Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US

03/13/2008 01:59 PM

	

To

"King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

cc

Darryl Weatherhead/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia
Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: Chap 5 edits









OK, that closes out chapter 5

Ron Evans

Leader, Air Benefit & Cost Group

HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA

Mail Drop C-439-02

919-541-5488

919-541-0839 fax

We do one thing: overwhelm people's impossible expectations.

"King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

03/13/2008 01:45 PM

	

To

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia
Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Darryl Weatherhead/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: Chap 5 edits









That works!

Thanks Ron -

heidi 

-----Original Message-----

From: Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:19 PM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov; Cakir.Janet@epamail.epa.gov;

Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov; Weatherhead.Darryl@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Fw: Chap 5 edits

Heidi, here are our suggested edits in response to your questions.   It

seemed easiest to just limit "e" to the basics and send the reader to

the appendix.  Please let  me know if this meets your needs.

   Changed footnote to this.

   "e These estimates do not reflect benefits or costs for the San

     Joaquin Valley or South Coast Air Basins. Please see Appendix 7b

     for analysis of these areas"

   and made sure the f is next to the $1,900.

                                                                        

             Ron                                                        

             Evans/RTP/USEPA/                                           

             US                                                      To 

                                      darryl weatherhead                

             03/13/2008 12:51                                        cc 

             PM                       Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA      

                                                                Subject 

                                      Fw: Chap 5 edits                  

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

Can you address by 2:00?

----- Forwarded by Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US on 03/13/2008 12:50 PM -----

                                                                        

             "King, Heidi R."                                           

             <Heidi_R._King@o                                           

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To 

                                      Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet 

             03/13/2008 12:37         Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA            

             PM                                                      cc 

                                                                        

                                                                Subject 

                                      Chap 5 edits                      

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

Footnotes in Table 5-1.

Footnote f is there, but I didn't see where the EGU avg annual cost per

ton of 1,900 displayed the f superscript to point a reader to the

footnote

Footnote e:  Is there  a way to phrase this more clearly?  Second

sentence in particular is misleading when it states "costs of these

emissions reductions are not incurred as part of meetinga new o3 std"

Don't you mean to say those emissions reductions are not estimated here,

rather than not inclurred?   Here is the full FN

"Sacramento Metro, CA geographic area also contains the South Coast and

San Joaquin Valley Areas. These two areas will still be reducing

emissions to meet the 0.08 ozone standard, and therefore the costs of

these emission reductions are not incurred as part of meeting a new

ozone standard. The difference between the emission reductions needed in

Table 4.7a and this table are accounted for by the tons that South Coast

and San Joaquin need to reduce to reach the current standard, and to

help Sacramento attain a new ozone standard."

