UNITED
STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
WASHINGTON,
D.
C.
20460
Date:
8/
17/
04
Chemical:
Napropamide
PC
Code:
103001
DP
Barcode:
D305601
MEMORANDUM
Subject:
Drinking
Water
Assessment
for
Napropamide
for
Terrestrial
Uses
Registrant:

To:
Susan
Lewis,
PM
51,
Demson
Fuller,
Chemical
Review
Manager
Special
Review
and
Reregistration
Division
(
7508C)

From:
James
Breithaupt,
Agronomist
Environmental
Risk
Branch
II
Environmental
Fate
and
Effects
Division
(
7507C)

Thru:
Nelson
Thurman,
Senior
Scientist
Environmental
Risk
Branch
II
Environmental
Fate
and
Effects
Division
(
7507C)

Tom
Bailey,
Chief
Environmental
Risk
Branch
II
Environmental
Fate
and
Effects
Division
(
7507C)

Summary
This
memorandum
contains
a
drinking
water
assessment
for
napropamide
for
terrestrial
uses.
This
assessment
incorporates
environmental
fate
data
and
transport
data
as
inputs
into
Tier
I
and
II
models
to
predict
drinking
water
exposure
for
10
of
the
registered
crops.

Human
exposure
to
napropamide
through
ingestion
of
drinking
water
from
the
use
on
many
small­
acreage
crops
was
assessed
through
modeling.
Surface
water
concentrations
from
use
on
terrestrial
crops
were
estimated
using
the
Tier
II
model
PRZM
version
3.12/
EXAMS
version
2.98.04
and
ground
water
concentrations
were
estimated
using
the
Tier
I
model
SCIGROW
version
2.2.
A
total
of
10
scenarios
were
modeled
for
napropamide
use
on
terrestrial
crops
based
on
individual
EFED
standard
scenarios.
The
scenarios
modeled
may
be
seen
in
Tables
1
and
2,
and
represent
the
highest
use
rates,
number
of
applications,
and
most­
vulnerable
sites
for
runoff
to
surface
water.
Some
uses
without
a
scenario
were
not
modeled.
These
scenarios
were
chosen
to
estimate
the
concentration
of
napropamide
in
surface
drinking
water
over
a
geographically
dispersed
range
of
existing
terrestrial
crop
production
areas
and
different
crop
types
(
orchards,
vineyards,
and
row
crops).
These
scenarios
chosen
for
this
assessment
represent
most
relevant
PRZM/
EXAMS
scenarios
for
the
terrestrial
use
of
napropamide.
Napropamide
is
to
be
applied
by
ground
equipment
only
as
per
the
use
information
provided
by
BEAD.
Appendix
A
provides
the
model
outputs
for
PRZM­
EXAMS.
Additional
details
on
each
scenario
may
be
seen
at
the
website:
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
oppefed1/
models/
water
.

Based
on
modeling
results,
the
estimated
surface
water
drinking
water
concentrations
for
napropamide
are:

112.0
m
g
/
L
for
the
1
in
10
year
annual
peak
concentration
(
acute)
0.5
m
g
/
L
for
the
1
in
10
year
annual
mean
concentration
(
non­
cancer
chronic)
and
0.2
m
g
/
L
for
the
36
year
annual
mean
concentration
(
cancer
chronic).

These
1
in
10
year
annual
peak
(
acute),
1
in
10
year
annual
mean
(
non­
cancer
chronic),
and
36­
year
annual
mean
concentrations
(
cancer
chronic)
were
derived
from
modeling
napropamide
on
the
labeled
terrestrial
crops
in
Table
1.
The
estimates
of
surface
water
concentrations
ranged
from
9.1
to
112.0,
0.05
to
0.5,
and
0.04
to
0.3
ug/
L
for
the
peak,
annual
mean,
and
overall
means,
respectively.
These
concentrations
will
likely
be
lower
because
any
napropamide
residues
on
the
soil
surface
may
degrade
faster
than
the
aerobic
soil
metabolism
rate.
However,
this
reduction
in
aqueous
concentrations
cannot
be
quantified
for
two
reasons.
There
are
uncertainties
regarding
the
amount
of
residues
left
on
the
surface
after
incorporation,
and
the
factors
affecting
photolysis
in
the
field
are
highly
variable.
For
shallow
ground
water
used
for
drinking
water,
the
SCI­
GROW
model
estimates
are
not
expected
to
exceed
4.5
:
g/
L
.
These
modeled
concentrations
can
be
considered
as
both
the
acute
and
chronic
value.
Since
no
degradates
of
concern
have
been
identified,
no
degradates
of
napropamide
were
modeled
in
this
assessment.
Should
the
Health
Effects
Division
(
HED)
determine
that
any
of
the
environmental
fate
degradates
are
of
concern,
a
separate
assessment
will
be
conducted
as
an
addendum
to
this
document.

For
most
compounds,
modeled
concentrations
in
surface
water
and
ground
water
are
generally
higher
than
monitored
concentrations.
Napropamide
was
not
detected
in
USGS
surface
water
monitoring
as
of
2001.

MODELING
ASSESSMENT
To
estimate
concentrations
of
napropamide
in
surface
water
or
groundwater,
modeling
was
used
and
compared
to
surface
water
or
groundwater
monitoring
data.
Typically,
Tier
I
drinking
water
assessments
(
FIRST)
are
completed
for
terrestrial
uses
by
EFED
for
chemicals
without
higher
tier
scenarios
or
as
a
screening
level
assessment.
In
the
case
of
napropamide,
Tier
II
scenarios
were
used
for
18
of
the
labeled
terrestrial
uses
for
napropamide.
Of
these
18
scenarios,
10
were
chosen
to
estimate
the
concentration
of
napropamide
in
surface
drinking
water
over
a
geographically
dispersed
range
of
existing
terrestrial
crop
production
areas
and
different
crop
types
(
orchards,
vineyards,
and
row
crops).
These
scenarios
chosen
for
this
assessment
represent
most
relevant
PRZM/
EXAMS
scenarios
for
the
terrestrial
use
of
napropamide.
Therefore,
drinking
water
exposure
assessments
for
people
who
drink
surface
water
were
completed
using
Tier
II
model
predictions.

Surface
Water
Modeling
of
Terrestrial
Uses
for
Napropamide
Proposed
drinking
water
concentrations
are
based
on
modeling
and
monitoring
estimates.
The
modeled
scenarios
may
be
seen
in
Tables
1
and
2.
Some
uses
without
a
scenario
were
not
modeled
and
some
uses
with
scenarios
were
represented
with
other
scenarios
in
th
same
geographic
region.
PRZM
3.12/
EXAMS
2.98.04
modeling
was
performed
with
index
reservoir
(
IR)
scenarios
and
percent
cropped
area
(
PCA)
adjustment
factors.
For
a
description
of
the
IR/
PCA
scenarios
and
the
uncertainties
associated
with
them
see
R.
D.
Jones
et
al
(
March
21,
2000).
For
the
five
scenarios,
a
PCA
adjustment
of
0.87
was
applied
to
the
model.
A
PCA
of
0.87
is
the
default
value.
The
PCA
adjusted
model
results
are
presented
in
Table
1.

Table
2
presents
the
input
parameters
used
in
the
Tier
II
PRZM/
EXAMS
modeling
for
drinking
water
from
a
surface
water
source
and
Table
3
presents
the
input
parameters
used
in
the
Tier
I
SCI­
GROW
modeling
for
drinking
water
from
a
groundwater
source.
Input
parameters
used
in
Tier
I
groundwater
(
SCI­
GROW
version
2.2)
modeling
were
selected
using
EFED
guidance
("
Guidance
for
Chemistry
and
Management
Practice
Input
Parameters
for
Use
in
Modeling
the
Environmental
Fate
and
Transport
of
Pesticides"
dated
February
28,
2002).

Table
1.
DrinkingWater
EECs
for
Napropamide
EECs
(
ug/
L)

Scenario
and
crop
Peak
4­
day
21­
day
60­
day
90­
day
Annual
mean
Overall
mean
CA
almonds
18.2
6.0
1.6
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.1
FL
citrus
72.5
22.8
5.1
2.4
1.7
0.4
0.3
OR
berry
9.1
4.6
1.1
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.08
OR
apple
12.8
5.5
1.5
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.1
PA
apple
52.0
14.4
4.5
2.0
1.4
0.4
0.2
PA
turf
19.2
6.6
2.1
0.7
0.5
0.1
0.1
FL
tomato
23.9
8.5
2.3
0.9
0.6
0.1
0.1
CA
grape
9.1
2.3
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.05
0.05
GA
pecan
112.0
29.4
6.5
3.0
2.1
0.5
0.2
NC
tobacco
7.9
2.4
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.04
Table
2.
Surface
Water
Exposure
Inputs
for
Drinking
Water
Exposure
for
Terrestrial
Uses
of
Napropamide
using
the
PRZM­
EXAMS
Model
(
EFED
Shell).

MODEL
INPUT
VARIABLE1
INPUT
VALUE
COMMENTS
Application
Rate
(
kg/
ha)
CA
Almonds
FL
Citrus
OR
Berry
OR
Apple
PA
Apple
PA
Turf
FL
Tomato
CA
Grape
GA
Pecan
NC
Tobacco
4
4
4
4
4
6
2
4
4
2
Based
on
BEAD
use
data
lbs
ai/
A
Maximum
No.
of
Applications
OR
berry,
CA
tomato,
PA
turf,
NC
tobacco
CA
almonds,
OR,
PA
apple,
CA
grape,
GA
pecan,
FL
citrus,
1
2
Based
on
BEAD
use
data
lbs
ai/
A
Interval
between
applications
21
days
for
all
crops
with
two
applications
Application
Date(
s)
May
15
June
5
for
all
crops
with
two
applications
Method
of
application
Ground
Ground
All
uses
Molecular
Weight
271
g/
Mol
Vapor
pressure
7.1e­
4
Torr
at
25
oC
Application
Efficiency
(
Drinking
Water)
All
uses
0.99
Per
2/
8/
02
Input
Parameter
Guidance
for
Ground
Applications
Spray
Drift
(
Drinking
Water)
All
uses
0.064
Per
2/
8/
02
Input
Parameter
Guidance
Kd
(
ml/
g)
8
Average
of
values
in
MRID
41575302
Percent
Cropped
Area
CA
Almonds
FL
Citrus
OR
Berry
OR
Apple
PA
Apple
PA
Turf
FL
Tomato
CA
Grape
GA
Pecan
NC
Tobacco
0.87
Default
Value
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolic
Half­
life
(
days)
parent
1338
3X
446
day
half­
life
based
on
extractable
residues
in
MRID
41105901
Incorporation
depth
(
cm)
All
uses
5
Broadcast
application
CAM=
4
Solubility
(
mg/
L)
730
73
mg/
L
at
20
oC
x
10
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolic
Halflife
(
days)
Kbacw
in
EXAMS
0
No
data
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
half­
life
(
days)
Kbacs
in
EXAMS
0
Essentially
stable
MRID
42699701
Photolysis
Half­
life
(
days,
ppm)
0.003
4.3
minutes/
1440
minutes/
day
41575301
Include
parent
+
Isomer
I
+
Isomer
II
1
Input
parameters
based
on
2/
8/
02
Input
Parameter
Guidance
Ground
Water
Assessment
Ground
water
EECs
were
modeled
using
SCI­
GROW,
a
screening
groundwater
regression
model
developed
using
data
from
prospective
groundwater
studies
submitted
to
the
OPP
in
support
of
registration.
SCI­
GROW
provides
a
high­
end
estimate
of
ground
water
concentrations
of
pesticides
on
soils
that
are
known
to
be
vulnerable
to
pesticide
leaching
(
i.
e.
high
sand
content
with
shallow
depth
to
groundwater).

Tables
3
and
4
provide
the
environmental
fate
inputs
and
ground
water
concentration
for
parent
napropamide,
respectively.
The
estimated
EEC
is
considered
representative
of
both
a
peak
and
longterm
average
concentration
because
of
the
inherent
transport
nature
of
ground
water
(
i.
e.
generally
slow
movement
from
source
of
contamination
both
laterally
and
horizontally).
Based
on
SCI­
GROW
modeling,
the
acute
and
chronic
napropamide
concentrations
are
not
expected
to
exceed
4.5
:
g/
L.
However,
the
USGS
has
not
found
any
detections
in
ground
water
as
of
2001.
Table
3.
SCI­
GROW
Inputs
for
Napropamide
using
the
SCI­
GROW2
Model.

MODEL
INPUT
VARIABLE1
INPUT
VALUE
COMMENTS
Application
Rate
(
kg/
ha)
CA
Almonds
FL
Citrus
OR
Berry
OR
Apple
PA
Apple
PA
Turf
FL
Tomato
CA
Grape
GA
Pecan
NC
Tobacco
44
4
44
6
2
44
2
Based
on
BEAD
use
data
lbs
ai/
A
Maximum
No.
of
Applications
OR
berry,
FL
tomato,
PA
turf,
NC
tobacco
CA
almonds,
OR,
PA
apple,
CA
grape,
GA
pecan,
FL
citrus,
1
2
Based
on
BEAD
use
data
lbs
ai/
A
Median
Koc
(
ml/
g)
577
Average
of
values
in
MRID
41575302
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolic
Half­
life
(
days)
parent
446
446
day
half­
life
based
on
extractable
residues
in
MRID
41105901
1
Input
parameters
based
on
2/
8/
02
Input
Parameter
Guidance
Table
4.
Drinking
Water
EECs
for
Napropamide
from
Ground
Water
EECs
(
ug/
L)

Scenario
and
crop
GW
Screening
Concentration
CA
almonds
4.5
FL
citrus
4.5
OR
berry
2.3
OR
apple
4.5
PA
apple
4.5
PA
turf
3.4
FL
tomato
1.1
CA
grape
4.5
GA
pecan
4.5
NC
tobacco
1.1
If
there
are
any
questions,
please
call
Jim
Breithaupt
at
(
703)
305­
5925.
Appendix
A.
Model
Outputs
using
PRZM­
EXAMS
for
Endothall
Applied
to
Terrestrial
Crops
California
Almonds
stored
as
caalmond.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
CAalmondC.
txt
modified
Satday,
12
October
2002
at
16:
30:
38
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w23232.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
04:
22
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)

Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
19.990
6.554
1.709
0.599
0.400
0.155
1962
99.340
36.970
7.383
2.586
1.745
0.489
1963
10.460
2.813
0.547
0.355
0.238
0.090
1964
10.460
3.145
0.673
0.354
0.236
0.132
1965
10.460
2.497
0.481
0.336
0.246
0.079
1966
10.460
3.061
1.122
0.525
0.350
0.143
1967
10.460
2.554
0.493
0.341
0.227
0.060
1968
10.460
2.565
0.495
0.338
0.226
0.082
1969
10.460
4.023
0.860
0.332
0.221
0.135
1970
27.100
10.830
2.200
0.836
0.557
0.214
1971
10.460
2.848
0.554
0.359
0.240
0.071
1972
10.460
2.529
0.572
0.337
0.225
0.099
1973
10.460
2.517
0.485
0.336
0.224
0.092
1974
10.460
2.417
0.482
0.399
0.266
0.080
1975
10.460
2.427
0.467
0.326
0.217
0.054
1976
10.460
2.417
0.465
0.324
0.216
0.053
1977
10.460
2.807
0.801
0.421
0.281
0.148
1978
10.460
2.420
0.486
0.325
0.217
0.109
1979
10.460
2.464
0.506
0.324
0.216
0.117
1980
10.460
2.565
0.495
0.341
0.228
0.081
1981
17.780
6.903
1.854
0.690
0.466
0.238
1982
10.600
3.325
0.786
0.398
0.268
0.132
1983
14.490
5.389
1.268
0.579
0.386
0.151
1984
10.460
2.475
0.476
0.328
0.219
0.056
1985
20.990
6.084
1.233
0.436
0.291
0.127
1986
10.460
2.607
0.503
0.338
0.225
0.061
1987
10.460
2.552
0.492
0.338
0.225
0.067
1988
10.460
2.654
0.513
0.353
0.235
0.078
1989
18.560
4.417
0.850
0.335
0.242
0.115
1990
11.930
3.409
1.108
0.548
0.366
0.130
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
99.340
36.970
7.383
2.586
1.745
0.489
0.065
27.100
10.830
2.200
0.836
0.557
0.238
0.097
20.990
6.903
1.854
0.690
0.466
0.214
0.129
19.990
6.554
1.709
0.599
0.400
0.155
0.161
18.560
6.084
1.268
0.579
0.386
0.151
0.194
17.780
5.389
1.233
0.548
0.366
0.148
0.226
14.490
4.417
1.122
0.525
0.350
0.143
0.258
11.930
4.023
1.108
0.436
0.291
0.135
0.290
10.600
3.409
0.860
0.421
0.281
0.132
0.323
10.460
3.325
0.850
0.399
0.268
0.132
0.355
10.460
3.145
0.801
0.398
0.266
0.130
0.387
10.460
3.061
0.786
0.359
0.246
0.127
0.419
10.460
2.848
0.673
0.355
0.242
0.117
0.452
10.460
2.813
0.572
0.354
0.240
0.115
0.484
10.460
2.807
0.554
0.353
0.238
0.109
0.516
10.460
2.654
0.547
0.341
0.236
0.099
0.548
10.460
2.607
0.513
0.341
0.235
0.092
0.581
10.460
2.565
0.506
0.338
0.228
0.090
0.613
10.460
2.565
0.503
0.338
0.227
0.082
0.645
10.460
2.554
0.495
0.338
0.226
0.081
0.677
10.460
2.552
0.495
0.337
0.225
0.080
0.710
10.460
2.529
0.493
0.336
0.225
0.079
0.742
10.460
2.517
0.492
0.336
0.225
0.078
0.774
10.460
2.497
0.486
0.335
0.224
0.071
0.806
10.460
2.475
0.485
0.332
0.221
0.067
0.839
10.460
2.464
0.482
0.328
0.219
0.061
0.871
10.460
2.427
0.481
0.326
0.217
0.060
0.903
10.460
2.420
0.476
0.325
0.217
0.056
0.935
10.460
2.417
0.467
0.324
0.216
0.054
0.968
10.460
2.417
0.465
0.324
0.216
0.053
0.1
20.9
6.9
1.8
0.7
0.5
0.2
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.1
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
18.2
6.0
1.6
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.1
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
caalmond
Metfile:
w23232.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
CAalmondC.
txt
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Description
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.003
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
0
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
1338
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
4.48
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Interval
1
interval
21
days
Set
to
0
or
delete
line
for
single
app.
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)

Florida
Citrus
stored
as
flcitrus.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
FLcitrusC.
txt
modified
Satday,
12
October
2002
at
16:
39:
50
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w12842.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
04:
28
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)

Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
21.74
5.942
1.6
0.9883
0.7881
0.2019
1962
21.32
5.792
1.94
1.049
0.7242
0.1941
1963
24.35
8.068
3.728
1.733
1.27
0.3196
1964
32.03
7.985
3.419
1.853
1.364
0.3373
1965
46.45
20.98
5.292
2.245
1.605
0.3968
1966
83.14
26.19
6.302
2.672
1.922
0.4759
1967
13.66
4.838
1.978
1.177
0.9173
0.2336
1968
35.09
12.85
2.852
2.09
1.42
0.3544
1969
62.22
17.48
4.095
2.342
1.879
0.4657
1970
29.97
7.394
2.311
1.054
1.034
0.2786
1971
97.91
22.31
4.322
1.876
1.426
0.3605
1972
74.96
20.49
4.691
2.209
1.595
0.4198
1973
13.65
3.61
1.197
0.8061
0.691
0.1756
1974
83.41
32.59
6.983
3.092
2.081
0.5152
1975
64.78
15.96
5.575
2.338
1.644
0.41
1976
111
29.33
5.915
3.537
2.375
0.5908
1977
16.62
4.037
1.269
0.7506
0.6106
0.1613
1978
10.46
2.759
1.356
0.6729
0.6721
0.1684
1979
31.49
7.535
2.086
1.335
1.188
0.3033
1980
30.86
7.228
3.211
1.415
1.118
0.2814
1981
24.77
8.314
3.17
1.455
0.9709
0.2733
1982
50.78
15.58
4.775
2.715
1.879
0.4645
1983
72.86
17.03
4.855
2.462
1.724
0.4264
1984
32.5
7.618
1.965
1.238
0.9154
0.2303
1985
50.19
26.11
5.732
2.304
1.667
0.4145
1986
16.07
4.102
1.67
0.9636
0.7019
0.1778
1987
36.41
10.12
1.979
1.425
1.061
0.267
1988
29.13
8.265
2.911
1.415
1.091
0.2942
1989
42.37
10.53
2.573
1.261
0.8999
0.2228
1990
19.09
4.866
1.729
1.245
0.9562
0.2369
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
111.000
32.590
6.983
3.537
2.375
0.591
0.065
97.910
29.330
6.302
3.092
2.081
0.515
0.097
83.410
26.190
5.915
2.715
1.922
0.476
0.129
83.140
26.110
5.732
2.672
1.879
0.466
0.161
74.960
22.310
5.575
2.462
1.879
0.465
0.194
72.860
20.980
5.292
2.342
1.724
0.426
0.226
64.780
20.490
4.855
2.338
1.667
0.420
0.258
62.220
17.480
4.775
2.304
1.644
0.415
0.290
50.780
17.030
4.691
2.245
1.605
0.410
0.323
50.190
15.960
4.322
2.209
1.595
0.397
0.355
46.450
15.580
4.095
2.090
1.426
0.361
0.387
42.370
12.850
3.728
1.876
1.420
0.354
0.419
36.410
10.530
3.419
1.853
1.364
0.337
0.452
35.090
10.120
3.211
1.733
1.270
0.320
0.484
32.500
8.314
3.170
1.455
1.188
0.303
0.516
32.030
8.265
2.911
1.425
1.118
0.294
0.548
31.490
8.068
2.852
1.415
1.091
0.281
0.581
30.860
7.985
2.573
1.415
1.061
0.279
0.613
29.970
7.618
2.311
1.335
1.034
0.273
0.645
29.130
7.535
2.086
1.261
0.971
0.267
0.677
24.770
7.394
1.979
1.245
0.956
0.237
0.710
24.350
7.228
1.978
1.238
0.917
0.234
0.742
21.740
5.942
1.965
1.177
0.915
0.230
0.774
21.320
5.792
1.940
1.054
0.900
0.223
0.806
19.090
4.866
1.729
1.049
0.788
0.202
0.839
16.620
4.838
1.670
0.988
0.724
0.194
0.871
16.070
4.102
1.600
0.964
0.702
0.178
0.903
13.660
4.037
1.356
0.806
0.691
0.176
0.935
13.650
3.610
1.269
0.751
0.672
0.168
0.968
10.460
2.759
1.197
0.673
0.611
0.161
0.1
83.4
26.2
5.9
2.7
1.9
0.5
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.3
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
72.5
22.8
5.1
2.4
1.7
0.4
0.3
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
flcitrus
Metfile:
w12842.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
FLcitrusC.
txt
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Description
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.003
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
0
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
1338
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
4.48
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Interval
1
interval
21
days
Set
to
0
or
delete
line
for
single
app.
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)

Oregon
Berry
stored
as
orberry.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
ORberriesC.
txt
modified
Satday,
12
October
2002
at
17:
17:
16
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w24232.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
06:
10
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)

Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
10.460
5.030
1.174
0.418
0.279
0.078
1962
10.460
5.422
1.319
0.462
0.308
0.104
1963
10.460
4.606
1.014
0.356
0.237
0.096
1964
10.460
4.873
1.105
0.387
0.258
0.077
1965
10.460
4.658
1.031
0.376
0.251
0.090
1966
10.460
4.467
0.970
0.340
0.227
0.085
1967
10.460
4.591
1.009
0.354
0.236
0.088
1968
10.460
4.890
1.189
0.419
0.280
0.088
1969
10.460
4.547
0.995
0.511
0.341
0.123
1970
10.460
4.511
0.984
0.345
0.230
0.075
1971
10.460
4.768
1.068
0.399
0.266
0.093
1972
11.020
6.344
1.423
0.500
0.334
0.097
1973
10.460
4.576
1.005
0.352
0.235
0.069
1974
10.460
4.999
1.150
0.403
0.269
0.109
1975
10.460
4.533
0.991
0.347
0.232
0.077
1976
10.460
4.599
1.012
0.355
0.237
0.058
1977
10.750
5.308
1.247
0.437
0.292
0.079
1978
10.460
4.768
1.068
0.374
0.251
0.073
1979
10.460
4.518
0.986
0.362
0.247
0.120
1980
10.460
5.035
1.164
0.433
0.289
0.089
1981
10.460
5.009
1.157
0.517
0.345
0.107
1982
10.460
4.482
0.975
0.342
0.228
0.065
1983
10.460
4.599
1.012
0.361
0.250
0.074
1984
10.460
4.914
1.120
0.492
0.328
0.091
1985
10.460
4.898
1.114
0.679
0.453
0.127
1986
10.460
4.913
1.119
0.405
0.270
0.074
1987
10.460
4.651
1.029
0.361
0.459
0.160
1988
10.460
5.050
1.174
0.412
0.275
0.083
1989
10.460
4.815
1.085
0.380
0.254
0.094
1990
10.460
5.130
1.221
0.428
0.286
0.089
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
11.020
6.344
1.423
0.679
0.459
0.160
0.065
10.750
5.422
1.319
0.517
0.453
0.127
0.097
10.460
5.308
1.247
0.511
0.345
0.123
0.129
10.460
5.130
1.221
0.500
0.341
0.120
0.161
10.460
5.050
1.189
0.492
0.334
0.109
0.194
10.460
5.035
1.174
0.462
0.328
0.107
0.226
10.460
5.030
1.174
0.437
0.308
0.104
0.258
10.460
5.009
1.164
0.433
0.292
0.097
0.290
10.460
4.999
1.157
0.428
0.289
0.096
0.323
10.460
4.914
1.150
0.419
0.286
0.094
0.355
10.460
4.913
1.120
0.418
0.280
0.093
0.387
10.460
4.898
1.119
0.412
0.279
0.091
0.419
10.460
4.890
1.114
0.405
0.275
0.090
0.452
10.460
4.873
1.105
0.403
0.270
0.089
0.484
10.460
4.815
1.085
0.399
0.269
0.089
0.516
10.460
4.768
1.068
0.387
0.266
0.088
0.548
10.460
4.768
1.068
0.380
0.258
0.088
0.581
10.460
4.658
1.031
0.376
0.254
0.085
0.613
10.460
4.651
1.029
0.374
0.251
0.083
0.645
10.460
4.606
1.014
0.362
0.251
0.079
0.677
10.460
4.599
1.012
0.361
0.250
0.078
0.710
10.460
4.599
1.012
0.361
0.247
0.077
0.742
10.460
4.591
1.009
0.356
0.237
0.077
0.774
10.460
4.576
1.005
0.355
0.237
0.075
0.806
10.460
4.547
0.995
0.354
0.236
0.074
0.839
10.460
4.533
0.991
0.352
0.235
0.074
0.871
10.460
4.518
0.986
0.347
0.232
0.073
0.903
10.460
4.511
0.984
0.345
0.230
0.069
0.935
10.460
4.482
0.975
0.342
0.228
0.065
0.968
10.460
4.467
0.970
0.340
0.227
0.058
0.1
10.5
5.3
1.2
0.5
0.3
0.1
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.1
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
9.1
4.6
1.1
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.08
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
orberry
Metfile:
w24232.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
ORberriesC.
txt
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Description
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.005
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
0
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
1338
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
4.48
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)

Oregon
Apple
stored
as
orapple.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
ORappleC.
txt
modified
Satday,
12
October
2002
at
17:
16:
34
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w24232.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
06:
10
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)

Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
10.460
3.642
0.739
0.462
0.308
0.119
1962
10.460
3.919
1.039
0.528
0.362
0.170
1963
18.160
6.364
1.709
0.671
0.447
0.188
1964
10.460
3.523
0.716
0.488
0.326
0.137
1965
10.460
4.029
1.453
0.547
0.370
0.162
1966
10.900
6.136
1.520
0.632
0.421
0.177
1967
11.650
3.915
0.969
0.521
0.360
0.160
1968
11.260
4.429
0.924
0.495
0.374
0.164
1969
10.460
3.530
0.815
0.701
0.468
0.189
1970
10.460
3.154
0.622
0.433
0.289
0.126
1971
16.130
4.635
0.942
0.498
0.363
0.157
1972
10.460
3.913
0.781
0.491
0.328
0.143
1973
10.460
3.424
0.685
0.459
0.306
0.125
1974
14.760
6.875
2.193
0.802
0.535
0.207
1975
10.460
3.297
0.883
0.446
0.297
0.130
1976
10.460
3.270
0.649
0.448
0.299
0.075
1977
10.590
3.728
0.758
0.474
0.316
0.124
1978
10.460
3.332
0.663
0.454
0.303
0.123
1979
12.980
3.738
0.815
0.542
0.382
0.188
1980
10.460
3.564
1.181
0.556
0.371
0.174
1981
10.460
5.072
1.129
0.644
0.430
0.176
1982
10.460
3.263
0.701
0.440
0.293
0.117
1983
10.460
3.570
0.721
0.477
0.328
0.112
1984
10.460
4.293
1.140
0.646
0.431
0.147
1985
14.360
6.207
1.252
0.680
0.454
0.156
1986
10.460
3.458
0.693
0.452
0.302
0.105
1987
13.630
7.919
2.052
0.806
0.538
0.251
1988
10.470
3.579
0.796
0.478
0.319
0.138
1989
10.840
3.996
0.976
0.672
0.448
0.186
1990
10.460
3.650
0.926
0.505
0.337
0.171
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
18.160
7.919
2.193
0.806
0.538
0.251
0.065
16.130
6.875
2.052
0.802
0.535
0.207
0.097
14.760
6.364
1.709
0.701
0.468
0.189
0.129
14.360
6.207
1.520
0.680
0.454
0.188
0.161
13.630
6.136
1.453
0.672
0.448
0.188
0.194
12.980
5.072
1.252
0.671
0.447
0.186
0.226
11.650
4.635
1.181
0.646
0.431
0.177
0.258
11.260
4.429
1.140
0.644
0.430
0.176
0.290
10.900
4.293
1.129
0.632
0.421
0.174
0.323
10.840
4.029
1.039
0.556
0.382
0.171
0.355
10.590
3.996
0.976
0.547
0.374
0.170
0.387
10.470
3.919
0.969
0.542
0.371
0.164
0.419
10.460
3.915
0.942
0.528
0.370
0.162
0.452
10.460
3.913
0.926
0.521
0.363
0.160
0.484
10.460
3.738
0.924
0.505
0.362
0.157
0.516
10.460
3.728
0.883
0.498
0.360
0.156
0.548
10.460
3.650
0.815
0.495
0.337
0.147
0.581
10.460
3.642
0.815
0.491
0.328
0.143
0.613
10.460
3.579
0.796
0.488
0.328
0.138
0.645
10.460
3.570
0.781
0.478
0.326
0.137
0.677
10.460
3.564
0.758
0.477
0.319
0.130
0.710
10.460
3.530
0.739
0.474
0.316
0.126
0.742
10.460
3.523
0.721
0.462
0.308
0.125
0.774
10.460
3.458
0.716
0.459
0.306
0.124
0.806
10.460
3.424
0.701
0.454
0.303
0.123
0.839
10.460
3.332
0.693
0.452
0.302
0.119
0.871
10.460
3.297
0.685
0.448
0.299
0.117
0.903
10.460
3.270
0.663
0.446
0.297
0.112
0.935
10.460
3.263
0.649
0.440
0.293
0.105
0.968
10.460
3.154
0.622
0.433
0.289
0.075
0.1
14.7
6.3
1.7
0.7
0.5
0.2
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.2
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
12.8
5.5
1.5
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.1
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
orapple
Metfile:
w24232.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
ORappleC.
txt
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Description
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.003
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
0
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
1338
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
4.48
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Interval
1
interval
21
days
Set
to
0
or
delete
line
for
single
app.
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)

Pennsylvania
Apple
stored
as
paaple.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
PAappleC.
txt
modified
Satday,
12
October
2002
at
17:
24:
46
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w14737.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
06:
12
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)

Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
40.750
12.160
3.250
1.356
1.061
0.287
1962
27.730
8.199
2.228
1.002
0.848
0.334
1963
19.730
5.692
1.341
0.617
0.456
0.252
1964
10.460
3.358
1.082
0.610
0.425
0.194
1965
10.490
2.999
0.781
0.429
0.330
0.167
1966
10.460
3.256
0.811
0.536
0.375
0.207
1967
77.850
22.300
5.364
2.331
1.645
0.475
1968
14.900
7.043
2.252
1.036
0.706
0.289
1969
25.390
12.030
3.038
1.394
1.077
0.316
1970
10.650
3.367
0.891
0.563
0.534
0.183
1971
14.760
6.306
1.309
0.693
0.678
0.222
1972
49.120
16.850
5.292
2.849
2.002
0.518
1973
59.850
18.160
3.676
2.052
1.401
0.432
1974
14.320
4.550
1.668
0.846
0.765
0.265
1975
32.840
10.550
2.489
1.173
0.924
0.249
1976
27.030
8.053
1.590
0.695
0.737
0.248
1977
14.420
4.467
1.519
0.747
0.605
0.223
1978
10.470
3.959
1.351
0.733
0.760
0.237
1979
17.820
6.580
1.991
1.026
0.922
0.295
1980
10.590
3.172
0.665
0.444
0.297
0.135
1981
18.540
5.440
1.447
0.905
0.617
0.178
1982
35.880
13.910
5.351
2.322
1.889
0.547
1983
12.750
3.439
1.218
0.709
0.520
0.176
1984
25.250
8.131
3.455
2.070
1.437
0.382
1985
17.900
5.450
1.602
0.941
0.777
0.233
1986
10.490
3.155
1.077
0.609
0.522
0.169
1987
17.650
5.280
1.273
0.797
0.802
0.235
1988
37.770
13.110
3.346
1.393
1.216
0.351
1989
17.020
7.209
2.066
1.358
0.978
0.286
1990
23.670
7.599
2.402
1.321
1.166
0.306
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
77.850
22.300
5.364
2.849
2.002
0.547
0.065
59.850
18.160
5.351
2.331
1.889
0.518
0.097
49.120
16.850
5.292
2.322
1.645
0.475
0.129
40.750
13.910
3.676
2.070
1.437
0.432
0.161
37.770
13.110
3.455
2.052
1.401
0.382
0.194
35.880
12.160
3.346
1.394
1.216
0.351
0.226
32.840
12.030
3.250
1.393
1.166
0.334
0.258
27.730
10.550
3.038
1.358
1.077
0.316
0.290
27.030
8.199
2.489
1.356
1.061
0.306
0.323
25.390
8.131
2.402
1.321
0.978
0.295
0.355
25.250
8.053
2.252
1.173
0.924
0.289
0.387
23.670
7.599
2.228
1.036
0.922
0.287
0.419
19.730
7.209
2.066
1.026
0.848
0.286
0.452
18.540
7.043
1.991
1.002
0.802
0.265
0.484
17.900
6.580
1.668
0.941
0.777
0.252
0.516
17.820
6.306
1.602
0.905
0.765
0.249
0.548
17.650
5.692
1.590
0.846
0.760
0.248
0.581
17.020
5.450
1.519
0.797
0.737
0.237
0.613
14.900
5.440
1.447
0.747
0.706
0.235
0.645
14.760
5.280
1.351
0.733
0.678
0.233
0.677
14.420
4.550
1.341
0.709
0.617
0.223
0.710
14.320
4.467
1.309
0.695
0.605
0.222
0.742
12.750
3.959
1.273
0.693
0.534
0.207
0.774
10.650
3.439
1.218
0.617
0.522
0.194
0.806
10.590
3.367
1.082
0.610
0.520
0.183
0.839
10.490
3.358
1.077
0.609
0.456
0.178
0.871
10.490
3.256
0.891
0.563
0.425
0.176
0.903
10.470
3.172
0.811
0.536
0.375
0.169
0.935
10.460
3.155
0.781
0.444
0.330
0.167
0.968
10.460
2.999
0.665
0.429
0.297
0.135
0.1
48.3
16.6
5.1
2.3
1.6
0.5
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.3
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
42.0
14.4
4.5
2.0
1.4
0.4
0.2
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
paaple
Metfile:
w14737.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
PAappleC.
txt
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Description
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.003
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
0
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
1338
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
4.48
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Interval
1
interval
21
days
Set
to
0
or
delete
line
for
single
app.
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)

Pennsylvania
Turf
stored
as
patrf2.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
PAturfC.
txt
modified
Satday,
12
October
2002
at
17:
27:
02
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w14737.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
06:
12
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)

Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
15.690
4.843
0.961
0.337
0.247
0.061
1962
15.690
4.559
0.894
0.388
0.259
0.064
1963
15.690
4.458
0.872
0.305
0.204
0.051
1964
15.690
4.246
0.826
0.298
0.199
0.049
1965
15.690
4.416
0.862
0.302
0.201
0.050
1966
15.690
4.812
0.951
0.333
0.222
0.055
1967
16.730
4.924
0.977
0.674
0.450
0.111
1968
15.690
4.991
1.539
0.540
0.360
0.089
1969
15.690
4.269
0.831
0.293
0.196
0.049
1970
15.690
4.664
0.918
0.321
0.215
0.053
1971
15.690
4.782
1.044
0.366
0.244
0.061
1972
24.790
7.684
2.424
0.886
0.591
0.146
1973
15.690
5.167
1.468
0.525
0.350
0.087
1974
15.690
4.623
0.908
0.364
0.243
0.060
1975
15.690
4.888
0.969
0.372
0.248
0.061
1976
15.690
4.865
0.963
0.341
0.228
0.056
1977
15.690
4.407
0.860
0.328
0.219
0.054
1978
15.690
5.116
1.031
0.362
0.242
0.060
1979
15.690
5.240
1.996
0.699
0.467
0.115
1980
15.690
4.664
0.919
0.322
0.215
0.053
1981
22.180
6.374
1.248
0.440
0.293
0.073
1982
15.690
4.596
1.714
0.610
0.407
0.101
1983
15.690
4.816
0.971
0.341
0.227
0.056
1984
16.570
5.226
2.470
0.866
0.578
0.142
1985
15.690
4.545
0.891
0.325
0.217
0.054
1986
15.690
4.232
1.194
0.419
0.279
0.069
1987
15.690
4.578
0.898
0.329
0.219
0.054
1988
31.510
11.210
3.144
1.101
0.735
0.181
1989
20.670
9.153
1.897
0.671
0.447
0.111
1990
15.690
5.120
1.975
0.694
0.463
0.114
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
31.510
11.210
3.144
1.101
0.735
0.181
0.065
24.790
9.153
2.470
0.886
0.591
0.146
0.097
22.180
7.684
2.424
0.866
0.578
0.142
0.129
20.670
6.374
1.996
0.699
0.467
0.115
0.161
16.730
5.240
1.975
0.694
0.463
0.114
0.194
16.570
5.226
1.897
0.674
0.450
0.111
0.226
15.690
5.167
1.714
0.671
0.447
0.111
0.258
15.690
5.120
1.539
0.610
0.407
0.101
0.290
15.690
5.116
1.468
0.540
0.360
0.089
0.323
15.690
4.991
1.248
0.525
0.350
0.087
0.355
15.690
4.924
1.194
0.440
0.293
0.073
0.387
15.690
4.888
1.044
0.419
0.279
0.069
0.419
15.690
4.865
1.031
0.388
0.259
0.064
0.452
15.690
4.843
0.977
0.372
0.248
0.061
0.484
15.690
4.816
0.971
0.366
0.247
0.061
0.516
15.690
4.812
0.969
0.364
0.244
0.061
0.548
15.690
4.782
0.963
0.362
0.243
0.060
0.581
15.690
4.664
0.961
0.341
0.242
0.060
0.613
15.690
4.664
0.951
0.341
0.228
0.056
0.645
15.690
4.623
0.919
0.337
0.227
0.056
0.677
15.690
4.596
0.918
0.333
0.222
0.055
0.710
15.690
4.578
0.908
0.329
0.219
0.054
0.742
15.690
4.559
0.898
0.328
0.219
0.054
0.774
15.690
4.545
0.894
0.325
0.217
0.054
0.806
15.690
4.458
0.891
0.322
0.215
0.053
0.839
15.690
4.416
0.872
0.321
0.215
0.053
0.871
15.690
4.407
0.862
0.305
0.204
0.051
0.903
15.690
4.269
0.860
0.302
0.201
0.050
0.935
15.690
4.246
0.831
0.298
0.199
0.049
0.968
15.690
4.232
0.826
0.293
0.196
0.049
0.1
22.0
7.6
2.4
0.8
0.6
0.1
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.1
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
19.2
6.6
2.1
0.7
0.5
0.1
0.1
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
patrf2
Metfile:
w14737.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
PAturfC.
tx
t
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Description
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.003
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
18
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
30
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
6.72
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)

Florida
Tomato
stored
as
fltomato.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
FLtomatoC.
txt
modified
Satday,
12
October
2002
at
16:
44:
04
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w12844.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
04:
30
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)
Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
6.432
2.385
0.728
0.344
0.231
0.069
1962
7.966
2.767
0.912
0.459
0.321
0.080
1963
5.231
1.339
0.262
0.133
0.098
0.031
1964
16.100
4.542
1.944
0.861
0.583
0.145
1965
10.770
4.411
1.890
0.802
0.589
0.146
1966
7.661
4.153
1.514
0.784
0.524
0.129
1967
8.838
2.460
1.213
0.545
0.369
0.092
1968
27.660
9.936
3.864
1.509
1.007
0.248
1969
13.320
3.482
1.389
0.665
0.451
0.111
1970
15.190
4.505
1.817
0.758
0.508
0.126
1971
44.010
10.820
2.141
1.036
0.692
0.172
1972
8.594
3.229
1.579
0.664
0.448
0.111
1973
11.260
2.928
1.051
0.676
0.496
0.123
1974
6.230
1.535
0.454
0.309
0.230
0.057
1975
12.550
4.618
1.245
0.609
0.411
0.102
1976
24.780
8.749
2.693
0.982
0.663
0.166
1977
43.620
13.310
3.026
1.140
0.774
0.195
1978
19.560
4.991
1.605
0.831
0.574
0.142
1979
15.880
5.128
0.993
0.537
0.362
0.099
1980
24.640
7.058
2.246
0.895
0.622
0.154
1981
12.350
2.931
1.080
0.528
0.362
0.100
1982
10.490
3.093
1.402
0.719
0.481
0.119
1983
14.770
4.766
1.599
0.668
0.450
0.111
1984
21.770
8.135
2.489
0.996
0.672
0.166
1985
5.363
1.895
0.762
0.431
0.345
0.085
1986
6.251
1.925
0.811
0.410
0.279
0.069
1987
10.050
4.090
1.058
0.486
0.338
0.088
1988
15.130
5.473
2.001
0.960
0.642
0.158
1989
6.433
2.182
0.445
0.245
0.188
0.048
1990
26.040
7.550
2.021
0.885
0.604
0.149
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
44.010
13.310
3.864
1.509
1.007
0.248
0.065
43.620
10.820
3.026
1.140
0.774
0.195
0.097
27.660
9.936
2.693
1.036
0.692
0.172
0.129
26.040
8.749
2.489
0.996
0.672
0.166
0.161
24.780
8.135
2.246
0.982
0.663
0.166
0.194
24.640
7.550
2.141
0.960
0.642
0.158
0.226
21.770
7.058
2.021
0.895
0.622
0.154
0.258
19.560
5.473
2.001
0.885
0.604
0.149
0.290
16.100
5.128
1.944
0.861
0.589
0.146
0.323
15.880
4.991
1.890
0.831
0.583
0.145
0.355
15.190
4.766
1.817
0.802
0.574
0.142
0.387
15.130
4.618
1.605
0.784
0.524
0.129
0.419
14.770
4.542
1.599
0.758
0.508
0.126
0.452
13.320
4.505
1.579
0.719
0.496
0.123
0.484
12.550
4.411
1.514
0.676
0.481
0.119
0.516
12.350
4.153
1.402
0.668
0.451
0.111
0.548
11.260
4.090
1.389
0.665
0.450
0.111
0.581
10.770
3.482
1.245
0.664
0.448
0.111
0.613
10.490
3.229
1.213
0.609
0.411
0.102
0.645
10.050
3.093
1.080
0.545
0.369
0.100
0.677
8.838
2.931
1.058
0.537
0.362
0.099
0.710
8.594
2.928
1.051
0.528
0.362
0.092
0.742
7.966
2.767
0.993
0.486
0.345
0.088
0.774
7.661
2.460
0.912
0.459
0.338
0.085
0.806
6.433
2.385
0.811
0.431
0.321
0.080
0.839
6.432
2.182
0.762
0.410
0.279
0.069
0.871
6.251
1.925
0.728
0.344
0.231
0.069
0.903
6.230
1.895
0.454
0.309
0.230
0.057
0.935
5.363
1.535
0.445
0.245
0.188
0.048
0.968
5.231
1.339
0.262
0.133
0.098
0.031
0.1
27.5
9.8
2.7
1.0
0.7
0.2
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.1
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
23.9
8.5
2.3
0.9
0.6
0.1
0.1
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
fltomato
Metfile:
w12844.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
FLtomatoC.
txt
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Description
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.003
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
0
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
1338
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
2.24
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)

California
Grape
stored
as
cagrape.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
CAgrapesC.
txt
modified
Satday,
12
October
2002
at
16:
36:
14
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w93193.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
04:
24
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)

Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
10.460
2.512
0.484
0.327
0.218
0.054
1962
10.460
2.540
0.489
0.328
0.219
0.054
1963
10.460
2.694
0.521
0.345
0.230
0.057
1964
10.460
2.532
0.488
0.338
0.226
0.055
1965
10.460
2.393
0.460
0.321
0.214
0.053
1966
10.460
2.496
0.480
0.329
0.220
0.054
1967
10.460
2.469
0.475
0.329
0.219
0.054
1968
10.460
2.457
0.473
0.324
0.216
0.053
1969
10.460
2.465
0.474
0.323
0.216
0.053
1970
10.460
2.416
0.464
0.322
0.215
0.053
1971
10.460
2.737
0.531
0.342
0.228
0.056
1972
10.460
2.544
0.491
0.331
0.221
0.054
1973
10.460
2.477
0.477
0.330
0.220
0.054
1974
10.460
2.314
0.444
0.311
0.207
0.051
1975
10.460
2.342
0.449
0.312
0.208
0.051
1976
10.460
2.393
0.460
0.321
0.214
0.053
1977
10.460
2.698
0.522
0.355
0.237
0.058
1978
10.460
2.338
0.449
0.312
0.208
0.051
1979
10.460
2.389
0.459
0.317
0.211
0.052
1980
10.460
2.603
0.502
0.336
0.224
0.055
1981
10.460
2.480
0.477
0.323
0.216
0.053
1982
10.460
2.457
0.473
0.325
0.216
0.053
1983
10.460
2.389
0.459
0.320
0.214
0.053
1984
10.460
2.358
0.453
0.317
0.211
0.052
1985
10.460
2.375
0.456
0.317
0.211
0.052
1986
10.460
2.461
0.473
0.320
0.214
0.053
1987
13.240
3.210
0.619
0.377
0.252
0.062
1988
10.460
2.481
0.477
0.333
0.222
0.055
1989
10.460
2.465
0.474
0.323
0.216
0.053
1990
10.460
2.512
0.498
0.330
0.220
0.054
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
13.240
3.210
0.619
0.377
0.252
0.062
0.065
10.460
2.737
0.531
0.355
0.237
0.058
0.097
10.460
2.698
0.522
0.345
0.230
0.057
0.129
10.460
2.694
0.521
0.342
0.228
0.056
0.161
10.460
2.603
0.502
0.338
0.226
0.055
0.194
10.460
2.544
0.498
0.336
0.224
0.055
0.226
10.460
2.540
0.491
0.333
0.222
0.055
0.258
10.460
2.532
0.489
0.331
0.221
0.054
0.290
10.460
2.512
0.488
0.330
0.220
0.054
0.323
10.460
2.512
0.484
0.330
0.220
0.054
0.355
10.460
2.496
0.480
0.329
0.220
0.054
0.387
10.460
2.481
0.477
0.329
0.219
0.054
0.419
10.460
2.480
0.477
0.328
0.219
0.054
0.452
10.460
2.477
0.477
0.327
0.218
0.054
0.484
10.460
2.469
0.475
0.325
0.216
0.053
0.516
10.460
2.465
0.474
0.324
0.216
0.053
0.548
10.460
2.465
0.474
0.323
0.216
0.053
0.581
10.460
2.461
0.473
0.323
0.216
0.053
0.613
10.460
2.457
0.473
0.323
0.216
0.053
0.645
10.460
2.457
0.473
0.322
0.215
0.053
0.677
10.460
2.416
0.464
0.321
0.214
0.053
0.710
10.460
2.393
0.460
0.321
0.214
0.053
0.742
10.460
2.393
0.460
0.320
0.214
0.053
0.774
10.460
2.389
0.459
0.320
0.214
0.053
0.806
10.460
2.389
0.459
0.317
0.211
0.052
0.839
10.460
2.375
0.456
0.317
0.211
0.052
0.871
10.460
2.358
0.453
0.317
0.211
0.052
0.903
10.460
2.342
0.449
0.312
0.208
0.051
0.935
10.460
2.338
0.449
0.312
0.208
0.051
0.968
10.460
2.314
0.444
0.311
0.207
0.051
0.1
10.5
2.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.1
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
9.1
2.3
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.05
0.05
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
cagrape
Metfile:
w93193.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
CAgrapesC.
txt
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Description
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.003
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
0
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
1338
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
4.48
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Interval
1
interval
21
days
Set
to
0
or
delete
line
for
single
app.
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)

Georgia
Pecan
stored
as
gapecan.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
GAPecansC.
txt
modified
Tueday,
22
April
2003
at
07:
57:
20
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w93805.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
04:
32
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)

Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
10.460
2.855
0.860
0.492
0.393
0.099
1962
14.510
5.217
1.864
0.830
0.591
0.147
1963
15.250
7.452
2.302
1.218
0.853
0.211
1964
72.920
20.090
4.095
2.269
1.632
0.403
1965
89.960
25.760
9.690
3.812
2.577
0.638
1966
138.000
35.520
7.412
3.547
2.537
0.631
1967
28.040
6.931
1.916
1.283
0.873
0.218
1968
10.460
2.720
0.721
0.456
0.328
0.090
1969
15.880
3.876
1.364
0.800
0.686
0.170
1970
20.740
5.615
1.912
1.229
0.945
0.234
1971
15.550
4.774
1.544
0.925
0.666
0.165
1972
133.000
34.690
7.482
3.130
2.091
0.518
1973
44.840
11.740
3.839
1.676
1.141
0.283
1974
20.430
7.223
1.758
0.839
0.782
0.196
1975
16.710
4.742
2.345
1.280
0.923
0.228
1976
34.200
10.750
2.916
1.885
1.273
0.315
1977
23.390
6.610
1.491
0.711
0.796
0.204
1978
26.010
7.220
1.550
1.141
0.845
0.209
1979
39.080
17.070
3.875
1.933
1.441
0.357
1980
13.220
4.971
1.495
0.914
0.766
0.189
1981
10.460
2.701
1.318
0.658
0.445
0.111
1982
167.000
42.170
8.666
3.548
2.419
0.601
1983
43.230
15.560
3.711
1.883
1.259
0.316
1984
10.470
3.236
1.307
0.898
0.626
0.155
1985
76.740
20.830
5.220
2.208
1.492
0.369
1986
61.980
16.000
3.935
1.801
1.234
0.306
1987
45.670
19.380
5.236
2.141
1.433
0.356
1988
10.460
2.629
0.508
0.344
0.296
0.079
1989
27.560
9.246
3.461
1.693
1.130
0.279
1990
34.080
8.425
2.125
0.930
0.715
0.183
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
167.000
42.170
9.690
3.812
2.577
0.638
0.065
138.000
35.520
8.666
3.548
2.537
0.631
0.097
133.000
34.690
7.482
3.547
2.419
0.601
0.129
89.960
25.760
7.412
3.130
2.091
0.518
0.161
76.740
20.830
5.236
2.269
1.632
0.403
0.194
72.920
20.090
5.220
2.208
1.492
0.369
0.226
61.980
19.380
4.095
2.141
1.441
0.357
0.258
45.670
17.070
3.935
1.933
1.433
0.356
0.290
44.840
16.000
3.875
1.885
1.273
0.316
0.323
43.230
15.560
3.839
1.883
1.259
0.315
0.355
39.080
11.740
3.711
1.801
1.234
0.306
0.387
34.200
10.750
3.461
1.693
1.141
0.283
0.419
34.080
9.246
2.916
1.676
1.130
0.279
0.452
28.040
8.425
2.345
1.283
0.945
0.234
0.484
27.560
7.452
2.302
1.280
0.923
0.228
0.516
26.010
7.223
2.125
1.229
0.873
0.218
0.548
23.390
7.220
1.916
1.218
0.853
0.211
0.581
20.740
6.931
1.912
1.141
0.845
0.209
0.613
20.430
6.610
1.864
0.930
0.796
0.204
0.645
16.710
5.615
1.758
0.925
0.782
0.196
0.677
15.880
5.217
1.550
0.914
0.766
0.189
0.710
15.550
4.971
1.544
0.898
0.715
0.183
0.742
15.250
4.774
1.495
0.839
0.686
0.170
0.774
14.510
4.742
1.491
0.830
0.666
0.165
0.806
13.220
3.876
1.364
0.800
0.626
0.155
0.839
10.470
3.236
1.318
0.711
0.591
0.147
0.871
10.460
2.855
1.307
0.658
0.445
0.111
0.903
10.460
2.720
0.860
0.492
0.393
0.099
0.935
10.460
2.701
0.721
0.456
0.328
0.090
0.968
10.460
2.629
0.508
0.344
0.296
0.079
0.1
128.7
33.8
7.5
3.5
2.4
0.6
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.3
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
112.0
29.4
6.5
3.0
2.1
0.5
0.2
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
gapecan
Metfile:
w93805.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
GAPecansC.
txt
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Descriptio
n
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.003
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
0
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
1338
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis
:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis
:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis
:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
4.48
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Interval
1
interval
21
days
Set
to
0
or
delete
line
for
single
app.
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)

North
Carolina
Tobacco
stored
as
nctobacc.
out
Chemical:
napropamide
PRZM
environment:
NCtobaccoC.
txt
modified
Satday,
12
October
2002
at
17:
13:
36
EXAMS
environment:
ir298.
exv
modified
Thuday,
29
August
2002
at
15:
34:
12
Metfile:
w13722.
dvf
modified
Wedday,
3
July
2002
at
09:
05:
50
Water
segment
concentrations
(
ppb)

Year
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
1961
5.231
1.447
0.282
0.116
0.090
0.026
1962
5.231
1.353
0.277
0.225
0.154
0.038
1963
5.231
1.458
0.626
0.223
0.152
0.041
1964
5.231
1.414
0.275
0.133
0.102
0.038
1965
8.302
2.769
0.866
0.448
0.301
0.074
1966
5.231
1.525
0.540
0.255
0.195
0.051
1967
11.880
3.347
0.773
0.379
0.259
0.066
1968
5.231
1.479
0.403
0.183
0.125
0.033
1969
5.231
1.358
0.324
0.150
0.115
0.029
1970
5.231
1.370
0.325
0.180
0.147
0.038
1971
7.288
2.049
0.510
0.219
0.149
0.039
1972
8.526
2.605
0.519
0.296
0.215
0.054
1973
7.213
2.251
0.651
0.354
0.243
0.060
1974
5.231
1.461
0.420
0.150
0.121
0.031
1975
5.231
1.511
0.390
0.157
0.143
0.036
1976
8.022
2.279
0.486
0.171
0.114
0.037
1977
5.231
1.380
0.384
0.134
0.104
0.041
1978
5.231
1.494
0.292
0.169
0.159
0.041
1979
5.231
1.509
0.382
0.147
0.142
0.041
1980
9.193
2.347
0.454
0.293
0.196
0.053
1981
5.231
1.401
0.395
0.195
0.144
0.037
1982
5.231
1.414
0.438
0.253
0.170
0.042
1983
5.231
1.425
0.408
0.147
0.098
0.025
1984
13.810
3.730
1.001
0.370
0.278
0.069
1985
5.231
1.445
0.307
0.140
0.120
0.032
1986
5.231
1.427
0.432
0.156
0.120
0.036
1987
5.231
1.413
0.339
0.124
0.098
0.040
1988
5.231
1.754
0.351
0.125
0.088
0.028
1989
5.231
1.427
0.286
0.197
0.135
0.035
1990
5.231
1.547
0.564
0.199
0.133
0.037
Sorted
results
Prob.
Peak
96
hr
21
Day
60
Day
90
Day
Yearly
0.032
13.810
3.730
1.001
0.448
0.301
0.074
0.065
11.880
3.347
0.866
0.379
0.278
0.069
0.097
9.193
2.769
0.773
0.370
0.259
0.066
0.129
8.526
2.605
0.651
0.354
0.243
0.060
0.161
8.302
2.347
0.626
0.296
0.215
0.054
0.194
8.022
2.279
0.564
0.293
0.196
0.053
0.226
7.288
2.251
0.540
0.255
0.195
0.051
0.258
7.213
2.049
0.519
0.253
0.170
0.042
0.290
5.231
1.754
0.510
0.225
0.159
0.041
0.323
5.231
1.547
0.486
0.223
0.154
0.041
0.355
5.231
1.525
0.454
0.219
0.152
0.041
0.387
5.231
1.511
0.438
0.199
0.149
0.041
0.419
5.231
1.509
0.432
0.197
0.147
0.040
0.452
5.231
1.494
0.420
0.195
0.144
0.039
0.484
5.231
1.479
0.408
0.183
0.143
0.038
0.516
5.231
1.461
0.403
0.180
0.142
0.038
0.548
5.231
1.458
0.395
0.171
0.135
0.038
0.581
5.231
1.447
0.390
0.169
0.133
0.037
0.613
5.231
1.445
0.384
0.157
0.125
0.037
0.645
5.231
1.427
0.382
0.156
0.121
0.037
0.677
5.231
1.427
0.351
0.150
0.120
0.036
0.710
5.231
1.425
0.339
0.150
0.120
0.036
0.742
5.231
1.414
0.325
0.147
0.115
0.035
0.774
5.231
1.414
0.324
0.147
0.114
0.033
0.806
5.231
1.413
0.307
0.140
0.104
0.032
0.839
5.231
1.401
0.292
0.134
0.102
0.031
0.871
5.231
1.380
0.286
0.133
0.098
0.029
0.903
5.231
1.370
0.282
0.125
0.098
0.028
0.935
5.231
1.358
0.277
0.124
0.090
0.026
0.968
5.231
1.353
0.275
0.116
0.088
0.025
0.1
9.1
2.8
0.8
0.4
0.3
0.1
Average
of
yearly
averages:
0.04
Adjusted
EECs
0.1
7.9
2.4
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.04
Inputs
generated
by
pe4.
pl
­
8­
August­
2003
Data
used
for
this
run:
Output
File:
nctobacc
Metfile:
w13722.
dvf
PRZM
scenario:
NCtobaccoC.
txt
EXAMS
environment
file:
ir298.
exv
Chemical
Name:
napropamide
Description
Variable
Name
Value
Units
Comments
Molecular
weight
mwt
271
g/
mol
Henry's
Law
Const.
henry
atm­
m^
3/
mol
Vapor
Pressure
vapr
7.10E­
04
torr
Solubility
sol
730
mg/
L
Kd
Kd
8
mg/
L
Koc
Koc
mg/
L
Photolysis
half­
life
kdp
0.003
days
Half­
life
Aerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacw
0
days
Halfife
Anaerobic
Aquatic
Metabolism
kbacs
0
days
Halfife
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolism
asm
1338
days
Halfife
Hydrolysis:
pH
5
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
7
0
days
Half­
life
Hydrolysis:
pH
9
0
days
Half­
life
Method:
CAM
4
integer
See
PRZM
manual
Incorporation
Depth:
DEPI
5
cm
Application
Rate:
TAPP
2.24
kg/
ha
Application
Efficiency:
APPEFF
0.99
fraction
Spray
Drift
DRFT
0.064
fraction
of
application
rate
applied
to
pond
Application
Date
Date
15­
5
dd/
mm
or
dd/
mmm
or
dd­
mm
or
dd­
mmm
Record
17:
FILTRA
IPSCND
1
UPTKF
Record
18:
PLVKRT
PLDKRT
FEXTRC
0.5
Flag
for
Index
Res.
Run
IR
IR
Flag
for
runoff
calc.
RUNOFF
total
none,
monthly
or
total(
average
of
entire
run)
APPENDIX
B.
SCI­
GROW
Input
Table
and
Runs
for
Napropamide
for
Assessed
Terrestrial
Crops
Assumptions
SCIGROW
is
a
regression­
based
model
that
uses
few
input
parameters:
pesticide's
organic
carbon
partition
coefficient
(
Koc),
aerobic
soil
degradation
half­
life,
and
product
label
application
rate
and
frequency
(
Barrett,
1997).
It
provides
a
groundwater
screening
concentration
to
be
used
in
determining
the
potential
risk
to
human
health
from
drinking
water
contaminated
with
a
pesticide.
The
groundwater
concentration
is
estimated
based
on
the
maximum
application
rates
in
areas
where
groundwater
is
exceptionally
vulnerable
to
contamination.
These
vulnerable
areas
are
characterized
by
high
rainfall,
rapidly
permeable
soil,
and
shallow
aquifer.
Since
the
concentrations
estimated
from
this
model
are
likely
to
be
approached
in
only
a
very
small
percentage
of
drinking
water
sources,
SCIGROW
is
apparently
not
to
be
applied
for
national
or
regional
estimates.
Tables
1
and
2
present
the
Inputs
and
Outputs
for
the
SCI­
GROW
Model,
respectively.

Table
1.
SCI­
GROW
Inputs
for
Napropamide
using
the
SCI­
GROW2
Model.

MODEL
INPUT
VARIABLE1
INPUT
VALUE
COMMENTS
Application
Rate
(
kg/
ha)
CA
Almonds
FL
Citrus
OR
Berry
OR
Apple
PA
Apple
PA
Turf
FL
Tomato
CA
Grape
GA
Pecan
NC
Tobacco
4
4
44
4
6
24
4
2
Based
on
BEAD
use
data
lbs
ai/
A
Maximum
No.
of
Applications
OR
berry,
FL
tomato,
PA
turf,
NC
tobacco
CA
almonds,
OR,
PA
apple,
CA
grape,
GA
pecan,
FL
citrus,
1
2
Based
on
BEAD
use
data
lbs
ai/
A
Median
Koc
(
ml/
g)
577
Average
of
values
in
MRID
41575302
Aerobic
Soil
Metabolic
Half­
life
(
days)
parent
446
446
day
half­
life
based
on
extractable
residues
in
MRID
41105901
1
Input
parameters
based
on
2/
8/
02
Input
Parameter
Guidance
Table
2.
Drinking
Water
EECs
for
Napropamide
from
Ground
Water
EECs
(
ug/
L)

Scenario
and
crop
GW
Screening
Concentration
CA
almonds
4.5
FL
citrus
4.5
OR
berry
2.3
OR
apple
4.5
PA
apple
4.5
PA
turf
3.4
FL
tomato
1.1
CA
grape
4.5
GA
pecan
4.5
NC
tobacco
1.1
Model
Outputs
SCIGROW
VERSION
2.3
ENVIRONMENTAL
FATE
AND
EFFECTS
DIVISION
OFFICE
OF
PESTICIDE
PROGRAMS
U.
S.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
SCREENING
MODEL
FOR
AQUATIC
PESTICIDE
EXPOSURE
SciGrow
version
2.3
chemical:
napropamide
time
is
7/
14/
2004
12:
43:
31
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Application
Number
of
Total
Use
Koc
Soil
Aerobic
rate
(
lb/
acre)
applications
(
lb/
acre/
yr)
(
ml/
g)
metabolism
(
days)
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
4.000
2.0
8.000
5.77E+
02
446.0
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
groundwater
screening
cond
(
ppb)
=
4.51E+
00
************************************************************************

SciGrow
version
2.3
chemical:
napropamide
time
is
7/
14/
2004
12:
43:
53
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Application
Number
of
Total
Use
Koc
Soil
Aerobic
rate
(
lb/
acre)
applications
(
lb/
acre/
yr)
(
ml/
g)
metabolism
(
days)
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
4.000
1.0
4.000
5.77E+
02
446.0
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
groundwater
screening
cond
(
ppb)
=
2.26E+
00
************************************************************************

SciGrow
version
2.3
chemical:
napropamide
time
is
7/
14/
2004
12:
44:
0
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Application
Number
of
Total
Use
Koc
Soil
Aerobic
rate
(
lb/
acre)
applications
(
lb/
acre/
yr)
(
ml/
g)
metabolism
(
days)
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
2.000
1.0
2.000
5.77E+
02
446.0
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
groundwater
screening
cond
(
ppb)
=
1.13E+
00
************************************************************************

SciGrow
version
2.3
chemical:
napropamide
time
is
7/
14/
2004
12:
44:
6
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Application
Number
of
Total
Use
Koc
Soil
Aerobic
rate
(
lb/
acre)
applications
(
lb/
acre/
yr)
(
ml/
g)
metabolism
(
days)
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
6.000
1.0
6.000
5.77E+
02
446.0
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
groundwater
screening
cond
(
ppb)
=
3.38E+
00
************************************************************************
