17631
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
69
/
Thursday,
April
10,
2003
/
Notices
k.
Description
of
Amendment:
The
Districts
request,
among
other
things,
pursuant
to
sections
4.200(
c)
and
4.202(
a)
of
the
Commission's
regulations
and
Public
Law
No.
106
 
343,
that
the
license
be
amended
to
extend
the
deadline
for
commencement
of
construction
to
March
26,
2005.
The
Districts
also
request
that
the
deadline
for
completion
of
construction
be
extended
to
March
26,
2007.
l.
The
filing
is
available
for
review
at
the
Commission
in
the
Public
Reference
Room
or
may
be
viewed
on
the
Commission's
Web
site
at
http://
www.
ferc.
fed.
gov
using
the
``
FERRIS''
link.
Enter
the
docket
number
excluding
the
last
three
digits
in
the
docket
number
field
to
access
the
document.
For
assistance,
call
toll­
free
1
 
866
 
208
 
3676
or
e­
mail
FERCOnlineSupport@
ferc.
gov.
For
TTY,
call
(
202)
502
 
8659.
A
copy
is
also
available
for
inspection
and
reproduction
at
the
address
in
item
h
above.
m.
Individuals
desiring
to
be
included
on
the
Commission's
mailing
list
should
so
indicate
by
writing
to
the
Secretary
of
the
Commission.
n.
Comments,
Protests,
or
Motions
to
Intervene
 
­
Anyone
may
submit
comments,
a
protest,
or
a
motion
to
intervene
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
Rules
of
Practice
and
Procedure,
18
CFR
385.210,
.211,
.214.
In
determining
the
appropriate
action
to
take,
the
Commission
will
consider
all
protests
or
other
comments
filed,
but
only
those
who
file
a
motion
to
intervene
in
accordance
with
the
Commission's
Rules
may
become
a
party
to
the
proceeding.
Any
comments,
protests,
or
motions
to
intervene
must
be
received
on
or
before
the
specified
comment
date
for
the
particular
application.
o.
Filing
and
Service
of
Responsive
Documents
 
­
Any
filings
must
bear
in
all
capital
letters
the
title
``
COMMENTS'',
``
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR
TERMS
AND
CONDITIONS'',
``
PROTEST'',
or
``
MOTION
TO
INTERVENE'',
as
applicable,
and
the
Project
Number
of
the
particular
application
to
which
the
filing
refers.
Any
of
the
above­
named
documents
must
be
filed
by
providing
an
original
and
eight
copies
to:
The
Secretary,
Federal
Energy
Regulatory
Commission,
888
First
Street,
NE.,
Washington,
DC
20426.
A
copy
of
any
motion
to
intervene
must
also
be
served
upon
each
representative
of
the
Applicant
specified
in
the
particular
application.
Comments,
protests,
and
motions
to
intervene
may
be
filed
electronically
via
the
Internet
in
lieu
of
paper;
see
18
CFR
385.2001(
a)(
1)(
iii)
and
the
instructions
on
the
Commission's
Web
site
under
the
``
e­
filing''
link.
The
Commission
strongly
encourages
electronic
filings.
p.
Agency
Comments
 
­
Federal,
state,
and
local
agencies
are
invited
to
file
comments
on
the
described
application.
A
copy
of
the
application
may
be
obtained
by
agencies
directly
from
the
Applicant.
If
an
agency
does
not
file
comments
within
the
time
specified
for
filing
comments,
it
will
be
presumed
to
have
no
comments.
One
copy
of
an
agency's
comments
must
also
be
sent
to
the
Applicant's
representatives.

Magalie
R.
Salas,
Secretary.
[
FR
Doc.
03
 
8772
Filed
4
 
9
 
03;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6717
 
01
 
P
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
[
OEI
 
2003
 
0003,
FRL
 
7479
 
7]

Agency
Information
Collection
Activities:
Continuing
Collection;
Comment
Request;
Confidentiality
Rules
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).
ACTION:
Notice.

SUMMARY:
In
compliance
with
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
(
44
U.
S.
C.
3501
et
seq.),
this
document
announces
that
EPA
is
planning
to
submit
the
following
continuing
Information
Collection
Request
(
ICR)
to
the
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB):
Confidentiality
Rules,
EPA
ICR
No.
1665.06,
OMB
Control
No.
2020
 
0003,
expiration
date
September
30,
2003.
Before
submitting
the
ICR
to
OMB
for
review
and
approval,
EPA
is
soliciting
comments
on
specific
aspects
of
the
proposed
information
collection
as
described
below.
DATES:
Comments
must
be
submitted
on
or
before
June
9,
2003.
ADDRESSES:
Follow
the
detailed
instructions
in
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Alan
D.
Margolis,
Collection
Stategies
Division,
Office
of
Information
Collection
(
2822T),
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
1200
Pennsylvania
Ave.,
NW.,
Washington,
DC
20460;
telephone
number:
202
 
566
 
1644;
fax
number:
202
 
566
 
1639;
e­
mail
address:
margolis.
alan@
epa.
gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:
EPA
has
established
a
public
docket
for
this
ICR
under
Docket
ID
number
OEI
 
2003
 
0003,
which
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
OEI
Docket
in
the
EPA
Docket
Center
(
EPA/
DC),
EPA
West,
Room
B102,
1301
Constitution
Ave.,
NW.,
Washington,
DC.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566
 
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
OEI
Docket
is
(
202)
566
 
1752;
FAX
(
202)
566
 
1753.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA
Dockets
(
EDOCKET)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.
Use
EDOCKET
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
draft
collection
of
information,
submit
or
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
Once
in
the
system,
select
``
search,''
then
key
in
the
docket
ID
number
identified
above.
Any
comments
related
to
this
ICR
should
be
submitted
to
EPA
within
60
days
of
this
notice,
and
according
to
the
following
detailed
instructions:
submit
your
comments
to
EPA
online
using
EDOCKET
(
our
preferred
method),
by
email
to
oei.
docket@
epa.
gov,
or
by
mail
to:
EPA
Docket
Center,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
OEI
Docket,
(
28221T),
1200
Pennsylvania
Ave.,
NW.,
Washington,
DC
20460.
EPA's
policy
is
that
public
comments,
whether
submitted
electronically
or
in
paper,
will
be
made
available
for
public
viewing
in
EDOCKET
as
EPA
receives
them
and
without
change,
unless
the
comment
contains
copyrighted
material,
confidential
business
information
(
CBI),
or
other
information
whose
public
disclosure
is
restricted
by
statute.
When
EPA
identifies
a
comment
containing
copyrighted
material,
EPA
will
provide
a
reference
to
that
material
in
the
version
of
the
comment
that
is
placed
in
EDOCKET.
The
entire
printed
comment,
including
the
copyrighted
material,
will
be
available
in
the
public
docket.
Although
identified
as
an
item
in
the
official
docket,
information
claimed
as
CBI,
or
whose
disclosure
is
otherwise
restricted
by
statute,
is
not
included
in
the
official
public
docket,
and
will
not
be
available
for
public
viewing
in
EDOCKET.
For
further
information
about
the
electronic
docket,
see
EPA's
Federal
Register
notice
describing
the
electronic
docket
at
67
FR
38102
(
May
31,
2002),
or
go
to
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.
Affected
entities:
Entities
potentially
affected
by
this
action
are
those
who
characterize
the
information
they
provide
to
EPA
as
CBI.

VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
19:
08
Apr
09,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00036
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
10APN1.
SGM
10APN1
17632
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
69
/
Thursday,
April
10,
2003
/
Notices
Title:
Confidentiality
Rules,
OMB
Control
Number
2020
 
0003;
EPA
ICR
Number
1665.06,
expiring
9/
30/
2003.
Abstract:
EPA
administers
a
number
of
environmental
protection
statutes
(
e.
g.,
the
Clean
Water
Act;
the
Clean
Air
Act;
the
Toxic
Substances
Control
Act;
the
Resource
Conservation
and
Recovery
Act;
and
the
Comprehensive
Environmental
Response,
Compensation,
and
Liability
Act),
under
which
the
Agency
collects
information
from
thousands
of
facilities
in
many
economic
sectors.
In
addition,
businesses
submit
information
to
EPA
without
the
Agency
requesting
it.
The
information
addresses
topics
such
as
toxic
chemicals,
industrial
processes,
waste
streams,
and
regulatory
compliance.
In
many
cases,
businesses
that
submit
information
claim
it
as
CBI.
EPA
established
the
procedures
described
in
40
CFR
part
2,
subparts
A
and
B,
to
protect
the
confidentiality
of
information
as
well
as
the
rights
of
the
public
to
obtain
access
to
information
under
the
Freedom
of
Information
Act
(
FOIA).
In
accordance
with
these
regulations,
when
EPA
finds
it
necessary
to
make
a
final
confidentiality
determination
(
e.
g.,
in
response
to
a
FOIA
request
or
in
the
course
of
rulemaking
or
litigation)
or
an
advance
confidentiality
determination,
it
notifies
the
affected
business
by
sending
a
letter
requesting
substantiation
of
the
confidentiality
claim.
This
letter
provides
the
affected
business
with
an
opportunity
to
submit
comments
(
i.
e.,
a
substantiation).
This
ICR
relates
to
the
collection
of
information
that
will
assist
EPA
in
determining
whether
previously
submitted
information
is
entitled
to
confidential
treatment.
EPA
is
proposing
to
use
an
updated
Request
for
Substantiation
letter
(``
proposed
letter'').
The
proposed
letter
consists
of
two
samples
to
address
separate
factual
situations:
Sample
Letter
A
and
Sample
Letter
B.
The
use
of
two
letters
is
a
clarification
of
existing
EPA
procedures.
Some
of
the
information
requested
differs
slightly
from
the
current
Request
for
Substantiation
letter,
concerning
the
possible
voluntary
nature
of
the
submission
and
the
issue
of
substantial
competitive
harm,
and
takes
into
account
the
vast
amount
of
information
now
available
electronically.
Nevertheless,
EPA
estimates
that
the
overall
burden
is
the
same.
The
proposed
letter
would
apply
to
any
context
where
a
final
confidentiality
determination
is
needed,
either
in
response
to
FOIA
requests
or
in
other
situations
(
e.
g.,
where
EPA
is
making
information
public
to
support
rulemakings),
or
in
the
case
of
an
advance
confidentiality
determination.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15.
EPA
is
soliciting
comments
to:
(
i)
Evaluate
whether
the
proposed
collection
of
information
is
necessary
for
the
proper
performance
of
the
functions
of
the
agency,
including
whether
the
information
will
have
practical
utility;
(
ii)
Evaluate
the
accuracy
of
the
agency's
estimate
of
the
burden
of
the
proposed
collection
of
information,
including
the
validity
of
the
methodology
and
assumptions
used;
(
iii)
Enhance
the
quality,
utility,
and
clarity
of
the
information
to
be
collected;
and
(
iv)
Minimize
the
burden
of
the
collection
of
information
on
those
who
are
to
respond,
including
through
the
use
of
appropriate
automated
electronic,
mechanical,
or
other
technological
collection
techniques
or
other
forms
of
information
technology,
e.
g.,
permitting
electronic
submission
of
responses.
Current
Burden
Statement:
EPA
estimates
that
in
response
to
the
procedures
outlined
in
40
CFR
part
2,
subpart
B,
the
Agency
would
notify
543
businesses
annually
and
provide
them
with
an
opportunity
to
submit
comments
explaining
why
previously
submitted
information
should
be
treated
as
confidential.
Of
the
543
businesses,
EPA
estimates
that
approximately
443
industries
would
respond
by
submitting
substantiations.
The
Agency
estimates
that
it
takes
industry
approximately
14
hours
and
$
464.43
in
labor
costs
to
prepare
and
submit
each
substantiation;
or
a
total
of
6,202
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
205,742.49
in
labor
for
all
443
substantiations.
For
those
100
businesses
that
do
not
submit
substantiations,
they
are
still
likely
to
spend
approximately
1
hour
at
a
cost
of
$
32.04
in
labor
to
review
EPA's
notice,
examine
the
information
in
question,
and
make
a
decision
not
to
respond;
or
a
total
of
100
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
3,204.00
in
labor
costs
for
reviewing
and
deciding
not
to
respond
in
100
cases.
The
total
burden
on
industry
to
review
and,
if
desired,
respond
to
543
EPA
substantiation
requests
is
6,302
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
208,946.49
in
labor.
In
addition,
when
EPA
utilizes
the
services
of
contractors/
subcontractors
under
the
authority
of
40
CFR
part
2,
subpart
B,
all
contractor/
subcontractor
employees
who
may
be
given
access
to
confidential
information
must
first
sign
confidentiality
agreements
stating
that
they
will
honor
the
terms
of
the
contract/
subcontract
which
requires
the
protection
of
CBI.
Contractor/
subcontractor
businesses
must
maintain
a
file
of
all
such
agreements.
EPA
estimates
that
there
are
about
129
contractor/
subcontractor
businesses
that
handle
CBI
in
connection
with
their
work
for
EPA
each
year.
These
129
contractor/
subcontractor
businesses
together
have
a
total
of
approximately
658
employees
who
must
sign
confidentiality
agreements
each
year.
Each
employee
would
need
approximately
0.1
hour
to
review
and
sign
an
agreement,
at
a
cost
of
$
3.34
in
labor;
employees'
review
and
signature
of
all
agreements
would
require
approximately
65.8
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
2,197.72
in
labor
per
year.
In
addition,
each
subcontractor/
contractor
business
would
need
approximately
0.5
hour
at
a
cost
of
$
8.07
in
labor
per
year
to
maintain
a
file
of
employee
confidentiality
agreements;
the
129
contractor/
subcontractor
businesses
together
would
require
a
total
of
64.5
hours
at
a
labor
cost
of
$
1,041.03
to
maintain
a
file
of
confidentiality
agreements.
The
total
burden
for
signing
and
maintaining
confidentiality
agreements
would
thus
be
130.3
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
3,238.75.
The
overall
burden
for
handling
confidentiality
claims
 
including
the
substantiation
process
and
the
signing
and
maintaining
of
confidentiality
agreements
 
would
be
6,432.3
hours
at
a
total
labor
cost
of
$
212,185.24
per
year.
EPA
estimates
that
no
capital
costs
or
operation
and
maintenance
costs
would
be
incurred
as
a
result
of
this
information
collection.
EPA
is
soliciting
the
following
additional
information
to
assist
in
its
assessment
of
the
Agency's
burden
statement:
1.
How
many
substantiation
requests
do
you
receive
from
EPA
per
year?
How
many
CBI
substantiations
do
you
submit
per
year
in
response?
2.
What
is
the
average
number,
type,
and
level
of
staff
involved
in
preparing
a
substantiation
of
CBI
claims?
3.
What
is
the
average
number
of
hours
per
staff
type
and
level
required
to
prepare
a
substantiation
of
CBI
claims?
How
does
this
hour
estimate
breakdown
by
the
following
activities:
a.
Read/
review
EPA's
substantiation
request.
b.
Review
information
claimed
confidential.
c.
Prepare
substantiation.
4.
What
is
the
average
wage
per
hour
for
each
staff
type
and
level
involved
in
preparing
substantiations?

VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
19:
08
Apr
09,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00037
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
10APN1.
SGM
10APN1
17633
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
69
/
Thursday,
April
10,
2003
/
Notices
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

Dated:
April
2,
2003.
Mark
Luttner,
Director,
Office
of
Information
Collection.
[
FR
Doc.
03
 
8827
Filed
4
 
9
 
03;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
P
FEDERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[
DA
03
 
638]

ITFS,
MDS,
and
MMDS
Pending
Legal
Matters
AGENCY:
Federal
Communications
Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.

SUMMARY:
In
this
document
the
Wireless
Telecommunications
Bureau
(
WTB)
has
released
two
lists,
the
first
contains
legal
matters
with
a
filing
date
prior
to
March
25,
2002
where
the
applicant/
licensee
(
or
petitioner,
if
the
petitioner
is
not
the
applicant
or
licensee)
did
not
respond
to
the
October
Public
Notice.
Accordingly,
any
items
on
the
first
list
are
dismissed
with
prejudice.
The
second
list
contains
all
the
current
pending
legal
matters
that
are
in
WTB's
records
in
the
Instructional
Television
Fixed
Service
(
ITFS),
the
Multipoint
Distribution
Service
(
MDS),
and
the
Multichannel
Multipoint
Distribution
Service
(
MMDS).
This
Public
Notice
ensures
that
the
WTB
has
a
complete
and
accurate
listing
of
all
pending
legal
matters
in
the
ITFS,
the
MDS,
and
the
MMDS,
which
will
enable
the
WTB
to
act
on
these
pending
legal
matters.
ADDRESSES:
Federal
Communications
Commission,
445
12th
Street,
SW.,
TW
 
A325,
Washington,
DC
20554.
FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Gregory
Vadas,
Esq.,
Policy
and
Rules
Branch,
at
(
202)
418
 
0680.
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:
This
is
a
summary
of
the
Commission's
Public
Notice,
DA
03
 
638,
released
on
March
18,
2002.
The
full
text
of
this
document
is
available
for
inspection
and
copying
during
normal
business
hours
in
the
Federal
Communications
Commission
Reference
Center,
445
12th
Street,
SW.,
Washington,
DC
20554.
The
complete
text
may
be
purchased
from
the
Federal
Communications
Commission's
copy
contractor,
Qualex
International,
445
12th
Street,
SW.,
Room
CY
 
B402,
Washington,
DC
20554.
The
full
text
may
also
be
downloaded
at:
http://
www.
fcc.
gov.
Alternative
formats
are
available
to
persons
with
disabilities
by
contacting
Brian
Millin
at
(
202)
418
 
7426
or
TTY
(
202)
418
 
7365
or
at
bmillin@
fcc.
gov.
1.
On
October
18,
2002,
the
Wireless
Telecommunications
Bureau
(
WTB)
released
a
Public
Notice
(
October
Public
Notice)
in
which
it
sought
to
ensure
that
it
had
a
complete
and
accurate
listing
of
all
pending
legal
matters
in
the
Instructional
Television
Fixed
Service
(
ITFS),
the
Multipoint
Distribution
Service
(
MDS),
and
the
Multichannel
Multipoint
Distribution
Service
(
MMDS).
An
Appendix
(
October
Appendix)
containing
a
list
of
all
of
the
pending
ITFS,
MDS,
and
MMDS
cases
was
attached
to
the
October
Public
Notice.
The
October
Appendix
indicated
the
name
of
the
applicant/
licensee,
the
file
number/
call
sign,
the
pleading
type
and
filing
date,
the
name
of
the
petitioner,
if
not
the
applicant,
and
whether
the
file
was
complete.
WTB
required
that
all
ITFS,
MDS,
and
MMDS
licensees,
applicants,
and
other
parties
with
pending
pleadings
relating
to
these
services
review
and
verify
the
information
contained
in
the
October
Appendix.
For
legal
matters
with
a
filing
date
before
March
25,
2002,
WTB
required
that
licensees,
applicants,
and
other
parties
with
pending
pleadings
respond
in
writing
by
December
17,
2002
if
they
desired
that
WTB
continue
processing
these
matters.
2.
Appendix
A
to
this
Public
Notice
contains
a
list
of
those
legal
matters
with
a
filing
date
prior
to
March
25,
2002
where
the
applicant/
licensee
(
or
petitioner,
if
the
petitioner
is
not
the
applicant
or
licensee)
did
not
respond
to
the
October
Public
Notice.
In
the
October
Public
Notice,
WTB
indicated,
``
For
any
legal
matter
for
which
written
affirmations
requesting
further
processing
have
not
been
received,
those
legal
matters
will
be
dismissed
with
prejudice.''
Accordingly,
it
is
ordered,
pursuant
to
section
4(
i)
of
the
Communications
Act
of
1934,
as
amended,
47
U.
S.
C.
154(
i)
and
sections
21.28(
d)
and
73.3568(
a)(
1)
of
the
Commission's
Rules,
47
CFR
21.28
(
d),
73.3568(
a)(
1),
the
legal
matters
listed
in
Appendix
A
to
this
Public
Notice
are
hereby
dismissed
with
prejudice.
3.
WTB
also
requested
petitioners
of
legal
matters
pending
before
the
Bureau
to
review
the
list
of
pending
matters
in
the
October
Appendix.
If
a
pending
matter
was
omitted
from
the
October
Appendix,
WTB
required
petitioners
to
submit
two
date­
stamped
copies
of
the
omitted
petition
or
filing
by
December
17,
2002
if
the
petitioner
desired
to
continue
prosecuting
the
filing.
After
our
review
of
these
files,
we
have
determined
that
the
cases
listed
in
Appendix
B
to
this
Public
Notice
are
all
the
valid
pending
legal
matters
that
are
contained
in
WTB's
records.
4.
With
respect
to
other
requests
to
add
legal
matters
to
its
list
of
pending
legal
matters,
the
WTB
notes
that
in
many
instances,
the
respondent,
but
not
the
petitioner,
submitted
legal
matters.
In
those
cases,
we
are
not
adding
those
matters
to
our
list
of
pending
legal
matters
because
the
petitioner
did
not
express
interest
in
prosecuting
the
matter.

Federal
Communications
Commission.
Marlene
H.
Dortch,
Secretary.

Applicant/
licensee
File
No./
call
sign
Petitioner
(
if
not
applicant)
Filing
date
Pleading
type
Alda
Gold,
Inc
........................
BPMD
 
9551382
.....................
................................................
3/
28/
97
...........
Petition
for
Reconsideration.
Alda
Gold,
Inc
........................
BPMD
 
9551384
.....................
................................................
3/
28/
97
...........
Petition
for
Reconsideration.
Alda
Gold,
Inc
........................
BPMD
 
9551386
.....................
................................................
3/
28/
97
...........
Petition
for
Reconsideration.
Alda
Gold,
Inc
........................
WHJ902
.................................
................................................
3/
28/
97
...........
Petition
for
Reconsideration.
Alda
Gold,
Inc
........................
WHK656
.................................
................................................
3/
28/
97
...........
Petition
for
Reconsideration.
Alda
Gold,
Inc
........................
WNTL436
...............................
................................................
3/
28/
97
...........
Petition
for
Reconsideration.
Atlantic
MicroSystems,
Inc
.....
BMDP960510FG
....................
................................................
6/
17/
96
...........
Petition
to
Deny.
Bookcliff
Christian
School
......
951020TS
..............................
................................................
6/
16/
97
...........
Informal
Complaint.
Bridgewater
College
..............
BPLIF
 
93123OEX
.................
................................................
2/
26/
96
...........
Petition
for
Reconsideration.
Burlington
College
.................
911008DX
..............................
Ascutney
Associates,
Inc
.......
1/
3/
92
.............
Petition
to
Deny.

VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
19:
50
Apr
09,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00038
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
10APN1.
SGM
10APN1
