Lydia
Wegman/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EP
A
05/
03/
2005
05:
37
PM
To
Kathy
Kaufman/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
cc
Subject
Fw:
List
of
analysis
items
for
Holmstead
­
BART
­­­­­
Forwarded
by
Lydia
Wegman/
RTP/
USEPA/
US
on
05/
03/
2005
05:
36
PM
­­­­­

Jeff
Holmstead/
DC/
USE
PA/
US
To
Lydia
Wegman
04/
27/
2005
06:
54
cc
PM
Subject
Fw:
List
of
analysis
items
for
Holmstead
­
BART
­­­­­
Forwarded
by
Jeff
Holmstead/
DC/
USEPA/
US
on
04/
27/
2005
06:
50
PM
­­­­­

Jeff
Holmstead/
DC/
USE
PA/
US
To
Art
Fraas
04/
26/
2005
09:
40
cc
PM
Bill
Wehrum
Subject
Fw:
List
of
analysis
items
for
Holmstead
­
BART
­­­­­
Forwarded
by
Jeff
Holmstead/
DC/
USEPA/
US
on
04/
26/
2005
09:
37
PM
­­­­­

Tom
Rosendahl/
RTP/
US
EPA/
US
To
Larry
Sorrels/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
04/
26/
2005
04:
23
Jeff
Holmstead/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
PM
Steve
Page/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Gregory
Green/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
cc
Joe
Paisie/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Kathy
Kaufman/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Todd
Hawes/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
Subject
Re:
List
of
analysis
items
for
Holmstead
­
BART(
Document
link:
Jeff
Holmstead)

Larry,
you
were
not
in
your
office
and
I
know
you
wanted
this
to
go
to
Jeff
for
the
4:
30
call
today
so
I
added
Jeff,
Steve,
and
Greg.

(
See
attached
file:
The
following
Table
summarizes
number
of
BART.
doc)

The
data
is
copied
here
for
convenience:

The
following
Table
summarizes
number
of
(
NonEGU)
BART­
eligible
units
in
the
Ozone
and
PM2.5
non
attainment
and
visibility
areas:
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|
|
|
|
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|
|
1130|
NonEGU
BART­
eligible
units
reside
in
20
States
which
have
N/
A
areas
for
|
|
|
PM2.5
|
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|
|
|
|
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|
|
1601|
NonEGU
BART­
eligible
units
(
NOx
only)
reside
in
30
States
which
have
N/
A
|
|
|
areas
for
Ozone
|
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|
|
|
|
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|
|
1129|
NonEGU
BART­
eligible
units
reside
in
19
States
which
have
N/
A
areas
for
|
|
|
both
Ozone
and
PM2.5
|
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|
|
|
|
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|
|
543|
NonEGU
BART­
eligible
units
reside
in
14
States
which
have
no
N/
A
areas
for|
|
|
Ozone
or
PM2.5
|
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|
|
|
|
|­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­|

2,276
Total
Number
of
NonEGU
BART­
eligible
units
The
information
that
follows
provides
the
detail
of
which
States
are
in
which
group:

|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
Total
Number
of
|
Ozone,
PM2.5
|
States
|
Number
of
|
|
NonEGU­
BART­
eligibl|
Non­
attainmen|
|
NonEGU­(
NOx­
only|
|
e
sources
|
t
areas
|
|
)
BART­
eligible
|
|
|
|
|
sources
|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
101|
Both
|
Alabama
|
100|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
37|
Both
|
California
|
34|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
8|
Both
|
Connecticut
|
8|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
41|
Both
|
Delaware
|
37|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
100|
Both
|
Georgia
|
90|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
113|
Both
|
Illinois
|
102|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
140|
Both
|
Indiana
|
138|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
95|
Both
|
Kentucky
|
94|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
11|
Both
|
Maryland
|
7|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
58|
Both
|
Michigan
|
51|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
10|
Both
|
Missouri
|
9|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
7|
Both
|
New
Jersey
|
7|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
27|
Both
|
New
York
|
24|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
40|
Both
|
North
Carolina
|
40|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
80|
Both
|
Ohio
|
78|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
78|
Both
|
Pennsylvania
|
71|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
41|
Both
|
Tennessee
|
33|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
91|
Both
|
Virginia
|
82|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
51|
Both
|
West
Virginia
|
47|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
6|
Ozone
|
Arizona
|
5|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
21|
Ozone
|
Arkansas
|
19|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
36|
Ozone
|
Colorado
|
29|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
109|
Ozone
|
Louisiana
|
97|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
63|
Ozone
|
Maine
|
63|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
12|
Ozone
|
Massachusetts
|
12|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
18|
Ozone
|
New
Hampshire
|
18|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
3|
Ozone
|
Rhode
Island
|
3|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
109|
Ozone
|
South
Carolina
|
102|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
182|
Ozone
|
Texas
|
171|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
31|
Ozone
|
Wisconsin
|
30|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
1|
PM2.5
|
Montana
|
1|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
70|
|
Florida
|
60|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
24|
|
Idaho
|
24|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
68|
|
Iowa
|
47|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
37|
|
Kansas
|
35|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
19|
|
Minnesota
|
19|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
32|
|
Mississippi
|
28|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
3|
|
Nebraska
|
3|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
24|
|
New
Mexico
|
21|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
4|
|
North
Dakota
|
2|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
58|
|
Oklahoma
|
58|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
29|
|
Oregon
|
29|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
1|
|
South
Dakota
|
1|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
105|
|
Washington
|
104|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|
|
69|
|
Wyoming
|
60|
|­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­+­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­|

Thanks.
Thomas
E.
Rosendahl
EPA,
OAQPS,
AQSSD
(
919)
541­
5314
Larry
Sorrels/
RTP/
USEP
A/
US
To
Kathy
Kaufman/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
04/
26/
2005
03:
40
cc
PM
Todd
Hawes/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Joe
Paisie/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Tom
Rosendahl/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
Subject
List
of
analysis
items
for
Holmstead
­
BART
Kathy,
my
list
of
items
Holmstead
requested
and
our
response
up
to
now
is
the
following:

1)
Emission
Reductions
and
Costs
for
$
2,000/
ton
(
marginal
cost)
scenario
­
emailed
to
Holmstead
early
afternoon
2)
Non­
EGU
emissions
data
by
unit:
­
emailed
to
Holmstead
mid­
afternoon
(
note:
EGU
unit
emissions
data
sent
up
to
him
around
noon)

3)
Number
of
non­
EGUs
in
States
with
PM2.5
and
ozone
nonattainment
areas
(
separately
and
together)
­
will
be
emailed
to
Holmstead
by
4:
30
today
Thanks.
I
think
this
is
right.

Larry
Sorrels
Economist
US
EPA/
OAQPS
C504­
02
RTP,
NC
27711
(
919)
541­
5041
fax:
(
919)
541­
5489
