"
Gault,
Roger"
<
rgault@
emamail.
org>
Transmission
Date:
03/
30/
2005
01:
35:
42
PM
To:
Alan
Stout/
AA/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
cc:
"
Kokrda,
Kevin"
<
kkokrda@
emamail.
org>
Subject:
RE:
call
attendance
OK,
understood.

Roger
Gault
Engine
Manufacturers
Association
Two
North
LaSalle
Street,
Suite
2200
Chicago,
Illinois
60602
Tel:
(
312)
827­
8742
Fax:
(
312)
827­
8737
rgault@
emamail.
org
www.
enginemanufacturers.
org
­­­­­
Original
Message­­­­­
From:
Stout.
Alan@
epamail.
epa.
gov
[
mailto:
Stout.
Alan@
epamail.
epa.
gov]
Sent:
Wednesday,
March
30,
2005
12:
33
PM
To:
Gault,
Roger
Cc:
Kokrda,
Kevin
Subject:
RE:
call
attendance
Roger,
That
looks
right
to
me.
The
only
clarification
is
that
we
are
adding
the
definition
for
maximum
engine
power,
but
it
will
just
point
to
gross
power
(
as
shown
below).
This
is
necessary
for
dealing
with
the
relationship
of
Large
SI
engines
and
Rec
vehicles
to
part
90.
This
should
have
no
affect
on
part
90
engines.

Alan
_____________________

Maximum
engine
power
means
the
maximum
value
of
gross
power
at
rated
speed.

"
Gault,
Roger"
<
rgault@
emamail.
org
To:
Alan
Stout/
AA/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
cc:
"
Kokrda,
Kevin"
<
kkokrda@
emamail.
org>
Subject:
RE:
call
attendance
Transmission
Date:
03/
29/
2005
05:
49:
09
PM
Alan:

I
wanted
to
close
the
loop
on
the
Part
90
Technical
Amendments
based
on
our
conference
call
and
subsequent
discussions.

My
understanding
is
that
the
draft
supplied
previously
will
be
modified
as
follows:
Section
90.1
(
a)
the
reference
to
maximum
engine
power
will
revert
back
to
the
current
language
of
gross
power
Section
90.3
the
new
definition
of
Maximum
engine
power
will
be
removed
Section
90.127
the
new
section
will
be
removed
Section
90.417
(
b)
will
remain
as
drafted
in
the
proposal,
EMA
withdraws
its
request
for
a
change
Section
90.421
(
B)(
4)(
ii)(
C)
reference
to
40
CFR
part
1065.750
will
revert
back
to
90.312
(
no
change
from
current)

Section
90.421
(
B)(
4)(
ii)(
D)
reference
to
40
CFR
part
1065,
subparts
C
&
D
will
revert
back
to
90.312
(
no
change
from
current)

Section
90.421
(
B)(
4)(
iii)
reference
to
40
CFR
part
1065,
subpart
D
will
revert
back
to
90.312
(
no
change
from
current)

I
believe
that
this
cleans
this
one
up
and
we
can
plan
to
start
focusing
on
the
Phase
3
test
procedure
issues
when
your
group
is
ready.

Roger
Gault
Engine
Manufacturers
Association
Two
North
LaSalle
Street,
Suite
2200
Chicago,
Illinois
60602
Tel:
(
312)
827­
8742
Fax:
(
312)
827­
8737
rgault@
emamail.
org
www.
enginemanufacturers.
org
­­­­­
Original
Message­­­­­
From:
Stout.
Alan@
epamail.
epa.
gov
[
mailto:
Stout.
Alan@
epamail.
epa.
gov]
Sent:
Wednesday,
March
16,
2005
3:
52
PM
To:
Gault,
Roger
Subject:
call
attendance
Roger,
I
realized
I
should
include
our
call
today
in
a
memo
I'm
pulling
together
to
docket
our
interactions
for
the
tech
amendments.
Could
you
send
me
a
list
of
those
who
participated?
I
didn't
get
everyone's
full
name.

Also,
just
to
let
you
know,
I
checked
into
the
changed
references
in
90.421
and
concluded
that
we
should
change
the
86
reference
in
421(
b)(
4)(
ii),
but
not
in
any
of
the
subparagraphs
(
A)
through
(
D)
or
in
(
iii).
I
will
be
taking
those
out
of
this
rulemaking,
so
those
paragraphs
will
remain
unchanged.

Alan
