SUPPORTING STATEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
SSSS) (Renewal)

1.  Identification of the Information Collection

1(a)  Title of the Information Collection

NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
SSSS) (Renewal);

EPA ICR Number 1957.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0487

1(b)  Short Characterization/Abstract

The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
for Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR part 63, subpart SSSS)
(Renewal), were proposed (65 FR 44616) on July 18, 2000, promulgated (67
FR 39812) on June 10, 2002, and amended (68 FR 12592) on March 17, 2003.
 Respondents are owners or operators of each new, reconstructed, or
existing affected source.  These standards apply to each facility that
is a major source of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) at which a coil
coating line is operated.  The coil coating line is a process and the
collection of equipment used to apply an organic coating to the surface
of a metal coil that is less than 0.15 millimeters (0.006 inches) thick,
and the coating line is controlled by a common control device that also
receives organic HAP emissions from a coil coating line that is subject
to the requirements of this subpart.

In general, all owners or operators subject to NESHAP are required to
submit one-time notifications and one-time reports on compliance status
and performance test results.  They are also required to maintain
records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or
malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period
during which the monitoring system is inoperative.  These notifications,
reports and records are essential in determining compliance, and are
required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP.  Semiannual
reports are required for periods of operation during which the emission
limitation is exceeded. 

Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart will
maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least
five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports,
and records.  All reports are sent to the delegated state or local
authority.  In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the
reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) regional office.

Approximately 89 respondents are subject to the regulation, and it is
estimated that no additional respondents per year will become subject to
the regulation in the next three years. 

All 89 metal coil surface coating plants in the United States are owned
and operated by the metal coil surface coating industry (the “Affected
Public”).  All these 89 facilities are privately- owned, for-profit
businesses; none of them are owned by state, local, tribal or the
Federal government.  The burden to the “Affected Public” is listed
in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden and Cost - NESHAP for Metal Coil
Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSS) (Renewal).  The
Federal government burden associated with the review of reports
submitted by the respondent is shown in Table 2: Average Annual EPA
Burden - NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart SSSS) (Renewal).

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the currently active
Information Collection Request (ICR) without any “Terms of
Clearance.”

2.  Need for and Use of the Collection

2(a)  Need/Authority for the Collection

The EPA is charged under section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended,
to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory
of major sources and area sources of HAP.  These standards are
applicable to new or existing sources of HAP and shall require the
maximum degree of emission reduction.  In addition, section 114(a)
states that the Administrator may require any owner or operator subject
to any requirement of this Act to:

(A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;    (C)
install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit
procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with
such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during
such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe);
(E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables
or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is
impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with
Section 114(a)(3);   and (G) provide such other information as the
Administrator may reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions from metal coil surface
coating plants cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably
be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.  Therefore, the
NESHAP was promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63,
subpart SSSS.

2(b)  Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure
compliance with the applicable regulations which were promulgated in
accordance with the Clean Air Act.  In addition, the collected
information is used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal
proceedings.

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected
facility’s initial capability to comply with the emission standard. 
Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the
standard at all times.  During the performance tests, a record of the
operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded
and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission
monitor.

The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency
or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements
of the regulations.  The reviewing authority may then inspect the source
to ensure that the pollution control devices are properly installed and
operated, that leaks are being detected and repaired, and that the
standards are being met.  The performance test may also be observed.

3.  Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part
63, subpart SSSS.

3(a)  Nonduplication

If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is
sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office.  Otherwise, the
information is sent directly to the delegated state or local agency.  If
a state or local agency has adopted their own similar standards to
implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the
state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the
report required by the Federal standards.  Therefore, no duplication
exists.

3(b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR
was published in the Federal Register (72 FR 10735) on March 9, 2007. 
No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal
Register.

3(c)  Consultations

The Agency’s industry experts have been consulted, and the Agency’s
internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next
three years have been considered.  The primary source of information as
reported by industry, in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting
provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System
(OTIS) which is operated and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance.
 OTIS is the EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval
of all compliance data.  The growth rate for the industry is based on
our consultations with the Agency’s internal industry experts. 
Approximately 89 respondents will be subject to the standard over the
three-year period covered by this ICR.

Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided
an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as
it was being developed, and the standard has been previously reviewed to
determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes.

It is our policy to respond after a thorough review of comments received
since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the
first Federal Register Notice.

3(d)  Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of
assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. 
Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful
techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are
applied and emission limitations are met.  If the information required
by these standards was collected less frequently, the proper operation
and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility of detecting
violations would be less likely.

3(e)  General Guidelines

None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the
regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

 	

These standards require the respondents to maintain all records,
including reports and notifications for at least five years.  This is
consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards.  EPA
believes that the five-year records retention requirement is consistent
with the Part 70 permit program and the five-year statute of limitations
on which the permit program is based.  The retention of records for five
years allows EPA to establish the compliance history of a source, any
pattern of non-compliance, and to determine the appropriate level of
enforcement action.   EPA has found that the most flagrant violators
have violations extending beyond the five years.    In addition, EPA
would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or
nonexistence of essential records.

3(f)  Confidentiality

Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency
policies set forth in title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B -
Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR
36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43
FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3(g)  Sensitive Questions

None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contain sensitive
questions.

4.  The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a)  Respondents/SIC Codes

The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are
metal coil surface coating plants.  The United States Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) codes for the respondents affected by
the standards, which correspond to the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) codes, are listed below for source
category description.

Standard (40 CFR, part 63, subpart SSSS)	SIC Codes	NAICS Codes

Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied
Services to Manufacturers	3479	332812

Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing	3053	339991

Electrometallurgical Ferroalloy Product Manufacturing	3313	331112

Steel Works, Blast Furnaces (Including Coke Ovens), and Rolling Mills
(hot-rolling purchased steel)	3312	331221

Cold-Rolled Steel Sheet, Strip, and Bars	3316	331221

Iron and Steel Pipe and Tube Manufacturing from Purchased Steel	3317
331210

Primary Aluminum Production	3334	331312

Secondary Smelting and Alloying of Aluminum	3341	331314

Aluminum Sheet, Plate, and Foil Manufacturing	3353	331315

Fabricated Structural Metal Manufacturing	3441	332312

Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing	3444	332322

Prefabricated Metal Building and Component Manufacturing	3448	332311

Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping	3465	336370

Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing and Coloring	3471	332813

All other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing	3499
332999

Printing Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing	3555	333293

All other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing	3714	336399

Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, and Chemical Manufacturing	3861	325992



4(b)  Information Requested

None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the
regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

(i)  Data Items

In this ICR, all the data recorded or reported is required by the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Metal Coil
Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSS) (Renewal).

A source must make the following reports:

Notifications

Notification and application of construction or reconstruction
63.5180(b)(1), 63.9(b)(1)-(3)

Notification of anticipated date of initial startup	63.5180(b)(2),
63.9(b)(4)

Notification to commence construction	63.5180(b)(2), 63.9(b)(4)

Notification of actual startup	63.5180(b)(2), 63.9(b)(4)

Notification of intent to construct/reconstruct	63.5180(b)(2),
63.9(b)(4)-(5)

Notification of performance tests	63.5180(c), 63.9(e)-(g)

Notification of compliance status	63.5180(d), 63.9(h)



Reports

Report of initial performance test	63.5180(e), 63.10(d)(2)

Reports of startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan	63.5180(f),
63.6(e)(3), 63.9(d)(5)

Semiannual compliance report of no deviation	63.5180(g), 63.10(e)(5)

Semiannual compliance report of deviation	63.5180(h)(i), 63.10(e)(5)



A source must keep the following records:

Recordkeeping 

Maintain records of all reports	63.5190(a)(1)-(3), 63.10(b)(2)

Maintain records of startup, shutdown, or malfunction plan	63.5180(f),
63.10(b)(2)

Maintain documentation of corrective action procedures	63.5180(f),
63.10(b)(2)



Electronic Reporting

Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that
automatically records parameter data.  Although personnel at the
affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has
significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and
recordkeeping at a plant site.

Also, regulatory agencies in cooperation with the respondents continue
to create reporting systems to transmit data electronically.  However,
electronic reporting systems are not widely used.  At this time, it is
estimated that 35 percent of the respondents use electronic reporting.

Respondent Activities

Read instructions.

Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a coil coating line at their
metal coil surface coating plants.

Perform initial performance test, Reference Methods 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 2C,
2D, 2F, 2G, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 25, 25A tests, and repeat performance tests if
necessary.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and
utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting,
validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of disclosing and providing information.

Adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.



	Currently, sources are using monitoring equipment that provides
parameter data in an automated way (e.g., continuous parameter
monitoring system).  Although personnel at the source still need to
evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly
reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping.

5.  The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology, and Information Management

5(a)  Agency Activities

EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the
acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required
information.

Agency Activities

Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if
necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports,
excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the OTIS.



5(b)  Collection Methodology and Management

Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority might inspect
the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are
properly installed and operational.  Performance test reports are used
by the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to comply with
the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which
compliance was achieved.  Data and records maintained by the respondents
are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement
programs.

Information contained in the reports is entered into OTIS which is
operated and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance.  OTIS is the
EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of
compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and
government-owned facilities.  EPA uses OTIS for tracking air pollution
compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA
regional offices, and EPA headquarters.  EPA-delegated Authorities can
edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner or
operator for five years.

5(c)  Small Entity Flexibility

The majority of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large
businesses).  However,          the impact on small entities (i.e.,
small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of
the regulation.  Due to technical considerations involving the process
operations and the types of control equipment employed, the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and
large entities.  The Agency considers these to be the minimum
requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce
them further for small entities.  To the extent that larger businesses
can use economies of scale to reduce their burden,   the overall burden
will be reduced.

5(d)  Collection Schedule

The specific frequency for each information collection activity within
this request is shown in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden for NESHAP for
Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSS)
(Renewal).  (Attached.)

6.  Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for
the subpart included in this ICR.  The individual burdens are expressed
under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept
of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act.  Wherever appropriate,
specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified.  Responses to
this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB Control Number.

6(a)  Estimating Respondent Burden

The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from
these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 19,901
(Total Labor Hours from Table 1).  These hours are based on Agency
studies and background documents from the development of the regulation,
Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously
approved ICR, and any comments received.

6(b)  Estimating Respondent Costs

(i)  Estimating Labor Costs 

	This ICR uses the following labor rates:

Managerial 	$96.41   ($45.91 + 110%)

Technical	$82.74   ($39.40 + 110%)

Clerical	$42.25   ($20.12 + 110%)

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, September 2004 “Table 10: Private Industry, by
Occupational and Industry Group.”  The rates are from column 1,
“Total Compensation.”  The rates have been increased by 110 percent
to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by
private industry.

(ii)  Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs

The type of industry costs associated with the information collection
activities in the subject standard are both labor costs, which are
addressed elsewhere in this ICR, and the costs associated with
continuous monitoring.  The capital/startup costs are one-time costs
when a facility becomes subject to the regulation.  The annual operation
and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor and
other costs, such as photocopying and postage.

(iii)  Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

(A)

Continuous Monitoring Device	(B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent	(C)

Number of New Respondents 	(D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost 

(B X C) 	(E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent	(F)

Number of Respondents with O&M 1	(G)

Total O&M,

(E X F)

Continuous monitoring system 	N/A	N/A	$0	48	76	$3,648



	$0

	$3,648

	1 There is an average of eighty-nine sources.  Thirteen of these
sources are considered synthetic minors and not subject to the emission
limits in the standard.

The total capital/startup costs for this ICR are zero.  This is the
total of column D in the above table.

The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs consists of
photocopying, and postage are $3,648.  This is the total of column G.

The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and
maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the ICR is
estimated to be $3,648.  The average annual cost for labor costs to
industry over the next three years of the ICR is estimated to be
$1,588,365.

6(c)  Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of
the reported information.  The EPA compliance and enforcement program
includes activities such as:               (1)  the examination of
records maintained by the respondents; periodic inspection of sources of
emissions; and (2) the publication and distribution of collected
information.

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is
estimated to be $19,842.

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

Managerial	$56.02   (GS-13, Step 5, $35.01 + 60%)

Technical	$41.57   (GS-12, Step 1, $25.98 + 60%)

Clerical	$22.50   (GS-6, Step 3, $14.06 + 60%)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2004
General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay.  The rates
have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages
available to government employees.  Details upon which this estimate is
based appear in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden, NESHAP for Metal
Coil Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSS) (Renewal). 
(Attached.)

6(d)  Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

	Based on our research for this ICR, approximately 89 respondents will
be subject to the standard the next three years.  It is estimated that
no additional sources per year will become subject to the standard.  The
average number of respondents, as shown in the table below, is 89 per
year. 

	The number of respondents is calculated using the following table which
addresses the three years covered by this ICR.

Number of Respondents

Year	(A)

Number of New Respondents 1	(B)

Number of Existing Respondents	(C)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit
Reports	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents	(E)

Number of Respondents

(E=A+B+C-D)

1	0	89	0	0	89

2	0	89	0	0	89

3	0	89	0	0	89

Average	0	89	0	0	89

1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and
modified affected facilities.

To avoid double-counting respondents, column D is subtracted.  As shown
above, the average Number of Respondents over the three-year period of
this ICR is 89.

The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the
following table:

Total Annual Responses

(A)

Information Collection Activity	(B)

Number of Respondents	(C)

Number of Responses	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit
Reports	(E)

Total Annual Responses

E=(BxC)+D

Initial notification	0	1	0	0

Notification of construction/reconstruction	0	1	0	0

Notification of anticipated startup	0	1	0	0

Notification of actual startup	0	1	0	0

Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0

Performance test notification	0	0.11	0	0

Performance test report	0	0.11	0	0

Semiannual report of exceedances	7.6	2	0	15.2

Semiannual report of no exceedances	68.4	2	0	136.8

Startup, shutdown, malfunction report	7.6	2	0	15.2



	Total	167



The number of Total Annual Responses is 167.

The total annual labor costs are $1,588,365.  Details regarding these
estimates may be found in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden and Cost -
NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
SSSS).  (Attached.)

6(e)  Bottom Line Burden Hours Burden Hours and Cost Tables

The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the
respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively,
and summarized below. 

(i)  Respondent Tally

The total annual labor costs are $1,588,365.  Details regarding these
estimates may be found in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost:
NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
SSSS) (Renewal) (Attached.)  Furthermore, the annual public reporting
and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated
to average 119 hours per response.

The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity
are $3,648.

(ii)  The Agency Tally

The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is
estimated to be 489 labor hours at a cost of $19,842.  See Table 2:
Annual Agency Burden and Cost: NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface Coating
Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSS) (Renewal) (Attached.)

6(f)  Reasons for Change in Burden

There is no change in the labor hours or cost in this ICR compared to
the previous ICR.  This is due to two considerations.  First, the
regulations have not changed over the past three years and are not
anticipated to change over the next three years.  Secondly, the growth
rate for the industry is very low, negative or non-existent, so there is
no significant change in the overall burden.  It should be noted that
the previous ICR rounded the burden cost down to the nearest one
thousand.  In this ICR, the exact cost figure is reported which results
in an apparent decrease in the cost when, in fact, no decrease has
occurred.

Since there are no changes in the regulatory requirements and there is
no significant industry growth, the labor hours and cost figures in the
previous ICR are used in this ICR, and there is no change in burden to
industry.

6(g)  Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average 119 hours per response.  Burden
means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide information to or for
a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information,
processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing
information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete
and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB
Control Number.  The OMB Control Numbers for EPA’s regulations are
listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number
EPA-HQ-OECA-2007-0065.  An electronic version of the public docket is
available at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/" 
http://www.regulations.gov/  which may be used to obtain a copy of the
draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access
the index listing of the content of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically.  When
in the system, select “search” than key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.  The documents are also available for
public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information
Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC.  The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and
Compliance Docket and Information Center Docket is (202) 566-1927. 
Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.  Please include
the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2007-0065 and OMB Control Number
2060-0487 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement

This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in
collecting this information.

Table 1:  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Metal Coil
Surface Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSS) (Renewal)

Burden item	(A)

Person hours per occurrence	(B)

No. of occurrences per respondent per year	(C)

Person hours per respondent per year

(C=AxB)	(D)

Respondents per year  a	(E)

Technical person- hours per year

(E=CxD)	(F)

Management person hours per year

(Ex0.05)	(G)

Clerical person hours per year

(Ex0.1)	(H)

Total Cost 

Per year b



1.  Applications	N/A







	2.  Survey and Studies	N/A







	3.  Reporting requirements









     A.  Read instructions 	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	$0

     B.  Required activities









        Initial oxidizer performance test c	280	0.11	30.8	0	0	0	0	$0

        Repeat oxidizer performance test c	280	0.11	30.8	0	0	0	0	$0

        Initial capture performance test c	215	0.11	23.65	0	0	0	0	$0

        Repeat capture performance test c	215	0.11	23.65	0	0	0	0	$0

        Emission rate limit compliance determination	16	12	192	0	0	0	0
$0

        Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan	32	1	32	0	0	0	0	$0

     C.  Create information	See 4B 







	     D.  Gather existing information	See 4B 







	     E.  Write Report









        Initial notification	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of construction/reconstruction	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of anticipated startup	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of actual startup	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of compliance status	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	$0

        Performance test notification c	2	0.11	0.22	0	0	0	0	$0

        Performance test report c	40	0.11	4.4	0	0	0	0	$0

        Semiannual report of exceedances d, e	16	2	32	7.6	243.2	12.16
24.32	$22,322.24

        Semiannual report of no exceedances f, g	8	2	16	68.4	1,094.4
54.72	109.44	$100,450.06

        Startup, shutdown, malfunction report h	8	2	16	7.6	121.60	6.08
12.16	$11,161.11

Subtotal  for Reporting  Requirements





1,678.08



4.  Recordkeeping requirements









     A.  Read instructions 	See 4B







	     B.  Plan activities	N/A







	     C.  Implement Activities 	N/A







	     D.  Develop record system	N/A







	     E.  Time to enter information









         Records of all information required by

         standards i	4	52	208	76	15,808	790.4	1,580.8	$1,450,945.10

    F.  Time to train personnel 	N/A







	    G.  Time to adjust existing ways to comply with

         previously applicable requirements	N/A







	    H.  Time to transmit or disclose information j	0.25	2	0.5	76	38	1.9
3.8	$3,486.85

     I.  Time for audits	N/A







	Subtotal  for Recordkeeping Requirements  





18,222.9







	17,305.2	865.26	1,730.52	$1,588,365.30

TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)





19,900.98

19,901

    (rounded)                                                           
                                                            

$1,588,365



Assumptions:

a  We have assumed that there are approximately eighty-nine respondents,
with no additional new or reconstructed sources becoming subject to the
rule over the next three years.  Within those eighty-nine existing
sources, only seventy-six are subject to the emission limits in the
standard.  The remaining thirteen respondents are permitted as synthetic
minors and, therefore, are not subject to the emission limits in the
standard.

b  This ICR uses the following labor rates:  $96.41 per hour for
Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $82.74 per hour for
Technical labor, and $42.25

per hour for Clerical labor.  These rates are from the United States
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2004 “Table
10: Private Industry, by Occupational and Industry Group.”  The rates
are from column 1, “Total Compensation.”  The rates have been
increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available
to those employed by private industry.

c  This is a one-time startup costs associated with initial compliance
determination and acquisition, installation, and utilization of
technology and systems needed to support recordkeeping and reporting. 
The one-time startup costs are amortized over the 15-year life of
control equipment at 7 percent interest.  For computational purposes,
the number of occurrences per respondent per year is amortized over 15
years.

d  We have assumed that exceedances are reported semiannually.

e  We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will report
exceedances.

f  Reports indicating no exceedances are required semiannually.

g  We have assumed that 90 percent of respondents will report no
exceedances.

h  We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will file a startup,
shutdown, malfunction report semiannually.

i  We have assumed that all information is entered on a weekly basis.

j  We have assumed that each of the 76 respondents will take 15 minutes
to transmit or disclose information twice a year.

Table 2:  Average Annual EPA Burden - NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface
Coating Plants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSS) (Renewal)

Activity	(A)

EPA person- hours per occurrence	(B)

No. of occurrences per plant per year	(C)

EPA person- hours per plant per year

(C=AxB)	(D)

Plants per year  a	(E)

Technical person- hours per year

(E=CxD)	(F)

Management person-hours per year

(Ex0.05)

	(G)

Clerical person-hours per year

(Ex0.1)	(H)

Cost, $ b

Initial performance test	495	1	495	0	0	0	0	$0

Repeat performance test-retesting preparation	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	$0

Repeat performance-retesting	495	1	495	0	0	0	0	$0

Excess emissions enforcement activities	120	1	120	0	0	0	0	$0

Review reports









   Notification of applicability	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

   Notification of construction/reconstruction	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

   Notification of anticipated startup	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

   Notification of actual startup	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

   Notification of special compliance requirements	N/A







	   Notification of compliance status	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

   Review of initial performance test report	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	$0

   Review of repeat performance test report	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	$0

   Semiannual report of excess emissions c, d	8	2	16	7.6	121.6	6.08
12.16	$5,669.11

   Semiannual report of no excess emissions e, f	2	2	4	68.4	273.6	13.68
27.36	$12,755.50

   Review of NESHAP waiver application	N/A







	   Review startup, shutdown, malfunction report g	2	2	4	7.6	30.4	1.52
3.04	$1,417.28

Subtotals Labor Burden and cost



	425.6	21.28	42.56	$19,841.89

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)	

	

	

	

	489.44

489 (rounded)	$19,842



 	Assumptions:

    a  We have assumed that there are approximately eighty-nine
respondents, with no additional new or reconstructed sources becoming
subject to the rule over the next

    three years.  Within those eighty-nine existing sources, only
seventy-six are subject to the emission limits in the standard.  The
remaining thirteen respondents are

    permitted as synthetic minors and, therefore, are not subject to the
emission limits in the standard.                                        
                                                                        
                                                                        
                                                              

b  This cost is based on the following hourly labor rates times a 1.6
benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead
expenses: $56.02 for Managerial (GS-13, Step 5, $35.01 x 1.6), $41.57
for Technical (GS-12, Step 1, $25.98 x 1.6) and $22.50 Clerical (GS-6,
Step 3, $14.06 x 1.6).  These rates are from the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) “2004 General Schedule” which excludes locality
rates of pay.

c  It is assumed that 10 percent of respondents will report excess
emissions.

d  It is assumed that reports of excess emissions are required
semiannually.

e  We have assumed that 90 percent of respondents will report excess
emissions.

f  It is assumed that reports of no excess emissions are required
semiannually.

g  We have assumed that 10 percent of startup, shutdown, malfunction
reports will be reviewed.

 PAGE   

 PAGE   17 

 PAGE   

