375
standards
achieve
sizable
reductions
in
HAP
and
other
pollutant
emissions.

2.
Social
Costs
and
Benefits
The
regulatory
analyses
prepared
for
the
final
rule,

including
our
assessment
of
costs
and
benefits,
is
detailed
in
the
"
Regulatory
Impact
Analysis
for
the
Plywood
and
Composite
Wood
Products
NESHAP"
in
Docket
ID
No.
A­
98­
44.

Based
on
estimated
compliance
costs
associated
with
the
final
rule
and
the
predicted
change
in
prices
and
production
in
the
affected
industries,
the
estimated
social
costs
of
the
final
rule
are
$
135.1
million
(
1999
dollars).
The
social
costs
of
the
final
rule
are
the
costs
imposed
upon
society
as
a
result
of
efforts
toward
compliance,
and
include
the
effects
upon
consumers
of
products
made
by
the
affected
facilities.

It
is
estimated
that
3
years
after
implementation
of
the
final
rule,
HAP
would
be
reduced
by
9,700
Mg/
yr
(
11,000
tons/
yr)
due
to
reductions
in
formaldehyde,

acetaldehyde,
acrolein,
methanol
and
other
HAP
from
PCWP
sources.
Formaldehyde
and
acetaldehyde
have
been
classified
as
"
probable
human
carcinogens."
Acrolein,
methanol
and
the
other
HAP
are
not
considered
carcinogenic,
but
produce
several
other
toxic
effects.
The
requirements
of
the
final
rule
would
also
achieve
reductions
of
10,000
Mg/
yr
(
11,000
tons/
yr)
of
CO,
approximately
11,000
Mg/
yr
376
(
13,000
tons/
yr)
of
PM10,
and
approximately
25,000
Mg/
yr
(
27,000
tons/
yr)
of
VOC
(
approximated
as
THC).
Exposure
to
CO
can
effect
the
cardiovascular
system
and
the
CNS.
The
PM
emissions
can
result
in
fatalities
and
many
respiratory
problems
(
such
as
asthma
or
bronchitis).
These
estimates
will
be
reduced
to
the
extent
facilities
demonstrate
eligibility
to
be
included
in
the
delisted
low­
risk
subcategory.
These
estimated
reductions
occur
from
existing
sources
in
operation
3
years
after
implementation
of
the
requirements
of
the
final
rule
and
are
expected
to
continue
throughout
the
life
of
the
sources.
Human
health
effects
associated
with
exposure
to
CO
include
cardiovascular
system
and
CNS
effects,
which
are
directly
related
to
reduced
oxygen
content
of
blood
and
which
can
result
in
modification
of
visual
perception,
hearing,
motor
and
sensorimotor
performance,
vigilance,
and
cognitive
ability.
The
VOC
emissions
reductions
may
lead
to
some
reduction
in
ozone
concentrations
in
areas
in
which
the
affected
sources
are
located.
There
are
both
human
health
and
welfare
effects
that
result
from
exposure
to
ozone,
and
these
effects
are
listed
in
Table
3
of
this
preamble.

As
mentioned
earlier
in
this
preamble,
we
are
unable
to
provide
a
comprehensive
quantification
and
monetization
of
the
HAP­
related
benefits
of
the
final
rule.
Nevertheless,

it
is
possible
to
derive
rough
estimates
for
one
of
the
more
377
important
benefit
categories,
i.
e.,
the
potential
number
of
cancer
cases
avoided
and
cancer
risk
reduced
as
a
result
of
the
imposition
of
the
MACT
level
of
control
on
this
source
category.
Our
analysis
suggests
that
imposition
of
the
MACT
level
of
control
would
reduce
cancer
cases
by
less
than
one
case
per
year,
on
average,
starting
some
years
after
implementation
of
the
standards.
We
present
these
results
in
the
RIA.
This
risk
reduction
estimate
is
uncertain
and
should
be
regarded
as
an
extremely
rough
estimate
and
should
be
viewed
in
the
context
of
the
full
spectrum
of
unquantified
noncancer
effects
associated
with
the
HAP
reductions.

At
the
present
time,
we
cannot
provide
a
monetary
estimate
for
the
benefits
associated
with
the
reductions
in
CO.
We
also
did
not
provide
a
monetary
estimate
for
the
benefits
associated
with
the
changes
in
ozone
concentrations
that
result
from
the
VOC
emissions
reductions
since
we
are
unable
to
do
the
necessary
air
quality
modeling
to
estimate
the
ozone
concentration
changes.
For
PM10,
we
did
not
provide
a
monetary
estimate
for
the
benefits
associated
with
the
reduction
of
these
emissions,
although
these
reductions
are
likely
to
have
significant
health
benefits
to
populations
living
in
the
vicinity
of
affected
sources.

There
may
be
increases
in
NOX
emissions
associated
with
today's
final
rule
as
a
result
of
increased
use
of
378
incineration­
based
controls.
These
NOX
emission
increases
by
themselves
could
cause
some
increase
in
ozone
and
PM
concentrations,
which
could
lead
to
impacts
on
human
health
and
welfare
as
listed
in
Table
3
of
this
preamble.
The
potential
impacts
associated
with
increases
in
ambient
PM
and
ozone
due
to
these
emission
increases
are
discussed
in
the
RIA.
In
addition
to
potential
NOX
increases
at
affected
sources,
today's
final
rule
may
also
result
in
additional
electricity
use
at
affected
sources
due
to
application
of
controls.
These
potential
increases
in
electricity
use
may
increase
emissions
of
SO2
and
NOX
from
electricity
generating
utilities.
As
such,
the
final
rule
may
result
in
additional
health
impacts
from
increased
ambient
PM
and
ozone
from
these
increased
utility
emissions.
We
did
not
quantify
or
monetize
these
impacts.

Every
benefit­
cost
analysis
examining
the
potential
effects
of
a
change
in
environmental
protection
requirements
is
limited
to
some
extent
by
data
gaps,
limitations
in
model
capabilities
(
such
as
geographic
coverage),
and
uncertainties
in
the
underlying
scientific
and
economic
studies
used
to
configure
the
benefit
and
cost
models.

Deficiencies
in
the
scientific
literature
often
result
in
the
inability
to
estimate
changes
in
health
and
environmental
effects,
such
as
potential
increases
in
premature
mortality
associated
with
increased
exposure
to
379
CO.
Deficiencies
in
the
economics
literature
often
result
in
the
inability
to
assign
economic
values
even
to
those
health
and
environmental
outcomes
which
can
be
quantified.

These
general
uncertainties
in
the
underlying
scientific
and
economics
literatures
are
discussed
in
detail
in
the
RIA
and
its
supporting
documents
and
references.

3.
Regulatory
Alternatives
Considered
The
final
standards
reflect
the
MACT
floor,
the
least
stringent
regulatory
alternative
required
under
the
CAA.
In
addition,
the
final
rule
includes
the
least
burdensome
and
most
flexible
monitoring,
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
requirements
that
we
feel
will
assure
compliance
with
the
compliance
options
and
rule
requirements.
Therefore,
the
standards
reflect
the
least
costly,
most
cost­
effective,
and
least
burdensome
regulatory
option
that
achieves
the
objectives
of
the
final
rule.

4.
Effects
on
the
National
Economy
The
economic
impact
analysis
for
the
final
rule
estimates
effects
upon
employment
and
foreign
trade
for
the
industries
affected
by
the
rule.
The
total
reduction
in
employment
for
the
affected
industries
is
0.3
percent
of
the
current
employment
level
(
or
225
employees).
This
estimate
includes
the
increase
in
employment
among
firms
in
these
industries
that
do
not
incur
any
cost
associated
with
the
final
rule.
There
is
also
minimal
change
in
the
foreign
380
trade
behavior
for
the
firms
in
these
industries
since
the
level
of
imports
of
affected
composite
wood
products
only
increases
by
less
than
0.1
percent.
There
will
be
reductions
in
effects
on
the
national
economy
associated
with
eligibility
of
sources
for
the
delisted
low­
risk
subcategory.
The
employment
level
will
now
be
reduced
by
126
employees,
which
is
99
fewer
than
the
reduction
estimated
for
the
final
rule.
The
increase
in
the
level
of
imports
is
half
as
large
as
that
for
the
final
rule.

5.
Consultation
with
Government
Officials
Throughout
the
development
of
the
final
rule,
we
interacted
with
representatives
of
affected
State
and
local
officials
to
inform
them
of
the
progress
of
our
rulemaking
efforts.
We
also
consulted
with
representatives
from
other
entities
affected
by
the
final
rule,
such
as
the
American
Forest
&
Paper
Association,
National
Council
for
Air
and
Stream
Improvement,
APA­
The
Engineered
Wood
Association,

Composite
Panel
Association,
American
Hardboard
Association,

Hardwood
Plywood
and
Veneer
Association,
and
representatives
from
affected
companies.

The
number
of
small
entities
that
are
significantly
affected
by
today's
final
PCWP
standards
is
not
expected
to
be
substantial.
The
final
rule
contains
no
regulatory
requirements
that
might
significantly
affect
small
governments
because
no
PCWP
facilities
are
owned
by
such
381
governments.
The
full
analysis
of
potential
regulatory
impacts
on
small
organizations,
small
governments,
and
small
businesses
is
included
in
the
economic
impact
analysis
in
the
docket
and
is
listed
at
the
beginning
of
today's
action
under
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Because
the
number
of
small
entities
that
are
likely
to
experience
significant
economic
impacts
as
a
result
of
today's
final
standards
is
not
expected
to
be
substantial,
no
plan
to
inform
and
advise
small
governments
is
required
under
section
203
of
the
UMRA.

E.
Executive
Order
13132:
Federalism
Executive
Order
13132
(
64
FR
43255,
August
10,
1999)

requires
EPA
to
develop
an
accountable
process
to
ensure
"
meaningful
and
timely
input
by
State
and
local
officials
in
the
development
of
regulatory
policies
that
have
federalism
implications."
"
Policies
that
have
federalism
implications"

is
defined
in
the
Executive
Order
to
include
regulations
that
have
"
substantial
direct
effects
on
the
States,
on
the
relationship
between
the
national
government
and
the
States,

or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
among
the
various
levels
of
government."
Under
Executive
Order
13132,
the
EPA
may
not
issue
a
regulation
that
has
federalism
implications,
that
imposes
substantial
direct
compliance
costs,
and
that
is
not
required
by
statute,

unless
the
Federal
government
provides
the
funds
necessary
to
pay
the
direct
compliance
costs
incurred
by
State
and
382
local
governments,
or
EPA
consults
with
State
and
local
officials
early
in
the
process
of
developing
the
proposed
regulation.
The
EPA
also
may
not
issue
a
regulation
that
has
federalism
implications
and
that
preempts
State
law
unless
EPA
consults
with
State
and
local
officials
early
in
the
process
of
developing
the
proposed
regulation.

If
EPA
complies
by
consulting,
Executive
Order
13132
requires
EPA
to
provide
to
OMB,
in
a
separately
identified
section
of
the
preamble
to
the
rule,
a
federalism
summary
impact
statement
(
FSIS).
The
FSIS
must
include
a
description
of
the
extent
of
EPA's
prior
consultation
with
State
and
local
officials,
a
summary
of
the
nature
of
their
concerns
and
EPA's
position
supporting
the
need
to
issue
the
regulation,
and
a
statement
of
the
extent
to
which
the
concerns
of
State
and
local
officials
have
been
met.
Also,

when
EPA
transmits
a
draft
final
rule
with
federalism
implications
to
OMB
for
review
pursuant
to
Executive
Order
12866,
it
must
include
a
certification
from
EPA's
Federalism
Official
stating
that
EPA
has
met
the
requirements
of
Executive
Order
13132
in
a
meaningful
and
timely
manner.

Today's
final
rule
does
not
have
federalism
implications.
It
will
not
have
substantial
direct
effects
on
the
States,
on
the
relationship
between
the
national
government
and
the
States,
or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
among
the
various
levels
of
government,
383
as
specified
in
Executive
Order
13132.
None
of
the
affected
facilities
are
owned
or
operated
by
State
governments,
and
the
final
rule
requirements
will
not
supercede
State
regulations
that
are
more
stringent.
Thus,
the
requirements
of
Executive
Order
13132
do
not
apply
to
the
final
rule.

F.
Executive
Order
13175:
Consultation
and
Coordination
with
Indian
Tribal
Governments
Executive
Order
13175
(
65
FR
67249,
November
6,
2000)

requires
EPA
to
develop
an
accountable
process
to
ensure
"
meaningful
and
timely
input
by
tribal
officials
in
the
development
of
regulatory
policies
that
have
tribal
implications."
"
Policies
that
have
tribal
implications"
is
defined
in
the
Executive
Order
to
include
regulations
that
have
"
substantial
direct
effects
on
one
or
more
Indian
tribes,
on
the
relationship
between
the
Federal
government
and
the
Indian
tribes,
or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
between
the
Federal
government
and
Indian
tribes."

Today's
final
rule
does
not
have
tribal
implications.

It
will
not
have
substantial
direct
effects
on
tribal
governments,
on
the
relationship
between
the
Federal
government
and
Indian
tribes,
or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
between
the
Federal
government
and
Indian
tribes,
as
specified
in
Executive
Order
13175.

No
affected
plant
sites
are
owned
or
operated
by
Indian
384
tribal
governments.
Thus,
Executive
Order
13175
does
not
apply
to
the
final
rule.

G.
Executive
Order
13045:
Protection
of
Children
from
Environmental
Health
&
Safety
Risks
Executive
Order
13045
(
62
FR
19885,
April
23,
1997)

applies
to
any
rule
that:
(
1)
is
determined
to
be
"
economically
significant,"
as
defined
under
Executive
Order
12866,
and
(
2)
concerns
an
environmental
health
or
safety
risk
that
EPA
has
reason
to
feel
may
have
a
disproportionate
effect
on
children.
If
the
regulatory
action
meets
both
criteria,
the
EPA
must
evaluate
the
environmental
health
or
safety
effects
of
the
planned
rule
on
children
and
explain
why
the
planned
regulation
is
preferable
to
other
potentially
effective
and
reasonably
feasible
alternatives
considered
by
the
Agency.

The
Agency
does
not
have
reason
to
feel
that
the
environmental
health
or
safety
risks
associated
with
the
emissions
addressed
by
today's
final
rule
present
a
disproportionate
risk
to
children.
This
demonstration
is
based
on
the
fact
that
the
noncancer
human
health
values
we
used
in
our
analysis
(
e.
g.,
RfC)
are
determined
to
be
protective
of
sensitive
subpopulations,
including
children.

Also,
while
the
cancer
human
health
values
do
not
always
expressly
account
for
cancer
effects
in
children,
the
cancer
risks
posed
by
PCWP
facilities
that
meet
the
eligibility
385
criteria
for
being
included
in
the
delisted
low­
risk
subcategory
will
be
sufficiently
low
so
as
not
to
be
a
concern
for
anyone
in
the
population,
including
children.

H.
Executive
Order
13211:
Actions
that
Significantly
Affect
Energy
Supply,
Distribution,
or
Use
Executive
Order
13211
(
66
FR
28355,
May
22,
2001)

provides
that
agencies
shall
prepare
and
submit
to
the
Administrator
of
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
a
Statement
of
Energy
Effects
for
certain
actions
identified
as
"
significant
energy
actions."
Section
4(
b)
of
Executive
Order
13211
defines
"
significant
energy
actions"
as
"
any
action
by
an
agency
(
normally
published
in
the
Federal
Register)
that
promulgates
or
is
expected
to
lead
to
the
promulgation
of
a
final
rule
or
regulation,
including
notices
of
inquiry,
advance
notices
of
proposed
rulemaking,

and
notices
of
proposed
rulemaking:
(
1)
(
i)
that
is
a
significant
regulatory
action
under
Executive
Order
12866
or
any
successor
order,
and
(
ii)
is
likely
to
have
a
significant
adverse
effect
on
the
supply,
distribution,
or
use
of
energy;
or
(
2)
that
is
designated
by
the
Administrator
of
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs
as
a
significant
energy
action."
The
final
rule
is
not
a
"
significant
energy
action"
because
it
is
not
likely
to
have
a
significant
adverse
effect
on
the
supply,
386
9U.
S.
Department
of
Energy,
Energy
Information
Administration.
Annual
Energy
Review,
End­
Use
Energy
Consumption
for
1998.
Located
on
the
Internet
at
http://
www.
eia.
doe.
gov/
emeu/
aer/
enduse.
html.
distribution,
or
use
of
energy.
The
basis
for
the
determination
is
as
follows.

The
final
rule
affects
manufacturers
in
the
softwood
veneer
and
plywood
(
NAICS
321212),
reconstituted
wood
products
(
NAICS
321219),
and
engineered
wood
products
(
NAICS
321213)
industries.
There
is
no
crude
oil,
fuel,
or
coal
production
from
these
industries.
Hence,
there
is
no
direct
effect
on
such
energy
production
related
to
implementation
of
this
proposal.
In
fact,
as
previously
mentioned
in
this
preamble,
there
will
be
an
increase
in
energy
consumption,

and
hence
an
increase
in
energy
production,
resulting
from
installation
of
RTO
and
WESP
likely
needed
for
sources
to
meet
the
requirements
of
the
final
rule.
This
increase
in
energy
consumption
is
equal
to
718
GWh/
yr
for
electricity
and
45
million
m3/
yr
(
1.6
billion
ft3/
yr)
for
natural
gas.

These
increases
are
equivalent
to
0.012
percent
of
1998
U.
S.

electricity
production
and
0.000001
percent
of
1998
U.
S.

natural
gas
production.
9
It
should
be
noted,
however,
that
the
reduction
in
demand
for
product
output
from
these
industries
may
lead
to
a
negative
indirect
effect
on
such
energy
production,
for
the
output
reduction
will
lead
to
less
energy
use
by
these
industries
and
thus
some
reduction
387
10
Ibid.
in
overall
energy
production.

For
fuel
production,
the
result
of
this
indirect
effect
from
reduced
product
output
is
a
reduction
of
only
about
1
barrel
per
day
nationwide,
or
a
0.00001
percent
reduction
nationwide
based
on
1998
U.
S.
fuel
production
data.
10
For
coal
production,
the
resulting
indirect
effect
from
reduced
product
output
is
a
reduction
of
only
2,000
tons
per
year
nationwide,
or
only
a
0.00001
percent
reduction
nationwide
based
on
1998
U.
S.
coal
production
data.
For
electricity
production,
the
resulting
indirect
effect
from
reduced
product
output
is
a
reduction
of
42.8
GWh/
yr,
or
only
a
0.00013
percent
reduction
nationwide
based
on
1998
U.
S.

electricity
production
data.
Given
that
the
estimated
price
increase
for
product
output
from
any
of
the
affected
industries
is
no
more
than
2.5
percent,
there
should
be
no
price
increase
for
any
energy
type
by
more
than
this
amount.

The
cost
of
energy
distribution
should
not
be
affected
by
the
final
rule
at
all
since
the
rule
does
not
affect
energy
distribution
facilities.
Finally,
with
changes
in
net
exports
being
a
minimal
percentage
of
domestic
output
(
0.01
percent)
from
the
affected
industries,
there
will
be
only
a
negligible
change
in
international
trade,
and
hence
in
dependence
on
foreign
energy
supplies.
No
other
adverse
outcomes
are
expected
to
occur
with
regards
to
energy
388
11U.
S.
Department
of
Energy,
Energy
Information
Administration.
1998
Manufacturing
Energy
Consumption
Survey.
Located
on
the
Internet
at
http://
www.
eia.
doe.
gov/
emeu/
mecs/
mecs98/
datatables/
contents.
html.

12U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
"
Energy
Impact
Analysis
of
the
Proposed
Plywood
and
Composite
Wood
Products
NESHAP."
July
30,
2001.

13
Ibid.
supplies.
Thus,
the
net
effect
of
the
final
rule
on
energy
production
is
an
increase
in
electricity
output
of
0.012
percent
compared
to
1998
output
data,
and
a
negligible
change
in
output
of
other
energy
types.
All
of
the
results
presented
above
account
for
the
passthrough
of
costs
to
consumers,
as
well
as
the
cost
impact
to
producers.
These
results
also
account
for
how
energy
use
is
related
to
product
output
for
the
affected
industries.
11
For
more
information
on
the
estimated
energy
effects,
please
refer
to
the
background
memo12
to
these
calculations
and
the
economic
impact
analysis
for
the
final
rule.
The
background
memo
and
economic
impact
analysis
are
available
in
the
public
docket.

The
impacts
from
consideration
of
a
low­
risk
subcategory
are
a
reduction
in
all
of
the
energy
impacts
listed
above.

For
fuel
production,
the
result
of
this
indirect
effect
from
reduced
product
output
is
a
reduction
of
only
about
0.6
barrel
per
day
nationwide,
or
a
0.000007
percent
reduction
nationwide
based
on
1998
U.
S.
fuel
production
data.
13
This
is
a
0.4
barrel
smaller
reduction
than
that
estimated
for
389
the
final
rule.
For
coal
production,
the
resulting
indirect
effect
from
reduced
product
output
is
a
reduction
of
only
950
tons
per
year
nationwide,
or
only
a
0.0000044
percent
reduction
nationwide
based
on
1998
U.
S.
coal
production
data.
This
is
a
smaller
reduction
than
that
estimated
for
the
final
rule
by
1,050
tons
per
year.
For
electricity
production,
the
resulting
indirect
effect
from
reduced
product
output
is
a
reduction
of
20.7
million
kWh/
yr,
or
only
a
0.00006
percent
reduction
nationwide
based
on
1998
U.
S.
electricity
production
data.
This
is
a
smaller
output
reduction
than
that
estimated
for
the
final
rule
by
22.1
million
kWh/
yr.
Given
that
the
estimated
price
increase
for
product
output
from
any
of
the
affected
industries
is
no
more
than
2.5
percent,
there
should
be
no
price
increase
for
any
energy
type
by
more
than
this
amount.
The
cost
of
energy
distribution
should
not
be
affected
by
the
final
rule
at
all
since
the
rule
does
not
affect
energy
distribution
facilities.
Finally,
with
changes
in
net
exports
being
a
minimal
percentage
of
domestic
output
(
0.006
percent,
or
practically
the
same
as
that
for
the
final
rule)
from
the
affected
industries,
there
will
be
only
a
negligible
change
in
international
trade,
and
hence
in
dependence
on
foreign
energy
supplies.
No
other
adverse
outcomes
are
expected
to
occur
with
regards
to
energy
supplies.
Thus,
the
net
effect
on
energy
production
if
facilities
are
eligible
for
the
low­
390
14U.
S.
Department
of
Energy,
Energy
Information
Administration.
1998
Manufacturing
Energy
Consumption
Survey.
Located
on
the
Internet
at
http://
www.
eia.
doe.
gov/
emeu/
mecs/
mecs98/
datatables/
contents.
html.
risk
source
category
is
an
increase
in
electricity
output
of
0.008
percent
compared
to
1998
output
data,
and
a
negligible
change
in
output
of
other
energy
types.
This
is
a
0.004
percent
smaller
increase
in
electricity
output
compared
to
the
impact
of
the
final
rule.
All
of
the
results
presented
above
account
for
the
passthrough
of
costs
to
consumers,
as
well
as
the
cost
impact
to
producers.

These
results
also
account
for
how
energy
use
is
related
to
product
output
for
the
affected
industries.
14
Therefore,
we
conclude
that
the
final
rule
is
not
likely
to
have
a
significant
adverse
effect
on
the
supply,

distribution,
or
use
of
energy.

I.
National
Technology
Transfer
and
Advancement
Act
Section
12(
d)
of
the
National
Technology
Transfer
and
Advancement
Act
(
NTTAA)
of
1995
(
Public
Law
No.
104­
113;

15
U.
S.
C.
272
note)
directs
the
EPA
to
use
voluntary
consensus
standards
in
their
regulatory
and
procurement
activities
unless
to
do
so
would
be
inconsistent
with
applicable
law
or
otherwise
impractical.
Voluntary
consensus
standards
are
technical
standards
(
e.
g.,
materials
specifications,
test
methods,
sampling
procedures,
business
practices)
developed
or
adopted
by
one
or
more
voluntary
391
consensus
bodies.
The
NTTAA
directs
EPA
to
provide
Congress,
through
annual
reports
to
OMB,
with
explanations
when
an
agency
does
not
use
available
and
applicable
voluntary
consensus
standards.

The
final
rulemaking
involves
technical
standards.
The
EPA
cites
the
following
standards
in
the
final
rule:
EPA
Methods
1,
1A,
2,
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
2G,
3,
3A,
3B,
4,
18,
25A,

and
29
in
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
204
and
204A
through
F
in
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M;
308,
316,
and
320
in
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A;
EPA
Method
0011
in
EPA
publication
no.

SW
846
("
Test
Methods
for
Evaluating
Solid
Waste,

Physical/
Chemical
Methods")
for
formaldehyde;
and
two
NCASI
methods:
NCASI
Method
CI/
WP­
98.01
(
1998),
"
Chilled
Impinger
Method
For
Use
At
Wood
Products
Mills
to
Measure
Formaldehyde,
Methanol,
and
Phenol,"
and
NCASI
Method
IM/
CAN/
WP­
99.02
(
2003),
"
Impinger/
Canister
Source
Sampling
Method
For
Selected
HAPs
and
Other
Compounds
at
Wood
Products
Facilities."

Consistent
with
the
NTTAA,
EPA
conducted
searches
to
identify
voluntary
consensus
standards
in
addition
to
these
EPA
methods/
performance
specifications.
No
applicable
voluntary
consensus
standards
were
identified
for
EPA
Methods
1A,
2A,
2D,
2F,
2G,
204,
204A
through
204F,
308,
and
316.
The
search
and
review
results
have
been
documented
and
are
placed
in
Docket
numbers
OAR­
2003­
0048
and
A­
98­
44
for
392
the
final
rule.

One
voluntary
consensus
standard
was
identified
as
an
acceptable
alternative
to
EPA
test
methods
for
the
purposes
of
the
final
rule.
The
voluntary
consensus
standard
ASTM
D6348­
03,
"
Standard
Test
Method
for
Determination
of
Gaseous
Compounds
by
Extractive
Direct
Interface
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
(
FTIR)
Spectroscopy,"
is
an
acceptable
alternative
to
EPA
Method
320
provided
that
the
percent
R
as
determined
in
Annex
A5
of
ASTM
D6348­
03
is
equal
or
greater
than
70
percent
and
less
than
or
equal
to
130
percent.
Also,
the
moisture
determination
in
ASTM
D6348­
03
is
an
acceptable
alternative
to
the
measurement
of
moisture
using
EPA
Method
4.

In
addition
to
the
voluntary
consensus
standards
the
EPA
uses
in
the
final
rule,
the
search
for
emissions
measurement
procedures
identified
13
other
voluntary
consensus
standards.
The
EPA
determined
that
11
of
those
13
voluntary
consensus
standards
identified
for
measuring
emissions
of
the
HAP
or
surrogates
subject
to
emission
standards
in
the
rule
were
impractical
alternatives
to
EPA
test
methods
for
the
purposes
of
the
final
rule.
Therefore,
EPA
does
not
intend
to
adopt
those
standards
for
that
purpose.
(
See
Dockets
A­
44­
98
and
OAR­
2003­
0048
for
the
reasons
for
the
determination
for
the
11
methods.)

Table
4
to
subpart
DDDD
of
40
CFR
part
63
lists
the
EPA
393
testing
methods
included
in
the
regulation.
Under
§
§
63.7(
f)

and
63.8(
f)
of
subpart
A
of
the
General
Provisions,
a
source
may
apply
to
EPA
for
permission
to
use
alternative
test
methods
or
alternative
monitoring
requirements
in
place
of
any
of
the
EPA
testing
methods,
performance
specifications,

or
procedures.

J.
Congressional
Review
Act
The
Congressional
Review
Act,
5
U.
S.
C.
801
et
seq.,
as
added
by
the
Small
Business
Regulatory
Enforcement
Fairness
Act
of
1996,
generally
provides
that
before
a
rule
may
take
effect,
the
agency
promulgating
the
rule
must
submit
a
rule
report,
which
includes
a
copy
of
the
rule,
to
each
House
of
the
Congress
and
to
the
Comptroller
General
of
the
United
States.
The
EPA
will
submit
a
report
containing
this
rule
and
other
required
information
to
the
U.
S.
Senate,
the
U.
S.

House
of
Representatives,
and
the
Comptroller
General
of
the
United
States
prior
to
publication
of
the
rule
in
the
Federal
Register.
A
major
rule
cannot
take
effect
until
60
days
after
it
is
published
in
the
Federal
Register.
This
action
is
a
"
major
rule"
as
defined
by
5
U.
S.
C.
804(
2).
The
final
rule
will
be
effective
[
INSERT
DATE
60
DAYS
AFTER
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER].
NESHAP:
Plywood
and
Composite
Wood
Products­­
Page
394
of
528
394
List
of
Subjects
in
40
CFR
Part
63
Environmental
protection,
Administrative
practice
and
procedure,
Air
pollution
control,
Hazardous
substances,

Intergovernmental
relations,
Incorporation
by
reference,

Reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements.

Dated:

Michael
O.
Leavitt,

Administrator.
395
For
the
reasons
stated
in
the
preamble,
title
40,
chapter
I,

part
63
of
the
Code
of
Federal
Regulations
is
amended
as
follows:

PART
63­­[
AMENDED]

1.
The
authority
citation
for
part
63
continues
to
read
as
follows:

Authority:
42
U.
S.
C.
7401
et
seq.

SUBPART
A­­[
AMENDED]

2.
Section
63.14
is
amended
by
adding
paragraph
(
b)(
39)
and
revising
paragraph
(
f)
to
read
as
follows:

§
63.14
Incorporation
by
reference.

*
*
*
*
*

(
b)
*
*
*

(
39)
ASTM
D6348­
03,
Standard
Test
Method
for
Determination
of
Gaseous
Compounds
by
Extractive
Direct
Interface
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
(
FTIR)
Spectroscopy,

incorporation
by
reference
(
IBR)
approved
for
Table
4
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
this
part
and
Appendix
B
to
subpart
DDDD
of
this
part
as
specified
in
the
subpart.

*
*
*
*
*

(
f)
The
following
material
is
available
from
the
National
Council
of
the
Paper
Industry
for
Air
and
Stream
Improvement,
Inc.
(
NCASI),
P.
O.
Box
133318,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27709­
3318
or
at
http://
www.
ncasi.
org.

(
1)
NCASI
Method
DI/
MEOH­
94.02,
Methanol
in
Process
396
Liquids
GC/
FID
(
Gas
Chromatography/
Flame
Ionization
Detection),
August
1998,
Methods
Manual,
NCASI,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
IBR
approved
for
§
63.457(
c)(
3)(
ii)
of
subpart
S
of
this
part.

(
2)
NCASI
Method
CI/
WP­
98.01,
Chilled
Impinger
Method
For
Use
At
Wood
Products
Mills
to
Measure
Formaldehyde,

Methanol,
and
Phenol,
1998,
Methods
Manual,
NCASI,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
IBR
approved
for
Table
4
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
this
part
and
Appendix
B
to
subpart
DDDD
of
this
part.

(
3)
NCASI
Method
IM/
CAN/
WP­
99.02,
Impinger/
Canister
Source
Sampling
Method
For
Selected
HAPs
and
Other
Compounds
at
Wood
Products
Facilities,
January
2004,
Methods
Manual,

NCASI,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC,
IBR
approved
for
Table
4
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
this
part
and
Appendix
B
to
subpart
DDDD
of
this
part.

*
*
*
*
*

3.
Part
63
is
amended
by
adding
subpart
DDDD
to
read
as
follows:

Subpart
DDDD­­
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Plywood
and
Composite
Wood
Products
Sec.

What
This
Subpart
Covers
63.2230
What
is
the
purpose
of
this
subpart?
63.2231
Does
this
subpart
apply
to
me?
63.2232
What
parts
of
my
plant
does
this
subpart
cover?
63.2233
When
do
I
have
to
comply
with
this
subpart?

Compliance
Options,
Operating
Requirements,
and
Work
397
Practice
Requirements
63.2240
What
are
the
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
and
how
must
I
meet
them?
63.2241
What
are
the
work
practice
requirements
and
how
must
I
meet
them?

General
Compliance
Requirements
63.2250
What
are
the
general
requirements?
63.2251
What
are
the
requirements
for
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption?

Initial
Compliance
Requirements
63.2260
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements?
63.2261
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
performance
tests
or
other
initial
compliance
demonstrations?
63.2262
How
do
I
conduct
performance
tests
and
establish
operating
requirements?
63.2263
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
dry
rotary
dryer.
63.2264
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
hardwood
veneer
dryer.
63.2265
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
softwood
veneer
dryer.
63.2266
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
veneer
redryer.
63.2267
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
reconstituted
wood
product
press
or
board
cooler.
63.2268
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
wet
control
device.
63.2269
What
are
my
monitoring
installation,
operation,
and
maintenance
requirements?

Continuous
Compliance
Requirements
63.2270
How
do
I
monitor
and
collect
data
to
demonstrate
continuous
compliance?
63.2271
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements?

Notifications,
Reports,
and
Records
63.2280
What
notifications
must
I
submit
and
when?
63.2281
What
reports
must
I
submit
and
when?
63.2282
What
records
must
I
keep?
63.2283
In
what
form
and
how
long
must
I
keep
my
records?

Other
Requirements
and
Information
398
63.2290
What
parts
of
the
General
Provisions
apply
to
me?
63.2291
Who
implements
and
enforces
this
subpart?
63.2292
What
definitions
apply
to
this
subpart?

Tables
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
Table
1A
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Production­
Based
Compliance
Options
Table
1B
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Add­
On
Control
Systems
Compliance
Options
Table
2
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Operating
Requirements
Table
3
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Work
Practice
Requirements
Table
4
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Requirements
for
Performance
Tests
Table
5
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Performance
Testing
and
Initial
Compliance
Demonstrations
for
the
Compliance
Options
and
Operating
Requirements
Table
6
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Initial
Compliance
Demonstrations
for
Work
Practice
Requirements
Table
7
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Continuous
Compliance
With
the
Compliance
Options
and
Operating
Requirements
Table
8
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Continuous
Compliance
With
the
Work
Practice
Requirements
Table
9
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Requirements
for
Reports
Table
10
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
­
Applicability
of
General
Provisions
to
Subpart
DDDD
Appendix
Appendix
A
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
 
Alternative
Procedure
to
Determine
Capture
Efficiency
from
Enclosures
Around
Hot
Presses
in
the
Plywood
and
Composite
Wood
Products
Industry
Using
Sulfur
Hexafluoride
Tracer
Gas
Appendix
B
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
 
Methodology
and
Criteria
for
Demonstrating
That
An
Affected
Source
is
Part
of
the
Low­
risk
Subcategory
of
Plywood
and
Composite
Wood
Products
Manufacturing
Facilities
What
This
Subpart
Covers
§
63.2230
What
is
the
purpose
of
this
subpart?

This
subpart
establishes
national
compliance
options,

operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements
for
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAP)
emitted
from
plywood
and
composite
wood
products
(
PCWP)
manufacturing
facilities.
399
This
subpart
also
establishes
requirements
to
demonstrate
initial
and
continuous
compliance
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements.

§
63.2231
Does
this
subpart
apply
to
me?

This
subpart
applies
to
you
if
you
meet
the
criteria
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
b)
of
this
section,
except
for
facilities
that
the
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)

determines
are
part
of
the
low­
risk
subcategory
of
PCWP
manufacturing
facilities
as
specified
in
appendix
B
to
this
subpart.

(
a)
You
own
or
operate
a
PCWP
manufacturing
facility.

A
PCWP
manufacturing
facility
is
a
facility
that
manufactures
plywood
and/
or
composite
wood
products
by
bonding
wood
material
(
fibers,
particles,
strands,
veneers,

etc.)
or
agricultural
fiber,
generally
with
resin
under
heat
and
pressure,
to
form
a
structural
panel
or
engineered
wood
product.
Plywood
and
composite
wood
products
manufacturing
facilities
also
include
facilities
that
manufacture
dry
veneer
and
lumber
kilns
located
at
any
facility.
Plywood
and
composite
wood
products
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,

plywood,
veneer,
particleboard,
oriented
strandboard,

hardboard,
fiberboard,
medium
density
fiberboard,
laminated
strand
lumber,
laminated
veneer
lumber,
wood
I­
joists,

kilndried
lumber,
and
glue­
laminated
beams.
400
(
b)
The
PCWP
manufacturing
facility
is
located
at
a
major
source
of
HAP
emissions.
A
major
source
of
HAP
emissions
is
any
stationary
source
or
group
of
stationary
sources
within
a
contiguous
area
and
under
common
control
that
emits
or
has
the
potential
to
emit
any
single
HAP
at
a
rate
of
9.07
megagrams
(
10
tons)
or
more
per
year
or
any
combination
of
HAP
at
a
rate
of
22.68
megagrams
(
25
tons)
or
more
per
year.

§
63.2232
What
parts
of
my
plant
does
this
subpart
cover?

(
a)
This
subpart
applies
to
each
new,
reconstructed,

or
existing
affected
source
at
a
PCWP
manufacturing
facility.

(
b)
The
affected
source
is
the
collection
of
dryers,

refiners,
blenders,
formers,
presses,
board
coolers,
and
other
process
units
associated
with
the
manufacturing
of
plywood
and
composite
wood
products.
The
affected
source
includes,
but
is
not
limited
to,
green
end
operations,

refining,
drying
operations,
resin
preparation,
blending
and
forming
operations,
pressing
and
board
cooling
operations,

and
miscellaneous
finishing
operations
(
such
as
sanding,

sawing,
patching,
edge
sealing,
and
other
finishing
operations
not
subject
to
other
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
NESHAP)).
The
affected
source
also
includes
onsite
storage
and
preparation
of
raw
materials
used
in
the
manufacture
of
plywood
and/
or
401
composite
wood
products,
such
as
resins;
onsite
wastewater
treatment
operations
specifically
associated
with
plywood
and
composite
wood
products
manufacturing;
and
miscellaneous
coating
operations
(
§
63.2292).
The
affected
source
includes
lumber
kilns
at
PCWP
manufacturing
facilities
and
at
any
other
kind
of
facility.

(
c)
An
affected
source
is
a
new
affected
source
if
you
commenced
construction
of
the
affected
source
after
January
9,
2003,
and
you
meet
the
applicability
criteria
at
the
time
you
commenced
construction.

(
d)
An
affected
source
is
reconstructed
if
you
meet
the
criteria
as
defined
in
§
63.2.

(
e)
An
affected
source
is
existing
if
it
is
not
new
or
reconstructed.

§
63.2233
When
do
I
have
to
comply
with
this
subpart?

(
a)
If
you
have
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source,
you
must
comply
with
this
subpart
according
to
paragraph
(
a)(
1)
or
(
2)
of
this
section,
whichever
is
applicable.

(
1)
If
the
initial
startup
of
your
affected
source
is
before
[
INSERT
DATE
60
DAYS
AFTER
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER],
then
you
must
comply
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements
for
new
and
reconstructed
sources
in
this
subpart
no
later
than
[
INSERT
DATE
60
DAYS
AFTER
402
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER].

(
2)
If
the
initial
startup
of
your
affected
source
is
after
[
INSERT
DATE
60
DAYS
AFTER
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER],
then
you
must
comply
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements
for
new
and
reconstructed
sources
in
this
subpart
upon
initial
startup
of
your
affected
source.

(
b)
If
you
have
an
existing
affected
source,
you
must
comply
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,

and
work
practice
requirements
for
existing
sources
no
later
than
[
INSERT
DATE
38
MONTHS
AFTER
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER].

(
c)
If
you
have
an
area
source
that
increases
its
emissions
or
its
potential
to
emit
such
that
it
becomes
a
major
source
of
HAP,
you
must
be
in
compliance
with
this
subpart
by
[
INSERT
DATE
38
MONTHS
AFTER
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER]
or
upon
initial
startup
of
your
affected
source
as
a
major
source,
whichever
is
later.

(
d)
You
must
meet
the
notification
requirements
according
to
the
schedule
in
§
63.2280
and
according
to
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
A.
Some
of
the
notifications
must
be
submitted
before
you
are
required
to
comply
with
the
403
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements
in
this
subpart.

Compliance
Options,
Operating
Requirements,
and
Work
Practice
Requirements
§
63.2240
What
are
the
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
and
how
must
I
meet
them?

You
must
meet
the
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
described
in
Tables
1A,
1B,
and
2
to
this
subpart
and
in
paragraph
(
c)
of
this
section
by
using
one
or
more
of
the
compliance
options
listed
in
paragraphs
(
a),

(
b),
and
(
c)
of
this
section.
The
process
units
subject
to
the
compliance
options
are
listed
in
Tables
1A
and
1B
to
this
subpart
and
are
defined
in
§
63.2292.
You
need
only
to
meet
one
of
the
compliance
options
outlined
in
paragraphs
(
a)
through
(
c)
of
this
section
for
each
process
unit.
You
cannot
combine
compliance
options
in
paragraph
(
a),
(
b),
or
(
c)
for
a
single
process
unit.
(
For
example,
you
cannot
use
a
production­
based
compliance
option
in
paragraph
(
a)
for
one
vent
of
a
veneer
dryer
and
an
add­
on
control
system
compliance
option
in
paragraph
(
b)
for
another
vent
on
the
same
veneer
dryer.
You
must
use
either
the
production­
based
compliance
option
or
an
add­
on
control
system
compliance
option
for
the
entire
dryer.)

(
a)
Production­
based
compliance
options.
You
must
meet
the
production­
based
total
HAP
compliance
options
in
404
Table
1A
to
this
subpart
and
the
applicable
operating
requirements
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart.
You
may
not
use
an
add­
on
control
system
or
wet
control
device
to
meet
the
production­
based
compliance
options.

(
b)
Compliance
options
for
add­
on
control
systems.

You
must
use
an
emissions
control
system
and
demonstrate
that
the
resulting
emissions
meet
the
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
in
Tables
1B
and
2
to
this
subpart.

If
you
own
or
operate
a
reconstituted
wood
product
press
at
a
new
or
existing
affected
source
or
a
reconstituted
wood
product
board
cooler
at
a
new
affected
source,
and
you
choose
to
comply
with
one
of
the
concentration­
based
compliance
options
for
a
control
system
outlet
(
presented
as
option
numbers
2,
4,
and
6
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart),
you
must
have
a
capture
device
that
either
meets
the
definition
of
wood
products
enclosure
in
§
63.2292
or
achieves
a
capture
efficiency
of
greater
than
or
equal
to
95
percent.

(
c)
Emissions
averaging
compliance
option
(
for
existing
sources
only).
Using
the
procedures
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section,
you
must
demonstrate
that
emissions
included
in
the
emissions
average
meet
the
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements.
New
sources
may
not
use
emissions
averaging
to
comply
with
this
subpart.

(
1)
Calculation
of
required
and
actual
mass
removal.

Limit
emissions
of
total
HAP,
as
defined
in
§
63.2292,
to
405
include
acetaldehyde,
acrolein,
formaldehyde,
methanol,

phenol,
and
propionaldehyde
from
your
affected
source
to
the
standard
specified
by
Equations
1,
2,
and
3
of
this
section.

(
Eq.
1)
RMR
UCEP
OH
i
i
i
n
=
×
×






=

090
1
.

(
Eq.
2)
AMR
CD
OCEP
OH
i
i
i
i
1
n
=
×
×






=

(
Eq.
3)
AMR
RMR
 

Where:

RMR
=
required
mass
removal
of
total
HAP
from
all
process
units
generating
debits
(
i.
e.,
all
process
units
that
are
subject
to
the
compliance
options
in
Tables
1A
and
1B
to
this
subpart
and
that
are
either
uncontrolled
or
under­
controlled),
pounds
per
semiannual
period;
AMR
=
actual
mass
removal
of
total
HAP
from
all
process
units
generating
credits
(
i.
e.,
all
process
units
that
are
controlled
as
part
of
the
Emissions
Averaging
Plan
including
credits
from
debit­
generating
process
units
that
are
under­
controlled),
pounds
per
semiannual
period;
UCEPi
=
mass
of
total
HAP
from
an
uncontrolled
or
under­
controlled
process
unit
(
i)
that
generates
debits,
pounds
per
hour;
OHi
=
number
of
hours
a
process
unit
(
i)
is
operated
during
the
semiannual
period,
hours
per
6­
month
period;
CDi
=
control
system
efficiency
for
the
emission
point
(
i)
for
total
HAP,
expressed
as
a
fraction,
and
not
to
exceed
90
percent,
unitless
(
Note:
To
calculate
the
control
system
efficiency
of
biological
treatment
406
units
that
do
not
meet
the
definition
of
biofilter
in
§
63.2292,
you
must
use
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
C,
Determination
of
the
Fraction
Biodegraded
(
Fbio)
in
a
Biological
Treatment
Unit.);
OCEPi
=
mass
of
total
HAP
from
a
process
unit
(
i)
that
generates
credits
(
including
credits
from
debit­
generating
process
units
that
are
undercontrolled
pounds
per
hour;
0.90
=
required
control
system
efficiency
of
90
percent
multiplied,
unitless.

(
2)
Requirements
for
debits
and
credits.
You
must
calculate
debits
and
credits
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
2)(
i)
through
(
vi)
of
this
section.

(
i)
You
must
limit
process
units
in
the
emissions
average
to
those
process
units
located
at
the
existing
affected
source
as
defined
in
§
63.2292.

(
ii)
You
cannot
use
nonoperating
process
units
to
generate
emissions
averaging
credits.
You
cannot
use
process
units
that
are
shut
down
to
generate
emissions
averaging
debits
or
credits.

(
iii)
You
may
not
include
in
your
emissions
average
process
units
controlled
to
comply
with
a
State,
Tribal,
or
Federal
rule
other
than
this
subpart.

(
iv)
You
must
use
actual
measurements
of
total
HAP
emissions
from
process
units
to
calculate
your
required
mass
removal
(
RMR)
and
actual
mass
removal
(
AMR).
The
total
HAP
measurements
must
be
obtained
according
to
§
63.2262(
b)

through
(
d),
(
g),
and
(
h),
using
the
methods
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart.
407
(
v)
Your
initial
demonstration
that
the
creditgenerating
process
units
will
be
capable
of
generating
enough
credits
to
offset
the
debits
from
the
debitgenerating
process
units
must
be
made
under
representative
operating
conditions.
After
the
compliance
date,
you
must
use
actual
operating
data
for
all
debit
and
credit
calculations.

(
vi)
Do
not
include
emissions
from
the
following
time
periods
in
your
emissions
averaging
calculations:

(
A)
Emissions
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
as
described
in
the
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
(
SSMP).

(
B)
Emissions
during
periods
of
monitoring
malfunctions,
associated
repairs,
and
required
quality
assurance
or
control
activities
or
during
periods
of
control
device
maintenance
covered
in
your
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption.
No
credits
may
be
assigned
to
credit­
generating
process
units,
and
maximum
debits
must
be
assigned
to
debit­
generating
process
units
during
these
periods.

(
3)
Operating
requirements.
You
must
meet
the
operating
requirements
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
for
each
process
unit
or
control
device
used
in
calculation
of
emissions
averaging
credits.

§
63.2241
What
are
the
work
practice
requirements
and
how
408
must
I
meet
them?

(
a)
You
must
meet
each
work
practice
requirement
in
Table
3
to
this
subpart
that
applies
to
you.

(
b)
As
provided
in
§
63.6(
g),
we,
the
EPA,
may
choose
to
grant
you
permission
to
use
an
alternative
to
the
work
practice
requirements
in
this
section.

(
c)
If
you
have
a
dry
rotary
dryer,
you
may
choose
to
designate
your
dry
rotary
dryer
as
a
green
rotary
dryer
and
meet
the
more
stringent
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
in
§
63.2240
for
green
rotary
dryers
instead
of
the
work
practices
for
dry
rotary
dryers.
If
you
have
a
hardwood
veneer
dryer
or
veneer
redryer,
you
may
choose
to
designate
your
hardwood
veneer
dryer
or
veneer
redryer
as
a
softwood
veneer
dryer
and
meet
the
more
stringent
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
in
§
63.2240
for
softwood
veneer
dryer
heated
zones
instead
of
the
work
practices
for
hardwood
veneer
dryers
or
veneer
redryers.

General
Compliance
Requirements
§
63.2250
What
are
the
general
requirements?

(
a)
You
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
the
work
practice
requirements
in
this
subpart
at
all
times,
except
during
periods
of
process
unit
or
control
device
startup,
shutdown,

and
malfunction;
prior
to
process
unit
initial
startup;
and
during
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
409
specified
in
§
63.2251.
The
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements
do
not
apply
during
times
when
the
process
unit(
s)
subject
to
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements
are
not
operating,
or
during
scheduled
startup
and
shutdown
periods,
and
during
malfunctions.

These
startup
and
shutdown
periods
must
not
exceed
the
minimum
amount
of
time
necessary
for
these
events.

(
b)
You
must
always
operate
and
maintain
your
affected
source,
including
air
pollution
control
and
monitoring
equipment,
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.6(
e)(
1)(
i).

(
c)
You
must
develop
and
implement
a
written
SSMP
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.6(
e)(
3).

(
d)
Shutoff
of
direct­
fired
burners
resulting
from
partial
and
full
production
stoppages
of
direct­
fired
softwood
veneer
dryers
or
over­
temperature
events
shall
be
deemed
shutdowns
and
not
malfunctions.
Lighting
or
relighting
any
one
or
all
gas
burners
in
direct­
fired
softwood
veneer
dryers
shall
be
deemed
startups
and
not
malfunctions.

§
63.2251
What
are
the
requirements
for
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption?

(
a)
You
may
request
a
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
from
the
EPA
Administrator
for
routine
maintenance
events
such
as
control
device
bakeouts,

washouts,
media
replacement,
and
replacement
of
corroded
410
parts.
Your
request
must
justify
the
need
for
the
routine
maintenance
on
the
control
device
and
the
time
required
to
accomplish
the
maintenance
activities,
describe
the
maintenance
activities
and
the
frequency
of
the
maintenance
activities,
explain
why
the
maintenance
cannot
be
accomplished
during
process
shutdowns,
describe
how
you
plan
to
make
reasonable
efforts
to
minimize
emissions
during
the
maintenance,
and
provide
any
other
documentation
required
by
the
EPA
Administrator.

(
b)
The
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
must
not
exceed
the
percentages
of
process
unit
operating
uptime
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.

(
1)
If
the
control
device
is
used
to
control
a
green
rotary
dryer,
tube
dryer,
rotary
strand
dryer,
or
pressurized
refiner,
then
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
must
not
exceed
3
percent
of
annual
operating
uptime
for
each
process
unit
controlled.

(
2)
If
the
control
device
is
used
to
control
a
softwood
veneer
dryer,
reconstituted
wood
product
press,

reconstituted
wood
product
board
cooler,
hardboard
oven,

press
predryer,
conveyor
strand
dryer,
or
fiberboard
mat
dryer,
then
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
must
not
exceed
0.5
percent
of
annual
operating
uptime
for
each
process
unit
controlled.

(
3)
If
the
control
device
is
used
to
control
a
411
combination
of
equipment
listed
in
both
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)

and
(
2)
of
this
section,
such
as
a
tube
dryer
and
a
reconstituted
wood
product
press,
then
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
must
not
exceed
3
percent
of
annual
operating
uptime
for
each
process
unit
controlled.

(
c)
The
request
for
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption,
if
approved
by
the
EPA
Administrator,

must
be
IBR
in
and
attached
to
the
affected
source's
title
V
permit.

(
d)
The
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
do
not
apply
during
times
when
control
device
maintenance
covered
under
your
approved
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
is
performed.
You
must
minimize
emissions
to
the
greatest
extent
possible
during
these
routine
control
device
maintenance
periods.

(
e)
To
the
extent
practical,
startup
and
shutdown
of
emission
control
systems
must
be
scheduled
during
times
when
process
equipment
is
also
shut
down.

Initial
Compliance
Requirements
§
63.2260
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements?

(
a)
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements,
you
must
conduct
performance
tests
and
establish
each
site­
specific
412
operating
requirement
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.2262
and
Table
4
to
this
subpart.

Combustion
units
that
accept
process
exhausts
into
the
flame
zone
are
exempt
from
the
initial
performance
testing
and
operating
requirements
for
thermal
oxidizers.

(
b)
You
must
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
each
compliance
option,
operating
requirement,
and
work
practice
requirement
that
applies
to
you
according
to
Tables
5
and
6
to
this
subpart
and
according
to
§
§
63.2260
through
63.2269
of
this
subpart.

(
c)
You
must
submit
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
containing
the
results
of
the
initial
compliance
demonstration
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.2280(
d).

§
63.2261
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
performance
tests
or
other
initial
compliance
demonstrations?

(
a)
You
must
conduct
performance
tests
upon
initial
startup
or
no
later
than
180
calendar
days
after
the
compliance
date
that
is
specified
for
your
source
in
§
63.2233
and
according
to
§
63.7(
a)(
2),
whichever
is
later.

(
b)
You
must
conduct
initial
compliance
demonstrations
that
do
not
require
performance
tests
upon
initial
startup
or
no
later
than
30
calendar
days
after
the
compliance
date
that
is
specified
for
your
source
in
§
63.2233,
whichever
is
later.

§
63.2262
How
do
I
conduct
performance
tests
and
establish
413
operating
requirements?

(
a)
You
must
conduct
each
performance
test
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.7(
e)(
1),
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
b)
through
(
o)
of
this
section,
and
according
to
the
methods
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart.

(
b)
Periods
when
performance
tests
must
be
conducted.

(
1)
You
must
not
conduct
performance
tests
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction,
as
specified
in
§
63.7(
e)(
1).

(
2)
You
must
test
under
representative
operating
conditions
as
defined
in
§
63.2292.
You
must
describe
representative
operating
conditions
in
your
performance
test
report
for
the
process
and
control
systems
and
explain
why
they
are
representative.

(
c)
Number
of
test
runs.
You
must
conduct
three
separate
test
runs
for
each
performance
test
required
in
this
section
as
specified
in
§
63.7(
e)(
3).
Each
test
run
must
last
at
least
1
hour
except
for:
testing
of
a
temporary
total
enclosure
(
TTE)
conducted
using
Methods
204A
through
204F
of
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M,
which
require
three
separate
test
runs
of
at
least
3
hours
each;
and
testing
of
an
enclosure
conducted
using
the
alternative
tracer
gas
method
in
appendix
A
to
this
subpart,
which
requires
a
minimum
of
three
separate
runs
of
at
least
20
minutes
each.
414
(
d)
Location
of
sampling
sites.

(
1)
Sampling
sites
must
be
located
at
the
inlet
(
if
emission
reduction
testing
or
documentation
of
inlet
methanol
or
formaldehyde
concentration
is
required)
and
outlet
of
the
control
device
and
prior
to
any
releases
to
the
atmosphere.
For
HAP­
altering
controls
in
sequence,
such
as
a
wet
control
device
followed
by
a
thermal
oxidizer,

sampling
sites
must
be
located
at
the
functional
inlet
of
the
control
sequence
(
e.
g.,
prior
to
the
wet
control
device)

and
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
sequence
(
e.
g.,
thermal
oxidizer
outlet)
and
prior
to
any
releases
to
the
atmosphere.

(
2)
Sampling
sites
for
process
units
meeting
compliance
options
without
a
control
device
must
be
located
prior
to
any
releases
to
the
atmosphere.
Facilities
demonstrating
compliance
with
a
production­
based
compliance
option
for
a
process
unit
equipped
with
a
wet
control
device
must
locate
sampling
sites
prior
to
the
wet
control
device.

(
e)
Collection
of
monitoring
data.
You
must
collect
operating
parameter
monitoring
system
or
continuous
emissions
monitoring
system
(
CEMS)
data
at
least
every
15
minutes
during
the
entire
performance
test
and
determine
the
parameter
or
concentration
value
for
the
operating
requirement
during
the
performance
test
using
the
methods
specified
in
paragraphs
(
k)
through
(
o)
of
this
section.
415
(
f)
Collection
of
production
data.
To
comply
with
any
of
the
production­
based
compliance
options,
you
must
measure
and
record
the
process
unit
throughput
during
each
performance
test.

(
g)
Nondetect
data.

(
1)
Except
as
specified
in
paragraph
(
g)(
2)
of
this
section,
all
nondetect
data
(
§
63.2292)
must
be
treated
as
one­
half
of
the
method
detection
limit
when
determining
total
HAP,
formaldehyde,
methanol,
or
total
hydrocarbon
(
THC)
emission
rates.

(
2)
When
showing
compliance
with
the
production­
based
compliance
options
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart,
you
may
treat
emissions
of
an
individual
HAP
as
zero
if
all
three
of
the
performance
test
runs
result
in
a
nondetect
measurement,

and
the
method
detection
limit
is
less
than
or
equal
to
1
parts
per
million
by
volume,
dry
basis
(
ppmvd).
Otherwise,

nondetect
data
for
individual
HAP
must
be
treated
as
onehalf
of
the
method
detection
limit.

(
h)
Calculation
of
percent
reduction
across
a
control
system.
When
determining
the
control
system
efficiency
for
any
control
system
included
in
your
emissions
averaging
plan
(
not
to
exceed
90
percent)
and
when
complying
with
any
of
the
compliance
options
based
on
percent
reduction
across
a
control
system
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart,
as
part
of
the
performance
test,
you
must
calculate
the
percent
reduction
416
using
Equation
1
of
this
section:

(
Eq.
1)
PR
CE
ER
ER
ER
in
out
in
=
×
 
(
)
100
Where:

PR
=
percent
reduction,
percent;
CE
=
capture
efficiency,
percent
(
determined
for
reconstituted
wood
product
presses
and
board
coolers
as
required
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart);
ERin
=
emission
rate
of
total
HAP
(
calculated
as
the
sum
of
the
emission
rates
of
acetaldehyde,
acrolein,
formaldehyde,
methanol,
phenol,
and
propionaldehyde),
THC,
formaldehyde,
or
methanol
in
the
inlet
vent
stream
of
the
control
device,
pounds
per
hour;
ERout
=
emission
rate
of
total
HAP
(
calculated
as
the
sum
of
the
emission
rates
of
acetaldehyde,
acrolein,
formaldehyde,
methanol,
phenol,
and
propionaldehyde),
THC,
formaldehyde,
or
methanol
in
the
outlet
vent
stream
of
the
control
device,
pounds
per
hour.

(
i)
Calculation
of
mass
per
unit
production.
To
comply
with
any
of
the
production­
based
compliance
options
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart,
you
must
calculate
your
mass
per
unit
production
emissions
for
each
performance
test
run
using
Equation
2
of
this
section:

(
Eq.
2)
MP
ER
P
CE
HAP
=
×
417
Where:

MP
=
mass
per
unit
production,
pounds
per
oven
dried
ton
OR
pounds
per
thousand
square
feet
on
a
specified
thickness
basis
(
see
paragraph
(
j)
of
this
section
if
you
need
to
convert
from
one
thickness
basis
to
another);
ERHAP
=
emission
rate
of
total
HAP
(
calculated
as
the
sum
of
the
emission
rates
of
acetaldehyde,
acrolein,
formaldehyde,
methanol,
phenol,
and
propionaldehyde)
in
the
stack,
pounds
per
hour;
P
=
process
unit
production
rate
(
throughput),
oven
dried
tons
per
hour
OR
thousand
square
feet
per
hour
on
a
specified
thickness
basis;
CE
=
capture
efficiency,
percent
(
determined
for
reconstituted
wood
product
presses
and
board
coolers
as
required
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart).

(
j)
Thickness
basis
conversion.
Use
Equation
3
of
this
section
to
convert
from
one
thickness
basis
to
another:

(
Eq.
3)
MSF
MSF
A
B
B
A
=
×
Where:

MSFA
=
thousand
square
feet
on
an
A­
inch
basis;
MSFB
=
thousand
square
feet
on
a
B­
inch
basis;
A
=
old
thickness
you
are
converting
from,
inches;
B
=
new
thickness
you
are
converting
to,
inches.

(
k)
Establishing
thermal
oxidizer
operating
requirements.
If
you
operate
a
thermal
oxidizer,
you
must
establish
your
thermal
oxidizer
operating
parameters
according
to
paragraphs
(
k)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.

(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
continuously
monitor
the
firebox
temperature
during
each
of
the
required
418
1­
hour
test
runs.
For
regenerative
thermal
oxidizers,
you
may
measure
the
temperature
in
multiple
locations
(
e.
g.,
one
location
per
burner)
in
the
combustion
chamber
and
calculate
the
average
of
the
temperature
measurements
prior
to
reducing
the
temperature
data
to
15­
minute
averages
for
purposes
of
establishing
your
minimum
firebox
temperature.

The
minimum
firebox
temperature
must
then
be
established
as
the
average
of
the
three
minimum
15­
minute
firebox
temperatures
monitored
during
the
three
test
runs.
Multiple
three­
run
performance
tests
may
be
conducted
to
establish
a
range
of
parameter
values
under
different
operating
conditions.

(
2)
You
may
establish
a
different
minimum
firebox
temperature
for
your
thermal
oxidizer
by
submitting
the
notification
specified
in
§
63.2280(
g)
and
conducting
a
repeat
performance
test
as
specified
in
paragraph
(
k)(
1)
of
this
section
that
demonstrates
compliance
with
the
applicable
compliance
options
of
this
subpart.

(
3)
If
your
thermal
oxidizer
is
a
combustion
unit
that
accepts
process
exhaust
into
the
flame
zone,
then
you
are
exempt
from
the
performance
testing
and
monitoring
requirements
specified
in
paragraphs
(
k)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance,
you
must
submit
documentation
with
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
showing
that
process
exhausts
controlled
by
the
combustion
419
unit
enter
into
the
flame
zone.

(
l)
Establishing
catalytic
oxidizer
operating
requirements.
If
you
operate
a
catalytic
oxidizer,
you
must
establish
your
catalytic
oxidizer
operating
parameters
according
to
paragraphs
(
l)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.

(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
continuously
monitor
during
the
required
1­
hour
test
runs
either
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
to
each
catalyst
bed
or
the
temperature
in
the
combustion
chamber.
For
regenerative
catalytic
oxidizers,
you
must
calculate
the
average
of
the
temperature
measurements
from
each
catalyst
bed
inlet
or
within
the
combustion
chamber
prior
to
reducing
the
temperature
data
to
15­
minute
averages
for
purposes
of
establishing
your
minimum
catalytic
oxidizer
temperature.

The
minimum
catalytic
oxidizer
temperature
must
then
be
established
as
the
average
of
the
three
minimum
15­
minute
temperatures
monitored
during
the
three
test
runs.
Multiple
three­
run
performance
tests
may
be
conducted
to
establish
a
range
of
parameter
values
under
different
operating
conditions.

(
2)
You
may
establish
a
different
minimum
catalytic
oxidizer
temperature
by
submitting
the
notification
specified
in
§
63.2280(
g)
and
conducting
a
repeat
performance
test
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
l)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section
that
demonstrates
compliance
with
the
applicable
420
compliance
options
of
this
subpart.

(
m)
Establishing
biofilter
operating
requirements.
If
you
operate
a
biofilter,
you
must
establish
your
biofilter
operating
requirements
according
to
paragraphs
(
m)(
1)

through
(
3)
of
this
section.

(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
continuously
monitor
the
biofilter
bed
temperature
during
each
of
the
required
1­
hour
test
runs.
To
monitor
biofilter
bed
temperature,
you
may
use
multiple
thermocouples
in
representative
locations
throughout
the
biofilter
bed
and
calculate
the
average
biofilter
bed
temperature
across
these
thermocouples
prior
to
reducing
the
temperature
data
to
15­

minute
averages
for
purposes
of
establishing
biofilter
bed
temperature
limits.
The
biofilter
bed
temperature
range
must
be
established
as
the
minimum
and
maximum
15­
minute
biofilter
bed
temperatures
monitored
during
the
three
test
runs.
You
may
base
your
biofilter
bed
temperature
range
on
values
recorded
during
previous
performance
tests
provided
that
the
data
used
to
establish
the
temperature
ranges
have
been
obtained
using
the
test
methods
required
in
this
subpart.
If
you
use
data
from
previous
performance
tests,

you
must
certify
that
the
biofilter
and
associated
process
unit(
s)
have
not
been
modified
subsequent
to
the
date
of
the
performance
tests.
Replacement
of
the
biofilter
media
with
the
same
type
of
material
is
not
considered
a
modification
421
of
the
biofilter
for
purposes
of
this
section.

(
2)
For
a
new
biofilter
installation,
you
will
be
allowed
up
to
180
days
following
the
compliance
date
or
180
days
following
initial
startup
of
the
biofilter
to
complete
the
requirements
in
paragraph
(
m)(
1)
of
this
section.

(
3)
You
may
expand
your
biofilter
bed
temperature
operating
range
by
submitting
the
notification
specified
in
§
63.2280(
g)
and
conducting
a
repeat
performance
test
as
specified
in
paragraph
(
m)(
1)
of
this
section
that
demonstrates
compliance
with
the
applicable
compliance
options
of
this
subpart.

(
n)
Establishing
operating
requirements
for
process
units
meeting
compliance
options
without
a
control
device.

If
you
operate
a
process
unit
that
meets
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart,
or
is
a
process
unit
that
generates
debits
in
an
emissions
average
without
the
use
of
a
control
device,
you
must
establish
your
process
unit
operating
parameters
according
to
paragraphs
(
n)(
1)
through
(
2)
of
this
section.

(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
identify
and
document
the
process
unit
controlling
parameter(
s)
that
affect
total
HAP
emissions
during
the
three­
run
performance
test.
The
controlling
parameters
you
identify
must
coincide
with
the
representative
operating
conditions
you
describe
according
to
§
63.2262(
b)(
2).
For
each
parameter,
you
must
422
specify
appropriate
monitoring
methods,
monitoring
frequencies,
and
for
continuously
monitored
parameters,

averaging
times
not
to
exceed
24
hours.
The
operating
limit
for
each
controlling
parameter
must
then
be
established
as
the
minimum,
maximum,
range,
or
average
(
as
appropriate
depending
on
the
parameter)
recorded
during
the
performance
test.
Multiple
three­
run
performance
tests
may
be
conducted
to
establish
a
range
of
parameter
values
under
different
operating
conditions.

(
2)
You
may
establish
different
controlling
parameter
limits
for
your
process
unit
by
submitting
the
notification
specified
in
§
63.2280(
g)
and
conducting
a
repeat
performance
test
as
specified
in
paragraph
(
n)(
1)
of
this
section
that
demonstrates
compliance
with
the
compliance
options
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart
or
is
used
to
establish
emission
averaging
debits
for
an
uncontrolled
process
unit.

(
o)
Establishing
operating
requirements
using
THC
CEMS.
If
you
choose
to
meet
the
operating
requirements
by
monitoring
THC
concentration
instead
of
monitoring
control
device
or
process
operating
parameters,
you
must
establish
your
THC
concentration
operating
requirement
according
to
paragraphs
(
o)(
1)
through
(
2)
of
this
section.

(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
continuously
monitor
THC
concentration
using
your
CEMS
during
each
of
the
required
1­
hour
test
runs.
The
maximum
THC
concentration
423
must
then
be
established
as
the
average
of
the
three
maximum
15­
minute
THC
concentrations
monitored
during
the
three
test
runs.
Multiple
three­
run
performance
tests
may
be
conducted
to
establish
a
range
of
THC
concentration
values
under
different
operating
conditions.

(
2)
You
may
establish
a
different
maximum
THC
concentration
by
submitting
the
notification
specified
in
§
63.2280(
g)
and
conducting
a
repeat
performance
test
as
specified
in
paragraph
(
o)(
1)
of
this
section
that
demonstrates
compliance
with
the
compliance
options
in
Tables
1A
and
1B
to
this
subpart.

§
63.2263
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
dry
rotary
dryer.

If
you
operate
a
dry
rotary
dryer,
you
must
demonstrate
that
your
dryer
processes
furnish
with
an
inlet
moisture
content
of
less
than
or
equal
to
30
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)
and
operates
with
a
dryer
inlet
temperature
of
less
than
or
equal
to
600oF.
You
must
designate
and
clearly
identify
each
dry
rotary
dryer.
You
must
record
the
inlet
furnish
moisture
content
(
dry
basis)
and
inlet
dryer
operating
temperature
according
to
§
63.2269(
a),
(
b),
and
(
c)

and
§
63.2270
for
a
minimum
of
30
calendar
days.
You
must
submit
the
highest
recorded
24­
hour
average
inlet
furnish
moisture
content
and
the
highest
recorded
24­
hour
average
dryer
inlet
temperature
with
your
Notification
of
Compliance
424
Status.
In
addition,
you
must
submit
with
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
a
signed
statement
by
a
responsible
official
that
certifies
with
truth,
accuracy,
and
completeness
that
the
dry
rotary
dryer
will
dry
furnish
with
a
maximum
inlet
moisture
content
less
than
or
equal
to
30
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)
and
will
operate
with
a
maximum
inlet
temperature
of
less
than
or
equal
to
600oF
in
the
future.

§
63.2264
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
hardwood
veneer
dryer.

If
you
operate
a
hardwood
veneer
dryer,
you
must
record
the
annual
volume
percentage
of
softwood
veneer
species
processed
in
the
dryer
as
follows:

(
a)
Use
Equation
1
of
this
section
to
calculate
the
annual
volume
percentage
of
softwood
species
dried:

(
Eq.
1)
SW
SW
T
%
(
)
=
100
Where:

SW%
=
annual
volume
percent
softwood
species
dried;
SW
=
softwood
veneer
dried
during
the
previous
12
months,
thousand
square
feet
(
3/
8­
inch
basis);
T
=
total
softwood
and
hardwood
veneer
dried
during
the
previous
12
months,
thousand
square
feet
(
3/
8­
inch
basis).

(
b)
You
must
designate
and
clearly
identify
each
hardwood
veneer
dryer.
Submit
with
the
Notification
of
425
Compliance
Status
the
annual
volume
percentage
of
softwood
species
dried
in
the
dryer
based
on
your
dryer
production
for
the
12
months
prior
to
the
compliance
date
specified
for
your
source
in
§
63.2233.
If
you
did
not
dry
any
softwood
species
in
the
dryer
during
the
12
months
prior
to
the
compliance
date,
then
you
need
only
to
submit
a
statement
indicating
that
no
softwood
species
were
dried.
In
addition,
submit
with
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
a
signed
statement
by
a
responsible
official
that
certifies
with
truth,
accuracy,
and
completeness
that
the
veneer
dryer
will
be
used
to
process
less
than
30
volume
percent
softwood
species
in
the
future.

§
63.2265
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
softwood
veneer
dryer.

If
you
operate
a
softwood
veneer
dryer,
you
must
develop
a
plan
for
review
and
approval
for
minimizing
fugitive
emissions
from
the
veneer
dryer
heated
zones,
and
you
must
submit
the
plan
with
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.

§
63.2266
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
veneer
redryer.

If
you
operate
a
veneer
redryer,
you
must
record
the
inlet
moisture
content
of
the
veneer
processed
in
the
redryer
according
to
§
63.2269(
a)
and
(
c)
and
§
63.2270
for
a
minimum
of
30
calendar
days.
You
must
designate
and
clearly
426
identify
each
veneer
redryer.
You
must
submit
the
highest
recorded
24­
hour
average
inlet
veneer
moisture
content
with
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
to
show
that
your
veneer
redryer
processes
veneer
with
an
inlet
moisture
content
of
less
than
or
equal
to
25
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis).
In
addition,
submit
with
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
a
signed
statement
by
a
responsible
official
that
certifies
with
truth,
accuracy,
and
completeness
that
the
veneer
redryer
will
dry
veneer
with
a
moisture
content
less
than
25
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)

in
the
future.

§
63.2267
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
reconstituted
wood
product
press
or
board
cooler.

If
you
operate
a
reconstituted
wood
product
press
at
a
new
or
existing
affected
source
or
a
reconstituted
wood
product
board
cooler
at
a
new
affected
source,
then
you
must
either
use
a
wood
products
enclosure
as
defined
in
§
63.2292
or
measure
the
capture
efficiency
of
the
capture
device
for
the
press
or
board
cooler
using
Methods
204
and
204A
through
204F
of
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M
(
as
appropriate),
or
using
the
alternative
tracer
gas
method
contained
in
appendix
A
to
this
subpart.
You
must
submit
documentation
that
the
wood
products
enclosure
meets
the
press
enclosure
design
criteria
in
§
63.2292
or
the
results
of
the
capture
efficiency
verification
with
your
Notification
of
Compliance
427
Status.

§
63.2268
Initial
compliance
demonstration
for
a
wet
control
device.

If
you
use
a
wet
control
device
as
the
sole
means
of
reducing
HAP
emissions,
you
must
develop
and
implement
a
plan
for
review
and
approval
to
address
how
organic
HAP
captured
in
the
wastewater
from
the
wet
control
device
is
contained
or
destroyed
to
minimize
re­
release
to
the
atmosphere
such
that
the
desired
emissions
reductions
are
obtained.
You
must
submit
the
plan
with
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.

§
63.2269
What
are
my
monitoring
installation,
operation,

and
maintenance
requirements?

(
a)
General
continuous
parameter
monitoring
requirements.
You
must
install,
operate,
and
maintain
each
continuous
parameter
monitoring
system
(
CPMS)
according
to
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.

(
1)
The
CPMS
must
be
capable
of
completing
a
minimum
of
one
cycle
of
operation
(
sampling,
analyzing,
and
recording)
for
each
successive
15­
minute
period.

(
2)
At
all
times,
you
must
maintain
the
monitoring
equipment
including,
but
not
limited
to,
maintaining
necessary
parts
for
routine
repairs
of
the
monitoring
equipment.

(
3)
Record
the
results
of
each
inspection,
428
calibration,
and
validation
check.

(
b)
Temperature
monitoring.
For
each
temperature
monitoring
device,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
b)(
1)
through
(
6)
of
this
section.

(
1)
Locate
the
temperature
sensor
in
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
temperature.

(
2)
Use
a
temperature
sensor
with
a
minimum
accuracy
of
4oF
or
0.75
percent
of
the
temperature
value,
whichever
is
larger.

(
3)
If
a
chart
recorder
is
used,
it
must
have
a
sensitivity
with
minor
divisions
not
more
than
20oF.

(
4)
Perform
an
electronic
calibration
at
least
semiannually
according
to
the
procedures
in
the
manufacturer's
owners
manual.
Following
the
electronic
calibration,
you
must
conduct
a
temperature
sensor
validation
check
in
which
a
second
or
redundant
temperature
sensor
placed
nearby
the
process
temperature
sensor
must
yield
a
reading
within
30oF
of
the
process
temperature
sensor's
reading.

(
5)
Conduct
calibration
and
validation
checks
any
time
the
sensor
exceeds
the
manufacturer's
specified
maximum
operating
temperature
range
or
install
a
new
temperature
sensor.

(
6)
At
least
quarterly,
inspect
all
components
for
integrity
and
all
electrical
connections
for
continuity,
429
oxidation,
and
galvanic
corrosion.

(
c)
Wood
moisture
monitoring.
For
each
furnish
or
veneer
moisture
meter,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1),
(
2),
(
4)
and
(
5)
and
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)

through
(
4)
of
this
section.

(
1)
For
dry
rotary
dryers,
use
a
continuous
moisture
monitor
with
a
minimum
accuracy
of
1
percent
(
dry
basis)

moisture
or
better
in
the
25
to
35
percent
(
dry
basis)

moisture
content
range.
For
veneer
redryers,
use
a
continuous
moisture
monitor
with
a
minimum
accuracy
of
3
percent
(
dry
basis)
moisture
or
better
in
the
15
to
25
percent
(
dry
basis)
moisture
content
range.
Alternatively,

you
may
use
a
continuous
moisture
monitor
with
a
minimum
accuracy
of
5
percent
(
dry
basis)
moisture
or
better
for
dry
rotary
dryers
used
to
dry
furnish
with
less
than
25
percent
(
dry
basis)
moisture
or
for
veneer
redryers
used
to
redry
veneer
with
less
than
20
percent
(
dry
basis)
moisture.

(
2)
Locate
the
moisture
monitor
in
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
measure
of
furnish
or
veneer
moisture.

(
3)
Calibrate
the
moisture
monitor
based
on
the
procedures
specified
by
the
moisture
monitor
manufacturer
at
least
once
per
semiannual
compliance
period
(
or
more
frequently
if
recommended
by
the
moisture
monitor
manufacturer).
430
(
4)
At
least
quarterly,
inspect
all
components
of
the
moisture
monitor
for
integrity
and
all
electrical
connections
for
continuity.

(
5)
Use
Equation
1
of
this
section
to
convert
percent
moisture
measurements
wet
basis
to
a
dry
basis:

(
)(
)
MC
MC
/
100
1
MC
/
100
100
dry
wet
wet
=
 
(
Eq.
1)

Where:

MCdry
=
percent
moisture
content
of
wood
material
(
weight
percent,
dry
basis);
MCwet
=
percent
moisture
content
of
wood
material
(
weight
percent,
wet
basis).

(
d)
Continuous
emission
monitoring
system(
s).
Each
CEMS
must
be
installed,
operated,
and
maintained
according
to
paragraphs
(
d)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.

(
1)
Each
CEMS
for
monitoring
THC
concentration
must
be
installed,
operated,
and
maintained
according
to
Performance
Specification
8
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
B.
You
must
also
comply
with
Procedure
1
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
F.

(
2)
You
must
conduct
a
performance
evaluation
of
each
CEMS
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.8
and
according
to
Performance
Specification
8
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
B.

(
3)
As
specified
in
§
63.8(
c)(
4)(
ii),
each
CEMS
must
complete
a
minimum
of
one
cycle
of
operation
(
sampling,

analyzing,
and
data
recording)
for
each
successive
15­
minute
431
period.

(
4)
The
CEMS
data
must
be
reduced
as
specified
in
§
63.8(
g)(
2)
and
§
63.2270(
d)
and
(
e).

Continuous
Compliance
Requirements
§
63.2270
How
do
I
monitor
and
collect
data
to
demonstrate
continuous
compliance?

(
a)
You
must
monitor
and
collect
data
according
to
this
section.

(
b)
Except
for,
as
appropriate,
monitor
malfunctions,

associated
repairs,
and
required
quality
assurance
or
control
activities
(
including,
as
applicable,
calibration
checks
and
required
zero
and
span
adjustments),
you
must
conduct
all
monitoring
in
continuous
operation
at
all
times
that
the
process
unit
is
operating.
For
purposes
of
calculating
data
averages,
you
must
not
use
data
recorded
during
monitoring
malfunctions,
associated
repairs,

out­
of­
control
periods,
or
required
quality
assurance
or
control
activities.
You
must
use
all
the
data
collected
during
all
other
periods
in
assessing
compliance.
A
monitoring
malfunction
is
any
sudden,
infrequent,
not
reasonably
preventable
failure
of
the
monitoring
to
provide
valid
data.
Monitoring
failures
that
are
caused
in
part
by
poor
maintenance
or
careless
operation
are
not
malfunctions.

Any
period
for
which
the
monitoring
system
is
out­
of­
control
and
data
are
not
available
for
required
calculations
432
constitutes
a
deviation
from
the
monitoring
requirements.

(
c)
You
may
not
use
data
recorded
during
monitoring
malfunctions,
associated
repairs,
and
required
quality
assurance
or
control
activities;
data
recorded
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction;
or
data
recorded
during
periods
of
control
device
downtime
covered
in
any
approved
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
in
data
averages
and
calculations
used
to
report
emission
or
operating
levels,
nor
may
such
data
be
used
in
fulfilling
a
minimum
data
availability
requirement,
if
applicable.
You
must
use
all
the
data
collected
during
all
other
periods
in
assessing
the
operation
of
the
control
system.

(
d)
Except
as
provided
in
paragraph
(
e)
of
this
section,
determine
the
3­
hour
block
average
of
all
recorded
readings,
calculated
after
every
3
hours
of
operation
as
the
average
of
the
evenly
spaced
recorded
readings
in
the
previous
3
operating
hours
(
excluding
periods
described
in
paragraphs
(
b)
and
(
c)
of
this
section).

(
e)
For
dry
rotary
dryer
and
veneer
redryer
wood
moisture
monitoring,
dry
rotary
dryer
temperature
monitoring,
biofilter
bed
temperature
monitoring,
and
biofilter
outlet
THC
monitoring,
determine
the
24­
hour
block
average
of
all
recorded
readings,
calculated
after
every
24
hours
of
operation
as
the
average
of
the
evenly
spaced
recorded
readings
in
the
previous
24
operating
hours
433
(
excluding
periods
described
in
paragraphs
(
b)
and
(
c)
of
this
section).

(
f)
To
calculate
the
data
averages
for
each
3­
hour
or
24­
hour
averaging
period,
you
must
have
at
least
75
percent
of
the
required
recorded
readings
for
that
period
using
only
recorded
readings
that
are
based
on
valid
data
(
i.
e.,
not
from
periods
described
in
paragraphs
(
b)
and
(
c)
of
this
section).

§
63.2271
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements?

(
a)
You
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements
in
§
§
63.2240
and
63.2241
that
apply
to
you
according
to
the
methods
specified
in
Tables
7
and
8
to
this
subpart.

(
b)
You
must
report
each
instance
in
which
you
did
not
meet
each
compliance
option,
operating
requirement,
and
work
practice
requirement
in
Tables
7
and
8
to
this
subpart
that
applies
to
you.
This
includes
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,

and
malfunction
and
periods
of
control
device
maintenance
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.

These
instances
are
deviations
from
the
compliance
options,

operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements
in
this
subpart.
These
deviations
must
be
reported
according
434
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.2281.

(
1)
During
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction,
you
must
operate
in
accordance
with
the
SSMP.

(
2)
Consistent
with
§
§
63.6(
e)
and
63.7(
e)(
1),

deviations
that
occur
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,

or
malfunction
are
not
violations
if
you
demonstrate
to
the
EPA
Administrator's
satisfaction
that
you
were
operating
in
accordance
with
the
SSMP.
The
EPA
Administrator
will
determine
whether
deviations
that
occur
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
are
violations,
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.6(
e).

(
3)
Deviations
that
occur
during
periods
of
control
device
maintenance
covered
by
any
approved
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
are
not
violations
if
you
demonstrate
to
the
EPA
Administrator's
satisfaction
that
you
were
operating
in
accordance
with
the
approved
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption.

Notifications,
Reports,
and
Records
§
63.2280
What
notifications
must
I
submit
and
when?

(
a)
You
must
submit
all
of
the
notifications
in
§
§
63.7(
b)
and
(
c),
63.8(
e),
(
f)(
4)
and
(
f)(
6),
63.9
(
b)

through
(
e),
and
(
g)
and
(
h)
by
the
dates
specified.

(
b)
You
must
submit
an
Initial
Notification
no
later
than
120
calendar
days
after
[
INSERT
DATE
60
DAYS
AFTER
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER]
or
435
after
initial
startup,
whichever
is
later,
as
specified
in
§
63.9(
b)(
2).

(
c)
If
you
are
required
to
conduct
a
performance
test,

you
must
submit
a
written
notification
of
intent
to
conduct
a
performance
test
at
least
60
calendar
days
before
the
performance
test
is
scheduled
to
begin
as
specified
in
§
63.7(
b)(
1).

(
d)
If
you
are
required
to
conduct
a
performance
test,

design
evaluation,
or
other
initial
compliance
demonstration
as
specified
in
Tables
4,
5,
and
6
to
this
subpart,
you
must
submit
a
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
as
specified
in
§
63.9(
h)(
2)(
ii).

(
1)
For
each
initial
compliance
demonstration
required
in
Table
5
or
6
to
this
subpart
that
does
not
include
a
performance
test,
you
must
submit
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
before
the
close
of
business
on
the
30th
calendar
day
following
the
completion
of
the
initial
compliance
demonstration.

(
2)
For
each
initial
compliance
demonstration
required
in
Tables
5
and
6
to
this
subpart
that
includes
a
performance
test
conducted
according
to
the
requirements
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
you
must
submit
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status,
including
the
performance
test
results,

before
the
close
of
business
on
the
60th
calendar
day
following
the
completion
of
the
performance
test
according
436
to
§
63.10(
d)(
2).

(
e)
If
you
request
a
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
according
to
§
63.2251,
you
must
submit
your
request
for
the
exemption
no
later
than
30
days
before
the
compliance
date.

(
f)
If
you
use
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c),
you
must
submit
an
Emissions
Averaging
Plan
to
the
EPA
Administrator
for
approval
no
later
than
1
year
before
the
compliance
date
or
no
later
than
1
year
before
the
date
you
would
begin
using
an
emissions
average,
whichever
is
later.
The
Emissions
Averaging
Plan
must
include
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
f)(
1)
through
(
6)
of
this
section.

(
1)
Identification
of
all
the
process
units
to
be
included
in
the
emissions
average
indicating
which
process
units
will
be
used
to
generate
credits,
and
which
process
units
that
are
subject
to
compliance
options
in
Tables
1A
and
1B
to
this
subpart
will
be
uncontrolled
(
used
to
generate
debits)
or
under­
controlled
(
used
to
generate
debits
and
credits).

(
2)
Description
of
the
control
system
used
to
generate
emission
credits
for
each
process
unit
used
to
generate
credits.

(
3)
Determination
of
the
total
HAP
control
efficiency
for
the
control
system
used
to
generate
emission
credits
for
437
each
credit­
generating
process
unit.

(
4)
Calculation
of
the
RMR
and
AMR,
as
calculated
using
Equations
1
through
3
of
§
63.2240(
c)(
1).

(
5)
Documentation
of
total
HAP
measurements
made
according
to
§
63.2240(
c)(
2)(
iv)
and
other
relevant
documentation
to
support
calculation
of
the
RMR
and
AMR.

(
6)
A
summary
of
the
operating
parameters
you
will
monitor
and
monitoring
methods
for
each
debit­
generating
and
credit­
generating
process
unit.

(
g)
You
must
notify
the
EPA
Administrator
within
30
days
before
you
take
any
of
the
actions
specified
in
paragraphs
(
g)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.

(
1)
You
modify
or
replace
the
control
system
for
any
process
unit
subject
to
the
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
in
this
subpart.

(
2)
You
shut
down
any
process
unit
included
in
your
Emissions
Averaging
Plan.

(
3)
You
change
a
continuous
monitoring
parameter
or
the
value
or
range
of
values
of
a
continuous
monitoring
parameter
for
any
process
unit
or
control
device.

§
63.2281
What
reports
must
I
submit
and
when?

(
a)
You
must
submit
each
report
in
Table
9
to
this
subpart
that
applies
to
you.

(
b)
Unless
the
EPA
Administrator
has
approved
a
different
schedule
for
submission
of
reports
under
438
§
63.10(
a),
you
must
submit
each
report
by
the
date
in
Table
9
to
this
subpart
and
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)

through
(
5)
of
this
section.

(
1)
The
first
compliance
report
must
cover
the
period
beginning
on
the
compliance
date
that
is
specified
for
your
affected
source
in
§
63.2233
ending
on
June
30
or
December
31,
and
lasting
at
least
6
months,
but
less
than
12
months.

For
example,
if
your
compliance
date
is
March
1,
then
the
first
semiannual
reporting
period
would
begin
on
March
1
and
end
on
December
31.

(
2)
The
first
compliance
report
must
be
postmarked
or
delivered
no
later
than
July
31
or
January
31
for
compliance
periods
ending
on
June
30
and
December
31,
respectively.

(
3)
Each
subsequent
compliance
report
must
cover
the
semiannual
reporting
period
from
January
1
through
June
30
or
the
semiannual
reporting
period
from
July
1
through
December
31.

(
4)
Each
subsequent
compliance
report
must
be
postmarked
or
delivered
no
later
than
July
31
or
January
31
for
the
semiannual
reporting
period
ending
on
June
30
and
December
31,
respectively.

(
5)
For
each
affected
source
that
is
subject
to
permitting
regulations
pursuant
to
40
CFR
part
70
or
40
CFR
part
71,
and
if
the
permitting
authority
has
established
dates
for
submitting
semiannual
reports
pursuant
to
439
§
70.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A)
or
§
71.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A),
you
may
submit
the
first
and
subsequent
compliance
reports
according
to
the
dates
the
permitting
authority
has
established
instead
of
according
to
the
dates
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.

(
c)
The
compliance
report
must
contain
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
8)
of
this
section.

(
1)
Company
name
and
address.

(
2)
Statement
by
a
responsible
official
with
that
official's
name,
title,
and
signature,
certifying
the
truth,

accuracy,
and
completeness
of
the
content
of
the
report.

(
3)
Date
of
report
and
beginning
and
ending
dates
of
the
reporting
period.

(
4)
If
you
had
a
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
during
the
reporting
period
and
you
took
actions
consistent
with
your
SSMP,
the
compliance
report
must
include
the
information
specified
in
§
63.10(
d)(
5)(
i).

(
5)
A
description
of
control
device
maintenance
performed
while
the
control
device
was
offline
and
one
or
more
of
the
process
units
controlled
by
the
control
device
was
operating,
including
the
information
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
5)(
i)
through
(
iii)
of
this
section.

(
i)
The
date
and
time
when
the
control
device
was
shut
down
and
restarted.

(
ii)
Identification
of
the
process
units
that
were
440
operating
and
the
number
of
hours
that
each
process
unit
operated
while
the
control
device
was
offline.

(
iii)
A
statement
of
whether
or
not
the
control
device
maintenance
was
included
in
your
approved
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
developed
pursuant
to
§
63.2251.

If
the
control
device
maintenance
was
included
in
your
approved
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption,
then
you
must
report
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
5)(
iii)(
A)

through
(
C)
of
this
section.

(
A)
The
total
amount
of
time
that
each
process
unit
controlled
by
the
control
device
operated
during
the
semiannual
compliance
period
and
during
the
previous
semiannual
compliance
period.

(
B)
The
amount
of
time
that
each
process
unit
controlled
by
the
control
device
operated
while
the
control
device
was
down
for
maintenance
covered
under
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
during
the
semiannual
compliance
period
and
during
the
previous
semiannual
compliance
period.

(
C)
Based
on
the
information
recorded
under
paragraphs
(
c)(
5)(
iii)(
A)
and
(
B)
of
this
section
for
each
process
unit,
compute
the
annual
percent
of
process
unit
operating
uptime
during
which
the
control
device
was
offline
for
routine
maintenance
using
Equation
1
of
this
section.
441
(
Eq.
1)
RM
DT
DT
PU
PU
p
c
p
c
=
+
+

Where:

RM
=
Annual
percentage
of
process
unit
uptime
during
which
control
device
is
down
for
routine
control
device
maintenance;
PUp
=
Process
unit
uptime
for
the
previous
semiannual
compliance
period;
PUc
=
Process
unit
uptime
for
the
current
semiannual
compliance
period;
DTp
=
Control
device
downtime
claimed
under
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
for
the
previous
semiannual
compliance
period;
DTc
=
Control
device
downtime
claimed
under
the
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption
for
the
current
semiannual
compliance
period.

(
6)
The
results
of
any
performance
tests
conducted
during
the
semiannual
reporting
period.

(
7)
If
there
are
no
deviations
from
any
applicable
compliance
option
or
operating
requirement,
and
there
are
no
deviations
from
the
requirements
for
work
practice
requirements
in
Table
8
to
this
subpart,
a
statement
that
there
were
no
deviations
from
the
compliance
options,

operating
requirements,
or
work
practice
requirements
during
the
reporting
period.

(
8)
If
there
were
no
periods
during
which
the
continuous
monitoring
system
(
CMS),
including
CEMS
and
CPMS,

was
out­
of­
control
as
specified
in
§
63.8(
c)(
7),
a
statement
that
there
were
no
periods
during
which
the
CMS
was
out­
of­
442
control
during
the
reporting
period.

(
d)
For
each
deviation
from
a
compliance
option
or
operating
requirement
and
for
each
deviation
from
the
work
practice
requirements
in
Table
8
to
this
subpart
that
occurs
at
an
affected
source
where
you
are
not
using
a
CMS
to
comply
with
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,

or
work
practice
requirements
in
this
subpart,
the
compliance
report
must
contain
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
6)
of
this
section
and
in
paragraphs
(
d)(
1)

and
(
2)
of
this
section.
This
includes
periods
of
startup,

shutdown,
and
malfunction
and
routine
control
device
maintenance.

(
1)
The
total
operating
time
of
each
affected
source
during
the
reporting
period.

(
2)
Information
on
the
number,
duration,
and
cause
of
deviations
(
including
unknown
cause,
if
applicable),
as
applicable,
and
the
corrective
action
taken.

(
e)
For
each
deviation
from
a
compliance
option
or
operating
requirement
occurring
at
an
affected
source
where
you
are
using
a
CMS
to
comply
with
the
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
in
this
subpart,
you
must
include
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
6)
and
paragraphs
(
e)(
1)
through
(
11)
of
this
section.
This
includes
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
and
routine
control
device
maintenance.
443
(
1)
The
date
and
time
that
each
malfunction
started
and
stopped.

(
2)
The
date
and
time
that
each
CMS
was
inoperative,

except
for
zero
(
low­
level)
and
high­
level
checks.

(
3)
The
date,
time,
and
duration
that
each
CMS
was
out­
of­
control,
including
the
information
in
§
63.8(
c)(
8).

(
4)
The
date
and
time
that
each
deviation
started
and
stopped,
and
whether
each
deviation
occurred
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction;
during
a
period
of
control
device
maintenance
covered
in
your
approved
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption;
or
during
another
period.

(
5)
A
summary
of
the
total
duration
of
the
deviation
during
the
reporting
period
and
the
total
duration
as
a
percent
of
the
total
source
operating
time
during
that
reporting
period.

(
6)
A
breakdown
of
the
total
duration
of
the
deviations
during
the
reporting
period
into
those
that
are
due
to
startup,
shutdown,
control
system
problems,
control
device
maintenance,
process
problems,
other
known
causes,

and
other
unknown
causes.

(
7)
A
summary
of
the
total
duration
of
CMS
downtime
during
the
reporting
period
and
the
total
duration
of
CMS
downtime
as
a
percent
of
the
total
source
operating
time
during
that
reporting
period.
444
(
8)
A
brief
description
of
the
process
units.

(
9)
A
brief
description
of
the
CMS.

(
10)
The
date
of
the
latest
CMS
certification
or
audit.

(
11)
A
description
of
any
changes
in
CMS,
processes,

or
controls
since
the
last
reporting
period.

(
f)
If
you
comply
with
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c),
you
must
include
in
your
semiannual
compliance
report
calculations
based
on
operating
data
from
the
semiannual
reporting
period
that
demonstrate
that
actual
mass
removal
equals
or
exceeds
the
required
mass
removal.

(
g)
Each
affected
source
that
has
obtained
a
title
V
operating
permit
pursuant
to
40
CFR
part
70
or
40
CFR
part
71
must
report
all
deviations
as
defined
in
this
subpart
in
the
semiannual
monitoring
report
required
by
§
70.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A)
or
§
71.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A).
If
an
affected
source
submits
a
compliance
report
pursuant
to
Table
9
to
this
subpart
along
with,
or
as
part
of,
the
semiannual
monitoring
report
required
by
§
70.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A)
or
§
71.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A),
and
the
compliance
report
includes
all
required
information
concerning
deviations
from
any
compliance
option,
operating
requirement,
or
work
practice
requirement
in
this
subpart,
submission
of
the
compliance
report
shall
be
deemed
to
satisfy
any
obligation
to
report
445
the
same
deviations
in
the
semiannual
monitoring
report.

However,
submission
of
a
compliance
report
shall
not
otherwise
affect
any
obligation
the
affected
source
may
have
to
report
deviations
from
permit
requirements
to
the
permitting
authority.

§
63.2282
What
records
must
I
keep?

(
a)
You
must
keep
the
records
listed
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.

(
1)
A
copy
of
each
notification
and
report
that
you
submitted
to
comply
with
this
subpart,
including
all
documentation
supporting
any
Initial
Notification
or
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
that
you
submitted,

according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
xiv).

(
2)
The
records
in
§
63.6(
e)(
3)(
iii)
through
(
v)

related
to
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction.

(
3)
The
records
in
§
63.2250(
e)
relating
to
control
device
maintenance
and
documentation
of
your
approved
routine
control
device
maintenance
exemption,
if
you
request
such
an
exemption
under
§
63.2251.

(
4)
Records
of
performance
tests
and
performance
evaluations
as
required
in
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
viii).

(
b)
You
must
keep
the
records
required
in
Tables
7
and
8
to
this
subpart
to
show
continuous
compliance
with
each
compliance
option,
operating
requirement,
and
work
practice
requirement
that
applies
to
you.
446
(
c)
For
each
CEMS,
you
must
keep
the
following
records.

(
1)
Records
described
in
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
vi)
through
(
xi).

(
2)
Previous
(
i.
e.,
superseded)
versions
of
the
performance
evaluation
plan
as
required
in
§
63.8(
d)(
3).

(
3)
Request
for
alternatives
to
relative
accuracy
testing
for
CEMS
as
required
in
§
63.8(
f)(
6)(
i).

(
4)
Records
of
the
date
and
time
that
each
deviation
started
and
stopped,
and
whether
the
deviation
occurred
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
or
during
another
period.

(
d)
If
you
comply
with
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c),
you
must
keep
records
of
all
information
required
to
calculate
emission
debits
and
credits.

(
e)
If
you
operate
a
catalytic
oxidizer,
you
must
keep
records
of
annual
catalyst
activity
checks
and
subsequent
corrective
actions.

§
63.2283
In
what
form
and
how
long
must
I
keep
my
records?

(
a)
Your
records
must
be
in
a
form
suitable
and
readily
available
for
expeditious
review
as
specified
in
§
63.10(
b)(
1).

(
b)
As
specified
in
§
63.10(
b)(
1),
you
must
keep
each
record
for
5
years
following
the
date
of
each
occurrence,
447
measurement,
maintenance,
corrective
action,
report,
or
record.

(
c)
You
must
keep
each
record
on
site
for
at
least
2
years
after
the
date
of
each
occurrence,
measurement,

maintenance,
corrective
action,
report,
or
record
according
to
§
63.10(
b)(
1).
You
can
keep
the
records
offsite
for
the
remaining
3
years.

Other
Requirements
and
Information
§
63.2290
What
parts
of
the
General
Provisions
apply
to
me?

Table
10
to
this
subpart
shows
which
parts
of
the
General
Provisions
in
§
§
63.1
through
63.13
apply
to
you.

§
63.2291
Who
implements
and
enforces
this
subpart?

(
a)
This
subpart
can
be
implemented
and
enforced
by
the
U.
S.
EPA
or
a
delegated
authority
such
as
your
State,

local,
or
tribal
agency.
If
the
EPA
Administrator
has
delegated
authority
to
your
State,
local,
or
tribal
agency,

then
that
agency
has
the
authority
to
implement
and
enforce
this
subpart.
You
should
contact
your
EPA
Regional
Office
to
find
out
if
this
subpart
is
delegated
to
your
State,

local,
or
tribal
agency.

(
b)
In
delegating
implementation
and
enforcement
authority
of
this
subpart
to
a
State,
local,
or
tribal
agency
under
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
E,
the
authorities
contained
in
paragraph
(
c)
of
this
section
are
retained
by
the
EPA
Administrator
and
are
not
transferred
to
the
State,
448
local,
or
tribal
agency.

(
c)
The
authorities
that
will
not
be
delegated
to
State,
local,
or
tribal
agencies
are
listed
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
5)
of
this
section.

(
1)
Approval
of
alternatives
to
the
compliance
options,
operating
requirements,
and
work
practice
requirements
in
§
§
63.2240
and
63.2241
as
specified
in
§
63.6(
g).
For
the
purposes
of
delegation
authority
under
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
E,
"
compliance
options"
represent
"
emission
limits";
"
operating
requirements"
represent
"
operating
limits";
and
"
work
practice
requirements"

represent
"
work
practice
standards."

(
2)
Approval
of
major
alternatives
to
test
methods
as
specified
in
§
63.7(
e)(
2)(
ii)
and
(
f)
and
as
defined
in
§
63.90.

(
3)
Approval
of
major
alternatives
to
monitoring
as
specified
in
§
63.8(
f)
and
as
defined
in
§
63.90.

(
4)
Approval
of
major
alternatives
to
recordkeeping
and
reporting
as
specified
in
§
63.10(
f)
and
as
defined
in
§
63.90.

(
5)
Approval
of
PCWP
sources
demonstrations
of
eligibility
for
the
low­
risk
subcategory
developed
according
to
appendix
B
of
this
subpart.

§
63.2292
What
definitions
apply
to
this
subpart?

Terms
used
in
this
subpart
are
defined
in
the
Clean
Air
449
Act
(
CAA),
in
40
CFR
63.2,
the
General
Provisions,
and
in
this
section
as
follows:

Affected
source
means
the
collection
of
dryers,

refiners,
blenders,
formers,
presses,
board
coolers,
and
other
process
units
associated
with
the
manufacturing
of
plywood
and
composite
wood
products.
The
affected
source
includes,
but
is
not
limited
to,
green
end
operations,

refining,
drying
operations,
resin
preparation,
blending
and
forming
operations,
pressing
and
board
cooling
operations,

and
miscellaneous
finishing
operations
(
such
as
sanding,

sawing,
patching,
edge
sealing,
and
other
finishing
operations
not
subject
to
other
NESHAP).
The
affected
source
also
includes
onsite
storage
of
raw
materials
used
in
the
manufacture
of
plywood
and/
or
composite
wood
products,

such
as
resins;
onsite
wastewater
treatment
operations
specifically
associated
with
plywood
and
composite
wood
products
manufacturing;
and
miscellaneous
coating
operations
(
defined
elsewhere
in
this
section).
The
affected
source
includes
lumber
kilns
at
PCWP
manufacturing
facilities
and
at
any
other
kind
of
facility.

Agricultural
fiber
means
the
fiber
of
an
annual
agricultural
crop.
Examples
of
agricultural
fibers
include,

but
are
not
limited
to,
wheat
straw,
rice
straw,
and
bagasse.

Biofilter
means
an
enclosed
control
system
such
as
a
450
tank
or
series
of
tanks
with
a
fixed
roof
that
contact
emissions
with
a
solid
media
(
such
as
bark)
and
use
microbiological
activity
to
transform
organic
pollutants
in
a
process
exhaust
stream
to
innocuous
compounds
such
as
carbon
dioxide,
water,
and
inorganic
salts.
Wastewater
treatment
systems
such
as
aeration
lagoons
or
activated
sludge
systems
are
not
considered
to
be
biofilters.

Capture
device
means
a
hood,
enclosure,
or
other
means
of
collecting
emissions
into
a
duct
so
that
the
emissions
can
be
measured.

Capture
efficiency
means
the
fraction
(
expressed
as
a
percentage)
of
the
pollutants
from
an
emission
source
that
are
collected
by
a
capture
device.

Catalytic
oxidizer
means
a
control
system
that
combusts
or
oxidizes,
in
the
presence
of
a
catalyst,
exhaust
gas
from
a
process
unit.
Catalytic
oxidizers
include
regenerative
catalytic
oxidizers
and
thermal
catalytic
oxidizers.

Combustion
unit
means
a
dryer
burner,
process
heater,

or
boiler
used
for
combustion
of
organic
HAP
emissions.

Control
device
means
any
equipment
that
reduces
the
quantity
of
HAP
emitted
to
the
air.
The
device
may
destroy
the
HAP
or
secure
the
HAP
for
subsequent
recovery.
Control
devices
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizers,
combustion
units
that
incinerate
process
exhausts,
biofilters,
and
condensers.
451
Control
system
or
add­
on
control
system
means
the
combination
of
capture
and
control
devices
used
to
reduce
HAP
emissions
to
the
atmosphere.

Conveyor
strand
dryer
means
a
conveyor
dryer
used
to
reduce
the
moisture
of
wood
strands
used
in
the
manufacture
of
oriented
strandboard,
laminated
strand
lumber,
or
other
wood
strand­
based
products.
A
conveyor
strand
dryer
is
a
process
unit.

Conveyor
strand
dryer
zone
means
each
portion
of
a
conveyor
strand
dryer
with
a
separate
heat
exchange
system
and
exhaust
vent(
s).
Conveyor
strand
dryers
contain
multiple
zones
(
e.
g.,
three
zones),
which
may
be
divided
into
multiple
sections.

Deviation
means
any
instance
in
which
an
affected
source
subject
to
this
subpart,
or
an
owner
or
operator
of
such
a
source:

(
1)
Fails
to
meet
any
requirement
or
obligation
established
by
this
subpart
including,
but
not
limited
to,

any
compliance
option,
operating
requirement,
or
work
practice
requirement;

(
2)
Fails
to
meet
any
term
or
condition
that
is
adopted
to
implement
an
applicable
requirement
in
this
subpart,
and
that
is
included
in
the
operating
permit
for
any
affected
source
required
to
obtain
such
a
permit;
or
(
3)
Fails
to
meet
any
compliance
option,
operating
452
requirement,
or
work
practice
requirement
in
this
subpart
during
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction,
regardless
of
whether
or
not
such
failure
is
permitted
by
this
subpart.
A
deviation
is
not
always
a
violation.
The
determination
of
whether
a
deviation
constitutes
a
violation
of
the
standard
is
up
to
the
discretion
of
the
entity
responsible
for
enforcement
of
the
standards.

Dryer
heated
zones
means
the
zones
of
a
softwood
veneer
dryer
or
fiberboard
mat
dryer
that
are
equipped
with
heating
and
hot
air
circulation
units.
The
cooling
zone(
s)
of
the
dryer
through
which
ambient
air
is
blown
are
not
part
of
the
dryer
heated
zones.

Dry
rotary
dryer
means
a
rotary
dryer
that
dries
wood
particles
or
fibers
with
a
maximum
inlet
moisture
content
of
less
than
or
equal
to
30
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)
and
operates
with
a
maximum
inlet
temperature
of
less
than
or
equal
to
600oF.
A
dry
rotary
dryer
is
a
process
unit.

Dry
forming
means
the
process
of
making
a
mat
of
resinated
fiber
to
be
compressed
into
a
reconstituted
wood
product
such
as
particleboard,
oriented
strandboard,
medium
density
fiberboard,
or
hardboard.

Fiber
means
the
discrete
elements
of
wood
or
similar
cellulosic
material,
which
are
separated
by
mechanical
means,
as
in
refining,
that
can
be
formed
into
boards.

Fiberboard
means
a
composite
panel
composed
of
453
cellulosic
fibers
(
usually
wood
or
agricultural
material)

made
by
wet
forming
and
compacting
a
mat
of
fibers.

Fiberboard
density
generally
is
less
than
0.50
grams
per
cubic
centimeter
(
31.5
pounds
per
cubic
foot).

Fiberboard
mat
dryer
means
a
dryer
used
to
reduce
the
moisture
of
wet­
formed
wood
fiber
mats
by
operation
at
elevated
temperature.
A
fiberboard
mat
dryer
is
a
process
unit.

Flame
zone
means
the
portion
of
the
combustion
chamber
in
a
combustion
unit
that
is
occupied
by
the
flame
envelope.

Furnish
means
the
fibers,
particles,
or
strands
used
for
making
boards.

Glue­
laminated
beam
means
a
structural
wood
beam
made
by
bonding
lumber
together
along
its
faces
with
resin.

Green
rotary
dryer
means
a
rotary
dryer
that
dries
wood
particles
or
fibers
with
an
inlet
moisture
content
of
greater
than
30
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)
at
any
dryer
inlet
temperature
or
operates
with
an
inlet
temperature
of
greater
than
600oF
with
any
inlet
moisture
content.
A
green
rotary
dryer
is
a
process
unit.

Group
1
miscellaneous
coating
operations
means
application
of
edge
seals,
nail
lines,
logo
(
or
other
information)
paint,
shelving
edge
fillers,

trademark/
gradestamp
inks,
and
wood
putty
patches
to
plywood
and
composite
wood
products
(
except
kiln­
dried
lumber)
on
454
the
same
site
where
the
plywood
and
composite
wood
products
are
manufactured.
Group
1
miscellaneous
coating
operations
also
include
application
of
synthetic
patches
to
plywood
at
new
affected
sources.

Hardboard
means
a
composite
panel
composed
of
interfelted
cellulosic
fibers
made
by
dry
or
wet
forming
and
pressing
of
a
resinated
fiber
mat.
Hardboard
generally
has
a
density
of
0.50
grams
per
cubic
centimeter
(
31.5
pounds
per
cubic
foot)
or
greater.

Hardboard
oven
means
an
oven
used
to
heat
treat
or
temper
hardboard
after
hot
pressing.
Humidification
chambers
are
not
considered
as
part
of
hardboard
ovens.
A
hardboard
oven
is
a
process
unit.

Hardwood
means
the
wood
of
a
broad­
leafed
tree,
either
deciduous
or
evergreen.
Examples
of
hardwoods
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,
aspen,
birch,
poplar,
and
oak.

Hardwood
veneer
dryer
means
a
dryer
that
removes
excess
moisture
from
veneer
by
conveying
the
veneer
through
a
heated
medium
on
rollers,
belts,
cables,
or
wire
mesh.

Hardwood
veneer
dryers
are
used
to
dry
veneer
with
less
than
30
percent
softwood
species
on
an
annual
volume
basis.

Veneer
kilns
that
operate
as
batch
units,
veneer
dryers
heated
by
radio
frequency
or
microwaves
that
are
used
to
redry
veneer,
and
veneer
redryers
(
defined
elsewhere
in
this
section)
that
are
heated
by
conventional
means
are
not
455
considered
to
be
hardwood
veneer
dryers.
A
hardwood
veneer
dryer
is
a
process
unit.

Kiln­
dried
lumber
means
solid
wood
lumber
that
has
been
dried
in
a
lumber
kiln.

Laminated
strand
lumber
(
LSL)
means
a
composite
product
formed
into
a
billet
made
of
thin
wood
strands
cut
from
whole
logs,
resinated,
and
pressed
together
with
the
grain
of
each
strand
oriented
parallel
to
the
length
of
the
finished
product.

Laminated
veneer
lumber
(
LVL)
means
a
composite
product
formed
into
a
billet
made
from
layers
of
resinated
wood
veneer
sheets
or
pieces
pressed
together
with
the
grain
of
each
veneer
aligned
primarily
along
the
length
of
the
finished
product.
Laminated
veneer
lumber
includes
parallel
strand
lumber
(
PSL).

Lumber
kiln
means
an
enclosed
dryer
operated
at
elevated
temperature
to
reduce
the
moisture
content
of
lumber.

Medium
density
fiberboard
(
MDF)
means
a
composite
panel
composed
of
cellulosic
fibers
(
usually
wood
or
agricultural
fiber)
made
by
dry
forming
and
pressing
of
a
resinated
fiber
mat.

Method
detection
limit
means
the
minimum
concentration
of
an
analyte
that
can
be
determined
with
99
percent
confidence
that
the
true
value
is
greater
than
zero.
456
Miscellaneous
coating
operations
means
application
of
any
of
the
following
to
plywood
or
composite
wood
products:

edge
seals,
moisture
sealants,
anti­
skid
coatings,
company
logos,
trademark
or
grade
stamps,
nail
lines,
synthetic
patches,
wood
patches,
wood
putty,
concrete
forming
oils,

glues
for
veneer
composing,
and
shelving
edge
fillers.

Miscellaneous
coating
operations
also
include
the
application
of
primer
to
oriented
strandboard
siding
that
occurs
at
the
same
site
as
oriented
strandboard
manufacture
and
application
of
asphalt,
clay
slurry,
or
titanium
dioxide
coatings
to
fiberboard
at
the
same
site
of
fiberboard
manufacture.

MSF
means
thousand
square
feet
(
92.9
square
meters).

Square
footage
of
panels
is
usually
measured
on
a
thickness
basis,
such
as
3/
8­
inch,
to
define
the
total
volume
of
panels.
Equation
6
of
§
63.2262(
j)
shows
how
to
convert
from
one
thickness
basis
to
another.

Nondetect
data
means,
for
the
purposes
of
this
subpart,

any
value
that
is
below
the
method
detection
limit.

Non­
HAP
coating
means
a
coating
with
HAP
contents
below
0.1
percent
by
mass
for
Occupational
Safety
and
Health
Administration­
defined
carcinogens
as
specified
in
29
CFR
1910.1200(
d)(
4),
and
below
1.0
percent
by
mass
for
other
HAP
compounds.

Oriented
strandboard
(
OSB)
means
a
composite
panel
457
produced
from
thin
wood
strands
cut
from
whole
logs,
formed
into
resinated
layers
(
with
the
grain
of
strands
in
one
layer
oriented
perpendicular
to
the
strands
in
adjacent
layers),
and
pressed.

Oven­
dried
ton(
s)
(
ODT)
means
tons
of
wood
dried
until
all
of
the
moisture
in
the
wood
is
removed.
One
oven­
dried
ton
equals
907
oven­
dried
kilograms.

Partial
wood
products
enclosure
means
an
enclosure
that
does
not
meet
the
design
criteria
for
a
wood
products
enclosure
as
defined
in
this
subpart.

Particle
means
a
discrete,
small
piece
of
cellulosic
material
(
usually
wood
or
agricultural
fiber)
produced
mechanically
and
used
as
the
aggregate
for
a
particleboard.

Particleboard
means
a
composite
panel
composed
primarily
of
cellulosic
materials
(
usually
wood
or
agricultural
fiber)
generally
in
the
form
of
discrete
pieces
or
particles,
as
distinguished
from
fibers,
which
are
pressed
together
with
resin.

Plywood
and
composite
wood
products
(
PCWP)

manufacturing
facility
means
a
facility
that
manufactures
plywood
and/
or
composite
wood
products
by
bonding
wood
material
(
fibers,
particles,
strands,
veneers,
etc.)
or
agricultural
fiber,
generally
with
resin
under
heat
and
pressure,
to
form
a
structural
panel
or
engineered
wood
product.
Plywood
and
composite
wood
products
manufacturing
458
facilities
also
include
facilities
that
manufacture
dry
veneer
and
lumber
kilns
located
at
any
facility.
Plywood
and
composite
wood
products
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,

plywood,
veneer,
particleboard,
oriented
strandboard,

hardboard,
fiberboard,
medium
density
fiberboard,
laminated
strand
lumber,
laminated
veneer
lumber,
wood
I­
joists,

kilndried
lumber,
and
glue­
laminated
beams.

Plywood
means
a
panel
product
consisting
of
layers
of
wood
veneers
hot
pressed
together
with
resin.
Plywood
includes
panel
products
made
by
hot
pressing
(
with
resin)

veneers
to
a
substrate
such
as
particleboard,
medium
density
fiberboard,
or
lumber.

Press
predryer
means
a
dryer
used
to
reduce
the
moisture
and
elevate
the
temperature
of
a
wet­
formed
fiber
mat
before
the
mat
enters
a
hot
press.
A
press
predryer
is
a
process
unit.

Pressurized
refiner
means
a
piece
of
equipment
operated
under
pressure
for
preheating
(
usually
by
steaming)
wood
material
and
refining
(
rubbing
or
grinding)
the
wood
material
into
fibers.
Pressurized
refiners
are
operated
with
continuous
infeed
and
outfeed
of
wood
material
and
maintain
elevated
internal
pressures
(
i.
e.,
there
is
no
pressure
release)
throughout
the
preheating
and
refining
process.
A
pressurized
refiner
is
a
process
unit.

Primary
tube
dryer
means
a
single­
stage
tube
dryer
or
459
the
first
stage
of
a
multi­
stage
tube
dryer.
Tube
dryer
stages
are
separated
by
vents
for
removal
of
moist
gases
between
stages
(
e.
g.,
a
product
cyclone
at
the
end
of
a
single­
stage
dryer
or
between
the
first
and
second
stages
of
a
multi­
stage
tube
dryer).
The
first
stage
of
a
multi­
stage
tube
dryer
is
used
to
remove
the
majority
of
the
moisture
from
the
wood
furnish
(
compared
to
the
moisture
reduction
in
subsequent
stages
of
the
tube
dryer).
Blow­
lines
used
to
apply
resin
are
considered
part
of
the
primary
tube
dryer.

A
primary
tube
dryer
is
a
process
unit.

Process
unit
means
equipment
classified
according
to
its
function
such
as
a
blender,
dryer,
press,
former,
or
board
cooler.

Reconstituted
wood
product
board
cooler
means
a
piece
of
equipment
designed
to
reduce
the
temperature
of
a
board
by
means
of
forced
air
or
convection
within
a
controlled
time
period
after
the
board
exits
the
reconstituted
wood
product
press
unloader.
Board
coolers
include
wicket
and
star
type
coolers
commonly
found
at
medium
density
fiberboard
and
particleboard
plants.
Board
coolers
do
not
include
cooling
sections
of
dryers
(
e.
g.,
veneer
dryers
or
fiberboard
mat
dryers)
or
coolers
integrated
into
or
following
hardboard
bake
ovens
or
humidifiers.
A
reconstituted
wood
product
board
cooler
is
a
process
unit.

Reconstituted
wood
product
press
means
a
press,
460
including
(
if
applicable)
the
press
unloader,
that
presses
a
resinated
mat
of
wood
fibers,
particles,
or
strands
between
hot
platens
or
hot
rollers
to
compact
and
set
the
mat
into
a
panel
by
simultaneous
application
of
heat
and
pressure.

Reconstituted
wood
product
presses
are
used
in
the
manufacture
of
hardboard,
medium
density
fiberboard,

particleboard,
and
oriented
strandboard.
Extruders
are
not
considered
to
be
reconstituted
wood
product
presses.
A
reconstituted
wood
product
press
is
a
process
unit.

Representative
operating
conditions
means
operation
of
a
process
unit
during
performance
testing
under
the
conditions
that
the
process
unit
will
typically
be
operating
in
the
future,
including
use
of
a
representative
range
of
materials
(
e.
g.,
wood
material
of
a
typical
species
mix
and
moisture
content
or
typical
resin
formulation)
and
representative
operating
temperature
range.

Resin
means
the
synthetic
adhesive
(
including
glue)
or
natural
binder,
including
additives,
used
to
bond
wood
or
other
cellulosic
materials
together
to
produce
plywood
and
composite
wood
products.

Responsible
official
means
responsible
official
as
defined
in
40
CFR
70.2
and
40
CFR
71.2.

Rotary
strand
dryer
means
a
rotary
dryer
operated
at
elevated
temperature
and
used
to
reduce
the
moisture
of
wood
strands
used
in
the
manufacture
of
oriented
strandboard,
461
laminated
strand
lumber,
or
other
wood
strand­
based
products.
A
rotary
strand
dryer
is
a
process
unit.

Secondary
tube
dryer
means
the
second
stage
and
subsequent
stages
following
the
primary
stage
of
a
multistage
tube
dryer.
Secondary
tube
dryers,
also
referred
to
as
relay
dryers,
operate
at
lower
temperatures
than
the
primary
tube
dryer
they
follow.
Secondary
tube
dryers
are
used
to
remove
only
a
small
amount
of
the
furnish
moisture
compared
to
the
furnish
moisture
reduction
across
the
primary
tube
dryer.
A
secondary
tube
dryer
is
a
process
unit.

Softwood
means
the
wood
of
a
coniferous
tree.
Examples
of
softwoods
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,
Southern
yellow
pine,
Douglas
fir,
and
White
spruce.

Softwood
veneer
dryer
means
a
dryer
that
removes
excess
moisture
from
veneer
by
conveying
the
veneer
through
a
heated
medium,
generally
on
rollers,
belts,
cables,
or
wire
mesh.
Softwood
veneer
dryers
are
used
to
dry
veneer
with
greater
than
or
equal
to
30
percent
softwood
species
on
an
annual
volume
basis.
Veneer
kilns
that
operate
as
batch
units,
veneer
dryers
heated
by
radio
frequency
or
microwaves
that
are
used
to
redry
veneer,
and
veneer
redryers
(
defined
elsewhere
in
this
section)
that
are
heated
by
conventional
means
are
not
considered
to
be
softwood
veneer
dryers.
A
softwood
veneer
dryer
is
a
process
unit.
462
Startup
means
bringing
equipment
online
and
starting
the
production
process.

Startup,
initial
means
the
first
time
equipment
is
put
into
operation.
Initial
startup
does
not
include
operation
solely
for
testing
equipment.
Initial
startup
does
not
include
subsequent
startups
(
as
defined
in
this
section)

following
malfunction
or
shutdowns
or
following
changes
in
product
or
between
batch
operations.
Initial
startup
does
not
include
startup
of
equipment
that
occurred
when
the
source
was
an
area
source.

Startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
(
SSMP)
means
a
plan
developed
according
to
the
provisions
of
§
63.6(
e)(
3).

Strand
means
a
long
(
with
respect
to
thickness
and
width),
flat
wood
piece
specially
cut
from
a
log
for
use
in
oriented
strandboard,
laminated
strand
lumber,
or
other
wood
strand­
based
product.

Temporary
total
enclosure
(
TTE)
means
an
enclosure
constructed
for
the
purpose
of
measuring
the
capture
efficiency
of
pollutants
emitted
from
a
given
source,
as
defined
in
Method
204
of
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M.

Thermal
oxidizer
means
a
control
system
that
combusts
or
oxidizes
exhaust
gas
from
a
process
unit.
Thermal
oxidizers
include
regenerative
thermal
oxidizers
and
combustion
units.

Total
hazardous
air
pollutant
emissions
means,
for
463
purposes
of
this
subpart,
the
sum
of
the
emissions
of
the
following
six
compounds:
acetaldehyde,
acrolein,

formaldehyde,
methanol,
phenol,
and
propionaldehyde.

Tube
dryer
means
a
single­
stage
or
multi­
stage
dryer
operated
at
elevated
temperature
and
used
to
reduce
the
moisture
of
wood
fibers
or
particles
as
they
are
conveyed
(
usually
pneumatically)
through
the
dryer.
Resin
may
or
may
not
be
applied
to
the
wood
material
before
it
enters
the
tube
dryer.
A
tube
dryer
is
a
process
unit.

Veneer
means
thin
sheets
of
wood
peeled
or
sliced
from
logs
for
use
in
the
manufacture
of
wood
products
such
as
plywood,
laminated
veneer
lumber,
or
other
products.

Veneer
redryer
means
a
dryer
heated
by
conventional
means,
such
as
direct
wood­
fired,
direct­
gas­
fired,
or
steam
heated,
that
is
used
to
redry
veneer
that
has
been
previously
dried.
Because
the
veneer
dried
in
a
veneer
redryer
has
been
previously
dried,
the
inlet
moisture
content
of
the
veneer
entering
the
redryer
is
less
than
25
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis).
Batch
units
used
to
redry
veneer
(
such
as
redry
cookers)
are
not
considered
to
be
veneer
redryers.
A
veneer
redryer
is
a
process
unit.

Wet
control
device
means
any
equipment
that
uses
water
as
a
means
of
collecting
an
air
pollutant.
Wet
control
devices
include
scrubbers,
wet
electrostatic
precipitators,

and
electrified
filter
beds.
Wet
control
devices
do
not
464
include
biofilters
or
other
equipment
that
destroys
or
degrades
HAP.

Wet
forming
means
the
process
of
making
a
slurry
of
water,
fiber,
and
additives
into
a
mat
of
fibers
to
be
compressed
into
a
fiberboard
or
hardboard
product.

Wood
I­
joists
means
a
structural
wood
beam
with
an
Ishaped
cross
section
formed
by
bonding
(
with
resin)
wood
or
laminated
veneer
lumber
flanges
onto
a
web
cut
from
a
panel
such
as
plywood
or
oriented
strandboard.

Wood
products
enclosure
means
a
permanently
installed
containment
that
was
designed
to
meet
the
following
physical
design
criteria:

(
1)
Any
natural
draft
opening
shall
be
at
least
four
equivalent
opening
diameters
from
each
HAPemitting
point,
except
for
where
board
enters
and
exits
the
enclosure,
unless
otherwise
specified
by
the
EPA
Administrator.

(
2)
The
total
area
of
all
natural
draft
openings
shall
not
exceed
5
percent
of
the
surface
area
of
the
enclosure's
four
walls,
floor,
and
ceiling.

(
3)
The
average
facial
velocity
of
air
through
all
natural
draft
openings
shall
be
at
least
3,600
meters
per
hour
(
200
feet
per
minute).
The
direction
of
airflow
through
all
natural
draft
openings
shall
be
into
the
enclosure.
465
(
4)
All
access
doors
and
windows
whose
areas
are
not
included
in
item
2
of
this
definition
and
are
not
included
in
the
calculation
of
facial
velocity
in
item
3
of
this
definition
shall
be
closed
during
routine
operation
of
the
process.

(
5)
The
enclosure
is
designed
and
maintained
to
capture
all
emissions
for
discharge
through
a
control
device.

Work
practice
requirement
means
any
design,
equipment,

work
practice,
or
operational
standard,
or
combination
thereof,
that
is
promulgated
pursuant
to
section
112(
h)
of
the
CAA.

1­
hour
period
means
a
60­
minute
period.
466
Tables
to
Subpart
DDD
of
Part
63
Table
1A
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Production­
Based
Compliance
Options
For
the
following
process
units...
You
must
meet
the
following
production­
based
compliance
option
(
total
HAPa
basis)...

(
1)
fiberboard
mat
dryer
heated
zones
(
at
new
affected
sources
only)
0.022
lb/
MSF
1/
2
½
"

(
2)
green
rotary
dryers
0.058
lb/
ODT
(
3)
hardboard
ovens
0.022
lb/
MSF
1/
8"

(
4)
press
predryers
(
at
new
affected
sources
only)
0.037
lb/
MSF
1/
2
½
"

(
5)
pressurized
refiners
0.039
lb/
ODT
(
6)
primary
tube
dryers
0.26
lb/
ODT
(
7)
reconstituted
wood
product
board
coolers
(
at
new
affected
sources
only)
0.014
lb/
MSF
3/
4"

(
8)
reconstituted
wood
product
presses
0.30
lb/
MSF
3/
4"

(
9)
softwood
veneer
dryer
heated
zones
0.022
lb/
MSF
3/
8"

(
10)
rotary
strand
dryers
0.18
lb/
ODT
(
11)
secondary
tube
dryers
0.010
lb/
ODT
aTotal
HAP,
as
defined
in
§
63.2292,
includes
acetaldehyde,
acrolein,
formaldehyde,
methanol,
phenol,
and
propionaldehyde.
lb/
ODT
=
pounds
per
oven­
dried
ton;
lb/
MSF
=
pounds
per
thousand
square
feet
with
a
specified
thickness
basis
(
inches).
Section
63.2262(
j)
shows
how
to
convert
from
one
thickness
basis
to
another.
Note:
There
is
no
production­
based
compliance
option
for
conveyor
strand
dryers.
467
Table
1B
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Add­
on
Control
Systems
Compliance
Options
For
each
of
the
following
process
units...
You
must
comply
with
one
of
the
following
six
compliance
options
by
using
an
emissions
control
system...

Fiberboard
mat
dryer
heated
zones
(
at
new
affected
sources
only);
green
rotary
dryers;
hardboard
ovens;
press
predryers
(
at
new
affected
sources
only);
pressurized
refiners;
tube
dryers;
reconstituted
wood
product
board
coolers
(
at
new
affected
sources
only);
reconstituted
wood
product
presses;
softwood
veneer
dryer
heated
zones;
rotary
strand
dryers;
conveyor
strand
dryer
zone
one
(
at
existing
affected
sources);
and
conveyor
strand
dryer
zones
one
and
two
(
at
new
affected
sources)
(
1)
reduce
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC
(
as
carbon)
a,
by
90
percent;
or
(
2)
limit
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC
(
as
carbon)
a,
to
20
ppmvd;
or
(
3)
reduce
methanol
emissions
by
90
percent;
or
(
4)
limit
methanol
emissions
to
less
than
or
equal
to
1
ppmvd
if
uncontrolled
methanol
emissions
entering
the
control
device
are
greater
than
or
equal
to
10
ppmvd;
or
(
5)
reduce
formaldehyde
emissions
by
90
percent;
or
(
6)
limit
formaldehyde
emissions
to
less
than
or
equal
to
1
ppmvd
if
uncontrolled
formaldehyde
emissions
entering
the
control
device
are
greater
than
or
equal
to
10
ppmvd.

aYou
may
choose
to
subtract
methane
from
THC
as
carbon
measurements.
468
Table
2
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Operating
Requirements
If
you
operate
a(
n)
...
you
must...
or
you
must...

(
1)
thermal
oxidizer
maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
firebox
temperature
above
the
minimum
temperature
established
during
the
performance
test
maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
concentrationa
in
the
thermal
oxidizer
exhaust
below
the
maximum
concentration
established
during
the
performance
test.

(
2)
catalytic
oxidizer
maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
catalytic
oxidizer
temperature
above
the
minimum
temperature
established
during
the
performance
test;
AND
check
the
activity
level
of
a
representative
sample
of
the
catalyst
at
least
every
12
months
maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
concentrationa
in
the
catalytic
oxidizer
exhaust
below
the
maximum
concentration
established
during
the
performance
test.

(
3)
biofilter
maintain
the
24­
hour
block
biofilter
bed
temperature
within
the
range
established
according
to
§
63.2262(
m)
maintain
the
24­
hour
block
average
THC
concentrationa
in
the
biofilter
exhaust
below
the
maximum
concentration
established
during
the
performance
test.

(
4)
control
device
other
than
a
thermal
oxidizer,
catalytic
oxidizer,
or
biofilter
petition
the
EPA
Administrator
for
sitespecific
operating
parameter(
s)
to
be
established
during
the
performance
test
and
maintain
the
average
operating
parameter(
s)
within
the
range(
s)
established
during
the
performance
test
maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
concentrationa
in
the
control
device
exhaust
below
the
maximum
concentration
established
during
the
performance
test.

(
5)
process
unit
that
meets
a
compliance
option
in
table
1a
of
this
subpart,
or
a
process
unit
that
generates
debits
in
an
emissions
average
without
the
use
of
a
control
device
maintain
on
a
daily
basis
the
process
unit
controlling
operating
parameter(
s)
within
the
ranges
established
during
the
performance
test
according
to
§
63.2262(
n)
maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
concentrationa
in
the
process
unit
exhaust
below
the
maximum
concentration
established
during
the
performance
test.

aYou
may
choose
to
subtract
methane
from
THC
measurements.
469
Table
3
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Work
Practice
Requirements
For
the
following
process
units
at
existing
or
new
affected
sources...
You
must...

(
1)
dry
rotary
dryers
process
furnish
with
a
24­
hour
block
average
inlet
moisture
content
of
less
than
or
equal
to
30
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis);
AND
operate
with
a
24­
hour
block
average
inlet
dryer
temperature
of
less
than
or
equal
to
600oF.

(
2)
hardwood
veneer
dryers
process
less
than
30
volume
percent
softwood
species
on
an
annual
basis.

(
3)
softwood
veneer
dryers
minimize
fugitive
emissions
from
the
dryer
doors
through
(
proper
maintenance
procedures)
and
the
green
end
of
the
dryers
(
though
proper
balancing
of
the
heated
zone
exhausts).

(
4)
veneer
redryers
process
veneer
that
has
been
previously
dried,
such
that
the
24­
hour
block
average
inlet
moisture
content
of
the
veneer
is
less
than
or
equal
to
25
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis).

(
5)
group
1
miscellaneous
coating
operations
use
non­
HAP
coatings
as
defined
in
§
63.2292.
470
Table
4
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Requirements
for
Performance
Tests
For...
You
must...
Using...

(
1)
each
process
unit
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1A
or
1B
to
this
subpart
or
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
average
under
§
63.2240(
c)
select
sampling
port's
location
and
the
number
of
traverse
ports
Method
1
or
1A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A
(
as
appropriate).

(
2)
each
process
unit
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1A
or
1B
to
this
subpart
or
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
average
under
§
63.2240(
c)
determine
velocity
and
volumetric
flow
rate
Method
2
in
addition
to
Method
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
or
2G
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
(
as
appropriate).

(
3)
each
process
unit
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1A
or
1B
to
this
subpart
or
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
average
under
§
63.2240(
c)
conduct
gas
molecular
weight
analysis
Method
3,
3A,
or
3B
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
(
as
appropriate).

(
4)
each
process
unit
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1A
or
1B
to
this
subpart
or
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
average
under
§
63.2240(
c)
measure
moisture
content
of
the
stack
gas
Method
4
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60;
OR
Method
320
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63;
OR
ASTM
D6348­
03
(
IBR,
see
§
63.14(
b))

(
5)
each
process
unit
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
for
which
you
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
using
a
total
HAP
as
THC
compliance
option
measure
emissions
of
total
HAP
as
THC
Method
25A
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60.
You
may
measure
emissions
of
methane
using
EPA
Method
18
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
and
subtract
the
methane
emissions
from
the
emissions
of
total
HAP
as
THC.

(
6)
each
process
unit
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart;
OR
for
each
process
unit
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
average
under
§
63.2240(
c)
measure
emissions
of
total
HAP
(
as
defined
in
§
63.2292)
Method
320
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63;
OR
the
NCASI
Method
IM/
CAN/
WP­
99.02
(
IBR,
see
§
63.14(
f));
OR
ASTM
D6348­
03
(
IBR,
see
§
63.14(
b))
provided
that
percent
R
as
determined
in
Annex
A5
of
ASTM
D6348­
03
is
equal
or
greater
than
70
percent
and
less
than
or
equal
to
130
percent.
471
(
7)
each
process
unit
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
for
which
you
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
using
a
methanol
compliance
option
measure
emissions
of
methanol
Method
308
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63;
OR
Method
320
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63;
OR
the
NCASI
Method
CI/
WP­
98.01
(
IBR,
see
§
63.14(
f));
OR
the
NCASI
Method
IM/
CAN/
WP­
99.02
(
IBR,
see
§
63.14(
f)).

(
8)
each
process
unit
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
for
which
you
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
using
a
formaldehyde
compliance
option
measure
emissions
of
formaldehyde
Method
316
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63;
OR
Method
320
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63;
OR
Method
0011
in
"
Test
Methods
for
Evaluating
Solid
Waste,
Physical/
Chemical
Methods"
(
EPA
Publication
No.
SW­
846)
for
formaldehyde;
OR
the
NCASI
Method
CI/
WP­
98.01
(
IBR,
see
§
63.14(
f));
OR
the
NCASI
Method
IM/
CAN/
WP­
99.02
(
IBR,
see
§
63.14(
f)).

(
9)
each
reconstituted
wood
product
press
at
a
new
or
existing
affected
source
or
reconstituted
wood
product
board
cooler
at
a
new
affected
source
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
or
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
average
under
§
63.2240(
c)
meet
the
design
specifications
included
in
the
definition
of
wood
products
enclosure
in
§
63.2292
OR
determine
the
percent
capture
efficiency
of
the
enclosure
directing
emissions
to
an
add­
on
control
device
Methods
204
and
204A
through
204F
of
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M,
to
determine
capture
efficiency
(
except
for
wood
products
enclosures
as
defined
in
§
63.2292).
Enclosures
that
meet
the
definition
of
wood
products
enclosure
or
that
meet
Method
204
requirements
for
a
permanent
total
enclosure
(
PTE)
are
assumed
to
have
a
capture
efficiency
of
100
percent.
Enclosures
that
do
not
meet
either
the
PTE
requirements
or
design
criteria
for
a
wood
products
enclosure
must
determine
the
capture
efficiency
by
constructing
a
TTE
according
to
the
requirements
of
Method
204
and
applying
Methods
204A
through
204F
(
as
appropriate).
As
an
alternative
to
Methods
204
and
204A
through
204F,
you
may
use
the
tracer
gas
method
contained
in
appendix
A
to
this
subpart.
472
(
10)
each
reconstituted
wood
product
press
at
a
new
or
existing
affected
source
or
reconstituted
wood
product
board
cooler
at
a
new
affected
source
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart
determine
the
percent
capture
efficiency
a
TTE
and
Methods
204
and
204A
through
204F
(
as
appropriate)
of
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M.
As
an
alternative
to
installing
a
TTE
and
using
Methods
204
and
204A
through
204F,
you
may
use
the
tracer
gas
method
contained
in
appendix
A
to
this
subpart.

(
11)
each
process
unit
subject
to
a
compliance
option
in
Tables
1A
and
1B
to
this
subpart
or
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
average
under
§
63.2240(
c)
establish
the
sitespecific
operating
requirements
(
including
the
parameter
limits
or
THC
concentration
limits)
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
data
from
the
parameter
monitoring
system
or
THC
CEMS
and
the
applicable
performance
test
method(
s).
473
Table
5
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Performance
Testing
and
Initial
Compliance
Demonstrations
for
the
Compliance
Options
and
Operating
Requirements
For
each...
For
the
following
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements
...
You
have
demonstrated
initial
compliance
if...

(
1)
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart
meet
the
production­
based
compliance
options
listed
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart
the
average
total
HAP
emissions
measured
using
the
methods
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
over
the
3­
hour
performance
test
are
no
greater
than
the
compliance
option
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart;
AND
you
have
a
record
of
the
operating
requirement(
s)
listed
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
for
the
process
unit
over
the
performance
test
during
which
emissions
did
not
exceed
the
compliance
option
value.

(
2)
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
reduce
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC,
by
90
percent
total
HAP
emissions,
measured
using
the
methods
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
over
the
3­
hour
performance
test,
are
reduced
by
at
least
90
percent,
as
calculated
using
the
procedures
in
§
63.2262;
AND
you
have
a
record
of
the
operating
requirement(
s)
listed
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
for
the
process
unit
over
the
performance
test
during
which
emissions
were
reduced
by
at
least
90
percent.

(
3)
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
limit
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC,
to
20
ppmvd
the
average
total
HAP
emissions,
measured
using
the
methods
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
over
the
3­
hour
performance
test,
do
not
exceed
20
ppmvd;
AND
you
have
a
record
of
the
operating
requirement(
s)
listed
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
for
the
process
unit
over
the
performance
test
during
which
emissions
did
not
exceed
20
ppmvd.
474
(
4)
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
reduce
methanol
or
formaldehyde
emissions
by
90
percent
the
methanol
or
formaldehyde
emissions
measured
using
the
methods
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
over
the
3­
hour
performance
test,
are
reduced
by
at
least
90
percent,
as
calculated
using
the
procedures
in
§
63.2262;
AND
you
have
a
record
of
the
operating
requirement(
s)
listed
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
for
the
process
unit
over
the
performance
test
during
which
emissions
were
reduced
by
at
least
90
percent.

(
5)
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
limit
methanol
or
formaldehyde
emissions
to
less
than
or
equal
to
1
ppmvd
(
if
uncontrolled
emissions
are
greater
than
or
equal
to
10
ppmvd)
the
average
methanol
or
formaldehyde
emissions,
measured
using
the
methods
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
over
the
3­
hour
performance
test,
do
not
exceed
1
ppmvd;
AND
you
have
a
record
of
the
operating
requirement(
s)
listed
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
for
the
process
unit
over
the
performance
test
during
which
emissions
did
not
exceed
1
ppmvd.
If
the
process
unit
is
a
reconstituted
wood
product
press
or
a
reconstituted
wood
product
board
cooler,
your
capture
device
either
meets
the
EPA
Method
204
criteria
for
a
PTE
or
achieves
a
capture
efficiency
of
greater
than
or
equal
to
95
percent.

(
6)
reconstituted
wood
product
press
at
a
new
or
existing
affected
source,
or
reconstituted
wood
product
board
cooler
at
a
new
affected
source
compliance
options
in
Tables
1A
and
1B
to
this
subpart
or
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c)
you
submit
the
results
of
capture
efficiency
verification
using
the
methods
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
with
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.

(
7)
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
controlled
by
routing
exhaust
to
a
combustion
unit
compliance
options
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
or
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c)
you
submit
with
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
documentation
showing
that
the
process
exhausts
controlled
enter
into
the
flame
zone
of
your
combustion
unit.

(
8)
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
using
a
wet
control
device
as
the
sole
means
of
reducing
HAP
emissions
compliance
options
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
or
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c)
you
submit
with
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
your
plan
to
address
how
organic
HAP
captured
in
the
wastewater
from
the
wet
control
device
is
contained
or
destroyed
to
minimize
re­
release
to
the
atmosphere.
475
476
Table
6
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Initial
Compliance
Demonstrations
for
Work
Practice
Requirements
For
each...
For
the
following
work
practice
requirements...
You
have
demonstrated
initial
compliance
if...

(
1)
dry
rotary
dryer
process
furnish
with
an
inlet
moisture
content
less
than
or
equal
to
30
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)
AND
operate
with
an
inlet
dryer
temperature
of
less
than
or
equal
to
600oF
you
meet
the
work
practice
requirement
AND
you
submit
a
signed
statement
with
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
that
the
dryer
meets
the
criteria
of
a
"
dry
rotary
dryer"
AND
you
have
a
record
of
the
inlet
moisture
content
and
inlet
dryer
temperature
(
as
required
in
§
63.2263).

(
2)
hardwood
veneer
dryer
process
less
than
30
volume
percent
softwood
species
you
meet
the
work
practice
requirement
AND
you
submit
a
signed
statement
with
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
that
the
dryer
meets
the
criteria
of
a
"
hardwood
veneer
dryer"
AND
you
have
a
record
of
the
percentage
of
softwoods
processed
in
the
dryer
(
as
required
in
§
63.2264).

(
3)
softwood
veneer
dryer
minimize
fugitive
emissions
from
the
dryer
doors
and
the
green
end
you
meet
the
work
practice
requirement
AND
you
submit
with
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
a
copy
of
your
plan
for
minimizing
fugitive
emissions
from
the
veneer
dryer
heated
zones
(
as
required
in
§
63.2265).

(
4)
veneer
redryers
process
veneer
with
an
inlet
moisture
content
of
less
than
or
equal
to
25
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)
you
meet
the
work
practice
requirement
AND
you
submit
a
signed
statement
with
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
that
the
dryer
operates
only
as
a
redryer
AND
you
have
a
record
of
the
veneer
inlet
moisture
content
of
the
veneer
processed
in
the
redryer
(
as
required
in
§
63.2266).

(
5)
group
1
miscellaneous
coating
operations
use
non­
HAP
coatings
as
defined
in
§
63.2292
you
meet
the
work
practice
requirement
AND
you
submit
a
signed
statement
with
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
that
you
are
using
non­
HAP
coatings
AND
you
have
a
record
showing
that
you
are
using
non­
HAP
coatings.
477
Table
7
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Continuous
Compliance
With
the
Compliance
Options
and
Operating
Requirements
For...
For
the
following
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements...
You
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
by...

(
1)
each
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
or
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
average
under
§
63.2240(
c)
compliance
options
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
or
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c)
and
the
operating
requirements
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
based
on
monitoring
of
operating
parameters
collecting
and
recording
the
operating
parameter
monitoring
system
data
listed
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
for
the
process
unit
according
to
§
63.2269(
a)
through
(
b)
and
§
63.2270;
AND
reducing
the
operating
parameter
monitoring
system
data
to
the
specified
averages
in
units
of
the
applicable
requirement
according
to
calculations
in
§
63.2270;
AND
maintaining
the
average
operating
parameter
at
or
above
the
minimum,
at
or
below
the
maximum,
or
within
the
range
(
whichever
applies)
established
according
to
§
63.2262.

(
2)
each
process
unit
listed
in
Tables
1A
and
1B
to
this
subpart
or
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
average
under
§
63.2240(
c)
compliance
options
in
Tables
1A
and
1B
to
this
subpart
or
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c)
and
the
operating
requirements
in
Table
2
of
this
subpart
based
on
THC
CEMS
data
collecting
and
recording
the
THC
monitoring
data
listed
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
for
the
process
unit
according
to
§
63.2269(
d);
AND
reducing
the
CEMS
data
to
3­
hour
block
averages
according
to
calculations
in
§
63.2269(
d);
AND
maintaining
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
concentration
in
the
exhaust
gases
less
than
or
equal
to
the
THC
concentration
established
according
to
§
63.2262.

(
3)
each
process
unit
using
a
biofilter
compliance
options
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
or
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c)
conducting
a
repeat
performance
test
using
the
applicable
method(
s)
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
within
2
years
following
the
previous
performance
test
and
within
180
days
after
each
replacement
of
any
portion
of
the
biofilter
bed
media
with
a
different
type
of
media
or
each
replacement
of
more
than
50
percent
(
by
volume)
of
the
biofilter
bed
media
with
the
same
type
of
media.
478
Table
7
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Continuous
Compliance
With
the
Compliance
Options
and
Operating
Requirements
(
4)
each
process
unit
using
a
catalytic
oxidizer
compliance
options
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
or
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c)
checking
the
activity
level
of
a
representative
sample
of
the
catalyst
at
least
every
12
months
and
taking
any
necessary
corrective
action
to
ensure
that
the
catalyst
is
performing
within
its
design
range.

(
5)
each
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart,
or
each
process
unit
without
a
control
device
used
in
calculation
of
an
emissions
averaging
debit
under
§
63.2240(
c)
compliance
options
in
Table
1A
to
this
subpart
or
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c)
and
the
operating
requirements
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
based
on
monitoring
of
process
unit
controlling
operating
parameters
collecting
and
recording
on
a
daily
basis
process
unit
controlling
operating
parameter
data;
AND
maintaining
the
operating
parameter
at
or
above
the
minimum,
at
or
below
the
maximum,
or
within
the
range
(
whichever
applies)
established
according
to
§
63.2262.

(
6)
process
unit
listed
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
using
a
wet
control
device
as
the
sole
means
of
reducing
HAP
emissions
compliance
options
in
Table
1B
to
this
subpart
or
the
emissions
averaging
compliance
option
in
§
63.2240(
c)
implementing
your
plan
to
address
how
organic
HAP
captured
in
the
wastewater
from
the
wet
control
device
is
contained
or
destroyed
to
minimize
re­
release
to
the
atmosphere.
479
Table
8
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Continuous
Compliance
With
the
Work
Practice
Requirements
For...
For
the
following
work
practice
requirements...
You
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
by...

(
1)
dry
rotary
dryer
process
furnish
with
an
inlet
moisture
content
less
than
or
equal
to
30
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)
AND
operate
with
an
inlet
dryer
temperature
of
less
than
or
equal
to
600oF
maintaining
the
24­
hour
block
average
inlet
furnish
moisture
content
at
less
than
or
equal
to
30
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)
AND
maintaining
the
24­
hour
block
average
inlet
dryer
temperature
at
less
than
or
equal
to
600oF;
AND
keeping
records
of
the
inlet
furnish
moisture
content
and
inlet
dryer
temperature.

(
2)
hardwood
veneer
dryer
process
less
than
30
volume
percent
softwood
species
maintaining
the
volume
percent
softwood
species
processed
below
30
percent
AND
keeping
records
of
the
volume
percent
softwood
species
processed.

(
3)
softwood
veneer
dryer
minimize
fugitive
emissions
from
the
dryer
doors
and
the
green
end
following
(
and
documenting
that
you
are
following)
your
plan
for
minimizing
fugitive
emissions.

(
4)
veneer
redryers
process
veneer
with
an
inlet
moisture
content
of
less
than
or
equal
to
25
percent
(
by
weight,
dry
basis)
maintaining
the
24­
hour
block
average
inlet
moisture
content
of
the
veneer
processed
at
or
below
25
percent
AND
keeping
records
of
the
inlet
moisture
content
of
the
veneer
processed.

(
5)
group
1
miscellaneous
coating
operations
use
non­
HAP
coatings
as
defined
in
§
63.2292
continuing
to
use
non­
HAP
coatings
AND
keeping
records
showing
that
you
are
using
non­
HAP
coatings.
480
Table
9
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Requirements
for
Reports
You
must
submit
a(
n)...
The
report
must
contain...
You
must
submit
the
report...

(
1)
compliance
report
the
information
in
§
63.2281(
c)
through
(
g).
semiannually
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.2281(
b).

(
2)
immediate
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
report
if
you
had
a
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
during
the
reporting
period
that
is
not
consistent
with
your
SSMP
(
i)
actions
taken
for
the
event.
by
fax
or
telephone
within
2
working
days
after
starting
actions
inconsistent
with
the
plan.

(
ii)
the
information
in
§
63.10(
d)(
5)(
ii).
by
letter
within
7
working
days
after
the
end
of
the
event
unless
you
have
made
alternative
arrangements
with
the
permitting
authority.
481
Table
10
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63.
Applicability
of
General
Provisions
to
Subpart
DDDD
Citation
Subject
Brief
Description
Applies
to
Subpart
DDDD
§
63.1
Applicability
Initial
applicability
determination;
applicability
after
standard
established;
permit
requirements;
extensions,
notifications
Yes
§
63.2
Definitions
Definitions
for
part
63
standards
Yes
§
63.3
Units
and
Abbreviations
Units
and
abbreviations
for
part
63
standards
Yes
§
63.4
Prohibited
Activities
Prohibited
activities;
compliance
date;
circumvention,
fragmentation
Yes
§
63.5
Construction/
Reconstruction
Applicability;
applications;
approvals
Yes
§
63.6(
a)
Applicability
GP
apply
unless
compliance
extension;
GP
apply
to
area
sources
that
become
major
Yes
§
63.6(
b)(
1)­(
4)
Compliance
Dates
for
New
and
Reconstructed
Sources
Standards
apply
at
effective
date;
3
years
after
effective
date;
upon
startup;
10
years
after
construction
or
reconstruction
commences
for
section
112(
f)
Yes
§
63.6(
b)(
5)
Notification
Must
notify
if
commenced
construction
or
reconstruction
after
proposal
Yes
§
63.6(
b)(
6)
[
Reserved]

§
63.6(
b)(
7)
Compliance
Dates
for
New
and
Reconstructed
Area
Sources
that
Become
Major
Area
sources
that
become
major
must
comply
with
major
source
standards
immediately
upon
becoming
major,
regardless
of
whether
required
to
comply
when
they
were
an
area
source
Yes
482
§
63.6(
c)(
1)­(
2)
Compliance
Dates
for
Existing
Sources
Comply
according
to
date
in
subpart,
which
must
be
no
later
than
3
years
after
effective
date;
for
section
112(
f)
standards,
comply
within
90
days
of
effective
date
unless
compliance
extension
Yes
§
63.6(
c)(
3)­(
4)
[
Reserved]

§
63.6(
c)(
5)
Compliance
Dates
for
Existing
Area
Sources
that
Become
Major
Area
sources
that
become
major
must
comply
with
major
source
standards
by
date
indicated
in
subpart
or
by
equivalent
time
period
(
e.
g.,
3
years)
Yes
§
63.6(
d)
[
Reserved]

§
63.6(
e)(
1)­(
2)
Operation
&
Maintenance
Operate
to
minimize
emissions
at
all
times;
correct
malfunctions
as
soon
as
practicable;
operation
and
maintenance
requirements
independently
enforceable;
information
Administrator
will
use
to
determine
if
operation
and
maintenance
requirements
were
met
Yes
§
63.6(
e)(
3)
Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Plan
(
SSMP)
Requirement
for
SSM
and
SSMP;
content
of
SSMP
Yes
§
63.6(
f)(
1)
Compliance
Except
During
SSM
You
must
comply
with
emission
standards
at
all
times
except
during
SSM
Yes
§
63.6(
f)(
2)­(
3)
Methods
for
Determining
Compliance
Compliance
based
on
performance
test,
operation
and
maintenance
plans,
records,
inspection
Yes
§
63.6(
g)(
1)­(
3)
Alternative
Standard
Procedures
for
getting
an
alternative
standard
Yes
§
63.6(
h)(
1)­(
9)
Opacity/
Visible
Emission
(
VE)
Standards
Requirements
for
opacity
and
visible
emission
standards
NA
§
63.6(
i)(
1)­(
14)
Compliance
Extension
Procedures
and
criteria
for
Administrator
to
grant
compliance
extension
Yes
§
63.6(
i)(
15)
[
Reserved]

§
63.6(
i)(
16)
Compliance
Extension
Compliance
extension
and
Administrator's
authority
Yes
483
§
63.6(
j)
Presidential
Compliance
Exemption
President
may
exempt
source
category
from
requirement
to
comply
with
rule
Yes
§
63.7(
a)(
1)­(
2)
Performance
Test
Dates
Dates
for
conducting
initial
performance
testing
and
other
compliance
demonstrations;
must
conduct
180
days
after
first
subject
to
rule
Yes
§
63.7(
a)(
3)
Section
114
Authority
Administrator
may
require
a
performance
test
under
CAA
section
114
at
any
time
Yes
§
63.7(
b)(
1)
Notification
of
Performance
Test
Must
notify
Administrator
60
days
before
the
test
Yes
§
63.7(
b)(
2)
Notification
of
Rescheduling
If
have
to
reschedule
performance
test,
must
notify
Administrator
as
soon
as
practicable
Yes
§
63.7(
c)
Quality
Assurance/
Test
Plan
Requirement
to
submit
sitespecific
test
plan
60
days
before
the
test
or
on
date
Administrator
agrees
with;
test
plan
approval
procedures;
performance
audit
requirements;
internal
and
external
QA
procedures
for
testing
Yes
§
63.7(
d)
Testing
Facilities
Requirements
for
testing
facilities
Yes
§
63.7(
e)(
1)
Conditions
for
Conducting
Performance
Tests
Performance
tests
must
be
conducted
under
representative
conditions;
cannot
conduct
performance
tests
during
SSM;
not
a
violation
to
exceed
standard
during
SSM
Yes
§
63.7(
e)(
2)
Conditions
for
Conducting
Performance
Tests
Must
conduct
according
to
rule
and
EPA
test
methods
unless
Administrator
approves
alternative
Yes
§
63.7(
e)(
3)
Test
Run
Duration
Must
have
three
test
runs
for
at
least
the
time
specified
in
the
relevant
standard;
compliance
is
based
on
arithmetic
mean
of
three
runs;
specifies
conditions
when
data
from
an
additional
test
run
can
be
used
Yes
484
§
63.7(
f)
Alternative
Test
Method
Procedures
by
which
Administrator
can
grant
approval
to
use
an
alternative
test
method
Yes
§
63.7(
g)
Performance
Test
Data
Analysis
Must
include
raw
data
in
performance
test
report;
must
submit
performance
test
data
60
days
after
end
of
test
with
the
notification
of
compliance
status;
keep
data
for
5
years
Yes
§
63.7(
h)
Waiver
of
Tests
Procedures
for
Administrator
to
waive
performance
test
Yes
§
63.8(
a)(
1)
Applicability
of
Monitoring
Requirements
Subject
to
all
monitoring
requirements
in
standard
Yes
§
63.8(
a)(
2)
Performance
Specifications
Performance
specifications
in
appendix
B
of
part
60
apply
Yes
§
63.8(
a)(
3)
[
Reserved]

§
63.8(
a)(
4)
Monitoring
with
Flares
Requirements
for
flares
in
§
63.11
apply.
NA
§
63.8(
b)(
1)
Monitoring
Must
conduct
monitoring
according
to
standard
unless
Administrator
approves
alternative
Yes
§
63.8(
b)(
2)­(
3)
Multiple
Effluents
and
Multiple
Monitoring
Systems
Specific
requirements
for
installing
monitoring
systems;
must
install
on
each
effluent
before
it
is
combined
and
before
it
is
released
to
the
atmosphere
unless
Administrator
approves
otherwise;
if
more
than
one
monitoring
system
on
an
emission
point,
must
report
all
monitoring
system
results,
unless
one
monitoring
system
is
a
backup
Yes
§
63.8(
c)(
1)
Monitoring
System
Operation
and
Maintenance
Maintain
monitoring
system
in
a
manner
consistent
with
good
air
pollution
control
practices
Yes
§
63.8(
c)(
1)(
i)
Operation
and
Maintenance
of
CMS
Must
maintain
and
operate
CMS
in
accordance
with
§
63.6(
e)(
1)
Yes
§
63.8(
c)(
1)(
ii)
Spare
Parts
for
CMS
Must
maintain
spare
parts
for
routine
CMS
repairs
Yes
485
§
63.8(
c)(
1)(
iii)
SSMP
for
CMS
Must
develop
and
implement
SSMP
for
CMS
Yes
§
63.8(
c)(
2)­(
3)
Monitoring
System
Installation
Must
install
to
get
representative
emission
of
parameter
measurements;
must
verify
operational
status
before
or
at
performance
test
Yes
§
63.8(
c)(
4)
Continuous
Monitoring
System
(
CMS)
Requirements
CMS
must
be
operating
except
during
breakdown,
out­
of
control,
repair,
maintenance,
and
high­
level
calibration
drifts;
COMS
must
have
a
minimum
of
one
cycle
of
sampling
and
analysis
for
each
successive
10­
second
period
and
one
cycle
of
data
recording
for
each
successive
6­
minute
period;
CEMS
must
have
a
minimum
of
one
cycle
of
operation
for
each
successive
15­
minute
period
Yes
§
63.8(
c)(
5)
Continuous
Opacity
Monitoring
System
(
COMS)
Minimum
Procedures
COMS
minimum
procedures
NA
§
63.8(
c)(
6)­(
8)
CMS
Requirements
Zero
and
high­
level
calibration
check
requirements;
out­
ofcontrol
periods
Yes
§
63.8(
d)
CMS
Quality
Control
Requirements
for
CMS
quality
control,
including
calibration,
etc.;
must
keep
quality
control
plan
on
record
for
5
years.
Keep
old
versions
for
5
years
after
revisions
Yes
§
63.8(
e)
CMS
Performance
Evaluation
Notification,
performance
evaluation
test
plan,
reports
Yes
§
63.8(
f)(
1)­(
5)
Alternative
Monitoring
Method
Procedures
for
Administrator
to
approve
alternative
monitoring
Yes
§
63.8(
f)(
6)
Alternative
to
Relative
Accuracy
Test
Procedures
for
Administrator
to
approve
alternative
relative
accuracy
tests
for
CEMS
Yes
486
§
63.8(
g)
Data
Reduction
COMS
6­
minute
averages
calculated
over
at
least
36
evenly
spaced
data
points;
CEMS
1
hour
averages
computed
over
at
least
4
equally
spaced
data
points;
data
that
can't
be
used
in
average;
rounding
of
data
Yes
§
63.9(
a)
Notification
Requirements
Applicability
and
State
delegation
Yes
§
63.9(
b)(
1)­(
2)
Initial
Notifications
Submit
notification
120
days
after
effective
date;
contents
of
notification
Yes
§
63.9(
b)(
3)
[
Reserved]

§
63.9(
b)(
4)­(
5)
Initial
Notifications
Submit
notification
120
days
after
effective
date;
notification
of
intent
to
construct/
reconstruct;
notification
of
commencement
of
construct/
reconstruct;
notification
of
startup;
contents
of
each
Yes
§
63.9(
c)
Request
for
Compliance
Extension
Can
request
if
cannot
comply
by
date
or
if
installed
best
available
control
technology/
lowest
achievable
emission
rate
Yes
§
63.9(
d)
Notification
of
Special
Compliance
Requirements
for
New
Source
For
sources
that
commence
construction
between
proposal
and
promulgation
and
want
to
comply
3
years
after
effective
date
Yes
§
63.9(
e)
Notification
of
Performance
Test
Notify
EPA
Administrator
60
days
prior
Yes
§
63.9(
f)
Notification
of
Visible
Emissions/
Opacity
Test
Notify
EPA
Administrator
30
days
prior
No
§
63.9(
g)
Additional
Notifications
When
Using
CMS
Notification
of
performance
evaluation;
notification
using
COMS
data;
notification
that
exceeded
criterion
for
relative
accuracy
Yes
487
§
63.9(
h)(
1)­(
6)
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
Contents;
due
60
days
after
end
of
performance
test
or
other
compliance
demonstration,
except
for
opacity/
VE,
which
are
due
30
days
after;
when
to
submit
to
Federal
vs.
State
authority
Yes
§
63.9(
i)
Adjustment
of
Submittal
Deadlines
Procedures
for
Administrator
to
approve
change
in
when
notifications
must
be
submitted
Yes
§
63.9(
j)
Change
in
Previous
Information
Must
submit
within
15
days
after
the
change
Yes
§
63.10(
a)
Recordkeeping/
Reporting
Applies
to
all,
unless
compliance
extension;
when
to
submit
to
Federal
vs.
State
authority;
procedures
for
owners
of
more
than
one
source
Yes
§
63.10(
b)(
1)
Recordkeeping/
Reporting
General
Requirements;
keep
all
records
readily
available;
keep
for
5
years
Yes
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
i)­
(
iv)
Records
Related
to
Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Occurrence
of
each
of
operation
(
process
equipment);
occurrence
of
each
malfunction
of
air
pollution
equipment;
maintenance
on
air
pollution
control
equipment;
actions
during
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
Yes
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
vi)
and
(
x)­(
xi)
CMS
Records
Malfunctions,
inoperative,
out­
of­
control
Yes
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
vii)­
(
ix)
Records
Measurements
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
compliance
options
and
operating
requirements;
performance
test,
performance
evaluation,
and
visible
emission
observation
results;
measurements
to
determine
conditions
of
performance
tests
and
performance
evaluations
Yes
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
xii)
Records
Records
when
under
waiver
Yes
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
xiii)
Records
Records
when
using
alternative
to
relative
accuracy
test
Yes
488
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
xiv)
Records
All
documentation
supporting
initial
notification
and
notification
of
compliance
status
Yes
§
63.10(
b)(
3)
Records
Applicability
determinations
Yes
§
63.10(
c)(
1)­
(
6),(
9)­(
15)
Records
Additional
records
for
CMS
Yes
§
63.10(
c)(
7)­(
8)
Records
Records
of
excess
emissions
and
parameter
monitoring
exceedances
for
CMS
No
§
63.10(
d)(
1)
General
Reporting
Requirements
Requirement
to
report
Yes
§
63.10(
d)(
2)
Report
of
Performance
Test
Results
When
to
submit
to
Federal
or
State
authority
Yes
§
63.10(
d)(
3)
Reporting
Opacity
or
VE
Observations
What
to
report
and
when
NA
§
63.10(
d)(
4)
Progress
Reports
Must
submit
progress
reports
on
schedule
if
under
compliance
extension
Yes
§
63.10(
d)(
5)
Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Reports
Contents
and
submission
Yes
§
63.10(
e)(
1)­(
2)
Additional
CMS
Reports
Must
report
results
for
each
CEM
on
a
unit;
written
copy
of
performance
evaluation;
3
copies
of
COMS
performance
evaluation
Yes
§
63.10(
e)(
3)
Reports
Excess
emission
reports
No
§
63.10(
e)(
4)
Reporting
COMS
data
Must
submit
COMS
data
with
performance
test
data
NA
§
63.10(
f)
Waiver
for
Recordkeeping/
R
eporting
Procedures
for
EPA
Administrator
to
waive
Yes
§
63.11
Flares
Requirements
for
flares
NA
§
63.12
Delegation
State
authority
to
enforce
standards
Yes
§
63.13
Addresses
Addresses
where
reports,
notifications,
and
requests
are
send
Yes
§
63.14
Incorporation
by
Reference
Test
methods
incorporated
by
reference
Yes
489
§
63.15
Availability
of
Information
Public
and
confidential
information
Yes
Appendix
A
to
Subpart
DDDD
of
Part
63
 
Alternative
Procedure
to
Determine
Capture
Efficiency
from
Enclosures
Around
Hot
Presses
in
the
Plywood
and
Composite
Wood
Products
Industry
Using
Sulfur
Hexafluoride
Tracer
Gas
1.0
Scope
and
Application.

This
procedure
has
been
developed
specifically
for
the
rule
for
the
plywood
and
composite
wood
products
(
PCWP)
industry
and
is
used
to
determine
the
capture
efficiency
of
a
partial
hot
press
enclosure
in
that
industry.
This
procedure
is
applicable
for
the
determination
of
capture
efficiency
for
enclosures
around
hot
presses
and
is
an
alternative
to
the
construction
of
temporary
total
enclosures
(
TTE).
Sulfur
hexafluoride
(
SF6)
is
used
as
a
tracer
gas
(
other
tracer
gases
may
be
used
if
approved
by
the
EPA
Administrator).
This
gas
is
not
indigenous
to
the
ambient
atmosphere
and
is
nonreactive.

This
procedure
uses
infrared
spectrometry
(
IR)
as
the
analytical
technique.
When
the
infrared
spectrometer
used
is
a
Fourier­
Transform
Infrared
spectrometer
(
FTIR),
an
alternate
instrument
calibration
procedure
may
be
used;
the
alternate
calibration
procedure
is
the
calibration
transfer
standard
(
CTS)
procedure
of
EPA
Method
320
(
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63).
Other
analytical
techniques
which
are
capable
of
equivalent
Method
Performance
(
Section
13.0)
also
may
be
used.
Specifically,
gas
chromatography
with
electron
capture
detection
(
GC/
ECD)
is
an
applicable
technique
for
analysis
of
SF6.

2.0
Summary
of
Method.

A
constant
mass
flow
rate
of
SF6
tracer
gas
is
released
through
manifolds
at
multiple
locations
within
the
enclosure
to
mimic
the
release
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
during
the
press
process.
This
test
method
requires
a
minimum
of
three
SF6
injection
points
(
two
at
the
press
unloader
and
one
at
the
press)
and
provides
details
about
considerations
for
locating
the
injection
points.
A
GC/
ECD
is
used
to
measure
the
concentration
of
SF6
at
the
inlet
duct
to
the
control
device
(
outlet
duct
from
enclosure).
Simultaneously,
EPA
Method
2
(
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60)
is
used
to
measure
490
the
flow
rate
at
the
inlet
duct
to
the
control
device.
The
concentration
and
flow
rate
measurements
are
used
to
calculate
the
mass
emission
rate
of
SF6
at
the
control
device
inlet.
Through
calculation
of
the
mass
of
SF6
released
through
the
manifolds
and
the
mass
of
SF6
measured
at
the
inlet
to
the
control
device,
the
capture
efficiency
of
the
enclosure
is
calculated.

In
addition,
optional
samples
of
the
ambient
air
may
be
taken
at
locations
around
the
perimeter
of
the
enclosure
to
quantify
the
ambient
concentration
of
SF6
and
to
identify
those
areas
of
the
enclosure
that
may
be
performing
less
efficiently;
these
samples
would
be
taken
using
disposable
syringes
and
would
be
analyzed
using
a
GC/
ECD.

Finally,
in
addition
to
the
requirements
specified
in
this
procedure,
the
data
quality
objectives
(
DQO)
or
lower
confidence
limit
(
LCL)
criteria
specified
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
KK,
Data
Quality
Objective
and
Lower
Confidence
Limit
Approaches
for
Alternative
Capture
Efficiency
Protocols
and
Test
Methods,
must
also
be
satisfied.
A
minimum
of
three
test
runs
are
required
for
this
procedure;
however,
additional
test
runs
may
be
required
based
on
the
results
of
the
DQO
or
LCL
analysis.

3.0
Definitions.

3.1
Capture
efficiency
(
CE).
The
weight
per
unit
time
of
SF6
entering
the
control
device
divided
by
the
weight
per
unit
time
of
SF6
released
through
manifolds
at
multiple
locations
within
the
enclosure.

3.2
Control
device
(
CD).
The
equipment
used
to
reduce,
by
destruction
or
removal,
press
exhaust
air
pollutants
prior
to
discharge
to
the
ambient
air.

3.3
Control/
destruction
efficiency
(
DE).
The
volatile
organic
compound
or
HAP
removal
efficiency
of
the
control
device.

3.4
Data
Quality
Objective
(
DQO)
Approach.
A
statistical
procedure
to
determine
the
precision
of
the
data
from
a
test
series
and
to
qualify
the
data
in
the
determination
of
capture
efficiency
for
compliance
purposes.
If
the
results
of
the
DQO
analysis
of
the
initial
three
test
runs
do
not
satisfy
the
DQO
criterion,
the
LCL
approach
can
be
used
or
additional
test
runs
must
be
conducted.
If
additional
test
runs
are
conducted,
then
the
DQO
or
LCL
analysis
is
conducted
using
the
data
from
both
the
initial
491
test
runs
and
all
additional
test
runs.

3.5
Lower
Confidence
Limit
(
LCL)
Approach.
An
alternative
statistical
procedure
that
can
be
used
to
qualify
data
in
the
determination
of
capture
efficiency
for
compliance
purposes.
If
the
results
of
the
LCL
approach
produce
a
CE
that
is
too
low
for
demonstrating
compliance,
then
additional
test
runs
must
be
conducted
until
the
LCL
or
DQO
is
met.
As
with
the
DQO,
data
from
all
valid
test
runs
must
be
used
in
the
calculation.

3.6
Minimum
Measurement
Level
(
MML).
The
minimum
tracer
gas
concentration
expected
to
be
measured
during
the
test
series.
This
value
is
selected
by
the
tester
based
on
the
capabilities
of
the
IR
spectrometer
(
or
GC/
ECD)
and
the
other
known
or
measured
parameters
of
the
hot
press
enclosure
to
be
tested.
The
selected
MML
must
be
above
the
low­
level
calibration
standard
and
preferably
below
the
mid­
level
calibration
standard.

3.7
Method
204.
The
U.
S.
EPA
Method
204,
"
Criteria
For
and
Verification
of
a
Permanent
or
Temporary
Total
Enclosure"
(
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M).

3.8
Method
205.
The
U.
S.
EPA
Method
205,
"
Verification
of
Gas
Dilution
Systems
for
Field
Instrument
Calibrations"
(
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M).

3.9
Method
320.
The
U.
S.
EPA
Method
320,
"
Measurement
of
Vapor
Phase
Organic
and
Inorganic
Emissions
by
Extractive
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
(
FTIR)
Spectroscopy"
(
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A).

3.10
Overall
capture
and
control
efficiency
(
CCE).
The
collection
and
control/
destruction
efficiency
of
both
the
PPE
and
CD
combined.
The
CCE
is
calculated
as
the
product
of
the
CE
and
DE.

3.11
Partial
press
enclosure
(
PPE).
The
physical
barrier
that
"
partially"
encloses
the
press
equipment,
captures
a
significant
amount
of
the
associated
emissions,
and
transports
those
emissions
to
the
CD.

3.12
Test
series.
A
minimum
of
three
test
runs
or,
when
more
than
three
runs
are
conducted,
all
of
the
test
runs
conducted.

4.0
Interferences.
492
There
are
no
known
interferences.

5.0
Safety.

Sulfur
hexafluoride
is
a
colorless,
odorless,
nonflammable
liquefied
gas.
It
is
stable
and
nonreactive
and,
because
it
is
noncorrosive,
most
structural
materials
are
compatible
with
it.
The
Occupational
Safety
and
Health
Administration
Permissible
Emission
Limit­
Time
Weighted
Average
(
PEL­
TWA)
and
Threshold
Limit
Value­
Time
Weighted
Average
(
TLV­
TWA)
concentrations
are
1,000
parts
per
million.
Sulfur
hexafluoride
is
an
asphyxiant.
Exposure
to
an
oxygen­
deficient
atmosphere
(
less
than
19.5
percent
oxygen)
may
cause
dizziness,
drowsiness,
nausea,
vomiting,
excess
salivation,
diminished
mental
alertness,
loss
of
consciousness,
and
death.
Exposure
to
atmospheres
containing
less
than
12
percent
oxygen
will
bring
about
unconsciousness
without
warning
and
so
quickly
that
the
individuals
cannot
help
themselves.
Contact
with
liquid
or
cold
vapor
may
cause
frostbite.
Avoid
breathing
sulfur
hexafluoride
gas.
Self­
contained
breathing
apparatus
may
be
required
by
rescue
workers.
Sulfur
hexafluoride
is
not
listed
as
a
carcinogen
or
a
potential
carcinogen.

6.0
Equipment
and
Supplies.

This
method
requires
equipment
and
supplies
for:
(
a)
the
injection
of
tracer
gas
into
the
enclosure,
(
b)
the
measurement
of
the
tracer
gas
concentration
in
the
exhaust
gas
entering
the
control
device,
and
(
c)
the
measurement
of
the
volumetric
flow
rate
of
the
exhaust
gas
entering
the
control
device.
In
addition,
the
requisite
equipment
needed
for
EPA
Methods
1
­
4
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
will
be
required.
Equipment
and
supplies
for
optional
ambient
air
sampling
are
discussed
in
Section
8.6.

6.1
Tracer
Gas
Injection.

6.1.1
Manifolds.
This
method
requires
the
use
of
tracer
gas
supply
cylinder(
s)
along
with
the
appropriate
flow
control
elements.
Figure
1
shows
a
schematic
drawing
of
the
injection
system
showing
potential
locations
for
the
tracer
gas
manifolds.
Figure
2
shows
a
schematic
drawing
of
the
recommended
configuration
of
the
injection
manifold.
Three
tracer
gas
discharge
manifolds
are
required
at
a
minimum.

6.1.2
Flow
Control
Meter.
Flow
control
and
measurement
meter
for
measuring
the
quantity
of
tracer
gas
injected.
A
mass
flow,
volumetric
flow,
or
critical
orifice
493
control
meter
can
be
used
for
this
method.
The
meter
must
be
accurate
to
within
±
5
percent
at
the
flow
rate
used.
This
means
that
the
flow
meter
must
be
calibrated
against
a
primary
standard
for
flow
measurement
at
the
appropriate
flow
rate.

6.2
Measurement
of
Tracer
Gas
Concentration.

6.2.1
Sampling
Probes.
Use
Pyrex
or
stainless
steel
sampling
probes
of
sufficient
length
to
reach
the
traverse
points
calculated
according
to
EPA
Method
1
(
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60).

6.2.2
Sampling
Line.
Use
a
heated
Teflon
sampling
line
to
transport
the
sample
to
the
analytical
instrument.

6.2.3
Sampling
Pump.
Use
a
sampling
pump
capable
of
extracting
sufficient
sample
from
the
duct
and
transporting
to
the
analytical
instrument.

6.2.4
Sample
Conditioning
System.
Use
a
particulate
filter
sufficient
to
protect
the
sampling
pump
and
analytical
instrument.
At
the
discretion
of
the
tester
and
depending
on
the
equipment
used
and
the
moisture
content
of
the
exhaust
gas,
it
may
be
necessary
to
further
condition
the
sample
by
removing
moisture
using
a
condenser.

6.2.5
Analytical
Instrument.
Use
one
of
the
following
analytical
instruments.

6.2.1.1
Spectrometer.
Use
an
infrared
spectrometer
designed
to
measuring
SF6
tracer
gas
and
capable
of
meeting
or
exceeding
the
specifications
of
this
procedure.
An
FTIR
meeting
the
specifications
of
Method
320
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63
may
be
used.

6.2.1.2
GC/
ECD.
Use
a
GC/
ECD
designed
to
measure
SF6
tracer
gas
and
capable
of
meeting
or
exceeding
the
specifications
of
this
procedure.

6.2.6
Recorder.
At
a
minimum,
use
a
recorder
with
linear
strip
chart.
An
automated
data
acquisition
system
(
DAS)
is
recommended.

6.3
Exhaust
Gas
Flow
Rate
Measurement.
Use
equipment
specified
for
EPA
Methods
2,
3,
and
4
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
for
measuring
flow
rate
of
exhaust
gas
at
the
inlet
to
the
control
device.

7.0
Reagents
and
Standards.

7.1
Tracer
Gas.
Use
SF6
as
the
tracer
gas.
The
494
manufacturer
of
the
SF6
tracer
gas
should
provide
a
recommended
shelf
life
for
the
tracer
gas
cylinder
over
which
the
concentration
does
not
change
more
than
±
2
percent
from
the
certified
value.
A
gas
mixture
of
SF6
diluted
with
nitrogen
should
be
used;
based
on
experience
and
calculations,
pure
SF6
gas
is
not
necessary
to
conduct
tracer
gas
testing.
Select
a
concentration
and
flow
rate
that
is
appropriate
for
the
analytical
instrument's
detection
limit,
the
MML,
and
the
exhaust
gas
flow
rate
from
the
enclosure
(
see
section
8.1.1).
You
may
use
a
tracer
gas
other
than
SF6
with
the
prior
approval
of
the
EPA
Administrator.
If
you
use
an
approved
tracer
gas
other
than
SF6,
all
references
to
SF6
in
this
protocol
instead
refer
to
the
approved
tracer
gas.

7.2
Calibration
Gases.
The
SF6
calibration
gases
required
will
be
dependent
on
the
selected
MML
and
the
appropriate
span
selected
for
the
test.
Commercial
cylinder
gases
certified
by
the
manufacturer
to
be
accurate
to
within
1
percent
of
the
certified
label
value
are
preferable,
although
cylinder
gases
certified
by
the
manufacturer
to
2
percent
accuracy
are
allowed.
Additionally,
the
manufacturer
of
the
SF6
calibration
gases
should
provide
a
recommended
shelf
life
for
each
calibration
gas
cylinder
over
which
the
concentration
does
not
change
more
than
±
2
percent
from
the
certified
value.
Another
option
allowed
by
this
method
is
for
the
tester
to
obtain
high
concentration
certified
cylinder
gases
and
then
use
a
dilution
system
meeting
the
requirements
of
EPA
Method
205,
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M,
to
make
multi­
level
calibration
gas
standards.
Low­
level,
mid­
level,
and
high­
level
calibration
gases
will
be
required.
The
MML
must
be
above
the
low­
level
standard,
the
high­
level
standard
must
be
no
more
than
four
times
the
low­
level
standard,
and
the
mid­
level
standard
must
be
approximately
halfway
between
the
high­
and
low­
level
standards.
See
section
12.1
for
an
example
calculation
of
this
procedure.
Note:
If
using
an
FTIR
as
the
analytical
instrument,
the
tester
has
the
option
of
following
the
CTS
procedures
of
Method
320
in
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63;
the
calibration
standards
(
and
procedures)
specified
in
Method
320
may
be
used
in
lieu
of
the
calibration
standards
and
procedures
in
this
protocol.

7.2.1
Zero
Gas.
High
purity
nitrogen.

7.2.2
Low­
Level
Calibration
Gas.
An
SF6
calibration
gas
in
nitrogen
with
a
concentration
equivalent
to
20
to
30
percent
of
the
applicable
span
value.
495
7.2.3
Mid­
Level
Calibration
Gas.
An
SF6
calibration
gas
in
nitrogen
with
a
concentration
equivalent
to
45
to
55
percent
of
the
applicable
span
value.

7.2.4
High­
Level
Calibration
Gas.
An
SF6
calibration
gas
in
nitrogen
with
a
concentration
equivalent
to
80
to
90
percent
of
the
applicable
span
value.

8.0
Sample
Collection,
Preservation,
Storage,
and
Transport.

8.1
Test
Design.

8.1.1
Determination
of
Minimum
Tracer
Gas
Flow
Rate.

8.1.1.1
Determine
(
via
design
calculations
or
measurements)
the
approximate
flow
rate
of
the
exhaust
gas
through
the
enclosure,
actual
cubic
feet
per
minute
(
acfm).

8.1.1.2
Calculate
the
minimum
tracer
gas
injection
rate
necessary
to
assure
a
detectable
SF6
concentration
at
the
exhaust
gas
measurement
point
(
see
section
12.1
for
calculation).

8.1.1.3
Select
a
flow
meter
for
the
injection
system
with
an
operating
range
appropriate
for
the
injection
rate
selected.

8.1.2
Determination
of
the
Approximate
Time
to
Reach
Equilibrium.

8.1.2.1
Determine
the
volume
of
the
enclosure.

8.1.2.2
Calculate
the
air
changes
per
minute
of
the
enclosure
by
dividing
the
approximate
exhaust
flow
rate
(
8.1.1.1
above)
by
the
enclosed
volume
(
8.1.2.1
above).

8.1.2.3
Calculate
the
time
at
which
the
tracer
concentration
in
the
enclosure
will
achieve
approximate
equilibrium.
Divide
3
by
the
air
changes
per
minute
(
8.1.2.2
above)
to
establish
this
time.
This
is
the
approximate
length
of
time
for
the
system
to
come
to
equilibrium.
Concentration
equilibrium
occurs
when
the
tracer
concentration
in
the
enclosure
stops
changing
as
a
function
of
time
for
a
constant
tracer
release
rate.
Because
the
press
is
continuously
cycling,
equilibrium
may
be
exhibited
by
a
repeating,
but
stable,
cyclic
pattern
rather
than
a
single
constant
concentration
value.
Assure
sufficient
tracer
gas
is
available
to
allow
the
system
to
come
to
equilibrium,
and
to
sample
for
a
minimum
of
20
minutes
and
repeat
the
procedure
for
a
minimum
of
three
test
runs.
Additional
test
runs
may
be
required
based
on
the
results
of
the
DQO
and
LCL
analyses
described
in
40
CFR
part
496
63,
subpart
KK,
appendix
A.

8.1.3
Location
of
Injection
Points.
This
method
requires
a
minimum
of
three
tracer
gas
injection
points.
The
injection
points
should
be
located
within
leak
prone,
volatile
organic
compound/
hazardous
air
pollutant
(
VOC/
HAP)
producing
areas
around
the
press,
or
horizontally
within
12
inches
of
the
defined
equipment.
One
potential
configuration
of
the
injection
points
is
depicted
in
Figure
1.
The
effect
of
wind,
exfiltration
through
the
building
envelope,
and
air
flowing
through
open
building
doors
should
be
considered
when
locating
tracer
gas
injection
points
within
the
enclosure.
The
injection
points
should
also
be
located
at
a
vertical
elevation
equal
to
the
VOC/
HAP
generating
zones.
The
injection
points
should
not
be
located
beneath
obstructions
that
would
prevent
a
natural
dispersion
of
the
gas.
Document
the
selected
injection
points
in
a
drawing(
s).

8.1.4
Location
of
Flow
Measurement
and
Tracer
Sampling.
Accurate
CD
inlet
gas
flow
rate
measurements
are
critical
to
the
success
of
this
procedure.
Select
a
measurement
location
meeting
the
criteria
of
EPA
Method
1
(
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A),
Sampling
and
Velocity
Traverses
for
Stationary
Sources.
Also,
when
selecting
the
measurement
location,
consider
whether
stratification
of
the
tracer
gas
is
likely
at
the
location
(
e.
g.,
do
not
select
a
location
immediately
after
a
point
of
air
in­
leakage
to
the
duct).

8.2
Tracer
Gas
Release.
Release
the
tracer
gas
at
a
calculated
flow
rate
(
see
section
12.1
for
calculation)
through
a
minimum
of
three
injection
manifolds
located
as
described
above
in
8.1.3.
The
tracer
gas
delivery
lines
must
be
routed
into
the
enclosure
and
attached
to
the
manifolds
without
violating
the
integrity
of
the
enclosure.

8.3
Pretest
Measurements.

8.3.1
Location
of
Sampling
Point(
s).
If
stratification
is
not
suspected
at
the
measurement
location,
select
a
single
sample
point
located
at
the
centroid
of
the
CD
inlet
duct
or
at
a
point
no
closer
to
the
CD
inlet
duct
walls
than
1
meter.
If
stratification
is
suspected,
establish
a
"
measurement
line"
that
passes
through
the
