
 From:
hec ybanez <hybanez@gmail.com>
 To:
Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
 Date:
04/05/2010 11:58 PM
 Subject:
Re: PCA THC Variability Analysis



I think that correct 
 
Section 3 is the THC 
 
for THC when you look at the 99th percentile of long term data none of the sources could meet the standard
 
 
 
 
Ranking
RndmKilnCo
Name
DataField
Count
99th Percentile
1
1520
Lehigh Union Bridge E02-001
30-Day Rolling Average
668
23.7
2
THC-1
Suwannee Bradford, FL 1
30-Day Rolling Average
274
10.8
3
1226
Holcim Trident
30-Day Rolling Average
762
15.1
4
1239
TXI Midlothian Kiln 5
30-Day Rolling Average
444
10.2
5
1316
Holcim Mason City Kiln 2
30-Day Rolling Average
701
28.6


On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:08 PM, <Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov> wrote:
I think you are talking about Appendix 1 section 3.

Keith W. Barnett
USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG
Mail Code D243-02
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
919-541-5605
barnett.keith@epa.gov
