
Napropamide
Technical
(
TGAI)
Produced
by
United
Phosphorus
at
Sandbach
UK:
Lab
Project
Number:
RAD1822.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products.
93
p.

62­
1
Preliminary
Analysis
MRID
162134
Yu
Farina,
L.
(
1986)
Characterization
of
Devrinol
Selective
Herbi­
cide:
Report
No.
RRC
86­
30.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
42
p.

41067801
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Project
ID:
Study
No.
APP­
001;
Report
No.
WRC
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
241
p.

41943301
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Supplemental
Information:
Lab
Project
No.
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
12
p.

44006502
Lee,
E.
(
1993)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
DEVRINOL
Technical
Produced
at
Cold
Creek
Organics
Plant:
Lab
Project
Number:
RR
93­
001B:
WRC
92­
152:
WRC
93­
007.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Western
Research
Center.
246
p.

44409302
Kennedy,
D.;
Robson,
C.
(
1997)
Napropamide:
Preliminary
Analysis,
Certification
of
Limits
and
Methods
of
Analysis
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
for
Napropamide
Technical
(
TGAI)
Produced
by
United
Phosphorus
at
Sandbach
UK:
Lab
Project
Number:
702371:
CGR10/
97:
WRC­
88­
76.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Specialities.
57
p.

46338601
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Preliminary
Analysis
(
830.1700),
Ceterified
Limits
(
830.1750),
and,
Analytical
Methods
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
(
830.1800):
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101,
GCLQA/
SAL/
FB/
0115.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
71
p.

92125002
Wegner,
M.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
41067801.
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Project
APP001;
Summary
ID
No.
RR
90­
179B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS
INC./
WESTERN
RESEARCH
CENTER.
18
p.

62­
2
Certification
of
limits
Page
68
of
150
MRID
40135
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
The
Name,
Chemical
Identity
and
Composition
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical:
Waylay^(
TM)
I.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Aug
20,
1971
under
2F1194;
CDL:
095554­
B)

61725
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Purities
of
Raw
Materials,
Inter­
mediates,
and
Devrinol
Technical.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1977
under
476­
2175;
CDL:
229649­
C)

72833
Brookman,
D.
J.
(
1973)
Determination
of
Impurities
in
Technical
Devrinol^(
R)
I.
Method
no.
WRC
73­
26
dated
Apr
2,
1973.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Apr
2,
1973
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101330­
A)

126778
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1983)
Devrinol
Technical
Selective
Herbi­
cide.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Apr
4,
1983
under
476­
2221;
CDL:
249917­
A)

137595
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1984)
?
Chemistry
of
Devrinol
50
DF|.
(
Com­
pilation;
unpublished
study
received
Feb
7,
1984
under
476­
2229;
CDL:
252427­
A)

41067801
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Project
ID:
Study
No.
APP­
001;
Report
No.
WRC
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
241
p.

41943301
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Supplemental
Information:
Lab
Project
No.
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
12
p.

43928602
Smith,
J.
(
1996)
Product
Chemistry
for
Napropamide­
Oxidiazon
4­
2
Granules:
Lab
Project
Number:
96­
1.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Platte
Chemical
Co.
13
p.

44006502
Lee,
E.
(
1993)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
DEVRINOL
Technical
Produced
at
Cold
Creek
Organics
Plant:
Lab
Project
Number:
RR
93­
001B:
WRC
92­
152:
WRC
93­
007.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Western
Research
Center.
246
p.

44409302
Kennedy,
D.;
Robson,
C.
(
1997)
Napropamide:
Preliminary
Analysis,
Certification
of
Limits
and
Methods
of
Analysis
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
for
Napropamide
Technical
(
TGAI)
Produced
by
United
Phosphorus
at
Sandbach
UK:
Lab
Project
Number:
702371:
CGR10/
97:
WRC­
88­
76.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Specialities.
57
p.

46338601
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Preliminary
Analysis
(
830.1700),
Ceterified
Limits
(
830.1750),
and,
Analytical
Methods
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
(
830.1800):
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101,
GCLQA/
SAL/
FB/
0115.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
71
p.

62­
3
Analytical
Method
MRID
41067801
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Project
ID:
Study
No.
APP­
001;
Report
No.
WRC
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
241
p.

41943301
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Supplemental
Information:
Lab
Project
No.
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Page
69
of
150
Americas,
Inc.
12
p.

43928602
Smith,
J.
(
1996)
Product
Chemistry
for
Napropamide­
Oxidiazon
4­
2
Granules:
Lab
Project
Number:
96­
1.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Platte
Chemical
Co.
13
p.

44006502
Lee,
E.
(
1993)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
DEVRINOL
Technical
Produced
at
Cold
Creek
Organics
Plant:
Lab
Project
Number:
RR
93­
001B:
WRC
92­
152:
WRC
93­
007.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Western
Research
Center.
246
p.

44409302
Kennedy,
D.;
Robson,
C.
(
1997)
Napropamide:
Preliminary
Analysis,
Certification
of
Limits
and
Methods
of
Analysis
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
for
Napropamide
Technical
(
TGAI)
Produced
by
United
Phosphorus
at
Sandbach
UK:
Lab
Project
Number:
702371:
CGR10/
97:
WRC­
88­
76.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Specialities.
57
p.

46338601
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Preliminary
Analysis
(
830.1700),
Ceterified
Limits
(
830.1750),
and,
Analytical
Methods
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
(
830.1800):
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101,
GCLQA/
SAL/
FB/
0115.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
71
p.

63­
0
Reports
of
Multiple
phys/
chem
Characteristics
MRID
4190
Gjerstad,
D.
H.;
South,
D.
B.
(
1976)
Supporting
Data
for
Application
for
State
Registration
of:
Modown
for
Weed
Control
in
Pine
Seed­
beds.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
13,
1977
under
2224­
50;
prepared
by
Auburn
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Forestry
in
cooperation
with
U.
S.
Forest
Service,
State
and
Private
Forestry,
Southeastern
Area,
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Industrial
Chemicals,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
232503­
A)

32566
Bost,
J.
J.
(
1974)
Devrinol
Tillam
Tank
Mix:
Project
No.
038229.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028421­
C)

33178
Hudek,
R.
D.;
Bost,
J.
J.
(
1974)
?
Tank
Mix
Compatibility|.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
000836­
G)

39764
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1972?)
Devrinol^(
R)
I:
Summary
of
Envi­
ronmental
Studies.
Summary
of
studies
093519­
C
through
093519­
M.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
093519­
A)

40135
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
The
Name,
Chemical
Identity
and
Composition
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical:
Waylay^(
TM)
I.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Aug
20,
1971
under
2F1194;
CDL:
095554­
B)

57801
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1972)
Devrinol^(
R)
I
Physical
and
Chemi­
cal
Properties.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
27,
1977
under
476­
2174;
CDL:
230294­
A)

67870
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Tillam
Dyfonate
Devrinol
Tank­
mix
Compatibility.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
26,
1981
under
476­
1615;
CDL:
244253­
B)

70782
Hudek,
R.
D.
(
1978)
Letter
sent
to
R.
L.
Riggs
dated
Oct
24,
1978
?
Tank
mix
data
for
Devrinol
registration|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
243859­
E)
Page
70
of
150
70787
Hudek,
R.
D.
(
1980)
Letter
sent
to
R.
L.
Riggs
dated
Oct
31,
1980:
Tank
mixes
for
registrations.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
243860­
E)

72688
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Devrinol:
Physical
and
Chemical
Properties.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1981
under
0F2319;
CDL:
070040­
C)

92498
Bost,
J.
J.
(
1974)
Letter
sent
to
Glenn
Kurimoto
dated
Nov
11,
1974:
Devrinol
tillam
tank
mix
project
#
038229.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101112­
C)

94168
Hudek,
R.
D.
(
1973)
Letter
sent
to
R.
L.
Riggs
dated
Apr
5,
1973:
Tank­
mix
compatibility­­
Devrinol
50W
and
Simazine
80W.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028423­
L)

94169
Bost,
J.
J.
(
1974)
Letter
sent
to
R.
Riggs
dated
Oct
2,
1974:
Tank
mix
compatibility
of
Devrinol
50W
and
2E
with
paraquat
2L
and
simazine
80W.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028423­
M)

94477
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
?
Tank­
mix
Compatibility­­
Devrinol
50W
and
Simazine
80W;
Devrinol
50W
and
2E
with
Paraquat
2L
and
Simazine
80W|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974;
CDL:
101111­
D)

97397
Hudek,
R.
D.
(
1979)
Letter
sent
to
W.
Hoover
dated
Oct
10,
1979:
Tank
mix
data
for
registration
of:
Devrinol
4F
+
simazine
80W;
Devrinol
4F
+
Paraquat
CL;
Devrinol
4F
+
simazine
80W
+
para­
quat
CL;
Devrinol
4F
+
Tillam
6E.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
U)

139541
Griffith,
W.
(
1983)
Particle
Size
Distribution
of
Technical
Dev­
rinol.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
15,
1983
under
476­
2221;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
252081­
A)

40362904
Wegner,
M.
(
1987)
Technical
Devrinol:
Particle
Size
Analysis:
Laboratory
Project
ID
RRC
87­
66.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
8
p.

41610201
Lee,
K.
(
1990)
Napropamide­
Physical
Properties:
Lab
Project
Number:
RR/
90/
093B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
33
p.

41943301
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Supplemental
Information:
Lab
Project
No.
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
12
p.

43928601
Irving,
J.
(
1995)
PCC­
146:
Chemical
and
Physical
Properties:
Lab
Project
Number:
PLT­
137.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Dartec
Inc.
34
p.

63­
2
Color
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.
Page
71
of
150
63­
3
Physical
State
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
6
Boiling
Point
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
7
Density
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
9
Vapor
Pressure
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
10
Dissociation
Constant
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
12
pH
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
14
Oxidizing/
Reducting
Action
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
15
Flammability
Page
72
of
150
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
16
Explodability
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
17
Storage
stability
MRID
41943301
Farina,
L.
(
1989)
Analysis
and
Certification
of
Product
Ingredients
in
Devrinol
Selective
Herbicide:
Supplemental
Information:
Lab
Project
No.
89­
19.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
12
p.

43928601
Irving,
J.
(
1995)
PCC­
146:
Chemical
and
Physical
Properties:
Lab
Project
Number:
PLT­
137.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Dartec
Inc.
34
p.

44152201
Irving,
J.
(
1996)
PCC­
146:
Storage
Stability,
Corrosion
Characteristics:
Supplemental
Report
to
MRID
43928601:
Lab
Project
Number:
PLT­
137.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Dartec,
Inc.
20
p.

46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
18
Viscosity
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
19
Miscibility
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
20
Corrosion
characteristics
MRID
44152201
Irving,
J.
(
1996)
PCC­
146:
Storage
Stability,
Corrosion
Characteristics:
Supplemental
Report
to
MRID
43928601:
Lab
Project
Number:
PLT­
137.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Dartec,
Inc.
20
p.
Page
73
of
150
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

63­
21
Dielectric
breakdown
voltage
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

71­
1
Avian
Single
Dose
Oral
Toxicity
MRID
73620
Fink,
R.
(
1976)
Final
Report:
Acute
Oral
LD50­­
Mallard
Duck:
Proj­
ect
No.
144­
102.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
27,
1977
under
476­
2174;
prepared
by
Wildlife
International,
Ltd.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
230293­
B)

79548
Fink,
R.
(
1976)
Final
Report:
Acute
Oral
LD50­­
Mallard
Duck:
Proj­
ect
No.
144­
102.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1977
under
476­
2175;
prepared
by
Wildlife
International,
Ltd.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229652­
A)

79555
Fink,
R.
(
1976)
Final
Report:
Acute
Oral
LD50­­
Mallard
Duck:
Proj­
ect
No.
144­
102.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
prepared
by
Wildlife
International,
Ltd.,
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229228­
A)

115312
Fink,
R.
(
1976)
Acute
Oral
LD50­­
Mallard
Duck:
Devrinol
Technical:
Project
No.
144­
102.
Final
rept.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1977
under
476­
2173;
prepared
by
Wildlife
International,
Ltd.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
229750­
A)

119533
Fink,
R.
(
1976)
Acute
Oral
LD50­­
Mallard
Duck:
Devrinol
Technical:
Project
No.
144­
102;
T­
5997.
Final
rept.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Nov
9,
1982
under
476­
2218;
prepared
by
Wildlife
In­
ternational
Ltd.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
248806­
B)

41610202
Culotta,
J.;
et
al.
(
1990)
An
Acute
Oral
Toxicity
Study
with
the
Mallard:
Lab
Project
Number:
123­
154.
Unpublished
Study
Pub­
lished
by
Wildlife
International.
18
p.

42657401
Edwards,
P.
(
1993)
Addendum
to
MRID
41610202:
Napropamide:
An
Acute
Oral
Toxicity
Study
with
the
Mallard.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Agrochemicals.
19
p.

43182401
Pearson,
F.;
White,
J.
(
1994)
Addendum
to
MRIDs
41610202
and
42657401:
Napropamide:
An
Acute
Oral
Toxicity
Study
with
the
Mallard:
Lab
Project
Number:
WI­
123­
154.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Agrochemicals.
5
p.

43506701
Campbell,
S.;
Beavers,
J.
(
1994)
Napropamide:
An
Acute
Oral
Toxicity
Study
With
the
Northern
Bobwhite:
Lab
Project
Number:
WI
123­
169:
123­
169.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Wildlife
Int'l
Ltd.
23
p.

71­
2
Avian
Dietary
Toxicity
MRID
25893
Beavers,
J.
B.;
Fink,
R.;
Brown,
R.
(
1978)
Final
Report:
Eight­
Day
Dietary
LC50­­
Bobwhite
Quail:
Page
74
of
150
Project
No.
144­
108.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
by
Wildlife
International,
Ltd.
in
cooperation
with
Washington
College,
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
P)

25894
Joiner,
R.
L.
(
1975)
Safety
Evaluation
of
Devrinol
Technical
by
a
Five­
Day
Feeding
Study
in
Mallard
Ducks:
T­
5469.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
Q)

39775
Knott,
W.
B.;
Johnston,
C.
D.
(
1970)
R­
7465
Safety
Evaluation
on
Bob­
white
Quail.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Woodard
Research
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
L)

49497
Knott,
W.
B.;
Johnston,
C.
D.
(
1970)
R­
7465:
Safety
Evaluation
on
Bobwhite
Quail.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Woodard
Research
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
T)

113819
Joiner,
R.
(
1975)
Safety
Evaluation
of
Devrinol
Technical
by
a
Five­
day
Feeding
Study
in
Mallard
Ducks:
T­
5469.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
25,
1979
under
476­
2175;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
238234­
A)

113820
Fink,
R.;
Beavers,
J.;
Brown,
R.
(
1978)
Eight­
day
Dietary
LC50­­
Bobwhite
Quail:
Devrinol:
Project
No.
144­
108;
T­
6519.
Final
rept.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
25,
1979
under
476­
2175;
prepared
by
Wildlife
International
Ltd.
and
Washington
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
238234­
B)

41610203
Foster,
J.;
et
al.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
A
Dietary
LC50
Study
with
the
Mallard:
Lab
Project
Number:
123­
153.
Unpublished
study
pre­
pared
by
Wildlife
International
Ltd.
55
p.

92125003
Calderbank,
A.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00113820.
Eight­
Day
Dietary
LC50­
Bobwhite
Quail­
Devrinol:
Report
No.
T­
6519;
Study
No.
144­
108.
Prepared
by
WILDLIFE
INTERNATIONAL
LTD.
10
p.

71­
4
Avian
Reproduction
MRID
42027701
Beavers,
J.;
Foster,
J.;
Lynn,
S.;
et
al.
(
1991)
Napropamide:
A
One
Generation
Reproduction
Study
with
the
Mallard
(
Anas
platyrhyn­
chos):
Lab
Project
Number:
123­
160.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Wildlife
International,
Ltd.
203
p.

42081301
Beavers,
J.;
Foster,
J.;
Lynn,
S.;
et
al.
(
1991)
Napromamide:
A
One
Generation
Reproduction
Study
With
the
Bobwhite
Quail
(
Colinus
virginianus):
Lab
Project
Number:
123­
159.
Unpublished
study
study
prepared
by
Wildlife
International,
Ltd.
204
p.

72­
1
Acute
Toxicity
to
Freshwater
Fish
MRID
72686
Vilkas,
A.
G.;
Schupner,
J.
K.
(
1981)
The
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
Technical
to
the
Rainbow
Trout:
UCCES
Project
No.
11506­
22­
10.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1981
under
0F2319;
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
070040­
A)
Page
75
of
150
115313
Calmbacher,
C.
(
1978)
The
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
Technical
Com­
posite
WRC
4921­
27­
3
to
the
Rainbow
Trout
...:
UCES
Proj.
No.
11506­
22­
10;
T­
6520.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
25,
1979
under
476­
2175;
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
238234­
C)

118002
Sleight,
B.
(
1972)
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
to
Bluegill
...:
?
Submitter|
T­
2223.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Nov
9,
1982
under
476­
2218;
prepared
by
Bionomics,
Inc.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
248806­
C)

41610204
Tapp,
J.;
et
al.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
Determination
of
Acute
Toxi­
city
to
Bluegill
Sunfish
(
Lepomis
macrochirus):
Lab
Project
No.
BL3804/
B.
Unpublished
Study
Prepared
by
Imperial
Chemical
Industries
PLC.
20
p.

92125004
Calderbank,
A.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00115313
and
Related
MRIDs
00072686.
The
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
Technical
to
the
Rainbow
Trout
Salmo
gairdneri
Richardson:
Report
No.
T­
10726;
Study
No.
11506­
22­
10.
Prepared
by
UNION
CARBIDE
CORP.
11
p.

72­
2
Acute
Toxicity
to
Freshwater
Invertebrates
MRID
57805
Vilkas,
A.
G.
(
1976)
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
Technical
to
the
Wa­
ter
Flea,~
Daphnia
magna~
Straus:
AES
Proj.
#
7600­
87.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
May
27,
1977
under
476­
2174;
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
230293­
C)

88064
Vilkas,
A.
G.
(
1976)
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
Technical
to
the
Water
Flea~
Daphnia
magna~
Straus:
AES
Proj.
#
7600­
87.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227696­
C)

41610205
Stewart,
K.;
et
al.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
Determination
of
Acute
Toxicity
to
Daphnia
magna:
Lab
Project
Number:
BL3845/
B.
Unpublished
Study
Prepared
by
Imperial
Chemical
Industries
PLC.
18
p.

72­
3
Acute
Toxicity
to
Estuarine/
Marine
Organisms
MRID
65360
Heitmuller,
T.
(
1976)
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
to
Embryos
of
Eastern
Oysters
(~
Crassostrea
virginica~),
to
Pink
Shrimp
(~
Penaeus
duorarum~),
and
to
Fiddler
Crabs
(~
Uca
pugila~­
?~
tor~).
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
prepared
by
EG&
G,
Bionomics,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chem­
ical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229228­
C)

41610206
Tapp,
J.;
et
al.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
Determination
of
Acute
Toxi­
city
to
Sheepshead
Minnow
(
Cyprinodon
variegatus):
Lab
Project
Number:
BL3854/
B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Imperial
Chemical
Industries
PLC.
18
p.

41610207
Williams,
T.;
et
al.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
Determination
of
Acute
Toxicity
to
Mysid
Shrimp:
Lab
Project
Number:
BL3741/
B.
Unpub­
lished
Study
Prepared
by
Imperial
Chemical
Industries
PLC.
16
p.
Page
76
of
150
41667101
Dionne,
E.
(
1990)
Napropamide
Technical­­
Acute
Toxicity
to
Eastern
Oysters
(
Crassos­
trea
virginica)
under
Flow­
Through
Conditions:
Lab
Project
Number:
90­
8­
3449.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Springborn
Labs,
Inc.
50
p.

42656201
Dionne,
E.
(
1993)
Addendum
to
MRID
41667101:
Napropamide
Technical:
Acute
Toxicity
to
Eastern
Oysters
(
Crassostrea
virginica)
Under
Flow­
Through
Conditions:
Lab
Project
Number:
90­
8­
3449.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Springborn
Labs.,
Inc.
17
p.

43875001
Dionne,
E.
(
1995)
Napropamide
Technical:
Acute
Toxicity
to
Eastern
Oysters
(
Crassostrea
virginica):
Addendum
to
MRID
Nos.
41667101
and
42656201:
Lab
Project
Number:
SL­
90­
8­
3449
ADDENDUM
2.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Brixham,
UK.
14
p.

72­
4
Fish
Early
Life
Stage/
Aquatic
Invertebrate
Life
Cycle
Study
MRID
25895
Calmbacher,
C.
W.
(
1978)
The
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
Technical
Composite
WRC
4921­
27­
3
to
the
Rainbow
Trout~
Salmo
gairdneri?~
Richardson:
UCES
Proj.
No.
11506­
22­
10.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
R)

39771
Howard,
D.
J.;
Johnston,
C.
D.
(
1971)
R­
7465:
Safety
Evaluation
on
Rainbow
Trout.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Woodard
Research
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
H)

39772
Howard,
D.
J.;
Johnston,
C.
D.
(
1971)
R­
7465:
Technical
and
50%
WP
Safety
Evaluation
on
Bluegill
Sunfish.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Woodard
Research
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
I)

39773
Sleight,
B.
H.,
III;
Macek,
K.
J.
(
1972)
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
to
Bluegill
(?~
Lepomis
macrochirus?~).
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Bionomics,
Inc.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
J)

49496
Howard,
D.
J.;
Johnston,
C.
D.
(
1971)
R­
7465:
Safety
Evaluation
on
Rainbow
Trout.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Woodard
Research
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
S)

81­
1
Acute
oral
toxicity
in
rats
MRID
32495
Bullock,
C.
H.
(
1973)
Acute
Oral
LDI50^,
Male
Rats:
Toxicology
Lab
Report­­
T­
1832.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
008951­
D)

35672
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Devrinol
4­
F
Selective
Herbicide.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
S
and
242620­
X.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
N)

35673
Humm,
L.
J.;
Castles,
T.
R.
(
1978)
Devrinol
4F­­
New
Flowable:
Toxico­
logy
Laboratory
Report
T­
6630.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
T
and
242620­
X.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
Page
77
of
150
CDL:
242620­
O)

35678
Brookins,
M.;
Howell,
A.;
Jones,
B.
(
1949?)
?
Acute
Oral
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
in
Rats|:
T­
6630.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
X)

55025
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
30,
1980
under
476­
2202;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
244052­
B)

65359
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229229­
C)

67521
Scholler,
J.
(
1970?)
Devrinol
10G
Acute
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Tox­
icity
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1977
under
476­
2176;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
230602­
A)

70815
Bullock,
C.
H.
(
1972)
Acute
Oral
LDI50^,
Male
Rats:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
1832.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
221951­
D)

72401
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Devrinol
10G
Acute
Toxicity
Evaluation:
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
2,
1981
under
476­
2205;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
244467­
B)

85945
Castles,
T.
R.
(
1978)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
?
Devrinol
Technical|:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6139.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Aug
1,
1979
under
9E2244;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
098861­
B)

88065
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Tillam­
Devrinol
4:
1­
E:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
5712.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
A)

88067
Howell,
A.
M.
(
1975)
Devrinol:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
4554.
Summary
of
studies
227697­
E
and
227697­
F.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL;
227697­
D)

88068
Howell,
A.
M.
(
1975)
Acute
Rat
Oral
Toxicity:
Devrinol:
T­
4554.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
E)

88070
Morgan,
S.
E.
(
1974)
Devrinol,
Technical:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
4825.
Summary
of
studies
227697­
H
through
227697­
J.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
G)

88071
Morgan,
S.
E.
(
1974)
Acute
Rat
Oral
Toxicity:
Devrinol,
Technical:
T­
4825;
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
H)

88072
Morgan,
S.
E.
(
1974)
Acute
Rat
Oral
Toxicity:
Devrinol,
Technical:
T­
4825.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
I)
Page
78
of
150
112719
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
19??)
Acute
Oral
(
Female)
Devrinol
Techni­
cal:
T­
6139.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
6,
1981
under
9E2244;
CDL:
099978­
A)

113802
Bullock,
C.
(
1970)
Toxicology
Summary:
?
R­
7465|:
T­
1555.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
B)

113803
Bullock,
C.;
Hall,
A.;
Saylor,
J.
(
1971)
Toxicology
Lab
Report:
?
R­
7465|:
T­
1179.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
C)

113806
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1969)
?
Toxicity
of
R­
7465
to
Rabbits|:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
1324.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091008­
F)

113807
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1971)
?
Toxicity
of
R­
7465
to
Rats|:
Toxi­
cology
Lab
Report
T­
1692.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091008­
G)

113808
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1971)
?
Toxicity
of
R­
7465
to
Guinea
Pigs
and
Mice|:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
1723.
(
Compilation;
unpub­
lished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091008­
H)

126779
Castles,
T.
(
1978)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
?
Devrinol
Technical|:
Tox­
icology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6139.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
4,
1983
under
476­
2221;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
249918­
A)

137596
Morgan,
R.;
Doane,
P.
(
1983)
Devrinol
50
Dry
Flowable:
?
Toxicity
in
Rats,
Rabbits|:
Richmond
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
11230.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Feb
7,
1984
under
476­
2229;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
252428­
A)

40362902
Morgan,
R.
(
1987)
Acute
Toxicity
Tests:
Oral
and
Dermal
Toxicity,
Skin
and
Ocular
Irritation
for
Devrinol
Technical:
Final
Report:
T­
13121.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
23
p.

46105004
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Acute
Toxicity
Studies:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Huntingdon
Life
Sciences,
Ltd.
67
p.

92125005
McCall,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00112719
and
Related
MRIDs
00126779.
Napropamide
(
Devrinol
Technical):
Acute
Oral
Toxicity­
Rat:
CTL
Report
No.
T­
6139.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
8
p.

81­
2
Acute
dermal
toxicity
in
rabbits
or
rats
MRID
32495
Bullock,
C.
H.
(
1973)
Acute
Oral
LDI50^,
Male
Rats:
Toxicology
Lab
Report­­
T­
1832.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
008951­
D)

35672
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Devrinol
4­
F
Selective
Herbicide.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
S
and
242620­
X.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
N)

35673
Humm,
L.
J.;
Castles,
T.
R.
(
1978)
Devrinol
4F­­
New
Flowable:
Toxico­
logy
Laboratory
Report
T­
6630.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
T
and
242620­
X.
(
Unpublished
study
Page
79
of
150
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
O)

35675
Howell,
A.;
Humm,
L.
(
1978)
Acute
Rabbit
Dermal
Toxicity:
T­
6630.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
Q)

55025
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
30,
1980
under
476­
2202;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
244052­
B)

65359
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229229­
C)

67521
Scholler,
J.
(
1970?)
Devrinol
10G
Acute
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Tox­
icity
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1977
under
476­
2176;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
230602­
A)

70816
Bullock,
C.
H.
(
1972)
Acute
Dermal
Screening,
Rabbits:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
1832.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
un­
der
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
221951­
E)

72401
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Devrinol
10G
Acute
Toxicity
Evaluation:
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
2,
1981
under
476­
2205;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
244467­
B)

85945
Castles,
T.
R.
(
1978)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
?
Devrinol
Technical|:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6139.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Aug
1,
1979
under
9E2244;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
098861­
B)

88065
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Tillam­
Devrinol
4:
1­
E:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
5712.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
A)

88067
Howell,
A.
M.
(
1975)
Devrinol:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
4554.
Summary
of
studies
227697­
E
and
227697­
F.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL;
227697­
D)

88069
Howell,
A.
M.
(
1975)
Acute
Rabbit
Dermal
Toxicity:
Devrinol:
T­
4554.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
F)

88070
Morgan,
S.
E.
(
1974)
Devrinol,
Technical:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
4825.
Summary
of
studies
227697­
H
through
227697­
J.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
G)

88073
Morgan,
S.
E.
(
1974)
Acute
Rabbit
Dermal
Toxicity:
Devrinol
Tech­
nical:
T­
4825.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
J)

113802
Bullock,
C.
(
1970)
Toxicology
Summary:
?
R­
7465|:
T­
1555.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
B)
Page
80
of
150
113803
Bullock,
C.;
Hall,
A.;
Saylor,
J.
(
1971)
Toxicology
Lab
Report:
?
R­
7465|:
T­
1179.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
C)

113806
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1969)
?
Toxicity
of
R­
7465
to
Rabbits|:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
1324.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091008­
F)

126779
Castles,
T.
(
1978)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
?
Devrinol
Technical|:
Tox­
icology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6139.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
4,
1983
under
476­
2221;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
249918­
A)

137596
Morgan,
R.;
Doane,
P.
(
1983)
Devrinol
50
Dry
Flowable:
?
Toxicity
in
Rats,
Rabbits|:
Richmond
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
11230.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Feb
7,
1984
under
476­
2229;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
252428­
A)

40362902
Morgan,
R.
(
1987)
Acute
Toxicity
Tests:
Oral
and
Dermal
Toxicity,
Skin
and
Ocular
Irritation
for
Devrinol
Technical:
Final
Report:
T­
13121.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
23
p.

43928603
Kuhn,
J.
(
1995)
PCC­
146:
Acute
Dermal
Toxicity
Study
in
Rabbits:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
2401­
95:
S9­
FF81­
2.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stillmeadow
Inc.
14
p.

46105004
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Acute
Toxicity
Studies:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Huntingdon
Life
Sciences,
Ltd.
67
p.

92125006
McCall,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
40362902.
Napropamide
(
Devrinol
Technical):
Acute
Dermal
Toxicity­
Rabbit:
Stauffer
Report
No.:
T­
13121.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
8
p.

81­
3
Acute
inhalation
toxicity
in
rats
MRID
Citation
Reference
32495
Bullock,
C.
H.
(
1973)
Acute
Oral
LDI50^,
Male
Rats:
Toxicology
Lab
Report­­
T­
1832.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
008951­
D)

35672
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Devrinol
4­
F
Selective
Herbicide.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
S
and
242620­
X.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
N)

35673
Humm,
L.
J.;
Castles,
T.
R.
(
1978)
Devrinol
4F­­
New
Flowable:
Toxico­
logy
Laboratory
Report
T­
6630.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
T
and
242620­
X.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
O)

52236
Miller,
J.
L.
(
1979)
Acute
Inhalation
Toxicity
of
Devrinol^(
R)
I
4F
in
Albino
Rats:
T­
6630.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
T)

70818
Bullock,
C.
H.
(
1973)
To
Evaluate
the
Acute
Inhalation
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
2E:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
4140.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
221951­
G)
Page
81
of
150
88065
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Tillam­
Devrinol
4:
1­
E:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
5712.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
A)

113807
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1971)
?
Toxicity
of
R­
7465
to
Rats|:
Toxi­
cology
Lab
Report
T­
1692.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091008­
G)

42181001
Lewis,
R.;
Gibson,
K.
(
1991)
Napropamide:
4­
Hour
Acute
Inhalation
Toxicity
Study
in
the
Rat
of
a
500g/
kg
DF
Formulation:
Lab
Project
Number:
CTL/
P/
3475:
HR2111.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Central
Tox
Lab
(
UK).
65
p.

42231501
Hext,
P.
(
1989)
Napropamide:
4­
Hour
Acute
Inhalation
Toxicity
Study
in
the
Rat:
Lab
Project
Number:
CTL/
P/
2418.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Central
Toxicology.
89
p.

43928604
Bennick,
J.
(
1995)
PCC­
146:
Acute
Inhalation
Toxicity
Study
in
Rats:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
2402­
95:
S9­
FF81­
3.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stillmeadow,
Inc.
11
p.

46105004
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Acute
Toxicity
Studies:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Huntingdon
Life
Sciences,
Ltd.
67
p.

81­
4
Primary
eye
irritation
in
rabbits
MRID
32495
Bullock,
C.
H.
(
1973)
Acute
Oral
LDI50^,
Male
Rats:
Toxicology
Lab
Report­­
T­
1832.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
008951­
D)

35672
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Devrinol
4­
F
Selective
Herbicide.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
S
and
242620­
X.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
N)

35673
Humm,
L.
J.;
Castles,
T.
R.
(
1978)
Devrinol
4F­­
New
Flowable:
Toxico­
logy
Laboratory
Report
T­
6630.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
T
and
242620­
X.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
O)

35677
Howell,
A.;
Humm,
L.
(
1978)
Ocular
Irritation:
T­
6630.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
S)

55025
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
30,
1980
under
476­
2202;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
244052­
B)

65358
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6021.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229229­
B)

65359
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229229­
C)

67521
Scholler,
J.
(
1970?)
Devrinol
10G
Acute
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Tox­
icity
Laboratory
Report
T
Page
82
of
150
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1977
under
476­
2176;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
230602­
A)

67522
Scholler,
J.
(
1965?)
Devrinol
Tech.
(
4059­
17­?
RFD­
2401|)
Skin
and
Eye
Irritation
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6021.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1977
under
476­
2176;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
230602­
B)

70817
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1972)
Acute
Eye
Irritation­­
Rabbits:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
1832.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
221951­
F)

72687
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
5991.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1981
under
0F2319;
CDL:
070040­
B)

88065
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Tillam­
Devrinol
4:
1­
E:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
5712.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
A)

88074
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Devrinol
Tech.
(
4059­
17­
1
?
RFD­
2401|):
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
6021.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
K)

88979
Hillebrecht,
W.
R.
(
1981)
Letter
sent
to
Robert
J.
Taylor
dated
Dec
22,
1981:
Devrinol^(
R)
I
50­
WP
selective
herbicide.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1981
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
070577­
A)

100311
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Devrinol
50­
WP
(
SEE
1504):
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
5991.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1977
under
476­
2175;
CDL:
229650­
A)

113803
Bullock,
C.;
Hall,
A.;
Saylor,
J.
(
1971)
Toxicology
Lab
Report:
?
R­
7465|:
T­
1179.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
C)

113806
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1969)
?
Toxicity
of
R­
7465
to
Rabbits|:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
1324.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091008­
F)

126779
Castles,
T.
(
1978)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
?
Devrinol
Technical|:
Tox­
icology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6139.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
4,
1983
under
476­
2221;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
249918­
A)

137596
Morgan,
R.;
Doane,
P.
(
1983)
Devrinol
50
Dry
Flowable:
?
Toxicity
in
Rats,
Rabbits|:
Richmond
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
11230.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Feb
7,
1984
under
476­
2229;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
252428­
A)

40362902
Morgan,
R.
(
1987)
Acute
Toxicity
Tests:
Oral
and
Dermal
Toxicity,
Skin
and
Ocular
Irritation
for
Devrinol
Technical:
Final
Report:
T­
13121.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
23
p.

41453401
Keenan,
K.
(
1989)
Acute
Ocular
Irritation
Test
for
Devrinol
DF:
Lab
Project
I.
D.:
T­
13540.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Ameri­
cas,
Inc.
20
p.

43928605
Kuhn,
J.
(
1995)
PCC­
146:
Primary
Eye
Irritation
Study
in
Rabbits:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
2403­
95:
S9­
FF81­
4.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stillmeadow,
Inc.
21
p.
Page
83
of
150
46105004
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Acute
Toxicity
Studies:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Huntingdon
Life
Sciences,
Ltd.
67
p.

92125007
Parr­
Dobrzanski,
R.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
40362902.
Napropamide:
(
Devrinol
Technical):
Eye
Irritation
to
the
Rabbit:
CTL
Report
No.:
T­
13121.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
6
p.

81­
5
Primary
dermal
irritation
MRID
35672
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Devrinol
4­
F
Selective
Herbicide.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
S
and
242620­
X.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
N)

35673
Humm,
L.
J.;
Castles,
T.
R.
(
1978)
Devrinol
4F­­
New
Flowable:
Toxico­
logy
Laboratory
Report
T­
6630.
Summary
of
studies
242620­
Q
through
242620­
T
and
242620­
X.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
O)

35676
Howell,
A.;
Jones,
B.
(
1978)
Primary
Skin
Irritation:
T­
6630.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
R)

55025
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
30,
1980
under
476­
2202;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
244052­
B)

65358
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6021.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229229­
B)

65359
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229229­
C)

67521
Scholler,
J.
(
1970?)
Devrinol
10G
Acute
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Tox­
icity
Laboratory
Report
T­
5559.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1977
under
476­
2176;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
230602­
A)

67522
Scholler,
J.
(
1965?)
Devrinol
Tech.
(
4059­
17­?
RFD­
2401|)
Skin
and
Eye
Irritation
Evaluation:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6021.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1977
under
476­
2176;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
230602­
B)

88065
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Tillam­
Devrinol
4:
1­
E:
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
5712.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
A)

88074
Scholler,
J.
(
1976)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
Devrinol
Tech.
(
4059­
17­
1
?
RFD­
2401|):
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report­­
T­
6021.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227697­
K)

88979
Hillebrecht,
W.
R.
(
1981)
Letter
sent
to
Robert
J.
Taylor
dated
Dec
22,
1981:
Devrinol^(
R)
I
50­
WP
selective
herbicide.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1981
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Page
84
of
150
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
070577­
A)

126779
Castles,
T.
(
1978)
Toxicity
Evaluation:
?
Devrinol
Technical|:
Tox­
icology
Laboratory
Report
T­
6139.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
4,
1983
under
476­
2221;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
249918­
A)

137596
Morgan,
R.;
Doane,
P.
(
1983)
Devrinol
50
Dry
Flowable:
?
Toxicity
in
Rats,
Rabbits|:
Richmond
Toxicology
Laboratory
Report
T­
11230.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Feb
7,
1984
under
476­
2229;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
252428­
A)

40362902
Morgan,
R.
(
1987)
Acute
Toxicity
Tests:
Oral
and
Dermal
Toxicity,
Skin
and
Ocular
Irritation
for
Devrinol
Technical:
Final
Report:
T­
13121.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
23
p.

43928606
Kuhn,
J.
(
1995)
PCC­
146:
Primary
Dermal
Irritation
Study
in
Rabbits:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
2404­
95:
S9­
FF81­
5.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stillmeadow,
Inc.
14
p.

46105004
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Acute
Toxicity
Studies:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Huntingdon
Life
Sciences,
Ltd.
67
p.

92125008
Parr­
Dobrzanski,
R.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
40362902.
Napropamide
(
Devrinol
Technical):
Skin
Irritation
to
the
Rabbit:
CTL
Report
No.
T­
13121.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
6
p.

81­
6
Dermal
sensitization
MRID
147494
Reagan,
E.
(
1984)
Dermal
Sensitization
Study
of
Devrinol
Technical
Lot
4921­
27­
24
in
Albino
Guinea
Pigs
(
Modified
Buehler
Test):
FDRL
Study
No.
8296A.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Food
&
Drug
Research
Laboratories,
Inc.
47
p.

149412
Reagan,
E.
(
1984)
Dermal
Sensitization
Study
of
Devrinol
50
DF
Lot
WDA
3005
in
Albino
Guinea
Pigs
(
Modified
Buehler
Test):
Study
No.
8296C.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Food
and
Drug
Research
Laboratories,
Inc.
49
p.

40362903
Mutter,
L.
(
1987)
Dermal
Sensitization
Test
of
Devrinol
Technical:
Final
Report:
T­
13161.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
66
p.

43928607
Kuhn,
J.
(
1995)
PCC­
146:
Dermal
Sensitization
Study
in
Guinea
Pigs:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
2405­
95:
S9­
FF81­
6.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stillmeadow,
Inc.
19
p.

92125009
Lees,
D.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
40362903.
Dermal
Sensitisation
Test
of
Napropamide
(
Devrinol
Technical):
WRC
Report
No:
T­
13161.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
RICHMOND
TOXIC.
9
p.

82­
1
Subchronic
Oral
Toxicity:
90­
Day
Study
MRID
42791
Fogleman,
R.
W.;
Tyler,
H.
Y.
(
1972)
Final
Report:
90­
Day
Subchronic
Toxicity
of
Isophorone
in
the
Rat:
Project
No.
120­
1008­
61.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
22,
1973
under
2F1224;
prepared
by
Affiliated
Medical
Enterprises,
Inc.,
submitted
by
Rohm
&
Haas
Co.,
Philadelphia,
Page
85
of
150
Pa.;
CDL:
091054­
I)

42792
Fogleman,
R.
W.
(
1971)
90­
Day
Subchronic
Toxicity
of
Isophorone
in
the
Rat­­
Progress
Report­­
8
Weeks:
Project
No.
120­
1008­
61.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
22,
1973
under
2F1224;
prepared
by
Affiliated
Medical
Enterprises,
Inc.,
submitted
by
Rohm
&
Haas
Co.,
Philadelphia,
Pa.;
CDL:
091054­
J)

113809
Howard,
D.;
Woodard,
M.;
Woodard,
G.
(
1970)
R­
7465:
Safety
Evalua­
tion
by
Dietary
Feeding
to
Rats
for
13
Weeks.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Woodard
Research
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
I)

113810
Banerjee,
B.;
Woodard,
M.;
Woodard,
G.;
et
al.
(
1970)
R­
7465:
Safety
Evaluation
by
Repeated
Dietary
Administration
to
Dogs
for
13
Weeks.
Final
rept.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Woodard
Research
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
J)

82­
2
21­
day
dermal­
rabbit/
rat
MRID
42006701
Parr­
Dobrzanski,
R.;
Leah,
A.
(
1991)
Napropamide:
21­
Day
Dermal
Toxicity
to
the
Rat:
Lab
Project
Number:
CTL/
P/
3397.
Unpublish­
ed
study
prepared
by
ICI
Central
Toxicology
Lab.
347
p.

83­
1
Chronic
Toxicity
MRID
72684
Goldenthal,
E.
I.;
Richter,
W.
R.;
Nair,
K.
P.
C.
(
1981)
Lifetime
Oral
Study
in
Mice:
IRDC
No.
153­
013.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1981
under
9E2244;
prepared
by
International
Research
and
Development
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
070039­
A)

81613
Goldenthal,
E.
I.;
Jessup,
D.
C.;
Geil,
R.
G.;
et
al.
(
1978)
Lifetime
Oral
Study
in
Mice:
153­
013.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1979
under
9E2244;
prepared
by
International
Research
and
Development
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
098861­
C)

81614
Trutter,
J.
A.;
Lemen,
J.
K;
Ulland,
B.
M.;
et
al.
(
1978)
24­
month
Chronic
Feeding
Study
in
Rats:
Devrinol
Technical:
Project
No.
132­
137.
Final
rept.
(
Unpublished
study,
including
letters
dated
Dec
18,
1978
and
Feb
21,
1980
from
D.
R.
Saunders
to
T.
R.
Castles,
R.
I.
Freudenthal,
T.
H.
Swigut,
et
al.,
received
Aug
1,
1979
under
9E2244;
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
098862­
B)

88979
Hillebrecht,
W.
R.
(
1981)
Letter
sent
to
Robert
J.
Taylor
dated
Dec
22,
1981:
Devrinol^(
R)
I
50­
WP
selective
herbicide.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1981
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
070577­
A)

112720
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1978)
Two
Year
Feeding
Study
in
Rats:
Devrinol
Technical:
Raw
Data:
Project
No.
132­
137.
(
Compila­
tion;
unpublished
study
received
Apr
6,
1981
under
9E2244;
CDL:
099978­
B)

112721
Goldenthal,
E.;
Richter,
W.
(
1980)
Lifetime
Oral
Study
in
Mice:
153­
013.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
6,
1981
under
9E2244;
prepared
by
International
Research
and
Development
Corp.,
Page
86
of
150
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
099978­
C)

41156602
Batham,
P.;
Engel,
D.
(
1988)
A
52Week
Toxicity
Study
of
Devrinol
Technical
in
the
Beagle
Dog:
Project
ID:
82658.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Bio­
Research
Laboratories
Ltd.
389
p.

43068801
Hodge,
M.
(
1993)
Two­
year
Chronic
Toxicity/
Oncogenicity
Study
with
R­
7465
(
Napropamide)
in
Rats:
Supplement
to
T­
13276
Histopathology
Report
and
Study
Discussion:
Addendum
to
MRID
42189102:
Lab
Project
Number:
CTL/
P/
4137:
PR0873.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Central
Toxicology
Lab.
1416
p.

92125010
Barber,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
41156602.
A
52­
Week
Oral
Toxicity
Study
of
Napropamide
(
Devrinol)
Technical
in
the
Beagle
Dog:
Stauffer
Report
No.:
T­
12924;
Bio­
Research
LTD
Project
No.:
82658.
Prepared
by
BIO­
RESEARCH
LABS.
LTD.
9
p.

83­
2
Oncogenicity
MRID
42189101
Pettersen,
J.;
Walberg,
J.
(
1992)
18­
Month
Dietary
Mouse
Oncogenicity
Study
with
R­
7465:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
T­
13272.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.
1163
p.

43068801
Hodge,
M.
(
1993)
Two­
year
Chronic
Toxicity/
Oncogenicity
Study
with
R­
7465
(
Napropamide)
in
Rats:
Supplement
to
T­
13276
Histopathology
Report
and
Study
Discussion:
Addendum
to
MRID
42189102:
Lab
Project
Number:
CTL/
P/
4137:
PR0873.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Central
Toxicology
Lab.
1416
p.

83­
3
Teratogenicity
­­
2
Species
MRID
72691
Durloo,
R.
S.;
Johnston,
C.
D.
(
1971)
R­
7465:
Safety
Evaluation
by
a
Teratological
Study
in
Rats.
(
Unpublished
study,
including
let­
ter
dated
Jan
21,
1972
from
G.
Woodard
to
A.
B.
Lindquist,
received
Apr
27,
1981
under
0F2319;
prepared
by
Woodard
Research
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
070040­
F)

88979
Hillebrecht,
W.
R.
(
1981)
Letter
sent
to
Robert
J.
Taylor
dated
Dec
22,
1981:
Devrinol^(
R)
I
50­
WP
selective
herbicide.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1981
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
070577­
A)

128104
Rodwell,
D.;
Tasker,
E.;
Winbigler,
J.;
et
al.
(
1982)
A
Teratology
Study
in
Rats
with
Devrinol:
Wil
27002.
Final
rept.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Feb
7,
1983
under
476­
2108;
prepared
by
Wil
Research
Laboratories,
Inc.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
071390­
A)

142118
Minor,
J.
(
1984)
A
Teratology
Study
in
New
Zealand
White
Rabbits
with
Devrinol:
T­
11898.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
207
p.

41156601
Sauerhoff,
M.
(
1987)
An
Oral
Dose
Rangefinding
Study
of
Devrinol
Technical
in
the
Beagle
Dog:
T­
12921:
Final
Reoport:
Project
ID:
82657.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Bio­
Research
Laboratories
Ltd.
162
p.

42006702
Meyer,
L.
(
1990)
A
Teratology
Study
in
CD
Rats
with
R­
7465
Technic­
al:
Lab
Project
Number:
T­
13589.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Environmental
Health
Center.
170
p
Page
87
of
150
42006703
Meyer,
L.
(
1990)
A
Teratology
Study
in
CD
Rats
with
R­
7465
Technic­
al:
Lab
Project
Number:
T­
13274.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Environmental
Health
Center.
211
p.

42006704
Minor,
J.
(
1990)
A
Teratology
Study
in
Rabbits
with
R­
7465
Technic­
al:
Lab
Project
Number:
T­
13270.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Environmental
Health
Center.
181
p.

83­
4
2­
generation
repro.­
rat
MRID
72685
Goldenthal,
E.
I.
(
1981)
Three
Generation
Reproduction
Study
in
Rats:
Amendment
to
the
Final
Report:
IRDC
No.
153­
015.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Apr
27,
1981
under
9E2244;
prepared
by
In­
ternational
Research
and
Development
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
070039­
B)

81615
Goldenthal,
E.
I.;
Jessup,
D.
C.;
Geil,
R.
G.;
et
al.
(
1978)
Three
Generation
Reproduction
Study
in
Rats:
153­
015.
(
Unpublished
study,
including
letter
dated
Dec
26,
1978
from
D.
R.
Saunders
to
T.
R.
Castles,
R.
I.
Freudenthal,
T.
H.
Swigut,
et
al.,
received
Aug
1,
1979
under
9E2244;
prepared
by
International
Research
and
Development
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
098862­
C)

88979
Hillebrecht,
W.
R.
(
1981)
Letter
sent
to
Robert
J.
Taylor
dated
Dec
22,
1981:
Devrinol^(
R)
I
50­
WP
selective
herbicide.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1981
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
070577­
A)

92125011
Guttmann,
E.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00081615
and
Related
MRIDs
00112722.
Napropamide
(
Devrinol):
Three
Generation
Reproduction
Study:
Stauffer
Report
No.:
T­
6334.
Prepared
by
INTERNATIONAL
RESEARCH/
DEVELOPMENT
CORP.
10
p.

92125069
Jessup,
D.;
Geil,
R.;
Rodwell,
D.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00081615
and
Related
MRIDs
00112722.
Napropamide
(
Devrinol):
Three
Generation
Reproduction
Study:
Stauffer
Report
Number:
T­
6334.
Prepared
by
INTERNATIONAL
RESEARCH
AND
DEVELOPMENT
CO.
120
p.

83­
5
Dietary:
Combined
Chronic
Toxicity/
Oncogenicity
Studies
MRID
42189102
Pettersen,
J.;
Walberg,
J.
(
1992)
Two­
Year
Chronic
Toxicity/
Oncogenicity
Study
with
R­
7465
in
Rats:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
T­
13276.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.
1085
p.

84­
2
Intreraction
with
Gonadal
DNA
MRID
25880
Shirasu,
Y.;
Moriya,
M.;
Simmon,
V.
F.;
et
al.
(
1976)
Mutagenicity
Testing
on
Napropamide
in
Microbial
Systems.
(
Unpublished
study
including
submitting
company
summary,
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
by
Institute
of
Environmental
Toxicology,
Toxicology
Div.
in
cooperation
with
Stanford
Research
Institute,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
B)
Page
88
of
150
147489
Majeska,
J.
(
1984)
Mutagenicity
Evaluation
in
Bone
Marrow
Micro­
nucleus
[
of
Devrinol
Technical]:
Report
No.
T­
11822.
Unpub­
lished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
12
p.

147490
Majeska,
J.
(
1984)
Mutagenicity
Evaluation
in
Mouse
Lymphoma
Mul­
tiple
Endpoint
Test:
Forward
Mutation
Assay:
Report
No.
T­
11912.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
21
p.

147491
Majeska,
J.
(
1984)
Mutagenicity
Evaluation
in
Mouse
Lymphoma
Mul­
tiple
Endpoint
Test:
Cytogenetic
Assay:
Report
No.
T­
11913.
Un­
published
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
14
p.

147492
Majeska,
J.
(
1984)
Mutagenicity
Evaluation
in
Salmonella
typhi­
murium:
Report
No.
T­
11914.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
16
p.

147493
Snyder,
R.
(
1984)
Effects
of
Devrinol
on
Human
Fibroblast
DNA:
Re­
port
No.
T­
11915.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemi­
cal
Co.
9
p.

162135
Snyder,
R.
(
1986)
Effects
of
Devrinol
Technical
on
Human
Fibro­
blast
DNA:
Report
No.
T­
12810.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
10
p.

162136
Majeska,
J.
(
1986)
Mutagenicity
Evaluation
in
Bone
Marrow
Micro­
nucleus:
Report
No.
T­
12813.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
10
p.

162137
Majeska,
J.
(
1985)
Mutagenicity
Evaluation
in
Chinese
Hamster
Ovary
Forward
Mutation
Assay:
Report
No.
T­
12057.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
21
p.

41582201
Callander,
R.
(
1986)
Study
of
the
Capacity
of
the
Test
Article,
Technical
Napropamide,
to
Induce
Gene
Mutation
in
V79
Chinese
Hamster
Lung
Cells:
Lab
Project
Number:
S­
162:
RBM/
M979.
Unpub­
lished
study
prepared
by
Instituto
di
Recerche
Biomediche.
32
p.

41610208
Kennelly,
J.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
Assessment
for
the
Induction
of
Unscheduled
DNA
Synthesis
in
Rat
Hepatocytes
in
Vivo:
Lab
Project
Number:
CTL/
P/
3018.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Central
Toxicology
Laboratory.
42
p.

92125012
Callander,
R.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00147492.
Devrinol
Technical
(
Lot
N.
WRC
4921­
27­
24);
Mutagenicity
Evaluation
in
Salmonella
typhimurium:
Report
No.:
T­
11914;
Study
No.
T­
11914.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
in
Vitro
Tox.
Section.
6
p.

92125013
Callander,
R.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00147490.
Devrinol
Technical
(
Lot
No.
4921­
27­
24):
Mutagenicity
Evaluation
in
Mouse
Lymphoma
Multiple
Endpoint
Test
Forward
Mutation
Assay:
Report
No.
T­
11912;
Study
No.:
T­
11912.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
in
Vitro
Toxicology
Section.
6
p.

92125014
MacKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00147489
and
Related
MRIDs
00162136.
Devrinol
Technical:
Mutagenicity
Evaluation
in
Bone
Marrow
Micro­
nucleus:
Report
Nos.
T­
11822
and
T­
12813;
Study
Nos.:
T­
11822
and
T­
12813.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
7
p.

85­
1
General
metabolism
MRID
25879
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Evidence
Regarding
the
Safety
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical
Page
89
of
150
Devrinol(
R).
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
099218­
A)

39765
Murphy,
J.
J.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1972)
Degradation
Products
of
R­
7465
in
the
Environment.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
093519­
B)

49480
Hoffman,
L.
J.;
Menn,
J.
J.
(
1970)
Metabolism
of
R­
7465­^
14IC
?
2­
alpha­
Naphthoxy)~
N~,~
N~­
diethylpropionamide|:
Balance
and
Tissue
Residue
Elimination
Studies
in
the
Rat:
ARC­
B­
27.
(
Un­
published
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
B)

49481
Murphy,
J.
J.;
Didriksen,
J.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1970?)
Metabolism
of
Radioactive
2­(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Plants
and
Animals.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
C)

113801
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
19??)
Evidence
Regarding
the
Safety
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical
Waylay.
Summary
of
studies
091008­
B
through
091008­
L.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091008­
A)

113811
Murphy,
J.;
Didriksen,
J.;
Gray,
R.
(
1970?)
Metabolism
of
Radio­
active
...
(
R­
7465)
in
Plants
and
Animals.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
L)

132823
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1983)
?
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
to
Rats,
Mice,
Dogs,
and
Rabbits:
Summary
of
Data|.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Dec
1,
1983
under
4F3005;
CDL:
072184­
A)

40838601
Jeffcoat,
A.
(
1988)
Dermal
Absorption
of
Devrinol
in
Rats:
T­
13014:
Volume
1:
Final
Report:
Laboratory
Project
ID
3586­
50.
Unpubli­
shed
study
prepared
by
Research
Triangle
Institute.
314
p.

42027702
Macpherson,
D.;
Jones,
B.
(
1991)
Napropamide:
Biotransformation
Study
in
the
Rat:
Lab
Project
Number:
CTL/
P/
3404.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Central
Toxicology
Laboratory.
55
p.

42027703
Hall,
M.;
Howard,
E.
(
1991)
Napropamide:
Repeat
Dose
Metabolism
Study
in
the
Rat
(
30
mg/
kg):
Lab
Project
Number:
CTL/
P/
3403:
UR044.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Central
Toxicology
Lab.
40
p.

42758901
Tanokura,
Y.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
Tissue
Distribution
in
Animal:
Lab
Project
Number:
021102:
R­
7465:
CTL/
C/
2689.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Nemoto
&
Co.,
Ltd.
79
p.

42758902
Macpherson,
D.;
Jones,
B.
(
1993)
Napropamide:
Biotransformation
Study
in
the
Rat:
Addendum
to
MRID
42027702:
Lab
Project
Number:
CTL/
P/
3404.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Central
Toxicology
Laboratory.
21
p.

42758903
Zeneca
Inc.
(
1993)
Napropamide:
Supplemental
Information
for
MRID
Nos.
42027702
and
42027703
in
Response
to
EPA
Toxicology
Branch
I
Review.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Central
Toxicology
Laboratory.
30
p.

85­
3
Dermal
Penetration/
Absorption
MRID
92125015
Batten,
P.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
40838601.
Dermal
Absorption
of
Devrinol
in
Rats:
ICI
Americas
Report
No.:
T­
13014;
RRI
Study
No.
3586­
50.
Prepared
by
Page
90
of
150
RESEARCH
TRIANGLE
INSTITUTE.
5
p.

121­
1
Phytotoxicity
MRID
2647
Monaco,
T.
J.
(
1970)
Weed
Control
in
Direct
Seeded
and
Transplanted
Tomatoes,
1970:
Report
No.
38246.
(
Unpublished
study
including
letter
dated
Mar
1,
1973
from
T.
J.
Monaco
to
Dick
Nash,
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
North
Carolina
State
Univ.,
Coastal
Plain
Vegetable
Research
Station,
Dept.
of
Horticultural
Science,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
AA)

2652
Tisdell,
T.;
King,
R.
(
1971)
Nightshade
Control
in
Tomatoes:
Report
No.
38866.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California­­
Davis,
Botany
Dept.,
sub­
mitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
AF)

2655
Putnam,
A.
(
1973)
Weed
Control
in
Seeded
Tomatoes:
Report
No.
39375.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Michigan
State
Univ.,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemi­
cal
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
AI)

2667
Ashton,
?;
Kukos,
?
(
1973)
Chemagro
Herbicide
Evaluation
Form:
Report
No.
40129.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California­­
Davis,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
AU)

2669
Fischer,
B.
B.
(
1973)
Tomato
Weed
Control
Trial:
1973
Vegetation
Management
in
Tomato
Production:
Report
No.
40483.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
(
Univ.
of
California­­
Riverside),
West
Side
Field
Station,
Farm
Advisor
Office,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
AY)

3252
Talbert,
R.
E.;
Kennedy,
J.
M.
(
1974)
Field
Evaluation
of
Herbicides
in
Vegetable
Crops,
1973.
By
Univ.
of
Arkansas,
Depts.
of
Agronomy,
Horticulture
and
Forestry.
Fayetteville,
Ark.:
Univ.
of
Arkansas,
Agricultural
Experiment
Station.
(
Mimeograph
se­
ries
219;
also~
In~
unpublished
submission
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BD)

4192
Mobil
Chemical
Company
(
1977)
Weed
Control
in
Tobacco.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Feb
9,
1978
under
2224­
50;
prepared
by
?
Univ.
of
Tennessee|,
Tobacco
Experiment
Station
and
Highland
Rim
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Indus­
trial
Chemicals,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
232880­
D)

12050
IR­
4
Project
at
Rutgers,
the
State
University
(
1969)
Weed
Control
in
Blueberries:
Screening
Study.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
19,
1975
under
6E1719;
CDL:
095364­
R)

12118
Foy,
C.
L.;
Witt,
H.
L.
(
1971)
Fruit:
Evaluation
of
Herbicides
for
Weed
Control
in
One­
Year­
Old
Red
Delicious
Apples­­
Piney
River,
Virginia.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
18,
1973
under
100­
437;
prepared
by
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiology,
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greensboro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
000242­
M)

12147
Foy,
C.
L.;
Witt,
H.
L.
(
1970)
Fruit:
Chemical
Weed
Control
in
a
Bearing
Peach
Orchard­­
Winchester.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
18,
1973
under
100­
437;
prepared
by
Virginia
Page
91
of
150
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiol­
ogy,
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greensboro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
000242­
AS)

12148
Foy,
C.
L.;
Witt,
H.
L.
(
1971)
Fruit:
Evaluation
of
Herbicides
for
Weed
Control
in
4­
Year­
Old
Blake
Peaches­­
Bonsack,
Virginia.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
18,
1973
under
100­
437;
prepared
by
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiology,
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greensboro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
000242­
AT)

12149
Foy,
C.
L.;
Witt,
H.
L.
(
1971)
Fruit:
Evaluation
of
Herbicides
for
Weed
Control
in
2­
Year­
Old
Peaches­­
Winchester,
Virginia.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Jan
18,
1973
under
100­
437;
prepared
by
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiology,
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greensboro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
000242­
AU)

12351
Wascom,
B.
W.;
Young,
W.
A.;
Meadows,
W.
A.
(
1971?)
A
Five
Year
Study
of
Weed
Control
in
Pecan
Orchards.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
11,
1978
under
352­
317;
prepared
by
Louisiana
State
Univ.,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
096709­
H)

12353
Aitken,
J.
B.;
Arnold,
C.
E.
(
1971)
Preliminary
Evaluation
of
Herbi­
cides
in
Pecan
Orchards.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
11,
1978
under
352­
317;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
Florida,
Agricultural
Research
and
Education
Center
at
Quincy
and
Fruit
Crops
Dept.,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
096709­
J)

12360
Aitken,
J.
B.
(
1974)
Evaluation
of
Pecan
Herbicides.
(
Incomplete
study;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
11,
1978
under
352­
317;
prepared
by
Clemson
Univ.,
Sandhill
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
096709­
R)

12403
Palm,
H.
L.;
Doll,
C.
C.
(
1972)
?
Weed
Control
in
Apple
Orchards|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
17,
1973
under
352­
374;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Illinois,
Cooperative
Extension
Service,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
026721­
B)

12417
Daniell,
J.
W.
(
1972)
Performance
of
Herbicides
in
Peach
Orchards.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
17,
1973
under
352­
374;
submit­
ted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
026721­
Q)

12421
Scroch,
W.
A.;
Harris,
M.
(
1972)
2
Year
Peach
Study­­
Sandhills
Re­
search
Station.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
17,
1973
under
352­
374;
prepared
by
North
Carolina
State
Univ.,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
026721­
U)

12422
Scroch,
W.
A.
(
1973)
3
Year
Old
Peaches,
1973.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
17,
1973
under
352­
374;
prepared
by
North
Carolina
State
Univ.,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wil­
mington,
Del.;
CDL:
026721­
W)

17896
Lange,
A.
H.;
Agamalian,
H.;
Aldrich,
T.;
et
al.
(
1972)
Fruit
and
Nut
Crops.
(
pp.
1­
7,42,47,56­
59
only;
unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
Califor­
nia,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AK)

17908
Gambrell,
C.
E.,
Jr.
(
1973)
Peach
Herbicide
Studies.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
prepared
by
Clemson
Univ.,
Sandhill
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
BD)

17913
Eli
Lilly
and
Company
(
1974)
Herbicides
on
Bearing
Pistachios.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
BJ)
Page
92
of
150
20711
Mulkey,
B.;
Fankhauser,
D.
(
1973)
1972­
73
Pre­
emergence
Sugarcane
Herbicide
Test
EA
7218­
E.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
1,
1974
under
5G1562;
prepared
by
Rio
Farms,
Inc.,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094912­
F)

21185
Rud,
O.
E.;
Foy,
C.
L.
(
1969)
Chemical
Control
of
Seedling
Johnson­
grass
and
Annual
Weeds
in
Corn:
Research
Report
CF­
4782.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Oct
18,
1969
under
9F0846;
prepared
by
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
submitted
by
Ciba
Agrochemical
Co.,
Summit,
N.
J.;
CDL:
091463­
BX)

21228
Sweet,
R.
D.
(
1968?)
Follow­
Up
Test­­
Potatoes:
Pre­
Emergence:
Re­
search
Report
CF­
3857.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
1,
1970
under
0F0993;
prepared
by
Cornell
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Vegetable
Crops,
submitted
by
Ciba
Agrochemical
Co.,
Summit,
N.
J.;
CDL:
092044­
AW)

21415
Wilson,
H.
P.
(
1970)
1970
Weed
Science
Research
Summary.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Apr
5,
1971
under
891­
EX­
21;
prepared
by
Virginia
Truck
and
Ornamentals
Research
Station,
Eastern
Shore
Branch,
Dept.
of
Plant
Physiology,
submitted
by
Hercules,
Inc.,
Agricultural
Chemicals,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
126399­
B)

23226
Rappos,
S.;
Hardman,
N.
F.;
Riddle,
R.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Efficacy
of
Simazine
and
Other
Chemicals
for
Various
Weeds|:
Test
No.
H­
8­
RGH­
72.
(
Unpublished
study
including
test
nos.
H­
9­
RGH­
72,
H­
10­
RGH­
72,
H­
11­
RGH­
72...,
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Luchessa
Brothers
and
others,
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101113­
A)

23227
Dickel,
C.
P.;
Fischer,
B.;
Schweers,
V.
H.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol­­
California
Pepper
Phytotoxicity.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California,
Agricultural
Extension
Service,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101113­
C)

23231
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
CO.
(
1973)
DEVRINOL
+
TILLAM
(
TANK
MIX)
ON
TOMA­
TOES
IN
CALIFORNIA:
BARNYARDGRASS
CONTROL
SUMMARY.
UNPUBLISHED
COMPILATION
PREPARED
IN
COOPERATION
WITH
WILBUR­
ELLIS
CO.
AND
OTHERS.
126
P.

23232
Deichler,
?;
Jenkins,
?;
Syms,
D.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol
50W
on
Grapes
in
the
Pacific
Northwest:
Grape
Phytotoxicity.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Oregon
State
Univ.,
North
Willamette
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101112­
D)

23234
Lake,
B.
H.;
Goza,
A.;
Eastin,
E.
F.;
et
al.
(
1973)
(
Devrinol:
Control
of
Weeds
and
Phytoxicity
in
Citrus
Fruits).
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Valley
Orchard
Service
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101112­
F)

23877
Zaput,
P.;
Leach,
J.;
Hamilton,
K.
C.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol
50W­­
Paraquat
2E.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Arizona
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028423­
D)

25312
Maltby,
R.;
Wright,
J.;
Tredinnick,
J.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Eptam
7E
Pre­
plant
Incorporated
Weed
Control
Summary.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Feb
22,
1976
under
476­
2154;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Auburn
Univ.,
Tallassee
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
224457­
G)
Page
93
of
150
26649
Shepherd,
J.
L.;
Cromartie,
J.;
Hauser,
E.;
et
al.
(
1966)
Summary
Analysis
of
Field
Test
Data
for
Tillam
6E
Applied
Pre­
transplant
by
Sub­
surface
Sweep
to
Tobacco
in
the
United
States.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Feb
5,
1968
under
8F0628;
prepared
in
co­
operation
with
Parramore
&
Griffin
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
090823­
B)

26683
Aitken,
J.
B.;
Arnold,
C.
E.;
Amling,
H.
J.;
et
al.
(
1972)
?
Efficacy
of
Various
Herbicides
in
Pecan
Orchards|.
(
Unpublished
study
including
published
data,
received
Nov
15,
1972
under
3F1313;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Florida,
Agricultural
Re­
search
and
Education
Center
at
Quincy,
Fruit
Crops
Dept.
and
others,
submitted
by
Dow
Chemical
U.
S.
A.,
Midland,
Mich.;
CDL:
092243­
H)

26684
Wascom,
B.
W.;
Young,
W.
A.;
Meadows,
W.
A.
(
1972)
A
five
year
study
of
weed
control
in
pecan
orchards.
Proceedings
of
the
Southern
Weed
Science
Society
25:
227.
(
Also~
In~
unpublished
submission
received
Nov
15,
1972
under
3F1313;
submitted
by
Dow
Chemical
U.
S.
A.,
Midland,
Mich.;
CDL:
092243­
I)

26725
Benson,
A.;
Baxter,
M.;
Gerhold,
J.
F.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Devrinol
50WP
Use
for
Weed
Control
on
Tomatoes|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Michi­
gan
State
Univ.
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225549­
B)

26726
Barry,
R.;
Cole,
W.;
Barrentin,
W.
L.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Devrinol
2­
E
Use
on
Tomatoes|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
U.
S.
Dept.
of
Agriculture
Roza
Unit
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225549­
C)

26727
Gerhold,
J.
F.;
Gruelach,
L.;
Cates,
M.
D.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Devrinol
2­
E
Use
on
Tomatoes|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Southwest­
ern
Louisiana,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225549­
D)

26729
Maltby,
R.;
Monaco,
T.;
Skiles,
R.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Devrinol
50
WP
2­
E
Use
on
Varieties
of
Peppers|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Kentucky,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225549­
F)

26884
Dickel,
C.
P.;
Hardman,
N.;
Kappos,
S.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Efficacy
of
Devrinol
and
Other
Herbicides
for
Weed
Control
in
Grapes
and
Citrus
Fruit|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
5,
1975
under
476­
2173;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Barr
Packing
Co.
and
J.
G.
Boswell
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
221821­
A)

26902
Collins,
W.
K.;
Holifield,
E.
L.;
Hogan,
W.
H.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Study
of
the
Efficacy
of
Various
Herbicides
Applied
after
Layby
to
Tobacco|.
(
Unpublished
study
including
published
data,
received
Feb
7,
1974
under
1023­
23;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
North
Carolina
State
Univ.
and
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiology,
submitted
by
Upjohn
Co.,
Kalamazoo,
Mich.;
CDL:
024396­
B)

27457
Mostel,
E.;
Gunning,
F.;
Pond,
D.
D.;
et
al.
(
1970)
Field
Perform­
ance
Summary
for
Dyfonate
Emulsifiable
on
Irish
Potatoes.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Jun
11,
1971
under
476­
2056;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
003889­
K)

27975
Fischer,
B.;
Lange,
A.
H.;
Elmore,
C.;
et
al.
(
1969)
?
Evaluation
of
Simazine
for
Weed
Control
in
Stone
Fruits
and
Almonds|.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Apr
19,
1974
under
100­
437;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California,
Kearney
Horticultural
and
Moreno
Field
Stations,
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Page
94
of
150
Corp.,
Greensboro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
009437­
B)

28446
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1974)
Devrinol
on
Ornamentals­­
Weed
Control
Summary.
Unpublished
study
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California­­
Davis
and
others.
555
p.

28797
Dickel,
C.
P.;
Kappos,
S.;
Hardman,
N.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Devrinol
+
Tillam
(
Tank
Mix)
on
Tomatoes
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Pure­
Gro
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
001019­
B)

28799
Lake,
B.
H.;
Goza,
A.;
Eastin,
E.
F.;
et
al.
(
1972)
?
Efficacy
Data
&
Summary|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Valley
Orchard
Service,
Inc.
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
001019­
E)

29346
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
?
Devrinol
and
Simazine
on
Orna­
mentals
and
Container
Stock­­
Tolerance
Summaries|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
5,
1975
under
476­
2173;
CDL:
224672­
A)

29602
Ciba
Agrochemical
Company
(
1968)
Weed
Control
in
Soybeans­­
1968:
Research
Report
CF­
4155.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Nov
29,
1969
under
8192­
11;
CDL:
006048­
C)

30958
Keeley,
P.
E.;
Carter,
C.
H.;
Miller,
J.
H.;
et
al.
(
1972)
?
Phytox­
icity
of
Herbicides
to
Cotton
and
Nutsedge|.
(
Unpublished
study
including
published
data,
received
Feb
16,
1973
under
876­
EX­
13;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California,
Agricultural
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
Velsicol
Chemical
Corp.,
Chi­
cago,
Ill.;
CDL:
210105­
D)

31343
Lavalleye,
M.
P.
(
1968)
Herbicide
Screening
Program,
Fall­­
1968:
Residue
Activity
Study:
Supplemental
Report
to
Herbicide
Screen­
ing
Report
No.
3.
(
pp.
1,7
only;
unpublished
study
including
submitter
summary,
received
Jul
11,
1973
under
707­
98;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California­­
Riverside,
submitted
by
Rohm
&
Haas
Co.,
Philadelphia,
Pa.;
CDL:
120403­
L)

31749
Lake,
B.
H.;
Leeper,
P.;
Cox,
E.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol
50W
Pre­
plant
Incorporated
on
Tomatoes/
Peppers.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
U.
S.
Agricultural
Research
Service,
Plant
Science
Research
Div.,
Weed
Investigations
in
Horticultural
Crops
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
A)

31750
Locascio,
S.;
Layton,
J.;
Sheets,
W.
A.;
et
al.
(
1976)
?
Weed
Control
in
Strawberries
with
Devrinol
50
WP|.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Oregon
State
Univ.,
North
Willamette
Experiment
Station,
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
B)

31752
Gerhold,
J.
F.;
Locascio,
S.;
Sheets,
A.;
et
al.
(
1975)
?
Weed
Con­
trol
in
Transplant
Strawberries
with
Devrinol|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Florida
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
D)

31753
Barnes,
J.;
Gerhold,
J.
F.;
Maltby,
R.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Weed
Control
in
Transplant
Tomatoes
with
Devrinol
+
Tillam
Tank
Mix|.
Sum­
mary
of
study
225548­
F.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Virginia
Truck
Ex­
periment
Station
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
E)

31754
Gerhold,
J.
F.;
Stevenson,
V.
C.;
Greulach,
L.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Weed
Control
in
Transplanted
Page
95
of
150
Tomatoes
with
Devrinol
+
Tillam
Tank
Mix|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Missouri,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
F)

31755
Orr,
J.;
Hardman,
N.;
Perry,
J.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Weed
Control
in
To­
matoes
with
Devrinol
+
Tillam
Tank
Mix|.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemi­
cal
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
G)

31757
Gerhold,
J.
F.;
Worsham,
A.
D.;
Hickey,
S.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Weed
Con­
trol
in
Tobacco
with
Devrinol
2­
E|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
I)

31760
Hickey,
S.;
Jeffery,
L.;
Worsham,
D.;
et
al.
(
1975)
?
Weed
Control
in
Tobacco
with
Devrinol­
Tillam
1:
4­
E|.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemi­
cal
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
L)

31761
Gerhold,
J.;
Monaco,
T.;
Hickey,
S.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol
2E
Pre­
plant
Incorporated
on
Tomatoes/
Peppers.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemi­
cal
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225348­
M)

31941
Rose,
E.;
Lange,
A.
H.;
Stevenson,
G.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Crop
Tolerance
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Apples.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Mar
21,
1975
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chem­
ical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101096­
A)

31943
Hardman,
N.;
Lange,
A.
H.;
Stevenson,
G.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Crop
Toler­
ance
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Pears.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
21,
1975
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101096­
C)

32299
Zaput,
P.;
Leach,
J.;
Hamilton,
K.
C.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Phytotoxicity
of
Various
Herbicies
on
Food
Crops|.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101111­
A)

32303
Lake,
B.
H.;
Zaput,
P.;
Clemens,
T.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Crop
Tolerance
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Pecans.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Reedley
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093854­
D)

32304
Kempen,
H.
M.;
Rose,
E.;
Lange,
A.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Crop
Tolerance
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Pistachios.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California,
Agricultural
Extension
Service,
Kear­
ney
Field
Station
and
Fowler
Farm
Management,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093854­
E)

32305
Lange,
A.;
Botkin,
G.;
Rose,
E.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Crop
Tolerance
Sum­
mary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Walnuts.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California,
Extension
Service,
Kearney
Field
Station,
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093854­
F)

32492
Fischer,
B.;
Ashton,
F.
M.;
Kukas,
R.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Synopsis
of
Devrinol:
Biological
Performance
and
Phytotoxicity
on
Tomatoes.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California­­
Davis,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
008951­
A)

32548
Huntley,
A.;
Lange,
A.;
Rose,
E.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Supplementary
Crop
Tolerance
Data
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
on
Apples
in
California.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Oct
1,
1974
under
4F1447;
Page
96
of
150
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Niagara
Chem
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093856­
A)

32549
Lange,
A.;
Rose,
E.
(
1974)
Supplementary
Crop
Tolerance
Data
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
on
Figs
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Oct
1,
1974
under
4F1447;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093856­
B)

32550
Lange,
A1;
Dickel,
C.
P.;
Rose,
E.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Supplementary
Crop
Tolerance
Data
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
on
Pears
in
California.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Oct
1,
1974
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
John
McCormack
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chem­
ical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093856­
C)

32552
Lange,
A.
(
1974)
Supplementary
Crop
Tolerance
Data
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
on
Pistachios
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
1,
1974
under
4F1447;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093856­
E)

32553
Lange,
A.
(
1974)
Supplementary
Crop
Tolerance
Data
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
on
Walnuts
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
1,
1974
under
4F1447;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093856­
F)

32555
Rose,
E.;
Sorensen,
C.,
Jr.;
Kinagawa,
B.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Summary
of
Devrinol
Soil
Residue
Data:
Multiple
Applications
of
Devrinol
50­
WP
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
1,
1974
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093856­
H)

32565
Dickel,
C.
P.;
Kappos,
S.;
Hardman,
N.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol
+
Tillam
(
Tank
Mix)
on
Tomatoes
in
California:
Barnyardgrass
Con­
trol
Summary.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Pure­
Gro
and
Fresh
Pic,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028421­
B)

32572
Lake,
B.
H.;
Goza,
A.;
Solether,
W.
K.
(
1973)
?
Devrinol
and
Simazine
in
Weed
Control
for
Citrus
Fruits|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Okla­
homa
State
Univ.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028421­
I)

33037
Huntley,
A.;
Lange,
A.;
Rose,
E.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Crop
Tolerance
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Apples.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California,
Extension
Service
and
others,
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093854­
A)

33038
Rose,
E.;
Lange,
A.;
Fischer,
B.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Crop
Tolerance
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Figs.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California,
Extension
Service,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093854­
B)

33039
Dickel,
C.
P.;
Lange,
A.
H.;
Fischer,
B.
B.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Crop
Tol­
erance
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Pears.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California,
Extension
Service,
Kearney
Horticul­
tural
Field
Station
and
John
McCormack
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093854­
C)

33960
Dickel,
C.
P.;
Fischer,
B.;
Schweers,
V.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol­­
California:
Pepper
Phytotoxicity.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California­­
Davis,
Agricultural
Extension
Service
and
Wilbur­
Ellis
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028312­
C)
Page
97
of
150
57806
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1975)
Devrinol
2­
E
Efficacy
and
Phyto­
toxicity
Data.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
May
27,
1977
under
476­
2174;
CDL:
230292­
A)

64536
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Devrinol
on
Ornamentals:
Crop
Tolerance
Summary.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2175;
CDL:
243858­
A)

65712
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Performance
Summaries:
?
Devrinol|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2201;
CDL:
243951­
A)

70812
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
Devrinol^(
R)
I
Biological
Perform­
ance
and
Phytotoxicity
on
Tomatoes.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
221951­
A)

113817
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1974)
?
Efficacy
Study:
Specified
Herbicides
on
Tobacco|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
on
un­
known
date
under
unknown
admin.
no.;
CDL:
223372­
B)

113822
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1979)
Performance
Summaries:
?
Devrinol
50­
WP
Selective
Herbicide|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
13,
1979
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
241323­
B)

115127
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1981)
Devrinol
Split
Application­­
Crop
Tol­
erance
and
Weed
Control
Summary.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Sep
3,
1982
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
248365­
A)

5001074
Orr,
J.
P.;
Elmore,
C.
L.
(
1974)
Canning
tomato
herbicide­­
varietal
interaction
trial.
Pages
48­
50,~
In~
Proceedings­­
Western
Society
of
Weed
Science.
Vol.
27.
Boise,
Idaho:
Western
Society
of
Weed
Science.

122­
1
Seed
Germination/
Seedline
Emergence
and
Vegetable
Vigor
MRID
41610209
Farmer,
D.
;
Canning,
L.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
A
Glasshouse
Study
of
Pre
and
Post­
emergence
Effects
on
Terrestrial
Non­
target
Plants:
Lab
Project
Number:
90JH176.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Agrochemicals.
94
p.

42656202
Farmer,
D.;
Canning,
L.
(
1993)
Addendum
to
MRID
41610209
Napropamide:
A
Glasshouse
Study
of
Pre
and
Post­
Emergence
Effects
of
Terrestrial
Non­
Target
Plants:
Lab
Project
Number:
RJ0873B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Agrochemicals.
42
p.

122­
2
Aquatic
plant
growth
MRID
41610210
Smyth,
D.;
et
al.
(
1989)
Napropamide:
Determination
of
Toxicity
of
a
45%
FL
Formulation
to
the
Green
Alga
(
Selenastrum
capricornu­
tum):
Lab
Project
Number:
BL/
B/
3671.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Imperial
Chemical
Industries
PLC.
19
p.

133­
3
Dermal
passive
dosimetry
expo
MRID
40251601
Knarr,
R.;
Curry,
K.
(
1987)
Applicator
and
Mixer­
loader
Exposure
to
Napropamide
During
Ground­
spray
Application
of
Devrinol
50­
WP
Selective
Herbicide
to
Pistachio
Orchards:
Project
Page
98
of
150
No.
148213.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
63
p.

133­
4
Inhal.
passive
dosimetry
expo
MRID
40251601
Knarr,
R.;
Curry,
K.
(
1987)
Applicator
and
Mixer­
loader
Exposure
to
Napropamide
During
Ground­
spray
Application
of
Devrinol
50­
WP
Selective
Herbicide
to
Pistachio
Orchards:
Project
No.
148213.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
63
p.

161­
1
Hydrolysis
MRID
49490
Miller,
W.
W.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1969?)
Behavior
and
Persistence
of
2­
(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Soils
and
Water.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
L)

49494
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Behavior
and
Persistence
of
2­
(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Soils
and
Water.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
1708,
B­
0480,
A­
626...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
P)

129110
Katague,
D.
(
1982)
Letter
sent
to
J.
McKay
dated
Mar
3,
1982:
Hy­
drolysis
of
Devrinol:
Project
No.
148229.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jul
6,
1983
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
071720­
C)

132497
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1983)
Devrinol
50­
WP
Selective
Herbicide:
Product
Chemistry
Data.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Aug
11,
1983
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
251690­
A)

41863201
Lee,
K.
(
1989)
Hydrolysis
of
Napropamide:
Lab
Project
Number:
WRC
89­
21.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
20
p.

161­
2
Photodegradation­
water
MRID
41575301
Lee,
K.
(
1989)
Aqueous
Photolysis
of
Napropamide:
Lab
Project
Num­
ber:
WRC
88­
80:
ENV­
002.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
82
p.

43175301
Ericson,
J.
(
1994)
Addendum
to
MRID
41575301
(
WRC
88­
80):
Aqueous
Photolysis
of
Napropamide:
Lab
Project
Number:
WRC
88­
80.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Inc.
19
p.

161­
3
Photodegradation­
soil
MRID
49490
Miller,
W.
W.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1969?)
Behavior
and
Persistence
of
2­
(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Soils
and
Water.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
L)

41863202
Lee,
K.
(
1989)
Soil
Photolysis
of
Napropamide:
Lab
Project
Number:
WRC
88­
79:
ENV­
003.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
30
p.
Page
99
of
150
162­
1
Aerobic
soil
metabolism
MRID
41105901
Lay,
M.
(
1989)
Aerobic
Metabolism
of
Napropamide
in
Soil:
Project
ID:
WRC
89­
38.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
57
p.

41901801
Lay,
M.
(
1989)
Aerobic
Metabolism
of
Napropamide
in
Soil:
Supple­
mental
Information:
Lab
Project
Number:
WRC
89­
38.
Unpublished
Study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
11
p.

45074202
Graham,
D.
(
2000)
Determination
of
Napropamide
Residues
in
Soil
by
Capillary
Gas
Chromatography:
Lab
Project
Number:
RR­
90­
005B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products.
19
p.

92125016
Calderbank,
A.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
41105901.
Aerobic
Metabolism
of
Napropamide
in
Soil:
Report
No.
WRC
89­
38:
Study
No.
PMS­
267.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS
INC./
WESTERN
RESEARCH.
17
p.

162­
2
Anaerobic
soil
metabolism
MRID
163271
Subba­
Rao,
R.
(
1986)
Anaerobic
Metabolism
of
Devrinol
in
Soil:
Laboratory
Project
ID
No.
PMS­
181;
MRC­
86­
03.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond
Research
Center.
58
p.

92125017
Calderbank,
A.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00163271.
Anaerobic
Metabolism
of
Devrinol
in
Soil:
Report
No.
MRC­
86­
03;
Study
No.:
PMS­
181.
Prepared
by
ICI
Richmond
Research
Center.
20
p.

162­
3
Anaerobic
aquatic
metab.

MRID
42699701
Joseph,
R.
(
1992)
The
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
of
(
carbon
14)­
Napropamide:
Lab
Project
Number:
HRC/
ISN
266A/
921034.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Huntingdon
Research
Centre,
Ltd.
92
p.

162­
4
Aerobic
aquatic
metab.

MRID
45074201
Graham,
D.
(
2000)
Napropamide
Determination
at
ppb
Concentrations
in
Water:
Lab
Project
Number:
RRC­
88­
09.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products.
14
p.

163­
1
Leach/
adsorp/
desorption
MRID
39766
Miller,
W.
W.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1971)
Behavior
and
Persistence
2­(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Soils
and
Water.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.,
CDL:
093519­
C)
Page
100
of
150
49490
Miller,
W.
W.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1969?)
Behavior
and
Persistence
of
2­
(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Soils
and
Water.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
L)

49494
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Behavior
and
Persistence
of
2­
(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Soils
and
Water.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
1708,
B­
0480,
A­
626...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
P)

110744
Fisher,
J.;
Callan,
E.
(
1979)
Goal
and
Devrinol
Soil
Residue
Decline
Study:
Technical
Report
No.
34H­
79­
4.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
12,
1979
under
707­
EX­
142;
submitted
by
Rohm
&
Haas
Co.,
Philadelphia,
PA;
CDL:
098213­
B)

113815
Thomas,
V.
(
1973)
Leaching
Study
on
Devrinol
Degradation
Products.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Nov
6,
1973
under
476­
2108;
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
180005­
A)

129111
Thomas,
V.;
Dennison,
J.
(
1981)
Adsorption,
Desorption,
and
Aged­
leaching
of
Devrinol
in
Soils:
MRC­
81­
03.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jul
6,
1983
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chem­
ical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
071720­
D)

41575302
Spillner,
C.
(
1987)
Adsorption
and
Desorption
of
Napropamide
in
Four
Soils:
Lab
Project
Number:
PMS­
270:
MRC­
87­
29.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
45
p.

42707201
Spillner,
C.
(
1993)
Addendum
to
MRID
41575302
Adsorption
and
Desorption
of
Napropamide
in
Four
Soils:
Lab
Project
Number:
PMS­
270:
MRC
87­
29.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Inc.
10
p.

43514401
Muller,
K.;
Ferguson,
R.
(
1994)
Napropamide:
Adsorption
and
Desorption
Properties
in
Soil
of
Naphthoxyproprionic
Acid,
a
Soil
Metabolite:
Lab
Project
Number:
94JH004:
RJ1703B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Agrochemicals.
49
p.

164­
1
Terrestrial
field
dissipation
MRID
39766
Miller,
W.
W.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1971)
Behavior
and
Persistence
2­(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Soils
and
Water.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.,
CDL:
093519­
C)

49495
Riggs,
R.
L.;
Humphreys,
R.;
MacLaren,
G.;
et
al.
(
1971)
Waylay
(
R­
7465)
Run­
Off
Study:
Soil,
Water,
Silt,
Fish
Residues.
(
Un­
published
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
1066,
B­
1067,
B­
1083...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
Q)

163272
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1986)
Field
Dissipation
Study
with
Devrinol
2E
and
10G:
California
Field
Research
Station.
Unpublished
compilation.
13
p.

163273
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1986)
Field
Dissipation
Study
with
Devrinol
2E
and
10G:
Florida
Field
Research
Station.
Unpublished
compi­
lation.
37
p.

41575303
Pearson,
F.
(
1989)
Devrinol
10G
Field
Dissipation
Study
for
Terres­
trial
Food
Crop
Uses:
Napropamide
(
Calif.
1989):
Lab
Project
Number:
DEVR­
88­
SD­
01:
USO2­
88­
122.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
157
p.
Page
101
of
150
41575304
Curry,
K.
(
1989)
Devrinol
50­
WP
Field
Dissipation
Study
for
Terres­
trial
Food
Crop
Uses:
Napropamide
(
Calif.
1988):
Lab
Project
Number:
94CA­
88­
123:
RR
89­
022B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
146
p.

42764201
Roper,
E.
(
1993)
Supplemental
Information/
Response
on
Napropamide
Field
Soil
Dissipation
Studies
(
MRID's
41575303
and
41575304):
Devrinol
10­
G
Field
Dissipation
Study
for
Terrestrial
Food
Crop
Uses,
Napropamide:
California,
1988
and
Devrinol
50­
WP
Field
Dissipation
Study
for
Terrestrial
Food
Crop
Uses,
Napropamide,
California,
1988:
Lab
Project
Number:
RR
89­
021/
022B
REB.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Inc.
25
p.

43742401
Meyers,
T.
(
1995)
Devrinol:
Terrestrial
Soil
Dissipation
for
Napropamide,
Mississippi,
1993­
1994:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
93­
SD­
01:
RR
95­
009B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products.
77
p.

43742402
Meyers,
T.
(
1995)
Devrinol:
Terrestrial
Soil
Dissipation
for
Napropamide,
California,
1993­
1994:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
93­
SD­
02:
RR
95­
018B:
02­
CA­
93­
443.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products.
105
p.

164­
2
Aquatic
field
dissipation
MRID
39766
Miller,
W.
W.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1971)
Behavior
and
Persistence
2­(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Soils
and
Water.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.,
CDL:
093519­
C)

49495
Riggs,
R.
L.;
Humphreys,
R.;
MacLaren,
G.;
et
al.
(
1971)
Waylay
(
R­
7465)
Run­
Off
Study:
Soil,
Water,
Silt,
Fish
Residues.
(
Un­
published
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
1066,
B­
1067,
B­
1083...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
Q)

165­
1
Confined
rotational
crop
MRID
41462001
Nelson,
S.;
NIcholls,
R.
(
1990)
Confined
Rotation
Crop
Study
for
Carbon
14
Phenyl
Labeled
Pronamide:
Lab
Project
Number:
TR
34­
90­
11:
EF­
87­
41.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Rohm
and
Haas
Co.,
in
cooperation
with
Pan­
Agricultural
Labs,
Inc.
540
p.

42794501
Parker,
S.;
Steel,
T.;
Harris,
M.;
et
al.
(
1993)
Napropamide:
Uptake
and
Metabolism
in
Confined
Rotational
Crops:
Lab
Project
Number:
90JH199:
RJ1348B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Agrochemicals
Jealott's
Hill
Research
Station.
174
p.

43419901
French,
D.
(
1993)
Addendum
to
MRID
42794501:
Napropamide:
Uptake
and
Metabolism
in
Rotational
Crops:
Lab
Project
Number:
RJ1348B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Agrochemicals.
36
p.

165­
4
Bioaccumulation
in
fish
MRID
92125019
Calderbank,
A.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00039774.
Exposure
of
Fish
Page
102
of
150
to
Carbon
14­
labelled
Devrinol:
Accumulation,
Distribution
and
Elimination
of
Residues:
Report
No.
T­
2224.
Prepared
by
BIONOMICS,
INC.
15
p.

171­
11
Tobacco
Uses:
Total
Residues
and
Pyrolysis
Products
MRID
2760
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1975)
Tillam
6­
E
Residue
Data
on
Wiscon­
sin
Cigar
Binder
Tobacco
(
Types
54
and
55).
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jul
19,
1976
under
476­
1615;
CDL:
225188­
A)

27323
Thompson,
L.;
Worsham,
A.
D.;
Newman,
R.
C.
(
1975)
Residue
Studies
Summary:
Devrinol
on
Tobacco.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Kentucky
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225547­
F)

41575306
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
Storage
Stability
Study
(
Validation):
Tobacco:
Lab
Project
Number:
RR
89­
061.
Unpublished
study
pre­
pared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
37
p.

92125059
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00120304
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Applied
Lay­
by
on
Tobacco:
Lab.
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
095B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas.
8
p.

171­
4B
Residue
Analytical
Methods
MRID
25882
MacLaren,
G.
E.;
Patchett,
G.
G.
(
1973)
Determination
of
Residues
of
Devrinol(
R)
in
Crops,
Animal
Tissues
and
Soils.
Method
WRC
73­
56
dated
Nov
20,
1973.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
D)

27549
MacLaren,
G.
E.
(
1973)
Determination
of
Residues
of
Devrinol^(
R)
I
in
Crops,
Animal
Tissues,
and
Soils.
Method
no.
WRC
73­
56
dated
Nov
20,
1973.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Feb
25,
1980
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099271­
B)

31946
MacLaren,
G.
E.;
Patchett,
G.
G.
(
1973)
Determination
of
Residues
of
Devrinol(
R)
in
Crops,
Animal
Tissues
and
Soils.
Method
no.
WRC
73­
56
dated
Nov
20,
1973.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
21,
1975
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101096­
F)

32355
MacLaren,
G.
E.;
Patchett,
G.
G.
(
1973)
Determination
of
Residues
of
Devrinol(
R)
in
Crops,
Animal
Tissues,
and
Soils.
Method
no.
WRC
73­
56
dated
Nov
20,
1973.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
CDL:
093855­
B)

32356
Patchett,
G.
G.
(
1972)
Determination
of
Residues
of
Devrinol(
TM)
Metabolites
R­
25541
and
R­
25124
in
Crops.
Method
WRC
72­
27
dated
Jun
19,
1972.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093855­
C)

41376
MacLaren,
G.
E.;
Patchett,
G.
G.
(
1973)
Determination
of
Residues
of
Devrinol^(
R)
Iin
Crops,
Animal
Tissues
and
Soils.
Method
no.
WRC
73­
56
dated
Nov
20,
1973.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
Page
103
of
150
CDL:
225547­
I)

49482
Patchett,
G.
G.
(
1971)
Determination
of
R­
7465
Residues
in
Crops:
WRC
71­
35.
Method
dated
Jul
12,
1971.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
D)

49483
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Determination
of
Residues
of
R­
7465
Metabolites
in
Tomatoes
and
Potatoes:
Research
Report
No.
WCR­
71­
42.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
E)

49484
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
R­
7465
50
W|:
FSDS
No.
B­
0610.
(
Reports
by
various
sources;
unpub­
lished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
0147,
B­
0909,
B­
0624...,
re­
ceived
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
F)

49485
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
R­
7465
50W|:
FSDS
No.
B­
0685.
(
Reports
by
various
sources;
unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
1787,
B­
0686,
B­
0683...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
G)

49486
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
R­
7465
50W|:
FSDS
No.
B­
0190.
(
Reports
by
various
sources;
unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
0189,
B­
1858,
B­
1860...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
H)

49487
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
R­
7465
50W|:
FSDS
No.
B­
0123.
(
Reports
by
various
sources;
unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
0094,
A
780,
B­
0187...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
I)

49488
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
Almonds|:
FSDS
No.
A
782.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
including
B­
1715,
B­
1714,
B­
1730...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
J)

49489
Patchett,
G.
G.
(
1971)
Storage
Stability
of
Waylay
in
Benzene
Ex­
tracts
of
Crops
and
Soils.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
K)

65363
MacLaren,
G.
E.;
Patchett,
G.
G.
(
1973)
Determination
of
Residues
of
Devrinol^(
R)
I
in
Crops,
Animal
Tissues,
and
Soils.
Method
no.
WRC
73­
56
dated
Nov
20,
1973.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229227­
B)

94488
McKay,
J.
C.
(
1973)
Letter
sent
to
R.
L.
Riggs
dated
Nov
21,
1973:
Frozen
storage
stability
studies
for
Devrinol.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093855­
G)

42256501
Biehn,
W.
(
1992)
Napropamide:
Magnitude
of
Residue
on
Sweet
Potato:
Lab
Project
Number:
IR­
4
PR
NO.
3938.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
IR­
4
Southeastern
Region
Analytical
Laboratory.
217
p.

43345102
Curry,
K.;
Grant,
C.
(
1994)
Napropamide:
Analytical
Method
for
the
Determination
of
Residues
of
Napropamide
in
Apple
Processed
Products:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
MV­
04:
RR
92­
073B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center.
45
p.

43345105
Storoni,
H.
(
1993)
Napropamide:
Analytical
Method
for
the
Determination
of
Napropamide
Residues
in
Orange
Processed
Commodities:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
MV­
05:
RR
92­
006B.
Page
104
of
150
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zenaca
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center.
52
p.

43345106
Curry,
K.;
Grant,
C.
(
1993)
Validation
of
an
Analytical
Method
for
Residues
of
Napropamide
in
Pome
Fruit:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
MV­
03:
RR
92­
072B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center.
42
p.

43345108
Curry,
K.;
Grant,
C.
(
1993)
Validation
of
an
Analytical
Method
for
the
Determination
of
Residues
of
Napropamide
in
Stone
Fruit
and
Prunes:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
MV­
02:
RR
91­
101B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center.
48
p.

92125046
Curry,
K.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00049482
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Residue
Method
for
Crops:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR/
90/
247B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
WESTERN
RESEARCH.
85
p.

92125070
Curry,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00049482.
Devrinol:
Residue
Method
for
Napropamide
Determination
of
Napro­
pamide
Residues
in
Crops:
WRC
71­
35;
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
160B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL.
23
p.

92125071
Curry,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025882.
Devrinol:
Residue
Method
for
Crops:
Determination
of
Residues
of
Devrinol
in
Crops,
Animal
Tissues
and
Soils;
WRC
73­
56:
Laboratory
Study
ID
RR
90­
173B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
WESTERN
RESEARCH.
42
p.

171­
4C
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
[
by
commodity]

MRID
23228
Lombardi,
G.;
Kitaharwa,
H.;
Schweers,
V.
H.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP,
2­
E
1­
2
Lbs.
a.
i./
A
on
Peppers
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Cali­
fornia,
Extension
Service,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101113­
D)

23230
Phillips,
?;
Wood,
?;
Gusti,
A.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Stud­
ies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP,
2­
E
+
Tillam
6­
E
(
1­
2+
4­
6
Lbs.
a.
i./
A)
Tank­
Mix
on
Direct­
Seeded
Tomatoes
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
A.
L.
Noll
Farms,
Inc.
and
Newhall
Land
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101112­
A)

23233
Tavenner,
H.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
4
Lbs.
a.
i./
A
on
Grapes
in
the
Pacific
Northwest.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
coopera­
tion
with
Univ.
of
Oregon,
North
Willamette
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101112­
E)

23235
Parker,
R.;
Solether,
N.;
Gay,
A.
D.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
4­
6
Lbs.
a.
i./
A
on
Grapefruit
and
Oranges
in
Texas.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101112­
G)

23883
Thompson,
R.;
Jensen,
?;
Elmore,
C.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
(
4
Lbs.
A.
I./
A)
Tank
Mixed
with
Simazine
80­
WP
(
0.5­
1
Lb.
A.
I./
A)
and/
or
Paraquat
(
1
Lb.
A.
I./
A)
in
California/
Arizona.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Kern
County
Land
Company
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chem­
ical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028423­
J)
Page
105
of
150
25883
Dorman,
D.
L.;
Agamalian,
H.;
DeSante,
J.;
et
al.
(
1979)
Devrinol
50­
WP:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
on
Artichokes.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
E)

25884
Dorman,
D.
C.;
De
Guzman,
D.;
Rahn,
E.
M.;
et
al.
(
1979)
Devrinol
50­
WP:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
on
Asparagus.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Delaware
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
F)

25885
Dewey,
M.
L.;
Doty,
C.;
Griffin,
M.;
et
al.
(
1976)
Devrinol
50­
WP:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
on
Avocados.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Morse
Laboratories,
Inc.
and
Lemoniera
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
G)

25886
Sullivan,
R.
E.;
De
Guzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.
C.;
et
al.
(
1979)
Devrinol(
R)
Selective
Herbicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Cucurbits.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Morse
Laboratory,
Inc.
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
H)

25887
Lesh,
M.;
Dorman,
D.
C.;
De
Guzman,
D.;
et
al.
(
1979)
Devrinol
50­
WP:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
on
Kiwifruit.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
California
Kiwi
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
I)

25888
DeGuzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.
C.;
Agamalian,
H.;
et
al.
(
1979)
Devri­
nol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Leafy
Vegetables.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
un­
der
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Oregon
State
Univ.
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
J)

25889
Dorman,
D.
C.;
Rettig,
M;
Herndon,
G.;
et
al.
(
1978)
Devrinol
50­
WP:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
on
Mint.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Oregon
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Crop
Science,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemi­
cal
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
K)

25890
Tootilian,
G.;
Apkarian,
V.
(
1975)
Devrinol
50­
WP:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
on
Persimmons.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Sadoian
Brothers
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
M)

27319
Hopen,
H.;
Weyand,
B.;
Barry,
B.
(
1975)
Summary
of
Residue
Data:
Devrinol
on
Tomatoes.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Illinois
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225547­
B)

27320
Barry,
B.;
Barrentine,
W.
L.;
Monaco,
T.;
et
al.
(
1975)
Summary
of
Residue
Data:
Devrinol
+
Tillam
on
Tomatoes.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Southwestern
Louisiana
and
Univ.
of
Missouri,
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225547­
C)

27321
Jones,
R.;
Barry,
B.;
Monaco,
T.;
et
al.
(
1976)
Summary
of
Residue
Data:
Devrinol
on
Peppers.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Southwestern
Louisiana,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225547­
D)

27322
Anderson,
L.;
VanBuren,
B.;
Collins,
R.;
et
al.
(
1976)
Summary
of
Residue
Data:
Devrinol
on
Strawberries.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
Page
106
of
150
with
Utah
State
Univ.
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225547­
E)

27550
Yavssey,
L.
O.
(
1978)
Devrinol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Nuts.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Feb
25,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Fowler
Farm
Management
and
Reedly
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099271­
C)

28796
Philips,
?;
Wood,
?;
Gusti,
A.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP,
2­
E
+
Tillam
6­
E
(
1­
2+
4­
6
Lbs.
a.
i./
A):
Tank
Mix
on
Direct­
Seeded
Tomatoes
in
California.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
A.
L.
Noll
Farms,
Inc.
and
Newhall
Land
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
001019­
A)

28800
Parker,
R.;
Solether,
N.;
Solether,
B.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
4­
6
Lbs.
a.
i./
A
on
Grapefruit
and
Oranges
in
Texas.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
001019­
F)

30179
Oberta,
?;
Kevorkian,
A.
(
1975)
Devrinol
50­
WP:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
on
Olives.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
un­
der
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Reedley
College,
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
L)

31946
MacLaren,
G.
E.;
Patchett,
G.
G.
(
1973)
Determination
of
Residues
of
Devrinol(
R)
in
Crops,
Animal
Tissues
and
Soils.
Method
no.
WRC
73­
56
dated
Nov
20,
1973.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
21,
1975
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101096­
F)

31947
Lombardi,
G.;
Kitaharwa,
H.;
Schweers,
V.
H.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrin­
ol­­
Rotational
Crop
Residue
Studies:
Data
on
Crops
with
Estab­
lished
Devrinol
Tolerances
but
No
Registrations.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
21,
1975
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
coop­
eration
with
Univ.
of
California,
Extension
Service
and
Univ.
of
Southwestern
Louisiana,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101096­
G)

31948
Rodgers,
B.;
Rocha,
J.;
Walton,
J.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol­­
Rota­
tional
Crop
Residue
Studies:
Data
on
Crops
for
Which
No
Devrinol
Tolerances
Have
Been
Established.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
21,
1975
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Fresno
State
Univ.
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101096­
H)

32300
Cannon,
J.
L.;
Smith,
V.;
McAfee,
K.
H.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies:
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
coopertion
with
Reedley
Col­
lege,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101111­
B)

32357
Tootilian,
G.;
Montgomery,
?
(
1973)
Summary
of
Devrinol
Residue
Data
on
Figs.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Sadoian
Brothers
and
Reed­
ley
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093855­
D)

32358
Elmore,
C.
L.;
Neely,
R.
E.;
McFarland,
?;
et
al.
(
1973)
Summary
of
Devrinol
Residue
Data
on
Nut
Crops.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California­­
Davis,
Depts.
of
Environmental
Toxicology
and
Botany
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093855­
E)

32359
Elmore,
C.
L.;
Daniels,
D.;
Warman,
H.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Summary
of
Devrinol
Residue
Data
for
Pome
Fruits.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
Page
107
of
150
with
Univ.
of
Connecticut,
Agricultural
Experiment
Station
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093855­
F)

32494
Bailey,
C.
E.;
Dumlao,
S.;
Phillips,
D.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Crop
Residue
Report:
Devrinol
2­
E:
Tomatoes:
FSDS
No.
A­
7740.
(
Unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
A­
7090,
A­
7085,
A­
7135...,
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
H.
J.
Heinz
Co.
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
008951­
C)

32564
Gusti,
A.;
Haven,
A.;
Wyrick,
F.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP,
2­
E
+
Tillam
6­
E
(
1­
2+
4­
6
Lbs.
a.
i./
A)
Tank
Mix
on
Direct­
Seeded
Tomatoes
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
pre­
pared
in
cooperation
with
A.
L.
Noll
Farms,
Inc.
and
Newhall
Land
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028421­
A)

32568
Tavenner,
H.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
4
Lbs.
a.
i./
A
on
Grapes
in
the
Pacific
Northwest.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
coopera­
tion
with
Oregon
State
Univ.,
North
Willamette
Experiment
Sta­
tion,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028421­
E)

32571
Parker,
R.;
Solether,
N.;
Solether,
B.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
4­
6
Lbs.
a.
i./
A
on
Grapefruit
and
Oranges
in
Texas.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028421­
H)

33035
Thompson,
R.;
Jensen,
?;
Elmore,
C.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
(
4
Lbs.
a.
i./
A)
Tank
Mixed
with
Simazine
80­
WP
(
0.5­
1
Lb.
a.
i./
A)
and/
or
Paraquat
(
1
Lb.
a.
i./
A)
in
California/
Arizona.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California­­
Davis
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101111­
C)

33961
Lombardi,
G.;
Kitaharwa,
H.;
Schweers,
V.
H.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP,
2­
E
1­
2
Lbs.
a.
i./
A
on
Peppers
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Califor­
nia,
Agricultural
Extension
Service,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chem­
ical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028312­
D)

34223
Cannon,
J.
L.;
Smith,
V.;
McAfee,
K.
H.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
4
Lbs.
a.
i./
A
on
Grapefruit,
Lemons
and
Tangerines
in
California/
Arizona
and
Oranges
in
Arizona.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
pre­
pared
in
cooperation
with
Lemoniera
Co.
and
Reedley
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
000836­
B)

35663
De
Guzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.
C.;
LaRue,
J.;
et
al.
(
1980)
Devrinol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Stone
Fruits.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Reedley
College
and
others,
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
E)

35664
De
Guzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.
C.
(
1980)
Devrinol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbi­
cide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Pome
Fruits.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
prepared
in
coopera­
tion
with
Reedley
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
F)

35665
De
Guzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.
C.;
Rodgers,
W.;
et
al.
(
1980)
Devri­
nol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Citrus.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Reedley
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Page
108
of
150
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
G)

35666
De
Guzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.
C.;
Stiles,
N.;
et
al.
(
1980)
Devri­
nol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Nuts.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Reedley
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
H)

35667
De
Guzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.
C.;
O'Sullivan,
R.;
et
al.
(
1980)
Devri­
nol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Small
Fruits.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Reedley
College,
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
I)

35668
De
Guzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.
C.
(
1980)
Devrinol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbi­
cide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Figs.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Reedley
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
J)

35669
De
Guzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.
C.;
Lesh,
M.
et
al.
(
1980)
Devrinol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Fruiting
Vegetables.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Clemson
Univ.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
K)

49484
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
R­
7465
50
W|:
FSDS
No.
B­
0610.
(
Reports
by
various
sources;
unpub­
lished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
0147,
B­
0909,
B­
0624...,
re­
ceived
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
F)

49485
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
R­
7465
50W|:
FSDS
No.
B­
0685.
(
Reports
by
various
sources;
unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
1787,
B­
0686,
B­
0683...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
G)

49486
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
R­
7465
50W|:
FSDS
No.
B­
0190.
(
Reports
by
various
sources;
unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
0189,
B­
1858,
B­
1860...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
H)

49487
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
R­
7465
50W|:
FSDS
No.
B­
0123.
(
Reports
by
various
sources;
unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
0094,
A
780,
B­
0187...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
I)

49488
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
Almonds|:
FSDS
No.
A
782.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
including
B­
1715,
B­
1714,
B­
1730...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
J)

49495
Riggs,
R.
L.;
Humphreys,
R.;
MacLaren,
G.;
et
al.
(
1971)
Waylay
(
R­
7465)
Run­
Off
Study:
Soil,
Water,
Silt,
Fish
Residues.
(
Un­
published
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
1066,
B­
1067,
B­
1083...,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
Q)

65362
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
Summary
of
Residue
Chemistry.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
CDL:
229227­
A)

67872
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Summary
of
Residue
Reports
for
Tillam
6­
E^(
R)
I/
Devrinol^(
R)
I
4­
F
Tank
Mix
on
Tomatoes.
(
Compi­
lation;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
26,
1981
under
476­
1615;
CDL:
244253­
G)
Page
109
of
150
67873
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Summary
of
Residue
Reports
for
Tillam^(
R)
I
6­
E/
Devrinol^(
R)
I/
Dyfonate^(
R)
I
Tank
Mix
on
Toma­
toes.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
26,
1981
under
476­
1615;
CDL:
244253­
I)

70779
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Devrinol^(
R)
I50­
WP
Selective
Her­
bicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Apples,
Peaches,
and
Citrus.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
243859­
A)

70780
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Devrinol^(
R)
I50­
WP
Selective
Her­
bicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Apples,
Pears,
Citrus,
Peaches,
Grapes
and
Walnuts.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
243860­
A)

70781
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
?
Residues
of
Devrinol
on
Egg­
plants|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
243859­
C)

70784
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Devrinol^(
R)
I4­
F
Selective
Herbi­
cide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Apples,
Peaches,
and
Cit­
rus.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
un­
der
476­
2199;
CDL:
243860­
A)

70785
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Devrinol^(
R)
I4­
F
Selective
Herbi­
cide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Apples,
Pears,
Citrus,
Peaches,
Grapes
and
Walnuts.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
243860­
B)

70786
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Devrinol^(
R)
I
4­
F
Selective
Herbi­
cide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Eggplants.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
243860­
C)

70814
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
Crop
Residue
Report:
Devrinol
2­
E:
FSDS
No.
A­
7740.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study,
including
FSDS
nos.
A­
7090,
A­
7085,
A­
7135...,
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
221951­
C)

72690
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
?
Residue
of
Devrinol
on
Lettuce
and
Sugar
Beets|:
FSDS
No.
A­
26496.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study,
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
2529,
A­
9615
and
A­
11880,
received
Apr
27,
1981
under
0F2319;
CDL:
070040­
E)

94087
Interregional
Research
Project
Number
4
(
1981)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Napropamide
Residues
Remaining
in
or
on
Basil
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used.
Includes
methods
dated
Aug
5,
1981
and
WRC
73­
56
dated
Nov
20,
1973.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Feb
3,
1982
under
2E2643;
CDL:
070654­
A)

113800
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1972)
?
Residues
of
R­
7465
in
Tomatoes
and
Other
Crops|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
May
11,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091005­
A)

113814
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1979)
?
Residues
of
Devrinol
in
Coffee
Beans
and
Other
Crops|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1979
under
9E2244;
CDL:
098860­
A)

113821
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1979)
Residue
Data:
Summaries
and
Analytical
Data
for
Devrinol,
Devrinol/
Simazine
and
Devrinol/
Paraquat
on
Citrus.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
13,
1979
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
241323­
A)

115110
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(
1982)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Napropamide
Residues
Remaining
in
or
on
Rose­
mary
and
Summer
Savory
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Sep
16,
1982
under
2E2759;
Page
110
of
150
CDL:
071098­
A)

115128
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1982)
?
Study:
Devrinol
Residue
on
Selected
Crops|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Sep
3,
1982
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
248365­
B)

118001
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1982)
?
Devrinol:
Residues
in
Apples
and
Other
Crops|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
9,
1982
under
476­
2218;
CDL:
248804­
A)

120304
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1982)
?
Devrinol:
Residues
in
Various
Crops|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
10,
1982
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
249003­
A)

126316
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(
1982)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Napropamide
Residues
Remaining
in
or
on
Rhu­
bard,
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Mar
7,
1983
under
3F2849;
CDL:
071479­
A)

129108
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1981)
Summary
of
Devrinol
Residue
Data
on
Rotation
Crops:
?
Residues|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jul
6,
1983
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
071720­
A)

132824
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1983)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
and
Nature
of
the
Residue,
and
Analytical
Methodology
for
Devrinol.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
1,
1983
under
4F3005;
CDL:
072186­
A)

140144
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1979)
?
Residue
of
Devrinol
50­
WP
on
or
in
Coffee
Beans|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Oct
10,
1979
under
9E2244;
CDL:
099027­
A)

144964
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4.
(
1983)
The
Results
of
Tests
On
the
Amount
of
Napropamide
Residues
Remaining
in
or
on
Pome­
granates
Including
A
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
used.
Unpublished
compilation.
65
p.

41575305
Curry,
K.
(
1990)
Determination
of
Napropamide
Residues
in
Crops
by
Gas
Chromatography
(
RRC
83­
68):
Lab
Project
Number:
90­
175B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
60
p.

41575307
McKay,
J.
(
1989)
Napropamide.
.
.:
Storage
Stability
Validation
for
Napropamide
in
Raw
Agricultural
Commodoties
and
Soil:
Lab
Pro­
ject
Number:
WRC
89­
54.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Amer­
icas
Inc.
118
p.

41575308
Baron,
J.;
Pearson,
F.
(
1990)
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
094087:
Napropamide­­
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Basil:
Lab
Project
Num­
ber
1570.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
IR­
4
Project.
12
p.

41575309
Baron,
J.;
Pearson,
F.
(
1990)
Phase
3
Summary
Of
MRID
115110:
Napropamide­­
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Rosemary:
Lab
Project
Number:
1829.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
in
cooperation
with
the
IR­
4
Project.
9
p.

41575310
Baron,
J.;
Pearson,
F.
(
1990)
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
115110:
Napropamide­­
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Savory:
Lab
Project
Number
1829.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
in
cooperation
with
the
IR­
4.
10
p.

42845901
Joseph,
R.
(
1993)
Napropamide:
Supplemental
Information
in
Response
to
EPA
HED
Chemistry
Branch
II
Review
of
Nature
of
the
Residue
Studies
on
Apples,
Tomatoes
and
Cabbage:
Lab
Project
Number:
RJ1128B
SUP:
RJ1153B
SUP:
RJ1124B
SUP.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products,
Jealott's
Hill
Research
Station.
70
p.

43249401
Grant,
C.;
Curry,
K.
(
1994)
DEVRINOL
50­
DF:
Residue
Processing
Study
for
Napropamide
on
Apples:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
PR­
01:
RR
92­
074B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Page
111
of
150
ZENECA
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center;
ACDs,
Inc.
and
Englar
&
Associates.
167
p.

43249402
Storoni,
H.
(
1994)
Napropamide:
Residue
Levels
in
Processed
Grapes
from
Trials
Carried
Out
in
the
USA
During
1992:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
92­
PR­
01:
56­
NY­
92­
602:
RR
93­
056B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ZENECA
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center.
161
p.

43249403
Curry,
K.;
Grant,
C.
(
1994)
DEVRINOL:
Residue
Processing
Study
for
Napropamide
on
Oranges:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
PR­
03:
42­
FL­
91­
181:
RR
92­
075B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ZENECA
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center
and
Univ.
of
Florida.,
Institute
of
Food
&
Agricultural
Sciences.
95
p.

43249404
Curry,
K.;
Grant,
C.
(
1994)
DEVRINOL:
Residue
Processing
Study
for
Napropamide
on
Plums
(
Prune
Type):
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
PR­
02:
RR
91­
079B:
18­
CA­
91­
152.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ZENECA
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center
and
The
National
Food
Laboratory,
Inc.
122
p.

43249405
Storoni,
H.
(
1994)
Napropamide:
Residue
Levels
in
Processed
Tomatoes
from
Trials
Carried
Out
in
the
USA
During
1992:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
92­
PR­
02:
RR
93­
007B:
RP
5707.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ZENECA
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center.
101
p.

43345101
Grant,
C.;
Curry,
K.
(
1994)
Devrinol
50­
DF:
Residue
Processing
Study
for
Napropamide
on
Apples:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
PR­
01:
RR
92­
074B:
91307.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center;
ACDS,
Inc.;
and
Englar
&
Associates,
Inc.
167
p.

43345103
Storoni,
H.
(
1994)
Napropamide:
Residue
Levels
in
Processed
Grapes
from
Trials
Carried
out
in
the
USA
During
1992:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
92­
PR­
01:
RR
93­
056B:
NAPR­
91­
MV­
05.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center.
161
p.

43345104
Curry,
K.;
Grant,
C.
(
1994)
Napropamide:
Residue
Processing
Study
for
Napropamide
on
Oranges:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
PR­
03:
RR
92­
075B:
42­
FL­
91­
182.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center
and
University
of
Florida,
Institute
of
Food
&
Agricultural
Sciences.
95
p.

43345107
Curry,
K.;
Grant,
C.
(
1994)
Devrinol:
Residue
Processing
Study
for
Napropamide
on
Plums
(
Prune
Type):
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
PR­
02:
RR
91­
079B:
18­
CA­
91­
151.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center
and
The
National
Food
Lab,
Inc.
122
p.

43345109
Storoni,
H.
(
1994)
Napropamide:
Residue
Levels
in
Processed
Tomatoes
from
Trials
Carried
Out
in
the
USA
During
1992:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
92­
PR­
02:
RR
93­
007B:
NAPR­
91­
MV­
01.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products,
Western
Research
Center.
101
p.

43843401
Thompson,
D.
(
1995)
Napropamide:
Magnitude
of
Residue
on
Oriental
Radish
(
Daikon):
Lab
Project
Number:
05133:
03253.
91­
FLR12:
05133.91­
FL39(
3253.91­
FL39).
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
University
of
Florida.
106
p.

44020101
Roper,
E.;
Markle,
J.
(
1996)
Devrinol:
Determination
of
the
Stability
of
Napropamide
in
Processed
Samples
of
Apples
During
Frozen
Storage:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
SS­
01:
RR
96­
036B:
ML91­
0234­
ICI.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products
and
Morse
Labs.,
Inc.
59
p.

44020102
Roper,
E.;
Markle,
J.
(
1996)
Devrinol:
Determination
of
the
Stability
of
Napropamide
in
Processed
Samples
of
Oranges
During
Frozen
Storage:
Lab
Project
Number:
NAPR­
91­
SS­
03:
RR
96­
032B:
Page
112
of
150
ML91­
0235­
ICI.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Zeneca
Ag
Products
and
Morse
Labs.,
Inc.
75
p.

92125020
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025883
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Artichokes:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
061B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL/
ICI
AMERICAS.
9
p.

92125021
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025888
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Cabbage:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR90­
148B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
102
p.

92125022
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00033035
and
Related
MRIDs
00035663,
00049487,
00070779,
00070780,
00070784,
00070785,
00113821,
00118001.
Devrinol
50­
WP:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Peaches:
Laboratory
ID
No.
RR
90­
018B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
ICI
Americas.
10
p.

92125023
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00140144
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Coffee:
Laboratory
Summary
ID
No.
RR
90/
084B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
9
p.

92125024
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00140144
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Processed
Food:
Coffee:
Laboratory
Summary
ID
No.
RR/
90/
219B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
9
p.

92125025
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025886
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Watermelon:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
200B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
8
p.

92125026
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00033035
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00023883,
00049487,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
50­
WP
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Cherries:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
015B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas/
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
9
p.

92125027
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00023257
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol
Processed
Food:
Figs:
Laboratory
Summary
ID
No.
RR
90­
242B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
CO./
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
8
p.

92125028
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025887
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Kiwifruit:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
118B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS.
9
p.

92125029
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025889
and
Related
MRIDs
00118001,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Mint:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR­
90­
198B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS.
9
p.

92125030
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025889
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Processed
Food:
Mint:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
210B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS.
8
p.

92125031
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00030179
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Olives:
RR­
90­
111B.
Prepared
Page
113
of
150
by
STUAFFER
CHEMICAL
CO./
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
9
p.

92125032
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00030179
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Processed
Food:
Olives:
Laboratory
Summary
ID
No.
RR­
90­
209B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS
INC./
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL.
8
p.

92125033
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025890
and
Related
MRIDs
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Persimmons:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
196B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS
INC.
10
p.

92125034
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00027550
and
Related
MRIDs
00032358,
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Pistachios:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
120B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS.
9
p.

92125035
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00032359
and
Related
MRIDs
00035664,
00070779,
00070780,
00070785,
00113821,
00115128,
00118001.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Apples:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
077B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS.
10
p.

92125036
Baron,
J.;
Pearson,
F.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00126316.
Napropamide­
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Rhubarb:
Study
ID
IR­
4
Project
No.
2482
and
Pesticide
Petition
3E­
2849.
Prepared
by
Interregional
Regional
Research
Project
No.
4.
9
p.

92125037
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00049486
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00118001,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Caneberries
(
Blackberries,
Boysenberries,
Raspberries
and
Loganberries):
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
104B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
9
p.

92125038
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00033035
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
DEVRINOL
Processed
Food:
Grapes:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
302B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
8
p.

92125039
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00033035
and
Related
MRIDs
00035663,
00049487,
00113821,
00115128,
00025882,
00032356,
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Plums:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
024B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
9
p.

92125040
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025884
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Asparagus:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
071B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
CO./
ICI
AMERICAS.
9
p.

92125041
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025885
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Avocados:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
089B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS/
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
90
p.

92125042
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00031947
and
Related
MRIDs
00070781,
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Eggplant:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
163B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
8
p.

92125043
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00032358
and
Related
MRIDs
00033035,
00035666,
00049488,
00113821,
00115128,
00025882,
00032356,
Page
114
of
150
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Almonds:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
046B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
ICI
Americas.
10
p.

92125044
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00144964
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Pomegranates:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR­
90­
134B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS/
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
8
p.

92125045
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00027323
and
Related
MRIDs
00027324,
00035670,
00120304,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Applied
Pre­
transplant
on
Tobacco:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
082B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS.
11
p.

92125047
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00023235
and
Related
MRIDs
00033035,
00035663,
00049485,
00070779,
00070780,
00113821,
00115121,
00115128.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Oranges:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
031B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
9
p.

92125048
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025888
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Cauliflower:
Lab.
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
152B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
8
p.

92125049
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00049486
and
Related
MRIDs
00118001,
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Cranberries:
Lab.
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
161B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
9
p.

92125050
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00035663
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Apricots:
RR
90­
026B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL/
ICI
AMERICAS
INC.
8
p.

92125051
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00023233
and
Related
MRIDs
00035677,
00049486,
00113821,
00115128,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Grapes:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
154B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
9
p.

92125052
Adelson,
B.;
Mckay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00035665
and
Related
MRIDs
00032300,
00023235,
00049485,
00113821,
00025882,
00049482,
00049483.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Grapefruit:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
033B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
103
p.

92125053
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00049482
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882,
00120304.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Blueberries:
Laboratory
Study
No.
RR
90­
099B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
8
p.

92125054
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00113821
and
Related
MRIDs
00033035,
00035665,
00032300,
00025882.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Lemons:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
041B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
9
p.

92125055
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00027322
and
Related
MRIDs
00031947,
00035667,
00118001,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Strawberries:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
215B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
11
p.
Page
115
of
150
92125056
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025888
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Brussels
Sprouts:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
146B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
8
p.

92125057
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00023257
and
Related
MRIDs
00035668,
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Figs:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
132B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
CO./
ICI
AMERICAS.
9
p.

92125058
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00025888
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Broccoli:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
90­
130B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS.
10
p.

92125059
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00120304
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Applied
Lay­
by
on
Tobacco:
Lab.
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
095B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas.
8
p.

92125060
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00032300
and
Related
MRIDs
00111381,
00025882.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Tangerines:
Lab.
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
044B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas.
8
p.

92125061
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00120304
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Applied
Post­
transplant
on
Tobacco:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
086B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
9
p.

92125062
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
Ici
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00035663
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Nectarines:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
028B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS
INC.
8
p.

92125063
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00023228
and
Related
MRIDs
00027321,
00031947,
00033961,
00113800,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Peppers:
Laboratory
ID
No.
RR
90­
194B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
ICI
Americas.
11
p.

92125064
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00023230
and
Related
MRIDs
00027319,
00027320,
00032494,
00035669,
00049484,
00113800,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Tomatoes:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
106B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS.
13
p.

92125065
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00032358
and
Related
MRIDs
00035666,
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Filberts:
Lab.
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
049B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
8
p.

92125066
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00032359
and
Related
MRIDs
00070780,
00113821,
00118001,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Pears:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
073B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
10
p.

92125067
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00032358
and
Related
MRIDs
00035666,
00070780,
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Walnuts:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
053B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
CO./
ICI
Page
116
of
150
AMERICAS.
9
p.

92125068
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Summary
of
MRID
00118001
and
Related
MRIDs
00032358,
00113821,
00025882.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Pecans:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
063B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
9
p.

92125072
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025888
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Cabbage:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
149B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY/
ICI
AMERICAS.
102
p.

92125073
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00023235
and
Related
MRIDs
00033035,
00035663,
00049485,
00070779,
00070780,
00113821,
00115121,
00115128.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Oranges:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
032B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
144
p.

92125074
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00140144
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Coffee:
Laboratory
Summary
ID
No.
RR
90­
085B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas.
93
p.

92125075
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00140144
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Processed
Food:
Coffee:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
220B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS.
64
p.

92125076
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025886
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Watermelon:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
201B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS
INC./
WESTERN
RESEARCH.
65
p.

92125077
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00023257
and
Related
MRIDs
00035668,
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Figs:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
133B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS.
72
p.

92125078
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00023257
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Processed
Food:
Figs:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
243B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS.
41
p.

92125079
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025887
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Kiwifruit:
RR
90­
119B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
81
p.

92125080
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025889
and
Related
MRIDs
00118001,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Fresh
Mint
Hay:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
199B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
CO./
WESTERN
RESEARCH.
76
p.

92125081
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025889
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Processed
Food:
Mint:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
211B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS.
56
p.

92125082
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00030179
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Olives:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
112B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
72
p.
Page
117
of
150
92125083
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00030179
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Processed
Food:
Olives:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR­
90­
192B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS.
57
p.

92125084
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025890
and
Related
MRIDs
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Persimmons:
Laboratory
ID
No.
90­
197B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
66
p.

92125085
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00027550
and
Related
MRIDs
00032358,
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Pistachios:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
90­
121B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
66
p.

92125086
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00032359
and
Related
MRIDs
00035664,
00070779,
00070780,
00070785,
00113821,
00115128,
00118001,
00025882.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Apples:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
078B.
Prepared
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
209
p.

92125087
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00049486
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00118001,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Caneberries
(
Blackberries,
Boysenberries,
Raspberries
and
Loganberries):
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
105B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
118
p.

92125088
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00033035
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Processed
Food:
Grapes:
Lab.
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
303B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas.
37
p.

92125089
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00033035
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00023883,
00049487,
00049482,
00025882.
DEVRINOL
50­
WP
Magnitude
of
the
Residues
on
Cherries:
Laboratory
ID
No.
RR
90­
017B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas.
101
p.

92125090
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025883
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Artichoke:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
062B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC./
WESTERN
RESEARCH.
91
p.

92125091
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025884
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Asparagus:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
072B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
99
p.

92125092
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025885
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Avocados:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
090B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
Western
Research
Center.
90
p.

92125093
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00031947
and
Related
MRIDs
00070781,
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Eggplant:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
164B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
58
p.

92125094
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00032358
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00033035,
00035666,
00049488,
00115128,
00032356,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Almonds:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
047B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC./
WESTERN
RESEARCH
CENTER.
167
p.
Page
118
of
150
92125095
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00144964
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Pomegranates:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
135B.
Prepared
by
ICI
AMERICAS,
INC.
80
p.

92125096
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00027323
and
Related
MRIDs
00027324,
00035670,
00120304,
00025882.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Applied
Pre­
transplant
on
Tobacco:
Laboratory
Study
Id
No.
RR
90­
083B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas.
319
p.

92125097
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025888
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Brussels
Sprouts:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
147B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
45
p.

92125098
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00027322
and
Related
MRIDs
00031947,
00035667,
00118001,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Strawberries:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
216B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
223
p.

92125099
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00120304
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Applied
Lay­
by
on
Tobacco:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
096B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
105
p.

92125101
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00032358
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00118001,
00025882.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Pecans:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
064B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
131
p.

92125102
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00113821
and
Related
MRIDs
00035663,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL:
Magnitude
of
the
residue
on
Apricots:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
027B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
88
p.

92125103
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00113821
and
Related
MRIDs
00032300,
00033035,
00035665,
00025882.
DEVRINOL:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Lemons:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
042B.
Prepared
by
STAUFFER
CHEMICAL
COMPANY.
98
p.

92125104
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00032358
and
Related
MRIDs
00035666,
00113821,
00025882.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Filberts:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
050B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
61
p.

92125105
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025888
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Cauliflower:
Lab.
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
153B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas.
62
p.

92125106
Adelson,
B.;
Leary,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00049486
and
Related
MRIDs
00118001,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Cranberries:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
162B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
76
p.

92125107
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00035663
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00025882.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Nectarines:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
029B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
44
p.

92125108
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00049487
and
Page
119
of
150
Related
MRIDs
00035663,
00033035,
00113821,
00115128,
00025882,
00032356,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Plums:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
025B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
169
p.

92125109
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00049482
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882,
00049482,
00120304.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Blueberries:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
100B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
56
p.

92125110
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00031947
and
Related
MRIDs
00027321,
00023228,
00033961,
00113800,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
­
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Peppers:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
195B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
127
p.

92125111
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00023235
and
Related
MRIDs
00032300,
00035665,
00049485,
00113821,
00025882,
00049482,
00049483.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Grapefruit:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
033B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
103
p.

92125112
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00025888
and
Related
MRIDs
00031948,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Broccoli:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
131B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
98
p.

92125113
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00023233
and
Related
MRIDs
00035667,
00049486,
00113821,
00115128,
00025882,
00049482.
Devrinol­­
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Grapes:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
155B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
111
p.

92125114
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00032300
and
Related
MRIDs
00113821,
00025882.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Tangerines:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
045B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
49
p.

92125115
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00033035
and
Related
MRIDs
00035663,
00049487,
00070779,
00118001,
00070780,
00070784,
00070785,
00113821.
DEVRINOL
50­
WP
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Peaches:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
019B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
207
p.

92125116
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00120304
and
Related
MRIDs
00025882.
Devrinol
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Applied
Post­
transplant
on
Tobacco:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
087B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas.
209
p.

92125117
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00023230
and
Related
MRIDs
00027319,
00027320,
00032494,
00035669,
00049484,
00113800,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Tomatoes:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
107B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
456
p.

92125118
Adelson,
B.;
Ott,
K.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00032359
and
Related
MRIDs
00070780,
00113821,
00118001,
00025882,
00049482.
DEVRINOL
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Pears:
Laboratory
Study
ID
No.
RR
90­
074B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Western
Research
Center.
215
p.

92125119
Adelson,
B.;
McKay,
J.
(
1990)
ICI
Americas
Inc.
Phase
3
Reformat
of
MRID
00032358
and
Related
MRIDs
00035666,
00070780,
00113821,
00025882.
Devrinol:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Walnuts:
RR
90­
054B.
Prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
Western
Research
Center.
85
p.
Page
120
of
150
171­
4A2
Nature
of
the
Residue
in
Plants
MRID
4190
Gjerstad,
D.
H.;
South,
D.
B.
(
1976)
Supporting
Data
for
Application
for
State
Registration
of:
Modown
for
Weed
Control
in
Pine
Seed­
beds.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
13,
1977
under
2224­
50;
prepared
by
Auburn
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Forestry
in
cooperation
with
U.
S.
Forest
Service,
State
and
Private
Forestry,
Southeastern
Area,
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Industrial
Chemicals,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
232503­
A)

25879
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Evidence
Regarding
the
Safety
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical
Devrinol(
R).
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
099218­
A)

39765
Murphy,
J.
J.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1972)
Degradation
Products
of
R­
7465
in
the
Environment.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
093519­
B)

39767
Murphy,
J.
J.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1972)
Plant
Uptake
of
Bound
Residue
from
?
1­
14C|
Devrinol
Treated
Soil.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
D)

40134
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971?)
Comparison
of
Acid
and
Enzymatic
Hydrolysis
of
R­
7465
Metabolites.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
20,
1971
under
2F1194;
CDL:
095554­
A)

49481
Murphy,
J.
J.;
Didriksen,
J.;
Gray,
R.
A.
(
1970?)
Metabolism
of
Radioactive
2­(
alpha­
Naphthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl
propionamide
(
R­
7465)
in
Plants
and
Animals.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
C)

113800
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1972)
?
Residues
of
R­
7465
in
Tomatoes
and
Other
Crops|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
May
11,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091005­
A)

113801
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
19??)
Evidence
Regarding
the
Safety
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical
Waylay.
Summary
of
studies
091008­
B
through
091008­
L.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091008­
A)

113811
Murphy,
J.;
Didriksen,
J.;
Gray,
R.
(
1970?)
Metabolism
of
Radio­
active
...
(
R­
7465)
in
Plants
and
Animals.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
L)

129109
Doane,
P.;
Spillner,
C.
(
1983)
Uptake
of
14C
Devrinol
Soil
Residues
by
Rotation
Crops:
MRC­
83­
04.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jul
6,
1983
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
071720­
B)

132824
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1983)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
and
Nature
of
the
Residue,
and
Analytical
Methodology
for
Devrinol.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
1,
1983
under
4F3005;
CDL:
072186­
A)

42349801
Hurt,
A.;
Joseph,
R.
(
1992)
Napropamide:
Uptake
and
Metabolism
in
Apples:
Lab
Project
Number:
90JH142.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Agrochemicals.
69
p.

42349802
Webb,
J.;
Allin,
R.;
Joseph,
R.
(
1992)
Napropamide:
Uptake
and
Metabolism
in
Tomatoes:
Lab
Project
Number:
90JH193.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Agrochemicals.
56
p.

42393901
Emburey,
S.;
Joseph,
R.
(
1992)
Napropamide:
Uptake
and
Metabolism
in
Cabbage:
Lab
Project
Page
121
of
150
Number:
90JH192.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Agrochemicals.
73
p.

171­
4A3
Nature
of
the
Residue
in
Livestock
MRID
42775801
Webb,
J.;
Allin,
R.;
Joseph,
R.
(
1993)
Napropamide:
Metabolism
of
Orally
Administered
Multiple
Doses
in
the
Lactating
Goat:
Lab
Project
Number:
91JH354:
RJ1388B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Agrochemicals
(
Jealotts
Hill,
Berkshire).
122
p.

42775802
Hurt,
A.;
Downey,
C.;
Joseph,
R.
(
1993)
Napropamide:
Metabolism
of
Orally
Administered
Multiple
Doses
in
the
Laying
Hen:
Lab
Project
Number:
92JH005:
RJ1408B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Agrochemicals
(
Jealotts
Hill,
Berkshire).
140
p.

830.1550
Product
Identity
and
composition
MRID
46105001
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Product
Identity
and
Composition,
Description
of
Materials
Used
to
Produce
the
Product,
Description
of
Production
Process,
Description
of
Formulation
Process,
and,
Discussion
of
Formulation
of
Impurities:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
MIDC
(
B­
27/
29).
58
p.

46142701
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide:
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide:
Product
Identity,
Composition
and
Analysis
(
Group
A).
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
016,
RAD86/
21,
RAD86/
22.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
United
Phosphorus
Inc.
65
p.

46459101
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Group
A:
Product
Identity
and
Composition
of
Devrinol
Technical.
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
19,
RRC/
87/
48,
3793.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Jai
Research
Foundation.
321
p.

830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
MRID
46105001
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Product
Identity
and
Composition,
Description
of
Materials
Used
to
Produce
the
Product,
Description
of
Production
Process,
Description
of
Formulation
Process,
and,
Discussion
of
Formulation
of
Impurities:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
MIDC
(
B­
27/
29).
58
p.

46142701
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide:
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide:
Product
Identity,
Composition
and
Analysis
(
Group
A).
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
016,
RAD86/
21,
RAD86/
22.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
United
Phosphorus
Inc.
65
p.

46459101
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Group
A:
Product
Identity
and
Composition
of
Devrinol
Technical.
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
19,
RRC/
87/
48,
3793.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Jai
Research
Foundation.
321
p.

830.1620
Description
of
production
process
MRID
46105001
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Product
Identity
and
Composition,
Description
of
Materials
Used
to
Produce
the
Page
122
of
150
Product,
Description
of
Production
Process,
Description
of
Formulation
Process,
and,
Discussion
of
Formulation
of
Impurities:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
MIDC
(
B­
27/
29).
58
p.

46459101
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Group
A:
Product
Identity
and
Composition
of
Devrinol
Technical.
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
19,
RRC/
87/
48,
3793.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Jai
Research
Foundation.
321
p.

830.1650
Description
of
formulation
process
MRID
46105001
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Product
Identity
and
Composition,
Description
of
Materials
Used
to
Produce
the
Product,
Description
of
Production
Process,
Description
of
Formulation
Process,
and,
Discussion
of
Formulation
of
Impurities:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
MIDC
(
B­
27/
29).
58
p.

46142701
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide:
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide:
Product
Identity,
Composition
and
Analysis
(
Group
A).
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
016,
RAD86/
21,
RAD86/
22.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
United
Phosphorus
Inc.
65
p.

830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
MRID
46105001
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Product
Identity
and
Composition,
Description
of
Materials
Used
to
Produce
the
Product,
Description
of
Production
Process,
Description
of
Formulation
Process,
and,
Discussion
of
Formulation
of
Impurities:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
MIDC
(
B­
27/
29).
58
p.

46142701
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide:
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide:
Product
Identity,
Composition
and
Analysis
(
Group
A).
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
016,
RAD86/
21,
RAD86/
22.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
United
Phosphorus
Inc.
65
p.

46459101
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Group
A:
Product
Identity
and
Composition
of
Devrinol
Technical.
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
19,
RRC/
87/
48,
3793.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Jai
Research
Foundation.
321
p.

830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
MRID
46338601
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Preliminary
Analysis
(
830.1700),
Ceterified
Limits
(
830.1750),
and,
Analytical
Methods
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
(
830.1800):
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101,
GCLQA/
SAL/
FB/
0115.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
71
p.

46459101
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Group
A:
Product
Identity
and
Composition
of
Devrinol
Technical.
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
19,
RRC/
87/
48,
3793.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Jai
Research
Foundation.
321
p.

830.1750
Certified
limits
Page
123
of
150
MRID
46142701
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide:
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide:
Product
Identity,
Composition
and
Analysis
(
Group
A).
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
016,
RAD86/
21,
RAD86/
22.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
United
Phosphorus
Inc.
65
p.

46338601
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Preliminary
Analysis
(
830.1700),
Ceterified
Limits
(
830.1750),
and,
Analytical
Methods
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
(
830.1800):
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101,
GCLQA/
SAL/
FB/
0115.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
71
p.

46459101
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Group
A:
Product
Identity
and
Composition
of
Devrinol
Technical.
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
19,
RRC/
87/
48,
3793.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Jai
Research
Foundation.
321
p.

830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
MRID
46142701
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide:
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide:
Product
Identity,
Composition
and
Analysis
(
Group
A).
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
016,
RAD86/
21,
RAD86/
22.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
United
Phosphorus
Inc.
65
p.

46338601
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Preliminary
Analysis
(
830.1700),
Ceterified
Limits
(
830.1750),
and,
Analytical
Methods
to
Verify
Certified
Limits
(
830.1800):
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Project
Number:
NAPRO/
101,
GCLQA/
SAL/
FB/
0115.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
71
p.

46459101
Tillman,
A.
(
2003)
Group
A:
Product
Identity
and
Composition
of
Devrinol
Technical.
Project
Number:
UPI/
2003/
19,
RRC/
87/
48,
3793.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Jai
Research
Foundation.
321
p.

830.6302
Color
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.6303
Physical
state
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.6304
Odor
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.
Page
124
of
150
830.6314
Oxidizing
or
reducing
action
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.6315
Flammability
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.6316
Explodability
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.6317
Storage
stability
of
product
MRID
46285601
Wo,
C.
(
2003)
Sotage
Stability
and
Corrosion
Characteristics
­
Interim
Report
­
12
Month:
Devrinol
EXP­
B1952­
1.
Project
Number:
P800UPI,
11972.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Product
Safety
Labs.
21
p.

830.6319
Miscibility
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
MRID
46285601
Wo,
C.
(
2003)
Sotage
Stability
and
Corrosion
Characteristics
­
Interim
Report
­
12
Month:
Devrinol
EXP­
B1952­
1.
Project
Number:
P800UPI,
11972.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Product
Safety
Labs.
21
p.

830.6321
Dielectric
breakdown
voltage
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.
Page
125
of
150
830.7000
pH
of
water
solutions
or
suspensions
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.7300
Density/
relative
density
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(
n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

830.7950
Vapor
pressure
MRID
46105003
Malte,
A.
(
2003)
Physical
Chemical
Properties:
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
266
p.

850.1010
Aquatic
invertebrate
acute
toxicity,
test,
freshwater
daphnids
MRID
46478704
Stewart,
K.;
Tapp,
J.;
Sankey,
S.;
et.
al.
(
1989)
Napropamide:
Determination
of
Chronic
Toxicity
to
Daphnia
magna.
Project
Number:
BL3709/
B,
S051/
C/
FT55/
89.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Imperial
Chemical
Industries,
Ltd.
26
p.

870.1100
Acute
oral
toxicity
MRID
46574101
Durando,
J.
(
2005)
Acute
Oral
Toxicity
Up
and
Down
Procedure
in
Rats:
Devrinol
2EC
Selective
Herbicide.
Project
Number:
17016,
P320/
UDP.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Product
Safety
Laboratories.
16
p.
Page
126
of
150
870.1200
Acute
dermal
toxicity
MRID
46574102
Durando,
J.
(
2005)
Acute
Dermal
Toxicity
Study
in
Rats
­
Limit
Test:
Devrinol
2EC
Selective
Herbicide.
Project
Number:
17476,
P322.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Product
Safety
Laboratories.
15
p.

870.1300
Acute
inhalation
toxicity
MRID
46494901
Sobotka,
F.
(
2005)
Acute
Toxicity
Study:
Selected
Studies
to
Fulfill
Guideline
Series
870
in
Accordance
with
40CFR
Parts
158.340.
Project
Number:
10965.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Indian
Institute
of
Toxicology.
37
p.

46574103
Durando,
J.
(
2005)
Acute
Inhalation
Toxicity
Study
in
Rats
­
Limit
Test:
Devrinol
2EC
Selective
Herbicide.
Project
Number:
17017,
P330.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Product
Safety
Laboratories.
22
p.

870.2400
Acute
eye
irritation
MRID
46302201
Merkel,
D.
(
2002)
Primary
Eye
Irritation
Study
in
Rabbits
(
Devrinol
EXP­
B1952­
1).
Project
Number:
11969.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Product
Safety
Labs,
Food
Products
Laboratory
and
New
Jersey
Laboratories.
17
p.

870.2500
Acute
dermal
irritation
MRID
46302202
Merkel,
D.
(
2002)
Devrinol
EXP­
B1952­
1:
Primary
Skin
Irritation
Study
in
Rabbits.
Project
Number:
11970,
P326.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Product
Safety
Labs,
Food
Products
Laboratory
and
New
Jersey
Laboratories.
16
p.

46494902
Sobotka,
F.
(
2005)
Acute
Toxicity
Study:
Selected
Studies
to
Fulfill
Guideline
Series
870
in
Accordance
with
40CFR
Parts
158.340.
Project
Number:
10966.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Indian
Institute
of
Toxicology.
26
p.

870.2600
Skin
sensitization
MRID
46553301
Durando,
J.
(
2005)
Dermal
Sensitization
Study
in
Guinea
Pigs
(
Buehler
Method):
Devrinol
2EC
Selective
Herbicide.
Project
Number:
P328,
17018.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Product
Safety
Laboratories.
23
p.

Non­
Guideline
Study
MRID
Page
127
of
150
2523
Collins,
W.
K.;
Hawks,
S.
N.,
Jr.;
Kittrell,
B.
U.;
Robertson,
R.
L.
(
1973)
Response
of
Flue­
Cured
Tobacco
to
Paarlan
in
Tank
Mixes
with
Certain
Insecticides
and/
or
Nematicides
in
1973.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jul
22,
1974
under
1471­
79;
prepared
by
North
Carolina
State
Univ.,
?
Agricultural
Extension
Service,
Dept.
of
Crop
Science
and
Entomology
Dept.|,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
024956­
B)

2531
Worsham,
A.
D.;
Rodriguez,
E.;
Lemons,
R.
(
1972)
Annual
Report
of
Tobacco
Weed
Control
Research
in
1971.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Jun
5,
1974
under
1471­
79;
prepared
by
North
Carolina
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Crop
Science,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
024954­
E)

2575
Ashton,
F.
M.;
Tisdell,
T.;
Neff,
B.
(
1970)
Evaluation
of
Herbicides
for
Vegetable
Crops­­
1970.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
6,
1972
under
2F1278;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California­­
Davis,
Dept.
of
Botany,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
092108­
AG)

2580
Keaton,
J.
A.
(
1971)
University
Research
Report:
January
11,
1970.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
6,
1972
under
2F1278;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
North
Carolina
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Horti­
cultural
Science,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
092108­
AN)

2633
Wilson,
H.
P.
(
1972)
1972
Weed
Science
Research
Summary:
Report
No.
36933.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Virginia
Truck
and
Ornamentals
Research
Sta­
tion,
Eastern
Shore
Branch,
Dept.
of
Plant
Physiology,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
H)

2635
Phatak,
S.
C.
(
1972)
Screening
Herbicides
for
Transplant
Tomatoes:
Report
No.
37106.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Horticultural
Experiment
Station,
?
Cana­
da|,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
J)

2637
Heeney,
H.
B.;
Warren,
V.
(
1972)
Bay
94337
in
Combination
with
Other
Herbicides
on
Tomato
Transplants:
Report
No.
37128.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
C.
D.
A.
Research
Station,
?
Canada|,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
L)

2646
Agamalian,
H.
(
1973)
Report
of
Planned
Work
Accomplished:
Selective
Herbicides
in
Vegetables
(
Tomatoes):
Report
No.
38169.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California,
(
Agricultural)
Extension
(
Service),
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
Z)

2651
Squire,
S.
W.
(
1972)
Herbicides
on
Transplanted
Tomatoes,
1972:
Report
No.
38596.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Campbell
Soup
Co.,
Ltd.,
(
Canada),
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
AE)

2659
Schweers,
V.
H.
(
1973)
Fresh
Market
Transplant
Tomatoes:
Weed
Control
Trial­­
Hotcapped:
Report
No.
39493.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California,
(
Agricultural
Extension
Service),
Tulare
County
Farm
Advisor
in
cooperation
with
Majarian
Brothers,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
AM)

2666
Putnam,
A.
R.;
Love,
A.
P.;
Pagano,
G.;
Rice,
R.
P.,
Jr.
(
1974)
Horticultural
Report:
Number
22:
Page
128
of
150
Weed
Control
Research­­
1973:
Report
No.
40067.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Michigan
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Horticulture,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
AI)

2675
Barrentine,
W.
L.
(
1973)
Herbicide
Evaluation
for
Weed
Control
in
Selected
Vegetable
Crops:
Report
No.
41300.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
?
Mississippi
State
Univ.
of
Applied
Arts
and
Sciences|,
Delta
Branch
Experi­
ment
Station,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BF)

2677
Squire,
S.
W.
(
1973)
Herbicides
on
Transplanted
Tomatoes,
1973:
Report
No.
42287.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Campbell
Soup
Co.,
Ltd.,
?
Canada|,
submit­
ted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BJ)

2678
Phatak,
S.
C.
(
1973)
Metribuzin
Programs
and
Mixtures
with
Other
Herbicides
for
Transplant
Tomatoes:
Report
No.
42296.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Horticultural
Experiment
Station,
?
Canada|,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BK)

2682
Squire,
S.
W.
(
1973)
Herbicides
for
Seeded
Tomatoes,
1973:
Report
No.
42319.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Campbell
Soup
Co.,
Ltd.,
?
Canada|,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BQ)

2686
Heeney,
H.
B.;
Warren,
V.
(
1974)
Metribuzin
in
Combination
with
Other
Herbicides
on
Tomatoes:
Report
No.
42562.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Smith­
field
Experimental
Farm,
?
Canada|,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BU)

2688
Heeney,
H.
B.;
Warren,
V.
(
1973)
Metribuzin
in
Combination
with
Other
Herbicides
on
Tomato
Transplants:
Report
No.
42591.
(
Un­
published
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
OMAF,
Smithfield
Experimental
Farm,
?
Canada|,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BW)

2691
Heeney,
H.
B.;
Warren,
V.
(
1973)
Weed
Control
in
Direct
Seeded
Tomatoes:
Report
No.
42616.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Smithfield
Experimental
Farm,
(
Canada),
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BZ)

2693
Phatak,
S.
C.;
Bouw,
W.
J.
(
1974)
Metribuzin
and
Mixtures
for
Field­
Seeded
Tomatoes:
Report
No.
42628.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Horticultural
Experiment
Station,
?
Canada|,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricul­
tural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
CB)

2761
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1975)
Tillam
6­
E/
Paarlan
6­
E
Tank­
Mix
Residue
Data
on
Tobacco.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jul
19,
1976
under
476­
1615;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Morse
Labora­
tories,
Inc.;
CDL:
225188­
B)

3251
Nickeson,
R.
L.
(
1973)
Chemagro
Herbicide
Evaluation
Form:
Report
No.
40293.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Campbell
Institute
for
Agricultural
Research
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemi­
cals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
AX)
Page
129
of
150
3255
Squire,
S.
W.
(
1973)
Observation
Herbicides
for
Seeded
Tomatoes,
1973:
Report
No.
42317.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Campbell
Soup
Co.,
Ltd.,
?
Canada|,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BO)

3256
Squire,
S.
W.
(
1973)
Observation
Herbicides
on
Seeded
Tomatoes,
1973:
Report
No.
42318.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
6,
1976
under
3125­
277;
prepared
by
Campbell
Soup
Co.,
Ltd.,
?
Canada|,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Agricultural
Chemicals
Div.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
224187­
BP)

3410
South,
D.;
Crowley,
R.
H.;
Gjerstad,
D.
H.
(
1976)
Recent
herbicide
weed
control
results
in
pine
seedbeds.
Proceedings
of
the
Southern
Weed
Science
Society
29(?
):
300­
308.
(
Also~
In~
unpublished
submission
received
Oct
8,
1976
under
2224­
50;
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Industrial
Chemicals,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
226306­
A)

3411
Gjerstad,
D.
H.;
South,
D.
B.
(
1975)
Supporting
Data
for
Application
for
Registration
of:
Amex­
820,
Devrinol,
Modown,
Devrinol
50WP
/
Modown
80WP­­
Tank
Mix,
Enide
50WP
/
Modown
80WP­­
Tank
Mix:
For
Weed
Control
in
Pine
Seedbeds.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
8,
1976
under
2224­
50;
prepared
by
Auburn
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Forestry
in
cooperation
with
U.
S.
Forest
Service,
State
and
Private
Forestry,
Southeastern
Area,
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Industrial
Chemicals,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
226306­
C)

3528
Currin,
R.
E.;
Pitner,
J.
B.;
Benton,
D.
A.;
Stephens,
R.
L.;
Ford,
Z.
T.
(
1977)
Tobacco
Herbicide
Evaluation­­
1977.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Feb
9,
1978
under
2224­
50;
prepared
by
?
Clemson
Univ.|,
Pee
Dee
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Industrial
Chemicals,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
232880­
C)

3542
Stewart,
R.
E.;
Weatherly,
H.
G.
(
1978)
Evaluation
of
Six
Herbicides
for
Weed
Control
in
Pacific
Coast
Forest
Nurseries.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Apr
11,
1978
under
WA
78/
12;
prepared
by
U.
S.
Forest
Service,
Div.
of
Timber
Management
Research,
a
Forestry
Sciences
Laboratory,
submitted
by
?;
CDL:
235638­
B)

12044
IR­
4
Project
at
Rutgers,
the
State
University
(
1973)
1973
Herbicide
Evaluation
on
Rabbiteye
Blueberries.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Dec
19,
1975
under
6E1719;
CDL:
095364­
H)

12078
Appleby,
A.
P.
(
1974)
Winter
and
Summer
Annual
Weed
Control.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Dec
3,
1975
under
6F1713;
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Inc.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
095184­
U)

12109
Ahrens,
J.
F.
(
1971)
Summary
of
Herbicide
Trials
in
Apple
Orchards
and
in
Strawberry
Plantings­
­
1970.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
18,
1973
under
100­
437;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
Connecticut,
Agricultural
Experiment
Station,
Valley
Laboratory
in
coopera­
tion
with
Chevron
Chemical
Co.,
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greensboro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
000242­
D)

12117
Foy,
C.
L.;
Witt,
H.
L.
(
1971)
Fruit:
Evaluation
of
Herbicides
for
Weed
Control
in
Apple
Seedlings­­
Blacksburg,
Virginia.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jan
18,
1973
under
100­
437;
prepared
by
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiology,
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greens­
boro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
000242­
L)

12143
Skroch,
W.
A.;
Hunt,
I.
(
1958?)
Weed
Control
in
Bearing
Peaches.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
18,
1973
under
100­
437;
prepared
by
North
Carolina
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Horticultural
Science,
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greensboro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
000242­
AN)
Page
130
of
150
12151
Foy,
C.
L.;
Witt,
H.
L.
(
1971)
Fruit:
Evaluation
of
Herbicides
for
Weed
Control
in
Bearing
Peaches­­
One
Year
after
Treatment.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Jan
18,
1973
under
100­
437;
prepared
by
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiology,
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greens­
boro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
000242­
AW)

12357
Daniell,
J.
W.
(
19??)
Pecan
herbicides.
Pecan
South
?
(?
):
10­
12.
(
Also~
In~
unpublished
submission
received
Jan
11,
1978
under
352­
317;
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
096709­
N)

12359
Aitken,
J.
B.
(
1973)
Pecan
Herbicides
Evaluation.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
11,
1978
under
352­
317;
prepared
by
Clemson
Univ.,
Sandhill
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
096709­
Q)

12361
Aitken,
J.
B.
(
1975)
Weed
Control
System
in
Young
Pecan
Trees.
(
In­
complete
study;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
11,
1978
under
352­
317;
prepared
by
Clemson
Univ.,
Sandhill
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
096709­
S)

12362
Aitken,
J.
B.
(
1976)
Herbicides
in
Pecans.
(
Incomplete
study;
un­
published
study
received
Jan
11,
1978
under
352­
317;
prepared
by
Clemson
Univ.,
Sandhill
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
096709­
T)

12411
Fisher,
B.
B.;
Sorensen,
C.,
Jr.
(
1970)
Peach
Weed
Control
Trial.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
17,
1973
under
352­
374;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
026721­
K)

12413
Aitken,
J.
B.
(
1971)
Chemical
Weed
Control
Research
in
Horticultural
Crops,
1971.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
17,
1973
under
352­
374;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
Florida,
Agricultural
Research
and
Education
Center
at
Quincy,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
026721­
M)

12414
Aitken,
J.
B.
(
1972)
Chemical
Weed
Control
Research
in
Horticultural
Crops,
1972.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
17,
1973
under
352­
374;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
Florida,
Agricultural
Research
and
Education
Center
at
Quincy,
submitted
by
E.
I.
du
Pont
de
Nemours
&
Co.,
Wilmington,
Del.;
CDL:
026721­
N)

17897
McFarlane,
W.
(
1972)
Almond
Weed
Control
Trial:
Al.
Fr.
70­
12.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AO)

17898
Fischer,
B.
B.
(
1973)
Annual
Weed
Control
in
Young
Almonds.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AP)

17899
Elmore,
C.
L.;
Holmberg,
D.
M.;
Roncoroni,
E.
J.;
et
al.
(
1972)
Annual
Weed
Control
in
Almonds­
­
2nd
Year
Evaluation.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AR)

17900
Jensen,
?
(
1972)
?
Efficacy
of
Various
Herbicides
on
Almonds|.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AS)

17901
Foy,
C.
L.;
Witt,
H.
L.
(
1972)
Residual
Herbicides
(
Winter
Applica­
tion)
For
Weed
Control
in
Page
131
of
150
Bearing
Apples­­
Gore,
Virginia.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
prepared
by
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiology,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AT)

17902
Foy,
C.
L.;
Witt,
H.
L.
(
1972)
Residual
Herbicides
(
Spring
Applica­
tion)
for
Weed
Control
in
Bearing
Apples­­
Gore,
Virginia.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
prepared
by
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiology,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AU)

17903
Klosterboer,
A.
(
19??)
Field
Screening
of
Herbicides
in
Texas
Cit­
rus.
(
Unpublished
study
including
letter
dated
Jul
6,
1973
from
C.
D.
Hobbs
to
C.
E.
Moore,
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
prepared
by
Texas
A
&
I
Univ.,
Citrus
Institute,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AX)

17904
Eli
Lilly
and
Company
(
1973)
Peach
Weed
Control
Trial.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AY)

17905
Fischer,
B.
B.
(
1973)
Annual
Weed
Control
in
Peach
Trees.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
AZ)

17906
Eli
Lilly
and
Company
(
1973)
Peach
Weed
Control
Trial
Evaluation.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
BA)

17909
Foy,
C.
L.;
Witt,
H.
L.
(
1972)
Residual
Herbicides
(
Winter
Applica­
tion)
for
Weed
Control
in
Bearing
Peaches­­
Gore,
Virginia.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
prepared
by
Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute
and
State
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Plant
Pathology
and
Physiology,
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
BE)

17910
Elmore,
C.
L.;
Morehead,
G.
W.;
Roncoroni,
E.
J.;
et
al.
(
1973)
Weed
Control
in
Pears­­
2nd
Year
Evaluation.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
BF)

17914
Schweers,
V.;
Sibbett,
S.;
LaRue,
J.;
et
al.
(
1972)
Weed
Control
in
Prunes,
Plums
and
Nectarines.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
BK)

17915
Schweers,
V.
H.;
LaRue,
J.;
Lange,
A.
(
1973)
Weed
Control
in
Decid­
uous
Trees.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
BL)

17916
Elmore,
C.
L.;
Holmberg,
D.;
Roncoroni,
E.;
et
al.
(
1972)
Annual
Weed
Control
in
Walnuts.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
BM)

17917
Elmore,
C.
L.;
Holmberg,
D.
M.;
Roncoroni,
E.
J.
(
1973)
Retreatment
of
Hartley
and
Ashley
Walnuts
in
Yolo
County.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
1,
1974
under
5G1563;
submitted
by
Elanco
Products
Co.,
Div.
of
Eli
Lilly
and
Co.,
Indianapolis,
Ind.;
CDL:
094565­
BO)
Page
132
of
150
21655
Ryker,
R.
A.
(
1979)
Western
Forest
Tree
Nursery
Herbicide
Study,
Rocky
Mountain­­
Great
Basin
Segment:
Progress
Report
for
1978.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
18,
1979
under
CO
79/
26;
pre­
pared
by
U.
S.
Forest
Service,
Intermountain
Forest
and
Range
Experiment
Station,
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
241002­
D)

21656
Stewart,
R.
E.;
Owstan,
P.
W.;
Weatherly,
H.
G.
(
1978)
Evaluation
of
six
herbicides
for
weed
control
in
pacific
coast
forest
nurser­
ies.
Pages
B.
127­
133,~
In~
Proceedings
of
the
Western
Forest
Nursery
Council
and
Intermountain
Nurseryman's
Association;
Aug
1978,
Eureka,
California.
?:
U.
S.
Forest
Service,
(
Also~
In~
unpublished
submission
received
Sep
18,
1979
under
CO
79/
26;
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
241002­
E)

21657
Trappe,
J.
M.
(
1977)
Progress
Report:
Effects
of
Three
Herbicides
on
Mycorrhiza
Development
of
Douglas­
Fir
and
Ponderosa
Pine
Seed­
lings
in
Western
Nurseries.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
18,
1979
under
CO
79/
26;
prepared
by
U.
S.
Forest
Service,
Pacific
Northwest
Forest
and
Range
Experiment
Station,
Forestry
Sciences
Laboratory,
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
241002­
G)

23229
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
Tomato
Phytotoxicity:
Devrinol
+
Tillam­­
Tomatoes
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
101113­
E)

23874
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
Citrus
Phytotoxicity.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028423­
A)

23875
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
Devrinol
&
Devrinol
+
Paraquat­­
Grape
Phototoxicity.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028423­
B)

23876
Cannon,
J.
L.;
Smith,
V.;
McAfee,
K.
H.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
4
Lbs.
A.
I./
A.
on
Grapefruit,
Lemons
and
Tangerines
in
California/
Arizona
and
Oranges
in
Arizona.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
pre­
pared
in
cooperation
with
Lemoniera
Co.
and
Reedley
College,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028423­
C)

23878
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
Devrinol
+
Simazine­­
Almond
Phyto­
toxicity.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028423­
E)

23879
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
Devrinol­­
Citrus
Phytotoxicity.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028423­
F)

23880
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
Grape
Phytotoxicity.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028423­
G)

23881
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
Peach
Phytotoxicity.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028423­
H)

23882
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
Plum
(
Prunes)
Phytotoxicity.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028423­
I)

23884
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
Devrinol
+
Simazine
Performance
Summary.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028423­
K)

23933
kin,
G.;
Brendler,
R.;
Schweers,
V.
H.;
et
al.
(
1972)
Devrinol­­
Transplanted
Tomatoes­­
California:
Tomato
Phytotoxicity.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
C.&
S.
Ananian
and
Majarian
Brothers,
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Page
133
of
150
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
121774­
B)

24932
Owston,
P.
W.;
Weatherly,
H.
G.
(
1979)
Semi­
operational
Trials
of
Three
Herbicides
in
Pacific
Coast
Forest
Nurseries.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Sep
18,
1979
under
CO
79/
26;
prepared
by
U.
S.
Forest
Service,
Pacific
Northwest
Forest
and
Range
Experi­
ment
Station,
Forestry
Sciences
Laboratory,
submitted
by
Mobil
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Va.;
CDL:
241002­
F)

25306
Layton,
J.;
Maltby,
R.;
Barnes,
J.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Microencapsulated
Eptam
Weed
Control
Summary.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
7,
1975
under
unknown
admin.
no.;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225855­
B)

25405
Ciba­
Geigy
Corporation
(
1973)
?
Weed
Control
Using
Simazine
and
Oth­
er
Herbicides
on
Apples,
Grapes,
and
Peaches|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jul
9,
1974
under
100­
526;
CDL:
023041­
A)

25407
Kappos,
S.;
Leonardini,
P.
W.;
Tooldian,
G.;
et
al.
(
1972)
Index
of
Crop
Tolerance
Reports
for
Devrinol
on
Deciduous
Fruit.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jun
1,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
in
co­
operation
with
various
growers
in
the
state
of
California,
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091007­
A)

25408
Kappos,
S.;
Dickel,
C.
P.;
McAfee,
K.
H.;
et
al.
(
1972)
Index
of
Per­
formance
Reports
Supporting
Weed
Additions
to
Devrinol
50­
WP
La­
bel.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Nov
6,
1972
under
2F1194;
pre­
pared
in
cooperation
with
various
growers
in
the
state
of
Cali­
fornia,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091007­
B)

25881
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1979)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
and
Nature
of
the
Residue,
and
Analytical
Methodology
for
Devrinol(
R).
Summary
of
studies
099218­
D
through
099218­
M.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
099218­
C)

25891
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1979)
Reasonable
Grounds
in
Support
of
the
Petition:
Devrinol^(
R)
I.
Summary
of
studies
099218­
E
through
099218­
M,
099218­
P
and
099218­
R.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
099218­
N)

25892
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1978)
Evidence
Regarding
the
Safety
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical
Devrinol^(
R)
I
to
Fish
and
Wildlife.
Sum­
mary
of
studies
099218­
P
through
099218­
S.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
099218­
O)

25896
Heitmuller,
T.
(
1976)
Acute
Toxicity
of
Devrinol
to
Embryos
of
Eastern
Oysters
(?~
Crassostrea
virginica~?),
to
Pink
Shrimp
(?~
Penaeus
duorarum~?),
and
to
Fiddler
Crabs
(~?
Uca
pugila­
?~
tor~?).
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
prepared
by
Bionomics,
EG&
G,
Inc.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
S)

25897
Cunningham,
B.
C.;
Goodman,
N.;
Rockhold,
D.
R.
(
1979)
Effect
of
Dev­
rinol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbicide
(
2­(
alpha­
Napthoxy)­
N,
N­
diethyl­
propionamide)
on
Soil
Microorganisms:
WRC
79­
24.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
29,
1980
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
099218­
T)

26648
Chappell,
?;
Parochetti,
J.
V.;
Watson,
M.;
et
al.
(
1967)
Summary
Analysis
of
Field
Test
Data
for
Tillam
6E
Applied
Pre­
transplant
by
Incorporation
To
Expand
the
Tobacco
Registration
from
North
Carolina
to
the
Entire
United
States.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Feb
5,
1968
under
8F0628;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Canada,
Dept.
of
Agriculture,
Experiment
Farm,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
090823­
A)
Page
134
of
150
26724
Benson,
A.;
Baxter,
M.;
Cates,
M.
D.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Devrinol
50
WP
Use
on
Tomatoes|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Illinois
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225549­
A)

26728
Lake,
B.
H.;
Goza,
A.;
Gerhold,
J.
F.;
et
al.
(
1973)
?
Devrinol
50
WP
and
2­
E
Use
on
Peppers|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Rich­
mond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225549­
E)

27318
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Residue
Chemistry:
Summary
of
Volume
Contents.
Summary
of
studies
225547­
A
through
225547­
J.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
225547­
A)

27324
Worsham,
A.
D.;
Newman,
R.
C.;
Olive,
R.;
et
al.
(
1976)
Residue
Studies
Summary:
Tillam
+
Devrinol
on
Tobacco.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
coopera­
tion
with
Univ.
of
Wisconsin,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225547­
G)

27325
Worsham,
A.
D.
(
1975)
Information
on
Tobacco
Samples
for
Smoke
Panel
Evaluation.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
by
North
Carolina
State
Univ.,
Crop
Science
Dept.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225547­
H)

27371
Sandoz,
Incorporated
(
1974)
Summary
Tables
of
Efficacy
and
Safety
of
Solicam
80
WP
in
Apricots,
Nectarines,
Peaches,
Plums,
Prunes,
Almonds,
and
Walnuts.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
14,
1975
under
11273­
EX­
9;
CDL:
224650­
E)

27372
Sandoz,
Incorporated
(
1974)
General
Remarks.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
14,
1975
under
11273­
EX­
9;
CDL:
224650­
F)

28798
Tavenner,
H.
(
1974)
Crop
Residue
Studies
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
4
Lbs.
a.
i./
A
on
Grapes
in
the
Pacific
Northwest.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
coopera­
tion
with
Oregon
State
Univ.,
North
Willamette
Experiment
Sta­
tion
and
Snake
River
Vineyards,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
001019­
D)

28823
Dumlao,
S.;
Vierra,
M.
(
1970)
?
Efficacy
Data
for
Prefar
on
Various
Crops|:
Test
No.
H­
66­
Se­
70.
(
Unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
H­
152­
SE­
70,
H­
117­
SE­
70
and
H­
172­
SE­
70,
received
Jan
25,
1972
under
476­
2004;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Purex
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
003867­
F)

30954
Maltby,
R.;
Skiles,
R.;
Duerkson,
C.
J.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Efficacy
of
Devrinol
and
Other
Herbicides
on
Ornamentals|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
5,
1975
under
476­
2173;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California­­
Davis
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
221820­
A)

31350
Agamalian,
H.
(
1973)
Herbicides
for
Lima
Beans.
(
Unpublished
study
including
submitter
summary,
received
Jul
11,
1973
under
707­
98;
submitted
by
Rohm
&
Haas
Co.,
Philadelphia,
Pa.;
CDL:
120403­
U)

31353
Lange,
A.
H.;
Megallanos,
D.;
Brendler,
R.
A.
(
1971)
Field
Trial
Progress
Report
7107:
Herbicide
Residue
Trial,
Ventura
College.
(
Unpublished
study
including
submitter
summary,
received
Jul
11,
1973
under
707­
98;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California,
Agricultural
Extension
Service,
submitted
by
Rohm
&
Haas
Co.,
Philadelphia,
Pa.;
CDL:
120403­
X)
Page
135
of
150
31751
Layton,
J.;
Stevenson,
V.
C.;
Sheets,
A.;
et
al.
(
1976)
?
Weed
Con­
trol
in
Strawberries
with
Devrinol
2­
E
and
Devrinol
50
WP|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
C)

31756
Wright,
J.;
Maltby,
R.;
Andrews,
H.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Weed
Control
in
Tobacco
with
Devrinol|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Tennessee,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
H)

31758
Wright,
J.;
Maltby,
R.;
Dennis,
S.;
et
al.
(
1975)
?
Weed
Control
in
Tobacco
with
Devrinol
+
Tillam
Tank
Mix|.
Summary
of
studies
225548­
H
and
225548­
I.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Virginia
Polytech­
nic
Institute,
Dept.
of
Plant
Physiology,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
J)

31759
Gerhold,
J.;
Worsham,
A.
D.;
Jeffery,
L.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Weed
Con­
trol
in
Tobacco
with
Devrinol
+
Tillam
Tank
Mix|.
Summary
of
studies
225548­
H
and
225548­
I.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Sep
7,
1976
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Kentucky,
Agronomy
Dept.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
225548­
K)

31942
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
Crop
Tolerance
Summary
for
Dev­
rinol
50­
W
on
Figs.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
21,
1975
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
101096­
B)

31944
Kemper?
sic|,
H.
M.;
Rose,
E.;
Fisher,
B.;
et
al.
(
1975)
Crop
Toler­
ance
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Pistachios.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
21,
1975
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California,
Agricultural
Extension
Service,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101096­
D)

31945
Lange,
A.
H.;
Stevenson,
G.;
Schlesselman,
J.
(
1974)
Crop
Tolerance
Summary
for
Devrinol
50­
W
on
Walnuts.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Mar
21,
1975
under
476­
2108;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chem­
ical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
101096­
E)

32298
Rohm
and
Haas
Company
(
1975)
Biological
Efficacy
Data.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jul
2,
1975
under
707­
EX­
79;
CDL:
210025­)

32354
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
and
Nature
of
the
Residue,
and
Analytical
Methodology:
Dev­
rinol^(
R)
I.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
CDL:
093855­
A)

32493
Brookman,
D.
J.;
Ja,
B.
Y.
(
1973)
Analysis
of
50W
and
2E
Formulations
of
Devrinol^(
R)
I.
Method
no.
WRC
73­
25
dated
Apr
5,
1973.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
008951­
B)

32551
Clemens,
T.;
Rose,
E.;
Cannon,
J.
L.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Supplementary
Crop
Tolerance
Data
for
Devrinol
50­
WP
on
Pecans
in
Arizona
and
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
1,
1974
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Farmers
Investment
Co.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093856­
D)

32554
Leach,
J.;
Clemens,
T.;
Waits,
E.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol
50­
WP
Performance
Summary.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Oct
1,
1974
under
4F1447;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Glenn
Curtis
Co.
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093856­
G)

32567
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
Devrinol
50W
on
Grapes
in
the
Pacific
Northwest:
Grape
Phytotoxicity.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028421­
D)
Page
136
of
150
32569
Deichler,
?;
Jenkins,
?
(
1974)
Devrinol
50W
on
Grapes
in
the
Pacific
Northwest:
Barnyardgrass
Control.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028421­
F)

32570
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
?
Phytotoxicity:
Devrinol|.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028421­
G)

33176
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
?
Phytotoxicity
in
Fruits|.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
000836­
A)

33177
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1973)
?
Efficacy
Summary|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
000836­
D)

33959
Kappos,
S.;
Hardman,
N.
F.;
Riddle,
R.;
et
al.
(
1974)
?
Efficacy
of
Herbicides
on
Various
Crops|:
Test
No.
H­
8­
RGH­
72.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
including
test
nos.
H­
9­
RGH­
72,
H­
10­
RGH­
72,
H­
11­
RGH­
72...,
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Luchessa
Brothers
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
028312­
A)

33962
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
Tomato
Phytotoxicity:
Devrinol
+
Tillam­­
Tomatoes
in
California.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2150;
CDL:
028312­
F)

34224
Zaput,
P.;
Leach,
J.;
Hamilton,
K.
C.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Devrinol
50W­­
Paraquat
2E.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
17,
1974
under
476­
2108;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Arizona,
submit­
ted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
000836­
C)

35661
Simons,
R.
(
19??)
Chemical
Stability
of
Devrinol^(
R)
I
4­
F.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
A)

35662
Foster,
L.
C.;
Kahn,
B.
B.;
Lisowski,
G.
T.;
et
al.
(
1980)
Determina­
tion
of
Napropamide
in
Devrinol(
R)
4F
Formulations
by
Gas
Chromatography.
Method
no.
RRC
80­
05
dated
May
22,
1980.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
B)

35670
De
Guzman,
D.;
Dorman,
D.;
Currin,
R.
E.,
III;
et
al.
(
1979)
Devri­
nol^(
R)
I
Selective
Herbicide:
Summary
of
Crop
Residue
Data
on
Tobacco.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
242620­
L)

35671
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1979)
?
Devrinol
4F:
Crop
Tolerance
and
Weed
Control
Summaries|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
M)

35674
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1978)
Acute
Oral
Toxicity­­
Rats:
14­
Day
Test
Period.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
P)

35679
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1978)
Acute
Dermal
Toxicity­­
Rabbits:
14­
Day
Test
Period.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
Y)

35680
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1978)
Primary
Dermal
Irritation­­
Rab­
bits:
72
Hour
Test
Period.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
Z)

35681
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1978)
Primary
Eye
Irritation­­
Rabbits:
7­
Day
Test
Period.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
AA)

38278
Rice,
R.
E.;
Dibble,
J.
E.;
Jones,
R.
A.;
et
al.
(
1974)
Insecticides
and
timing
sprays
for
control
of
Page
137
of
150
San
Jose
scale.
California
Agriculture
28(
4):
3.
(
Also~
In~
unpublished
submission
received
Jun
26,
1974
under
100­
501;
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greensboro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
094034­
V)

39768
Miller,
J.;
Crandall,
?;
Phillips,
M.;
et
al.
(
1972)
Crop
Residue
Report:
Soil:
FSDS
No.
B­
0493.
(
Unpublished
study
including
FSDS
nos.
B­
0495,
B­
0494,
B­
0496...,
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
U.
S.
Dept.
of
Agriculture
and
others,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
E)

39769
Riggs,
R.
L.;
Humphreys,
R.;
MacLaren,
G.
(
1972)
Waylay
(
R­
7465)
Run­
Off
Study:
Soil,
Water,
Silt,
Fish
Residues.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
F)

39770
Williamson,
T.
B.;
Thomas,
V.
M.;
Freiberg,
A.
H.
(
1972)
Effect
of
Devrinol^(
R)
I
?
2­
(
alphaNaphthoxy)
N,
N­
diethylpropionamide|
on
the
Growth
of
Certain
Beneficial
Soil
Microorganisms.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
G)

39774
Sleight,
B.
H.,
III;
Macek,
K.
J.
(
1972)
Exposure
of
Fish
to
14C­
Labeled
Devrinol:
Accumulation,
Distribution
and
Elimination
of
Residues.
(
Unpublished
study
including
letter
dated
Nov
10,
1972
from
K.
J.
Macek
to
George
Meyding,
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Bionomics,
Inc.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
K)

39776
Kamienski,
F.
X.;
Bullock,
C.
H.;
MacLaren,
G.;
et
al.
(
1971)
R­
7465
Feed
Study­­
Quail
Tissue
Residues:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
1664.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
14,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
093519­
M)

40136
Heinritz,
D.
W.;
Below,
J.
F.
(
1971)
The
Determination
of
R­
7465
in
Technical
Material
and
in
Wettable
Formulations:
RR
68­
14R.
Method
dated
Mar
22,
1968.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
20,
1971
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
095554­
C)

40138
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Chemical
Stability
of
Waylay
50­
WP.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
20,
1971
under
2F1194;
CDL:
095554­
E)

40139
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Reasonable
Grounds
in
Support
of
the
Petition:
?
Waylay|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Aug
20,
1971
under
2F1194;
CDL:
095554­
F)

42790
Phillips,
R.;
Monaco,
T.
J.;
Lange,
A.
H.;
et
al.
(
1971)
?
Efficacy
Experiments
with
Waylay
in
Tree
Fruits,
Nuts,
Grapes,
Tomatoes|.
(
Reports
by
various
sources;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091009­
A)

49479
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Summary:
?
Waylay|.
Summary
of
studies
091006­
B
through
091006­
N.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
A)

49491
MacLaren,
G.
E.
(
1971)
Determination
of
R­
7465
Residues
in
Soil:
WRC
71­
30.
Method
dated
May
18,
1971.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
091006­
M)

49492
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1971)
Crop
Residue
Report:
?
R­
7465
50W|:
FSDS
No.
B­
2228.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
including
FSDS
no.
B­
2601,
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
N)

49493
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Waylay^(
TM)
I
Environmental
Stud­
ies.
Summary
of
studies
Page
138
of
150
091006­
P
through
091006­
S.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
May
5,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091006­
O)

55024
Li,
R.
T.
(
1980)
Determination
of
Napropamide
in
Devrinol^(
R)
1I
Selective
Herbicide
2G
and
5G
Formulations
by
Gas
Chromatog­
raphy.
Method
no.
WRC
80­
13
dated
Dec
1,
1980.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Dec
30,
1980
under
476­
2202;
submitted
by
Stauf­
fer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
244052­
A)

55026
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
?
Efficacy
of
Herbicides
in
Weed
Control
on
Apples
and
Other
Crops|.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Dec
30,
1980
under
476­
2202;
CDL:
244052­
C)

57803
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1976)
Chemical
Stability
Data:
Devrinol
2­
E.
(
Unpublished
study
received
May
27,
1977
under
476­
2174;
CDL:
230294­
C)

57804
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Devrinol
2­
E­­
Fish
and
Wildlife
Studies.
Summary
of
studies
230293­
B
and
230293­
C.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
May
27,
1977
under
476­
2174;
CDL:
230293­
A)

61723
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1975)
?
Devrinol:
Herbicidal
Efficacy
Trials|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1977
under
476­
2175;
CDL:
229651­
A)

61726
Hudek,
R.
D.
(
1977)
Letter
sent
to
G.
S.
Kurimoto
dated
Jan
17,
1977:
Devrinol
50
W
long
term
storage.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
27,
1977
under
476­
2175;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229649­
D)

65356
Allochuku,
G.
C.
(
1976)
Determination
of
Devrinol(
R)
in
Devrinol
10­
G
Formulations
by
Gas
Chromatography.
Method
no.
RRC
76­
13
dated
Mar
4,
1976.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
229230­
C)

65357
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1976?)
Summary
of
Toxicology
Data.
Summary
of
studies
229229­
B
and
229229­
C.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
CDL:
229229­
A)

65361
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1975)
Summary
of
Performance
Data.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Mar
28,
1977
under
476­
2184;
CDL:
229226­
A)

67871
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Summary
of
Residue
Reports
for
Tillam
6­
E^(
R)
I/
Devrinol^(
R)
I
4­
F
Tank
Mix
on
Tobacco.
(
Compi­
lation;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
26,
1981
under
476­
1615;
CDL:
244253­
F)

67874
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Tillam^(
R)
I
6­
E/
Dyfonate^(
R)
I
4­
E/
Devrinol^(
R)
I
(
50­
WP
or
4­
F)
Tank
Mix
and
Tillam^(
R)
I
6­
E/
Dev­
rinol^(
R)
I
4­
F
Tank
Mix:
Field
Performance
Summary.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jan
26,
1981
under
476­
1615;
CDL:
244253­
J)

69569
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
Summary
of
Residue
Reports
for
Tillam
6­
E^(
R)
I/
Devrinol^(
R)
I/
Dyfonate^(
R)
I
Tank
Mix
on
Tobacco.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
26,
1981
under
476­
1615;
CDL:
244253­
H)

70783
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
?
Efficacy
of
Devrinol
on
Trees
and
Vines|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
11,
1980
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
243859­
F)

70813
Brookman,
D.
J.;
Ja,
B.
Y.
(
1973)
Analysis
of
50W
and
2E
Formulations
of
Devrinol^(
R)
I.
Method
no.
WRC
73­
25
dated
Apr
5,
1973.
(
Un­
published
study
received
Oct
16,
1973
under
476­
2150;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
221951­
B)
Page
139
of
150
72402
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
?
Devrinol
on
Ornamentals,
Fruit
Trees
and
Strawberries:
Crop
Tolerance
&
Weed
Control
Summary|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Mar
2,
1981
under
476­
2205;
CDL:
244467­
C)

79045
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Evidence
Regarding
the
Safety
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical
Devrinol^(
R)
I.
(
Unpublished
study
re­
ceived
Jul
22,
1981
under
476­
2188;
CDL:
070204­
A)

79046
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
19??)
Reasonable
Grounds
in
Support:
?
Devrinol|.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jul
22,
1981
under
476­
2188;
CDL:
070204­
B)

79333
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1981)
?
Efficacy
of
Devrinol
in
Various
Crops|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
24,
1981
under
476­
2108;
CDL:
245345­
A)

81612
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1978?)
Reports
and
References
Regard­
ing
the
Safety
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical
Devrinol^(
R)
I.
Summary
of
studies
098861­
B,
098861­
C,
098862­
B
and
098862­
C.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Aug
1,
1979
under
9E2244;
CDL:
098861­
A)

88058
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1974)
Storage
Stability:
Tillam/
Devrinol
4:
1­
E.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
CDL:
227694­
E)

88059
Allochuku,
G.
C.
(
1976)
Assay
of
Tillam/
Devrinol
4­
1E
by
Gas
Chroma­
tography.
Method
no.
RRC
76­
12
dated
Mar
10,
1976.
(
Unpub­
lished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227694­
F)

88060
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1976)
?
Residue
Data
for
Various
Combi­
nations
of
Tillam
and
Devrinol|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
CDL:
227695­
A)

88061
Worsham,
A.
D.
(
1975)
Information
on
Tobacco
Samples
for
Smoke
Panel
Evaluation:
Herbicide
Research.
(
Unpublished
study,
including
submitter
summary,
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
pre­
pared
by
North
Carolina
State
Univ.,
Crop
Science
Dept.,
sub­
mitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
Calif.;
CDL:
227695­
B)

88075
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1975)
?
Efficacy
Data
for
Crop
Tolerance
and
Weed
Control
for
Devrinol­
tillam
1:
4­
E|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
25,
1977
under
476­
2182;
CDL:
227698­
A)

88390
Neas,
I.
(
1975)
Letter
sent
to
A.
Doug
Worsham
dated
Oct
2,
1975:
?
Smoke
panel
evaluation
for
herbicide
treated
tobacco|:
?
Sub­
mitter|
02363.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
5,
1976
under
7182­
EX­
17;
prepared
by
R.
J.
Reynolds
Industries,
Inc.,
sub­
mitted
by
3M
Co.,
St.
Paul,
Minn.;
CDL:
227717­
I)

88391
Glock,
E.
(
1975)
Letter
sent
to
A.
D.
Worsham
dated
Oct
30,
1975:
Flue­
cured
tobacco
herbicide
tests­­
1974
crop:
North
Carolina
State
University:
?
Submitter|
02704.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Apr
5,
1976
under
7182­
EX­
17;
prepared
by
American
Brands,
Inc.,
submitted
by
3M
Co.,
St.
Paul,
Minn.;
CDL:
227717­
J)

97398
Stauffer
Chemical
Company
(
1980)
?
Taste
Tests:
Tobacco
Treated
with
Devrinol|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
9,
1980
under
476­
2199;
CDL:
242620­
V)

112722
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1978)
Devrinol:
Three
Generation
Reproduc­
tion
Study:
T­
6334.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Apr
6,
1981
under
9E2244;
CDL:
099978­
D)
Page
140
of
150
113804
Bleiberg,
M.;
Woodard,
G.
(
1970)
Evaluation
of
Acute
Pharmaco­
dynamic
Properties
of
R­
7465.
(
Unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
prepared
by
Woodard
Research
Corp.,
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
091008­
D)

113805
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1969)
?
Toxicity
of
R­
7465
to
Rabbits|:
Toxicology
Lab
Report
T­
1389.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
2,
1972
under
2F1194;
CDL:
091008­
E)

113812
Brookman,
D.;
Ja,
B.
(
1973)
Analysis
of
50W
and
2E
Formulations
of
Devrinol:
WRC
73­
25.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
093858­
A)

113813
Meyding,
G.
(
1973)
Letter
sent
to
C.
Smith
dated
Apr
3,
1973:
Devrinol
50­
WP.
(
Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
4F1447;
submitted
by
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.,
Richmond,
CA;
CDL:
093858­
B)

113816
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1975)
?
Study:
Specific
Herbicide
Residues
on
Tobacco|.
(
Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
unknown
admin.
no.;
CDL:
223372­
A)

5004454
Holt,
H.
A.;
Wickham,
S.
H.;
Wichman,
J.
R.
(
1976)
Forest
nursery
weed
control
results.
Pages
175­
177,~
In~
Proceedings,
North
Central
Weed
Control
Conference.
Vol.
31.
Lincoln,
Nebr.:
North
Central
Weed
Control
Conference.

40251600
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1987)
Submission
of
Toxicology
Data
as
Part
of
Generic
Data
Base
for
Devrinol.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

40362900
Stauffer
Chemical
Co.
(
1987)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
and
Toxicological
Data
for
the
Chemical,
Devrinol
Technical.
Transmittal
of
4
studies.

40838600
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1988)
Submission
of
Fate
Data
in
Support
of
Reg­
istration
of
Devrinol
Technical
Selective
Herbicide
(
EPA
Reg.
No.
10182­
255).
Transmittal
of
1
study.

41067800
ICI
Agricultural
Products
Group
(
1989)
Submission
of
Data
To
Support
Registration
of
Devrinol
Technical
Selective
Herbicide:
Product
Chemistry
Data.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

41105900
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1989)
Submission
of
Data
To
Support
Registration
of
Devrinol
Technical
Selective
Herbicide:
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
Study.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

41156600
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1989)
Submission
of
Data
To
Support
Registration
of
Devrinol
Technical
Selective
Herbicide:
Toxicology
Data.
Transmittal
of
2
studies.

41453400
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
(
1990)
Submission
of
Toxicological
Data
to
Support
the
Amended
Registration
for
Devrinol
50­
DF
Selective
Herbicide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

41462000
Rohm
and
Haas
Co.
(
1990)
Submission
of
data
in
support
of
reregi­
stration
of
Pronamide:
Confined
rotation
crop
study.
Trans­
mittal
of
1
study.

41575300
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1990)
Submission
of
residue
data
to
support
the
registration
of
Napropamide
for
agricultural
use.
Transmittal
of
10
studies.

41582200
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1990)
Submission
of
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
Technical
Napropamide
Registration.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

41610200
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1990)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
Data
and
Toxicity
Data
to
Support
the
Napropamide
FIFRA
88
Accelerated
Reregistration.
Transmittal
of
10
Studies.
Page
141
of
150
41667100
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
(
1990)
Submission
of
toxicity
data
to
support
the
registration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

41863200
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1991)
Submission
of
Environmental
Fate
Data
to
Support
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
2
Studies.

41901800
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1991)
Submission
of
Data
to
Support
the
Reregis­
tration
of
Napropamide:
Environmental
Fate
Data.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

41943300
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
(
1991)
Submission
of
supplemental
product
chem­
istry
information
for
Devrinol
herbicide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42006700
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1991)
Submission
of
toxicity
data
in
support
of
reregistration
of
napromamide.
Transmittal
of
4
studies.

42027700
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1991)
Submission
of
toxicity
data
in
support
of
reregistration
of
napropamide.
Transmittal
of
3
studies.

42081300
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
(
1991)
Submission
of
toxicity
data
in
support
of
registration
of
napromamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42181000
ICI
Ag.
Products
(
1992)
Submission
of
toxicity
data
to
support
the
registration
of
Devrinol
50
DF
(
Napropamide).
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42189100
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
(
1992)
Submission
of
toxicity
data
in
support
of
reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
2
studies.

42231500
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1992)
Submission
of
FIFRA
88
Phase
3
Committed
Data
To
Support
Accelerated
Reregistration
of
Napropamide:
Toxicology
Study.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42256500
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(
1992)
Submission
of
residue
data
in
support
of
proposed
tolerance
for
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42349800
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
(
1992)
Submission
of
residue
data
in
support
of
the
reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
2
studies.

42393900
ICI
Agricultural
Products
(
1992)
Submission
of
residue
data
in
support
of
the
reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42656200
Zeneca
(
1993)
Submission
of
toxicity
and
environmental
data
in
support
of
the
reregistration
for
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
2
studies.

42657400
Zeneca
(
1993)
Submission
of
toxicity
data
in
support
of
the
rere­
gistration
for
napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42699700
Zeneca
Inc.
(
1993)
Submission
of
environmental
fate
data
in
support
of
the
Phase
4
requirement
for
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42707200
Zeneca
Inc.
(
1993)
Submission
of
environmental
fate
data
in
support
of
the
napropamide
reregistration.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42758900
Zeneca
Inc.
(
1993)
Submission
of
metabolism
data
in
support
of
the
reregistration
for
napropamide.
Transmittal
of
3
studies.
Page
142
of
150
42764200
Zeneca
Inc.
(
1993)
Submission
of
supplemental
environmental
fate
data
in
support
of
reregistration
for
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42775800
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1993)
Submission
of
residue
(
animal
metabolism)
data
to
support
Phase
3
reregistration
requirements
for
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
2
studies.

42794500
Zeneca
Inc.
(
1993)
Submission
of
environmental
fate
data
in
support
of
the
phase
3
data
for
napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

42845900
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1993)
Submission
of
supplemental
residue
data
in
support
of
reregistration
for
napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

43068800
Zeneca
Inc.
(
1993)
Submission
of
Supplemental
Toxicology
Data
in
Support
of
Napropamide
Reregistration.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

43175300
Zeneca
Inc.
(
1994)
Submittal
of
Environmental
Fate
Data
in
Support
of
Reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

43182400
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1994)
Submittal
of
Additional
Comments
on
Avian
Toxicity
Study
in
Support
of
Reregistration
for
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

43249400
ZENECA
Inc.
(
1994)
Submission
of
Residue
Chemistry
Data
for
Napropamide
in
Support
of
Reregistration.
Transmittal
of
5
studies.

43345100
Zenaca
Ag
Products
(
1994)
Submission
of
Residue
Data
in
Support
of
Napropamide
Reregistration.
Transmittal
of
9
Studies.

43419900
Zeneca
Inc.
(
1993)
Submittal
of
Environmental
Fate
Data
in
Support
of
Napropamide
Reregistration.
Transmittal
of
1
study.

43506700
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1994)
Submission
of
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

43514400
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1995)
Submission
of
Environmental
Fate
Data
in
Support
of
Napropamide
Reregistration.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

43659500
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.
(
1995)
Submission
of
Pesticide
Residues
in
the
Environment
Data
in
Support
of
FIFRA
6(
a)(
2)
Requirements
for
over
20
Organic
Pesticides.
Transmittal
of
2
Studies.

43659501
MacCoy,
D.;
Crepeau,
K.;
Kuivila,
K.
(
1995)
Dissolved
Pesticide
Data
for
the
San
Joaquin
River
at
Vernalis
and
the
Sacramento
River
at
Sacramento,
California,
1991­
94:
Open
File
Report
95­
110.
Prepared
by
U.
S.
Geological
Survey
in
cooperation
with
the
U.
S.
EPA
and
the
California
Regional
Water
Quality
Control
Board;
available
from
U.
S.
Government
Printing
Office.
31
p.

43659502
Crepeau,
K.;
Domagaiski,
J.;
Kuivila,
K.
(
1994)
Methods
of
Analysis
and
Quality­
Assurance
Practices
of
the
U.
S.
Geological
Survey
Organic
Laboratory,
Sacramento,
California­­
Determination
of
Pesticides
in
Water
by
Solid­
Phase
Extraction
and
Capillary­
Column
Gas
Chromatography/
Mass
Spectrometry:
Open
File
Report
94­
362.
Prepared
by
the
U.
S.
Geological
Survey;
available
from
U.
S.
Government
Printing
Office.
21
p.

43742400
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1995)
Submission
of
Environmental
Fate
Data
in
Support
of
Napropamide
Reregistration.
Transmittal
of
2
Studies.

43843400
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(
1995)
Submission
of
Residue
Chemistry
Data
in
Support
of
Page
143
of
150
the
Petition
for
Tolerance
for
Napropamide
on
Oriental
Radish.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

43875000
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1995)
Submission
of
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

43928600
Platte
Chemical
Co.
(
1996)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
and
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
Application
for
Registration
of
Napropamide­
Oxadiazon
4­
2
Granules.
Transmittal
of
7
Studies.

44006500
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1996)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
Data
in
Support
of
Registration
Amendment
of
DEVRINOL
Technical.
Transmittal
of
2
Studies.

44020100
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1996)
Submission
of
Residue
Data
in
Support
of
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
2
Studies.

44152200
Platte
Chemical
Co.
(
1996)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
Data
in
Support
of
the
Registration
of
Napropamide­
Oxadiazon
4­
2
Granules.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

44409300
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
1997)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
Data
in
Support
of
the
Registration
of
Devrinol
Technical
Selective
Herbicide.
Transmittal
of
2
Studies.

45074200
Zeneca
Ag
Products
(
2000)
Submission
of
Environmental
Fate
Data
in
Support
of
Registration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
2
Studies.

46105000
Gharda
USA
Inc.
(
2003)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
and
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
Application
for
the
Registration
of
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Transmittal
of
3
Studies.

46142700
United
Phosphorus,
Inc.
(
2003)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
Data
in
Support
of
the
Amended
Registrations
of
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide
and
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

46285600
United
Phosphorus,
Inc.
(
2004)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
Data
in
Support
of
the
Registrations
of
Devrinol
2EC
Ornamental
Herbicide
and
Devrinol
2EC
Selective
Herbicide.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

46302200
United
Phosphorus,
Inc.
(
2004)
Submission
of
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
Amended
Registrations
of
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide
and
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide.
Transmittal
of
2
studies.

46308700
United
Phosphorus,
Inc.
(
2004)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
Data
in
Support
of
the
Amended
Registrations
of
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide
and
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

46308701
Tillman,
A.
(
2004)
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide,
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide:
Justification
for
Change
in
Hazard
Classification.
Project
Number:
UPI/
2004/
02.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
United
Phosphorus
Inc.
37
p.

46338600
Gharda
USA,
Inc.
(
2004)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
Data
in
Support
of
the
Application
for
Registration
of
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

46427000
Gharda
USA,
Inc.
(
2004)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry
Data
in
Support
of
the
Application
for
Registration
of
Napropamide
Technical.
Transmittal
of
3
Studies.

46427001
Sonawane,
K.
(
2004)
Physical
and
Chemical
Characteristics
of
Napropamide
Technical:
UV­
VIS
Absorption
Spectra.
Project
Number:
C/
NAAO/
019,
GLP/
PC/
0401,
GLP/
PC/
01.
Unpublished
Page
144
of
150
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
22
p.

46427002
Sonawane,
K.
(
2004)
Physical
and
Chemical
Characteristics
of
Napropamide
Technical:
Dissociation
Constant.
Project
Number:
C/
NAO/
020,
GLP/
PC/
0401,
GLP/
PC/
02.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
30
p.

46427003
Sonawane,
K.
(
2004)
Physical
and
Chemical
Characteristics
of
Napropamide
Technical:
Accelerated
Storage
Stability.
Project
Number:
C/
NAO/
021,
GLP/
PC/
03,
GPLP/
PC/
0401.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Gharda
Chemicals
Ltd.
31
p.

46459100
United
Phosphorus,
Inc.
(
2005)
Submission
of
Product
Chemistry,
Residue,
Environmental
Fate
and
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
12
Studies.

46459102
White,
G.
(
2003)
Spectral
Examination
of
Napropamide:
Final
Report.
Project
Number:
J/
14368,
FOR/
02/
024.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by:
G.
C.
Laboratories,
Ltd.
34
p.

46459103
Lurvey,
E.
(
1993)
Napropamide:
Magnitude
of
Residue
on
Basil.
Project
Number:
03439,
90/
FLR/
050,
90/
FL/
045.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4,
University
of
Florida
and
Zeneca
Inc.
147
p.

46459104
Shaw,
D.
(
2001)
Napropamide:
Aerobic
Soil
Route
and
Rate
of
Degradation.
Project
Number:
UPH/
027,
UPH/
027/
013239.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Huntingdon
Life
Sciences,
Ltd.
75
p.

46459106
McKay,
J.
(
1989)
Devrinol
50­
WP
Field
Dissipation
Study:
Simcoe,
Ontario,
Canada:
Final
Report.
Project
Number:
WRC/
89/
50,
WRC/
73/
56.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas
Inc.
139
p.

46459109
Tapp,
J.;
Sankey,
S.;
Caunter,
J.;
et.
al.
(
1989)
Napropamide:
Determination
of
the
28
Day
LC50
to
Rainbow
Trout
(
Salmo
gairdneri).
Project
Number:
BL/
B/
3624,
S051/
A.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Imperial
Chemical
Industries,
Ltd.
24
p.

46459111
Jenkins,
C.
(
2002)
Napropamide
Higher
Plant
(
Lemna
minor)
Growth
Inhibition
Test.
Project
Number:
UPH022/
013214.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Huntingdon
Life
Sciences,
Ltd.
39
p.

46459112
Jenkins,
C.
(
2002)
Napropamide:
Algal
Growth
Inhibition
Assay
(
Anabaena).
Project
Number:
UPH021/
013213.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Huntingdon
Life
Sciences,
Ltd.
34
p.

46459113
Balluff,
M.
(
2003)
Seedling
Emergence
Dose
Response
Test
for
Non­
Target
Plants
Following
Multiple
Rate
Application
of
Devrinol
45FL
in
the
Greenhouse
Under
Controlled
Climactic
Conditions
in
Spain,
2002.
Project
Number:
20023053/
S1/
FNTP.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Arbeitsgemeinschaft
GAB
Biotechnologie.
64
p.

46459114
Balluff,
M.
(
2003)
Seedling
Emergence
Dose
Response
Test
for
Non­
Target
Plants
Following
Multiple
Rate
Application
with
Soil
Incorporation
of
Devrinol
45FL
in
the
Greenhouse
Under
Controlled
Climactic
Conditions
in
Spain,
2003.
Project
Number:
20023053/
S3/
FNTP.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Arbeitsgemeinschaft
GAB
Biotechnologie.
57
p.

46459115
Schmitzer,
S.
(
2003)
Laboratory
Testing
for
Toxicity
(
Acute
Contact
and
Oral)
of
Devrinol
450
SC
on
Honey
Bees
(
Apis
mellifera
L.):
Final
Report.
Project
Number:
17073035.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Institut
fuer
Biologische
Analytik
und
Consulting
IBACON.
43
p.

46459116
Gough,
H.;
Pilling,
E.
(
1995)
Napropamide:
Acute
Contact
Toxicity
to
Honey
Bees
(
Apis
mellifera)
of
a
50%
Wettable
Powder
Formulation.
Project
Number:
TMJ3457B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Jealott's
Hill
Res.
Station.
11
p.
Page
145
of
150
46462000
United
Phosphorus,
Inc.
(
2005)
Submission
of
Risk
Data
in
Support
of
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

46462001
Tillman,
A.
(
2005)
Registrant's
Error
Comments
on
EPA's
Preliminary
Risk
Assessments
for
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
for
Napropamide.
Project
Number:
UPI/
2005/
01.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
United
Phosphorus
Inc.
34
p.

46478700
United
Phosphorus,
Inc.
(
2005)
Submission
of
Environmental
Fate
and
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
Reregistration
of
Napropamide.
Transmittal
of
4
Studies.

46478701
McKay,
J.
(
1989)
Devrinol
50­
WP
Field
Dissipation
Study:
Rodney,
Ontario,
Canada:
Final
Report.
Project
Number:
WRC/
89/
55,
006031.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Americas,
Inc.
163
p.

46478702
Simmons,
N.
(
1990)
Napropamide:
Soil
Dissipation
Studies
(
West
Germany
1988­
89).
Project
Number:
RJ0860B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
ICI
Agrochemicals.
119
p.

46478703
Long,
K.;
Roberts,
G.
(
1995)
Napropamide:
Degradation
of
14­(
Carbon)­
Labelled
Material
in
Natural
Sediment­
Water
Systems.
Project
Number:
AA0900/
A,
BL5425/
B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Jealott's
Hill
Res.
Station.
62
p.

46494900
Gharda
Chemical
Ltd.
(
2005)
Submission
of
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
Application
for
Registration
of
Gharda
Napropamide
Technical.
Transmittal
of
2
Studies.

46553300
United
Phosporus,
Inc.
(
2005)
Submission
of
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
FIFRA
6(
a)(
2)
Data
Requirements
for
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide
and
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide.
Transmittal
of
1
Study.

46574100
United
Phosphorus,
Inc.
(
2005)
Submission
of
Toxicity
Data
in
Support
of
the
Amended
Registrations
of
Devrinol
2­
EC
Selective
Herbicide
and
Devrinol
2­
EC
Ornamental
Herbicide.
Transmittal
of
3
Studies.

92125000
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1990)
Reregistration
Phase
3
Response:
Diethyl­
2­(
1­
naphthalenyloxy)
propanamide.

92125999
ICI
Americas
Inc.
(
1990)
Reregistration
Phase
3
Response:
Diethyl­
2­(
1­
naphthalenyloxy)
propanamide.
Correspondence
and
Supporting
Material.

Appendix
E.
Generic
Data
Call­
In
Page
146
of
150
The
Generic
Data
Call­
In
will
be
posted
at
a
later
date.
See
Chapter
V
of
the
napropamide
RED
for
a
list
of
studies.

Appendix
F.
Product
Specific
Data
Call­
In
Page
147
of
150
A
Product
Specific
Data­
Call­
In
will
be
posted
at
a
later
date.

Appendix
G.
EPA's
Batching
of
Napropamide
products
for
meeting
acute
toxicity
data
requirements
for
reregistration.
Page
148
of
150
In
an
effort
to
reduce
the
time,
resources
and
number
of
animals
needed
to
fulfill
the
acute
toxicity
data
requirements
for
reregistration
of
products
containing
NAPROPAMIDE
as
the
active
ingredient,
the
Agency
has
batched
products
which
can
be
considered
similar
for
purposes
of
acute
toxicity.
Factors
considered
in
the
sorting
process
include
each
product's
active
and
inert
ingredients
(
identity,
percent
composition
and
biological
activity),
type
of
formulation
(
e.
g.,
emulsifiable
concentrate,
aerosol,
wettable
powder,
granular,
etc.),
and
labeling
(
e.
g.,
signal
word,
use
classification,
precautionary
labeling,
etc.).
Note
that
the
Agency
is
not
describing
batched
products
as
"
substantially
similar"
since
some
products
within
a
batch
may
not
be
considered
chemically
similar
or
have
identical
use
patterns.

Using
available
information,
batching
has
been
accomplished
by
the
process
described
in
the
preceding
paragraph.
Not
with­
standing
the
batching
process,
the
Agency
reserves
the
right
to
require,
at
any
time,
acute
toxicity
data
for
an
individual
product
should
the
need
arise.

Registrants
of
products
within
a
batch
may
choose
to
cooperatively
generate,
submit
or
cite
a
single
battery
of
six
acute
toxicological
studies
to
represent
all
the
products
within
that
batch.
It
is
the
registrants'
option
to
participate
in
the
process
with
all
other
registrants,
only
some
of
the
other
registrants,
or
only
their
own
products
within
a
batch,
or
to
generate
all
the
required
acute
toxicological
studies
for
each
of
their
own
products.
If
a
registrant
chooses
to
generate
the
data
for
a
batch,
he/
she
must
use
one
of
the
products
within
the
batch
as
the
test
material.
If
a
registrant
chooses
to
rely
upon
previously
submitted
acute
toxicity
data,
he/
she
may
do
so
provided
that
the
data
base
is
complete
and
valid
by
today's
standards
(
see
acceptance
criteria
attached),
the
formulation
tested
is
considered
by
EPA
to
be
similar
for
acute
toxicity,
and
the
formulation
has
not
been
significantly
altered
since
submission
and
acceptance
of
the
acute
toxicity
data.
Regardless
of
whether
new
data
is
generated
or
existing
data
is
referenced,
registrants
must
clearly
identify
the
test
material
by
EPA
Registration
Number.
If
more
than
one
confidential
statement
of
formula
(
CSF)
exists
for
a
product,
the
registrant
must
indicate
the
formulation
actually
tested
by
identifying
the
corresponding
CSF.

In
deciding
how
to
meet
the
product
specific
data
requirements,
registrants
must
follow
the
directions
given
in
the
Data
Call­
In
Notice
and
its
attachments
appended
to
the
RED.
The
DCI
Notice
contains
two
response
forms
which
are
to
be
completed
and
submitted
to
the
Agency
within
90
days
of
receipt.
The
first
form,
"
Data
Call­
In
Response,"
asks
whether
the
registrant
will
meet
the
data
requirements
for
each
product.
The
second
form,
"
Requirements
Status
and
Registrant's
Response,"
lists
the
product
specific
data
required
for
each
product,
including
the
standard
six
acute
toxicity
tests.
A
registrant
who
wishes
to
participate
in
a
batch
must
decide
whether
he/
she
will
provide
the
data
or
depend
on
someone
else
to
do
so.
If
a
registrant
supplies
the
data
to
support
a
batch
of
products,
he/
she
must
select
one
of
the
following
options:
Developing
Data
(
Option
1),
Submitting
an
Existing
Study
(
Option
4),
Upgrading
an
Existing
Study
(
Option
5)
or
Citing
an
Existing
Study
(
Option
6).
If
a
registrant
depends
on
another's
data,
he/
she
must
choose
among:
Page
149
of
150
Cost
Sharing
(
Option
2),
Offers
to
Cost
Share
(
Option
3)
or
Citing
an
Existing
Study
(
Option
6).
If
a
registrant
does
not
want
to
participate
in
a
batch,
the
choices
are
Options
1,
4,
5
or
6.
However,
a
registrant
should
know
that
choosing
not
to
participate
in
a
batch
does
not
preclude
other
registrants
in
the
batch
from
citing
his/
her
studies
and
offering
to
cost
share
(
Option
3)
those
studies.

Thirteen
products
were
found
which
contain
Napropamide
as
the
active
ingredient.
These
products
have
been
placed
five
batches
and
a
no
batch
group
in
accordance
with
the
active
and
inert
ingredients
and
type
of
formulation.

Batching
Instructions:

No
Batch:
Each
product
in
this
Batch
should
generate
their
own
data.

NOTE:
The
technical
acute
toxicity
values
included
in
this
document
are
for
informational
purposes
only.
The
data
supporting
these
values
may
or
may
not
meet
the
current
acceptance
criteria.

Batch
1
EPA
Reg.
No.
Percent
Active
Ingredient
33658­
22
97
70506­
35
95.7
Batch
2
EPA
Reg.
No.
Percent
Active
Ingredient
70506­
36
50
70506­
38
50
Batch
3
EPA
Reg.
No.
Percent
Active
Ingredient
70506­
31
43.2
70506­
37
43.2
Page
150
of
150
Batch
4
EPA
Reg.
No.
Percent
Active
Ingredient
70506­
63
24.1
70506­
64
24.1
Batch
5
EPA
Reg.
No.
Percent
Active
Ingredient
70506­
33
2
70506­
39
2
No
Batch
EPA
Reg.
No.
Percent
Active
Ingredient
34704­
771
Napropamide:
4.0
Oxadiazon:
2.0
70506­
27
21.8
70506­
34
10
Appendix
H.
List
of
Registrants
Sent
this
Data
Call­
In
A
list
of
registrants
sent
this
data
call­
in
will
be
posted
at
a
later
date.
