WordPerfect
Document
Compare
Summary
Original
document:
G:\
USER\
SHARE\_
MICG\
Refractories\
OMBDrctFnlAmndPkgApr05\
Amendments
Direct
Final
Rule.
wpd
Revised
document:
G:\
USER\
SHARE\_
MICG\
Refractories\
OMBDrctFnlAmndPkgApr05\
OMBChangesDrctFnlAmdmn
ts.
wpd
Deletions
are
shown
with
the
following
attributes
and
color:
Strikeout,
Blue
RGB(
0,0,255).
Deleted
text
is
shown
as
full
text.
Insertions
are
shown
with
the
following
attributes
and
color:
Double
Underline,
Redline,
Red
RGB(
255,0,0).

The
document
was
marked
with
5
Deletions,
5
Insertions,
0
Moves.
6560­
50­
P
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
40
CFR
Part
63
[
OAR­
2002­
0088,
FRL­
]

RIN
2060­
AM90
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).

ACTION:
Direct
final
rule;
amendments.

SUMMARY:
EPA
is
taking
direct
final
action
on
amendments
to
the
national
emission
standards
for
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
new
and
existing
refractory
products
manufacturing
facilities,
which
were
promulgated
on
April
16,
2003,
under
section
112(
d)
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA).

The
amendments
clarify
the
testing
and
monitoring
requirements
and
startup
and
shutdown
requirements
for
batch
processes,
make
certain
technical
corrections,
and
add
recent
changes
to
be
consistent
with
the
NESHAP
General
Provisions.

DATES:
The
direct
final
rule
is
effective
[
INSERT
DATE
90
DAYS
AFTER
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
DIRECT
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER]
without
further
notice,
unless
adverse
comments
are
received
by
[
INSERT
DATE
45
DAYS
AFTER
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
DIRECT
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER]
or
by
[
INSERT
THE
DATE
60
DAYS
AFTER
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
DIRECT
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER]
if
a
3
public
hearing
is
requested.
If
we
receive
such
comment,
we
will
publish
a
timely
withdrawal
in
the
Federal
Register
which
amendments
will
become
effective
and
which
amendments
are
being
withdrawn
due
to
adverse
comment.

ADDRESSES:
Submit
your
comments,
identified
by
Docket
ID
No.
OAR­
2002­
0088,
by
one
of
the
following
methods:

!
Federal
eRulemaking
Portal:

http://
www.
regulations.
gov.
Follow
the
on­
line
instructions
for
submitting
comments.

!
Agency
Website:
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.

EDOCKET,
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
and
comment
system,
is
EPA's
preferred
method
for
receiving
comments.
Follow
the
on­
line
instructions
for
submitting
comments.

!
E­
mail:
a­
and­
r­
docket@
epa.
gov
!
Fax:
(
202)
566­
1741
!
Mail:
EPA
Air
Docket,
Mailcode:
6102T,
1200
Pennsylvania
Ave.,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20460.
Please
include
a
total
of
two
copies.

!
Hand
Delivery:
Air
and
Radiation
Docket,
Room
B­

108,
EPA,
1301
Constitution
Avenue,
NW,
Washington,

DC
20460,
Attention
Docket
ID
No.
OAR­
2002­
0088.

Such
deliveries
are
only
accepted
during
the
Docket's
normal
hours
of
operation,
and
special
arrangements
should
be
made
for
deliveries
of
boxed
information.
4
Instructions:
Direct
your
comments
to
Docket
ID
No.
OAR­

2002­
0088.
EPA's
policy
is
that
all
comments
received
will
be
included
in
the
public
docket
without
change
and
may
be
made
available
online
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket,

including
any
personal
information
provided,
unless
the
comment
includes
information
claimed
to
be
Confidential
Business
Information
(
CBI)
or
other
information
whose
disclosure
is
restricted
by
statute.
Do
not
submit
information
that
you
consider
to
be
CBI
or
otherwise
protected
through
EDOCKET,
regulations.
gov,
or
e­
mail.
The
EPA
EDOCKET
and
the
federal
regulations.
gov
websites
are
"
anonymous
access"
systems,
which
means
EPA
will
not
know
your
identity
or
contact
information
unless
you
provide
it
in
the
body
of
your
comment.
If
you
send
an
e­
mail
comment
directly
to
EPA
without
going
through
EDOCKET
or
regulations.
gov,
your
e­
mail
address
will
be
automatically
captured
and
included
as
part
of
the
comment
that
is
placed
in
the
public
docket
and
made
available
on
the
Internet.
If
you
submit
an
electronic
comment,
EPA
recommends
that
you
include
your
name
and
other
contact
information
in
the
body
of
your
comment
and
with
any
disk
or
CD­
ROM
you
submit.
If
EPA
cannot
read
your
comment
due
to
technical
difficulties
and
cannot
contact
you
for
clarification,
EPA
may
not
be
able
to
consider
your
comment.
Electronic
files
should
avoid
the
use
of
special
characters,
any
form
of
encryption,

and
be
free
of
any
defects
or
viruses.
For
additional
5
information
about
EPA's
public
docket
visit
EDOCKET
on­
line
or
see
the
Federal
Register
of
May
31,
2002
(
67
FR
38102).

Docket:
All
documents
in
the
docket
are
listed
in
the
EDOCKET
index
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.
Although
listed
in
the
index,
some
information
is
not
publicly
available,
i.
e.,
CBI
or
other
information
whose
disclosure
is
restricted
by
statute.
Certain
other
material,
such
as
copyrighted
material,
is
not
placed
on
the
Internet
and
will
be
publicly
available
only
in
hard
copy
form.
Publicly
available
docket
materials
are
available
either
electronically
in
EDOCKET
or
in
hard
copy
form
at
Air
and
Radiation
Docket,
EPA/
DC,
EPA
West,
Room
B102,
1301
Constitution
Ave.,
NW,
Washington,
DC.
The
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Public
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566­
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
Air
Docket
is
(
202)
566­
1742.

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Susan
Fairchild,
Emission
Standards
Division
(
C504­
05),
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards,
EPA,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27711;

telephone
number
(
919)
541­
5167;
fax
number
(
919)
541­
5600;

e­
mail
address:
fairchild.
susan@
epa.
gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:

Regulated
Entities.
Categories
and
entities
potentially
regulated
by
this
action
include
those
listed
in
the
following
table:
6
Category
NAICS
Examples
of
regulated
entities
Industrial
327124
Clay
refractories
manufacturing
plants
Industrial
327125
Nonclay
refractories
manufacturing
plants
This
table
is
not
intended
to
be
exhaustive,
but
rather
provides
a
guide
for
readers
regarding
entities
likely
to
be
regulated
by
this
action.
To
determine
whether
your
facility
is
regulated
by
this
action,
you
should
examine
the
applicability
criteria
in
§
63.9782
of
the
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP.
If
you
have
any
questions
regarding
the
applicability
of
this
action
to
a
particular
entity,
consult
the
person
listed
in
the
preceding
FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT
section.

Worldwide
Web
(
WWW).
In
addition
to
being
available
in
the
docket,
an
electronic
copy
of
today's
document
will
also
be
available
on
the
WWW.
Following
the
Administrator's
signature,
a
copy
of
this
action
will
be
posted
at
www.
epa.
gov/
ttn/
oarpg
on
EPA's
Technology
Transfer
Network
(
TTN)
policy
and
guidance
page
for
newly
proposed
or
promulgated
rules.
The
TTN
provides
information
and
technology
exchange
in
various
areas
of
air
pollution
control.

Comments.
We
are
publishing
the
direct
final
rule
without
prior
proposal
because
we
view
the
amendments
as
noncontroversial
and
do
not
anticipate
adverse
comments
because
the
amendments
clarify
several
of
the
requirements
7
of
the
NESHAP,
bring
the
NESHAP
into
consistency
with
the
General
Provisions
to
40
CFR
part
63,
and
make
technical
corrections
to
the
NESHAP.
However,
in
the
Proposed
Rules
section
of
this
Federal
Register,
we
are
publishing
a
separate
document
that
will
serve
as
the
proposal
to
amend
the
NESHAP
for
refractory
products
manufacturing
facilities
if
adverse
comments
are
filed.

If
we
receive
adverse
comment
on
one
or
more
distinct
amendments,
we
will
publish
a
timely
withdrawal
in
the
Federal
Register
informing
the
public
which
amendments
will
become
effective
and
which
amendments
are
being
withdrawn
due
to
adverse
comment.
We
will
address
all
public
comments
on
withdrawn
amendments
in
a
subsequent
final
rule.
We
will
not
institute
a
second
comment
period
on
this
action.
Any
parties
interested
in
commenting
must
do
so
at
this
time.

Judicial
Review.
Under
section
307(
b)(
1)
of
the
CAA,

judicial
review
of
the
direct
final
rule
amendments
is
available
only
by
filing
a
petition
for
review
in
the
U.
S.

Court
of
Appeals
for
the
District
of
Columbia
Circuit
by
[
INSERT
DATE
90
DAYS
AFTER
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THIS
DIRECT
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER].
Under
section
307(
d)(
7)(
B)
of
the
CAA,
only
an
objection
to
the
direct
final
rule
which
was
raised
with
reasonable
specificity
during
the
period
for
public
comment
can
be
raised
during
judicial
review.
Moreover,
under
section
307(
b)(
2)
of
the
CAA,
the
requirements
established
by
the
direct
final
rule
8
may
not
be
challenged
separately
in
any
civil
or
criminal
proceedings
brought
by
EPA
to
enforce
these
requirements.

Outline.
The
information
presented
in
this
preamble
is
organized
as
follows:

I.
Background
II.
Amendments
to
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
SSSSS
A.
Emission
Testing
B.
Control
Device
Operation
C.
Operating
Limits
D.
Monitoring
E.
Other
Changes
F.
Table
1.
Summary
of
Amendments
to
Subpart
SSSSS
III.
Statutory
and
Executive
Order
Reviews
A.
Executive
Order
12866:
Regulatory
Planning
and
Review
B.
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
C.
Regulatory
Flexibility
Act
D.
Unfunded
Mandates
Reform
Act
E.
Executive
Order
13132:
Federalism
F.
Executive
Order
13175:
Consultation
and
Coordination
with
Indian
Tribal
Governments
G.
Executive
Order
13045:
Protection
of
Children
from
Environmental
Health
Risks
and
Safety
Risks
H.
Executive
Order
13211:
Actions
that
Significantly
Affect
Energy
Supply,
Distribution,
or
Use
I.
National
Technology
Transfer
and
Advancement
Act
J.
Congressional
Review
Act
I.
Background
EPA
promulgated
the
NESHAP
for
new
and
existing
refractory
products
manufacturing
facilities
on
April
16,

2003
(
68
FR
18730)
as
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
SSSSS.

Shortly
after
promulgation
of
the
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP,
EPA
also
promulgated
amendments
to
the
General
Provisions
to
40
CFR
part
63
(
68
FR
32586,
May
30,

2003).
After
reviewing
the
final
amendments
to
the
General
Provisions
and
comparing
those
to
the
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP,
we
discovered
discrepancies
between
sections
of
the
General
Provisions
as
cited
in
the
NESHAP
9
and
the
newly
amended
sections
of
the
General
Provisions.

We
also
identified
minor
technical
errors
and
other
specific
sections
of
the
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP
that
needed
clarification.
Today's
action
includes
amendments
to
the
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP
that
clarify
the
requirements
for
testing,
control
device
operation,
operating
limits,
and
monitoring.

II.
Amendments
to
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
SSSSS
A.
Emission
Testing
The
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP
specify
several
requirements
that
pertain
to
the
testing
of
batch
process
sources.
Because
emissions
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAP)
from
a
batch
process
source
can
vary
significantly
over
the
course
of
a
batch
cycle,
the
NESHAP
specify
emission
limits
in
terms
of
the
peak
emissions
period.
In
today's
action,
we
are
revising
the
definition
of
the
peak
emissions
period
in
terms
of
the
applicable
emission
limits
to
include
separate
definitions
for
the
3­

hour
peak
total
hydrocarbons
(
THC)
mass
emissions
period,

which
applies
to
batch
process
sources
that
comply
with
the
THC
percentage
reduction
limit;
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period,
which
applies
to
batch
sources
that
satisfy
the
THC
emission
concentration
limit;

and
the
3­
hour
peak
hydrogen
fluoride
(
HF)
mass
emissions
period,
which
pertains
to
the
emission
limits
for
batch
process
clay
refractory
products
kilns.
All
references
to
10
the
peak
emissions
period
in
the
tables
to
40
CFR
part
63,

subpart
SSSSS,
have
been
revised
for
consistency.

The
NESHAP
include
provisions
to
allow
the
owner
or
operator
of
an
affected
batch
process
source
to
develop
an
emissions
profile
and
use
the
profile
to
limit
emissions
testing
to
the
peak
emissions
period.
In
today's
action,
we
are
amending
40
CFR
63.9802
to
clarify
that
emissions
profiles
for
sources
subject
to
the
THC
emission
limits
must
be
developed
using
data
collected
at
the
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate.
This
amendment
also
clarifies
that
a
new
emissions
profile
must
be
developed
if
a
facility
wants
to
use
an
emissions
profile
to
limit
testing
to
the
peak
emissions
period
at
a
process,
but
increases
its
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate
at
that
process.
In
addition,

we
are
amending
40
CFR
63.9802
to
clarify
that
emissions
profiles
for
batch
process
clay
refractory
kilns
must
be
developed
using
data
from
when
the
kiln
is
processing
the
clay
refractory
product
with
the
highest
uncalcined
clay
processing
rate.

We
are
amending
40
CRF
63.9798(
a)
to
eliminate
the
reference
to
permit
renewal,
and
stating
that
subsequent
performance
tests
must
be
conducted
at
least
every
5
years.

Item
1(
b)(
i)(
1)
of
Table
4
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63
is
amended
to
clarify
that
a
sampling
port
is
also
required
at
the
control
device
inlet
if
the
owner
or
operator
plans
to
develop
an
emissions
profile
or
use
the
provision
for
11
reducing
the
operating
temperature
of
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer
on
an
affected
batch
process
source.
In
both
cases,
sampling
is
required
at
the
control
device
inlet.

Item
8(
a)(
i)(
5)
of
Table
4
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63
is
amended
to
specify
the
THC
concentration
in
terms
of
the
outlet
of
the
control
device.
We
also
made
other
minor
changes
to
this
provision
in
Table
4
to
simplify
the
wording.

Item
13
of
Table
4
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63
is
amended
to
eliminate
the
reference
to
the
THC
percentage
reduction
limit.
We
have
clarified
that
regardless
of
which
THC
emission
limit
applies
to
a
specific
source,
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
source
must
measure
not
only
the
THC
concentration
but
also
the
oxygen
concentration
at
the
control
device
inlet
for
at
least
the
1­
hour
period
that
immediately
follows
the
temperature
reduction.
This
measurement
is
necessary
for
demonstrating
that
the
source
is
meeting
the
limit
of
20
parts
per
million
dry
volume
(
ppmvd)
THC,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
after
the
oxidizer
temperature
has
been
reduced.

Item
13.
a.
5
of
Table
4
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63
is
amended
to
clarify
that
only
the
THC
emissions
concentration
limit
applies
following
any
reduction
in
the
oxidizer
temperature.
We
received
comment
on
the
proposed
rule
(
67
FR
42108,
June
20,
2002)
requesting
a
second
emission
limit
be
allowed
for
sources
wanting
to
meet
a
percentage
12
reduction
limit
rather
than
an
emission
concentration
limit.

The
commenter
believed
that
since
EPA
had
promulgated
percentage
reduction
limits
for
other
MACT
standards
to
reduce
emissions
of
THC,
and
since
air
pollution
control
devices
are
usually
rated
and
installed
with
a
minimum
percent
reduction
achieved
by
the
devices,
that
emission
limit
would
be
simpler
to
meet.
At
promulgation
of
the
final
rule
(
April
16,
2003,
68
FR
18730),
we
changed
the
rule
to
allow
regulated
sources
to
meet
either
the
percentage
reduction
limit
or
the
concentration
limit.

In
the
final
rule,
we
allowed
the
choice
between
either
the
percentage
reduction
limit
or
the
concentration
limit,

but
required
owners
and
operators
to
meet
the
selected
emission
limit
during
all
times
of
operation.
We
also
allowed
owners
and
operators
the
option
to
turn
off
the
control
device
when
it
was
no
longer
needed.
However,
for
those
owners
or
operators
meeting
the
percentage
reduction
compliance
option,
it
is
not
possible
to
meet
that
limit
if
the
control
device
is
not
in
operation.
We
believe
that
conserving
energy
is
a
beneficial
option
for
all
owners
and
operators,
and
regardless
of
the
compliance
option
selected,

all
should
have
the
opportunity
to
benefit
from
turning
off
the
control
device
when
it
is
no
longer
needed.
Thus,
we
are
clarifying
that
whether
an
owner
or
operator
shows
compliance
with
the
percentage
reduction
limit
or
the
concentration
limit,
compliance
with
the
rule
for
a
unit
13
with
a
control
device
no
longer
in
operation
may
only
be
demonstrated
by
meeting
the
concentration
limit,
that
is,

when
the
THC
emissions
are
below
20
ppmvd
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen
from
the
heated
process
unit.
Owners
and
operators
in
this
case
may
choose
to
meet
the
percentage
reduction
limit
before
turning
off
the
control
device
and
may
show
compliance
with
the
concentration
limit
after
turning
off
the
control
device.

Item
14(
a)(
i)(
1)
of
Table
4
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63
is
amended
to
specify
that
the
performance
tests
must
be
performed
while
processing
the
clay
refractory
product
with
the
highest
uncalcined
clay
processing
rate.

B.
Control
Device
Operation
Refractory
products
manufacturing
plants
typically
produce
a
wide
range
of
products,
some
of
which
may
contain
organic
HAP
binders
or
additives,
while
other
products
may
contain
only
inorganic
binders
or
additives
that
do
not
contain
or
form
HAP.
Many
plants
do
not
have
dedicated
thermal
process
units
(
e.
g.,
dryers
and
kilns)
for
each
type
of
product
they
manufacture
and
instead,
use
the
same
process
units
to
manufacture
products
that
emit
HAP
and
products
that
do
not
contain
or
emit
HAP.
Recognizing
this
situation,
we
are
amending
40
CFR
63.9792
of
the
NESHAP
to
clarify
that
control
devices
used
to
comply
with
the
emission
limits
established
by
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
SSSSS,
do
not
have
to
be
operated
when
an
otherwise
affected
14
process
unit
is
processing
products
that
do
not
contain
or
release
HAP.
This
amendment
applies
to
sources
subject
to
the
THC
emission
limits
as
well
as
the
emission
limits
for
HF
and
hydrochloric
acid
(
HCl).

Table
3
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63,
which
specifies
work
practice
standards,
includes
several
options
for
controlling
emissions
of
polycyclic
organic
matter
(
POM)

from
shape
preheaters
and
pitch
working
tanks
used
in
the
manufacture
of
pitch­
impregnated
refractory
products.

Options
include
exhausting
the
affected
source
to
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer
that
is
comparable
to
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer
that
is
used
to
meet
the
emission
limits
for
an
affected
defumer
or
coking
oven.
To
clarify
what
is
meant
by
a
"
comparable"
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer,
we
are
amending
40
CFR
63.9824
to
include
a
definition
of
"
comparable
control
device."

C.
Operating
Limits
The
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP
refer
to
the
operating
limit
as
the
"
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate."
We
are
amending
the
definition
of
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate
in
40
CFR
63.9824
to
distinguish
between
the
operating
limit
and
the
actual
processing
rate
measured
during
the
performance
test.

The
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP
include
several
operating
limits
for
clay
refractory
products
kilns
that
are
controlled
by
dry
limestone
adsorbers
(
DLA).
We
15
are
amending
the
NESHAP
to
eliminate
the
operating
limits
of
maintaining
free­
flowing
limestone
throughout
the
DLA
because
the
term
"
free­
flowing"
may
not
be
appropriate
for
the
grade
of
limestone
used
in
DLA.
The
remaining
operating
limits
specified
for
DLA
in
the
NESHAP
are
adequate
for
ensuring
compliance
with
the
emission
limits
for
clay
refractory
products
kilns.

As
specified
in
Table
2
(
Requirements
for
Establishing
Operating
Limits)
of
the
rule,
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63,

owners
and
operators
of
certain
thermal
process
sources
of
organic
HAP
are
required
to
establish
an
operating
limit
for
the
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate.
The
organic
HAP
processing
rate
is
a
function
of
the
amount
of
organic
HAP
in
the
raw
materials
and
the
amounts
of
those
raw
materials
in
the
refractory
product
formulation.
Because
there
are
minor
variations
in
the
content
of
organic
HAP
in
a
specific
binder
or
additive,
the
operating
limit
for
the
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate
can
inadvertently
be
exceeded
without
changing
the
product
formulation.
In
today's
action,
we
are
amending
the
procedure
for
establishing
the
operating
limit
and
clarifying
that
minor
exceedances
of
the
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate
established
during
the
performance
test
are
not
violations
of
the
operating
limit.

Specifically,
we
are
amending
items
3(
b)
and
8(
b)
of
Table
4
(
Requirements
for
Performance
Tests)
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63
to
be
consistent
with
the
requirements
in
Table
2
16
that
reflect
a
10
percent
allowance
when
calculating
the
operating
limit.

Today's
action
amends
the
procedures
for
determining
minimum
temperature
operating
limits
for
thermal
and
catalytic
oxidizers
that
are
used
to
control
emissions
from
certain
batch
process
sources
of
organic
HAP
as
they
pertain
to
sources
that
comply
with
the
provisions
for
reducing
the
operating
temperature
of
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer.

We
are
also
amending
subpart
SSSSS
to
clarify
that
owners
or
operators
of
batch
process
sources
controlled
with
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizers
must
measure
the
oxidizer
operating
temperature
throughout
each
entire
test
run.

D.
Monitoring
The
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP
require
THC
continuous
emission
monitoring
systems
(
CEMS)
on
thermal
process
sources
of
organic
HAP
that
use
process
changes
or
control
devices
other
than
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizers
to
meet
the
THC
emission
limits.
We
are
amending
40
CFR
63.9800(
i)(
1)
by
adding
a
reference
to
sources
that
use
process
changes
to
meet
the
emission
limits.

We
are
also
amending
40
CFR
63.9800(
i)
to
state
that
such
sources
must
maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
concentration
at
or
below
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.

Today's
action
amends
the
definition
of
"
deviation"
in
40
CFR
63.9824
to
include
failure
to
provide
adequate
17
continuous
monitoring
systems
(
CMS)
data
for
demonstrating
compliance
with
any
emission
limit
or
other
requirement.
In
addition,
we
are
amending
the
requirement
that
the
owner
or
operator
of
an
affected
source
that
is
required
to
use
a
CMS
to
meet
an
operating
limit
must
report
any
deviations
from
those
operating
limits.

E.
Other
Changes
We
are
amending
the
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP
to
include
definitions
for
Shutdown
and
Startup
to
preclude
unnecessary
reporting
of
batch
process
source
operation.

III.
Statutory
and
Executive
Order
Reviews
A.
Executive
Order
12866:
Regulatory
Planning
and
Review
Under
Executive
Order
12866
(
58
FR
51735,
October
4,

1993),
EPA
must
determine
whether
the
regulatory
action
is
"
significant"
and,
therefore,
subject
to
review
by
the
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB)
and
the
requirements
of
the
Executive
Order.
The
Executive
Order
defines
"
significant
regulatory
action"
as
one
that
is
likely
to
result
in
a
rule
that
may:

(
1)
Have
an
annual
effect
on
the
economy
of
$
100
million
or
more
or
adversely
affect
in
a
material
way
the
economy,
a
sector
of
the
economy,
productivity,
competition,

jobs,
the
environment,
public
health
or
safety,
or
State,

local,
or
tribal
governments
or
communities;

(
2)
create
a
serious
inconsistency
or
otherwise
18
interfere
with
an
action
taken
or
planned
by
another
agency;

(
3)
materially
alter
the
budgetary
impact
of
entitlements,
grants,
user
fees,
or
loan
programs,
or
the
rights
and
obligation
of
recipients
thereof;
or
(
4)
raise
novel
legal
or
policy
issues
arising
out
of
legal
mandates,
the
President's
priorities,
or
the
principles
set
forth
in
the
Executive
Order.

Pursuant
to
the
terms
of
Executive
Order
12866,
it
has
been
determined
that
the
direct
finalthis
rule
amendments
do
not
constituteis
a
"
significant
regulatory
action"
because
none
of
the
listed
criteria
apply
to
this
action.

Consequentlyit
raises
novel
legal
or
policy
issues
arising
out
of
legal
mandates.
As
such,
this
action
was
not
submitted
to
OMB
for
review
under
Executive
Order
12866.

Changes
made
in
response
to
OMB
suggestions
or
recommendations
will
be
documented
in
the
public
record.

B.
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
This
action
does
not
impose
an
information
collection
burden
under
the
provisions
of
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act,

44
U.
S.
C.
3501
et
seq.
OMB
approved
the
information
collection
requests
for
the
NESHAP
for
refractory
products
manufacturing
pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act,
44
U.
S.
C.
3501
et
seq.
OMB
assigned
OMB
control
number
2060­
0515
(
EPA
ICR
No.
2040.01)
to
these
information
collection
requests.
A
copy
of
the
Information
Collection
Request
(
ICR)
may
be
obtained
from
Susan
Auby
by
19
mail
at
US
EPA,
Office
of
Environmental
Information,

Collection
Strategies
Division
(
MD­
2822T),
1200
Pennsylvania
Ave.,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20460;
by
e­
mail
at
auby.
susan@
epa.
gov;
or
by
calling
(
202)
566­
1672.
You
may
also
download
a
copy
off
the
Internet
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
icr.

Today's
action
makes
clarifying
changes
to
the
NESHAP
for
refractory
products
manufacturing
and
imposes
no
new
information
collection
requirements
on
the
industry.

Because
there
is
no
additional
burden
on
the
industry
as
a
result
of
the
direct
final
rule
amendments,
the
ICR
has
not
been
revised.

Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,

or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,

validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
20
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
current
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15.

C.
Regulatory
Flexibility
Act
EPA
has
determined
that
it
is
not
necessary
to
prepare
a
regulatory
flexibility
analysis
in
connection
with
this
final
rule.

For
purposes
of
assessing
the
impacts
of
today's
rule
on
small
entities,
small
entity
is
defined
as:
(
1)
a
small
business
as
defined
by
the
Small
Business
Administrations'

regulations
at
13
CFR
121.201;
(
2)
a
small
governmental
jurisdiction
that
is
a
government
of
a
city,
county,
town,

school
district
or
special
district
with
a
population
of
less
than
50,000;
and
(
3)
a
small
organization
that
is
any
not­
for­
profit
enterprise
which
is
independently
owned
and
operated
and
is
not
dominant
in
its
field.

After
considering
the
economic
impacts
of
today's
direct
final
rule
amendments
on
small
entities,
EPA
has
concluded
that
this
action
will
not
have
a
significant
economic
impact
on
a
substantial
number
of
small
entities
(
SISNOSE).
At
promulgation
of
the
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP,
EPA
determined
that
one
facility,
or
17
percent
of
all
facilities,
is
owned
by
a
small
company
and
would
experience
an
impact
of
less
than
one
half
of
one
21
percent
(<
0.50
percent)
of
company
sales.
EPA
found
no
SISNOSE
for
the
underlying
rule,
and
the
direct
final
rule
amendments
are
minor
corrections
and
clarifications
to
that
rule
that
do
not
add
any
additional
requirements.

Although
the
direct
final
rule
amendments
will
not
have
a
significant
economic
impact
on
a
substantial
number
of
small
entities,
EPA
nonetheless
has
tried
to
reduce
the
impact
of
the
direct
final
rule
amendments
on
small
entities.
EPA
has
limited
the
amendments
to
changes
that
clarify
ambiguities
of
the
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP,
correct
citations
to
the
General
Provisions,
and
clarify
the
complex
batch
testing
requirements
of
the
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing
NESHAP.
EPA
believes
that
the
amendments
will
simplify
the
NESHAP
and
will
not
add
additional
burden
to
regulated
entities.

D.
Unfunded
Mandates
Reform
Act
Title
II
of
the
Unfunded
Mandates
Reform
Act
of
1995
(
UMRA),
Public
Law
No.
104­
4,
establishes
requirements
for
Federal
agencies
to
assess
the
effects
of
their
regulatory
actions
on
State,
local,
and
tribal
governments
and
the
private
sector.
Under
section
202
of
the
UMRA,
EPA
generally
must
prepare
a
written
statement,
including
a
cost­
benefit
analysis,
for
proposed
and
final
rules
with
"
Federal
mandates"
that
may
result
in
expenditures
by
State,

local,
and
tribal
governments,
in
the
aggregate,
or
by
the
private
sector,
of
$
100
million
or
more
in
any
1
year.
22
Before
promulgating
an
EPA
rule
for
which
a
written
statement
is
needed,
section
205
of
the
UMRA
generally
requires
EPA
to
identify
and
consider
a
reasonable
number
of
regulatory
alternatives
and
adopt
the
least
costly,
most
cost­
effective,
or
least
burdensome
alternative
that
achieves
the
objectives
of
the
rule.
The
provisions
of
section
205
do
not
apply
when
they
are
inconsistent
with
applicable
law.
Moreover,
section
205
allows
EPA
to
adopt
an
alternative
other
than
the
least
costly,
most
costeffective
or
least
burdensome
alternative
if
the
Administrator
publishes
with
the
final
rule
an
explanation
why
that
alternative
was
not
adopted.
Before
EPA
establishes
any
regulatory
requirements
that
may
significantly
or
uniquely
affect
small
governments,

including
tribal
governments,
it
must
have
developed
under
section
203
of
the
UMRA
a
small
government
agency
plan.
The
plan
must
provide
for
notifying
potentially
affected
small
governments,
enabling
officials
of
affected
small
governments
to
have
meaningful
and
timely
input
in
the
development
of
EPA's
regulatory
proposals
with
significant
Federal
intergovernmental
mandates,
and
informing,

educating,
and
advising
small
governments
on
compliance
with
the
regulatory
requirements.

The
EPA
has
determined
that
today's
direct
final
rule
amendments
do
not
contain
a
Federal
mandate
that
may
result
in
expenditures
of
$
100
million
or
more
for
State,
local,
23
and
tribal
governments,
in
the
aggregate,
or
the
private
sector
in
any
1
year,
nor
do
the
direct
final
rule
amendments
significantly
or
uniquely
impact
small
governments
because
there
are
no
requirements
that
apply
to
such
governments
or
impose
obligations
upon
them.

Therefore,
today's
direct
final
rule
amendments
are
not
subject
to
the
requirements
of
sections
202
and
205
of
the
UMRA.

E.
Executive
Order
13132:
Federalism
Executive
Order
13132,
entitled
"
Federalism"
(
64
FR
43255,
August
10,
1999),
requires
EPA
to
develop
an
accountable
process
to
ensure
"
meaningful
and
timely
input
by
State
and
local
officials
in
the
development
of
regulatory
policies
that
have
federalism
implications."

"
Policies
that
have
federalism
implications"
is
defined
in
the
Executive
Order
to
include
regulations
that
have
"
substantial
direct
effects
on
the
States,
on
the
relationship
between
the
national
government
and
the
States,

or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
among
the
various
levels
of
government."

The
direct
final
rule
amendments
do
not
have
federalism
implications.
They
will
not
have
substantial
direct
effects
on
the
States,
on
the
relationship
between
the
national
government
and
the
States,
or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
among
the
various
levels
of
government,

as
specified
in
Executive
Order
13132.
None
of
the
affected
24
facilities
are
owned
or
operated
by
State
governments,
and
the
direct
final
rule
amendments
will
not
supercede
State
regulations
that
are
more
stringent.
Thus,
Executive
Order
13132
does
not
apply
to
the
direct
final
rule
amendments.

F.
Executive
Order
13175:
Consultation
and
Coordination
with
Indian
Tribal
Governments
Executive
Order
13175,
entitled
"
Consultation
and
Coordination
with
Indian
Tribal
Governments"
(
65
FR
67249,

November
9,
2000),
requires
EPA
to
develop
an
accountable
process
to
ensure
"
meaningful
and
timely
input
by
tribal
officials
in
the
development
of
regulatory
policies
that
have
tribal
implications."
The
direct
final
rule
amendments
do
not
have
tribal
implications,
as
specified
in
Executive
Order
13175.
They
will
not
have
substantial
direct
effects
on
tribal
governments,
on
the
relationship
between
the
Federal
government
and
Indian
tribes,
or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
between
the
Federal
government
and
Indian
tribes,
as
specified
in
Executive
Order
13175.

No
tribal
governments
own
or
operate
refractory
products
manufacturing
facilities.
Thus,
Executive
Order
13175
does
not
apply
to
the
direct
final
rule
amendments.

G.
Executive
Order
13045:
Protection
of
Children
from
Environmental
Health
Risks
and
Safety
Risks
Executive
Order
13045
(
62
FR
19885,
April
23,
1997)

applies
to
any
rule
that
(
1)
is
determined
to
be
"
economically
significant"
as
defined
under
Executive
Order
25
12866
and
(
2)
concerns
an
environmental
health
or
safety
risk
that
EPA
has
reason
to
believe
may
have
a
disproportionate
effect
on
children.
If
the
regulatory
action
meets
both
criteria,
EPA
must
evaluate
the
environmental
health
or
safety
effects
of
the
planned
rule
on
children
and
explain
why
the
planned
rule
is
preferable
to
other
potentially
effective
and
reasonably
feasible
alternatives
that
EPA
considered.

EPA
interprets
Executive
Order
13045
as
applying
only
to
those
regulatory
actions
that
are
based
on
health
or
safety
risks,
such
that
the
analysis
required
under
section
5­
501
of
the
Executive
Order
has
the
potential
to
influence
the
regulation.
Today's
direct
final
rule
amendments
are
not
subject
to
Executive
Order
13045
because
they
are
based
on
technology
performance
and
not
on
health
or
safety
risks.

In
addition,
the
direct
final
rule
amendments
have
been
determined
not
to
be
"
economically
significant"
as
defined
under
Executive
Order
12866.

H.
Executive
Order
13211:
Actions
Concerning
Regulations
that
Significantly
Affect
Energy
Supply,
Distribution,
or
Use
Today's
direct
final
rule
amendments
are
not
subject
to
Executive
Order
13211
(
66
FR
28355,
May
22,
2001)
because
they
are
not
a
significant
regulatory
action
under
Executive
Order
12866.

I.
National
Technology
Transfer
and
Advancement
Act
of
1995
Section
12(
d)
of
the
National
Technology
Transfer
and
Advancement
Act
(
NTTAA)
of
1995
(
Public
Law
No.
104­
113;

15
U.
S.
C.
272
note)
directs
EPA
to
use
voluntary
consensus
standards
in
their
regulatory
and
procurement
activities
unless
to
do
so
would
be
inconsistent
with
applicable
law
or
otherwise
impractical.
Voluntary
consensus
standards
are
technical
standards
(
e.
g.,
materials
specifications,
test
methods,
sampling
procedures,
business
practices)
developed
or
adopted
by
one
or
more
voluntary
consensus
bodies.
The
NTTAA
directs
EPA
to
provide
Congress,
through
annual
reports
to
OMB,
with
explanations
when
an
agency
does
not
use
available
and
applicable
voluntary
consensus
standards.

The
direct
final
rule
amendments
implement
clarifications
and
corrections
to
the
NESHAP
for
refractory
product
manufacturing,
but
do
not
change
any
technical
standards.

Therefore,
EPA
did
not
consider
the
use
of
any
voluntary
consensus
standards.

J.
Congressional
Review
Act
The
Congressional
Review
Act,
5
U.
S.
C.
801
et
seq.,
as
added
by
the
Small
Business
Regulatory
Enforcement
Fairness
Act
of
1996,
generally
provides
that
before
a
rule
may
take
effect,
the
agency
promulgating
the
rule
must
submit
a
rule
report,
which
includes
a
copy
of
the
rule,
to
each
House
of
the
Congress
and
to
the
Comptroller
General
of
the
United
States.
EPA
will
submit
a
report
containing
the
direct
final
rule
and
other
required
information
to
the
US
Senate,

the
US
House
of
Representatives,
and
the
Comptroller
General
27
of
the
United
States
prior
to
publication
of
the
rule
in
the
Federal
Register.
This
action
is
not
a
"
major
rule"
as
defined
by
5
U.
S.
C.
804(
2).
The
direct
final
rule
amendments
are
effective
on
[
INSERT
DATE
90
DAYS
AFTER
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THIS
DIRECT
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
FEDERAL
REGISTER].
NESHAP:
Refractory
Products
Manufacturing­­
Page
28
of
94
28
List
of
Subjects
in
40
CFR
Part
63
Environmental
protection,
Administrative
practice
and
procedure,
Air
pollution
control,
Hazardous
substances,

Intergovernmental
relations,
Reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements.

Dated:

Stephen
L.
Johnson,
Acting
Administrator
29
For
the
reasons
stated
in
the
preamble,
title
40,

chapter
I,
part
63
of
the
Code
of
Federal
Regulations
is
amended
as
follows:

PART
63
 
[
AMENDED]

1.
The
authority
citation
for
part
63
continues
to
read
as
follows:

Authority:
42
U.
S.
C.
7401,
et
seq.

SUBPART
SSSSS
 
[
AMENDED]

2.
Section
63.9792
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
paragraph
(
b);

b.
Changing
the
designation
of
paragraph
(
f)
to
paragraph
(
g);
and
c.
Adding
a
new
paragraph
(
f).

§
63.9792
What
are
my
general
requirements
for
complying
with
this
subpart?

*
*
*
*
*

(
b)
Except
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
e)
and
(
f)
of
this
section,
you
must
always
operate
and
maintain
your
affected
source,
including
air
pollution
control
and
monitoring
equipment,
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.6(
e)(
1)(
i).
During
the
period
between
the
compliance
date
specified
for
your
affected
source
in
§
63.9786
and
the
date
upon
which
continuous
monitoring
systems
have
been
installed
and
validated
and
any
applicable
operating
limits
have
been
established,
you
must
maintain
a
log
detailing
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
process
and
emissions
30
control
equipment.

*
*
*
*
*

(
f)
For
any
affected
source
that
is
subject
to
any
of
the
emission
limits
specified
in
Table
1
to
this
subpart,

you
do
not
have
to
operate
the
control
device
on
that
affected
source
under
the
conditions
specified
in
paragraphs
(
f)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.

(
1)
For
any
source
that
is
subject
to
the
THC
emissions
concentration
limit
or
the
THC
percentage
reduction
limit,
you
do
not
have
to
operate
the
control
device
on
that
source
when
none
of
the
refractory
products
that
are
being
processed
by
that
source
contain
or
form
an
organic
HAP.

(
2)
For
any
new
clay
refractory
products
kiln
that
is
subject
to
the
production­
based
mass
emission
limits
or
the
percentage
reduction
limits
for
HF
and
HCl,
you
do
not
have
to
operate
the
control
device
on
that
kiln
when
none
of
the
refractory
products
that
are
being
processed
by
that
kiln
are
clay
refractory
products,
as
defined
in
§
63.9824.

(
g)
You
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
provisions
of
subpart
A
of
this
part,
except
as
noted
in
Table
11
to
this
subpart.

3.
Section
63.9798
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
paragraph
(
a);

b.
Revising
paragraph
(
c)
introductory
text;
and
c.
Revising
paragraphs
(
c)(
2)
and
(
d).
31
§
63.9798
When
must
I
conduct
subsequent
performance
tests?

(
a)
You
must
conduct
a
performance
test
at
least
every
5
years
following
the
initial
performance
test.

*
*
*
*
*

(
c)
If
you
own
or
operate
a
source
that
is
subject
to
the
emission
limits
specified
in
items
2
through
9
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
you
must
conduct
a
performance
test
on
the
source(
s)
listed
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section
before
you
start
production
of
any
refractory
product
for
which
the
organic
HAP
processing
rate
is
likely
to
exceed
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate,

as
defined
in
items
3(
b)
and
8(
b)
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test
on
that
same
source.

*
*
*
*
*

(
2)
Each
affected
kiln
that
follows
an
affected
shape
dryer
or
curing
oven
in
the
same
process
line
and
is
used
to
process
the
refractory
product
with
the
higher
organic
HAP
processing
rate.

(
d)
If
you
own
or
operate
a
kiln
that
is
subject
to
the
emission
limits
specified
in
item
5
or
9
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
you
must
conduct
a
performance
test
on
the
affected
kiln
following
any
process
changes
that
are
likely
to
increase
organic
HAP
emissions
from
the
kiln
(
e.
g.,
a
decrease
in
the
curing
cycle
time
for
a
curing
oven
that
precedes
the
affected
kiln
in
the
same
process
line).
32
*
*
*
*
*

4.
Section
63.9800
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
paragraph
(
g)(
1);

b.
Revising
paragraph
(
g)(
3);

c.
Revising
paragraph
(
i)(
1);
and
d.
Adding
paragraphs
(
i)(
1)(
iv)
to
(
vi).

§
63.9800
How
do
I
conduct
performance
tests
and
establish
operating
limits?

*
*
*
*
*

(
g)
*
*
*

(
1)
To
determine
compliance
with
the
THC
emission
concentration
limit
listed
in
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
you
must
calculate
your
emission
concentration
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen
for
each
test
run
using
Equation
1
of
this
section:

(
Eq.
1)

(
)
C
2.9
C
20.9
C
THC
THC
O
C
2
=
×
 

Where:

CTHCC
=
THC
concentration,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen
ppmvd
CTHC
=
THC
concentration
(
uncorrected),
ppmvd
CO2
=
Oxygen
concentration,
percent.

*
*
*
*
*

(
3)
To
determine
compliance
with
production­
based
HF
and
HCl
emission
limits
in
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
you
must
calculate
your
mass
emissions
per
unit
of
uncalcined
clay
33
processed
for
each
test
run
using
Equation
3
of
this
section:

(
Eq.
3)
MP
ER
P
=

Where:

MP
=
mass
emissions
of
specific
HAP
(
HF
or
HCl)
per
unit
of
production,
kilograms
of
pollutant
per
megagram
(
pounds
per
ton)
of
uncalcined
clay
processed
ER
=
mass
emissions
rate
of
specific
HAP
(
HF
or
HCl)
during
each
performance
test
run,
kilograms
(
pounds)
per
hour
P
=
average
uncalcined
clay
processing
rate
for
the
performance
test,
megagrams
(
tons)
of
uncalcined
clay
processed
per
hour.
*
*
*
*
*

(
i)
*
*
*

(
1)
For
sources
subject
to
the
THC
concentration
limit
specified
in
item
3,
4,
7,
or
8
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart,

you
must
satisfy
the
requirements
specified
in
paragraphs
(
i)(
1)(
i)
through
(
vi)
of
this
section.

(
i)
*
*
*

(
iv)
You
must
meet
the
data
reduction
requirements
specified
in
§
63.8(
g).

(
v)
You
must
maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
concentration
at
or
below
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.

(
vi)
To
calculate
the
oxygen
correction
specified
in
paragraph
(
i)(
1)(
v)
of
this
section,
you
may
use
oxygen
concentration
measurements
concurrent
with
THC
concentration
34
measurements,
the
average
oxygen
concentration
measured
during
the
most
recent
performance
test
on
the
affected
source,
or
other
oxygen
concentration
measurements
that
are
representative
of
normal
operation
for
the
affected
source.

*
*
*
*
*

5.
Section
63.9802
is
revised
to
read
as
follows:

§
63.9802
How
do
I
develop
an
emissions
profile?

(
a)
If
you
decide
to
develop
an
emissions
profile
for
an
affected
batch
process
source,
as
indicated
in
item
8(
a)(
i)(
4)
or
17(
b)(
i)(
4)
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
you
must
measure
and
record
mass
emissions
of
the
applicable
pollutant
throughout
a
complete
batch
cycle
of
the
affected
batch
process
source
according
to
the
procedures
described
in
paragraph
(
a)(
1)
or
(
2)
of
this
section.

(
1)
If
your
affected
batch
process
source
is
subject
to
the
THC
concentration
limit
specified
in
item
6(
a),
7(
a),

8,
or
9
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart
or
the
THC
percentage
reduction
limit
specified
in
item
6(
b)
or
7(
b)
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
you
must
measure
and
record
the
THC
mass
emissions
rate
at
the
inlet
to
the
control
device
using
the
test
methods,
averaging
periods,
and
procedures
specified
in
items
10(
a)
and
(
b)
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart
for
each
complete
hour
of
the
batch
process
cycle
and
while
the
source
is
processing
the
product
with
the
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate.

(
2)
If
your
affected
batch
process
source
is
subject
35
to
the
HF
and
HCl
percentage
reduction
emission
limits
in
item
11
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
you
must
measure
and
record
the
HF
mass
emissions
rate
at
the
inlet
to
the
control
device
through
a
series
of
1­
hour
test
runs
using
one
of
the
test
methods
specified
in
item
14(
a)
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart
for
each
complete
hour
of
the
batch
process
cycle
and
while
the
source
is
processing
the
product
with
the
highest
uncalcined
clay
processing
rate.

(
b)
You
must
develop
a
new
emissions
profile
if
you
meet
all
of
the
conditions
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)

through
(
3)
of
this
section.

(
1)
You
own
or
operate
a
batch
process
source
that
is
subject
to
the
emission
limits
specified
in
item
6(
a),
6(
b),

7(
a),
7(
b),
8,
or
9
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart.

(
2)
You
use
an
emissions
profile
to
limit
emission
testing
to
the
3­
hour
peak
emissions
period.

(
3)
You
begin
manufacturing
a
new
refractory
product
for
which
the
organic
HAP
processing
rate
is
likely
to
exceed
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test
on
that
same
source.

6.
Section
63.9812
is
amended
by
revising
paragraphs
(
b)
and
(
c)
as
follows:

§
63.9812
What
notifications
must
I
submit
and
when?

*
*
*
*
*

(
b)
As
specified
in
§
63.9(
b)(
2),
if
you
start
up
your
36
affected
source
before
April
16,
2003,
you
must
submit
an
Initial
Notification
not
later
than
120
calendar
days
after
April
16,
2003.

(
c)
As
specified
in
§
63.9(
b)(
2),
if
you
start
up
your
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source
on
or
after
April
16,

2003,
you
must
submit
an
Initial
Notification
not
later
than
120
calendar
days
after
you
become
subject
to
this
subpart.

*
*
*
*
*

7.
Section
63.9816
is
amended
by
revising
paragraph
(
c)(
9)
as
follows:

§
63.9816
What
records
must
I
keep?

*
*
*
*
*

(
c)
*
*
*

(
1)
*
*
*

(
9)
If
you
operate
a
source
that
is
subject
to
the
THC
emission
limits
specified
in
item
2
or
6
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart
and
is
controlled
with
a
catalytic
oxidizer,
records
of
annual
checks
of
catalyst
activity
levels
and
subsequent
corrective
actions.

*
*
*
*
*

8.
Section
63.9824
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
paragraph
(
3)
and
adding
paragraph
(
4)
to
the
definition
of
Deviation;

b.
Revising
the
definitions
of
Maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate
and
Peak
emissions
period;
and
c.
Adding
the
definitions
of
Comparable
control
37
device,
Shutdown,
and
Startup.

§
63.9824
What
definitions
apply
to
this
subpart?

*
*
*
*
*

Comparable
control
device
means,
subject
to
paragraphs
(
1),(
2)
and
(
3)
of
this
definition,
a
control
device
with
design
and
operating
parameters
that
are
comparable
to
the
reference
control
device.

(
1)
For
a
thermal
oxidizer,
a
comparable
control
device
is
either:

(
i)
A
thermal
oxidizer
with
a
residence
time
at
least
as
long
as,
and
a
combustion
chamber
operating
temperature
at
least
as
high
as
the
reference
thermal
oxidizer;
or
(
ii)
A
control
device
that
has
been
demonstrated
to
control
emissions
to
a
level
that
is
comparable
to
or
better
than
the
level
of
emissions
control
achieved
by
the
reference
thermal
oxidizer.

(
2)
For
a
catalytic
oxidizer,
a
comparable
control
device
is
either:

(
i)
A
catalytic
oxidizer
with
a
space
velocity
no
greater
than,
and
a
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
at
least
as
high
as
the
reference
catalytic
oxidizer;
or
(
ii)
A
control
device
that
has
been
demonstrated
to
control
emissions
to
a
level
that
is
comparable
to
or
better
than
the
level
of
emissions
control
achieved
by
the
reference
catalytic
oxidizer.

(
3)
For
other
control
devices,
a
comparable
control
38
device
is
one
that
has
been
demonstrated
either
through
engineering
calculations
or
emission
testing
to
control
emissions
to
a
level
that
is
comparable
to
or
better
than
the
level
of
control
achieved
by
the
reference
control
device.

*
*
*
*
*

Deviation
*
*
*

(
3)
Fails
to
meet
any
emission
limitation
(
emission
limit,
operating
limit,
or
work
practice
standard)
in
this
subpart
during
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction,
regardless
of
whether
or
not
such
failure
is
permitted
by
this
subpart;

or
(
4)
Fails
to
provide
adequate
monitoring
data
for
demonstrating
compliance
with
any
emission
limitation
(
emission
limit,
operating
limit,
or
work
practice
standard)

or
other
applicable
requirement
established
by
this
subpart
due
to
a
malfunction
or
failure
of
any
CMS
required
by
this
subpart.

*
*
*
*
*

Maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate
means
the
maximum
rate
at
which
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
materials
in
refractory
shapes
are
processed
in
an
affected
process
unit.

(
See
also
the
definition
of
organic
HAP
processing
rate.)

*
*
*
*
*

Peak
emissions
period
means
the
period
of
consecutive
hourly
average
emissions
of
the
applicable
pollutant
that
is
39
greater
than
any
other
period
of
consecutive
hourly
average
emissions
for
the
same
pollutant
over
the
course
of
a
specified
batch
process
cycle,
as
defined
in
paragraphs
(
1)

through
(
3)
of
this
definition.
The
peak
emissions
period
is
a
function
of
the
rate
at
which
the
temperature
of
the
refractory
shapes
is
increased,
the
mass
and
loading
configuration
of
the
shapes
in
the
process
unit,
the
constituents
of
the
refractory
mix,
and
the
type
of
pollutants
emitted.

(
1)
The
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period
is
the
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
over
which
the
sum
of
the
uncontrolled
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
is
greater
than
the
sum
of
the
uncontrolled
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
for
any
other
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
during
the
same
batch
process
cycle.

(
2)
The
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period
is
the
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
over
which
the
sum
of
the
THC
concentrations,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
is
greater
than
the
sum
of
the
THC
concentrations
at
the
same
sampling
location,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
for
any
other
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
during
the
same
batch
process
cycle.

(
3)
The
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period
is
the
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
over
which
the
sum
of
the
uncontrolled
hourly
HF
mass
emissions
rates
is
greater
than
the
sum
of
the
uncontrolled
hourly
HF
mass
emissions
rates
40
for
any
other
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
during
the
same
batch
process
cycle.

*
*
*
*
*

Shutdown
means
the
cessation
of
operation
of
an
affected
source.
For
an
affected
batch
process
source,

shutdown
means
the
cessation
of
operation
during
a
batch
cycle.
Shutdown
does
not
include
normal
periods
between
batch
cycles
when
the
batch
process
source
is
not
in
operation.

Startup
means
the
setting
into
operation
of
an
affected
source.
For
an
affected
batch
process
source,
startup
means
the
initial
startup
of
the
source
or
the
startup
of
the
source
following
maintenance,
replacement
of
equipment,
or
equipment
repairs.
Startup
does
not
include
routine
recharging
of
a
batch
process
source
at
the
start
of
a
batch
cycle.

*
*
*
*
*

9.
Table
1
to
subpart
SSSSS
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
items
6.
a
and
b;

b.
Revising
items
7.
a
and
b;

c.
Revising
item
8;

d.
Revising
item
9;
and
e.
Revising
items
11.
a
and
b.

Table
1
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63­­
Emission
Limits
As
stated
in
§
63.9788,
you
must
comply
with
the
emission
limits
for
affected
sources
in
the
following
table:
41
For
....
You
must
meet
the
following
emission
limits...

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

6.
Batch
process
units
that
are
controlled
with
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer.
a.
The
2­
run
block
average
THC
concentration
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period
must
not
exceed
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device;
OR
b.
The
2­
run
block
average
THC
mass
emissions
rate
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period
must
be
reduced
by
at
least
95
percent.

7.
Batch
process
units
that
are
equipped
with
a
control
device
other
than
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer.
a.
The
2­
run
block
average
THC
concentration
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period
must
not
exceed
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device;
OR
b.
The
2­
run
block
average
THC
mass
emissions
rate
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period
must
be
reduced
by
at
least
95
percent.

8.
Batch
process
units
that
use
process
changes
to
reduce
organic
HAP
emissions.
The
2­
run
block
average
THC
concentration
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period
must
not
exceed
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
at
the
outlet
of
the
process
gas
stream.

9.
Batch
process
kilns
that
are
not
equipped
with
a
control
device.
The
2­
run
block
average
THC
concentration
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period
must
not
exceed
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
at
the
outlet
of
the
process
gas
stream.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
11.
Each
new
batch
process
kiln
that
is
used
to
produce
clay
refractory
products.
a.
The
2­
run
block
average
HF
mass
emissions
rate
for
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period
must
be
reduced
by
at
least
90
percent;
AND
b.
The
2­
run
block
average
HCl
mass
emissions
rate
for
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period
must
be
reduced
by
at
least
30
percent.

10.
Table
2
to
subpart
SSSSS
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
item
1.
c;

b.
Revising
item
4;

c.
Revising
7;

d.
Revising
items
8.
a
and
b
and
adding
items
8.
c
through
e;

e.
Revising
items
9.
a
and
b,
and
adding
new
items
9.
d
through
f;
and
f.
Deleting
item
11.
b
and
renumbering
items
11.
c
and
d
as
items
11.
b
and
c,
respectively.

Table
2
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63­­
Operating
Limits
As
stated
in
§
63.9788,
you
must
comply
with
the
operating
limits
for
affected
sources
in
the
following
table:

For...
You
must...

1.
Each
affected
source
listed
in
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
a.
Operate
all
affected
sources
according
to
the
requirements
to
this
subpart
on
and
after
the
date
on
which
the
initial
performance
test
is
conducted
or
required
to
be
conducted,
whichever
date
is
earlier;
AND
b.
Capture
emissions
and
vent
them
through
a
closed
system;
AND
c.
Operate
each
control
device
that
is
required
to
comply
with
this
subpart
on
each
affected
source
during
all
periods
that
the
43
source
is
operating,
except
where
specified
in
§
63.9792(
e)
and
(
f),
item
2
of
this
table,
and
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
d.
Record
all
operating
parameters
specified
in
Table
8
to
this
subpart
for
the
affected
source;
AND
e.
Prepare
and
implement
a
written
OM&
M
plan
as
specified
in
§
63.9792(
d).

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

4.
Each
affected
continuous
process
unit.
Maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
organic
HAP
processing
rate
(
pounds
per
hour)
at
or
below
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

7.
Each
affected
batch
process
unit.
For
each
batch
cycle,
maintain
the
organic
HAP
processing
rate
(
pounds
per
batch)
at
or
below
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.

8.
Batch
process
units
that
are
equipped
with
a
thermal
oxidizer.
a.
Except
as
specified
in
item
8.
b.
of
this
table,
maintain
throughout
the
entire
batch
cycle
the
hourly
average
operating
temperature
in
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
operating
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
11
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
b.
If
complying
with
the
provisions
for
reducing
the
thermal
oxidizer
operating
temperature,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
satisfy
the
requirements
of
items
8.
c.
through
8.
e.
of
this
table;
c.
From
the
start
of
the
batch
cycle
until
the
batch
process
unit
44
reaches
its
maximum
temperature,
maintain
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
11
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
d.
From
the
time
when
the
batch
process
unit
reaches
its
maximum
temperature,
maintain
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
11
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
for
a
length
of
time
that
equals
or
exceeds
the
length
of
time
between
the
process
unit
reaching
its
maximum
temperature
and
the
start
of
the
thermal
oxidizer
temperature
reduction
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
e.
For
the
remainder
of
the
batch
process
cycle,
maintain
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
at
or
above
the
reduced
thermal
oxidizer
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart.

9.
Batch
process
units
that
are
equipped
with
a
catalytic
oxidizer.
a.
Except
as
specified
in
item
9.
b.
of
this
table,
maintain
throughout
the
entire
batch
cycle
the
hourly
average
operating
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
operating
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
12
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
b.
If
complying
with
the
provisions
for
reducing
the
catalytic
oxidizer
operating
temperature,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
satisfy
the
requirements
of
items
45
9.
d
through
9.
f
of
this
table;
AND
c.
Check
the
activity
level
of
the
catalyst
at
least
every
12
months.
d.
From
the
start
of
the
batch
cycle
until
the
batch
process
unit
reaches
its
maximum
temperature,
maintain
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
12
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
e.
From
the
time
when
the
batch
process
unit
reaches
its
maximum
temperature,
maintain
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
12
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
for
a
length
of
time
that
equals
or
exceeds
the
length
of
time
between
the
process
unit
reaching
its
maximum
temperature
and
the
start
of
the
catalytic
oxidizer
temperature
reduction
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
f.
For
the
remainder
of
the
batch
process
cycle,
maintain
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed
at
or
above
the
reduced
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

11.
Each
affected
kiln
that
is
equipped
with
a
DLA.
a.
Maintain
the
3­
hour
block
average
pressure
drop
across
the
DLA
at
or
above
the
minimum
levels
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
b.
Maintain
the
limestone
feeder
at
or
above
the
level
established
46
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
c.
Use
the
same
grade
of
limestone
from
the
same
source
as
was
used
during
the
most
recent
performance
test
and
maintain
records
of
the
source
and
type
of
limestone
used.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

11.
Table
4
to
subpart
SSSSS
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:

Table
4
to
Subpart
SSSSS
to
Part
63­­
Requirements
for
Performance
Tests
As
stated
in
§
63.9800,
you
must
comply
with
the
requirements
for
performance
tests
for
affected
sources
in
the
following
table:

For...
You
must...
Using...
According
to
the
following
requirements...

1.
Each
affected
source
listed
in
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
a.
Conduct
performance
tests.
i.
The
requirement
s
of
the
general
provisions
in
subpart
A
of
this
part
and
the
requirement
s
to
this
subpart.
(
1)
Record
the
date
of
the
test;
AND
(
2)
Identify
the
emission
source
that
is
tested;
AND
(
3)
Collect
and
record
the
corresponding
operating
parameter
and
emission
test
data
listed
in
this
table
for
each
run
of
the
performance
test;
AND
(
4)
Repeat
the
performance
test
at
least
every
5
years;
AND
(
5)
Repeat
the
performance
test
before
changing
the
parameter
value
for
47
any
operating
limit
specified
in
your
OM&
M
plan;
AND
(
6)
If
complying
with
the
THC
concentration
or
THC
percentage
reduction
limits
specified
in
items
2
through
9
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
repeat
the
performance
test
under
the
conditions
specified
in
items
2.
a.
2.
and
2.
a.
3.
of
this
table;
AND
(
7)
If
complying
with
the
emission
limits
for
new
clay
refractory
products
kilns
specified
in
items
10
and
11
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
repeat
the
performance
test
under
the
conditions
specified
in
items
14.
a.
i.
4.
and
17.
a.
i.
4.
of
this
table.

b.
Select
the
locations
of
sampling
ports
and
the
number
of
traverse
points.
i.
Method
1
or
1A
of
40
CFR,
part
60,
appendix
A.
(
1)
To
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
percentage
reduction
limits
specified
in
items
2.
b.,
3.
b.,
6.
b.,
7.
b.,
10,
and
11
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
OR
to
develop
an
emissions
profile,
OR
to
satisfy
the
requirements
of
item
13.
a.
of
this
table,
locate
48
sampling
sites
at
the
inlet
of
the
control
device
and
at
either
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
at
the
stack
prior
to
any
releases
to
the
atmosphere;
AND
(
2)
To
demonstrate
compliance
with
any
other
emission
limit
specified
in
Table
1
to
this
subpart,
locate
all
sampling
sites
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
at
the
stack
prior
to
any
releases
to
the
atmosphere.

c.
Determine
gas
velocity
and
volumetric
flow
rate.
Method
2,
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
or
2G
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A.
Measure
gas
velocities
and
volumetric
flow
rates
at
1­
hr
intervals
throughout
each
test
run.

d.
Conduct
gas
molecular
weight
analysis.
(
i)
Method
3,
3A,
or
3B
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
As
specified
in
the
applicable
test
method.

(
ii)
ASME
PTC
19.10­
1981­
Part
10.
You
may
use
ASME
PTC
19.10­
1981­
Part
10
(
available
for
purchase
from
Three
Park
Avenue,
New
York,
NY
10016­
5990)
as
an
alternative
to
EPA
Method
3B.

e.
Measure
gas
moisture
Method
4
of
40
CFR
part
60,
As
specified
in
the
applicable
test
method.
49
content.
appendix
A.

2.
Each
new
or
existing
curing
oven,
shape
dryer,
and
kiln
that
is
used
to
process
refractory
products
that
use
organic
HAP;
each
new
or
existing
coking
oven
and
defumer
that
is
used
to
produce
pitchimpregnated
refractory
products;
each
new
shape
preheater
that
is
used
to
produce
pitchimpregnated
refractory
products;
AND
each
new
or
existing
process
unit
that
is
exhausted
to
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer
that
also
controls
emissions
from
an
a.
Conduct
performance
tests.
(
1)
Conduct
the
performance
test
while
the
source
is
operating
at
the
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate,
as
defined
in
§
63.9824,
reasonably
expected
to
occur;
AND
(
2)
Repeat
the
performance
test
before
starting
production
of
any
product
for
which
the
organic
HAP
processing
rate
is
likely
to
exceed
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
specified
in
§
63.9798(
c);
AND
(
3)
Repeat
the
performance
test
on
any
affected
uncontrolled
kiln
following
process
changes
(
e.
g.,
shorter
curing
oven
cycle
time)
that
could
increase
organic
HAP
emissions
from
the
affected
kiln,
as
specified
in
§
63.9798(
d).
50
affected
shape
preheater
or
pitch
working
tank.

b.
Satisfy
the
applicable
requirement
s
listed
in
items
3
through
13
of
this
table.

3.
Each
affected
continuous
process
unit.
a.
Perform
a
minimum
of
3
test
runs.
The
appropriate
test
methods
specified
in
items
1,
4,
and
5
of
this
table.
Each
test
run
must
be
at
least
1
hour
in
duration.

b.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate.
i.
Method
311
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A,
OR
material
safety
data
sheets
(
MSDS),
OR
product
labels
to
determine
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
each
resin,
binder,
or
additive;
AND
ii.
Product
formulation
data
that
specify
the
mass
fraction
of
(
1)
Calculate
and
record
the
organic
HAP
content
of
all
refractory
shapes
that
are
processed
during
the
performance
test,
based
on
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
the
resins,
binders,
or
additives;
the
mass
fraction
of
each
resin,
binder,
or
additive,
in
the
product;
and
the
process
feed
rate;
AND
(
2)
Calculate
and
record
the
organic
HAP
processing
rate
(
pounds
per
hour)
for
each
test
run;
AND
(
3)
Calculate
and
record
the
maximum
51
each
resin,
binder,
and
additive
in
the
products
that
are
processed
during
the
performance
test;
AND
iii.
Process
feed
rate
data
(
tons
per
hour).
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
as
110%
of
the
average
of
the
organic
HAP
processing
rates
for
the
three
test
runs.

c.
Record
the
operating
temperature
of
the
affected
source.
Process
data.
During
each
test
run
and
at
least
once
per
hour,
record
the
operating
temperature
in
the
highest
temperature
zone
of
the
affected
source.

4.
Each
continuous
process
unit
that
is
subject
to
the
THC
emission
limit
listed
in
item
2.
a.,
3.
a.,
4,
or
5
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
a.
Measure
THC
concentrati
ons
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
in
the
stack.
i.
Method
25A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A.
(
1)
Each
minute,
measure
and
record
the
concentrations
of
THC
in
the
exhaust
stream;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
50
1­
minute
measurements
for
each
valid
hourly
average
THC
concentration.

b.
Measure
oxygen
concentrati
ons
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
in
the
stack.
i.
Method
3A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A.
(
1)
Each
minute,
measure
and
record
the
concentrations
of
oxygen
in
the
exhaust
stream;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
50
1­
minute
measurements
for
each
valid
hourly
52
average
oxygen
concentration.

c.
Determine
the
hourly
average
THC
concentrati
on,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.
i.
Equation
1
of
§
63.9800(
g)
(
1);
AND
ii.
The
1­
minute
THC
and
oxygen
concentrati
on
data.
(
1)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
THC
concentration
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test
as
the
average
of
the
1­
minute
THC
measurements;
AND
(
2)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
oxygen
concentration
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test
as
the
average
of
the
1­
minute
oxygen
measurements;
AND
(
3)
Correct
the
hourly
average
THC
concentrations
to
18
percent
oxygen
using
Equation
1
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
1).

d.
Determine
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
emission
concentrati
on,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.
The
hourly
average
concentrati
on
of
THC,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
for
each
test
run.
Calculate
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
emission
concentration,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
average
THC
emission
concentrations,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.

5.
Each
continuous
process
unit
that
is
subject
to
the
THC
percentage
reduction
limit
listed
in
a.
Measure
THC
concentrati
ons
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device.
i.
Method
25A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A.
(
1)
Each
minute,
measure
and
record
the
concentrations
of
THC
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
50
1­
minute
measurements
for
53
item
2.
b.
or
3.
b.
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
each
valid
hourly
average
THC
concentration
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet.

b.
Determine
the
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device.
i.
The
1­
minute
THC
concentrati
on
data
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet;
AND
ii.
The
volumetric
flow
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet.
Calculate
the
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test.

c.
Determine
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
percentage
reduction.
i.
The
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device.
(
1)
Calculate
the
hourly
THC
percentage
reduction
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
1);
AND
(
2)
Calculate
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
percentage
reduction.

6.
Each
continuous
process
unit
that
is
equipped
with
a
thermal
oxidizer.
a.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
minimum
allowable
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
.
i.
Continuous
recording
of
the
output
of
the
combustion
chamber
temperature
measurement
device.
(
1)
At
least
every
15
minutes,
measure
and
record
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
one
measurement
during
at
least
three
15­
minute
periods
per
hour
of
testing;
54
AND
(
3)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test;
AND
(
4)
Calculate
the
minimum
allowable
combustion
chamber
temperature
as
the
average
of
the
combustion
chamber
temperatures
for
the
three
test
runs,
minus
14

C
(
25

F).

7.
Each
continuous
process
unit
that
is
equipped
with
a
catalytic
oxidizer.
a.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed.
i.
Continuous
recording
of
the
output
of
the
temperature
measurement
device.
(
1)
At
least
every
15
minutes,
measure
and
record
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
one
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
measurement
during
at
least
three
15­
minute
periods
per
hour
of
testing;
AND
(
3)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test;
AND
(
4)
Calculate
the
minimum
allowable
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
as
the
average
of
the
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperatures
for
the
three
test
55
runs,
minus
14

C
(
25

F).

8.
Each
affected
batch
process
unit.
a.
Perform
a
minimum
of
2
test
runs.
i.
The
appropriate
test
methods
specified
in
items
1,
9,
and
10
of
this
table.
(
1)
Each
test
run
must
be
conducted
over
a
separate
batch
cycle
unless
you
satisfy
the
requirements
of
§
63.9800(
f)(
3)
and
(
4);
AND
(
2)
Each
test
run
must
begin
with
the
start
of
a
batch
cycle,
except
as
specified
in
item
8.
a.
i.
4.
of
this
table;
AND
(
3)
Each
test
run
must
continue
until
the
end
of
the
batch
cycle,
except
as
specified
in
items
8.
a.
i.
4.
and
8.
a.
i.
5.
of
this
table;
AND
(
4)
If
you
develop
an
emissions
profile,
as
described
in
§
63.9802(
a)(
1),
you
can
limit
each
test
run
to
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period;
AND
(
5)
If
you
do
not
develop
an
emissions
profile,
a
test
run
can
be
stopped,
and
the
results
of
that
run
considered
complete,
if
either
of
the
following
provisions
are
met:
i)
you
measure
emissions
56
continuously
until
at
least
3
hours
after
the
affected
process
unit
has
reached
maximum
temperature,
AND
the
hourly
average
THC
mass
emissions
rate
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
in
the
stack
has
not
increased
during
the
3­
hour
period
since
maximum
process
temperature
was
reached,
AND
the
applicable
emission
limit
specified
in
items
6
through
9
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart
was
met
during
each
of
the
3
hours
since
maximum
process
temperature
was
reached,
OR,
ii)
for
sources
equipped
with
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer,
at
least
1
hour
has
passed
since
any
reduction
in
the
operating
temperature
of
the
oxidizer,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
this
table.

b.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
maximum
organic
HAP
processing
rate.
i.
Method
311
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A,
OR
MSDS,
OR
product
labels
to
determine
the
mass
(
1)
Calculate
and
record
the
organic
HAP
content
of
all
refractory
shapes
that
are
processed
during
the
performance
test,
based
on
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
the
resins,
57
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
each
resin,
binder,
or
additive;
AND
ii.
Product
formulation
data
that
specify
the
mass
fraction
of
each
resin,
binder,
and
additive
in
the
products
that
are
processed
during
the
performance
test;
AND
iii.
Batch
weight
(
tons).
binders,
or
additives;
the
mass
fraction
of
each
resin,
binder,
or
additive,
in
the
product,
and
the
batch
weight
prior
to
processing;
AND
(
2)
Calculate
and
record
the
organic
HAP
processing
rate
(
pounds
per
batch)
for
each
test
run;
AND
(
3)
Calculate
and
record
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
as
110%
of
the
average
of
the
organic
HAP
processing
rates
for
the
two
test
runs.

c.
Record
the
batch
cycle
time.
Process
data.
Record
the
total
elapsed
time
from
the
start
to
the
completion
of
the
batch
cycle.

d.
Record
the
operating
temperature
of
the
affected
source.
Process
data.
Record
the
operating
temperature
of
the
affected
source
at
least
once
every
hour
from
the
start
to
the
completion
of
the
batch
cycle.
58
9.
Each
batch
process
unit
that
is
subject
to
the
THC
emission
limit
listed
in
item
6.
a.,
7.
a.,
8,
or
9
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
a.
Measure
THC
concentrati
ons
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
in
the
stack.
i.
Method
25A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A.
(
1)
Each
minute,
measure
and
record
the
concentrations
of
THC
in
the
exhaust
stream;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
50
1­
minute
measurements
for
each
valid
hourly
average
THC
concentration.

b.
Measure
oxygen
concentrati
ons
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
in
the
stack.
i.
Method
3A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A.
(
1)
Each
minute,
measure
and
record
the
concentrations
of
oxygen
in
the
exhaust
stream;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
50
1­
minute
measurements
for
each
valid
hourly
average
oxygen
concentration.

c.
Determine
the
hourly
average
THC
concentrati
on,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.
i.
Equation
1
of
§
63.9800(
g)
(
1);
AND
ii.
The
1­
minute
THC
and
oxygen
concentrati
on
data.
(
1)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
THC
concentration
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test
as
the
average
of
the
1­
minute
THC
measurements;
AND
(
2)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
oxygen
concentration
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test
as
the
average
of
the
1­
minute
oxygen
measurements;
AND
(
3)
Correct
the
hourly
average
THC
concentrations
to
18
percent
oxygen
using
Equation
1
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
1).
59
d.
Determine
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentrati
on
period
for
each
test
run.
The
hourly
average
THC
concentrati
ons,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.
Select
the
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
over
which
the
sum
of
the
hourly
average
THC
concentrations,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
at
the
control
device
outlet
or
in
the
stack
is
greater
than
the
sum
of
the
hourly
average
THC
emission
concentrations,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
at
the
control
device
outlet
or
in
the
stack
for
any
other
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
during
the
test
run.

e.
Determine
the
average
THC
concentrati
on,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
for
each
test
run.
The
hourly
average
THC
emission
concentrati
ons,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentrati
on
period.
Calculate
the
average
of
the
hourly
average
THC
concentrations,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
for
the
3
hours
of
the
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period
for
each
test
run.

f.
Determine
the
2­
run
block
average
THC
concentrati
on,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
for
The
average
THC
concentrati
on,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
for
each
test
run.
Calculate
the
average
of
the
average
THC
concentrations,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
for
the
two
test
runs.
60
the
emission
test.

10.
Each
batch
process
unit
that
is
subject
to
the
THC
percentage
reduction
limit
listed
in
item
6.
b.
or
7.
b.
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
a.
Measure
THC
concentrati
ons
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device.
i.
Method
25A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A.
(
1)
Each
minute,
measure
and
record
the
concentrations
of
THC
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
50
1­
minute
measurements
for
each
valid
hourly
average
THC
concentration
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet.

b.
Determine
the
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet.
i.
The
1­
minute
THC
concentrati
on
data
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet;
AND
ii.
The
volumetric
flow
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet.
(
1)
Calculate
the
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test.

c.
Determine
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period
for
each
test
run.
The
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet.
Select
the
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
over
which
the
sum
of
the
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
is
greater
than
the
sum
of
the
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
for
any
other
period
of
3
61
consecutive
hours
during
the
test
run.

d.
Determine
the
average
THC
percentage
reduction
for
each
test
run.
i.
Equation
2
of
§
63.9800(
g)
(
2);
AND
ii.
The
hourly
THC
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period.
Calculate
the
average
THC
percentage
reduction
for
each
test
run
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
2).

e.
Determine
the
2­
run
block
average
THC
percentage
reduction
for
the
emission
test.
The
average
THC
percentage
reduction
for
each
test
run.
Calculate
the
average
of
the
average
THC
percentage
reductions
for
the
two
test
runs.

f.
If
complying
with
the
provisions
for
reducing
the
thermal
oxidizer
operating
temperature
,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
measure
the
i.
Method
3A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A.
(
1)
Each
minute,
measure
and
record
the
concentrations
of
oxygen
in
the
exhaust
stream;
AND
(
2)
Calculate
each
hourly
average
oxygen
concentration
using
at
least
50
1­
minute
measurements
for
each
valid
hourly
average
oxygen
concentration.
62
oxygen
concentrati
on
at
the
inlet
to
the
control
device.

11.
Each
batch
process
unit
that
is
equipped
with
a
thermal
oxidizer.
a.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
minimum
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
.
i.
Continuous
recording
of
the
output
of
the
combustion
chamber
temperature
measurement
device.
(
1)
At
least
every
15
minutes
of
each
entire
test
run,
measure
and
record
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
one
temperature
measurement
during
at
least
three
15­
minute
periods
per
hour
of
testing;
AND
(
3)
For
each
test
run,
calculate
the
hourly
average
combustion
chamber
temperature
for
each
hour
of
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period
or
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period,
as
defined
in
§
63.9824,
whichever
applies;
AND
(
4)
Calculate
the
average
combustion
chamber
temperature
for
the
applicable
3­
hour
peak
emissions
period
for
each
test
run
using
the
average
hourly
combustion
chamber
temperatures
for
63
the
applicable
3­
hour
peak
emissions
period;
AND
(
5)
Calculate
the
minimum
allowable
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
operating
temperature
as
the
average
of
the
average
combustion
chamber
temperatures
for
the
applicable
3­
hour
peak
emissions
period
for
the
two
test
runs,
minus
14

C
(
25

F).

12.
Each
batch
process
unit
that
is
equipped
with
a
catalytic
oxidizer.
a.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed.
i.
Continuous
recording
of
the
output
of
the
temperature
measurement
device.
(
1)
At
least
every
15
minutes
of
each
entire
test
run,
measure
and
record
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
one
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
measurement
during
at
least
three
15­
minute
periods
per
hour
of
testing;
AND
(
3)
For
each
test
run,
calculate
the
hourly
average
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
for
each
hour
of
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period
or
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period,
as
defined
in
§
63.9824,
whichever
64
applies;
AND
(
4)
Calculate
the
average
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
for
the
applicable
3­
hour
peak
emissions
period
for
each
test
run
using
the
average
hourly
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperatures
for
the
applicable
3­
hour
peak
emissions
period;
AND
(
5)
Calculate
the
minimum
allowable
catalyst
bed
inlet
operating
temperature
as
the
average
of
the
average
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperatures
for
the
applicable
3­
hour
peak
emissions
period
for
the
two
test
runs,
minus
14

C
(
25

F).

13.
Each
batch
process
unit
that
is
equipped
with
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer.
a.
During
each
test
run,
maintain
the
applicable
operating
temperature
of
the
oxidizer
until
emission
levels
allow
the
oxidizer
to
be
shut
off
or
the
operating
temperature
(
1)
The
oxidizer
can
be
shut
off
or
the
oxidizer
operating
temperature
can
be
reduced
if
you
do
not
use
an
emissions
profile
to
limit
testing
to
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period,
as
specified
in
item
8.
a.
i.
4.
of
this
table;
AND
(
2)
At
least
3
hours
have
passed
since
the
affected
65
of
the
oxidizer
to
be
reduced.
process
unit
reached
maximum
temperature;
AND
(
3)
The
applicable
emission
limit
specified
in
item
6.
a.
or
6.
b.
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart
was
met
during
each
of
the
previous
three
1­
hour
periods;
AND
(
4)
The
hourly
average
THC
mass
emissions
rate
at
the
control
device
inlet
did
not
increase
during
the
3­
hour
period
that
immediately
preceded
the
oxidizer
temperature
reduction;
AND
(
5)
The
THC
concentration
at
the
oxidizer
inlet
did
not
exceed
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
during
each
of
the
four
15­
minute
periods
immediately
following
the
oxidizer
temperature
reduction;
AND
(
6)
If
the
THC
concentration
exceeded
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
during
any
of
the
four
15­
minute
periods
immediately
following
the
oxidizer
66
temperature
reduction,
you
must
return
the
oxidizer
to
its
normal
operating
temperature
as
soon
as
possible
and
maintain
that
temperature
for
at
least
1
hour;
AND
(
7)
Continue
the
test
run
until
the
THC
concentration
at
the
oxidizer
inlet
is
no
more
than
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen,
for
at
least
four
consecutive
15­
minute
periods
that
immediately
follow
the
oxidizer
temperature
reduction.

14.
Each
new
continuous
kiln
that
is
used
to
process
clay
refractory
products.
a.
Measure
emissions
of
HF
and
HCl.
i.
Method
26A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
ii.
Method
26
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
iii.
Method
320
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A.
(
1)
Conduct
the
test
while
the
kiln
is
operating
at
the
maximum
production
level
and
is
processing
the
refractory
product
with
the
highest
uncalcined
clay
processing
rate,
as
specified
in
item
15.
a.
of
this
table;
AND
(
2)
You
may
use
Method
26
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A,
only
if
no
acid
PM
(
e.
g.,
HF
or
HCl
dissolved
in
water
droplets
emitted
by
sources
controlled
by
a
wet
scrubber)
is
present;
67
AND
(
3)
If
you
use
Method
320
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A,
you
must
follow
the
analyte
spiking
procedures
of
Section
13
of
Method
320
unless
you
can
demonstrate
that
the
complete
spiking
procedure
has
been
conducted
at
a
similar
source;
AND
(
4)
Repeat
the
performance
test
if
the
affected
source
is
controlled
with
a
DLA
and
you
change
the
source
of
the
limestone
used
in
the
DLA.

b.
Perform
a
minimum
of
3
test
runs.
The
appropriate
test
methods
specified
in
items
1
and
14.
a.
of
this
table.
Each
test
run
must
be
at
least
1
hour
in
duration.

15.
Each
new
continuous
kiln
that
is
subject
to
the
productionbased
HF
and
HCl
emission
limits
specified
in
items
10.
a.
and
10.
b.
of
a.
Record
the
uncalcined
clay
processing
rate.
i.
Production
data;
AND
ii.
Product
formulation
data
that
specify
the
mass
fraction
of
uncalcined
clay
in
the
products
that
are
processed
(
1)
Record
the
production
rate
(
tons
per
hour
of
fired
product);
AND
(
2)
Calculate
and
record
the
average
rate
at
which
uncalcined
clay
is
processed
(
tons
per
hour)
for
each
test
run.
68
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
during
the
performance
test.

b.
Determine
the
HF
mass
emissions
rate
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
in
the
stack.
i.
Method
26A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
ii.
Method
26
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
iii.
Method
320
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A.
Calculate
the
HF
mass
emissions
rate
for
each
test
run.

c.
Determine
the
3­
hour
block
average
productionbased
HF
emissions
rate.
i.
The
HF
mass
emissions
rate
for
each
test
run;
AND
ii.
The
average
uncalcined
clay
processing
rate.
(
1)
Calculate
the
hourly
productionbased
HF
emissions
rate
for
each
test
run
using
Equation
3
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
3);
AND
(
2)
Calculate
the
3­
hour
block
average
productionbased
HF
emissions
rate
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
production­
based
HF
emissions
rates
for
each
test
run.

d.
Determine
the
HCl
mass
emissions
rate
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
in
the
stack.
i.
Method
26A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
ii.
Method
26
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
Calculate
the
HCl
mass
emissions
rate
for
each
test
run.
69
iii.
Method
320
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A.

e.
Determine
the
3­
hour
block
average
productionbased
HCl
emissions
rate.
i.
The
HCl
mass
emissions
rate
for
each
test
run;
AND
ii.
The
average
uncalcined
clay
processing
rate.
(
1)
Calculate
the
hourly
productionbased
HCl
emissions
rate
for
each
test
run
using
Equation
3
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
3);
AND
(
2)
Calculate
the
3­
hour
block
average
productionbased
HCl
emissions
rate
as
the
average
of
the
productionbased
HCl
emissions
rates
for
each
test
run.

16.
Each
new
continuous
kiln
that
is
subject
to
the
HF
and
HCl
percentage
reduction
limits
specified
in
items
10.
a.
and
10.
b.
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
a.
Measure
the
HF
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device.
i.
Method
26A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
ii.
Method
26
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
iii.
Method
320
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A.
Calculate
the
HF
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet
for
each
test
run.

b.
Determine
the
3­
hour
block
average
HF
percentage
reduction.
i.
The
HF
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device
for
each
test
(
1)
Calculate
the
hourly
HF
percentage
reduction
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
2);
AND
(
2)
Calculate
the
3­
hour
block
average
HF
70
run.
percentage
reduction
as
the
average
of
the
HF
percentage
reductions
for
each
test
run.

c.
Measure
the
HCl
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device.
i.
Method
26A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
ii.
Method
26
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
iii.
Method
320
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A.
Calculate
the
HCl
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
and
outlet
for
each
test
run.

d.
Determine
the
3­
hour
block
average
HCl
percentage
reduction.
i.
The
HCl
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device
for
each
test
run.
(
1)
Calculate
the
hourly
HCl
percentage
reduction
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
2);
AND
(
2)
Calculate
the
3­
hour
block
average
HCl
percentage
reduction
as
the
average
of
HCl
percentage
reductions
for
each
test
run.

17.
Each
new
batch
process
kiln
that
is
used
to
process
clay
refractory
products.
a.
Measure
emissions
of
HF
and
HCl
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device.
i.
Method
26A
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A;
OR
ii.
Method
26
of
40
CFR
part
60,
(
1)
Conduct
the
test
while
the
kiln
is
operating
at
the
maximum
production
level
and
is
processing
the
refractory
product
with
the
highest
uncalcined
clay
processing
rate,
as
71
appendix
A;
OR
iii.
Method
320
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A.
specified
in
item
15.
a.
of
this
table;
AND
(
2)
You
may
use
Method
26
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A,
only
if
no
acid
PM
(
e.
g.,
HF
or
HCl
dissolved
in
water
droplets
emitted
by
sources
controlled
by
a
wet
scrubber)
is
present;
AND
(
3)
If
you
use
Method
320
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A,
you
must
follow
the
analyte
spiking
procedures
of
Section
13
of
Method
320
unless
you
can
demonstrate
that
the
complete
spiking
procedure
has
been
conducted
at
a
similar
source;
AND
(
4)
Repeat
the
performance
test
if
the
affected
source
is
controlled
with
a
DLA
and
you
change
the
source
of
the
limestone
used
in
the
DLA.

b.
Perform
a
minimum
of
2
test
runs.
i.
The
appropriate
test
methods
specified
in
items
1
and
17.
a.
of
this
table.
(
1)
Each
test
run
must
be
conducted
over
a
separate
batch
cycle
unless
you
satisfy
the
requirements
of
§
63.9800(
f)(
3)
and
(
4);
AND
(
2)
Each
test
run
must
consist
of
a
72
series
of
1­
hour
runs
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device,
beginning
with
the
start
of
a
batch
cycle,
except
as
specified
in
item
17.
b.
i.
4.
of
this
table;
AND
(
3)
Each
test
run
must
continue
until
the
end
of
the
batch
cycle,
except
as
specified
in
item
17.
b.
i.
4.
of
this
table;
AND
(
4)
If
you
develop
an
emissions
profile,
as
described
in
§
63.9802(
a)(
2),
you
can
limit
each
test
run
to
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period.

c.
Determine
the
hourly
HF
and
HCl
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device
i.
The
appropriate
test
methods
specified
in
items
1
and
17.
a.
of
this
table.
Determine
the
hourly
mass
HF
and
HCl
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device
for
each
hour
of
each
test
run.

d.
Determine
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period.
The
hourly
HF
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
of
the
control
device.
Select
the
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
over
which
the
sum
of
the
hourly
HF
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
is
greater
than
the
sum
of
the
73
hourly
HF
mass
emissions
rates
at
the
control
device
inlet
for
any
other
period
of
3
consecutive
hours
during
the
test
run.

e.
Determine
the
2­
run
block
average
HF
percentage
reduction
for
the
emissions
test.
i.
The
hourly
average
HF
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
device.
(
1)
Calculate
the
HF
percentage
reduction
for
each
hour
of
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
2);
AND
(
2)
Calculate
the
average
HF
percentage
reduction
for
each
test
run
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
HF
percentage
reductions
for
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period
for
that
run;
AND
(
3)
Calculate
the
2­
run
block
average
HF
percentage
reduction
for
the
emission
test
as
the
average
of
the
average
HF
percentage
reductions
for
the
two
test
runs.

f.
Determine
the
2­
run
block
average
HCl
percentage
reduction
for
the
emission
i.
The
hourly
average
HCl
emissions
rates
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
control
(
1)
Calculate
the
HCl
percentage
reduction
for
each
hour
of
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.9800(
g)(
2);
AND
74
test.
device.
(
2)
Calculate
the
average
HCl
percentage
reduction
for
each
test
run
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
HCl
percentage
reductions
for
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period
for
that
run;
AND
AND
(
3)
Calculate
the
2­
run
block
average
HCl
percentage
reduction
for
the
emission
test
as
the
average
of
the
average
HCl
percentage
reductions
for
the
two
test
runs.

18.
Each
new
kiln
that
is
used
to
process
clay
refractory
products
and
is
equipped
with
a
DLA.
a.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
minimum
pressure
drop
across
the
DLA.
i.
Data
from
the
pressure
drop
measurement
device
during
the
performance
test.
(
1)
At
least
every
15
minutes,
measure
the
pressure
drop
across
the
DLA;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
one
pressure
drop
measurement
during
at
least
three
15­
minute
periods
per
hour
of
testing;
AND
(
3)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
pressure
drop
across
the
DLA
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test;
AND
(
4)
Calculate
and
record
the
minimum
pressure
drop
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
average
pressure
drops
75
across
the
DLA
for
the
two
or
three
test
runs,
whichever
applies.

b.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
limestone
feeder
setting.
i.
Data
from
the
limestone
feeder
during
the
performance
test.
(
1)
Establish
the
limestone
feeder
setting
1
week
prior
to
the
performance
test;
AND
(
2)
Record
and
maintain
the
feeder
setting
for
the
1­
week
period
that
precedes
the
performance
test
and
during
the
performance
test.

19.
Each
new
kiln
that
is
used
to
process
clay
refractory
products
and
is
equipped
with
a
DIFF
or
DLS/
FF.
a.
Document
conformance
with
specificati
ons
and
requirement
s
of
the
bag
leak
detection
system.
Data
from
the
installatio
n
and
calibration
of
the
bag
leak
detection
system.
Submit
analyses
and
supporting
documentation
demonstrating
conformance
with
EPA
guidance
and
specifications
for
bag
leak
detection
systems
as
part
of
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.

b.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
lime
feeder
setting.
i.
Data
from
the
lime
feeder
during
the
performance
test.
(
1)
For
continuous
lime
injection
systems,
ensure
that
lime
in
the
feed
hopper
or
silo
is
free­
flowing
at
all
times
during
the
performance
test;
AND
(
2)
Record
the
feeder
setting
for
the
two
or
three
runs,
whichever
applies.
(
3)
If
the
feed
rate
setting
varies
during
the
three
test
runs,
76
calculate
and
record
the
average
feed
rate
for
the
two
or
three
test
runs,
whichever
applies.

19.
Each
new
kiln
that
is
used
to
process
clay
refractory
products
and
is
equipped
with
a
WS.
a.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
minimum
scrubber
pressure
drop.
i.
Data
from
the
pressure
drop
measurement
device
during
the
performance
test.
(
1)
At
least
every
15
minutes,
measure
the
pressure
drop
across
the
scrubber;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
one
pressure
drop
measurement
during
at
least
three
15­
minute
periods
per
hour
of
testing;
AND
(
3)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
pressure
drop
across
the
scrubber
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test;
AND
(
4)
Calculate
and
record
the
minimum
pressure
drop
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
average
pressure
drops
across
the
scrubber
for
the
two
or
three
test
runs,
whichever
applies.

b.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
minimum
scrubber
liquid
pH.
i.
Data
from
the
pH
measurement
device
during
the
performance
test.
(
1)
At
least
every
15
minutes,
measure
scrubber
liquid
pH;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
one
pH
measurement
during
at
least
three
15­
minute
periods
per
hour
of
testing;
AND
77
(
3)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
pH
values
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test;
AND
(
4)
Calculate
and
record
the
minimum
liquid
pH
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
average
pH
measurements
for
the
two
or
three
test
runs,
whichever
applies.

c.
Establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
minimum
scrubber
liquid
flow
rate.
i.
Data
from
the
flow
rate
measurement
device
during
the
performance
test.
(
1)
At
least
every
15
minutes,
measure
the
scrubber
liquid
flow
rate;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
least
one
flow
rate
measurement
during
at
least
three
15­
minute
periods
per
hour
of
testing;
AND
(
3)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
liquid
flow
rate
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test;
AND
(
4)
Calculate
and
record
the
minimum
liquid
flow
rate
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
average
liquid
flow
rates
for
the
two
or
three
test
runs,
whichever
applies.

d.
If
chemicals
are
added
to
the
scrubber
liquid,
i.
Data
from
the
chemical
feed
rate
measurement
device
(
1)
At
least
every
15
minutes,
measure
the
scrubber
chemical
feed
rate;
AND
(
2)
Provide
at
78
establish
the
operating
limit
for
the
minimum
scrubber
chemical
feed
rate.
during
the
performance
test.
least
one
chemical
feed
rate
measurement
during
at
least
three
15­
minute
periods
per
hour
of
testing;
AND
(
3)
Calculate
the
hourly
average
chemical
feed
rate
for
each
hour
of
the
performance
test;
AND
(
4)
Calculate
and
record
the
minimum
chemical
feed
rate
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
average
chemical
feed
rates
for
the
two
or
three
test
runs,
whichever
applies.

12.
Table
5
to
subpart
SSSSS
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
items
5
and
6;
and
b.
Revising
items
10.
a
and
b.

Table
5
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63­­
Initial
Compliance
with
Emission
Limits
As
stated
in
§
63.9806,
you
must
show
initial
compliance
with
the
emission
limits
for
affected
sources
according
to
the
following
table:

For
...
For
the
following
emission
limit...
You
have
demonstrated
initial
compliance
if...

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

5.
Each
affected
batch
process
unit
that
is
subject
to
the
THC
emission
concentration
limit
listed
in
The
average
THC
concentration
must
not
exceed
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
The
2­
run
block
average
THC
emission
concentration
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
emissions
concentration
period
measured
during
the
79
item
6.
a.,
7.
a.,
8,
or
9
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
18
percent
oxygen.
performance
test
using
Methods
25A
and
3A
is
equal
to
or
less
than
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.

6.
Each
affected
batch
process
unit
that
is
subject
to
the
THC
percentage
reduction
limit
listed
in
item
6.
b.
or
7.
b.
of
Table
1
to
this
subpart.
The
average
THC
percentage
reduction
must
equal
or
exceed
95
percent.
The
2­
run
block
average
THC
percentage
reduction
for
the
3­
hour
peak
THC
mass
emissions
period
measured
during
the
performance
test
using
Method
25A
is
equal
to
or
greater
than
95
percent.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

10.
Each
new
batch
process
kiln
that
is
used
to
process
clay
refractory
products.
a.
The
average
uncontrolled
HF
emissions
must
be
reduced
by
at
least
90
percent.
The
2­
run
block
average
HF
emission
reduction
for
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period
measured
during
the
performance
test
is
equal
to
or
greater
than
90
percent.

b.
The
average
uncontrolled
HCl
emissions
must
be
reduced
by
at
least
30
percent.
The
2­
run
block
average
HCl
emissions
reduction
for
the
3­
hour
peak
HF
mass
emissions
period
measured
during
the
performance
test
is
equal
to
or
greater
than
30
percent.

13.
Table
7
to
subpart
SSSSS
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
item
2;

b.
Revising
item
4
by
labeling
the
entry
in
column
3
as
item
i
and
adding
item
4.
ii;

c.
Revising
item
5
by
labeling
the
entry
in
column
3
as
item
i
and
adding
item
5.
ii;
and
d.
Deleting
item
9.
a.
ii
and
renumbering
items
9.
a.
iii
80
and
iv
as
items
9.
a.
ii
and
iii,
respectively.

Table
7
to
Subpart
SSSSS
to
Part
63­­
Continuous
Compliance
with
Emission
Limits
As
stated
in
§
63.9810,
you
must
show
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limits
for
affected
sources
according
to
the
following
table:

For
....
For
the
following
emission
limit...
You
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
by...

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

2.
Each
new
or
existing
curing
oven,
shape
dryer,
and
kiln
that
is
used
to
process
refractory
products
that
use
organic
HAP;
each
new
or
existing
coking
oven
and
defumer
that
is
used
to
produce
pitchimpregnated
refractory
products;
each
new
shape
preheater
that
is
used
to
produce
pitchimpregnated
refractory
products;
AND
each
new
or
existing
process
unit
that
is
exhausted
to
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer
that
also
controls
emissions
from
an
affected
As
specified
in
items
3
through
7
of
this
table.
Satisfying
the
applicable
requirements
specified
in
items
3
through
7
of
this
table.
81
shape
preheater
or
pitch
working
tank.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

4.
Each
affected
process
unit
that
is
equipped
with
a
control
device
other
than
a
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizer
The
average
THC
concentration
must
not
exceed
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen;
OR
the
average
THC
percentage
reduction
must
equal
or
exceed
95
percent.
i.
Operating
and
maintaining
a
THC
CEMS
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
in
the
stack
of
the
affected
source,
according
to
the
requirements
of
Procedure
1
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
F;
AND
ii.
Maintaining
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
concentration
at
or
below
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.

5.
Each
affected
process
unit
that
uses
process
changes
to
meet
the
applicable
emission
limit.
The
average
THC
concentration
must
not
exceed
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.
i.
Operating
and
maintaining
a
THC
CEMS
at
the
outlet
of
the
control
device
or
in
the
stack
of
the
affected
source,
according
to
the
requirements
of
Procedure
1
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
F;
AND
ii.
Maintaining
the
3­
hour
block
average
THC
concentration
at
or
below
20
ppmvd,
corrected
to
18
percent
oxygen.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

9.
Each
affected
kiln
that
is
equipped
with
a
DLA
a.
The
average
HF
emissions
must
not
exceed
0.019
kg/
Mg
(
0.038
lb/
ton)
of
uncalcined
clay
processed,
OR
the
average
i.
Maintaining
the
pressure
drop
across
the
DLA
at
or
above
the
minimum
levels
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
82
uncontrolled
HF
emissions
must
be
reduced
by
at
least
90
percent;
AND
b.
The
average
HCl
emissions
must
not
exceed
0.091
kg/
Mg
(
0.18
lb/
ton)
of
uncalcined
clay
processed,
OR
the
average
uncontrolled
HCl
emissions
must
be
reduced
by
at
least
30
percent.
ii.
Recording
the
limestone
feeder
setting
daily
to
verify
that
the
feeder
setting
is
at
or
above
the
level
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
iii.
Using
the
same
grade
of
limestone
as
was
used
during
the
most
recent
performance
test
and
maintaining
records
of
the
source
and
grade
of
limestone.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

14.
Table
8
to
subpart
SSSSS
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
item
4.
iii
and
adding
item
4.
iv;

b.
Revising
item
7.
iv
and
adding
item
7.
v;

c.
Revising
items
8
and
8.
i
through
v
and
adding
items
8.
vi
through
viii;

d.
Revising
items
9
and
9.
i
through
iv,
renumbering
items
9.
v
and
vi
as
items
9.
viii
and
ix,
respectively,
and
adding
items
9.
v.
through
vii;

e.
Revising
items
11.
a.
ii
and
iii,
adding
item
11.
a.
iv,
deleting
item
11.
b,
and
renumbering
items
11.
c
and
d
as
items
11.
b
and
c,
respectively;
and
f.
Revising
items
13.
a.
ii
and
iii,
13.
b.
ii
and
iii,

13.
c.
ii
and
iii,
and
13.
d.
ii
and
iii,
and
adding
items
13.
a.
iv,
13.
b.
iv,
13.
c.
iv,
and
13.
d.
iv.
83
Table
8
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63­­
Continuous
Compliance
with
Operating
Limits
As
stated
in
§
63.9810,
you
must
show
continuous
compliance
with
the
operating
limits
for
affected
sources
according
to
the
following
table:

For...
For
the
following
operating
limit...
You
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
by...

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

4.
Each
affected
continuous
process
unit.
a.
Maintain
process
operating
parameters
within
the
limits
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
i.
Recording
the
organic
HAP
processing
rate
(
pounds
per
hour);
AND
ii.
Recording
the
operating
temperature
of
the
affected
source
at
least
hourly;
AND
iii.
Maintaining
the
3­
hour
block
average
organic
HAP
processing
rate
at
or
below
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
iv.
Reporting,
in
accordance
with
§
63.9814(
e),
any
3­
hour
block
average
organic
HAP
processing
rate
that
exceeds
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

7.
Each
affected
batch
process
unit.
a.
Maintain
process
operating
parameters
within
the
limits
i.
Recording
the
organic
HAP
processing
rate
(
pounds
per
batch);
AND
ii.
Recording
the
hourly
average
operating
84
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
temperature
of
the
affected
source;
AND
iii.
Recording
the
process
cycle
time
for
each
batch
cycle;
AND
iv.
Maintaining
the
organic
HAP
processing
rate
at
or
below
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
v.
Reporting,
in
accordance
with
§
63.9814(
e),
any
organic
HAP
processing
rate
that
exceeds
the
maximum
allowable
organic
HAP
processing
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.

8.
Batch
process
units
that
are
equipped
with
a
thermal
oxidizer.
Maintain
the
hourly
average
temperature
in
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
operating
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
i.
Measuring
and
recording
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
at
least
every
15
minutes
throughout
any
period
during
which
the
thermal
oxidizer
is
required
to
be
in
operation;
AND
ii.
Calculating
the
hourly
average
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
for
any
period
during
which
the
thermal
oxidizer
is
required
to
be
in
operation;
AND
iii.
Except
as
permitted
by
item
8.
iv
of
this
table,
maintaining
throughout
the
entire
batch
cycle
the
hourly
85
average
operating
temperature
in
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
operating
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
iv.
If
complying
with
the
provisions
for
reducing
the
thermal
oxidizer
operating
temperature,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
satisfying
the
requirements
of
items
8.
vi.
through
8.
viii.
of
this
table;
AND
v.
Reporting,
in
accordance
with
§
63.9814(
e),
any
temperature
measurements
below
the
minimum
allowable
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
vi.
From
the
start
of
the
batch
cycle
until
the
batch
process
unit
reaches
its
maximum
temperature,
maintaining
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
11
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
vii.
From
the
time
when
the
batch
process
unit
reaches
its
maximum
temperature,
maintaining
86
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
11
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
for
a
length
of
time
that
equals
or
exceeds
the
length
of
time
between
the
process
unit
reaching
its
maximum
temperature
and
the
start
of
the
thermal
oxidizer
temperature
reduction
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
viii.
For
the
remainder
of
the
batch
process
cycle,
maintaining
the
thermal
oxidizer
combustion
chamber
temperature
at
or
above
the
reduced
thermal
oxidizer
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart.

9.
Batch
process
units
that
are
equipped
with
a
catalytic
oxidizer.
Maintain
the
hourly
average
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
operating
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
i.
Measuring
and
recording
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed
at
least
every
15
minutes
throughout
any
period
during
which
the
catalytic
oxidizer
is
required
to
be
in
operation;
AND
ii.
Calculating
the
hourly
average
temperature
at
the
catalyst
bed
inlet
for
any
period
during
which
the
catalytic
oxidizer
is
87
required
to
be
in
operation;
AND
iii.
Except
as
specified
in
items
9.
a.
iv
through
9.
a.
vii
of
this
table,
maintaining
throughout
the
entire
batch
cycle
the
hourly
average
operating
temperature
at
the
catalyst
bed
inlet
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
operating
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
iv.
If
complying
with
the
provisions
for
reducing
the
catalytic
oxidizer
operating
temperature,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
satisfying
the
requirements
of
items
9.
a.
v.
through
9.
a.
vii.
of
this
table;
AND
v.
From
the
start
of
the
batch
cycle
until
the
batch
process
unit
reaches
its
maximum
temperature,
maintaining
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
12
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
vi.
From
the
time
when
the
batch
process
unit
reaches
its
maximum
temperature,
maintaining
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed
at
or
above
the
minimum
allowable
temperature
88
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
determined
according
to
item
12
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
for
a
length
of
time
that
equals
or
exceeds
the
length
of
time
between
the
process
unit
reaching
its
maximum
temperature
and
the
start
of
the
catalytic
oxidizer
temperature
reduction
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
vii.
For
the
remainder
of
the
batch
process
cycle,
maintaining
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
of
the
catalyst
bed
at
or
above
the
reduced
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
as
specified
in
item
13
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
viii.
Reporting,
in
accordance
with
§
63.9814(
e),
any
temperature
measurements
below
the
minimum
allowable
catalyst
bed
inlet
temperature
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
ix.
Checking
the
activity
level
of
the
catalyst
at
least
every
12
months
and
taking
any
necessary
corrective
action,
such
as
replacing
the
catalyst,
to
ensure
that
the
catalyst
is
performing
as
designed.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
89
11.
Each
new
kiln
that
is
equipped
with
a
DLA.
a.
Maintain
the
average
pressure
drop
across
the
DLA
for
each
3­
hour
block
period
at
or
above
the
minimum
pressure
drop
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
i.
Collecting
the
DLA
pressure
drop
data,
as
specified
in
item
18.
a.
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
ii.
Calculating
the
hourly
average
pressure
drop
across
the
DLA;
AND
iii.
Maintaining
the
3­
hour
block
average
pressure
drop
across
the
DLA
at
or
above
the
minimum
pressure
drop
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
iv.
Reporting,
in
accordance
with
§
63.9814(
e),
any
3­
hour
block
average
pressure
drop
across
the
DLA
below
the
minimum
pressure
drop
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.

b.
Maintain
the
limestone
feeder
setting
at
or
above
the
level
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
Verifying
at
least
daily
that
the
feeder
setting
is
being
maintained
at
or
above
the
level
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test,
and
recording
the
feeder
setting
for
each
verification.

c.
Use
the
same
grade
of
limestone
from
the
same
source
as
was
used
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
Using
the
same
grade
of
limestone
as
was
used
during
the
most
recent
performance
test
and
maintaining
records
of
the
source
and
grade
of
limestone.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
90
13.
Each
new
kiln
that
is
used
to
process
clay
refractory
products
and
is
equipped
with
a
wet
scrubber.
a.
Maintain
the
average
pressure
drop
across
the
scrubber
for
each
3­
hour
block
period
at
or
above
the
minimum
pressure
drop
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
i.
Collecting
the
scrubber
pressure
drop
data,
as
specified
in
item
20.
a.
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
ii.
Calculating
the
hourly
average
pressure
drop
across
the
scrubber;
AND
iii.
Maintaining
the
3­
hour
block
average
scrubber
pressure
drop
at
or
above
the
minimum
pressure
drop
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
iv.
Reporting,
in
accordance
with
§
63.9814(
e),
any
3­
hour
block
average
pressure
drop
across
the
scrubber
below
the
minimum
pressure
drop
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.

b.
Maintain
the
average
scrubber
liquid
pH
for
each
3­
hour
block
period
at
or
above
the
minimum
scrubber
liquid
pH
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
i.
Collecting
the
scrubber
liquid
pH
data,
as
specified
in
item
20.
b.
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
ii.
Calculating
the
hourly
average
scrubber
liquid
pH;
AND
iii.
Maintaining
the
3­
hour
block
average
scrubber
liquid
pH
at
or
above
the
minimum
scrubber
liquid
pH
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
iv.
Reporting,
in
accordance
with
§
63.9814(
e),
any
3­
hour
block
average
scrubber
91
liquid
pH
below
the
minimum
liquid
pH
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.

c.
Maintain
the
average
scrubber
liquid
flow
rate
for
each
3­
hour
block
period
at
or
above
the
minimum
scrubber
liquid
flow
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
i.
Collecting
the
scrubber
liquid
flow
rate
data,
as
specified
in
item
20.
c.
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
ii.
Calculating
the
hourly
average
scrubber
liquid
flow
rate;
AND
iii.
Maintaining
the
3­
hour
block
average
scrubber
liquid
flow
rate
at
or
above
the
minimum
scrubber
liquid
flow
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
iv.
Reporting,
in
accordance
with
§
63.9814(
e),
any
3­
hour
block
average
scrubber
liquid
flow
rate
below
the
minimum
liquid
flow
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.

d.
If
chemicals
are
added
to
the
scrubber
liquid,
maintain
the
average
scrubber
chemical
feed
rate
for
each
3­
hour
block
period
at
or
above
the
minimum
scrubber
chemical
feed
rate
i.
Collecting
the
scrubber
chemical
feed
rate
data,
as
specified
in
item
20.
d.
of
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
AND
ii.
Calculating
the
hourly
average
scrubber
chemical
feed
rate;
AND
iii.
Maintaining
the
3­
hour
block
average
scrubber
chemical
feed
rate
at
or
above
the
minimum
scrubber
chemical
feed
rate
established
92
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
during
the
most
recent
performance
test;
AND
iv.
Reporting,
in
accordance
with
§
63.9814(
e),
any
3­
hour
block
average
scrubber
chemical
feed
rate
below
the
minimum
chemical
feed
rate
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.

15.
Table
10
to
subpart
SSSSS
is
amended
by
revising
item
1
to
read
as
follows:

Table
10
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63­­
Requirements
for
Reports
As
stated
in
§
63.9814,
you
must
comply
with
the
requirements
for
reports
in
the
following
table:

You
must
submit
a(
n)...
The
report
must
contain...
You
must
submit
the
report...

1.
Compliance
report
The
information
in
§
63.9814(
a)
through
(
f).
Semiannually
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.9814(
b).

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

16.
Table
11
to
subpart
SSSSS
is
amended
as
follows:

a.
Revising
citation
§
63.4;

b.
Adding
citations
§
63.6(
i)(
15)
and
(
16);

c.
Revising
citation
§
63.7(
b)(
2);

d.
Revising
citation
§
63.7(
e)(
3);
and
e.
Revising
citations
§
63.8(
c)(
1)(
i),
(
ii),
and
(
iii).

­
Table
11
to
Subpart
SSSSS
of
Part
63­­
Applicability
of
General
Provisions
to
Subpart
SSSSS
93
As
stated
in
§
63.9820,
you
must
comply
with
the
applicable
General
Provisions
requirements
according
to
the
following
table:

Citatio
n
Subject
Brief
Description
Applies
to
Subpart
SSSSS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

§
63.4
Prohibited
Activities.
Compliance
date;
circumvention;
fragmentation.
Yes.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

§
63.6(
i
)
(
15)
[
Reserved]

§
63.6(
i
)
(
16)
Administrator
'
s
authority.
Granting
extension
does
not
abrogate
Administrator's
authority.
Yes.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

§
63.7(
b
)
(
2)
Notification
of
Rescheduling.
Must
notify
Administrator
as
soon
as
is
practicable
and
provide
rescheduled
date.
Yes.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

§
63.7(
e
)
(
3)
Test
Run
Duration.
Must
have
three
test
runs
for
at
least
the
time
specified
in
the
relevant
standard;
compliance
is
based
on
arithmetic
mean
of
three
runs;
specifies
conditions
when
data
from
an
additional
test
run
can
be
used.
Yes;
Yes,
except
where
specified
in
§
63.9800
for
batch
process
sources;
Yes.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
94
§
63.8(
c
)
(
1)(
i)
Operation
and
Maintenance
of
CMS.
Must
maintain
CMS
in
accordance
with
§
63.6(
e)(
1).
Yes.

§
63.8(
c
)
(
1)(
ii)
Spare
Parts
for
CMS.
Must
maintain
spare
parts
for
routine
CMS
repairs.
Yes.

§
63.8(
c
)
(
1)(
iii
)
SSMP
for
CMS.
Must
develop
and
implement
SSMP
for
CMS.
Yes.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
