	SF-83 SUPPORTING STATEMENT

	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	

NESHAP for Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing 

(40 CFR part 63, subpart LLLLL)  (Renewal)

1.  Identification of the Information Collection

1(a)  Title of the Information Collection

NESHAP for Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing (40 CFR
part 63, subpart LLLLL) (Renewal)

1(b)  Short Characterization/Abstract

The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
for Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing were proposed
on   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 January 10, 1989, and promulgated on November
20, 1990 (55 FR 48414).  These standards apply to new and existing
facilities that manufacture asphalt roofing products or oxidized asphalt
that are major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), or are
collocated at major sources.  This information is being collected to
assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart LLLLL. 

Owners and operators of affected sources are subject to the monitoring,
recordkeeping and reporting requirements of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A,
the General Provisions, unless specified otherwise in the regulation. 
This rule requires sources to submit initial notifications, conduct
performance tests if the source is using an add-on control device, and
submit periodic compliance reports.  In addition, sources are required
to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any start-up,
shutdown, or malfunction in the operation if using an add-on control
device; any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative;
parametric monitoring data; system maintenance and calibration; and work
practices to demonstrate initial and ongoing compliance with the
regulation.  

In the development of this Information Collection Request (ICR), we
reviewed the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Terms of Clearance
(TOC) section on the active ICR. There are no TOC.

There is an average of 24 respondents per year over the next three years
of this ICR.  We have determined that approximately 22 of 135 existing
asphalt processing and asphalt roofing manufacturing source categories,
including 9 petroleum refineries that process asphalt, are estimated to
be potential major sources subject to the NESHAP subpart LLLLL
requirements.  In addition, we have assumed that one new facility per
year will become subject to this regulation.  This information was
confirmed with the rule lead addressing this source category at the
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), information
available in the active ICR, EPA database for the Clean Air Program, and
existing background information on the industry gathered during rule
development.  

2.  Need for and Use of the Collection

2(a)  Need/Authority for the Collection

The Clean Air Act (CAA) provides authority to the Agency to establish
standards to control air pollution and to ensure compliance with
promulgated regulations through adequate recordkeeping and reporting by
the affected industries (i.e., respondents).  The regulations include
the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) under section 111 of the
Act, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (
NESHAP) which includes the original NESHAP standards and the more recent
Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) or NESHAP-MACT standards
under section 112 of the Act, and emission guidelines for the designated
types incinerators under section 129 of the CAA.

2(b)  Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standards are used
by regulatory agencies, the public and the regulated community for a
variety of reasons including the determination of the respondent’s
compliance status, analytical studies to demonstrate compliance trends,
and evaluations regarding the efficacy of the promulgated regulations.

The required recordkeeping and reporting are also used to: 1) certify
compliance with the regulations; 2) determine the respondent’s
compliance with the designated emission limitations; 

3) notify regulatory agencies when a standard is violated; 4) evaluate
continuous compliance through the use of emission or operational
parameter monitors; and 5) ensure that plant personnel are following the
required procedures and are periodically trained, as indicated.

3.  Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

3(a)  Nonduplication

The standards do not require duplication in the collection and reporting
of information.  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the
information is sent directly to the appropriate Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) regional office.  Otherwise, the information is sent
directly to the delegated state or local agency.  If a state or local
agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal
standards, a copy of the report submitted to the state or local agency
can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the
Federal standards.

 

3(b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR
was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 24020) on May 6, 2005.  No
comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register.

3(c)  Consultations

It is our policy to carefully review any comments received since the
last ICR renewal including those submitted in response to the first
federal register notice and respond appropriately.  In this case, no
comments were received.  The Agency’s internal industry experts have
been consulted.  The Agency’s internal data sources and any
projections of industry growth over the next three years have also been
considered.

The primary source of information as reported by industry, in compliance
with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the
AFS (Air Facility Subsystem) which is operated and maintained by EPA's
Office of Compliance.  AFS is EPA’s database for the collection,
maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data.  Approximately 22
respondents are currently subject to the regulation, and our
consultations with Agency industry experts regarding the growth rate for
the industry indicated that an additional one respondent per year will
become subject to the regulation over the next three years.

It should be noted that the respondents, the industry trade
associations, including the Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association
(ARMA), and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to
comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being
developed and the standard has been previously reviewed to determine the
minimum information needed for compliance purposes. 

  

3(d)  Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of
assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. 
Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful
techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are
applied and emission limitations are met.  If the information required
by these standards was collected less frequently, the proper operation
and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility of detecting
violations would be less likely.

3(e)  General Guidelines

Neither the reporting nor recordkeeping requirements violate the
regulations established by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) at 5
CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.  However, most NESHAP standards and a few
NSPS standards require records to be kept more than three years.  In
general, these standards require the respondents to maintain all
records, including reports and notifications, for five years.  The
five-year record retention requirement is consistent with the permit
program at 40 CFR part 70, and the five-year statute of limitations on
which the permit program is based.  

The retention of records for five years allows EPA to establish the
compliance history of the respondent for purposes of determining the
appropriate level of enforcement action.  Historically, EPA notes that
the most flagrant violations have extended beyond a five-year period. If
records are retained for less than five years, EPA would be deterred
from pursuing the most flagrant violations due to the destruction of
records documenting noncompliance.

3(f)  Confidentiality

Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency
policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart B -
Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902,
September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR
42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3(g)  Sensitive Questions

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements do not contain sensitive
questions.

4.  The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a)  Respondents/SIC Codes

The Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes and corresponding
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes for the
respondents are listed below. 



Category	SIC 

code	NAICS code	Examples of regulated entities

Asphalt Felts and Coatings	2952 	324122	Asphalt Shingle and Coating
Materials Manufacturing

Petroleum Refining	2911	32411	Petroleum Refineries



This table is not meant to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding the entities likely to be regulated by this
standard.  To determine whether the standard applies to a particular
entity, review the applicability provisions in the standard.

4(b)  Information Requested

(i)  Data Items

Notification Reports

Initial notification requirements	63.9(b)(1)

Notification of compliance status when a source becomes subject to the
standard	63.9(h), 63.5755(a)

Notification that source is subject to special compliance requirements,
if applicable	63.9(d)

Notification of performance test   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	63.7(b),
63.9(e), 63.5755(a)

Rescheduled of performance test	63.7(b)(2)

Demonstration of continuous monitoring system	63.9(g), 63.5755(a)

Change in information already provided	63.9(j)

Request for an extension of compliance with relevant standard	63.9(c)



Reports

Application for approval of the construction or reconstruction of a new
major affected source, or reconstruction of a major affected source
63.5(6)(d)

Performance test results	63.10(d)(2),

63.5755

Startup, shutdown and malfunction plan	63.6(e)(3), 63.5758(d)

Periodic startup, shutdown and malfunction reports	63.10(d)(5)(i),
63.5758

Progress reports for compliance extension (if applicable)	63.6(i)  SEQ
CHAPTER \h \r 1 

Semiannual compliance reports 	63.5758(b-c)



	A source must keep the following records:

Recordkeeping

Startup, shutdown and malfunction plan	63.6(e)(3), 63.8694(a)(2)

All reports and notifications	63.10(b)(1), 63.8694(a)(1)

Records of startup, shutdown, and malfunction of process equipment
63.10(b)(2)(i), (iv), (v), 63.8694(a)(2)

Records of malfunctions of air pollution control equipment
63.10(b)(2)(ii)

Any applicability determination that demonstrates why owner or operator
believes source is unaffected	63.10(b)(3)

Records of maintenance of air pollution control equipment
63.10(b)(2)(iii)

Records of performance tests, performance evaluations, and opacity and
visible emissions observations	63.10(b)(2)(viii),  63.8694(a)(3),
63.8694(b), 63.6(h)(6)

Five-year retention of records	63.10(b)(1),   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 

63.8695(c)



	Electronic Reporting

Some respondents use monitoring equipment that automatically records
parameter data.  Although personnel at the affected facility must
evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the
burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at the plant site.

Also regulatory agencies, in cooperation with the respondents, continue
to create reporting systems to transmit data electronically.  However,
electronic reporting systems are still not widely used.  At this time,
it is estimated that approximately 25 percent of the respondents use
electronic reporting.

(ii)  Respondent Activities	

Respondent Activities

Read instructions.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and
utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting,
validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of disclosing and providing information.

Adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.



Regulatory agencies, to the extent possible, are relying more on
automated techniques such as electronic submissions of reports, and are
improving their tracking systems and database systems to enhance the use
of these techniques.  However, electronic reporting systems are still 

not widely used.  At this time, it is estimated that approximately 25
percent of the respondents use electronic reporting.

5.  The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology, and Information Management

5(a)  Agency Activities 

EPA conducts one or more of the following activities in connection with
the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required
information.

Agency Activities

Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if
necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports,
and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the Air Facility System (AFS).



5(b)  Collection Methodology and Management

The required data and reports can be evaluated on-site by conducting a
partial compliance evaluation, full compliance evaluation or inspection,
or thru an off-site review of compliance monitoring records and reports.
 Evaluation reports and inspection results are maintained by the Agency
or delegated authority.

The results of these evaluations are entered into the Air Facility
Subsystem (AFS) which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of
Compliance.  AFS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance,
and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial
and government-owned facilities.  EPA uses the AFS for tracking air
pollution compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory
agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters.  EPA and delegated
authorities can retrieve and analyze the data.

5(c)  Small Entity Flexibility

Over 65 percent of the existing facilities subject to this NESHAP are
classified as small businesses according to the Small Business
Administration (SBA) size standards and NAICS code, as one with 100 to
500 employees or $5 million or less in annual sales.  

However, the impact on small businesses was accounted for in the
regulation development.  The Agency has minimized the information
collection burden by reducing the recordkeeping and reporting
requirements to include only the information needed to determine
compliance with the asphalt processing and roofing NESHAP.  The asphalt
processing and roofing NESHAP is applicable only to major source
facilities.  

Additionally, we have limited the monitoring, record keeping and
reporting requirements for all facilities, including those owned by
small businesses, to the minimum necessary to ensure compliance.  

5(d)  Collection Schedule

The specific frequency for each information collection activity within
this request is shown in Table 1, attached.

6.  Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry. 
The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings
believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.  Where appropriate, the specific tasks and major
assumptions have been identified when calculating the burden.  Responses
to this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB Control Number.

6(a)  Estimating Respondent Burden

The respondent burden is shown in Table 1.  The labor hours in Table 1
are based on Agency studies and background documents from the
development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the
standard, the previously approved ICR, and any comments received.

6(b)  Estimating Respondent Costs

(i)  Estimating Labor Costs 

 

This ICR uses the following labor rates: 

Managerial	$100.99 ($48.09 + 110%)   

Technical	$87.97   ($41.89 + 110%)

Clerical	$43.81   ($20.86 + 110%)

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, December, 2005, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by
occupational and industry group.  The rates are from column 1, Total
compensation.  The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account
for the benefit packages available to those employed by private
industry.

	

(ii)  Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs

The annual burden for respondent activities includes labor costs and
operating and maintenance (O&M) costs.  The asphalt processing and
roofing NESHAP does not require any capital/startup costs.  The
capital/startup costs are one-time costs when a facility becomes subject
to the regulation.  We have assumed that all of the facilities have or
will obtain add-on control devices that are already equipped with
continuous parameter monitoring equipment. This monitoring equipment is
required not only for compliance purposes but also to operate the
control equipment.  

The annual operation and maintenance cost for this ICR is $25,407 which
includes contractor costs for initial performance tests of add-on
control devices and other costs such as file storage, photocopying and
postage.  Photocopying and postage costs are incurred when reports
required by the rule are submitted to regulatory agencies.  These costs
were estimated to be $7.50 per report.  The annual average cost of
photocopying and postage is expected to be $406.50.   Based on
information gathered during rule development, the estimated contractor
cost for initial performance tests of a PM control device, using EPA
Method 5A, is $7,000; and for initial performance tests of a thermal
oxidizer, using EPA Method 25A, is $25,000.  We have assumed that all
existing respondents have conducted performance test.  We have further
assumed that new respondents will be conducting an initial performance
test for one add-on control device, a thermal oxidizer.  The annual
average contractor cost for performance testing for the three years
covered by this ICR was estimated to be $25,000.

(iii)  Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

The annual burden for respondent includes labor costs and operating and
maintenance (O&M) costs.  The asphalt processing and roofing NESHAP does
not require any capital/startup costs.  This is based on the assumption
that all existing sources are in compliance with initial rule
requirements and the assumption that the monitoring devices are integral
parts of the control devices necessary to determine whether these are
operating properly.  The annual operation and maintenance costs include
contractor costs for initial performance tests of add-on control devices
and other costs such as file storage, photocopying and postage.  These
costs are shown on the OMB 83-I form.

As discussed in Section 6(b)(iii), there are no total capital/startup
costs for this ICR, as shown on the OMB 83-I form in block 14(a), Total
annualized capital/startup costs.  The total operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs for this ICR is $25,407 (rounded) which is shown on the OMB
83-I form in block 14(b), Total annual costs (O&M).  The total
annualized respondent costs over the next three years of the ICR is
shown in block 14 (c), Total annualized cost requested.  This has been
calculated as the addition of the capital/startup costs and the annual
operation and maintenance costs.  The numbers in block 14 of the OMB
83-I form are rounded to show the cost in thousands of dollars.

6(c)  Estimating Agency Burden and Costs

The only costs to the Agency are those associated with analysis of the
reported information.  EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program
includes activities such as the examination of records maintained by the
respondents and the publication and distribution of collected
information. 

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is
$19,767, which is shown in Table 2, attached.

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

Managerial	$56.02  (GS-13, Step 5, $35.01 x 1.6)

Technical	$41.57  (GS-12, Step 1, $25.98 x 1.6)

Clerical	$22.50  (GS-6, Step 3, $14.06 x 1.6)

These rates from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2005 General
Schedule which excludes locality rates of pay.

6(d)  Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

Number of respondents is calculated using the following table which
addresses the three years covered by this ICR.



Number of Respondents



	

Respondents That Submit Reports	

Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports	





Year	

(A)

Number of New Respondents 1	

(B)

Number of Existing Respondents	

(C)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records but Do Not Submit
Reports	

(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents	

(E)

Number of Respondents

(E=A+B+C-D)



1	

1	

22	

0	

0	

23



2	

1	

23	

0	

0	

24



3	

1	

24	

0	

0	

25



Average	

1	

23	

0	

0	

24

1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and
modified affected facilities.  

To avoid double-counting respondents column D is subtracted.  The
average Number of Respondents over the three-year period of this ICR is
shown in column D.  This number appears on the OMB 83-I form in block
13(a), Number of respondents. 

The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the
following table: 

Total Annual Responses



(A)

Information Collection Activity	

(B)

Number of Respondents	

(C)

Number of Responses	

(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit
Reports	

(E)

Total Annual Responses 

E=(BxC)+D



Notification of compliance status	

1	

1	

0	

1



Notification/application  of  construction	

1	

1

	

0	

1



Notification of actual startup 	

1	

1	

0	

1



Notification of performance test and test plan	

1	

1	

0	

1



Report of performance test results 	

1	

1.2	

0	

1.2



Report of semiannual compliance reports   	

24	

2	

0	

48



Report of startup, shutdown, malfunction 	

1	

1	

0	

1



Total	

	

	

	

54.2

The number of Total Annual Responses, 54 (rounded), is shown in column
E.  This number is shown on the OMB 83-I form in block 13(b), Total
annual responses.

The Total Hours Requested, 12,017 (rounded), is shown on the OMB 83-I
form in block 13(c).  The total annual labor cost may be found in Table
1.  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost:  NESHAP for Asphalt Processing
and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart LLLLL).

The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is shown
in Table 2.  Annual Burden and Cost for The Federal Government: NESHAP
for Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing (40 CFR part
63, subpart LLLLL).

6(e)  Bottom Line Burden Hours Burden Hours and Cost Tables

The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the
respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.  

(i) Respondent Tally

The Total Hours Requested is shown on the OMB 83-I form in block 13(c). 
The annual labor costs are not shown on the OMB 83-I form.  Details
regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1.  Furthermore, the
annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 223 hours per response.  

The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity
are shown on the OMB 83-I form in block 14(c), Total annualized cost
requested.  The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii),
Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Cost.

(ii) The Agency Tally

The average annual Agency burden hours and cost over next three years is
shown in Table 2.

6(f)  Reasons for Change in Burden

The increase from 1,962 hours to 12,017 hours in the annual labor burden
to industry from the most recently approved ICR is due to adjustments. 
The increase in burden from the most recently approved ICR is due to an
increase from 19 to 22 in the number of existing sources and the
assumption that all existing sources are in full compliance with the
rule initial and on-going requirements since the compliance date has
passed, May 1, 2006.  All respondents are currently recording operating
parameters and submitting semiannual compliance reports to comply with
rule requirement compared to only new respondents in the active ICR.

The decrease from $277,684 to $25,407 in the total annualized capital
and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs are due to no startup capital
costs being attributed to this rule since monitors are an integral part
of the control equipment necessary to determine if it is operating
properly and a decrease in the contractor’s costs associated with
performance tests based on the assumption that all existing respondent
are in full compliance with the rule requirements.

	The Federal government burden decrease from 818 to 488 hours due to the
deletion of burden and costs associated with inspections (i.e., labor
and travel costs associated with observing performance tests) and
enforcement activities that are exempt under the Paperwork Reduction
Act.

6(g)  Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average 223 hours per response.  Burden
means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide information to or
for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed to review
instructions; to develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting, validating and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; to adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; to train personnel
to be able to respond to a collection of information; to search data
sources; to complete and review the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB
Control Number.  The OMB Control Numbers for EPA’s regulations are
listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number
EPA-HQ-OECA-2005-0051, which is available for online viewing at  
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  www.regulations.gov , or in
person viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information
Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.  The EPA Docket Center
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading
Room is (202) 566-1927, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and
Compliance Docket and Information Center Docket is (202) 566-1752.  An
electronic version of the public docket is available online at  
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  http://www.regulations.gov . 
This web site can be used to submit or view public comments, to access
the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access
those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. 
When in the system, select “search,” then key in the Docket ID
Number identified above.  You can also send comments to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for
EPA.  Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2005-0051 and
OMB Control Number 2060-0520 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement

This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in
collecting this information.

Table 1.  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost:  NESHAP for Asphalt
Processing and

Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing  (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLLLL)

Burden item	

(A)

Person-

hours per

occurrence	

(B)

No.  of

occurrences

per respondent

per year	

(C)

Person-

hours per

respondent

per year

(C=AxB)	

(D)

Respondents

per year  a	

(E)

Technical

person-

hours per

year

(E=CxD)	

(F)

Management

person-hours

per year

(Ex0.05)	

(G)

Clerical

person-

hours per 	year

(Ex0.1)	

(H)

Cost, $  b



1.  Applications	

N/A







	

2.  Survey and Studies	

N/A







	

3.  Acquisition, Installation,         and Utilization of  Technology
and  Systems	

N/A	

	

	

	

	

	

	





4.  Reporting Requirements











  A.  Read instructions:	

25	

1	

25	

1	

25	

1.3	

2.5	

$2,440.06



  B.  Required activities:











     New Respondents  c, d











     i.  Initial performance test     	

24	

1	

24	

1	

24	

1.2	

2.4	

$2,337.61



     ii.  Repeat of performance test	

24	

1	

24	

0.2	

4.8	

0.2	

0.5	

$464.36



     iii.  Startup, shutdown,                   malfunction plan	

40	

1	

40	

1	

40	

2.0	

4.0	

$3,896.02

    

     New and Existing Respondents









  

     v.  Monitoring of operating            parameters and equipment:  e


Included in 5E









  C.  Gather Existing Information	

Included in 5D, 5E









  D.  Write report  c, d 











     i.  Notification of compliance        status  	

4	

1	

4	

1	

4	

0.2	

0.4	

$125.69

     ii.  Notification of intent to            construct a major source
and         review application	

4	

1	

4	

1	

4	

0.2	

0.4	               $125.69



     iii.  Notification of initial               construction/
reconstruction  a	

4	

1	

4	

1	

4	

0.2	

0.4	$125.69



     iv.  Notification of actual               startup	

4	

1	

4	

1	

4	

0.2	

0.4	

$125.69



     v.  Notification of performance      test 	

4	

1	

4	

1	

4	

0.2	

0.4	

$125.69



    vi.  Reports of performance           test results	

Included in 4B, 5E









    vii.  Semiannual compliance          reports  d     	

12	

2	

24	

24	

576.0	

28.8	

57.6	

$56,102.69



    viii.  Startup, shutdown,           

    malfunction report  f	

8	

1	

8	

1	

8	

0.4	

0.8	

$779.20



5.  Recordkeeping Requirements











  A.  Read instructions	

Included in 4A









  B.  Plan activities	

10	

1	

10	

1	 

10	

0.5	

1.0	

$974.01



  C.  Implement activities	

Included in 4B







  

  D.  Develop record system  g	NA









  E.  Time to enter and transmit all   information into record system  h

	

    i.  Record performance tests	

4	

1	

4	

1	

4	

0.2	

0.4	$125.69



    ii.  Record operating                      parameters	

1	

365	

365	

24	8,760.0	438.0	876.0	$853,228.38



    iii  Record malfunctions	

2	

1	

2	

1	2.0	0.1	0.2	$194.80



    iv.  Continuous parameter              monitoring calibration and   
         maintenance	

4	

5	

20	

24	480.0	24.0	48.0	$46,752.24

    v.  Store, file, and maintain            records	

20	

1	

20	

24	480.0	24.0	48.0	

$46,752.24

 

 F.  Time to train personnel	

16	

1	

16	

1	

16	0.8	1.6	

$1,558.41



G. Time for audits	

N/A	

	











TOTAL LABOR  BURDEN AND COST  	

	

	

	

	

10,449.8	

522.49	

1,044.98	

$1,016,234.17



TOTAL LABOR HOURS (Rounded)	

	

	

	

	

12,017	

$1,016,234



Assumptions:

a  There is an average of 24 respondents per year over the next three
years of this ICR.  We have determined that approximately 22 of 135
existing asphalt processing and asphalt roofing manufacturing source
categories, including 9 petroleum refineries that process asphalt, are
estimated to be potential major sources subject to the NESHAP subpart
LLLLL requirements.  In addition, we have assumed that one new facility
per year will become subject to this regulation.  

b  This ICR uses the following labor rates: $100.99 per hour for
Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $87.97 per hour for
Technical labor, and $43.81 per hour for Clerical labor.  These rates
are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, December, 2005, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational
and industry group.  The rates are from column 1, Total compensation. 
The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit
packages available to those employed by private industry.

c    SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 We have assumed that existing respondents are
in compliance with initial rule requirements.  New respondents would
have to comply with the initial rule requirements including
notifications and performance tests for add-on control devices.

d  We have assumed that the initial performance tests and reports are
conducted by an emissions testing contractor, however, facility
personnel will also work on-site to assist the contractor.

e  Monitoring and recordkeeping of operations for respondents with
add-on control devices include: 1) specific operating parameters for
each control device established during the performance test, 2)
start-up, shutdown, and malfunctions of equipment,  and 3) work
practices.

f   We have assumed that one respondent with add-on controls per year
will have at least one startup, shutdown or malfunction (SSM) that is
not managed according to the SSM plan.

g  We have assumed that new respondents already have the technology and
recordkeeping systems in place to monitor its daily operations and to
comply with existing regulations.  

h  We have assumed that it takes respondents the following approximate
times to meet recordkeeping requirements:  1) one hour per day for
recording operating parameters, 365 days per year; 2) four hours per
year to calibrate and provide maintenance to continuous parameter
monitors five times per year; and 3) and 16 hours per year to train new
employees on add-on control devices, continuous parameter monitoring
technology and requirements, and review and implementation of startup,
shutdown, and malfunction plans.



Table 2.  Annual Burden and Cost for The Federal Government:   NESHAP
for Asphalt Processing 

and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing  (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLLLL) 

	Activity	

(A)

EPA person-

hours per

occurrence	

(B)

No. of

occurrences

per plant

per year

	

(C)

EPA person-

hours per

plant per

year

(C=AxB)	

(D)

Plants

per

year  a

	

(E)

Technical

person-hours

per year

(E=CxD)	

(F)

Management

person-hours

per year

(Ex0.05)

	

(G)

Clerical

person-

hours per

year

(Ex0.1)

	

(H)

Cost, $ b



New Respondents:











i.  Notification of compliance status	

4	

1	

4	1	4.0	

0.2	

0.4	

$186.48



ii.  Notification of intent to construct a major source and review
application	

4	

1	

4	1	

4.0	

0.2	

0.4	

$186.48



iii.  Notification of start of construction	

2	

1	

2	1	

2.0	

0.1	

0.2	

$93.24



iv.  Notification of actual startup 	

2	

1	

2	1	

2.0	

0.1	

0.2	

$93.24



v.  Notification of initial performance test and test plan	

4	

1	

4	1	4.0	

0.2	

0.4	

$186.48



New and Existing Respondents











i.  Report of performance test results including operating parameters 	

20	

1	

20	1	20.0	

1.0	

2.0	

$932.42



ii.  Review of semiannual compliance reports  	

8	

2	

16	

24	

384.0	

19.2	

38.4	

$17,902.47



iii.  Review of startup, shutdown, malfunction reports  d	

4	

1	

4	

1	

4.0	

0.2	

0.4	

$186.48



Subtotal Burden and Cost



	

424.0	

21.2	

42.4	

$19,767.29



TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)



	

488	

$19,767



Assumptions:

a   There is an average of 24 respondents per year over the next three
years of this ICR.  We have determined that approximately 22 of 135
existing asphalt processing and asphalt roofing manufacturing source
categories, including 9 petroleum refineries that process asphalt, are
estimated to be potential major sources subject to the NESHAP subpart
LLLLL requirements.  In addition, we have assumed that one new facility
per year will become subject to this regulation.  .

b   This cost is based on the following labor rates which incorporates a
1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead
expenses:  Managerial rate of $56.02 (GS-13, Step 5, $35.01 x 1.6),
Technical rate of $41.57 (GS-12, Step 1, $25.98 x 1.6), and Clerical
rate of $22.50 (GS-6, Step 3, $14.06 x 1.6).  These rates are from the
Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2005 General Schedule which
excludes locality rates of pay.  

c   We have assumed that existing sources have comply with the initial
rule requirements.  New respondents are required to conduct performance
test for add-on control equipments, submit initial notifications and
prepare startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) plans.  

d  Sources are required to submit semiannual compliance reports and
startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) reports if there is an
occurrence that is not managed according to the SSM plan.

 PAGE   

 PAGE   

 PAGE   2 

 PAGE   

 PAGE   9 

