"King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

01/16/2008 09:18 AM

	

To

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Johansson, Robert"
<Robert_C._Johansson@omb.eop.gov>, Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

RE: Follow up to today on O3 RIA; Mtg time on Thu









Ron thank you - you started my day with a smile.

Now for those finger strengthening exercises ..

:-)

heidi 

-----Original Message-----

From: Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:17 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov; Johansson, Robert;

Cakir.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Follow up to today on O3 RIA; Mtg time on Thu

Heidi

Your fingers must be tired after all these e-mails.   Hopefully you have

a 3:00 meeting request on Thursday on your calendar to talk about

baseline.   We are shooting for Friday to talk about the extrapolated

cost with Art, time to be arranged (our first time did not work

internally).   I will arrange a slot for the Energy EO for sometime next

week, I have not caught up Lydia on this issue yet (I keep giving up my

1 on 1 slots to OMB meetings..............).  I have asked my staff to

pull together the emissions data you requested, it should be available

for the meeting on Thursday.

Ron

                                                                        

             "King, Heidi R."                                           

             <Heidi_R._King@o                                           

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To 

                                      Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA        

             01/15/2008 06:07                                        cc 

             PM                       Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,    

                                      "Johansson, Robert"               

                                      <Robert_C._Johansson@omb.eop.gov> 

                                                                Subject 

                                      RE: Follow up to today on O3 RIA; 

                                      Mtg time on Thu                   

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

I promise this is my last email of the day:

Ron, we agreed I believe to set up an interagency conversation on the

Energy Executive Order for Ozone NAAQS, and I wonder whether we can get

that scheduled for next week as well.  At the very least to have the

dialogue as a starting place.

Thanks, and good night,

heidi

From: King, Heidi R.

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 6:00 PM

To: 'Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov'

Cc: 'Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov'; Johansson, Robert

Subject: RE: Follow up to today on O3 RIA; Mtg time on Thu

Also - who will be reaching out to set up time to brief Art on

extrapolated costs?  Or should I reach out to someone?

Thank you; I don't mean to push, but rather to avoid losing the

conversation thread while it is relatively fresh.

Best regards,

heidi

From: King, Heidi R.

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 5:58 PM

To: 'Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov'

Cc: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov; Johansson, Robert

Subject: Follow up to today on O3 RIA; Mtg time on Thu

Ron and Lydia,

A couple of follow ups to today's conversation on Ozone NAAQS RIA:

- My apologies if I've missed an email, I believe we were going to set a

time for a Thu conversation to continue today's discussion on the

baseline issues.  Best time for OMB is something between 11am and 4pm;

let me know if we should rearrange schedules to accomodate an earlier

(or later) hour

- Could EPA please share the tons of NOx reduced (and % contribution)

between base case and baseline in the draft final RIA broken out by

1) Bond Rule

2) Progress toward current NAAQS

3) Locomotive and Marine Rule

4) Aircraft (for sake of completeness)

5) Mobile (Tier 3, after-market catalyst, plug-in hybrids) - this is

169,000 tons, I understand

- Furthermore, could we get further detail on what is assumed as

progress toward meeting the current NAAQS

Thank you;

heidi

