Supporting
Statement
for
Information
Collection
Request
Non­
road
Compression­
Ignition
Engine
and
On­
road
Heavy
Duty
Engine
Application
for
Emission
Certification,
and
Participation
in
the
Averaging,
Banking,
and
Trading
Program
42
USC
7521
§
206
42
USC
7521
§
213(
d)
40
CFR
Part
86
40
CFR
Part
89
February
2001
Certification
and
Compliance
Division
Office
of
Transportation
and
Air
Quality
Office
of
Air
and
Radiation
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
­
2­
Part
A
SUBMISSION
1.
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
1
(
a)
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection
Non­
road
Compression­
ignition
Engine
and
On­
road
Heavy
Duty
Engine
Application
for
Emission
Certification,
and
Participation
in
the
Averaging,
Banking,
and
Trading
Program.

1(
b)
Short
Characterization
This
supporting
statement
consolidates
two
previously
existing
ICRs
(
EPA
No.
1684.04,
OMB
2060­
0287
and
1851.01,
OMB
2060­
0404)
into
ICR
number
1684.05.
A
comparison
of
the
burden
hours
and
cost
between
the
individual
ICRs
and
the
consolidation
into
ICR
1684.05
is
shown
in
section
6(
f).
The
purpose
of
this
consolidation
is
to
eliminate
duplication
by
incorporating
all
certification
and
averaging,
banking
and
trading
(
AB&
T)
collection
activities
in
the
non­
road
and
on­
highway
sectors
into
one
ICR.
Because
ICR
1684.04
has
an
earlier
expiration
date
than
ICR
1851.01,
ICR
1851.01
is
being
incorporated
into
ICR
1684.05.

ICR
1851.01
covered
all
nonroad
compression­
ignition
engines
at
or
above
50
horsepower
(
37
kilowatts)
and
on­
highway
heavy
duty
engine
applications
for
emission
certification
and
participation
in
the
AB&
T
program.
ICR
1684.04
covered
certification
requirements
for
all
nonroad
compression
ignition
engines,
including
those
at
or
above
50
horsepower
(
engines
rated
under
50
Hp
became
regulated
as
recently
as
1999).
Thus,
there
was
a
degree
of
overlap
between
the
two
ICRs
because
both
accounted
for
the
burden
associated
with
the
certification
requirements
for
nonroad
engines
at
or
above
50
horsepower.
This
accounting
overlap
is
removed
in
the
consolidated
ICR
1684.05;
the
associated
burden
is
reduced
accordingly.
Additionally,
the
burden
associated
with
both
certification
programs
has
decreased
dramatically
because
CCD
has
developed
an
electronic
database
for
industry
submission
that
greatly
simplifies
the
application
process.

Under
Title
II
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
42
U.
S.
C.
7521
et
seq.;
CAA),
EPA
is
charged
with
issuing
certificates
of
conformity
for
those
engines
that
comply
with
applicable
emission
standards.
Such
a
certificate
must
be
issued
before
engines
may
be
legally
introduced
into
commerce.
To
apply
for
a
certificate
of
conformity,
manufacturers
are
required
to
submit
descriptions
of
their
planned
production
engines,
including
detailed
descriptions
of
emission
control
systems
and
test
data.
This
information
is
organized
by
"
engine
family"
groups
expected
to
have
similar
­
3­
emission
characteristics.
There
are
also
recordkeeping
requirements.

Those
manufacturers
electing
to
participate
in
the
AB&
T
Program
are
also
required
to
submit
information
regarding
the
calculation,
actual
generation
and
usage
of
credits
in
an
initial
report,
end­
of­
the­
year
report
and
final
report.
These
reports
are
used
for
certification
and
enforcement
purposes.
Manufacturers
will
also
maintain
records
for
eight
years
on
the
engine
families
included
in
the
program.

This
information
is
collected
by
the
Engine
Programs
Group
(
EPG),
Certification
and
Compliance
Division
(
CCD),
Office
of
Transportation
and
Air
Quality
(
OTAQ),
Office
of
Air
and
Radiation
(
OAR),
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).
Besides
CCD,
this
information
could
be
used
by
the
Office
of
Enforcement
and
Compliance
(
OECA)
and
the
Department
of
Justice
for
enforcement
purposes.
Confidential
Business
Information(
CBI)
is
also
disclosed
in
a
public
database
and
over
the
Internet.
It
is
used
by
trade
associations,
environmental
groups,
and
the
public.
The
information
is
usually
submitted
in
an
electronic
format,
and
it
is
stored
in
EPG's
certification
database.

It
has
been
estimated
that
a
total
of
84
manufacturers
will
respond
to
this
collection
with
an
approximate
cost
of
$
10,536,479.60.

2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
Vehicle
and
engine
manufacturers
may
not
legally
introduce
their
product
into
US
commerce
unless
EPA
has
certified
that
their
vehicles
and
engines
comply
with
applicable
emission
standards.
To
ensure
compliance
with
these
statutes,
EPA
reviews
product
information
and
manufacturers'
test
results.
EPA
also
tests
some
vehicles
and
engines
to
confirm
manufacturers'
results.

EPA's
emission
certification
programs
are
statutorily
mandated;
the
agency
does
not
have
discretion
to
cease
these
functions.
Under
Section
206(
a)
of
the
CAA
(
42
USC
7521):

"
The
Administrator
shall
test,
or
require
to
be
tested
in
such
manner
as
he
deems
appropriate,
any
new
motor
vehicle
or
new
motor
vehicle
engine
submitted
by
a
manufacturer
to
determine
whether
such
vehicle
or
engine
conforms
with
the
regulations
prescribed
under
§
202
of
this
Act.
If
such
vehicle
or
engine
conforms
to
such
regulations,
the
Administrator
shall
issue
a
certificate
of
conformity
upon
such
terms,
and
for
such
period
(
not
in
excess
of
one
year)
as
he
may
prescribe."
­
4­
This
provision
also
applies
to
nonroad
engines,
pursuant
to
§
213(
d)
of
the
CAA.
Also,
under
the
authority
of
the
CAA
§
217,
on­
highway
engine
manufacturers
are
required
to
pay
a
fee
when
applying
for
a
certificate
of
conformity.

EPA
also
conducts,
under
40
CFR
86.094­
15
and
40
CFR
89.111­
96,
an
Averaging,
Banking,
and
Trading
(
AB&
T)
Program.
This
program
is
one
of
many
regulatory
features
designed
to
enhance
the
compliance
flexibility
for
and
reduce
the
burden
on
the
affected
engine
manufacturers,
without
compromising
the
expected
emissions
benefit
derived
from
these
emissions
standards.

2(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data
EPA
uses
certification
information
to
verify
that
the
proper
vehicles
have
been
selected
and
that
the
necessary
testing
has
been
performed
to
assure
that
each
engine
complies
with
emission
standards.
Once
the
engines
have
been
produced,
EPA
uses
the
information
to
support
various
enforcement
actions
including
assembly
line
audits
and
in­
use
compliance
testing.

The
AB&
T
program
allows
manufacturers
to
generate
emission
credits.
Under
averaging,
a
manufacturer
could
certify
one
or
more
engine
families
within
its
product
line
at
levels
above
the
emission
standard,
provided
the
increased
emissions
are
offset
by
emission
reductions
from
one
or
more
families
certified
below
the
standard.
The
average
emissions
(
weighted
by
horsepower
and
production)
from
all
the
manufacturer's
engine
families
involved
in
the
program
in
a
given
model
year
must
be
at
or
below
the
emission
standard.
The
banking
program
would
allow
a
manufacturer
to
bank
credits
generated
in
one
model
year
for
use
in
averaging
or
trading
in
subsequent
model
years.
The
trading
program
would
allow
credit
transactions
between
manufacturers.

The
information
will
be
received
and
used
by
EPG,
CCD,
OTAQ,
OAR.
Non­
confidential
portions
of
the
information
submitted
to
EPG
is
available
to
and
used
by
importers,
engine
users,
environmental
groups,
members
of
the
public
and
state
and
local
government
organizations.

3.
Nonduplication,
Consultations
and
Other
Collection
Criteria
3(
a)
Nonduplication
The
information
requested
under
this
ICR
is
required
by
statute.
Because
of
its
specialized
(
and
sometimes
confidential)
nature,
and
the
fact
that
it
must
be
submitted
to
EPA
prior
to
the
start
of
production,
the
information
collected
is
not
available
from
any
other
source.
Furthermore,
some
of
the
information
requested
under
the
AB&
T
Bsuch
as
actual
sales
volumes­­
is
­
5­
confidential
in
nature;
therefore
EPA
can
only
obtain
it
if
the
manufacturers
submit
it.
Participation
in
the
program
is
voluntary.

3(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
An
announcement
of
the
public
comment
period
for
this
ICR
renewal
was
published
in
the
Federal
Register
on
December
11,
2000.
(
65
FR
77373).
No
comments
were
received.
A
copy
of
the
FR
notice
is
attached.

3(
c)
Consultations
EPA
consulted
less
than
ten
past
respondents
regarding
this
information
collection
burden.

Contact:
Mr.
David
Polivka
Company:
Navistar
Phone:
708­
865­
3565
Contact:
Richard
Bishop
Company:
Deere
Power
Systems
Phone:
319­
292­
8157
Contact:
Saul
Boast
Company:
Caterpillar
Phone:
309­
675­
5217
3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
The
CAA
states
that
emission
certification
must
be
done
on
a
yearly
basis
(
CAA
206(
a)(
1)),
coinciding
with
the
industry's
`
model
year'.
Major
product
changes
typically
occur
at
the
start
of
a
model
year.
For
these
reasons,
a
collection
frequency
of
less
than
a
model
year
is
not
possible.
However,
when
an
engine
design
is
"
carried
over"
to
a
subsequent
model
year,
the
amount
of
new
information
required
is
substantially
reduced.

3(
e)
General
Guidelines
According
to
40
CFR
86.098­
7(
onroad/
on­
highway)
and
89.210­
96(
nonroad),
certification,
AB&
T,
and
end­
of­
the­
year
report
related
records
must
be
maintained
for
eight
years.
However,
"
records
may
be
retained
as
hard
copy
or
reduced
to
microfilm,
ADP
film,
etc.,
depending
on
the
manufacturer's
record
retention
procedure,
provided
that
in
every
case
all
the
information
contained
in
the
hard
copy
is
retained."
These
recordkeeping
requirements
stem,
in
large
part,
from
the
statutory
requirement
to
warrant
some
items
for
long
periods
of
time.
In
addition,
the
manufacturers
must
comply
with
requirements
to
recall
vehicles
and
engines
failing
to
meet
emission
standards
during
their
useful
­
6­
lives.

Manufacturers
are
required
to
submit
confidential
business
information
such
as
sales
projections
and
certain
sensitive
technical
descriptions
(
Please
see
section
4(
b)(
i)
for
reference).
This
information
is
kept
confidential
in
accordance
with
the
Freedom
of
Information
Act,
EPA
regulations
at
40
CFR
Part
2,
and
class
determinations
issued
by
EPA's
Office
of
General
Counsel.
Also,
non­
proprietary
information
submitted
by
manufacturers
is
held
as
confidential
until
the
specific
vehicle
or
engine
to
which
it
pertains
is
available
for
purchase.

No
other
general
guideline
is
exceeded
by
this
information
collection.

3(
f)
Confidentiality
Manufacturers
are
allowed
to
assert
a
claim
of
confidentiality
over
information
provided
to
EPA.
Confidentiality
is
provided
in
accordance
with
the
Freedom
of
Information
Act
and
EPA
regulations
at
40
CFR
Part
2.
For
further
detail,
refer
to
section
3(
e).

3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
No
sensitive
questions
are
asked
in
this
information
collection.

4.
Respondents
and
Information
Requested
4(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
The
respondents
are
manufacturers
or
importers
of
large
nonroad
and
on­
highway,
heavy
duty
engines.
The
following
Standard
Industrial
Classification
codes
are
associated
with
this
information
collection:

3519
Internal
Combustion
Engines,
Not
Elsewhere
Classified
3523
Farm
Machinery
and
Equipment
3531
Construction
Machinery
and
Equipment
3537
Industrial
Trucks,
Tractors,
Trailers,
and
Stackers
3711
Motor
Vehicle
and
Passenger
Car
Bodies
3714
Motor
Vehicle
Parts
and
Accessories
4(
b)
Information
Requested
All
manufacturers
must
describe
their
products
and
supply
test
data
to
verify
compliance.
This
information
is
organized
by
"
engine
family"
groups
expected
to
have
similar
emission
characteristics.
Manufacturers
must
also
retain
records.
­
7­
The
burden
for
a
given
engine
family
is
reduced
after
the
model's
first
production
year,
because
data
and
information
from
previous
years
can
be
"
carried
over"
when
no
significant
changes
have
occurred.
For
instance,
an
engine
family
certified
in
model
year
2000
can
be
certified
in
the
2001
model
year
by
"
carry
over"
of
data
and
paperwork
from
the
2000
model
year
if
no
significant
changes
have
occurred
to
the
engine
family
between
model
years.
EPA
may
also
allow
manufacturers
to
"
carry
across"
data
and
paperwork
from
on­
highway
certification
of
an
engine
family
which
they
produce
for
both
the
on­
highway
and
nonroad
markets
if
there
are
no
significant
differences
between
the
on­
highway
and
nonroad
versions
of
the
engine
family.
Allowing
manufacturers
to
"
carry
over"
and
"
carry
across"
data
and
paperwork
saves
manufacturers
the
burden
of
duplication
of
data
and
paperwork
which
would
occur
in
the
absence
of
such
provisions.

On­
highway
engine
manufacturers
are
also
required
to
pay
a
fee
as
promulgated
by
the
CAA
Section
217.
The
amount
of
the
fee
is
determined
under
40
CFR
86
Subpart
J.
This
fee
is
collected
by
the
Motor
Vehicle
and
Engine
Compliance
Program
in
St.
Louis,
MO.
The
purpose
of
the
fee
is
to
"
recover
those
compliance,
investigation
and
review
costs
which
EPA
incurs
in
providing
vehicle
and
engine
manufacturers
or
importers
with
certificates
of
conformity,
fuel
economy
labels",
and
others,
as
stated
in
40
CFR
86.905­
93.

(
i)
Data
Items
The
data
items
in
the
Tables
A
to
F
are
requested
under
these
information
collections.
Different
items
are
requested
depending
on
the
type
and
specific
characteristics
of
the
engine
family
to
be
certified.
Although
most
of
them
must
be
included
in
the
certification
application,
some
of
them
are
only
required
to
be
kept
in
records
and
submitted
upon
request,
as
provided
by
89.115­
96(
f)(
1).

EPA
encourages
manufacturers
to
apply
electronically
and
has
developed
a
simple
electronic
application
format.
A
copy
of
the
application
template
is
attached.
The
Large
Engine
Application
Form
is
designed
to
be
used
by
both
nonroad
and
on
highway
engine
manufacturers,
and
questions
are
answered
as
applicable
to
each
engine
category.
A
complete
application
consists
of
(
1)
a
Statement
of
Compliance,
(
2)
a
Family
Information
Form
(
FIF),
(
3)
a
Test
Information
Form
(
TIF),
(
4)
a
Technical
Description
Form
(
TDF),
(
5)
an
Engine
Model
Summary
(
EMS),
and
(
6)
an
Engine
Part
Summary
(
EPS).
However,
manufacturers
requesting
a
certificate
of
conformity
for
evaporative
engine
families
are
only
required
to
submit
the
Statement
of
Compliance
and
an
Evaporative
Engine
Form
(
EEF).
­
8­
A.
Certification:

Table
A
Information
Items
Requested
Under
The
Certification
Program
Item
#
in
electronic
application
Information
Item
Non
Road
Engines
On
Highway
Letter
Statement
of
compliance
89.115­
96(
d)(
10)
86.001­
21(
b)(
i)
(
C)

1­
8
10,
12
Identification
and
description
of
the
basic
engine
design
including,
but
not
limited
to,
the
engine
family
specifications
(
fuel,
cooling
medium,
etc.)
89.115(
d)(
1)
86.09­
21(
b)(
1)
(
i)

9
An
explanation
of
how
the
emission
control
system
operates
89.115­
96(
d)(
2)
86.094­
21(
b)(
1)
(
i)

11
Fuel
System
type
and
components
89.115­
96(
d)(
2)
86.094­
21(
b)(
1)
(
i)

13
Useful
life
Period
89.104­
96
86.094­
21(
b)(
5)(
i)(
B
)

FIF­
14
TIF­
16
Deterioration
factors
89.118
86.094­
21(
b)(
4)(
ii)

15
Intended
Service
Class
N/
A
86.094­
21(
b)(
5)(
ii)

16
Projected
Sales
89.115­
96(
e)
86.0001­
21(
b)(
2)

17
Estimated
Production
Period
89.115­
96(
e)
86.1006­
84(
c)(
1)

18
Sales
Area
89.115­
96(
e)
86.090­
21(
b)(
2)

19­
20
Plant
Contact
and
Location
89.503­
96(
d)
86.091­
7(
c)(
1)(
vi)

21
Program
information
89.209­
96(
a)(
1)
86.115­
91
­
9­
22
Family
emission
limits
89.209­
96(
a)(
3)
86.094­
21(
b)(
6)(
i)

23
Nonroad
engine
equipment
types
89.115­
96.(
d)(
1)
N/
A
24
Detailed
description
and
justification
of
each
auxiliary
emission
control
devices
(
AECD),
and
how
they
affects
emissions
89.115­
96(
d)(
2)
86.094­
21(
b)(
1)(
i)
AB
25
A
description
of
all
adjustable
parameters,
their
adjustable
ranges
and
methods
employed
to
prevent
tampering,
etc
89.115­
96(
d)(
6)
86.094­
21(
b)(
1)(
ii)
A­
B
TDF
Detail
drawings
and
descriptions
of
the
of
the
various
emission
related
components
89.115­
96.(
d)(
1)
86.094­
21(
b)(
1)(
ii)
(
C)

TIF­
14
A
description
of
the
test
equipment
and
fuel
to
be
used
89.115­
96(
d)(
8)
86.0001­
21(
b)(
3)

A
description
of
the
test
procedures
to
be
used
to
establish
the
durability
data
or
the
exhaust
emission
deterioration
factors
N/
A
86.094­
21(
b)(
5)(
i)
(
A)

TIF­
15,17
EET­
8
All
test
data
obtained
by
the
manufacturer
on
each
test
engine
89.115­
96(
d)(
9)
CAA
Section
206
A
statement
of
the
useful
life
89.104­
96(
d)
86.094­
21(
b)(
5)(
i)(
B
)

If
applicable,
a
statement
of
the
alternative
useful­
life
period
and
a
brief
synopsis
of
the
justification
89.104­
96(
d)
86.094­
21(
b)(
5)(
i)(
C
)

Maintenance
information
89.128­
96(
d)
86.094­
21(
b)(
5)(
iii)
(
A)
­
10­
EEFComments
For
evaporative
families:
a
description
of
any
unique
procedures
required
to
perform
evaporative
and/
or
refueling
test,
and
of
the
method
used
to
develop
those
unique
procedures
N/
A
86.001­
21(
b)(
9)

For
evaporative
families:
Canister
working
capacity,
canister
bed
volume,
and
fuel
temperature
profile
for
the
running
loss
test
N/
A
86.001­
21(
b)(
10)

For
evaporative
families:
Maximum
nominal
fuel
tank
capacity
N/
A
86.094­
21(
e)

EEF­
6
For
evaporative
families:
Certification
standard
N/
A
86.096­
10(
b)(
5)(
i)

EEF­
7
For
evaporative
families:
Weight
category
N/
A
86.094­
21(
b)(
7)

TIF­
11
The
manufacturer
shall
identify
those
families
which
will
not
comply
with
cold
temperature
CO
standards
N/
A
86.094­
21(
g)

TDF
For
families
incorporating
an
emission
control
diagnostic
system:
a
full
and
detailed
description
of
its
functional
characteristics,
the
method
of
detecting
malfunctions,
and
provisions
taken
to
prevent
tampering
N/
A
86.094­
21(
h)

TDF
Description
of
the
provisions
taken
to
prevent
tampering
with
emission
control
computer
instructions
89.108­
96(
b)
86.094­
21(
i)

For
methanol­
fueled
vehicles:
wether
the
vehicle
is
flexible
or
dedicated,
and
the
fuel
for
which
the
vehicle
was
design
N/
A
86.094­
21(
j)

Proposed
test
fleet
selection
and
the
rationale
for
the
test
fleet
selection
89.115­
96(
d)(
3)
86.096­
24(
b)(
2)(
B)
­
11­
TIF­
13,14
Special
or
alternate
test
procedures,
if
applicable
89.115­
96(
d)(
4)
86.090­
27
The
period
of
operation
necessary
to
accumulate
service
hours
on
test
engines
and
stabilize
emission
levels
89.115­
96(
d)(
5)
86.094­
26(
c)(
3)

Fee
Filing
Form
Fee
Filing
Form
N/
A
86.909­
93(
b)

Request
for
waiver,
if
applicable
N/
A
86.908­
93(
a)

Request
for
refund,
if
applicable
N/
A
86.908­
93(
b)
­
12­
Table
B
Recordkeeping
requirements
­
Certification
Program
Manufacturers
must
keep
records
for
eight
years
(
86.094­
7(
a)(
3)
and
89.124­
96(
b))
except
routine
emission
records.
Manufacturers
must
keep
routine
emission
records
for
only
one
year.

General
records:

Identification
and
description
of
all
engines
for
which
testing
is
required
89.124­
96(
a)(
2)(
i)
86.091­
7(
a)(
1)
(
A)

Description
of
emission
control
systems
89.124­
96(
a)(
2)(
i)
86.091­
7(
a)(
1)
(
B)

Description
of
test
procedures
89.124­
96(
a)(
2)(
i)
86.091­
7(
a)(
1)
(
C)

Individual
Records:

Copies
of
all
the
applications
submitted
89.124­
96(
a)(
1)
86.091­
7(
a)(
1)
(
C)(
ii)

A
brief
history
of
all
test
engines
and
running
changes
89.124­
96(
a)(
2)(
i)
86.091­
7(
a)(
2)

A
complete
record
of
all
emission
tests
performed
89.124­
96(
a)(
2)(
iv)
86.091­
7(
a)(
2)
(
B)

The
date
of
each
mileage
accumulation
run
and
the
mileage
accumulated
89.124­
96(
a)(
2)(
ii)
86.091­
7(
a)(
2)
(
C)

Record
and
description
of
all
maintenance
and
other
servicing
performed
89.124­
96(
a)(
2)(
iii
)
86.091­
7(
a)(
2)
(
E)

Record
and
description
of
each
test
performed
to
diagnose
engine
or
emission
control
system
performance
89.124­
96(
a)(
2)(
v)
86.091­
7(
a)(
2)
(
F)

A
brief
description
of
any
significant
events
affecting
the
vehicle
89.124­
96(
a)(
2)(
vi)
86.091­
7(
a)(
2)
(
G)
­
13­
Actual
U.
S.
sales
volume
89.210­
96(
b)(
5)
86.094­
7(
h)(
2)

For
Heavy
Duty
engines
model
1996­
98:
Shipment
date,
purchaser,
purchaser
contract,
and
EPA
evaporative/
refueling
family
N/
A
86.096­
8(
h)(
7)

Routine
emission
test
data
89.124­
96(
b)
86.094­
7(
a)(
3)

When
a
manufacturer
needs
to
make
changes
to
a
certified
engine,
or
to
add
an
engine
model
to
an
already
certified
engine
family,
the
following
information
must
be
submitted.
Running
changes
are
submitted
using
the
same
electronic
format
used
to
apply
for
a
certificate
of
conformity.
­
14­
Table
C
For
Running
Changes
Notification
of
changes
made
to
the
application
and
request
to
amend
the
application
89.123­
96(
a)
86.079­
32(
a)
and
­
33(
a)

A
full
description
of
the
change
to
be
made
89.123­
96(
b)
(
1)
86.079­
32(
a)
and
­
33(
a)

Engineering
evaluations
or
data
showing
that
engines
as
modified
or
added
will
comply
with
all
applicable
emission
standards
89.123­
96(
b)
(
2)
86.079­
32
86.079­
33
86.082­
34
A
determination
wether
the
original
test
fleet
selection
is
still
appropriate,
and
proposed
new
test
fleet
selections,
if
applicable
89.123­
96(
b)
(
3)
86.079­
33(
b)

Upon
request,
test
data
on
the
engine
changed
or
added
89.123­
96(
c)
86.079­
32(
b)

Supporting
documentation,
test
data
and
engineering
evaluations
as
appropriate
to
demonstrate
that
all
affected
engines
will
still
meet
applicable
emission
standards
89.123­
96(
e)
(
1)
86.082(
a)
­
15­
Each
manufacturer
is
also
required
to
submit
the
following
information:

Table
D
Annual
Production
Report
and
Hearings
An
annual
production
report
identifying
the
number
of
engines
produced
by
engine
family,
by
gross
power,
by
displacement,
by
fuel
system,
or
by
other
categories
as
the
Administrator
may
require.
89.125­
96
86.094­
24(
e)(
2)

If
the
manufacturer
requests
a
hearing
on
the
Administrator's
denial
or
revocation
of
a
certificate
of
conformity,
the
request
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
Administrator's
decision,
shall
be
in
writing,
and
shall
set
forth
the
manufacturer's
objections
to
the
Administrator's
decision
and
data
to
support
the
objections.
89.127­
96
86.094­
23(
g)

The
Engine
Model
Summary
(
EMS)
is
requested
to
evaluate
whether
engine
families
were
developed
correctly.
The
information
contained
in
this
form
allows
EPA
engineers
to
know
if
the
engine
models
were
grouped
correctly,
and,
most
important,
if
the
test
data
submitted
corresponds
to
the
worst
case
within
that
family.
The
calculation
of
the
engine's
rated
power,
torque,
etc.,
is
customary
business
practice.

The
Part
Summary
Form
(
PSF)
allows
EPA
to
make
sure
that
the
engine
is
actually
built
in
its
certified
configuration.
This
information
is
used
when
conducting
Selective
Enforcement
Audits.
The
Selective
Enforcement
Program
is
covered
by
a
separate
ICR.
1Applicable
production
volume
includes
only
those
engines
that
have
been
tracked
to
a
location
defined
as
a
point
of
first
retail
sale
within
the
U.
S.,
excluding
ineligible
states.

­
16­
B.
Average,
Banking
and
Trading:

Table
E
Information
Items
Required
Under
the
Average,
Banking
and
Trading
Program
Intent
to
include
this
specific
engine
family
in
the
ABT
program
89.209­
96(
a)(
1)
86.091­
15(
b)(
1)(
i)

Declaration
that
participation
in
this
program
will
not
cause
the
applicable
emission
standard
to
be
exceeded
(
have
negative
credit
balance)
89.209­
96(
a)(
2)
86.094­
23(
h)(
1)

Family
emission
limit
89.209­
96(
a)(
3)
86.094­
21(
b)(
6)

Projected
applicable1
production
volumes
for
the
model
year
89.209­
96(
a)(
4)
86.094­
21(
b)(
6)

Values
required
to
calculate
credits
89.209­
96(
a)(
4)
86.091­
15(
b)(
1)(
iv)
(
A)

Projected
number
of
credits
generated/
used
89.209­
96(
a)(
4)
86.091­
15(
b)(
2)(
ii)

If
credits
are
generated,
the
designated
use
of
the
credits
involved
or
if
credits
are
used,
the
source
of
those
credits
89.209­
96(
a)(
6)
86.091­
15(
b)(
2)(
ii)
­
17­
Table
F
Recordkeeping
Requirements
Average,
Banking
and
Trading
Program
Records
are
to
be
kept
for
eight
years
(
86.094­
7(
c)(
3)
and
89.210­
96(
d)).

EPA
engine
family
89.210­
96(
a)(
1)
86.091­
7(
c)(
1)(
i)

Engine
identification
number
89.210­
96(
a)(
2)
86.091­
7(
c)(
1)(
ii)

Engine
build
date
and
model
year
89.210­
96(
a)(
3)
86.091­
7(
c)(
1)(
iii
)

Power
rating
89.210­
96(
a)(
4)
86.091­
7(
c)(
1)(
iv)

Purchaser
and
destination
89.210­
96(
a)(
5)
86.091­
7(
c)(
1)(
v)

Assembly
plant
89.210­
96(
a)(
6)
86.091­
7(
c)(
1)(
vi)

Family
emission
Limit
89.210­
96(
b)(
1)
86.091­
7(
c)(
2)(
ii)

Useful
life
89.210­
96(
b)(
1)
86.091­
7(
c)(
2)(
iv)

Projected
and
actual
production
model
89.210­
96(
b)(
1)
86.091­
7(
c)(
2)(
v)
and
(
vi)

For
families
participating
in
trading,
the
following
records
must
be
kept
quarterly:

Actual
quarterly
and
cumulative
applicable
production/
sales
volume
89.210­
96(
c)(
2)
86.091­
7(
c)(
8)
(
iii)

Value
required
to
calculate
credits
89.210­
96(
c)(
3)
86.091­
7(
c)(
8)
(
iv)

Resulting
type
and
number
of
credits
generated/
required
89.210­
96(
c)(
4)
86.091­
7(
c)(
8)
(
v)
­
18­
How
and
where
credit
surpluses
are
dispersed
89.210­
96(
c)(
5)
86.091­
7(
c)(
8)
(
vi)

How
and
through
what
means
credit
deficits
are
met
89.210­
96(
c)(
6)
86.091­
7(
c)(
8)
(
vii)

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
The
type
of
activities
a
manufacturer
would
do
to
certify
an
engine
family
are
as
follows:

$
Review
the
regulations
and
the
guidance
document
$
Develop
engine
family
groups
$
Test
engines
for
compliance
with
emission
standards
$
Develop
deterioration
factors
(
on­
highway
and
some
categories
of
nonroad
engines,
see
section
6(
a)
for
details).

$
Gather
emissions
data
$
Submit
the
fee
filing
form
(
On
Highway
only)

$
Pay
the
corresponding
fee
(
On
Highway
only)

$
Submit
the
Application
for
Certification
$
Retain
and
maintain
records,
and
submit
them
upon
Administrator's
request
$
Submit
an
annual
production
report
Manufacturers
electing
to
participate
in
the
AB&
T
program
will
carry
out
the
following
activities:

$
Pre­
certification
Activities:

$
Familiarization
with
the
AB&
T
program
provisions
$
Determine
which
engine
families
will
participate
in
ABT.

$
Project
applicable
production
volumes
for
the
model
year
for
all
engine
families.

$
Submit
AB&
T
information
with
the
certification
application
$
Gather
information
regarding
point
of
first
retail
sale
$
Monitor
production
volumes
and
engine
sales
(
customary
business
practice)

$
Develop
and
submit
end­
of­
year
reports
$
Develop
and
submit
final
reports
$
Store,
file,
and
maintain
information
as
required
­
19­
5.
The
Information
Collected­­
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
5(
a)
Agency
Activities
A
significant
portion
of
EPA's
emission
certification
activity
is
spent
reviewing
applications,
verifying
that
the
correct
engines
have
been
selected
and
tested,
answering
manufacturers'
questions,
issuing
appropriate
certificates
of
conformity,
and
storing
the
data.
A
part
of
the
certification
process
involves
determining
if
"
carry
over"
of
data
from
a
previous
model
year
is
appropriate
or
if
new
testing
will
be
required.
The
agency
also
analyzes
requests
for
confidentiality
and
provides
appropriate
protection.

5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
EPA
currently
makes
extensive
use
of
computers
in
evaluating
information
from
vehicle
and
engine
manufacturers.
Most
manufacturers
use
the
electronic
format
provided
by
EPA
to
submit
their
applications.
Once
the
diskette
containing
the
application
is
received,
the
application
is
entered
into
the
Certification
Database
and
reviewed
for
completeness.
If
the
manufacturer
chooses
to
submit
the
application
in
hard
copy,
then
EPA
enters
the
information
in
the
database.
The
certification
reviewer
analyses
the
application
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
CAA
and
applicable
regulations.
Non
confidential
parts
of
the
application
can
be
accessed
by
the
public
by
contacting
the
EPG
or
through
the
Engine
Certification
Information
Center
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
otaq/
certdata.
htm
.
Currently,
the
Center
contains
information
on
1998
and
later
model
years.

Currently,
manufacturers
have
to
submit
signed
statements
of
compliance
in
hard
copy.
EPA
is
working
to
enable
e­
signature,
so
that
we
can
receive
the
complete
application
by
electronic
transmission
directly
from
the
manufacturer,
further
reducing
costs
and
burden
for
both
the
industry
and
the
agency.

5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
Small
on­
highway
engine
manufacturers
may
use
optional
procedures
outlined
in
86.098­
14
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
general
standards
and
specific
emission
requirements.
These
procedures
apply
to
manufacturers
with
US
sales,
including
all
imported
engines,
of
fewer
than
10,000
units.
The
alternate
procedures
reduce
small
manufacturers'
burden
associated
with
durability
data
requirements,
testing,
determination
of
deterioration
factors
and
certification
test
data.
Small
volume
manufacturers
are
also
exempt
from
some
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
associated
to
the
certification
of
evaporative
families
(
86.098­
22(
m)).
­
20­
EPA
can
also
waive
the
on­
highway
certification
application
fee
upon
request
by
the
manufacturer.
A
fee
waiver
is
granted
if:
(
1)
the
certificate
is
to
be
used
to
sell
engines
within
the
United
States;
and
(
2)
the
full
fee
exceeds
1%
of
the
aggregate
projected
retail
sales
price
of
all
vehicles
covered
by
the
certificate
of
conformity
(
40
CFR
86.908­
93).
Although
this
is
a
provision
available
to
all
manufacturers,
it
is
beneficial
to
some
small
manufacturers.

Under
the
other
programs
included
in
this
ICR,
the
information
being
requested
is
considered
to
be
the
minimum
needed
to
effectively
conduct
and
maintain
integrity
of
the
required
certification
and
enforcement
programs.
Further
measures
to
simplify
reporting
for
small
businesses
do
not
appear
prudent
or
necessary.

5(
d)
Collection
Schedule
Collection
frequency
is
largely
determined
by
the
manufacturer's
marketing
and
product
plans.
Information
must
be
submitted
for
each
`
model
year'
that
a
manufacturer
intends
to
build
(
or
import)
an
engine
model.
A
certificate
of
conformity
must
be
obtained
before
the
start
of
production
(
or
importation).
Taking
these
two
considerations
into
account,
manufacturers
normally
submit
information
on
an
annual
basis
and
submit
their
applications
at
their
earliest
convenience.

6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
Refer
to
Tables
1
to
4
for
details.

6(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
Burden
estimates
were
taken
from
the
previous
ICRs
and
adjusted
to
reflect
comments
from
fewer
than
10
respondents
consulted
by
EPA.

6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs
(
i)
Estimating
Burden
Hours
The
estimated
cost
for
labor
is
$
75
per
hour
for
engineers/
technicians
and
$
38
per
hour
for
clerical
support.
In
deriving
these
costs,
EPA
used
cost
estimates
provided
in
consultations
with
the
industry.
The
labor
cost
rate
provided
by
the
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
($
35.75/
hour
and
$
17.15/
hour,
respectively)
was
not
used.
This
is
an
average
for
all
manufacturing
industries
that
do
not
reflect
the
actual
cost
for
the
engine
manufacturing
industry,
which
is
much
higher.

During
the
next
three
years,
Tier
2
standards
will
become
­
21­
effective
in
four
power
categories
of
nonroad
engines
(
NR4,
NR5,
NR6
and
NR8).
As
part
of
Tier
2
requirements,
manufacturers
must
submit,
for
the
first
time,
deterioration
factors
for
engine
families
in
these
categories.
This
burden
is
reflected
in
Table
1.

In
estimating
respondent
burden
for
the
Nonroad
AB&
T
Program,
a
considerable
amount
of
time
was
allocated
for
regulation
review
and
presented
as
a
separated
item
in
the
burden
table.
The
Nonroad
AB&
T
Program
is
relatively
new
and
EPA
estimates
that
nonroad
engine
manufacturers
still
spend
much
time
reviewing
regulations.
This
is
especially
true
for
manufacturers
of
nonroad
engines
rated
below
50
Hp,
as
these
engines
became
regulated
recently.
EPA
wanted
to
make
this
distinction
by
listing
"
review
of
regulations"
as
a
separate
item
in
the
nonroad
burden
table.
However,
this
item
is
not
listed
in
the
on­
highway
AB&
T
burden
table.
The
on­
highway
AB&
T
Program
has
been
in
place
for
a
long
time
and
manufacturers
are
well
aware
of
the
provisions
of
the
program.
In
this
case,
burden
associated
with
the
occasional
review
of
the
regulations
was
included
in
pre­
certification
activities.

(
ii)
Estimating
Capital
and
Operations
and
Maintenance
Costs
Operation
and
Maintenance
costs
associated
with
all
programs
covered
by
this
information
collection
include
diskettes,
photocopying,
postage
expenses,
maintenance
of
emission
laboratories,
testing
costs,
and
the
on­
highway
certification
fee.
Diskettes
are
used
by
manufacturers
to
submit
their
electronic
applications.

Some
engine
manufacturers
have
in­
house
testing
facilities
for
certification
testing
and
research.
The
cost
of
maintaining
these
laboratories
have
been
estimated
at
$
60,000
per
year.
This
estimate
include
the
cost
of
test
fuels,
calibration
gases
and
equipment.

Other
manufacturers,
usually
smaller
manufacturers,
prefer
to
hire
a
contractor
to
conduct
the
necessary
certification
emission
testing
in
the
contractor's
facilities.
EPA
has
estimated
that
testing
at
a
private
facility
costs,
on
average,
$
20,000.
This
is
a
one­
time
cost
per
engine
family
since
manufacturers
can
carry
over
emissions
data
from
one
model
year
to
the
next.
This
cost
has
been
annualized
over
the
approval
period
requested
for
this
ICR
(
3
years):
$
20,000/
3
years
=
$
6,667.00
per
year.

On­
highway
engine
manufacturers
are
requested
to
pay
a
fee
when
submitting
an
application
for
a
certificate
of
conformity.
This
fee
is
requested
under
the
authority
of
the
CAA
Section
217,
and
established
by
40
CFR
86.907­
93
as
follows:

Heavy
Duty
Engines:
$
12,584.00
per
application
All
Evaporative
only:
$
2,145.00
per
application
­
22­
Manufacturers
can
request
a
fee
waiver
under
the
provisions
of
40
CFR
93(
a).
Refer
to
section
4(
b)
of
this
ICR
for
further
detail.

Capital
costs
were
covered
by
the
previous
ICR
and
incurred
by
engine
manufacturers
at
the
beginning
of
the
certification
programs.
Therefore,
those
costs
are
excluded
from
this
ICR.
EPA
does
not
expect
any
new
nonroad
CI
or
on
highway
engine
manufacturers
to
build
emission
testing
laboratories
in
the
near
future.
Their
emission
testing
expenses
are
covered
under
O&
M
costs
as
explained
above.

(
iii)
Capital/
Start
Up
Costs
There
are
no
capital
or
start
up
costs
associated
with
the
renewal
of
this
ICR.
(
See
6(
b)(
ii)
for
details.)

(
iv)
Annualizing
capital
costs
There
are
no
capital
costs
associated
with
the
renewal
of
this
ICR.
(
See
6(
b)(
ii)
for
details.)

6(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
Government
cost
is
based
on
GS­
13
salary
for
professional
engineers
($
30.29/
hr)
and
on
GS­
7
salary
for
clerical
support
($
14.36).
The
hourly
rates
were
obtained
from
the
Office
of
Personal
Management.
(
Refer
to
Tables
5
and
6.)

6(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
EPA
receives
about
772
certification
applications
from
84
different
engine
manufacturers
each
year.

From
the
on­
highway
sector,
EPA
receives
about
159
(
21%)
applications
annually.
Twenty­
two
(
22)
manufacturers
submit
117
on
highway
heavy­
duty
engine
certification
applications,
59
of
which
are
carry
overs.

Seven
on­
highway
engine
manufacturers
also
submit
applications
for
evaporative
engine
families.
They
submit
around
42
applications
each
year:
36
carry
overs
and
6
"
non­
carry
overs".
Usually,
2
manufacturers
submit
running
changes
(
about
five).
Five
on­
highway
engine
manufacturers
elect
to
participate
in
the
AB&
T
Program
each
year
with
12
engine
families.

Applications
from
62
nonroad
engine
manufacturers
account
for
79%
(
613).
About
393
of
those
applications
are
"
carry
overs"
.
The
remaining
220
applications
are
new
applications
for
which
new
emissions
data
was
collected.
Nonroad
engine
manufacturers
also
submitted
about
264
running
changes,
in
aggregate.
Only
2
manufacturers
participate
in
the
AB&
T
Program
with
15
engine
­
23­
families.

6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Cost
Tables
(
i)
Respondent
Tally
Table
7
Total
Estimated
Respondent
Burden
And
Cost
Summary
Program
Number
of
Respon
Number
of
Activities
Total
Hours
Per
Year
Total
Labor
Cost
Per
Year
Total
Annual
Capital
Costs
Total
Annual
O&
M
Costs
Total
Costs
On­
highway
Certification
22
13
18,269
$
1,217,136
0
$
2,516,656
$
3,733,791
On­
highway
AB&
T
5
6
3,996
$
279,720
0
$
0
$
279,720
Nonroad
Certification
62
8
62,222
$
4,632,225
0
$
1,572,165
$
6,204,390
Nonroad
AB&
T
2
7
4,560
$
318,579
0
$
0
$
318,579
Total
84
34
89,047
$
6,447,660
0
$
4,088,820
$
10,536,480
(
ii)
The
Agency
Tally
Table
8
Total
Estimated
Agency
Burden
And
Cost
Summary
Program
Number
of
Respon
Number
of
Activities
Total
Hours
Per
Year
Total
Labor
Cost
Per
Year
Total
Annual
Capital
Costs
Total
Annual
O&
M
Costs
Certification
84
8
10,433
$
316,010
0
$
1,546
AB&
T
7
4
448
$
13,361
0
$
0
Total
91
12
10,881
$
329,370
0
$
1,546
6(
f)
Reasons
for
change
in
burden
­
24­
Table
9
Total
OMB
Inventory
(
Total
Burden
of
Consolidated
ICRs)

Program
ICR
1684.04
ICR
1851.01
Total
Total
Burden
Hours
78,006
53,169
131,175
Total
Cost
$
0
$
1,606,000
$
1,606,000
Table
10
Comparison
between
original
ICRs
(
1684.04
and
1851.01)
and
the
consolidation
(
1684.05)

Consolidation
ICR
Original
ICRs
combined
Change
Category
Total
Burden
(
Hours)
89,047
131,175
(
42,128)
Adjustment
Total
Cost
$
10,536,480
$
1,606,000
$
8,930,480
Adjustment
Total
burden
has
decreased
for
various
reasons.
First,
EPA
has
developed
an
electronic
database
that
simplifies
the
application
process.
Second,
EPA
has
done
a
better
job
in
this
consolidated
ICR
of
accounting
for
carry
over
applications,
which
require
significantly
less
time
and
expense
to
prepare
since
they
contain
exactly
the
same
information
than
the
original
application.
Although
ICR
1851.01
accounted
for
these
facts,
ICR
1684.04
did
not.
Furthermore,
ICR
1684.04
included
burden
estimates
for
the
first
model
year
(
model
year
1999)
on
which
nonroad
CI
engines
rated
at
or
below
50
Hp
were
regulated.
It
was
estimated
that
the
burden
to
respondents
was
higher
during
the
first
year
due
to
one­
time
preparations
needed
to
apply
for
certification
plus
a
learning
curve.
That
segment
of
the
industry
has
already
been
regulated
for
3
years.
Manufacturers
participating
in
these
programs
have
already
incurred
in
those
one­
time
expenses
and
are
well
aware
of
emission
regulations
and
procedures.
Manufacturers
are
also
increasingly
carrying
over
their
applications
from
one
year
to
the
next.
­
25­
Further
reductions
in
burden
were
offset
by
increased
participation
in
both
the
on­
highway
and
nonroad
AB&
T
programs.
Participation
increased
from
7
to
12
on­
highway
manufacturers,
and
from
5
to
15
nonroad
manufacturers.

There
was
an
increase
in
total
costs,
however,
due
to
the
accounting
for
O&
M
costs,
such
as
laboratory
maintenance
costs
and
the
cost
of
contracting
out
emission
testing.
EPA
did
not
accounted
for
this
expenses
in
the
previous
ICRs.

6(
g)
Burden
Statement
For
on­
highway
engine
manufacturers,
the
burden
associated
with
requesting
certificates
of
conformity
is
estimated
to
average
327
hours
per
application.
For
those
on­
highway
engine
manufacturers
participating
in
the
Average,
Banking
and
Trading
Program,
the
burden
associated
with
this
program
averages
333
hours
per
year.

Nonroad
manufacturers
spend,
in
average,
284
hours
per
application
annually.
The
average
burden
associated
with
participation
in
the
nonroad
Average,
Banking
and
Trading
Program
is
of
460
hours
annually
per
respondent.

These
estimates
include
time
to
review
applicable
regulations
and
guidance
documents,
generate
and
gather
the
necessary
information,
submit
applications
and
reports,
and
maintain
records.

Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
Part
9
and
48
CFR
Chapter
15.

Send
comments
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
through
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques
to
the
Sandy
Farmer,
U.
S.
­
26­
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Collection
Strategies
Division
(
Mail
Code
2822),
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
N.
W.,
Washington,
DC
20460;
and
to
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB),
Attention:
Desk
Officer
for
EPA,
725
17th
Street,
N.
W.,
Washington,
DC
20503.
Include
the
EPA
ICR
number
1684.05
and
OMB
control
number
2060­
0287
in
any
correspondence.

The
following
information
will
be
included
with
the
various
forms:

Form
Approved
OMB
Control
No.
­

Approval
expires
/
/

The
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
of
information
is
estimated
to
average
[
]
hours
or
minutes
per
response
or
to
range
from
[
]
hours
or
minutes
per
respondent
annually.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.

Send
comments
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
through
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques
to
the
Director,
Collection
Strategies
Division,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
2822),
1200
Pennsylvania
Ave.,
NW,
Washington,
D.
C.
20460.
Include
the
OMB
control
number
in
any
correspondence.
Do
not
send
the
completed
[
form
or
survey]
to
this
address.
