From: 
Jones, DonnaLee <Jones.Donnalee@epa.gov>
Sent:
Tuesday, May 26, 2020 5:26 PM
To: 
Brett J Tunno <BJTunno@uss.com>; Jonelle S Scheetz <JSScheetz@uss.com>; Michalik, Sarah K <skmichalik@uss.com>
Cc:
Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>
Subject: 
Coke ICR - Questionnaire and Source Tests - USS Clairton


Hello - Thank you very much for the QA review of your source test data for USS-Clairton-PA. We have no further questions on the test data file.

However, in the Questionnaire, we noticed that for USS-Clairton-PA there were entries of  "POSTPONED" used for some of the answers in tab `Part II Q16b&c' in the review file that was re-submitted to us (see attached and below).

Can you please fill out the information in Q16-b and c and return to me in 30 days? If there is more of a story behind these entries, please let me know,  

16.b. If major source of HAP, list each process unit that emits HAP. 			
16.b-pt.1. Identify each unit according to its permit/state ID number	
16.b-pt.2. If no permit ID number exists, the facility ID number should be used. 	
16.b-pt.3. If no ID number is assigned at all, then provide a description of each unit and its location within the facility
16.c-pt.1. If major source of HAP, provide 2014 emission inventories for each process unit	
16.c-pt.2. If major source of HAP, provide 2015 emission inventories for each process unit
		
Thankyou again for your cooperation with the ICR, especially the source testing and the extra effort needed to test the quench tower.
Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals&Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC27711Tele:(919)541-5251Fax(919)541-3207
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."- anon.


<< USS-Coke-Enclosure-1-Questionnaire ICR-draft summary-review-August-5-2019-USS Comments.xlsx >>

