­­

.
­­
­
­­

,
.
=.

..
_.
.
"
_.

­.,­

4
m
I
.
.

ado
4
.
.

I
E
H
.
.

ri
_.
.
.,
ril
.
.

x
..
.
.
c_;.

­

d­

.
.
E
­
d
n
4
4
d
'

...
­.
.
.
­

I
I
I
I
Test
No.
I
I
­­
~

%*
z
E
L
4
7
l
\
I 
bf4f­
l
1
Dr'rt/
(
;­)>
60.4
Ambient
Temp.
(
WB)

Ambient
Temp.
@
B)

Specific
Humidity
Baro.
Press
I
I
..
3
.
.

­
n
.
'.

I
..
.
_
.

:.
.
...
J
­.­

I
­
_
Is
­­.

I
ill
­
i
::

Y
'
I
W
.­..

.~
.
,
.
.
~,
~
j
~
~
.
.
.
­
,
^
~
.
,
.
~
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
,.
..,
.
.
_
_
.
.
.

.
..
.
'
...
.
:?."
E
..
.
'­&
&:
A
..._
r­
4
I+

.­
m
..
,
~
".

.
.
.
e
0
c:

ib
.
.
h
.
.
I
030
i
r
.

­
­

­
I
­

I
.
?

.
9.

L
.

.
­.

r
..

.
..,

b.

~
.
.
.

c
..

­
7­.

.
.­

..

_
A
­
.
c
t
­­­­
.
I,­.*
­..
r
­­
.
.

1
5
I
B
Y
5=.
f
.
..

_
.
._­­

1­
0
.
..
9
p'

m
J
4
\
=
.%
.
ts
:­
i
.
I
.

06Cs
:
.
.
.

L.

.
.
.
c
.
"
.
=
SI50
.
.
I
am63
1
­
4
n
Y
b
F
.

.
.;
&%
ri
91
I
'+
...
_.
Ln
'
a
1.3
.
.
.

I
z,

.3:
.
E
4."
J
­,
.

.
1
s
0
..­

f,
.
b.'

I­
i
­
s
.
d
F,

E
Y
4
i
+.
m
,
._
.
.
.
..

­

__
I
.
.

:
­­
PI_=­

.
­
­.

Ambient
Temp.
(
DU)

S
peci
fic
I
I
u
111
id
it
y
1
t
h
r
o
.
Press
7
./*
­
*.'

?
7
,
7
­
­
Test
No.

Time
Ambient
Temp.
(
DB)

Specific
Hunnidiity
I
I
I
Baro.
Press
k
I
I
I
­+=
I­=

7
7
.
.
_
I­

­..

"
.
.
.
I
e
c
e
'
i!
zD
r
s
.
I
i
.­
­
I
1
2
_
r.
I
..
­
:
:..

_
r
.,­
.
.
.

­
.
d
u
­
1
.
b.'
­.
L
!
m
­
.
I
*

c;
:
.+

I
.
.
­.
,
­.
c
*
I
.
T
."

K
­.
­
6..
....
..­

I­
n
+:

;
Ci
..
.
­~
s
..
.

i
E
­
Y
e
­
1
.
_­

­
.
e
.

r
i'
2
.­
_=___

.
.

i..
.
I
..
­*
r?
u
2
A
ip
.­­
­

u
*
u
L­
9
Q
C
L
b
C
?­
4
.
w
.
._
.­­
id
:
2&
.
­.
.­
1
,
,
:
­

:
.
&

A
­

_­

?­.

.
..
L
._
...
.
.
..
x
l
i.
t
v
­
c
.
.
r
.
.
I
­
?­
c,
.
h
u
t
_
_

­..
.
­
....
4
W
U
E
T
E
T
f
u
­
__
*
­
.
.
.
.
.
U
Test
No.

Date
12­
8
­
9
3
I
Time
a:
50
67:
30­

F*.

Turbine
Cont.
Temp.=
TS
QF)
I
I
I
Ambient
Temp.
@
B)
I
I
I
SDecific
Humidity
I
I
I
Baro.
Press
t
p
h=
r
a
­
:­­
s
1
m
AT
iJ
.
U
.
.
.
.
i
.

­

.
.
:­
I
­
­
;

fs.;:
*<
L.
­­
~~.
.
.
_
i
­­­

­
A,.
.
­
.
­.

­

<

,
­­­,
Appendix
C.
2.
b
Load
Curves
GRI
1
E­
125
15­
1971
5/
R
120D755.
T
I_
___
I______
s__

­
_
TURBINES
INCORPORATED
..­
I
­
DATE
RUN
:­
­
8­
NOV­
9
3
­
c
­?

"`
GINE
PERFOWANCE
DATA
REV.
2.3
RUN
BY:
DAN
JARRELL
EXHAUST
GAS
ANlD
EMISSION
DATA.
REV.
2.0
,
IB
ID
:
.­:
XT
CHANGES
REV.
2.1
­@
MARS
100s
MARS
T14000S
(
SOLONOX)
CS/
MD
59F
MATCH
GAS
TMD­
2S
REV.
2
DATA
FOR
NOMINAL
PERFORMANCE
FUEL
TYPE
ELEVATION,
I?
EET
INLET
LOSS,
I
N
.
`
H20
EXHAUST
LOSS,
I
N
.
H
2
0
AMB
TEMP,
DEG.
F
REL
"
MI,
PCT
INLET
LOSS
HP
EXHAUST
LOSS
HP
ELEVATION
LOSS
HP
COMP
OR
PIJME'
RPM
OPTIMUM
RI?
M
PERCENT
G2lS
PROD,
SPEED
GAS
PRODUCER
RPM
NET
OUTPUT
POWER
(
HP)
SPECIFIED
PART
LOAD
FUEL
FLOW,,
MMBTU/
HR
HEAT
RATE
BTU/
HP­
HR
S
D
NATURAL
GAS
35.0
60.0
43.
24
.
300.

6591.
6591.
87.
9365.
3430.
25.0%

54
.
47
15878
.
INmT
AIR
FLOW,
LB/
HR
204515.
ENGINE
EXH
FLOW,
LB/
HR
206442.
PCD
P.
S.
1C.
GI..
93.7
P.
T.
INLET
TEMP,
DEG.
F
1251.
COMPENSATED
PTIT
DEG,
F
1310.
ENGINE
EXH
TEMP,
DEG.
F
888
.
2185.
2.0
2.0
35.0
60.0
49.
26.
358.

6910.
6910.
88.
9455.
4116.
30.0%

59.03
14340.
13148.
12202.
214218.
222968.
230826.
216332.
225251.
233267.
103.1
112.4
121.2
1260.
1268.
1274
.
1319.
1327.
1333.
896,
902.
905.
35.0
60.0
55.
28.
418
.

7207
.
7207.
88.
9536.
4803.
35.0%

63
.
14
35.0
60.0
60.
30.
478
.

74`
61,
7461.
89
.
9601.
5489.
40.0%

66.97
35.0
601.0
66.
32.
.538.

7687.
7687.
90.
9658.
6175.
45.0%

70.59
11433.
238093.
240684.
129.7
1279
.
1339.
907
.
35.0
60.0
71.
33
..
597
.

7886.
7886.
90.
9723.
6861.
50.0%

74.11
10801.
244736.
247475,
137.7
1285,
1345.
909.
"%
R
TURBINES
INCORPORATED
DATE
RUN:
8­
NOV­
93
­
NE
PERFORMANCE­
DATA
REV.
2.3
­
R
U
R
­
B
­
E
­
D
j
­
­
JJST
GAS­
AND­
EMISSION
­
DA
?
CHANGES
REV.
2.1
MARS
T14000S
(
SOLONOX)
CS/
MD
59F
MATCH
GAS
TMD­
2S
REV.
2
DATA
FOR
NOMINAL
PERFORMANCE
:
VEL
T
Y
~
G
S
D
NATURAL
GAS
,
LEVATION,
FEET
2185.

7­+
LNLET
LOSS,
I
N
.
H20
2.0
SXHAUST
LOSS,
I
N
.
H20
2.0
r
J
+
f
O
D
WMB
TEMP,
DEG.
F
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
$
EL
HUMI,
PCT
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.
30.
~
X
H
A
U
S
T
LOSS
H
P
24.
26.
28.
ELEVATION
LOSS
HP
297.
353
.
413.
472.

COMP
OR
PUMP
RPM
6585.
6899.
7191.
7450.

89.
PERCENT
GAS
PROD.
SPEED
87
.
88.
89
.
SAS
PRODUCER
R
P
M
9402.
9491.
9571.
9639.
NET
OUTPUT
POWER
(
HP)
3389.
4067.
14744.
5422.1
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
E
D
PART
LOAD
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
IZNLET
LOSS
HP
43.
48.
54
.

3PTIMUM
RPM
.
6585.
6899.
7191.
7450.

FUEL
FLOW,
MMBTU/
HR
54.09
58.61
62.64
HEAT
RATE
,
BTU/
HP­
HR
15963.
14411.
13202.
INLET
AIR
FLOW,
LB/
HR
202242.
211747.
220297.
ENGINE
EXH
FLOW,
LB/
HR
204158.
213849.
222565.

P.
T.
INLET
TEMP.
DEG.
F
1257.
1266.
1273.
COMPENSATED
PTIT
DEG.
F
1316.
1325.
1332.
I
C
D
P.
S.
I.
G.
93.0
102.4
111.5
ENGINE
EXH
TEMP,
DEG.
F
897.
904.
909.
66.40
12247.
228067
.
230490.
120.3
1279
.
1338.
913.
40.0
60.0
65.
31.
531.

7674
.
7674.
90.
9695.
6100.
45.0%

69.99
11474­
7M­
f
.
C
I
"

40.0
60.0
71.
33
.
590.
..
7874.
7874
.
90.
9756.

50.0%
1
6778.
­

73.38
10827
.
235219.
241730,
237791.
244444.
128.6
136.7
1284.
1289.
1343.
1348.
914
.
915
.
.
.
.
.

7
,
:­

L.
*

:
­
I
MARS
T14000S
(
SOLONOX)
CS/
MD
59F
MATCH
GAS
TMD­
2S
REV.
2
DATA
FOR
NOMINAL
PERFORMANCE
­
FUEL
TYPE
S
D
NATURAL
GAS
ELEVATION,
FEET
2185.
'­­
INLET
LOSS,
:
IN.
H20
2.0
EXHAUST
LOSS,
I
N
.
H
2
0
2.0
'
AMB
TEMP,
DE(:.
F
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
­
REL
HTJMI,
P
c
r
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
INLET
LOSS
HIP
76.
81.
87.
92.
97
.
103
.
EXHAUST
LOSS
HP
35.
36.
38.
39.
41.
42
.
.
ELEVATION
LOSS
HP
648.
708.
766.
825.
884,
941.

.'
zOMP
OR
PUMP
RPM
8054
.
OPTIMUM
RPM
8054
.
GAS
PRODUCER
RPM
9820.

SPECIFIED
PART
LOAD
55.0%

FUEL
FLOW,
MUIBTU/
HR
76.67
OHEAT
RATE
,
I3TU/
HP­
HR
10284
.
.
INLET
AIR
FLOW,
LB/
HR
247994.
ENGINE
EXH
FlLOW,
LB/
HR
­
250846.
­
ZPCD
P.
S.
I.
G<.
144.6
P.
T.
INLET
TEMP.
DEG.
F
1293,
COMPENSATED
]?
TIT
DEG.
F
1353.

,
ENGINE
EXH
TEMP,
DEG.
F
915.
NET
OUTPUT
POWER
(
HP)
7456J
7.
8226.
8226.
9883
.
8133
.
60.0%

79
.
84
9816.
254158.
257142.
152
.
5
1298.
1357.
915.
8379.
8379.
9995.
8811.
65.0%

83.09
9431.
260628.
263747.
160.0
1304.
1363.
914
.
8519.
8519
.
10117.
9489.
70.0%

86.24
9088.
266511.
269762.
.
167.4
1310.
1369.
913.
8648.
8648
.
10238.
10167
.
75.01%

89
.
16
87701.
271926.
275300.
174.7
1314
.
1373
.
912
.
8770.
8770.
10374
.
10845.
80.0%

91.92
8475
.
276721.
280212.
182.1
'
13
17.
1377.
910.

.
.­

i
MARS
T14000S
(
SOLONOX)
CS/
MD
59F
MATCH
GAS
TMD­
2S
REV.
2
DATA
FOR
NOMINAL
PERFORMANCE
­

3JEL
TYPE
ISLEVATION
,
FEET
ENLET
LOSS,
I
N
.
H20
'
ZXHAUST
LOSS,
IN­
H20
iHB
TEMP,
DEG.
F
S
D
NATURAL
GAS
2185.
2.0
2.0
b33'

35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
60.0
87.
93
.
98
.
103
.

656.
716.
776.
835.
895.
951.
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
*,
EL
HUMI,
PCT
INLET
LOSS
HP
77.
82.
­­

2XHAUST
LOSS
H
P
ZSVATION
LOSS
HP
35.
36.
38,
40.
41.
43
.

ZOMP
OR
PUMP
RPM
8069.
8240.
8395.
8534.
8664.
8788.
IlPTIMUM
RPM
8069.
8240.
8395.
8534.
8664.
8788.
SAS
PRODUCER
RPM
9788.
9866.
9983.
10111.
10233.
10385.
7547.
8233.
8919.
9606.
110292.
10978
I
~
E
T
OUTPUT
POWER
(
HP)
'
SPECIFIED
PART
LOAD
55.0%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
75.0%
80.0
1
_
.
I
'
FUEL
FLOW,
MMBTU/
HR
77.44
80.73
84.07
87.27
90.24
93.00
­
BEAT
RATE
,
BTU/
HP­
HR
10261.
9805.
9426.
9085.
8768.
8472.
INLET
AIR
FLOW,
LB/
HR
251135.
257572.
264240.
269988.
275537.
279984,
ENGINE
EXH
FLOW,
LB/
HR
254013.
260587.
267394.
273277.
278950.
283516.
PCD
P
.
S
.
I
.
G
.
145.8
153.6
161.2
168.7
176.2
183.5
B,
T.
INLET
TEMP,
DEG.
F
1290.
1296,
1302.
1309.
1313.
1317.
COMPENSATED
PTIT
DEG.
F
1349,
1355.
1362.
1368.
1372.
1376,
ENGINE
EXH
TEMP,
DEG.
F
909
.
909.
908.
909.
907.
906.
MARS
'

T14000S
(
SOLONOX)
CS/
MD
59F
MATCH
GAS
.
TMD­
2S
REV.
2
DATA
FOR
NOMINAL
PERFORMANCE
FUEL
TYPE:
SD
NATURAL
ELEVATIONI,
FEET
EXHAUST
LOSS,
I
N
.
H20
INLET
LOSiS,
I
N
.
H
2
0
GAS
2185.

2.0
2
.
0
'

­
33'

AMB
TEMP,
DEG,
F
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
REL
HUMI,
PCT
6
0
.
0
60.0
60.0
60.0
INLET
LOSS
HP
109.
114.
119
.
125.
EXHAUST
LOSS
HP
44.
46.
47
.
49.
ELEVATION
LOSS
HP
1009.
1068,
1129.
1193.

COMP
OR
PUMP
RPM
8902.
9001.
9087.
9234.
OPTIMUM
RPM
8902.
9001.
9087.
9234.
GAS
PRODUCEIR
RPM
10536.
10695,
10848.
11051.
NET
OUTPUT
POWER
(
HP)
11664.
12350.
113036.
13722.1
SPECIFIED
PART
LOAD
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
FULL
FUEL
FLOW,
IYIMBTU/
HR
95.49
97.71
99.73
104.01
HEAT
RATE
,
BTU/
HP­
HR
8187.
7912.
7650.
7580.
INLET
AIR
FILOW,
LB/
HR
283905.
286668.
288893,
291168.
ENGINE
EXH
F
L
O
W
,
LB/
HR
287544.
290404.
292720.
295195.
PCD
P.
S.
1.
G.
190.9
198.2
205.5
211.1
PIT,
I
N
W
T
TEMP,
DEG.
F
1318.
1319.
1320.
1356.
COMPENSATED
PTIT
DEG,
F
1378.
1379,
1379.
1415.
ENGINE
EXlK
TEMP,
DEG.
F
904
.
901,
896,
918
,

,
...

­_
~
LE~
WRE$
UES
INCORPORATED
DATE
RUN:
9­
NOV­
93
RUN
BY:
DAN
J
A
R
R
E
r
­
X 
_
PE_
fzF_
pECE
DATA
REV.
2.3
­
UST
GAS
AND
EMISSION­.
DATA
­%
iEV.­
2
.
o­­
.
REV.
2.1
MARS
T14000S
(
SOLONOX)
CS/
MD
59F
MATCH
GAS
TMD­
2S
REv.
2
DATA
FOR
NOMINAL
PERFORMANCE
`
UEL
TYPE
LEVAT
TI
ON,
FEET
3LET
LOSS,
I
N
.
H20
:
XHAUST
LOSS,
I
N
.
H20
IMB
TEMP,.
DEG.
­
F
ZL
HUMI,
PCT
:
NLET
LOSS
HP
X  AUST
LOSS
HP
XEVATION
LOSS
HP
:
OMP
OR
PUMP
RF'M
bPTIMUM
RPM
;
AS
PRODUCER
RPM
ET
OUTPUT
POWER
(
HP)
iPECIFIED
PART
LOAD
;
PEL
FLOW,
MMBTU/
HR
lEAT
RATE
,
BTU/
HP­
HR
INLET
AIR
FLOW,
LB/
HR
ENGINE
EXH
FLOW,
LB/
HR
T
D
P.
S.
I.
G.
).
To
INLET
TEMP.
DEG.
F
SD
NATURAL
GAS
2185.
2.0
.
2.0
40.0
40.0
6
0
.
0
60.0
108.
113.
44
.
46.
997.
1055­

8883.
8985.
8883.
8985.
10521.
10673
.
11522.
12200.
85.0%
90.0%

94.38
96.61
8191.
7919.
40.0
60.0
118
.
47
.
1114
9077
.
9077.
10834.
12878.
95.0%

98.66
7661.
40.0
6
0
.
0
124.
49.
1177.

9221.
9221­
11034.
13556.
FULL
102.90
7591.
280792,
283842.
286574.
2a8872.
284388.
287535.
290357.
292853.
189.4
196.6
203.8
209.3
1319.
1320.
1
3
2
0
,
`
1356.
_
_
­

`
OMPENSATED
PTIT
DEG.
F
1378,
1379.
1379.
1415.
ZNGINE
EXH
TEMP,
DEG.
F
907.
904.
899.
921.

i
GlU
1
E­
125
15­
197
lSlRl20D755.
T
Appendix
C.
3
Carnot
CEMS
Data
Appendix
C.
3.
a
NO,,
N,
O,
SO,,
CO,
0,,
and
CO,
Summaries
GFUl
E­
125
15­
1971
YR120D755.
T
­­
<.­

'
Test
No.
l­
CEM­
6A
2­
CEM­
6A
3CEM­
6A
Average
IDate
12/
7/
93
12/
7/
93
12t7193
.
Time
1019.1119
1144­
1234
1254­
1334
­­

INominal
Load
(%)
IF&
Flow
(
scfh)

IDry
Bulb
Temp.
0
Wet
t3ulb
Temp.
0
IReference
Temp.
0
.
IBarornetric
Press.
(
in.
Hg)
lrlumidity
(#
H2O#
air)
4
.
..
IEPA
"
Fd
factor(
dscf/
l
OqBtu)'
lfPA
"
Fc'
factor(
dscf/
l
O"
6Bhr)"
liW
(
btulsd)
Stack
Flow
­
based
on
Fd
(
dsdm)
!
Stack
Flow
­
based
on
Fc
(
dxfm)
Stack
Flow
­
based
on
S­
type
pitot
(
dxfm)

02.41;
(
202.
Y
IWx.
ppm
(
3.
ppm
IQO.
ppm
IUOX.
ppm
Q
15
%
0
2
IWx,
ppm
Q
15
%
0
2
IS0
IUOx.
Iblhr+
IUOx.
Ibihr++
IrlOX.
Iblhr+++
IJOX.
lWlCr68tW
lmx.
lb110*
6Blu++

CO.
pipm
Q
15
%
0
2
CO.
Itfir+
(=
o.
uJhr++
CO.
Itmr­
co.
IVlO*
GBtu+
(
10.
ItdlO%
Bhr*

1520.
ppm
Q
15
%
02
1520,
Ibh+
1520,
lwhr++
1520.
Ib/
hr+++
1520.
IWl
C
r
6
m
1520.
Ibll
0%­

H2S.
ppm
tQS.
lWhr
S02.
pprn
!;
02.
ppm
Q
15%
0
2
S02,
lblhr
,
r302.
IWlO"
GBtw
SO2,
rmi
0%­
100
108.200
35
35
68
27.57
0.0043
8.609
1,017
­
1.013
57.463
54.007
89.428
15.18
3.44
25.1
5.8
1
.
o
25.9
27.9
10.3
9.7
16.1
0.094
0.089
6.0
1
5
1.4
2.3
0.01
3
0.013
1.0.
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.004
0.003
<
1.4
<
0.013
<
0.04
<
0.05
<
0.03
<
0.0002
<
0.0002
100
108.420
35
35
68
27.55
0.0043
8,609
1.017
1,013
59.237
55241
89.969
15.34
3.37
26.3
8.4
1.1
27.9
30.1
112
10.4
16.9
0.1
02
0.095
8.9
2
2
2.0
3.3
0.020
0.018
1
2
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.004
0.004
1.4
0.01
3
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.0002
O.
OOO2
100
108.660
36
36
68
27.54
0.0044
8.609
1.01
7
1.013
59.907
57231
90.055
15.39
3.26
25.9
5
2
1.1
27.7
29.9
11.1
10.6
,

16.7
0.101
0.096
5.6
1.4
.1.3
2.0
0.012
0.012
1
2
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.004
0.004
1.4
0.013
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.0002
0.0002
58.869
55.493
89.817
15.30
3.36
'
25.8
6.5
1
.
l
272
29.3
10.9
102
16.6
0.099
0.093
6.8
1.7
1.6
2.5
0.015
0.014
1.1
0.4
.
0.4
0.7
0.004
0.004
1.4
0.01
3
0.04
Q.
05
0.03
0.0002
0.0002
IS0
PRESS
(
Camot
method)
I:
S0
TEMP
I
S
0
HUMIDITY
150
F,
ACTOR
1.042
1.042
1.042
.
1.042
1.075
1.075
1
.
OR
1.074
0.963
0.963
0.965
0.963
1.078
1.079
1.078
1.078
­­
­
EF'A
Fd­
factor
02
based
­*
­
EPA
Fc­
factor
C02
based
4.
~

Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
Fd­
factor
(
02)
++
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
Fc­
facior
(
C02)
+++
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
S­
type
pitot
IS0
PISESS
=
(
29.92
in.
Hg
I
B.
P.
in.
Hg)"
l/
2
IS0
TEMP
=
(
288
K
I
Tambient
K)"
l
.53
IS0
HIUMIDITY
=
eA(
l
9
(
Humidity
­
0.0063))
180
FACTOR
=
IS0
PRESS
IS0
TEMP
IS0
HUMIDITY
Nominal
Load
(%)
F
I
J
~
Fliow
(
sdfi)

Dry
Bulb
Temp.
(
F)
*
ret
Bidb
Temp.
0
Reference
Temp.
(
F)
Rarometrk
Press.
on­
Hg)
Humidity
(
0
HZOM
air)

EIPA
­
F
W
factor(
dscf/
lO%
Btu)'
EIPA
T
c
­
factor(
dscfll0"
BBtu)"
HMI
(
l1Wsd)
Stack
I3ow
­
based
on
Fd
(
dsdm)
Stack
Flow
­
based
on
Fc
(
dscfrn)
Sib&
Flow
­
based
on
S­
type
pitot
(
dscfm)

02.
w
co2.
?
6
CO.
Prim
N20.
ppm
N&.
FlPm
NOx.
Flpm
@
15
%
0
2
N&.
FIpm
@
15
%
02
fso
NOx.
IldtU+
NOx.
Ilfir++
NOx.
UJ/
llr+++
NDX.
lldl
owBtu+
NOx.
ll3/
10"
68an+

CO.
prim
Q
15
%
02
CQ.
bhr+
co.
m++
CO.
bhr­
CO.
IbtlOAGBtu+
CO.
lhfl
OA6Bhr++

N20.
ppm
@
15
%
0
2
N20.
Ibh+
NZO.
Iblhr++
N20.
Ihlhrcc+
N2O.
lhll
NBtu+
N2O.
lbllO%
8tuc+

H2S.
pprn
H2S.
llblhr
S02.
ppm
S02.
pprn
@
15%
02
s02.
lblhr
SOZ.
lbll
o%
Btu+
502.
IbllCP6Btu­
75
94.860
36
36
68
27.54
0.0044
8,609
1,017
1.013
56,392
52204
65.965
15.79
3.12
20.8
15.1
1.3
24.0
25.9
8.4
7.8
9.8
0.087
0.081
17.4
3.7
3.4
4.3
0.039
0.036
1
.5
0.5
0
5
0.6
0.005
0.­

C
1.4
C
0.012
C
0.04
<
0.05
<
0.02
<
O.
OOO2
<
o.
Oo02
75
94.700
37
37
68
27.56
0.0046
8.609
1.017
1,013
55.860
51
,950
67.025
15.75
3.13
21
.
o
15.0
1
.
o
24.1
26.0
8.4
7.8
10.1
0.088
0.082
172
3.6
3.4
4.4
0.038
0.035
1.1
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.004
0.004
1.4
0.01
2
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.0002
0.0002
56,126
52.077
66.495
15.77
3.13
20.9
15.0
1.1
24.0
25.9
8.4
7.8
10.0
0.088
0.081
17.3
3.7
3.4
4.4
0.038
0.036
1.3
'

0.4
0.4
0.5
0.005
0.004
1.4
0.012
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.0002
O.
OOO2
­.'
,
.
­­
ISb
PRESS
(
Camot
method)
IS0
TEMP
BO
H~
UMlOITY
SO
FACTOR
1.042
.
1
.
on
0.965
1.078
1.042
1.069
0.968
1.078
1.042,
1.070
0.966
1.078
..

­_.

­
 PIA
FdJactor
0
2
based
*'
­
EF'A
Fc­
factor
CO2
based
"
*.
+
­
Misss
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
Fd­
lador
(
02)
++
­
Nhss
emisuons
are
calc.
using
stack
R4w
based
on
Fc­
facbr
(
CO2)
+++
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
S­
type
pitd
I
S
0
PRESS
=
(
29.92
in.
Hg
I
B.
P.
in.
Hg)*
lQ
I
O
TEMP
=
(
288
K
I
Tambient
Kp1.53
BO
HUMlDlN
=
eA(
19
(
Humidity
­
0.0063))
IS0
FACTOR
=
IS0
PRESS
IS0
TEMP
*
IS0
HUMiOlTY
Test
No.
Date
Time
Average
Nominal
Load
(%
j
Fuel
Flow
(
SCRI)

Dry
Bulb
Temp.
(
F)
Wet
Bulb
Temp.
(
F)
Reference
Temp.
(
F)
Baromebic
Press.
(
in.
Hg)
Humidity
(
at
HZOl
air)

EPA
'
F6
factor(
dsdl1NBhr)'
EPA
'
Fc.
factor(
dSdl1
OW3tu)­
HHV
WSCQ
StacK
Flow
­
based
on
Fd
(
dsdm)
Stack
Flow
­
based
on
Fc
(
dscfm)
Stack
Row
­
based
on
S­
type
pitot
(
dsdm)

02,
%
c02.
%
NO*.
ppm
CO.
ppm
N20.
ppm
NO*.
ppm
@
15
'%
02
NOx,
pprn@
15%
02!
SO
NO*.
Ib/
hr+
NOx.
IMU*
NO*.
Ib/
ht++
NO*.
lbll
O%
Btu+
NOx.
IbflO%
Btw+

CO.
ppm
Q
15
%
02
CO.
IWr+
CO.
IMr*
CO.
IWr*
co.
Ibllo"
GBtu+
CO.
Ib/
lO%
Btu++

~
2
0
.
ppm
Q
15
%
02
N20.
Ibhr+
N20.
lblhr++
N20.
Lblhr*++
N20.
IbM
0"
6Btu+
N20.
lWlO%
Btuc*

S02.
pprn
S02,
pprn
Q
15%
02
s02.
fMu
502.
IbllD*
6Btui
s02.
IWl0"
6Btu++
<
<
50
sO.
520
43
41
68
27.44
O.
OO50
8.609
1.017
1.013
47.496
46.866
44.474
.
15.75
2.95
352
572
1.8
403
43.1
121)
11.8
112
0.147
0.145
65.6
11.9
11.7
11.1
0.145
0.143
2.1
0
6
0.6
0.6
0­
007
0­
007
1.4
0.01
0
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.0002
O.
OOO2
50
(
Lean
PreMi)
79,580
44
42
68
27.40
0.0051
8.609
1.017
1,013
48253
46.795
44.658
15.89
2.92
34.5
52.5
1
3
40.6
43.4
11.9
11.6
11.0
0.1
48
0.143
61.8
11.0
10.7
10.2
0.137
0.133
1.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.005
0.005
1.4
0.01
0
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.0002
0.0002
47.874
46.831
44.566
15.82
2.94
34.9
54.9
1.6
40:
s
43.3
11.9
11.7
11.1
0.1
47
ai+

63.7
11.4
1
1
2
0.141
0.138
1
8
0
5
0
5
O
S
0.006
0.006
1.4
0.01
0
0.04
0.05
0.02
O.
WO2
0.0002
10.7
IS0
PRESS
(
Carnot
method)
1.044
1.045
1.045
IS0
TEMP
1.049
1.046
1.048
0.976
0.977
0.977
1.069
1­.
068
1.069
IS0
HUMIDITY
IS0
FACTOR
­
EPA
Fd­
factor
0
2
based
..
­
EPA
Fc­
fador
C02
based
+
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
Fd­
factor
(
02)

++
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
fiow
based
on
Fc­
factor
(
C02)
+++
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
S­
type
pitot
IS0
PRESS
=
(
29.92
in.
Hg
I
B.
P.
in.
Hg)
W2
IS0
TEMP
=
(
288
K
i
Tambient
QA1
­
53
IS0
HUMlDrrY
=
eA(
19
.
(
Humidity
­
ODO63))
IS0
FACTOR
=
IS0
DRESS
*
IS0
TEMP
IS0
HUMIDITY
7
Test
No.
Date
Time
Average
Nominal
Load
(%)
Fuel
fllow
(
scfh)

Dry
Bulb
Temp.
(
F)
Wet
Bulb
Temp.
0
Refwence
Temp.
(
FJ
Barometric
Press.
(
in.
Hg)
Humidity
(#
H2OnP
air)

EPA
'
Fb
factor(
dsdI1
OA6BtU)'
 PA
'
Fc"
factor(
dsdI1
O%
BtU)­­

Stack
lRow
­
based
cn
Fd
(
dscfm)
Stack
lnow
­
based
on
Fc
(
dscfm)
Stack
lflow
­
based
on
S­
type
pitot
(
dsmn)

02.
%
COZ.
'
R
NOx.
ppm
CO.
piJm
N
2
0
.
ppm
(
IWN
NlOx,
ppm
Q
15
%
02
NKk,
ppm
Q
15
%
02
IS0
NIOx.
Ilbhr+
NDx,
IiblhrM
NDx,
UMu+++
~
i
~
x
,
mwi
w
a
~
+

CD.
ppm
Q
15
%
0
2
NDx,
IIWl
(
yLGBtu++

GO.
Iblhr+
CO.
Iblhr++
CD.
lblhrm
CO,
IbllO%
Btu+
cx9.
Ibillo%
Bam
hQ0.
ppm
Q
15
%
0
2
N20,
Im+
hl2O.
llb/
hr*
hr20.
IlblhW
N2O,
Ilbllo%
8tu+
hno.
Ilbllo%
Btu++

H2S.
ppm
HZS.
llbh
S02.
lppm
S02.
lppm
Q
15%
02
502,
IIMU
bi02.
'
Wlo%
Btu+
$
02.
WlO%
Btu++
.
.
45
42
68
27.35
0.0048
8.609
1.017
1.013
44.210
45.793
45,515
16.96
2.15
9
1498.6
112.6
302
32­
0
6.4
6.6
6.6
0.110
0.114
22442
288.9
2992
297.4
4.973
5.151
168.5
34.1
35.3
35.1
0587
0.608
c
1.4
<
0.007
SC
20.1
c
0.03
<
0.
B
<
0.01
<
O.
OOO2
<
0.
m1
35
(
Diision)
58,220
43
42
68
27.35
0.0052
8.609
1.01
7
1.013
44.888
45.233
44,?
78
16.96
221
20.1
1453.0
112.5
30.1
32.3
,

6.5
6
5
6.4
0.110
0.110
21
75.7
284.3
286.5
283.6
4.821
4.858
168.5
34.6
34.9
34.5
0.587
0.591
1.4
0.007
0.03
0.05
0.01
0.0002
OMMZ
44.549
45.513
45.147
16.96
2.1
8
20.1
1475.8
112.5
30.1
322
6.4
6.6
6
5
0.1
10
0.1
12
2209.9
2196.6
292.9
290.5
4.897
5.005
168.5
34.3
35.1
34.8
0.587
0.600
1.4
0.007
0.03
0.05
0.01
O.
OOO2
O.
OOO2
­­

SO
PRESS
(
Carnot
method)
L30
TEMP
L30
"
JMIDITY
t
S
0
FACTOR
1.046
1.046
1.043
1.049
0.972
0.979
1
.
om
1.075
1.046
1.046
0.976
1.067
*
­
 PA
Fd­
fador
02
based
41
­
Mass
emissions
are
cak.
using
stack
iiow
based
on
Fd­
factw
(
02)
++
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
Fc­
factor
(
C02)
+
H.+
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
usingstackflow
based
on
S­
lype
pitot
Is0
PRESS
=
(
29.92
in.
Hg
I
B.
P.
in.
Hg)
W2
IS0
TEMP
=
(
288
K
I
Tarnbient
Q'
1.53
SO
PlUMlMM
=
eA(
l
9
*
(
Humidity
­
0.0063))
IS0
FACTOR
=
IS0
PRESS
*
IS0
TEMP
IS0
HUMIDITY
**
­
 PA
Fc­
factw
C02
based
.
_.
­

.­
.

.
1
.­­
7
Ted
No.
Date
rime
20
15
(
Diion)
34=
28.500
Nominal
Load
(%)
Fuel
Row
(
XR)

I
­

Dry
Bulb
Temp.
(
F)
Wet
Bulb
Temp.
(
F)
Reference
Temp.
(
F)
Barometric
Press.
(
in.
Hg)
Humidity
(#
H20W
air)
43
42
68
27.35
0.0052
43
42
68
27.35
0.0052
8.609
1,017
1,013
30.061
33.983
8.609
1.017
1.013
34.362
37.731
EPA
'
Fb
factor(
dsdl1
WBtu)'
EPA
'
Fc'
factor(
dsdl1
WBtu)"
HHV
(
btulsd)
Stack
Flow
­
based
on
Fd
(
dsdm)
Stack
Flow
­
based
on
Fc
(
dsdm)

02.
Dk
co2.
%
NOx.
P
P
~
CO.
ppm
N2O.
ppm
NOx.
ppm@
15%
02
NOx.
ppm
Q
15
%
0
2
IS0
NOx.
Iblhr+
NOx.
IbhM
NOx.
IbllO"
6Btuc
NOx.
Wl0"
6Btu++
17.85
1.57
10.6
2009.4
351.4
18.02
1.44
9.2
1923.0
382.8
18.8
20.3
2.0
2
2
0.078
0.
oSs
20.6
22.1
2.6
2.9
0.075
0.082
3939.4
252.0
284.9
8.730
9.868
CO.
ppm
@
15
%
0
2
CO.
Iblhr+
co.
Ihlhr++
co.
Wl
o"
GBtu+
co.
Ibllcr6BtVw
3887.1
'
301.0
330.6
8.614
9.458
679.7
82.7
90.8
2.367
2599
784.1.
78.8
89.1
2.730
3.087
N20.
ppm
@
15
%
0
2
N20.
Whr+
N20.
I
W
h
m
N20.
IbllO"
6Btu+
N20.
IbllO"
6Btrm
1.4
0.00
1.4
0.00
H2S.
ppm
H2S.
lblhr
C
C
0.02
0.05
0.01
o:
m1
0.
m1
0.02
0.05
0.01
.
o.
Ooo1
o.
oO01
SO2.
ppm
S02.
ppm
Q
15%
02
s02.
Iblhr
s02.
IblloLGBtu+
s02.
Ibllo"
GBtU++

IS0
PRESS
(
Carnot
method)
IS0
TEMP
IS0
HUMIDITY
IS0
FACTOR
1.046
1.049
0.979
1.075
1.046
1.049
0.979
1.075
I
.
.
­
EPA
Fd­
factor
02
based
­
­
 PA
Fc­
factor
C02
based
'

+
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
Fd­
factor
(
02)
++
­
Mass
emissions
are
calc.
using
stack
flow
based
on
Fc­
factor
(
CO2)

IS0
PRESS
=
(
29.92
in.
Hg
I
B.
P.
in.
Hg)'
lR
IS0
TEMP
=
(
288
K
I
Tambient
K)*
l.
53
IS0
HUMIDITY
=
e*(
19
(
Humidity
­
0.0063))
IS0
FACTOR
=
IS0
PRESS
*
IS0
TEMP
­
IS0
HUMIDITY
.
.
­
..

......

.
I.

.­
Appendix
C.
3.
b
Calibration
md
Drift
Corrc:::­
zs
GRI
1E­
I25
15­
197
1
SIR
120D755.
T
t
CEM
System
Bi,
as
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
1
­
CEM­
6A
0
2
c02
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Status
Linearity:
Analyzer
Range
1
Analyzer
Range
2
High
Cat
Mid
Cal
Analyzer
Reads
Analyzer
Cat.
Error,%
Low
Cal
Analyzer
Reads
Analyzer
Cal.
Error.%
.

System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
zero
Span
ZWO
Span
Posttest
Bias
Span
V,
alue
Zero
IDrift,
%
Span
Drift.
%

Test
Ave.
Corrected
Ave.
25
20.90
11.17
11.31
0.6
7.99
8.16
0.7
0.1
5
8.30
0.1
5
8.03
7.99
0.00
­
1
­
08
15.39
15.18
.
25
22.48
15.20
15.59
1.6
NA
NA
0.0
0.00
22.03
0.00
22.64
22.48
0.00
2.44
3.42
3.44
500
100.
424.00
84.87
79.90
­
1
.
o
NA
NA
0.0
0.00
79.90
­
1.10
79.50.
84.87
­
1.10
­
0.40
4.96
5.83
250
100
227.20
139.30
139.40
0.0
89.72
90.30
0.2
100
80.00
40.10
40.60
0.5
NA
NA
0.0
0.00
1.20
87.50
40.25
0.30
1.15
86.00
40.70
89.72
40.1
0
0.12
­
0.05
­
0.60
0.45
i
2%

<
2%

<
5%
<
5%

<
5%
e
5%

c
3%
K
3%
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
FAIL
PASS
PASS
24.40
2.16
25.12
1.01
­
Calculations:
Analyzer
Cal.
Ernor,%
=
[
Low(
Analyzer
Reads)
­
Low(
Cal)]
/
Analyzer
Range
X
100,
%
Zero
Drift,
%
:=
[
Posttest
Biasgero)
­
Pretest
Bias(
Zero}]
/
Analyzer
Range
X
100,
%
Span
Drift,
%
=
[
Posttest
Bias(
Span)
­
Pretest
Bias(
Span)]
/
Analyzer
Range
X
100,
%
Corrected
Avt?.
=
(
Span
Value
/
(((
Posttest
Bias(
Span)
+
Pretest
Bias(
Span))
­
(
Posttest
Biasgera)
+
Pfietest
Bias
(
Zero)))
/
2))
X
(
Test
Ave.
­
(
Posttest
Biasgero)
+
Pretest
Bias(
2ero))
/
2)

Carnot
2/
21/
94
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
2­
CEM­
6A
0
2
c
0
2
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Status
Analyzer
Range
25
25
100
100
100
.­

System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
0.1
5
0.00
0.00
0.30
1.15
<
5%
PASS
­­
Spain
8.03
22.64
85.90
86.00
40.70
<
5%
PASS
Posttest
Bias
Zero
0.1
5
0.00
0.00
0.30
1.15
<
5%
PASS
Spain
7.99
22.50
85.00
85.50
40.25
<
5
%
PASS
Span
'
Value
'
7.99
22.48
84.87
89.72
40.1
0
Zero
Drift,
%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
~
3
%
PASS
Spain
Drift,
%
­
0.16
­
0.56
­
0.90
­
0.50
­
0.45
<
3%
PASS
Test
Ave.
15.25
3.38
8.48
25.39
2.23
Corrected
Ave.
15.34
3.37
8.42
26.34
1.10
Camot
3/
29/!
94
.
.­
CEM
System
Bizs
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
3­
CEM­
6A
02
c02
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Status
4
Analyzer
Range
25
25
100
100
100
System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Posttest
Bias
Span
Value
0.00
22.50
0.00
85.00
0.30
85.50
1.15
<
5%
PASS
40.25
2
5%
PASS
0.15
7.99
0.00
85.60
84.87
0.30
89.72
85­
90
1.15
c
5%
PASS
40.50
5%
PASS
40.1
0
0.15
.
7.98
7.99
0.00
22.50
22.48
0.00
0.40
0.00
<
3%
PASS
0.25
c
3%
PASS
Zero
Drift,
%
Span
Drift,
%
0.00
.­
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
Test
Ave.
Corrected
Ave.
24.93
25.88
2.24
1.11
15.25
15.39
3.26
3.26
5.22
5.1
9
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
4­
CEM­
6A
0
2
c02
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Status
Analyzer
Range
System
Bias:.
Pretest
Bias
,
Zero
Span
Posttest
Bias
Zero
Span
Spain
Value
Zero
Drift,
%
Span
Drift,
%

Test.
Ave.
Corrected
Ave.
25
25
0.15
0.00
7.98
22.55
0.14
­
0.04
7.97
.
22.39
7.99
22.48
­
0.04
­
0.16
­
0.04
­
0.64
15.63
3.10
,

15.79
3.12
100
0.00
85.60
0.00
85.80
84.87
0.00
0.20
15.26
.

15.11
100
0.30
.

85.90
0.1
0
86.00­
89.72
­
0.20
9.1
0
20.06
20.78
100
1.15
1
~
5
%
.
PASS
40.50
<
5%
PASS
1­
95
<
5%
PASS
40.60
~
5
%
PASS
40.1
0­

0.80
<
3%
PASS
0.1
0
c
3%'
PASS
2.82
1.31
...

.

7
Camot
2/
21
/
94
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
Status
1
5­
CEM­
6A
0
2
e
0
2
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Analyzer
Range
25
25
100
100
100
System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Posttest
Bias
.
Span
Value
0.00
85.80
0.10
86.00
1.95
40.60
~
5
%
PASS
<
5
%
PASS
0.14
7.97
­
0.04
22.39
0.30
85.80
84.87
0.10
85.30
89.72
2.00
41
­
00
40.1
0
~
5
%
PASS
~
5
%
PASS
0.1
5
8.01
7.99
­
0.04
22.55
22.48
0.05
0.40
~
3
%
PASS
~
3
%
.
PASS
Zero
Drift,
%
Span
Drift,
%
0.04
0.16
0.00
0.64
3.09
3.13
0.30
0.00
0.00
­
0.70
20.1
5
21.03
2.90
0.96
Test
Ave.

'
Corrected
Ave.
15.62
15.75
15.27
14.98
Carnot
2/
21/
94
­
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
6­
CEM­
6A
02
c02
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Status
­

Linearity:
Analyzer
Range
1
Analyzer
Range
2
High
Cal
Mid
Cal
Analyzer
Reads
Analyzer
Cal.
Enror,%
Low
Cal
Analyzer
Reads
Analyzer
Cal.
Enror,%

System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
Sipan
Posttest
Bias
Zero
.

Spain
Value
SlPan
Zero
Drift.
%
Sipan
Drift,
%

Test
Ave.
Corrected
Ave.
25
20.90
11.17
11
­
46
1.2
7­
99
8.1
8
0.8
0.10
8­
09
0.12
7.99
7.99
0.08
­
0.40
15.75
15.75
.
25
22­
48
15.20
15.59
1.6
NA
NA
0.0
­
0.05
22.58
0.00
22.38
22.48
0.20
­
0.80
2.93
2.95
500
100
424.00
84.87
82.30
­
0.5
NA
NA
0.0
0.00
82.50
0.90
82­
40
84­
87
0.90
­
0.1
0
55.74
57.23
250
100
227.20
139.30
138.30
­
0.4
89­
72
89.50
­
0.1
100
80.00
40.10
40.60
0.5
c2%
PASS
NA
NA
0.0
c2%
PASS
0.00
0.60
~
5
%
PASS
78.40
5%
PASS
87.00
1.20
1
.
a0
c5%
PASS
89.50
77.40
<
5%
PASS
89.72
80.00
0.48
1.20
c3%
PASS
1
.
oo
­
1
.
oo
<
3%
PASS
34.98
2.95
35.1
9
1.83
.
­
Calculations:
,.
Analyzer
Cal.
Enor,%
=
[
Low(
Analyzer
Reads)
­
Low(
Cal)]
/
Analyzer
Range
X
100,
%
Zero
Drift,
%
=
[
Posttest
Biasvero)
­
Pretest
Biasgero)]
/
Analyzer
Range
X
100,
%
Span
Drift,
%
I
=
[
Posttest
Bias(
Span)
­
Pretest
Bias(
Span)]
/
Analyzer
Range
X
100,
%
Corrected
Ave.
=:
(
Span
Value
I
(((
Posttest
Bias(
Span)
+
Pretest
Bias(
Span))
­
(
Posttest
Bias(
Zero)
­
+
Pretest
Bias
(
Zero)))
/
2))
X
vest
Ave.
­
(
Posttest
Biasgero)
+
Pretest
BiasGero))
/
2)

Carnot
2/
21/
94
L
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
7­
CEM­
6A
02
c02
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Status
Analyzer
Range
25
25
.
500
100
100
System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
0.12
0.00
0.90
1.20
1.80
<
5
%
PASS
Span
7.99
22.38
82.40
89­
50
77.40
<
5%
PASS
Zero
0.12
­
0.05
0.90
1.00
1.30
<
5%
PASS
Span
7.91
22.17
82.30
89.1
0
78.00
~
5
%
PASS
Posttest
Bias
Span
Value
7.99
22.48
84.87
89.72
80.00
Zero
Drift,
%
0.00
­
0.20
0.00
­
0.20
­
0.50
<
3%
PASS
Span
Drift,
%
­
0.32
­
0.84
­
0.02
­
0.40
0.60
<
3%
PASS
Test
Ave.
15.70
2.87
51
­
30
35.03
2.82
Corrected
Ave.
.
15;
89
2.92
52.52
34.51
1.33
7
Camot
2/
21/
94
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
8­
CEM­
6A
0
2
co2
co
NOx
N
2
0
Criteria
Status
Analyzer
Range
System
Bias:
Preteslt
Bias
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Po.
sttest
Bias
Span
Value
ilero
Drift.
%
Span
Drift.
%

Test
Ave.
Corrected
Ave.
25
0.12
7.91
0.1
0
7.86
7.99
­
0.08
­
0.20
16.62
16.96
25
­
0.05
22.1
7
­
0.05
22.00
22.48
0.00
­
0.68
2.07
2.15
1000
0.90
82.30
1
.
oo
83.40
84.87
0.01
0.1
1
ND
­
0.98
100
1.00
89.1
0
1
.
oo
88.00
89.72
0.00
­
1.10
20.65
20.14
1000
1.30
<
5%
78.00
<
5%

2.00
<
5%
79.90
<
5%
80.00
0.07
<
3%
0.1
9
<
3%

1
10.40
112.55'
.
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
Carnot
U21l94
Y
­
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptanc
Run
8­
CEM­
6A
02
02
DIL
CO
CO(
Corr)
Criteria
Status
Analyzer
Range
25
25
1000
1000
System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
Span
0.12
0.10
0.90
NA
~
5
%
PASS
7.91.
8.10
82.30
NA
~
5
%
PASS
Posttest
Bias
0.10
1.00
NA
~
5
%
PASS
Zero
0.10
Span
7.86
8.08
83.40
NA
~
5
%
PASS
7.99
7.99
84.87
NA
Span
Value
Zero
Drift,
%
­
0.08
0.00
0.01
Span
Drift,
%
­
0.20
­
0.08
0.1
1
~
3
%
PASS
~
3
%
PASS
Test
Ave.
16.62
19.13
690.50
1669.68
Corrected
Ave.
16.96
19.02
714.56
1498.64
Calculations:
CO(
C0r­
r)
=
(
20.9
­
Stack
02,
%)/(
20.9
­
Dilution
02,
%)*
CO,
ppm
CEM
System1
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
9­
CEM­
6A
02
c
o
2
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Status
Analyzer
Range
25
25
1000
100
200
System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
0.1
0
­
0.05
1.00
1­
00
3.50
~
5
%
PASS
Span
8.1
5
22.00
425.80
88.00
80.1
o
~
5
%
PASS
Zero
0.1
0
­
0.04
1.80
0.50
4.50
~
5
%
?
ASS
Span
8.1
4
22.25
425.80
89.1
0
80.90
~
5
%
PASS
Pos;
ttes;
t
Bias
Spain
Value
7.99
22.48
424.00
89.72
80.00
Zero
Drift.
%
0.00
0.04
0.08
­
0.50
0.50
<
3%
PASS
Sipan
Drift,
%
.
­
0.04
1.00
.
0.00
1.10
0.40
~
3
%
PASS
Test
Ave.
17.19
~

2.1
3
ND
20.43
111.60
Corrected
Ave.
16.96
­
2.21
­
1.40
20.11
112.52
Camot
3/
29/
94
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptanc
Run
9­
CEM­
6A
02
02
DIL
CO
CO(
Corr)
Criteria
Status
..
Analyzer
Range
25
25
1
000
1000
System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
0.10
0.10
1.00
NA
~
5
%
PASS
Span
8.15
8.03
425.80
NA
~
5
%
PASS
Zero
0.10
0.10
1.80
NA
~
5
%
PASS
Posttest
Bias
Span
8.14
8.00
425.80
NA
<
5%
PASS
Span
Value
7.99
7.99
424.00
NA
Zero
Drift,
%
0.00
0.00
0.08
Span
Drift,
YO
­
0.04
­
0.12
0.00
Test
Ave.
17.19
18.71
785.99
1331.52
Corrected
Ave.
16.96
10.78
783.85
1452.95
~
3
%
PASS
c
3%
PASS
\
\
Carnot
2/
21/
94
.
.

CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
1
O­
CEM­
GA
02
co2
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Status
~

.
J
­
~~

Analyzer
Range
25
25
1000
100
1000
System
Bias:

­_
Pretest
Bias
Zero
0.10
r'
­
0.05
1­
00
1
.
oo
3­
50
c5%
PASS
Span
8.1
5
22­
00
425.80
88.00
80.10
5%
PASS
Zero
0.1
0
­
0.04
1.80
0.50
4.50
~
5
%
PASS
Span
8.14
22.25
425.80
89.10
80.90
c5%
PASS
Posttest
Bias
Span
Value
7.99
22.48
424.00
89.72
80.00
Zlero
Drift,
%
0.00
0.04
0.08
­
0.50
0.1
0
<
3%
PASS
Span
Drift.
%
­
0.04
1.00
0.00
1.10
0.08
~
3
%
PASS
­
Test
Ave.
18.08
1.50
ND
11.15
340.00
Corrected
Ave.
17.85
1.57
­
1.40
10.63
351.37
.­­
.
.

Camot
2/
21/
9,4
­
­

e
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptanc
Run
1
0­
CEM­
6A
02
02
DIL
CO
CO(
C0rr)
Criteria
Status
Analyzer
Range
25
25
1000
1000
System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
.
0.10
0.10
1.00
NA
~
5
%
PASS
Span
8.1
5
8.03
425.80
NA
~
5
%
PASS
Zero
0.10
0.1
0
1.80
NA
<
5%
PASS
Span
8.14
8.00
425.80
NA
~
5
%
PASS
Posttest
Bias
Span
Value
7.99
7.99
424.00
NA
Zero
Drift,
YO
0.00
0.00
0.08
~
3
%
PASS
Span
Drift,
YO
­
0.04
­
0.12
0.00
~
3
%
PASS
Test
Ave.
­
18­
08
19.88
622.60
1721.31
Corrected
Ave.
17.85
19.96
620.61
2009.44
Calculations:
CO(
Corr)
=
(
20.9
­
Stack
02,
%)/(
20.9
­
Dilution
02,
%)*
CO,
ppm
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
.

\
T)
Camot
2/
21/
94
.
.­

CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptance
Run
1
1­
CEM­
6A
02
c02
co
NOx
N20
Criteria
Status
Analyzer
Ramie
System
Bias:
.

Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Pretest
13ias
Posttest
Bias
Span
Value
Zero
Drift,
%
Span
IMt,
%

`
Test
Ave.
Corrected
Ave.
25
0.1
0
8.1
5
0.1
0
8.14
7.99
0.00
­
0.04
18.25
18.02
25
­
0.05
22­
00
­
0.04
22.25
22.48
0.04
1
.
oo
1.38
1­
44
1000
1.00
425.80
1.80
425.80
424.00
0.08
0.00
ND
­
1
­
40
100
1
.
oo
88.00
0.50
89.10
89.72
­
0.50
1­
10
9­
75
9.20
.
1000
3.50
'
5%
80.1
0
c
5%

4.50
5%
80.90
c
5%
80.00
0.10
<
3%
0.08
c
3%
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
370.00
382.75
Camot
2/
21/
94
...
CEM
System
Bias
and
Linearity
Correction
Calculations
Test
No.
Acceptanc
Run
11­
CEM­
6A
02
02DIL
CO
CO(
Corr)
Criteria
status
Analyzer
Range
25
25
1000
1000
System
Bias:
Pretest
Bias
Zero
Span
0.1
0
1
.
oo
NA
~
5
%
PASS
8.03
425.80
NA
<
5%.
PASS
0.10
8.15
Posttest
Bias
0.10
1.80
NA
~
5
%
PASS
8.00
425.80
NA
~
5
%
PASS
Zero
0.10
Span
8.14
7.99
7.99
424.00
NA
0.00
0.00
0.08
~
3
%
PASS
Span
Drift,
%
­
0.04
­
0.12
0.00
<
3%
PASS
Span
Value
Zero
Drift,
YO
Test
Ave.
18.25
19.98
563.30
1622.55
­
Corrected
Ave.
18.02
20.06
561.37
1922.95
Calculations:
CO(
C0r­
r)
=
(
20.9
­
Stack
02,
%)/(
20.9
­
Dilution
02,
%)
r
CO,
ppm
,.
GRI
1E­
125
15­
197151R120D755.
T
Appendix
C.
3.
c
Raw
Data
GASEOUSMEASUREMENTS
'
CLIEh7ILOCATl3N:
CONDfTON:
t=;\
­

CORRECTED
TO
x
­,
DRY
POINT/
DRY,
UNCORRECTED
­

I
I
I
SAMPLE
TIME
TEST
CO,
I
CO
I
NOx
I
NO
I
NO,
CO
1
NOx
SO,

;

0,
I
1
SFAN
GAS
CONCENTF;
r?
FlOh'

I
A
f
M
.
AS
FOUND
SPAN
I
i
l
i
,
,
CONDITION:
I
CLENTROCATION:
SEOUS
MEASUREMENTS
CONDITION:
7
u
,>
n.!
cA!
c;
r
­
I
OPEfikTOR:
GL"
if)
2.
DATE:

TEST
LOCATION:
#

'
TESTNUMEX
6
m%&
SEOUS
MEASUREMENTS
CLIENT/
LOCATICIN:
*
CONDITION:
55%
Cjfk/
Nw]
TEST
NUM3fFi:­
9
a
4
4
­
TEST
LOCATION:
Appendix
C.
4
Formaldehyde
Data
GFU
1
E4251
5­
19715/
R
120D755.
T
­.
x
.­,

.....

L
Appendix
C.
4.
a
Exhaust
Gas
.
­
...
.
w
a­

_
.
_._
il
­..­

r
I
I­
­
oc'

N
c
C
c
?
I­

2
#
I­
Y
­

I­
rr)

2
VI
P­

m
'
3
T
VI
p:

W
­
w
s
W
m
VI
2
N
0
0
2
m
­

rrl
e
e
2
VI
m
2
;
I
f!
­

<

Ri
0
i&
e
cn
J
i
>
1
d
..
H
0
e
0
0
9
r!
I­
N
Y
m
N
9
N
v)
?

N
Q\
1
4
CI
v)
r
­

m
.
.
.

u
U
x
"
L
­
..
­

­­

­
,

r­­
..

8
..
z
P
c
t
'
C
&
­
s
5
p?

.
s
N
.­

0
N
0
d
N
OI
0
m
0
:
$
8
h
5
8
9
0
N
Y
OI
Y
x
n:
0
0.
c'!
N
m
VI
04
a
W
.
o:
cy
VI
2
N
0
I­
?

2
.
­

m
a
:
o
*

9
2
0
LL
:!

Y
'
I­
.
.
December
21
354
Nordhoff
St.,
Suite
11
3,
Chatsworth,
CA
9131
1
(
81
8)
71
8­
6070
FAX
(
818)
71
8­
9779
21,
1993
environmental
consultants
laboratory
servlcer
LTR/
468/
93
Rus=?
l1
Pence
CARNOT
1140
Pearl
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
S
t
e
216
Boulder,
CO
80302
re:
impingers
&
cartridge
samples
Dear
Russell:

P
l
e
a
s
e
f
i
n
d
enclosed
t
h
e
laboratory
analysis
reports
and
t
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
l
a
l
chain
of
custody
forms
for
f
i
f
t
y
DNPH
impinger
samples
received
on
December
8
&
9
,
1993.

The
sa~
mpltes
w
e
r
e
analyzed
for
formaldehyde
by
high
performance
liquid
chromatography.

Sincerely,

AtmAA,
Iric.

Dr.
Koc:
hy
Fung
Air
Programs
Director
Encl.
KF/
krp
k.
.,
rL
c
..
...
.~
­
­­
,
.,.
.­­.
.
~
~
­
~
_.­*
F
Inc.­

_­
21
354
Nordhoff
St..
Suite
1
13,
Chatsworth,
CA
91
31
1
(
81
8)
71
8­
6070
FAX
(
81
8)
71
8­
9779
environmental
consultants
laboratory
services
LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
REPORT
DNPH
impinger
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
w
e
r
e
extracted
and
analyzed
for
formaldehyde
(
HCHO)
by
h
i
g
h
performance
liquid
chromatography.

Report
D
a
t
e
:
December
20,
1993
D
a
t
e
Received:
December
9,
1993
D
a
t
e
E
x
t
r
a
c
t
e
d
:
December
9,
1993
D
a
t
e
Analyzed:
December
17,
1993
P.
O.
No.:
1510
C
l
i
e
n
t
P
r
O
j
.
No.:
10515
19714
HCHO
ug/
sample
Sample.
AtmAA
Lab,
No.
Sample
I
D
ug/
sample
vol.,
m
l
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­_­­­
­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­
93433­
21
9
343
3­
2
2
9
34
3
3­
2
3
9
34
33­
24
9
34
33
­
2
5
9
3
433
­
2
6
9
3433­
21
9
34
33­
29
93433­
30
93433­
31
9
3433­
32
93433­
33
93433­
34
93433­
35
93433­
36
93433­
37
93433­
39
93433­
40
93433­
41
934
33­
42
*
*
93433­
43**
93433­
44
93433­
45**
93433­
46**
93433­
47
93433­
49
93433­
50
93433­
28
93433­
38
93433­
48
1A­
fom­
6A
1.07
lB­
fom­
6A
1­
blk­
6A
2
~
­
f
o
r
m
­
6
~
2B­
fom­
6A
3­
0.20
2­
blk­
6A
­
0.21
3B­
fom­
6A
1.­
­+
0­
18
3A­
fom­
6A
1.04
3
­
blk­
6A
4A­
f
0m­
6A
­
0­
16
m
4B­
fom­
6A
sp
$
0.38
4­
blk­
6A
­
0.21
5A­
f
om­
6A
2
­
9
8
SB­
fOm­
BA
3­\
5
t
0.36
5­
blk­
6A
I
O
.
1
9
6A­
f
om­
CA
43.20
6B­
fom­
6A
q*­
Q
­
p
1
­
0
9
6­
blk­
6A
­
0.23
7A­
fom­
6A
45­
35
7B­
f
orm­
6A
YrOdS?
A­
1
­
1
0
­
0.22­
7­
blk­
6A
­
8A­
f
orm­
6A
8B­
f
om­
6A
8­
blk­
6A
­
4
­
2
9
.
9A­
f
om­
6A
620­
39
9­
blk­
6A
8.22
9B­
fom­
6A
\\!%'
2?
t
501
­
16
t
r
i
p
b
l
a
n
1.40
1.78
,

1.22
5.93
3.34
44
­
29
46.44
1281
.
7
3
1121
­
55
15
­
2
9.9
10
­
7
16.5
10.5
1
0
­
2
15.9
10.6
10.2
13.7
11.6
14.2
9.9
10.4
14.9
10.6
9.9
17.0
10.8
11.1
15.0
12.2
13.3
15
­
9
10.8
13.1
9.9
13.2
11.0
9.8
.­
._

..:.:

.
I
S
.
.

..­/.

c
.­

L
.

.
­
LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
REPORT
(
continued)

RCHO
ug/
sample
Sample
A
t
m
~
Lab.
N
o
.
ug
/
sample
Vol.,
ml
RE:
PEATS
:
93
433­
2
1
1A­
f
om­
6A
0
.
9
8
9
3
433­
3
1
0.35
4
B
­
f
o
m
­
6A
9
3
433­
4
1
7­
blk­
6A
0.22
"
TRIX
SPIKES:
9
343
3­
22
1B­
f
om­
6A
7.46
93433­
37
6B­
fom­
6A
.
8
.
3
1
0
.
0
2
Field
spikes
are
at
5
ug/
sample.
*
HCHO
s
p
i
k
e
i
s
at
6
.
7
1
ug
per
sample.
**
Large
d
i
l
u
t
i
o
n
needed
 or
these
samples.

Df.
Kochy
Fung
A
i
r
Programs
Director
2
:
.
:

.
..
­.
.

COHC
NfiHE
0
.
0
2
3
8
HCHO
El.
 11378
CHSCHEl
0.6864.
PF;
PNGL
e.
1
179
­­­­­­­­­

,
.­.
i
'
3
8.6251
8.
 1748
I
tim
HCHO
A
C
ET
0
N
CARNOT
CLIENT:
CARB
METHOD
430
TEST
DATA
'
I
TEST
LOCATION:
0
AMBENT
TEMPERATURE:

OPERATOR:
c#

MPINGERS
LOADED
c4­
Y
MPINGER
RECOVERED
CAt
SAMPLE
LINE
RECOVERED
,&

NOTES:
­
,.
I
I
c­

.
.
."
CARNOT
­
CARB
METHOD
430
TEST
DATA
2
.
ST
BAROMETRIC
PRESS.:
7
DATE:
­­
/
J/
7/$
2
TEST
LOCATION/:
Lfh
FUEL
A
I
&
~

AMBIENT'
TEMPERATURE:
RELATIVE
HUMIDIW.

IMPINGERS
LOADED
L
IMPJNGER
RECOVERED
cg
SAMPLE
LINE
RECOVERED
c#

NOTES:

'
INCLUDES
CA?.

­
PMF­
037
CARNOT
CARB
METHOD
430
TEST
DATA
­

OPERATOR:
cff
UPINGERS
LOADED
MPINGER
RECOVERED
SAMPLE
LINE
RECOVEFIED
&­

NOTES:

J
CARNOT
CARB
METHOD
430
TEST
DATA
.
­

TEST
NO.:
L/­
P>&­
I
((
A
BAROMETRIC
PRESS.:
77­
5v
I&/
7A]
CLIENT:.

DATE:
­­

TEST
LOCATION:
FUEL
I'f.&=
S
AMBIENT
TEMPERATURE:
RELATIVE
HUMIDIIY:

OPE
RAT0
R:
GYP
4
9
­
3b
06
­
36
IMPINGEFlS
LOADED
led
IMPfNGER
RECOVERED
C
"
d
SAMPLE
LINE
RECOVERED
c/
H
NOTES:

t­
i
I
­
­
1
­­­
­
,
1
*­
­
PMF437
CARNOT
AMBIENT
TEMPER
ANRE:
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY:

OPERATOR:
&#
d0­
37
IMPINGERS
LOADED
SAMPLE
LINE
RECOVERED
­
IMPINGER
RECOVERED
I
NOTES:

Pt&­
c37
I
­_
..
.

.
5
CARNOT
L.

CARB
METHOD
430
TEST
DATA
c
.­

­.­
DATE:
­­
,
c?/
5/
9?,
BAROMETRIC
PRESS.:
274
TEST
LOCATION:
'
d4.?­
FUEL:
td
:
O
M
S
r/
AM6
I
ENT
TE
Ivl
PE
RATU
RE:
RELATIVE
HUMIDIN:

OPEFATOR:
G/

IMPINGERS
LOADED
L
IMPINGER
RECOVERED
A
SAMPLE
LINE
RECOVERED
NOTES:
AMBIENT
TEMPERATURE:
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY:

n
//
OPE
%.
TOR:
cjy
ll
IMPINGERS
LOADED
IMPINGER
RECOVERED
11
II
SAMPLE
LINE
RECOVERED
I
NOTES:
.­

CARNOT
CARB
METHOD
420
TEST
DATA
­$..
8­
/&%
­
6A
.
'­
'
mm­
TEST
NO.:
CLIENT:
­

TEST
LCCATION:
'
f
§
uf/
2­
RIEL:
J
r
k
5
DATE:
­­
@
mv
BAROMETRIC
PRESS.:
a5
L­

.
.

r­

.
.­
IMPINGEAS
LOADED
IMPINGER
RECOVERED
L
SAMPLE
LINE
RECOVERED
C­
tt­

NOTES:

L
COMMENTS
AND
OBSERVATJONS:
CARNOT
CAR8
METHOD
430
TEST
DATA
7
­
/
s­
­
Gp
TEST
NO.:

DATE:
2
/>/=/
e
BAROMETRIC
PRESS.:
21­
35
CUENT:

'
@
of/&
FUEL:
NrGCLe)
E
S
T
LOCATION:

RELATIVE
HUMIDITY:

­
.
I
MPINGERS
LOADED
IMPlNGER
RECOVERED
­­

....

.
­

I
­.

­.
...
­,

GRI
1
E­
125
lii­
197
15/
R
120D755.
T
c
Appendix
C.
4.
b
Ambient
Air
3
z
B
f
!
<
0
L.
l
i.
1
d
d
z
z
F
.

.
i,
l
..
u
i
o
I
­..

r
n
z
L
2
a
4
z
d
z
0
\
4
0
'
0
0
d
z
r­
l
0
9
W
2
n
n
n
M
d
9
­
:

f
c
Z
d
f
a
n
d
d
z
0
8
0
E
2
N
3
E)

W
>
4
d
_
_

.­

A.

.
i
.
.
I
.
..
i
...

I
­
­
z
M
n
I
w
i
w
>
rf
e
h
­
s­
8
3
d
e
x
..
.

3
x
'
I
Y
21
354
Nordhoff
St..
Suite
1
13,
Chatsworth,
CA
91
31
1
(
81
8)
71
8­
6070
FAX
(
81
8)
71
8­
9ng
environmental
consultants
laboratory
services
LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
REPORT
I
m
P
R
cartridges
were
extracted
and
analyzed
for
formaldehyde
perf
onnance
liquid
chromatography.
I[
HCHO)
by
high
Report
Date
:
Date
Received:
Date
Analyzed
:

c­­
c
l
i
e
n
t
I?
ro
j.
NO.
:

.
..­

I.

­
AtsrAlL
Lab.
No.

9
3
4
33
­
97
9
3
4
33­
9
8
9
3
4
3
3
­
9
9
93433­
100
93433­
101
93433­
102
93433­
103
93
433­
1
04
93433­
105
9
3
34
3
3­
1
06
­­­.­­.­­­­­­­­­­

REPEATS
:

­
93433­
91
D
e
t
.
.
L
i
m
i
t
.
*'
December
10,
1993
December
9;
1993
December
9,
1993
10515
19714
Sample
I
D
147
138
13
5
151
116
179
137
130
16
1
1
Cr­
rs]

147
0.21
0.03
Dr.
Kochy
Fung
Air
Programs
Director
1
t
l
E
t
l
O
R
I
Z
E
D
RRT
M
E
A
IlK
I
D
N
O
CONC
R
1
6.
lilE.
l
NAHE
HCHO
L­
.
.

.­
.
I
I
I
c
1.
i
I
i
i
I
!
I
'
I.!
I
.
.
..
L
.
A
4
'
1
.
'
.
.
.
.

N
1.
!

m
a
1
I
It
I
Q
ii
I
I
..

N
­
',
I
1
1
I
I
c
,
I
I
.
I
I
i
i
0­

­
.­.

I­

s­
!
.
.
­
1
­

.
­

'
.
­,
I
­­

I
,
.
1.
­
f
­­
i­
f
.
I
/
I
1
1
I
1
­
.
m
=
c
c
i
i
j
:

N
a
i
c
I
t
*
I
I
m
a
1
I
i
I
I
I
I
11
\"
T
..
Y
0
!
I/
I
1
­
I
H
I
J
a"
X
I
­'
4
W
(
3­

u
­

P
I
I
c
4
>
­

0­
Appendix
C.
5
Benzene,
Methane,
and
TGNMO
Data
1
.
.

.,,
e,:
I.

.­­

GR.
31
E125
15­
19715/
R120D755.
T
.
Appendix
C.
5.
a
Exhaust
Gas
GRI
1
E­
ITS
15­
1
97
1S/
R120D7SS.
T
G
W
t
b
!

.

­.
e
N
C
V
w
m
m
kl
N
5
5
m
044
v
v
v
­
w
m
m
m
m
CI;.
2
P
r
r
3
N
­

.
­
(
r,
N
?
=
"

w
b
w
m
m
m
­
B
?
"

i
5
w
c.

0
z
s­
r­
3
d
.
r­
U
M
5
I
n
b­

e
..
L
U
Q
b
9
9
Iff2
2
%
­,
OQ­

*
*
21
354
Nordhoff
St..
Suite
1
13.
Chatsworth,
CA
91
31
1
(
81
8)
71
8­
6070
FAX
(
81
8)
71
8­
9779
environmental
consultants
laboratory
services
December
22,
1993
Russell
Pence
CARNOT
1140
Pearl
Street
Ste
216
Bouldeic
CO
80302
re:
10515­
19714
Dear
Russel
1
:
LTR/
4
6
9
/
9
3
Please
find
enclosed
the
laboratory
analysis
reports,
quality
assurance
summaries,
and
the
original
chain
of
custody
forms
for
ten
!
Sunma
canister
and
ten
Tedlar
bag
samples
received
on
December
9,
1993,

The
samples
were
analyzed
for
methane,
total
gaseous
non­
methane
organics,
benzene,
toluene,
and
carbon
monoxide
per
the
chain
of
custody
,

Sincerely,

AtmAZi,
Inc.

Caboratory
Director
Encl.
MLP/
kzp
environmental
consultants
laboratory
services
LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
REPORT
Benzene,
Toluene,
Methane,
&
Total
Gaseous
Non­
Methane
Organics
Analysis
in
Tedlar
Bag
Samples
Report
Date:
December
21,1993
Client:
CARNOT
P0.
No.:
1509
Project
No.:
10515
19714
Date
Received:
December
9,1993
Date
Analyzed:
December
10
&
11,1993
ANALYSIS
DESCRPTXON
Methane
and
totdgaseous
non­
methane
organics
were
measured
ly
flame
ionizah`
on
detecfionltotal
combustion
analysis
FIDlTCA)­
Benzene
and
toluene
were
measwed
by
GCIMS.

At&
Lab
NO.:
93433­
11
93433­
12
93433­
13
93433­
14
93433­
15
93433­
16
Sample
LD.:
l­
Bexu
2­
Benz
3­
Benz
4­
Benz
5­
Ben2
6­
Benz
I
I
1
I
I
I
6A
6A
6A
6A
6A
6A
1
Components
(
Concentration
in
ppmv)
Methane
4.49
(
1
cl
1.02
1.09
2.59
TGNMO
1.70
3.02
2.21
1.28
2.22
4.69
Benzene
0.62
0.36
0.34
0.34
0.32
0.76
Toluene
0.95
1.48
1.66
1.12
1.70
1.16
(
Concentration
m
ppbv)

TGNMO
is
total
gaseous
non­
methane
organics
reported
as
ppm
methane.

­.­

I­
LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
REPORT
]
Benzene,
Toluene,
CO,
Methane,
&
Total
Gaseous
Non­
Methane
Organics
Analysis
in
Tedlar
Bag
Samples
&
port
Date:
December
21,1993
Client:
CARNOT
P.
0.
No.:
1503
Project
No.:
10515
19714
.
Date
Received:
December
9,1993
Date
P
d
y
z
e
d
December
10
&
11,1993
ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTION
Methane,,
total
gaseous
non­
methane
organics,
and
c&
n
rnonm.
de
were
measured
by
flame
ionization
detectionliotal
combustion
analysis
FIDITCA).
Benzene
and
toluene
were
mectsured
by
GCIMS.

AbAA
:
Lab
NO.:
93433­
17
93433­
18
93433­
19
93433­
20
Sample
I.
D.:
?­
Bern
8­
Ben2
9­
Benz
BIk­
Bern
I
6A
I
6A
1
6A
I
6A
1
­
Components
(
Concentration
in
ppmv)
Methane.
8.95
1440
1360
<
1
TGNMO
6.48
185
202
<
1
1460
1370
<
1
Carbon
Monoxide
­

Benzene
0.83
7.33
7.19
0.21
(
Concentration
in
ppbv)

Toluene
2.68
3.94
4.05
1.04
TGNMO
is
total
gaseous
non­
methane
organics
reported
as
ppm
methane.

h
Michael
L.
Porter
QUALITYASSURANCE
SUMMARY
mepeat
~
n
d
y
s
i
s
)
i
4
Sample
Repeat
AMI*
Mean
ID
Run#
1
1
Rm#
2
Cone.
%
M.
FromMean
Methane
8­
Ben2
1440
1430
1440
0.35
TGNMO
8­
Ben~
184
186
185
0.54
Carbon
8­
Benz
1460
1460
1460
0.0
Monoxide
(
Concentration
in
ppbv)

Benzene
4­
Ben2
0.29
0.39
0.34
15
9­
Benz
7.31
7.08
7.19
1.6
Toluene
4­
Benz
0.80
1.43
1.12
28
9­
Benz
3.36
4.75
4.05
17
A
set
of
10
TedIar
bug
samples
laboratory
numbers,
93433­(
11­
20)
was
analyzed
for
methane,
TGNMO,
carbon
monoxide,
benzene,
and
toluene.
Agreement
between
repeat
andyses
is
a
measure
of
precision
and
is
shown
above
in
the
column
"
R
Diffemnce
fmm
Mean."
Repeaf
analyses
are
an
important
part
of
AtmAA's
quaiie
msurance
program
The
merage
5%
Diffetence
f
b
m
Mean
for
7
­
at
rneczsmments
fivm
the
sample
set
of
10
Tedlur
bag
samples
is
83%.
Project
No.:
Date
R
e
i
v
d
Date
Analyzed:
QUALITYASSURANCE
SUMMARY
(
Spike
Analysis)
1
1
10515­
19714
December
9,1993
December
ll,
1993
Component
Amount
Recovery
Spike
I
Theoretical
lExperimentaIf
(
W
Components
­­
Composition
(
Concenration
in
ppbv)

Benzene
(
8
ml
NBS
1811
99.5
134
135
+
12
ml93433­
19)

Toluene
(
8
ml
NBS
1811
92.4
90.4
97.8
+
12
ml93433­
19)

Spike
results
in
obtained
by
analyzing
an
exact
mlme
ofa
standard,
mixed
with
an
exact
volwne
of
a
prwiously
analyzed
sample.
The
theomfical
amount
is
obtained
by
adding
componeni!
amrtunts
contributed
by
the
known
standard
OOILune
and
b.
r
the
Known.
CpreV;
ously
analyzed)
sample
volume.
Eqxrimental
results
are
those
derived
fiom
anai'.
ng
the
spike
mixture.
CARNOT
0,
­
AND
CO,
INTEGRATED
BAG
SAMPLES
Analytical
Method
(
Orsat/
CEM):
&'
k
Unit:
6
4
Fuel:
­
6
~
~
7
Date:
121
'
3
'
3
I
I
1
1
I
3
­
Q
Appendix
C.
5.
b
Ambient
Air
GRI
1
E­
ll251!
i­
197
I
5IR120D755
.
T
21
354
Nordhoff
St.,
Suite
1
13,
Chatsworth,
CA
91
31
1
(
81
8)
71
8­
6070
FAX
(
81
8)
71
8­
9779
LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
REPORT
environmental
consultants
laboratory
services
Benzene,
Toluene,
Methane,
&
Total
Gaseous
Non­
Methane
Organics
Analysis
in
Summa
Canister
Samples
I
Report
Date:
December
21,1993
'
Client:
CARNOT
P.
O.
No.:
1511
Project
No.:
10515
19714
.
Date
Ikeived:
December
9,1993
Date
ILnalyzed:
December
11
&
13,1993
ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTION
Methane
and
totalgaseorrs
nowmethane
organics
were
measlrred
by
flame
ionization
deiecfionlfottd
combustion
analysis
FIDITCA).
Benzene
and
toIuene
were
measwrd
by
GCIMS.

AtmAA
:
Lab
NO.:
93433­
1
93433­
2
934­
33­
3
93433­
4
93433­
5
9
M
­
6
Saniple
I.
D.:
l­
Benz
2­
Ben2
3­
Benz
Blk­
Benz
4­
Benz
5i­
Be;
nz
I
AMB­
6A
1
AMB­
6A
I
AMB­
6A
I
AMB­
6A
I
AMB­
GA
1
AMB­
GA
1
656
742
11.4
666
7301
801
805
780
803
803
1.84
1.61
1.65
c
1
1.64
1.72
inititd
p
m
s
s
m
653
finad
pressure..
797
Componeints
(
Concentration
in
ppmv)
Methane
TGNMO
Benzene
1.56
<
1
(
1
(
1
(
1
<
1
0­
88
0.25
0.59
0.22
0.25
0.21
(
Concentration
in
ppbv)

0.34
0.17'
Toluene
1.61
1.06
0.92
0.020
TGNMO
is
total
gaseous
non­
methane
organics
reporfed
as
ppm
methane.
inifialpnessure,
mm
Hg
final
pressure,
mm
Hg
4
LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
REPORT
Benzene,
Toluene,
Methane,
&
Total
Gaseous
Non­
Methane
Organics
Report
Date:
Client:
P.
O.
No.:
Project
No.:
Date
Received:
Date
Analyzed:
Amlysis
in
Summa
Canister
Samples
December
21,1993
CARNOT
1511
1051519714
.
December
9,1993
December
11
&
13,1993
ANALYSIS
DESCRfPTION
Methane
and
total
gaseous
non­
methane
organics
were
measured
by
thermal
conductivity
detectionfgas
chmmatography
VCDIGC).
Benzene
and
toluene
wem
measured
by
GCfMS.

At­
Lab
NO.:
93433­
7
93433­
8
93433­
9
93433­
10
Sample
ID.:
6­
Ben2
7­
Bem
&
Ben2
9­
Benz
initial
pmssm­
645
715
644
­
650
final
pressure=
801
802
801
800
Components
(
Concentration
in
ppmv)
Methane
1.63
1.63
1.63
1.65
TGNMO
(
1
(
1
(
1
<
1
Benzene
0.33
0.47
0.27
0.30
Toluene
18.0
3.37
3.45
1.33
1
AMB­
6A
I
AMB­
6A
1
AMB­
6A
1
AMB­
6A
I
(
Concentration
in
ppbv)

TGNMO
is
totdgaseorrs
non­
methane
orgmics
reported
as
ppm
methane.
initialpressrrre,
mm
Hg
final
presswe,
mm
Hg
Michael
L.
Porter
'

Laboratory
Director
­
­
.
...

Repeat
Analysis
Run#
1
1
Run#
2
Jty
Mean
%
DDiff.
Cone
FromMean
.
.
'
,

L
:_
.

__..

....

_­
QUAUTYASSURANCE
SUMMARY
(
Repeaf
AnaIysis)

Client
Project
No.:
10515
19714
Date
R.
eceivd
December
9,1993
Date
Andyzd
December
11
&
13,1993
Sample
ID
Components
Methane
2­
Benz
6­
BenZ
TG".
Io
2­
Bern
6­
I3em
1.58
1.65
1.61
2.2
1.64
1.62
1.63
0.61
­
I
<
1
<
I
.

e1
<
1
(
Concentration
m
ppbv)
­
­

Benzene
Blk­
Bm
026
0.17
0.22
21
6­
BenZ
0.42
0%
0.33
27
Toluene
Blk­
Bem
0.023
0.016
0.020
18
6­
Bern
20.9
15.1
18.0
16
A
set
of10
Sunzna
canister
samples
laboratory
numbers,
93433­(
1­
10)
was
analyzed
for
methane,
TGNMO,
benzene,
and
toluene.
Agreement
between
repeat
analyses
is
a
measum
of
precision
and
is
shown
above
in
the
coIumn
'
8
Diffemnce
fhm
Mean.'
Repeat
analyses
are
an
impwtant
part
of
AtmAA's
quality
asswance
program.
The
uverage
%
Diffimnce
j%
m
Mean
for
6
repeal
measurements
frvm
the
sample
sef
of
10
Summa
canisier
sampIes
is
14%.

page3of
4
QUALITYASSUBANCE
SUMMARY
(
Spike
Andysis)

Project
No.:
10515­
19714
Date
Received:
December
9,1993
Date
Analyzed:
December
13,1993
Comuonent
Amount
Recovery
Spike
I
Theorbtical
[
Experimentall
(%
I
I
Components
Composition
(
Comemation
in
ppbv)

Benzene
(
10
ml
NBS
1811
48.0
48.2
100.4
+
40
mI
93443­
8)

Toluene
(
10
ml
NBS
1811
47.7
49.3
103
+
40
mI
93443­
8)

Spike
msulfs
are
obtained
by
analya'ng
an
exact
volume
of
a
standard,
mixed
with
an
exact
volume
of
a
previously
andjmd
sample.
The
theoreiical
amount
is
obtained
by
adding
component
amounts
mntduted
by
the
known
standard
volume
and
by
the
known
(
previously
analyzed)
sample
volume.
E
x
p
e
r
i
r
n
d
msrlts
are
those
&
rived
h
r
n
anaiyzing
Me
spike
rnixfwv.

.­
CARNOT
EVACUATED
FLASK
DATA
.
­
.
.
.
.
CARNOT
EVACUATED
FLASK
DATA
BY:
M
AL
Appendix
C.
6
Fuel
Analysis
Data
GRI
1
E­
12515­
19715/
Rl20D755.
T
GAS
FUEL
F
FACTOR
CALCS
Y_

.
.­

­.
12/
07/
93
.12/
08/
93
­
­
SPECIES
Mole(%)

c1
C2
C5
IS0
c4
N­
C4
IS0
c5
NC5
C
~
C
co
~
C02
:
N2
102
94.307
2.486
0.298
0.027
0.034
0.008
0.006
0.003
O.
Oo0
0.501
0.
OOO
1.937
0.393
94.507
2.757
0.320
0­
032
0.042
0.012
0.008
0.004
O.
Oo0
0.524
O­
OOO
1.527
0.267
­­
Average
94.407
2.622
0.309
0.030
0.038
0.010
0.007
0.004
0.000
0.513
0.000
1.732
0.330
GAS
MW
'
16.93
'
16.92
16.93
I3TU/
SCF=
1008.6825
1016.78
@
60F
13TLJAb.
=
22610.70
22804.51
Ib./
scf=
0.0446
0.0446
Fd"(
68)
=
Fdl'(
60)
=
8608.87
8610.53
(
02
Based)
8478.43
8480.07
FC
"(
68)
=
1017.34)
Fc'(
60)
=
1001.92)
1018.42
(
C02
Based)
1002.99
1012.73
22707.60
0.0445
8609.70
8479.25
1017.88
1002.46
.
.

1.:
15
PM
GAS
FUEL
F
FACTOR
CALCS
Date:
1247­
93
De~~
ripdon:
5­
F~
l­
6A
SPECIES
Cl
'

c
2
c3
IS0
c
4
N­
C4
IS0
c5
NC5
C6+
co
c02
H20
N2
02
MW
MOLE
%

16
30
44
58
58
72
72
86
28
44
18
28
32
94.307
2.486
0.298
0.027
0.034
0.008
0.006
0.003
O.
Oo0
0.501
0­
OOO
1­
937
0.393
Mw*%
HHV
BTU/
SCF
C
H
0
1511.46
74.69
13.13
1.57
1.97
0.58
0.43
0.26
0.00
22.05
0.00
54.26
12.58
1012.00
954.39
11.33
3.79
0.00
1773­
00.
44­
08
0.60
0.15
0.00
2524.00
7­
52
0.11
0.02
0.00
3271.00
0.88
0.01
0.00
0.00
3271­
00
1.11
0.02
0.00
0.00
3998.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
3998.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
4743.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
321.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
­
­
0.06
0.00
0.16
­
0.00
0.00
0.00
­
0.00
0.00
0.00
­
­
0.00
0.00
0.13
N
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.54
0.00
­­
1
AVGJTOT.
100.00
16Z.
98
1008.68
12.13
3.97
0.29
0.54
wr.
x
100.00
­
71.66
23.45
1.69
3.21
GAS
Mw
16.93
BTU!
SCF=
1008.68
@
6OF
BTUnb.
=
22610.70
I
b
.
k
f
=
0.0446
Fd"(
68)=
8608.87
(
02
Based)
Fd"(
60)=
8478.43
F~'(
68)
=
1017.34
(
CO2
Based)
­
_
+

Fc'(
60)
=
1001.92
­­
.­
Calculations:

Fd"(
68)
10­
6
*
[
3.64
*
(
HX)
+
1.53
*
(
C%)
+
0.14
*
(
N%)
­
0.46
*
(
02%)]
/
"
V,
B
d
l
b
Fd"(
60)
=
Fd"(
68)
*
520
R
/
528
R
Fc"(
68)
=
10­
6
*
10.321
*
(
C$)]
/
HHV,
BmAb
Fc"(
60)
=
Fc'(
68)
*
520
R
/
528
R
I
­.
­
r­

.
.
.
­.
Y
L
­
.
.
*­
ZALCO
LABORATORIES,
INC.

Analytical
&
Consufting
Services
.
­­.

*
­
.
LL;
i
­
.

_
.
_.
_.
.

CAHNIDT
Z
'
u
s
t
l
n
,
,
CA
92680­'/
388
15991
R
e
d
Hill
A
v
e
.
S
t
e
.
110
L
a
b
.
No.:
038144­
001
Received:
D
e
c
9,
1993
Reported:
D
e
c
1
0
,
1993
A
t
t
e
m
t
l
.
o
n
:
R
u
s
s
Pence
*
CHROMATOGRAPHIC
ANALYSiS
[
Z
1635)
*

C
o
n
i
p
o
n
e
n
ts
.
Mole
?,
Wt
Y
Hydrogen
0.000
0.000
C
a
r
b
o
n
IYonoxlde
0.000
0.000
Hydrogen
Sulfide
0.000
0.000
Propane
,298
­
377
N­
ButanE?
­
0
3
4
­
11s
N
­
P
e
n
tarre
.006
,
0
2
7
Hexanles+
.003
.015
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

C
a
r
b
o
n
Dioxide
.
so1
1..
301
O
x
y
g
e
n
*
393
.742
N1
tralgeln
1.937
3.202
Methane
94.307
89.285
E
t
h
a
n
e
2.486
4.411
I
soBu
tarie
.027
­
092
1
s
o
P
e
n
t
a
n
e
.
OD8
.032
CHONS
W
t
Y
CARBON
71.55)
.­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

HYUHOGEhl
23.51
OXYGEN
1.69
NLTHOGEN
3.20
SULFUR
0.00
T
o
t
a
l
s
9'
9.99
T
o
t
a
l
H/
C
­
3
3
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

100.000
100.000
'
l'ot,
a1s
=

!
3lJEClFIC
GKAVI'I'Y
1
A
i
r
=
11
­
5
8
6
0
22.36
SPECIFIC
VOiL'PlE,
cu.
ft./
lb
GROSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
B
*
r
u
/
c
u
.
f
t
.
**
1010.68
GROSS
C
A
L
O
R
I
F
I
C
VALUE,
BTU/
fb
X
X
22598.88
NF:'
l'
CALOR1
FIIC
VALUE,
B
T
U
/
c
u
.
ft.
X
X
910.85
!
JET
C
A
L
O
R
l
F
l
C
VALUE,
B
T
U
/
l
b
x*
20366.70
8.5784
C:
OMPHESSIBILl'TY
FACTOR
'
2'
160
F
,
l
ATMj
­
9980
E:
PA
'
F'
F
a
c
t
o
r
@
68
F:
8618.980
DSCF
/
MM
B
t
u
.
KCAPCD
'
F
'
Factor
I$
60
F:
8489.695
DSCF
/
HM
B
t
u
.
1
GROSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
wru/
cu.
t
t
.
x
993.50
DSCF
EXHAUST
PEW
SCF
FUEL
(
0%
Oxygen1
*
Water
S
a
t
u
r
a
t
e
d
**
Dry
G
a
s
@
60
F
,
14.73
p
s
i
a
­.
.
.
,
~
i
Jlrn
k
L
___=_­­­­#
LE­
__

T
S
a
l
y
s
r
LaboratGry
.
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
­
4309
Armour
Avenue
Bakersfield.
Californts
93308­

FAX
1
8
0
5
1
395­
3069
GAS
FUEL
F
FACTOR
CALCS
Date:
1248­
93
Descripaon:
7­
Fuei­
6A
SPECIES
MW
MOLE%
MW*%
HHV
BTUlSCF
C
H
0
N
c1
c
2
c
3
IS0
c4
NC4
IS0
c5
NC5
C6+
co
c02
H20
.
N2
02
16
30
44
58
58
72
72
86
28
44
18
28
32
94.507
2.757
0.320
0.032
0.042
0.012
0.008
0.004
0.
OOO
0.524
0.
ooo
1.527
0.267
1514.66
82.84
14.10
1.86
2.44
0.87
0.58
0.34
0.00
23.06
0.00
42.78
8­
54
1012.00
2524.00
3271.00
3271­
00
3998.00
3998.00
4743.00
321.00
.
im:
m
956.41
11.35
48.88
0.66
8.08
0.12
1.05
0.02
1.37
0.02
0.48
0.01
0.32
.
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
­
.
0.06
­
0.00
­
0.00
­
0.00
3.80
0.17
0.03
0.00
0.00
.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0­
00
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
AVG./
TOT.
100.00
1692.07
1016.78
12.24
4.00
0.25
0.43
WT.
5%
100.00
­
72.35
23.63
'
1.50
'
2.53
GAS
MW
16.92
BTU/
SCF
=
1016.78
@
60F
BTUAb.
=
2304.51
Ib./
scf=
0.0446
Fd'(
68)
=
8610.53
(
02
Based)
Fd'(
60)
=
8480.07
FC
"
(
68)
=
1018.42
(
C02
Based)
F~"(
60)
=
1002.99
__._
I*

.
.

.­
Calculations:

Fd'(
68)
=
10'
6
*
13.64
*
(
HX)
+
1.53
*
(
C%)
+
0.14
*
(
N%)
­
0.46
*
(
OZX)]
i'
HHV,
B
d
I
b
Fd"(
60)
=
Fd"(
68)
*
520
R
/
528
R
Fc"(
68)
=
10'
6
*
10.321
*
(
C
%)]
/
HHV,
B
d
l
b
Fc'(
60)
=
Fc"(
68)
*
520
R
/
528
R
I
c­
7
L
C
O
LABORATORIES,
INC.

Analytical
G
Consulting
Services
1
CARNO'I'
Lab.
No.:
038144­
002
1
5
Y
Y
l
!
Hled
Hill
Ave.
Ste.
110
Received:
U
e
c
9
,
1993
Tust3.
n,
CA
92680­
7388
Reported:
D
e
c
10,
1993
I
Attention:
~
u
s
s
Pence
\
2/
 3l%
Sample
Description:
7­
Yuel­
6A
.
12­
7­
93
Id
1030
*
CHROMATOGRAPHIC
ANALYSlS
(
2
1635)
*

Cornponen
t
s
Mole
%
Wt
Y
CHONS
Wt
%
­­­­­­­.­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Hydrogen
0.000
0
.
0
0
0
CAKBON
72.28
Carbon
]
Dioxide
.
5
2
4
1.361
HYDROGEN
23.69
Oxygen
­
2
6
7
.
SO4
OXYGEN
1.49
Nitrogen
1.527
2.525
*
NlTROGEN
2.53
Carbon
Honoxide
0.000
0
.
0
0
0
SU
L
FUR
0
.
0
0
Hydrogen
S
u
l
f
i
d
e
0
.
0
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Me
thane
94.507
8Y.
521
Totals
99.99
E
t
ha
n
e
2.757
4.896
'
rota1
H/
C
.33
Prop
a
1'
1
e
,
3
2
0
.834
3.
so
Bu
IC
a
ne
­
032
.
ill
hl­
BUtZIAe
­
0
4
2
­
142
1
sopen
tane
.012
.
os0
N­
Pen
t
a
ne
.
0
0
8
­
.036
Hexanes+
.004
.019
T
o
t
a
l
s
=
100.000
1
0
0
.
0
0
0
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

SPECIFIC
GRAVITY
(
Air
=
1)
.
5
8
5
7
S:
PECIFIC
VOLUME,
cu.
ft./
lb
%
22.37
GROSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
cu.
ft.
**
.
1018.84
GROSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
lb
%*
22792.65
NET
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
cu.
ft.
%
*
918.3U
NET
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
lb
%
*
20543.34
DSCF
EXHAUST
PER
SCF
FUEL
(
0
%
Oxygen)
8.6429
COMPRESSlBLLlTY
FACTOR
'
2'
(
6
0
F,
1
ATM)
.9980
EPA
'
F'
Factor
@
68
F:
8620.641
DSCF
/
MM
Btu.
KCAPCD
'
F'
Factor
@
60
F:
8491.332
DSCF
/
M
M
Btu.
a
n
G:
Z.
OSS
CkLCiXlTIC
VALilE,
ETU/
cu.
fi.
*
AU31.52
I
*
Watler
Saturated
**
Dry
Gas
@
60
F,
14.73
p
s
l
a
­­
4309
Armour
Avenue
Bakersfield.
California
93308
..
GAS
FUEL
ANALYSIS
SPECIES
CI
c2
c3
IS0
c4
NC4
IS0
c.
5
NC5
C6+

CO2
HZO
N2
02
­
co
Mole
(
X)
9­
13­
93
96.523
1.659
0.125
0.044
0.013
0.005
O.
Oo0
0.002
O.
Oo0
0.381
O.
Oo0
1.153
0.095
11­
16­
93
93.065
4.181
0.382
0.038
0.050
0.014
0.009
0.005
0.
OOO
0.621
O.
Oo0
1.385
0.25
1
11­
18­
93
84.202
3
­
4
3
0.3
17
0.032
0­
043
0.010
0.010
0.004
O.
Oo0
0.541
O.
Oo0
8.901
2.536
12­
07­
93
94.307
2.486
0.298
0.027
0.034
0.008
0.006
0.003
0.
OOO
0.501
O.
Oo0
1.937
0.393
12­
08­
93
Avenge*

94.507
2.757
.
0.320
0.032
0.042
0.012
0.008
0.004
O.
Oo0
0.524
O.
Oo0
1.527
0.267
Notes:
*
­
Avaerage
for
H2s
includes
the
fuel
samples
collected
on
9­
13­
93
and
11­
16­
93
and
omits
the
sample
collected
on
11­
18­
93,
12­
7­
93
and
12­
9­
93
as
it
appears
the
11­
18­
93
sample
was
diluted
With
ambient
and
the
ocher
two
sampl
were
not
anal
by
th;
&
ntracred
labratoty.
The
sample
collected
on
9­
13­
93
w
a
~
~
01le~
red
at
w
t
A
and
the
sample
collected
on
11­
16­
93
was
collected
at
­
nit
C.
The
average
of
these
cwo
fuel
gas
sampies
presents
a
more
representarive
itel
sample
for
H2S
than
any
of
che
the
octten
collecd
during
the
system­
wide
test
program.

_­

2/
17/
94
1:
15
PM
!
ZALCO
LABORATORIES,
INC.

Anafytical
&.
Consuking
Services
*

1150
3umerz
Avenue,
Suire­
C
Caacord,
CA
94520
Lab.
No.:
037261­
001
Received:
Sep
IS,
1
~
9
3
Reported:
Sep
15,
1993
.
A
t
t
e
t
i
t
i
.
o
n
:
.
Russ
P
e
n
c
e
a
.

Sample
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
:
Project
'
S30152­
9­
13­
93
*
CHROHATOaPHIC
ANALYSIS
(
2
1535)
*

Components
Mole
%
Wt
1
cxobis
Wf
'
5
Hydrogen
CarSon
Dioxide
N
i
trogen
Carbon
Honoxide
Hydrogen
S
u
l
f
i
d
e
fierhane
.
Ethane
Pro
pan
e
1
so9u
Larue
I
s
oP
en
tan
e
N­
Pen
t:
a
ne
n
exa
n
E?
s+
­
Yg=*

N­
BU
tiZne
0.000
.381
.
0
9
5
1.153
0.000.
0
.
0
0
0
96.523
1
.­
65
9
..
I
25
I
0
4
4
­
013
,005
.
0
.
0
0
0
IO02
0
­
000
1.010
1
­
947
0.000
0.000
93.293
3
­
006
­
331
­
154
­
0
4
6
­
021
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
8
.
is4
T
o
t
a
l
s
­
100.000
100.000
­
SPECIFIC
GZUiVITY
(
A
i
r
­
1)
SPECIFIC
VOLUXE,
cu.
ft./
lb
L
GXOSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
E?
TU/
cu
.
f
t
.
x
G2OSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
lb
X
X
NET
CALORIFIC
?
VALUE,
B!
I?
U/
cu.
f
t.
xx
NET
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
B
T
U
/
l
b
x
x
GFtOSS
CALORlFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
cu.
2
t
.
*
x
e
DSCF
­
EXHAUST
P
U
SCF
FUEL
I
O
1
Oxygen1
COMPRESSIBILITY
FACTOR
'
2'
160
F
,
1
ATHl
EPA
'
F'
F
a
c
t
o
r
@
58
F:
8618.222
DSCF
KCXE'CD
'
F'
Factor
@
60
F:
8488.949
DSCF
CkillJON
HYDROGEN
OXYGEN
NITROGZN
su
L
FUB
Totals
T
o
t
a
l
H/
C
­
72.90
2
4
.
1
4
­
9
2
1
­
9
5
0
.
0
0
99
.
I
99
­
33
­­

.
.5­
74
0.
22.83.
9
9
6
­
2
7
1013.50
23136.42
913.08
20844.04
.
8
­
5874
/
M
9tu.
/
rVI
Btu.
.9380.

**
Dry
Gas
@
60
F,
14.73
p
s
i
a
*
Water
S
a
t
u
r
a
t
e
d
Carno
t
1150
Burnett
Avenue,
Suite
C
Concord,
CA
94520
Attention:
Russ
Pence
.
.
Laboratory
No:
Oate
Received:
Date
Reported:
P
0
8:
1120
..
37261
9­
15­
93
9­
16­
93
Sample:
Gas
Sample
Description:
5,.
'*

;.

T
o
t
a
l
Sulfur
(
ASTM
0
3246)

As
BzS,
ppm
(
v
o
l
­
)
~

As
S
,
Grains/
100
SCF*
Sampled
on
9­
13­
93
a
t
*
Stzndard
cubic
feet
(
60
OF,
14­
7
p
i
a
)
1200
hours
.
.
.
­
­
­
.
.
.
1­
.­­.

.
.

Lab
Operations
Manager
.
..

.
.

.
..
­.

L
­.

T..

L.
c
..
.
.

r
­.
ZALLCO
IEORATOHIES,
INC.

Analyti­
I
&
Consulting
Services
L
Carnoc
.
1140
Pearl
Street,
Suite
216
Bouldler,
CO
80302
Atcention:
Russell
Tence
*'.
:.
.'
:
*­
.
.
.
*.
3,:
.
'
.
.:;>
Lab.
No.:
037960­
001
Received:
Nov
18,
1
9
9
3
Reported:
Nov
22,
1993
Samp1.
e
Description:
Trojecr
#
SO100
11­
16­
93
I
*
CHROMATOG­
PHIC
ANALYSIS
12
1635)
X
Comiponents
Hole
%
Wt
%
CHONS
Wt
%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­_
I_­

­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
Hydrogen
0
.
0
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
CARBON
72.54
Carbon
,
Dioxide
­
621
1.592
HYDROGEN
23­
57
Oxygen
.251
.467
OXYGEN
1­
62
N
i
crogen
1.385
2.259
NITROGEN
2
.
2
6
Carbon
Honoxide
0.000
0
.
0
0
0
SULFUR
0
.
0
0
Hydrogen
Sulfide
0
.
0
0
0
­
0
,
0
0
0
Methane
93.065
8
6
.
9
6
2
T
o
t
a
l
s
9
9
.
9
9
Ethane
4.181
7
.
3
2
3
T
o
t
a
l
H/
C
­
32
Propane
­
382
.982
I
so
9
u
ta
ne
I038
.129
N­
Sutantt
.
os0
.169
I
s
o
Pein
t
a
n
e
.014
.
O
S
8
N­?
en
cane
.009
.037
.
H
exa
n
e
s
i­
­
005
.023
*
rot:
ais
=
100.000
100.000
:
j
f
g
c
I
F
i
C
G
a
­
d
I
T
y
[
Air
I
r;
S
I
E
C
I
r
'
I
C
VOLUHE,
Cu.
ft./
lb
x
C;
20SS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
lb
x
x
NET
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
lb
x
x
C;
EIOSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
cu.
f
t.
X
(;
XlSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
cu.
ft.
x
*

NET'
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
cu.
ft.
x
a
DSCP
EXHAUST
PER
SCF
FUEL
(
0
%
Oxygen1
GOMPAESSl~
ILITY
FACTOR
'
2
'
1
6
0
F,
1
ATHj
ETA
'
F'
Factor
6
8
F:
8624.165
DSCF
KCAPCD
'
F'
­
f
a
c
t
o
r
li!
60
Fr
8494.803
DSCF
ca­
e
22.07
1014.21
1031.75
22767
­
32
930.33
20529.20
LI
.7547
­
9
9
7
9
/
t
l
f
l
Btu.
1
,
HM
Btu,
*­
a­

WaCt??
S
a
t
u
r
a
t
e
d
*
x
Dry
Gas
@
60
F,
1
4
.
7
3
psia
ZALCO
LABORATORIES,
INC.

Analytical
(
SI
Consukhg
Services
Carno
t
1140
Pearl
Street,
Suite
216
Eoulder,
CO
80302
Attention:
Russell
Pence
Laboratory
No:
37960
Date
Received:
11­
18­
93
Date
Reported:
11­
23­
93
P
0
8
:
I466
Sample:
Gas
Fuel
Line,
Project
t5G100
.
6
Sample
Description:
Sampled
y
`
Russell
Pence.
on
11­
16­
93
``
it
1800
hours
Total
S
u
l
f
u
r
(
ASTM
D
3246)

As
H,
S,
ppm
(
v
o
l
.)
.
1.7
As
S
,
Grains/!
OO
SCF*
0*
10
_.

*
Standard
cubic
f
~
t
(
60
OF,
14.7
psia)

e­­,>
irn
Etherton
Is
­
_____
____
.­_
gl_
E_
I_
E_
r____
z_
g_
I­
­
­
a
­
­
4309
Armour
Avenue
Bakersfield.
Celiforn'ia
93308­
DI(
ZALCO
LABORATORIES,
INC.

Analytical
&
Consulting
Services
Carno
c
1140
Pearl
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
S
u
i
t
e
212
Boulder,
CO
80302
Lab.
No.:
037982­
001
Received:
Nov
22,
1993
Reported:
Nov
2
2
,
1993
A
t
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
:
R
u
s
s
e
l
l
Pence
+.
­.
i
.
*
4
Sampl'e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
:
FS­
SA
.
11­
18­
93
*
CHROMATOGRAPHIC
ANALYSIS
[
Z
1
6
3
5
1
*

C
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
Hole
%
W
t
%
CXONS
W
t
%

O
x
y
g
e
n
2
.
5
3
6
4
.
4
4
1
OXYGEN
5.39
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

H
y
d
r
o
g
e
n
o
*
o
o
o
0.000
CARBON
6
1
.
0
7
Ca
rborl
E
l
i
oxi
de
­
5
4
1
1
.
3
0
3
HYDROGEN
1
9
.
8
9
N
i
t
r
o
g
e
n
8
.
9
0
1
1
3
.
6
4
4
NITROGEN
1
3
.
6
4
C
a
r
b
o
n
Monoxide
0
.
0
0
0
0
­
000
SULFUR
0
.
0
0
H
y
d
r
o
g
e
n
S
u
l
f
i
d
e
M
e
t
ha
ne
­
E
t
h
a
n
e
3.403
5
.
s99
T
o
t
a
l
H/
C
­
33
P
ropa
nl
e
.317
.764
I
s
o
B
u
r
a
n
e
.032
.
I
O
3
­­­­­­­
u­­­
0
.
0
0
0
0.000
8
4
.
2
0
2
7
3
.
9
1
3
T
o
t
a
l
s
99
*
99
N­
Butane
­
013
.
1
3
8
I
s
o
P
e
n
t
a
n
e
­
010
­
0
3
9
N
­
P
e
n
t
a
n
e
.
0
1
0
*
039
H
e
x
a
n
e
s
+
.
0
0
4
.
0
1
7
T
o
t
g
a
l
s
­
1
0
0
.
0
0
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
0
SI;
E(:
it'IC
GXAiiiiTY
[
Air
=
i
j
SPECIFIC
VOLUME,
cu.
ft./
lb
GROSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
GROSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
cu.
f
t
­
%*
x
x
BTU/
cu.
f
t
.

G.
ROSS
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTU/
lb
**
NET
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
B
T
U
/
c
u
.
f
t
.
%*

NET
CALORIFIC
VALUE,
BTiJ/
lb
**
D:
SCF
EXHAUST
PER
SCF
FUEL
[
O
x
Oxygen1
ERA
'
F'
F
a
c
t
o
r
@
6
8
F:
8
6
1
1
.
5
9
1
DSCF
KCAE'CD
'
F'
F
a
c
t
o
r
@
60
F:
8482.417
DSCF
COMPRESSIBILITY
FACTOR
'
Z'
I
6
0
F
J
l
ATHI
.
I_
0
.
O
~
L
Y
2
0
.
7
4
909.86
925.59
19192.1
8
8
3
4
.
5
0
1
7
3
0
3
.
3
3
7
.
9
5
4
4
.
9
9
8
2
/
MM
B
t
u
.
/
JIM
Btu.

x
Water
S
a
t
u
r
a
t
e
d
**
Dry
Gas
@
6
0
F,
1
4
­
7
3
psia
ZALCO;
LABORATORIES,
INC.

Analytical
&
Consulting
Services
\

Carnot
1140
Pearl
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
S
u
i
t
e
212
Boulder,
CO
8,0302.

Attention:
Russell
Sample:
Gas
Sample
Description:
Pence
F
S
­
J
n
w
e
r
l
Line
Project
Sampled
by
on
1­
18­
93
Laboratory
No:
37982
Date
Received:
11­
22­
93
Date
Reported:
11­
23­
93
P
0
51470
Total
Sulfur
(
ASTM
D
3246)

As
5,
Grains/
100
SCFi
<
0.06
*
Standard
cubic
f
e
e
t
(
60
O
F
,
14.7
psia)
iSir100­
10033
.
Appendix
C.
7
Flow
Rate
Data
CARNOT
SAMPLE
TRAIN
TEST
SUMMARY
ClienVLocation
Date
Test
N
um
b
er
Data
By
Test
Method
Sample
Lcication
Fuel
Reference
Temp
(
F)
Control
Box
#
Unit
Pitot
Factor
Meter
Cal
Ifactor
Stack
Area
(
sqi
ft)
Sample
Time
(
Min)
Bar
Press
([
in
tig)
%
l­
VELH204A
RJP
 PA
14
STACK
GAS
68
ES­
31
ICE
0.840
1.0292
52.56
30
.

27.57
72/
7/
93
2­
VEL,
H20­
6A
RJP
EPA
1­
4
GAS
68
ES­
31
ICE
0.840
1.0292
52.56
30
27.55
STACK
Meter
Vol
(
acfJ
Meter
Temp
(
F)
Sack
Press
(
ivvg)
Stack
Temp
(
F)
Vel
Head
(
liwg)
0
2
(%):
from
(
CEM
from
portable
C02
(%):
from
CEM
calculated
Liquid
Vol
i[
ml)
Meter
Press
(
ivvg)
Sta
rt/
Stop
'
Tim
le
21.960
37.3
0.47
926.6
0.8303
15.18
3.44
3.44
36.2
1.50
1045­
1
11
5
15.18
20.529
38.5
0.47
926.6
15.34
.
15.34
3.37
3.37
30.1
1.50
0.8303
1
145­
1
21
5
19.470
39.6
0.47
926.6
0.8303
15.39
15.39
3.26
3.26
28.0
1.50
131
5­
1
345
20.653
38.5
0.47
926.6
0.8303
15.30
15.30
3.36
3.36
31.4
1.50
3­
VE1,
H20­
6A
Average
RJP
EPA
1­
4
STACK
GAS
68
ES­
31
ICE
0.840
1.0292
52.56
30
27.54
i
a
Std
Sample
Val1
(
SCF)
Metric
Sarriple
Vol
(
mA3)
Moisture
Fraction
Stack
Gas
Mol
Wt
Stack
Gas
Vel.
(
Wsec)
Stack
Flow
Rake
(
wacfm)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
dscfm)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
dscfh)
22.19
0.63
0.072
86.95
274.21
3
5.37E+
06
28­
36
89,428
20.67
0.59
0.064
28.44
86.87
273.946
5.40E+
06
89,969
19.56
0.55
0.063
86.89
274,012
90.055
5.40E+
06
28­
43
I
20.81,
0.59
0.07
28.41
274,057
89,817
86.90
5.39E+
06
.

VEL­
6A.
XLS
3/
29/
94
1:
14
PM
I
CARNOT
SAMPLE
TRAIN
TEST
SUMMARY
ClientRocation
Date
Test
Number
Data
By
.

Test
Method
Sample
Location
Fuel
Reference
Temp
(
F)
Control
Box
#
Unit
Pitot
Factor
Meter
Cal
Factor
Stack
Area
(
sq
f
t
)
Sample
Time
(
Min)
Bar
Press
(
in
Hg)
4­
VEL,
H20­
6A
RJP
EPA
1­
4
STACK
GAS
68
ES­
31
ICE
0.840
1.0292
52.56
30
27.54
5­
VEL.
H20s6A
RJP
EPA
1­
4
STACK
GAS
68
ES­
31
ICE
0.840
1.0292
52.56
40
27.56
Average
­­.
Meter
Vol
(
acf)
19.925
23.204
21.565
Stack
Press
(
iwg)
0.39
0.39
0.39
Vel
Head
(
iwg)
0.4373
0.4373
0.4373
02
(%):
from
CEM
15.79
15.75
15.77
from
portable
15.79
15.75
15.77
CO2
(%):
from
CEM
3.12
3.13
3.13
calculated
3.12
3.13
3.13
Meter
Press
(
i
g
)
1
S
O
1.50
1.50
Start/
Stop
Time
1420­
1450
1530­
1610
Meter
Temp
(
F)
39.7
39.6
39.7
.
Stack
Temp
(
F)
913.2
91
3.2
913.2
Liquid
Vol
(
ml)
26.2
20.6
23.4
­

Std
Sample
Vol
(
SCF)
Metric
Sample
Val
(
rnA3)
Moisture
Fraction
Stack
Gas
Mol
Wt
Stack
Gas
Vel.
(
ftfsec)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
wacfm)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
dscfm)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
dscfh)
20.01
0.57
0.058
28.48
62­
70
197,739
65,965
3.96E+*
23.33
0.66
0.040
28.69
mi46
196.969
67,025
4.02E+
06
21.67
0.61
0.05
28.58
62.58
197,354
66,495
3.99E+
06
.

VEL­
6A.
XLS
.+
2/
21/
94
8:
08
AM
CARNOT
SAMPLE
TRAIN
TEST
SUMMARY
ClientlLocatiori
Date
Test
Number
Data
By
Test
Method
Sample
Location
Fuel
Reference
Temp
(
F)
Control
Box
#
Unit
Pitot
Factor
Meter
Cat
Factor
Stack
Area
(
sq
ft)
Sample
Time
(
Min)
Bar
Press
(
in
Hg)
­­
1
2819
3
12/
8/
93
6­
VEL,
H20­
6A
RJP
EPA
1­
4
STACK
GAS
68
ES­
31
ICE
0.840
1.0292
52.56
27.44
30
.
7­
VEL.
H20­
6A
RJP
STACK
GAS
68
ICE
0.840
1.0292
52.56
40
27.40
EPA
I
­'

ES­
31
Average
Meter
Vol
(
acf)
Meter
Temp
(
F)
Stack
Press
(
i
i
g
)
Stack
Temp
(
F)
Vel
Head
(
hwg)
0
2
(%):
f
r
o
m
C:
EM
from
portable
C02
i%):
from
CEM
calculated
Liquid
Vol
(
iml)
Meter
Press,
(
ikg)
StaNStop
Time
21.077
­
.
43.5
.
a.
10
920.1
0.2012
15.75
15.75
2.95
2.95
28.3
1.50
1000­
1
030
27.813
47.9
­
0.10
920.1
0.2012
15.89
15.89
2.92
2.92
33.3
1.50
1040­
1
120
24.445
45.7
­
0.10
920.1
0.1341
15.82
15.82
2.94
2.94
,
30.8
1.50
Std
Sample
Vol
(
SCF)
Metric
Sample
Vol
(
m"
3)
Moisture
Fraction
Stack
Gas
Mol
Wt
Stack
Gas
Vel.
(
Wsec)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
wacfm)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
dscfm)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
dscfh)
20.93
0.59
0.060
28.44
42.78
134,908
44,474
2.67E+
06
27.34
­
0.77
0.054
28.50
42.76
134,856
44,658
2.68E+
06
24.14
0.68
0.06
28.47
134,882
44.566
2.67E+
06
.
42.77
5
VEL­
6A.
XLS
2/
21/
94
8:
12
AM
CARNOT
SAMPLE
TRAIN
TEST
SUMMARY
ClientLocation
Date
Test
Number
Data
By
Test
Method
Sample
Location
Fuel
Reference
Temp
(
F)
Control
Box
#
unit
Pitot
Factor
Meter
Cal
Factor
Stack
Area
(
sq
ft)
Sample
Time
(
Min)
Ear
Press
(
in
Hg)
12/
8/
93
RJP
EPA
1­
4
STACK
GAS
68
ES­
3
1
ICE
0.840
1.0292
52.56
30
27.35
8­
VEL.
HZ0­
6A
­
ILIUIYJ
9­
VE/
H20­
6A
RJP
EPA
1­
4
STACK
GAS
68
ES­
31
ICE
0.840
1
­
0292
52.56
35
27.35
Average
.­

.
.

.­
i
.
.

Meter
Vol
(
acr)
Meter
Temp
(
F)
.
Stack
Press
(
`
i
g
)
Stack
Temp
(
F)
Vel
Head
(
iwg)
0
2
(%):
from
CEM
from
portable
C02
(%):
from
CEM
calculated
Liquid
Vol
(
mi)
Meter
Press
(
iwg)
StaNStop
Time
18.824
48.8
4­
10
731.5
0.1796
16.96
16.96
2.15
2.15
21.5
1.50
1235­
1305
20.968
45.9
­
0.1
0
731.5
0.1
796
16.96
16.96
2.21
2.21
33.3
1
s
o
13351
41
0
19.896
47.4
­
0.10
731.5
0.1197
'
'
16.96
16.96
2.18
2.1
8
27.4
1.50
.­.

..
,

Std
Sample
Vol
(
SCF)
Metric
Sample
Vol
(
rn"
3)
Moisture
Fraction
Stack
Gas
Mol
Wt
Stack
Gas
Vel.
(
Wsec)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
wacfm)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
dscfm)
Stack
Flow
Rate
(
dscfh)
18.44
0.52
0.052
28.45
37.61
4551
5
2.73E+
06
i
18,603
20.66
0.59
0.071
28.25
37.74
119,012
44,778
269E+
06
19.55
0.55
0.06
28.35
37.67
45,147
­
1
i
8,
a07
2.71
E+
06
CARNOT
SAMF'LE
LOCATION:
*
I
L
UNITNO.:
fk
TESTNO.:,
[,&­­­
de\­
­

EARO.
PRESS.
(
in.
Hg):
m­
soi
A3S.
STATIC
PFIESS.
IN
STACK
(
in.
Hg)
oty>
ps
I
­
DATA
TAKEN
BY:

TEST
DESCRIPTION:
I
de\
c\
Ls\
V
CJr
­
t
o
2
PITOT
TUBE
COEFFICIENT
Cp
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
.­

­
s.

.­

L
I
I
I
I
­
­
e
­
i
i
1
r
i
I
­
4
c
u.
­

.
.
1
1
1
1
1
.
.
.
.
.
t
\

I
­
I
L;
CARNOT
..
2
+:
i
I
I
I
I
I
­
tz
C
L'

1
8
1
1
8
e
.
s
.
.
.

\

.
.
ii
.
­

­­
.

..
~

..

_.
._....

...
.­
N
I
m
­
i
I­
:
a
'
0
­
CARNOT
TRAVERSE
DATA
CLI
ENTLOCATlO
SAMPLE
LOCATION:
s­
h&­­

UNIT
NO.:
L
TEST
NO.:
'
7
­\
fELCi/>
A
BARO.
PRESS.
(
in.
Hg):

A
S
.
STATIC
PRESS.
IN
STACK
(
in.
Hg)
­­
D,
lO
ps
DATA
TAKEN
BY:
W&+
cJ+

PITOT
TUBE
COEFFICIENT
0
Cp
I
.*
'.
m
I
.
.
.
.
.
t
i
I
:
I
f
I
.
.
.
.

z
c
l
c
r
....
~­

­
CLIEN'TROCATIO
BARO.
PRESS.
(
in.
Hg):
7­
1
­
­
­
35
'
ABS.
STATIC
PRESS.
IN
STACK
(
in.
Hg)
­
0
1
ID
P,

.
.
b
I
~

DATA
TAKEN
BY:
&$?
&­­
cbLs
TEST
DESCRIPTION:
k
PITOT
TUBE
COEFFICIENT
0
*
v
Cp
.
.
c
I
I
I
­
I
,
I
I
'
I
I
.­

1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
1.1
1
f.
.
_.

­
­

.­

..
A
i
.
.­
1
5
Appendix
C.
8
Ambient
Wind
Speed
and
Directiori
Data
GRI
1
E­
125
IS­
1
971
5/
R
120D755.
T
..
~

­
.
.

,
c:.

..
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.__
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
....
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
­
.
.
..
.
.

..

.
.
.
.
.
.
­
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I­
.

Bc
X'

c
c
c
7
/
.
!
:
.
.
I
.
.
*
:
"

.
.
.
.

.
,
/
I
.
.
..,
.
.
.
­
.
_
.

.
.
.

­*
­
....
.
.
.
.
.
._.
.
.
.
.
.
.
i
t
..
:
:.,
.
:
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
_.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.5
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
.
.
._
.­
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...

.
.
.
.
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
....
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
:

.
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
.
:
'._
__.
'

..........
...........
.
.
.
.
­
.
___
II___
i­

.
_­
..
.
.
.
­
.
.
.

.
.
.
,:.
$
<:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.­.
..?
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

...
.
I
.
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
.
.
i:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
....
.
.
.
_
.
.
­_
.
.
.

c
c
c
c,!

,
.
.
r
.
.
.
­
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
c
.
.
..........

.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
....
_
*

.
.
.
.
'
.
:
.
­

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.

......
..'
_:
'
I
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
a..
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
......
.:
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
_
.
.
.
.
_..
.
:..
.
:
­
_
.
.
.
..

1
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
....
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
­.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
.
.

...

­
IC______=_
.
.
­­­
.
.
.
.
.
APPENDIX
D
CALCULATIONS
.
.
.

GFU
I
E­
12.5
15­
1!?
7
15/
R
120D755.
T
D­
1
Appendix
D.
1
General
Emissions
Calculations
GIUl
E­
125
115­
19715/
R120D755.
T
Page
1
of
4
EMISSION
CALCULATIONS
1.
$
mule
Volume
and
Isokinetics
.
...
a.
Sample
gas
volume,
dscf
V,
=
0.03342
V,
Pb+­
5
(
Y)
(
I
q
.
.
)

b.
Water
vapor
voIume,
scf
V,,
=
a
0.0472
V'

­
[
5
2
k
!
]

C
SI
Moisture
content,
nondimensional
d.
Stack
gas
molecular
weight,
Ibhb
mole
Mw,,
=
0.44
(
XCOJ
+
0.32
(%
OJ
+
028
(%
NJ
M
w
,
=
MW,,
(
1
­
BJ
+
18
(
I33
e.
Absolute
stack
pressure,
in
Hg
P,
=
Pb
+
­
%
13.6
f.
Stack
velocity,
ftJsec
~
.
"
g.
Actual
stack
flow
rate,
wach
Q
=
(
VJ(
AJ(
W
I­

h.
Standard
stack
gas
flow
rate,
dscfin
Qd
=
Q
(
1
­
B
,
J
[
s
)
(
L
)
T,
29.92
1.
Percent
isokinetic
­
10020F136C219.
T
Page
2
of
4
2.
])
articulate
Emissions
a.
Grain
loading,
gddsd
C
=
0.01543
[
2)

ti.
Grain
loading
at
12%
COz,
gr/
dscf
C.
Mass
emissions,
I
b
h
3.
­­
Gaseous
Emissions.
lbhr
where,

SY
=
Jpeciific
molar
volume
of
an
ideat
gar;:

SV
=
385.3
fr3/
lb
moIe
for
qd
=
528
"
R
SV
=
3795
fr3]
lb
mole
for
Trd
=
520
"
R
4.
­­
Emissions
Rates.
lb/
106
Btu
a.
Fuel
factor
at
68
OF,
dscf/
106
BN
at
0%
O2
106[
3.64(%
H)
+
1.53(%
C)
+
0.14
(
X
R
)
+
057(%
S)
­
0.46(%
U2fLeo]

H
m
,
Bzuilb
Fa
=

b
.,
Fuel
factor
at
60
OF
520
"
R
F60
=
Fa
(
e)

C.
Gaseous
Emissions
factor
20.9
d
.
I
Particulate
emission
factor
Nomeincla
ture:

­
­
4
3,

=
12*
w2
­
­

­
stack
area,
ft'

flue
gas
moisture
content
particulate
grain
loading,
gr/
dscf
corrected
to
12%
CO,

particulate
grain
loading,
gddscf
pitot
calibration
factor,
dimensionless
nozzle
diameter,
in.

fuel
F
factor,
dscf/
106
Btu
at
0%
0,

orifice
pressure
differential,
iwg
%
isokinetics
mass
of
collected
particulate,
mg
mass
emissions
of
species
i,
lbhr
molecular
weight
of
flue
gas
molecular
weight
of
species
i:

NO,
:
46
so,
:
64
co
:
28
HC
:
16
sample
time,
min.
Page
3
of
4
average
velocity
heaL,
iwg
=
(

barometric
pressure,
in.
Hg
stack
absolute
pressure,
in.
Hg
stack
static
pressure,
iwg
p
Nommdature
(
Continued):

=
wet
stack
gas
flow
rate
at
actual
conditions,
wacfm
dry
stack
gas
flow
rate
at
standard
conditions,
dsch
specific
molar
volume
of
an
ideal
gas
at
standard
conditions,
ffAb
mole
meter
temperature,
OR
reference
temperature,
.
OR
stack
temperature,
"
R
stack
velocity,
ft/
sec
voIume
of
liquid
collected
in
impingers,
ml
dry
meter
volume
uncorrected,
dcf
dry
meter
volume
at
standard
conditions,
dscf
volume
of
water
vapor
at
standard
conditions,
scf
meter
calibration
coefficient
Page
4
of
4
Appendix
D.
2
Specific
Emissions
Calculations
.
.
­

d
z
..
.

.
.

SHEET
HO.
­
Q
f
,
COMPUTED
BY
,­

DATE
1
0
/
5
C
H
t
H
E
C
K
E
D
BY
OAT
E
­

.
.

b
­­.
11
50
Burnerr,
Suite
C,
Concord,
CA
94596
APPENDIX
E
STRIP
CHARTS
.
.
.
_
­
I
...
.
Inn
n
I
._
.
I
i
­­

I_

2­­
'
1
i
I
I
i
i
i
i
1
!
I
1
i
..

I
i
I
:
i
c
I
i
­

I
I
i
I
i­
i
I
t
I
I
i
I
T
i
L
1
1
3
I
.
.
I
.

.
1
j
!

I
;
!
I
.
I
..
:
I
.
­

..­

4
.
.
1"
­
,
­.
A
....
.
.

'.
.
­
*.
...
...
I
.
.
:

.
.
.
,
..
*
.
.
.
.
.
.
,­
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:.

.:._
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$,
'­%..
i
.
7
:
.
_.
.
­
9.

...
.:'...
.
.
.

t;:
i
!
r..
;>
.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.;..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..

a
­>­

,
.
Is­.

­­
­­

_­
I
.

~
..

.
.
..
I..

.
.
..

..
.
.

I
.
:
I
.
.
..

)
­
I
.
.

...

I
l
l
'
1
:

.
...
;
ii
j4
I
.
!
I
.

I
!
;
­
:;
.
I
1
m
.
­

­.­.
,­
\
3
.
.
.

...
.
.

.
­
.
.
.
­

i
i
.
o.
r
.....
b"
r
*
r,
l?*"
I
..­'
(
I.,.,

.........
1b.
129
I
l
I
3
"
l
.
I
1.0."
itn
.......
­
i
I
1
i
I
1
1
1
i
i
i
1
t
I
f
i
1
?
i
d
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,.
*
­
i
:
.
%.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
..
.
.
.
s
i
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
_._
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
?
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
x
.
­
_
.
.
;.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
>.*.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
7.:.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...:
.
.
.
.

.
_

?
.
­
i
­:
....
....
.
.
1
.:
A
...
APPENDIX
F
CHAIN
OF
CUSTODY
II
GRl1
E­
125
15­
197CSIR120D755
.
T
F­
1
*
CERTIFICATION
OF
SAMPLE
RECEIPT
1
F
R
o
x
c
T
*
JO
s
I
3­
197
4
OUTSIDE
LAB
REWIRED
(
Y
f
l
)
SAM?
LEDATE
fZ
17­
81
93
CUENTROCATlCN
PROJECTMANAGER
&
P
­

SAMPLE
LOCATION
SALV
METHOD($)
q%
TECHNICIAN
ch'

COMPLIANCE
TEST
(
YN)
d
DATE
DUE
/
2jZ3/
q3
RECIPIENT
k­
6
CERTIFICATION
OF
SAMPLE
RECEIPT
PFICJECT'S
lOsI7
19
OUTSIDE
IAB
REOUIFIED
(
Y;"
J
,
SAMPLE
DATE
/
z
/
7­
g/
q3
SAMPLE
LOCATION
Ah.&­
g.
N­
J
METHOO(
S)
6
p
A
TO­
ll
TECHNICIAN
/
mz
CUENTICOCATION
PROJECT
MANAGER
kf
Gwnl
0Jh'PLc
DATE
DUE
COMPLIANCE
TEST
(
YM)
AI
,

RECIPIENT
COMPANY
3ATE
B/
4/
43
.
I­
­

CERTIFICATION
OF
SAMPLE
RECEIPT
PROJECT
#
­
d
l
6
I
4
OUTSIDE
LAB
REQUIRED
(
Y
N
)
9
SAMPLE
DATE
lLPf
4
.­,*

r.
4
*

.
.
I
CUENTROCATIO
N
PROJECTMANAGER
#
.

SAMPLE
LOCATlON
METHOD(
S)
@­
flo
L
id/
TECHNlClAM
.
F
A
CHAIN
OF
CUSTODY
PRIOR
TO
SHIPMEW:

DATE
)
t/
r­
193
t
CERTIFlCATlON
OF
SAMPLE
RECEiPT
CUENTROCAnON
PROJECT
MANAGER
...
.
d
CHAIN
OF
CUSTODY
PRIOR
TO
SHIPMENT:

.
.
CARNOT
TEDLAR
BAG
SAMPLE
DATA
.
­.

.,+

­

!
I
I­

­
_
UNIT
3:
DATE:
­
­
­
1
I
BAG
ID
I
BAGID
1
BAGID
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
STOP
TIME
SAL!
PLE
LOCATION
I
I
li
!

C3MPhNY
DATE
I
I
.
­

4­

.
.

;.:
.

CHAIN
OF
CUSTODY
­
DATE
UNR
BY:

r
I
BAGID
I
BAGlD
TEST
NO.
1
I
BAG
ID
1
SdhAPE
?.
ATE
STAFlT
TIME
I
1
I
I
I
­­..
1
NOTES:
I
I
b'

I
CERTlFlCATiON
OF
SAMPLE
R
E
C
W
T
COMPUANlCE
'
TEST
(
Ym)
9
SAMPES
SHIP?

RECIPE..
.
CHAIN
OF
CUSTODY
