1
John
Huber
<
jhuber@
nora­
oilheat.
org>
11/
10/
2003
03:
34
PM
To:
Jeff
Herzog/
AA/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
cc:
Subject:
RE:
Low
Sulfur
and
Heating
Oil
Jeff
My
limited
thinking
on
that
was
if
there
was
an
objection
to
my
proposal,
we
could
be
in
a
position
that
we
affirmatively
mark
product
in
PADD
I.

John
­­­­­
Original
Message­­­­­
From:
Herzog.
Jeff@
epamail.
epa.
gov
[
mailto:
Herzog.
Jeff@
epamail.
epa.
gov]
Sent:
Monday,
November
10,
2003
12:
46
PM
To:
John
Huber
Subject:
Re:
Low
Sulfur
and
Heating
Oil
John,
Thanks
for
your
thoughtful
comments.
I'll
make
sure
the
right
folks
are
aware
of
them
and
will
keep
you
in
the
loop
in
our
ongoing
discussions
on
the
marker
issue.
A
point
of
clarification:
re
the
marking
of
credit
gallons
being
a
reasonable
alternative
....
marking
credit
gallons
might
result
in
lower
costs
if
there
were
fewer
credit
gallons
than
heating
oil
volumes
(
hence
it
seems
attractive),
however,
we
would
have
to
ensure
that
such
a
system
satisfied
our
enforcement
goals
(
its
unclear
if
and
how
this
would
be
accomplished)
......

Best
Regards
Jeffrey
A.
Herzog,
Mechanical
Engineer
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency
National
Vehicle
and
Fuel
Emissions
Laboratory
Assessment
and
Standards
Division
2000
Traverwood
Drive
Ann
Arbor,
Michigan,
48105
2
Phone:
(
734)
214­
4227
Fax:
(
734)
214­
4816
E­
Mail:
herzog.
jeff@
epa.
gov
John
Huber
<
jhuber@
nora­
oilh
To:
Jeff
Herzog/
AA/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
eat.
org>
cc:

Subject:
Low
Sulfur
and
Heating
Oil
Received
Date:

11/
10/
2003
11:
31:
06
AM
Transmission
Date:
11/
10/
2003
11:
31:
06
AM
Jeff
Here
are
my
thoughts
on
this,
let
me
know
if
you
think
they
have
merit
or
I
should
try
a
different
approach.
John(
See
attached
file:
marking
comments.
doc)
