SF­
83
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
NSPS
for
Small
Industrial­
Commercial­
Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc)
(
Renewal)

1.
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
1(
a)
Title
of
the
Information
Collection
NSPS
for
Small
Industrial­
Commercial­
Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc)
(
Renewal)

1(
b)
Short
Characterization/
Abstract
The
New
Source
Performance
Standards
(
NSPS)
for
small
industrial­
commercialinstitutional
steam
generating
units,
published
at
40
CFR
60.40c,
were
proposed
on
June
9,
1989,
and
promulgated
on
September
12,
1990.
These
standards
apply
to
industrial­
commercialinstitutional
steam
generating
units
with
maximum
design
heat
input
capacity
of
29
megawatts
(
MW)
(
100
million
Btu/
hr)
or
less,
but
greater
than
or
equal
to
2.9
MW
(
10
million
Btu/
hr),
commencing
construction,
modification,
or
reconstruction
after
June
9,
1989.
The
standards
limit
the
emissions
of
sulfur
dioxide
(
SO
2)
and
particulate
matter
(
PM).
For
the
purposes
of
this
document,
new
units
are
those
affected
units
that
have
had
construction,
modification,
or
reconstruction
within
the
last
three
years.
This
information
is
being
collected
to
assure
compliance
with
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc.

In
general,
all
NSPS
standards
require
initial
notifications,
performance
tests,
and
periodic
reports.
Owners
or
operators
are
also
required
to
maintain
records
of
the
occurrence
and
duration
of
any
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
in
the
operation
of
an
affected
facility,
or
any
period
during
which
the
monitoring
system
is
inoperative.
These
notifications,
reports,
and
records
are
essential
in
determining
compliance,
and
are
required
of
all
sources
subject
to
NSPS.

Any
owner
or
operator
subject
to
the
provisions
of
this
part
shall
maintain
a
file
of
these
measurements,
and
retain
the
file
for
at
least
two
years
following
the
date
of
such
measurements,
maintenance
reports,
and
records.
All
reports
are
sent
to
the
delegated
state
or
local
authority.
In
the
event
that
there
is
no
such
delegated
authority,
the
reports
are
sent
directly
to
the
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
regional
office.
Once
received
by
the
authority,
reports
are
reviewed
and
the
data
is
entered,
analyzed,
and
maintained
in
the
Air
Facility
System
(
AFS).
Information
from
these
reports
can
be
used
by
any
regions,
states,
agencies
and
offices
with
access
to
AFS
and
may
be
used
in
determining
where
inspections
and
enforcement
actions
may
be
necessary.

Approximately
213
sources
are
currently
subject
to
the
regulation,
and
it
is
estimated
that
an
additional
11
sources
per
year
will
become
subject
to
the
regulation
in
the
next
three
years.
It
is
further
assumed
that
there
is
an
average
of
1.7
affected
facilities
per
plant.
The
annual
cost
of
2
this
ICR
will
be
$
9,466,145
for
nonlabor
and
$
10,206,909
for
labor
(
based
on
a
labor
burden
of
156,610
hours)
for
a
total
of
$
19,673,054.

The
active
(
previous)
ICR
had
the
following
Terms
of
Clearance:

"
This
request
for
extension
of
ICR
OMB
number
2060­
0202
is
approved
for
three
years
pursuant
to
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act.
Before
resubmission
of
this
ICR
for
extension,
the
Agency
should
demonstrate
in
the
Supporting
Statement
how
estimates
of
the
respondents
and
estimates
of
the
burden
per
respondent
were
developed
taking
into
account
Agency
experience
and
public/
respondent
comments."

EPA
has
addressed
the
items
of
concern
in
the
Terms
of
Clearance
in
three
ways.
To
determine
the
current
number
of
respondents,
EPA
queried
the
RACT/
BACT/
LAER
Clearinghouse
(
RBLC)
to
determine
the
number
of
permits
issued
since
June
1989
for
steam
generating
units
within
the
size
range
covered
by
subpart
Dc.
The
RBLC
contains
information
on
all
permits
issued
by
states
and
EPA,
and
represents
the
best
data
source
to
identify
the
current
number
of
respondents.
To
forecast
the
number
of
new
sources
over
the
next
three
years,
EPA
used
current
industry
energy
forecasts
from
the
Energy
Information
Agency
(
EIA),
in
combination
with
trends
in
new
permits
issued
(
using
the
RBLC),
to
estimate
the
number
of
new
sources
in
each
of
the
next
three
years.
Finally,
to
estimate
burden,
EPA
used
detailed
cost
data
on
the
installation
and,
operation
and
maintenance
of
monitoring
equipment
(
EPA
Air
Pollution
Control
Manual,
January
2002),
and
closely
followed
the
monitoring
requirements
in
subpart
Dc
to
estimate
burden.
For
example,
a
subset
of
sources
under
this
subpart
are
required
to
monitor
SO
2
emissions
before
and
after
a
control
device,
requiring
additional
monitoring
equipment
and
costs.
For
PM,
a
subset
of
the
sources
under
this
subpart
are
required
to
install
continuous
opacity
monitors.
Using
data
in
the
RBLC,
EPA
determined
the
number
of
existing
sources
(
and
estimated
the
number
of
new
sources)
that
fall
into
each
of
the
monitoring
categories.
This
information
is
provided
in
Section
6(
b)(
iii)
of
this
supporting
statement.

2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
The
EPA
is
charged
under
Section
111
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA),
as
amended,
to
establish
standards
of
performance
for
new
stationary
sources
that
reflect:

.
.
.
application
of
the
best
technological
system
of
continuous
emissions
reduction
which
(
taking
into
consideration
the
cost
of
achieving
such
emissions
reduction,
or
any
non­
air
quality
health
3
and
environmental
impact
and
energy
requirements)
the
Administrator
determines
has
been
adequately
demonstrated.
Section
111(
a)(
l).

The
Agency
refers
to
this
charge
as
selecting
the
best
demonstrated
technology
(
BDT).
Section
111
also
requires
that
the
Administrator
review
and,
if
appropriate,
revise
such
standards
every
four
years.

In
the
Administrator's
judgment,
SO
2
and
PM
emissions
from
small
industrial­
commercialinstitutional
steam
generating
units
cause
or
contribute
to
air
pollution
that
may
reasonably
be
anticipated
to
endanger
public
health
or
welfare.
Therefore,
the
NSPS
were
promulgated
for
this
source
category
at
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc.

2(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data
The
control
of
emissions
of
SO
2
and
PM
from
small
industrial­
commercial­
institutional
steam
generating
units
requires
not
only
the
installation
of
properly
designed
equipment,
but
also
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
that
equipment.
Emissions
of
SO
2
and
PM
from
small
industrial­
commercial­
institutional
steam
generating
units
are
the
result
of
combustion
of
fuels
in
the
boilers.
The
subject
standards
are
achieved
by
the
capture
and
reduction
of
SO
2
and
PM
emissions
using
control
technologies
such
as
settling
chambers,
cyclones,
wet
collectors
and
scrubbers,
electrostatic
precipitators,
and
fabric
filters.
The
notifications
required
in
the
applicable
regulations
are
used
to
inform
the
Agency
or
delegated
authority
when
a
source
becomes
subject
to
the
requirements
of
the
regulations.
The
reviewing
authority
may
then
inspect
the
source
to
check
if
the
pollution
control
devices
are
properly
installed
and
operated
and
the
regulations
are
being
met.
Performance
test
reports
are
needed
as
these
are
the
Agency's
record
of
a
source's
initial
capability
to
comply
with
the
emission
standards.
The
semiannual
reports
are
used
for
problem
identification,
as
a
check
on
source
operation
and
maintenance,
and
for
compliance
determinations.
The
information
generated
by
the
monitoring,
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
described
in
this
ICR
is
used
by
the
Agency
to
ensure
that
facilities
affected
by
the
NSPS
continue
to
operate
the
control
equipment
in
compliance
with
the
regulation.
Adequate
monitoring,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
are
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
applicable
regulations,
as
required
by
the
Clean
Air
Act.
The
information
collected
from
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
is
also
used
for
targeting
inspections,
and
is
of
sufficient
quality
to
be
used
as
evidence
in
court.

3.
Nonduplication,
Consultations,
and
Other
Collection
Criteria
The
requested
recordkeeping
and
reporting
are
required
under
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc.
4
3(
a)
Nonduplication
If
the
subject
standards
have
not
been
delegated,
the
information
is
sent
directly
to
the
appropriate
EPA
regional
office.
Otherwise,
the
information
is
sent
directly
to
the
delegated
state
or
local
agency.
If
a
state
or
local
agency
has
adopted
its
own
similar
standards
to
implement
the
federal
standards,
a
copy
of
the
report
submitted
to
the
state
or
local
agency
can
be
sent
to
the
Administrator
in
lieu
of
the
report
required
by
the
federal
standards.
Therefore,
no
duplication
exists.

3(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
An
announcement
of
a
public
comment
period
for
the
renewal
of
this
ICR
was
published
in
the
Federal
Register
(
69
FR
29718)
on
May
25,
2004.
No
comments
were
received
on
the
burden
published
in
the
Federal
Register.

3(
c)
Consultations
EPA
used
information
from
the
Energy
Information
Agency
(
including
the
Annual
Energy
Outlook)
to
determine
the
current
number
of
sources
and
to
estimate
the
number
of
new
sources
over
the
next
three
years.
EPA
also
reviewed
data
in
the
RACT/
BACT/
LAER
Clearinghouse
and
the
OTIS
database.
Please
note
that
because
the
respondents
covered
under
this
subpart
span
a
wide
range
of
manufacturing,
service,
and
institutional
sectors,
a
specific
trade
group
does
not
exist
that
covers
the
sources
regulated
by
this
subpart.

EPA
also
spoke
with
Stephen
D.
Smith,
Senior
Safety
and
Environmental
Engineer
for
Novus
Engineering
PC
(
518­
439­
8235),
whose
company
represents
some
facilities
that
are
subject
to
this
rule.
He
had
the
following
comments.

Thank
you
for
your
interest
in
receiving
a
brief
synopsis
of
our
concerns
regarding
the
requirement
for
the
collection
of
Fuel
Supplier
Certification
documents,
which
are
described
at
40
CFR
60.42c(
h),
60.44c(
h),
60.48c(
e)(
11)
and
60.48c(
f).
While
this
requirement
provides
relief
from
the
more
onerous
and
expensive
Continuous
Emissions
Monitoring
of
sulfur,
as
written,
the
requirement
imposes
an
unreasonable
burden
on
the
regulated
community
for
the
following
reasons:

1.
Fuel
oil
suppliers
are
usually
small
carting
operations
that
receive
oil
from
large
distribution
facilities.
The
distribution
facilities
are
constantly
receiving
and
distributing
oil.
Given
the
time
it
takes
for
oil
to
be
sampled,
tested,
and
the
results
to
be
returned,
it
is
not
possible
for
a
test
to
reflect
the
current
sulfur
content
of
any
distributor's
tank
or
any
load
of
oil
dispensed
to
a
delivery
truck
and
provided
to
a
facility.
Therefore,
the
copious
information
that
is
collected
does
5
not
serve
its
intended
purpose.

2.
Given
that
the
testing
is
conducted
by
the
oil
distributor
and
the
oil
is
transported
by
a
carter,
neither
the
carter
nor
the
facility
receiving
the
oil
can
have
any
control
over
the
information
that
is
included
in
the
fuel
supplier
certification
form.
NSPS
wrongly
make
the
facility
responsible
for
the
information
contained
in
the
form.

3.
Certification
is
required
for
each
delivery
of
fuel.
Given
that
several
deliveries
per
day
may
be
received
by
a
facility
during
the
winter
months,
NSPS
reports
often
include
scores
of
unnecessary
pages
of
duplicate
information.

3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
Less
frequent
information
collection
would
decrease
the
margin
of
assurance
that
facilities
are
continuing
to
meet
the
standards.
Requirements
for
information
gathering
and
recordkeeping
are
useful
techniques
to
ensure
that
good
operation
and
maintenance
practices
are
applied
and
emission
limitations
are
met.
If
the
information
required
by
these
standards
was
collected
less
frequently,
the
likelihood
of
detecting
poor
operation
and
maintenance
of
control
equipment
and
noncompliance
would
decrease.

3(
e)
General
Guidelines
None
of
these
reporting
or
recordkeeping
requirements
violate
any
of
the
regulations
established
by
OMB
at
5
CFR
1320.5.

3(
f)
Confidentiality
Any
information
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
Agency
policies
set
forth
in
Title
40,
Chapter
1,
part
2,
subpart
B
­
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information
(
see
40
CFR
2;
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;
amended
by
43
FR
40000,
September
8,
1978;
43
FR
42251,
September
20,
1978;
44
FR
17674,
March
23,
1979).

3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
None
of
the
reporting
or
recordkeeping
requirements
contain
sensitive
questions.

4.
The
Respondents
and
the
Information
Requested
6
4(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
The
respondents
to
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
facilities
with
small
industrial­
commercial­
institutional
steam
generating
units.
The
types
of
businesses
that
use
these
units
cross
many
manufacturing,
service,
and
institutional
SIC
(
United
States
Standard
Industrial
Classification)
codes
and
NAICS
(
United
States
Standard
Industrial
Classification)
codes.
Therefore,
the
list
of
SIC/
NAICS
codes
below
are
for
industries
that
might
be
covered
under
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc
and
is
not
all
inclusive.

Standard
SIC
Codes
NAICS
Codes
40
CFR
Part
60,
Subpart
Dc
13
211
24
321
26
322
28
325
29
324
30
316,
326,
339
33
331
34
332
37
336
49
221
80
622
82
611
4(
b)
Information
Requested
(
i)
Data
Items
All
data
in
this
ICR
that
are
recorded
and/
or
reported
are
required
by
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc,
Standards
of
Performance
for
Small
Industrial­
Commercial­
Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units.
7
A
source
must
make
the
following
reports:

Notification
Reports
Notification
of
construction
or
reconstruction.
60.7(
a)(
1),
60.48c(
a)

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
60.7(
a)(
2),
60.48c(
a)

Notification
of
actual
startup
date.
60.7(
a)(
3)

Notification
of
modification.
60.7(
a)(
4)

Notification
of
demonstration
of
continuous
monitoring
system.
60.7(
a)(
5)

Notification
of
initial
performance
test.
60.8(
a),
60.8(
d)

Reports
Semiannual
reports
of
excess
emissions
and
performance
of
continuous
monitoring
systems,
and/
or
summary
report
forms.
60.7(
c),
60.7(
d),
60.48c(
c),
60.48c(
d),
60.48c(
j)

Initial
performance
test
results
and
any
subsequent
performance
tests
and,
if
applicable,
the
performance
evaluation
of
the
CEMS
and/
or
COMS.
60.8(
a)
and
60.48c(
b)

A
respondent
must
keep
the
following
records:

Recordkeeping
Keep
records
of
startups,
shutdowns,
and
malfunctions
of
affected
facilities;
malfunctions
of
control
devices;
and
periods
where
the
continuous
monitoring
system
is
inoperative.
60.7(
b)

Keep
records
of
measurements,
performance
evaluations,
calibration
checks,
adjustments
and
maintenance
related
to
continuous
monitoring
systems.
60.7(
f)

Keep
records
regarding
SO
2
emission
limits,
fuel
oil
sulfur
limits,
or
percent
reduction
requirements.
60.48c(
e),
60.48c(
f),
60.48c(
g),
and
60.48(
h)
8
Electronic
Reporting
Presently,
respondents
are
using
monitoring
equipment
that
provides
automated
parameter
data
(
e.
g.,
SO
2
and
PM
emissions).
Although
personnel
at
the
affected
plants
must
evaluate
the
data,
this
type
of
monitoring
equipment
has
significantly
reduced
the
burden
associated
with
monitoring
and
recordkeeping.
In
addition,
some
regulatory
entities
(
both
governments
and
respondents)
are
setting
up
electronic
reporting
systems
to
allow
sources
to
report
electronically,
which
is
reducing
the
reporting
burden.
It
is
estimated
that
approximately
10
percent
of
respondents
use
electronic
reporting.

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
Respondent
Activities
Read
instructions.

Install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
operate
CEMS
for
SO
2
or
sample
fuel
prior
to
combustion
and
estimate
emissions
using
Method
6B.
Install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
operate
COMS
for
opacity.

Perform
initial
performance
test
for
SO
2,
Reference
Method
19
test
(
Method
6B
for
fuel
sampling),
and
repeat
performance
tests
if
necessary.

Perform
initial
performance
test
for
PM,
Reference
Methods
1,
5,
5B,
9,
and/
or
17,
and
repeat
performance
tests
if
necessary.

Write
the
notifications
and
reports
listed
above.

Enter
information
required
to
be
recorded
above.

Submit
the
required
reports,
developing,
acquiring,
installing,
and
utilizing
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information.

Develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
processing
and
maintaining
information.

Develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
disclosing
and
providing
information.

Adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements.

Train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information.
9
Respondent
Activities
Transmit,
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

5.
The
Information
Collected:
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
5(
a)
Agency
Activities
EPA
conducts
the
following
activities
in
connection
with
the
acquisition,
analysis,
storage,
and
distribution
of
the
required
information.

Agency
Activities
Observe
initial
performance
tests
and
repeat
performance
tests,
if
necessary.

Review
notifications
and
reports,
including
performance
test
reports,
and
excess
emissions
reports,
required
to
be
submitted
by
industry.

Audit
facility
records.

Input,
analyze,
and
maintain
data
in
the
Air
Facility
System
(
AFS).

5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
Following
notification
of
startup,
the
reviewing
authority
might
inspect
the
source
to
determine
whether
the
pollution
control
devices
are
properly
installed
and
operated
and
the
regulations
are
being
met.
Performance
test
reports
are
used
by
the
Agency
to
discern
a
source's
initial
capability
to
comply
with
the
emission
standard,
and
serve
as
a
record
of
the
operating
conditions
under
which
compliance
was
achieved.
Data
and
records
maintained
by
the
respondents
are
tabulated
and
published
for
use
in
compliance
and
enforcement
programs.
The
semiannual
reports
are
used
for
problem
identification,
as
a
check
on
source
operation
and
maintenance,
and
for
compliance
determinations.

Information
contained
in
the
reports
is
entered
into
the
AFS,
which
is
operated
and
maintained
by
EPA's
Office
of
Compliance.
AFS
is
EPA's
database
for
the
collection,
maintenance,
and
retrieval
of
compliance
data
for
approximately
125,000
industrial
and
government­
owned
facilities.
EPA
uses
the
AFS
for
tracking
air
pollution
compliance
and
enforcement
by
local
and
state
regulatory
agencies,
EPA
regional
offices
and
EPA
headquarters.
EPA
and
its
delegated
Authorities
can
edit,
store,
retrieve
and
analyze
the
data.
10
The
records
required
by
this
regulation
must
be
retained
by
the
owner
or
operator
for
two
years.

5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
There
is
a
distribution
of
business
sizes
among
the
regulated
industry.
Due
to
technical
considerations
involving
the
process
operations
and
the
types
of
control
equipment
employed,
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
the
same
for
both
small
and
large
entities.
The
impact
of
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
of
this
subpart
on
small
businesses
was
taken
into
consideration
during
the
development
of
the
regulation.
Although
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
the
same
for
small
and
larger
businesses,
the
Agency
considers
these
requirements
the
minimum
needed
to
ensure
compliance
and,
therefore,
cannot
reduce
these
requirements
further
for
small
businesses.
To
the
extent
that
larger
businesses
can
use
economies
of
scale
to
reduce
their
burden,
the
overall
burden
will
be
reduced.

5(
d)
Collection
Schedule
The
specific
frequency
for
each
information
collection
activity
within
this
request
is
shown
in
Table
1:
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
subpart
Dc,
Standards
of
Performance
for
Small
Industrial­
Commercial­
Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units.

6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
Table
1
documents
the
computation
of
individual
burdens
for
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
applicable
to
the
industry
for
the
subpart
included
in
this
ICR.
The
individual
burdens
are
expressed
under
standardized
headings
believed
to
be
consistent
with
the
concept
of
burden
under
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act.
Where
appropriate,
specific
tasks
and
major
assumptions
have
been
identified.
Responses
to
this
information
collection
are
mandatory.

The
Agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
Control
Number.

6(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
The
average
annual
burden
to
industry
over
the
next
three
years
from
these
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
is
estimated
to
be
156,610
hours.
These
hours
are
based
on
Agency
studies
and
background
documents
from
the
development
of
the
regulation,
Agency
knowledge
and
experience
with
the
NSPS
program,
the
previously
approved
ICR,
and
any
comments
received.

6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs
11
(
i)
Estimating
Labor
Costs
This
ICR
uses
the
following
labor
rates:

Managerial
$
95.32
($
45.39
+
110%)
Technical
$
64.60
($
30.76
+
110%)
Clerical
$
40.09
($
19.09
+
110%)

These
rates
are
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Labor,
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics,
December,
2003,
"
Table
10.
Private
industry,
by
occupational
and
industry
group."
The
rates
are
from
column
1,
"
Total
compensation."
The
rates
have
been
increased
by
110%
to
account
for
the
benefit
packages
available
to
those
employed
by
private
industry.

(
ii)
Estimating
Capital/
Startup
and
Operation
and
Maintenance
Costs
The
type
of
industry
costs
associated
with
the
information
collection
activities
in
the
subject
standard
are
both
labor
costs,
which
are
addressed
elsewhere
in
this
ICR,
and
the
costs
associated
with
continuous
monitoring.
The
capital/
startup
costs
are
one
time
costs
when
a
facility
becomes
subject
to
the
regulation.
The
annual
operation
and
maintenance
costs
are
the
ongoing
costs
to
maintain
the
monitor(
s)
and
other
costs
such
as
photocopying
and
postage.

(
iii)
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
The
following
table
presents
the
respondent
costs
associated
with
capital/
startup,
and
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
monitoring
systems
that
are
required
by
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc.

Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
(
A)

Continuous
Monitoring
Device
(
B)

Capital/
Startu
p
Cost
for
One
Device
(
C)

Annual
Number
of
New
Devices
(
D)

Total
Annual
Capital/
Startu
p
Cost,
(
B
X
C)
(
E)

Annual
O&
M
Costs
for
One
Device
(
F)

Annual
Number
of
Devices
(
G)

Total
O&
M,
(
E
X
F)

SO2
Monitoring
CEMS,
control
device
inlet
and
outlet
$
113,592
0
$
0
$
25,900
26
$
673,400
12
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
CEMS,
control
device
outlet
only
$
73,028
19
$
1,387,532
$
17,100
3741
$
6,395,400
PM
Monitoring
COMS
for
sources
burning
coal,
residual
oil,
or
wood
$
47,033
2.2
$
103,473
$
9,100
97.42
$
886,340
Total
$
1,491,005
$
7,955,140
1
This
represents
an
annual
average
of
235
existing
respondents,
multiplied
by
an
average
of
1.7
affected
units
per
respondent,
less
an
annual
average
of
26
units
requiring
inlet
and
outlet
monitoring.

2
This
represents
93
existing
affected
units
that
require
COMS,
plus
2.2
new
affected
units
per
year
that
require
COMS,
averaged
over
the
next
three
years.

Cost
information
in
the
above
table
is
from
the
EPA
Air
Pollution
Control
Cost
Manual,
January
2002.
To
estimate
the
costs,
EPA
used
data
from
Table
4.12:
Default
Analyzed
and
Monitor
Equipment
Costs
for
CEMS,
Table
4.13:
Coefficients
for
Calculating
Total
Capital
Investment
(
TCI)
for
CEMS,
and
Table
4.14:
Coefficients
for
Calculating
Total
Annual
Costs
(
TAC)
for
CEMS,
along
with
equations
presented
in
Section
4.2,
Total
Capital
Investment,
and
Section
4.3,
Total
Annual
Costs.

The
total
capital/
startup
costs
for
this
ICR
are
$
1,491,005.
This
is
the
total
of
column
D
in
the
above
table.
These
costs
are
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
a),
Total
annualized
capital/
startup
costs.

The
total
operation
and
maintenance
(
O&
M)
costs
for
this
ICR
are
$
7,955,140.
This
is
the
total
of
column
G.
These
costs
are
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
b),
Total
annual
costs
(
O&
M).

The
total
respondent
costs
in
block
14
have
been
calculated
as
the
addition
of
the
capital/
startup
costs,
and
the
annual
operation
and
maintenance
costs.
The
average
annual
cost
for
capital/
startup
and
operation
and
maintenance
costs
to
industry
over
the
next
three
years
of
the
ICR
is
estimated
to
be
$
9,466,145.
This
cost
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
c),
Total
annualized
cost
requested.
The
numbers
in
block
14
of
the
OMB
83­
I
form
are
rounded
to
show
the
cost
in
thousands
of
dollars.
13
6(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
The
only
costs
to
the
Agency
are
those
costs
associated
with
analysis
of
the
reported
information.
EPA's
overall
compliance
and
enforcement
program
includes
activities
such
as
the
examination
of
records
maintained
by
the
respondents,
periodic
inspection
of
sources
of
emissions,
and
the
publication
and
distribution
of
collected
information.

The
average
annual
Agency
cost
during
the
three
years
of
the
ICR
is
estimated
to
be
$
177,840.

This
cost
is
based
on
the
average
hourly
labor
rate
as
follows:

Managerial
$
54.66
(
GS­
13,
Step
5,
$
34.16
x
1.6)
Technical
$
40.56
(
GS­
12,
Step
1,
$
25.35
x
1.6)
Clerical
$
21.95
(
GS­
6,
Step
3,
$
13.72
x
1.6)

These
rates
are
from
the
Office
of
Personnel
Management
(
OPM)
"
2004
General
Schedule"
which
excludes
locality
rates
of
pay.
These
rates
can
be
obtained
from
the
OPM
web
site,
http//
www.
opm.
gov/
oca/
payrates/
index/
htm.
Details
upon
which
this
estimate
is
based
appear
in
Table
2:
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
Subpart
Dc,
Standards
of
Performance
for
Small
Industrial­
Commercial­
Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc),
below.

6(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
Based
on
our
research
for
this
ICR,
approximately
213
existing
sources
are
currently
subject
to
the
standard.
It
is
estimated
that
an
additional
11
sources
per
year
will
become
subject
to
the
standard
in
the
next
three
years.

The
number
of
respondents
is
calculated
using
the
following
table,
which
addresses
the
three
years
covered
by
this
ICR.

Number
of
Respondents
Respondents
That
Submit
Reports
Respondents
That
Do
Not
Submit
Any
Reports
14
Number
of
Respondents
Year
(
A)
Number
of
New
Respondents
1
(
B)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
(
C)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
that
keep
records
but
do
not
submit
reports
(
D)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
That
Are
Also
New
Respondents
1
(
E)
Number
of
Respondents
(
E=
A+
B+
C­
D)

1
11
213
0
0
224
2
11
224
0
0
235
3
11
235
0
0
246
Average
11
224
0
0
235
1
New
respondents
include
plants
with
constructed,
reconstructed
and
modified
affected
sources.
EPA
assumes
that
all
new
sources
also
represent
new
respondents.

To
avoid
double­
counting
respondents
column
D
is
subtracted.
As
shown
above,
the
average
Number
of
Respondents
over
the
three
year
period
of
this
ICR
is
235.
This
number
appears
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
a),
Number
of
respondents.

The
total
number
of
annual
responses
per
year
is
calculated
using
the
following
table.

Total
Annual
Responses
(
A)

Information
Collection
Activity
(
B)

Number
of
Respondents
(
C)

Number
of
Responses
(
D)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
That
Keep
Records
But
Do
Not
Submit
Reports
(
E)
Total
Annual
Responses
E=(
BxC)+
D
Notification
of
construction/
reconstruction
4
1.7
0
7
Notification
of
modification
7
1.7
0
12
Notification
of
actual
start­
up
11
1.7
0
19
Notification
of
initial
performance
test
11
1.7
0
19
Notification
of
CEMS
demonstration
11
1.7
0
19
Semiannual
compliance
reports
235
2
0
470
15
Total
Annual
Responses
Total
546
The
number
of
Total
Annual
Responses
is
546.
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
b),
Total
annual
responses.

The
Total
Hours
Requested
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
c).
The
total
annual
labor
costs
are
$
10,206,909.
The
annual
labor
costs
are
not
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form.
Details
regarding
these
estimates
may
be
found
in
Table
1:
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
Subpart
Dc,
Standards
of
Performance
for
Small
Industrial­
Commercial­
Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units
(
40
CFR
Part
60,
Subpart
Dc).

6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
Burden
Hours
and
Cost
Tables
The
detailed
bottom
line
burden
hours
and
cost
calculations
for
the
respondents
and
the
Agency
are
shown
in
Tables
1
and
2,
respectively,
and
summarized
below.

(
i)
Respondent
Tally
The
Total
Hours
Requested
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
c).
The
total
annual
labor
costs
are
$
10,206,909.
The
annual
labor
costs
are
not
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form.
Details
regarding
these
estimates
may
be
found
in
Table
1:
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
subpart
Dc,
Standards
of
Performance
for
Small
Industrial­
Commercial­
Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc).
Furthermore,
the
annual
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
of
information
is
estimated
to
average
287
hours
per
response.

The
total
annual
capital/
startup
and
O&
M
costs
to
the
regulated
entity
are
$
9,466,145.
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
c),
Total
annualized
cost
requested.
The
cost
calculations
are
detailed
in
Section
6(
b)(
iii),
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs.

(
ii)
The
Agency
Tally
16
The
average
annual
Agency
burden
and
cost
over
next
three
years
is
estimated
to
be
4,496
labor
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
177,840.
See
Table
2:
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
subpart
Dc,
Standards
of
Performance
for
Small
Industrial­
Commercial­
Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc),
above.

6(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
The
decrease
in
burden
from
the
most
recently
approved
ICR
is
due
to
adjustments.
The
adjustment
decrease
in
burden
from
the
most
recently
approved
ICR
is
primarily
due
to
a
decrease
in
the
expected
number
of
new
sources
over
the
next
three
years
and
the
resulting
decrease
in
the
burden
associated
with
submitting
notifications.
The
estimated
respondent
burden
associated
with
capital/
startup
and
operation
and
maintenance
costs
has
decreased
to
less
than
the
current
OMB
inventory
due
to
a
reduction
in
the
number
of
new
sources
and
revisions
to
operation
and
maintenance
costs.

6(
g)
Burden
Statement
The
annual
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
of
information
is
estimated
to
average
287
hours
per
response.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
valid
OMB
Control
Number.
The
OMB
Control
Numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
at
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
Chapter
15.

To
comment
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques,
EPA
has
established
a
public
docket
for
this
ICR
under
Docket
ID
Number
OECA­
2004­
0010,
which
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Docket
and
Information
Center
in
the
EPA
Docket
Center
(
EPA/
DC),
EPA
West,
Room
B102,
1301
Constitution
Avenue,
NW,
Washington,
DC.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566­
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Docket
and
Information
Center
is
(
202)
566­
1752.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA
Dockets
(
EDOCKET)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.
Use
EDOCKET
to
submit
or
view
public
17
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
When
in
the
system,
select
"
search,"
then
key
in
the
Docket
ID
Number
identified
above.
Also,
you
can
send
comments
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20503,
Attention:
Desk
Officer
for
EPA.
Please
include
the
EPA
Docket
ID
Number
OECA­
2004­
0010
and
OMB
Control
Number
2060­
0202
in
any
correspondence.

Part
B
of
the
Supporting
Statement
This
part
is
not
applicable
because
no
statistical
methods
were
used
in
collecting
this
information.
18
Table
1:
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
Subpart
Dc,
Standards
of
Performance
for
Small
Industrial­

Commercial­
Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc)

Activity
(
A)
Technical
Hrs/
Occurrence
(
B)
Occurrences/

Respondent/

Yr.
(
C)
Hours/
Respondent/

Yr.
(
D)
Number
of
Respondents
(
E)
Technical
Hrs/
Yr.

(
E
=
C
x
D)
(
F)
Management
Hours/
Yr.

(
F
=
0.05
x
E)
(
G)
Clerical
Hours/
Yr.

(
G
=
0.1
x
E)
(
H)

Total
Labor
Costs/
Yr.

($)
1
1.
Applications
Not
applicable
2.
Survey
and
Studies
Not
applicable
3.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
2
1
2
11
22
1.1
2.2
1,614
B.
Required
activities
i.
Performance
test
(
2.9
­
8.7
MW)
3
8
2
16
7
112
5.6
11.2
8,218
ii.
Performance
test
(
8.7
­
29
MW)
3
330
2
660
4
2640
132
264
193,710
C.
Create
information
See
3B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
3E
E.
Write
reports
i.
Notification
of
construction/

reconstruction
2
1.7
3.4
4
13.6
0.68
1.36
998
ii.
Notification
of
modification
2
1.7
3.4
7
23.8
1.19
2.38
1,746
iii.
Notification
of
actual
start­
up
2
1.7
3.4
11
37.4
1.87
3.74
2,744
iv.
Notification
of
initial
performance
test
2
1.7
3.4
11
37.4
1.87
3.74
2,744
v.
Notification
of
demo
of
CEMS
2
1.7
3.4
11
37.4
1.87
3.74
2,744
vi.
Semiannual
reports
16
2
32
235
7,520
376
752
551,780
vii.
Results
of
performance
test
See
3B
19
Activity
(
A)
Technical
Hrs/
Occurrence
(
B)
Occurrences/

Respondent/

Yr.
(
C)
Hours/
Respondent/

Yr.
(
D)
Number
of
Respondents
(
E)
Technical
Hrs/
Yr.

(
E
=
C
x
D)
(
F)
Management
Hours/
Yr.

(
F
=
0.05
x
E)
(
G)
Clerical
Hours/
Yr.

(
G
=
0.1
x
E)
(
H)

Total
Labor
Costs/
Yr.

($)
1
4.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
3A
B.
Plan
activities
Not
applicable
C.
Implement
activities
Not
applicable
D.
Develop
record
system
Not
applicable
E.
Check
computer
system,
calibrate
continuous
monitors
1.5
365
547.5
235
128,662.5
6,433.13
12,866.25
9,440,611
F.
Train
personnel
Not
applicable
G.
Perform
audits
Not
applicable
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
rounded)
156,610
hours
$
10,206,909
1
This
cost
is
based
on
the
sum
of
personnel
hours
multiplied
by
their
hourly
labor
rates
[(
Technical
hours
x
$
64.60)
+
(
Management
hours
x
$
95.32)
+

(
Clerical
hours
x
$
40.09)].

2
Occurrences/
respondent
for
new
facilities
is
based
on
an
average
of
1.7
affected
facilities
per
respondent,
with
an
estimated
ten
percent
retest.

3
This
estimate
includes
performance
test
(
opacity)
for
coal,
wood
and
oil­
fired
steam
generating
units
and
test
of
continuous
emissions
monitor.
20
Table
2:
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost,
NSPS
subpart
Dc,
Standards
of
Performance
for
Small
Industrial­
Commercial­

Institutional
Steam
Generating
Units
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
Dc)

Activity
(
A)
Technical
Hrs/
Occurrence
(
B)
Occurrences/

Respondent/

Yr.
1
(
C)
Hours/
Respondent/
Yr.

©
=
A
x
B)
(
D)

#
Respondents
(
E)
Technical
Hrs/

Yr.

(
E
=
C
x
D)
(
F)
Management
Hours/
Yr.

(
F
=
0.05
x
E)
(
G)
Clerical
Hours/
Yr.

(
G
=
0.1
x
E)
(
H)

Total
Labor
Costs/
Yr.

($)
2
1.
Review
of
notification
of
construction/
reconstruction
2
1.7
3.4
4
13.6
0.68
1.36
619
2.
Review
of
notification
of
modification
2
1.7
3.4
7
23.8
1.19
2.38
1,083
3.
Review
of
notification
of
actual
start­
up
2
1.7
3.4
11
37.4
1.87
3.74
1,701
4.
Review
of
initial
CEMS
demonstration
2
1.7
3.4
11
37.4
1.87
3.74
1,701
5.
Review
of
demonstration
of
monitoring
system
2
1.7
3.4
11
37.4
1.87
3.74
1,701
6.
Review
of
semiannual
reports
8
2
16
235
3,760
188
376
171,035
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
rounded)
4,496
hours
$
177,840
1
Occurrences/
respondent
for
new
facilities
is
based
on
an
average
of
1.7
affected
facilities
per
respondent.

2
This
cost
is
based
on
the
sum
of
personnel
hours
multiplied
by
their
hourly
labor
rates
[(
Technical
hours
x
$
40.56)
+
(
Management
hours
x
$
54.66)
+

(
Clerical
hours
x
$
21.95)].
21
