Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

05/01/2008 12:46 AM

	

To

"King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>, "Fraas, Arthur G."
<Arthur_G._Fraas@omb.eop.gov>

cc

Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Robert
Meyers/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jason Burnett/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Re: air-to-blood ratio section









We'll plan to discuss this later this morning.  

 ----- Original Message -----

  From: "King, Heidi R." [Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov]

  Sent: 05/01/2008 12:16 AM AST

  To: Lydia Wegman; "Fraas, Arthur G." <Arthur_G._Fraas@omb.eop.gov>

  Cc: Tricia Crabtree; Karen Martin; Robert Meyers; Jason Burnett

  Subject: RE: air-to-blood ratio section

Lydia,

Thank you for this draft.  Two comments:

1.  We failed to note additional or clarified support for the higher
ratios.  We remain somewhat uncomfortable with characterizing the
science-based support for a ratio of 1:7 as equivalently robust to the
science-based support for standards ranging up to 1:6.  I believe
we’ll pick up the conversation in the morning.

2.  Questions regarding “reanalysis” and “potentially” on p 4:

 

More recently, a study of changes in children’s blood Pb levels
associated with reduced Pb emissions and associated air concentrations
near a Pb smelter in Canada (for children through age six in age)
reports a ratio of 1:6 and reanalysis << Did the Agency mean to say
additional analysis ??  Our conversation had not left me with the
impression that the Hilts dataset has been reanalyzed by the Agency >>
of the data by EPA for the initial time period of the study resulted in
a ratio of 1:7 (CD, pp. 3-23 to 3-24; Hilts, 2003).[1]  Ambient air and
blood Pb levels associated with the Hilts (2003) study range from 1.1 to
0.03 µg/m3, and associated population mean blood Pb levels range from
11.5 to 4.7 µg/dL, which are lower than levels associated with the
older studies cited in the 1986 Criteria Document (USEPA, 1986). 

Sources of uncertainty potentially  << The sentence reads well without
“potentially”.  I believe these uncertainties are not potentially
related; they were identified by the author as related >> related to
air-to-blood ratios obtained from Hilts (2003) study have been
identified.  

 

 

Best regards,

 

heidi

 

 

 

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 11:25 PM

To: King, Heidi R.; Fraas, Arthur G.

Cc: Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov; Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov;
Meyers.Robert@epamail.epa.gov; Burnett.Jason@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Fw: air-to-blood ratio section

 

 

-----Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 04/30/2008 11:24PM -----

To: Wegman Lydia@EPA

From: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US

Date: 04/30/2008 10:28PM

Subject: air-to-blood ratio section

Karen Martin, Ph.D.

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. EPA (C504-06)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

phone:  (919) 541-5274

fax:  (919) 541-0237

martin.karen@epa.gov 

 

[1] This study considered changes in ambient air Pb levels and
associated blood Pb levels over a five-year period which included
closure of an older Pb smelter and subsequent opening of a newer
facility in 1997 and a temporary (3 month) shutdown of all smelting
activity in the summer of 2001. The author observed that the
air-to-blood ratio for children in the area over the full period was
approximately 1:6. The author noted limitations in the dataset
associated with exposures in the second time period, after the temporary
shutdown of the facility in 2001, including sampling of a different age
group at that time and a shorter time period (3 months) at these lower
ambient air Pb levels prior to collection of blood Pb levels.
Consequently, EPA calculated an alternate air-to-blood Pb ratio based on
consideration for ambient air Pb and blood Pb reductions in the first
time period (after opening of the new facility in 1997).  

