TABLE
1.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
STEEL
PICKLING
NESHAP,
SUBPART
CCC
Burden
item
Notes
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
b
4
1
4
0.3
1.20
0.06
0.12
$
75.44
B.
Required
activities
Initial
performance
test
b
125
1
125
0.3
37.50
1.88
3.75
$
2,357.79
Repeat
performance
test
d
125
1
125
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
Annual
performance
test
c
125
1
125
71
8875.00
443.75
887.50
$
557,918.00
Startup,
shutdown,

malfunction
plan
b
40
1
40
0.3
12.00
0.60
1.20
$
754.37
Maintenance
plan
b
40
1
40
0.3
12.00
0.60
1.20
$
754.37
Maintenance
plan
revision
f
40
1
40
7.1
284.00
14.20
28.40
$
17,853.38
C.
Create
information
See
3B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
3B
E.
Write
report
Notification
of
applicability
g
2
1
2
0.3
0.60
0.03
0.06
$
37.72
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
h
2
1
2
0.3
0.60
0.03
0.06
$
37.72
Burden
item
Notes
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
g
2
1
2
0.3
0.60
0.03
0.06
$
37.72
Notification
of
actual
startup
g
2
1
2
0.3
0.60
0.03
0.06
$
37.72
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
i
N/
A
Notification
of
performance
test
d
2
1
2
0.3
0.60
0.03
0.06
$
37.72
Notification
of
compliance
status
g
4
1
4
0.3
1.20
0.06
0.12
$
75.44
NESHAP
waiver
application
i
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
Report
of
performance
test
d
See
3B
Report
of
monitoring
exceedances
j
16
2
32
14.26
456.32
22.82
45.63
$
28,686.10
Report
of
no
excess
emissions
j
8
2
16
57.04
912.64
45.63
91.26
$
57,372.04
Startup,
shutdown,

malfunction
report
k
8
2
16
3.57
57.12
2.86
5.71
$
3,591.11
4.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
3B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
inf
ormation
Records
of
all
info.

required
by
standards
l,
m
3
52
156
71.3
11122.80
556.14
1112.28
$
669,223.70
Burden
item
Notes
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
4
1
4
0.3
1.20
0.06
0.12
$
75.44
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
m
0.25
6
3
0.75
71.3
53.50
2.68
5.35
$
3,363.22
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
LABOR
COST
(
HOURS)
$
1,372,289.00
25103.92
a
Costs
are
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Commerce
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics,
March
2000,
"
Table
10.
Private
industry,
by
occupational
and
industry
group."
The
rates
are
from
column
1,
"
Total
compensation.":
technical
at
$
55.37,
management
at
$
78.54,
and
clerical
at
$
35.67.

b
The
EPA
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards
has
indicated
that
there
has
been
no
significant
change
in
this
sector
since
the
rule
was
promulgated.
Therefore,
we
have
assumed
that
there
are
71
existing
sources
subject
to
the
standard.
This
estimate
is
based
on
about
20
percent
of
the
86
(
or
17)
existing
steel
pickling
facilities
and
acid
regeneration
plants
at
the
time
of
rule
development
may
be
area
sources
that
would
not
be
subject
to
the
standard.
We
have
also
that
one
new
source
at
one
facility
would
begin
operation
during
the
next
3­
year
period
and
would
be
required
to
comply
with
one­
time
only
activities.
Based
on
these
assumptions,
the
average
number
of
respondents
per
year
for
this
ICR
would
be
71.3.
For
this
ICR,
we
have
further
assume
that
all
sources
are
in
compliance
with
the
existing
rule
requirements
and
none
have
requested
a
compliance
extension.

c
Estimated
hours
for
performance
test
and
report
by
EPA
Method
26A.

d
The
new
source
will
be
required
to
conduct
an
initial
performance
test
and
we
assume
will
not
have
to
repeat
it.

e
All
existing
sources
(
71)
are
required
to
conduct
an
annual
performance
test.

f
Assumes
10%
of
all
existing
sources
(
or
7.1)
must
write
a
revised
maintenance
plan.

g
The
new
source
will
be
required
to
meet
initial
notifications
requiremenets.

h
Assumes
one
reconstructed
source
at
one
facility
over
the
3­
yr
period,
for
0.3
occurrences
per
respondent
(
1/
3=
0.3).

i
Assumes
no
respondents
will
request
a
NESHAP
waiver.

j
Assumes
20%
of
respondents
(
or
14.26)
report
excess
emissions
semiannually
and
the
remaining
80
%
(
or
57.04
sources)
report
no
excess
emissions
over
the
3­
year
period.

k
Assumes
5%
of
respondents
(
or
3.57)
will
have
a
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
event
not
managed
according
to
the
plan
that
requires
a
semiannual
report.

l
Assumes
3
hours
per
respondent
per
week.

m
Assume
that
on
average
respondents
transmits
3
reports
per
year
(
reports
that
may
be
transmitted
include
performance
test
reports,
progress
reports,
semiannual
reports,
and
immediate
reports
if
corrective
actions
taken
are
different
from
the
startup,
shutdown
and
malfunction
plan).

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
TABLE
2.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT
ASSOCIATED
FOR
STEEL
PICKLING
NESHAP
Activity
Notes
(
A)

EPA
hours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

EPA
hours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)

Cost,
$
a
Initial
performance
test
b
32
1
32
0.3
9.6
0.48
$
0.96
412.35
Repeat
performance
test
Retesting
preparation
c
16
1
16
0
0
0
0
0.00
c
32
1
32
0
0
0
0
0.00
Litigation
N/
A
Excess
Emissions
Enforcement
Activities
d
120
1
120
14.26
1711.2
85.56
171.12
73,501.17
Report
Review
New
Sources:

Notification
of
applicability
e
2
1
2
0.3
0.6
0.03
0.06
25.77
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
b
2
1
2
0.3
0.6
0.03
0.06
25.77
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
f
2
1
2
0.3
0.6
0.03
0.06
25.77
Notification
of
actual
startup
f
2
1
2
0.3
0.6
0.03
0.06
25.77
Notification
of
special
comp.
req.
b
N/
A
Notification
of
performance
test
b
2
1
2
0.3
0.6
0.03
0.06
25.77
Notification
of
compliance
status
c
2
1
2
0.3
0.6
0.03
0.06
25.77
Review
of
performance
test
report
b
4
1
4
0.3
0.6
0.03
0.06
25.77
Review
of
repeat
test
report
c
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0.00
New
and
Existing
Sources:

Review
of
ex.
emissions
report
e
4
2
8
14.06
4,900.12
Review
of
no
ex.
emissions
report
g
2
2
4
57.04
19,601.70
Review
of
waiver
application
h
0
0
0
0
0.00
Review
of
startup,
shutdown,

malfunction
report
i
2
2
4
3.52
604.78
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
HOURS)
$
99,200.51
(
2,655.94)

Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
0.3
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
0.3
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
135.00
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
99,335.51
a
Costs
are
based
on
"
OPM's
2002General
Schedule"
hourly
labor
rates
excluding
locality
pay:
technical
$
38.30,
management
at
$
51.62,
and
clerical
at
$
20.72.

b
One
new
source
over
the
3­
year
period
will
perform
an
initial
performance
test.

c
Assume
no
new
source
will
fail
the
initial
performance
test.

d
The
EPA
does
not
anticipate
litigation
of
the
proposed
NESHAP.

e
Assume
that
20%
of
respondents/
yr
or
14.26
are
required
to
retest
as
a
result
of
excess
emissions.

f
Assume
1
new
or
reconstructed
source
over
the
3­
yr
period
(
1/
3=
0.3).

g
Assume
80%
of
the
respondents/
yr
or
57.04
report
no
excess
emissions.

h
No
NESHAP
waivers
are
expected.

i
Assume
5%
of
respondents/
yr
or
3.57
will
have
a
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
event
not
managed
according
to
the
plan
and
will
file
semiannual
reports.
