PAPERWORK
REDUCTION
ACT
SUBMISSION
Please
read
the
instructions
before
completing
this
form.
For
additional
forms
or
assistance
in
completing
this
form,
contact
your
agency's
Paperwork
Clearance
Officer.
Send
two
copies
of
this
form,
the
collection
instrument
to
be
reviewed,
the
Supporting
Statement
and
any
additional
documentation
to:
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
Docket
Library,
Room
10102,
725
17th
Street
NW
Washington,
DC
20503.

1.
Agency/
Subagency
originating
request
EPA
2.
OMB
control
number
b.

None
a__
__
__
__
­
__
__
__
__
_
2
_
0
_
6_
0_

3.
Type
of
information
collection
(
check
one)

a.

New
collection
b.

Revision
of
a
currently
approved
collection
c.

Extension
of
a
currently
approved
collection
d.

Reinstatement,
without
change,
of
a
previously
approved
collection
for
which
approval
has
expired
e.

Reinstatement,
with
change,
of
a
previously
approved
collection
for
which
approval
has
expired
f.

Existing
collection
in
use
without
an
OMB
control
number
4.
Type
of
review
requested
(
check
one)

a.

Regular
b.

Emergency
­
Approval
requested
by:
/
/

c.

Delegated
5.
Small
entities
Will
this
information
collection
have
a
significant
economic
impact
on
a
substantial
number
of
small
entities?

Yes

No
For
b­
f,
note
item
A2
of
Supporting
Statement
Instructions
6.
Requested
expiration
date
a.

Three
years
from
approval
date
b.

Other
Specify:
/
/___

7.
Title:
NESHAP:
Metal
Can
Surface
Coating
(
Proposed
Rule)

8.
Agency
form
number(
s)
ICR
2079.01
9.
Keywords
metal
cans,
surface
coating,
printing,
control
device,
HAP,
NESHAP,
solids,
low­
or
no­
HAP
coatings,
air
pollution,
hazardous
air
pollutant,
beverage
cans,
aerosol
cans,
food
cans,
sheetcoating,
decorative
tins,
crowns
&
closures,
end
lining
operations,
can
assembly,
air
pollution
control,
metal
can
manufacturing,
stationary
sources
10.
Abstract
The
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
is
charged
under
Section
112(
d)
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
to
establish
standards
to
limit
hazardous
air
pollutant
(
HAP)
emissions
from
stationary
sources.
In
the
Administrator's
judgment,
the
metal
can
manufacturing
surface
coating
industry
causes
or
contributes
significantly
to
air
pollution
that
may
reasonably
be
anticipated
to
endanger
public
health
or
welfare.
Metal
can
manufacturing
surface
coating
operations
are
listed
as
an
affected
source
category
in
a
Federal
Register
notice
dated
July
16,
1992
(
see
57
FR
31576)
under
the
Surface
Coating
Processes
industry
group.
The
EPA's
enforcement
personnel
will
use
the
emissions
data
collected
by
each
metal
can
manufacturing
surface
coating
facility
to
(
1)
identify
existing
and
new
HAP
emissions
sources
subject
to
the
metal
can
manufacturing
(
surface
coating)
NESHAP,
and
(
2)
ensure
the
proper
regulation
of
HAP
emissions.
Respondents
are
owners
or
operators
of
facilities
that
have
metal
can
manufacturing
surface
coating
operations.
Metal
cans
include
any
single­
walled
container,
usually
cylindrical
in
shape,
that
is
manufactured
from
metal
substrate
equal
to
or
thinner
than
0.3785
millimeters
(
0.0149
inch),
in
which
solid
or
liquid
materials
may
be
packaged.
Can
ends,
decorative
tins,
crowns,
and
closures
are
also
included
in
the
metal
can
source
category.
It
is
estimated
that
142
major
source
facilities
are
subject
to
the
provisions
of
this
NESHAP
in
the
United
States
and
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
the
metal
can
manufacturing
(
surface
coating)
NESHAP
within
three
years
of
the
effective
date
(
promulgation
date)
of
the
rule.
No
new
growth
is
expected
in
the
metal
can
manufacturing
surface
coating
industry.

11.
Affected
public
(
Mark
primary
with
"
P"
and
all
others
that
apply
with
"
X")
a.
Individuals
or
households
d.
Farms
b.
P
Business
or
other
for­
profit
e.
Federal
Government
c.
Not­
for­
profit
institutions
f.
State,
Local
or
Tribal
Government
12.
Obligation
to
respond
(
Mark
primary
with
"
P"
and
all
others
that
apply
with
"
X")

a.

Voluntary
b.

Required
to
obtain
or
retain
benefits
c.
PG
Mandatory
13.
Annual
recordkeeping
and
reporting
hour
burden
a.
Number
of
respondents
142
b.
Total
annual
responses
284
1.
Percentage
of
these
responses
collected
electronically
0
%
c.
Total
hours
requested
1
d.
Current
OMB
inventory
0
e.
Difference
1
f.
Explanation
of
difference
1.
Program
Change
1
2.
Adjustment
0
14.
Annual
recordkeeping
and
reporting
cost
burden
(
in
thousands
of
dollars)

a.
Total
annualized
capital/
startup
costs
$
0
b.
Total
annual
costs
(
O&
M)
$
1
c.
Total
annualized
cost
requested
$
1
d.
Current
OMB
inventory
$
0
e.
Difference
$
1
f.
Explanation
of
difference
1.
Program
change
$
1
2.
Adjustment
$
0
15.
Purpose
of
information
collection
(
Mark
Primary
With
"
P"
and
all
others
that
apply
with
"
X")
a.
__
Application
for
benefits
e.
__
Program
planning
or
management
b.
__
Program
evaluation
f.
__
Research
c.
__
General
purpose
statistics
g.
P
Regulatory
or
compliance
d.
__
Audit
16.
Frequency
of
recordkeeping
or
reporting
(
check
all
that
apply)

a.

Recordkeeping
b.

Third
party
disclosure
c.

Reporting
1.

On
occasion
2.

Weekly
3.

Monthly
4.

Quarterly
5.

Semi­
annually
6.

Annually
7.

Biannually
8.

Other
(
describe)

17.
Statistical
methods
Does
this
information
collection
employ
statistical
methods?


Yes

No
18.
Agency
contact
(
person
who
can
best
answer
questions
regarding
the
content
of
this
submission)
Name:
Paul
Almodovar
Phone:
(
919)
541­
0283
OMB
83­
I
10/
95
19.
Certification
for
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
Submissions
On
behalf
of
this
Federal
agency,
I
certify
that
the
collection
of
information
encompassed
by
this
request
complies
with
5
CFR
1320.9.

NOTE:
The
text
of
5
CFR
1320.9,
and
the
related
provisions
of
5
CFR
1320.8(
b)(
3),
appear
at
the
end
of
the
instructions.
The
certification
is
to
be
made
with
reference
to
those
regulatory
provisions
as
set
forth
in
the
instructions.

The
following
is
a
summary
of
the
topics,
regarding
the
proposed
collection
of
information,
that
the
certification
covers:

(
a)
It
is
necessary
for
the
proper
performance
of
agency
functions;

(
b)
It
avoids
unnecessary
duplication;

(
c)
It
reduces
burden
on
small
entities;

(
d)
It
uses
plain,
coherent,
and
unambiguous
terminology
that
is
understandable
to
respondents;

(
e)
Its
implementation
will
be
consistent
and
compatible
with
current
reporting
and
recordkeeping
practices;

(
f)
It
indicates
the
retention
periods
for
recordkeeping
requirements;

(
g)
It
informs
respondents
of
the
information
called
for
under
5
CFR
1320.8(
b)(
3):
(
i)
Why
the
information
is
being
collected'
(
ii)
Use
of
information;
(
iii)
Burden
estimate;
(
iv)
Nature
of
response
(
voluntary,
required
for
a
benefit,
or
mandatory);
(
v)
Nature
and
extent
of
confidentiality;
and
(
vi)
Need
to
display
currently
valid
OMB
control
number;

(
h)
It
was
developed
by
an
office
that
has
planned
and
allocated
resources
for
the
efficient
and
effective
management
and
use
of
the
information
to
be
collected
(
see
note
in
Item
19
of
the
instructions);

(
I)
It
uses
effective
and
efficient
statistical
survey
methodology;
and
(
j)
It
makes
appropriate
use
of
information
technology.

If
you
are
unable
to
certify
compliance
with
any
of
these
provisions,
identify
the
item
below
and
explain
the
reason
in
Item
18
of
the
Supporting
Statement.

Signature
of
Program
Official
Date
Signature
of
Senior
Official
or
designee
Oscar
Morales,
Director
Collection
Strategies
Division
Office
of
Environmental
Information
Date
OMB
83­
I
10/
95
