E­
Mail
FROM:
"
Stolpe,
Elizabeth
A."
<
Elizabeth_
A._
Stolpe@
ceq.
eop.
gov>
06/
23/
2004
03:
44
PM
To:
Stephanie
Daigle/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Jeff
Holmstead/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Bill
Wehrum/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Bill
Harnett/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Natalie
Gochnour/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Cynthia
Bergman/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Prudence
Goforth/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
cc:
"
Perino,
Dana
M."
<
Dana_
M._
Perino@
ceq.
eop.
gov>,
"
Fraas,
Arthur
G."
<
afraas@
OMB.
eop.
gov>

Subject:
RE:
Logistics
on
NSR
Update
­
no
new
DOE
issues
on
the
Stay.
Cross
that
one
off
the
list.
E.

­­­­­
Original
Message­­­­­
From:
Stolpe,
Elizabeth
A.
Sent:
Wednesday,
June
23,
2004
1:
27
PM
To:
'
Stephanie
Daigle
(
Daigle.
Stephanie@
epamail.
epa.
gov)';
'
Jeff
Holmstead
(
Holmstead.
Jeff@
epamail.
epa.
gov)';
'
Bill
Wehrum
(
Wehrum.
Bill@
epamail.
epa.
gov)';
'
Bill
Harnett
(
Harnett.
Bill@
epamail.
epa.
gov)';
gochnour.
natalie@
epamail.
epa.
gov;
Cynthia
Bergman
(
bergman.
cynthia@
epa.
gov);
Prudence
Goforth
(
Goforth.
Prudence@
epamail.
epa.
gov)
Cc:
Perino,
Dana
M.;
Fraas,
Arthur
G.
Subject:
RE:
Logistics
on
NSR
Stephanie
­
I'm
answering
your
voicemail
w/
an
email
to
everyone
just
to
facilitate
keeping
us
all
up
to
date
real
time:
Your
question
is
can
we
clear
the
ERP
Petition
by
tomorrow?
I
think
the
prospects
are
good.
DOE's
concerns
are
unknown
but
at
this
point
I
think
they
are
related
to
the
Stay
not
the
Petition.
Lee
and
I
are
still
exchanging
voicemails.
If
there
are
any
problems,
I'll
report
back
and
do
my
utmost
to
resolve
them
quickly.
Our
bigger
impediment
to
finishing
the
ERP
tomorrow
in
my
view
is
getting
communication
docs
over
here
and
giving
people
time
to
review.

Thanks,
E.
