SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
SECONDARY
NON­
FERROUS
METALS
PROCESSING
AREA
SOURCE
STANDARD
DEVELOPMENT
QUESTIONNAIRE
PART
A
1.0
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
(
a)
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection.

"
Secondary
Non­
Ferrous
Metals
Processing
Area
Source
Standard
Development
Questionnaire".
This
is
a
new
information
collection
request
(
ICR);
the
EPA
ICR
number
is
2200.01.

(
b)
Short
Characterization/
Abstract.

The
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
plans
to
collect
information
and
data
from
110
existing
secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
firms.
These
establishments
recover
nonferrous
metals
and
alloys
from
new
and
used
scrap
and
dross
or
produce
alloys
from
purchased
refined
metals
through
secondary
smelting
and
refining
as
well
as
by
chemical
processes.
Plants
will
be
requested
to
complete
a
simple
paper
questionnaire
on
production
processes
and
equipment,
air
pollution
control
systems,
pollution
prevention
management
practices,
applicable
regulatory
requirements,
and
emissions
test
data.
The
questionnaire
may
be
completed
from
existing
information;
no
additional
monitoring
or
testing
is
required.
The
information
collected
will
be
quality­
assured
and
entered
into
a
computerized
database
for
use
in
the
development
of
area
source
standards
for
emissions
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAP).

2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection.

Section
112(
d)
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA)
requires
EPA
to
promulgate
national
2
emission
standards
for
HAP
emissions
from
new
and
existing
major
and
area
sources
that
are
listed
for
regulation
under
section
112(
c).
Area
sources
are
small
emitters
(
less
than
10
tons/
yr
of
any
individual
HAP
or
25
tons/
yr
from
a
combination
of
HAP),
but
contribute
about
half
of
the
nationwide
HAP
emissions
from
stationary
sources.
The
purpose
of
the
area
source
program,

described
in
section
112(
k)
of
the
CAA,
is
to
reduce
HAP
emissions
to
a
level
that
achieves
a
substantial
reduction
in
risk
to
the
public
health.
The
area
source
standards
may
be
based
on
the
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT)
under
section
112(
d)(
2)
or
on
generally
available
control
technology
(
GACT)
or
management
practices
under
section
112(
d)(
5).

Secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
is
one
of
the
70
area
source
categories
listed
for
regulation
under
EPA's
Integrated
Urban
Air
Toxics
Strategy
(
67
FR
43112,
June
26,
2002).

Current
information
and
data
are
needed
to
support
the
development
of
area
source
standards
for
this
source
category.
This
information
collection
is
authorized
under
section
114
of
the
CAA.

(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data.

The
proposed
ICR
focuses
on
the
basic
information
and
data
needed
for
development
of
technology­
based
standards
or
requirements
such
as
the
type
of
metal
processed,
annual
capacity,

production
processes,
equipment,
and
air
pollution
control
systems
(
or
management
practices).

The
proposed
ICR
also
requests
basic
information
needed
to
perform
economic
impact
analyses.

The
database
resulting
from
the
completed
questionnaires
will
be
used
by
the
Emission
Standards
Division
(
ESD)
in
EPA's
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards
to
identify
HAP
emissions,

emission
sources
(
including
any
subcategories),
and
applicable
control
technologies
or
methods;

to
determine
the
appropriate
scope
and
level
of
control;
and
to
estimate
emissions
as
well
as
environmental,
cost,
and
economic
impacts.
3
3.
Nonduplication,
Consultations,
and
Other
Collection
Criteria
(
a)
Nonduplication.

A
search
of
EPA's
ongoing
ICRs
revealed
no
duplication
of
information­
gathering
efforts,

and
the
information
requested
is
not
available
through
other
sources.

(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB.

The
EPA
published
a
pre­
ICR
Federal
Register
notice
on
July
27,
2005
which
announced
our
intent
to
submit
this
ICR
to
OMB
and
requested
public
comments.

(
c)
Consultations.

The
questionnaire
was
developed
in
consultation
with
individual
facilities
and
industry
trade
associations.
The
draft
questionnaire
was
field­
tested
by
eight
facilities
representing
a
crosssection
of
the
industry
to
obtain
labor
hour
estimates
and
suggestions
for
improvements.
Five
of
the
eight
facilities
provided
labor
hour
estimates
with
their
responses.
Comments
also
were
invited
on
a
voluntary
basis
from
industry
trade
associations
and
from
plants
that
hosted
site
visits.
In
general,
the
trade
association
and
plants
found
the
questionnaire
to
be
clearly
presented
and
easy
to
complete.
As
a
result
of
these
consultations,
ESD
made
minor
revisions
to
the
survey
instrument
to
clarify
questions
and
simplify
responses.
Table
1
identifies
the
non­
EPA
persons
consulted
during
development
of
the
proposed
ICR.
4
TABLE
1.
PERSONS
CONSULTED
ON
THE
PROPOSED
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
ACTIVITIES
Contact
Organization
Telephone
no.

1.
Field
testing
participants
John
Stourac
U.
S.
Zinc
(
IMCO
Recycling)
773.380.6776
Christopher
Kiser
MagReTech,
Inc.
216.518.9165
Ric
Clark
Colonial
Metals
Co.
717.684.2311
David
McSweeney
AMG
Resources
Corp.
410.477.0300
Joe
Westerhausen
Multimetco
Inc.
205.831.8300
Peter
Eckert
Heraeus
Metal
Processing,
Inc.
562.921.7464
Roy
Wood
Eastman
Kodak
Co.
585.588.7538
George
Phillips
Sipi
Metals
Corp.
773.276.0070
2.
General
Comments
Todd
Johnston
National
Mining
Association
202.463.2668
Greg
Patzer
International
Magnesium
Association
847.526.2010
Neil
King
The
Nickel
Institute
202.663.6061
John
Bullock
International
Precious
Metals
Institute
203.784.3181
Mike
Dirienzo
The
Silver
Institute
202.835.0185
Eric
Harris
Institute
of
Scrap
Recycling
Industries
202.662.8514
John
Larch
Gemini
Industries
949.250.4011
Roger
Fumey
Atlas
Pacific
Corp.
909.421.1200
5
(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection.

Not
applicable
because
this
is
a
one­
time
request.

(
e)
General
Guidelines.

None
of
the
guidelines
in
5
CFR
1320.6
are
being
exceeded.

(
f)
Confidentiality.

All
information
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
Agency
policies
set
forth
in
40
CFR
Part
2,
Subpart
B
 
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information
(
See
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;
amended
by
43
FR
39999,
September
8,
1978;
43
FR
42251,
September
28,
1978;
44
FR
17674,
March
23,

1979).

(
g)
Sensitive
Questions.

This
section
is
not
applicable
because
this
ICR
does
not
involve
matters
of
a
sensitive
nature.

4.
The
Respondents
And
The
Information
Requested
(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
and
NAICS
Codes.

Potential
respondents
are
owners
and
operators
of
existing
secondary
non­
ferrous
metal
processing
firms.
Plants
engaged
in
the
secondary
smelting
of
aluminum,
copper,
and
lead
are
not
included
because
their
HAP
emissions
are
covered
by
separate
air
pollution
control
standards.

The
primary
SIC
code
for
the
respondents
is
3341
(
Secondary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Nonferrous
Metals);
the
NAICS
code
is
331492
(
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining,
and
Alloying
of
Nonferrous
Metal,
Except
Copper
and
Aluminum).

(
b)
Information
Requested.
6
(
i)
Data
Items,
Including
Recordkeeping
Requirements.
A
copy
of
the
questionnaire
is
provided
as
an
attachment.
There
are
no
recordkeeping
requirements
associated
with
this
request.

°
Part
I
(
Instructions)
provides
guidance
to
the
respondent
and
highlights
that
no
additional
monitoring
or
testing
is
required
to
respond
to
the
questionnaire.
The
instructions
also
list
an
EPA
contact
for
questions
(
or
for
requests
to
submit
the
information
collected
in
a
different
format
such
as
computer
microdisk)
and
provide
the
name
and
address
to
which
the
completed
survey
should
be
mailed.
The
instructions
also
direct
the
respondent
to
an
attachment
that
provides
additional
information
on
the
scope
and
purpose
of
the
ICR
and
relevant
requirements
of
the
CAA.

°
Part
II
(
General
Information)
requests
the
company
name,
address,
contact
person,

and
geographical
location
(
UTM
coordinates
if
available)
and
basic
economic
characteristics
(
annual
revenue,
Dunn
&
Bradstreet
facility
identification
number,
applicable
NAICS
or
SIC
code,
number
of
employees,
and
parent
company).
Information
is
also
requested
on
company
operating
parameters
(
amount/
type/
percent
of
metal
processed,
annual
operating
hours,
types
of
material
processed,
types
of
products
produced,
and
secondary
metal
processes
that
are
present).

°
Part
III
(
Secondary
Non­
ferrous
Metal
Processing
Operations)
directs
the
respondent
to
fill
out
tables
to
briefly
characterize
each
process
and
the
type
of
air
pollution
control
device
or
pollution
prevention
measure
used
in
the
operation.
When
an
air
pollution
control
device
is
used,
the
respondent
is
asked
to
fill
out
a
table
that
characterizes
the
control
device.
Respondents
also
are
asked
to
provide
information
on
emission
test
measurements,

permit
conditions,
and
the
amount
of
material
collected
by
fabric
filters/
cartridge
collectors.

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities.
Respondent
activities
include
reading
the
instructions;
7
searching
data
sources
to
collect
available
data
from
files;
completing
the
written
survey;
and
transmitting
the
survey
to
EPA.
The
request
does
not
require
respondents
to
make
measurements
of
emissions
or
otherwise
create
information,
and
it
relies
on
information
that
should
be
readily
available
from
existing
records
and
reports.
There
is
no
need
for
respondents
to
develop
or
acquire
technology
or
systems
to
collect,
process,
or
disclose
the
information;
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previous
instructions;
or
to
train
personnel.

5.
The
Information
Collected
 
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
(
a)
Agency
Activities.

Agency
activities
associated
with
this
information
collection
include
preparing
and
transmitting
the
questionnaire,
answering
respondent
questions
about
the
questionnaire,
reviewing
and
assuring
quality
of
data
submissions,
addressing
any
requests
for
confidentiality,
and
entering
the
data
into
a
computerized
database.

(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Information
Management.

The
EPA
has
identified
a
total
of
110
plants
as
secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
area
sources.
The
ESD
will
mail
each
facility
a
paper
copy
of
the
survey;
the
facility
may
return
the
completed
survey
in
paper
or
electronic
format
except
when
the
survey
contains
CBI,
in
which
case
it
cannot
be
emailed
or
sent
by
fax.
The
completed
responses
will
be
reviewed
for
completeness
and
quality­
assured
prior
to
being
entered
in
a
computerized
database.
Followup
calls
will
be
made
to
maximize
the
response
rate
and
clarify
any
questions
on
the
responses.
Any
CBI
will
be
maintained
in
a
secure
location
as
required
by
EPA
CBI
procedures.
CBI
will
not
be
entered
into
the
database.
Public
access
to
non­
CBI
information
will
be
provided
through
the
8
rulemaking
docket,
which
will
contain
a
copy
of
the
database.

(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility.

The
Small
Business
Administration
defines
a
small
entity
in
this
industry
as
a
company
with
fewer
than
750
employees
at
all
facilities.
The
information
collected
from
small
entities
is
needed
to
perform
analyses
required
by
the
Regulatory
Flexibility
Act
and
the
Small
Business
Regulatory
Enforcement
Fairness
Act.
Information
on
emissions
and
the
level
of
control
performance
is
needed
from
all
plants
(
large
and
small)
to
determine
the
appropriate
regulatory
approach
and
level
of
control.
Information
on
small
facilities
will
also
provide
insight
into
pollution
prevention
measures
that
may
be
applicable.

Many
of
the
plants
in
this
area
source
category
may
meet
the
definition
of
small
entity,
and
this
survey
has
been
designed
to
ensure
that
the
burden
of
responding
is
not
high.
Because
smaller
facilities
have
fewer
of
the
same
processes
as
large
plants,
less
time
should
be
required
to
complete
a
response.
The
information
requested
should
be
readily
available,
and
the
questionnaire
highlights
that
facilities
are
not
required
to
perform
additional
monitoring
or
testing
or
create
information.

(
d)
Collection
Schedule.

The
proposed
mailing
date
for
the
ICR
is
within
4
weeks
of
ICR
approval
by
OMB.

Respondents
are
asked
to
complete
and
return
the
survey
as
quickly
as
possible,
but
there
is
no
mandatory
date
for
submission.
The
database
will
be
created
and
checked
by
quality
assurance
procedures
by
September
30,
2005.
The
completed
database
will
be
used
to
develop
area
source
standards
with
proposal
targeted
for
September
30,
2006
and
promulgation
in
September
2007.

6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
9
(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden.

The
annual
burden
estimates
for
collecting
and
reporting
information
were
derived
from
labor
hour
estimates
provided
by
five
of
the
eight
plants
that
field­
tested
the
draft
questionnaire.

Five
of
the
eight
plants
provided
labor
hour
estimates
with
their
responses.
The
labor
estimates
ranged
from
6.5
hours
for
a
small
plant
to
102
hours
for
a
larger
plant.
The
average
labor
hour
burden
per
facility
was
estimated
at
62
hours.

(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs.

(
i)
Estimating
Labor
Costs.
Technical,
management,
and
clerical
average
hourly
rates
are
from
recent
Employment
Cost
Trends
(
http://
stats.
bls.
gov/
news.
release/
ecec.
t02.
htm)
published
by
the
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
(
BLS).
Wages
for
civilian
workers
(
white
collar
occupations)

are
used
as
the
basis
of
the
labor
rates
with
a
total
compensation
of
$
38.82
for
technical
(
i.
e.,

engineer),
$
45.29
for
managerial,
and
$
19.92
for
clerical.
These
rates
represent
salaries
plus
fringe
benefits
but
do
not
include
the
cost
of
overhead.
An
overhead
rate
of
110
percent
is
used
to
account
for
these
costs.
The
fully­
burdened
wage
rates
used
to
represent
respondent
labor
costs
are:
technical
at
$
81.52,
management
at
$
95.11,
and
clerical
at
$
41.83.

(
ii)
Estimating
Capital
and
Operations
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs;
Capital/
Startup
v.
O&
M
Costs;
and
Annualizing
Capital
Costs.
There
are
no
capital
or
O&
M
costs.

(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost.

The
Agency
burden
estimates
are
based
on
labor
hours
for
preparing
and
transmitting
the
questionnaire;
answering
respondent
questions
about
the
questionnaire;
reviewing
data
submissions
(
including
followup
calls
if
needed
to
clarify
responses),
addressing
requests
for
confidentiality,
and
entering
data
in
the
computerized
database
(
including
quality
assurance
10
procedures).
These
burden
items
are
based
on
Agency
experience
with
previous
industry
surveys
conducted
to
meet
standards
development
needs.

The
Agency
labor
rates
are
based
on
Office
of
Personnel
Management
(
OPM)
2004
General
Schedule
which
excludes
locality
rates
of
pay.
These
rates
can
be
obtained
from
Salary
Table
2004­
GS
available
on
the
OPM
website
at
http://
www.
opm.
gov/
oca/
04tables/
pdf/
gs_
h.
pdf.

The
government
employee
labor
rates
are
$
30.14
for
technical
(
GS­
13,
Step
1),
$
41.90
for
managerial
(
GS­
15,
Step
1),
and
$
14.29
for
clerical
(
GS­
7,
Step
1).
These
rates
represent
salaries
plus
fringe
benefits
but
do
not
include
the
cost
of
overhead.
An
overhead
rate
of
110
percent
is
used
to
account
for
these
costs.
The
fully­
burdened
wage
rates
used
to
represent
Agency
labor
costs
are:
technical
at
$
63.29,
management
at
$
87.99,
and
clerical
at
$
30.01.

(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs.

The
EPA
has
identified
a
total
of
110
potential
respondents
from
existing
Agency
databases
and
reference
sources.
Burden
hours
and
costs
are
annualized
over
the
3­
year
clearance
period
for
the
ICR.
Therefore,
the
average
annual
number
of
respondents
is
36.67.

(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Cost
Tables.

(
i)
Respondent
Tally.
Respondent
burden
hours
are
shown
in
Table
2.
The
average
annual
burden
is
estimated
at
2281
person­
hours
per
year
with
an
average
annual
cost
of
$
179,456.
No
annual
capital
or
O&
M
costs
are
applicable.

(
ii)
The
Agency
tally.
The
average
annual
Agency
burden
is
given
in
Table
3.
The
average
annual
burden
is
estimated
at
209
person­
hours
with
an
average
annual
cost
of
$
12,831.

(
iii)
Variations
in
the
annual
bottom
line.
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
no
significant
variation
is
anticipated.
11
(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden.

This
section
does
not
apply
since
this
is
a
new
collection.

(
g)
Burden
Statement.

The
average
annual
respondent
burden
per
facility
is
estimated
at
62
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
4,894.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
in
40
CFR
part
63
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9.

To
comment
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggestions
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
through
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques,
EPA
has
established
a
public
docket
for
this
ICR
under
Docket
ID
No.
OAR­
2005­
0116,
which
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
Air
and
Radiation
Docket
in
the
EPA
Docket
Center,
EPA
West,
Room
B­
102,
1301
Constitution
Ave.,
NW,

Washington,
DC.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Reading
12
Room
is
(
202)
566­
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
Air
Docket
is
(
202)
566­
1742.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA
Dockets
(
EDOCKET)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
docket.
Use
EDOCKET
to
submit
or
view
public
comments,
and
to
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
Also,
you
can
send
comments
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20503,
Attention
Desk
Officer
for
EPA.

Please
include
the
EPA
Docket
ID
No.
OAR­
2005­
0116
in
any
correspondence.

PART
B
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
statistical
methods
are
not
used
in
the
proposed
data
collection.
13
TABLE
2.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
respondenta
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
yearb
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
F=
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
G=
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
c
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Surveys
and
Studies
A.
Read
instructions
3
1
3
36.67b
110.01
5.50
11.00
$
9,951
B.
Gather
existing
information
27.1
1
27.1
36.67b
993.76
49.69
99.38
$
89,894
C.
Complete
and
review
survey
form
21.6
1
21.6
36.67b
792.07
39.60
79.21
$
71,650
D.
Transmit
information
2.4
1
2.4
36.67b
88.01
4.40
8.80
$
7,961
3.
Acquisition,

Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
N/
A
4.
Reporting
Requirements
N/
A
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
respondenta
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
yearb
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
F=
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
G=
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
c
14
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
1,984
99
198
179,456
Annualized
cost
of
capital
$
0
Operation
and
maintenance
$
0
a
Based
on
pretest
responses
from
five
of
the
eight
facilities
that
field­
tested
the
draft
questionnaire;
five
of
the
eight
facilities
provided
labor
hour
estimates
with
their
responses.

b
One
time
event
over
the
3­
year
term
of
the
ICR
(
110/
3
=
36.67
respondents/
yr).

c
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
81.52,
management
at
$
95.11,
and
clerical
at
$
41.83.
15
TABLE
3.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Number
of
occurrences
per
year
(
C)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
Cx0.05)
(
E)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
E=
Cx0.1)
(
F)

Cost,
$
a
Surveys
and
Studies
1.
Develop
survey
160
0.33b
52.80
2.64
5.28
$
3,732
2.
Distribute
survey
40
0.33b
13.20
0.66
1.32
$
933
3.
Answer
questions
0.5
3.67c
1.84
0.09
0.18
$
130
4.
Log
in
and
acknowledge
receipt
of
responses
1
36.67d
36.67
1.83
3.67
$
2,592
5.
Enter
into
database,
QA
check,
analyze
and
summarize
results
2
36.67b
73.34
3.67
7.33
$
5,184
6.
Respond
to
requests
for
confidentiality
1
3.67c
3.67
0.18
0.37
$
259
Travel
N/
Ae
Litigation
N/
Ae
Enforcement
Activities
N/
Ae
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
182
9
18
$
12,831
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
:
technical
at
$
63.29,
management
at
$
87.99,
and
clerical
at
$
30.01.

b
One
time
event
over
the
3­
year
term
of
the
ICR
(
1/
3=
0.33
occurrences/
yr)

c
Of
36.67
respondents/
yr
(
110/
3),
assume
10%
(
3.67)
will
require
assistance.

d
Applies
to
responses
from
all
110
respondents
over
the
3­
year
term
of
the
ICR
(
110/
3=
36.67).

e
Travel,
litigation,
and
enforcement
activities
are
not
applicable.
16
SECONDARY
NON­
FERROUS
METALS
PROCESSING
AREA
SOURCE
STANDARD
DEVELOPMENT
QUESTIONNAIRE
I.
Instructions
This
questionnaire
is
to
be
completed
for
operations
that
comprise
the
"
Secondary
Nonferrous
Metals"
source
category
at
your
facility.
This
source
category
includes
all
processes
that
are
part
of
secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
operations
such
as
pretreatment,
smelting,
refining,
casting,
removing
castings
from
molds,
and
casting
finishing.
By
our
definition,
a
secondary
non­
ferrous
metal
processing
facility
is
an
establishment
primarily
engaged
in
recovering
non­
ferrous
metals
and
alloys
from
new
and
used
scrap
and
dross
or
in
producing
alloys
from
purchased
refined
metals.
This
industry
includes
establishments
engaged
in
both
the
recovery
and
alloying
of
precious
metals.
Plants
engaged
in
the
recovery
of
tin
through
secondary
smelting
and
refining,
as
well
as
by
chemical
processes
are
included
in
this
industry.
The
subject
operations
are
generally
conducted
under
Standard
Industrial
Classification
(
SIC)
Code
3341,
Secondary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Non­
ferrous
Metals
or
under
North
American
Industry
Classification
System
(
NAICS)
Code
331492
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining,
and
Alloying
of
Nonferrous
Metal
(
except
Copper
and
Aluminum).

We
are
requesting
information
regarding
air
emissions
from
your
secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
operations,
the
use
of
air
pollution
control
(
APC)
devices
in
those
operations,
and
their
effectiveness
in
reducing
emissions,
particularly
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAPs).
The
information
requested
is
described
in
Sections
II
and
III
of
this
questionnaire.
A
list
of
HAPs
is
included
as
Attachment
1.

Please
satisfy
this
request
as
completely
as
possible
from
existing
information.
No
additional
monitoring
or
emission
testing
is
required
by
your
company
to
respond
to
this
request.

If
you
wish
to
submit
the
requested
information
in
a
different
format
(
computer
microdisk,
for
example),
please
contact
Iliam
Rosario
at
919­
541­
5308
(
e­
mail
rosario.
iliam@
epa.
gov)
first
to
ensure
that
the
EPA
can
process
your
information
in
the
format
you
intend
to
use.
If
you
have
any
questions
regarding
this
request,
please
contact
Mr.
Rosario.

Return
this
request
along
with
any
additional
information
to:

Iliam
Rosario
USEPA
Mailroom
(
C439­
02)
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27711
17
II.
General
Information
1.
Name
of
facility:

2.
Mailing
address:

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

3.
Street
address
of
plant:

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

4.
Latitude
and
longitude
of
the
plant,
in
degrees,
minutes,
and
seconds
or
UTM
coordinates
(
please
specify
units
used):

_________________________________________________________________

5.
Names
and
telephone
numbers
of
contact
persons
who
are
able
to
answer
technical
questions
about
this
survey:

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

6.
Dunn
and
Bradstreet
number
of
your
facility:

7.
Enter
the
appropriate
NAICS
or
SIC
codes
for
your
facility
and
circle
code
type
used:

Primary
code
NAICS
//
SIC
Secondary
code
NAICS
//
SIC
Tertiary
code
NAICS
//
SIC
8.
Annual
revenue
in
2003:
$

9.
Total
tons
of
metal
processed
in
2003:
tons/
yr
18
10.
Annual
operating
hours
for
2003:
hrs/
yr
11.
Hourly
processing
capacity
(
as
of
December
2003):
tons/
hr
12.
Number
of
employees
at
your
facility:

13.
Are
you
part
of
a
larger
corporate
entity?
Yes
No
If
Yes:
Name
of
parent
company:

Number
of
employees
in
parent
company:

If
Yes,
check
the
statement
below
that
best
applies:

The
facility
is
fully
independent
of
the
parent
organization
(
independent
sources
of
capital,
different
Boards
of
Directors,
etc.).

The
parent
organization
provides
some
financial
support.

Operations
of
the
parent
organization
and
this
facility
are
fully
integrated
(
full
access
to
investment
capital,
same
Board
of
Directors,
etc.).

14.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
all
secondary
metal
processing
operations
that
apply:

1
Pretreatment
2
Melting/
Smelting
3
Refining
4
Electrolytic
processing
5
Chemical
processing
(
e.
g.,
chlorination,
precipitation,
etc.)
6
Other
(
describe):
______________________________

15.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
the
type(
s)
of
metal
produced
and
give
the
percent
of
the
annual
total
for
each
type:

1
Zinc
_____
%
2
Nickel
_____
%
3
Gold
_____
%
4
Silver
_____
%
5
Brass/
Bronze
_____
%
6
Magnesium
_____
%
7
Tin
_____
%
8
Platinum
_____
%
9
Other
(
specify):
_____________
_____
%
19
16.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
all
types
of
castings/
products
that
apply:

1
Metal
powders
2
Ingots
or
bars
(
100
lbs
or
less)
3
Blocks
(
greater
than
100
lbs)
4
Specialty
cast
shapes
5
Other
(
specify):
_______________________________________________

17.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
all
product
categories
that
apply:

1
Produce
intermediate
products
(
e.
g.,
metal
bars
or
ingots)
2
Produce
final
products
18.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
all
product
markets
that
apply:

1
Products
are
sold
in
the
market
2
Products
are
used
captively
Please
complete
the
process­
specific
questionnaires
in
Section
III.
Record
the
total
number
of
labor
hours
required
to
complete
the
entire
questionnaire.
You
may
report
the
hours
per
each
of
the
following
categories
or
simply
report
the
total
number
of
hours
in
the
following
table.

Item
Technical
Person
Hours
Management
Person
Hours
Clerical
Person
Hours
Review
instructions
Search
data
sources
Complete
and
review
information
Transmit
information
to
EPA
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
20
III.
Secondary
Non­
ferrous
Metal
Processing
Operations,
Use
of
Air
Pollution
Control
Equipment,
and
Air
Emission
Data.

A.
Processing
Information
Use
Tables
1
through
7
to
describe
all
secondary
non­
ferrous
metal
processing
equipment
and
processes
at
your
facility.
Give
information
that
is
representative
of
the
capacity
of
the
individual
items
of
equipment
or
processes,
not
your
current
production
rate.
You
may
use
one
table
to
describe
a
number
of
equipment
items
or
processes
if
they
are
identical.

Provide
an
identification
number
for
each
process.
Also,
give
the
identification
numbers
of
the
air
pollution
control
(
APC)
devices
that
service
the
process
operations
(
see
Section
C
below,
Air
Pollution
Control
Devices).
If
no
device
is
used,
report
"
None".

B.
Pollution
Prevention
In
Tables
1
through
7,
identify
any
emission
reduction
(
pollution
prevention)
measures
used
in
your
operations.
Such
measures
consist
of
process
variations
or
procedures
that
have
been
demonstrated
to
reduce
air
emissions.

C.
Air
Pollution
Control
Devices
Use
Tables
A
through
D
to
describe
all
APC
devices
used
to
service
secondary
non­
ferrous
metal
processing
equipment
or
processes.
Provide
an
identification
number
for
each
device,
and
also
give
the
identification
numbers
of
the
processes
serviced
by
the
device
(
see
Section
A
above,
Processing
Information).

D.
Application
of
Control
Devices
In
all
tables,
assign
an
identification
number
or
description
to
each
piece
of
equipment,
process,
and
APC
device
so
that
each
APC
device
can
be
associated
with
the
equipment
and
processes
it
serves.
The
number
or
description
can
be
chosen
for
your
convenience.
NOTE:
You
may
use
flow
diagrams
to
show
the
relationship
between
processes
and
APC
devices
if
you
wish.

E.
Permit
Conditions
Provide
either
a
summary
of
air
emission
conditions
to
which
you
are
subject
or
a
copy
of
your
air
permit.
21
F.
Emission
tests
Enclose
summary
data
from
emission
tests
conducted
on
all
secondary
non­
ferrous
metal
processing
operations
and
APC
devices.
Include:

(
1)
emission
rates
measured,

(
2)
the
test
method
or
procedure
used,

(
3)
information
on
actual
production
or
processing
rates
and
on
process
conditions
at
the
time
the
measurements
were
made,
and
(
4)
a
statement
that
any
APC
devices
(
if
present)
were
operating
normally
during
the
test,
or
if
not,
what
the
abnormal
operating
conditions
were.

Regarding
item
(
3),
refer
to
the
cover
letter
that
accompanied
this
request
if
you
have
concerns
about
protecting
the
confidentiality
of
production
information.

G.
Emission
Collection
Inventories
For
each
fabric
filter/
cartridge
collector,
report
the
amount
of
material
collected
and
the
amount
of
material
processed,
produced,
or
treated
over
any
recent
time
period
for
which
the
data
are
available.
Also,
report
the
results
of
any
direct
analyses
of
the
materials
collected,
but
not
TCLP
data.

H.
Tables
Tables
1
through
7
below
apply
to
processes
and
equipment;
Tables
A
through
D
apply
to
air
pollution
control
devices.
Each
table
should
represent
a
unique
process
or
piece
of
equipment.
If
you
have
two
identical
processes,
you
can
complete
a
single
table
and
indicate
that
the
table
represents
two
identical
processes.

NOTE:
No
new
information
need
be
developed
for
this
survey.
If
the
information
requested
is
not
known,
simply
state
"
Not
known".

1.
Scrap
Specification
and
Inspection
Use
copies
of
Table
1
to
describe
each
unique
scrap
specification
and
inspection
operation.

2.
Pretreatment
Use
copies
of
Table
2
to
describe
each
unique
pretreatment
process.
22
3.
Furnaces
Use
copies
of
Table
3
to
describe
each
unique
furnace.

4.
Pouring
and
Cooling
Lines
Use
copies
of
Table
4
to
describe
each
unique
pouring/
cooling
line.

5.
Casting
Removal
Operations
Use
copies
of
Table
5
to
describe
each
unique
casting
removal
operation.

6.
Finishing
Operations
Use
copies
of
Table
6
to
describe
each
unique
finishing
operation.

7.
Non­
melting
Secondary
Non­
ferrous
Metals
Processing
Operations
Use
copies
of
Table
7
to
describe
each
unique
non­
melting
secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
operations.

8.
Fabric
Filters
(
baghouses)/
Cartridge
Collectors
Complete
a
copy
of
Table
A
for
each
unique
fabric
filter/
cartridge
dust
collector
system
used
that
services
operations
described
in
Tables
2
through
7.

9.
Wet
Scrubbers
Complete
a
copy
of
Table
B
for
each
unique
wet
scrubber
system
that
services
secondary
non­
ferrous
metal
processing
operations.

10.
Thermal
Air
Pollution
Control
Devices
Complete
a
copy
of
Table
C
for
each
unique
unit
that
processes
emissions
from
secondary
non­
ferrous
metal
processing
operations
by
a
thermal
method
such
as
incineration,
thermal/
catalytic
oxidation,
and
afterburning.

11.
Other
APC
Devices
For
each
device
other
than
those
listed
in
Sections
8
through
10
above
that
services
secondary
non­
ferrous
metal
processing
operations,
provide
a
similar
description,
including
relevant
design
and
operating
data,
using
copies
of
Table
D.
23
ABREVIATIONS
AND
ACRONYMS
acf
Actual
cubic
feet
acfm
Actual
cubic
feet
per
minute
APC
device
Air
pollution
control
device

F
Degrees
Fahrenheit
fpm
Feet
per
minute
gr/
dscf
Grains
per
dry
standard
cubic
foot
HAPs
Hazardous
air
pollutants
lbs
Pounds
mass
lbs/
hr
Pounds
mass
per
hour
sq.
ft.
Square
feet
TCLP
Toxicity
characteristic
leaching
procedure
24
TABLE
1.
SCRAP
SPECIFICATION
AND
INSPECTION
1.
Please
provide
a
copy
of
your
written
scrap
specifications
and
scrap
management
plan.

2.
Give
a
brief
description
of
the
type
of
material
processed
(
e.
g.,
turnings,
jewelry,
photographic
waste
materials,
ingots,
electrical
and
electronics
scrap,
etc.):

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

3.
What
grades
of
scrap
are
used
(
e.
g.,
according
to
the
codes
and
descriptions
of
non­
ferrous
scrap
by
the
Institute
of
Scrap
Recycling
Industries
or
similar
information)
?

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

4.
Circle
the
appropriate
frequency
of
scrap
inspections:

0
Do
not
inspect
incoming
shipments
1
Greater
than
0
but
less
than
10%
of
each
incoming
scrap
shipment
2
Greater
than
or
equal
to
10%
but
less
than
50%
of
each
incoming
scrap
shipment
3
Greater
than
or
equal
to
50%
but
less
than
90%
of
each
incoming
scrap
shipment
4
Greater
than
or
equal
to
90%
to
100%
of
each
incoming
scrap
shipment
5.
Circle
all
applicable
code
numbers
for
reasons
why
a
scrap
shipment
would
be
rejected:

1
Visible
oils
or
grease
2
Visible
painted
parts
3
Visible
plastic
parts
4
Visible
lead
components
5
Visible
automotive
scrap/
components
6
Visible
dripping
liquids
7
Visible
mercury
switches
8
Other
(
describe):
___________________
25
TABLE
2.
PRETREATMENT
1.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):
________________________

2.
Number
of
identical
pretreatment
stations
described:
_______________________
(
Enter
"
1"
if
unique
process,
"
2"
if
data
represents
two
identical
processes,
etc.)

3.
Pretreatment
station
ID
number(
s)
or
description:
_________________________

4.
Circle
the
code
number
for
the
type
of
pretreatment
operation:

1
Sorting
2
Crushing
3
Shredding
4
Screening
5
Furnace
sweating
6
Leaching
(
e.
g.,
sodium
carbonate
leaching
for
secondary
zinc
processing)
7
Degreasing
8
Preheating
9
Other
(
describe):
__________________________________________

5.
Circle
the
code
numbers
for
the
type
of
air
pollution
control
device
and
the
type
of
fume
capture
system
used:
APC
device
ID
no.:
Fume
capture
system:

0
No
device
is
used
0
None
1
Fabric/
cartridge
filter
1
Side­
draft
or
canopy
hood
2
Wet
scrubber
2
Close­
fitting
hood
or
direct
process
vent
3
Other:
3
Other:

6.
Describe
any
work
practices
or
other
measures
that
reduce
emissions
from
pretreatment
operations.

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

7.
Have
air
emission
tests
been
conducted
on
these
pretreatment
operations?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data.]

8.
Additional
comments
and
information:

_________________________________________________________________
26
TABLE
3.
FURNACE
DATA
1.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):
______________________

2.
Number
of
identical
furnaces
described:
_______________________________
(
Enter
"
1"
if
unique
process,
"
2"
if
data
represents
two
identical
processes,
etc.)

3.
Furnace
ID
number(
s)
or
description:
_________________________________

4.
Circle
the
code
number
for
furnace
application:

1
Melting
2
Holding
5.
Circle
the
code
number
for
furnace
type:

1
Blast
2
Electric
arc
3
Electric
induction
4
Reverberatory
5
Crucible
6
Kettle
7
Muffle
8
Retort
9
Rotary
Kiln
10
Other
(
describe):
________________________

6.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
furnace
description,
if
applicable:

Blast:
1
Afterburning
used
2
No
afterburning
3
Above
charge
gas
takeoff
4
Below
charge
takeoff
5
Cold
blast
6
Recuperative
hot
blast
7
Nonrecuperative
hot
blast
Electric
induction:
8
Coreless
9
Channel
7.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
the
fuel
or
energy
source
used
for
this
furnace:

1
AC
electric
2
DC
electric
3
Natural
gas­
fired
4
Coke
or
coal
5
Other
(
specify):
27
8.
Melting
capacity
of
furnace,
if
applicable:
________________
tons
per
hour
9.
Holding
capacity
of
furnace,
if
applicable:
________________
tons
10.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
the
type(
s)
of
metals
charged
to
the
furnace
and
give
the
percent
of
the
annual
total
for
each
type:

1
Zinc
_____
%
2
Nickel
_____
%
3
Gold
_____
%
4
Silver
_____
%
5
Brass/
Bronze
_____
%
6
Magnesium
_____
%
7
Tin
_____
%
8
Platinum
_____
%
9
Other
(
specify):
_____________
_____
%

11.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
materials
added
for
smelting:

1
Lime
2
Fluxing
materials
(
e.
g.,
magnesium
chloride,
calcium
chloride,
etc.)
3
Inhibitive
gases
4
Alloying
agents
(
describe):
_______________
5
Other
(
describe):
_______________________

12.
Circle
the
code
which
describes
how
molten
material
is
transferred
to
molds
for
casting:

1
Hand
ladling
2
Pumping
3
Tilt
pouring
4
Other
(
describe):
_______________

13.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
the
type(
s)
of
metals
produced
by
the
furnace
and
give
the
percent
of
the
annual
total
for
each
type:

1
Zinc
_____
%
2
Nickel
_____
%
3
Gold
_____
%
4
Silver
_____
%
5
Brass/
Bronze
_____
%
6
Magnesium
_____
%
7
Tin
_____
%
8
Platinum
_____
%
28
9
Other
(
specify):
_____________
_____
%

For
charging,
melting,
and
tapping
operations
associated
with
this
furnace,
circle
the
code
numbers
for
the
types
of
air
pollution
control
devices
and
fume
capture
systems
used.

14.
Charging:
APC
device
ID
no.:
Fume
capture
system:

0
No
device
is
used
0
None
1
Fabric/
cartridge
filter
1
Side­
draft
or
canopy
hood
2
Wet
scrubber
2
Close­
fitting
hood
or
direct
process
vent
3
Other:
3
Other:

15.
Melting:
APC
device
ID
no.:
Fume
capture
system:

0
No
device
is
used
0
None
1
Fabric/
cartridge
filter
1
Side­
draft
or
canopy
hood
2
Wet
scrubber
2
Close­
fitting
hood
or
direct
process
vent
3
Other:
3
Other:

16.
Tapping:
APC
device
ID
no.:
Fume
capture
system:

0
No
device
is
used
0
None
1
Fabric/
cartridge
filter
1
Side­
draft
or
canopy
hood
2
Wet
scrubber
2
Close­
fitting
hood
or
direct
process
vent
3
Other:
3
Other:

17.
Describe
any
work
practices
or
other
measures
that
reduce
furnace
operation
emissions.

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

18.
Have
air
emission
tests
have
been
conducted
on
this
furnace?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data
and
processing
rate
information.]

19.
Additional
comments
and
information:

_________________________________________________________________
29
_________________________________________________________________
30
TABLE
4.
POURING
AND
COOLING
LINE
DATA
1.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):

2.
Number
of
identical
lines
described
in
this
table:
(
Enter
"
1"
if
unique
line,
"
2"
if
data
represents
two
identical
lines,
etc.)

3.
Line
ID
number(
s)
or
description:

4.
Circle
the
code
number
for
the
configuration
of
the
pouring
station:

1
Automated
conveyor
2
Pallet
line
3
Floor
(
stationary)
mold
4
Other
(
describe):

5.
Capacity
per
line
in
terms
of
metal
poured:
tons
per
hour
6.
Circle
the
code
number
for
the
type
of
mold
system:

1
Permanent
mold
2
Sand
mold,
not
chemically
treated
3
Chemically
bonded
sand
4
Centrifugal
mold
5
Other
(
describe):

7.
If
sand
system,
the
sand/
metal
ratio:

8.
If
chemically
bonded
sand
is
used,
include
MSDS
for
each
chemical
binder
material
used,
and
report
the
annual
amount
of
each
chemical
binder
material
used
in
2003:

Name
of
Binder
System
1
(
describe):
_________________________

Quantity
of
Material
A:
_______________________
tons
per
year
Quantity
of
Material
B:
_______________________
tons
per
year
Quantity
of
Catalyst:
_______________________
tons
per
year
Name
of
Binder
System
2
(
describe):
_________________________

Quantity
of
Material
A:
_______________________
tons
per
year
Quantity
of
Material
B:
_______________________
tons
per
year
Quantity
of
Catalyst:
_______________________
tons
per
year
31
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
the
type(
s)
of
metal
poured
and
give
the
percent
of
the
annual
total
for
each
type:

1
Zinc
_____
%
2
Nickel
_____
%
3
Gold
_____
%
4
Silver
_____
%
5
Brass/
Bronze
_____
%
6
Magnesium
_____
%
7
Tin
_____
%
8
Platinum
_____
%
9
Other
(
specify):
_____________
_____
%

For
the
pouring
and
cooling
sections
of
the
line,
circle
the
code
numbers
for
the
types
of
APC
devices
and
fume
capture
systems
used.

10.
Pouring:
APC
device
ID
no.:
Fume
capture
system:

0
No
device
is
used
0
None
1
Fabric/
cartridge
filter
1
Side­
draft
or
canopy
hood
2
Wet
scrubber
2
Close­
fitting
hood
or
direct
process
vent
3
Other:
3
Other:

11.
Cooling:
APC
device
ID
no.:
Fume
capture
system:

0
No
device
is
used
0
None
1
Fabric/
cartridge
filter
1
Side­
draft
or
canopy
hood
2
Wet
scrubber
2
Close­
fitting
hood
or
direct
process
vent
3
Other:
3
Other:

12.
Describe
any
emission
reduction
systems
or
procedures
used.

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

13.
Have
air
emission
tests
been
conducted
on
this
line?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data
and
metal
pouring
rate
information.]
32
14.
Additional
comments
and
information:

_________________________________________________________________
33
TABLE
5.
CASTING
REMOVAL
DATA
9.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):

2.
Number
of
identical
systems
described
in
this
table:
(
Enter
"
1"
if
unique
system,
"
2"
if
data
represents
two
identical
systems,
etc.)

3.
System
ID
number(
s)
or
description:

4.
Identify
the
pouring
and
cooling
lines
in
the
"
Pouring
and
Cooling
Data"
section
that
feed
this
system:
___________________________________________________

5.
Circle
the
code
number
for
the
system
type:

1
Shaker
deck
or
table
2
Rotary
separator
3
Vibratory
conveyor
4
High­
frequency
vibration
5
Mechanical
6
Manual
7
Other
(
describe):

6.
Circle
the
code
number
for
the
type
of
APC
device
used:
APC
device
ID
no.:
Fume
capture
system:

0
No
device
is
used
0
None
1
Fabric/
cartridge
filter
1
Side­
draft
or
canopy
hood
2
Wet
scrubber
2
Close­
fitting
hood
or
direct
process
vent
3
Other:
3
Other:

7.
Describe
any
emission
reduction
systems
or
procedures
used.

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

8.
Have
air
emission
tests
been
conducted
on
this
system?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data.]
34
9.
Additional
comments
and
information:

_________________________________________________________________
35
TABLE
6.
FINISHING
DATA
1.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):

2.
Number
of
identical
treatment
stations
described
in
this
table:
(
Enter
"
1"
if
unique
system,
"
2"
if
data
represents
two
identical
systems,
etc.)

3.
Process
ID
number(
s)
or
description:

4.
Circle
the
code
number
for
the
finishing
process
used:

1
Cutoff
2
Grinding
3
Shot
blasting
4
Grit
blasting
5
Coating
(
e.
g.,
painting
or
varnishing)
6
Other
(
describe):
__________________________

5.
Casting
processing
capacity
per
process:
____________________
tons
per
hour
6.
If
coating,
circle
the
code
number
for
the
application
method:

1
Spray
2
Dip
3
Roll
4
Flow
5
Other
(
describe):
__________________________

7.
If
coating,
circle
the
code
number
for
the
type
of
coating
material
used:

1
Organic
solvent­
borne
liquid
2
Water­
borne
liquid
3
Powder
4
Other
(
describe):
__________________________

8.
Circle
the
code
number
for
the
type
of
APC
device
used:
APC
device
ID
no.:
Fume
capture
system:

0
No
device
is
used
0
None
1
Fabric/
cartridge
filter
1
Side­
draft
or
canopy
hood
2
Wet
scrubber
2
Close­
fitting
hood
or
direct
process
vent
3
Other:
3
Other:
36
Identify
materials
that
contain
HAPs.
Give
the
rate
per
process
at
which
these
materials
are
consumed
at
full
operating
capacity
and
annual
quantity
used
in
2003.

9.
Material
10.
Annual
quantity
used
in
2003
(
tons)
11.
Maximum
consumption
rate
(
lb/
hr)
12.
Actual
consumption
rate
(
lb/
hr)
13.
Known
HAPs
14.
Concentration
in
material
(%)

15.
Describe
any
emission
reduction
systems
or
procedures
used.

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

16.
Have
air
emission
tests
been
conducted
on
this
process?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data
and
relevant
processing
rate
information.]

17.
Additional
comments
and
information:

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________
37
TABLE
7.
NON­
MELTING
SECONDARY
NON­
FERROUS
METALS
PROCESSING
OPERATIONS
1.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):

2.
Number
of
identical
process
units
described
in
this
table:
(
Enter
"
1"
if
unique
process
unit,
"
2"
if
data
represents
two
identical
process
units,
etc.)

3.
Process
unit
ID
number(
s)
or
description:

4.
Circle
the
code
number(
s)
for
the
type
of
process(
es)
conducted
in
this
unit:

1
Electrolysis
2
Precipitation
3
Dissolution
4
Gas­
phase
volatilization
5
Chlorination
followed
by
electrorefining
6
Neutralization
7
Other
(
describe):
_______________

5.
Circle
the
code
number
for
the
type
of
metal
processed/
recovered
in
this
unit:

1
Zinc
2
Nickel
3
Gold
4
Silver
5
Brass/
Bronze
6
Magnesium
7
Tin
8
Platinum
9
Other
(
specify):
_____________

6.
If
process
conducted
in
a
tank
please
provide:

Tank
capacity:
_________________________
gallons
Tank
description:
(
Circle
all
that
apply)
1
covered
tank
2
uncovered
tank
3
stirred,
mixed,
or
agitated
liquid
4
quiescent
liquid
7.
Specify
the
processing
mode:

1
Continuous
2
Batch
38
8.
Process
rate
capacity:
________________________
tons
per
hour
9.
Average
actual
process
rate
in
2003:
________________________
tons
per
hour
Identify
all
materials
that
contain
HAPs
in
the
following
table
for
all
non­
melting
secondary
nonferrous
metals
processing
operations
indicated
in
Question
2
above.
Give
the
rate
per
process
at
which
these
materials
are
consumed
at
full
operating
capacity
and
annual
quantity
used
in
2003.

10.
Material
11.
Annual
quantity
used
in
2003
(
tons)
12.
Maximum
consumption
rate
(
lb/
hr)
13.
Actual
consumption
rate
(
lb/
hr)
14.
Known
HAPs
15.
Concentration
in
material
(%)

16.
Circle
the
code
number
for
the
type
of
air
pollution
control
device
and
the
type
of
fume
capture
system
used:
APC
device
ID
no.:
Fume
capture
system:

0
No
device
is
used
0
None
1
Fabric/
cartridge
filter
1
Side­
draft
or
canopy
hood
2
PM
wet
scrubber
(
venturi)
2
Close­
fitting
hood
or
direct
process
vent
3
Chemical
absorption
scrubber
3
Other:
______________
4
Carbon
adsorption
5
Incinerator
6
Condenser
7
Other:
_____________

17.
Describe
any
additional
emission
reduction
systems
or
procedures
used.

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________
39
18.
Have
air
emission
tests
been
conducted
on
this
process
unit?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data
and
relevant
processing
rate
information.]

19.
Additional
comments
and
information:

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________
40
TABLE
A.
FABRIC
FILTER/
CARTRIDGE
COLLECTOR
DESCRIPTION
2.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):

2.
Device
description
and
ID
number:

3.
Year
installed/
rebuilt:
/

4.
Design
collection
efficiency
and/
or
outlet
concentration:

percent/
gr/
dscf
5.
Circle
the
code
number
for
device
type:

1
Fabric
filter
2
Cartridge
collector
6.
Circle
the
code
number
for
pressure
mode
of
operation:

1
Positive
pressure
2
Negative
pressure
7.
Circle
the
code
number
for
bag
cleaning
method:

1
Pulse
jet
2
Shaker
3
Reverse
air
4
Other
(
describe):

8.
Circle
the
code
number
for
bag
cleaning
mode:

1
On
line
2
Off
line
9.
Cloth
type:

10.
Number
of
compartments:

11.
Gas
inlet
temperature:

F
12.
Gas
flow
rate:
acfm
13.
Gross
filtering
area:
sq.
ft.

14.
Net
filtering
area:
sq.
ft.

15.
Air
to
cloth
ratio:
fpm
41
16.
Referring
to
the
processes
described
in
Tables
1
through
7,
identify
each
process
served
by
this
device.

If
furnaces
are
served,
distinguish
between
charging,
melting,
and
tapping
operations.
Similarly,
if
pretreatment
lines,
pouring
and
cooling
lines,
casting
removal
processes,
finishing
processes,
or
other
non­
melting
secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
operations
are
served,
identify
the
operations
serviced.

Table
No.
Process
ID/
Description
Operation
17.
Amount
of
particulate
matter
collected
by
this
device:

A.
Tons
of
dust
material
collected:
_________________
tons
B.
Time
period
for
which
dust
material
was
collected:
_____________
hours
of
operation
C.
Amount
of
metal
or
material
processed
or
treated:
_____________
tons
18.
Has
this
material
been
analyzed?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
analysis
(
but
not
TCLP
data).]

19.
Have
emission
tests
been
conducted
on
this
device?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data
and
relevant
processing
rate
information.]

20.
Additional
comments
and
information:
_________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________
42
TABLE
B.
WET
SCRUBBER
DESCRIPTION
1.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):

2.
Device
description
and
ID
number:

3.
Year
installed/
rebuilt:
/

4.
Design
collection
efficiency
and/
or
outlet
concentration:
percent/
gr/
dscf
5.
Basis
for
efficiency
(
particulate
matter,
gas):

6.
Circle
the
code
number
for
scrubber
type:

1
Venturi
2
Sieve
tray
3
Vertical
packed
bed
4
Horizontal
packed
bed
5
Other
(
specify):

7.
Circle
the
code
number
for
pressure
mode
of
operation:

1
Positive
pressure
2
Negative
pressure
8.
Gas
flow
rate:
acfm
9.
Gas
inlet
temperature:

F
10.
Pressure
drop:
inches
water
column
11.
Liquid
to
gas
ratio:
gallons
per
1,000
acf
43
12.
Referring
to
the
processes
described
in
Tables
1
through
7,
identify
each
process
served
by
this
device.
If
furnaces
are
served,
distinguish
between
charging,
melting,
and
tapping
operations.
Similarly,
if
pretreatment
lines,
pouring
and
cooling
lines,
casting
removal
processes,
finishing
processes,
or
other
non­
melting
secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
operations
are
served,
identify
the
operations
serviced.

Table
No.
Process
ID/
Description
Operation
13.
Have
emission
tests
been
conducted
on
this
device?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data
and
relevant
processing
rate
information.]

14.
Additional
comments
and
information:
_________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________
44
TABLE
C.
THERMAL
AIR
POLLUTION
CONTROL
DEVICE
DESCRIPTION
1.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):

2.
Device
description
and
ID
number:

3.
Design
efficiency
for
this
application:
percent
4.
Basis
for
efficiency
(
for
example:
carbon
monoxide
destruction,
volatile
organic
compound
destruction):

_________________________________________________________________

5.
Excess
air:
percent
6.
Residence
time:
seconds
[
Residence
time
is
equal
to
the
volume
of
the
combustion
chamber
divided
by
the
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
at
combustion
conditions.]

7.
Combustion
temperature:

F
8.
Other
relevant
design
and
operating
data:
________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________
45
9.
Referring
to
the
processes
described
in
Tables
1
through
7,
identify
each
process
served
by
this
device.
If
furnaces
are
served,
distinguish
between
charging,
melting,
and
tapping
operations.
Similarly,
if
pretreatment
lines,
pouring
and
cooling
lines,
casting
removal
processes,
finishing
processes,
or
other
non­
melting
secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
operations
are
served,
identify
the
operations
serviced.

Table
No.
Process
ID/
Description
Operation
10.
Have
emission
tests
been
conducted
on
this
device?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data
and
relevant
processing
rate
information.]

11.
Additional
comments
and
information:
__________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________
46
TABLE
D.
OTHER
APC
DEVICE
DESCRIPTION
1.
Facility
ID
number
(
EPA
will
code
this
response):

2.
Device
description
and
ID
number:

3.
Design
efficiency
for
this
application:
percent
4.
Basis
for
efficiency:

5.
Relevant
design
and
operating
data:

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

6.
Referring
to
the
processes
described
in
Tables
1
through
7,
identify
each
process
served
by
this
device.
If
furnaces
are
served,
distinguish
between
charging,
melting,
and
tapping
operations.
Similarly,
if
pretreatment
lines,
pouring
and
cooling
lines,
casting
removal
processes,
finishing
processes,
or
other
non­
melting
secondary
non­
ferrous
metals
processing
operations
are
served,
identify
the
operations
serviced.

Table
No.
Process
ID/
Description
Operation
7.
Have
emission
tests
been
conducted
on
this
device?

0
No
1
Yes
[
Enclose
summary
measurement
data
and
relevant
processing
rate
information.]
47
8.
Additional
comments
and
information:

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________
1­
1
Attachment
1.
List
of
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
CAS
No.
Chemical
name
CAS
No.
Chemical
name
75070
Acetaldehyde
60355
Acetamide
75058
Acetonitrile
98862
Acetophenone
53963
2­
Acetylaminofluorine
107028
Acrolein
79061
Acrylamide
79107
Acrylic
acid
107131
Acrylonitrile
107051
Allyl
chloride
92671
4­
Aminobiphenyl
62533
Aniline
90040
o­
Anisidine
1332214
Asbestos
71432
Benzene
(
including
benzene
from
gasoline)
92875
Benzidine
98077
Benzotrichloride
100447
Benzyl
chloride
92524
Biphenyl
117817
Bis(
2­
ethylhexyl)
phthalate
(
DEHP)
542881
Bis(
chloromethyl)
ether
75252
Bromoform
106990
1,3­
Butadiene
156627
Calcium
cyanamide
133062
Captan
63252
Carbaryl
75150
Carbon
disulfide
56235
Carbon
tetrachloride
463581
Carbonyl
sulfide
120809
Catechol
133904
Chloramben
57749
Chlordane
7782505
Chlorine
79118
Chloroacetic
acid
532274
2­
Chloroacetophenone
108907
Chlorobenzene
510156
Chlorobenzilate
67663
Chloroform
107302
Chloromethyl
methyl
ether
126998
Chloroprene
1319773
Cresols/
Cresylic
acid
(
isomers
and
mixture)
95487
o­
Cresol
108394
m­
Cresol
106445
p­
Cresol
98828
Cumene
94757
2,4­
D,
salts
and
esters
3547044
DDE
334883
Diazomethane
132649
Dibenzofurans
96128
1,2­
Dibromo­
3­
chloropropane
84742
Dibutylphthalate
106467
1,4­
Dichlorobenzene(
p)
91941
3,3­
Dichlorobenzidene
111444
Dichloroethyl
ether
(
Bis(
2­
chloroethyl)
ether)
542756
1,3­
Dichloropropene
62737
Dichlorvos
111422
Diethanolamine
121697
N,
N­
Diethyl
aniline
(
N,
N­
Dimethylaniline)
64675
Diethyl
sulfate
119904
3,3­
Dimethoxybenzidine
60117
Dimethyl
aminoazobenzene
119937
3,3

­
Dimethyl
benzidine
79447
Dimethyl
carbamoyl
chloride
57147
1,1­
Dimethyl
hydrazine
68122
Dimethyl
formamide
131113
Dimethyl
phthalate
77781
Dimethyl
sulfate
534521
4,6­
Dinitro­
o­
cresol,
and
salts
51285
2,4­
Dinitrophenol
121142
2,4­
Dinitrotoluene
123911
1,4­
Dioxane
(
1,4­
Diethyleneoxide)
122667
1,2­
Diphenylhydrazine
106898
Epichlorohydrin
(
1­
Chloro­
2,3­
epoxypropane)
106887
1,2­
Epoxybutane
140885
Ethyl
acrylate
100414
Ethyl
benzene
51796
Ethyl
carbamate
(
Urethane)
75003
Ethyl
chloride
(
Chloroethane)
106934
Ethylene
dibromide
(
Dibromoethane)
107062
Ethylene
dichloride
(
1,2­
Dichloroethane)
107211
Ethylene
glycol
151564
Ethylene
imine
(
Aziridine)
75218
Ethylene
oxide
96457
Ethylene
thiourea
75343
Ethylidene
dichloride
(
1,1­
Dichloroethane)
50000
Formaldehyde
76448
Heptachlor
List
of
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
continued)

CAS
No.
Chemical
name
CAS
No.
Chemical
name
1­
2
118741
Hexachlorobenzene
87683
Hexachlorobutadiene
77474
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
67721
Hexachloroethane
822060
Hexamethylene­
1,6­
diisocyanate
680319
Hexamethylphosphoramide
110543
Hexane
302012
Hydrazine
7647010
Hydrochloric
acid
7664393
Hydrogen
fluoride
(
Hydrofluoric
acid)
123319
Hydroquinone
78591
Isophorone
58899
Lindane
(
all
isomers)
108316
Maleic
anhydride
67561
Methanol
72435
Methoxychlor
74839
Methyl
bromide
(
Bromomethane)
74873
Methyl
chloride
(
Chloromethane)
71556
Methyl
chloroform
(
1,1,1­
Trichloroethane)
78933
Methyl
ethyl
ketone
(
2­
Butanone)
60344
Methyl
hydrazine
74884
Methyl
iodide
(
Iodomethane)
108101
Methyl
isobutyl
ketone
(
Hexone)
624839
Methyl
isocyanate
80626
Methyl
methacrylate
1634044
Methyl
tert
butyl
ether
101144
4,4­
Methylene
bis(
2­
chloroaniline)
75092
Methylene
chloride
(
Dichloromethane)
101688
Methylene
diphenyl
diisocyanate
(
MDI)
101779
4,4'­
Methylenedianiline
91203
Naphthalene
98953
Nitrobenzene
92933
4­
Nitrobiphenyl
100027
4­
Nitrophenol
79469
2­
Nitropropane
684935
N­
Nitroso­
N­
methylurea
62759
N­
Nitrosodimethylamine
59892
N­
Nitrosomorpholine
56382
Parathion
82688
Pentachloronitrobenzene
(
Quintobenzene)
87865
Pentachlorophenol
108952
Phenol
106503
p­
Phenylenediamine
75445
Phosgene
7803512
Phosphine
7723140
Phosphorus
85449
Phthalic
anhydride
1336363
Polychlorinated
biphenyls
(
Aroclors)
1120714
1,3­
Propane
sultone
57578
beta­
Propiolactone
123386
Propionaldehyde
114261
Propoxur
(
Baygon)
78875
Propylene
dichloride
(
1,2­
Dichloropropane)
75569
Propylene
oxide
75558
1,2­
Propylenimine
(
2­
Methyl
aziridine)
91225
Quinoline
106514
Quinone
100425
Styrene
96093
Styrene
oxide
1746016
2,3,7,8­
Tetrachlorodibenzo­
p­
dioxin
79345
1,1,2,2­
Tetrachloroethane
127184
Tetrachloroethylene
(
Perchloroethylene)
7550450
Titanium
tetrachloride
108883
Toluene
95807
2,4­
Toluene
diamine
584849
2,4­
Toluene
diisocyanate
95534
o­
Toluidine
8001352
Toxaphene
(
chlorinated
camphene)
120821
1,2,4­
Trichlorobenzene
79005
1,1,2­
Trichloroethane
79016
Trichloroethylene
95954
2,4,5­
Trichlorophenol
88062
2,4,6­
Trichlorophenol
121448
Triethylamine
1582098
Trifluralin
540841
2,2,4­
Trimethylpentane
108054
Vinyl
acetate
593602
Vinyl
bromide
75014
Vinyl
chloride
75354
Vinylidene
chloride
(
1,1­
Dichloroethylene)
1330207
Xylenes
(
isomers
and
mixture)
95476
o­
Xylenes
108383
m­
Xylenes
106423
p­
Xylenes
1­
3
List
of
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
continued)

CAS
No.
Chemical
name
0
Antimony
Compounds
0
Arsenic
Compounds
(
inorganic
including
arsine)
0
Beryllium
Compounds
0
Cadmium
Compounds
0
Chromium
Compounds
0
Cobalt
Compounds
0
Coke
Oven
Emissions
0
Cyanide
Compounds1
0
Glycol
ethers2
0
Lead
Compounds
0
Manganese
Compounds
0
Mercury
Compounds
0
Fine
mineral
fibers3
0
Nickel
Compounds
0
Polycylic
Organic
Matter4
0
Radionuclides
(
including
radon)
5
0
Selenium
Compounds
NOTE:
For
all
listings
above
which
contain
the
word
"
compounds"
and
for
glycol
ethers,
the
following
applies:
Unless
otherwise
specified,
these
listings
are
defined
as
including
any
unique
chemical
substance
that
contains
the
named
chemical
(
i.
e.,
antimony,
arsenic,
etc.)
as
part
of
that
chemical's
infrastructure.

1X'CN
where
X
=
H'
or
any
other
group
where
a
formal
dissociation
may
occur.
For
example
KCN
or
Ca(
CN)
2.
2Includes
mono­
and
di­
ethers
of
ethylene
glycol,
diethylene
glycol,
and
triethylene
glycol
R­(
OCH2CH2)
n­
OR'
where
n
=
1,
2,
or
3
R
=
alkyl
or
aryl
groups
R'
=
R,
H,
or
groups
which,
when
removed,
yield
glycol
ethers
with
the
structure:
R­(
OCH2CH)
n­
OH.
Polymers
are
excluded
from
the
glycol
category.
3Includes
mineral
fiber
emissions
from
facilities
manufacturing
or
processing
glass,
rock,
or
slag
fibers
(
or
other
mineral
derived
fibers)
of
average
diameter
1
micrometer
or
less.
4Includes
organic
compounds
with
more
than
one
benzene
ring,
and
which
have
a
boiling
point
greater
than
or
equal
to
100

C.
5A
type
of
atom
which
spontaneously
undergoes
radioactive
decay.
