Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US 

03/13/2008 01:19 PM

	

To

"King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

cc

Lydia Wegman, Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia
Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, darryl weatherhead

Subject

Fw: Chap 5 edits









Heidi, here are our suggested edits in response to your questions.   It
seemed easiest to just limit "e" to the basics and send the reader to
the appendix.  Please let  me know if this meets your needs.

Changed footnote to this.

"e These estimates do not reflect benefits or costs for the San Joaquin
Valley or South Coast Air Basins. Please see Appendix 7b for analysis of
these areas"

and made sure the f is next to the $1,900.

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US 

03/13/2008 12:51 PM

	

To

darryl weatherhead

cc

Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Fw: Chap 5 edits









Can you address by 2:00?

----- Forwarded by Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US on 03/13/2008 12:50 PM -----

"King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

03/13/2008 12:37 PM

	

To

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

Chap 5 edits









Footnotes in Table 5-1.

 

Footnote f is there, but I didn't see where the EGU avg annual cost per
ton of 1,900 displayed the f superscript to point a reader to the
footnote

 

Footnote e:  Is there  a way to phrase this more clearly?  Second
sentence in particular is misleading when it states "costs of these
emissions reductions are not incurred as part of meetinga new o3 std" 
Don't you mean to say those emissions reductions are not estimated here,
rather than not inclurred?   Here is the full FN

"Sacramento Metro, CA geographic area also contains the South Coast and
San Joaquin Valley Areas. These two areas will still be reducing
emissions to meet the 0.08 ozone standard, and therefore the costs of
these emission reductions are not incurred as part of meeting a new
ozone standard. The difference between the emission reductions needed in
Table 4.7a and this table are accounted for by the tons that South Coast
and San Joaquin need to reduce to reach the current standard, and to
help Sacramento attain a new ozone standard." 

