From: 
David Ailor <dailor@accci.org>
Sent:
Tuesday, December 22, 2020 2:33 PM
To: 
Jones, DonnaLee <jones.donnalee@epa.gov>; 'Jay Cornelius' <jcornelius@abccoke.com>; 'Bill Osborn' <bosborn@abccoke.com>; Katie.Kistler@aksteel.com; Chris.Potts@aksteel.com; 'Patrick Smith' <patrick.smith@mscarbonllc.com>; Rich.Zavoda@arcelormittal.com; Marian.Gammon@arcelormittal.com; 'Charles Jones' <cjones@bluestonecoke.com>; 'Brenna M Harden' <brenna.harden@dteenergy.com>; 'Robert B Sanch' <robert.sanch@dteenergy.com>; 'Katie Batten' <kmbatten@suncoke.com>; kesingleton@suncoke.com; BJTunno@uss.com; JSScheetz@uss.com
Cc:
Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>
Subject: 
RE: follow-up review of Whole Industry Data, Comments, & EPA Responses


Hello again, Donna Lee.
                                                                                                                   
Insofar as the spreadsheet you sent us on November 16 for comment (see "Comments-CokeOvens-Enclosure 12 QA-Whole IndustryTest Data-Aug 2020 Industry Comments Final 101420-EPA-Response-11-16-20.xlsx"), please note that the only feedback we have is the December 16 Mostardi Platt letter that COETF consultant Al Dittenhoefer included with his e-mail earlier today providing the COETF's comments on EPA's emissions spreadsheets (see "MostardiPlatt Coke ICR BH Pushing Methylene Chloride 12.16.20.pdf").  This letter explains that the data quality of the Coke ICR Burns Harbor pushing test volatile HAPs, PAH compounds, and Dioxins/Furans is acceptable, except for methylene chloride, and should be included in the industry test data.

Happy Holidays!  DCA

David C. Ailor, P.E.
President
American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute
25 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone: 703-795-3541
eFax.: 866-422-7794
dailor@accci.org
www.accci.org


<< Comments-CokeOvens-Enclosure 12 QA-Whole IndustryTest Data-Aug 2020 Indu....xlsx >>
<< MostardiPlatt Coke ICR BH Pushing Methylene Chloride 12.16.20.pdf >>


From: Jones, DonnaLee [mailto:Jones.Donnalee@epa.gov] 
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 8:30 PM
To: Jay Cornelius <jcornelius@abccoke.com>; Bill Osborn <bosborn@abccoke.com>; Katie.Kistler@aksteel.com; Chris.Potts@aksteel.com; Patrick Smith <patrick.smith@mscarbonllc.com>; Rich.Zavoda@arcelormittal.com; Marian.Gammon@arcelormittal.com; 'Charles Jones' <cjones@bluestonecoke.com>; Brenna M Harden <brenna.harden@dteenergy.com>; Robert B Sanch <robert.sanch@dteenergy.com>; Katie Batten <kmbatten@suncoke.com>; kesingleton@suncoke.com; BJTunno@uss.com; JSScheetz@uss.com
Cc: David Ailor (dailor@accci.org) <dailor@accci.org>; Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>
Subject: follow-up review of Whole Industry Data, Comments, & EPA Responses

Hello all - Thank you for your comments on this file and the recent model file "shell." Your inputs are greatly appreciated. While we are addressing your comments on the model file "shell", we would like you to review another round of comments and information. The instructions below are in the first tab, labelled "Introduction." There are two tabs next with EPA replies to previous industry comments. Some industry comments are still outstanding; we will address when they are received.

This file contains EPA comments on the 10/24/20 COETF and Other Industry Comments received by the EPA.

Yellow heading blank columns have been provided for new industry comments; however, columns can be added anywhere and industry comments added as needed.



Data in orange tabs are the tabs likely to be of the most interest, some needing industry input. 

We are specifically interested in oven and battery counts, and battery sizes in tabs A-4 & A-5.

Other data previously provided  are repeated here; comments can be made on these data as well.


I will be sending a few more individual files with stand-alone emissions data also for your review and comment. While you all are working on these files, we will be working on the model file to incorporate your comments on the "shell." 

It would be helpful if all of your comments could be received before the December holiday break. Sooner is always acceptable, and individual facility data is also acceptable to stagger our workload.

Hope you and your family have a good Thanksgiving, or as good as it can be in these special circumstances.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:  (919)  541-5251  Fax  (919)  541-3207
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.




