"King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

03/10/2008 11:20 AM

	

To

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Schwab,
Margo" <Margo_Schwab@omb.eop.gov>

cc

Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Lydia: O3 NAAQS Next steps









My attention has returned to this review, and I'm on the phone with

Neal, Ron and Margo now.  I will call Margaret as soon as we finish to

set up our next conversation.

Lydia, I believe our next steps are the following:

- Preamble:  Review comments on new Implementation language

- RIA: OMB comments and EPA response discussion

   + I have yet to review Ron's response to Fri OMB list of comments;

however

   + I have a larger issue on costs to discuss (cost caps, RIA p 5-15)

and have additional comments to assemble for EPA

Are there remaining issues in the preamble language that we should

prepare to cover as soon as we finish this benefits conversation?

Thank you all,

heidi 

-----Original Message-----

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 10:38 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Lee, Amanda I.; Morrison.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov; fann.neal@epa.gov

Subject: RE: Lydia

No problem.  We're here and will wait to hear from you.

                                                                        

             "King, Heidi R."                                           

             <Heidi_R._King@o                                           

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To 

                                      Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA     

             03/10/2008 10:33                                        cc 

             AM                       "Lee, Amanda I."                  

                                      <Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov>,      

                                      Margaret                          

                                      Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal   

                                      Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA             

                                                                Subject 

                                      RE: Lydia                         

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

Lydia, my apologies at cancelling our 10am, another conversation has

demanded my attention.

I'll call Margaret as soon as I am available to resume our conversation,

and thank you for your patience,

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:26 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Lee, Amanda I.; Morrison.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov; fann.neal@epa.gov

Subject: Re: Lydia

Yes, we can meet this AM as soon as we're done with the 10 AM call on

the rule, though I need to check with Neal on his availability.

             "King, Heidi R."

             <Heidi_R._King@o

             mb.eop.gov>                                             To

                                      Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,

             03/10/2008 09:23         Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,

             AM                       Margaret

                                      Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

                                                                     cc

                                      "Lee, Amanda I."

                                      <Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov>

                                                                Subject

                                      Lydia

Good morning Lydia,

We continue to prioritize our review the Ozone NAAQS materials.  We

would like to have a conversation asap on the Benefits; would it be

possible to meet today, given the timeline?

In an effort to identify issues we'd like to cover while hopefully not

restricting further conversation, we've assembled the following list:

- Conversion to max 8 hour average for mortality studies

- PM scaling factor

- Visibility calculations

- 2006 dollars vs 2000 dollars

- UV write up

- Section 7.5.1

Thank you, as Margo and I mentioned last week, our calendars are for the

most part available to this project and we're happy to be as flexible as

possible.

heidi

(202) 395-4551

