From:
Holloway,
Thomas
C.
(
Tom)
Sent:
Wednesday,
February
26,
2003
12:
15
PM
To:
'
dail.
lynn@
epa.
gov';
'
dusetzina.
mike@
epa.
gov'
Cc:
Reeves,
David
Subject:
Inputs
for
magnetic
tape
risk
test
Attached
are
spreadsheets
and
supporting
information
for
the
residual
risk
test
for
magnetic
tape
manufacturing.
(
This
is
the
same
information
provided
to
Lynn
Dail
yesterday
at
the
project
status
meeting.)

I
have
included
HAP
emissions
for
the
entire
facility
and
HAP
emissions
associat
ed
with
the
magnetic
tape
manufacturing
process
at
the
facility.
There
are
six
facilities
on
the
list
(
Quantegy,
JVC,
Sony,
3M,
Kodak,
and
Imation).
For
three
of
the
facilities
(
Quantegy,
JVC,
and
Sony),
the
facility
and
process
HAP
emiss
ions
are
the
same
because
magnetic
tape
manufacturing
accounts
for
all
of
the
HA
P
emitted
from
the
facilities.
For
the
remaining
three
facilities
(
3M,
Kodak,
a
nd
Imation),
the
facility
and
process
HAP
emissions
are
different
because
magnet
ic
tape
manufacturing
accounts
for
only
a
fraction
of
the
HAP
emitted
from
the
f
acilities
(
3M­­
30%,
Kodak­­
0.2%,
Imation­­
8.9%).

I
have
included
parameter
information
for
the
magnetic
tape
manufacturing
proces
s
for
all
of
the
facilities
on
the
list
except
3M.
(
We
are
still
waiting
on
tha
t
information
from
3M.)
We
have
no
parameter
information
for
the
entire
facilit
y
for
any
of
the
facilities
on
the
list.
(
The
plant
layout
for
Sony,
provided
i
n
d­
700126.
dwg,
is
a
CAD
file.
If
you
don't
have
AutoCAD
software,
then
you
can
download
the
free
viewer
version
at
http://
usa.
autodesk.
com/
adsk/
section/
0,,
837
637­
123112,00.
html
.)

As
I
mentioned
during
the
meeting
yesterday,
I
would
recommend
doing
separate
ri
sk
tests
for
the
facility
and
the
magnetic
tape
manufacturing
process
for
3M,
Ko
dak,
and
Imation,
where
magnetic
tape
manufacturing
accounts
for
only
a
fraction
of
the
HAP
emitted
from
the
facilities.

FYI:
As
agreed
during
yesterday's
project
status
meeting,
I
asked
my
contact
at
Kodak
about
(
1)
the
speciation
of
chromium
compounds
emitted
from
the
Kodak
Park
facility,
(
2)
any
readily
available
parameter
information
for
the
Kodak
Park
fa
cility,
and
(
3)
the
MACT
standards
to
which
the
Kodak
Park
facility
is
subject.
He
said
he
would
provide
information
within
the
next
couple
of
days
about
the
s
peciation
of
chromium
compounds
emitted
from
the
Kodak
Park
facility.
(
Note
tha
t
there
are
no
chromium
emissions
from
the
magnetic
tape
process
at
the
facility
.)
He
did
not
know
how
much
parameter
information
would
be
available
for
the
en
tire
Kodak
Park
facility,
but
he
said
he
would
ask
around.
He
said
that
the
Kod
ak
Park
facility
is
subject
to
a
number
of
MACT
standards.
Two
of
the
biggest
a
re
Polymers
&
Resins
IV
and
Paper
&
Other
Web
Coating.
Other
MACT
standards
inc
lude
Halogenated
Solvent
Cleaners,
Offsite
Waste,
Incinerator
MACT,
Boiler
MACT
[
not
out
yet],
MON
[
not
final
yet],
Magnetic
Tape,
and
one
or
two
smaller
MACT
s
tandards.
He
said
they
are
also
subject
to
the
Wood
Furniture
MACT,
but
only
fo
r
recordkeeping
purposes,
to
keep
below
the
de
minimis
level.

If
you
have
any
questions,
feel
free
to
contact
me.
My
contact
information
is
p
rovided
below.

Tom
Holloway
RTI
International
3040
Cornwallis
Rd.,
P.
O.
Box
12194
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27709
Phone:
(
919)
316­
3733
Fax:
(
919)
541­
7155
E­
mail:
tcholloway@
rti.
org
