
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81234-81251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32639]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 51, 52, 55, 70, 71 and 124

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0090, FRL-9937-21-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS59


Revisions to the Public Notice Provisions in Clean Air Act 
Permitting Programs

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to 
revise the public notice rule provisions for the New Source Review 
(NSR), title V and Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) permit programs of the 
Clean Air Act (CAA) and the corresponding onshore area (COA) 
determinations for implementation of the OCS air quality regulations. 
This action would remove the mandatory requirement to provide public 
notice of a draft air permit, as well as certain other program actions, 
through publication in a newspaper and would instead allow for 
electronic noticing (e-notice) of these actions. The proposed rule 
revisions would apply to major source air permits issued by the EPA, by 
EPA-delegated air agencies, and by air agencies with EPA-approved 
programs (with the exception of permits that are issued pursuant to the 
Tribal NSR Rule, which already allows for e-notice methods).

DATES: Comments. Comments must be received on or before February 29, 
2016.
    Public hearing. If anyone contacts us requesting a public hearing 
on or before January 13, 2016, we will hold a hearing. Additional 
information about the hearing, if requested, will be published in a 
subsequent Federal Register document.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2015-0090, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any 
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA 
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, 
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information on this 
proposed rule for NSR and OCS programs, please contact Mr. Dave 
Svendsgaard, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, by phone at (919) 541-2380 or by email 
at svendsgaard.dave@epa.gov; for title V programs please contact Ms. 
Grecia Castro, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, by phone at (919) 541-1351 or by email 
at castro.grecia@epa.gov. To request a public hearing or information 
pertaining to a public hearing on this document, contact Ms. Pamela 
Long, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, by phone at (919) 541-0641 or by email at 
long.pam@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. How is this Federal Register notice organized?

    The information presented in this document is organized as follows:

I. General Information
    A. How is this Federal Register notice organized?
    B. Does this action apply to me?
    C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
    D. How can I find information about a possible public hearing?
    E. Where can I obtain a copy of this document and other related 
information?
II. Overview of Action
III. Background
IV. Proposed Revisions
    A. What are the e-notice requirements?
    B. What are the e-access requirements?
    C. Requirements for Agencies Implementing the Federal Permit 
Program Rules
    D. Requirements for Agencies Implementing Approved Programs 
Pursuant to the EPA's Permitting Rules for States
    E. Soliciting Comment on Allowing Temporary Use of Alternative 
Noticing Methods
    F. Clarifying E-Notice and E-Access Applicability for Minor NSR 
Permits
    G. Notice Requirements for PSD Permit Rescissions
V. Policy Rationale and Legal Basis
VI. Implementation
    A. Agencies Implementing Federal Preconstruction Permit Program 
Rules
    B. Agencies Implementing State Preconstruction Permit Program 
Rules
    C. Agencies Implementing Approved Operating Permit Programs
    D. Agencies Delegated to Implement the Federal Operating Permit 
Program
VII. Environmental Justice Considerations
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and 
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
    E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With 
Indian Tribal Governments
    G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From 
Environmental Health and Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
    J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address 
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations
IX. Statutory Authority

B. Does this action apply to me?

    Entities potentially affected by this proposed rule include air 
agencies responsible for the permitting of stationary and OCS sources 
of air pollution or for determining COA designation for implementation 
of the OCS Air Regulations. This includes the EPA Regions, and both 
EPA-delegated air programs and EPA-approved air programs that are 
operated by state, local and tribal governments. Entities also 
potentially affected by this proposed rule include owners and operators 
of stationary and OCS sources that are subject to air pollution 
permitting under the CAA, as well as the general public who would have 
an interest in knowing about permitting actions, public hearings and 
other agency actions.

[[Page 81235]]

C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to the EPA 
through http://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the specific 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI in a disk or CD-ROM that 
you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and 
then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific 
information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version 
of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the 
comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be 
submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked 
will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 
40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing comments. When submitting comments, remember 
to:
     Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other 
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and 
page number).
     Follow directions. The proposed rule may ask you to 
respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a 
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
     Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives 
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical 
information and/or data that you used to support your comment.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how 
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be 
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns 
wherever possible, and suggest alternatives.
     Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the 
use of profanity or personal threats.
     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period 
deadline identified.

D. How can I find information about a possible public hearing?

    To request a public hearing or information pertaining to a public 
hearing on this document, contact Ms. Pamela Long, Office of Air 
Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
by phone at (919) 541-0641 or by email at long.pam@epa.gov.

E. Where can I obtain a copy of this document and other related 
information?

    In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of 
this Federal Register document will be posted at http://www3.epa.gov/nsr/actions.html and http://www3.epa.gov/airquality/permits/actions.html.

II. Overview of Action

    The CAA authorizes the EPA to administer and oversee the permitting 
of stationary and other sources of air pollution. To accomplish this 
obligation, the EPA has promulgated permitting regulations for 
construction of sources pursuant to NSR under title I of the CAA, for 
operation of major and certain other sources of air pollutants under 
title V of the CAA; and for OCS sources under CAA Sec.  328. These 
regulations are contained in 40 CFR parts 51, 52, 55, 70, 71 and 124, 
and cover the requirements for federal permit actions (i.e., when the 
EPA or a delegated air agency is the permitting authority \1\) and 
minimum permitting requirements under an approved state implementation 
plan (SIP) and title V program.\2\ These rules contain, among other 
things, requirements for public notice and availability of supporting 
information to allow for informed public participation in permit 
actions. These regulatory requirements for public participation in 
permit and other actions are the subject of this proposed rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In lieu of ``permitting authority,'' in this preamble and 
rule, we sometimes use the terms ``permitting agency,'' ``reviewing 
authority,'' and ``air agency'' (or ``agency''). These terms 
generally denote all forms of air permitting authorities, including 
EPA Regions, EPA-delegated air programs, and air programs that are 
operated by state, local and tribal governments and that implement 
their own rules under an EPA-approved implementation plan. 
Furthermore, the rules for the federal permit programs sometimes use 
the terms ``Administrator'' and ``Director'' in referring to the 
permitting authority.
    \2\ NSR includes the Prevention of Significant Deterioration 
(PSD), nonattainment major NSR (NNSR), and minor NSR permitting 
programs. Requirements for the NSR programs can be found at 40 CFR 
51 for approved state and local permitting programs, and at 40 CFR 
52 for federal permit programs. (In addition, 40 CFR 52 references 
part 124 for additional requirements.) Requirements for approved 
title V operating permit programs are located at 40 CFR 70 and for 
federal operating permit programs at 40 CFR 71. Requirements for the 
permitting of OCS sources can be found at 40 CFR 55.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In general, prior to issuing a permit to a major stationary source 
\3\ of air pollution, the permitting authority prepares a draft permit, 
provides notice to the public of the draft permit, and provides the 
public reasonable access to the draft permit, the application, and 
supporting information. The permitting authority must provide an 
opportunity for public comment, as well as an opportunity to request a 
public hearing on the draft permit. See, e.g., 40 CFR 70.7(h). In 
addition, the information that supports the permit decisions--referred 
to in some cases as the ``permit record'' or ``administrative 
record''--must be made available to the public for inspection. Id. 
Under the title V programs, these procedures apply to permits for all 
covered sources, including certain non-major sources. See 40 CFR 
70.3.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``major source'' in the title V program rules 
includes any ``major stationary source'' under the NSR program 
rules. See, e.g., 40 CFR 52.21(b)(1)(i) and 40 CFR 71.2. In this 
preamble, we use the terms ``major source'' and ``major stationary 
source'' interchangeably.
    \4\ The EPA's rules generally require less extensive public 
participation procedures for the permitting of minor sources and 
minor modifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This action addresses the method by which the permitting agency 
provides the required notice of the permitting action and access to the 
information supporting the action. We specifically propose to remove 
from the EPA rules the mandatory requirement that draft permits under 
CAA permitting programs for major sources be noticed in a newspaper of 
general circulation and instead allow--and, in some cases, require (as 
explained below)--the use of electronic methods to provide notice of 
and access to these draft permits. We are not changing the majority of 
the existing procedural requirements for processing permit applications 
and the requirement to keep a record of the materials that support the 
permit decisions. We also are not changing existing requirements as to 
the substance of the information that must be made available when the 
permitting agency notifies the public of the draft permitting action.
    We are also not proposing to revise the federal rules for public 
notice that apply to minor NSR permits under 40 CFR part 51.161, which 
require ``notice by prominent advertisement.'' See Sec.  51.161(b)(3). 
In 2012, the EPA clarified through guidance that the Sec.  51.161 term 
``prominent advertisement'' is media neutral, and therefore newspaper 
notice of minor NSR actions is not required. (``EPA's 2012 
Memorandum'') \5\ The guidance memorandum did not, however, address 
notice requirements for synthetic minor source permits.\6\ In

[[Page 81236]]

this action, we are proposing to extend the media neutrality policy of 
the EPA's 2012 Memorandum to all permit actions governed by Sec.  
51.161, including synthetic minor source permits, and to ensure that e-
access methods are available for minor NSR permit actions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Memorandum from Janet McCabe, Principal Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation, ``Minor New Source 
Review Program Public Notice Requirements under 40 CFR 
51.161(b)(3)'' (April 17, 2012). See http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/pubnot.pdf.
    \6\ A synthetic minor source is a source that has taken 
restrictions to avoid applicability of major source requirements. 
Under the NSR program, such restrictions must be legally and 
practically enforceable. See, e.g., 67 FR 80191.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are also not proposing to revise the public participation 
requirements for permits that establish a Plantwide Applicability 
Limitation (PAL), which cross reference the public participation 
procedures at Sec.  51.161. See Sec. Sec.  51.165(f)(5), 51.166(w)(5), 
and 52.21(aa), and Appendix S to part 51, Section IV.K.5. As discussed 
in the preamble to the PAL regulations (``PAL preamble''), ``[t]he 
reviewing authority must establish a PAL in a federally enforceable 
permit (for example, a ``minor'' NSR construction permit, a major NSR 
permit, or a SIP-approved operating permit program).'' 67 FR 80208; 
December 31, 2002. The PAL preamble further explains that ``the 
reviewing authority must provide an opportunity for public 
participation when issuing a PAL permit . . . consistent with the 
requirements at Sec.  51.161 and include a minimum of a 30-day period 
for public notice and opportunity for public comment.'' Id. As 
explained above, in EPA's 2012 Memorandum we clarified that the term 
``prominent advertisement'' in Sec.  51.161 is media neutral for minor 
NSR permits, and in this action we are proposing to extend the 
applicability of the policy in that memorandum to all permit actions 
governed by Sec.  51.161. In addition, the PAL preamble explains 
``[w]here the PAL is established in a major NSR permit, major NSR 
public participation procedures apply.'' Id. In this rule action, we 
propose to amend the public participation requirements for major source 
permits under CAA permitting programs to allow or require the use of 
electronic methods to provide notice of these permits. Therefore, since 
this proposed action along with our previous rules and guidance would 
collectively ensure that Sec.  51.161 and the major source specific 
regulations allow for e-notice in lieu of newspaper notice, and these 
public notice requirements would apply as well to all of the types of 
permits that may be used to establish a PAL, we believe that it is 
unnecessary to propose any revisions to the PAL-specific provisions of 
EPA's air permitting rules.
    In addition, these proposed revisions would not change the 
requirements for nonattainment NSR (NNSR), minor NSR, and synthetic 
minor NSR permits in Indian country, which are contained in 40 CFR part 
49 and allow for other means of public noticing beyond a newspaper of 
general circulation. See Sec. Sec.  49.157 (minor NSR and synthetic 
minor NSR permits) and 49.171 (nonattainment major NSR permits). 
However, these proposed revisions would change the requirements for PSD 
permits that the EPA issues in Indian country, as well as Prevention of 
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permits that are issued by a tribe 
through a delegation agreement or by a tribe that has an approved 
tribal implementation plan (TIP) that incorporates by reference the 
public noticing requirements in the federal PSD rules at 40 CFR 52.21. 
Also, since this proposal would revise the noticing requirements in 40 
CFR 71, which apply to Indian country absent an approved part 70 
program, the revisions would affect the public notice procedures for 
the majority of title V operating permits in tribal lands.\7\ Also, the 
tribal agency with an approved part 70 program would have the option to 
implement e-notice under the same terms that apply to other approved 
part 70 programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Most states, certain local agencies and currently one tribe 
have approved part 70 programs. The EPA administers the part 71 
federal program in most areas of Indian country (one tribe has been 
delegated implementation authority) and on the Outer Continental 
Shelf (when there is no delegated state permitting authority).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This action addresses the public notice requirements for all air 
agencies. For the noticing of major source permits by the EPA and other 
air agencies that implement the federal permitting rules, e-notice 
would be required under this proposed rule. For major source permits 
issued by air agencies that implement their own rules approved by EPA, 
this proposed rule would allow additional flexibility such that these 
permitting authorities would have the option to provide e-notice or to 
continue to provide traditional newspaper notice, although they must 
adopt a single, ``consistent noticing method'' to be used for all of 
their major source permits. Thus, where an agency opts to post notices 
of draft permits on a Web site in lieu of newspaper publication, it 
must post all notices to this Web site in order to ensure that the 
public has a consistent and reliable location to turn to for all permit 
notices. If the agency does not maintain a consistent noticing method 
(i.e., if the state posts some notices to a Web site and others in the 
newspaper), the public may not know where to look for information 
regarding a permit for a source of interest to them. We are taking 
comment on this proposed approach of requiring a consistent noticing 
method for these approved state programs, as well as the option of not 
requiring a consistent noticing method.
    In addition, to satisfy the proposed requirements for e-notice, 
except for programs that implement part 51 regulations for PSD and NNSR 
permits and states that issue OCS permits, the air agency must maintain 
a mailing list that will notify any person on the list of any new 
public notice. This approach is consistent with the current noticing 
requirements in the federal rules for NSR and EPA-issued OCS permits, 
and for federal and state operating permits under parts 70 and 71 (and 
OCS permits subject to these requirements), which all require that a 
copy of the notice be mailed to persons who have subscribed to the 
appropriate mailing list. The EPA believes that continuing with this 
approach will maintain the current efforts to reach communities through 
a variety of methods. This proposed rule clarifies that distributing 
the public notice information to the persons on the mailing list can be 
by way of email or the more traditional mailing methods (e.g., postal 
service, courier).
    This proposed action also requires that, when a permitting 
authority adopts the e-notice approach, it also must provide e-access. 
For the purpose of this proposed rule, e-access means that the 
permitting authority must make the draft permit available 
electronically (i.e., on the agency's public Web site or on a Web site 
identified by the permitting agency, which could be an online document 
management system) for the duration of the public comment period. It is 
important to note that, while e-access in this proposed rule only 
pertains to the availability of and access to the draft permit during 
the public comment period, nothing in this rule alters the requirement 
for the permitting authority to maintain a record of the permit action 
and to make it available to the public. Thus, a permitting authority 
that is satisfying the proposed conditions of e-access by posting the 
draft permit on a Web site must also provide the public with reasonable 
access to the other materials that support the permit decision (as it 
has always been required to do). Access to the other materials can be 
provided either electronically, or at a physical location, or a 
combination of both.
    In addition to the proposed approach described above for EPA-
approved permitting programs, we are requesting comment on an 
alternative approach. In the alternative approach, permitting programs 
that implement 40 CFR part 51 or 70 and that select e-notice as their

[[Page 81237]]

consistent noticing method would have the option, but would not be 
required to, provide e-access. This approach could be of benefit to 
some agencies that may notice permits using an online permits 
register--which would qualify for e-notice under this rule proposal--
but do not have the Web site capabilities to satisfy the e-access 
requirement of making the draft permit available electronically.
    Additionally, we are soliciting comment on including a provision in 
the regulations to allow air agencies to temporarily use an alternative 
noticing method if their Web site is unavailable for a period of time. 
This may be necessary during periods when a Web site is temporarily 
offline due to, for example, malfunctions, transitions to a different 
Web site platform, or emergency situations that result in prolonged 
electrical system outages. As with the Web site noticing method, the 
permitting agency would need to assure that the alternative noticing 
method provides adequate notice to the affected public. We specifically 
seek comment on the criteria for determining when the alternative 
method should be available, the length of time it could be used, and 
how the transition to the method would be conveyed to the public.
    Finally, we are proposing to extend the use of e-notice methods to 
three non-permitting actions. In each case, the regulatory provision 
currently requires notice of the action by way of newspaper 
publication. We briefly describe each provision below.
     The ``OCS Air Regulations'' at 40 CFR part 55 apply to 
more than just OCS permitting actions. Specifically, when the EPA makes 
a COA designation determination, it must do so by way of a process that 
allows for public comment on the draft determination. Through this 
action, we are proposing to require electronic notice of the COA 
designation.
     The existing federal PSD regulations contain a provision 
for ``permit rescission'' that only refers to newspaper notification. 
Specifically, paragraph 40 CFR 52.21(w)(4) requires that, if an agency 
rescinds a permit, it shall give ``adequate notice of the rescission,'' 
and that newspaper publication ``shall be considered adequate notice.'' 
We are proposing in this action to revise the provision to specifically 
require that the Administrator notify the public of a permit rescission 
by e-notice.
     Paragraph 40 CFR 71.4(g) provides that, when the EPA takes 
action to administer and enforce, or to delegate, a federal operating 
permits program, it will publish a notice in the Federal Register and, 
``to the extent practicable, publish notice in a newspaper of general 
circulation within the area subject to the part 71 program 
effectiveness or delegation.'' We are proposing to revise this 
provision to require the additional notice of the program effectiveness 
or delegation by way of posting on a public Web site identified by the 
EPA.
     It is important to note that the EPA is not proposing 
additional public participation where existing rules do not require 
public participation. Thus, the minimum notice and access requirements 
being proposed in this rule would apply to the public participation 
procedures of air quality permits issued by EPA and other air agencies 
in cases where the current rules require public participation in a 
permitting decision.

III. Background

    While the CAA requires permitting authorities to offer the 
opportunity for public participation in the processing of air permits, 
it does not specify the best or preferred method for providing notice 
to the public. See, e.g., CAA 165(a)(2). The EPA's air permitting 
regulations also address the issue of public participation, and in 
those rules there is more specificity regarding the methods of meeting 
the public notice obligations. The EPA's regulations are intended to 
ensure that the EPA and other permitting authorities provide adequate 
public notice of their permitting actions. Among the procedural 
requirements for public notice, the current regulations for the major 
NSR, title V and OCS programs include (or cross reference to) specific 
language that requires agencies to notify the public of pending 
permitting actions and the opportunity to comment on those permitting 
actions by advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Those regulations also specify the information that the 
public notice must include, and, as noted above, this regulation 
does not change such information requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When the EPA first developed public notice provisions for the major 
NSR program in the late 1970s and early 1980s, newspaper advertisement 
was the most commonly accepted method for providing notice of permits 
and other agency actions in the community. The EPA, therefore, 
finalized rules that contained, among other things, requirements for 
newspaper notice of permitting and other actions. When the title V 
rules were first issued in 1992, the EPA considered the public notice 
requirements for PSD permits and similarly required in part that the 
public be notified of a permitting action by way of ``a newspaper of 
general circulation in the area where the source is located or in a 
State publication designed to give general public notice.'' 40 CFR 
70.7(h)(1).\9\ OCS regulations, also promulgated in 1992, included this 
same approach of requiring public notice via newspaper publication, by 
requiring that the applicable requirements for federal PSD permits in 
40 CFR part 124 also apply to the processing of OCS permit 
applications.\10\ The EPA also added specific language within the OCS 
rules that require COA designation determinations to be announced by 
way of a newspaper of general circulation. Consequently, in 
promulgating the rules for NSR, title V and OCS air programs, the EPA 
determined that it was most appropriate for permitting actions, COA 
designations, and public hearings to be announced to the public by a 
newspaper notice. The public notice procedures in the regulations for 
each of these programs have not changed with respect to newspaper 
notification since they were first developed and issued.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 57 FR 32250 (July 21, 1992) regarding state operating 
permit programs (40 CFR 70) and 61 FR 34202 (July 1, 1996) regarding 
federal operating permit programs (40 CFR 71).
    \10\ See 57 FR 40792 (September 4, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Permitting authorities typically have met the required newspaper 
notice provision by publishing a single-day legal notice of 
availability of the draft permit action in a local newspaper. In some 
cases, depending on the location of the source and the demographics of 
the affected community, some permitting agencies may publish the notice 
in multiple newspapers to reach the intended audience, or may provide 
bilingual newspaper notices of their permitting actions. The specific 
contents of the newspaper notice are specified for some programs, and 
they tend to vary with different permitting authorities. Most notices 
typically contain basic information about the draft permit, such as the 
permit number, the name and physical address of the facility, and the 
name and contact information of a person from whom interested persons 
may obtain additional information on the draft permit. Depending on the 
permitting authority, the notice may include more detailed information 
on the draft permit, such as the anticipated emissions increase from 
the proposed project. The public notice for the permit also informs 
interested parties on how to request and/or attend a public hearing and 
how to access additional information relevant to the draft permit. This 
additional information is typically

[[Page 81238]]

housed in a designated public reading room near the source or in a 
library at the permitting agency with specified hours of operation for 
viewing the documents. In the case of title V permits, as well as PSD 
and OCS permits that follow 40 CFR part 124, the regulations also 
provide for mailing lists for permit actions and, as a result, notice 
may also occur for these draft permits (in addition to the mandatory 
newspaper notice) via direct mail or other communication to those 
persons included on a mailing list.
    Over the years, however, availability of and access to the basic 
forms of electronic media--namely, the Internet and email--have 
increased significantly across the United States. More recently, 
sophisticated mobile devices and high-speed wireless networks are 
transforming the Internet and how our society interacts with it.\11\ 
One effect of this electronic media development is that circulation of 
newspapers and other print media is declining, making printed newspaper 
notice less effective in providing widespread public notice of permit 
actions. Over the same time period, many permitting authorities 
developed their own Internet Web sites and began using email for the 
purpose of communicating with the public. In doing so, many of these 
agencies began to supplement the required one-time newspaper 
publication with the posting of electronic notices of availability of 
draft permits via their agency Web sites. Once the permitting agency 
develops its Web site and formats it to post permitting notices, the 
agency has an effective and convenient way to communicate permitting-
related information to the majority of the public. In addition, the 
effort and cost to post a notice on an already-established Web site is 
generally lower than the expense of purchasing a newspaper 
advertisement, and it generally enables broader and faster 
dissemination of information to interested and affected parties as 
compared to newspaper noticing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Exploring the Digital Nation: Embracing the Mobile 
Internet, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications 
and Information Administration, October 2014, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/exploring_the_digital_nation_embracing_the_mobile_internet_10162014.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA believes that having the notice of availability and the 
draft permit remain electronically available on an agency's Web site 
for an extended period of time, as compared to a one-time publication 
in an area newspaper that directs the public to a reading room at the 
permitting agency, or at a library or other location near the source, 
results in a significant increase in public awareness of the proposed 
permitting action and access to the draft permit. Even without this 
additional electronic access to the draft permit, posting the notice 
for the duration of the public comment period provides more widespread 
public notice than a single-day publication in a newspaper of general 
circulation.
    We note that, in some instances, communities that are potentially 
affected by a proposed permitting action may have limited access to the 
Internet, and therefore may rely more on newspapers for receiving their 
information. In these cases, newspaper publication can still provide a 
means to convey permitting information to these communities. However, 
we expect that in many cases these communities would have access to a 
public library with Internet access that would provide access to the 
online permit notices and draft permits. Furthermore, because many 
permitting authorities are now supplementing their newspaper notices 
with electronic posting of the notice on their agency Web site, it 
seems unlikely that the public would continue to seek out permitting 
announcements in newspapers in the future. As discussed later in this 
preamble, a report issued by the National Environmental Justice 
Advisory Council (NEJAC) found that publication in the legal section of 
a newspaper is antiquated and ineffective and is not ideal for 
providing notice to affected environmental justice (EJ) communities. 
Given this significant shift away from the public's reliance on 
traditional newspapers for information, and the corresponding increased 
reliance on the Internet, the EPA recognizes that newspaper notice is 
no longer the only, or most effective, method of announcing permitting 
actions to reach the public.
    To this end, the EPA has identified the need to allow for more 
noticing options than just newspaper publication. In 2011, the EPA 
issued the Tribal NSR Rules that contained, among other things, 
requirements for noticing of permits in Indian country that allowed for 
options other than newspaper and print media.\12\ The July 2011 rule 
provides options such as web posting and email lists among the methods 
that the permitting authority may use to provide adequate public notice 
in agreement with the prominent advertisement goal. See 76 FR 38764. 
Then, through guidance issued in 2012, the EPA clarified its position 
on what constitutes public notice for minor NSR permit programs and is 
adequate to meet the requirement of ``notice by prominent 
advertisement.'' 40 CFR 51.161(b)(3). As noted above, the EPA's 2012 
Memorandum explained, ``. . . as the public continues to increase the 
use of web based sources of information and states experience decreases 
in budgets allocated for public noticing of permits, we believe that 
for the purposes of minor NSR programs and permits, the `prominent 
advertisement' requirement at 40 CFR 51.161(b)(3) is media neutral.'' 
The guidance further explains that the EPA believes ``it is appropriate 
to give state and local programs the flexibility to determine what 
constitutes prominent advertisement for purposes of minor NSR programs 
and permits, consistent with the overarching requirement that the 
public have routine and ready access to the alternative publishing 
venues.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See 76 FR 38748, July 1, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Proposed Revisions

    This action proposes to remove the mandatory requirement that draft 
permits for sources subject to the major NSR, title V or OCS programs 
be noticed in a newspaper of general circulation and instead allow the 
use of electronic methods to provide notice of draft permits. This 
action also proposes these same revisions for COA designations in the 
OCS program, permit rescissions under the federal PSD program, and 
noticing of federal operating permits programs. In the case of permits 
issued by the EPA or other agencies implementing 40 CFR parts 52 or 71, 
we are proposing to require that the EPA provide e-notice for all draft 
permits. For permits issued by other air agencies--specifically, 
agencies that implement 40 CFR parts 51 or 70--we are proposing that 
those permitting authorities would have the option to adopt either e-
notice or traditional newspaper notice; however, they must select one 
of the noticing methods as their consistent noticing method to be used 
to notice all of their draft permits and their rules must reflect this 
selection.
    This proposed action also requires that, if the permitting 
authority adopts the e-notice approach, it would also provide e-access 
as described in this rule. Specifically, the agency would make the 
draft permit available electronically for the duration of the public 
comment period. Furthermore, this rule proposes specific minimum 
requirements for satisfying the meaning of the terms ``e-notice'' and 
``e-access.'' While e-access in this rule pertains only to the 
availability and access to the draft permit, nothing in this rule 
nullifies the requirement for the permitting authority to maintain a 
record of the permit

[[Page 81239]]

decisions and to make it available to the public. Hence, a permitting 
authority that is satisfying the proposed terms of e-access by posting 
the draft permit on its Web site must also maintain the other materials 
that support the permit decision and make them publicly available--
either electronically, or at a physical location, or a combination of 
both. This proposed action does not affect any of the record retention 
or CBI policies of agencies.
    More specifically, this proposed action includes revisions to 40 
CFR part 51.166 (state/local PSD permits), part 52.21 (EPA/delegated 
agency-issued PSD permits), part 70 (state/local/tribal operating 
permits), part 71 (EPA/delegated agency-issued operating permits), part 
55 (EPA-issued OCS permits and COA designations), and part 124 (EPA-
issued permits applying generally to a number of media programs, 
including EPA-issued PSD and OCS permits). In addition, this action 
proposes to add specific public notice provisions in 40 CFR 51.165 (for 
state/local major NNSR permits), which currently does not contain 
section-specific public notification requirements (except for PAL 
permits).\13\ However, since the PSD program rules under 40 CFR 51.166 
contain specific newspaper public notice provisions at Sec.  
51.166(q)(2)(iii), for clarity and consistency purposes we are 
proposing to add parallel noticing provisions to Sec.  51.165 to avoid 
any possible confusion as to the methods for providing notice under 
approved state and local NNSR programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ While 40 CFR 51.165 does not currently contain specific 
noticing provisions for draft major source permits, agencies 
implementing Sec.  51.165 rely on the provisions of Sec.  51.161 for 
the noticing of NNSR permits. As noted in this preamble, the EPA's 
2012 Memorandum clarified that the terms used in Sec.  51.161 allow 
for a media neutral approach to the noticing of permits, but the 
memorandum only applies to minor NSR permits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is important to note that some of the rule sections that we are 
proposing to amend have existing noticing and access requirements that 
are specific to the section and may not appear in other sections. We 
are not proposing to alter these specific rule provisions in this 
action. For example, the notice requirements in Sec.  51.166(q) relate 
to the ``degree of increment consumption'' that is expected from the 
source or modification, but these requirements are not in other 
sections. Similarly, parts 70 and 71 have differing requirements for 
what information the notice should identify. In the federal PSD and the 
OCS permitting sections, there are currently no specific provisions for 
permit noticing--nor are we proposing specific requirements through 
this action--but these sections cross reference the procedural 
requirements in part 124 for which amendments are being proposed in 
this action. Consequently, the proposed rule revisions that would allow 
for e-notice and e-access appear differently in each rule section, but 
the basic effect of the changes is the same across all of the sections 
being revised.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The docket for this action contains a document that 
reflects how the proposed rule changes compare to the existing rule 
provisions. See EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0090-0002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In specifying that an agency electronically post the notice and 
draft permit ``for the duration of the public comment period,'' we note 
that there may be instances during the comment period when the Web site 
is unavailable. This may occur due to, among other things, Web site 
failures or power outages. While we expect that these situations would 
be infrequent and short in duration, they would nonetheless temporarily 
interrupt the noticing of the draft permit and the electronic posting 
would be less than ``the duration of the comment period.'' We do not 
interpret ``the duration of the comment period'' to be a requirement 
for uninterrupted web access, but rather to mean that, to the extent 
that interruptions to the accessibility of the posted notice and draft 
permit occur, they would be short and infrequent. Further, we expect 
that the permitting authority or webmaster would be in a good position 
to make a reasonable assessment, based on experience, regarding unusual 
interruptions that would significantly affect the noticing of the 
permit. In general, we do not expect that short interruptions would 
significantly affect the noticing of the permit, and we do not expect 
these situations to result in a need for the comment period to be 
extended to account for the time during which the Web site is 
unavailable. On the other hand, for an agency that is providing only 
electronic access to the permit record (i.e., no physical access 
options), Web site interruptions could present larger problems for 
anyone who is attempting to understand the draft permit and provide 
timely comments. In such cases, the air agency should evaluate the 
degree of limitation that the interruption has on the public's access 
to the permit record. For any interruption that impacts public access 
for an extended period, we recommend that the agency provide hard 
copies of the permit record at appropriate locations. In addition to 
taking comment on this proposed approach for the phrase ``for the 
duration of the public comment period,'' we are soliciting comment on 
whether we should include a provision in the regulations that allows a 
permitting authority to use an alternative noticing (and/or access) 
method to reach the affected public while the Web site is unavailable.
    In addition to the proposed rule approach, we are taking comment on 
an alternative approach for air agencies that implement 40 CFR parts 51 
and 70 that would not require these agencies to couple e-notice with e-
access. In other words, if an agency adopts e-notice as its consistent 
noticing method, it would not be required to provide e-access (although 
the agency could provide e-access at its discretion--e.g., to 
supplement its physical access of the draft permit). This alternative 
approach may be of benefit to some agencies that notice permits using 
an online permits register--which would qualify for e-notice--but do 
not have the technical capabilities to satisfy the e-access requirement 
of making the draft permit electronically available.
    These proposed rules provide flexibility to air agencies with EPA-
approved programs, such that they are no longer required to use 
newspaper noticing, although they can continue to use the newspaper 
method for noticing if they choose. In the case of EPA and other air 
agencies that implement the federal permitting rules, we are proposing 
that these programs are required to use e-notice and e-access, but 
these terms are limited in scope to require only minimal electronic 
noticing and access and to allow the agency the flexibility to use 
either its own Web site or another publicly available Web site that it 
identifies. We believe the proposed rule revisions, once final, will 
lead to more effective noticing of air permitting actions and will 
likely promote additional public participation in the permitting 
process, while also avoiding the higher costs of newspaper 
advertisement.

A. What are the e-notice requirements?

    For the purpose of this proposed rule, the term ``e-notice'' means 
the notice of availability of the draft permitting action is provided 
on the permitting agency's Web site or another public Web site 
identified by the permitting agency for the purpose of noticing 
permits. The Web site should be easily accessible by the public, and 
the noticing section of the Web site should be ``user friendly''--i.e., 
organized in such a way that it directs the public to the entire notice 
in a clear and straightforward manner. In some cases, the Web site may 
be characterized as a ``portal'' or it can be some other publicly 
accessible

[[Page 81240]]

Web site that is identified by the permitting authority and allows for 
the noticing of draft permits (e.g., a state permits register).
    In some of the rule sections proposed for revision, the permitting 
authority must maintain a mailing list that will be used to notify 
persons on the list of any new public notice of a draft permit. This 
requirement exists in part 124 for EPA-issued PSD and OCS permits and 
in parts 70 and 71 for title V permits. We are proposing that the 
mailing list requirement would continue to apply for the noticing of 
these permits, and we are proposing that the mailing list requirement 
would not apply to programs that currently do not have a mailing list 
requirement--namely, agencies that follow part 51 regulations for PSD 
and NNSR permits and for state-issued OCS permits. Although the mailing 
list provisions were originally created with the idea that authorities 
would use the postal service to physically convey the notice to the 
recipients on the list, it has evolved over time such that many 
agencies that maintain a mailing list use electronic notification 
rather than mailing the notice through the postal service. In general, 
email notification has become a common practice among air agencies that 
currently provide supplemental notice via their agency Web site. 
Furthermore, many of these agencies' Web sites are equipped with a 
hyperlink or a radio button that facilitates convenient and easy sign 
up for interested persons to subscribe to the mailing list. Thus, we 
are not changing the current rule sections that require mailing lists, 
but we are updating the provisions to also allow agencies to use 
electronic methods to administer the activities of the mailing list, to 
include subscribing to the list, maintaining the list, and distributing 
the required information to the parties on the list. We expect that 
some agencies may use both electronic methods and more traditional 
methods (e.g., a mailing list sign-up sheet posted at a public hearing) 
to administer their permits mailing lists.
    Part 71.11(d)(3) currently requires the EPA and delegated agencies 
to affirmatively solicit for their mailing lists. As part of this 
proposed rulemaking, we are proposing revised language for part 71 to 
explain that the permitting authority will notify the public via Web 
site of the opportunity to be included or removed from its mailing 
list. We expect that many agencies will add a generally accepted method 
(e.g., hyperlink sign up function, radio button) to their Web sites 
that will facilitate easy and convenient sign-up for their mailing 
list, as well as methods for unsubscribing. As noted above, many air 
agencies maintain a Web site that currently supplements the newspaper 
noticing of their permits with online noticing of their permits. 
Furthermore, some of these agencies rely on a variety of methods, 
beyond mailing lists, to alert the affected community that their Web 
site has been updated with a new draft permit or new information about 
a permit. Though not required under this proposed rule, we encourage 
air agencies to continue the practice of providing appropriate 
additional outreach to the general public for permits of interest. 
These outreach efforts may consist of opportunities presented by social 
media services (e.g., RSS feed, Twitter, Facebook) where appropriate, 
or more traditional techniques such as online community bulletin boards 
or community newspapers. We are proposing that use of these additional 
outreach methods is not required, but is discretionary for the 
permitting authority.
    Also, it is important to reiterate that we are not proposing to 
alter any existing requirements regarding the content of the public 
notice. We are, however, expressly requiring that the notice direct 
interested parties to information on how to request and/or attend a 
public hearing and how to access additional information relevant to the 
draft permit. Requirements regarding additional information in the 
notice vary across the different sections of the permitting rules, and 
may further vary among different individual permitting authorities. 
Most notices of availability will contain, at a minimum, the permit 
number, name and physical address of the facility, and the name and 
contact information of a person from whom interested persons may obtain 
additional information on the draft permit.
    We request comment on this approach to defining e-notice as it 
applies to this proposed rule. In particular, we request comment on 
whether this approach and the corresponding rule text preclude some 
forms of electronic noticing that are currently being used or under 
development.
    To clarify what this action is proposing for e-notice, in the 
following section we provide a summary of the proposed rule 
requirements. In addition, we are providing recommended ``best 
practices'' for electronic notice. These best practices recommendations 
are intended to foster improved communication and outreach of permit 
notices beyond the minimum requirements being proposed in this action.
1. Proposed Regulatory Requirements for E-Notice
    In order to satisfy the requirement for e-notice of a permit, the 
permitting authority shall electronically post, for the duration of the 
public comment period, the following information on a public Web site 
identified by the permitting authority:
    (1) notice of availability of the draft permit for public comment;
    (2) information on how to access the permit record (either 
electronically and/or physically);
    (3) information on how to request and/or attend a public hearing on 
the draft permit; and
    (4) all other information currently required to be included in the 
public notice under the existing regulations.
    In addition, where already required by the current rules, the 
permitting authority shall maintain a mailing list of persons who 
request to be notified of permitting activity and shall distribute 
(e.g., by email) the above information to these persons.
2. Recommended Best Practices for E-Notice
    While not proposed as a requirement of this rule, the EPA is 
recommending best practices that can be used to augment the above 
requirements for electronic notice. These best practice methods are not 
required to satisfy the e-notice requirements for this proposed rule, 
but may be helpful in the course of providing the fullest communication 
to the public on permitting actions. The recommended best practices of 
e-notice include:
     Providing notice of the final permit issuance on the Web 
site.
     Soliciting actively for the mailing list on the Web site 
(e.g., Web site equipped with radio button, hyperlink, or ``click 
here'' function to subscribe).
     Providing options for email notification that enable 
subscribers to tailor the types of notifications they receive (e.g., a 
person can request notification of only draft permit notices for major 
source actions, rather than receiving notice of all permitting activity 
by the agency).

B. What are the e-access requirements?

    For the purpose of this proposed rule, the term ``e-access'' means 
the permitting authority shall post on its Web site (or a Web site 
identified by the permitting authority) the draft permit for the 
duration of the public comment period. As with e-notice, the posting of 
the draft permit should be in a prominent location on the Web site, and 
the Web site should allow user-friendly

[[Page 81241]]

access to the draft permit. Access to all other relevant materials that 
represent the record for the permit shall also be available to the 
public during the public comment period, but these other materials can 
be accessible either electronically or at a physical location, or in 
both locations. In this action, we are proposing that if the permitting 
authority provides e-notice, then it must also provide e-access.
    In defining the requirements for e-access and authorizing the use 
of e-access for major source permits that are undergoing public notice, 
we are proposing to add new paragraphs to certain program rules and 
specifically revise other program rules that have draft permit access 
requirements containing language that could be read to suggest that 
access requirements could not be met through electronic availability of 
the permit materials. See, e.g., 40 CFR 51.166(q)(2)(ii), 
55.5(f)(1)(i). These revised rule paragraphs would expressly allow for 
electronic availability of permit documents.
    As noted above, nothing in this proposed rule affects the 
requirement for an agency to maintain a record to support the decisions 
of the permitting actions and to make it available to the public. 
Furthermore, nothing in this proposed rule affects the record retention 
policies and requirements of governmental agencies that provide 
schedules for retention and disposal of paper and electronic records. 
Finally, the electronic posting of draft and final permits, including 
information supporting the permit decisions (e.g., permit 
applications), would be subject to the applicable CBI policies and 
requirements of the air agency and, consequently, some permit-related 
documents may be redacted or otherwise withheld from viewing on a Web 
site or public reading room if it is determined that the document 
contains CBI.
    We request comment on this approach to defining e-access as it 
applies to this proposed rule. In particular, we request comment on 
whether this approach and the corresponding regulatory text preclude 
some forms of electronic access that are currently being used or under 
development. Also, as noted above, we are requesting comment on an 
alternative proposal that does not require air agencies with EPA-
approved programs to electronically post the draft permit (i.e., e-
access) if they choose e-notice as their consistent noticing method.
    To clarify what this action is proposing for e-access, in the 
following section we provide a summary of the proposed rule 
requirements. As we provided in the preceding section on e-notice, we 
are also sharing what we consider to be recommended best practices for 
electronic access.
1. Proposed Regulatory Requirements for E-Access
    In order to satisfy the requirement for electronic access, the 
permitting authority shall electronically post, for the duration of the 
public comment period, the draft permit on a public Web site identified 
by the permitting authority, which may include the permitting 
authority's public Web site, an online state permits register, or a 
publicly-available electronic document management Web site that allows 
for downloading documents. The draft permit file should be in a format 
that can be opened and viewed by the public using commonly accepted 
computer software (e.g., portable document format that can be opened 
with Adobe Acrobat Reader). We request comment on whether our rules 
should require that the electronic format of the draft permit be 
viewable by software that is ``free'' (i.e., available without charge) 
to the user.
    The Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at http://www.regulations.gov is a web-based docket system used for, among other 
things, federal permitting actions that require public notice and 
comment. This searchable docket system allows for public access and 
downloading of the draft permit and permit related documents. The 
http://www.regulations.gov Web site also allows the public to register 
to receive email alerts to track activity on selected dockets. Similar 
online data management systems exist in a number of states and allow 
agencies to provide digital access to permits and other records.
2. Recommended Best Practices for E-Access
    While not proposed as a requirement of this rule, the EPA is 
recommending best practices that can be used to augment the above 
requirement for electronic access. These best practice methods are not 
required to satisfy the e-access provision for this proposed rule, but 
may be helpful in the course of providing the fullest communication to 
the public on permitting actions. The recommended best practices of e-
access include:
     Continued posting of the draft permit on the Web site past 
the public comment period (e.g., until issuance of the final permit or 
until the permit application has been denied or withdrawn).
     Posting the final permit on the Web site for a specified 
period of time after issuance of the permit (e.g., through the permit 
appeal period or petition period).
     Posting (or hyperlinking to) other key permit support 
documents on the agency Web site or on a publicly-available online 
document management site (e.g., FDMS), such as the permit application, 
Statement of Basis, fact sheet, preliminary determination, final 
determination, and response to comments.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ While the EPA believes it is a best practice to 
electronically post as many of the key permit decision documents and 
information as possible, we recognize that air quality modeling runs 
and other permit data files may not be compatible with e-access. 
These documents typically cannot be uploaded to an electronic format 
due to the size and storage requirements in the electronic posting. 
In some cases, permitting authorities may choose to upload a 
description of these documents with directions on how to access the 
files or how to request access to them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Requirements for Agencies Implementing the Federal Permit Program 
Rules

    For programs in which the permits are issued by the EPA or by an 
air agency that implements the EPA's federal permitting rules (i.e., 40 
CFR parts 52, 55, 71 or 124), the EPA is proposing specific changes to 
the public notice and permit access methods. We are proposing to remove 
the mandatory newspaper notice requirement and mandatory access to the 
permit information at a physical address, and to replace these 
requirements with mandatory e-notice and mandatory e-access, as those 
terms are outlined in this rule, as the consistent noticing method for 
major source permits issued under the federal rules for NSR and title 
V, and for all EPA-issued OCS permits.\16\ While each of these programs 
currently has specific rule provisions for noticing that may be worded 
differently depending on the program, we are proposing to replace the 
existing rule provisions with consistently worded provisions that 
describe the requirements for mandatory e-notice and e-access.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ OCS permits issued by delegated agencies should use the 
approved public notice requirements of the delegated agency. 40 CFR 
55.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted in the above sections of this preamble, if an agency is 
satisfying the requirements of e-notice and e-access, the permitting 
authority would retain the discretion to supplement the e-notice with 
any other noticing method (e.g., newspaper publication, announcement 
through social media) depending on the specific circumstances of the 
permit application, such as the location of the proposed project and 
the accessibility of

[[Page 81242]]

information sources by the affected community and other stakeholders. 
Moreover, the EPA recommends that agencies supplement their Web site 
postings with notices in newspapers and other forms of print media when 
noticing draft permits for facilities that are in areas where the 
agency believes such print media may enhance noticing efforts for 
certain audiences among the interested public. The EPA specifically 
encourages agency practices that consider the input and special needs 
(such as social, economic and geographic factors at the location) of 
the particular communities that may be affected by a permit action in 
order to provide public notice by methods that would better reach 
particular communities.\17\ Thus, we are not proposing to require that 
the permitting agency provide additional noticing methods beyond e-
notice. At the same time, nothing in the proposed rule revisions 
prevents the permitting agency from also providing additional notice by 
a method other than e-notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ For example, an agency may determine that a permitting 
action may potentially impact a community that has a large 
population with limited English proficiency and could decide that it 
is prudent to provide multilingual notices of the draft permit to 
reach the affected community. See http://www.epa.gov/ocr/limited-english-proficiency and http://www.lep.gov/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to title V in particular, the rule revisions include 
additional changes in order to support the movement to e-notice. 
Currently, the title V regulations in part 71 include the use of a 
mailing list for public notice purposes. This proposal includes 
regulatory revisions to amend the EPA's solicitation obligations 
associated with the mailing list, but it otherwise keeps the mailing 
list in place. The EPA interprets its rules, and understands that many 
air agencies do as well, to allow for the mailing list to be maintained 
in an electronic format. Further, the EPA recognizes that many air 
agencies also maintain their part 70 mailing lists in an electronic 
format and that such a format is generally supported by stakeholders as 
well. See, e.g., Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) Task Force 
Report at 202, 206-207.\18\ With respect to the EPA's mailing list 
obligations for the federal program, we are proposing to remove the 
specific language within 40 CFR 71.11(d)(3)(E) and 71.27(d)(3)(E) that 
requires the EPA to solicit mailing list membership through ``area 
lists'' and ``periodic publication in the public press.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ In 2006, a task force assembled by the EPA finalized a 
document titled, ``Final Report to the Clean Air Act Advisory 
Committee: Title V Implementation Experience.'' This document was 
the result of the task force's efforts to report on the 
implementation performance of the operating permit program under 
title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, based on the first 10 
years of experience. The final report to the CAAAC, dated April 
2006, can be found at http://www3.epa.gov/airquality/permits/taskforcedocs/200604_report.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similar changes are proposed for 40 CFR part 124, which are 
``general program requirements'' that apply to federally-issued PSD and 
OCS permits, as well as permits issued for other media programs. 40 CFR 
52.21(q), 40 CFR 55.6(a)(3). Due to the existing language in part 124 
covering a number of permit programs other than air permitting, the EPA 
is proposing minor revisions to part 124 in order to maintain the 
current provisions for the other permit programs and to specifically 
clarify public notice requirements associated with EPA-issued PSD 
permits (and PSD permits issued by any program that implements 40 CFR 
52.21). In this action, we are proposing to establish a new paragraph 
within paragraph 124.10(c)(2) that applies exclusively to PSD permits 
(and OCS permits, which use the PSD provisions) with clearly identified 
public notice requirements that will require e-notice rather than 
newspaper notice. The part 124 provisions would continue to require the 
agency to solicit the public to be added to a mailing list and to 
provide specific notifications (e.g., state, local governments, 
resource agencies). However, the proposed new provision would allow 
that in lieu of the existing requirement in part 124 regarding 
soliciting persons for ``area lists'' and notifying the public of the 
opportunity to be on a mailing list, the agency may use generally 
accepted methods (e.g., hyperlink sign up function or radio button on 
agency Web site, sign-up sheet at public hearing) that enable 
interested parties to subscribe to the mailing list.
    The OCS regulations specify that EPA will use the applicable 
administrative and procedural requirements in 40 CFR part 124 and the 
federal title V rules (part 71 is incorporated by reference), and that 
the Administrator will follow the procedures used to issue PSD permits 
when using 40 CFR part 124. 40 CFR 55.6(a)(3), 40 CFR 55.13(f), 40 CFR 
55.14(c)(5). Hence, as e-notice flexibility is added to parts 71 and 
124, it will be incorporated by reference into the OCS regulations for 
EPA-issued OCS permits. In addition, specific language referencing the 
administrative procedures of 40 CFR 71 is proposed to be added to the 
Administrative Procedures and Public Participation requirements 
provisions of the OCS regulations to clarify that EPA may use either 
the applicable administrative procedures of 40 CFR 71 or 40 CFR 124 
when issuing OCS permits.
    We note that some air programs with EPA-approved plans for 
implementing the PSD program incorporate by reference the federal rule 
provisions--e.g., 40 CFR part 52.21. Furthermore, some of these program 
rules automatically update whenever the EPA revises its rules and the 
revisions become effective. These agencies would not have the option to 
continue with newspaper notice as their noticing method (unless they 
revise their rules and undertake a SIP revision to remove the 
referencing of the federal rules). These agencies would be required to 
provide e-notice and e-access according to this rule. This same 
scenario would apply to programs that are delegated by the EPA to 
implement 40 CFR 52.21 and issue PSD permits on behalf of the EPA. We 
specifically solicit comment on whether any air program that 
incorporates by reference the federal permitting rules would have 
difficulty meeting the e-notice and e-access requirements of this 
proposed rule if the revisions become effective immediately upon 
finalizing the rule. We also solicit suggestions for addressing such 
difficulties.
    In addition, we are proposing to delete a superfluous provision 
from 40 CFR 52.21(q) ``Public participation.'' The second sentence 
reads ``[t]he Administrator shall follow the procedures at 40 CFR 
52.21(r) as in effect on June 19, 1979, to the extent that the 
procedures of 40 CFR part 124 do not apply.'' The preamble to the 1980 
NSR rules explained the transition from the previous regulations to the 
consolidated permitting regulations at part 124: ``. . . the procedures 
of the 1978 Part 52 regulations continue to apply to the extent that 
the new procedures have not yet displaced them. In time, the new 
procedures will displace the old ones entirely.'' See 45 FR 52686, 
August 7, 1980. Since the procedures of 40 CFR 124 have displaced the 
old procedures, this sentence is no longer necessary.
    We solicit comment on this ``mandatory e-notice and e-access'' 
approach for permit programs implemented by the EPA and by other 
agencies implementing the federal air permitting rules.

D. Requirements for Agencies Implementing Approved Programs Pursuant to 
the EPA's Permitting Rules for States

    For the noticing of major source permits issued pursuant to EPA-
approved air agency programs under 40 CFR part 51 or 70, we are 
proposing to

[[Page 81243]]

remove the mandatory newspaper notice requirement and provide these 
agencies with the option to select either e-notice or newspaper notice. 
A required element of these programs is to provide adequate notice and 
informed public participation, and this program element is not 
changing. However, a key aspect of this proposed approach is that the 
agency would be required to adopt one noticing method--known as the 
``consistent noticing method''--to be used for all of its notices. 
Thus, if an agency selects e-notice, it must provide e-notice for all 
of its draft permit notices. If a consistent noticing approach is not 
adhered to (i.e., if the agency posted some notices to its Web site and 
others in the newspaper), it could lead to confusion for the public, 
who may not know where to look for permitting information regarding a 
source proposing to locate in the community. Accordingly, if the agency 
elects e-notice as its consistent noticing method (and e-notice is not 
available in its approved SIP), it must implement its choice of 
noticing method through a change in its program rules. As discussed 
later in this preamble, we are requesting comment on whether there are 
air agencies that believe they can implement e-notice and e-access in 
lieu of newspaper notice without contravening their state rules.
    As with the proposed mandatory requirements for e-notice for the 
federal programs, if the e-notice option is chosen as the consistent 
noticing method for a particular state program, the state must use e-
notice to provide the information required under existing public 
notification regulations and must provide e-access to the draft permit. 
All other permit documents required under existing regulations can be 
accessible either electronically or physically (i.e., in a designated 
reading room). However, if the agency chooses newspaper notice as the 
consistent noticing method, then the agency can either provide 
electronic access or physical access (or both) to the additional 
materials that existing regulations require be made publicly available.
    We are aware that many states already have Web sites that are 
actively used for permitting purposes--e.g., permit application 
instructions, form downloads, online permit applications. Consequently, 
we anticipate that most of these state agencies will opt for the e-
notice approach, since it may mirror what they are already doing to 
supplement their newspaper notice. For these agencies, we believe this 
change would be minimally burdensome and would relieve them of the 
additional burden of providing newspaper notice. At the same time, we 
recognize that some air agencies do not have an established Web site, 
or they may have a Web site but they would need to invest in 
significant infrastructure to increase their Web site capability in 
order to accommodate the posting of permit information that existing 
regulations require be included in a newspaper notice. These agencies 
may opt to continue with the newspaper notice as their consistent 
noticing method.
    With regard to part 70, the proposed revisions would affect only 
the mandatory newspaper language, and would not change any other 
obligations such as the requirement to have or maintain a mailing list. 
The EPA interprets the existing mailing list obligations to include 
either electronic or hardcopy mailing list, or both, at the reasonable 
discretion of the air agency.
    Furthermore, nothing in these proposed revisions to parts 51 and 70 
prevents the air agency from also providing public notice through other 
methods including, but not limited to, a newspaper notice. As with our 
proposal for noticing of permitting actions under the federal rules, 
under this proposed option, agencies would have the discretion to 
provide public notice through other methods--in addition to their 
consistent noticing method--if a particular permit action warrants it 
and ensure that the notice of the draft permit reaches the affected 
community and stakeholders. We encourage all air agencies to consider 
facility- and permit-specific facts in determining the appropriate 
methods of public notice, such as expected public interest, location 
and type of source being permitted, environmental justice 
considerations, including the language that will be understood by the 
affected community.
    To summarize, we propose that for air agencies that implement 40 
CFR part 51 or 70, for the noticing of their major source draft 
permits, they either provide: (1) Mandatory e-notice and e-access, as 
these terms are used in the context of this proposed rule, or (2) 
newspaper notice with either electronic access (e.g., Web site) and/or 
physical access (e.g., reading room) to the draft permit. In choosing 
(1) or (2), they must use a consistent method of noticing. These air 
agencies can continue to supplement the consistent noticing method with 
other noticing methods at their discretion or as currently required 
under part 70. We specifically request comment on this approach for 
EPA-approved NSR and title V permit programs to establish either ``e-
notice'' or newspaper notice as the single, consistent noticing method.
    As noted above, since many air agencies with EPA approved programs 
currently have a Web site and notice draft permits and provide permit 
documents on their Web sites, we do not believe that the e-notice 
requirement would impose any additional burden on most agencies. We are 
specifically seeking comment on whether (and how significantly) this 
rule imposes additional burden on air agencies that already provide 
postings of permits on their Web sites and those air agencies that do 
not already use a Web site for permit postings.
    Finally, the EPA is requesting comment on two alternative 
approaches to the ones being proposed in this rule and described above, 
one for providing notice and the other for providing access. In the 
first alternative approach, an agency implementing rules pursuant to 
either part 51 or 70 would not be required to choose a consistent 
noticing method. Thus, the agency could potentially provide one 
noticing method for some permits (or some types of permits) and another 
noticing method for other permits. This approach is analogous to the 
``media neutral'' approach that is available under Sec.  51.161 for the 
noticing of minor NSR permits, as well as the approach adopted in the 
Tribal NSR Rule. See 40 CFR 49.157(b)(1). Neither of these other 
program rules requires a consistent noticing method. Thus, under such 
an approach for this rule, we would amend the part 51 and 70 rules that 
currently require ``newspaper'' notice to require use of Web site or 
newspaper notice, but without specifying a consistent noticing method. 
Alternatively, to provide additional flexibility to the agency, we 
could simply require that they provide notice via ``a method reasonably 
likely to provide routine and ready access to the public'' without 
imposing any more specific requirements. The EPA requests comment on 
whether to allow such an approach, how likely it is that this approach 
could lead to confusion (e.g., if the permitting agency regularly or 
frequently changed its noticing method from one permitting action to 
another), and whether EPA should require the permitting agency to 
specify the circumstances under which it will use a particular method 
or articulate criteria for doing so. The EPA also requests comment on 
whether it is reasonable to assume that permitting authorities would 
try to avoid such problems because each agency is ultimately 
responsible to ensure that it provides adequate notice on each of its 
permits and access to the permit information. In

[[Page 81244]]

other words, does the suggested requirement for the agency to notice 
via ``a method reasonably likely to provide routine and ready access to 
the public,'' in and of itself ensure that some level of noticing 
consistency is achieved?
    The EPA also requests comments on a second alternative approach to 
providing access, under which e-notice would not need to be coupled 
with e-access for state agency programs implementing approved rules 
pursuant to parts 51 and 70. This may help some states that notice 
permits using an online permits register (which would qualify for e-
notice), but where the state may not have its own Web site to satisfy 
the ``e-access'' requirement of making the draft permit available 
electronically. As noted elsewhere in this preamble, the state would 
still be required to provide access to the draft permit, as well as any 
other documents that are part of the permit record.

E. Soliciting Comment on Allowing Temporary Use of Alternative Noticing 
Methods

    We are requesting comments on adding a provision to each of the 
program rules that would allow an agency that is relying on e-notice 
(and/or e-access) to temporarily use another noticing medium for a 
reasonable period of time during which its Web site is unavailable. 
This may be necessary during planned Web site outages (e.g., a 
transition to a different Web site platform) or unforeseen 
circumstances, such as Web site malfunctions or emergency situations 
(e.g., hurricanes) that result in prolonged electrical system outages. 
We do not believe this same problem existed under the current 
regulations that require newspaper notice. This is based on the 
assumption that, in the event that a problem occurs with a newspaper 
that the agency plans to use, the agency can notice the permit in 
another newspaper in the area that it determines would provide adequate 
notice.
    If an alternative noticing method is used, it would need to be 
publicly announced in some way before they occur, so that the public 
has reasonable notice of where to look for permit notices during such 
outages. It would also need to assure adequate notice to the affected 
public. Noticing either in the newspaper or State Register could be an 
agency's alternative noticing method, since each method is generally 
presumed to provide adequate notice to the public.
    Given the broad range of situations that could lead to problems 
with a Web site, it may be difficult to specify the limits of the 
duration of the ``temporary'' period. We expect that most agencies 
would generally have an incentive to restore operations to their Web 
site as soon as possible for cost purposes and to ensure that they 
continue to provide the most effective notice of their permitting 
actions. We request comment as to whether providing specific boundaries 
around the use of the alternative noticing method should be required, 
and how those boundaries should be established and what criteria should 
be used to judge their adequacy. We specifically seek comment on the 
appropriate criteria for invoking the alternative noticing method, the 
length of time it could be used, and how the transition to the 
alternative method would be conveyed to the public.

F. Clarifying E-Notice and E-Access Applicability for Minor NSR Permits

    As noted earlier in this preamble, this rule proposal is not 
revising any regulatory requirements for minor NSR permits. Notably, 
this rule proposal is not revising the requirement for ``notice by 
prominent advertisement'' in 40 CFR 51.161(b)(3), because the prominent 
advertisement term, as discussed in the EPA's 2012 Memorandum, is 
sufficiently broad to allow for e-notice. However, while we are 
reaffirming the guidance provided in the EPA's 2012 Memorandum, we are 
proposing to amplify its policy guidance in two respects.
    This rule is proposing to clarify that the EPA's 2012 Memorandum's 
interpretation of ``prominent advertisement'' in paragraph 51.161(b)(3) 
as ``media neutral'' also applies to paragraph 51.161(b)(1). The 
provision currently reads: ``[a]vailability for public inspection in at 
least one location in the area affected of the information submitted by 
the owner or operator and of the State or local agency's analysis of 
the effect on air quality.'' Thus, paragraph 51.161(b)(1) does not 
expressly require that permitting information be made available in the 
form of paper records, and we are proposing to clarify that it allow 
for electronic access to the permitting information. More specifically, 
we are proposing that allowing electronic access to the information 
submitted by the owner or operator and to the agency's analysis of the 
effect on air quality by way of a Web site identified by the permitting 
authority would satisfy the requirement of ``availability for public 
inspection in at least one location in the area affected . . .'' We 
believe this approach is consistent with the memorandum with respect to 
allowing use of electronic and other methods to provide notice of minor 
NSR actions, and it is reasonable for the same reasons discussed in 
this preamble for allowing electronic access to permit documents for 
major source permits. We specifically request comment on this 
clarification for the minor NSR program rules.
    In addition, in issuing the EPA's 2012 Memorandum, the EPA 
indicated that our guidance on the meaning of the term ``prominent 
advertisement'' in 40 CFR part 51.161(b)(3) applies only to minor 
sources and not to synthetic minor sources. See Footnote 1. Given the 
statement in the memorandum, which raises uncertainty about the 
flexibility to use media neutral methods for synthetic minor programs, 
the EPA has now determined that it is not appropriate to exclude 
synthetic minor permits in this regard, and that this action should 
propose to clarify that the limitation established in the footnote is 
no longer appropriate. In this action, we are proposing to treat minor 
and synthetic minor sources identically in this regard by extending the 
EPA's media neutrality policy to synthetic minor sources. In addition, 
we propose to extend this policy to any permit action that relies on 
the public notice requirements of Sec.  51.161.
    We seek comment on these two proposed revisions to the policy 
guidance provided by the EPA's 2012 Memorandum. Through the preamble to 
the final rule for this action, we intend to provide amplifying 
guidance with regard to the EPA's noticing policies for permits subject 
to 40 CFR 51.161.

G. Notice Requirements for PSD Permit Rescissions

    In addition to the existing mandatory newspaper notice required for 
draft permits, part 71 permits programs and COA designations, the 
permitting program rules contain another regulatory provision that 
provides for newspaper notification. In the federal PSD regulations, a 
provision titled ``permit rescission'' requires that ``[i]f the 
Administrator rescinds a permit under this paragraph, the public shall 
be given adequate notice of the rescission'' and that notice ``in a 
newspaper of general circulation in the affected region . . .'' is 
considered adequate. 40 CFR 52.21(w)(4). While this language does not 
foreclose the notion that another type of noticing method could also be 
``adequate,'' we are proposing to revise the rule provision to 
specifically require that the permitting authority notify the public of 
a permit rescission electronically--i.e., on a Web site identified by 
the permitting authority. This ``mandatory e-notice'' approach for

[[Page 81245]]

permit rescissions under 40 CFR 52.21(w) is consistent with our 
approach for the noticing of other actions that implement the federal 
program rules. We specifically request comment on whether this is an 
appropriate approach for the noticing of a permit rescission.

V. Policy Rationale and Legal Basis

    This proposal to revise these CFRs to allow permitting authorities 
to provide public notice of permits and other actions on a publicly 
available Web site in lieu of the newspaper publication requirement, 
when final and effective, would reduce burden to all air agencies. In 
addition, the proposed requirements are consistent with practices some 
permitting agencies currently follow to supplement existing 
requirements for noticing permits, and they would provide flexibility 
for agencies to use the noticing methods that they determine are 
appropriate, reasonable and effective without the need for newspaper 
notice. These proposed changes are consistent with the approaches taken 
in EPA's permitting rule for Indian country and in EPA's minor NSR 
regulations, and with broad stakeholder input regarding more effective 
advertisement of permitting actions.
    As noted earlier in this preamble, Internet Web sites have become 
an increasingly effective and widely employed avenue for broadly 
disseminating information to the public and many agencies currently 
supplement the required newspaper publication by posting draft and 
final permits on their agency Web sites. Since the Internet is 
generally available at all times, it allows for the noticing of a 
permit, and for the information that supports the permit, to be 
available and accessible over a longer period of time, rather than a 
one-day newspaper publication of the notice. As noted above, most 
states are already using the Internet (to varying degrees) for noticing 
permitting actions, so we do not anticipate many agencies having to 
spend a lot of time or funding on upgrading their existing Web sites to 
meet the proposed requirements. For agencies currently without a Web 
site for noticing permits and hearings, the use of e-notice and other 
applicable alternatives may allow the permitting authority to redirect 
funds that were being used for newspaper publication in order to 
establish and maintain a Web site where permit information could be 
posted. Thus, the EPA anticipates these proposed rule revisions, when 
finalized, would result in more effective dissemination of permitting 
and hearing information to the surrounding communities (including the 
underserved and environmental justice (EJ) communities) and possibly 
substantial cost savings for both the EPA and for state and local 
program permitting authorities.
    We believe these proposed requirements are consistent with CAA 
goals of providing public notice and promoting access to information in 
permitting, and they would enhance the permitting process. With respect 
to preconstruction permit actions, CAA Sec.  160(1) establishes a 
statutory policy of providing for informed public participation in the 
permitting process, and CAA Sec.  165(a)(2) precludes issuing a PSD 
permit without an opportunity for the public to review the decision and 
submit comments. These proposed revisions enable the use of e-notice 
and e-access for both EPA-issued and other agency-issued permits and 
further the statutory policies these provisions establish. With respect 
to operating permits, the 1990 CAA Amendments require that the EPA 
rules for permitting programs provide ``adequate, streamlined and 
reasonable procedures'' including an opportunity for the general public 
to have informed participation in the air permitting process in the 
areas affected by a proposed permit. CAA Sec.  502(b)(6). Also, Sec.  
502(b)(8) provides that procedures to make information available should 
be consistent with the need for expeditious action on permit 
applications or related matters. The proposed revisions, which enable 
the use of e-notice for both EPA-issued and other agency-issued 
permits, would improve implementation of the statutory policy of 
ensuring public notice of title V permits by providing more effective 
noticing procedures in affected areas across the country.
    Another basis for, and benefit from, the proposed action would come 
from the cost savings associated with the move to electronic 
notification instead of legal notice advertisements in newspapers. The 
EPA's annual costs for publishing notices in newspapers is a 
significant annual expenditure, and it is the EPA's understanding that 
the newspaper publication for noticing permits has become costly for 
states as well. The EPA's proposal intends to reduce those costs by 
allowing the permitting authority to notice draft permits using a 
publicly available Web site in lieu of newspaper publication. While e-
notice may pose a burden for certain states that do not already have a 
permitting Web site, the EPA is not mandating that permitting 
authorities that implement 40 CFR part 51 or 70 adopt the e-notice and 
e-access approaches, so these agencies can continue with the current 
program of newspaper publication if they prefer. In addition, 
permitting authorities that incorporate by reference the federal PSD 
rules at 40 CFR 52.21 that wish to continue to use newspaper notice as 
their primary method of notice can undertake a SIP revision to remove 
the reference to the federal provisions and adopt their own noticing 
rules that conform to Sec.  51.166.
    As an example of the approximate costs for publishing permit and 
hearing notices in the newspaper, in Fiscal Year 2013, the EPA Regions 
incurred a cost of over $40,000 to publish newspaper notices for NSR, 
title V and OCS permits. In Fiscal Year 2014, newspaper notice for the 
EPA regional permits exceeded $35,000. Newspaper publication costs vary 
widely depending on a number of factors, but for most permits the cost 
to notice averages between $600 and $1,000 per notice. While these 
costs vary on a yearly basis in each EPA Region, the overall annual 
costs are significant for the EPA. Moreover, given that state and local 
air agencies generally process more air permits than the EPA, it is 
reasonable to expect that the annual costs incurred for newspaper 
publication by state and local permitting agencies exceed the annual 
costs incurred by the EPA. (We note, however, that some air agencies 
require that the applicant bear the cost of newspaper publication.)
    While we recognize that there is a cost associated with developing 
and maintaining an agency Web site for the purpose of noticing permits, 
the incremental cost to upload permit notices is expected to be very 
low, and we expect the overall burden would be less than that of the 
existing rules that mandate newspaper publication. This is because most 
agencies already have their own Web sites (or some other means to 
electronically notice draft permits and hearings) and they will 
continue to have their Web sites regardless of the requirements that 
are being proposed by this action. Thus, even though the costs of 
creating, upgrading and maintaining a Web site and providing web 
security may very well be many times higher than the cost of an 
agency's annual newspaper notice, states are choosing to continue to 
have a Web site due to the convenience of noticing and the ability to 
level out the overall costs of the Web site across all of the program 
areas of the agency. Furthermore, for agencies that already do web 
postings and posting of the draft permit, the newspaper requirement is 
duplicative and consequently the

[[Page 81246]]

removal of the requirement would result in savings. The EPA 
specifically seeks comments on the potential cost savings, and the 
possibility of increased burden, from the specific noticing 
requirements in this rule proposal.
    A broad range of stakeholders has identified e-notice as a more 
efficient, more prominent, less costly and more cost-effective, and 
more reasonable approach to public notice of permitting actions, as 
compared to newspaper notice. For example, e-notice is responsive to 
recommendations from the CAAAC's Title V Task Force Report, which 
includes a number of recommendations for implementation improvements, 
such as public notice. Importantly, task force members agreed 
unanimously on two recommendations related to the means of providing 
public notice. First, task force members recommended that state program 
rules should be allowed to include alternatives to newspaper 
notification, provided the alternative is more effective in informing a 
cross section of the affected public. (A remaining concern mentioned 
was that members of the public may lack routine access to the 
Internet.) See Recommendation #1 at 210. Second, task force members 
agreed that states should improve their title V Web sites to provide 
better notice and access to relevant documents in a permit proceeding. 
Accordingly, the Final Report recommended that the EPA should encourage 
permitting authorities to provide the option to receive notification by 
email instead of traditional mail, and to maintain their Web sites with 
information, documents, and dates helpful for public participation, 
including how to sign up to be included on a mailing list. See 
Recommendation #3 at 210. While these recommendations were focused on 
permitting under title V, the EPA believes that the same concepts and 
concerns would also apply to NSR and OCS permits.
    As noted in the previous sections, providing e-notice is consistent 
with noticing requirements of the EPA's Tribal NSR Rule issued in 2011 
and with the EPA's 2012 Memorandum that clarified the term ``prominent 
advertisement'' is media neutral for the minor NSR program. This action 
also supports Executive Orders 13563 and 13610 (issued in 2011 and 
2012, respectively), which direct the Agency to modernize its rules 
periodically in order to achieve regulatory objectives more 
effectively, considering the agency resources and priorities.

VI. Implementation

A. Agencies Implementing Federal Preconstruction Permit Program Rules

    Once this rule becomes final, it will become effective within 30 
days for air permitting programs that implement the federal program 
rules at 40 CFR parts 52, 55 and 124. This includes EPA Regions, air 
agencies that are delegated authority by the EPA to issue permits on 
behalf of the EPA (via a delegation agreement), and air agencies that 
have their own rules approved by EPA in a SIP and the SIP incorporates 
by reference the federal program rules and automatically updates when 
EPA's rules are amended. Under this rule proposal, these programs would 
be required to implement e-notice and e-access, with the exception of 
states that are delegated authority to issue permits under part 55 (as 
described earlier in this preamble).
    While we expect that most programs that implement the federal 
permitting rules are in a position to comply with the proposed 
requirements for e-notice and e-access once this rule is finalized, 
some programs may need more time. More time may be necessary if, for 
example, a delegated air program needs to upgrade or improve its Web 
site to allow for e-notice and/or e-access. We request comment on 
whether any air programs that would be required to immediately 
implement 40 CFR 52.21 would need a ``phase in'' period, beyond the 30 
days, in order to implement e-notice and e-access.

B. Agencies Implementing State Preconstruction Permit Program Rules

    For an air agency with an approved SIP that implements 40 CFR part 
51 and that chooses e-notice and e-access as its consistent noticing 
method, it may need to revise its applicable program rules and seek the 
EPA's approval of a SIP revision in order to begin to implement e-
notice in lieu of newspaper notice. (However, NNSR programs under Sec.  
51.165 are subject to the public participation requirements at Sec.  
51.161 and may be able to interpret their state rules and SIP to 
currently allow for implementing e-notice in lieu of newspaper notice.) 
Similarly, for an agency that implements rules that incorporate by 
reference our federal program regulations (40 CFR 52), and if its rules 
do not automatically update upon the EPA amending its federal rules, it 
may need to amend its regulations and seek the EPA's approval of a SIP 
revision in order to implement e-notice and e-access in lieu of 
newspaper notice.
    Under this proposed rule it is voluntary for these programs to move 
to e-notice and e-access, and we are not proposing to impose a deadline 
for submission of SIP revisions for those programs that are choosing to 
adopt e-notice and e-access instead of newspaper notice. Furthermore, 
nothing in the current or proposed 40 CFR part 51 rules prevents an 
agency from beginning to implement e-notice and e-access methods once 
the agency is ready, but depending on the air agency's rules there may 
be ongoing obligations to continue with newspaper notices until the 
agency revises its rules. We request comment on whether agencies 
believe they have the ability to implement e-notice and e-access in 
lieu of newspaper notice without amending their state rules.

C. Agencies Implementing Approved Operating Permit Programs

    Consistent with title V and the part 70 regulations for initial 
program submittals, approved part 70 programs must provide for 
implementation of 40 CFR 70.7, including subsection ``h'' which sets 
forth the public participation obligations including ``adequate 
procedures for public notice.'' See, e.g., 40 CFR 70.4(b)(16). A 
program revision may be necessary when the relevant federal regulations 
are modified or supplemented. 40 CFR 70.4(i). When part 70 is revised 
after the air agency program is approved, the EPA determines the need 
for conforming revisions, but the approved program may initiate a 
program revision on its own initiative. See, e.g., 40 CFR 70.4(a) and 
(i). Under the proposed rulemaking, air agencies implementing part 70 
have a choice as to whether or not to adopt e-notice as their 
consistent method of public notice of air permits. If an air agency 
chooses that approach and a program revision is necessary (e.g., 
additional authority is needed), then the agency should initiate a 
program revision by undergoing a rule change and submitting a program 
revision package to the EPA for review and approval consistent with 
Sec.  70.4(i)(2).
    As previously noted in this preamble, this proposal would not 
change the requirement to provide ``adequate procedures for public 
notice.'' Consequently, we believe that a program revision will not 
necessarily be required for all approved programs and that certain 
agency programs could implement e-notice and e-access upon approval of 
the rules at the state level. We propose that, for an agency that needs 
only to revise the agency program rules to clarify its implementation 
of e-notice and e-access but does not otherwise require a program 
change because the current program practice

[[Page 81247]]

includes electronic posting of public notices and the draft permit and 
has adequate authority and resources for maintaining the practice, that 
such agency does not need a program revision for implementing the 
revised part 70 notice requirements. We request comment on our proposed 
determination that certain approved programs will not need a program 
revision for implementing e-notice. Alternatively, the EPA proposes 
that these program revisions are non-substantial. Accordingly, the EPA 
Regional offices would issue direct approvals of these program 
revisions concurrent with their notice of proposed approval. We request 
comment on our interpretation that the program revisions are non-
substantial.

D. Agencies Delegated To Implement the Federal Operating Permit Program

    With regard to the proposed part 71 program revisions, once the 
rules are finalized, an air agency that is delegated the part 71 
program would likely need to update its delegation agreement to update 
its notice procedures consistent with the e-notice requirement in the 
federal rules.

VII. Environmental Justice Considerations

    The 1990 CAA Amendments generally require that the EPA or the 
permitting authority provide for adequate procedural opportunity for 
the general public to have informed participation in the air permitting 
process in the areas affected by a proposed permit. These areas include 
EJ communities.
    The effectiveness of noticing methods for reaching underserved and 
EJ communities is a substantial concern to the EPA. A 2011 report 
issued by NEJAC found that publication in the legal section of a 
regional newspaper is antiquated and ineffective, and is not ideal for 
providing notice to affected EJ communities.\19\ Regarding public 
participation, the report recommends to the EPA: ``To ensure meaningful 
public participation, the public notice and outreach process must 
include direct communication in appropriate languages through telephone 
calls and mailings to EJ and tribal communities, press releases, radio 
announcements, electronic and regular mail, Web site postings and the 
posting of signs.'' Thus, the NEJAC specifically listed Web site 
postings as a method to ensure meaningful public participation. The EPA 
concludes that notice via the Internet would be a viable and effective 
means of making information widely available to the public. We 
encourage permitting authorities to provide additional notice where 
they determine that a specific jurisdiction or population would be 
better served with notice by traditional newspaper or another noticing 
method.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ ``Enhancing Environmental Justice in EPA Permitting 
Programs.'' National Environmental Justice Advisory Council. April, 
2011, pp. 20-21, http://www3.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/resources/publications/nejac/ej-in-permitting-report-2011.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was 
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden 
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection 
activities contained in the existing regulations and has assigned OMB 
control numbers 2060-0003 (for PSD and NNSR permit programs) and 2060-
0243 and 2060-0336 (for operating permit programs).
    In this action, the EPA is proposing to revise regulations to 
address public noticing method requirements for permits for major 
sources of air pollution. It is important to note that the proposed 
rule revisions would not require air agencies that implement the 
permitting program through an EPA-approved title V program or SIP to 
use e-notice. These agencies may continue to provide notice by 
newspaper publication or they can adopt e-notice as their consistent 
noticing method. Only in the latter case would an agency be required to 
revise the title V program rules or undertake a SIP revision. For EPA-
delegated agencies, and for agencies that incorporate by reference the 
federal rules and their rules automatically update when the EPA revises 
its rules, no rulemaking action would be required by the agency to 
adopt the e-notice requirements. In addition, an agency delegated a 
part 71 program may need to update its delegation agreement. However, 
if any of these agencies desire to continue to provide notice by way of 
newspaper publication, they could request removal of delegation, revise 
their program rules consistent with the rules for state programs (e.g., 
40 CFR 51.166), and undertake a SIP revision. An agency delegated the 
part 71 program may have to choose between implementing e-notice, 
obtaining approval for implementing a part 70 program, or relinquishing 
their title V program. Given that many air agencies already are 
providing various forms of electronic notice as a supplement to their 
newspaper notices, we anticipate that many agencies will cease to 
notice permits by way of newspaper. However, to the extent that a SIP 
revision or a title V program revision is necessary to effect the 
changes being proposed, we believe that the burden is already accounted 
for under the approved information collection requests noted above.
    In addition, the proposed rule would not create any new 
requirements for regulated entities, since air agencies are responsible 
for the noticing of permits. Some industry sources could experience a 
reduction in costs for permitting in cases where the permitting agency 
requires that the cost of the newspaper public notice be incurred by 
the permit applicant.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This 
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. Entities 
potentially affected directly by this proposal include state, local and 
tribal governments, and none of these governments would qualify as a 
small entity. Other types of small entities are not directly subject to 
the requirements of this action.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (URMA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded federal mandate as 
described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable 
duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13175. Specifically, these proposed public notice 
revisions do not affect the relationship or distribution of

[[Page 81248]]

power and responsibilities between the federal government and Indian 
tribes. Elsewhere in this preamble we specifically describe the 
interaction of this proposed rule with tribal air agencies. Thus, 
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those 
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks 
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect 
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in 
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to 
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental 
health risk or safety risk.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is 
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed 
by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and 
adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income 
or indigenous populations because it does not affect the level of 
protection provided to human health or the environment. The results of 
this evaluation are contained in Section VII of this preamble titled, 
``Environmental Justice Considerations.''

IX. Statutory Authority

    The statutory authority for this action is provided by 23 U.S.C. 
101; 42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 300f, et seq. 33 U.S.C. 1251, 
et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 51

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control.

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference.

40 CFR Part 55

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control.

40 CFR Part 70

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control.

40 CFR Part 71

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control.

40 CFR Part 124

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control.

    Dated: December 21, 2015.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the 
Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 51--REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF 
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401--7671q.

Subpart I--Review of New Sources and Modifications

0
2. Section 51.165 is amended by adding paragraph (i) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  51.165  Permit requirements.

* * * * *
    (i) Public participation requirements. The reviewing authority 
shall notify the public of a draft permit by a method described in 
either paragraph (i)(1) or (2) of this section. The selected method, 
known as the ``consistent noticing method,'' shall comply with the 
public participation procedural requirements of Sec.  51.161 of this 
chapter and be used for all permits issued under this section and can 
be supplemented by other methods on individual permits at the 
discretion of the reviewing authority.
    (1) Post the information in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) through (iv) of 
this section, for the duration of the public comment period, on a 
public Web site(s) identified by the reviewing authority.
    (i) A notice of availability of the draft permit for public 
comment;
    (ii) The draft permit;
    (iii) Information on how to access the record for the permit; and
    (iv) Information on how to request and/or attend a public hearing 
on the permit.
    (2) Publish a notice of availability of the draft permit for public 
comment in a newspaper of general circulation in the area where the 
source is located. The notice shall include information on how to 
access the draft permit and the record for the permit and how to 
request and/or attend a public hearing on the draft permit.
0
3. Section 51.166 is amended by revising paragraphs (q)(2)(ii), (iii), 
(iv), (vi), and (viii) to read as follows:


Sec.  51.166  Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality.

* * * * *
    (q) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (ii) Make available in at least one location in each region in 
which the proposed source would be constructed a copy of all materials 
the applicant submitted, a copy of the preliminary determination, and a 
copy or summary of other materials, if any, considered in making the 
preliminary determination. This requirement can be met by making these 
materials available at a physical location or on a public Web site 
identified by the reviewing authority.
    (iii) Notify the public, by advertisement in a newspaper of general 
circulation in each region in which the proposed source would be 
constructed, of the application, the preliminary determination, the 
degree of increment consumption that is expected from the source or 
modification, and of the opportunity for comment through a public 
hearing and through written public comment. Alternatively, these 
notifications can be made on a public Web site identified by the 
reviewing authority; however, the reviewing authority's selected 
notification method (i.e., either newspaper or Web site), known as the 
``consistent noticing method,'' shall be used for all permits subject 
to notice under this section and can be supplemented by other methods 
on individual permits at the discretion of the reviewing authority. If 
the reviewing authority selects Web site notice as its consistent 
noticing method, the notice shall be available for the duration of the 
comment period and shall include the notice of public comment, the 
draft permit, and information on how to access the record for the 
permit and how to request and/or attend a public hearing on the permit.

[[Page 81249]]

    (iv) Distribute (e.g., via email, courier mail, postal service) a 
copy of the notice of public comment to the applicant, the 
Administrator and to officials and agencies having cognizance over the 
location where the proposed construction would occur as follows: Any 
other State or local air pollution control agencies, the chief 
executives of the city and county where the source would be located; 
any comprehensive regional land use planning agency, and any State, 
Federal Land Manager, or Indian Governing body whose lands may be 
affected by emissions from the source or modification.
* * * * *
    (vi) Consider all written comments submitted within a time 
specified in the notice of public comment and all comments received at 
any public hearing(s) in making a final decision on the approvability 
of the application. The reviewing authority shall make all comments 
available for public inspection in the same physical location(s), or 
the same Web site(s), where the reviewing authority made available 
preconstruction information relating to the proposed source or 
modification.
* * * * *
    (viii) Notify the applicant in writing of the final determination 
and make such notification available for public inspection at the same 
location(s) or Web site(s) where the reviewing authority made available 
preconstruction information and public comments relating to the 
proposed source or major modification.
* * * * *

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
4. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart A--General Provisions

0
5. Section 52.21 is amended by revising paragraphs (q) and (w)(4) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  52.21  Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality.

* * * * *
    (q) Public participation. The administrator shall follow the 
applicable procedures of 40 CFR part 124 in processing applications 
under this section.
* * * * *
    (w) * * *
    (4) If the Administrator rescinds a permit under this paragraph, 
the Administrator shall post a notice of the rescission determination 
on a public Web site identified by the Administrator within 60 days of 
the rescission.
* * * * *

PART 55--OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF AIR REGULATIONS

0
6. The authority citation for the part 55 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Section 328 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401, et 
seq.) as amended by Public Law 101-549.

0
7. Section 55.5 is amended by revising paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (ii) 
and (f)(2) and (4) to read as follows:


Sec.  55.5  Corresponding onshore area designation.

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) Make available, in at least one location in the NOA and in the 
area requesting COA designation, which can be a public Web site 
identified by the EPA, a copy of all materials submitted by the 
requester, a copy of the Administrator's preliminary determination, and 
a copy or summary of other materials, if any, considered by the 
Administrator in making the preliminary determination; and
    (ii) Notify the public, by prominent advertisement in a newspaper 
of general circulation in the NOA and the area requesting COA 
designation or on a public Web site identified by the EPA, of a 30-day 
opportunity for written public comment on the available information and 
the Administrator's preliminary COA designation.
    (2) A copy of the notice required pursuant to paragraph (f)(1)(ii) 
of this section shall be sent (or emailed) to the requester, the 
affected source, each person from whom a written request of such notice 
has been received, and the following officials and agencies having 
jurisdiction over the COA and NOA: State and local air pollution 
control agencies, the chief executive of the city and county, the 
Federal Land Manager of potentially affected Class I areas, and any 
Indian governing body whose lands may be affected by emissions from the 
OCS source.
* * * * *
    (4) The Administrator will make a final COA designation within 60 
days after the close of the public comment period. The Administrator 
will notify, in writing (which includes email), the requester and each 
person who has requested notice of the final action and will set forth 
the reasons for the determination. Such notification will be made 
available for public inspection.
0
8. Section 55.6 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  55.6  Permit requirements.

    (a) * * *
    (3) Administrative procedures and public participation. The 
Administrator will follow the applicable procedures of 40 CFR part 71 
or 40 CFR part 124 in processing applications under this part. When 
using 40 CFR part 124, the Administrator will follow the procedures 
used to issue Prevention of Significant Deterioration (``PSD'') 
permits.
* * * * *
0
9. Section 55.7 is amended by revising paragraphs (f)(4)(ii) and (iii) 
to read as follows:


Sec.  55.7  Exemptions.

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii) Make available, in at least one location in the COA and NOA, 
which can be a public Web site identified by the permitting authority, 
a copy of all materials submitted by the requester, a copy of the 
preliminary determination, and a copy or summary of other materials, if 
any, considered in making the preliminary determination.
    (iii) Notify the public, by prominent advertisement in a newspaper 
of general circulation in the COA and NOA or on a public Web site 
identified by the permitting authority, of a 30-day opportunity for 
written public comment on the information submitted by the owner or 
operator and on the preliminary determination.
* * * * *

PART 70--STATE OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAMS

0
10. The authority citation for the part 70 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

0
11. Section 70.7 is amended by revising paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  70.7  Permit issuance, renewal, reopenings, and revisions.

* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (1) Notice shall be given by one of the following methods that is 
selected by the permitting authority as its ``consistent noticing 
method'': by publishing the notice in a newspaper of general 
circulation in the area where the source is located (or in a State 
publication designed to give general public notice) or by posting the 
notice, for the duration of the public comment period, on a public Web 
site identified

[[Page 81250]]

by the permitting authority. The consistent noticing method shall be 
used for all permits subject to notice under this paragraph. If Web 
site noticing is selected as the consistent noticing method, the draft 
permit shall also be posted, for the duration of the public comment 
period, on a public Web site identified by the permitting authority. In 
addition, notice shall be given to persons on a mailing list developed 
by the permitting authority, including those who request in writing 
(via email, Web sign up, or other method) to be on the list. The 
permitting authority shall use other means if necessary to assure 
adequate notice to the affected public.
    (2) The notice shall identify the affected facility; the name and 
address of the permittee; the name and address of the permitting 
authority processing the permit; the activity or activities involved in 
the permit action; the emissions change involved in any permit 
modification; the name, address, and telephone number of a person (or 
an email or Web site address) from whom interested persons may obtain 
additional information, including copies of the permit draft, the 
application, all relevant supporting materials, including those set 
forth in Sec.  70.4(b)(3)(viii) of this part, and all other materials 
available to the permitting authority (except for otherwise publically 
available materials and publications) that are relevant to the permit 
decision; a brief description of the comment procedures required by 
this part; and the time and place of any hearing that may be held, 
including a statement of procedures to request a hearing (unless a 
hearing has already been scheduled).
* * * * *

PART 71--FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAMS

0
12. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart A--Operating Permits

0
13. Section 71.4 is amended by revising paragraph (g) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  71.4  Program implementation.

* * * * *
    (g) Public notice of part 71 programs. In taking action to 
administer and enforce an operating permits program under this part, 
the Administrator will publish a notice in the Federal Register 
informing the public of such action and the effective date of any part 
71 program as set forth in Sec.  71.4(a) through (c) or (d)(1)(ii). The 
publication of this part in the Federal Register on July 1, 1996 serves 
as the notice for the part 71 permit programs described in Sec.  
71.4(d)(1)(i) and (e). The EPA will also publish a notice in the 
Federal Register of any delegation of a portion of the part 71 program 
to a State, eligible Tribe, or local agency pursuant to the provisions 
of Sec.  71.10. In addition to notices published in the Federal 
Register under this paragraph (g), the Administrator will, to the 
extent practicable, post a notice on a public Web site identified by 
the Administrator of the part 71 program effectiveness or delegation, 
and will send a letter to the Tribal governing body for an Indian Tribe 
or the Governor (or his or her designee) of the affected area to 
provide notice of such effectiveness or delegation.
* * * * *
0
14. Section 71.11 is amended by revising paragraphs (d)(3)(i) 
introductory text, (d)(3)(ii), and (d)(4)(i)(G) to read as follows:


Sec.  71.11  Administrative record, public participation, and 
administrative review.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (i) By mailing (or emailing) a copy of a notice to the following 
persons (any person otherwise entitled to receive notice under 
paragraph (d) of this section may waive his or her rights to receive 
notice for any permit):
* * * * *
    (ii) By posting a notice on a public Web site identified by the 
permitting authority for the duration of the public comment period. The 
notice shall be consistent with paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section and 
be accompanied by a copy of the draft permit.
* * * * *
    (4) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (G) The physical location and/or Web site address of the 
administrative record, the times at which the record will be open for 
public inspection, and a statement that all data submitted by the 
applicant are available as part of the administrative record; and
* * * * *

Subpart B--Permits for Early Reductions Sources

0
15. Section 71.27 is amended by revising paragraphs (d)(3)(i) 
introductory text, (d)(3)(ii), and (d)(4)(i)(E) to read as follows:


Sec.  71.27  Public participation and appeal.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (i) By mailing (or emailing) a copy of a notice to the following 
persons (any person otherwise entitled to receive notice under this 
paragraph (d) may waive his or her rights to receive notice for any 
permit):
* * * * *
    (ii) By posting a notice of availability and a copy of the draft 
permit on a public Web site identified by the permitting authority for 
the duration of the public comment period.
* * * * *
    (4) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) The physical location and/or Web site address of the 
administrative record, the times at which the record will be open for 
public inspection, a statement that all data submitted by the applicant 
are available as part of the administrative record, and the name, 
address, and telephone number of a person (or an email or Web site 
address) from whom interested persons may obtain additional 
information, including copies of the draft permit, the application, all 
relevant supporting materials, and all other materials available to the 
Administrator that are relevant to the permit decision;
* * * * *

PART 124--PROCEDURES FOR DECISIONMAKING

0
16. The authority citation for part 124 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 
6901 et seq.; Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.; Clean 
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et 
seq.

Subpart A--General Program Requirements

0
17. Section 124.10 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(2)(iii) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  124.10  Public notice of permit actions and public comment 
period.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iii) For PSD permits:
    (A) In lieu of the requirement in paragraphs (c)(1)(ix)(B) and (C) 
of this section regarding soliciting persons for ``area lists'' and 
notifying the public of the opportunity to be on a mailing list, the 
Director may use generally accepted methods (e.g., hyperlink sign up 
function or radio button on agency Web site, sign-up sheet at public 
hearing, etc.) that enable interested parties to subscribe to a mailing 
list. The Director may update the mailing list from time to time by 
requesting written indication of continued interest from those listed. 
The Director may delete from the list the

[[Page 81251]]

name of any person who fails to respond to such a request within a 
reasonable timeframe.
    (B) In lieu of the requirement in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this 
section to publish a notice in a daily or weekly newspaper, the 
Director shall notify the public by posting the following information, 
for the duration of the public comment period, on a public Web site 
identified by the Director: a notice of availability of the draft 
permit for public comment (or the denial of the permit application), 
the draft permit, information on how to access the administrative 
record, and information on how to request and/or attend a public 
hearing on the permit.
    (C) In lieu of the requirement in paragraph (d)(1)(vi) of this 
section to specify a location of the administrative record, the 
Director may post the administrative record on a public Web site 
identified by the Director.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-32639 Filed 12-28-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


