STANDARD
FORM
83
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
ICR
No.
2163.01
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
STANDARDS
OF
PERFORMANCE
FOR
NEW
STATIONARY
SOURCES:
OTHER
SOLID
WASTE
INCINERATION
(
OSWI)
UNITS
(
40
CFR
PART
60,
SUBPART
EEEE)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27711
September
2004
1
PART
A
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
FOR
STANDARD
FORM
83
Other
Solid
Waste
Incineration
Units
1.
IDENTIFICATION
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
1(
a)
Title
of
the
Information
Collection.

"
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
Requirements
for
Standards
of
Performance
for
New
Stationary
Sources:
Other
Solid
Waste
Incineration
(
OSWI)
Units
(
40
CFR
Part
60,
Subpart
EEEE)."

1(
b)
Short
Characterization/
Abstract.

This
supporting
statement
addresses
information
collection
activities
that
would
be
imposed
by
the
proposed
"
Standards
of
Performance
for
New
Stationary
Sources:
Other
Solid
Waste
Incineration
(
OSWI)
Units,"
40
CFR
Part
60,

subpart
EEEE.
The
new
source
performance
standards
(
NSPS)

fulfill
the
requirements
of
sections
111
and
129
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA),
which
require
EPA
to
promulgate
NSPS
for
solid
waste
incineration
units.
The
NSPS
regulate
two
subcategories
of
OSWI
units:
very
small
municipal
waste
combustion
(
VSMWC)
units
and
institutional
waste
incineration
(
IWI)
units.

The
information
collection
activities
required
by
the
NSPS
include:
siting
requirements,
operator
training
and
qualification
requirements,
testing,
monitoring
and
reporting
requirements,
one­
time
and
periodic
reports,
and
the
maintenance
of
records.
These
activities
will
enable
EPA
to
determine
initial
compliance
with
the
emission
limits
for
the
regulated
pollutants,
monitor
compliance
with
operating
parameters,
and
ensure
that
facilities
conduct
the
proper
planning
and
operator
training.

No
new
OSWI
units
are
expected
to
be
constructed
or
operated,
so
there
will
be
no
annual
burden.
The
population
of
OSWI
units
has
been
declining
for
several
years.
No
new
OSWI
units
are
being
constructed,
even
in
the
absence
of
regulations,
because
other
waste
disposal
alternatives,
such
2
as
landfilling,
are
more
economical.
The
cost
of
complying
with
the
proposed
NSPS
makes
it
even
more
likely
that
sources
will
select
an
alternative
method
of
waste
disposal
and
no
new
OSWI
units
will
be
constructed.

2.
NEED
FOR
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTION
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection.

The
EPA
is
required
under
sections
111
and
129
of
the
CAA
to
establish
standards
of
performance
for
new
stationary
sources
that
reflect
the
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT)
for
achieving
continuous
emission
reductions:

CAA
section
129(
a)(
1)
states:

Standards
applicable
to
solid
waste
incinerator
units
promulgated
under
section
111
and
this
section
shall
reflect
the
maximum
degree
of
reduction
in
emissions
of
air
pollutants
listed
under
section
(
a)(
4)
that
the
Administrator,
taking
into
consideration
the
cost
of
achieving
such
emission
reduction,
and
any
non­
air
quality
health
and
environmental
impacts
and
energy
requirements,
determines
is
achievable
for
new
or
existing
units
in
each
category.

CAA
section
111(
e)
further
states:

After
the
effective
date
of
standards
of
performance
promulgated
under
this
section,
it
shall
be
unlawful
for
any
owner
or
operator
of
any
new
source
to
operate
such
source
in
violation
of
any
standards
of
performance
applicable
to
such
source.

2(
b)
Practical
Utility
Users
of
the
Data.

Although
no
new
OSWI
units
are
expected,
the
NSPS
must
include
information
collection
requirements
necessary
for
enforcement.
In
the
unlikely
event
that
any
new
OSWI
units
are
constructed,
this
information
will
be
used
by
EPA
to:

(
1)
identify
new,
modified,
and
reconstructed
sources
subject
to
the
NSPS;
(
2)
ensure
that
the
NSPS
are
being
properly
applied;
(
3)
ensure
that
the
emission
limits
are
3
being
complied
with;
and
(
4)
ensure,
on
a
continuous
basis,

that
the
operating
limits
established
during
the
initial
performance
test
are
not
exceeded.

In
addition,
records
and
reports
are
necessary
to
enable
EPA
to
identify
facilities
that
may
not
be
in
compliance
with
the
NSPS.
Based
on
reported
information,

EPA
will
decide
which
facilities
should
be
inspected
and
what
records
or
units
should
be
inspected
at
the
facilities.

The
records
that
facilities
maintain
will
indicate
to
EPA
whether
facility
personnel
are
properly
operating
and
maintaining
the
incinerator
and
control
equipment
and
whether
facility
personnel
have
met
the
qualification
requirements.

3.
NONDUPLICATION,
CONSULTATIONS,
AND
OTHER
COLLECTION
CRITERIA
3(
a)
Nonduplication.

The
information
collected
pursuant
to
the
NSPS
consists
primarily
of
a
siting
analysis,
operator
training,
emissions
testing,
and
monitoring
of
operating
parameters.
This
information
is
currently
not
collected
for
OSWI
units
by
EPA
or
any
other
Federal
agency.

In
more
than
95
percent
of
the
cases,
the
enforcement
of
NSPS
has
been
delegated
to
State
air
pollution
control
agencies.
In
such
cases,
the
actual
emission
data
reports
required
by
the
NSPS
will
be
submitted
to
the
appropriate
State
agency,
and
not
directly
to
EPA.
Thus,
there
is
minimal
possibility
for
the
submittal
of
duplicate
information
to
State
agencies
and
EPA.
In
the
few
cases
where
State
agencies
have
not
requested
delegation
of
NSPS
enforcement,
yet
still
require
information
from
the
facility,
the
facility
owner
or
operator
may
submit
a
copy
of
the
State
or
local
reports
to
EPA
in
lieu
of
the
report
required
by
the
NSPS,
as
specified
in
the
General
Provisions
4
of
40
CFR
part
60.

3(
b)
Public
notice
prior
to
ICR
submission
to
OMB.

A
public
notice
of
this
collection
will
be
provided
in
the
notice
of
proposed
rulemaking
for
the
NSPS.

3(
c)
Consultations.

While
collecting
technical
information
pertaining
to
the
OSWI
category,
EPA
contacted
incinerator
manufacturers
and
associations
as
well
as
State
and
Federal
agencies.
In
addition
to
these
contacts,
EPA
chartered
an
Industrial
Combustion
Coordinated
Rulemaking
advisory
committee
in
1996,
under
the
Federal
Advisory
Committee
Act.
The
committee's
objective
was
to
develop
recommendations
for
regulations
for
several
combustion
source
categories
under
sections
112
and
129
of
the
CAA.
The
EPA
considered
information
received
from
all
of
these
sources
in
the
development
of
the
proposed
NSPS.

The
public
will
also
have
the
opportunity
to
review
and
comment
on
the
proposed
NSPS
and
the
ICR
during
the
specified
comment
period.

3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Data
Collection.

The
NSPS
require
initial
and
annual
performance
tests
for
nine
pollutants
and
opacity,
continuous
emission
monitoring
for
carbon
monoxide
(
CO),
continuous
operating
parameter
monitoring,
annual
operator
training,
and
annual
reporting
(
semiannual
deviation
reports
are
required
if
any
of
the
emission
limits
or
operating
limits
are
exceeded).

The
frequency
of
these
activities
was
chosen
by
EPA
as
the
period
that
will
provide
an
adequate
margin
of
assurance
that
affected
facilities
will
not
operate
for
extended
periods
in
violation
of
the
NSPS.

The
annual
performance
testing
will
ensure,
on
an
ongoing
basis,
that
the
air
pollution
control
device
is
operating
properly
and
its
performance
has
not
deteriorated.

The
NSPS
allows
the
owner
or
operator
to
skip
two
annual
5
tests
for
a
pollutant
if
all
performance
tests
over
the
previous
three
years
show
compliance
with
the
emission
limit.

During
the
initial
performance
test
for
particulate
matter
(
PM),
dioxins/
furans,
opacity,
hydrochloric
acid
(
HCl),
cadmium
(
Cd),
lead
(
Pb),
mercury
(
Hg),
CO,
nitrogen
oxides
(
NOx)
and
sulfur
dioxide
(
SO2),
the
owner
or
operator
must
establish
maximum
or
minimum
values
for
each
operating
parameter.
Thereafter,
the
owner
or
operator
must
conduct
annual
performance
tests
for
the
nine
previously
listed
pollutants
and
opacity,
and
continuously
monitor
CO
emissions
and
the
operating
parameters.

Although
continuous
monitoring
of
operating
parameters
cannot
provide
a
direct
measurement
of
emissions,
it
is
less
expensive
than
continuous
emission
monitoring
systems
(
CEMS),
and
the
information
provided
can
be
used
to
ensure
that
the
incinerator
and
associated
air
pollution
control
equipment
are
operating
properly.
This
information
assures
EPA
and
the
public
that
the
reductions
envisioned
by
the
regulations
are
being
achieved.
Less
frequent
monitoring
would
not
ensure
continuous
compliance.

The
proposed
NSPS
include
initial
and
annual
operator
training
requirements
for
OSWI
unit
operators.
(
The
NSPS
requires
at
least
one
qualified
operator
or
supervisor
per
facility.)
The
annual
training
requirements
include
annual
refresher
training
to
maintain
operator
qualification
and
an
annual
review
of
site­
specific
documentation.
The
way
in
which
an
incinerator
is
operated
has
a
significant
impact
on
the
emissions
from
that
incinerator.
The
annual
operator
training
is
essential
to
ensure
that
the
incinerator
is
being
operated
properly.
The
NSPS
contains
flexibility
in
the
operator
training
by
allowing
the
use
of
State­
approved
training
and
qualification
programs.

Annual
reporting
allows
the
submittal
of
required
6
information
and
data
parameters
so
that
any
potential
problems
can
be
identified
in
a
timely
fashion.
A
semiannual
deviation
report
is
required
for
deviations
from
the
operating
limits
and
the
emission
limits
so
that
EPA
can
ensure
that
rapid
corrective
action
is
being
taken.

3(
e)
General
Guidelines.

With
the
exception
of
requiring
records
to
be
maintained
for
more
than
3
years,
none
of
the
guidelines
in
5
CFR
1320.5
are
being
exceeded.
The
NSPS
requires
all
records
to
be
maintained
by
the
source
for
a
period
of
5
years.
In
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
A,
"
General
Provisions
for
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
Source
Categories,"
owners
or
operators
of
facilities
are
required
to
keep
and
maintain
records
for
a
period
of
5
years.
Records
must
be
kept
on
file
for
use,
if
needed,
by
the
regulating
authority
to
ensure
that
the
plant
personnel
are
operating
and
maintaining
control
equipment
properly.
Under
section
129
of
the
CAA,
OSWI
facilities
are
subject
to
regulation
under
similar
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT)­
based
regulations,
therefore,
this
5­
year
record
retention
requirement
was
adopted
for
OSWI
facilities.
Furthermore,
CAA
section
129
requires
all
OSWI
units
to
obtain
title
V
operating
permits
under
40
CFR
part
70
or
71
permit
programs.
The
title
V
permit
programs
also
require
records
to
be
retained
for
5
years.
To
minimize
the
burden,
the
NSPS
allows
files
to
be
kept
in
paper
or
electronic
format.
Files
must
be
kept
on
site
for
2
years
but
may
be
kept
off
site
for
the
remaining
3
years.

3(
f)
Confidentiality
and
Sensitive
Questions.

(
i)
Confidentiality.
All
information
submitted
to
EPA
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
EPA
policies
set
forth
in
title
40,

chapter
1,
part
2,
subpart
B,
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information
(
see
40
CFR
2;
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976,
7
amended
by
43
FR
39999,
September
28,
1978;
43
FR
42251,

September
28,
1978;
44
FR
17674,
March
23,
1979).

(
ii)
Sensitive
Questions.
The
ICR
for
the
NSPS
does
not
involve
matters
of
a
sensitive
nature.

4.
THE
RESPONDENTS
AND
THE
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
4(
a)
Respondents/
NAICS
Codes.

As
stated
previously
in
section
1(
b)
of
this
supporting
statement,
EPA
does
not
expect
any
new
OSWI
units
to
be
constructed
or
operated
in
the
future;
however,
respondents
(
if
any)
would
be
owners
or
operators
of
OSWI
units
for
which
construction
commences
after
the
date
of
proposal
publication
in
the
Federal
Register
or
for
which
reconstruction
or
modification
commences
6
months
(
or
later)

after
promulgation
of
the
final
NSPS.
OSWI
units
include
VSMWC
units
that
combust
less
than
35
tons
per
day
of
waste
collected
from
multiple
residences,
businesses,
etc.
In
the
unlikely
event
there
are
any
new
VSMWC,
they
would
be
operated
by
municipalities
(
NAICS
562213,
92411).
OSWI
units
also
include
IWI
units,
as
defined
in
the
regulation,

that
are
located
at
an
institutional
facility
and
combust
waste
generated
at
that
facility.
In
the
unlikely
event
there
are
any
new
IWI
units,
they
could
be
located
at
institutions
such
as
schools,
universities,
prisons,

military
bases,
government
facilities,
churches
and
other
institutions
with
NAICS
623,
922,
928,
6111,
6112,
6113,

7121,
8131,
or
8134.

4(
b)
Information
Requested.

(
i)
Data
items.
The
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
of
the
proposed
NSPS
are
described
in
section
4(
b)(
iii)
and
include
the
following:

°
pre­
construction
notification;

°
siting
analysis;
8
°
waste
management
plan;

°
records
of
operator
training
and
qualification;

°
performance
test
reports;

°
records
of
CO
and
operating
parameter
monitoring;

°
annual
compliance
reports;
and
°
semiannual
deviation
reports.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities.
No
respondent
activities
are
estimated
since
no
growth
of
the
source
category
is
expected.

(
iii)
Summary
of
Requirements.
The
information
collection
activities
in
this
ICR
include
the
following:

performance
tests,
CO
emissions
monitoring,
operating
parameter
monitoring,
preparation
of
a
siting
analysis,

preparation
of
a
waste
management
plan,
operator
training,

one­
time
and
periodic
reports,
and
the
maintenance
of
records.

Testing
and
Monitoring:
The
NSPS
requires
an
initial
performance
test
for
PM,
dioxins/
furans,
opacity,
HCl,
Cd,

Pb,
Hg,
CO,
NOx
and
SO2.
During
the
initial
performance
test,
the
owner
or
operator
must
establish
limits
for
each
operating
parameter.
Thereafter,
the
owner
or
operator
must
conduct
annual
performance
tests
for
the
nine
pollutants
and
opacity,
and
must
continuously
monitor
CO
and
the
operating
parameters.
The
NSPS
allows
the
owner
or
operator
to
skip
two
annual
performance
tests
for
a
pollutant
if
all
performance
tests
over
the
three
previous
years
show
compliance
with
the
emission
limit.

Operating
Training:
To
ensure
the
proper
operation
of
the
incinerator,
the
NSPS
requires
that
each
facility
establish
and
maintain
at
least
one
qualified
OSWI
unit
operator
or
supervisor.
The
operator
qualification
process
includes
training,
an
exam,
and
review
of
site­
specific
materials.
The
operator
qualification
requirements
allow
9
the
flexibility
to
use
State­
approved
training
and
qualification
programs.
To
maintain
qualification
the
operators
or
supervisors
must
attend
an
annual
refresher
course
and
review
site­
specific
materials
annually.

Reporting:
Prior
to
commencing
construction,
the
owner
or
operator
must
submit
a
report
that
includes
a
statement
of
intent
to
construct,
the
anticipated
date
of
commencement
of
construction,
the
siting
analysis,
the
waste
management
plan,
and
the
anticipated
date
of
initial
start­
up.
The
siting
analysis
considers
air
pollution
control
alternatives
that
minimize,
on
a
site­
specific
basis,
potential
risks
to
public
health
or
the
environment.
The
waste
management
plan
identifies
both
the
feasibility
and
the
approach
to
separate
certain
components
of
solid
waste
from
the
waste
stream
to
reduce
the
amount
of
toxic
emissions
from
incinerated
waste.

Prior
to
initial
startup,
the
owner
or
operator
must
submit
a
report
that
documents
the
types
of
wastes
burned,

the
maximum
design
waste
burning
capacity,
the
anticipated
maximum
charge
rate,
and
any
petitions
for
site­
specific
operating
parameters.

Following
the
initial
performance
test,
the
owner
or
operator
must
submit
a
report
that
documents
the
results
of
the
performance
test
for
the
nine
pollutants
and
opacity
and
the
values
for
the
facility's
operating
limits.

An
annual
compliance
report
is
required
that
documents
the
values
for
the
operating
limits,
performance
test
results
and
any
deviations
from
the
emission
limits,

operating
limits
or
other
requirements.

If
there
is
a
deviation
from
the
operating
limits
or
emission
limits,
the
owner
or
operator
must
submit
a
deviation
report
that
provides
details
on
the
deviation.

These
reports
are
submitted
semiannually
if
a
deviation
occurs
during
the
6­
month
period.

Recordkeeping:
As
specified
in
the
NSPS,
owners
or
10
operators
of
OSWI
units
are
required
to
keep
records
of
certain
parameters
and
information
for
a
period
of
5
years.

Owners
or
operators
are
required
to
maintain
records
of
the
initial
performance
test,
annual
performance
tests,
and
any
subsequent
performance
tests.
Owners
or
operators
must
also
maintain
records
of
the
monitoring
data
for
CO
and
the
operating
parameters,
and
records
of
monitoring
device
calibration.

Records
must
be
maintained
for
any
incinerator
malfunctions,
any
deviations
from
the
operating
limits,
and
days
for
which
CO
or
operating
parameter
monitoring
data
were
not
obtained.

Owners
or
operators
must
maintain
the
names
of
persons
who
have
completed
the
review
of
site­
specific
information
and
who
have
met
the
operator
qualification
requirements.

Records
must
also
be
maintained
of
all
documentation
for
the
siting
analysis
and
the
waste
management
plan.

5.
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTED
­­
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES,

COLLECTION,
METHODOLOGY,
AND
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
5(
a)
Agency
Activities.

No
agency
activities
are
expected
because
no
respondents
are
likely.
As
previously
explained
in
section
1(
b),
no
new
OSWI
units
are
expected
to
be
constructed
during
the
three
years
after
promulgation
of
the
NSPS.

5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management.

This
collection
of
information
does
not
require
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques
because
no
respondents
are
expected.
11
5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility.

Because
no
OSWI
units
are
expected
to
be
affected
by
the
NSPS,
no
small
businesses
or
small
entities
will
be
affected.
Therefore,
the
NSPS
will
not
have
a
significant
impact
on
small
entities.

The
NSPS
does
not
contain
any
provisions
reserved
exclusively
for
the
benefit
of
small
entities.
However,
the
NSPS
does
contain
provisions
that
reduce
the
impact
on
all
regulated
entities,
which
would
include
any
small
entities
(
in
the
unlikely
event
that
any
new
OSWI
units
are
built).

The
owner
or
operator
is
allowed
to
skip
two
annual
performance
tests
for
a
pollutant
if
all
performance
tests
over
the
previous
three
years
show
compliance.
Deviation
reports
are
required
only
if
there
is
a
deviation,
otherwise
reporting
is
annual.

5(
d)
Collection
Schedule.

Although
no
respondents
are
expected,
typical
information
collected
includes
the
following
one­
time­
only
activities:
reading
the
NSPS,
initial
performance
tests
(
PM,

dioxins/
furans,
opacity,
HCl,
Cd,
Pb,
Hg,
CO,
NOx,
and
SO2),

initial
operator
training
and
qualification,
notification
of
intent
to
construct
(
includes
a
study
addressing
siting
requirements),
waste
management
plan,
report
prior
to
initial
start­
up,
and
report
following
initial
performance
test
(
includes
operating
parameter
values).
The
data
will
be
entered
into
the
Aerometric
Information
Retrieval
System
(
AIRS),
operated
and
maintained
by
EPA's
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards.

Annual
performance
tests
are
required
for
the
nine
pollutants
and
opacity.
Continuous
parameter
monitoring
and
continuous
emission
monitoring
of
CO
is
required.
An
annual
operator
training
refresher
course
and
site­
specific
information
review
is
required.

An
annual
report
is
required
that
includes
compliance
12
data
on
the
operating
limits,
performance
test
results,

identification
of
deviations
from
emission
limits,
operating
limits
or
other
requirements.

Additionally,
if
the
operating
limits
or
emission
limits
are
exceeded,
the
owner
or
operator
must
submit
a
deviation
report
that
provides
details
on
the
deviation.

Information
obtained
from
annual
compliance
reports
will
be
published
and
distributed
through
the
EPA
compliance
data
system
(
CDS).
Data
obtained
during
periodic
visits
by
EPA
personnel
from
records
maintained
by
the
respondents
will
be
tabulated
and
published
for
internal
EPA
use
in
compliance
and
enforcement
programs.

6.
ESTIMATING
THE
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
THE
COLLECTION
No
new
growth
is
anticipated
for
the
OSWI
source
category.
It
is
assumed
that
potential
respondents
would
use
alternative
waste
disposal
options
rather
than
replacing
existing
OSWI
units.
The
population
of
OSWI
units
has
been
declining
for
several
years.
No
new
OSWI
units
are
being
constructed,
even
in
the
absence
of
regulations,
because
other
waste
disposal
alternatives,
such
as
landfilling,
are
more
economical.
The
cost
of
complying
with
the
proposed
NSPS
makes
it
even
more
likely
that
sources
will
select
an
alternative
method
of
waste
disposal
and
no
new
OSWI
units
will
be
constructed.
As
a
result,
no
respondent
or
agency
burdens
or
costs
have
been
estimated.
We
expect
that
there
will
be
no
annual
burden.

To
comment
on
the
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques,
EPA
has
established
a
public
docket
for
this
ICR
under
Docket
ID
No.
OAR­
2003­

0156,
which
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
Air
and
Radiation
Docket
and
Information
Center
in
the
EPA
Docket
13
Center
(
EPA/
DC),
EPA
West
Building,
Room
B102,
1301
Constitution
Ave.,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20460.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566­
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
Air
Docket
is
(
202)
566­
1742.

An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA
Dockets
(
EDOCKET)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.

Use
EDOCKET
to
submit
or
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
Once
in
the
system,
select
"
search,"
then
key
in
the
docket
ID
number
identified
above.

Also,
you
can
send
comments
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20503,
Attention:
Desk
Officer
for
EPA.
Please
include
the
EPA
Docket
ID
No.
(
OAR­

2003­
0156)
in
any
correspondence.
PART
B
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
statistical
methods
are
not
used
in
data
collection
associated
with
this
regulation.
