1
PART
A
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
1.
IDENTIFICATION
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
1(
a)
TITLE
AND
NUMBER
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
REQUEST
(
ICR)

Control
technology
determinations
for
constructed
and
reconstructed
major
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants,
ICR
1658.03.

2(
b)
SHORT
CHARACTERIZATION
Section
112(
g)(
2)(
B)
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
as
amended
in
1990
requires
that
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT)
standards
be
met
by
constructed
or
reconstructed
major
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants.
Where
no
applicable
emission
limit
has
been
set,
the
MACT
determination
shall
be
made
on
a
case­
by­
case
basis.

This
ICR
supports
the
regulations
under
development
(
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
B)
to
implement
section
112(
g).
It
addresses
the
information
collection
burden
(
hours
and
costs)
to
three
parties:
(
1)
industry
respondents
subject
to
these
provisions,
(
2)
state
and
local
agencies
that
review
applications
made
under
these
provisions,
and
(
3)
the
EPA
for
oversight
review
of
a
percentage
of
state/
local
decisions.
The
information
collection
activities
for
which
burden
estimates
are
calculated
are
summarized
below.

Owners
or
operators
of
major
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
who
modify
a
source
after
the
effective
date
of
an
approved
Title
V
permit
program
must
control
that
sources
to
the
level
of
the
appropriate
MACT
standard.
Where
no
MACT
standard
exists,
a
case­
by­
case
determination
of
MACT
("
case
by
case
MACT")
will
be
made.
The
owner
or
operator
is
responsible
for
such
a
case­
by­
case
MACT
determination.
This
ICR
contains
supporting
information
for
case­
by­
case
MACT
determinations.

State
and
local
agencies
with
operating
permit
programs
that
have
been
approved
by
EPA
will
be
reviewing
applications
submitted
by
sources
under
section
112(
g)
provisions,
once
they
are
promulgated.
These
permitting
agencies
must
determine
the
level
of
control
that
will
be
necessary
to
meet
case­
by­
case
MACT
requirements
for
new
sources.
Finally,
EPA
will
review
a
percentage
of
the
determinations
in
order
to
provide
oversight
of
the
various
state
and
local
permitting
authorities.
2
2.
NEED
FOR
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTION
2(
a)
NEED/
AUTHORITY
FOR
THE
COLLECTION
The
need
and
authority
for
this
information
collection
is
contained
in
section
112(
g)
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
as
amended
in
1990
[
42
U.
S.
C.
7401
(
et
seq.)
as
amended
by
Pub.
L.
101­
549].

2(
b)
PRACTICAL
UTILITY/
USERS
OF
THE
DATA
The
information
collected
in
the
section
112(
g)
applications
provides
(
for
the
purposes
of
compliance
determination)
documentation
of
the
selection
of
a
particular
control
technology
for
case­
by­
case
MACT.
Applications
are
reviewed
by
a
state
or
local
agency
for
which
authority
has
been
delegated
by
EPA
to
make
the
requisite
determinations.
In
addition,
EPA
will
review
some
applications
as
an
oversight
function.

3.
THE
RESPONDENTS
AND
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
3(
a)
RESPONDENTS/
SIC
CODES
Respondents
include
owners/
operators
of
major
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants.
A
major
source
is
defined
as
one
that
emits
more
than
10
tons
per
year
of
any
hazardous
air
pollutant,
25
tons
per
year
for
a
combination
of
all
hazardous
air
pollutants,
or
amounts
exceeding
any
lesser
quantity
cutoff
established
under
40
CFR
Part
63.
The
requirements
of
section
112(
g)
do
not
apply
to
electric
utility
steam
generating
units.
This
definition
of
major
source
cuts
across
a
wide
variety
of
industries,
including
both
manufacturing
and
non­
manufacturing
sources.

3(
b)
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
(
i)
Data
Items,
Including
Recordkeeping
Requirements
All
items
addressed
in
this
ICR
involve
information
submitted
with
the
application.
There
are
no
recordkeeping
requirements
per
se,
although
some
of
the
information
necessary
to
document
control
options
would
require
the
source
to
have
kept
records
of
certain
information.
The
data
items
for
the
112(
g)
rule
consist
of
the
following:

Actual
Emissions.
Sources
complying
with
the
requirements
of
section
112(
g)
under
the
case­
bycase
MACT
provisions
(
i.
e.,
constructed
and
reconstructed
major
sources)
generally
do
not
have
to
provide
detailed
analytic
determinations
of
individual
hazardous
air
pollutants
if
the
owner/
operator
agrees
that
the
emissions
increase
in
question
constitutes
a
greater
than
major
increase
which
will
subject
the
construction
or
reconstruction
to
the
section
112(
g)
requirements.
Rather,
the
source
needs
only
to
identify
and
quantify
classes
and
types
of
pollutants
to
a
sufficient
degree
to
support
the
MACT
evaluation.
3
Case­
by­
Case
MACT
Determination.
The
source
owner
or
operator
must
submit
the
following
information
when
it
performs
a
case­
by­
case
MACT
determination
[
40
CFR
63.43(
e)]:

1.
The
name
and
address
(
physical
location)
of
the
major
source
and
affected
source(
s)
undergoing
construction
or
reconstruction;

2.
A
brief
description
of
the
major
source,
its
source
category
or
subcategory,
and
a
description
of
the
affected
stationary
source(
s)
requiring
a
MACT
determination;

3.
The
expected
commencement
date
of
the
construction
or
reconstruction
of
the
affected
source;

4.
The
expected
completion
date
of
the
construction
or
reconstruction
of
the
affected
sources;

5.
The
anticipated
date
of
start­
up;

6.
The
type
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
emitted
by
each
emission
unit
and
the
emission
rate
for
each
hazardous
air
pollutants;

7.
Any
federally­
enforceable
emission
limitations
applicable
to
the
MACT­
affected
emissions
units;

8.
The
maximum
capacity
and
expected
utilization,
and
associated
uncontrolled
emission
rates,
for
the
MACT­
affected
emissions
units
(
potential
to
emit
in
an
uncontrolled
state);

9.
Controlled
emissions
for
the
MACT­
affected
emission
unit
in
tons
per
year
(
potential
to
emit
in
a
controlled
state);

10.
A
recommended
emission
limitation
for
the
MACT­
affected
emission
unit
that
complies
with
all
relevant
emission
standards;

11.
The
selected
MACT
candidate
to
meet
the
emission
limitation
including
technical
information
on
the
design,
operation,
size,
estimated
control
efficiency,
etc.;

12.
Supporting
documentation
including
identification
of
alternative
control
technologies
considered
to
meet
the
emission
limitation,
an
analysis
of
non­
air
quality
health
environmental
impacts
or
energy
requirements
for
the
selected
MACT
candidate;
4
13.
An
installation
schedule
for
installing
the
selected
MACT
candidate
including:

(
a)
The
anticipated
date
that
contracts
for
emission
control
systems
or
process
changes
for
emission
control
will
be
awarded,

(
b)
The
anticipated
date
that
orders
will
be
issued
for
the
purpose
of
component
parts
to
accomplish
emission
control
or
process
changes,

(
c)
The
anticipated
date
by
which
on­
site
construction
and
installation
of
process
changes
are
to
be
initiated,
and
(
d)
The
anticipated
date
final
compliance
is
to
be
achieved.

14.
Any
other
information
which
may
be
required
pursuant
to
subpart
A
of
40
CFR
Part
63.

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
Activities
that
the
owner
or
operator
must
perform
are
listed
in
this
section.

Case­
by­
case
MACT
S
read
applicable
regulations
to
determine
compliance
requirements
S
assemble
necessary
source
information,
including
source
identification
and
descriptive
information,
construction
schedules,
sufficient
data
on
classes
and
types
of
pollutants
to
support
the
MACT
evaluations,
and
potential
to
emit
(
controlled
and
uncontrolled)

S
identify
and
describe
MACT
candidate,
any
required
MACT
limits,
expected
emissions
limitation,
and
MACT
installation
schedule
S
prepare
and
submit
application
S
revise
application
per
comments
received
from
the
permitting
authority,
ensuring
compliance
with
case­
by­
case
MACT
decision
5
4.
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTED
­
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES,
COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY,
AND
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
4(
a)
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES
Activities
of
state
and
local
agencies
(
as
the
permitting
authority)
and
EPA
(
in
an
oversight
capacity)
are
addressed
in
this
section.
The
permitting
authority,
typically
the
state
or
local
air
agency,
will
perform
the
following
activities:

­
answer
respondent
questions
­
log
in
and
review
applications
­
request
additional
information
for
incomplete
applications
­
when
no
MACT
standard
has
been
promulgated,
verify
that
the
source
will
achieve
the
level
of
control
necessary
to
meet
case­
by­
case
MACT
requirements
for
constructed
or
reconstructed
sources
­
inform
source
of
permitting
authority's
decision
regarding
the
application
In
carrying
out
its
oversight
role,
EPA
will
review
the
decision
of
the
permitting
authority.

4(
b)
COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY
AND
MANAGEMENT
It
will
be
the
responsibility
of
the
owners
or
operators
of
the
constructed
or
reconstructed
major
sources
affected
by
these
regulations
of
submit
an
application
to
the
permitting
authority.
Applications
will
be
prepared
and
submitted
according
to
guidance
issued
in
conjunction
with
the
section
112(
g)
rules.
No
forms
are
contained
in
the
regulations
for
112(
g)
applications.

The
permitting
authority
will
determine
how
to
log
in
and
track
applications.
MACT
determinations
are
performed
on
a
case­
by­
case
basis.
It
will
also
be
the
responsibility
of
the
permitting
authority
to
provide
EPA
with
the
information
necessary
for
oversight
review.

For
each
application,
the
applicant
will
be
required
to
supply
information
on
how
the
data
were
obtained
(
e.
g.,
indicate
whether
the
emissions
data
were
obtained
through
the
use
of
emission
factors
or
test
data)
and
how
calculations
were
performed.
Qualified
staff
at
the
permitting
authority
will
check
the
quality
of
data
submitted
by
the
applicant
on
a
case­
by­
case
basis.
This
will
be
done
by
reviewing
control
technology
determinations
for
similar
sources,
by
reviewing
test
data,
and
by
checking
engineering
calculations.
Confidential
information
submitted
by
the
applicant
will
be
handled
by
the
permitting
authority
in
conformance
with
confidential
information
handling
procedures.
No
specific
provisions
have
been
made
for
electronic
methods
of
submittal.
6
The
section
112(
g)
regulations
will
not
require
the
request
of
information
through
any
type
of
survey.

4(
c)
SMALL
ENTITY
FLEXIBILITY
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
the
requirements
of
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
B
will
not
affect
a
significant
number
of
small
businesses.

4(
d)
COLLECTION
SCHEDULE
The
section
112(
g)
regulations
were
proposed
on
April
1,
1994.
Each
source
affected
by
the
section
112(
g)
regulations
will
be
required
to
submit
an
application.
Preparation
of
application
in
compliance
with
the
section
112(
g)
rules
is
a
one­
time­
only
activity
(
i.
e.,
once
for
each
construction
or
reconstruction
subject
to
the
112(
g)
provisions).
The
section
112(
g)
regulations
will
not
require
periodic
reporting
or
surveys.

5.
NONDUPLICATION,
CONSULTATIONS,
AND
OTHER
COLLECTION
CRITERIA
5(
a)
NONDUPLICATION
The
information
required
to
be
collected
under
the
section
112(
g)
regulations
is
not
routinely
collected
elsewhere
by
EPA.
A
small
number
of
the
information
items
(
e.
g.,
a
site
plan)
may
have
been
previously
collected
from
source
owners
or
operators
by
the
permitting
authority
in
support
of
other
applications.
However,
most
items
of
information
are
tailored
specifically
for
the
individual
case­
by­
case
MACT
determinations,
meaning
that
previously
submitted
information
is
likely
to
be
inadequate
for
112(
g)
purposes.

5(
b)
CONSULTATIONS
A
public
review
and
comment
period
will
occur
after
proposal
of
the
section
112(
g)
regulations
in
the
Federal
Register.
Only
a
small
number
of
commenters
have
raised
concerns
related
to
the
112(
g)
ICR.
These
commenters
believe
that
the
estimates
of
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
are
too
low.
Others
suggested
that
the
number
of
proposed
sources
subject
to
section
112(
g)
are
too
low.

5(
b)
(
i)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
An
announcement
of
a
public
comment
period
for
the
renewal
of
this
ICR
was
published
in
the
Federal
Register
on
December
15,
2000.
(
65
FR
78483);
no
comments
were
received.

5(
c)
EFFECTS
OF
LESS
FREQUENT
COLLECTION
7
This
section
does
not
apply
because
the
information
required
to
be
submitted
by
each
applicant
would
be
submitted
on
a
one­
time­
only
basis.

5(
d)
GENERAL
GUIDELINES
The
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
contained
in
the
section
112(
g)
regulations
do
not
violate
any
of
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
guidelines
contained
in
5
CFR
1320.6.

5(
e)
CONFIDENTIALITY
AND
SENSITIVE
QUESTIONS
(
i)
Confidentiality
Any
information
submitted
to
a
permitting
authority
with
a
claim
of
confidentiality
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
agency's
policies
set
forth
prior
to
approval
of
the
agency's
operating
permit
program
by
EPA.
Any
confidential
information
submitted
to
EPA
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
policies
in
40
CFR,
Chapter
1,
Part
2,
Subpart
B
 
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information.

(
ii)
Sensitive
Questions
This
section
is
not
applicable.
The
section
112(
g)
regulations
does
not
contain
any
sensitive
questions
relating
to
sexual
behavior
or
attitudes,
religious
beliefs,
or
other
matters
usually
considered
private.

6.
ESTIMATING
THE
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
THE
COLLECTION
6(
a­
b)
ESTIMATING
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COSTS
Respondents
include
owners/
operators
of
major
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
that
undertake
construction
or
reconstruction.
The
respondent
burden
(
i.
e.,
labor
hours
and
costs)
associated
with
the
section
112(
g)
rules
over
a
7­
year
period
is
shown
in
Table
1.
The
attachment
to
this
ICR
explains
how
the
number
of
sources
and
the
burden
estimates
presented
in
Table
1
were
derived.
The
labor
rate
of
$
45
per
hour
(
including
overhead)
was
based
on
the
rate
used
in
similar
ICRs
recently
completed
for
other
Clean
Air
Act
regulatory
packages.

6(
c­
d)
ESTIMATING
AGENCY
BURDEN
AND
COST
Table
1
also
shows
the
burden
estimates
for
state
and
local
agencies
and
EPA
to
implement
the
section
112(
g)
rules.
The
attachment
to
this
ICR
explains
how
the
burden
estimates
for
state
and
local
agencies
and
the
EPA
presented
in
Table
1
were
derived.
Federal,
state,
and
local
wage
rates
were
assumed
to
be
a
the
Federal
Grade
11/
Step
3
level
for
th
1991
8
pay
scale.
Total
costs
include
direct
personnel
costs
plus
overhead
costs,
for
a
total
cost
of
$
34
per
hour.
This
was
based
on
the
rate
used
in
similar
ICR's
recently
completed
for
other
Clean
Air
Act
regulatory
packages.
9
TABLE
1.
SUMMARY
OF
RECORDKEEPING
AND
REPORTING
BURDEN
ESTIMATES
TO
INDUSTRY
RESPONDENTS,
STATE
AND
LOCAL
AGENCIES,
AND
EPA
Year
Respondent
Hours
Respondent
Costs
($
1000)
State/

Local
Agency
Hours
State/

Local
Agency
Costs
($
1000)
EPA
Hours
EPA
Costs
($
1000)
Total
Administ.

Cost
($
1000)

1997
105,477
4,746
56,254
1,913
2,110
72
6,731
1998
106,532
4,794
56,817
1,932
2,131
72
6,798
1999
107,597
4,842
57,385
1,951
2,152
73
6,866
2000
81,505
3,668
43,469
1,478
1,630
55
5,201
2001
82,320
3,704
43,904
1,493
1,646
56
5,253
2002
83,143
3,741
44,343
1,508
1,663
57
5,306
2003
14,947
673
7,972
271
299
10
954
1
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.

10
Table
1
also
shows
the
total
administrative
costs
over
a
7­
year
period
for
the
section
112(
g)
regulations.
Details
to
support
these
calculations
are
presented
in
the
attachment.
As
shown
in
Table
1,
the
bottom
line
burden
varies
from
year
to
year.
This
variation
results
from
two
main
factors:
(
1)
there
are
periodic
dates
when
MACT
standards
will
be
promulgated,
reducing
the
number
of
sources
which
must
do
case­
by­
case
MACT
under
112(
g),
and
(
2)
annual
growth
in
sources
subject
to
section
112(
g)
rules
is
expected
to
be
steady
at
1
percent.
The
result
of
these
variations
is
that
the
annual
burden
varies
depending
upon
the
time
period
being
considered.

6(
e)
REASONS
FOR
CHANGE
IN
BURDEN
The
drop
of
71,142
burden
hours
was
due
to
the
shrinking
universe
of
sources
to
which
112(
g)
applies.
Section
112(
g)
requirements
only
applies
to
major
sources
of
air
toxics
in
source
categories
not
yet
regulated
by
a
MACT
standard
under
section
112(
d).
As
more
and
more
section
112(
d)
MACT
standards
have
been
promulgated,
the
number
of
source
categories
containing
sources
potentially
subject
to
section
112(
g)
has
shrunk.

6(
f)
BURDEN
STATEMENT
Industry
reporting
burden
for
this
information
collection
is
estimated
to
average
153
hours
per
response,
including
time
for
reviewing
instructions,
searching
existing
data
sources,
gathering
data
needed,
and
completing
the
application.
(
Application
details
are
found
in
the
attachment
to
this
statement.)
1
Send
comments
regarding
this
burden
estimate
or
any
other
aspects
of
this
collection
of
information,
including
suggestions
for
reducing
the
burden
to:
Sandy
Farmer,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Collection
Strategies
Division
(
Mail
Code
2822),
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
N.
W.,
Washington,
DC
20460;
and
to
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB),
Attention:
Desk
Officer
for
EPA,
725
17th
Street,
N.
W.,
Washington,
DC
20503.
Include
the
EPA
ICR
number
1658.03
and
OMB
control
number
2060­
0373
in
any
correspondence.
11
PART
B
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
statistical
methods
are
not
used
in
the
data
collection
associated
with
the
section
112(
g)
regulations.
12
ATTACHMENT
Documentation
of
the
Methods
Used
to
Estimate
the
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
Burden
Associated
with
the
Section
112(
g)
Rules
1.0
Estimation
of
the
Number
of
Sources
Subject
to
Section
112(
g)
Regulations
In
order
to
estimate
the
number
of
sources
subject
to
section
112(
g)
regulations,
EPA
conducted
a
review
of
available
information.
EPA
has
developed
an
estimate
of
approximately
6,000
sources
that
are
subject
to
section
112(
g)
regulations.

One
factor
is
most
significant
in
its
effect
on
the
annual
number
of
sources
subject
to
section
112(
g)
regulations.
As
the
MACT
implementation
schedule
proceeds,
the
universe
of
sources
subject
to
section
112(
g)
regulations
shrinks
markedly
through
the
year
2003,
when
all
sources
subject
to
MACT
standards
are
scheduled
to
be
in
compliance.
An
additional
major
factor
affecting
source
numbers
is
that
some
state
agencies
currently
have
programs
in
place
for
control
of
hazardous
air
pollutants.
These
programs
would
continue
to
result
in
emissions
reductions
regardless
of
section
112(
g)
requirements.
Thus,
all
estimated
emissions
reductions
cannot
be
attributable
to
section
112(
g).
Based
on
reviews
of
state
programs
and
the
percent
of
TRI
emissions
for
each
state,
it
was
estimated
that
50
percent
of
the
emission
reduction
would
have
been
achieved
by
states
in
the
absence
of
section
112(
g),
and,
thus,
only
50
percent
of
the
universe
of
potentially
affected
sources
will
fall
under
section
112(
g)
requirements.

In
addition
to
the
above
factors,
assumptions
were
made
that
further
affect
the
estimate
of
the
number
of
sources.
First,
a
growth
rate
in
the
number
of
sources
of
one
percent
per
year
was
assumed.
Second,
the
average
number
of
new
additions
per
plant
per
year
that
would
be
covered
by
112(
g)
was
assumed
to
be
0.2.
Thus,
the
number
of
physical
changes
per
year
subject
to
112(
g),
used
to
estimate
both
the
number
of
respondents
and
the
annual
number
of
responses,
begins
at
391
in
1997,
and
ends
at
55
in
2003,
but
varies
from
year
to
year.
Using
these
assumptions,
impacts
were
calculated
over
the
7­
year
period
from
1997­
2003.
As
stated
previously,
all
sources
subject
to
MACT
standards
are
scheduled
to
be
in
compliance
by
the
year
2003,
so
the
number
of
sources
subject
to
section
112(
g)
after
that
year
is
predicted
to
be
small.

2.0
Estimation
of
the
Number
of
State
and
Local
Air
Agencies
Title
V
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
requires
each
state
to
establish
an
operating
permit
program.
The
burden
of
the
112(
g)
rule
on
these
agencies
varies
widely,
depending
upon
the
number
of
respondents
submitting
applications
to
a
given
agency.
13
3.0
Estimation
of
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
Burden
to
Industry
Respondents,
State
and
Local
Agencies,
and
EPA
Tables
A­
1
and
A­
3
summarize
the
activities
and
the
estimated
hours
for
each
activity
for
respondents,
state
and
local
agencies,
and
EPA,
respectively.
Table
A­
4
summarizes
the
yearly
respondent
burden
for
industry,
state,
and
local
agencies,
and
EPA.

Impacts
are
presented
for
the
entire
7­
year
period
to
illustrate
impacts
throughout
the
course
of
development
of
MACT
standards.
Regulatory
milestones
that
occurred
prior
to
and
will
occur
during
this
period
were
factored
into
this
burden
calculation
and
are
as
follows:

1995
­
MACT
standards
were
put
in
place
for
HON,
which
covered
approximately
50
percent
of
source
categories,
compliance
with
the
standards
is
required
no
later
than
the
year
1998
1997
­
MACT
standards
in
place
for
an
additional
25
percent
of
source
categories,
which
compliance
required
no
later
than
the
year
2000
2000
­
MACT
standard
compliance
required
for
75
percent
of
source
categories;
MACT
standards
in
place
for
final
25
of
source
categories;
with
compliance
required
no
later
than
the
year
2003
2003
­
MACT
standard
compliance
required
for
all
source
categories
2
EPA
would
review
10
percent
of
permits
involving
112(
g)
rules.

14
TABLE
A­
1.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN/
COST
ESTIMATES
Activity
Case­
by­
Case
MACT
1.
Read
rule,
make
compliance
determination
15
2.
Receive
training
7.5
3.
Plan
activities
15
4.
Gather
information
55
5.
Process,
compile,
and
review
information
for
accuracy
and
appropriateness
20
6.
Complete
application
37.5
Total
Hours
150
TABLE
A­
2.
ANNUAL
STATE
AND
LOCAL
AGENCY
BURDEN/
COST
ESTIMATES
Activity
Case­
by­
Case
MACT
1.
Answer
respondent
questions
8
2.
Log
in
and
review/
audit
applications
36
3.
Determine
early
MACT,
if
required,
and
verify
MACT
is
being
proposed
36
Total
80
TABLE
A­
3.
ANNUAL
EPA
BURDEN/
COST
ESTIMATES2
Activity
Case­
by­
Case
MACT
1.
Audit,
review
applications
15
2.
Review
decisions
of
permitting
authority
15
Total
30
15
TABLE
A­
4.
SUMMARY
OF
RECORDINGKEEPING
AND
REPORTING
BURDEN
ESTIMATES
TO
INDUSTRY
RESPONDENTS,
STATE
AND
LOCAL
AGENCIES,
AND
EPA
Year
Respondent
Hours
Respondents
Costs
($
1000)
State/

Local
Agency
Hours
State/

Local
Agency
Costs
($
1000)
EPA
Hours
EPA
Costs
($
1000)
Total
Administ.

Cost
($
1000)

1997
105,477
4,746
56,254
1,913
2,110
72
6,731
1998
106,532
4,794
56,817
1,932
2,131
72
6,798
1999
107,597
4,842
57,385
1,951
2,152
73
6,866
2000
81,505
3,668
43,469
1,478
1,630
55
5,201
2001
82,320
3,704
43,904
1,493
1,646
56
5,253
2002
83,143
3,741
44,343
1,508
1,663
57
5,306
2003
14,947
673
7,972
271
299
10
954
