1
Asphalt
Shingle
and
Coating
Materials
Manufacturing:
2002,
2002
Economic
Census,
Manufacturing
Industry
Series,
U.
S.
Census
Bureau,
ECO2­
311­
324122,
August
2004
SF­
83
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
NSPS
for
Asphalt
Processing
and
Roofing
Manufacture
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
UU)

1.
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
1(
a)
Title
of
the
Information
Collection
NSPS
for
Asphalt
Processing
and
Roofing
Manufacture
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
UU)(
Renewal)

1(
b)
Short
Characterization/
Abstract
The
New
Source
Performance
Standards
(
NSPS)
for
Asphalt
Processing
and
Asphalt
Roofing
Manufacture
were
proposed
on
November
18,
1980,
amended
on
May
26,
1981,
and
promulgated
on
August
6,
1982.
These
standards
apply
to
each
saturator
and
each
asphalt
storage
facility
at
asphalt
roofing
plants;
and
to
each
asphalt
storage
tank
and
each
blowing
still
at
asphalt
processing
plants,
petroleum
refineries,
and
asphalt
roofing
plants.
New
facilities
include
those
that
commenced
construction,
modification
or
reconstruction
after
the
date
of
proposal.
This
information
is
being
collected
to
assure
compliance
with
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
UU.

In
general,
all
NSPS
standards
require
initial
notifications,
performance
tests,
and
periodic
reports.
Owners
or
operators
are
also
required
to
maintain
records
of
the
occurrence
and
duration
of
any
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
in
the
operation
of
an
affected
facility,
or
any
period
during
which
the
monitoring
system
is
inoperative.
These
notifications,
reports,
and
records
are
essential
in
determining
compliance,
and
are
required
of
all
sources
subject
to
NSPS.

Any
owner
or
operator
subject
to
the
provisions
of
this
part
shall
maintain
a
file
of
these
measurements,
and
retain
the
file
for
at
least
two
years
following
the
date
of
such
measurements,
maintenance
reports,
and
records.
All
reports
are
sent
to
the
delegated
state
or
local
authority.
In
the
event
that
there
is
no
such
delegated
authority,
the
reports
are
sent
directly
to
the
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
regional
office.

Approximately
178
sources
are
currently
subject
to
the
regulation,
and
it
is
estimated
that
two
(
2)
existing
sources
will
undergo
reconstruction
and
become
new
sources
subject
to
the
regulation
per
year
over
the
next
three
years.
Based
on
historical
data
provided
by
the
U.
S.
Census
Bureau,
we
also
estimate
that
nine
(
9)
facilities
currently
subject
to
the
regulation
will
cease
operations
per
year
over
the
next
three
years.
1
There
were
83
sources
identified
in
the
previous
Information
Collection
Request
(
ICR)
and
a
new
growth
rate
of
two
(
2)
sources
per
year.
The
increase
in
the
number
of
sources
in
this
ICR
compared
to
the
previous
ICR
is
due
to
an
error
in
estimating
the
number
of
sources
in
the
previous
ICR.
The
change
in
the
estimated
2
growth
rate
from
the
previous
ICR
is
due
to
the
availability
of
new
information
provided
by
the
United
States
Census
Bureau
(
USCB).

The
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB)
approved
the
currently
active
ICR
without
any
"
Terms
of
Clearance."

2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
The
EPA
is
charged
under
Section
111
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA),
as
amended,
to
establish
standards
of
performance
for
new
stationary
sources
that
reflect:

.
.
.
application
of
the
best
technological
system
of
continuous
emissions
reduction
which
(
taking
into
consideration
the
cost
of
achieving
such
emissions
reduction,
or
any
non­
air
quality
health
and
environmental
impact
and
energy
requirements)
the
Administrator
determines
has
been
adequately
demonstrated.
Section
111(
a)(
l).

The
Agency
refers
to
this
charge
as
selecting
the
best
demonstrated
technology
(
BDT).
Section
111
also
requires
that
the
Administrator
review
and,
if
appropriate,
revise
such
standards
every
four
years.

In
addition,
section
114(
a)
states
that
the
Administrator
may
require
any
owner
or
operator
subject
to
any
requirement
of
this
Act
to:

(
A)
Establish
and
maintain
such
records;
(
B)
make
such
reports;
(
C)
install,
use,
and
maintain
such
monitoring
equipment,
and
use
such
audit
procedures,
or
methods;
(
D)
sample
such
emissions
(
in
accordance
with
such
procedures
or
methods,
at
such
locations,
at
such
intervals,
during
such
periods,
and
in
such
manner
as
the
Administrator
shall
prescribe);
(
E)
keep
records
on
control
equipment
parameters,
production
variables
or
other
indirect
data
when
direct
monitoring
of
emissions
is
impractical;
(
F)
submit
compliance
certifications
in
accordance
with
Section
114(
a)(
3);
and
(
G)
provide
such
other
information
as
the
Administrator
may
reasonably
require.

In
the
Administrator's
judgment,
particulate
matter
emissions
from
asphalt
processing
and
roofing
manufacture
cause
or
contribute
to
air
pollution
that
may
reasonably
be
anticipated
to
endanger
public
health
or
welfare.
Therefore,
the
NSPS
were
promulgated
for
this
source
category
at
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
UU.
3
2(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data
The
control
of
particulate
matter
emissions
from
asphalt
processing
and
roofing
manufacture
requires
not
only
the
installation
of
properly
designed
equipment,
but
also
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
that
equipment.
Emissions
of
particulate
matter
from
asphalt
processing
and
roofing
manufacture
are
the
result
of
the
operation
of
the
affected
facilities.
The
subject
standards
are
achieved
by
the
capture
of
particulate
emissions
using
control
devices
such
as
electrostatic
precipitators,
high
velocity
air
filters,
or
afterburners.
The
notifications
required
in
the
applicable
regulations
are
used
to
inform
the
Agency
or
delegated
authority
when
a
source
becomes
subject
to
the
requirements
of
the
regulations.
The
reviewing
authority
may
then
inspect
the
source
to
ensure
that
the
pollution
control
devices
are
properly
installed
and
operated,
that
leaks
are
being
detected
and
repaired,
and
that
the
regulations
are
being
met.
Performance
test
reports
are
needed
as
these
are
the
Agency's
record
of
a
source's
initial
capability
to
comply
with
the
emission
standards,
and
to
serve
as
a
record
of
the
operating
conditions
under
which
compliance
was
achieved.
The
semiannual
reports
are
used
for
problem
identification,
as
a
check
on
source
operation
and
maintenance,
and
for
compliance
determinations.
The
information
generated
by
the
monitoring,
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
described
in
this
ICR
is
used
by
the
Agency
to
ensure
that
facilities
affected
by
the
NSPS
continue
to
operate
the
control
equipment
in
compliance
with
the
regulation.
Adequate
monitoring,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
are
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
applicable
regulations,
as
required
by
the
Clean
Air
Act.
The
information
collected
from
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
is
also
used
for
targeting
inspections,
and
is
of
sufficient
quality
to
be
used
as
evidence
in
court.

3.
Nonduplication,
Consultations,
and
Other
Collection
Criteria
The
requested
recordkeeping
and
reporting
are
required
under
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
UU.

3(
a)
Nonduplication
If
the
subject
standards
have
not
been
delegated,
the
information
is
sent
directly
to
the
appropriate
EPA
regional
office.
Otherwise,
the
information
is
sent
directly
to
the
delegated
state
or
local
agency.
If
a
state
or
local
agency
has
adopted
its
own
similar
standards
to
implement
the
Federal
standards,
a
copy
of
the
report
submitted
to
the
state
or
local
agency
can
be
sent
to
the
Administrator
in
lieu
of
the
report
required
by
the
Federal
standards.
Therefore,
no
duplication
exists.

3(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
An
announcement
of
a
public
comment
period
for
the
renewal
of
this
ICR
was
published
in
the
Federal
Register
(
69
FR
29718)
on
May
25,
2004.
No
comments
were
received
on
the
burden
published
in
the
Federal
Register.
4
3(
c)
Consultations
In
estimating
the
burden
associated
with
this
standard,
we
contacted
the
Asphalt
Roofing
Manufacturers
Association
(
ARMA).
However,
no
response
was
provided.
As
an
alternative,
we
used
EPA's
Enforcement
and
Compliance
History
Online
(
ECHO)
database
and
United
States
Census
Bureau
(
USCB)
data
to
estimate
the
number
of
sources
and
the
growth
rate
of
the
industry.
Based
on
these
sources,
there
are
approximately
178
sources
currently
subject
to
the
regulation.
We
also
estimate
two
(
2)
existing
sources
will
undergo
reconstruction
and
become
new
sources
subject
to
the
regulation
each
year
over
the
next
three
years.
Based
on
historical
data
provided
by
the
USCB,
we
estimate
that
nine
(
9)
sources
currently
subject
to
the
regulation
will
cease
operations
each
year
over
the
next
three
years.

The
increase
in
the
number
of
sources
compared
to
the
previous
ICR
is
due
to
an
error
in
estimating
the
number
of
sources
in
the
previous
ICR.
The
change
in
the
estimated
growth
rate
from
the
previous
ICR
is
due
to
the
availability
of
new
information
as
provided
by
the
USCB.

3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
Less
frequent
information
collection
would
decrease
the
margin
of
assurance
that
facilities
are
continuing
to
meet
the
standards.
Requirements
for
information
gathering
and
recordkeeping
are
useful
techniques
to
ensure
that
good
operation
and
maintenance
practices
are
applied
and
emission
limitations
are
met.
If
the
information
required
by
these
standards
was
collected
less
frequently,
the
likelihood
of
detecting
poor
operation
and
maintenance
of
control
equipment
and
noncompliance
would
decrease.

3(
e)
General
Guidelines
None
of
these
reporting
or
recordkeeping
requirements
violate
any
of
the
regulations
established
by
OMB
at
5
CFR
part
1320,
section
1320.5.

3(
f)
Confidentiality
Any
information
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
Agency
policies
set
forth
in
Title
40,
Chapter
1,
part
2,
subpart
B
­
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information.
(
See
40
CFR
2;
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;
amended
by
43
FR
40000,
September
8,
1978;
43
FR
42251,
September
20,
1978;
44
FR
17674,
March
23,
1979).

3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
None
of
the
reporting
or
recordkeeping
requirements
contain
sensitive
questions.
5
4.
The
Respondents
and
the
Information
Requested
4(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
The
respondents
to
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
asphalt
processing
and
roofing
manufacture
facilities.
The
table
below
provides
a
list
of
the
United
States
Standard
Industrial
Classification
System
(
SIC)
codes
and
corresponding
North
American
Industry
Classification
System
(
NAICS)
codes
for
the
respondents.

Standard
SIC
Codes
NAICS
Codes
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
UU
2911
­
Petroleum
Refining
324110
­
Petroleum
Refineries
2951
­
Asphalt
Paving
Mixtures
and
Blocks
324121
­
Asphalt
Paving
Mixture
and
Block
Manufacturing
2952
­
Asphalt
Felts
and
Coatings
324122
­
Asphalt
Shingle
and
Coating
Materials
Manufacturing
4(
b)
Information
Requested
(
i)
Data
Items
All
data
in
this
ICR
that
are
recorded
and/
or
reported
are
required
by
the
NSPS
for
Asphalt
Processing
and
Roofing
Manufacture
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
UU).

A
source
must
make
the
following
reports:

Notification
Reports
Notification
of
construction/
reconstruction.
60.7(
a)(
1)

Notification
of
actual
startup.
60.7(
a)(
3)

Notification
of
physical
or
operational
change
which
may
increase
the
emission
rate.
60.7(
a)(
4)

Notification
of
demonstration
of
continuous
monitoring
system.
60.7(
a)(
5)

Notification
of
initial
performance
tests.
60.8(
d)
6
Reports
Report
on
initial
performance
test.
60.8(
a)

A
source
must
keep
the
following
records:

Recordkeeping
Startups,
shutdowns,
malfunctions,
periods
where
the
continuous
monitoring
system
is
inoperative.
60.7(
b)

Records
of
operating
parameters
of
the
Continuous
Monitoring
Systems
(
CMS)
Operating
temperature
measurements
of
pollution
control
devices
as
appropriate,
and
the
initial
performance
test
results
including
temperature
measurements.
60.7(
d)

Continuously
monitor
and
record
the
temperature
of
the
gas
at
the
inlet
of
the
control
device.
60.473(
a)

Continuously
monitor
and
record
the
temperature
in
the
combustion
zone
of
the
afterburner.
60.472(
b)(
1)

For
control
devices
not
mentioned
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
b)
of
this
section,
provide
to
the
Administrator
information
describing
the
operation
of
the
control
device
and
the
process
parameter(
s)
which
would
indicate
proper
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
device.
60.473(
c)

Records
are
required
to
be
retained
for
two
(
2)
years.
60.7(
f)

Electronic
Reporting
Currently,
sources
are
using
monitoring
equipment
that
provides
automated
parameter
data,
e.
g.,
continuous
opacity
monitoring.
Although
personnel
at
the
affected
facility
must
evaluate
the
data,
this
type
of
monitoring
equipment
has
significantly
reduced
the
burden
associated
with
monitoring
and
recordkeeping.
In
addition,
some
regulatory
agencies
are
setting
7
up
electronic
reporting
systems
to
allow
sources
to
report
electronically.
This
reduces
the
reporting
burden.
However,
electronic
reporting
systems
are
not
widely
used
by
the
regulatory
agencies.
It
is
estimated
that
approximately
10
percent
of
the
respondents
use
electronic
reporting.

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
Respondent
Activities
Read
instructions.

Install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
operate
temperature
monitoring
device.

Perform
initial
performance
test,
Reference
Methods
5a,
Method
9
(
opacity),
Method
22
and
repeat
performance
tests
if
necessary.

Write
the
notifications
and
reports
listed
above.

Enter
information
required
to
be
recorded
above.

Submit
the
required
reports
developing,
acquiring,
installing,
and
utilizing
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information.

Develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
processing
and
maintaining
information.

Develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
disclosing
and
providing
information.

Adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements.

Train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information.

Transmit,
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

5.
The
Information
Collected:
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
5(
a)
Agency
Activities
EPA
conducts
the
following
activities
in
connection
with
the
acquisition,
analysis,
storage,
and
distribution
of
the
required
information.
8
Agency
Activities
Observe
initial
performance
tests
and
repeat
performance
tests
if
necessary.

Review
notifications
and
reports,
including
performance
test
reports,
and
excess
emissions
reports,
required
to
be
submitted
by
industry.

Audit
facility
records.

Input,
analyze,
and
maintain
data
in
the
Air
Facility
System
(
AFS).

5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
Following
notification
of
startup,
the
reviewing
authority
might
inspect
the
source
to
determine
whether
the
pollution
control
devices
are
properly
installed
and
operated.
Performance
test
reports
are
used
by
the
Agency
to
discern
a
source's
initial
capability
to
comply
with
the
emission
standard.
Data
and
records
maintained
by
the
respondents
are
tabulated
and
published
for
use
in
compliance
and
enforcement
programs.
The
semiannual
reports
are
used
for
problem
identification,
as
a
check
on
source
operation
and
maintenance,
and
for
compliance
determinations.

Information
contained
in
the
reports
is
entered
into
the
AFS
which
is
operated
and
maintained
by
EPA's
Office
of
Compliance.
AFS
is
EPA's
database
for
the
collection,
maintenance,
and
retrieval
of
compliance
data
for
approximately
125,000
industrial
and
government­
owned
facilities.
EPA
uses
the
AFS
for
tracking
air
pollution
compliance
and
enforcement
by
local
and
state
regulatory
agencies,
EPA
regional
offices
and
EPA
headquarters.
EPA
and
its
delegated
Authorities
can
edit,
store,
retrieve
and
analyze
the
data.

The
records
required
by
this
regulation
must
be
retained
by
the
owner
or
operator
for
two
years.

5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
A
majority
of
the
affected
facilities
are
large
entities
(
e.
g.,
large
businesses).
However,
the
impact
on
small
entities
(
i.
e.,
small
businesses)
was
taken
into
consideration
during
the
development
of
the
regulation.
Due
to
technical
considerations
involving
the
process
operations
and
the
types
of
control
equipment
employed,
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
the
same
for
both
small
and
large
entities.
The
Agency
considers
these
requirements
the
minimum
needed
to
ensure
compliance
and,
therefore,
cannot
reduce
them
further
for
small
entities.
To
the
extent
that
larger
businesses
can
use
economies
of
scale
to
reduce
their
burden,
the
overall
burden
will
be
reduced.

5(
d)
Collection
Schedule
The
specific
frequency
for
each
information
collection
activity
within
this
request
is
shown
9
in
Table
1:
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
for
Asphalt
Processing
and
Roofing
Manufacture
(
40
CFR
Part
60,
Subpart
UU).

6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
Table
1
documents
the
computation
of
individual
burdens
for
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
applicable
to
the
industry
for
the
subpart
included
in
this
ICR.
The
individual
burdens
are
expressed
under
standardized
headings
believed
to
be
consistent
with
the
concept
of
burden
under
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act.
Where
appropriate,
specific
tasks
and
major
assumptions
have
been
identified.
Responses
to
this
information
collection
are
mandatory.

The
Agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
Control
Number.

6(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
The
average
annual
burden
to
industry
over
the
next
three
years
from
these
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
is
estimated
to
be
30,419
hours
[
Total
Labor
Hours
from
Table
1:
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
for
Asphalt
Processing
and
Roofing
Manufacture
(
40
CFR
Part
60,
Subpart
UU),
attached].
These
hours
are
based
on
Agency
studies
and
background
documents
from
the
development
of
the
regulation,
Agency
knowledge
and
experience
with
the
NSPS
program,
the
previously
approved
ICR,
and
any
comments
received.

6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs
(
i)
Estimating
Labor
Costs
This
ICR
uses
the
following
labor
rates:

Managerial
$
95.32
($
45.39
+
110%)
Technical
$
64.60
($
30.76
+
110%)
Clerical
$
40.09
($
19.09
+
110%)

These
rates
are
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Labor,
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics,
December
2003,
"
Table
10.
Private
industry,
by
occupational
and
industry
group."
The
rates
are
from
column
1,
"
Total
compensation."
The
rates
have
been
increased
by
110
percent
to
account
for
the
benefit
packages
available
to
those
employed
by
private
industry.

(
ii)
Estimating
Capital/
Startup
and
Operation
and
Maintenance
Costs
The
type
of
industry
costs
associated
with
the
information
collection
activities
in
the
subject
standard(
s)
are
both
labor
costs
which
are
addressed
elsewhere
in
this
ICR
and
the
costs
associated
with
continuous
monitoring.
The
capital/
startup
costs
are
one­
time
costs
when
a
10
facility
becomes
subject
to
the
regulation.
The
annual
operation
and
maintenance
costs
are
the
ongoing
costs
to
maintain
the
monitor(
s)
and
other
costs
such
as
photocopying
and
postage.

(
iii)
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
(
A)
Continuous
Monitoring
Device
(
B)
Capital/
Startu
p
Cost
for
One
Respondent
(
C)
Number
of
Reconstructed
Respondents
(
D)
Total
Capital/
Startu
p
Cost
(
B
X
C)
(
E)
Annual
O&
M
Costs
for
One
Respondent
(
F)
Number
of
Respondents
with
O&
M
(
G)
Total
O&
M,
(
E
X
F)

Temperatur
e
Monitors
$
100,000
2
$
200,000
$
35,000
167
$
5,845,000
The
total
capital/
startup
costs
for
this
ICR
are
$
200,000.
This
is
the
total
of
column
D
in
the
above
table.
These
costs
are
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
a),
Total
annualized
capital/
startup
costs.

The
total
operation
and
maintenance
(
O&
M)
costs
for
this
ICR
are
$
5,845,000.
This
is
the
total
of
column
G.
These
costs
are
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
b),
Total
annual
costs
(
O&
M).

The
total
respondent
costs
in
block
14
have
been
calculated
as
the
addition
of
the
capital/
startup
costs,
and
the
annual
operation
and
maintenance
costs.
The
average
annual
cost
for
capital/
startup
and
operation
and
maintenance
costs
to
industry
over
the
next
three
years
of
the
ICR
are
estimated
to
be
$
6,045,000.
This
cost
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
c),
Total
annualized
cost
requested.
The
numbers
in
block
14
of
the
OMB
83­
I
form
are
rounded
to
show
the
cost
in
thousands
of
dollars.
The
continuous
monitoring
costs
that
are
included
in
this
section
consist
only
of
those
capital/
startup
and
O&
M
costs
that
a
source
incurs
as
a
result
of
the
standard.
Some
continuous
monitoring
costs
may
not
be
included
in
this
section.
For
instance,
if
a
particular
industry
typically
utilizes
a
control
device
that
must
have
a
continuous
monitor
(
e.
g.,
temperature,
pressure
drop,
etc.)
to
function
properly,
and
the
recordation
of
additional
measurements
beyond
the
minimum
are
required
by
the
standard,
then
there
is
no
11
capital/
startup
or
O&
M
cost,
but
there
is
a
labor
cost
to
record
the
additional
readings.
Such
a
cost
would
not
appear
in
this
section,
but
in
the
industry
burden
Section
6
(
d)
below.

6(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
The
only
costs
to
the
Agency
are
those
costs
associated
with
analysis
of
the
reported
information.
EPA's
overall
compliance
and
enforcement
program
includes
activities
such
as
the
examination
of
records
maintained
by
the
respondents,
periodic
inspection
of
sources
of
emissions,
and
the
publication
and
distribution
of
collected
information.

The
average
annual
Agency
cost
during
the
three
years
of
the
ICR
is
estimated
to
be
$
3,848.

This
cost
is
based
on
the
average
hourly
labor
rate
as
follows:

Managerial
$
54.66
(
GS­
13,
Step
5,
$
34.16
x
1.6)
Technical
$
40.56
(
GS­
12,
Step
1,
$
25.35
x
1.6)
Clerical
$
21.95
(
GS­
6,
Step
3,
$
13.72
x
1.6)

These
rates
are
from
the
Office
of
Personnel
Management
(
OPM)
"
2004
General
Schedule"
which
excludes
locality
rates
of
pay.
Details
upon
which
this
estimate
is
based
appear
in
Table
2:
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
for
Asphalt
Processing
and
Roofing
Manufacture
(
40
CFR
Part
60,
Subpart
UU).

6(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
Based
on
our
research
for
this
ICR,
approximately
169
existing
sources
are
currently
subject
to
the
standard.
Over
the
next
three
years,
we
estimate
that
two
(
2)
existing
sources
per
year
will
undergo
reconstruction
such
that
they
will
become
a
new
source
subject
to
the
standard.
Based
on
historical
data
provided
by
the
United
States
Census
Bureau,
we
also
estimate
that
nine
(
9)
facilities
currently
subject
to
the
regulation
will
cease
operations
per
year
over
the
next
three
years.

Number
of
respondents
is
calculated
using
the
following
table
which
addresses
the
three
years
covered
by
this
ICR.

Number
of
Respondents1
Respondents
That
Submit
Reports
Respondents
That
Do
Not
Submit
Any
Reports
12
Number
of
Respondents1
Year
(
A)
Number
of
New
Respondents
(
B)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
(
C)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
That
Keep
Records
but
Do
Not
Submit
Reports
(
D)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
That
Are
Also
New
Respondents
(
E)
Number
of
Respondents
(
E=
A+
B+
C­
D)

1
0
2
178
2
178
2
0
2
169
2
169
3
0
2
160
2
160
Average
0
2
169
2
169
1We
estimate
that
two
(
2)
existing
sources
will
undergo
reconstruction
such
that
they
are
new
sources.
We
also
estimate
that
the
number
of
existing
respondents
will
decrease
by
approximate
nine
(
9)
respondents
per
year
of
the
next
three
years.

As
shown
above,
the
average
Number
of
Respondents
over
the
three­
year
period
of
this
ICR
is
169.
This
number
appears
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
a),
Number
of
Respondents.

The
total
number
of
annual
responses
per
year
is
calculated
using
the
following
table:

Total
Annual
Responses
(
A)
Information
Collection
Activity
(
B)
Number
of
Respondents
(
C)
Number
of
Responses
(
D)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
That
Keep
Records
But
Do
Not
Submit
Reports
(
E)
Total
Annual
Responses
E=(
BxC)+
D
Notification
and
application
of
construction
or
modification.
2
1
N/
A
2
Notification
of
actual
startup.
2
1
N/
A
2
Notification
of
physical
or
operational
change
which
may
increase
the
emission
rate.
2
1
N/
A
2
Notification
of
demonstration
of
continuous
monitoring
system.
2
1
N/
A
2
Notification
of
initial
performance
tests.
2
1
N/
A
2
Report
on
initial
performance
test.
2
1
N/
A
2
13
Total
Annual
Responses
(
A)
Information
Collection
Activity
(
B)
Number
of
Respondents
(
C)
Number
of
Responses
(
D)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
That
Keep
Records
But
Do
Not
Submit
Reports
(
E)
Total
Annual
Responses
E=(
BxC)+
D
Records
of
production
rate
and
hours
of
operations
169
0
169
169
Records
of
operating
parameters
of
CMS
169
0
169
169
Records
of
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
169
0
169
169
Total
519
The
number
of
Total
Annual
Responses
is
519.
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
b),
Total
Annual
Responses.

6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
Burden
Hours
and
Cost
Tables
The
detailed
bottom
line
burden
hours
and
cost
calculations
for
the
respondents
and
the
Agency
are
shown
in
the
attached
Tables
1
and
2,
respectively,
and
are
summarized
on
the
following
page.

(
i)
Respondent
Tally
The
Total
Hours
Requested
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
c).
The
total
annual
labor
costs
are
$
1,940,874.
The
annual
labor
costs
are
not
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form.
Details
regarding
these
estimates
may
be
found
in
Table
1:
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
for
Asphalt
Processing
and
Roofing
Manufacture
(
40
CFR
Part
60,
Subpart
UU),
attached.
Furthermore,
the
annual
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
of
information
is
estimated
to
average
58.6
hours
per
response.

The
total
annual
capital/
startup
and
O&
M
costs
to
the
regulated
entity
are
$
6,045,000.
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
c),
Total
annualized
cost
requested.
The
cost
calculations
are
detailed
in
Section
6(
b)(
iii),
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs.

(
ii)
The
Agency
Tally
The
average
annual
Agency
burden
and
cost
over
next
three
years
is
estimated
to
be
97
labor
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
3,848.
See
Table
2:
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
for
Asphalt
Processing
and
Roofing
Manufacture
(
40
CFR
Part
60,
Subpart
UU),
attached.
14
6(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
The
increase
in
burden
from
the
most
recently
approved
ICR
is
due
to
an
adjustment
in
the
number
of
existing
affected
sources
from
83
to
178.
The
reason
for
the
change
in
the
number
of
existing
sources
is
due
to
the
availability
of
better
data
(
e.
g.,
EPA's
Enforcement
and
Compliance
History
Online
(
ECHO)
database
and
the
U.
S.
Census
Bureau's
2002
Economic
Census
Reports).

6(
g)
Burden
Statement
The
annual
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
of
information
is
estimated
to
average
58.6
hours
per
response.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
to
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
to
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
to
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
to
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
to
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
valid
OMB
Control
Number.
The
OMB
Control
Numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
at
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15.

To
comment
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques,
EPA
has
established
a
public
docket
for
this
ICR
under
Docket
ID
Number
OECA­
2004­
0013,
which
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Docket
and
Information
Center
in
the
EPA
Docket
Center
(
EPA/
DC),
EPA
West,
Room
B102,
1301
Constitution
Avenue,
NW,
Washington,
D.
C.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566­
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
OECA
Docket
is
(
202)
566­
1752.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA
Dockets
(
EDOCKET)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.
Use
EDOCKET
to
submit
or
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
When
in
the
system,
select
"
search,"
then
key
in
the
Docket
ID
Number
identified
above.
Also,
you
can
send
comments
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,
NW,
Washington,
D.
C.
20503,
Attention:
Desk
Officer
for
EPA.
Please
include
the
EPA
Docket
ID
Number
OECA­
2004­
0013
and
OMB
Control
Number
2060­
0002
in
any
correspondence.

Part
B
of
the
Supporting
Statement
15
This
part
is
not
applicable
because
no
statistical
methods
were
used
in
collecting
this
information.
