UNITED
STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
WASHINGTON,
D.
C.
20460
OFFICE
OF
PREVENTION,
PESTICIDES
AND
TOXIC
SUBSTANCES
May
30,
2002
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
Carbaryl.
List
A
Reregistration
Case
0080.
Chemical
No.
056801.
Revised
Product
and
Residue
Chemistry
Chapters
for
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision.
DP
Barcode:
D283328.

FROM:
Felecia
Fort,
Chemist
Reregistration
Branch
1
Health
Effects
Division
(7509C)

THRU:
Whang
Phang,
Ph.
D.,
Branch
Senior
Scientist
Reregistration
Branch
1
Health
Effects
Division
(7509C)

TO:
Jeff
Dawson,
Chemist
Health
Effects
Division(
7509C)
and
Anthony
Britten,
Chemical
Review
Manager
Special
Review
and
Reregistration
Division
(7508C)

Attached
are
the
Revised
Product
and
Residue
Chemistry
Chapters
for
the
Carbaryl
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
Document
(RED).
The
chapters
were
revised
to
incorporate
comments
submitted
by
the
registrant.
These
revisions
include
changes
to
the
requirements
for
label
amendments,
changes
to
label
acceptance
dates,
and
changes
to
the
food/
feed
use
patterns
table.
The
chapters
were
also
changed
to
reflect
uses
that
are
not
being
supported
by
the
registrant
or
have
been
cancelled.

Product
Chemistry
Most
pertinent
data
requirements
are
satisfied
for
the
Aventis
99%
T,
except
that
data
are
required
for
UV/
visible
absorption
(OPPTS
830.7050).
For
the
Aventis
97.5%
and
80%
FIs,
and
the
Drexel
50%
FI,
additional
data
are
required
concerning
product
identity
and
composition,
discussion
of
formation
of
impurities,
certified
limits,
enforcement
analytical
method,
oxidation/
reduction,
explodability,
storage
stability,
corrosion
characteristics,
and
density
(OPPTS
830.1550,
1670,
1750,
1800,
6314,
6316,
6317,
6320,
and
7000).
Data
requirements
for
the
Drexel
and
Platte
99%
Ts,
and
AgrEvo
97.5%
FI,
which
are
repackaged
from
EPA­
registered
products,
will
be
satisfied
by
data
for
the
source
products.
All
product­
specific
product
chemistry
data
are
required
for
the
Sureco
80%
FI,
Amvac
46%
FI,
and
AgrEvo
1%
FI.
Provided
that
the
registrants
submit
the
data
required
in
the
attached
data
summary
tables
for
the
carbaryl
MPs,
and
2
either
certify
that
the
suppliers
of
beginning
materials
and
the
manufacturing
processes
for
the
carbaryl
MPs
have
not
changed
since
the
last
comprehensive
product
chemistry
review
or
submit
complete
updated
product
chemistry
data
packages,
HED
has
no
objections
to
the
reregistration
of
carbaryl
with
respect
to
product
chemistry
data
requirements.

Residue
Chemistry
The
residue
chemistry
database
is
essentially
complete.
The
reregistration
requirements
for
plant
and
livestock
metabolism
are
fulfilled.
Acceptable
metabolism
studies
depicting
the
qualitative
nature
of
the
residues
in
lettuce,
radish,
soybean,
ruminants
and
poultry
have
been
submitted
and
evaluated.
In
addition,
adequate
magnitude
of
the
residue
data
are
available
on
the
following
crops:
alfalfa,
almond,
asparagus,
beans
(dried
and
succulent),
blueberry,
broccoli,
cabbage,
celery,
cherry,
citrus
fruits,
clover,
corn
(sweet
and
field),
cucurbits
(cantaloupes,
cucumbers
and
squash),
cranberry,
flax,
grape,
head
and
leaf
lettuce,
mustard
greens,
okra,
peanut,
peas
(dried
and
succulent),
pecan,
pepper,
pistachio,
pome
fruits,
potato,
prickly
pear
cactus,
raspberry,
rice,
sorghum,
soybean,
spinach,
stone
fruits,
strawberry,
sunflower,
sweet
potato,
tobacco,
tomato,
and
walnut.

The
following
data
gaps
remain
outstanding.

°
A
review
of
the
labels
and
supporting
residue
data
indicate
that
several
label
amendments
are
required.
Details
are
provided
in
the
attached
chapter.

°
The
requirement
for
acceptable
enforcement
methods
which
determine
residues
of
concern
in
plant
and
livestock
commodities
remains
outstanding.

°
The
requirements
for
storage
stability
data
are
not
satisfied
for
purposes
of
reregistration.
Additional
data
are
required
depicting
the
storage
stability
of
carbaryl
per
se
in
an
oilseed,
processed
commodities
of
an
oily
crop,
and
a
dried
fruit
stored
for
up
to
10
months.

In
addition,
the
registrant
is
relying
on
earlier
magnitude
of
the
residue
studies
that
are
not
supported
by
the
existing
storage
stability
data;
therefore,
additional
storage
stability
data
are
required.
The
required
data
must
reflect
storage
intervals
of
18
months
for
alfalfa
commodities,
15
months
for
potatoes,
22
months
for
wheat
commodities,
and
33
months
for
rangeland
grass.
In
addition,
if
the
registrant
wishes
to
rely
on
the
previously
submitted
sugar
beet
processing
study,
information
pertaining
to
sample
conditions
and
intervals
for
the
study
must
be
submitted.

°
For
the
purpose
of
reregistration,
the
requirements
for
storage
stability
data
for
carbaryl
residues
in
livestock
commodities
are
partially
satisfied.
Additional
information
on
the
storage
intervals
prior
to
analysis
for
metabolite
residues
in
the
cattle
feeding
study
is
required.

°
Separate
tolerances
on
many
commodities
need
to
be
reassigned
concomitant
with
establishing
tolerances
for
the
appropriate
crop
group
and
subgroup.
The
recommended
changes
are
summarized
in
Table
C
under
"Tolerances
Needed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
a),
crop
group/
subgroup
tolerances."
3
°
The
data
submitted
are
not
adequate
to
support
the
use
of
granular
(G)
formulations
of
carbaryl
on
leafy
vegetables.
Residues
of
carbaryl
found
in
leaf
lettuce
were
not
consistent.
Both
samples
of
lettuce
from
the
10%
G
treatment
had
substantially
higher
residues
(37.01
and
47.22
ppm)
than
one
of
the
samples
treated
with
the
FlC
(23.25
ppm).
Additionally,
all
residues
were
significantly
above
the
current
tolerance
of
10
ppm.
and
all
residue
data
submitted
in
support
of
the
tolerance
in
lettuce
(<
8.85
ppm).
No
explanation
for
the
higher
residues
was
given
by
the
registrant.
The
registrant
may
elect
to
repeat
the
side
by
side
trial
on
leaf
lettuce
again
or
submit
a
rationale
for
the
results
of
the
leaf
lettuce
study.

°
Data
are
required
depicting
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
grass
forage
harvested
immediately
(0­
day)
following
the
last
of
two
applications
of
carbaryl
(WP
or
FlC)
at
1.5
lb
ai/
A
to
pasture.
A
total
of
12
field
trials
are
required
in
areas
throughout
the
U.
S.

°
Adequate
data
are
available
to
reassess
the
tolerances
for
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
dried
beans,
cowpeas,
lentils
and
peas
with
pods.
These
data
support
the
establishment
of
crop
subgroup
tolerances
for
edible­
podded
legume
vegetables
(6A),
and
for
dried,
shelled
pea
and
bean
except
soybean
(6C).
However,
additional
residue
data
are
required
if
the
registrant
seeks
tolerances
for
residues
in/
on
succulent,
shelled
pea
and
bean
commodities.
A
total
of
12
tests,
six
tests
each
on
a
succulent,
shelled
cultivar
of
bean
and
garden
pea,
are
required
to
support
a
tolerance
for
residues
in/
on
the
succulent,
shelled
pea
and
bean
crop
subgroup
(6B).
The
registrant
is
referred
to
OPPTS
GLN
860.1500
for
the
number
and
distribution
of
tests
required.

°
Adequate
data
are
available
to
reassess
the
tolerance
for
wheat
forage
and
straw.
However,
the
Agency
now
considers
wheat
hay
a
significant
RAC
for
feed
purposes
(OPPTS
GLN
860.1000
Table
1.).
A
full
set
of
20
field
trials
as
specified
in
OPPTS
GLN
860.1500
are
required
depicting
carbaryl
residues
in/
on
wheat
hay.
When
all
the
field
trials
are
complete,
PHIs
and
tolerances
for
hay
based
on
the
field
trial
data
should
be
proposed.
Data
on
wheat
hay
will
be
translatable
to
proso
millet
hay.

°
The
registrant
intends
to
support
a
tolerance
for
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
imported
pineapples
(Aventis
personal
communication
with
C.
Olinger,
9/
24/
98
SMART
meeting).
Residue
data
are
required
depicting
residues
in/
on
pineapples
following
application
of
carbaryl
at
the
maximum
use
rate
and
minimum
PHI.
Five
trials
must
be
submitted,
three
from
Costa
Rica
and
two
from
Mexico.

°
The
registrant
does
not
intend
to
support
carbaryl
uses
on
avocados,
barley,
maple
sap,
oats,
rye,
and
sweet
sorghum;
however,
IR­
4
has
indicated
(Correspondence
from
K.
Dorschner,
IR­
4
Project,
9/
15/
94)
that
they
may
fulfill
the
residue
data
requirements
for
some
of
these
commodities.
These
data
have
not
been
submitted.

cc:
List
B
Rereg.
File
RDI:
WPhang
11/
7/
00,
WJHazel
10/
7
/2000
7509C:
FFort:
RRB1:
CM2:
Rm
722H:
703
305­
7478:
11/
03/
2000
CARBARYL
Chemical
ID
No.
056801;
Case
0080
Product
Chemistry
Chapter
of
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
(RED)
Document
O
O
N
H
CH
3
CARBARYL
REREGISTRATION
ELIGIBILITY
DECISION:

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
CONSIDERATIONS
Chemical
ID
No.
056801;
Case
No.
0080
DESCRIPTION
OF
CHEMICAL
Carbaryl
[1­
naphthyl
N­
methylcarbamate]
is
a
broad­
spectrum
insecticide
used
for
control
of
various
insects
on
numerous
varieties
of
fruits,
nuts,
and
field
and
vegetable
crops.

Empirical
Formula:
C12H11NO2
Molecular
Weight:
201.2
CAS
Registry
No.:
63­
25­
2
Chemical
ID
No.:
056801
IDENTIFICATION
OF
ACTIVE
INGREDIENT
Carbaryl
is
a
white
to
light
tan
solid
with
a
melting
point
of
142
C,
vapor
pressure
of
<0.005
mm
Hg
at
26
C,
specific
gravity
of
1.23
at
20
C,
and
octanol/
water
partition
coefficient
(Koc)
of
217.
Carbaryl
is
soluble
in
water
(40
ppm
at
25
C)
and
in
organic
solvents
including
dimethyl
formamide
(
#
45
g/
100
mL);
acetone,
cyclohexanone,
and
isophorone
(
#
25
g/
100
mL);
methylethyl
ketone
(
#
20
g/
100
mL);
dichloromethane
(
#
15
g/
100
mL);
ethanol
and
ethyl
acetate
(
#
10
g/
100
mL);
mixed
aromatic
solvents
and
xylene
(
#
3
g/
100
mL);
and
kerosene
(
#
1
g/
100
mL).
Carbaryl
hydrolyzes
rapidly
in
alkaline
solutions.

MANUFACTURING­
USE
PRODUCTS
A
search
of
the
Reference
Files
System
(REFS)
conducted
10/
25/
00
identified
10
carbaryl
manufacturing­
use
products
(MPs)
registered
under
Chemical
ID
No.
056801;
the
registered
carbaryl
MPs
are
listed
below
in
Table
1.
Only
the
registered
MPs
listed
below
are
subject
to
a
reregistration
eligibility
decision.

Table
1.
Registered
Carbaryl
Manufacturing­
Use
Products.
3
Table
2.
Product
chemistry
data
requirements
specified
in
the
Carbaryl
FRSTR.

Product
OPPTS
830
Guidelines
Outstanding
99%
T
(EPA
Reg.
No.
264­
324)
830.1600,
1620,
1670,
1700,
1750,
1800,
6313,
7000,
7370,
and
7950
97.5%
T
(EPA
Reg.
No.
264­
325)
830.1670,
1750,
1800,
6314,
6316,
6317,
6320,
and
7000
80%
FI
(EPA
Reg.
No.
264­
328)
830.1670,
1750,
1800,
6314,
6316,
6317,
6320,
and
7000
99%
T
(EPA
Reg.
No.
19713­
75)
All
Group
A
and
B
Guidelines
50%
FI
(EPA
Reg.
No.
19713­
369)
a
830.1670,
1750,
1800,
6314,
6316,
6317,
6320,
and
7000
97.5%
FI
(EPA
Reg.
No.
4816­
270)
None;
data
requirements
to
be
satisfied
by
the
source
product.

46%
FI
(EPA
Reg.
No.
5481­
190)
All
Group
A
and
B
Guidelines.

a
Based
on
data
submitted
by
Aventis.

The
current
status
of
the
product
chemistry
data
requirements
for
the
carbaryl
manufacturing­
use
products
is
presented
in
the
attached
data
summary
tables.
Refer
to
these
tables
for
a
listing
of
the
outstanding
product
chemistry
data
requirements.

CONCLUSIONS
All
pertinent
product
chemistry
data
requirements
are
satisfied
for
the
Aventis
99%
T,
except
that
data
are
required
for
UV/
visible
absorption
(OPPTS
830.7050).
For
the
Aventis
97.5%
and
80%
FIs,
and
the
Drexel
50%
FI,
additional
data
are
required
concerning
product
identity
and
composition,
discussion
of
formation
of
impurities,
certified
limits,
enforcement
analytical
method,
oxidation/
reduction,
explodability,
storage
stability
corrosion
characteristics,
and
density
(OPPTS
830.1550,
1670,
1750,
1800,
6314,
6316,
6317,
6320,
and
7000).
Data
requirements
for
the
Drexel
and
Platte
99%
Ts,
and
AgrEvo
97.5%
FI,
which
are
repackaged
from
EPA­
registered
products,
will
be
satisfied
by
data
for
the
source
products.
All
productspecific
product
chemistry
data
are
required
for
the
Sureco
80%
FI,
Amvac
46%
FI,
and
AgrEvo
1%
FI.
Provided
that
the
registrants
submit
the
data
required
in
the
attached
data
summary
tables
for
the
carbaryl
MPs,
and
either
certify
that
the
suppliers
of
beginning
materials
and
the
manufacturing
processes
for
the
carbaryl
MPs
have
not
changed
since
the
last
comprehensive
product
chemistry
review
or
submit
complete
updated
product
chemistry
data
packages,
HED
has
no
objections
to
the
reregistration
of
carbaryl
with
respect
to
product
chemistry
data
requirements.

AGENCY
MEMORANDA
CITED
IN
THIS
DOCUMENT
CBRS
No(
s).:
8724
DP
Barcode(
s):
D169720
Subject:
Rhone­
Poulenc
Ag
Company:
Response
to
the
Carbaryl
Reregistration
Standard:
Residue
and
Product
Chemistry
Comments
From:
R.
Perfetti
2
Formulation
EPA
Reg.
No.
Registrant
99%
T
264­
324
Aventis
Ag
Company
(formerly
Union
Carbide)
97.5%
FI
a
264­
325
80%
FI
264­
328
99%
T
b
19713­
75
Drexel
Chemical
Company
50%
FI
c
19713­
369
99%
T
b
34704­
707
Platte
Chemical
Company
Inc.

97.5%
FI
b
4816­
270
AgrEvo
Environmental
Health
(formerly
Fairfield
American)
1%
FI
4816­
407
80%
FI
769­
971
Sureco
Inc.

46%
FI
5481­
190
Amvac
Chemical
Corporation
a
Although
REFS
identifies
this
product
as
a
technical
(T),
it
is
appropriately
identified
as
an
formulation
intermediate
(FI)
because
it
is
formulated
from
a
registered
technical
product.
b
Repackaged
from
an
EPA­
registered
product;
confirmed
for
the
Drexel
99%
T
(EPA
Reg.
No.
19713­
75)
subsequent
to
the
FRSTR.
c
Transferred
from
Aventis
(EPA
Reg.
No.
264­
327;
7/
15/
92).

REGULATORY
BACKGROUND
The
Carbaryl
Reregistration
Standard
dated
6/
11/
82
and
Guidance
Document
dated
3/
30/
84
required
additional
generic
and
product­
specific
product
chemistry
data
for
the
registered
carbaryl
MPs.
The
Carbaryl
(FRSTR)
Reregistration
Standard
dated
5/
3/
88
reviewed
data
submitted
in
response
to
the
Guidance
Document
and
summarized
the
outstanding
data
requirements
for
the
reregistration
of
carbaryl.
Additional
data
requirements
listed
in
the
FRSTR
are
presented
in
Table
2.
The
FRSTR
did
not
address
the
AgrEvo
1%
FI
(EPA
Reg.
No.
4816­
407),
which
was
registered
3/
31/
72;
the
Platte
99%
T
(EPA
Reg.
No.
34704­
707)
and
Sureco
80%
FI
(EPA
Reg.
No.
769­
971)
were
registered
subsequent
to
issuance
of
the
FRSTR.
4
To:
W.
Burnam
and
L.
Rossi
Dated:
11/
1/
91
MRID(
s):
41982601
CBRS
No(
s).:
10083
DP
Barcode(
s):
D179698
Subject:
Rhone­
Poulenc
Ag
Company:
Response
to
the
Carbaryl
Reregistration
Standard:
Nitrosamine
&
Stability
Considerations.
From:
K.
Dockter
To:
L.
Propst/
J.
Edwards
Dated:
7/
14/
92
MRID(
s):
42318501
CBRS
No(
s).:
11101
DP
Barcode(
s):
D186160
Subject:
Response
to
the
Carbaryl
Reregistration
Standard:
Product
Chemistry
From:
R.
Perfetti
To:
L.
Rossi
and
E.
Saito
Dated:
1/
29/
93
MRID(
s):
None
CBRS
No(
s).:
11201
DP
Barcode(
s):
D186515
Subject:
Response
to
the
Carbaryl
Reregistration
Standard:
Product
Chemistry.
From:
R.
Perfetti
To:
L.
Rossi
and
E.
Saito
Dated:
4/
21/
93
MRID(
s):
42583901
and
42583902
5
CBRS
No(
s).:
12225
DP
Barcode(
s):
D193013
Subject:
Carbaryl
Reregistration:
List
A
Chemical
No.
056801;
Case
No.
0080.
Rhone­
Poulenc
Response
to
the
Carbaryl
Product
Chemistry
Data
Requirements
Regarding
Dissociation
Constant
and
pH
(Guideline
Nos.
63­
10
and
63­
12).
From:
F.
Toghrol
To:
L.
Rossi/
L.
Propst
Dated:
1/
26/
94
MRID(
s):
42832401
CBRS
No(
s).:
13127
DP
Barcode(
s):
D198578
Subject:
Carbaryl.
Rhone­
Poulenc
1/
4/
94
Response
[62­
3
data
for
EPA
Reg.
264­
324]
to
5/
13/
93
Agency
Letter
[RE:
5/
3/
88
FRSTR]
Rereg.
Case
0080.
From:
K.
Dockter
To:
J.
Loranger
Dated:
4/
29/
94
MRID(
s):
43075801
CBRS
No(
s).:
15442
DP
Barcode(
s):
D214535
Subject:
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080,
Drexel
Request
for
Product
Chemistry
Generic
Data
Exemption
(GDE),
New
Confidential
Statement
of
Formula.
From:
S.
Hummel
To:
J.
Loranger/
L.
Propst
Dated:
5/
8/
95
MRID(
s):
None
6
PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
CITATIONS
Bibliographic
citations
include
only
MRIDs
containing
data
which
fulfill
data
requirements.

References
(cited):

00151776
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1984)
The
Name,
Chemical
Identity
and
Composition
of
the
Pesticide
Chemical
Sevin.
Unpublished
compilation.
336
p.

41982601
McDaniel,
R.;
Weiler,
D.
(1987)
Vapor
Pressure
Determination
of
Carbaryl:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
40196.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Rhone­
Poulenc
Ag
Co.
35
p.

42318501
Siemann,
L.
(1992)
Product
Chemistry
on
Technical
Grade
Carbaryl
in
Support
of
Registration:
Analysis
for
Nitrosoamines
and
Stability
Study:
[Interim
Report]:
Lab
Project
Number:
6489­
F.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Midwest
Research
Institute.
26
p.

42583901
Helfant,
L.
(1992)
Sevin
Brand
99%
Technical
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Product
Identity
and
Composition
Series
61:
Lab
Project
Number:
AC­
92­
014:
41330.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Rhone­
Poulenc
Ag
Co.
42
p.

42583902
Siemann,
L.
(1992)
Product
Chemistry
on
Technical
Grade
Carbaryl
in
Support
of
Registration
Analysis
for
Nitrosoamines
and
Stability
Study:
Lab
Project
Number:
6489­
F.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Midwest
Research
Institute.
149
p.

42832401
Siemann,
L.
(1993)
Carbaryl
Product
Chemistry:
Lab
Project
Number:
3424­
F.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Midwest
Research
Institute.
21
p.

43075801
Siemann,
L.
(1993)
Method
Validation
for
Analysis
of
Carbaryl:
Lab
Project
Number:
3521/
F.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Midwest
Research
Institute.
127
p.
7
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
Aventis
Ag
Company
Product(
s):
99%
T
(EPA
Reg
No.
264­
324)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
Y
00151776,
42583901
3
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
Y
00151776,
42583901
3
830.1620
Description
of
production
process
Y
00151776,
42583901
3
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
Y
00151776,
42583901
3
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
Y
00151776,
42318501
4
,
42583902
3
830.1750
Certified
limits
Y
00151776,
42583901
3
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
Y
00151776,
43075801
5
830.6302
Color
Y
00151776
830.6303
Physical
state
Y
00151776
830.6304
Odor
Y
00151776
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
Y
00151776,
42318501
4
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
Y
00151776
830.6315
Flammability
N/
A
6
830.6316
Explodability
Y
00151776
830.6317
Storage
stability
Y
00151776
830.6319
Miscibility
N/
A
6
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
Y
00151776
830.7000
pH
Y
42832401
7
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N
8
830.7100
Viscosity
N/
A
6
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
Y
00151776
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
6
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
Y
00151776
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
Y
42832401
7
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
Y
00151776
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
Y
00151776
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
Y
00151776,
41982601
9
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
Aventis
indicated
(CBRS
No.
11101,
D186160,
1/
29/
93,
R.
Perfetti)
that
the
alternate
formulation
for
which
data
were
required
in
the
FRSTR
is
no
longer
produced.

2
MRID
00151776
was
reviewed
initially
under
a
HED
Memorandum
from
W.
T.
Chin
dated
9/
18/
85
and
reevaluated
in
the
Carbaryl
(FRSTR)
Reregistration
Standard
dated
5/
3/
88;
remaining
references
were
reviewed
as
noted.

3
CBRS
No.
11201,
D186515,
4/
21/
93,
R.
Perfetti.

4
CBRS
No.
10083,
D179698,
7/
14/
92,
K.
Dockter.

5
CBRS
No.
13127,
D198578,
4/
29/
94,
K.
Dockter.

6
Data
are
not
required
because
the
T/
TGAI
is
a
solid
at
room
temperature.

7
CBRS
No.
12225,
D193013,
1/
26/
94,
F.
Toghrol.

8
The
OPPTS
Series
830,
Product
Properties
Test
Guidelines
require
data
pertaining
to
UV/
visible
absorption
for
the
PAI.

9
CBRS
No.
8724,
D169720,
11/
1/
91,
R.
Perfetti.
8
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
Aventis
Ag
Company
Product(
s):
97.5%
FI
(EPA
Reg.
No.
264­
325)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
N
3
00151776
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
Y
00151776
830.1650
Description
of
formulation
process
Y
00151776
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
N
4
00151776
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
N/
A
5
830.1750
Certified
limits
N
3
00151776
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
N
6
00151776
830.6302
Color
Y
00151776
830.6303
Physical
state
Y
00151776
830.6304
Odor
Y
00151776
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
N/
A
5
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
N
830.6315
Flammability
N/
A
7
830.6316
Explodability
N
830.6317
Storage
stability
N
830.6319
Miscibility
N/
A
7
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
N
830.7000
pH
N
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N/
A
5
830.7100
Viscosity
N/
A
7
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
N/
A
5
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
5
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
Y
00151776
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
N/
A
5
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
N/
A
5
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
N/
A
5
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
N/
A
5
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
Although
REFS
identifies
this
product
as
a
T,
it
is
appropriately
identified
as
an
FI
because
it
is
formulated
from
a
registered
technical
product.

2
MRID
00151776
was
reviewed
initially
under
a
HED
Memorandum
from
W.
T.
Chin
dated
9/
18/
85
and
reevaluated
in
the
Carbaryl
(FRSTR)
Reregistration
Standard
dated
5/
3/
88.

3
Product
identity,
nominal
concentrations
and
proposed
certified
limits
must
be
submitted
on
EPA
Form
8570­
4.

4
A
discussion
must
be
submitted
concerning
the
possible
formation
of
impurities
associated
with
the
inert
ingredients
in
the
MP
and
the
potential
for
formation
of
nitrosamines
in
the
formulation
process
or
in
storage.

5
Data
requirements
for
the
TGAI
will
be
satisfied
by
data
for
the
technical
source
product.

6
Supporting
validation
data
must
be
submitted
for
the
enforcement
method
used
to
quantitate
the
active
ingredient
in
the
formulated
product.

7
Data
are
not
required
because
the
MP
is
a
solid
at
room
temperature.
9
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
Aventis
Ag
Company
Product(
s):
80%
FI
(EPA
Reg.
No.
264­
328)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
N
3
00151776
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
Y
00151776
830.1650
Description
of
formulation
process
Y
00151776
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
N
4
00151776
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
N/
A
5
830.1750
Certified
limits
N
3
00151776
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
N
6
00151776
830.6302
Color
Y
00151776
830.6303
Physical
state
Y
00151776
830.6304
Odor
Y
00151776
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
N/
A
5
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
N
830.6315
Flammability
N/
A
7
830.6316
Explodability
N
830.6317
Storage
stability
N
830.6319
Miscibility
N/
A
7
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
N
830.7000
pH
N
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N/
A
5
830.7100
Viscosity
N/
A
7
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
N/
A
5
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
5
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
Y
00151776
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
N/
A
5
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
N/
A
5
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
N/
A
5
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
N/
A
5
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.

2
MRID
00151776
was
reviewed
initially
under
a
HED
Memorandum
from
W.
T.
Chin
dated
9/
18/
85
and
reevaluated
in
the
Carbaryl
(FRSTR)
Reregistration
Standard
dated
5/
3/
88.

3
Product
identity,
nominal
concentrations
and
proposed
certified
limits
must
be
submitted
on
EPA
Form
8570­
4.

4
A
discussion
must
be
submitted
of
the
possible
formation
of
impurities
associated
with
the
inert
ingredients
in
the
MP
and
the
potential
for
formation
of
nitrosamines
in
the
formulation
process
or
in
storage.

5
Data
requirements
for
the
TGAI
will
be
satisfied
by
data
for
the
technical
source
product.

6
Supporting
validation
data
must
be
submitted
for
the
enforcement
method
used
to
quantitate
the
active
ingredient
in
the
formulated
product.

7
Data
are
not
required
because
the
MP
is
a
solid
at
room
temperature.
10
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
Drexel
Chemical
Company
Product(
s):
99%
T
(EPA
Reg
No.
19713­
75)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
Y
CSF
date
not
specified
CSF
dated
8/
7/
95
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
N/
A
830.1620
Description
of
production
process
N/
A
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
N/
A
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
N/
A
830.1750
Certified
limits
N/
A
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
N/
A
830.6302
Color
N/
A
830.6303
Physical
state
N/
A
830.6304
Odor
N/
A
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
N/
A
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
N/
A
830.6315
Flammability
N/
A
830.6316
Explodability
N/
A
830.6317
Storage
stability
N/
A
830.6319
Miscibility
N/
A
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
N/
A
830.7000
pH
N/
A
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N/
A
830.7100
Viscosity
N/
A
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
N/
A
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
N/
A
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
N/
A
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
N/
A
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
N/
A
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
N/
A
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.

2
The
CSF
(date
not
specified)
reviewed
under
CBRS
No.
15442,
D214535,
5/
8/
95,
S.
Hummel,
and
an
updated
CSF
dated
8/
7/
95
(from
the
product
jacket),
confirm
that
this
product
is
repackaged
from
an
EPA­
registered
product;
all
data
requirements
will
be
fulfilled
by
data
for
the
source
product.
11
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
Drexel
Chemical
Company
Product(
s):
50%
FI
(EPA
Reg.
No.
19713­
369)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
N
3
00151776
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
Y
00151776
830.1650
Description
of
formulation
process
Y
00151776
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
N
4
00151776
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
N/
A
5
830.1750
Certified
limits
N
3
00151776
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
N
6
00151776
830.6302
Color
Y
00151776
830.6303
Physical
state
Y
00151776
830.6304
Odor
Y
00151776
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
N/
A
5
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
N
830.6315
Flammability
N/
A
7
830.6316
Explodability
N
830.6317
Storage
stability
N
830.6319
Miscibility
N/
A
7
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
N
830.7000
pH
N
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N/
A
5
830.7100
Viscosity
N/
A
7
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
N/
A
5
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
5
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
Y
00151776
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
N/
A
5
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
N/
A
5
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
N/
A
5
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
N/
A
5
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
This
product
was
transferred
from
Aventis
(EPA
Reg.
No.
264­
327);
the
data
summary
table
includes
data
submitted
by
Aventis.
Drexel
must
confirm
that
the
manufacturing
process
and
site
have
not
changed
since
the
product
transfer;
otherwise,
all
product
chemistry
data
will
be
required.

2
MRID
00151776
was
reviewed
initially
under
a
HED
Memorandum
from
W.
T.
Chin
dated
9/
18/
85
and
reevaluated
in
the
Carbaryl
(FRSTR)
Reregistration
Standard
dated
5/
3/
88.

3
Product
identity,
nominal
concentrations
and
proposed
certified
limits
must
be
submitted
on
EPA
Form
8570­
4.

4
A
discussion
must
be
submitted
of
the
possible
formation
of
impurities
associated
with
the
inert
ingredients
in
the
MP
and
the
potential
for
formation
of
nitrosamines
in
the
formulation
process
or
in
storage.

5
Data
requirements
for
the
TGAI
will
be
satisfied
by
data
for
the
technical
source
product.

6
Supporting
validation
data
must
be
submitted
for
the
enforcement
method
used
to
quantitate
the
active
ingredient
in
the
formulated
product.

7
Data
are
not
required
because
the
MP
is
a
solid
at
room
temperature.
12
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
Platte
Chemical
Company
Product(
s):
99%
T
(EPA
Reg
No.
34704­
707)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
Y
CSF
dated
4/
12/
91
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
N/
A
830.1620
Description
of
production
process
N/
A
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
N/
A
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
N/
A
830.1750
Certified
limits
N/
A
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
N/
A
830.6302
Color
N/
A
830.6303
Physical
state
N/
A
830.6304
Odor
N/
A
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
N/
A
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
N/
A
830.6315
Flammability
N/
A
830.6316
Explodability
N/
A
830.6317
Storage
stability
N/
A
830.6319
Miscibility
N/
A
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
N/
A
830.7000
pH
N/
A
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N/
A
830.7100
Viscosity
N/
A
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
N/
A
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
N/
A
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
N/
A
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
N/
A
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
N/
A
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
N/
A
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.

2
The
CSF
dated
4/
12/
91
(from
the
product
jacket)
confirms
that
this
product
is
repackaged
from
an
EPA­
registered
product;
all
data
requirements
will
be
fulfilled
by
data
for
the
source
product.
We
note
that
an
updated
CSF
should
be
submitted
reflecting
the
nominal
concentration
of
the
active
ingredient
in
the
product.
13
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
AgrEvo
Environmental
Health
Product(
s):
97.5%
T
(EPA
Reg
No.
4816­
270)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
Y
CSF
dated
7/
24/
91
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
N/
A
830.1620
Description
of
production
process
N/
A
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
N/
A
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
N/
A
830.1750
Certified
limits
N/
A
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
N/
A
830.6302
Color
N/
A
830.6303
Physical
state
N/
A
830.6304
Odor
N/
A
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
N/
A
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
N/
A
830.6315
Flammability
N/
A
830.6316
Explodability
N/
A
830.6317
Storage
stability
N/
A
830.6319
Miscibility
N/
A
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
N/
A
830.7000
pH
N/
A
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N/
A
830.7100
Viscosity
N/
A
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
N/
A
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
N/
A
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
N/
A
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
N/
A
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
N/
A
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
N/
A
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.

2
The
CSF
dated
7/
24/
91
(from
the
product
jacket)
confirms
that
this
product
is
repackaged
from
an
EPA­
registered
product;
all
data
requirements
will
be
fulfilled
by
data
for
the
source
product.
We
note
that
an
updated
CSF
should
be
submitted
reflecting
the
nominal
concentration
of
the
active
ingredient
in
the
product.
14
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
AgrEvo
Environmental
Health
Product(
s):
1%
FI
(EPA
Reg
No.
4816­
407)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
N
CSF
dated
7/
24/
91
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
N
830.1650
Description
of
formulation
process
N
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
N
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
N/
A
3
830.1750
Certified
limits
N
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
N
830.6302
Color
N
830.6303
Physical
state
N
830.6304
Odor
N
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
N/
A
3
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
N
830.6315
Flammability
N
830.6316
Explodability
N
830.6317
Storage
stability
N
830.6319
Miscibility
N
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
N
830.7000
pH
N
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N/
A
3
830.7100
Viscosity
N
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
N/
A
3
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
3
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
N
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
N/
A
3
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
N/
A
3
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
N/
A
3
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
N/
A
3
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.

2
The
CSF
dated
7/
24/
91
(from
the
product
jacket)
confirms
that
this
product
is
formulated
from
an
EPA­
registered
product.

3
TGAI
data
requirements
will
be
satisfied
by
data
for
the
technical
source
product.
15
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
Sureco
Inc.
Product(
s):
80%
FI
(EPA
Reg
No.
769­
971)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
N
CSF
dated
9/
23/
94
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
N
830.1650
Description
of
formulation
process
N
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
N
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
N/
A
3
830.1750
Certified
limits
N
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
N
830.6302
Color
N
830.6303
Physical
state
N
830.6304
Odor
N
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
N/
A
3
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
N
830.6315
Flammability
N
830.6316
Explodability
N
830.6317
Storage
stability
N
830.6319
Miscibility
N
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
N
830.7000
pH
N
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N/
A
3
830.7100
Viscosity
N
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
N/
A
3
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
3
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
N
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
N/
A
3
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
N/
A
3
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
N/
A
3
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
N/
A
3
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
A
letter
from
L.
Howard,
Aventis,
to
D.
Edwards,
EPA,
dated
9/
14/
94
authorizes
use
of
Aventis
data
to
satisfy
data
requirements
for
this
product;
however,
until
a
determination
concerning
substantial
similarity
for
the
two
products
has
been
made,
all
product
chemistry
data
requirements
remain
outstanding.

2
The
CSF
available
from
the
product
jacket
confirms
that
this
product
is
formulated
from
an
EPA­
registered
product.

3
TGAI
data
requirements
will
be
satisfied
by
data
for
the
technical
source
product.
16
Case
No.
0080
Chemical
No.
056801
Case
Name:
Carbaryl
Registrant:
Amvac
Chemical
Corporation
Product(
s):
46%
FI
(EPA
Reg
No.
5481­
190)

PRODUCT
CHEMISTRY
DATA
SUMMARY
Guideline
Number
Requirement
Are
Data
Requirements
Fulfilled?
1
MRID
Number
2
830.1550
Product
identity
and
composition
N
CSF
dated
5/
18/
84
830.1600
Description
of
materials
used
to
produce
the
product
N
830.1650
Description
of
formulation
process
N
830.1670
Discussion
of
formation
of
impurities
N
830.1700
Preliminary
analysis
N/
A
3
830.1750
Certified
limits
N
830.1800
Enforcement
analytical
method
N
830.6302
Color
N
830.6303
Physical
state
N
830.6304
Odor
N
830.6313
Stability
to
normal
and
elevated
temperature,
metals,
and
metal
ions
N/
A
3
830.6314
Oxidation/
reduction:
chemical
incompatibility
N
830.6315
Flammability
N
830.6316
Explodability
N
830.6317
Storage
stability
N
830.6319
Miscibility
N
830.6320
Corrosion
characteristics
N
830.7000
pH
N
830.7050
UV/
visible
absorption
N/
A
3
830.7100
Viscosity
N
830.7200
Melting
point/
melting
range
N/
A
3
830.7220
Boiling
point/
boiling
range
N/
A
3
830.7300
Density/
relative
density/
bulk
density
N
830.7370
Dissociation
constants
in
water
N/
A
3
830.7550
Partition
coefficient
(n­
octanol/
water),
shake
flask
method
N/
A
3
830.7840
Water
solubility:
column
elution
method;
shake
flask
method
N/
A
3
830.7950
Vapor
pressure
N/
A
3
1
Y
=
Yes;
N
=
No;
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.

2
The
CSF
dated
5/
18/
84
(from
the
product
jacket)
confirms
that
this
product
is
manufactured
from
an
EPAregistered
product.

3
TGAI
data
requirements
will
be
satisfied
by
data
for
the
technical
source
product.
CARBARYL
Chemical
ID
No.
056801;
Case
0080
Residue
Chemistry
Chapter
of
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
(RED)
Document
CARBARYL
REREGISTRATION
ELIGIBILITY
DECISION
RESIDUE
CHEMISTRY
CONSIDERATIONS
PC
Code
056801;
Case
0080
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
page
INTRODUCTION
.............................................................
1
REGULATORY
BACKGROUND
................................................
1
SUMMARY
OF
SCIENCE
FINDINGS
............................................
2
GLN
860.1300:
Nature
of
the
Residue
­
Plants
.................................
4
GLN
860.1300:
Nature
of
the
Residue
­
Livestock
...............................
5
GLN
860.1340:
Residue
Analytical
Methods
...................................
5
GLN
860.1360:
Multiresidue
Methods
........................................
6
GLN
860.1380:
Storage
Stability
Data
­
Plants
.................................
7
GLN
860.1380:
Storage
Stability
Data
­
Livestock
..............................
8
GLN
860.1500:
Crop
Field
Trials
............................................
8
GLN
860.1520:
Processed
Food/
Feed
.......................................
11
GLN
860.1480:
Meat,
Milk,
Poultry,
Eggs
....................................
12
GLN
860.1400:
Water,
Fish,
and
Irrigated
Crops
...............................
13
GLN
860.1460:
Food
Handling
............................................
14
GLNs
860.1850
and
860.1900:
Confined/
Field
Accumulation
in
Rotational
Crops
....
14
FOOD/
FEED
USE
PATTERN
..................................................
15
TOLERANCE
REASSESSMENT
SUMMARY
....................................
78
Tolerances
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
a),
(b),
(c),
(d),
and
(e)
.................
80
Tolerance
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§180.319
....................................
86
Tolerance
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§186.550
....................................
86
Tolerances
Needed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
a)
................................
86
CODEX
HARMONIZATION...................................................
89
AGENCY
MEMORANDA
RELEVANT
TO
REREGISTRATION
.....................
94
MASTER
RECORD
IDENTIFICATION
NUMBERS................................
98
O
O
N
H
CH
3
CARBARYL
REREGISTRATION
ELIGIBILITY
DECISION
RESIDUE
CHEMISTRY
CONSIDERATIONS
PC
Code
No.
056801;
Case
0080
INTRODUCTION
Carbaryl
(1­
naphthyl
N­
methylcarbamate)
is
a
carbamate
insecticide
registered
for
use
on
a
variety
of
field,
fruit,
and
vegetable
crops.
The
reregistration
of
carbaryl
in
the
United
States
is
being
supported
by
the
Aventis
Crop
Science
(basic
producer);
the
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(IR­
4)
is
additionally
supporting
the
reregistration
of
carbaryl
use
on
a
few
selected
minor
crops.
Carbaryl
products
are
marketed
under
trade
names
such
as
Sevin®
and
Sevimol®.
Registered
carbaryl
end­
use
formulations
include
flowable
concentrates
(FlC),
granulars
(G),
pelleted/
tableted
(P/
T),
ready­
to­
use
(RTU),
and
wettable
powders
(WP).
Depending
on
the
crop,
these
formulations
may
be
applied
as
dormant,
delayed
dormant,
prebloom,
foliar
(broadcast,
banded,
and
directed
spray),
post­
harvest
treatment
(dip),
soil
(broadcast
and
banded),
premise
treatment,
and
direct
animal
treatment
using
ground
or
aerial
equipment.
Carbaryl
may
be
applied
on
agricultural
and
residential
use
sites.

REGULATORY
BACKGROUND
Carbaryl
was
the
subject
of
a
Reregistration
Standard
Guidance
Document
dated
3/
30/
84;
the
Residue
Chemistry
Science
Chapter
of
the
Guidance
Document
was
dated
3/
15/
83.
The
Residue
Chemistry
Chapter
of
the
Carbaryl
(FRSTR)
Reregistration
Standard
was
issued
on
5/
3/
88.
A
Data
Call­
In
(DCI)
Notice
for
carbaryl
was
also
issued
4/
91.
These
documents
summarized
the
regulatory
conclusions
based
on
available
residue
chemistry
data,
and
specified
the
additional
data
required
for
reregistration
purposes.
Several
data
submissions
have
been
received
and
evaluated
since
the
FRSTR.
The
information
contained
in
this
document
outlines
the
Residue
Chemistry
Science
Assessments
with
respect
to
the
reregistration
of
carbaryl.

Tolerances
for
residues
of
carbaryl
are
currently
expressed
in
terms
of
carbaryl
(1­
naphthyl
Nmethylcarbamate
including
its
hydrolysis
product
1­
naphthol,
calculated
as
carbaryl,
for
most
raw
crop
commodities
[40
CFR
§180.169(
a)].
The
established
tolerances
for
residues
in/
on
pineapples,
pome
fruits,
avocados,
and
fresh
dill
are
expressed
in
terms
of
carbaryl
per
se
[40
CFR
§180.169(
d)
and
(e)].
Tolerances
for
residues
in
livestock
commodities
are
expressed
as
2
carbaryl,
including
its
metabolites
1­
naphthol
(naphthyl
sulfate),
5,6­
dihydrodihydroxy
carbaryl,
and
5,6­
dihydrodihydroxy
naphthol,
calculated
as
carbaryl
[40
CFR
§180.169(
b)
and
(c)].
A
tolerance
for
residues
in
pineapple
bran
is
expressed
in
terms
of
carbaryl
per
se
[40
CFR
§186.550].
An
interim
tolerance
has
been
established
for
carbaryl
and
its
1­
naphthol
metabolite
in
eggs
[40
CFR
§180.319].

Since
the
FRSTR
was
issued,
the
Agency
has
updated
the
list
of
raw
agricultural
and
processed
commodities
and
feedstuffs
derived
from
crops
(Table
1,
OPPTS
860.1000).
As
a
result
of
changes
to
Table
1,
additional
carbaryl
residue
data
are
now
required
for
some
commodities;
these
data
requirements
have
been
incorporated
into
this
document.
These
new
data
requirements
will
be
imposed
at
the
issuance
of
the
Carbaryl
RED
but
should
not
delay
on
the
reregistration
eligibility
decisions
for
carbaryl.
The
need
for
revisions
to
dietary
exposure/
risk
assessments
will
be
determined
upon
receipt
of
the
required
residue
chemistry
data.

SUMMARY
OF
SCIENCE
FINDINGS
GLN
860.1200:
Directions
for
Use
A
REFS
search,
conducted
on
1/
5/
2000,
identified
15
carbaryl
end­
use
products
(EPs)
registered
under
FIFRA
Section
3
to
the
basic
producer,
Aventis
Ag
Company,
with
registered
uses
on
food/
feed
crops.
These
EPs,
including
the
associated
Special
Local
Need
(SLN)
registrations
under
FIFRA
Section
24
(c),
are
listed
in
Table
A1.
3
Table
A1.
Carbaryl
EPs
with
Food/
Feed
Uses
Registered
to
Aventis
Ag
Company.

EPA
Reg.
No.
Label
Acceptance
Date
1
Formulation
Product
Name
234­
312
6/
99
10.04%
P/
T
Sevin®
brand
10%
Bait
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
314
6/
99
50%
WP
Sevin®
brand
50W
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
315
6/
99
85%
WP
Sevin®
brand
85
Sprayable
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
316
2
1/
00
80%
WP
Sevin®
brand
80S
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
320
6/
99
5%
P/
T
Sevin®
brand
5%
Bait
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
321
6/
99
4
lb/
gal
FlC
Sevimol®
brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
333
2/
01
4
lb/
gal
FlC
Sevin®
brand
XLR
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
334
2/
99
2
lb/
gal
FlC
Sevin®
brand
RP2
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
335
10/
00
4
lb/
gal
FlC
Sevin®
brand
RP4
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
349
3
1/
00
4
lb/
gal
FlC
Sevin®
brand
4F
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
422
4/
97
4
lb/
gal
RTU
Sevin®
brand
4­
Oil
ULV
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
427
9/
96
3.2
lb/
gal
RTU
Sevin®
brand
4­
Oil
41A
Carbaryl
Insecticide
264­
429
3/
99
7%
G
Sevin®
brand
Granular
Carbaryl
Insecticide
For
Commercial
Use
Only
264­
430
3/
99
6
7%
G
Sevin®
brand
Granular
Carbaryl
Insecticide
For
Outdoor
Home
Use
264­
526
4/
00
80%
WP
Sevin®
brand
80
WSP
Carbaryl
Insecticide
1
Date
of
the
most
recently
EPA­
approved
label
submitted
by
the
basic
producer
which
corresponds
to
the
most
recently
EPA­
approved
label
date
found
in
REFs,
unless
specified
otherwise.
2
Including
SLN
Nos.
CA810059,
FL890036,
and
WA900013.
3
Including
SLN
No.
FL890037.

A
review
of
the
labels
listed
above
and
supporting
residue
data
indicate
that
the
following
label
amendments
are
required:

Based
on
acceptable
residue
data
on
okra
from
IR­
4,
the
registrant
should
amend
use
directions
on
FlC
and
WP
labels
to
specify
a
maximum
of
four
applications
per
season
at
1.5
lb
ai/
A/
application
at
a
minimum
retreatment
interval
(RTI)
of
6
days
and
a
minimum
PHI
of
3
days.

Use
directions
for
oysters
on
the
80%
WP
label
(SLN
WA900013)
concerning
the
PHI
should
be
amended
to
read
"treatment
is
allowed
only
on
beds
from
which
no
oysters
will
be
harvested
within
one
year
of
application."

A
comprehensive
summary
of
the
registered
food/
feed
use
patterns
of
carbaryl,
based
on
the
product
labels
registered
to
Aventis,
is
presented
in
Table
A2.
A
tabular
summary
of
the
residue
chemistry
science
assessments
for
reregistration
of
carbaryl
is
presented
in
Table
B.
The
conclusions
listed
in
Table
B
regarding
the
reregistration
eligibility
of
carbaryl
food/
feed
uses
are
based
on
the
use
patterns
registered
by
the
basic
producer,
Aventis.
When
end­
use
product
DCIs
are
developed
(e.
g.,
at
issuance
of
the
RED),
all
end­
use
product
labels
(e.
g.,
MAI
labels,
SLNs,
4
and
products
subject
to
the
generic
data
exemption)
should
be
amended
such
that
they
are
consistent
with
the
basic
producer's
labels.

GLN
860.1300:
Nature
of
the
Residue
­
Plants
The
reregistration
requirements
for
plant
metabolism
are
fulfilled.
Acceptable
metabolism
studies
depicting
the
qualitative
nature
of
the
residues
in
lettuce,
radish,
and
soybean
have
been
submitted
and
evaluated.

In
these
studies
(all
conducted
at
­
1x
rates),
surface
residues
on
radish
tops,
lettuce,
and
soybean
forage
accounted
for
38­
67%
of
the
total
radioactive
residues
(TRR),
and
virtually
all
of
these
residues
were
unconjugated
carbaryl.
Unconjugated
carbaryl
ranged
from
36­
95%
of
the
TRR
in
all
commodities
of
radish,
lettuce,
and
soybean,
with
the
exception
of
soybean
seed,
in
which
the
parent
accounted
for
only
4%
of
the
TRR.
Other
unconjugated
residues,
including
N­(
hydroxymethyl)
carbaryl
(N­
OH­
Me
carbaryl),
1­
naphthol,
and
5,6­
dihydro­
dihydroxy­
1­
naphthol,
were
present
in
minor
amounts
(
#
3.4%
of
the
TRR).

Conjugated
carbaryl
accounted
for
#
2.8%
of
the
TRR
in
the
tested
commodities.
Other
conjugates
detected
in
plants
included
a
malonylglycoside
conjugate
of
1­
naphthol
comprising
26%
of
the
TRR
in
soybeans;
a
hexose
conjugate
of
N­
OH­
Me
carbaryl
accounting
for
17%
and
12.2%
of
the
TRR
in
soybeans
and
soybean
hay;
and
several
minor
conjugates
of
desmethyl
carbaryl,
5­
hydroxycarbaryl,
and
4­
hydroxycarbaryl,
each
at
#
2.7%
of
the
TRR.

Based
on
the
available
metabolism
data,
the
HED
Metabolism
Committee
(S.
Hummel,
2/
8/
96)
determined
that
tolerances
for
crop
commodities
should
be
expressed
as
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se.
The
carbaryl
metabolite,
N­
hydroxymethyl
carbaryl
does
not
need
to
be
regulated
because
it
is
expected
to
have
considerably
less
potential
as
a
cholinesterase
inhibitor
(based
on
in
vitro
studies).
As
noted
above,
conjugated
carbaryl
does
not
contribute
significantly
to
the
TRR,
and
is
not
of
concern.

GLN
860.1300:
Nature
of
the
Residue
­
Livestock
The
reregistration
requirements
for
livestock
metabolism
are
fulfilled.
Acceptable
metabolism
studies
depicting
the
qualitative
nature
of
the
residues
in
ruminants
and
poultry
have
been
submitted
and
evaluated.
The
metabolic
pathways
for
carbaryl
in
plants
and
livestocks
are
similar,
but
are
more
extensive
in
livestocks.

In
the
ruminant
metabolism
study,
lactating
cows
were
orally
dosed
with
1­
naphthyl­[
14
C]
carbaryl
at
dietary
levels
of
10­
100
ppm
for
14
days.
The
high­
dose
group
represents
approximately
a
0.8x
feeding
level
based
on
current
tolerance
levels.
The
Metabolism
Assessment
Review
Committee
(6/
17/
99)
concluded
that
tolerances
for
ruminant
meat
and
milk
should
be
expressed
as
residues
of
free
and
conjugated
forms
of
carbaryl,
5,6­
dihydro­
5,6­
dihydroxy
carbaryl,
and
5­
methoxy­
6­
hydroxy
carbaryl.
The
tolerance
expression
should
be
modified
to
reflect
these
changes.
5
Currently,
no
tolerances
are
needed
for
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
poultry;
the
presently
registered
uses
of
carbaryl
are
classified
as
Category
3
of
40
CFR
§180.6(
a)
with
respect
to
the
need
for
tolerances
in
poultry
and
eggs
i.
e.,
there
is
no
reasonable
expectation
of
finite
residues.

GLN
860.1340:
Residue
Analytical
Methods
The
available
methods
for
tolerance
enforcement
(PAM,
Volume
II,
Methods
I
through
IV,
A,
and
B)
measure
total
combined
residues
of
carbaryl
and
1­
naphthol,
calculated
as
carbaryl.
The
requirement
for
acceptable
enforcement
methods
which
determine
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
in
plant
and
livestock
commodities
remains
outstanding.
Athough
some
analytical
methods
determine
the
combined
residue
of
carbaryl
and
1­
naphthol,
it
should
be
noted
that
1­
napthol
is
a
very
minor
part
of
the
residue;
therefore,
the
plant
commodity
tolerances,
which
are
based
on
carbaryl
only,
are
not
greatly
exaggerated.

The
registrant
has
proposed
as
an
enforcement
method
HPLC
Method
CACR­
0194,
which
quantifies
carbaryl
per
se
in
plant
matrices.
This
method
has
undergone
successful
independent
laboratory
validation
(ILV)
using
samples
of
representative
plant
commodities
(oily
and
non­
oily
matrices),
and
has
also
been
successfully
radiovalidated
using
samples
from
plant
metabolism
studies.
The
method
should
be
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
method
validation.

Residue
data
on
most
crop
plants
and
processed
commodities
have
been
collected
using
the
above
HPLC
method
with
only
minor
modifications
involving
changes
in
solvents
and
cleanup
procedures.
Method
CACR­
1212,
a
modification
of
CACR­
0194,
has
also
been
used
to
generate
data
on
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
in
some
of
the
recent
residue
studies.
The
two
methods
are
identical
except
that
with
method
CACR­
1212
residues
are
extracted
with
ethyl
acetate
instead
of
DCM,
and
cleanup
procedures
use
deactivated
rather
than
activated
Florisil.
The
carbaryl­
HPLCalfalfa
method,
described
in
the
FRSTR,
was
used
to
generate
data
for
earlier
residue
studies.
This
method
does
not
distinguish
between
carbaryl
and
1­
naphthol;
however,
the
Agency
concluded
(DP
Barcode
D194407,
S.
Hummel,
2/
25/
94)
that
the
contribution
of
residues
of
1­
naphthol
is
insignificant
relative
to
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se.

The
registrant
must
also
propose
an
enforcement
method
for
determining
residues
of
free
and
conjugated
forms
of
carbaryl,
5,6­
dihydro­
5,6­
dihydroxy
carbaryl,
and
5­
methoxy­
6­
hydroxy
carbaryl
in
livestock
commodities.
An
adequate
HPLC
data
collection
method
(Aventis
File
No.
45186)
used
to
determine
residues
of
carbaryl
(free
and
conjugated)
and
its
metabolites
in
livestock
commodities
is
available,
and
has
undergone
a
successful
ILV.
The
method
is
similar
to
method
CARDC­
1286
which
was
described
in
a
recent
Agency
review
(C.
Olinger,
12/
13/
99).
Once
the
modified
method
has
been
submitted,
the
Agency
will
initiate
a
method
validation.

GLN
860.1360:
Multiresidue
Methods
The
FDA
PESTDATA
database
indicates
that
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
are
completely
recovered
using
FDA
Multiresidue
Protocols
A
and
D
(PAM
I
Sections
242.2
and
232.4).
No
data
are
available
concerning
the
recovery
of
carbaryl
by
Protocol
E
(PAM
I
Section
211.1
and
211.2).
These
PAM
I
methods
are
not
expected
to
recover
conjugated
carbaryl
residues.
6
GLN
860.1380:
Storage
Stability
Data
­
Plants
The
requirements
for
storage
stability
data
are
not
satisfied
for
purposes
of
reregistration.
Additional
data
are
required
depicting
the
storage
stability
of
carbaryl
per
se
in
an
oilseed,
processed
commodities
of
an
oily
crop,
and
a
dried
fruit
stored
for
up
to
10
months.

In
addition,
the
registrant
is
relying
on
earlier
magnitude
of
the
residue
studies
that
are
not
supported
by
the
existing
storage
stability
data;
therefore,
additional
storage
stability
data
are
required.
The
required
data
must
reflect
storage
intervals
of
18
months
for
alfalfa
commodities,
15
months
for
potatoes,
22
months
for
wheat
commodities,
and
33
months
for
rangeland
grass.
In
addition,
if
the
registrant
wishes
to
rely
on
the
previously
submitted
sugar
beet
processing
study,
information
pertaining
to
sample
conditions
and
intervals
for
the
study
must
be
submitted.

Adequate
storage
stability
data
have
been
submitted
indicating
that
residues
of
carbaryl
are
relatively
stable
under
frozen
storage
conditions
(­
20
C)
for
up
to
12
months
in/
on
pearled
barley
and
barley
flour,
head
lettuce,
potatoes,
tomatoes
and
tomato
processed
commodities,
and
wheat
forage,
hay,
and
straw.
Residue
decline
was
observed
in
tomato
dry
pomace
after
3
months
storage
(
­
30­
40%),
and
barley
grain
and
peanut
hulls
after
3
months
of
storage
(
­
50%
and
40%,
respectively;
these
commodities
are
no
longer
considered
to
be
significant
livestock
feed
items.
In
a
separate
study,
carbaryl
residues
were
shown
to
be
stable
in/
on
wheat
grain
stored
at
­20
C
for
up
to
7
months.

Adequate
storage
stability
data
have
been
submitted
indicating
that
weathered
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
are
stable
at
­20
C
for
at
least
15
months
in/
on
apple
fruit,
juice,
and
wet
and
dry
pomace;
13
months
in/
on
grapes;
12
months
in/
on
processed
raisins;
11
months
in/
on
almond
nutmeat
and
hulls,
and
dry
bean
hay;
and
10
months
in/
on
dry
bean
vines.

GLN
860.1380:
Storage
Stability
Data
­
Livestock
For
the
purpose
of
reregistration,
the
requirements
for
storage
stability
data
for
carbaryl
residues
in
livestock
commodities
are
partially
satisfied.
Additional
information
on
the
storage
intervals
prior
to
analysis
for
metabolite
residues
in
the
cattle
feeding
study
is
required.
Samples
from
the
feeding
study
were
analyzed
for
carbaryl
per
se
within
the
interval
of
known
stability
of
free
carbaryl
residues.

The
storage
stability
studies
conducted
to
date
indicate
that
residues
of
unconjugated
carbaryl
and
metabolites
are
less
stable
than
conjugated
residues.
A
storage
stability
study
submitted
in
conjunction
with
the
ruminant
feeding
study
indicated
that
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
are
relatively
stable
in
frozen
storage
for
up
to
3
months
in
milk,
fat,
and
muscle
and
up
to
1
month
in
kidney.
Residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
in
liver
declined
­
69%
after
2
weeks
of
storage
and
continued
to
decline
over
the
3­
month
storage
interval
(94%
decline).
Tissue
and
milk
samples
from
the
ruminant
feeding
study
were
stored
frozen
for
#
21
days
(9
days
for
liver)
prior
to
carbaryl
analysis.
The
data
indicate
that
conjugated
carbaryl­
related
residues
are
relatively
stable
in
frozen
storage
for
up
to
158
days
in
muscle,
173
days
in
liver,
196
days
in
kidney,
215
days
in
fat,
and
7
248
days
in
milk.
A
method
equivalency
study
using
samples
from
the
feeding
study
adequately
demonstrated
that
unconjugated
residues
are
not
a
significant
portion
of
carbaryl
residues
in
liver.

GLN
860.1500:
Crop
Field
Trials
Aventis
CropScience
submitted
data
to
support
the
use
of
granular
(G)
formulations
for
postemergence
applications
to
several
food/
feed
crops.
HED
(DP
Barcode
D240441,
C.
Olinger,
1/
22/
98)
required
the
registrant
to
conduct
one
side­
by­
side
trial
comparing
a
granular
formulation
and
a
spray
formulation
for
each
crop
group
and
miscellaneous
crop.
To
these
uses,
Aventis
CropScience
submitted
data
comparing
carbaryl
residues
in/
on
asparagus,
cabbage,
sweet
corn,
leaf
lettuce,
black­
eyed
peas,
squash,
strawberries,
tomatoes,
and
turnips
following
multiple
applications
of
either
a
4
lb/
gal
flowable
concentrate
(FlC)
or
10%
granular
(G)
formulation
in
side­
by­
side
tests.

A
total
of
nine
side­
by­
side
tests
using
a
10%
G
and
4
lb/
gal
FlC
were
conducted
on
crops
representing
major
field
crop
groups
and
miscellaneous
commodities
(asparagus,
cabbage,
sweet
corn,
peas,
squash,
strawberry,
tomato
and
turnip).
The
tests
were
conducted
at
the
maximum
label
rate
specified
on
the
label
for
the
4
lb/
gal
FlC
(EPA
Reg
No.
264­
333)
and
were
conducted
in
a
major
growing
region
for
each
crop.

Carbaryl
residues
resulting
from
application
of
the
10%
G
formulation
were
substantially
lower
than
from
the
FlC
formulation
in/
on
9
of
the
14
commodities
analyzed
(asparagus,
cabbage
w/
o
wrapper
leaves,
sweet
corn
forage,
pea
hay
and
dried
seeds,
squash,
strawberries,
tomatoes
and
turnip
tops)
and
were
similar
in
2
other
commodities
(sweet
corn
K+
CWHR
and
fodder).
Although
residues
of
the
10%
G
formulation
were
higher
than
residues
from
the
side
by
side
trial
for
cabbage
(w/
wrapper
leaves)
and
turnip
root,
the
residues
were
similar
or
lower
than
residues
found
in
the
residue
field
trials
submitted
to
the
Agency
in
support
of
tolerances
in/
on
turnip
and
cabbage.

The
data
submitted
are
not
adequate
to
support
the
use
of
granular
(G)
formulations
of
carbaryl
on
leafy
vegetables.
Residues
of
carbaryl
found
in
leaf
lettuce
were
not
consistent.
Both
samples
of
lettuce
from
the
10%
G
treatment
had
substantially
higher
residues
(37.01
and
47.22
ppm)
than
one
of
the
samples
treated
with
the
FlC
(23.25
ppm).
Additionally,
all
residues
were
significantly
above
the
current
tolerance
of
10
ppm.
and
all
residue
data
submitted
in
support
of
the
tolerance
in
lettuce
(<
8.85
ppm).
No
explanation
for
the
higher
residues
was
given
by
the
registrant.
The
registrant
may
elect
to
repeat
the
side
by
side
trial
on
leaf
lettuce
again
or
submit
a
rationale
for
the
results
of
the
leaf
lettuce
study.

In
addition,
conclusions
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
data
for
alfalfa,
apples,
potatoes,
wheat
processed
commodities,
grasses,
and
soybean
processed
commodities
are
contingent
upon
receipt
and
acceptance
of
adequate
supporting
storage
stability
data.

For
the
purpose
of
reregistration,
adequate
magnitude
of
the
residue
data
are
available
on
the
following
crops:
alfalfa,
almond,
asparagus,
bananas,
beans
(dried
and
succulent),
blueberry,
broccoli,
cabbage,
celery,
cherry,
citrus
fruits,
clover,
corn
(sweet
and
field),
cucurbits
(cantaloupes,
cucumbers
and
squash),
cranberry,
flax,
grape,
okra,
peanut,
peas
(dried
and
8
succulent),
pecan,
pepper,
pistachio,
pome
fruits,
potato,
prickly
pear
cactus,
raspberry,
rice,
sorghum,
soybean,
spinach,
stone
fruits,
strawberry,
sunflower,
sweet
potato,
tobacco,
tomato,
and
walnut.

Adequate
field
trial
data
depicting
carbaryl
residues
following
applications
made
according
to
the
maximum
or
proposed
use
patterns
have
been
submitted
for
these
commodities.
Geographic
representation
is
adequate
and
a
sufficient
number
of
trials
reflecting
representative
formulation
classes
were
conducted.
Carbaryl
residues
were
<LOQ
in/
on
sweet
potato,
sugar
beets,
corn
grain,
flax
seed,
and
peanuts.
Quantifiable
residues
were
detected
in
all
other
RACs.
For
a
given
crop,
residue
levels
were
quite
variable
overall,
probably
owing
to
climactic
variations,
but
were
generally
consistent
within
any
specific
field
trial
location.

In
addition
to
the
required
field
trial
data,
an
adequate
[
14
C]­
carbaryl
tobacco
pyrolysis
study
has
been
conducted.

Adequate
data
are
available
to
reassess
the
tolerances
for
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
sugar
beet
roots
and
tops
provided
that
use
directions
on
five
currently
approved
labels
are
modified
to
allow
a
maximum
of
two
applications
per
season
at
1.5
lb
ai/
A/
application
and
a
PHI
of
28
days.
The
registrant
has
proposed
(Letter
from
Aventis
to
J.
Loranger,
6/
1/
94)
amending
all
EP
labels
to
conform
to
these
requirements,
and
the
Greybeard
Committee
(1/
9/
97)
has
granted
a
waiver
from
the
requirement
of
additional
field
trials
provided
that
the
labels
are
amended.
Alternatively,
residue
data
are
required
depicting
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
in/
on
sugar
beet
roots
and
tops
harvested
28
days
following
four
applications
totaling
4.0
lb
ai/
A
(1x
the
maximum
seasonal
rate).
A
total
of
12
tests
should
be
conducted
in
the
following
areas:
Region
5
(5
tests),
Regions
7,
8,
and
9
(one
test
each),
and
Regions
10
and
11
(2
tests
each).

Adequate
residue
data
on
representative
Brassica
and
leafy
vegetables
are
available
to
support
uses
on
other
vegetable
commodities
with
the
same
carbaryl
use
pattern:
Adequate
data
on
broccoli
will
be
translated
to
support
the
uses
on
Brussels
sprouts,
cauliflower,
and
kohlrabi;
data
on
spinach
will
support
tolerances
on
dandelion
and
parsley;
and
residue
data
on
lettuce
will
be
translated
to
endive.

The
available
data
from
alfalfa
will
be
translated
to
support
uses
on
birdsfoot
trefoil.

The
following
data
on
grasses
are
available
for
risk
assessment/
reregistration
purposes:
Residue
data
from
rangeland
grass
field
trials
support
the
current
tolerance
of
100
ppm
in/
on
grass
forage.
Data
on
pasture
hay
harvested
at
the
14­
day
PHI
indicate
that
the
tolerance
on
grass
hay
should
be
lowered
to
15
ppm.

The
registrant
has
provided
data
on
pasture
grass
forage
harvested
at
a
PHI
of
14
days.
For
postemergence
applications
to
grasses,
the
Agency
currently
considers
feeding
restrictions
and
PHIs
greater
than
zero
days
impractical
for
forage
of
pasture
and
rangeland
grasses.
Grass
forage
tolerances
are
set
using
residue
data
from
a
0­
day
post­
treatment
interval.
However,
reasonable
PHIs
are
allowed
for
the
cutting
of
grass
hay.

Adequate
data
are
available
to
reassess
the
tolerances
for
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
dried
beans,
cowpeas,
lentils
and
peas
with
pods.
These
data
support
the
establishment
of
crop
subgroup
9
tolerances
for
edible­
podded
legume
vegetables
(6A),
and
for
dried,
shelled
pea
and
bean
except
soybean
(6C).
However,
additional
residue
data
are
required
if
the
registrant
seeks
tolerances
for
residues
in/
on
succulent,
shelled
pea
and
bean
commodities.
A
total
of
12
tests,
six
tests
each
on
a
succulent,
shelled
cultivar
of
bean
and
garden
pea,
are
required
to
support
a
tolerance
for
residues
in/
on
the
succulent,
shelled
pea
and
bean
crop
subgroup
(6B).
The
registrant
is
referred
to
OPPTS
GLN
860.1500
for
the
required
number
and
distribution
of
tests.

Data
are
available
to
reassess
the
tolerances
for
residues
in/
on
soybean
forage
and
hay.
To
establish
a
tolerance
for
residues
in/
on
the
foliage
of
legume
vegetables
except
soybeans
crop
subgroup
(7A),
the
guidelines
state
that
three
field
trials
each
are
required
on
any
cultivar
of
bean
and
field
pea.
Although
data
from
forage
and
hay
of
field
pea
are
not
available,
data
from
seven
field
trials
depicting
residues
in/
on
bean
forage
(vines)
and
hay
are
adequate
to
satisfy
the
guidelines
for
a
tolerance
on
the
crop
subgroup
7A.
The
use
patterns
are
the
same
for
forage
and
hay
of
peas
and
beans.

Adequate
data
are
available
to
reassess
the
tolerance
for
wheat
forage
and
straw.
However,
the
Agency
now
considers
wheat
hay
to
be
a
livestock
feed
item.
(OPPTS
GLN
860.1000
Table
1.).
A
full
set
of
20
field
trials
as
specified
in
OPPTS
GLN
860.1500
is
required
depicting
carbaryl
residues
in/
on
wheat
hay.
When
all
the
field
trials
are
complete,
PHIs
and
tolerances
for
hay
based
on
the
field
trial
data
should
be
proposed.
Data
on
wheat
hay
will
be
translatable
to
proso
millet
hay.

The
registrant
intends
to
support
a
tolerance
for
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
imported
pineapples
(Aventis
personal
communication
with
C.
Olinger,
9/
24/
98
SMART
meeting).
Residue
data
are
required
depicting
residues
in/
on
pineapples
following
application
of
carbaryl
at
the
maximum
use
rate
and
minimum
PHI.
Five
trials
must
be
submitted,
three
from
Costa
Rica
and
two
from
Mexico.

The
registrant
does
not
intend
to
support
carbaryl
uses
on
avocados,
barley,
maple
sap,
oats,
rye,
and
sweet
sorghum;
however,
IR­
4
has
indicated
(Correspondence
from
K.
Dorschner,
IR­
4
Project,
9/
15/
94)
that
they
may
fulfill
the
residue
data
requirements
for
some
of
these
commodities.
These
data
have
not
been
submitted.

GLN
860.1520:
Processed
Food/
Feed
Pending
adequate
resolution
of
the
outstanding
storage
stability
issues
noted
above,
the
reregistration
requirements
for
magnitude
of
the
residue
data
in
processed
food/
feed
commodities
are
fulfilled
for
citrus
fruits,
corn,
flaxseed,
grape,
olive,
peanut,
plum,
pome
fruits,
rice,
sorghum,
soybean,
sugar
beet,
sunflower,
potato,
tomato,
and
wheat.
Based
on
the
available
processing
studies,
tolerances
are
required
for
residues
in
citrus
fruit
oil,
raisins,
wet
apple
pomace,
and
rice
hulls
only.

In
a
tomato
processing
study,
carbaryl
residues
concentrated
by
2x
in
puree.
However,
when
this
concentration
factor
is
applied
the
HAFT
residues
of
2.45
ppm
for
tomatoes,
the
resulting
value
is
10
lower
than
the
reassessed
tolerance
(5.0
ppm)
for
residues
in/
on
fruiting
vegetables.
Therefore,
a
separate
tolerance
for
residues
in
puree
is
not
required.

In
an
apple
processing
study,
carbaryl
residues
concentrated
in
wet
apple
pomace
by
1.3x.
Based
on
this
concentration
factor
and
the
current
HAFT
residues
of
10.6
ppm
in/
on
apples,
an
appropriate
tolerance
for
carbaryl
residues
in
wet
apple
pomace
is
15.0
ppm.
Residues
did
not
concentrate
in
apple
juice.

Data
from
the
citrus
fruit
processing
study
indicate
that
residues
of
carbaryl
concentrate
in
citrus
oil
by
2.4x.
Based
on
this
concentration
factor
and
the
current
HAFT
residues
of
8.09
ppm
in/
on
citrus
fruit,
an
appropriate
tolerance
for
carbaryl
residues
in
citrus
oil
is
20.0
ppm.
Residues
did
not
concentrate
in
dried
pulp
or
juice.

Data
from
adequate
grape
processing
studies
indicate
that
residues
of
carbaryl
do
not
concentrate
in
grape
juice;
however,
carbaryl
residues
concentrate
by
1.4x
in
raisins.
Based
on
the
current
HAFT
residues
of
7.94
ppm
in/
on
grapes,
carbaryl
residues
in
raisins
could
be
expected
to
reach
11.1
ppm.
A
12.0
ppm
tolerance
for
carbaryl
residues
in
raisins
should
be
established.
Residues
did
not
concentrate
in
dried
pulp
or
juice.

A
rice
processing
study
indicated
that
residues
of
carbaryl
do
not
concentrate
in
polished
rice
or
bran,
but
concentrate
in
rice
hulls
by
2.4x.
Based
on
this
concentration
factor
and
the
current
HAFT
residues
of
11.0
ppm
in/
on
rice
grain,
residues
in
rice
hulls
could
be
expected
to
reach
26.4
ppm;
therefore,
an
appropriate
tolerance
for
carbaryl
residues
in
rice
hulls
is
30.0
ppm.

Data
from
a
wheat
processing
study
indicate
that
carbaryl
residues
in/
on
wheat
aspirated
grain
fractions
are
11.8x
higher
than
in/
on
wheat
grain.
Based
upon
HAFT
residues
of
0.27
ppm,
residues
of
carbaryl
may
be
expected
to
reach
3.2
ppm
in
wheat
aspirated
grain
fractions.
Adequate
soybean
aspirated
grain
fraction
data
are
available
and
indicate
that
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
soybean
aspirated
grain
fractions
are
5.6x
higher
than
in
soybean
seed.
Based
on
HAFT
residues
of
0.15
ppm,
residues
of
carbaryl
may
be
expected
to
reach
0.8
ppm
in
soybean
aspirated
grain
fractions.
For
grain
sorghum,
the
concentration
factor
between
the
aspirated
grain
fractions
and
the
whole
grain
samples
was
7.4x.
Based
on
HAFT
residues
of
9.55
ppm,
residues
of
carbaryl
could
be
expected
to
reach
70.2
ppm
in
sorghum
aspirated
grain
fractions.
As
carbaryl
residues
were
nondetectable
(<
0.02
ppm)
in/
on
all
samples
of
field
corn
grain
from
field
trials
conducted
at
the
maximum
labeled
use
rate
(8.0
lb
ai/
A,
MRID
44058001),
no
carbaryl
residue
data
on
aspirated
grain
fractions
derived
from
field
corn
grain
are
required.
Based
on
these
data,
a
tolerance
of
70
ppm
should
be
established
for
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
in/
on
aspirated
grain
fractions.

GLN
860.1480:
Meat,
Milk,
Poultry,
Eggs
The
reregistration
data
requirements
for
magnitude
of
the
residue
in
livestock
commodities
are
fulfilled.
11
The
presently
registered
uses
of
carbaryl
are
classified
as
Category
3
of
40
CFR
§180.6(
a)
with
respect
to
the
need
for
tolerances
in
poultry
and
eggs
i.
e.,
there
is
no
reasonable
expectation
of
finite
residues.

Based
upon
the
established
or
reassessed
tolerances
for
carbaryl
residues
in/
on
livestock
feed
items,
the
calculated
maximum
theoretical
dietary
burdens
for
livestock
are
presented
below:

Calculation
of
maximum
dietary
burdens
of
livestock
for
carbaryl.

Feed
Commodity
%
Dry
Matter
a
%
Diet
a
Tolerance
(ppm)
b
Dietary
Contribution
(ppm)
c
Beef
and
Dairy
cattle
grass,
forage
25
60
100.0
240.00
cowpea
seed
88
20
5.0
1.
1
Aspirated
grain
fraction
85
20
70.0
16.0
TOTAL
BURDEN
100
257.1
Swine
sorghum
grain
N/
A
85
10.0
8.
5
cowpea
forage
N/
A
15
60.0
9.
0
TOTAL
BURDEN
100
17.5
a
Table
1
(August
1996).
b
Current
or
reassessed
tolerance
from
Table
C.
c
Contribution
=
[tolerance
/
%
DM
(if
cattle)]
X
%
diet).

An
adequate
ruminant
feeding
study
is
available
reflecting
the
dosing
of
dairy
cattle
for
28
days
at
levels
equivalent
to
114,
342,
and
1140/
570
ppm
in
the
diet
(the
high­
dose
level
was
reduced
to
570
ppm
on
Day
5
due
to
toxic
effects
observed
in
study
animals).
These
dosing
levels
represent
0.4x,
1.3x,
and
4.4/
2.2x
the
theoretical
dietary
burden
for
cattle,
and
6.5x,
19.5x,
and
65.1/
32.6x
the
theoretical
dietary
burden
for
swine.
The
calculation
of
the
maximum
dietary
is
tentative
because
data
remain
outstanding
for
pasture
grass
forage.

Based
upon
the
results
of
this
study,
tolerances
for
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
in
livestock
(excluding
swine)
commodities
should
be
reassessed
as
follows:
1.0
ppm
for
milk,
0.5
ppm
for
fat,
1.0
ppm
for
meat,
and
3.0
ppm
for
meat
byproducts.

Using
the
results
of
the
feeding
study
to
reassess
tolerances
for
swine,
tolerances
for
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
in
swine
commodities
should
be
reassessed
as
follows:
0.05
ppm
for
fat,
0.1
ppm
for
meat,
and
0.5
ppm
for
meat
byproducts.

GLN
860.1400:
Water,
Fish,
and
Irrigated
Crops
Adequate
residue
data
are
available
to
support
the
use
of
carbaryl
on
oyster
beds
in
WA.
No
residue
data
are
required
for
catfish
or
crayfish
from
the
use
of
carbaryl
on
rice
since
this
use
is
prohibited
on
the
carbaryl
labels.
12
GLN
860.1460:
Food
Handling
Carbaryl
is
presently
not
registered
for
use
in
food­
handling
establishments;
therefore,
no
residue
chemistry
data
are
required
under
this
guideline
topic.

GLNs
860.1850
and
860.1900:
Confined/
Field
Accumulation
in
Rotational
Crops
An
adequate
confined
rotational
crop
study
is
available,
and
no
additional
rotational
crop
studies
are
required.
The
current
label
restriction
against
rotating
crops
for
which
carbaryl
is
not
registered
is
adequate.
13
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Table
A2.
Food/
Feed
Use
Patterns
on
EP
Labels
Subject
to
Reregistration
for
Carbaryl
(Case
0080).
1
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
Food/
Feed
Crop
Uses
Alfalfa
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
Fl/
C
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
1
per
cutting
1.5
lb/
A
per
cutting
7
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
14
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Almond,
chestnut,
filbert,
pecan,
walnut
Foliar,
dormant/
delayed
dormant
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
5.0
lb/
A
4
15.0
lb/
A
14
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
(including
dormant/
delayed
dormant
applications)
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
For
almonds
only,
dormant/
delayed
dormant
applications
may
be
made
in
combination
with
dormant
oil.

Foliar
application
Ground
50%
WP
[CA830007]
80%
WP
[CA830007]
1.0
lb/
100
gal
NS
NS
1
(for
nut
crops)
Use
limited
to
CA
for
nut
crops.

Applications
may
be
made
at
7­
day
retreatment
intervals
or
as
needed.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
15
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Apricot,
cherry,
nectarine,
peach,
plum/
prune
Foliar
and
dormant/
delayed
dormant
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
3.0
lb/
A
4.0
lb/
A
(CA
only)

5.0
lb/
A
(dormant/
delayed
only)
3
(foliar)
and
1
(dormant/
delayed
dormant)
14.0
lb/
A
3
(except
CA)

1
(CA
only)
A
maximum
of
three
foliar
applications
and
one
dormant/
delayed
dormant
application
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval
(14
days
in
CA).
A
maximum
seasonal
rate
of
14.0
lb
ai/
A
(5.0
lb
ai/
A
during
dormant/
delayed
dormant
period
and
9.0
lb
ai/
A
during
production
season)

has
been
established.

Foliar
application
Ground
50%
WP
[CA830007]
80%
WP
[CA830007]
1.0
lb/
100
gal
NS
NS
3
Use
limited
to
CA.
Applications
may
be
made
at
7­
day
retreatment
intervals
or
as
needed.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
16
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Asparagus
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
3
6.0
lb/
A
3.0
lb/
A
for
5%
P/
T
only
1
A
maximum
of
three
applications
may
be
made
prior
to
harvest
or
a
maximum
of
five
applications
may
be
made
per
crop
with
a
minimum
3­
day
retreatment
interval.

Postharvest
Ground
or
aerial
2
10.0
lb/
A
Not
applicable
(NA)
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
17
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Asparagus
(continued)
Postharvest
(to
fern
or
brush
growth)

Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
4.0
lb/
A
5
10.0
lb/
A
NA
A
maximum
of
five
applications
may
be
made
per
crop
(spears
and
ferns
combined)
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
1
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Avocado
Foliar
application
Ground
50%
WP
[CA830007]
80%
WP
[CA830007]
1.0
lb/
100
gal
5
NS
5
Use
limited
to
CA.
Applications
may
be
made
at
7­
day
retreatment
intervals
or
as
needed.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
18
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Bean,
cowpea,
pea
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
1.5
lb/
A
4
6.
0
lb/
A
3
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Bean,
fresh
and
dried
(Phaseolus
species
including
snap,
navy,
and
kidney),
cowpea,
lentil,
pea,
fresh
and
dried
(pisum
species),
soybean
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
4
6.
0
lb/
A
3
(fresh
beans)
14
(forage)
21
(dried
beans,
or
hay)
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
19
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Beet,
garden,
roots,
carrot,
horseradish,
radish,
parsnip,
rutabaga,
salsify
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
6
6.
0
lb/
A
7
A
maximum
of
six
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
7
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
20
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Beet,
garden,
tops
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
2.0
lb/
A
5
6.
0
lb/
A
14
A
maximum
of
five
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Beet,
sugar
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
2.0
lb/
A
4
4.
0
lb/
A
28
(roots
and
forage)
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.

50%
WP
[264­
314]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
335]
1.5
lb/
A
4
4.0
lb/
A
3.0
lb/
A
(FlC)
28
(roots
and
forage)
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.

80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
333]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
2
4.0
lb/
A
3.0
lb/
A
(FlC)
28
(roots
and
forage)
A
maximum
of
two
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
21
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Blueberry
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
5
10.0
lb/
A
7
A
maximum
of
five
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
0.05
lb/
1,000
sq.
ft
4
NS
7
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
22
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Broccoli,
Brussels
sprouts,
cabbage,
cauliflower,
Chinese
cabbage,
collards,
kale,
kohlrabi,
mustard
greens
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
4
6.
0
lb/
A
3
14
(Chinese
Cabbage,
collards,
kale
and
mustard
greens)
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
3
14
(Chinese
Cabbage,
collards,
kale
and
mustard
greens)
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Brussels
sprouts
(see
broccoli)

Cabbage
(see
broccoli)
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
23
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Caneberry
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
5
10.0
lb/
A
7
A
maximum
of
five
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
7
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Carrot
(see
beet,
garden)

Cauliflower
(see
broccoli)

Celery,
dandelion
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
24
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
5
6.
0
lb/
A
14
A
maximum
of
five
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
14
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
25
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Cherry
(see
apricot)

Chestnut
(see
almond)

Chinese
cabbage
(see
broccoli)

Citrus
fruits
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
7.5
lb/
A
8
16.0
lb/
A
5
A
maximum
of
eight
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.

16.0
lb/
A
1
16.0
lb/
A
5
Use
limited
to
CA
for
control
of
California
red
scale
and
yellow
scale.

Foliar
application
Ground
50%
WP
[CA83007]
80%
WP
[CA83007]
1.0
lb/
100
gal
NS
NS
5
Use
limited
to
CA.
Applications
may
be
made
at
7­
day
retreatment
intervals
or
as
needed.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
26
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Citrus
fruits
(continued)

Foliar
application
Ground
or
aerial
80%
WP
[FL890036]
4
lb/
gal
FlC
[FL890037]
10.0
lb/
A
NS
NS
5
Use
limited
to
FL.
Applications
may
be
made
as
a
dilute
or
concentrate
spray
using
ground
equipment
or
in
a
minimum
of
10
gal/
A
by
air.

Applications
may
be
made
as
needed.

Clover
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
1
per
cutting
1.5
lb/
A
per
cutting
7
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
27
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Collards
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
4
6.0
lb/
A
6.1
lb/
A
for
the
2
and
4
lb/
gal
FlC
(EPA
Reg.

Nos.
264­
334
and
264­
335)
14
See
"Broccoli."

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
14
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
28
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Corn,
field
and
pop
Broadcast
foliar,
banded
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
4
8.
0
lb/
A
14
(forage
and
silage)

48
(grain
and
fodder)
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
29
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Corn,
sweet
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
8
16.0
lb/
A
2
(ears)

14
(forage)

48
(fodder)
A
maximum
of
eight
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
3­
day
retreatment
interval.

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
2
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
30
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Cotton
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
1.5
lb/
A
4
6.
0
lb/
A
14
(forage)
28
(seed)
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Band
and/
or
directed
spray
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
4
6.
0
lb/
A
14
(forage)
28
(seed)
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
31
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Cowpea
(see
bean)

Cranberry
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
5
10.0
lb/
A
7
See
"Blueberry."
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
32
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Cucumber,
melon,
pumpkin,
squash
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.0
lb/
A
6
6.
0
lb/
A
3
A
maximum
of
six
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

P/
T
formulations
not
used
on
pumpkins
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
33
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Dandelion
(see
celery)

Eggplant
(see
tomato)

Endive
(see
lettuce)

Filbert
(see
almond)

Flax
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
2
3.
0
lb/
A
42
(seed
and
straw)
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
two
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
34
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Grape
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
5
10.0
lb/
A
7
See
"Blueberry."

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
7
See
"Blueberry."
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
35
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Grasses
(grown
for
seed)

Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
2
3.
0
lb/
A
14
A
maximum
of
two
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.

Horseradish
(see
beet,
garden)

Kale
(see
broccoli)
Kohlrabi
(see
broccoli)
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
36
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Lentil
(see
bean)

Lettuce,
head
and
leaf;
endive
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
5
6.
0
lb/
A
14
See
"Beet,
garden,
top"
or
"Celery."

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
14
See
"Celery."
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
37
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Melon
(see
cucumber)

Millet,
proso
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
2
3.
0
lb/
A
7
(forage)
21
(grain
and
straw)
A
maximum
of
two
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.
Use
of
the
50%,

80%,
and
85%
WP
(EPA
Reg.
Nos.

264­
314,
264­
315,
264­
316,
and
264­

526)
and
the
4
lb/
gal
FlC
(EPA
Reg.

Nos.
264­
321,
264­
333,
264­
335,
and
264­
349)
formulations
is
prohibited
in
CA.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
38
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Mustard
greens
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
4
6.0
lb/
A
6.1
lb/
A
for
the
2
and
4
lb/
gal
FlC
(EPA
Reg.

Nos.
264­
334
and
264­
335)
14
See
"Broccoli."

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
14
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­

day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
39
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Nectarine
(see
apricot)

Olive
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
7.5
lb/
A
2
15.0
lb/
A
14
A
maximum
of
two
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
40
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Parsley
(see
lettuce)

Parsnip
(see
beet,
garden)

Pastures
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
2
3.
0
lb/
A
14
A
maximum
of
two
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.

Cereal
grain
bait
application
Ground
or
aerial
4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
333]
0.5
lb/
A
1
NS
0
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
41
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Peach
(see
apricot)

Peanut
Broadcast
foliar,
banded
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
1.0
lb/
A
5
8.
0
lb/
A
14
A
maximum
of
five
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
5
8.
0
lb/
A
14
A
maximum
of
five
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
14
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
42
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Pea
(see
bean)

Pea,
fresh
and
dried
(Pisum
species)
and
Southern
pea
(see
bean)

Pecan
(see
almond)

Pepper
(see
tomato)

Pistachio
Dormant/
delayed
dormant
and
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
5.0
lb/
A
4
15.0
lb/
A
14
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
(including
dormant/
delayed
dormant
applications)
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Dormant/
delayed
dormant
applications
may
be
made
in
combination
with
dormant
oil.

Foliar
application
Aerial
80%
WP
[CA810059]
6.0
lb/
A
1
NS
14
Use
limited
to
CA.
Application
may
be
made
in
a
minimum
of
20
gal/
A.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
43
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Plum/
Prune
(see
apricot)

Pome
fruits
(including
apples,
pears,
loquats,
crabapples,
oriental
pears,
and
quince)

Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
3.0
lb/
A
8
15.0
lb/
A
3
A
maximum
of
eight
applications
may
be
made
(including
thinning
sprays
on
apples)
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.
Application
of
the
80%
WP
(EPA
Reg.
Nos.
264­
316
and
264­
526)
and
4
lb/
gal
FlC
(EPA
Reg.

Nos.
264­
333,
264­
335,
and
264­
349)

formulations
to
quince
are
prohibited.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
44
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Pome
fruits
(including
apples,
pears,
loquats,
crabapples,
oriental
pears,
and
quince)(
continued)

Postbloom
(for
fruit
thinning)
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
3.0
lb/
A
8
15.0
lb/
A
3
Use
limited
to
apples.
A
maximum
of
eight
applications
may
be
made
(including
thinning
sprays
on
apples)

with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.

Postbloom
(for
fruit
thinning)
Ground
4
lb/
gal
FlC
[NC960003]
[OH960003]
[OR950006]
[PA960002]
[VA950001]
[WA940021]
3.0
lb/
A
NS
6.0
lb/
A
for
NC960003
NS
Use
limited
to
NC,
OH,
OR,
PA,
VA,

and
WA.
Applications
may
be
made
after
80
to
100%
petal
fall
and
9
mm
fruit
size.

Postbloom
(for
fruit
thinning)
Ground
50%
WP
[NC820007]
1.0
lb/
100
gal
(dilute)

[250­
600
gal
finished
spray/
A]
NS
NS
NS
Tank
mix
use
with
plant
regulator
ethephon
limited
to
NC.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
45
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Pome
fruits
(including
apples,
pears,
loquats,
crabapples,
oriental
pears,
and
quince)(
continued)

Foliar
application
Ground
50%
WP
[CA83007]
80%
WP
[CA83007]
1.0
lb/
100
gal
5
(for
loquats)
NS
1
(for
apples
and
pears)
5
(for
loquats)
Use
limited
to
CA.
Applications
may
be
made
at
7­
day
retreatment
intervals
or
as
needed.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
46
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Potato
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
6
6.
0
lb/
A
7
See
"Beet,
garden,
roots."
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
47
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Potato
(continued)
Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
7
See
"Beet,
garden,
roots."

Pumpkin
(see
cucumber)

Radish
(see
beet,
garden)
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
48
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Rangeland
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]

3.2
lb/
gal
RTU
[264­
427]
3
4
lb/
gal
RTU
[264­
422]
1.0
lb/
A
1
1.
0
lb/
A
0
A
maximum
of
one
application
may
be
made
per
year.

Cereal
grain
bait
application
Ground
or
aerial
4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
333]

4
lb/
gal
RTU
[264­
422]
0.5
lb/
A
1
NS
0
Rhubarb
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
49
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
14
See
"Celery."
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
50
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Rice
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
2
4.
0
lb/
A
14
(grain
and
straw)
A
maximum
of
two
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

CA
only:
for
control
of
tadpole
shrimp;
max
number
applications
and
RTI
not
specified.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
51
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Rutabaga
(see
beet,
garden)

Salsify
(see
beet,
garden)

Sorghum,
grain
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
4
6.
0
lb/
A
21
(grain
and
fodder)

14
(forage
and
silage)
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
52
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Soybean
(see
bean)

Spinach
(see
lettuce)

Squash
(see
cucumber)
Strawberry
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
5
10.0
lb/
A
7
A
maximum
of
five
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
53
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Strawberry
(continued)

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
7
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Sunflower
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
2
3.
0
lb/
A
30
(forage)
60
(seed)
Use
in
CA
is
prohibited.
A
maximum
of
two
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
54
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Sweet
potato
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
8
8.
0
lb/
A
7
A
maximum
of
eight
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
55
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Sweet
potato
(continued)

Dip
treatment
Preplant
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
8.0
lb/
100
gal
NS
1.
2
lb/
A
NA
Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.3
lb/
A
4
NS
7
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
56
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Swiss
chard
(see
lettuce)

Tobacco
Broadcast
foliar
(plant
bed
and
field)

Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
4
8.
0
lb/
A
0
A
maximum
of
four
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.
Applications
may
be
made
in
a
minimum
of
10
gal
of
finished
spray/
A.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
57
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Tomato,
pepper,
eggplant
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

2
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
334]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
2.0
lb/
A
7
8.
0
lb/
A
3
A
maximum
of
seven
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
7­
day
retreatment
interval.

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
3
Use
prohibited
in
CA.
A
maximum
of
4
applications
may
be
made
per
year
with
a
minimum
7­
day
RTI.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
58
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Trefoil,
birdsfoot
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
1
per
cutting
1.5
lb/
A
per
cutting
7
Turnip,
roots
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
2.0
lb/
A
6
6.
0
lb/
A
7
See
"Beet,
garden,
roots."

Soil
broadcast
Before,
during,
or
after
the
growing
season
Ground
7%
G
[264­
429]
[264­
430]
2.2
lb/
A
4
NS
7
See
"Beet,
garden,
root."
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
59
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Turnip,
tops
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
2.0
lb/
A
5
6.
0
lb/
A
14
See
"Beet,
garden,
top."

Walnut
(see
almond)

Wheat
Broadcast
foliar
Ground
or
aerial
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
1.5
lb/
A
2
3.
0
lb/
A
7
(forage)
21
(grain
and
straw)
A
maximum
of
two
applications
may
be
made
with
a
minimum
14­
day
retreatment
interval.
Use
of
the
50%,

80%,
and
85%
WP
(EPA
Reg.
Nos.

264­
314,
264­
315,
264­
316,
and
264­

526)
and
4
lb/
gal
FlC
(EPA
Reg.
Nos.

264­
321,
264­
333,
264­
335,
and
264­

349)
formulations
is
prohibited
in
CA.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
60
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Livestock
Uses
Poultry
treatment
(chickens,
ducks,
geese,
game
birds,
pigeons,
and
turkeys)

Direct
animal
treatment
Electric
fog
machine
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
349]
5
oz/
1
gal
[1.
5
gal
finished
spray
per
1,000
hens]
NS
NS
7­
day
pre

slaughter
interval
Applications
may
be
repeated
in
4
weeks
if
necessary.

Direct
animal
treatment
Compressed
air
sprayer
50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
3.2
oz/
5
gal
[1
gal
finished
spray
per
100
hens]
NS
NS
7­
day
pre

slaughter
interval
Applications
may
be
repeated
in
4
weeks
if
necessary.
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
61
(continued;
footnotes
follow)

Poultry
houses
(chickens,
ducks,
geese,
gamebirds,
pigeons,
and
turkeys)

Premise
treatment
Spreader
or
sprayer
5%
P/
T
[264­
320]

10.04%
P/
T
[264­
312]
2.4
oz/
1,000
sq.
ft
NS
NS
NA
Applications
may
be
made
uniformly
to
the
floor
or
litter
area.
A
7­
day
preslaughter
interval
(PSI)
has
been
established
for
poultry,
game
birds
and
their
premises.

50%
WP
[264­
314]
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
85%
WP
[264­
315]

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
321]
[264­
335]
[246­
349]
4­
50
lb/
100
gal
[1­
2
gal
of
spray
mixture
per
1,000
sq.

ft]
NS
NS
NA
Applications
may
be
made
to
the
wall,

litter,
or
roost
area.
A
7­
day
PSI
has
been
established
for
birds
and
their
premises.

Premise
treatment
Sprayer
or
duster
80%
WP
[264­
316]
[264­
526]
1.0
lb/
1,000
sq.
ft
NS
NS
NA
Applications
may
be
made
as
a
dilute
spray
or
as
a
dry
dust
to
floor
surface,

walls,
cracks,
posts,
and
crevices.
A
7­

day
PSI
has
been
established
for
birds
and
their
premises.

4
lb/
gal
FlC
[264­
333]
[264­
335]
[264­
349]
0.54­
0.55
lb/
1,000
sq.

ft
NS
NS
NA
Site
Application
Type
Application
Timing
Application
Equipment
Formulation
[EPA
Reg.
No.]
Maximum
Single
Application
Rate,
ai
Maximum
Number
of
Applications
Per
Season
Maximum
Seasonal
Rate,

ai
Preharvest
Interval,
Days
Use
Directions
and
Limitations
2
62
Fish
and
Shellfish
Uses
Oyster
beds
Application
to
dewatered
oyster
beds
Ground
or
aerial
80%
WP
[WA900013]
10.0
lb/
A
NS
NS
365
Application
is
for
control
of
ghost
shrimp
and
mud
shrimp.
Application
must
be
made
and
completed
within
30
minutes
after
low
tide
to
prevent
direct
contamination
of
water.
Use
is
limited
to
areas
greater
than
200
feet
from
channels
and
sloughs.
For
aerial
application,
a
200­
foot
buffer
zone
is
required
between
the
treatment
area
and
the
nearest
shellfish
to
be
harvested.
A
50­
foot
buffer
zone
is
required
if
treatment
is
by
hand
spray.

Treatment
is
allowed
only
on
ground
with
no
oysters
within
one
year
of
harvest
are
present.

1
The
following
labels
list
a
drench
spot
application
to
fire
ant
mounds
in
rangeland
or
pastures:
Epa
Reg.
Nos.
264­
314,
­315,
­316,
­321,
­349,
and
­526.
EPA
Reg.
Nos.

264­
334
and
­335
permit
drench
spot
treatment
for
fire
ants
on
all
labeled
crops/
sites.
The
labeled
rate
for
fire
ant
spot
treatment
is
6.7­
10.6
g/
gal.
Granular
spot
treatment
with
EPA
Reg.
Nos.
264­
429
and
­430
may
also
be
made
at
6g/
ant
mound.

2
A
restriction
against
planting
rotational
food
and
feed
crops
not
listed
on
the
label
or
other
carbaryl
labels
in
carbaryl
treated
soil
is
specified
on
the
labels
for
the
following
products:
EPA
Reg.
Nos.
264­
312,
264­
314,
264­
315,
264­
316,
264­
320,
264­
321,
264­
333,
264­
334,
264­
335,
264­
349,
264­
422,
264­
427,
264­
429,
and
264­
526.

Irrigation
restrictions:
(i)
Use
in
irrigation
systems
prohibited
for
EPA
Reg.
No.
264­
422,
­427;
(ii)
use
of
reclaimed
irrigation
water
on
upland
crops
for
which
no
carbaryl
tolerances
established
prohibited
for
EPA
Reg.
Nos.
264­
312,
­314,
­315,
­320,
­321,
­333,
­334,
­335,
­349,
­422,
­427;
(iii)
may
be
applied
through
sprinkler
irrigation
systems
including
center
pivot
and
solid
set
­
use
of
all
other
types
prohibited
EPA
Reg.
Nos.
264­
312,
­314,
­315,
­316,
­321,
­333,
­349,
­526).

12­
Hour
RTI
for
EPA
Reg.
Nos.
264­
312,
­314,
­315,
­316,
­320,
­321,
­333,
­335,
­349,
­422,
­427,
­526).

3
The
3.2
lb/
gal
RTU
(EPA
Reg.
No.
264­
427)
product
label
lists
the
application
rates
in
quarts
of
product
per
acre
for
non
cropland
and
rangeland;
however,
to
make
this
product
label
consistent
with
the
other
products
the
application
rates
should
be
expressed
as
fluid
ounces
per
acre.
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
63
Table
B.
Residue
Chemistry
Science
Assessments
for
Reregistration
of
Carbaryl.

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
860.1200:
Directions
for
Use
N/
A
=
Not
Applicable
Yes
3
860.1300:
Plant
Metabolism
N/
A
No
00049135
00053897
00116083
00118342
00124353
00124968
00125170
43249101
4
43249102
4
43249103
4
860.1300:
Livestock
Metabolism
N/
A
No
5
00015669
00053897
00080417
00080679
00080680
00080681
00080682
00080683
00080686
00080689
00080690
00091952
00095927
00118346
00118347
00118365
00118368
00118371
00118375
00118376
00118377
00139664
43324601
6,7
860.1340:
Residue
Analytical
Methods
­Plant
commodities
N/
A
Yes
8
00080417
00080680
00098504
00107017
00118342
00118346
00118366
00118367
00118368
00118370
00118372
00118373
00118377
00124334
00124361
00145884
00147760
00154626
00156736
00159326
05001852
05004154
05004934
05008728
05010424
05014156
05014889
05016141
05018884
05019959
40255702
40408601
43672701
9
43672702
9
43786805
10
44155401
11
­Livestock
commodities
N/
A
Yes
12
00061103
00080417
00080680
00118346
00118366
00118367
00118368
00118370
00118372
00118373
00118375
00118376
05001852
05004154
05008728
05010424
05014156
05014889
05016141
05018884
05019959
44286901
13
44286902
13
44286903
13
860.1360:
Multiresidue
Methods
N/
A
No
860.1380:
Storage
Stability
Data
­Plant
commodities
N/
A
Yes
14
00163007
00163009
00163014
40408601
43850902
15
44068401
16
44123101
17
44250301
16
44412501
18
Table
B
(continued).

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
64
­Livestock
commodities
N/
A
No
44250901
13
44381901
13
860.1500:
Crop
Field
Trials
Root
and
Tuber
Vegetables
Group
­Beet,
garden,
roots
5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43813601
10
­Beet,
sugar,
roots
None
established
No
00089868
00163007
40376001
19
40376002
20
­Carrot
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090325
43813601
10
­Horseradish
5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43813601
10
­Parsnips
5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43813601
10
­Potato
0.
2
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00107017
00134421
40512501
20
­Radishes
5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43813601
10
­Salsify,
roots
5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43813601
10
­Turnip,
roots
5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43813601
10
­Sweet
potato
0.2
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00107017
43702002
21
Leaves
of
Root
and
Tuber
Vegetables
Group
­Beet,
garden,
tops
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43813601
10
­Beet,
sugar,
tops
100
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
19
00089868
­Salsify,
tops
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43813601
10
­Turnip,
tops
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43813601
10
Leafy
Vegetables
(except
Brassica)
Vegetables
Group
­Celery
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00124337
43677401
22
­Dandelions
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
22
00089868
43677401
22
­Endive
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
23
00089868
43677401
22
Table
B
(continued).

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
65
­Lettuce
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
00090162
43677401
22
­Parsley
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
23
00089868
43677401
22
­Spinach
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43677401
22,24
­Swiss
chard
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43677401
22
Brassica
(Cole)
Vegetables
Group
­Broccoli
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090325
43721001
22
44019701
25
­Brussels
sprouts
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
26
00090325
43721001
22
­Cabbage
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090325
43786806
10
­
Cauliflower
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
27
00090325
43721001
22
­
Chinese
cabbage
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43794903
10
­
Collards
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43794903
10
­Kale
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43794903
10
­
Kohlrabi
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
27
00090325
43721001
22
­Mustard
greens
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43794903
10
Legume
Vegetables
Group
­Bean,
fresh
and
dried
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089679
00089680
00089681
00082424
00089837
00090113
00163014
00124334
43786804
10
43984701
27
­Cowpeas
5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
43694103
22
­Lentils
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
00124334
43694103
22
­Peas
(with
pods)
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090113
00124334
43703102
22
­Soybeans
5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
43694102
22
Foliage
of
Legume
Vegetables
Group
Table
B
(continued).

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
66
­Bean,
forage
and
hay
100,
forage
100,
hay
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
28
00082424
00089679
00089680
00089681
00089837
00125090
­Cowpea,
forage
and
hay
100,
forage
100,
hay
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
43786804
10
­Pea,
vines
100
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
00124334
43786804
10
­Soybean,
forage
and
hay
100,
forage
100,
hay
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
43694102
22
Fruiting
Vegetables
(Except
Cucurbits)
Group
­Eggplant
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089600
43686701
22
43996101
28
­Pepper
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089600
43686701
22
­Tomato
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089600
00159326
43996101
28
Cucurbit
Vegetables
Group
­Cucumber
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089376
43786802
10
­Melon
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090325
43786802
10
­Pumpkin
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090325
43786802
10
­Squash,
summer
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089376
43786802
10
­Squash,
winter
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090325
43786802
10
Citrus
Fruits
Group
­Citrus
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090204
00090320
00163008
43802101
15
44211801
29
Pome
Fruits
Group
­Pome
fruits
10
[§
180.169(
d)]
No
00080419
00082420
00082423
00083311
00083312
00089455
00089679
00089680
00159327
44072901
11
Stone
Fruits
Group
­Apricot
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090160
43793202
15
44284701
30
Table
B
(continued).

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
67
­Cherry
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089348
00124345
43793202
15
44284701
30
­Nectarine
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090160
43793202
15
44284701
30
­Peach
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00082422
43793202
15
44284701
30
­Plum
(fresh
prune)
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089348
00124345
43793202
15
44284701
30
Berries
Group
­Blackberry
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43698201
22
­Blueberry
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090161
43694101
22
­Boysenberry
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43698201
22
­Dewberry
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43698201
22
­Loganberry
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43698201
22
­Raspberry
12
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089868
43698201
22
Tree
Nuts
Group
­Almond,
nutmeat
and
hulls
1,
almonds;
40,
almonds,
hulls
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00108985
00140447
43786801
15
­Chestnut
1
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
43786801
15
43802102
15
­Filbert
1
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090156
43786801
15
43802102
15
­Pecan
1
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00123219
43802102
15
­Walnut
1
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00108985
00140447
43818901
15
Cereal
Grains
Group
­Barley,
grain
0
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
30
­Corn,
field
and
pop
5,
fresh
(including
sweet)
K+
CWHR
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089420
00125090
00125107
00163009
44058001
16
Table
B
(continued).

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
68
­Corn,
sweet
5,
fresh
(including
sweet)
K+
CWHR
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089378
00089420
00125090
00125107
44058101
11
­Millet,
proso,
grain
3
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
31
00074368
43975601
15
­Oats,
grain
0
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
30
­Rice,
grain
5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
00125138
43802103
15
­Rye,
grain
0
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
30
­Sorghum,
grain
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
43794901
10
­Wheat,
grain
3
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00015669
00115284
00136415
41594301
32
43975601
15
Forage,
Fodder,
and
Straw
of
Cereal
Grains
Group
­Barley,
forage
and
straw
100,
green
fodder
100,
straw
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
30
­Corn,
fodder
and
forage
100,
fodder
100,
forage
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089378
00089420
00125090
00125107
44058001
33
44058101
11
­Millet,
proso,
straw
100
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
31
00074368
43975601
15
­Oats,
forage
and
straw
100,
green
fodder
100,
straw
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
30
­Rice,
straw
100,
straw
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
00125138
43802103
15
­Rye,
forage
100,
green
fodder
100,
straw
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
30
­Sorghum,
forage
100,
forage
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00159329
43794901
10
­Wheat,
forage
and
straw
100,
green
fodder
100,
straw
[§
180.169(
a)]
Yes
34
00015669
00115284
00136415
Grass
Forage,
Fodder,
and
Hay
Group
­Pastures
100,
grass;
100,
hay
[§
180.169(
a)]
Yes
35
00089837
00125121
00125123
00125555
00163006
43716601
22
­Rangeland
100,
grass;
100,
hay
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
00125121
00125123
00125555
00163006
44065901
34
Table
B
(continued).

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
69
Non­
grass
Livestock
Feeds
(Forage,
Fodder,
Straw,
and
Hay)
Group
­Alfalfa,
forage
and
hay
100,
fresh;
100,
hay
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
00125121
00125123
00159325
­Birdsfoot
trefoil,
forage
and
hay
100,
fresh;
100,
hay
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
00125121
00125123
00159325
­Clover,
forage
and
hay
100,
fresh;
100,
hay
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
00125121
00125123
43694105
22
Herbs
and
Spices
Group
­Dill,
fresh
0.2
[§
180.169(
e)]
No
PP#
7E3543
36
Miscellaneous
Commodities
­Aspirated
grain
fractions
None
No
37
43794902
10
43813602
10
­Asparagus
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00083527
00140449
43654201
10
­Avocado
10
[§
180.169(
e)]
No
30
­Banana
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
44798401
39
­Cranberry
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090161
43697604
22
­Cotton,
seed
and
forage
5,
cottonseed
100,
cotton
forage
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
(Revoke)
38
00089837
00124343
00125099
40881307
­Flax,
seed
and
straw
5,
seed;
100,
straw
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00074366
00074367
43982801
15
­Grapes
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089418
00089458
00125084
43793201
15
­Maple,
sap
0.5
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
30
­Okra
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00090229
44123101
17
­Olives
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
40
00090281
43702001
22
44321301
18
­Peanuts,
nut
and
hay
5,
peanut;
100,
hay
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089837
43703101
22
­Pineapple
2.
0
[§
180.169(
d)]
Yes
39
PP#
5F3208
­Pistachio
nuts
1
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00124335
43703103
22
­Prickly
pear
cactus
12,
fruit;
12,
pads
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00103288
44145201
17
Table
B
(continued).

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
70
­Strawberry
10
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00089348
43698202
22
­Sunflower
1,
seeds
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
00058927
00058928
43786803
10
­Tobacco
None
established
No
44114301
40
860.1520:
Processed
Food/
Feed
­Beet,
sugar
None
established
No
00163017
­Citrus
fruits
None
established
No
43694104
22
­Corn,
field
None
established
No
00163018
43915201
15
­Cottonseed
None
established
No
43850901
15
­Flaxseed
None
established
No
00074366
00074367
­Grapes
None
established
No
00163010
00163011
43697601
22
43697602
22
­Olives
None
established
No
43698203
22
­Peanut
None
established
No
00163012
44046101
26
­Pineapple
20,
bran
[§
186.550]
No
PP#
5F3208
41
­Plum
None
established
No
00159328
­Pome
fruits
None
established
No
43702003
22
­Potato
None
established
No
00159324
43697603
22
­Rice
None
established
No
00163013
43813603
10
­Sorghum
None
established
No
00163015
43813604
10
­Soybean
None
established
No
00163016
43794902
10
­Sunflower
None
established
No
43845205
15
­Tomato
None
established
No
43686702
22
­Wheat
None
established
No
43813602
10
860.1480:
Meat,
Milk,
Poultry,
Eggs
­Milk
and
the
Fat,
Meat,
and
Meat
Byproducts
of
Cattle,
Goats,
Hogs,
Horses,
and
Sheep
0.1,
fat,
meat,
and
meat
byproducts;
1,
kidney
and
liver
[§
180.169(
b)]
No
00015669
00061106
00080417
00080419
00080420
00089380
00089836
00089837
00118342
00118346
00118367
00118368
00118370
00118372
00118373
00118374
00118378
40881302
40881312
40881313
40881314
44250901
13
44381901
13
Table
B
(continued).

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
71
­Fat,
Meat,
and
Meat
Byproducts
of
Poultry
5.0
Fat
and
meat
[§
180.169(
b)]
No
00061103
00080420
00080680
00118375
00118376
00124367
00125571
00135678
00135680
40881308
40881309
­Eggs
0.5
[§
180.319]
No
Table
B
(continued).

GLN:
Data
Requirements
Current
Tolerances,
ppm
[40
CFR]
Must
Additional
Data
Be
Submitted?
1
References
2
72
1.
Reassessed
tolerances
for
leafy
vegetables
remain
tentative
until
granular
data
required
to
support
the
reregistration
of
carbaryl
are
submitted.
The
registrant
should
conduct
one
side­
by­
side
trial
comparing
a
granular
formulation
and
a
spray
formulation.
If
the
residues
resulting
from
use
of
the
granular
formulation
for
all
crops
are
the
same
or
less
than
the
spray
formulation,
then
no
additional
granular
data
would
be
required.

2.
Bolded
references
were
reviewed
in
the
Residue
Chemistry
Chapter
of
the
Carbaryl
Reregistration
Standard
dated
3/
15/
83
or
the
Interim
Residue
Chemistry
Chapter
of
the
Carbaryl
Reregistration
Standard
dated
3/
30/
84.
Italicized
references
were
reviewed
in
the
Residue
Chemistry
Chapter
of
the
Carbaryl
(FRSTR)
Reregistration
Standard
dated
5/
3/
88.
All
other
references
were
reviewed
as
noted.

3.
Label
revisions
are
required
for
several
crops
in
order
to
reflect
the
parameters
of
use
patterns
for
which
residue
data
are
available.
Details
of
the
required
label
amendments
are
presented
in
the
Directions
for
Use
section.

4.
DP
Barcode
D204197,
11/
28/
95,
S.
Hummel.

5.
No
tolerances
are
needed
for
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
poultry;
the
presently
registered
uses
of
carbaryl
are
classified
as
Category
3
of
40
CFR
§180.6(
a)
with
respect
to
the
need
for
tolerances
in
poultry
and
eggs
i.
e.,
there
is
no
reasonable
expectation
of
finite
residues.

6.
CB
No.
14249,
DP
Barcode
D206777,
11/
28/
95,
S.
Hummel.

7.
DP
Barcode
D255855,
C.
Olinger,
5/
16/
99
and
6/
17/
99.

8.
The
proposed
HPLC
enforcement
method
for
carbaryl
per
se
in
plants
(Method
CACR­
0194)
should
be
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
validation.

9.
DP
Barcode
D216544,
S.
Hummel,
1/
22/
96.

10.
DP
Barcodes
D216242,
D219527,
D219596,
and
D220287,
T.
Morton,
9/
17/
98.

11.
DP
Barcodes
D230246,
D230406,
and
D231533,
M.
Perry,
5/
26/
98.

12.
HPLC
Method
Aventis
File
No.
45186,
which
has
successfully
undergone
an
ILV
should
be
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
validation
13.
DP
Barcodes
D236574,
D236421,
and
D240469,
C.
Olinger,
12/
15/
99.
860.1400:
Water,
Fish,
and
Irrigated.
Crops
­Oysters
0.25
[§
180.169(
a)]
No
PP#
1E2554
42
860.1460:
Food
Handling
Establishments
N/
A
N/
A
860.1850:
Confined
Rotational
Crops
N/
A
No
43651701
43
860.1900:
Field
Rotational
Crops
None
established
No
Table
B
(continued).

73
14.
Additional
data
are
required
depicting
the
storage
stability
of
carbaryl
per
se
in
processed
commodities
of
an
oily
crop
for
up
to
10
months.
The
maximum
storage
interval
for
processed
commodities
of
an
oily
crop
was
­
10
months
(soybean
processed
commodities).

In
addition,
the
registrant
is
relying
on
earlier
magnitude
of
the
residue
studies
which
are
not
supported
by
the
existing
storage
stability
data.
Unless
the
registrant
can
demonstrate
that
samples
from
studies
reflecting
the
use
patterns
the
registrant
wishes
to
support
were
not
stored
longer
than
12
months,
additional
storage
stability
data
are
required.
The
required
data
must
reflect
storage
intervals
of
18
months
for
alfalfa
commodities,
15
months
for
potatoes,
22
months
for
wheat
commodities,
and
33
months
for
rangeland
grass.
In
addition,
if
the
registrant
wishes
to
rely
on
the
previously
submitted
sugar
beet
processing
study,
information
pertaining
to
sample
conditions
and
intervals
for
the
study
must
be
submitted.

15.
DP
Barcodes
D218865,
D219999,
D220949,
D221158,
D223008,
D219971,
D220601,
D220948,
D221313,
D225204,
and
D225576,
F.
Suhre,
9/
13/
96.

16.
DP
Barcodes
D228656
and
D235113,
C.
Olinger,
11/
09/
99.

17.
DP
Barcodes
D230900
and
D231134,
M.
Perry,
5/
22/
98
18.
DP
Barcode
D240998
and
D237653,
C.
Olinger,
4/
9/
98.

19.
CB
No.:
3027,
DP
Barcode:
none,
M.
Nelson,
3/
28/
88.

20.
CB
No.:
3510,
DP
Barcode:
none,
M.
Kovacs,
4/
25/
88.

21.
DP
Barcodes
D217179,
D217172,
D217177,
D217631,
D217704,
and
D217705,
F.
Suhre,
10/
7/
96.

22.
Data
for
spinach
will
be
translated
to
dandelion
and
parsley.

23.
Data
on
lettuce
will
translate
to
endive.

24.
DP
Barcode
D234692,
C.
Olinger,
9/
11/
97.

25.
DP
Barcodes
D227765
and
D227009,
M.
Perry,
5/
12/
98.

26.
Data
on
broccoli
will
be
translated
to
Brussels
sprouts,
cauliflower,
and
kohlrabi.

27.
DP
Barcodes
D225659
and
D226582,
F.
Suhre,
8/
21/
96.

28.
Data
are
no
longer
required
as
cowpea
is
the
only
bean
crop
considered
for
livestock
feeding.

29.
DP
Barcodes
D236422
and
D236485,
C.
Olinger,
11/
9/
99.

30.
The
registrant
does
not
intend
to
support
carbaryl
uses
on
avocados,
barley,
maple
trees,
oats,
rye,
and
sweet
sorghum;
however,
IR­
4
has
indicated
(Correspondence
from
K.
Dorschner,
IR­
4
Project,
9/
15/
94)
that
they
may
submit
residue
data
to
support
reregistration
for
some
of
these
commodities.
These
data
have
not
been
submitted.

31.
Acceptable
residue
data
on
wheat
will
be
translated
to
support
the
use
on
proso
millet.

32.
CB
No.
6972,
H.
Fonouni,
10/
5/
90.

33.
DP
Barcodes
D228260
and
D228652,
C.
Olinger,
11/
9/
99.

34.
Adequate
data
are
available
to
reassess
the
tolerance
for
wheat
forage
and
straw.
However,
the
Agency
now
considers
wheat
hay
a
significant
livestock
feed
item
(OPPTS
GLN
860.1000
Table
1.).
A
full
set
of
20
field
trials
as
specified
in
OPPTS
GLN
860.1500
are
required
depicting
carbaryl
residues
in/
on
wheat
hay.
When
all
the
field
trials
are
complete,
PHIs
and
tolerances
for
hay
based
on
the
field
trial
data
should
be
proposed.
Data
on
wheat
hay
will
be
translatable
to
proso
millet
hay.
Table
B
(continued).

74
35.
Data
are
required
depicting
residues
of
carbaryl
in/
on
grass
forage
harvested
immediately
(0­
day)
following
the
last
of
two
applications
of
carbaryl
(WP
or
FlC)
at
1.5
lb
ai/
A
to
pasture.
A
total
of
12
field
trials
are
required
in
areas
throughout
the
U.
S.

The
following
data
on
grasses
are
available
for
risk
assessment/
reregistration
purposes:
Residue
data
from
rangeland
field
trials
support
the
current
tolerance
of
100
ppm
in/
on
grass
forage;
as
noted
above,
data
are
still
needed
on
pasture
grass
forage
before
the
tolerance
can
be
reassessed
.
Data
on
pasture
hay
harvested
at
the
14­
day
PHI
indicate
that
the
tolerance
on
grass
hay
should
be
lowered
to
15
ppm.

36.
CB
No.
3357,
DP
Barcode:
none,
M.
Nelson,
2/
25/
88.

37.
Based
on
available
data,
a
tolerance
of
70
ppm
should
be
established
for
residues
of
carbaryl
per
se
in/
on
aspirated
grain
fractions.

38.
The
use
of
carbaryl
products
on
cotton
has
been
cnaceled.

39.
The
registrant
intends
to
support
a
tolerance
for
residues
in/
on
imported
pineapple.
Five
residue
field
trials
must
be
submitted,
three
from
Costa
Rica
and
two
from
Mexico.
DP
Barcode
D255348,
11/
2000,
C.
Olinger.

40.
DP
Barcode
D230407,
T.
Morton,
9/
29/
98.

41.
DP
Barcode
D215259,
S.
Hummel,
5/
31/
95.

42.
Residues
resulting
from
the
registered
use
of
carbaryl
on
oyster
beds
in
WA
are
not
likely
to
exceed
the
established
tolerance
(DP
Barcode
D204888,
J
Garbus,
8/
5/
94).

43.
DP
Barcode
D215844,
9/
10/
98,
C.
Olinger.
75
TOLERANCE
REASSESSMENT
SUMMARY
The
HED
Metabolism
Committee
has
concluded
that
the
U.
S.
tolerance
expression
for
plant
commodities
should
be
amended
to
include
only
carbaryl
per
se
(S.
Hummel,
2/
8/
96).
Accordingly,
the
tolerance
definition
for
carbaryl
should
be
amended
to
include
only
parent
carbaryl.
The
tolerance
expression
for
livestock
commodities
should
be
amended
to
include
free
and
conjugated
residues
of
carbaryl,
5,6­
dihydro5,6
dihydroxy
carbaryl,
and
5­
methoxy­
6­
hydroxy
carbaryl.
In
addition,
the
tolerances
listed
separately
under
40
CFR
§180.169
(a
through
e)
should
be
pooled
into
three
listings,
one
for
plant
commodity
tolerances
with
national
registrations,
one
for
livestock
commodities,
and
the
third
for
tolerances
with
regional
registrations.
The
food
additive
tolerance
for
residues
in
pineapple
bran
should
be
revoked
as
this
is
no
longer
a
regulated
commodity
(40
CFR
§186.550).
Some
analytical
methods
determine
the
combined
residue
of
carbaryl
and
1­
naphthol.
It
should
be
noted
that
1­
napthol
is
a
very
minor
part
of
the
residue;
therefore,
the
plant
commodity
tolerances,
which
are
based
on
carbaryl
only,
are
not
greatly
exaggerated.

A
summary
of
carbaryl
tolerance
reassessments
and
recommended
modifications
in
commodity
definitions
are
presented
in
Table
C.

Tolerances
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
a),
(b),
(c),
(d),
and
(e):

As
noted
above,
conclusions
pertaining
to
leafy
vegetables
crops
which
retain
post­
emergence
granular
uses
are
tentative
pending
submission
of
bridging
residue
data
reflecting
use
of
a
representative
G
formulation
or
revision
of
the
labels
for
the
G
formulations.
In
addition,
supporting
storage
stability
data
are
still
required
for
several
crop
commodities.

Aventis
has
proposed
and/
or
the
available
data
support
the
establishment
of
tolerances
for
residues
in/
on
the
following
crop
groups
and
subgroups:
Brassica
leafy
greens;
bushberry;
caneberry;
cucurbit
vegetables;
dried,
shelled
pea
and
bean
(except
soybean);
edible­
podded
legume
vegetables;
foliage
of
legume
vegetables
except
soybeans;
fruiting
vegetables
(excluding
cucurbits);
leaf
petioles;
leaves
of
root
and
tuber
vegetables
(excluding
sugar
beet);
root
and
tuber
vegetables
(excluding
sugar
beet
roots
and
sweet
potatoes);
stone
fruits;
and
tree
nuts
(excluding
walnuts).
As
a
result,
separate
tolerances
on
many
commodities
need
to
be
revoked
concomitant
with
establishing
tolerances
for
the
appropriate
crop
group
and
subgroup.
The
recommended
changes
are
summarized
in
Table
C
under
"Tolerances
Needed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
a),
crop
group/
subgroup
tolerances."

Residue
data
are
required
on
pasture
grass
forage
before
the
tolerance
for
residues
in/
on
grass
forage
can
be
reassessed.

Additional
data
are
required
on
pineapple
before
the
tolerance
can
be
reassessed.
Five
trials
must
be
submitted,
three
from
Costa
Rica
and
two
from
Mexico.

The
registrant
is
not
supporting
carbaryl
uses
on
avocados,
barley,
maple
sap,
oats,
and
rye,
and
with
the
exception
of
avocados,
these
uses
have
been
removed
from
the
labels.
IR­
4
has
indicated
(Correspondence
from
K.
Dorschner,
IR­
4
Project,
9/
15/
94)
that
they
may
be
willing
to
submit
residue
data
for
some
of
these
commodities;
however,
data
have
not
been
submitted.

The
tolerances
for
bean
forage
and
hay
should
be
revoked
because
they
are
no
longer
considered
significant
livestock
feed
items.
76
Data
from
a
ruminant
feeding
study
were
used
as
the
basis
for
reassessing
tolerances
for
residues
in
livestock
commodities.
For
tolerances
on
commodities
of
cattle,
goats,
horses
and
sheep,
the
available
data
support
the
current
tolerances
of
0.1
ppm
for
residues
of
carbaryl
in
meat,
but
indicate
that
the
tolerances
for
fat
are
too
low
and
should
be
increased
to
0.2
ppm;
the
established
tolerance
for
residues
in
milk
should
be
lowered
to
0.1
ppm.
Separate
tolerances
for
residues
in
kidney
and
liver
(1.0
ppm)
and
meat
byproducts
excluding
kidney
and
liver
(0.1
ppm)
should
be
revoked,
and
a
separate
tolerance
for
residues
in
meat
byproducts
should
be
established
at
3.0
ppm.

For
swine
commodities,
the
available
data
indicate
the
established
tolerances
for
carbaryl
residues
in
hog
meat
and
fat
(0.1
ppm)
are
too
high
and
should
be
set
at
0.02
ppm
(the
method
limit
of
quantitation).
Separate
tolerances
for
residues
in
hog
kidney
and
liver
(1.0
ppm
each)
and
meat
byproducts
excluding
kidney
and
liver
(0.1
ppm)
should
be
revoked,
and
a
separate
tolerance
for
residues
in
hog
meat
byproducts
established
at
0.5
ppm.

The
available
residue
data
support
the
establishment
of
separate
tolerances
for
residues
in/
on
various
crop
groups
and
subgroups.
As
a
result,
separate
tolerances
on
many
commodities
need
to
be
revoked
concomitant
with
establishing
new
tolerances
for
residues
in/
on
the
appropriate
crop
groups
and
subgroups.
The
recommended
changes
are
summarized
in
Table
C
under
"Tolerances
Needed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
a),
crop
group/
subgroup
tolerances."

New
tolerances
are
also
needed
for
carbaryl
residues
in/
on
the
following
RACs:
aspirated
grain
fractions,
proso
millet
hay,
sorghum
stover,
sugar
beet
roots,
and
wheat
hay.
At
the
present
time,
sufficient
data
are
only
available
to
determine
an
appropriate
tolerance
for
residues
in/
on
aspirated
grain
fractions
(70
ppm),
sugar
beet
roots
(0.5
ppm)
and
sorghum
stover
(30.0
ppm).
Additional
residue
data
are
required
before
appropriate
tolerances
can
be
determined
for
residues
in/
on
the
remaining
commodities;
data
on
wheat
hay
will
be
translatable
to
proso
millet
hay.

Separate
tolerances
are
also
required
for
residues
in
the
following
processed
food/
feed
items:
wet
apple
pomace
(15.0
ppm),
citrus
fruit
oil
(20.0
ppm),
raisins
(12.0
ppm),
and
rice
hulls
(30.0
ppm).

For
livestock
commodities,
the
residue
data
support
establishing
new
tolerances
for
residues
in
meat
byproducts
of
swine
(0.5
ppm)
and
cattle,
goats,
and
sheep
(3.0
ppm);
separate
tolerances
for
residues
in
kidney
and
liver
(1.0
ppm),
and
meat
byproducts
excluding
kidney
and
liver
(0.1
ppm)
should
be
reassigned.
77
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Table
C.
Tolerance
Reassessment
Summary
for
Carbaryl.

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

Tolerance
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
a)

Alfalfa
100.0
50.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered
to
50.0
ppm.

Alfalfa,
Hay
100.0
75.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered
to
75.0
ppm.

Almonds
1.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
0.1
ppm
tolerance
on
the
nuts,
tree
crop
group
(excluding
walnuts).

Almond,
hulls
40.0
50.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
increased.

Apricots
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
fruit,
stone
crop
group.

Asparagus
10.0
15.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
increased.

Banana
10.0
5
Barley,
fodder,
green
100.0
Revoke
The
registrant
does
not
intend
to
support
carbaryl
uses
on
barley.
Barley,
grain
0.0
Barley,
straw
100.0
Beans
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
for
ediblepodded
legume
vegetables
(
crop
subgroup
6A),
and
a
1.0
ppm
tolerance
for
dried,
shelled
pea
and
bean
(except
soybean)
(crop
subgroup
6C).

Beans,
forage
100.0
Revoke
Tolerance
should
be
revoked.
Bean
forage
and
hay
are
no
longer
considered
significant
livestock
feed
items.
Beans,
hay
100.0
Beets,
garden,
roots
5.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassigned
concomitant
with
establishing
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetables,
root
and
tuber
crop
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Beets,
garden,
tops
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
75.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
leaves
of
vegetables,
root
and
tuber
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
tops).

Beets,
sugar,
tops
100.0
25.0
The
available
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered.
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

78
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Blackberries
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
12.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
caneberry
crop
subgroup.

Blueberries
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
bushberry
crop
subgroup.

Boysenberries
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
12.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
caneberry
crop
subgroup.

Broccoli
10.0
10.0
Brussels
sprouts
10.0
10.0
Data
on
broccoli
will
translate
to
Brussels
sprouts.

Cabbage
10.0
21.0
The
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
increased
to
21.0
ppm.

Cabbage,
chinese
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
Brassica
leafy
group.

Carrots
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetables,
root
and
tuber
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Cauliflower
10.0
10.0
Data
on
broccoli
will
translate
to
cauliflower.

Celery
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
leaf
petioles
crop
subgroup.

Cherries
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
fruit,
stone
group
.

Chestnuts
1.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
0.1
ppm
tolerance
on
the
nut,
tree
group
(excluding
walnuts).

Citrus
fruits
10.0
10.0
Fruit,
citrus,
group
Clover
100.0
50.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered
to
50.0
ppm.

Clover,
hay
100.0
70.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered
to
70.0
ppm.
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

79
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Collards
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetables,
Brassica,
leafy,
group
.

Corn
(inc.
sweet)
(K+
CWHR)
5.0
0.10
Corn,
sweet
(K+
CWHR);
residue
data
indicate
that
a
separate
tolerance
on
sweet
corn
(K+
CWHR)
should
be
established
at
0.1
ppm.

0.02
Corn,
grain,
field
and
pop;
residue
data
indicate
that
a
separate
tolerance
should
be
established
for
corn,
grain
at
0.02
ppm.

Corn,
fodder
100.0
20.0
Corn,
stover
(field
and
pop).
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
for
field
and
pop
corn
stover
should
be
lowered
to
20.0
ppm.

215.0
Corn,
sweet,
stover.
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
for
sweet
corn
stover
should
be
increased.

Corn,
forage
100.0
30.0
Corn,
field,
forage.
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
for
field
corn
forage
should
be
lowered
to
30.0
ppm.

185.0
Corn,
sweet,
forage.
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
for
field
corn
forage
should
be
increased.

Cotton,
forage
100.0
Revoke
No
longer
considered
a
significant
feed
item.

Cotton,
seed
5.0
Revoke
The
use
on
cotton
has
been
cancelled.

Cranberries
10.0
3.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered
to
3.0
ppm.

Cucumbers
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
cucurbit,
group.

Dandelions
12.0
22.0
Residue
data
on
spinach
are
translatable
to
dandelion.
The
residue
data
on
spinach
indicate
that
the
tolerance
must
be
increased.

Dewberry
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
12.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
caneberry
crop
subgroup.

Eggplant
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
5.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetables,
fruiting,
group
(excluding
cucurbits).
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

80
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Endive
(escarole)
10.0
10.0
Residue
data
on
lettuce
are
translatable
to
endive.

Filberts
(hazelnuts)
1.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
0.1
ppm
tolerance
on
the
nuts,
tree,
group
(excluding
walnuts).

Flax,
seed
5.0
0.50
Residue
data
support
lowering
the
tolerance.

Flax,
straw
100.0
Revoke
No
longer
considered
a
RAC
of
flax.

Grapes
10.0
10.0
Grasses
100.0
TBD
Grass,
forage.
Residue
data
on
rangeland
grass
forage
harvested
at
a
0­
day
PGI
support
the
current
tolerance
of
100
ppm;
data
on
pasture
grass
forage
harvested
at
0­
day
PGI
are
needed.

Grasses,
hay
100.0
15.0
Residue
data
on
pasture
hay
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered
to
15.0
ppm.

Horseradish
5.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
root
and
tuber,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Kale
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
Brassica,
leafy,
group.

Kohlrabi
10.0
10.0
Residue
data
on
broccoli
are
translatable
to
kohlrabi.

Lentils
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
1.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
pea
and
bean,
dried
shelled,
except
soybean
group
(6C).

Lettuce
10.0
10.0
Loganberries
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
12.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
caneberry
crop
subgroup.

Maple
sap
0.50
Revoke
The
registrant
is
not
supporting
this
use
Melons
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
cucurbit,
group.

Millet,
proso,
grain
3.0
1.0
Residue
data
for
wheat
grain
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered
to
1.0
ppm
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

81
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Millet,
proso,
straw
100.0
20.0
Adequate
residue
data
on
wheat
straw
are
translatable
to
proso
millet
straw;
the
residue
data
support
lowering
the
tolerance.

Mustard,
greens
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
Brassica,
leafy,
group.

Nectarines
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
fruit,
stone,
group.

Oats,
fodder,
green
100.0
Revoke
The
registrant
does
not
intend
to
support
carbaryl
uses
on
oats
Oats,
grain
0.0
Oats,
straw
100.0
Okra
10.0
4.0
The
available
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered.

Olives
10.0
10.0
Oysters
0.25
0.25
Parsley
12.0
22.0
Residue
data
on
spinach
are
translatable
to
parsley;
the
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
on
parsley
should
be
increased.

Parsnips
5.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
root
and
tuber,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Peaches
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
fruit,
stone,
group.

Peanuts
5.0
0.05
The
available
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered.

Peanuts,
hay
100.0
20.0
Residue
data
support
a
lower
tolerance.

Peas,
cowpeas
5.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
1.0
ppm
tolerance
for
dried,
shelled
pea
and
bean
(except
soybean)
group.

Peas,
cowpeas,
Forage
100.0
Reassign
Tolerances
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
60.0
ppm
tolerance
for
vegetable,
foliage
of
legume,
group.
Peas,
cowpeas,
Hay
100.0
Peas,
vines
100.0
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

82
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Peas,
with
pods
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
for
vegetable,
legume,
edible­
podded
subgroup
(crop
subgroup
6A).

Pecans
1.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
0.1
ppm
tolerance
on
the
nuts,
tree,
group
(excluding
walnuts).

Peppers
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
5.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
fruiting
group
(excluding
cucurbits)
crop
group.

Pistachio
1.0
0.10
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered.

Plums
(fresh
prunes)
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
fruit,
stone,
group.

Potatoes
0.20
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
root
and
tuber,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Prickly
pear
cactus,
fruit
12.0
5.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
decreased.

Prickly
pear
cactus,
pads
12.0
12.0
Pumpkins
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
cucurbit,
group.

Radishes
5.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
root
and
tuber,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Raspberry
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
12.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
caneberry
crop
subgroup.

Rice
5.0
15.0
Rice,
grain;
the
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
increased.

Rice,
straw
100.0
60.0
Residue
data
support
lowering
the
tolerance
to
60.0
ppm.
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

83
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Rutabagas
5.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
root
and
tuber,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Rye,
fodder,
green
100.0
Revoke
The
registrant
does
not
intend
to
support
carbaryl
uses
on
rye
Rye,
grain
0.0
Rye,
straw
100.0
Salsify,
roots
5.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
root
and
tuber,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Salsify,
tops
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
75.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
leaves
of
vegetables,
root
and
tuber
vegetables,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
tops).

Sorghum
grain,
forage
100.0
30.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered.

Sorghum
grain,
grain
10.0
10.0
Soybean
5.0
0.50
Residue
data
support
lowering
the
tolerance
to
0.5
ppm.

Soybean,
forage
100.0
15.0
Residue
data
support
lowering
the
tolerance
to
15.0
ppm.

Soybean,
hay
100.0
15.0
Residue
data
support
lowering
the
tolerance
to
15.0
ppm.

Spinach
12.0
22.0
Residue
data
on
spinach
indicate
that
a
higher
tolerance
is
required.

Squash,
summer
10.0
Reassign
Tolerances
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
cucurbit
group
.
Squash,
winter
10.0
Strawberries
10.0
4.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered
to
4.0
ppm.

Sunflower,
seed
1.0
0.50
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered
to
0.5
ppm.

Sweet
potatoes
0.20
0.20
potato,
sweet
Swiss
chard
12.0
Reassign
The
tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
leaf
petioles
crop
subgroup.
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

84
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Tomatoes
10.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
5.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetables,
fruiting
group(
excluding
cucurbits).

Trefoil,
birdsfoot,
forage
100.0
15.0
Residue
data
on
alfalfa
forage
will
translate
to
trefoil,
forage.

Trefoil,
birdsfoot,
hay
100.0
25.0
Residue
data
on
alfalfa
hay
will
translate
to
trefoil,
hay.

Turnips,
roots
5.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
root
and
tuber,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Turnips,
tops
12.0
Reassign
Tolerance
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
75.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
leaves
of
vegetables,
root
and
tuber,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
tops).

Walnuts
1.0
1.0
Wheat,
fodder,
green
100.0
30.0
The
available
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered.
Wheat,
forage
Wheat,
grain
3.0
1.0
Residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered.

Wheat,
straw
100.0
20.0
The
available
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
lowered.

Tolerance
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
b)

Cattle,
goats,
horses
and
sheep,
fat
0.10
0.50
Residue
data
support
increasing
the
tolerance
Hog,
fat
0.10
0.05
Residue
data
support
lowering
the
tolerance
Cattle,
goats,
horses,
and
sheep,
meat
0.10
1.0
Hog,
meat
0.10
0.10
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

85
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Cattle,
goats,
horses
and
sheep,
kidney
&
Liver
1.0
Reassign
Tolerances
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
for
meat
byproducts
of
cattle,
goats,
horses,
and
sheep.
Cattle,
goats,
horses,
and
sheep,
mbyp
(exc.
kidney
&
liver)
0.10
Hog,
kidney
&
Liver
1.0
Reassign
Tolerances
should
be
reassignd
concomitant
with
establishing
a
0.5
ppm
tolerance
for
hog
meat
byproducts
Hog,
mbyp
(exc.
kidney
&
liver)
0.10
Poultry,
fat
and
meat
5.0
Revoke
A
Category
3
Tolerance
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
c)

Milk
0.30
1.0
Should
be
moved
to
40
CFR
§180.169(
b)

Tolerance
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
d)

Pineapple
2.0
TBD
Residue
data
are
required
Pome
fruits
10.0
12.0
The
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
should
be
increased.

Tolerance
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
e)

Avocados
10.0
Revoke
The
registrant
is
not
supporting
this
use.

Dill
(fresh)
0.20
0.20
Interim
Tolerance
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§180.319
Eggs
0.50
Revoke
Category
3.

0Tolerance
Listed
Under
40
CFR
§186.550
Pineapple,
bran,
wet
and
dry
20.0
Revoke
No
longer
considered
a
significant
processed
commodity.

Tolerances
Needed
Under
40
CFR
§180.169(
a)

Separate
plant
commodities
Apple,
wet
pomace
None
15.0
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
15.0
ppm
tolerance
on
wet
apple
pomace.

Aspirated
grain
fractions
None
70
The
available
data
indicate
that
a
tolerance
of
70
ppm
should
be
established
for
residues
in/
on
aspirated
grain
fractions.

Beet,
sugar,
roots
None
0.50
The
available
data
indicate
that
a
tolerance
of
0.5
ppm
should
be
established
for
residues
in/
on
sugar
beet
roots.
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

86
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Citrus,
fruit,
oil
None
20.0
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
20.0
ppm
tolerance
on
citrus
fruit
oil.

Cotton,
gin
byproducts
None
TBD
Residue
data
are
required.

Grapes,
raisins
None
12.0
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
12.0
ppm
tolerance
on
raisin.

Millet,
proso,
hay
None
TBD
Residue
data
are
required.
Residue
data
required
on
wheat
hay
may
be
translatable
to
proso
millet
hay.

Rice,
hulls
None
30.0
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
30.0
ppm
tolerance
for
residues
in/
on
rice
hulls.

Sorghum,
stover
None
30.0
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
30.0
ppm
on
sorghu
grain,
stover.

Wheat,
hay
None
TBD
Residue
data
are
required.

Livestock
commodities
Cattle,
goats,
horses
and
sheep,
meat
byproducts
None
3.0
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
for
residues
in
kidney
and
liver
and
meat
byproducts
(excluding
kidney
and
liver),
separate
3.0
ppm
tolerances
are
required
on
meat
byproducts
of
cattle,
goats,
horses,
and
sheep.

Hog,
meat
byproducts
None
0.50
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
0.5
ppm
tolerance
on
meat
byproducts
of
hog;
the
separate
tolerances
for
residues
in
kidney
and
liver
and
meat
byproducts
(excluding
kidney
and
liver)
of
hog
should
be
reassigned.

Croup
group/
subgroups
Brassica
leafy
greens
None
10.0
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
on
Chinese
cabbage,
collards,
kale,
and
mustard
greens,
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
Brassica,
leafy,
group
crop
subgroup
should
be
established.

Bushberry
None
3.0
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
bushberry
crop
subgroup;
the
separate
tolerance
on
blueberry
should
be
reassigned.
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

87
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Caneberry
None
12.0
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
on
blackberry,
boysenberry,
dewberry,
loganberry,
and
raspberry,
a
12.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
caneberry
crop
subgroup
should
be
established.

Cucurbit
Vegetables
None
3.0
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetable,
cucurbit
groups
crop
group;
separate
tolerances
on
cucumbers,
melons,
pumpkins,
and
summer
and
winter
squash
should
be
reassigned.

Dried,
shelled
pea
and
bean
(except
soybean)
None
1.0
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
on
beans,
cowpeas,
and
lentils,
a
1.0
ppm
tolerance
should
be
established
on
the
dried,
shelled
pea
and
bean
(except
soybean)
crop
subgroup
(6C).

Edible­
podded
legume
vegetables
None
10.0
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
on
peas
(with
pods),
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
should
be
established
on
the
edible­
podded
legume
vegetables
crop
subgroup
(6A).

Foliage
of
legume
vegetables
except
soybeans
None
60.0
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
on
cowpea
forage
and
hay,
and
pea
vines,
a
60.0
ppm
tolerance
should
be
established
on
the
foliage
of
legume
vegetables
except
soybeans
crop
subgroup.

Fruiting
vegetables
(excluding
cucurbits)
None
5.0
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
5.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
vegetables,
fruiting
group(
excluding
cucurbits)
crop
group;
separate
tolerances
on
eggplants,
peppers,
and
tomatoes
should
be
reassigned.

Leaf
petioles
None
3.0
Residue
data
support
establishing
a
3.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
leaf
petioles
crop
subgroup;
the
separate
tolerances
on
celery
and
swiss
chard
should
be
reassigned.

Leaves
of
root
and
tuber
vegetables
(excluding
sugar
beet)
None
75.0
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
on
garden
beet,
salsify,
and
turnip
tops,
a
75.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
leaves
of
root
and
tuber
vegetables
crop
group
(excluding
sugar
beet
tops)
should
be
established.
Table
C
(continued).

Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comments
[Correct
Commodity
Definition]

88
Root
and
tuber
vegetables
(excluding
sugar
beet
roots
and
sweet
potatoes)
None
2.0
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
on
garden
beet
roots,
carrots,
horseradish,
potatoes,
parsnips,
radishes,
rutabagas,
salsify
roots,
and
turnip
roots,
a
2.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
root
and
tuber
vegetables
crop
group
(excluding
sugar
beet
roots
and
sweet
potatoes)
should
be
established.

Stone
fruits
None
10.0
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
on
apricots,
cherries,
nectarines,
peaches,
and
plums
(fresh
prunes),
a
10.0
ppm
tolerance
on
the
fruit,
stone,
group
should
be
established.

Tree
nuts
(excluding
walnuts)
None
0.10
Concomitant
with
reassigning
separate
tolerances
on
almonds,
chestnuts,
filberts,
and
pecans,
a
0.1
ppm
tolerance
on
the
nuts,
tree,
group
(excluding
walnuts)
should
be
established.

1
TBD
=
To
be
determined.
Reassessment
of
tolerance(
s)
cannot
be
made
at
this
time
because
additional
data
are
required.
89
CODEX
HARMONIZATION
The
Codex
Alimentarius
Commission
has
established
maximum
residue
limits
(MRLs)
for
carbaryl
residues
in/
on
various
plant
and
livestock
commodities
(see
Guide
to
Codex
Maximum
Limits
For
Pesticide
Residues,
Part
A.
1,
1995).
The
Codex
MRLs
and
U.
S.
tolerances
are
not
compatible
because
the
U.
S.
tolerance
expression
includes
parent
carbaryl
and
its
metabolite
1­
naphthol
for
most
raw
crop
commodities
[40
CFR
§180.169(
a)];
tolerances
for
residues
in
livestock
commodities
are
expressed
as
carbaryl
and
its
metabolites
1­
naphthol,
5,6­
dihydrodihydroxy
carbaryl,
and
5,6­
dihydrodihydroxy
naphthol
[40
CFR
§180.169(
b)].
Only
the
established
tolerances
for
residues
in/
on
pineapples,
pome
fruits,
avocados,
and
fresh
dill
are
expressed
in
terms
of
carbaryl
per
se.
However,
the
HED
Metabolism
Committee
(MARC)
determined
that
the
U.
S.
tolerance
expression
for
plant
comodities
be
amended
to
include
only
carbaryl
per
se
(S.
Hummel,
2/
8/
96).
Once
the
U.
S.
tolerance
definition
is
amended,
it
will
be
compatible
with
the
definition
for
Codex
MRLs.
The
MARC
has
recommended
that
the
tolerance
expression
for
livestock
commodities
include
the
free
and
conjugated
forms
of
carbaryl,
5,6­
dihydro­
5,6­
dihydroxy
carbaryl,
and
5­
methoxy­
6­
hydroxy
carbaryl.
The
Codex
MRLs
and
U.
S.
tolerances
cannot
be
made
compatible
for
livestock
commodities
with
respect
to
the
tolerance
definition.

A
comparison
of
the
Codex
MRLs
and
the
corresponding
reassessed
U.
S.
tolerances
is
presented
in
Table
D.

The
following
conclusions
can
be
made
regarding
efforts
to
harmonize
the
U.
S.
tolerances
with
the
Codex
MRLs:

Once
the
U.
S.
tolerance
definition
is
amended
to
include
only
carbaryl
per
se,
U.
S.
tolerances
and
Codex
MRLs
would
be
compatible
for
the
following
crops
and
commodities:
apricot,
beetroot,
carrot,
cherries,
cowpea
(dry),
cucumber,
egg
plant,
hay
or
fodder
(dry)
of
grasses,
leafy
vegetables,
melons
(except
watermelon),
nectarine,
olives,
parsnip,
peppers,
plums
(including
prunes),
pumpkins,
radish,
tomato,
and
winter
squash.

Based
upon
the
use
patterns
registered
in
the
U.
S.
and
the
available
residue
data,
compatibility
of
U.
S.
tolerances
and
Codex
MRLs
is
not
currently
possible
for
the
following
crops/
commodities:
Alfalfa
forage,
apple,
asparagus,
blackberries,
cabbage,
milk,
meat
of
cattle,
goats,
and
sheep,
citrus
fruits,
clover,
common
bean,
cranberry,
dewberries
(including
boysenberry
and
loganberry),
grapes,
maize
forage,
okra,
pea
vines,
peanut
(whole
and
fodder),
pear,
peas
(podded
and
succulent),
potato,
raspberries,
sorghum
forage,
soya
bean
(dry),
soya
bean
forage,
strawberry,
sugar
beet,
sugar
beet
tops,
sweet
corn
(kernels),
and
tree
nuts.
90
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Table
D.
Codex
MRLs
for
carbaryl
and
applicable
U.
S.
tolerances
for
carbaryl.

Codex
Reassessed
U.
S.
Tolerance
(
ppm)
2
Comments
Commodity,
As
Defined
MRL
(mg/
kg)
1
Step
Alfalfa
forage
(green)
100
CXL
15.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
Apple
5
CXL
12.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
pome
fruits
crop
group;
U.
S.
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
cannot
be
lowered.

Apricot
10
CXL
10.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
fruit,
stone,
group
Asparagus
10
CXL
15.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
higher
reassessed
tolerance
Banana
5
CXL
5
Barley
5
(Po)
CXL
None
Not
registered
for
use
in
the
U.
S.

Bean
forage
(green)
100
CXL
None
No
longer
regulated
as
a
feed
item
in
the
U.
S.

Beetroot
2
CXL
2.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
on
the
root
and
tuber
vegetables
crop
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes)
which
includes
garden
beet
roots.

Blackberries
10
CXL
12.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
caneberry
crop
subgroup;
U.
S.
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
cannot
be
lowered.

Blueberries
7
CXL
4.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
bushberry
crop
subgroup;
U.
S.
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance.

Cabbages,
head
5
CXL
21.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
higher
reassessed
tolerance
Carrot
2
CXL
2.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
on
the
root
and
tuber
vegetables
crop
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Cattle
meat
0.2
CXL
1.0
U.
S
tolerance
expression
includes
metabolites
not
included
in
Codex
MRL
expression,
resulting
in
a
higher
numerical
level.

Cherries
10
CXL
10.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
fruit,
stone,
group
Table
D
(continued).

Codex
Reassessed
U.
S.
Tolerance
(
ppm)
2
Comments
Commodity,
As
Defined
MRL
(mg/
kg)
1
Step
91
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Citrus
fruits
7
CXL
10.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
citrus
fruits
crop
group;
U.
S.
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
cannot
be
lowered.

Clover
100
fresh
wt
CXL
50.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
Common
bean
(pods
and
or
immature
seeds)
5
CXL
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
edible10.0
podded
legume
vegetables
(
crop
subgroup
6A);
U.
S.
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
cannot
be
lowered.

TBD
Data
are
not
available
for
succulent,
shelled
pea
and
beans
Cotton
seed
1
CXL
Revoke
Uses
in
the
U.
S.
are
cancelled.

Cowpea
(dry)
1
CXL
1.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
dried,
shelled
pea
and
bean
(except
soybean)
crop
subgroup.

Cranberry
7
CXL
3.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
Cucumber
3
CXL
3.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
vegetable,
cucurbit
groups
crop
group
Dewberries
(including
boysenberry
and
loganberry)
10
CXL
12.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
caneberry
crop
subgroup;
U.
S.
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
cannot
be
lowered.

Egg
plant
5
CXL
5.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
vegetables,
fruiting
group(
excluding
cucurbits)
crop
group
Eggs
0.5
CXL
None
Dermal
and
poutry
house
uses
cancelled
in
the
U.
S.
Category
3
of
40
CFR
§180.6(
a)
exists
for
U.
S.

Goat
meat
0.2
CXL
1.0
U.
S
tolerance
expression
includes
metabolites
not
included
in
Codex
MRL
expression,
resulting
in
a
higher
numerical
level.

Grapes
5
CXL
10.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
higher
reassessed
tolerance
Table
D
(continued).

Codex
Reassessed
U.
S.
Tolerance
(
ppm)
2
Comments
Commodity,
As
Defined
MRL
(mg/
kg)
1
Step
92
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Hay
or
fodder
(dry)
of
grasses
100
CXL
100.0
Kiwifruit
10
CXL
None
Not
registered
for
use
in
the
U.
S.

Leafy
vegetables
10
CXL
3.0
and
10.0
Tolerances
to
be
established
on
the
Vegetable,
Brassica,
leafy,
group
and
leaf
petioles
crop
subgroups,
10.0
and
3.0
ppm,
respectively,
together
with
separate
tolerances
on
broccoli,
Brussels
sprouts,
cauliflower,
endive,
and
kohlrabi
21.0
U.
S
residue
data
on
spinach
support
the
higher
reassessed
tolerance
Maize
forage
(fresh
wt)
100
CXL
30.0
U.
S
residue
data
on
field
corn
forage
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
185.0
U.
S
residue
data
on
sweet
corn
forage
support
the
higher
reassessed
tolerance
Melons,
except
watermelon
3
CXL
3.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
vegetable,
cucurbit
groups
crop
group
Milk
products
0.1(*)
CXL
None
A
U.
S.
tolerance
is
not
established
on
milk
products
Milks
0.1
(*)
CXL
1.0
U.
S
tolerance
expression
includes
metabolites
not
included
in
Codex
MRL
expression,
resulting
in
a
higher
numerical
level.

Nectarine
10
CXL
10.0
Tolerance
established
for
fruit,
stone,
group
Nuts
(whole
in
shell)
except
peanut,
whole
and
tree
nuts
10
CXL
0.1
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
tree
nuts,
except
walnuts
crop
group
Oats
5
(Po)
CXL
None
Not
registered
for
use
in
the
U.
S.

Okra
10
CXL
4.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
Olives
10
CXL
10.0
Olives,
processed
1
CXL
None
U.
S
residue
data
do
not
support
a
separate
tolerance
for
olive
processed
commodities
Table
D
(continued).

Codex
Reassessed
U.
S.
Tolerance
(
ppm)
2
Comments
Commodity,
As
Defined
MRL
(mg/
kg)
1
Step
93
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Parsnip
2
CXL
2.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
on
the
vegetables,
root
and
tuber,
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Pea
vines
(green)
(Fresh
wt)
100
CXL
TBD
Residue
data
are
required
(preferably
on
Austrian
winter
pea)

Peanut
fodder
100
CXL
20.0
Tolerance
established
for
peanut
hay;
U.
S.
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance.

Peanut,
whole
2
CXL
0.05
U.
S.
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance.

Pear
5
CXL
12.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
pome
fruits
crop
group;
U.
S.
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
cannot
be
lowered.

Peas
(pods
and
succulent
=
immature
seeds)
5
CXL
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
edible10.0
podded
legume
vegetables
(
crop
subgroup
6A);
U.
S.
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
cannot
be
lowered.

TBD
Data
are
not
available
for
succulent,
shelled
pea
and
beans
Peppers
5
CXL
5.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
vegetables,
fruiting
group(
excluding
cucurbits)
crop
group
Plums
(including
prunes)
10
CXL
10.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
fruit,
stone,
group
Potato
0.2
CXL
2.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
on
the
root
and
tuber
vegetables
crop
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes);
U.
S.
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
cannot
be
lowered.

Poultry
meat
0.5
(V)
CXL
None
Dermal
and
poutry
house
uses
cancelled
in
the
U.
S.
Category
3
of
40
CFR
§180.6(
a)
exists
for
U.
S.
Poultry
skin
5
CXL
None
Pumpkins
3
CXL
3.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
vegetable,
cucurbit
groups
crop
group
Table
D
(continued).

Codex
Reassessed
U.
S.
Tolerance
(
ppm)
2
Comments
Commodity,
As
Defined
MRL
(mg/
kg)
1
Step
94
(continued;
footnotes
follow)
Radish
2
CXL
2.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
on
the
root
and
tuber
vegetables
crop
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).

Raspberries,
red
and
black
10
CXL
12.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
caneberry
crop
subgroup;
U.
S.
residue
data
indicate
that
the
tolerance
cannot
be
lowered.

Rice
5
(PoP)
CXL
15.0
Not
registered
for
postharvest
use
on
rice
and
rye
in
the
U.
S.
Rice,
husked
5
(Po)
CXL
None
Rye
5
(Po)
CXL
None
Sheep
meat
0.2
CXL
1.0
U.
S
tolerance
expression
includes
metabolites
not
included
in
Codex
MRL
expression,
resulting
in
a
higher
numerical
level.

Sorghum
10
(Po)
CXL
None
Not
registered
for
this
use
in
the
U.
S.

Sorghum
forage
(green)
(fresh
wt)
100
CXL
30.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
Soya
bean
(dry)
1
CXL
0.5
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
Soya
bean
forage
(green)
(fresh
wt)
100
CXL
15.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
Squash,
summer
3
CXL
3.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
vegetable,
cucurbit
groups
crop
group
Strawberry
7
CXL
4.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
Sugar
beet
0.2
CXL
0.5
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
higher
reassessed
tolerance
Sugar
beet
leaves
or
tops
100
CXL
25.0
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
Swede
2
CXL
2.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
on
the
root
and
tuber
vegetables
crop
group
(excluding
sugar
beets
and
sweet
potatoes).
Table
D
(continued).

Codex
Reassessed
U.
S.
Tolerance
(
ppm)
2
Comments
Commodity,
As
Defined
MRL
(mg/
kg)
1
Step
95
Sweet
corn
(kernels)
1
CXL
0.1
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
for
sweet
corn
(K+
CWHR)

Tomato
5
CXL
5.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
vegetables,
fruiting
group(
excluding
cucurbits)
crop
group
Tree
nuts
1
CXL
0.1
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
nuts,
tree,
group
(excluding
walnuts);
U.
S
residue
data
support
the
lower
reassessed
tolerance
1.0
Tolerance
established
for
walnuts
Wheat
5
(Po)
CXL
1.0
Not
registered
for
postharvest
use
on
wheat
in
the
U.
S.
Wheat
bran,
unprocessed
20
(PoP)
CXL
None
Wheat
flour
0.2(
PoP
)
CXL
None
Wheat
wholemeal
2
CXL
None
A
separate
tolerance
on
processed
commodities
of
wheat
is
not
needed
Winter
squash
3
CXL
3.0
Tolerance
to
be
established
for
vegetable,
cucurbit
groups
crop
group
1
An
asterisk
(*)
signifies
that
the
MRL
was
established
at
or
about
the
limit
of
detection.
A
"Po"
or
"PoP"
following
the
MRL
indicate
that
the
MRL
was
established
based
on
postharvest
uses.
2
Recommendations
for
compatibility
are
based
on
conclusions
following
reassessment
of
U.
S.
tolerances
(see
Table
C).
96
AGENCY
MEMORANDA
RELEVANT
TO
REREGISTRATION
Date
DP
Barcode
CB
No.
From
To
MRID
Nos.
Subject
2/
25/
88
None
3357
M.
Nelson
H.
Jamerson
and
Toxicology
Branch
None
PP#
7E3543
­
Carbaryl
in
or
on
Dill


Amendment
of
1/
18/
88.

3/
28/
88
None
3027
M.
Nelson
D.
Edwards
and
Toxicology
Branch
40376001,
40376002
PP#
7F3490
­
Carbaryl
in
or
on
Sugar
Beet
Roots
­
Amendment
of
10/
6/
87.

4/
25/
88
None
3510
M.
Kovacs
H.
Jamerson
and
Toxicology
Branch
40512501
PP#
2E2667
­
Carbaryl
in
or
on
Potatoes


Amendment
Dated
January
27,
1988.

10/
5/
90
None
6972
H.
Fonouni
W.
Boodee
41594301
Carbaryl
in/
on
Wheat,
Amended
Use
Registration
No.
264­
333.

4/
9/
92
D176240
9659
R.
Perfetti
W.
Burnam
and
L.
Rossi
None
Aventis
Ag
Company:
Response
to
the
Carbaryl
Reregistration
Standard:
Residue
Chemistry
Comments.

12/
2/
93
D193129
12374
S.
Hummel
J.
Loranger/
L.

Propst
and
D.

Utterback
None
Carbaryl
(056801)
Anticipated
Residues
for
Carcinogenic
Dietary
Risk
Assessment.

2/
25/
94
D194407
12405
S.
Hummel
J.
Loranger/
L.

Propost
and
D.
Utterback
42883101­
42883104
Carbaryl
(056801;
Case
No.
0080)
Field
Trial
Protocols,
Waiver
Requests
Date
DP
Barcode
CB
No.
From
To
MRID
Nos.
Subject
97
8/
5/
94
D204888
13984
J.
Garbus
D.
Edwards
and
R.
Kumar
None
WA­
90­
0013:
Special
Local
Need
Label
[24(
c)]

for
Carbaryl
(SEVIN
80S)
for
Use
in
Washington
State
on
Oyster
Beds
5/
22/
95
D213142
15275
S.
Hummel
J.
Loranger/
L.

Propst
None
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
DCI
for
Field
Trials
on
Onions,
Barley,
Oats,
and
Rye;
and
Sweet
Sorghum
Processing
Data
5/
31/
95
D215259
15565
S.
Hummel
Files
None
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
Analysis
of
Pineapple
Bran
Feed
Additive
Tolerance
with
Respect
to
the
DES
Proviso
11/
28/
9
5
D204197
13831
S.
Hummel
J.
Loranger
43249101­
43249103
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
Metabolism
in
Lettuce,
Radish,
and
Soybeans
GLN
171­
4(
a).

11/
28/
9
5
D206777
14249
S.
Hummel
J.
Loranger
43324601
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
Metabolism
in
Poultry
GLN
171­
4(
b).

1/
19/
96
D221978
16669
S.
Hummel
HED
Metabolism
Committee
None
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
Issues
to
be
presented
to
HED
Metabolism
Committee
on
1/
25/
96
1/
22/
96
D216544
15757
S.
Hummel
J.
Loranger
43672701
43672702
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
Plant
Analytical
Methods
GLN
171­
4(
c),

Independent
Laboratory
Validation
of
Proposed
Enforcement
Method
2/
8/
96
D221979
16670
S.
Hummel
HED
Metabolism
Committee
None
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
HED
Metabolism
Committee
Decision;
Meeting
on
1/
25/
96.
Date
DP
Barcode
CB
No.
From
To
MRID
Nos.
Subject
98
3/
15/
96
D211172
16516
S.
Hummel
J.
Loranger
None
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
Metabolism
in
Lettuce,
Radish,
and
Soybeans
GLN
171­
4(
a)
Corrected
Study
Pages
for
MRIDs
43249101
and
43249103
(Update
to
CB
13831,
DP
Barcode
D204197).

8/
21/
96
D225659,
D226582
17209,
17243
F.
Suhre
J.
Loranger
43984701,
43996101
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
in
Succulent
Bean
and
Tomato;
GLN
171­
4(
k)

9/
13/
96
D218865,
D219999,
D220949,
D221158,
D223008,
D219971,
D220601,
D220948,
D221313,
D225204,
D225576
16140,
16364,
16555,
16559,
16887,
16329,
16460,
16556,
16584,
17127,
17147
F.
Suhre
P.
Deschamp
43786801,
43793201,
43793202,
43802101­
43802103,
43818901,
43845205,
43850901,
43850902,
43915201,
43975601,
43982801
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Studies
(GLN
171­

4(
k))
on
Several
Crops;
Processing
Studies
(GLN
171­
4(
l))
on
Field
Corn,
Cottonseed,
and
Sunflower;
Storage
Stability
Studies
(GLN
171­

4(
e))
for
Representative
Crops.

10/
7/
96
D217179,
D217172,
D217177,
D217631,
D217704,
D217705
15829,
15830,
15832,
15897,
15946,
15952
F.
Suhre
P.
Deschamp
43677401,
43686701,
43686702,
43694101­
43694105,
43697601­
43697604,
43698201­
43698203,
43702001­
43702003,
43703101­
43703103,
43716601,
43721001
Carbaryl
(056801)
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
(GLN
171­
4(
k))
and
Processing
(GLN
171­
4(
l))
studies
on
numerous
crops.

9/
11/
97
D234692
None
C.
Olinger
J.
Loranger
None
Carbaryl:
Over­
Tolerance
Residues
on
Spinach;

Chemical
No.
56801.
Date
DP
Barcode
CB
No.
From
To
MRID
Nos.
Subject
99
1/
22/
98
D240441
None
C.
Olinger
K.
Boyle
None
Carbaryl:
Request
for
Waiver
of
Field
Trials
Using
Granular
Formulation;
Chemical
No.

56801
4/
9/
98
D240998,
D237653
None
C.
Olinger
V.
Dobozy
44321301
and
44412501
Reregistration
of
Carbaryl:
Olive
Field
Trial
and
Wheat
Storage
Stability;
Chemical
No.
56801.

5/
12/
98
D227765,
D227009
17424
17444
M.
Perry
J.
Loranger
44019701,
44046101
Carbaryl.
Aventis
Ag
Company.
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080.
Peanut
Processing
Study
and
Amended
Report
to
Broccoli
Field
Trial
Study.

5/
22/
98
D230900,
D231134
17626
and
17655
M.
Perry
J.
Loranger
44123101,
44145201
Carbaryl.
PC
Code
056801.
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080.
IR­
4
Submission
of
Okra
and
Prickly
Pear
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Studies
(GLN
860.1500)

5/
26/
98
D230246,
D230406,
D231533
17610,
17606,
and
17689
M.
Perry
J.
Loranger
44058101,
44072901,

and
44155401
Carbaryl.
PC
Code
056801.
Reregistration
Case
No.
0080.
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Data
in/
on
Sweet
Corn
and
Pome
Fruits
and
ILV
Data
on
Enforcement
Method
for
Oily
Crops.

9/
10/
98
D215844
None
C.
Olinger
V.
Dobozy
43651701
Reregistration
of
Carbaryl:
Confined
Rotational
Crop
Study;
Chemical
No.
56801.

9/
29/
98
D230407
None
T.
Morton
K.
Boyle
44114301
Carbaryl
Reregistration
­
Evaluation
of
tobacco
pyrolysis
study
to
satisfy
GLN
860.1500.

9/
17/
98
D206443
14130
T.
Morton
K.
Boyle
None
Carbaryl
(056801);
Reregistration
Case
No.

0080)
Review
of
Revised
Labels
for
EPA
Reg.

No.
264­
315
and
264­
321.
Date
DP
Barcode
CB
No.
From
To
MRID
Nos.
Subject
100
9/
17/
98
D216242,
D219527,
D219596,
and
D220287
15690,
16235,
16266,
and
16384
T.
Morton
K.
Boyle
43654201,
43786802­
43786806,
43794901­
43794903,
43813601­
43813604
Carbaryl:
PC
Code
56801,
Case
No.
0080.

Residue
Analytical
Methods,
and
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
in/
on
Asparagus;
Beans
(dry);

Cabbage;
Cucurbits;
Mustard
Greens;
Root
and
Tuber
Vegetables
including
Beets,
Carrots,
and
Turnips;
Sorghum;
Sunflowers;
and
Processed
Commodities
of
Rice;
Sorghum;
Soybeans;
and
Wheat.

5/
6/
99
D255855
None
C.
Olinger
G.
Kramer
None
Metabolism
of
Carbaryl
in
Dairy
Cattle;

Briefing
Memorandum
for
HED
Metabolism
Assessment
Review
Committee;
Chemical
No.

56801
6/
17/
99
D255855
None
C.
Olinger
G.
Kramer
None
Metabolism
of
Carbaryl
in
Dairy
Cattle;
HED
Metabolism
Assessment
Review
Committee
Decision
Memorandum;
Chemical
No.
56801
11/
9/
99
D228656
and
D235113
None
C.
Olinger
V.
Dobozy
44068401,
44250301
Reregistration
of
Carbaryl:
Storage
Stability
Studies;
Chemical
No.
56801
11/
9/
99
D228260
and
D228652
None
C.
Olinger
V.
Dobozy
44321301,
44412501
Reregistration
of
Carbaryl:
Field
Corn
and
Rangeland
Grass
Field
Trial
Studies;
Chemical
No.
56801
11/
9/
99
D236422
and
D236485
None
C.
Olinger
V.
Dobozy
44321301,
44412501
Reregistration
of
Carbaryl:
Stone
Fruit
and
Orange
Field
Trial
Studies;
Chemical
No.
56801
12/
15/
9
9
D236574,
D236421,
D240469
None
C.
Olinger
V.
Dobozy
44250901,
44286901­
44286903,
44381901
Reregistration
of
Carbaryl:
Livestock
Analytical
Method,
Storage
Stability,
and
Magnitude
of
Residue
Studies;
Chemical
No.
56801
Date
DP
Barcode
CB
No.
From
To
MRID
Nos.
Subject
101
10/
2000
D266186
None
F.
Fort
V.
Dobozy
45115402,
45115403,
45115404,
45115405,
45115406,
45115407,
45115408,
45115409,
45189102
Reregistration
of
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
in/
on
Various
Cops
Resulting
from
Ground
Applications
of
Liquid
and
Granular
Formulations,
Chemical
No.
56801
102
MASTER
RECORD
IDENTIFICATION
NUMBERS
[Note:
references
for
MRIDs
05001852­
05019959,
representing
published
material,
were
unavailable
for
citation]

00015669
Knaak,
J.
B.;
Tallant,
M.
J.;
Bartley,
W.
J.;
et
al.
(1965)
The
metabolism
of
Carbaryl
in
the
rat,
guinea
pig,
and
man.
Journal
of
Agricultural
and
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
13(
6):
537­
543.
(Also
in
unpublished
submission
received
Sep
26,
1974
under
5G1553;
submitted
by
Ciba­
Geigy
Corp.,
Greensboro,
N.
C.;
CDL:
094221­
C)

00049135
Kuhr,
R.
J.;
Casida,
J.
E.
(1966?)
Persistent
Glycosides
of
Metabolites
of
Methylcarbamate
Insecticide
Chemicals
Formed
by
Hydroxylation
in
Bean
Plants:
Report
No.
19547.
(Unpublished
study
received
Jul
15,
1976
under
3125­
EX­
135;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
California­­
Berkeley,
Div.
of
Entomology,
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
226512­
G)

00053897
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(1975)
Introduction:
[Carbaryl].
(Reports
by
various
sources;
unpublished
study
including
published
data,
received
Oct
14,
1976
under
7F1878;
CDL:
095306­
B)

00058927
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(1977)
Determination
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Sunflowers.
Method
dated
May
1977.
(Unpublished
study
received
Jan
7,
1980
under
5E1564;
submitted
by
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4,
New
Brunswick,
N.
J.;
CDL:
099745­
B)

00058928
Interregional
Research
Project
Number
4
(1978)
Carbaryl:
Residue
Tolerance
Petition­

Sunflowers.
(Reports
by
various
sources;
unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
5E1564;
CDL:
099745­
C)

00061103
Johnson,
D.
P.;
Critchfield,
F.
E.;
Arthur,
B.
W.
(1963)
Determination
of
Sevin
insecticide
and
its
metabolites
in
poultry
tissues
and
eggs.
Journal
of
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
11(
1):
77­
80.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
1963
under
unknown
ad­
min.
no.;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Arlington,
Va.;
CDL:
129334­
D)

00061106
Claborn,
H.
V.;
Roberts,
R.
H.;
Mann,
H.
D.;
et
al.
(1963)
Residues
in
body
tissues
of
livestock
sprayed
with
Sevin
or
given
Sevin
in
the
diet.
Journal
of
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
11(
1):
74­
76.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
1963
under
unknown
admin.
no.;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Arlington,
Va.;
CDL:
129334­
H)

00074366
Interregional
Research
Project
Number
4
(1979)
Carbaryl:
Residue
Tolerance
Petition­­
Flax.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Apr
7,
1981
under
1E2498;
CDL:
099997­
A)

00074367
McBride,
D.
K.
(1979)
Carbaryl
(Sevin)
Residue
Trial­­
Flax
(PR#
1084).
(Unpublished
study
received
Apr
7,
1981
under
1E2498,
prepared
by
North
Dakota
State
Univ.
of
Agriculture
and
Applied
Science,
submitted
by
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4,
New
Brunswick,
N.
J.;
CDL:
099997­
C)

00074368
Interregional
Research
Project
Number
4
(1979)
Carbaryl:
Residue
Tolerance
Petition­­
Millet:
Summary.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Apr
7,
1981
under
1E2497;
CDL:
099998­
A)
103
00080419
Annand,
A.
M.;
Robinson,
D.
H.
(1965)
Residues
of
Sevin
in
Tissues
of
Cattle
Dipped
at
Various
Frequencies
in
Sevin
Cattle
Dip:
Report
No.
230/
102/
2.
(Unpublished
study
received
Jun
1,
1966
under
7E0518;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
South
Charleston,
W.
Va.;
CDL:
090613­
F)

00080420
Claborn,
H.
V.;
Roberts,
R.
H.;
Mann,
H.
D.;
et
al.
(1963)
Residues
in
body
tissues
of
livestock
sprayed
with
Sevin
or
given
Sevin
in
the
diet.
Journal
of
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
II(
1):
74­
76.
(Also
in
unpublished
submission
received
Jun
1,
1966
under
7E0518;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
South
Charleston,
W.
Va.;
CDL:
090613­
G)

00080679
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(1971)
Metabolism
of
Carbaryl
in
Animals:
Summary.
Summary
of
studies
091048­
R,
091048­
S,
091048­
U,
091048­
V
and
091048­
AB.
(Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1971
under
2F1220;
CDL:
091048­
O)

00080680
Andrawes,
N.
R.;
Chancey,
E.
L.;
Crabtree,
R.
J.;
et
al.
(1971)
Fate
of
Naphthyl­
1­
14
C
Carbaryl
in
Laying
Chickens.
(Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1971
under
2F1220;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Arlington,
Va.;
CDL:
091048­
P)

00080681
Baron,
R.
L.;
Locke,
R.
K.
(1970)
Utilization
of
cell
culture
techniques
in
carbaryl
metabolism
studies.
Bulletin
of
Environmental
Contamination
&
Toxicology
5(
4):
287­
291.
(Also
in
unpublished
submission
received
Dec
22,
1971
under
2F1220;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Arlington,
Va.;
CDL:
091048­
Q)

00080682
Bartley,
W.
J.
(1970)
Sevin
Metabolism
Studies:
The
Identification
of
a
New
Metabolite
of
Sevin
in
Milk:
Project
No.
111A12,
File
No.
14750.
(Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1971
under
2F1220;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Arlington,
Va.;
CDL:
091048­
R)

00080683
Bartley,
W.
J.
(1971)
Sevin
Metabolism
Studies:
The
Identification
of
3,4­
Dihydro­
3,4­
dihydroxy­
1­
naphthyl
Methylcarbamate
in
Milk­­
a
New
Sevin
Metabolite:
Project
No.
111A12,
File
No.
15133.
(Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1971
under
2F1220;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Arlington,
Va.;
CDL:
091048­
S)

00080686
Dorough,
H.
W.
(1971)
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Milk
and
Meat
of
Dairy
Animals.
(Unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1971
under
2F1220;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
Kentucky,
Dept.
of
Entomology,
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Arlington,
Va.;
CDL:
091048­
V)

00080689
Pekas,
J.
C.
(1971)
Intestinal
metabolism
and
transport
of
Naphthyl
N­
methylcarbamate
in
vitro
(rat).
American
Journal
of
Physiology
220(
6):
2008­
2012.
(Also
in
unpublished
submission
received
Dec
22,
1971
under
2F1220;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Arlington,
Va.;
CDL:
091048­
Y)

00080690
Pekas,
J.
C.;
Paulson,
G.
D.
(1970)
Intestinal
hydrolysis
and
conjugation
of
a
pesticidal
carbamate
in
vitro.
Science
170:
77­
78.
(Also
in
unpublished
submission
received
Dec
22,
1971
under
2F1220;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Arlington,
Va.;
CDL:
091048­
Z)

00082420
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1958)
Summary:
[Results
of
Residue
Determinations
on
Apples
with
Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Oct
15,
1958
under
PP0193;
CDL:
092469­
J)
104
00082422
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1958)
Summary:
[Residues
of
Sevin
on
Peaches].
(Unpublished
study
received
Oct
15,
1958
under
PP0193;
CDL:
092469­
L)

00082423
Carbide
and
Carbon
Chemicals
Company
(1957)
Alpha­
Naphthyl
N­
Methyl
Carbamate
(Experimental
Insecticide
Sevin):
Determination
of
Residues
in
Apples.
Method
30­
U1A15­
4
dated
Feb
20,
1957.
(Unpublished
study
received
Oct
15,
1958
under
PP0193;
CDL:
092469­
M)

00082424
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1958)
Summary:
[Results
of
Residue
Determinations
on
Beans].
(Unpublished
study,
including
letter
dated
Sep
15,
1958
from
C.
E.
Herald
to
J.
W.
Keays,
received
Oct
15,
1958
under
PP0193;
CDL:
092469­
O)

00083311
Union
Carbide
&
Chem.
(1957)
Summary:
[Evidence
of
Residues
of
Sevin
on
Apples].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
14,
1957
under
PP0155;
CDL:
090181­
D)

00083312
Whitehurst,
W.
E.;
Johnson,
J.
B.
(1957)
alpha­
Naphthyl
N­
Methyl­
carbamate:
Determination
of
Residues
in
Apples:
File
No.
300­
U1A15;
1543­
I1.
Interim
rept.
Method
dated
Feb
26,
1957.
(Unpublished
study
received
Nov
14,
1957
under
PP0155;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
&
Chem.,
New
York,
N.
Y.;
CDL:
090181­
E)

00083527
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(19??)
Sevin
Residues
in
Asparagus:
Summary
and
Discussion.
(Unpublished
study
received
Oct
2,
1961
under
PP0333;
CDL:
092615­
C)

00089348
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1959)
Summary:
[Sevin
Residue­
Plums].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Aug
21,
1959
under
PP0222;
CDL:
090250­
A)

00089376
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1959)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Residue
Remaining
on
Cucumbers
and
Summer
Squash
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used:
[Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
7,
1959
under
PP0236;
CDL:
090264­
A)

00089378
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1960)
Results
of
Tests
To
Determine
Sevin
Residues
in
Corn
(Kernels
Only
and
Kernel
plus
Cob
with
Husk
Removed)
and
in
Corn
Fodder
and
Forage.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
5,
1960
under
PP0243;
CDL:
090270­
A)

00089380
Whitehurst,
W.
E.;
Bishop,
E.
T,;
Critchfield,
F.
E.
(1960)
Sevin
Insecticide:
A
Study
of
the
Metabolic
Fate
in
Dairy
Cows:
Project
No.
328B.
Final
rept.
(Unpublished
study
received
Jan
5,
1960
under
PP0243;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corp.,
New
York,
N.
Y.;
CDL:
090270­
C)

00089418
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1958)
Summary:
[Sevin
and
1­
Naphthol
Residue
Analyses].
Includes
method
no.
30­
U1A15­
7
dated
Jul
9,
1958.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
19,
1958
under
PP0203;
CDL:
090231­
A)

00089420
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1958)
Summary:
[Sevin
and
1­
Naphthol
Residue
Analyses].
Includes
method
no.
30­
U1A15­
7
dated
Jul
9,
1958.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
19,
1958
under
PP0203;
CDL:
090231­
C)

00089455
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1957)
Summary:
[Residues
of
Sevin
on
Pears].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jan
31,
1958
under
PP0165;
CDL:
090191­
A)
105
00089458
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1957)
Summary:
[Analyses
for
Sevin
Residues
on
Grapes].
Includes
method
30­
U1A15­
4
dated
Feb
20,
1957.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Feb
24,
1958
under
PP0169;
CDL:
090196­
A)

00089600
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1959)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Residue
Remaining
on
Tomatoes,
Eggplants
and
Peppers
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used:
[Sevin].
Includes
method
30­
U1A15­
7
dated
Jul
9,
1958.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Oct
30,
1959
under
PP0228;
CDL:
090257­
A)

00089679
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1957)
Summary:
[Residues
of
Sevin
on
Beans].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Feb
6,
1958
under
PP0167;
CDL:
090193­
A)

00089680
Carbide
and
Carbon
Chemicals
Company
(1957)
Alpha­
Naphthyl
N­
Methyl
Carbamate
(Experimental
Insecticide
Sevin):
Determination
of
Residues
in
Apples.
Method
30­
U1A15­
4
dated
Feb
20,
1957.
(Unpublished
study
received
Feb
6,
1958
under
PP0167;
CDL:
090193­
B)

00089681
Swango,
W.
H.;
Herald,
C.
E.;
Massie,
J.
L.;
et
al.
(1957)
Insecticide
Sevin:
Determination
on
Green
Beans:
File
No.
307­
U­
1A15.
Final
rept.
(Unpublished
study
received
Feb
6,
1958
under
PP0167;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corp.,
New
York,
N.
Y.;
CDL:
090193­
C)

00089836
U.
S.
Agricultural
Research
Service
(1960)
Residues
in
Animal
Tissues
following
Dermal
Application
and
Feeding
with
Sevin:
Special
Report
K­
64.
(Unpublished
study;
CDL:
090343­
B)

00089837
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(1961)
Results
of
Tests
To
Determine
Residues
of
Sevin
in
(1)
the
Green
Forage
and/
or
Cured
Hay
or
Crop
Refuse
of
Alfalfa,
Bean,
Clovers,
Cotton,
Cowpea,
Grasses,
Peanut,
Rice,
Sorghum,
Soybean,
Sugarbeet,
and
(2)
in
Sorghum
Grain,
Cowpeas,
Peanuts,
Rice
and
Soybean.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Mar
10,
1961
under
PP0302;
CDL:
090343­
C)

00089868
Union
Carbide
Chemicals
Company
(1962)
Results
of
Tests
To
Determine
Sevin
Residues
in
Spinach
Group,
Lettuce
Group,
Blackberry
Group
and
Root
Crops.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
PP0368;
CDL:
090397­
B)

00090113
Union
Carbide
Chemicals
Company
(1961)
Sevin
Residues
in
Garden
Peas
and
Pea
Vines.
(Unpublished
study
received
Nov
12,
1962
under
PP0387;
CDL:
090419­
A)

00090156
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(1960)
Sevin
for
Use
on
Filberts:
Insect
Control
and
Residue
Data:
April
1960.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Oct
7,
1960
under
PP0277;
CDL:
090299­
B)

00090160
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1960)
Sevin
Residues
in
Apricots
and
Nectarines.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
25,
1960
under
PP0281;
CDL:
090303­
A)

00090161
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1960)
Sevin
Residues
in
Cranberries
and
Blueberries.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
25,
1960
under
PP0281;
CDL:
090303­
B)

00090162
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1960)
Sevin
Residues
on
Lettuce.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
25,
1960
under
PP0281;
CDL:
090303­
C)
106
00090204
Union
Carbide
&
Carbon
Corporation
(1961)
Summary­­
Sevin
Residues
on
Citrus.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
May
5,
1961
under
PP0313;
CDL:
090331­
A)

00090229
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(1961)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Residue
Remaining
on
Okra
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used:
[Sevin].
(Unpublished
study
received
Feb
10,
1961
under
PP0296;
CDL:
090316­
A)

00090281
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(1961)
Sevin
Residues
in
Olives.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
20,
1961
under
PP0337;
CDL:
090367­
A)

00090320
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(1961)
Summary­­
Sevin
Residue
in
Citrus.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Aug
4,
1961
under
PP0327;
CDL:
090354­
A)

00090325
Union
Carbide
Corporation
(1961)
Results
of
Tests
To
Determine
Sevin
Residues
in
Cabbage;
Broccoli,
Brussels
Sprouts,
Cauliflower
and
Kohlrabi,
Melons,
Pumpkins
and
Winter
Squash,
and
Carrots.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
14,
1961under
PP0318;
CDL:
090346­
A)

00091952
Oonnithan,
E.
S.;
Casida,
J.
E.
(1968)
Oxidation
of
methyl­
and
dimethylcarbamate
insecticide
chemicals
by
microsomal
enzymes
and
anticholinesterase
activity
of
the
metabolites.
Journal
of
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
16(
1):
28044.
(Also
in
unpublished
submission
received
Jun
9,
1971
under
3125­
EX­
118;
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Kansas
City,
Mo.;
CDL:
126996­
E)

00095927
Dorough,
H.
W.
(1970)
Metabolism
of
insecticidal
methylcarbamates
in
animals.
Journal
of
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
18(
6):
1015­
1022.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
Jan
18,
1971
under
9F0843;
submitted
by
Shell
Chemical
Co.,
Washington,
D.
C.;
CDL:
093138­
AC)

00098504
Interregional
Research
Project
Number
4
(1980)
Summary
of
Residue
Data
for
Carbaryl
in
or
on
Potatoes
from
Postharvest
Treatment.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Apr
7,
1982
under
2E2667;
CDL:
070770­
A)

00103288
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(1981)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Carbaryl
Residues
Remaining
in
or
on
Prickley
Pear
Cactus
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jun
17,
1982
under
2E2712;
CDL:
070930­
A)

00107017
Union
Carbide
(1965)
The
Results
of
Analyses
on
the
Amount
of
Residue
Remaining
on
or
in
Irish
Potatoes
and
Sweet
Potatoes:
[Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Sep
19,
1966
under
7F0537;
CDL:
090655­
A)

00108985
Prudich,
J.;
Herald,
C.;
Zweig,
G.
(1961)
Summary:
[Residue
Determinations
for
Sevin
on
Walnuts
and
Almonds].
(Unpublished
study
received
Aug
17,
1961
under
PP0329;
prepared
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
California­­
Berkeley,
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
090356­
A)

00115284
Union
Carbide
Corp.
(1977)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Residue
Remaining
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used:
[Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
23,
1977
under
1016­
EX­
39;
CDL:
096707­
A)
107
00116083
Union
Carbide
Corp.
(1971)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Residue
Remaining
Including
a
Description
of
the
Methods
Used:
[Sevin
Carbaryl].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Jul
17,
1972
under
2F1220;
CDL:
091049­
A)

00118342
Union
Carbide
Corp.
(1969)
[Study:
Carbaryl
Residue
in
Milk,
Oysters,
and
Selected
Crops].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
CDL:
091556­
E)

00118346
Knaak,
J.;
Tallant,
M.;
Kozbelt,
S.;
et
al.
(1968)
The
metabolism
of
carbaryl
in
man,
monkey,
pig,
and
sheep.
J.
Agr.
Food
Chem.
16(
3):
465­
470.
16(
3):
465­
470.
(Also
in
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
J)

00118347
Knaak,
J.;
Sullivan,
L.
(1967)
Metabolism
of
carbaryl
in
the
dog.
J.
Agr.
Food
Chem.
15(
6):
1125.
(Also
in
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
K)

00118365
Union
Carbide
Corp.
(1969)
Metabolism
of
Carbaryl
in
Animals:
Summary.
(Unpublished
study
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
CDL:
091556­
AD)

00118366
Baron,
R.
(1968)
Radioactive
lactose
in
skim
milk
following
administration
of
carbonyl­
14Ccarbaryl
to
a
lactating
cow.
Journal
of
the
Assoc.
Off.
Anal.
Chem.
51(
5):
1046­
1049.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AE)

00118367
Baron,
R.;
Palmer,
N.;
Ross,
R.;
et
al.
(1968)
Distribution
of
radioactivity
in
milk
resulting
from
oral
administration
of
14C­
labelled
carbaryl.
Journal
of
the
Assoc.
Off.
Anal.
Chem.
51
(1):
32­
34.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,1970
under
0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AF)

00118368
Baron,
R.;
Sphon,
J.;
Chen,
J.;
et
al.
(1969)
Confirmatory
isolation
and
identification
of
a
metabolite
of
carbaryl
in
urine
and
milk.
Journal
of
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
17(
4):
883­
887.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,
1970
under0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AG)

00118370
Dorough,
H.
(1967)
Carbaryl­
C14
metabolism
in
a
lactating
cow.
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
15(
2):
261­
266.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AI)

00118371
Dorough,
H.
(1969)
Continuous
Feeding
of
Sevin­
naphthyl­
C14
to
Lactating
Cows.
Progress
rept.,
Jun
17,
1969.
(Unpublished
study
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
Kentucky,
Dept.
of
Entomology,
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AJ)

00118372
Dorough,
H.;
Casida,
J.
(1964)
Nature
of
certain
carbamate
metabolites
of
the
insecticide
Sevin.
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
12(
4):
294­
304.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AK)
108
00118373
Dorough,
H.;
Leeling,
N.;
Casida,
J.
(1963)
Nonhydrolic
pathway
in
metabolism
of
Nmethylcarbamate
insecticides.
Science
140(
Apr
12):
170­
171.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AL)

00118374
Dorough,
H.;
Wiggins,
O.
(1969)
Nature
of
the
water­
soluble
metabolites
of
carbaryl
in
bean
plants
and
their
fate
in
rats.
Journal
of
Economic
Entomology
62(
1):
49­
53.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AM)

00118375
Paulson,
G.;
Feil,
V.
(1969)
The
Fate
of
a
Single
Oral
Dose
of
Carbaryl
...
in
the
Chicken.
(Unpublished
study
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
prepared
by
U.
S.
Agricultural
Research
Service,
Metabolism
and
Radiation
Research
Laboratory,
Animal
Husbandry
Research
Div.,
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AO)

00118376
Paulson,
G.;
Zaylskie,
R.;
Zehr,
M.;
et
al.
(1969)
Metabolites
of
Carbaryl
...
in
Chicken
Urine.
(Unpublished
study
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
prepared
by
U.
S.
Agricultural
Research
Service,
Metabolism
and
Radiation
Research
Laboratory,
Animal
Husbandry
Research
Div.
and
Entomology
Research
Div.,
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AP)

00118377
Sullivan,
L.
(1969)
5,6­
Dihydro­
5,6­
dihydroxycarbaryl
Glucuronide
as
a
Significant
Metabolite
of
Carbaryl
in
the
Rat:
Special
Report
32­
100.
(Unpublished
study
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
prepared
by
Mellon
Institute,
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AQ)

00118378
Whitehurst,
W.;
Bishop,
E.;
Critchfield,
F.;
et
al.
(1963)
The
metabolism
of
Sevin
in
dairy
cows.
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
11(
2):
167­
169.
(Also
In
unpublished
submission
received
May
15,
1970
under
0F0902;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
New
York,
NY;
CDL:
091556­
AR)

00123219
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(1972)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Carbaryl
Residues
Remaining
on
or
in
Pecans,
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Oct
18,
1972
under
3E1324;
CDL:
093553­
A)

00124334
Union
Carbide
Corp.
(1977)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Carbaryl
Residues
Remaining
in
or
on
Lentils
and
Lentil
Forage
and
Hay,
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Sep
13,
1978
under1016­
68;
CDL:
097397­
A)

00124335
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(1978)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Carbaryl
Residues
Remaining
in
or
on
Pistachios.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
21,
1978
under
9E2153;
CDL:
097652­
A)

00124337
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(1965)
Results
of
Tests
Concerning
the
Amount
of
Carbaryl
Residue
Remaining
in
or
on
Celery,
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Mar
11,
1977
under7E1935;
CDL:
097769­
A)

00124343
Herald,
C.;
Wene,
G.
(1959)
Residue
Analyses
for
Sevin
on
Cotton
Seed
Crop
and
Variety:
Reference
T­
797­
142.
(Unpublished
study
received
on
unknown
date
under
PP0212;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC;
CDL:
098737­
A)
109
00124345
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1959)
[Residues:
Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
1959
under
PP0222;
CD:
098753­
A)

00124353
Herrett,
R.;
Bagley,
W.;
Kramer,
J.
(1966)
Insecticide
Sevin:
Uptake
and
Distribution
in
Corn:
855­
31047­
8019.
(Unpublished
study
received
Oct
5,
1966
under
unknown
admin.
no.;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Corp.,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC;
CDL:
121177­
A)

00124361
Gutenmann,
W.;
Lisk,
D.
(1964)
Gas
Chromatographic
Residue
Determination
of
Sevin
as
Brominated
1­
Naphthyl
Acetate.
(Unpublished
study
received
1964
under
unknown
admin.
no.;
prepared
by
Cornell
Univ.,
Dept.
of
Entomology,
submitted
by
?;
CDL:
121435­
A)

00124367
Union
Carbide
Corp.
(1963)
Summary
of
Sevin
and
1­
Naphthol
Residues
in
Poultry,
Meat
and
Eggs:
Hens
Treated
by
Dust­
bath­
box
Method.
(Unpublished
study
received
Mar
13,
1963
under
unknown
admin.
no.;
CDL:
121450­
A)

00124968
Abdel­
Wahab,
A.;
Kuhr,
R.;
Casida,
J.
(1966)
Fate
of
C14­
carbonyl­
labeled
aryl
methylcarbamate
insecticide
chemicals
in
and
on
bean
plants.
J.
Agr.
Food
Chem.
14(
3):
290­
297.
(Submitter
18274;
also
In
unpublished
submission
received
Jul
15,
1976under
3125­
EX­
135;
submitted
by
Mobay
Chemical
Corp.,
Kansas
City,
MO;
CDL:
227756­
E)

00125084
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(19??)
[Sevin
Residues
in
Leaves
and
Other
Subjects].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Feb
24,
1958
under
PP0169;
CDL:
092447­
A)

00125090
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1959)
[Study
of
the
Residue
of
Sevin
in
Milk,
Fruit
and
Vegetables].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Feb
17,
1959;
Jan
22,
1959
under
PP0193;
CDL:
092470­
A)

00125099
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1959)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Residue
Remaining,
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used:
[Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Mar
3,
1959;
Jul
9,
1959;
Jun
8,1959
under
PP0212;
CDL:
092490­
A)

00125107
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1960)
[Residues:
Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
1960
under
PP0243;
CDL:
092520­
A)

00125121
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1960)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Residue
Remaining
on
Alfalfa,
Grass
Forage,
Sorghum
Forage
and
Sorghum
Grain,
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Methods
Used:
[Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
1960
under
PP0263;
CDL:
092540­
A)

00125123
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1960)
[Residues:
Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Nov
28,
1960
under
PP0263;
CDL:
092541­
A)

00125138
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1961)
[Residues:
Sevin].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Mar
14,
1960
under
PP0302;
CDL:
092582­
A)

00125170
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1974)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Residues
Remaining,
Including
a
Description
of
the
Methods
Used:
[Carbaryl].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
1974
under
2F1220;
CDL:
094079­
L)
110
00125555
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1963)
[Sevin:
Residues
in
Wheat
and
Other
Crops].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
May
3,
1963
under
PP0405;
CDL:
092693­
C)

00125571
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1963)
The
Results
of
Analyses
on
the
Amount
of
[Carbaryl]
Residue
Remaining
on
or
in
Eggs.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Sep
24,
1966
under
7F0538;
CDL:
092826­
B)

00134421
Union
Carbide
Corp.
(1958)
Sevin
Insecticide
Residues
in
Potatoes.
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Dec
22,
1958
under
unknown
admin.
no.;
CDL:
121475­
A)

00135678
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1961)
[Residue:
Sevin
in
Poultry
Meat].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
1961
under
PP0311;
CDL:
092591­
B)

00135680
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1961)
[Residue:
Sevin
in
Poultry
Products].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
Mar
23,
1961
under
PP0311;
CDL:
092592­
B)

00136415
Romine,
R.
(1979)
Residue
Data
Transmittal:
[Carbaryl
in
or
on
Wheat].
(Unpublished
study
received
Aug
9,
1979
under
264­
316;
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC;
CDL:
098950­
A)

00139664
Dorough,
H.
(1971)
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Milk
and
Meat
of
Dairy
Animals.
(Unpublished
study
received
Dec
1,
1971
under
2F1220;
prepared
by
Univ.
of
Kentucky,
Dept.
of
Entomology,
submitted
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC;
CDL:
111825­
W)

00140447
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1962)
[Residue:
Sevin
in
Almonds
and
Filberts].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
1962
under
PP0329;
CDL:
092611­
A)

00140449
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1961)
[Residue:
Sevin
on
Asparagus].
(Compilation;
unpublished
study
received
1961
under
PP0333;
CDL:
092616­
B)

00145884
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4
(1984)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Carbaryl
Residues
Remaining
in
or
on
Loquats
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used.
Unpublished
study.
30
p.

00147760
Interregional
Research
Project
No.
4.
(1984)
The
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Carbaryl
Residues
Remaining
in
or
on
Avocado
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used.
Unpublished
compilation.
27
p.

00154626
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
(1984)
Results
of
Tests
on
the
Amount
of
Residue
Remaining
Including
a
Description
of
the
Analytical
Method
Used:
Carbaryl
on
or
in
Pineapples
.
Unpublished
compilation.
26
p.

00156736
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.
(1985)
Sevin
(Carbaryl)
Residues
in
Pineapple
Products.
Unpublished
compilation.
29
p.

00159324
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Potato
Processing
Study:
Project
No.
801R11:
File
No.
34477.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
20
p.
111
00159325
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Alfalfa
Processing
Study:
Project
No.
801R11:
File
No.
34398.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
11
p.

00159326
Davis,
C.;
Thomas,
S.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Tomato
Processing
Study:
Project
No.
801R11:
File
No.
34397.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
13
p.

00159327
Davis,
C.;
Thomas,
S.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Apple
Processing
Study:
Project
No.
801R11:
File
No.
34443.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
13
p.

00159328
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Prune
Processing
Study:
Project
No.
801R11:
File
No.
34438.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
8
p.

00159329
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Sweet
Sorghum
Processing
Study:
Project
No.
801R11:
File
No.
34413.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.
Inc.
13
p.

00163006
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
on
Rangeland
and
Pasture
Grasses:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
in
cooperation
with
Hazleton
Laboratories,
Inc.
78
p.

00163007
Thomas,
S.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Sugar
Beet
Roots:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
in
cooperation
with
Hazleton
Laboratories
America,
Inc.
28
p.

00163008
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Citrus
Processing
Study:
Residue
Data
in
Grapefruits,
Oranges,
and
Lemons:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Florida,
Citrus
Research
and
Education
Center.
46
p.

00163009
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Field
Corn
Processing
Study:
Residue
Data:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
in
cooperation
with
Texas
A&
M
University,
Food
Protein
Center
and
US
Dept.
of
Agriculture,
Northern
Regional
Research
Center.
22
p.

00163010
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Grape
Processing
Study:
Residue
Data:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
in
cooperation
with
Agricultural
Chemicals
Development
Services,
Inc.
13
p.

00163011
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Raisins
and
Raisin
Waste:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
15
p.

00163012
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Peanut
Processing
Study:
Residue
Data:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
in
cooperation
with
Texas
A&
M
Univ.,
Food
Protein
Center.
18
p.
112
00163013
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Rice
Processing
prepared
bu
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
in
cooperation
with
Univ.
of
Arkansas,
Dept.
of
Entomology.
15
p.

00163014
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Snap
Bean
Cannery
Waste:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
19
p.

00163015
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Grain
Sorghum
Processing
Study:
Project
No.
801R11:
File
No.
34847.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
12
p.

00163016
Davis,
C.;
Thomas,
S.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Soybean
Processing
Study:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
in
cooperation
with
Texas
A&
M
Univ.,
Food
Protein
Center.
17
p.

00163017
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Sugar
Beet
Processing
Study:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
16
p.

00163018
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Sweet
Corn
Cannery
Waste:
Project
No.
801R11.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
19
p.

05008444
Baron,
R.
L.
(1978)
Terminal
residues
of
carbamate
insecticides.
Pure
and
Applied
Chemistry
50(
5):
505­
509.

40255702
Davis,
C.
(1986)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Sweet
Corn
Cannery
Waste:
Project
No.:
801R11:
File
No.:
34830.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
21
p.

40376001
Davis,
C.;
Thomas,
S.
(1985)
Sevin
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Method
of
Analysis
for
Carbaryl
in
Alfalfa
(Modified
to
Include
Sugar
Beets):
Laboratory
Project
ID:
801R11;
File
No:
33769.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
17
p.

40376002
Davis,
C.
(1987)
Data
in
Support
of
Sugar
Beet
Root:
Residue
Data
Submitted
as
Part
of
Pesticide
Petition
#
7F3490.
Unpublished
compilation
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
42
p.

40408601
Davis,
C.;
Thomas,
S.
(1987)
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
Crop
Field
Trials:
Barley:
Project
No.
801R11
and
File
No.
40092.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Union
Carbide
Agricultural
Products
Co.,
Inc.
in
cooperation
with
Hazleton
Laboratories
America,
Inc.
136
p.

40512501
Sorensen,
K.;
Sheets,
T.;
Markle,
G.
(1987)
Carbaryl­­
Magnitude
of
Residues
on
Potato
(Post
Harvest):
Project
No.
402.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
North
Carolina
State
Univ.
31
p.

40881302
Butler,
L.;
McDonough,
L.
(1970)
Specific
glc
method
for
determining
residues
of
carbaryl
by
electron
capture
detection
after
derivative
formation.
Journal
of
the
AOAC
53(
3):
494­
499.

40881307
Pablo,
F.;
Bello,
F.
(19??)
Carbaryl
and
monocrotophos
residues
in
cottonseeds,
oil
and
cake.
Phillipine
Entomologist
(?):
301­
309.
113
40881308
Nir,
I.;
Weisenberg,
E.;
Hadani,
A.;
et
al.
(1966)
Studies
of
the
toxicity,
excretion
and
residues
of
sevin
in
poultry
p.
719­
728.

40881309
McCay,
C.;
Arthur,
B.
(1962)
Sevin
residues
in
poultry
products.
Journal
of
Economic
Entomology
55(
6):
936­
938.

40881312
Johnson,
D.
(1963)
Determination
of
Sevin
insecticides
residues
in
fruits
and
vegetables.
Journal
of
the
AOAC
46(
2):
233­
237.

40881313
Johnson,
D.
(1964)
Determination
of
sevin
insecticide
residues
in
fruits
and
vegetables.
Journal
of
the
AOAC
47(
2):
282­
287.

40881314
Miskus,
R.;
Gordon,
H.;
George,
D.
(1959)
Colorimetric
determination
of
1­
naphthyl
nmethylcarbamte
in
agricultural
crops.
Agricultural
and
Food
Chemistry
7(?):
612­
614.

41594301
Lee,
R.
(1990)
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Wheat:
Residues
­Examination
of
Residue
Levels
in/
on
Forage,
Straw
and
Grain
at
Selected
PreHarvest
Intervals:
Lab
Project
Number:
S86­
054­
02:
40533.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
79
p.

43249101
Harsy,
S.
(1994)
Metabolic
Fate
and
Distribution
of
(carbon
14)­
Carbaryl
in
Lettuce:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
HWI
6224­
188:
EC­
92­
231.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Hazleton
Wisconsin,
Inc.
125
p.

43249102
Harsy,
S.
(1994)
Metabolic
Fate
and
Distribution
of
(carbon
14)­
Carbaryl
in
Radishes:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
HWI
6224­
186:
EC­
92­
232.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Hazleton
Wisconsin,
Inc.
164
p.

43249103
Harsy,
S.
(1994)
Metabolic
Fate
and
Distribution
of
(carbon
14)­
Carbaryl
in
Soybeans:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
HWI
6224­
190:
EC­
92­
233.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Hazleton
Wisconsin,
Inc.
178
p.

43324601
Struble,
C.
(1994)
Nature
of
the
Residue
of
(carbon
14)­­
Carbaryl
in
Laying
Hens:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
HWI
6224­
183:
EC­
92­
223.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Hazleton
Wisconsin,
Inc.
157
p.

43651701
Harsy,
S.
(1995)
(Carbon­
14)
Carbaryl
Accumulation
in
Confined
Rotational
Crops
(Screenhouse
Study):
Lab
Project
Number:
HWI
6224­
192:
EC­
94­
284.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Hazleton
Wisconsin,
Inc.
180
p.

43654201
Chancey,
E.
(1995)
Sevin
XLR
Plus:
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Asparagus
Raw
Agricultural
Commodities:
Final
Study
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44695:
US94S20R:
94­
0143.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
239
p.

43672701
Thiem,
D.
(1995)
Method
Validation
for
Aventis
Ag
Company
Method
No.
CACR­
0194
Revised
March
27,
1995:
Carbaryl
General
Method
for
the
Determination
of
Residue
in
Crop
Samples
by
High
Performance
Liquid
Chromatography:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44754:
1247.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
&
Development
Corp.
353
p.
114
43672702
Humble,
G.;
Herzig,
R.
(1995)
Independent
Laboratory
Confirmation
of
the
Tolerance
Enforcement
Method
by
EPA
Notice
88­
5
for
Carbaryl:
General
Method
for
the
Determination
of
Residues
in
Crop
Samples
by
High
Performance
Liquid
Chromatography:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
RES9544:
44778:
8765.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agvise
Labs,
Inc.
120
p.

43677401
Tew,
E.;
Koktavy,
K.
(1995)
Sevin
XLR
PLUS:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Leafy
Vegetables
(Celery,
Head
Lettuce,
Leaf
Lettuce,
and
Spinach):
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S04R:
44749.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Research
Designed
for
Agriculture;
Ag
Consulting
Inc.;
Agsearch
Co.
608
p.

43686701
Ely,
C.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Bell
Peppers
Following
Treatment
with
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
94­
0059:
44758:
US94S14R.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
EN­
CAS
Analytical
Labs.
262
p.

43686702
Lee,
R.
(1995)
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS:
Carbaryl
Tomato
Processing
(Magnitude
of
Residues):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44759:
US94S01R:
94­
0001.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
228
p.

43694101
Mede,
K.
(1995)
CARBARYL:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Blueberries
Resulting
from
Ground
Application
of
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS
(1994):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
94­
0177:
94­
0178:
94­
0179.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech
and
Aventis.
216
p.

43694102
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residue
in/
on
Soybeans:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S41R:
44740:
94­
0248.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group,
Inc.
459
p.

43694103
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residue
in/
on
Dried
Peas:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S39R:
44737:
94­
0232.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group,
Inc.
291
p.

43694104
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS:
Carbaryl
Citrus
Processing
(Orange):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
94­
0095:
US94S10R:
44734.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group,
Inc.
248
p.

43694105
Singer,
G.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Clover
Forage
and
Clover
Hay
Resulting
from
a
Ground
Application
of
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
94­
0321:
94­
0322:
94­
0323.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
American
Agricultural
Services,
Inc.
488
p.

43697601
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Sevin
XLR
PLUS:
Carbaryl:
Grape
Processing
(Raisins):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S13R:
44733:
94­
0098.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group,
Inc.
468
p.

43697602
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Sevin
XLR
PLUS:
Carbaryl:
Grape
Processing
(Juice):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S12R:
44732:
94­
0097.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group,
Inc.
312
p.
115
43697603
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residue
in
Processed
Potato
Fractions
Following
Field
Treatment
with
Sevin
XLR
Plus:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S21R:
44742:
94­
149.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group,
Inc.
319
p.

43697604
Mede,
K.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residue
in/
on
Cranberries
Resulting
from
Ground
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1994):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S28R:
44780:
94­
0181.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
and
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech,
Ltd.
216
p.

43698201
Lee,
R.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Caneberries
Resulting
from
Ground
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1994):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S18R:
44760:
94­
0173.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
220
p.

43698202
Mede,
K.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Strawberries
Resulting
from
Ground
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1994):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S30R:
44765:
94­
0195.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
and
Enviro­
Bio­
Test,
Ltd.
216
p.

43698203
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Determination
of
the
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Olive
Oil
Processed
from
Olives
Treated
with
Sevin
XLR
Plus
Brand
of
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S02R:
44731:
94­
002.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group,
Inc.
263
p.

43702001
Macy,
L.;
Lee,
R.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Determination
of
the
Magnitude
of
Residues
on
Olives
Treated
with
Foliar
Applications
of
SEVIN
XLR
Plus
Brand
of
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S09R:
44791:
94­
0091.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
&
Development
Corp.
and
Aventis
Ag
Co.
288
p.

43702002
Kowite,
W.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Sweet
Potato
RAC
Resulting
from
Applications
of
SEVIN
XLR
Plus
Insecticide
(1994):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S16R:
44794:
94­
0117.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
&
Development
Corp.
and
Aventis
Ag
Co.
367
p.

43702003
Cappy,
J.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Apples
and
Processed
Fractions
of
Apples:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S11R:
44773:
94­
0096.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech,
Ltd.
and
Aventis
Ag
Co.
263
p.

43703101
Kowite,
W.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Peanuts
RAC
Resulting
From
Application
of
Sevin
XLR
PLUS
Insecticide
(1994):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S22R:
44795:
94­
0150.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech,
Ltd.
332
p.

43703102
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residue
In/
On
Fresh
Peas:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S40R:
44738:
94­
0240.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
332
p.

43703103
Macy,
L.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Determination
of
the
Magnitude
of
Residues
on
Pistachios
Treated
with
Foliar
Applications
of
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS
of
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S23R:
44792:
94­
0158.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech,
Ltd.
246
p.

43716601
Singer,
G.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Pasture
Forage
and
Pasture
Hay
Resulting
From
Ground
Applications
of
the
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
94S43R:
44654:
94­
0329.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
American
Agricultural
Services,
Inc.
670
p.
116
43721001
Macy,
L.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Broccoli
Resulting
from
Ground
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1993):
Final
Study
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S05R:
44799:
94­
0051.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
and
Colorado
Analytical
&
Development
Corp.
301
p.

43786801
Macy,
L.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Determination
of
the
Magnitude
of
Residues
on
Almonds
Treated
with
Foliar
Applications
of
SEVIN
XLR
Brand
of
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S19R:
94­
0199:
94­
0200.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
and
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech,
Ltd.
279
p.

43786802
Lee,
R.
(1995)
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Cucurbit
Vegetable
Raw
Agricultural
Commodities:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44870:
US94S15R:
94­
0060.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
EN­
CAS
Analytical
Labs.
552
p.

43786803
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Determination
of
the
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Sunflower
Seeds
and
Forage
Treated
with
Foliar
Applications
of
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS
Brand
of
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44741:
US94S44R:
94­
0220.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group.
311
p.

43786804
Robinson,
P.;
Cappy,
J.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residue
in/
on
Dried
Beans:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
ML
95­
0514­
RHP:
44736:
US94S38R.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group.
341
p.

43786805
Pittman,
J.
(1995)
Radiovalidation
of
the
Method
No.
CARC­
0194
Revised
March
27,
1995:
"Carbaryl
Method
for
the
Determination
of
Residue
in
Crop
Samples
by
High
Performance
Liquid
Chromatography":
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
EC­
95­
308:
6295:
44789.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
107
p.

43786806
Mede,
K.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Cabbage
Resulting
from
Application
of
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS
(1993):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S06R:
94­
0059:
94­
0060.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
&
Development
Corp.
326
p.

43793201
Tew,
E.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Grapes
Resulting
from
Ground
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1994):
Final
Study
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44856:
US94S29R:
ML94­
0509­
RHP.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
349
p.

43793202
Ely,
C.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Stone
Fruit
(Cherry,
Peach,
and
Plum)
RAC
Resulting
from
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1994):
Final
Study
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44822:
US94S17R:
94­
0123.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
and
McKenzie
Labs,
Inc.
495
p.

43794901
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Sorghum:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S42R:
44739:
94/
0070.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group.
592
p.

43794902
Cappy,
J.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Soybean
and
Processed
Fractions
of
Soybean:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S33R:
44880:
1258/
US94S33R.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
&
Development
Corp.
296
p.
117
43794903
Mede,
K.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Mustard
Green
Resulting
from
Ground
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1993):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S07R:
44872:
1230/
US94S07R.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
&
Development
Corp.
291
p.

43802101
Hovis,
A.
(1995)
Sevin
XLR
Plus:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Citrus
(Orange,
Grapefruit,
Lemon):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44860:
US94S08R:
94­
0075.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
and
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech,
Ltd.
407
p.

43802102
Macy,
L.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Determination
of
the
Magnitude
of
Residues
on
Pecans
Treated
with
Foliar
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
Brand
of
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44871:
US94S32R:
94­
0209.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
and
EN­
CAS
Analytical
Labs.
303
p.

43802103
Mede,
K.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
the
Residues
in/
on
Rice
Resulting
from
Foliar
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1994):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44853:
US94S24R:
94­
0163.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
and
EN­
CAS
Analytical
Labs.
498
p.

43813601
Kowite,
W.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Root
and
Tuber
Crops
(Garden
Beets,
Carrots,
and
Turnips)
RAC
Resulting
from
Application
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
Insecticide
(1994):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S03R:
44883:
94­
0003
CA.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
&
Development
Corp.
and
Aventis
Ag
Co.
854
p.

43813602
Cappy,
J.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Wheat
and
Processed
Fractions
of
Wheat:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S36R:
44884:
94­
0218.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech,
Ltd.
and
Aventis
Ag
Co.
267
43813603
Macy,
L.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Processed
Rice
Fractions
Resulting
from
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1994):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S26R:
44889:
RP­
04­
95.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech,
Ltd.
and
Aventis
Ag
Co.
187
p.

43813604
Cappy,
J.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Grain
Sorghum
and
Processed
Fractions
of
Grain
Sorghum:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S35R:
44892:
94­
0217.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
and
Colorado
Analytical
Research
&
Development
Corp.
270
p.

43818901
Macy,
L.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Determination
of
the
Magnitude
of
Residues
on
Walnuts
Treated
with
Foliar
Applications
of
SEVIN
XLR
Plus
Brand
of
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94A31R:
94­
0204:
94­
0205.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
EN­
CAS
Analytical
Labs.
295
p.

43845205
Robinson,
P.
(1995)
Determination
of
the
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Sunflower
Seed
Processed
Fractions
Treated
with
Foliar
Applications
of
SEVIN
XLR
Plus
Brand
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
44735:
US94S37R:
94­
0219.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agri
Business
Group.
484
p.

43850901
Lee,
R.
(1995)
Sevin
XLR
Plus:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residue
in/
on
Cottonseed
and
Processed
Fractions
of
Cottonseed:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S25R:
44875:
94­
0162.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
390
p.
118
43850902
Shults,
J.
(1995)
Storage
Stability
of
Carbaryl
on
Frozen
Raw
Agricultural
Commodity
Substrates
and
Selected
Processing
Fractions:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S47R:
U:\
RHONE\
94S47RFR.
DOC.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
McKenzie
Labs,
Inc.
276
p.

43915201
Cappy,
J.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residue
in/
on
Field
Corn
and
Processed
Fractions
of
Field
Corn:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94S34R:
44944:
1272.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Rhone­
Poulenc
Ag
Co.
309
p.

43975601
Ely,
C.
(1996)
SEVIN
XLR
PLUS:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Wheat
Grain:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S10R:
45031:
95­
0126.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
315
p.

43982801
Lee,
R.
(1996)
Determination
of
the
Magnitude
of
Residues
on
Flax
Seed
and
Straw
Treated
with
Foliar
Applications
of
SEVIN
XLR
Plus
Brand
of
Carbaryl
Insecticide:
Final
Study
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S12R:
45045:
1278.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Agvise
Laboratories;
Agri
Business
Group;
and
Colorado
Analytical
Research
and
Development.
240
p.

43984701
Hovis,
A.
(1996)
Sevin
XLR
Plus:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Succulent
Beans:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S14R:
45044:
95­
0258.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
McKenzie
Labs,
Inc.;
Agri
Business
Group,
Inc.;
and
Aventis
Ag
Co.
273
p.

43996101
Macy,
L.
(1996)
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Tomatoes
Resulting
from
Foliar
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1995):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S05R:
95­
0149:
95­
0150.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
McKenzie
Laboratories.
323
p.

44019701
Macy,
L.
(1995)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Broccoli
Resulting
from
Ground
Applications
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
(1993):
Amended
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US94SO5R:
44799:
1231/
US94SO5R.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
and
Development
Corporation:
Aventis
Ag
Co.:
and
Agvise
Lab.
303
p.

44046101
Chancey,
E.
(1996)
Carbaryl
Residues
in
Processed
Peanut
Fractions:
Final
Study
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S03R:
45070:
95­
0161.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Texas
A&
M
University
Food
Protein
R&
D
Center
and
Colorado
Analytical
R&
D
Corp.
234
p.

44058001
Chancey,
E.
(1996)
Sevin
XLR
Plus:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Field
Corn
Raw
Agricultural
Commodities:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S01R:
45068:
95­
0117.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
and
Development
Corp.
and
Aventis
Ag
Co.
356
p.

44058101
Kowite,
W.
(1996)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
or
on
Sweet
Corn
RAC
Resulting
from
Application
of
Sevin
XLR
Plus
Insecticide
(1995):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S13R:
45099:
95­
0195.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
303
p.
Relates
to
L0000109.

44065901
Norris,
F.
(1996)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Rangeland
Forage
Resulting
from
an
Aerial
Application
of
Sevin
4­
Oil
ULV:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S02R:
45095:
95­
0037.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Diamond
Ag
Research;
Midwest
Research,
Inc.;
and
Agvise
Labs.,
Inc.
270
p.

44068401
Norris,
F.
(1996)
Carbaryl:
Freezer
Storage
Stability
of
Carbaryl
in/
on
Selected
Agricultural
Commodities:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S15R:
45112:
ML95­
0570­
RHP.
Unpublished
study
prepared
119
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
&
Development
Corp.;
Enviro­
Bio­
Tech,
Ltd.;
Morse
Laboratories,
Inc.
433
p.

44072901
Mede,
K.
(1996)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Pome
Fruit
Resulting
from
Foliar
Applications
of
SEVIN
XLR
Plus
(1995):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S06R:
45101:
95­
0141.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
McKenzie
Labs.
293
p.
(Relates
to
L0000110).

44114301
O'Neal,
S.;
Bentley,
W.
(1996)
Identification
of
the
Pyrolysis
Products
of
(carbon
14)
Carbaryl
in
Cigarette
Smoke:
(Final
Report):
Lab
Project
Number:
984:
1912:
EC­
95­
326.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
PTRL
East,
Inc.
128
p.

44123101
Dorschner,
K.
(1996)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Okra
Fruit
(Pods):
(Final
Report):
Lab
Project
Number:
05772:
PR
05772:
5772.95­
FL25.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
North
Carolina
State
University;
University
of
Florida;
and
USDA/
ARS
SARL.
436
p.

44145201
Dorschner,
K.
(1996)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
the
Residue
on
Prickly
Pear
Cactus
Fruit
and
Pads:
Lab
Project
Number:
5146:
05146:
PR
05146.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Herbicide
Science
Agriculture
Foundation
and
Food
and
Environmental
Toxicology
Lab.,
University
of
Florida.
261
p.

44155401
Nandihalli,
U.
(1996)
Independent
Laboratory
Validation
of
a
Method
for
the
Determination
of
Residues
of
Carbaryl
in
Crop
Samples:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
CHW
6224­
233:
45151:
11642.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Corning
Hazleton,
Inc.
71
p.

44211801
Ely,
C.
(1997)
Sevin
XLR
Plus:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Oranges
Grown
in
EPA
Region
10:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S11R:
45202:
1282.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
299
p.
(Relates
to
L0000142).

44250301
Hunt,
T.
(1997)
Sample
Storage
Intervals
and
Conditions
Data
to
Support
MRIDs
42883102,
42883103,
42883104:
(Magnitude
of
Residues
of
Carbaryl):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
45268.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
17
p.

44250901
Lee,
R.
(1997)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Milk
and
Tissues
of
Lactating
Dairy
Cows:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
96S06298:
45266:
96139B.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Southwest
Bio­
Labs,
Inc.;
Colorado
Analytical
Research
and
Development;
and
Aventis
Ag
Co.
1270
p.
(Relates
toL0000170).
{OPPTS
860.1480}.

44284701
Macy,
L.
(1997)
Sevin
80WSP:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Stone
Fruit
(Cherry,
Peach,
and
Plum)
RAC
in
California:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
96S10562:
45306:
10562­
01.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
372
p.

44286901
Ibrahim,
A.
(1997)
Carbaryl­­
Validation
of
Method
of
Analysis
for
Free
and
Conjugated
Carbaryl,
5,6­
Dihydro­
5,6­
dihydroxy
Carbaryl
and
5­
Methoxy­
6­
hydroxy
Carbaryl
in
Egg,
Milk,
Poultry,
and
Animal
Tissues:
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
EC­
96­
349:
45319:
45186.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
300
p.
{OPPTS
860.1340}
120
44286902
Curti,
J.;
Keller,
G.
(1997)
Independent
Laboratory
Validation
of
a
Method
for
the
Determination
of
Free
and
Conjugated
Carbaryl,
5,6­
Dihydro­
5,6­
dihydroxy
Carbaryl,
and
5­
Methoxy­
6­
hydroxy
Carbaryl
in
Egg,
Milk,
and
Beef
Liver:
Final
Report,
:
Lab
Project
Number:
6224­
237:
EC­
97­
365.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Covance
Labs,
Inc.
155
p.{
OPPTS
860.1340}

44286903
Ibrahim,
A.
(1997)
Method
of
Analysis
for
the
Determination
of
Free
and
Conjugated
Carbaryl,
5,6­
Dihydro­
5,6­
dihydroxy
Carbaryl,
and
5­
Methoxy­
6­
hydroxy
Carbaryl
and
Egg,
Milk,
Poultry
and
Animal
Tissues:
Revised:
Lab
Project
Number:
45321.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
40
p.

44303101
Lee,
R.
(1997)
Carbaryl
and
Its
Metabolites:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Milk
and
Tissues
of
Lactating
Dairy
Cows:
Storage
Stability
(Interim
Report):
Lab
Project
Number:
96S12035:
1292:
45132.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
and
Development
Corp.
448
p.

44321301
Mede,
K.
(1997)
Carbaryl:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in/
on
Olives
Resulting
from
Foliar
Applications
of
Sevin
80WSP
(1996):
Final
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
96S10561:
45324:
10561­
01.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Aventis
Ag
Co.
179
p.

44381901
Lee,
R.
(1997)
Carbaryl
and
Its
Metabolites:
Magnitude
of
Residues
in
Milk
and
Tissues
of
Lactating
Dairy
Cows
Storage
Stability:
Final
Study
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
45402:
96S12035:
Aventis
1292.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
and
Development,
Inc.
466
p.
{OPPTS
860.1380}

44412501
Ely,
C.
(1997)
Sevin
XLR
Plus:
Magnitude
of
Carbaryl
Residues
in/
on
Wheat
Grain:
Amended
Report:
Lab
Project
Number:
US95S10R:
45031:
95­
0126.
Unpublished
study
prepared
by
Colorado
Analytical
Research
&
Development
Corp.
and
Agvise
Labs.
359
p.
{OPPTS
860.1500}
