
From:	Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US
To:	Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov
Cc:	"Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	03/26/2012 03:47 PM
Subject:	


Nathan,

Attached is our response to the 10 issues raised.

1-3 - see red-line/strikeout edits to preamble where interagency edits were suggested
4 - see edits to EJ section of preamble to make consistent with RIA
5 - see deletion of language at second reference
6 - see added language noting that conclusions re: natural gas are robust even with higher gas price sensitivity
7 - see addition of footnote 5 in ES and 17 in Ch 5 of RIA
8 - see edit to make clear that language re: cost effectiveness refered to NGCC, not CCS
9 - see footnote 25 previously added to address OIRA concerns on this issue
10 - Note that preamble and RIA already include gas price sensitivity analysis, have added additional discussion to address concern.


GHG NSPS preamble redline with edits for OMB 3-26.docx
  

EO 12866 EGU GHG NSPS RIA Chapter 5 Costs, Benefits, Economic, and Energy Impacts 2060_AQ91 2012_03_26.docx
  


EO 12866 EGU GHG NSPS RIA Executive Summary 2060_AQ91 2012_03_26.docx  


- Kevin
