1
PART
A
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
1.
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
1(
a)
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection
"
Reporting,
Recordkeeping
and
Monitoring
Requirements
for
the
National
Emission
Standard
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Halogenated
Solvent
Cleaning
Machines."
The
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
tracking
number
for
this
ICR
is
1652­
04.

1(
b)
Short
Characterization
(
i)
Applicability.
Respondents
are
owners
or
operators
of
solvent
cleaning
machines
using
any
solvent
containing
methylene
chloride
(
MC),
perchloroethylene
(
PCE)'
1,
1,1­
trichloroethane
(
TCA),

trichloroethylene
(
TCE),
carbon
tetrachloride
(
CT),
chloroform
(
C),
or
any
combination
of
these
halogenated
solvents
in
a
concentration
greater
than
5
percent
by­
weight.
This
includes
batch
vapor,
in­
line
vapor,
in­
line
cold,
and
batch
cold
solvent
cleaning
machines.

(
ii)
Batch
vapor
and
in­
line
solvent
cleaning
machines
.
Owners
or
operators
of
a
batch
vapor
or
in­
line
cleaning
machine
subject
to
this
regulation
must
choose
between
an
equipment/
work
practice
standard
or
a
solvent
emission
limit
standard
in
order
to
comply.
All
respondents
must
submit
an
initial
report
for
applicability
determination.
All
respondents
must
then
submit
an
initial
statement
of
compliance
that
delineates
the
compliance
alternative
chosen
for
each
solvent
cleaning
machine
and
how
the
requirements
are
being
met.

To
comply
with
the
regulation,
respondents
choose
between
an
equipment/
work
practice
option
and
an
overall
solvent
emissions
limit
option
for
each
solvent
cleaning
machine.
To
meet
the
equipment
standards,
respondents
must
either
install
and
monitor
specific
control
device
combinations
listed
in
the
regulation,
or
they
must
monitor
the
idling
emission
control
parameters
that
they
have
established.
If
the
respondents
choose
to
install
a
control
combination
listed
in
the
regulation,
they
must
maintain
quarterly,
monthly
or
weekly
control
device
monitoring
records
based
on
the
type
of
control
device
installed
as
specified
in
the
regulation,
and
installation
dates
of
each
2
cleaning
machine
and
its
control
devices.
The
frequency
of
monitoring
and
recordkeeping
of
certain
control
device
parameters
is
reduced
if
parameter
compliance
is
consistent
and
increased
when
a
parameter
is
exceeded.

Respondents
choosing
the
idling
emission
option
must
perform
an
idling
emission
test
on
their
solvent
cleaning
machines
and
monitor
idling
emission
control
parameters.
Emission
control
parameters
to
be
maintained
and
monitored
must
be
established
during
the
test.
In
most
cases,
this
test
will
be
completed
by
the
manufacturer
of
the
solvent
cleaning
machine.
All
respondents
using
idling
emission
parameter
monitoring
to
demonstrate
compliance
must
keep
records
of
the
monitoring
results,
test
results
(
if
an
idling
emission
test
was
required),
and
installation
dates
or
certification
of
each
cleaning
machine
and
its
control
devices.

If
the
respondents
choose
the
overall
solvent
emissions
limit
option,
they
must
maintain
a
log
of
the
dates
and
amounts
of
solvent
additions
and
deletions,
and
the
solvent
composition
of
wastes
removed;
calculate
monthly
emissions
and
rolling
3­
month
average
emissions;
and
maintain
the
calculation
sheets
showing
how
the
emissions
were
determined.
These
records~
must
be
maintained
for
five
years
for
each
solvent
cleaning
machine.

All
respondents
must
submit
an
annual
report
of
monitoring
or
solvent
emission
results
to
the
EPA.
All
respondents
must
submit
a
biannual
exceedance
report.
If
an
exceedance
occurs,

exceedance
reports
must
be
submitted
quarterly.
The
circumstances
under
which
an
exceedance
of
a
monitored
control
parameter
occurs,
under
the
equipment
standard,
are
outlined
in
the
regulation.
Some
exceedances
occur
when
a
monitored
parameter
does
not
meet
specified
requirements
within
15
days
of
the
initial
occurrence
of
an
exceedance
of
a
specified
requirement.

Other
exceedances
occur
immediately
upon
the
exceedance
of
a
specified
requirement.
An
exceedance
of
the
overall
solvent
emissions
limit
occurs
at
the
time
when
the
emission
limit
is
not
met.

(
iii)
Batch
cold
cleaning
machines
.
owners
or
operators
of
3
a
batch
cold
cleaning
machine
must
comply
with
an
equipment
standard
and
work
practices.
All
respondents
must
submit
an
initial
notification
report
and
an
initial
statement
of
compliance.

(
iv)
Record
retention.
Owners
or
operators
of
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
cleaning
machines
must
maintain
all
control
device
monitoring
or
solvent
consumption
records
on­
site
for
5
years.

Owners
or
operators
of
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
cleaning
machines
must
retain
records
of
installation
dates
of
each
machine
and
related
equipment,
owner's
manuals,
and
any
test
reports
for
the
life
of
the
machine.
For
existing
cleaning
machines
for
which
an
operator
or
owner
no
longer
has
an
owner's
manual
or
any
installation
records,
an
owner
or
operator
must
provide
and
maintain
certification
that
the
machine
and/
or
its
controls
were
installed
prior
to
the
proposal
date.
Owners
or
operators
of
batch
cold
cleaning
machines
have
no
recordkeeping
requirements.

This
information
will
be
used
by
EPA
to
determine
that
all
sources
subject
to
these
national
emission
standards
for
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
NESHAP)
are
achieving
the
standards.

(
v)
Need
and
use
of
data
.
Records
and
reports
required
by
the
NESHAP
for
halogenated
solvent
cleaners
are
necessary
to
enable
EPA
to
identify
sources
subject
to
the
standards
and
to
ensure
that
the
standards
are
being
achieved.
Records
and
reports
must
be
maintained
at
the
facility
and/
or
submitted
to
EPA.
The
submitted
information
will
be
maintained
by
EPA
in
a
centralized
location.

(
vi)
Cost
for
Data
Collect
.
Owners
or
operators
are
required
to
comply
with
the
NESHAP
for
halogenated
solvent
cleaners
at
the
annual
cost
of
$
5,887,968.50.

2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
of
the
Collection
The
EPA
is
required
under
Section
112(
d)
of
the
1990
Clean
Air
Act
(
Act),
to
regulate
emissions
of
189
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAP's)
listed
in
Section
112(
b)
of
the
Act.
The
4
following
six
pollutants
are
covered
under
the
halogenated
solvent
cleaner
NESHAP:
MC,
PCE,
TCA,
TCE,
CT,
and
C.

In
the
Administrator's
judgement,
the
pollutants
emitted
from
halogenated
HAP
solvent
cleaning
machines
cause
or
contribute
significantly
to
air
pollution
that
may
reasonably
be
anticipated
to
endanger
public
health.
Implementation
of
the
NESHAP
for
halogenated
solvent
cleaners
will
reduce
the
pollutants
emitted
to
the
air.

Certain
records
and
reports
are
necessary
to
enable
the
Administrator
to
identify
sources
subject
to
the
standard
and
to
ensure
that
the
standard,
which
is
based
on
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT)
for
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
cleaning
machines,
and
generally
available
control
technology
(
GACT)
for
batch
cold
cleaning
machines,
is
being
achieved.

2(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
Of
The
Data
The
information
is
and/
or
will
be
used
by
Agency
enforcement
personnel
to:
(
1)
identify
sources
subject
to
the
standard;
(
2)

ensure
that
MACT
and
GACT
are
being
properly
applied;
(
3)
ensure
that
solvent
emissions
are
being
measured
or
that
monitoring
is
being
conducted
as
specified
in
the
regulation,
as
appropriate;

(
4)
identify
those
facilities
that
should
be
inspected;
(
5)

identify
those
facilities
that
may
benefit
from
compliance
assistance
activities;
and
(
6)
to
ensure
that
the
emission
control
devices
are
being
properly
operated
and
maintained
on
a
continuous
basis
to
reduce
HAP
emissions.

The
records
and
reports
are
necessary
to
enable
the
EPA
to
identify
those
facilities
that
may
not
be
in
compliance
with
the
standard.
Based
on
reported
information,
the
EPA
can
decide
whether
a
facility
should
be
targeted
for
compliance
assistance
or
inspected
and
what
records
or
processes
should
be
inspected.
The
records
that
facilities
maintain
indicate
to
the
EPA
whether
plant
personnel
are
operating
and
maintaining
control
equipment
5
properly.

To
minimize
the
burden,
much
of
the
information
the
EPA
needs
to
determine
compliance
will
be
recorded
and
retained
onsite
at
the
facility.
Such
information
will
be
reviewed
by
enforcement
personnel
during
an
inspection
and
will
not
need
to
be
routinely
reported
to
the
EPA.
Minimal
reporting
is
necessary
unless
a
violation
occurs.

Facilities
subject
to
the
NESHAP
for
halogenated
solvent
cleaners
are
not
required
to
achieve
compliance
with
all
applicable
provisions
until
December
1997.
However,
the
regulating
agencies
have
made
use
of
the
initial
notification
reports
as
required
in
§
63.468(
a)
to
identify
sources
for
compliance
assistance
activities.

3.
THE
RESPONDENTS
AND
THE
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
3(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
The
halogenated
solvent
cleaning
machine
source
category
does
not
constitute
a
distinct
industry
category,
but
is
an
integral
part
of
many
major
and
minor
industries.
The
respondents
are
owners
or
operators
of
batch,
vapor,
or
in­
line
(
cold
and
vapor)
solvent
cleaning
machines
using
any
solvent
containing
MC,

PCE,
TCA,
TCE,
CT,
C,
or
any
combination
of
these
halogenated
solvents,
in
a
total
concentration
greater
than
5
percent
byweight
The
largest
quantities
of
halogenated
solvents
used
for
cleaning
are
in
the
following
2­
digit
SIC
codes:
SIC
25,

furniture
and
fixtures;
SIC
24,
fabricated
metal
products;
SIC
36,
electric
and
electronic
equipment;
SIC
37,
transportation
equipment;
and
SIC
39,
miscellaneous
manufacturing.
Additional
industries
that
use
halogenated
solvents
in
cleaning­
include
the
6
following:
SIC
20,
food
and
kindred
products;
SIC
33,
primary
metals;
SIC
35,
nonelectric
machinery;
and
SIC
38,
instruments
and
clocks.
Nonmanufacturing
industries
such
as
railroad,
bus,

aircraft,
and
truck
maintenance
facilities;
automotive
and
electric
tool
repair
shops;
automobile
dealers;
and
service
stations
also
use
halogenated
solvent
cleaning
machines.

3(
b)
Information
Requested
(
i)
Data
items.
Attachment
1,
Source
Data
Information
Requirements,
summarizes
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities.
The
respondent
activities
required
by
the
standards
are
listed
in
the
first
column
of
Tables
2
and
3,
which
are
presented
in
Section
6(
a).
The
activities
listed
in
Tables
2
and
3
are
not
considered
"
customary
and
usual
business
practice."

4.
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTED­­
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES,
COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY,
AND
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
4(
a)
Agency
Activities
Reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
on
the
part
of
respondents
are
required
under
section
112
of
the
Act.

Recordkeeping
is
required
to
ensure
that
installation,
monitoring
and
applicable
results
are
documented
and
maintained.
The
reports
are
necessary
to
inform
the
regulatory
agency
that
this
rule
applies
to
a
machine
and
that
the
facility
is
complying
with
the
rule.
The
reports
that
are
specifically
required
by
the
rule
are
initial
notification
report,
initial
statement
of
compliance
report,
annual
compliance
report,
exceedance
report
(
required
only
when
and
exceedance
occurs
and
equivalency
determination
report
(
required
only
if
the
facility
wants
to
use
different
equipment
or
procedures
other
than
those
specified
in
the
rule.

Examination
of
records
to
be
maintained
by
the
respondents
will
7
occur
incidentally
as
a
part
of
the
periodic
inspection
and
compliance
assistance
outreach
to
sources
that
is
part
of
the
EPA's
overall
compliance
and
enforcement
program
and
is
not
attributable
to
this
ICR.
A
list
of
Agency
activities
is
provided
in
Table
4
and
is
discussed
in
Section
6(
c).

4(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
This
section
is
not
relevant
to
this
information
collection
request
(
ICR).

4(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
This
regulation
does
not
have
a
significant
impact
on
a
substantial
number
of
small
business
entities
because
solvent
cleaning
operations
generally
represent
a
small
cost
share
of
total
production
costs,
and
compliance
cost
increases
would
be
less
than
5
percent
of
the
annual
total
production
costs
for
small
business
entities.
The
alternatives
included
in
the
proposed
regulation
provide
flexibility
to
accommodate
small
businesses.

4(
d)
Collection
Schedule
For
all
existing
sources,
the
initial
notification
report
was
required
to
be
submitted
within
9
months
of
promulgation
of
this
standard.
New
sources
for
which
construction
or
reconstruction
had
commenced
and
initial
startup
had
not
occurred
before
the
date
of
promulgation
of
this
standard
were
required
submit
the
initial
report
as
soon
as
practicable
before
startup
but
no
later
than
60
days
after
the
date
of
promulgation
of
the
standard.
New
sources
for
which
the
construction
or
reconstruction
commenced
after
the
date
of
promulgation
of
this
standard
must
submit
the
initial
notification
as
soon
as
practicable
before
the
construction
or
reconstruction
is
planned
to
commence
(
but
no
sooner
than
the
date
of
promulgation
of
the
standard).
Owners
or
operators
of
existing
solvent
cleaning
machines
must
submit
an
initial
compliance
report
within
150
days
8
of
the
date
of
compliance
(
December
1997).
Owners
or
operators
of
new
cleaning
machines
must
submit
an
initial
compliance
report
no
later
than
150
days
after
startup
or
150
days
from
the
date
of
promulgation,
whichever
is
later.
Thereafter,
owners
or
operators
of
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
cleaning
machines
must
document
compliance
through
reporting
solvent
consumption
and
emissions
estimates,
or
maintaining
monitoring
records.
Also,
owners
or
operators
of
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
cleaning
machines
must
submit
a
biannual
exceedance
report,
as
discussed
in
Section
1(
b)(
ii).

5.
NONDUPLICATION,
CONSULTATIONS,
AND
OTHER
COLLECTION
CRITERIA
5(
a)
Nonduplication
There
is
no
duplication
of
the
requested
information.
There
are
requirements
for
some
facilities
under
the
Superfund
Amendments
and
Reauthorization
Act
(
SARA,
Title
III)
to
track
solvent
consumption;
however,
they
are
required
to
keep
data
on
a
facility­
wide
basis
as
opposed
to
tracking
solvent
consumption
for
each
solvent
cleaning
machine,
and
not
all
facilities
that
use
solvent
cleaning
machines
are
required
to
report
under
SARA
Title
III.

5(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
A
60­
day
public
comment
period
for
the
renewal
of
this
ICR
was
announced
in
the
Federal
Register
on
August
17,2000
(
65
FR
50196).
No
comments
were
received
by
EPA.

5(
c)
Consultations
The
EPA
consulted
with
several
industry
representatives
to
obtain
information
and/
or
comment
on
the
burden
estimates.
Table
1
provides
a
list
of
industry
representatives
who
were
contacted
for
information.
The
industry
representatives
contacted
concurred
with
the
burden
estimates
provided
in
this
ICR.

Table
1.
Persons
Contacted
For
Information
Used
to
9
Develop
the
Information
Name
Affiliation
Phone
Number
Lloyd
B.
Bryant
Allied
Signal
Aerospace
(
410)
832­
220
Edward
Parker
Sonicor
Instrument
Corporation
(
516)
842­
3344
Alton
D.
Romig
Environmental
Consultant
(
610)
865­
2284
5(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
If
the
relevant
information
were
collected
less
frequently,

the
EPA
would
not
be
reasonably
assured
that
an
owner
or
operator
of
a
regulated
solvent
cleaning
machine
is
in
compliance
with
the
standards.

5(
e)
General
Guidelines
The
NESHAP
for
halogenated
solvent
cleaning
machines
requires
that
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
solvent
cleaning
machine
owners
and
operators
retain
records
of
control
device
monitoring
or
solvent
emissions
calculations
records
at
facilities
for
a
period
of
5
years,
which
exceeds
the
3­
year
retention
period
contained
in
the
guidelines
in
5
CFR
1320.6.

Title
V
operating
program
permits
are
required
for
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
cleaning
machines.
Nonmajor
sources
are
exempt
from
permitting
requirements
for
5
years.
The
5­
year
records
retention
time
period
is
consistent
with
records
retention
requirements
in
the
operating
permit
program
under
title
V
of
the
CAA,
and
the
General
Provisions
(
CFR
Part
63,
subpart
A).
Batch
cold
cleaning
machines
located
at
nonmajor
sources
are
exempt
from
title
V
permit
requirements.

The
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
cleaning
machine
owners
and
operators
are
also
required,
for
the
lifetime
of
each
machine
and
its
control
devices,
to
retain
the
owner's
manuals,
and
records
of
the
dates
of
installation;
or
provide
and
maintain
certification
of
such
information
if
an
owner
or
operator
no
10
longer
possesses
an
owner's
manual
or
installation
records.

Required
performance
tests
must
also
be
maintained
for
the
lifetime
of
each
cleaning
machine,
as
applicable.
The
Agency
does
not
consider
the
retention
of
these
items
a
burden
since
no
work
is
required
other
than
placing
them
in
an
accessible
file.

5(
f)
Confidentiality
(
i)
Confidentiality.
All
information
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
Agency
policies
set
forth
in
Title
40,
Chapter
1,
Part
2,
Subpart
B­­
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information
(
see
40
CFR
2;
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;

amended
by
43
FR
39999,
September
8,
1978;
43
FR
42251,
September
28,
1978;
44
FR
17674,
March
23,
1979).

5(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
the
NESHAP
for
halogenated
solvent
cleaning
machines
does
not
involve
matters
of
a
sensitive
nature.

6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
6(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
The
annual
burden
estimates
for
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
are
presented
in
Table
2
for
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
cleaning
machines
and
in
Table
3
for
batch
cold
cleaning
machines.
Table
4
is
an
aggregate
burden
table
that
compiles
the
burden
totals
from
Tables
2
and
3.
These
numbers
were
derived
from
estimates
based
on
the
EPA's
experience
with
other
standards,
and
from
discussions
with
the
industry
representatives
listed
in
Table
1.
These
costs
represent
the
average
burden
that
will
be
incurred
by
industry
over
a
three
year
period.
11
6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs
(
i)
Estimating
Labor
Costs
The
information
collection
activities
and
total
costs
for
facilities
subject
to
the
standard
are
also
presented
in
Tables
2
and
3.
It
is
assumed
that
there
are
an
average
of
2.6
batch
vapor
and/
or
in­
line
solvent
cleaning
machines
per
respondent.
It
is
assumed
that
there
is
one
batch
cold
solvent
cleaning
machine
per
respondent.
EPA
estimates
an
average
annual
respondent
hourly
cost
of
$
56.63
($
26.97
+
110%
overhead)
for
managerial
staff
and
$
35.89
for
technical
staff
($
18.94
+
110%
overhead).
These
labor
rates
were
obtained
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Commerce
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics,
March
1998,
Table
2:
Employment
Costs
for
Civilian
Workers
by
Occupational
and
Industry
Group.

(
ii)
Estimating
Capital
and
Operations
and
Maintenance
Costs
The
total
capital
cost
for
facilities
with
batch
vapor
and/
or
in­
line
solvent
cleaning
machines
to
achieve
compliance
with
the
standard
is
estimated
to
be
$
17,000
(
assumes
2.6
cleaning
machines
per
facility).
Although
the
rule
was
promulgated
in
December
1994,
affected
existing
sources
were
not
required
to
comply
with
the
standard
until
December
1997.

Therefore,
it
is
assumed
that
all
existing
sources
will
spend
the
estimated
$
17,000
to
achieve
compliance
with
the
standard.
The
annualized
capital/
startup
cost
is
estimated
to
be
$
2,609.
The
annual
operations
and
maintenance
cost
associated
with
the
standard
for
owners
or
operators
of
batch
vapor
or
in­
line
solvent
cleaning
machines
is
estimated
to
be
$
858.
The
total
annualized
cost
requested
per
facility
is
$
3,467.
($
2609
capital
and
$
858
Operations
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)),
for
a
total
annual
capital
O&
M
cost
of
$
4,091,060
for
1189
facilities.
Due
to
the
minimal
reporting
and
record
keeping
requirements
for
batch
cold
solvent
cleaning
machines,
capital
and
operations
and
maintenance
costs
will
not
be
incurred.
EPA
1
PVFA
is
the
present
value
factor.

2
ANPV
is
the
annualized
net
present
value.

12
developed
these
cost
estimates
through
direct
consultation
with
industries
and
consultants
to
industry
affected
by
the
requirements.

(
iii)
Annualizing
Capital
Costs
The
annualized
stream
of
payments
that
an
owner
or
operator
of
a
batch
vapor
or
in­
line
solvent
cleaning
machine
would
have
to
make
over
a
nine­
year
period
is
computed
as
follows:
PVFA1
=
SUM
{
1/(
1.07)
t},
where
t
=
1
to
8
years
PVFA
=
6.515
ANPV2
=
$
17,000/
6.515
ANPV
=
$
2,609/
year
6(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
Because
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
on
the
part
of
respondents
are
required
under
section
112
of
the
Act,
no
operational
costs
will
be
incurred
by
the
Federal
government.

Examination
of
records
to
be
maintained
by
the
respondents
will
occur
incidentally
as
a
part
of
the
periodic
inspection
and
compliance
assistance
outreach
to
sources
that
is
part
of
the
EPA's
overall
compliance
and
enforcement
program
and
is
not
attributable
to
this
ICR.
The
only
costs
that
the
Federal
government
will
incur
are
costs
associated
with
the
review
of
reported
information,
as
presented
in
Table
5.
Labor
rates
are
as
follows:
technical
at
$
39.77
and
management
at
$
56.63.

6(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
EPA
estimates
that
the
subject
universe
includes
3,069
vapor
or
in­
line
halogenated
solvent
cleaning
machines
and
752
batch
cold
cleaning
machines.
The
total
number
of
owners
or
operators
with
batch
vapor
or
in­
line
solvent
cleaning
machines
subject
to
the
standards
is
estimated
to
be
1180
(
2.6
cleaning
machines
per
facility.)
The
total
number
of
owners
or
operators
with
batch
13
cold
cleaning
machines
is
estimated
to
be
752
(
1
cleaning
machine
per
facility.)
The
universe
was
determined
based
on
the
submittal
of
initial
notification
reports
as
required
in
§
63.468(
a).
As
presented
in
Tables
2,
3,
and
4,
the
total
burden
and
cost
for
owners
and
operators
of
vapor
or
in­
line
halogenated
solvent
cleaning
machines
is
45,207
hours
and
$
5,887,968.50.

6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Costs/
Master
Tables
(
i)
The
respondent
tally.
The
bottom
line
respondent
burden
hours
and
costs,
presented
in
Tables
2,
3,
and
4,
are
calculated
by
summing
the
person­
hours
column
and
by
summing
the
cost
column.
For
the
batch
vapor
and
in­
line
cleaning
machine
subcategories
as
a
whole,
the
annual
burden
and
costs
averaged
over
the
first
three
years
are
44,956.20
hours
and
$
1,787,900.10
in
labor
costs.

(
ii)
The
Agency
tally.
The
bottom
line
Agency
burden
hours
and
costs,
which
are
presented
in
Table
5,
are
calculated
as
in
the
respondent
table.
The
annual
number
of
hours
averaged
over
the
first
three
years
is
4,636.52
at
a
cost
of
$
182,138.61
per
year.

(
iii)
Variations
in
the
annual
bottom
line.
In
this
ICR,

the
one­
time
burden
and
costs
associated
with
the
initial
report
for
applicability
determination,
initial
statement
of
compliance,

and
performance
tests
were
averaged
over
a
3­
year
period.

6(
f)
Reason
for
Change
in
Burden
There
are
no
changes
in
burden
because
we
do
not
anticipate
any
new
sources
within
the
next
three
years.

6(
g)
Burden
Statement
Table
2
presents
the
average
annual
respondent
burden
for
each
owner
or
operator
of
a
batch
vapor
or
in­
line
solvent
14
cleaning
machine.
Table
3
presents
the
average
annual
respondent
burden
for
each
owner
or
operator
of
a
batch
cold
cleaning
machine.
Table
4
compiles
the
burden
totals
from
Tables
2
and
3.

Estimate
include
time
for
preparing
and
submitting
notices,

preparing
and
submitting
performance
test
results,
reporting
exceedances,
and
monitoring
and
recording
solvent
consumption.

Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
person
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instruction;
develop
,
acquire,

install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintain
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information'

adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;

complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
Part
9
and
48
CFR
Chapter
15.

Send
comments
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,

the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
through
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques
to
the
Director,

Collection
Strategy
Division,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
2822),
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
N.
W.,
Washington,
D.
C.

20460­
0001;
and
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,
NW,

Washington,
D.
C.
20503,
Attention:
Desk
Officer
for
EPA.
Include
the
EPA
ICR
No.
1652.04
and
OMB
Control
No.
2060­
0273
in
any
correspondence.
