1
PART
A
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
1.
IDENTIFICATION
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
1(
a)
Title
of
the
Information
Collection
The
title
of
this
Information
Collection
Request
(
ICR)
is
"
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
Ferroalloys
Production."
This
is
an
extension
of
a
currently
approved
collection.

1(
b)
Short
Characterization/
Abstract
The
NESHAP
for
ferroalloys
production
is
applicable
to
all
new
and
existing
ferromanganese
and
silicomanganese
production
facilities
that
are
major
sources
or
are
co­
located
at
major
sources.
The
owners
or
operators
of
the
affected
facilities
are
the
respondents.

All
respondents
for
the
NESHAP
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
requirements
within
two
years
of
the
effective
date
(
promulgation
date)
of
the
rule.
It
is
estimated
that
the
NESHAP
will
have
only
one
existing
major
source
subject
to
the
proposed
regulations.
Although
no
new
sources
are
anticipated
for
the
NESHAP,
in
the
event
that
a
new
source
is
erected
it
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
regulation
upon
startup
or
the
promulgation
date,
whichever
is
later.

Owners
and
operators
of
affected
sources
are
subject
to
the
requirements
of
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
A,
the
General
Provisions,
unless
specified
otherwise
in
the
regulation.
All
records
are
to
be
maintained
by
the
source
for
a
period
of
at
least
five
years.

In
addition,
sources
are
required
to
comply
with
regulation
specific
requirements
related
to
the
frequency
and
type
of
information
to
be
collected
and
maintained
to
demonstrate
initial
and
on­
going
compliance
with
the
regulation
(
See
Attachment
1
for
a
complete
list).

This
ICR
addresses
the
information
collection
burden
(
hours
and
cost)
to
industry
affected
by
the
proposed
regulations
and
the
burden
to
the
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).

2.
NEED
FOR
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTION
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
The
EPA
is
required
under
Section
112(
d)
of
the
1990
Clean
Air
Act
(
Act),
to
regulate
emissions
of
188
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAP's)
listed
in
Section
112(
b)
of
the
Act.
Hazardous
air
pollutants
identified
as
being
emitted
from
the
2
source
category
include
metal
HAP
compounds
and
organic
HAP
compounds.
An
analysis
was
performed
which
determined
that
most
facilities
found
in
the
ferroalloy
industry
do
not
appear
to
be
major
sources
of
organic
HAP
emissions.
However,
one
facility
was
determined
to
be
a
major
source
of
metal
HAP
emissions.

In
the
Administrator's
judgement,
the
pollutants
emitted
from
ferroalloys
production
facilities
cause
or
contribute
significantly
to
air
pollution
that
may
be
reasonably
anticipated
to
endanger
public
health.
Consequently,
the
NESHAP
for
ferroalloys
production
has
been
developed
and
is
being
proposed
for
promulgation.

Certain
records
and
reports
are
necessary
to
enable
the
Administrator
to
identify
sources
subject
to
the
standards
and
to
ensure
that
the
standards,
which
are
based
on
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT),
are
being
achieved.

2(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data
The
information
will
be
used
by
Agency
enforcement
personnel
to:
1)
identify
sources
subject
to
the
standard;
2)
ensure
that
MACT
is
being
properly
applied;
3)
ensure
that
emission
control
devices
are
being
properly
operated
and
maintained
on
a
continuous
basis
to
reduce
HAP
emissions
from
furnaces
and
process
fugitive
sources;
and
4)
ensure
that
fugitive
dust
controls
are
being
fully
implemented.

The
records
and
reports
are
necessary
to
enable
the
EPA
to
identify
facilities
that
may
not
be
in
compliance
with
the
standard.
Based
on
reported
information,
the
EPA
can
decide
which
facilities
should
be
subject
to
inspection
or
enforcement
action.
The
records
that
facilities
maintain
indicate
to
the
EPA
whether
plant
personnel
are
employing
adequate
standard
operating
procedures
and
if
they
are
operating
and
maintaining
control
equipment
properly.

3.
NONDUPLICATION,
CONSULTATIONS,
AND
OTHER
COLLECTION
CRITERIA
3(
a)
Nonduplication
Certain
reports
required
by
State
or
local
agencies
may
duplicate
information
required
by
the
standards
(
e.
g.,
records
of
annual
particulate
matter
performance
tests).
In
such
cases,
a
copy
of
the
report
submitted
to
the
State
or
local
agency
may
be
sent
in
lieu
of,
or
as
a
part
of,
the
report
required
by
the
standards.
3
3(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
A
public
review
and
comment
period
occured
after
proposal
of
the
NESHAP
for
ferroalloys
production.

3(
c)
Consultations
OMB
regulations
require
periodic
consultation
with
respondents
and
data
users
such
as
members
of
industry
as
well
as
State
and
local
governments.
Consultations
with
numerous
representatives
of
companies
involved
with
ferroalloys
production
were
conducted
throughout
the
development
process
for
the
NESHAP.
The
following
persons
provided
input
during
development
of
the
proposed
rules:

Name
Affiliation
John
Hughes
Elkem
Metals
Company
Richard
Melvin
Elkem
Metals
Company
Dave
Renfrew
Elkem
Metals
Company
Rex
Haggy
Ohio
EPA
A
90­
day
public
comment
period
was
provided
after
proposal,
during
which
all
affected
parties
were
given
the
opportunity
to
comment
on
the
proposed
NESHAP
standards.
All
received
comments
were
considered,
and
some
were
reflected
in
the
development
of
the
final
NESHAP
standards.

3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
If
the
requirement
for
the
designated
representatives
of
owners
and
operators
of
affected
sources
to
submit
compliance
demonstrations
of
relevant
information
were
collected
less
frequently,
the
EPA
would
not
be
reasonably
assured
that
a
source
is
in
compliance
with
the
NESHAP.
In
addition,
the
EPA's
authority
to
take
administrative
action
would
be
significantly
reduced.

3(
e)
General
Guidelines
With
one
exception,
none
of
the
general
information
collection
guidelines
in
5
CFR
1230.5(
d)(
2)
of
the
OMB
regulations
implementing
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
is
being
exceeded
in
the
ferroalloys
production
NESHAP.
The
one
exception
is
the
ferroalloys
production
NESHAP
would
require
each
respondent
to
maintain
air
pollution
control
equipment
inspection
and
monitoring
records
for
5
years.

Section
113(
a)(
1)
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
provides
that
the
EPA
can
initiate
enforcement
actions
for
violations
"
subject
to
section
2462
of
Title
28."
Section
2462
of
Title
28
establishes
4
a
5­
year
statute
of
limitations
that
in
essence
prevents
the
EPA
from
collecting
penalties
for
violations
that
have
occurred
more
than
5
years
prior
to
filing
of
a
complaint
(
with
certain
exceptions
for
special
circumstances
such
as
fraud).
Based
on
these
legislative
directives,
the
EPA
is
requiring
a
5­
year
record
retention
period
for
the
ferroalloys
production
NESHAP
(
as
well
as
all
other
NESHAP).
The
EPA
believes
that
this
5­
year
period
is
necessary
so
that
in
those
cases
when
enforcement
action
is
appropriate
the
Agency
will
have
evidence
of
the
full
compliance
history
by
a
source
for
the
entire
period
for
which
penalties
may
be
sought
(
e.
g.,
number
of
times
violations
occurred,
seriousness
of
the
violations,
any
efforts
by
the
source
to
correct
the
problems
causing
the
violations).
Allowing
the
respondent
to
discard
records
earlier
than
5
years
would
potentially
destroy
evidence
critical
to
proving
when
violations
occurred,
establishing
the
seriousness
of
the
violations,
and
assessing
penalties
for
the
violations.

3(
f)
Confidentiality
All
information
submitted
to
the
EPA
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
EPA
policies
set
forth
in
Title
40,
Chapter
1,
Part
2,
Subpart
B,
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information.
See
40
CFR;
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;
amended
by
43
FR
3999,
September
8,
1978;
43
FR
42251,
September
28,
1978;
and
44
FR
17674,
March
23,
1979.
Even
where
the
EPA
has
determined
that
data
received
in
response
to
an
ICR
is
eligible
for
confidential
treatment
under
40
CFR
Part
2,
Subpart
B,
the
EPA
may
nonetheless
disclose
the
information
if
it
is
"
relevant
in
any
proceeding"
under
the
statute
[
42
U.
S.
C.
7414
(
C);
40
CFR
2.301
(
g)].
The
information
collection
complies
with
the
Privacy
Act
of
1974
and
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB)
Circular
108.

3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
this
ICR
does
not
involve
matters
of
a
sensitive
nature.

4.
THE
RESPONDENTS
AND
THE
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
4(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
The
respondents
are
owners
or
operators
of
all
new
and
existing
ferroalloys
production
facilities
that
are
major
sources
or
are
co­
located
at
major
sources.
The
affected
facilities
produce
either
ferromanganese
or
silicomanganese.
Ferroalloys
production
is
included
under
SIC
Code
3313,
"
Electrometallurgical
Products,
Except
Steel."

4(
b)
Information
Requested
5
(
i)
Data
items,
including
recordkeeping
requirements
Attachment
1,
Source
Data
Information
Requirements,
summarizes
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements.

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
Respondent
activities
for
major
sources
are
shown
for
each
of
the
first
three
years
following
promulgation
of
the
rule.
The
respondent
activities
required
for
existing
ferromanganese
and
silicomanganese
production
major
sources
affected
by
the
NESHAP
are
shown
in
Tables
1a,
2b,
and
2c.
No
new
ferromanganese
and
silicomanganese
production
major
sources
are
expected
in
the
first
three
years
following
promulgation
of
this
rule.

5.
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTED­
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES,
COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY,
AND
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
5(
a)
Agency
Activities
A
list
of
the
EPA's
activities
is
provided
in
Tables
3a
through
3c
introduced
in
section
6(
c).

5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
Information
contained
in
the
periodic
reports
submitted
to
the
EPA
will
be
reviewed
for
accuracy
and
completeness.
Data
obtained
during
periodic
visits
by
EPA
personnel
from
records
maintained
by
the
respondents
will
be
tabulated
and
published
for
internal
EPA
use
in
compliance
and
enforcement
programs.

5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
Minimizing
the
information
collection
burden
for
all
sizes
of
organizations
is
a
continuing
effort
on
the
EPA's
part.
The
NESHAP
for
ferroalloys
production
facilities
is
applicable
to
only
major
sources.
The
EPA
has
reduced
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
to
include
only
the
information
needed
by
the
EPA
to
determine
compliance
with
the
standards.
In
addition,
the
EPA
has
closely
reviewed
the
existing
permit
conditions
at
each
of
the
facilities,
and,
where
feasible,
has
incorporated
similar,
if
not
identical,
requirements
in
the
proposed
rule.

5(
d)
Collection
Schedule
The
NESHAP
for
ferroalloys
production
was
proposed
in
the
Federal
Register
on
August
4,
1998,
and
promulgated
on
May
20,
1999.
The
promulgated
rule
was
amended
on
March
22,
2001.
Collection
of
data
began
after
promulgation.

Results
of
performance
tests
for
demonstration
of
compliance
must
be
sent
on
or
before
the
60th
day
following
completion.
6
Subsequent
annual
performance
tests
are
required
for
specified
equipment
at
each
facility.

Initial
and
subsequent
opacity
observations
must
be
performed
and
reported
along
with
the
performance
test.
If
opacity
observations
are
not
conducted
concurrently
with
the
performance
test
then
the
results
must
be
reported
before
the
close
of
business
on
the
30th
day
following
completion
of
the
opacity
observations.

A
report
detailing
actions
taken
during
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
must
be
submitted
semiannually
and
delivered
or
postmarked
by
the
30th
day
following
the
end
of
each
calendar
year.

A
control
device
maintenance
plan
and
a
fugitive
dust
plan
must
be
developed
and
available
for
inspection
when
requested
by
the
Administrator.
A
summary
of
the
records
maintained
as
part
of
the
practices
described
in
the
maintenance
plan
for
air
pollution
control
devices
must
be
submitted
semiannually,
including
an
explanation
of
the
periods
when
procedures
were
not
followed
and
the
corrective
actions
that
were
taken.
When
the
procedures
in
the
fugitive
dust
operating
procedures
manual
are
not
followed
a
semiannual
report
must
be
submitted
along
with
the
corrective
actions
taken.

A
summary
of
monitoring
parameter
exceedances
and
the
corrective
actions
taken
for
capture
systems
must
be
reported
semiannually.
Reports
are
to
be
submitted
on
a
quarterly
basis
detailing
excess
emission
events.

6.
ESTIMATING
THE
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
THE
COLLECTION
6(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
The
annual
burden
estimates
for
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
presented
in
Tables
1a,
1b,
and
1c
for
the
NESHAP
requirements
affecting
ferromanganese
and
silicomanganese
production
facilities.
The
labor
hours
required
for
industry
personnel
to
keep
records
and
write
reports
as
well
as
the
burden
estimates
for
initial
performance
tests
were
derived
from
estimates
based
on
the
EPA's
experience
with
other
standards
and
knowledge
of
the
affected
industry.
Burden
estimates
listed
in
Table
2
represent
the
overall
burden
that
will
be
incurred
by
industry
in
the
first
three
years
after
affected
facilities
are
required
to
come
into
compliance
with
the
regulations.

6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Cost
The
information
collection
activities
and
total
costs
for
the
affected
facilities
are
also
listed
in
Table
2.
Private
7
manufacturing
industry
labor
rates
were
obtained
from
the
U.
S.
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
website.
The
estimated
hourly
rates
are
as
follows:
management
at
$
37.72,
technical
at
$
27.90,
and
clerical
at
$
16.69.

The
annual
costs
after
the
third
year
are
expected
to
remain
relatively
constant
for
the
NESHAP
as
there
are
only
two
known
affected
facilities.
Furthermore,
as
indicated
by
the
industry
trends,
no
new
ferroalloys
production
facilities
are
expected
to
be
built
in
the
future.

6(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
Under
the
proposed
NESHAP
regulations,
the
EPA
will
serve
in
an
oversight
capacity.
Tables
3a
through
3c
provide
a
breakdown
in
the
amount
of
hours
associated
with
each
activity
and
the
total
burden
hours
per
occurrence.
Wage
rates
for
EPA
employees
are
based
upon
the
Federal
government
pay
scale
for
1997
and
are
as
follows:
$
54.53
per
hour
for
management
(
GS­
15),
$
32.99
per
hour
for
technical
labor
(
GS­
12),
and
$
16.74
per
hour
for
clerical
labor
(
GS­
6).

6(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
The
respondent
universe
consists
of
one
existing
facility
producing
ferromanganese
and
silicomanganese.
The
total
burden
and
costs
for
this
facility
are
presented
in
Table
2.

6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Cost
Tables
(
i)
Respondent
Tally
The
bottom
line
respondent
burden
hours
and
costs
are
presented
in
Table
2.
These
values
were
calculated
by
summing
the
burden
hours
and
costs
for
the
three
burden
years,
as
presented
in
Tables
1a
through
1c.

The
total
annual
labor
hour
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
is
presented
in
Box
13
of
OMB
83­
I
(
Revised
10/
95).
This
is
based
on
the
average
annual
total
hour
estimate.

Total
estimated
annualized
costs
for
the
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
are
presented
in
Box
14
of
OMB
83­
I
(
Revised
10/
95).
The
total
annualized
capital/
startup
costs
are
reported
in
Box
14.
No
capital/
startup
costs
are
anticipated.
In
addition,
the
total
average
annual
costs
(
O&
M)
are
zero.
The
only
costs
associated
with
this
regulation
are
labor
costs,
and
these
are
are
summarized
in
Table
2.
The
average
annual
labor
hours
and
cost
for
industry
from
ferromanganese
and
silicomanganese
production
facilities
is
estimated
to
be
746
8
hours
and
$
20,761,
respectively.
The
total
average
labor
burden
to
the
industry
is
746
hours
and
$
20,761.

(
ii)
The
Agency
Tally
The
bottom
line
Federal
government
burden
hours
and
costs
are
presented
in
Table
4.
Average
annual
burden
hours
and
costs
to
the
Federal
government
from
ferromanganese,
and
silicomanganese
production
facilities
is
estimated
to
be
103
labor
hours
and
$
3,340,
respectively.
The
total
average
annual
burden
to
the
Federal
government
is
103
hours
and
$
3,340.

(
iii)
Variations
in
the
Annual
Bottom
Line
The
source's
burden
in
the
first
year
of
the
collection
is
approximately
25
percent
higher
than
in
subsequent
years.
Similarly,
the
burden
to
the
Federal
government
is
highest
in
the
first
year
of
the
collection.
This
difference
is
due
to
the
performance
of
activities
to
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
rule
such
as
initial
performance
tests
and
the
development
of
record
systems.
The
Federal
government's
burden
is
also
higher
during
this
period,
primarily
to
accommodate
attendance
at
the
initial
performance
tests.
Tables
1a
through
1c
summarize
the
annual
burden
to
respondents
in
each
of
the
3
years
of
the
clearance
period.
Similarly,
Tables
3a
through
3c
summarize
the
annual
burden
to
the
Federal
government
in
each
of
the
3
years
of
the
clearance
period.

6(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
The
facility
that
produced
ferronickel
was
shutdown
in
1999.

6(
g)
Burden
Statement
The
total
3­
year
monitoring,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
burden
for
this
collection
is
estimated
at
2,236
labor
hours
at
a
total
cost
of
$
62,283
for
the
only
facility
that
is
currently
producing
ferromanganese
and
silicomanganese,
and
the
annual
average
burden
is
746
labor
hours
and
$
20,761
for
the
facility.
This
estimate
includes
a
one­
time
performance
test
and
report;
subsequent
performance
tests
and
reports
for
some
sources;
semiannual
reports
when
the
procedures
in
a
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
were
not
followed;
quarterly
and
semiannual
excess
emissions
reports;
maintenance
inspections;
notifications;
and
recordkeeping.
There
are
no
separate
capital/
startup
costs
associated
with
the
proposed
rules.

Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose,
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
Agency.
This
includes
9
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information;
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
existing
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15.

Send
comments
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
through
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques,
to
the
Director,
Collection
Strategies
Division,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
2822),
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20460,
and
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street
NW,
Washington,
DC
20503,
marked
"
Attention:
Desk
Office
for
EPA."
Include
the
EPA
ICR
number
and
OMB
control
number
in
any
correspondence.
A­
1
Attachment
1
SOURCE
DATA
AND
INFORMATION
REQUIREMENTS
Requirements
Regulation,
§
Recordkeeping
As
required
by
§
63.10(
b)
of
subpart
A,
maintain
records
for
a
period
of
five
years
from
the
date
of
each
record
63.1628(
a)(
2)
63.1658(
a)(
2)

Occurrence
and
duration
of
each
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
(
SSM)
of
operation
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
i)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
i)

Occurrence
and
duration
of
each
malfunction
of
the
source
or
air
pollution
control
equipment
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
ii)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
ii)

All
maintenance
performed
on
the
air
pollution
control
equipment
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
iii)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
iii)

Actions
taken
during
periods
of
SSM
when
such
actions
are
different
from
the
procedures
specified
in
the
SSM
plan
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
iv)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
iv)

All
information
necessary
to
demonstrate
conformance
with
the
SSM
plan
when
all
actions
taken
during
periods
of
SSM
are
consistent
with
the
procedures
specified
in
such
plan
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
v)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
v)

All
required
measurements
needed
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
standard
and
to
support
data
that
the
source
is
required
to
report,
including,
but
not
limited
to
performance
test
measurements
and
measurements
as
may
be
necessary
to
determine
the
conditions
of
the
initial
test
or
subsequent
tests
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
vi)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
vi)
Requirements
Regulation,
§
A­
2
All
results
of
initial
or
subsequent
performance
tests
and
opacity
and
visible
emissions
observations
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
vii)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
vii)

If
the
owner
or
operator
has
been
granted
a
waiver
from
recordkeeping
or
reporting
requirements
under
§
63.10(
f)
of
subpart
A,
any
information
demonstrating
whether
a
source
is
meeting
the
requirements
for
a
waiver
of
recordkeeping
or
reporting
requirements
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
viii)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
viii)

If
the
owner
or
operator
has
been
granted
a
waiver
from
the
initial
performance
test
under
§
63.7(
h)
of
subpart
A,
a
copy
of
the
full
request
and
the
Administrator's
approval
or
disapproval
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
ix)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
ix)

All
documentation
supporting
initial
notifications
and
notifications
of
compliance
status
required
by
§
63.9
of
subpart
A
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
x)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
x)

As
required
by
§
63.10(
b)(
3),
records
of
any
applicability
determination,
including
supporting
analyses
63.1628(
a)(
2)(
xi)
63.1658(
a)(
2)(
xi)

Records
of
pressure
drop
across
the
venturi,
if
a
venturi
scrubber
is
used
63.1628(
b)(
1)(
i)
63.1658(
b)(
1)(
i)

Records
of
results
of
weekday
opacity
observations
63.1628(
b)(
1)(
ii)

Records
of
manufacturer
certification
that
monitoring
devices
are
accurate
to
within
5
percent
and
of
semiannual
calibration
63.1628(
b)(
1)(
iii)
63.1658(
b)(
1)(
ii)

Copy
of
the
written
maintenance
plan
for
each
air
pollution
control
device
63.1628(
b)(
1)(
iv)
63.1658(
b)(
1)(
iii)
Requirements
Regulation,
§
A­
3
Copy
of
the
fugitive
dust
operating
procedures
manual
63.1628(
b)(
1)(
v)
63.1658(
b)(
1)(
iv)

Records
of
each
maintenance
inspection
and
repair,
replacement,
or
other
corrective
action
63.1628(
b)(
1)(
vi)
63.1658(
b)(
1)(
v)

All
records
for
the
most
recent
two
years
of
operation
must
be
maintained
on
site.
Records
for
the
previous
three
years
may
be
maintained
off
site.
63.1628(
c)
63.1658(
c)

Reporting
Reporting
results
of
performance
tests
63.1627(
a)(
2)
63.1657(
a)(
2)

Reporting
results
of
opacity
observations
63.1627(
a)(
3)
63.1657(
a)(
3)

Periodic
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
reports
63.1627(
a)(
4)
63.1657(
a)(
4)

Summary
record
of
maintenance
plan
reports
63.1627(
b)(
1)
63.1657(
b)(
1)

Pressure
drop
report
for
venturi
scrubbers
63.1627(
b)(
1)(
i)
63.1657(
b)(
2)

Weekday
opacity
observation
report
63.1627(
b)(
1)(
ii)

Fugitive
dust
corrective
action
report
63.1627(
b)(
2)
63.1657(
b)(
3)

Capture
system
monitoring
parameter
exceedance
report
63.1627(
b)(
3)
63.1657(
b)(
4)

Excess
emission
report
63.1627(
b)(
4)
63.1657(
b)(
5)
