13301
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
53
/
Wednesday,
March
19,
2003
/
Notices
4.
If
you
estimate
potential
burden
or
costs,
explain
how
you
arrived
at
your
estimate.
5.
Provide
specific
examples
to
illustrate
your
concerns.
6.
Offer
alternatives.
7.
Make
sure
to
submit
your
comments
by
the
comment
period
deadline
identified.
8.
To
ensure
proper
receipt
by
EPA,
identify
the
appropriate
docket
identification
number
in
the
subject
line
on
the
first
page
of
your
response.
It
would
also
be
helpful
if
you
provided
the
name,
date,
and
Federal
Register
citation
related
to
your
comments.

F.
What
Information
Is
EPA
Particularly
Interested
In?

Pursuant
to
section
3506(
c)(
2)(
A)
of
the
PRA,
EPA
specifically
solicits
comments
and
information
to
enable
it
to:
1.
Evaluate
whether
the
proposed
collections
of
information
are
necessary
for
the
proper
performance
of
the
functions
of
the
Agency,
including
whether
the
information
will
have
practical
utility.
2.
Evaluate
the
accuracy
of
the
Agency's
estimates
of
the
burdens
of
the
proposed
collections
of
information.
3.
Enhance
the
quality,
utility,
and
clarity
of
the
information
to
be
collected.
4.
Minimize
the
burden
of
the
collections
of
information
on
those
who
are
to
respond,
including
through
the
use
of
appropriate
automated
or
electronic
collection
technologies
or
other
forms
of
information
technology,
e.
g.,
permitting
electronic
submission
of
responses.

II.
Technical
Information
Title:
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
Requirements
for
40
CFR
part
258
 
Solid
Waste
Disposal
Facilities
and
Practices,
OMB
Control
No.
2050
 
0122.
This
information
collection
is
an
extension
of
a
currently
approved
collection
that
is
scheduled
to
expire
on
August
31,
2003.
Under
the
PRA
regulations,
the
agency
may
continue
to
conduct
or
sponsor
the
collection
of
information
while
this
submission
is
pending
at
OMB.
Abstract:
In
order
to
effectively
implement
and
enforce
final
changes
to
40
CFR
part
258
on
a
State
level,
owners/
operators
of
municipal
solid
waste
landfills
have
to
comply
with
the
final
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements.
Respondents
include
owners
or
operators
of
new
municipal
solid
waste
landfills
(
MSWLFs),
existing
MSWLFs,
and
lateral
expansions
of
existing
MSWLFs.
These
owners
or
operators
could
include
Federal,
State,
and
local
governments,
and
private
waste
management
companies.
Facilities
in
SIC
codes
922,
495,
282,
281,
and
287
may
be
affected
by
this
rule.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15,
and
are
identified
on
the
form
and/
or
instrument,
if
applicable
Burden
Statement:
The
annual
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
the
current
collection
of
information
averages
97
hours
per
response.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
Current
ICR:
Respondents/
Affected
Entities:
Owners/
Operators
of
Municipal
Solid
Waste
Landfills.
Estimated
Number
of
Respondents:
2300.
Frequency
of
Response:
On
Occasion.
Estimated
Total
Annual
Hour
Burden:
239,858
Hours.
Estimated
Total
Annualized
Capital
and
Operating
&
Maintenance
Cost
Burden:
0.

Robert
Springer,
Director,
Office
of
Solid
Waste.
[
FR
Doc.
03
 
6581
Filed
3
 
18
 
03;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
P
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
[
OPP
 
2003
 
0105;
FRL
 
7298
 
6]

Notice
of
Availability
of
Regional
Pesticide
Environmental
Stewardship
Program
(
PESP)
Grants
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).
ACTION:
Notice.

SUMMARY:
EPA
is
announcing
the
availability
of
approximately
$
500,000
in
fiscal
year
2003
grant/
cooperative
agreement
funds
under
section
20
of
the
Federal
Insecticide,
Fungicide,
and
Rodenticide
Act
(
FIFRA)
as
amended.
This
funding
is
for
grants
to
States
and
federally
recognized
Native
American
Tribes
for
research,
public
education,
training,
monitoring,
demonstrations,
and
studies
that
advance
pesticide
risk
reduction.
DATES:
Applications
must
be
received
by
the
appropriate
EPA
Regional
Office
on
or
before
May
16,
2003.
EPA
will
make
its
award
decisions
by
June
20,
2003.

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Your
EPA
Regional
PESP
Coordinator
listed
under
Unit
V.
of
this
notice.

SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:

I.
General
Information
A.
Does
this
Action
Apply
to
Me?

This
action
is
directed
to
the
public
in
general
but
will
be
of
particular
interest
to
eligible
applicants
which
include
the
50
States,
District
of
Columbia,
U.
S.
Virgin
Islands,
Commonwealth
of
Puerto
Rico,
any
territory
or
possession
of
the
United
States,
any
agency
or
instrumentality
of
a
State
including
State
universities,
and
all
federally
recognized
Native
American
Tribes.
Since
other
entities
may
also
be
interested,
the
Agency
has
not
attempted
to
describe
all
the
specific
entities
that
may
be
affected
by
this
action.
If
you
have
any
questions
regarding
the
applicability
of
this
action
to
a
particular
entity,
consult
your
EPA
Regional
PESP
Coordinator
listed
under
Unit
V.
of
this
notice.

B.
How
Can
I
Get
Additional
Information,
Including
Copies
of
this
Document
and
Other
Related
Documents?

1.
Docket.
EPA
has
established
an
official
public
docket
for
this
action
under
docket
identification
(
ID)
number
OPP
 
2003
 
0105.
The
official
public
docket
consists
of
the
documents
specifically
referenced
in
this
action,
any
public
comments
received,
and
other
information
related
to
this
action.
Although
a
part
of
the
official
docket,
the
public
docket
does
not
include
Confidential
Business
Information
(
CBI)
or
other
information
whose
disclosure
is
restricted
by
statute.
The
official
public
docket
is
the
collection
of
materials
that
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
Public
Information
and
Records
Integrity
Branch
(
PIRIB),
Rm.
119,
Crystal
Mall
#
2,
1921
Jefferson
Davis
Hwy.,
Arlington,
VA.
This
docket
facility
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
18:
09
Mar
18,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00050
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
19MRN1.
SGM
19MRN1
13302
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
53
/
Wednesday,
March
19,
2003
/
Notices
holidays.
The
docket
telephone
number
is
(
703)
305
 
5805.
2.
Electronic
access.
You
may
access
this
Federal
Register
document
electronically
through
the
EPA
Internet
under
the
``
Federal
Register''
listings
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
fedrgstr/.
Additional
information
is
available
on
EPA's
PESP
website
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
oppbppd1/
PESP/
regional_
grants.
htm.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
and
comment
system,
EPA
Dockets.
You
may
use
EPA
Dockets
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket/
to
submit
or
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
official
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
Although
not
all
docket
materials
may
be
available
electronically,
you
may
still
access
any
of
the
publicly
available
docket
materials
through
the
docket
facility
identified
in
Unit
I.
B.
1.
Once
in
the
system,
select
``
search,''
then
key
in
the
appropriate
docket
ID
number.
3.
By
mail
or
in
person.
Contact
your
EPA
Regional
PESP
Coordinator
listed
under
Unit
V.
of
this
notice.

II.
Availability
of
FY'
03
Funds
With
this
publication,
EPA
is
announcing
the
availability
of
approximately
$
500,000
in
grant/
cooperative
agreement
funds
for
FY'
03.
The
Agency
has
delegated
grant
making
authority
to
the
EPA
Regional
Offices.
Federal
funding
is
limited
to
$
40,000
per
project
and
matching
funds
are
not
required.
Projects
which
leverage
funding
from
other
sources
are
encouraged.

III.
Eligible
Applicants
In
accordance
with
the
Act,
``.
.
.
Federal
agencies,
universities,
or
others
as
may
be
necessary
to
carry
out
the
purposes
of
the
act,
.
.
.''
are
eligible
to
receive
funding.
Restrictions
on
the
funds
appropriated
for
this
program
limit
the
eligible
applicants
to
the
50
States,
District
of
Columbia,
U.
S.
Virgin
Islands,
Commonwealth
of
Puerto
Rico,
any
territory
or
possession
of
the
United
States,
any
agency
or
instrumentality
of
a
State
including
State
universities,
and
all
federally
recognized
Native
American
Tribes.
The
term
``
State''
in
this
notice
refers
to
all
eligible
applicants.
Local
governments,
private
universities,
private
nonprofit
entities,
private
businesses,
and
individuals
are
not
eligible.
EPA
encourages
organizations
excluded
from
applying
directly
to
work
with
eligible
applicants
in
developing
proposals
that
include
them
as
participants
in
the
projects.
Contact
your
EPA
Regional
PESP
Coordinator
for
assistance
in
identifying
and
contacting
eligible
applicants.

IV.
Activities
and
Criteria
A.
Activities
The
goal
of
PESP
is
to
reduce
the
risks
associated
with
pesticide
use
in
agricultural
and
non­
agricultural
settings
in
the
United
States.
The
purpose
of
the
grant
program
is
to
support
projects
that
address
this
goal.
Pesticide
pollution
prevention,
integrated
pest
management
(
IPM),
IPM
in
schools,
children's
health
issues
related
to
pesticides,
and
those
research
methods
for
documenting
IPM
adoption
or
the
reduction
of
risks
associated
with
changes
in
pesticide
use
will
receive
priority
consideration.
Other
projects
will
be
considered
as
they
complement
these
goals
through
public
education,
training,
monitoring,
demonstrations,
and
other
activities.
EPA
specifically
seeks
to
build
IPM
capacities
or
to
evaluate
the
economic
feasibility
of
new
IPM
approaches
at
the
local
level
(
i.
e.,
innovative
approaches
and
methodologies
that
use
application
or
other
strategies
to
reduce
the
risks
associated
with
pesticide
use).
Projects
might
focus
on,
for
example:
 
Researching
the
effectiveness
of
multimedia
communication
activities
for;
including
but
not
limited
to:
promoting
local
IPM
activities,
providing
technical
assistance
to
pesticide
users;
collecting
and
analyzing
data
to
target
outreach
and
technical
assistance
opportunities;
developing
measures
to
determine
and
document
progress
in
pollution
prevention;
and
identifying
regulatory
and
nonregulatory
barriers
or
incentives
to
pollution
prevention.
 
Researching
methods
for
establishing
IPM
as
an
environmental
management
priority,
establishing
prevention
goals,
developing
strategies
to
meet
those
goals,
and
integrating
the
ethic
within
both
governmental
and
non­
governmental
institutions
of
the
State
or
region.
 
Initiating
research
or
other
projects
that
test
and
support:
Innovative
techniques
for
reducing
pesticide
risk
or
using
pesticides
in
a
way
to
reduce
risk,
and
innovative
application
techniques
to
reduce
worker
and
environmental
exposure.
 
Implementing
reduced­
risk
pest
management
programs
with
special
considerations
of
the
impact
to
human
health,
water
and/
or
air
quality,
or
ecosystem
processes.
A
list
of
projects
funded
since
FY'
98
and
their
proposals
may
be
obtained
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
oppbppd1/
PESP/
regional_
grants.
htm
or
from
your
Regional
PESP
Coordinator.

B.
Criteria
EPA
Regional
Offices
are
responsible
for
the
solicitation,
screening,
and
selection
of
proposals
for
funding.
A
generic
request
for
proposal
will
be
available
on
EPA's
website
on
or
before
March
26,
2003,
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
oppbppd1/
PESP/
regional_
grants.
htm.
Interested
applicants
must
contact
the
appropriate
EPA
Regional
PESP
Coordinator
to
obtain
specific
instructions,
regional
criteria,
guidance,
and
format
for
submitting
proposals.
Proposals
will
be
evaluated
based
on
the
following
criteria:
1.
Qualifications
and
experience
of
the
applicant
relative
to
the
proposed
project.
 
Does
the
applicant
demonstrate
experience
in
the
field
of
the
proposed
activity?
 
Does
the
applicant
have
the
properly
trained
staff,
facilities,
or
infrastructure
in
place
to
conduct
the
project?
2.
Consistency
of
proposal
with
the
risk
reduction
goals
of
PESP.
3.
Does
the
project
provide
for
a
quantitative
or
qualitative
evaluation
of
achieving
the
stated
goals?
 
Is
the
project
designed
in
such
a
way
that
it
is
possible
to
measure
and
document
the
results
quantitatively
and
qualitatively?
 
Does
the
applicant
identify
the
method
that
will
be
used
to
measure
and
document
the
results
quantitatively
and
qualitatively?
4.
Likelihood
the
project
can
be
replicated
to
benefit
other
communities
or
the
product
may
have
broad
utility
to
a
widespread
audience.
Can
this
project,
taking
into
account
typical
staff
and
financial
restraints,
be
replicated
by
similar
organizations
in
different
locations
to
address
the
same
or
similar
problem?

C.
Program
Management
The
awarding
of
FY'
03
funds
will
be
managed
through
the
EPA
Regional
Offices.
Quality
Assurance/
Quality
Control
plans
may
be
required,
depending
on
the
nature
of
the
project
and
the
data
collected.
Contact
your
Regional
PESP
Coordinator
for
more
information
about
this
requirement.

V.
Regional
PESP
Coordinators
Region
I:
(
Connecticut,
Maine,
Massachusetts,
New
Hampshire,
Rhode
Island,
Vermont),
Andrea
Szylvian,
1
Congress
St.,
Suite
1100,
(
CPT),
Boston,
MA
02114
 
2023;
telephone:
(
617)
918
 
1198;
e­
mail:
szylvian.
andrea@
epa.
gov.
Region
II:
(
New
Jersey,
New
York,
Puerto
Rico,
Virgin
Islands),
Tara
VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
18:
09
Mar
18,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00051
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
19MRN1.
SGM
19MRN1
13303
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
53
/
Wednesday,
March
19,
2003
/
Notices
Masters,
Raritan
Depot,
2890
Woodbridge
Ave.,
(
MS­
500),
Edison,
NJ
08837
 
3679;
telephone:
(
732)
906
 
6183;
e­
mail:
masters.
tara@
epa.
gov.
Region
III:
(
Delaware,
Maryland,
Pennsylvania,
Virginia,
West
Virginia,
District
of
Columbia),
Fatima
El­
Abdaoui,
1650
Arch
St.,
(
3WC32),
Philadelphia,
PA
19103
 
2029;
telephone:
(
215)
814
 
2129;
e­
mail:
elabdaoui
fatima@
epa.
gov.
Region
IV:
(
Alabama,
Florida,
Georgia,
Kentucky,
Mississippi,
North
Carolina,
South
Carolina,
Tennessee),
Troy
Pierce,
61
Forsyth
St.,
SW.,
Atlanta,
GA
30303
 
8960;
telephone:
(
404)
562
 
9016;
e­
mail:
pierce.
troy@
epa.
gov.
Region
V:
(
Illinois,
Indiana,
Michigan,
Minnesota,
Ohio,
Wisconsin),
Heather
McDonald,
77
W
Jackson
Blvd.,
(
DT­
8J),
Chicago,
IL
60604
 
3507;
telephone:
(
312)
886
 
3572;
e­
mail:
mcdonald.
heather@
epa.
gov.
Region
VI:
(
Arkansas,
Louisiana,
New
Mexico,
Oklahoma,
Texas),
Jerry
Collins,
1445
Ross
Ave.,
Suite
1200,
(
6PD­
P),
Dallas,
TX
75202
 
2733;
telephone:
(
214)
665
 
7562;
e­
mail:
collins.
jerry@
epa.
gov.
Region
VII:
(
Iowa,
Kansas,
Missouri,
Nebraska),
Brad
Horchem,
901
N
5th
St.,
(
WWPDPEST),
Kansas
City,
KS
66101;
telephone:
(
913)
551
 
7137;
e­
mail:
horchem.
brad@
epa.
gov.
Region
VIII:
(
Colorado,
Montana,
North
Dakota,
South
Dakota,
Utah,
Wyoming),
Peg
Perreault,
999
18th
St,
Suite
300,
(
8P­
P3T),
Denver,
CO
80202
 
2466;
telephone:
(
303)
312
 
6286;
e­
mail:
perreault.
peg@
epa.
gov.
Region
IX:
(
Arizona,
California,
Hawaii,
Nevada,
American
Samoa,
Guam),
Paul
Feder,
75
Hawthorne
St.,
(
CMD­
1),
San
Francisco,
CA
94105;
telephone:
(
415)
947
 
4160;
e­
mail:
feder.
paul@
epa.
gov.
Region
X:
(
Alaska,
Idaho,
Oregon,
Washington),
Sandy
Halstead,
24106
North
Bunn
Road,
Prosser,
WA
99350;
telephone:
(
509)
786
 
9225;
e­
mail:
halstead.
sandra@
epa.
gov.

List
of
Subjects
Environmental
protection,
Pesticides,
Risk
reduction.

Dated:
March
13,
2003.

Janet
L.
Andersen,

Director,
Biopesticides
and
Pollution
Prevention
Division,
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs.
[
FR
Doc.
03
 
6586
Filed
3
 
18
 
03;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
S
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
[
FRL
 
7469
 
9]

Notice
of
Request
for
Initial
Proposals
(
IP)
for
Projects
To
Be
Funded
From
the
Water
Quality
Cooperative
Agreement
Allocation
(
CFDA
66.463
 
Water
Quality
Cooperative
Agreements)

AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).
ACTION:
Notice.

SUMMARY:
EPA
Region
6
is
soliciting
Initial
Proposals
(
IP)
from
State
water
pollution
control
agencies,
interstate
agencies,
other
public
or
nonprofit
agencies,
institutions,
organizations,
and
other
entities
as
defined
by
the
Clean
Water
Act
(
CWA)
interested
in
applying
for
Federal
assistance
for
Water
Quality
Cooperative
Agreements
under
the
CWA
section
104(
b)(
3)
in
the
States
of
Arkansas,
Louisiana,
New
Mexico,
Oklahoma
and
Texas.
Region
6
EPA
will
award
an
estimated
$
1
million
to
eligible
applicants
through
assistance
agreements
ranging
in
size,
on
average,
from
$
40,000
up
to
$
200,000
(
Federal)
for
innovative
projects/
demonstrations/
studies
that
can
be
used
as
models
relating
to
the
prevention,
reduction,
and
elimination
of
water
pollution.
From
the
IPs
received,
EPA
estimates
up
to10
to
12
projects
may
be
selected
to
submit
full
applications.
The
Agency
reserves
the
right
to
reject
all
IPs
and
not
make
awards.
A
request
for
proposals
for
tribal
governments
will
be
issued
under
a
separate
notice.
DATES:
EPA
will
consider
all
proposals
received
on
or
before
12
p.
m.
midnight
central
standard
time
May
5,
2003.
IPs
received
after
the
due
date
will
not
be
considered
for
funding.
ADDRESSES:
IPs
should
be
mailed
to:
Terry
Mendiola
(
6WQ
 
AT),
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Region
6,
Water
Quality
Protection
Division,
1445
Ross
Avenue,
Dallas,
Texas
75202
 
2733.
Overnight
delivery
may
be
sent
to
the
same
address.
FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Terry
Mendiola
by
telephone
at
214
 
665
 
7144
or
by
e­
mail
at
mendiola.
teresita@
epa.
gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:

Purpose
of
This
Request
for
Initial
Proposals
EPA
Region
6'
s
Water
Quality
Protection
Division
is
requesting
proposals
from
State
water
pollution
control
agencies,
interstate
agencies,
other
public
or
nonprofit
agencies,
institutions,
organizations,
and
other
entities
as
defined
by
the
CWA
for
unique
and
innovative
projects
that
address
the
National
Pollutant
Discharge
Elimination
System
(
NPDES)
program
with
special
emphasis
on
concentrated
animal
feeding
operations
(
CAFO)
permitting,
sanitary
sewer
overflow
(
SSO)
impact
studies,
watershed
integration
through
NPDES,
homeland
security,
and
promotion
of
``
good
data''
efforts
to
support
NPDES
decisions,
as
well
as,
water
quality
projects
relating
to
water
quality
standards,
assessment
methods,
and
reporting,
ecoregion
and
subregion
delineation,
and
improved
approaches
to
total
maximum
daily
load
(
TMDL)
modeling.
An
organization
whose
IP
is
selected
for
Federal
assistance
must
complete
an
EPA
Application
for
Assistance,
including
the
Federal
SF
 
424
form
(
Application
for
Federal
Assistance,
see
40
CFR
30.12
&
31.10).
Organizations
who
have
an
existing
agreement
under
this
program
are
eligible
to
compete
for
new
awards.

EPA
Region
6
Has
Identified
the
Following
High
Priority
Areas
for
Consideration
WQCAs
awarded
under
section
104(
b)(
3)
may
only
be
used
to
conduct
and
promote
the
coordination
and
acceleration
of
activities
such
as
research,
investigations,
experiments,
training,
education,
demonstrations,
surveys,
and
studies
relating
to
the
causes,
effects,
extent,
prevention,
reduction,
and
elimination
of
water
pollution.
These
activities,
while
not
defined
in
the
statute,
advance
the
state
of
knowledge,
gather
information,
or
transfer
information.
For
instance,
``
demonstrations''
are
generally
projects
that
demonstrate
new
or
experimental
technologies,
methods,
or
approaches
and
the
results
of
the
project
will
be
disseminated
so
that
others
can
benefit
from
the
knowledge
gained.
A
project
that
is
accomplished
though
the
performance
of
routine,
traditional,
or
established
practices,
or
a
project
that
is
simply
intended
to
carry
out
a
task
rather
than
transfer
information
or
advance
the
state
of
knowledge,
however
worthwhile
the
project
may
be,
is
not
a
demonstration.
Research
projects
may
include
the
application
of
the
practices
when
they
contribute
to
learning
about
an
environmental
concept
or
problem.
EPA
Region
6
has
identified
several
subject
areas
for
priority
consideration.
EPA
will
award
WQCAs
for
research,
investigations,
experiments,
training,
demonstrations,
surveys
and
studies
related
to
the
causes,
effects,
extent,
prevention,
reduction,
and
elimination
VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
18:
09
Mar
18,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00052
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
19MRN1.
SGM
19MRN1
