­­­­­
Forwarded
by
Pam
Long/
RTP/
USEPA/
US
on
10/
06/
2003
11:
34
AM
­­­­­
Dave
Svendsgaard
08/
22/
2003
01:
47
PM
To:
Amy_
L._
Farrell@
omb.
eop.
gov
cc:
Bill
Wehrum/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Jeff
Holmstead/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
,
Lynn
Hutchinson/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Racqueline
Shelton/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Bill
Harnett/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Arthur_
G._
Fraas@
omb.
eop.
gov,
(
bcc:
Pam
Long/
RTP/
USEPA/
US)
Subject:
8/
22
Revision
of
ERP
Preamble
and
Rule
Amy,
Attached
are
the
revised
Rule
and
Preamble
files
for
the
ERP
and
corresponding
redline
versions.
The
redlined
versions
are
compared
against
the
8/
19
versions.

We
wanted
to
give
you
a
heads­
up
on
one
item
that
we
are
tracking
here
at
OAQPS.
Since
the
decision
to
add
into
the
preamble
several
industry­
specific
process
unit
definitions
that
were
submitted
by
commenters,
we've
had
our
technical
folks
review
them
to
see
if
they
had
concerns
with
the
proposed
definitions.
This
review
will
not
conclude
until
later
today,
but
in
one
or
two
cases
so
far,
we've
heard
concerns
with
how
the
commenter's
proposed
definition
would
work
within
the
framework
of
our
rule.
We'll
have
more
information
on
where
we
stand
on
this
issue
when
we
re­
convene
(
presumably
Monday),
and
we
can
share
our
thoughts
with
you
and
the
rest
of
the
review
team
then.

dave
Positions
or
views
expressed
do
not
represent
official
EPA
policy
or
guidance
and
are
CONFIDENTIAL.
