PART
A
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
1.0
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
(
a)
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection.

"
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
Requirements
for
Primary
Magnesium
Refining
NESHAP."
This
is
a
new
ICR
(
Number
2098.02).

(
b)
Short
Characterization.

Potential
respondents
are
owners
or
operators
of
primary
magnesium
refining
plants
that
are
major
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutant
(
HAP)
emissions.
The
national
emission
standard
for
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
NESHAP)
applies
to
emissions
from
spray
dryers,
magnesium
chloride
storage
bins,
melt/
reactor
systems,

and
launder
off­
gas
systems
at
new
and
existing
primary
magnesium
refining
plants.
The
final
rule
includes
emission
limitations
for
each
of
these
emission
points.

Owners
or
operators
must
prepare
and
operate
by
a
written
operation
and
maintenance
plan
and
a
fugitive
dust
control
plan.

Consistent
with
the
NESHAP
General
Provisions,
all
respondents
are
required
to
prepare
and
operate
by
a
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan.
Owners
or
operators
are
required
to
conduct
an
initial
performance
test
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
each
emission
limit
and
to
make
written
compliance
certifications
for
the
operation
and
maintenance
and
fugitive
dust
requirements.

Subsequent
performance
tests
are
required
twice
during
each
term
of
the
title
V
operating
permit.
Continuous
parameter
monitoring
systems
(
CPMS)
are
also
required
for
pressure
drop
and
scrubber
2
water
flow
rate.
Installation,
inspection,
and
maintenance
requirements
are
established
for
the
monitoring
systems.

Respondents
must
submit
one­
time
notifications
as
required
by
the
NESHAP
General
Provisions
and
semiannual
reports
of
deviations
from
the
rule
requirements.
An
immediate
report
is
required
if
actions
taken
in
response
to
the
startup,
shutdown,

or
malfunction
were
not
consistent
with
the
written
startup,

shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan.
Respondents
must
maintain
records
of
specific
information
to
ensure
that
the
rule
requirements
are
being
achieved
and
maintained.
These
requirements
are
listed
in
Attachment
1.

2.
Need
For
and
Use
of
the
Collection
(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection.

The
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
is
charged
under
section
112
of
the
Clean
Air
Act,
as
amended,
to
establish
NESHAP
for
new
or
existing
major
sources
or
area
sources
that
reflect:

...
the
maximum
degree
of
reduction
in
emissions
of
[
HAPs]
that
is
achievable
taking
into
consideration
the
cost
of
achieving
the
emission
reduction,
any
nonair
quality
health
and
environmental
reduction,
and
energy
requirements.
[
section
112(
d)(
2)]

This
level
of
control
is
commonly
referred
to
as
the
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT).
Certain
records
and
reports
are
necessary
for
the
Administrator
to:
(
1)
confirm
the
compliance
status
of
major
sources,
identify
any
non­
major
3
sources
not
subject
to
the
standards,
and
identify
new
or
reconstructed
sources
subject
to
the
standards;
and
(
2)
ensure
that
the
MACT
standards
are
being
achieved.
These
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
specifically
authorized
by
section
114
of
the
Act
(
42
U.
S.
C.
7414)
and
set
out
in
the
NESHAP
General
Provisions.

(
b)
Use/
Users
of
the
Data.

The
information
will
be
used
by
Agency
enforcement
personnel
to:
(
1)
identify
major
sources
and
new
or
reconstructed
sources
subject
to
the
standards,
(
2)
ensure
that
MACT
is
being
properly
applied,
and
(
3)
ensure
that
the
emission
control
devices
are
being
properly
operated
and
maintained
on
a
continuous
basis.

Based
on
the
reported
information,
EPA
can
decide
which
plants,

records,
or
processes
should
be
inspected.

3.
Nonduplication,
Consultations,
and
Other
Collection
Criteria
(
a)
Nonduplication.

A
search
of
EPA's
ongoing
ICR's
revealed
no
duplication
of
information­
gathering
efforts.
Certain
reports
required
by
State
or
local
agencies
may
duplicate
information
required
by
the
rule.

In
such
cases,
a
copy
of
the
report
submitted
to
the
State
or
local
agency
can
be
provided
to
the
Administrator
in
lieu
of
the
report
required
by
this
rule.
4
(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB.

This
section
is
not
applicable
because
this
is
a
rulerelated
ICR.

(
c)
Consultations.

This
rule
was
developed
in
consultation
with
the
State
agency,
EPA
regional
office
experts,
and
the
single
existing
primary
magnesium
plant.
The
non­
EPA
persons
consulted
during
development
of
the
rule
are
identified
in
Table
1.

TABLE
1.
PERSONS
CONSULTED
ON
THE
PROPOSED
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
ACTIVITIES
Contact
Organization
Telephone
Number
Dave
Maxfield
US
Magnesium
Corporation
801­
532­
1522
Dave
Hansell
Utah
DEQ
801­
536­
4040
(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection.

If
the
relevant
information
were
collected
less
frequently,

EPA
would
not
be
reasonably
assured
that
a
plant
is
in
compliance
with
the
standards.

(
e)
General
Guidelines.

None
of
the
guidelines
in
5
CFR
1320.6
are
being
exceeded.

(
f)
Confidentiality.

All
information
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
Agency
policies
set
forth
in
Title
40,
Chapter
1,
Part
2,
Subpart
B
­­
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information
(
see
40
CFR
2;
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;
amended
by
43
FR
39999,
September
28,

1978;
43
FR
42251,
September
28,
1978;
44
FR
17674,
March
23,

1979).

(
g)
Sensitive
Questions.
5
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
this
ICR
does
not
involve
matters
of
a
sensitive
nature.

4.
The
Respondents
and
the
Information
Requested
(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
and
NAICS
Codes.

Potential
respondents
are
owners
or
operators
of
new
and
existing
primary
magnesium
refining
plants
that
are
major
sources.
There
is
only
one
existing
plant.
The
SIC
code
for
the
respondent
is
3339;
the
NAIC
code
is
331419.

(
b)
Information
Requested.

(
i)
Data
Items,
Including
Recordkeeping
Requirements.

Attachment
1,
Source
Data
and
Information
Requirements,

summarizes
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements.

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities.
The
respondent
activities
required
by
the
rule
are
identified
in
Table
2
and
introduced
in
section
6(
a).

5.
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
(
a)
Agency
Activities.

A
list
of
Agency
activities
is
provided
in
Table
3
and
introduced
in
section
6(
c).

(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management.

This
is
not
relevant
to
this
information
collection
request.

(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility.

A
small
entity
for
this
industry
is
defined
as
a
firm
having
no
more
than
1,000
employees.
The
one
existing
plant
is
not
a
small
entity.
The
rule
provides
a
maximum
degree
of
operational
flexibility,
and
the
ICR
requirements
are
the
minimum
necessary
to
demonstrate
compliance.
The
affected
plant
has
1
year
to
demonstrate
compliance,
and
the
Administrator
or
permitting
authority
may
grant
1
additional
year
if
more
time
is
needed
to
install
controls.

(
d)
Collection
Schedule.
6
Information
contained
in
the
one­
time
only
reports
will
be
entered
into
the
National
Compliance
Database
(
NCDB)
operated
and
maintained
by
EPA's
Office
of
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Assurance.
Data
obtained
during
periodic
visits
by
Agency
personnel
from
records
maintained
by
the
respondents
will
be
tabulated
and
published
for
internal
EPA
use
in
enforcement
and
compliance
programs.
A
schedule
for
collection
of
information
and
publication
of
data
is
not
applicable
because
reports
are
triggered
by
actions
of
the
respondents.

6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden.

The
information
burden
estimates
for
reporting
and
recordkeeping
are
presented
in
Table
2.
These
numbers
were
derived
from
estimates
based
on
EPA's
experience
with
other
standards.

(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs.

The
information
collection
activities
for
the
rule
are
presented
in
Table
2.
Because
much
of
the
data
are
already
collected
by
the
respondent
under
existing
State
requirements,

minimal
respondent
development
costs
are
associated
with
the
information
collection
activities
for
the
rule.

(
i)
Estimating
Labor
Costs.
Labor
rates
and
associated
costs
are
based
on
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
(
BLS)
data.

Technical,
management,
and
clerical
average
hourly
rates
for
civilian
workers
were
taken
from
the
March
2002
Employment
Cost
Trends
(
http://
stats.
bls.
gov/
news.
release/
ecec.
t02.
htm).
Wages
for
civilian
workers
(
white­
collar
occupations)
are
used
as
the
basis
for
the
labor
rates
with
a
total
compensation
of
$
28.49/
hour
for
technical,
$
42.20/
hour
for
managerial,
and
$
18.41/
hour
for
clerical.
These
rates
represent
salaries
plus
fringe
benefits
and
do
not
include
the
cost
of
overhead.
An
overhead
rate
of
110
percent
is
used
to
account
for
these
costs.
7
The
fully­
burdened
wage
rates
used
to
represent
respondent
labor
costs
are:
technical
at
$
59.83,
management
at
$
88.62,
and
clerical
at
$
38.66.

(
ii)
Estimating
Monitoring
Costs.

There
are
no
capital,
startup,
or
operation
and
maintenance
costs
for
monitoring
because
the
affected
plant
has
already
installed
all
continuous
parameter
monitoring
systems
as
a
result
of
State
requirements.
This
final
rule
does
not
require
the
installation
of
any
additional
equipment.

(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost.

Because
the
information
collection
requirements
were
developed
as
an
incidental
part
of
standards
development,
no
costs
can
be
attributed
to
the
development
of
the
information
collection
requirements.
Because
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
on
the
part
of
the
respondent
are
required
under
the
General
Provisions
for
the
MACT
standards,
no
operational
costs
will
be
incurred
by
the
Federal
Government.
Publication
and
distribution
of
the
information
are
part
of
the
Compliance
Data
System,
with
the
result
that
no
Federal
costs
can
be
directly
attributed
to
the
ICR.
Examination
of
records
to
be
maintained
by
the
respondent
will
occur
incidentally
as
part
of
the
periodic
inspection
of
sources
that
is
part
of
EPA's
overall
compliance
and
enforcement
program,
and,
therefore,
is
not
attributable
to
the
ICR.
The
only
costs
that
the
Federal
government
will
incur
are
user
costs
associated
with
the
analysis
of
the
reported
information,
as
presented
in
Table
3.
Labor
rates
and
associated
costs
for
the
Agency
are
assumed
to
be
the
same
as
the
respondent's
hourly
rates.
The
Agency
labor
rates
are
estimated
as
follows:
technical
at
$
59.83,
management
at
$
88.62,
and
clerical
at
$
38.66.

(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
Cost.
8
There
is
only
one
affected
plant,
and
that
plant
has
installed
the
required
monitoring
equipment
as
a
result
of
existing
regulatory
requirements.
The
additional
requirements
of
the
final
rule
include
conducting
an
initial
performance
test
for
dioxin/
furan
using
EPA
Method
23;
preparing
a
startup,
shutdown,

and
malfunction
plan
and
operation
and
maintenance
plan;
and
providing
the
one­
time
notifications
during
the
3­
year
clearance
period
for
this
ICR.
Details
on
each
individual
burden
item
are
given
in
Table
2.
The
total
burden,
provided
in
Table
2,
is
731
hours;
the
estimated
cost
is
$
43,289
per
year
including
technical,
management,
and
clerical
hours.
The
total
cost
given
in
Table
2,
including
the
cost
of
labor,
capital,
operation,
and
maintenance,
is
$
43,289
per
year.

(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Cost
Tables.

The
bottom
line
respondent
burden
hours
and
costs,
presented
in
Table
2,
are
calculated
by
adding
person­
hours
per
year
down
each
column
for
technical,
managerial,
and
clerical
staff,
and
by
adding
down
the
cost
column.
The
total
annual
hours
are
731
hours.
As
discussed
above,
there
is
no
additional
capital
cost
for
monitoring
devices
or
annual
cost
for
operation
and
maintenance.

(
The
bottom
line
Agency
burden
hours
and
costs,
presented
in
Table
3,
are
calculated
by
adding
person­
hours
per
year
down
each
column
for
technical,
managerial,
and
clerical
staff,
and
by
adding
down
the
cost
column.
In
this
case,
total
cost
is
the
sum
of
this
total
salary
cost
and
total
travel
expenses
for
tests
attended.
The
total
annual
hours
are
20.
The
total
annual
cost
is
$
1,958.

(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden.

This
section
does
not
apply
because
this
is
a
new
ICR.

(
g)
Burden
Statement
9
The
average
annual
respondent
burden
per
facility
is
estimated
at
731
hours.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,

retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;

develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
in
40
CFR
part
63
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9.

PART
B
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
statistical
methods
are
not
used
in
data
collection
associated
with
this
regulation.
10
TABLE
2.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
STANDARD
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Systems
N/
A
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
rule
and
plan
activities
24
1
24
0.33b
8
0.4
0.8
$
540
B.
Required
activities
Method
23
performance
test
120
1
120
0.33b
40
2
4
$
2,698
Inspect
unpaved
areas
1
365
365
0.67c
245
12.2
24.5
$
16,660
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
plan
32
1
32
0.33b
11
1
1
$
719
Operation
and
maintenance
plan
8
1
8
0.33b
3
0.13
0.26
$
180
Fugitive
dust
emission
control
plan
16
1
40
0.33b
13
0.7
1.3
$
899
CPMS
inspections,
calibrations
16
2
32
0.67c
21
1.1
2.1
$
1,461
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Notification
of
applicability
4
1
2
0.33b
1
0.03
0.1
$
45
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
N/
A
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
N/
A
TABLE
2.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
STANDARD
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
11
Notification
of
actual
startup
N/
A
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
N/
A
Compliance
extension
request
N/
A
Notification
of
performance
test
6
1
6
0.33b
2
0.1
0.2
$
135
Site­
specific
test
plan
32
1
40
0.33b
13
1
1
$
899
Notification
of
compliance
status
16
1
16
0.33b
5
0.3
0.5
$
360
NESHAP
waiver
application
N/
A
Report
of
performance
test
60
1
60
0.33b
20
1.0
2.0
$
1,349
Semiannual
compliance
reports
2
1
2
0.67c
1
0.1
0.1
$
91
Emergency
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
reports
2
0.33
d
0.66
0.67c
0.44
0.02
0.04
$
30
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4A
B.
Plan
activities
3
1
3
0.33b
1.0
0.05
0.10
$
67
C.
Implement
activities
12
1
12
0.33b
4.0
0.2
0.4
$
270
D.
Develop
record
system
3
1
3
0.33b
1.0
0.05
0.10
$
67
E.
Time
to
enter
information
1
365
365
0.67c
245
12.2
24.5
$
16,660
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
3
1
3
0.33b
1.0
0.05
0.10
$
67
TABLE
2.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
STANDARD
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
12
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
3
1
3
0.33
b
1.0
0.05
0.10
$
67
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25e
2
0.5
0.67
0.3
0.0
0.0
$
23
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
635
32
64
$
43,289
Annualized
cost
of
capital
$
0f
Operation
and
maintenance
(
O&
M)
$
0f
Total
(
capital
recovery
plus
O&
M)
$
0f
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
59.83,
management
at
$
88.62,
and
clerical
at
$
38.66.

b
This
event
occurs
one
time
over
the
3­
year
term
of
this
ICR
and
affects
only
one
respondent
(
1/
3
=
0.33
respondents/
yr).

c
Compliance
is
not
required
until
after
the
first
year
of
this
ICR.
Affects
one
respondent
in
the
second
and
third
year
of
the
3­
year
term
of
the
ICR
(
2/
3
=
0.67
respondents/
yr).

d
Assumes
one
event
evey
three
years
(
1/
3
=
0.33
occurrences
per
respondent).

e
Assumes
15
minutes
to
transmit
recorded
information.

f
No
additional
cost
because
the
continuous
parameter
monitoring
systems
are
already
installed
and
are
required
by
the
State.
13
TABLE
3.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
STANDARD
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Occurrences
per
year
(
C)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Cx0.05)
(
E)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Cx0.1)
(
F)

Cost,
$/
yra
Attend
initial
performance
test
40
0.33b
13
1
1
$
899
Repeat
performance
test­
Retesting
preparationc
Repeat
performance­
Retestingc
Litigationd
Excess
Emissions
Enforcement
Activitiesd
Report
Review
Notification
of
construction/
reconstruction
N/
A
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
N/
A
Notification
of
actual
startup
N/
A
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
N/
A
Notification
of
initial
performance
test
2
0.33b
0.7
0.03
0.07
$
45
Notification
of
compliance
status
2
0.33b
0.7
0.03
0.07
$
45
Review
of
repeat
performance
test
report
N/
A
Review
of
semi­
annual
compliance
report
2
0.67e
1.3
0.07
0.13
$
91
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
N/
A
Review
of
emergency
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
report
2
0.33
f
0.7
0.03
0.07
$
45
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
17
1
2
$
1,125
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
0.33
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
100
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
2
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
833
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
1,125
+
$
833
=
$
1,958
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
59.83,
management
at
$
88.62,
and
clerical
at
$
38.66.

b
This
event
occurs
one
time
over
the
3­
year
term
of
this
ICR
and
affects
only
one
respondent
(
1/
3
=
0.33
occurrences/
yr).

c
Assumes
the
plant
does
not
have
to
repeat
their
performance
test
over
the
3­
year
term
of
the
ICR.
14
d
Assumes
the
plant
does
not
have
enforcement
activity
or
litigation
over
the
3­
year
term
of
the
ICR.

e
Compliance
is
not
required
until
after
the
first
year
of
this
ICR.
Affects
one
respondent
in
the
second
and
third
year
of
the
3­
year
term
of
the
ICR
(
2/
3
=
0.67
occurrences/
yr).

f
Assumes
one
event
evey
three
years
(
1/
3
=
0.33
occurrences
per
year).
15
ATTACHMENT
1
SOURCE
DATA
AND
INFORMATION
REQUIREMENTS
Requirement
Regulation
citation
General
Provisions
citation
Record
retention
a
PLANS
Startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
63.9910(
b)
63.6(
e)(
3)
Life
of
the
affected
source
Operation
and
maintenance
plan
63.9900(
b)
N/
A
Life
of
the
affected
source
Fugitive
dust
control
plan
63.9891(
b)
N/
A
Life
of
the
affected
source
Site­
specific
test
plan
63.9930(
a)
63.7(
c)
5
years
NOTIFICATIONS
Applicability
63.9930(
a)
63.9(
b)(
1)­(
3)
5
years
Construction/
reconstruction
63.9930(
a)
63.9(
b)(
4)
5
years
Request
for
extension
of
compliance
63.9930(
a)
63.9(
c)
5
years
Special
compliance
requirements
63.9930(
a)
63.9(
d)
5
years
Opacity
observations
63.9930(
a)
63.6(
h)(
4),
63.9(
f)
5
years
Performance
test
63.9930(
a)
63.7(
b),
63.9(
e)
5
years
Performance
evaluation
63.9930(
a)
63.8(
e),
63.9(
g)
5
years
Request
for
alternative
monitoring
method
63.9930(
a)
63.8(
f)(
4)
5
years
Compliance
status
63.9930(
a)
63.9(
h)
5
years
REPORTS
Semiannual
compliance
reports
b
63.9931(
a)­(
b)
N/
A
5
years
Immediate
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
reports
63.9931(
c)
63.6(
e)(
3),
63.10(
d)(
5)
5
years
Part
70
monitoring
report
63.9931(
d)
N/
A
5
years
RECORDKEEPING
Notifications
and
reports
63.9932(
a)(
1)
63.10(
b)(
2)(
xiv)
5
years
Startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan/
events
63.9932(
a)(
2)
63.6(
e)(
3)(
iii)­(
v)
5
years
Performance
tests
and
opacity
observations
63.9932(
a)(
3)
63.10(
b)(
2)(
viii)
5
years
Continuous
monitoring
systems
63.9932(
b)
63.10(
b)(
2)(
vi)­(
xi)
63.6(
h)(
7)(
i)­(
ii)
63.8(
d)(
3)
63.10(
b)(
2)(
i)­(
ii)
5
years
Records
required
to
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
63.9932(
b)
63.10(
b)(
2)(
vii)
5
years
a
Records
for
the
most
recent
2
years
must
be
retained
onsite
but
records
for
the
remaining
3
years
may
be
kept
offsite.
b
Semiannual
reports
are
authorized
by
§
63.10(
e).
The
rule
includes
streamlined
reporting
requirements
for
deviations
and
startups,
shutdowns,
or
malfunctions
where
procedures
in
the
plan
were
followed
as
provided
in
40
CFR
63.10(
d)(
5).
