SF­
83
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
STANDARDS
OF
PERFORMANCE
National
Emission
Standard
for
Beryllium,
40
CFR
Part
61,
Subpart
C
1.
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
1(
a)
Title
of
the
Information
Collection
ICR
for
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
Beryllium,
40
CFR
Part
61,
Subpart
C.

2(
b)
Short
Characterization/
Abstract
The
NESHAP
standard
for
Beryllium
was
proposed
on
December
7,
1971
(
36
F.
R.
23939)
and
promulgated
on
April
6,
1973
(
38
F.
R.
8826).
This
standard
applies
to
all
extraction
plants,
ceramic
plants,
foundries,
incinerators,
and
propellant
plants
which
process
beryllium
ore,
beryllium,
beryllium
oxide,
beryllium
alloys,
or
beryllium­
containing
waste.
The
standard
also
applies
to
machine
shops
which
process
beryllium,
beryllium
oxides,
or
any
alloy
when
such
alloy
contains
more
than
five
percent
beryllium
by
weight.
All
sources
known
to
have
caused,
or
to
have
the
potential
to
cause,
dangerous
levels
of
beryllium
in
the
ambient
air
are
covered
by
the
Beryllium
NESHAP.
This
information
is
being
collected
to
assure
compliance
with
40
CFR
Part
61,
Subpart
C.

In
general,
all
NESHAP
standards
require
owners
or
operators
of
the
affected
facilities
to
submit
one­
time­
only
notifications
including:
notification
of
any
physical
or
operational
change
to
an
existing
facility
which
may
increase
the
regulated
pollutant
emission
rate,
notification
of
the
initial
performance
test,
including
information
necessary
to
determine
the
conditions
of
the
performance
test,
and
performance
test
measurements
and
results.
Owners
or
operators
are
also
required
to
maintain
records
of
the
occurrence
and
duration
of
any
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
in
the
operation
of
an
affected
facility,
or
any
period
during
which
the
monitoring
system
is
inoperative.
These
notifications,
reports,
and
records
are
essential
in
determining
compliance,
and
are
required
of
all
sources
subject
to
NESHAP.

Specifically,
most
facilities
subject
to
40
CFR
Part
61,
Subpart
C
will
meet
the
standard
by
means
of
a
one­
time­
only
initial
stack
test.
However,
those
existing
facilities
that
have
elected
to
comply
with
an
alternative
ambient
air
quality
limit
are
required
to
operate
a
continuous
monitor
in
the
vicinity
of
the
affected
facility.
The
monitoring
requirements
for
these
facilities
provide
information
on
ambient
air
quality
and
ensure
that
locally,
the
airborne
beryllium
concentration
does
not
exceed
0.01
micrograms/
m3.
For
those
complying
by
ambient
monitoring,
a
monthly
report
of
all
measured
concentrations
shall
be
submitted
to
the
Administrator.

Any
owner
or
operator
subject
to
the
provisions
of
this
part
shall
maintain
a
file
of
these
measurements,
and
retain
the
file
for
at
least
two
years
following
the
date
of
such
measurements,
maintenance
reports,
and
records.
All
reports
are
sent
to
the
delegated
State
or
Local
authority.
In
the
event
that
there
is
no
such
delegated
authority,
the
reports
are
sent
directly
to
the
EPA
Regional
Office.
Previous
ICRs
and
a
telephone
consultation
with
the
EPA's
Office
of
Air
Quality
and
Standards
indicate
that
there
has
been
no
growth
in
industry
size
for
the
SIC
codes
affected
by
the
Beryllium
NESHAP.
There
are
approximately
236
existing
sources
subject
to
this
rule.
Of
the
total
number
of
existing
sources,
we
have
assumed
that
approximately
10
sources
have
elected
to
comply
with
this
rule
by
monitoring
ambient
air
beryllium
concentrations
and
the
remaining
226
sources
have
elected
to
comply
with
the
rule
by
conducting
a
one­
time
only
stack
test
to
determine
beryllium
emission
levels.
We
also
assumed
that
10
percent
of
the
226
sources
(
or
23
respondents)
complying
with
the
emission
limit
standard
will
engage
in
an
operational
change
at
their
facilities
that
could
potentially
increase
beryllium
emissions,
and
would
be
required
to
repeat
the
stack
test
to
determine
the
beryllium
emission
limits,
and
consequently
will
have
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
associated
with
this
activity.
No
additional
sources
are
expected
to
become
subject
to
the
standard
in
the
next
three
years.
Therefore,
there
are
33
respondents
for
the
purpose
of
determining
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
burden
associated
with
this
rule.

2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
The
EPA
is
charged
under
Section
112
of
the
Clean
Air
Act,
as
Amended,
to
establish
standards
of
performance
for
each
category
or
subcategory
of
major
sources
and
area
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants.
These
standards
are
applicable
to
new
or
existing
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
and
shall
require
the
maximum
degree
of
emission
reduction.

In
addition,
Section
114(
a)
states
that
the
Administrator
may
require
any
owner
or
operator
subject
to
any
requirement
of
this
Act
to:

"(
A)
Establish
and
maintain
such
records;
(
B)
make
such
reports;
(
C)
install,
use,
and
maintain
such
monitoring
equipment,
and
use
such
audit
procedures,
or
methods;
(
D)
sample
such
emissions
(
in
accordance
with
such
procedures
or
methods,
at
such
locations,
at
such
intervals,
during
such
periods,
and
in
such
manner
as
the
Administrator
shall
prescribe);
(
E)
keep
records
on
control
equipment
parameters,
production
variables
or
other
indirect
data
when
direct
monitoring
of
emissions
is
impractical;
(
F)
submit
compliance
certifications
in
accordance
with
Section
114(
a)(
3);
and
(
G)
provide
such
other
information
as
the
Administrator
may
reasonably
require."

In
the
Administrator's
judgment,
beryllium
emissions
from
extraction
plants,
ceramic
plants,
foundries,
incinerators,
and
propellant
plants
and
machine
shops
which
process
beryllium
ore,
beryllium,
beryllium
oxide,
beryllium
alloys,
or
beryllium­
containing
waste
(
for
machine
shops
these
should
have
a
five
percent
beryllium
by
weight)
cause
or
contribute
to
air
pollution
that
may
reasonably
be
anticipated
to
endanger
public
health
or
welfare.
Therefore,
NESHAP
standards
were
promulgated
for
this
source
category
at
40
CFR
Part
61,
Subpart
C.
2(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data
The
control
of
emissions
of
beryllium
from
extraction
plants,
ceramic
plants,
foundries,
incinerators,
and
propellant
plants
and
machine
shops
(
when
alloy
contains
more
than
five
percent
beryllium
by
weight)
which
process
beryllium
ore,
beryllium,
beryllium
oxide,
beryllium
alloys,
or
beryllium­
containing
waste
requires
not
only
the
installation
of
properly
designed
equipment,
but
also
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
that
equipment.
Emissions
of
beryllium
from
the
subject
stationary
sources
are
the
result
of
operation
of
processing
beryllium
ore,
beryllium,
beryllium
oxide,
beryllium
alloys,
or
beryllium­
containing
waste.

These
standards
rely
on
individual
facilities
to
ensure
that
beryllium
stack
emissions,
or
local
ambient
concentrations,
do
not
exceed
the
established
limits.
The
required
notifications
are
used
to
inform
the
Agency
or
delegated
authority
when
a
source
becomes
subject
to
the
standard.
The
reviewing
authority
may
then
inspect
the
source
to
ensure
that
stack
emission
or
ambient
concentration
limits
are
being
met.
The
initial
performance
test
report
for
stack
tests
and
the
request
to
comply
with
the
ambient
beryllium
concentration
limit
in
the
vicinity
of
the
stationary
source
supported
with
3
years
of
data,
ending
30
days
before
the
effective
date
of
the
standard,
are
needed
as
these
are
the
Agency's
record
of
a
source's
initial
capability
to
comply
with
the
emission
standard,
and
serve
as
a
record
of
the
operating
conditions
under
which
compliance
will
be
achieved.

The
information
generated
by
the
monitoring,
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
described
in
this
ICR
is
used
by
the
Agency
to
ensure
that
facilities
affected
by
the
NESHAP
continue
to
operate
the
control
equipment
and
achieve
compliance
with
the
standard.
The
information
collected
from
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
is
also
used
for
targeting
inspections,
and
is
of
sufficient
quality
to
be
used
as
evidence
in
court.

3.
Nonduplication,
Consultations,
and
Other
Collection
Criteria
The
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requested
is
required
under
40
CFR
Part
61.

3(
a)
Nonduplication
If
the
standard
has
not
been
delegated,
the
information
is
sent
to
the
appropriate
EPA
Regional
Office.
Otherwise,
the
information
is
sent
directly
to
the
delegated
State
or
Local
Agency.
If
a
State
or
Local
Agency
has
adopted
their
own
similar
regulation
to
implement
the
Federal
Regulation,
a
copy
of
the
report
submitted
to
the
State
or
Local
Agency
can
be
sent
to
the
Administrator
in
lieu
of
the
report
required
by
the
Federal
Standard.
Therefore,
no
duplication
exists.

3(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
An
announcement
of
a
public
comment
period
for
the
renewal
of
this
ICR
was
published
in
the
Federal
Register
on
February
1,
2001.

3(
c)
Consultations
No
comments
were
received
on
the
burden
published
in
the
Federal
Register.

3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
Less
frequent
information
collection
would
decrease
the
margin
of
assurance
that
facilities
are
continuing
to
meet
the
required
standards.
Requirements
for
information
gathering
and
recordkeeping
are
useful
techniques
to
ensure
that
good
operation
and
maintenance
practices
are
applied
and
emission
limitations
are
met.
If
the
information
required
by
these
standards
was
collected
less
frequently,
the
likelihood
of
detecting
poor
operation
and
maintenance
of
control
equipment
and
noncompliance
would
decrease.

3(
e)
General
Guidelines
None
of
these
reporting
or
recordkeeping
requirements
violate
any
of
the
regulations
established
by
OMB
in
5
CFR
1320.6.

3(
f)
Confidentiality
The
required
information
consists
of
emissions
data
and
other
information
that
have
been
determined
not
to
be
private.
However,
any
information
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
Agency
policies
set
forth
in
Title
40,
Chapter
1,
Part
2,
Subpart
B
­
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information
(
see
40
CFR
2;
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;
amended
by
43
FR
40000,
September
8,
1978;
43
FR
42251,
September
20,
1978;
44
FR
17674,
March
23,
1979).

3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
None
of
the
reporting
or
recordkeeping
requirements
contain
sensitive
questions.

4.
The
Respondents
and
the
Information
Requested
4(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
The
respondents
of
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
described
in
the
following
table:

Industry
Classification
(
IC)
using
SICs
SIC
Codes
NAICS
Codes
Corresponding
IC
using
NAICs
Industrial
Inorganic
Chemicals,
Not
Elsewhere
Classified
2819
325188
All
Other
Basic
Inorganic
Chemical
Manufacturing
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Nonferrous
Metals,
Except
Copper
and
Aluminum
3339
331419
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Nonferrous
Metal
(
except
Copper
and
Aluminum)
Non
Ferrous
Foundaries,
Except
Aluminum
and
Copper
3369
331528
Other
Nonferrous
Foundries
(
except
Die­
Casting)

Industrial
and
Commercial
Machinery
and
Equipment,
Not
Elsewhere
Classified
3599
33271
Machine
Shops
Refuse
Systems
4953
562211
56292
Hazardous
Waste
Treatment
and
Disposal;
and
Materials
Recovery
Facilities
4(
b)
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
(
i)
Data
Items
All
data
in
this
ICR
that
is
recorded
and/
or
reported
is
required
by
40
CFR
Part
61,
Subpart
C.

A
source
must
make
the
following
reports:

Reports
for
NESHAP,
SUBPART
C
Construction
or
modification
application
61.07
Anticipated
startup
61.09(
a)(
1)

Actual
startup
61.09(
a)(
2)

Initial
performance
test
results
61.13(
f),
61.33(
d)

Notification
of
emission
tests
61.13(
c),
61.33(
b)

Notification
requesting
approval
to
meet
an
ambient
concentration
limit
on
beryllium
in
the
vicinity
of
the
stationary
source
(
alternative
standard)
61.32(
b)

Source
status
report:
For
facilities
complying
by
ambient
monitoring,
a
monthly
report
of
all
measured
beryllium
concentrations
shall
be
submitted
to
the
Administrator
61.10(
a),
61.34
(
d)
A
source
must
maintain
the
following
records:

Recordkeeping
for
NESHAP,
SUBPART
C
Startups,
shutdowns,
malfunctions,
periods
where
the
continuous
monitoring
system
is
inoperative
due
to
maintenance
and
calibration,
for
changing
filters,
or
for
replacement
equipment
needing
major
repair.
61.34(
b)

Emission
test
results
and
other
data
needed
to
determine
emissions
61.13(
g),
61.34(
c)

Records
are
required
to
be
retained
for
2
years.
61.34(
c)

ii.
Respondent
Activities
include:

Respondent
Activities
Read
instructions.

For
facilities
that
have
elected
to
comply
with
an
alternative
ambient
air
quality
limit,
install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
operate
a
continuous
monitor
in
the
vicinity
of
the
affected
facility
to
measure
beryllium
concentrations.

For
facilities
complying
by
ambient
monitoring,
perform
emission
testing
to
determine
berylium
emissions
to
the
atmosphere
according
to
Method
104
or
Method
103
(
an
alternative
method
needing
approval)
of
appendix
B
to
Part
61.

Write
the
notifications
and
reports
listed
above.

Enter
information
required
to
be
recorded
above.

Submit
the
required
reports
developing,
acquiring,
installing,
and
utilizing
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information.

Develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
processing
and
maintaining
information.

Develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
disclosing
and
providing
information.

Adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements.

Train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information.

Transmit,
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

The
owner
may
retain
records
on
microfilm,
on
a
computer,
on
computer
disks,
on
magnetic
tape,
or
on
microfiche.
It
may
also
report
using
a
labeled
computer
disc
using
a
compatible
software.

5.
The
Information
Collected
­­
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
5(
a)
Agency
Activities
EPA
conducts
the
following
activities
in
connection
with
the
acquisition,
analysis,
storage,
and
distribution
of
the
required
information.

Agency
Activities
Observe
emission
testings
conducted
to
determine
emissions
from
a
source,
if
complying
with
the
emission
limit
standard.

Review
notifications
and
reports,
including
monthly
emission
test
reports,
required
if
source
complying
with
the
ambient
air
emission
standard.

Audit
facility
records.

Input,
analyze,
and
maintain
data
in
the
AFS
[
AIRS
(
Aerometric
Information
Retrieval
System)
Facility
Subsystem]
database.

5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
Following
notification
of
startup,
the
reviewing
authority
might
inspect
the
source
to
determine
whether
the
pollution
control
devices
are
properly
installed
and
operated.
Data
and
records
maintained
by
the
respondents
are
tabulated
and
published
for
use
in
compliance
and
enforcement
programs.
The
monthly
reports,
if
complying
with
the
ambient
concentration
limit,
and
the
results
of
stack
tests
conducted
when
an
operational
change
occurs
that
may
cause
an
increase
on
beryllium
emissions
are
used
for
problem
identification,
as
a
check
on
source
operation
and
maintenance,
and
for
compliance
determinations.

Information
contained
in
the
reports
is
entered
into
AFS
which
is
operated
and
maintained
by
EPA's
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards.
AFS
is
EPA's
database
for
the
collection,
maintenance,
and
retrieval
of
compliance
and
annual
emission
inventory
data
for
over
100,000
industrial
and
government­
owned
facilities.
EPA
uses
AFS
for
tracking
air
pollution
compliance
and
enforcement
by
Local
and
State
regulatory
agencies,
and
EPA
Regional
Offices
and
Headquarters.
EPA
and
its
delegated
Authorities
can
edit,
store,
retrieve
and
analyze
the
data.

The
records
required
by
this
regulation
must
be
retained
by
the
owner
or
operator
for
two
years.

5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
Most
of
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
activities
under
this
subpart
apply
to
new
or
modified
sources
only,
and
no
additional
sources
are
anticipated
during
the
next
three
years.
Consequently,
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
burden
is
quite
low,
even
for
small
businesses.
Only
those
facilities
(
approximately
10)
that
elect
to
perform
ambient
air
monitoring
will
have
monthly
reports
to
submit.

In
general,
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
were
selected
within
the
context
of
this
specific
subpart
and
the
specific
process
equipment
and
pollutant(
s).
The
impact
on
small
businesses
was
accounted
for
in
the
regulation
development;
thus
the
requirements
reflect
the
burden
on
small
businesses.
To
the
extent
that
larger
businesses
can
use
economies
of
scale
to
reduce
their
burden,
the
overall
burden
will
be
reduced.
The
Agency
considers
these
requirements
the
minimum
needed
to
ensure
compliance
and,
therefore,
cannot
reduce
them
further
for
small
businesses.

5(
d)
Collection
Schedule
The
specific
frequency
for
each
information
collection
activity
within
this
request
is
shown
in
Table
2:
Industry
Burden.

6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
Table
2
documents
the
computation
of
individual
burdens
for
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
applicable
to
the
industry
for
the
subpart
included
in
this
ICR.
The
individual
burdens
are
expressed
under
standardized
headings
believed
to
be
consistent
with
the
concept
of
burden
under
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act.
Where
appropriate,
specific
tasks
and
major
assumptions
have
been
identified.
Responses
to
this
information
collection
are
mandatory
(
40
CFR
Part
61,
Subpart
C).

The
Agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.

6(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
The
average
annual
burden
to
industry
over
the
next
three
years
from
these
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
is
estimated
at
2,231.6
person­
hours.
Details
upon
which
this
estimate
is
based
appear
in
Table
2:
Industry
Burden.
These
hours
are
based
on
Agency
studies
and
background
documents
from
the
development
of
the
standards
or
test
methods,
Agency
knowledge
and
experience
with
the
NESHAP
program,
the
previously
approved
ICR,
and
any
comments
received.

6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs
(
i)
Estimating
Labor
Costs
This
ICR
uses
a
technical
labor
rate
of
$
55.34
per
hour.
This
rate
is
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Commerce
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics,
March
2000,
Table
10:
Employment
Costs
for
Private
Industry
by
Occupational
and
Industry
Group.
The
rate
is
from
column
1:
Total
Compensation.
The
wage
rates
have
been
loaded
by
adding
110%
overhead
($
55.34
=
$
26.35
+
110%).
The
records
and
reports
required
under
this
subpart
are
routine,
and
therefore,
entered
and/
or
submitted
by
plant
technicians.
The
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
do
not
involve
clerical
or
managerial
hours.

(
ii)
Estimating
Capital
and
Operations
and
Maintenance
Costs
The
type
of
industry
costs
associated
with
the
information
collection
activity
in
the
standards
are
labor
and
continuous
ambient
monitoring
systems.
There
are
no
capital
start
up
costs
since
no
new
facility
is
expected
to
become
subject
to
the
standard.
The
annual
operations
and
maintenance
costs
are
the
ongoing
costs
to
maintain
the
monitors.
The
total
respondent
costs
are
calculated
by
adding
the
capital
start
up
costs
and
the
annual
operations
and
maintenance
costs.

(
iii)
Capital/
Start­
up
vs.
Operating
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
There
are
no
capital
start
up
costs
since
no
new
facilities
will
become
subject
to
the
standard
over
the
next
three
years.
This
cost
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14
letter
a:
Total
annualized
capital/
startup
costs.

The
annual
operations
and
maintenance
costs
are
$
35,000.
These
costs
are
based
on
the
assumption
that
10
facilities
elected
to
comply
with
the
ambient
air
monitoring
standard,
and
will
need
to
operate
and
maintain
an
ambient
monitor
to
measure
beryllium
emissions
at
a
cost
of
$
3,500
a
year
(
See
table
below
for
calculation).
This
cost
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14
letter
b:
Total
annual
costs
(
O&
M).

As
mentioned
above,
the
total
respondent
costs
are
calculated
by
adding
the
capital
start
up
costs
and
the
annual
operations
and
maintenance
costs.
Since
there
are
no
capital
cost,
the
respondent
costs
are
associated
only
with
the
operations
and
maintenance
costs
to
industry
over
the
next
three
years
of
the
ICR
which
is
estimated
to
be
$
35,000.
This
cost
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14
letter
c:
Total
annualized
cost
requested.

Capital/
Start­
up
vs.
Operating
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
Continuous
Monitoring
device
(
A)
Annual
O&
M
costs
($)
for
1
affected
facility
(
B)
#
of
affected
facilities
with
O&
M
Total
O&
M
(
AXB)

ambient
monitor
$
3,500
10
$
35,000
6(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
The
only
Federal
costs
are
user
costs
associated
with
analysis
of
the
reported
information.
Publication
and
distribution
of
the
information
are
part
of
the
AIRS
program.
Examination
of
records
to
be
maintained
by
the
respondents
will
occur
as
part
of
the
periodic
inspection
of
sources,
which
is
part
of
EPA's
overall
compliance
and
enforcement
program.

The
average
annual
Federal
Government
cost
during
the
3
years
of
the
ICR
is
estimated
to
be
$
8,003.
This
cost
is
based
on
an
average
labor
rate
of
a
GS
10
step
1
employee
rate
times
a
1.6
government
benefits
multiplication
factor
to
account
for
overhead
expenses
for
a
total
of
a
$
28.08
hourly
rate.
This
rate
is
from
OPM's
2001
General
Schedule
(
GS)
hourly
salary
data,
excluding
locality
pay,
basic
rates,
and
travel
associated
with
compliance
activities.
Details
upon
which
this
estimate
is
based
appear
in
Table
1:
Agency
Burden.

6(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
There
are
236
sources
subject
to
the
standard.
However,
only
33
sources
are
respondents
since
most
facilities
(
i.
e.,
203
facilities)
complied
with
this
standard
by
conducting
a
one
time
stack
test.
Of
the
33
sources,
10
sources
are
complying
with
the
emission
limit
standard
and
23
are
complying
with
the
ambient
monitoring
standard.
We
assume
that
there
has
been
no
growth
in
industry
size
for
the
SIC
codes
affected
by
the
Beryllium
NESHAP.
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13
a.
This
is
the
number
of
existing
sources
plus
the
number
of
new
sources
anticipated
in
one
year.

The
total
annual
responses
is
166.
This
number
is
based
on
the
number
of
reporting
occurrences
per
plant
per
year
times
the
number
of
plants
per
year
required
to
submit
such
reports.
It
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13
b.
The
total
annual
labor
costs
are
$
123,496.7.
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13
c.
Details
upon
which
this
estimate
is
based
appear
in
Table
2:
Industry
Burden.

The
total
annual
capital
and
O&
M
costs
to
the
regulated
entity
are
$
35,000
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14
c.
These
costs
are
detailed
in
section
6
b
(
iii)
Capital/
Start­
up
vs.
Operating
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs.

6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
And
Cost
Tables
Refer
to
the
Attachment
for
Tables
1
and
2.

6(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
There
is
no
increase
in
burden
hours
from
the
most
recently
approved
ICR,
however,
the
cost
for
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
has
increase
due
to
an
increase
in
labor
rates.

6(
g)
Burden
Statement
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
Part
9
and
48
CFR
Chapter
15.

Send
comments
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
through
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques
to
the
Director,
Collection
Strategies
Division,
Office
of
Environmental
Information
(
OEI),
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Mail
code
2822,
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
Washington,
D.
C.
20460;
and
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20503,
Attention:
Desk
Officer
for
EPA.
Include
the
EPA
ICR
number
and
OMB
Control
Number
in
any
correspondence.

Part
B
of
the
Supporting
Statement
This
part
is
not
applicable
because
no
statistical
methods
were
used
in
collecting
this
information.
