PART
A
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
1.0
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
(
a)
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection.

"
NESHAP:
site
Remediation
(
Final
Rule)."
The
EPA
tracking
number
is
#
2062.02.

(
b)
Short
Characterization.

Respondents
who
will
be
required
to
perform
this
information
collection
are
the
owners
and
operators
of
facilities
that
are
subject
to
the
national
emission
standards
for
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
site
remediations
that
the
EPA
is
promulgating
under
authority
of
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA)
section
112.

A
site
remediation
involves
conducting
an
activity
or
a
series
of
activities
to
"
cleanup"
hazardous
substances,
to
the
extent
required
to
protect
human
health
and
the
environment,
that
have
or
potentially
could
contaminate
soils,
groundwaters,
or
other
environmental
media.

The
final
rule
will
apply
to
site
remediations
at
certain
types
of
facilities
performed
to
clean
up
materials
containing
organics
that
potentially
could
be
released
to
the
atmosphere
as
a
hazardous
air
pollutant
(
HAP).
These
site
remediation
activities
can
potentially
be
conducted
at
any
facility
where
materials
containing
organic
HAP
currently
are
or
have
been
in
the
past,
stored,
processed,
treated,
or
otherwise
managed
at
the
facility.
The
types
of
businesses
most
likely
to
be
subject
to
the
rule
include,
but
are
not
limited
to:
organic
liquid
storage
terminals,
petroleum
refineries,
chemical
manufacturing
facilities,
and
manufacturing
facilities
using
organic
materials.

Affected
owners
and
operators
subject
to
the
rule
will
be
required
to
install
and
operate
air
emission
controls
and
meet
certain
work
practice
standards.
To
demonstrate
initial
and
continuous
compliance
with
the
rule
requirements,
affected
owners
and
operators
will
need
to
collect
information
to
meet
specific
monitoring,
inspection,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
requirements.

The
information
collection
requirements
for
the
site
remediation
NESHAP
are
summarized
in
Attachment
1.
Each
respondent
will
be
required
to
submit
to
the
EPA
a
one­
time
notification
of
applicability
of
the
respondent's
facility
to
the
final
NESHAP.
The
respondents
will
be
required
to
perform
an
annual
performance
test
for
each
control
device
used
to
comply
with
the
emission
limitation
standards
and
submit
to
the
EPA
a
report
following
the
test.
Between
performance
tests,
the
respondents
will
be
required
to
monitor
selected
operating
parameters
indicative
of
the
control
device
performance
and
to
maintain
records
of
the
monitoring
results.
Semiannually,
the
respondent
will
be
required
to
prepare
and
submit
to
the
EPA
a
compliance
report
describing
any
periods
of
control
device
operation
during
which
the
monitored
values
of
the
control
device
operating
parameters
deviated
from
the
boundaries
established
during
the
most
recent
performance
test.
For
the
affected
sources
subject
to
work
practice
standards,
the
respondents
will
be
required
to
collect
and
maintain
records
of
the
air
pollution
equipment
inspections
and
repairs,
as
specified
in
the
rule.
The
respondents
will
need
to
also
maintain
records
of
initial
and
subsequent
determinations
for
any
affected
sources
qualifying
for
an
exemption
from
control
requirements
under
the
rule.

Records
and
reports
will
be
required
to
be
retained
for
a
total
of
5
years
(
2
years
at
the
site;
the
remaining
3
years
of
records
may
be
retained
at
an
off­
site
location).
The
files
could
be
maintained
on
microfilm,
on
computer
or
floppy
disks,
on
magnetic
tape
disks,
or
on
microfiche.

2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection.

The
EPA
is
required
under
CAA
section
112
to
establish
NESHAP
for
control
of
HAP
emissions
from
both
new
and
existing
sources
determined
to
be
major
sources
of
HAP
emissions.
The
EPA
has
determined
that
site
remediation
activities
can
be
major
sources
of
organic
HAP
(
including
benzene,
ethyl
benzene,

toluene,
vinyl
chloride,
xylenes)
and
other
volatile
organic
compounds
(
VOC).
The
range
of
potential
human
health
effects
associated
with
exposure
to
these
organic
HAP
and
VOC
include
cancer,
aplastic
anemia,
upper
respiratory
tract
irritation,

liver
damage,
and
neurotoxic
effects
(
e.
g.,
headache,
dizziness,

nausea,
tremors).
This
final
rule
will
implement
CAA
section
112(
d)
by
requiring
those
affected
site
remediation
activities
to
meet
emission
limitation,
operating
limit,
and
work
practice
standards
reflecting
the
application
of
the
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT).

To
implement
and
enforce
this
NESHAP,
certain
information
is
needed
by
the
EPA
to:
1)
confirm
the
compliance
status
of
major
sources,
identify
any
non­
major
sources
not
subject
to
the
standards,
and
identify
new
or
reconstructed
sources
subject
to
the
standards;
and
2)
ensure
that
the
standards
are
being
achieved.
These
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
specifically
authorized
by
CAA
section
114
(
42
U.
S.
C.
7414)
and
are
codified
in
the
NESHAP
General
Provisions
(
40
CFR
63
subpart
A).

(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data.

The
information
collected
will
be
used
by
EPA
personnel
to:

1)
identify
major
sources
and
new
or
reconstructed
sources
subject
to
the
standards,
2)
ensure
that
MACT
is
being
properly
applied;
3)
ensure
that
the
emission
control
devices
are
being
properly
operated
and
maintained
on
a
continuous
basis
to
reduce
HAP
emissions;
4)
identify
those
facilities
that
should
be
inspected;
and
5)
identify
those
facilities
that
may
benefit
from
compliance
assistance
activities.

To
minimize
the
burden,
much
of
the
information
the
EPA
needs
to
determine
compliance
will
be
recorded
and
retained
onsite
at
the
facility.
Such
information
will
be
reviewed
by
the
enforcement
personnel
during
an
inspection
and
will
not
need
to
be
routinely
reported
to
the
EPA.
For
situations
other
than
when
a
deviation
from
the
rule
requirements
has
occurred,
information
required
to
be
reported
has
been
reduced
to
the
extent
practical.

3.
The
Respondents
and
the
Information
Requested
(
a)
Respondents/
NAICS
Codes.

Unlike
a
specific
industry
sector
or
type
of
business,
the
respondents
potentially
affected
by
this
ICR
cannot
be
easily
or
definitively
identified.
Potentially,
the
site
remdiation
NESHAP
may
be
applicable
to
any
type
of
business
or
facility
at
which
a
site
remediation
is
conducted
to
clean
up
media
contaminated
with
organic
HAP,
and
the
remediation
activities
performed
and
the
magnitude
of
the
cleanup
meets
the
applicability
criteria
specified
in
the
rule.
A
site
remediation
that
is
subject
to
this
rule
potentially
may
be
conducted
at
any
type
of
privatelyowned
or
government­
owned
facility
at
which
contamination
has
occurred
due
to
past
events
or
current
activities
at
the
facility.
Site
remediations
performed
at
sites
where
the
facility
has
permanently
closed,
the
owner
has
gone
out
of
business,
or
the
facility
has
been
abandoned
and
there
is
no
owner
(
in
this
latter
case
a
government
agency
takes
responsibility
for
the
cleanup)
will
not
be
subject
to
this
NESHAP
in
most
cases.

The
regulated
sources
under
this
NESHAP
(
i.
e.,
the
site
remediation
activities)
are
not
the
predominant
activity,

process,
operation,
or
service
conducted
at
the
facility.
A
comprehensive
list
of
North
American
Industry
Classification
System
(
NAICS)
codes
cannot
be
compiled
for
the
respondents
who
will
potentially
be
regulated
by
this
action
due
to
the
nature
of
activities
regulated
by
the
source
category.
The
NAICS
code
indicates
a
primary
product
produced
or
service
provided
at
the
facility
rather
than
the
presence
of
a
site
remediation
performed
to
support
the
predominant
function
of
the
facility.
Some
representative
NAICS
codes
for
facilities
where
site
remediations
have
been
or
are
currently
being
conducted
at
some
(
but
not
all)

facilities
under
a
given
code
include
325211,
325192,

325188,32411,
49311,
49319,
48611,
42269,
and
42271.
However,

these
codes
are
not
necessarily
comprehensive
as
to
the
types
of
facilities
at
which
site
remediations
subject
to
the
rule
may
be
required
in
the
future.

(
b)
Information
Requested.

(
i)
Data
items,
Including
Recordkeeping
Requirements.

Attachment
1
summarizes
the
final
information
collection
requirements.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities.
The
respondent
activities
required
by
the
standards
are
identified
in
Tables
1
through
3
and
introduced
in
Section
6(
a).

4.
The
Information
Collected­­
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
(
a)
Agency
Activities.

A
list
of
Agency
activities
is
provided
in
Tables
4
through
6
and
introduced
in
Section
6(
c).

(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management.

Information
contained
in
the
one­
time
only
reports
will
be
entered
into
the
Compliance
Data
System
operated
and
maintained
by
the
EPA's
Office
of
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Assurance.

Data
obtained
from
records
maintained
by
the
respondents
during
site
inspection
visits
by
Agency
personnel
will
be
tabulated
and
published
for
internal
EPA
use
in
enforcement
and
compliance
programs.

(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility.

The
final
rule
will
place
no
requirement
on
any
facility
to
initiate
site
remediation
activities.
The
EPA
anticipates
that
parties
that
undertake
site
remediation
generally
will
do
so
voluntarily
and
that
the
impact
of
this
rule
on
those
parties
will
not
be
significant.
Further,
because
States
and
other
parties
will
decide
whether
to
undertake
site
remediation
activities,
predicting
how
many,
or
what
types
of
small
entities
will
undertake
such
activities,
is
extremely
difficult,
if
not
impossible.
Nonetheless,
the
rule
is
structured
to
avoid
impacts
on
small
businesses.
The
rule
will
specifically
exclude
from
its
scope
remediations
conducted
at
gasoline
stations,
farm
sites
and
residential
sites.
Moreover,
the
rule
will
apply
only
to
remediation
sites
located
at
a
facility
that
is
a
major
source
under
the
CAA
and
at
which
is
collocated
one
or
more
nonremediation
activities
listed
as
a
MACT
major
source
category
(
pursuant
to
CAA
section
112(
c)).
Such
sources
tend
to
be
large
businesses.
The
rule
also
contains
applicability
emission
thresholds
that
are
likely
to
exclude
many
site
remediations
conducted
at
small
businesses.
For
example,
the
rule
will
exempt
sources
where
the
total
annual
quantity
of
HAP
contained
in
all
extracted
remediation
material
at
the
facility
is
less
than
1
megagram
per
year.
For
these
reasons,
the
rule
will
not
impose
a
significant
burden
on
a
substantial
number
of
small
entities.

(
d)
Collection
Schedule.

A
schedule
for
collection
of
information
and
publication
of
data
is
not
applicable
because
reports
and
recordkeeping
are
triggered
by
action
of
the
respondents.

5.
Nonduplication,
Consultation,
and
Other
Collection
Criteria
(
a)
Nonduplication.

No
similar
information
requests
are
being
carried
out
by
the
Federal
government.
A
search
of
the
EPA's
ongoing
ICR's
revealed
no
duplication
of
information­
gathering
efforts.
Certain
control
device
performance
test
reports
and
other
information
that
will
be
required
by
the
final
site
remediation
NESHAP
may
duplicate
information
also
required
from
a
respondent
by
a
State
air
regulatory
agency.
In
such
cases,
a
copy
of
the
information
submitted
by
a
respondent
to
the
State
agency
could
be
provided
to
the
EPA.
(
b)
Consultations.

Participants
outside
the
EPA
involved
in
the
development
of
the
site
remediation
NESHAP
include
other
Federal
agencies,
State
air
regulatory
agencies,
trade
associations,
and
private
businesses.
In
teleconferences
with
these
participants,
no
major
problems
regarding
the
rule
monitoring,
recordkeeping,
or
reporting
were
identified.

(
c)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection.

If
the
relevant
information
were
collected
at
less
frequent
intervals,
the
EPA
would
not
be
reasonably
assured
that
an
affected
facility
owner
or
operator
is
in
compliance
with
the
standards.

(
d)
General
Guidelines.

With
one
exception,
none
of
the
general
information
collection
guidelines
in
5
CFR
1230.5(
d)(
2)
of
the
OMB
regulations
implementing
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
is
being
exceeded.
The
one
exception
is
that
the
rule
requires
the
respondent
maintain
inspection
and
monitoring
records
for
a
minimum
of
5
years.
In
addition,
the
Agency
has
taken
all
practical
steps
to
develop
easy­
to­
understand
requirements
for
all
respondents.

(
e)
Confidentiality
and
Sensitive
Questions.

(
i)
Confidentiality.
All
information
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
Agency
policies
set
forth
in
Title
40,
Chapter
1,
Part
2,
Subpart
B
­­
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information
(
see
40
CFR
2;
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;

amended
by
43
FR
39999,
September
28,
1978;
43
FR
42251,

September
28,
1978;
44
FR
17674,
March
23,
1979).

(
ii)
Sensitive
Questions.
This
section
is
not
applicable
because
this
ICR
does
not
involve
matters
of
a
sensitive
nature.
6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden.

Estimating
the
number
of
respondents
for
the
site
remediation
NESHAP
is
more
difficult
than
the
other
source
categories
for
which
the
EPA
establishes
NESHAP
because
of
a
unique
set
of
considerations.
As
discussed
earlier
in
Section
3(
a),
site
remediations
cannot
be
categorized
by
a
particular
industry
sector
or
group
of
industry
sectors.

Another
consideration
is
the
finite
period
for
which
a
site
remediation
is
conducted.
The
objective
of
a
site
remediation
is
to
mitigate
a
detected
risk
to
public
health
or
the
environment
by
successfully
completing
the
cleanup
of
the
area
contaminated
by
a
hazardous
substance.
For
NESHAP
source
categories
associated
with
industrial
processes
or
product
distribution,
a
facility
and
its
air
emission
sources
typically
remain
in
operation
for
many
years.
Once
an
existing
source
reaches
the
end
of
its
useful
service
life,
it
is
often
reconstructed
or
replaced
with
a
new
source.
In
contrast,
the
air
emission
sources
associated
with
site
remediations
cease
to
exist
once
the
remediation
cleanup
criteria
are
achieved.
Depending
on
sitespecific
facts
such
as
the
extent
of
the
contamination
and
the
type
of
remediation
activities
needed,
the
"
life
span"
of
a
given
site
remediation
may
be
a
short
period
lasting
several
weeks
to
a
more
extended
period
lasting
several
years.
Even
for
those
site
remediations
requiring
a
number
of
years
to
complete,
it
is
important
to
recognize
that
ultimately
the
remediation
activities
at
a
facility
will
be
completed
and
the
air
emission
sources
will
no
longer
exist.
Thus,
at
any
given
time,
the
number
of
respondents
will
be
changing
since
at
some
facilities
the
site
remediations
are
completed
(
i.
e.,
subtracting
respondents
from
the
total
number),
at
other
facilities
the
site
remediations
are
still
on­
going,
and
at
some
new
facilities
site
remediations
are
beginning
(
i.
e.,
adding
respondents
to
the
total
number).

The
annual
burden
estimates
for
reporting
and
recordkeeping
presented
in
Tables
1,
2
and
3
are
based
on
an
estimated
total
of
286
respondents.
The
respondent
numbers
used
for
the
estimates
were
derived
from
data
used
by
EPA
for
estimating
the
nationwide
emission
reduction
and
cost
impacts
of
the
final
rule.
For
this
total
number
of
respondents,
26
respondents
are
estimated
to
use
an
in­
situ
treatment
process.
At
each
of
these
sites,
a
control
device
is
assumed
to
be
required
on
the
process
vent.
The
other
260
respondents
are
assumed
to
use
an
on­
site
ex­
situ
treatment
process.
The
vast
majority
of
these
sites
use
tanks
for
storage
and
handling
of
contaminated
media.
Although
a
rare
practice
at
existing
sites,
and
not
likely
to
be
used
at
future
sites,
use
of
surface
impoundments
at
the
ex­
situ
treatment
sites
is
included
in
the
burden
estimates
by
assuming
that
5
of
the
260
sites
use
a
surface
impoundment
in
place
of
tanks.
Finally,
the
organic
content
of
the
contaminated
media
extracted
at
most
of
the
exsitu
treatment
sites
will
be
below
the
10
percent
threshold
level
specified
in
the
final
rule
for
implementation
of
a
leak
detection
and
repair
(
LDAR)
program.
For
the
burden
estimates
it
is
assumed
that
10
facilities
will
need
to
implement
a
LDAR
program.
Other
assumptions
are
that
10
percent
of
the
respondents
operating
ex­
situ
treatment
sites
(
26
respondents)

choose
to
exempt
one
source
at
the
site
from
the
air
emission
control
requirements
according
to
the
rule
requirements
and
an
additional
unit,
an
oil/
water
separator,
is
used
at
5
of
the
sites.

(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs.

The
information
collection
activities
for
sources
subject
to
the
standards
are
presented
in
Tables
1,
2,
and
3.
The
capital
costs
and
the
operating
and
maintenance
(
O&
M)
costs
were
estimated
by
identifying
the
capital
equipment
each
facility
would
be
expected
to
purchase
and
install,
and
the
changes
in
the
operating,
maintenance,
monitoring,
and
recordkeeping
operations
that
would
be
expected
to
be
implemented
to
comply
with
the
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
of
rule.
Capital
costs
are
estimated
for
the
purchase
and
installation
of
equipment
to
monitor
and
record
control
device
operating
parameters.
For
estimating
the
respondent
burden
and
costs,
the
initial
control
device
performance
tests
are
assumed
to
be
conducted
during
the
first
year
following
promulgation.

The
average
hourly
respondent
costs
(
labor
plus
overhead)

used
for
the
burden
estimates
were
$
86/
hr
for
legal
staff,
$
65/
hr
for
managerial
staff,
$
43/
hr
for
technical
staff,
and
$
22/
hr
for
clerical
staff.
As
discussed
above,
the
respondents
potentially
regulated
by
the
site
remediation
NESHAP
cannot
be
defined
by
a
particular
industry
sector
or
group
of
industry
sectors.

Therefore,
the
hourly
costs
were
based
on
rates
used
by
EPA
for
the
ICR
burden
calculations
for
rules
for
underground
storage
tanks
(
OMB
Control
Number
2050­
0033).
Many
site
remediations
involve
the
cleanup
of
contamination
from
underground
storage
tanks.

(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost.

Because
the
information
collection
requirements
were
developed
as
an
incidental
part
of
the
development
of
the
rule,

no
costs
can
be
attributed
to
the
development
of
the
information
collection
requirements.
Because
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
for
the
respondents
are
required
under
the
General
Provisions
for
the
MACT
standards,
no
operational
costs
will
be
incurred
by
the
Federal
Government.
Publication
and
distribution
of
the
information
are
part
of
the
Compliance
Data
System,
so
that
no
Federal
costs
can
be
directly
attributed
to
the
ICR.

Examination
of
records
to
be
maintained
by
the
respondents
will
occur
incidentally
as
part
of
the
periodic
inspection
of
sources
that
is
part
of
the
EPA's
overall
compliance
and
enforcement
program,
and,
therefore,
is
not
attributable
to
the
ICR.
The
only
costs
that
the
Federal
government
will
incur
are
user
costs
associated
with
the
analysis
of
the
reported
information
and
for
labor
and
travel
for
site
visits
to
observe
performance
tests
and
conduct
compliance
inspections,
estimates
for
these
costs
are
presented
in
Tables
4,
5,
and
6.

For
estimating
the
agency
burden
and
costs,
the
initial
performance
tests
are
assumed
to
be
conducted
during
the
first
year
following
promulgation
of
the
rule.
The
assumed
hourly
rates
are
as
follows:
$
86/
hr
for
legal
staff,
$
65/
hr
for
managerial
staff,
$
43/
hr
for
technical
staff,
and
$
22/
hr
for
clerical
staff.
Total
travel
costs
for
the
facility
site
inspection
visits
are
estimated
assuming
travel
costs
average
$
500
per
site.

(
d)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Costs/
Master
Tables.

(
i)
The
simple
collection.
The
bottom
line
respondent
burden
hours
and
costs
for
the
first
3
years
following
promulgation
are
presented
in
Tables
1,
2,
and
3.
The
total
burden
hours
are
calculated
by
adding
the
total
labor­
hours
per
year
estimated
for
legal,
technical,
managerial,
and
clerical
staff.
The
total
annual
costs
are
calculated
by
adding
the
total
labor
costs,
annualized
capital
costs,
and
operating
and
maintenance
(
O&
M)
costs.
The
bottom
line
respondent
burden
hour
and
cost
estimates
for
each
of
first
3
years
following
promulgation
are
summarized
below.

Respondent
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Costs
Total
Annual
Burden
Hours
Total
Annual
Cost
1st
year
521,345
hours
$
28,061,000
2nd
year
251,933
hours
$
12,539,000
3rd
year
251,933
hours
$
12,539,000
Average
341,737
hours
$
17,713,000
Based
on
a
total
of
286
respondents
nationwide,
the
3­
year
average
burden
to
the
individual
respondent
is
1,200
hours
per
year
at
a
cost
of
$
62,000
per
year.

(
ii)
The
Agency
tally.
The
bottom
line
Agency
burden
hours
and
costs
for
the
first
3
years
following
promulgation
are
presented
in
Tables
4,
5,
and
6.
The
total
burden
hours
are
calculated
by
adding
the
total
labor­
hours
per
year
estimated
for
legal,
technical,
managerial,
and
clerical
staff.
The
total
annual
costs
are
calculated
by
adding
the
total
labor
costs,

annualized
capital
costs,
and
operating
and
maintenance
(
O&
M)

costs.
The
bottom
line
Agency
burden
hour
and
cost
estimates
for
each
of
first
3
years
following
promulgation
are
summarized
below.

Agency
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Costs
Total
Annual
Person
Hours
Total
Annual
Cost
1st
year
30,756
hours
$
1,464,000
2nd
year
21,318
hours
$
1,027,000
3rd
year
21,318
hours
$
1,027,000
Average
24,464
hours
$
1,173,000
(
iii)
The
complex
collection.
This
section
does
not
apply
since
this
is
a
simple
collection.

(
iv)
Variations
in
the
annual
bottom
line.
This
section
does
not
apply
since
no
significant
variation
is
anticipated.

(
e)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden.

This
is
a
new
collection.

PART
B
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
This
section
is
not
applicable
the
"
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
Requirements
for
the
Site
Remediation
NESHAP"

because
statistical
methods
are
not
used
in
data
collection
associated
with
this
regulation.
13
Attachment
1
Summary
of
Respondent
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
Requirements
for
40
CFR
part
63
Subpart
GGGGG
Requirement
40
CFR
part
63
Subpart
GGGGG
Citation
40
CFR
part
63
Subpart
A
Citation
Retention
Time
Notifications
and
Reports
Initial
notification
§
63.7950(
a)­(
c)
§
63.9(
b)

Notification
of
performance
tests
§
63.7950(
a),(
d)
§
63.7,
§
63.9(
e)

Notification
of
compliance
status
§
63.7950(
a),(
e)
§
63.9(
h)

Performance
test
results
§
63.7950(
a),(
e)
§
63.10(
d)(
2)

Semiannual
compliance
reports
§
63.7951(
a),(
b)
§
63.10(
e)

Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
reports
§
63.7951(
a),(
b),(
c)
§
63.10(
d)(
5)

Recordkeeping
Copies
of
each
notification
and
report
submitted
to
comply
with
subpart
as
listed
above
§
63.7952(
a)(
1)
5
years
Records
of
process
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunctions
§
63.7952(
a)(
2)
§
63.10(
b)(
2)
5
years
Records
of
performance
tests
§
63.7952(
a)(
3)
§
63.10(
b)(
2)
5
years
Records
of
initial
and
subsequent
determinations
for
affected
sources
exempted
from
control
requirements
§
63.7952(
a)(
4)
§
63.10(
b)(
2)
5
years
Records
of
control
device
operating
parameter
continuous
monitoring
system
(
CMS)
deviations,

calibrations,
and
maintenance
§
63.7952(
b)
§
63.10(
b)(
2)
5
years
Records
of
air
pollution
equipment
inspections
and
repairs
as
required
by
rule
§
63.7952(
c)
§
63.10(
b)(
2)
5
years
14
Legal
Managerial
Technical
Clerical
$
86
$
65
$
43
$
22
1.
Applications
2.
Surveys
and
studies
3.
Acquisition,
installation,
and
use
of
technology
and
systems
a.
Control
device
operating
parameter
monitoring
system
0
8
100
0
1
286
30,888
$
0
$
148,720
$
1,229,800
$
0
$
1,378,520
$
2,860,000
$
572,000
$
4,810,520
4.
Reporting
requirements
a.
Read
instructions
8
8
16
0
1
286
9,152
$
196,768
$
148,720
$
196,768
$
0
$
542,256
$
0
$
0
$
542,256
b.
Required
activities
c.
Create
information
i.
Conduct
control
device
performance
test
0
16
120
0
1
286
38,896
$
0
$
297,440
$
1,475,760
$
0
$
1,773,200
$
0
$
286,000
$
2,059,200
d.
Gather
existing
information
e.
Write
reports
i.
Initial
notification
4
8
0
2
1
286
4,004
$
98,384
$
148,720
$
0
$
12,584
$
259,688
$
0
$
57,200
$
316,888
ii.
Performance
test
notification
0
2
0
1
1
286
858
$
0
$
37,180
$
0
$
6,292
$
43,472
$
0
$
57,200
$
100,672
iii.
Initial
compliance
determination
4
8
40
8
1
286
17,160
$
98,384
$
148,720
$
491,920
$
50,336
$
789,360
$
0
$
57,200
$
846,560
iv.
Performance
test
reports
4
8
80
16
1
286
30,888
$
98,384
$
148,720
$
983,840
$
100,672
$
1,331,616
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,388,816
v.
Compliance
report
4
4
40
8
2
286
32,032
$
196,768
$
148,720
$
983,840
$
100,672
$
1,430,000
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,487,200
vi.
Startup/
shutdown/
malfunction
report
0
1
8
1
2
286
5,720
$
0
$
37,180
$
196,768
$
12,584
$
246,532
$
0
$
57,200
$
303,732
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
a.
Read
instructions
8
8
40
0
1
286
16,016
$
196,768
$
148,720
$
491,920
$
0
$
837,408
$
0
$
0
$
837,408
b.
Plan
activities
0
8
100
0
1
286
30,888
$
0
$
148,720
$
1,229,800
$
0
$
1,378,520
$
0
$
0
$
1,378,520
c.
Implement
activities
i.
Prepare
startup/
shutdown/
malfunction
plan
8
16
80
8
1
286
32,032
$
196,768
$
297,440
$
983,840
$
50,336
$
1,528,384
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,585,584
ii.
Prepare
documentation
for
exempted
sources
8
16
80
8
1
26
2,912
$
17,888
$
27,040
$
89,440
$
4,576
$
138,944
$
0
$
5,200
$
144,144
iii.
In­
situ
treatment
process
vents
Monitor
control
device
parameters
0
0
0.5
0
365
26
4,745
$
0
$
0
$
204,035
$
0
$
204,035
$
0
$
0
$
204,035
iv.
Ex­
situ
treatment
process
vents
Monitor
control
device
parameters
0
0
0.5
0
365
260
47,450
$
0
$
0
$
2,040,350
$
0
$
2,040,350
$
0
$
0
$
2,040,350
v.
Tanks
Inspect
covers
0
0
2
0
12
255
6,120
$
0
$
0
$
263,160
$
0
$
263,160
$
0
$
0
$
263,160
vi.
Containers
Inspect
covers
0
0
0.5
0
12
260
1,560
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
vii.
Surface
impoundments.

Inspect
covers
0
0
2
0
12
5
120
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
viii.
Oil/
water
separators
Inspect
covers
0
0
2
0
12
5
120
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
ix.
Transfer
systems
Inspect
covers
0
0
0.5
0
12
260
1,560
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
x.
Leal
detection
and
repair
program
0
16
100
0
1
10
1,160
$
0
$
10,400
$
43,000
$
0
$
53,400
$
0
$
10,000
$
63,400
d.
Develop
record
system
0
16
100
8
1
286
35,464
$
0
$
297,440
$
1,229,800
$
50,336
$
1,577,576
$
286,000
$
0
$
1,863,576
e.
Time
to
enter
information
0
0
2
0
52
286
29,744
$
0
$
0
$
1,278,992
$
0
$
1,278,992
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,336,192
f.
Time
to
train
personnel
0
16
480
0
1
286
141,856
$
0
$
297,440
$
5,903,040
$
0
$
6,200,480
$
0
$
143,000
$
6,343,480
TOTAL
521,345
$
23,440,373
$
3,146,000
$
1,473,800
$
28,060,173
I
Total
Costs
per
year
(
F+
G+
H)

Technical
F
Total
Labor
Costs
per
Year
G
Annualized
Start­
up/

Capital
Costs
H
Annual
O&
M
Costs
Not
applicable
to
this
rulemaking
Not
applicable
to
this
rulemaking
E
Labor
Costs
per
Labor
Category
per
Year
(
AxBxCxRate)

A
Labor
Hours
per
Activity
per
Labor
Category
Clerical
B
Activities
per
Respondent
per
Year
C
Total
Number
of
Respondents
D
Total
Hours
per
Year
Information
Collection
Activity
Legal
Managerial
Table
1.
Site
Remediation
NESHAP
­
First
Year
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
15
Legal
Managerial
Technical
Clerical
$
86
$
65
$
43
$
22
1.
Applications
2.
Surveys
and
studies
3.
Acquisition,
installation,
and
use
of
technology
and
systems
a.
Control
device
operating
parameter
monitoring
system
0
4
40
0
1
286
12,584
$
0
$
74,360
$
491,920
$
0
$
566,280
$
0
$
572,000
$
1,138,280
4.
Reporting
requirements
a.
Read
instructions
8
8
16
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
b.
Required
activities
c.
Create
information
i.
Conduct
control
device
performance
test
0
16
120
0
1
286
38,896
$
0
$
297,440
$
1,475,760
$
0
$
1,773,200
$
0
$
286,000
$
2,059,200
d.
Gather
existing
information
e.
Write
reports
i.
Initial
notification
4
8
0
2
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
ii.
Performance
test
notification
0
2
0
1
1
286
858
$
0
$
37,180
$
0
$
6,292
$
43,472
$
0
$
57,200
$
100,672
iii.
Initial
compliance
determination
4
8
40
8
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
iv.
Performance
test
reports
4
8
80
16
1
286
30,888
$
98,384
$
148,720
$
983,840
$
100,672
$
1,331,616
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,388,816
v.
Compliance
report
4
4
40
8
2
286
32,032
$
196,768
$
148,720
$
983,840
$
100,672
$
1,430,000
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,487,200
vi.
Startup/
shutdown/
malfunction
report
0
1
8
1
2
286
5,720
$
0
$
37,180
$
196,768
$
12,584
$
246,532
$
0
$
57,200
$
303,732
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
a.
Read
instructions
8
8
40
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
b.
Plan
activities
0
8
100
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
c.
Implement
activities
i.
Prepare
startup/
shutdown/
malfunction
plan
8
16
80
8
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
ii.
Prepare
documentation
for
exempted
sources
8
16
80
8
1
26
2,912
$
17,888
$
27,040
$
89,440
$
4,576
$
138,944
$
0
$
5,200
$
144,144
iii.
In­
situ
treatment
process
vents
Monitor
control
device
parameters
0
0
0.5
0
365
26
4,745
$
0
$
0
$
204,035
$
0
$
204,035
$
0
$
0
$
204,035
iv.
Ex­
situ
treatment
process
vents
Monitor
control
device
parameters
0
0
0.5
0
365
260
47,450
$
0
$
0
$
2,040,350
$
0
$
2,040,350
$
0
$
0
$
2,040,350
v.
Tanks
Inspect
covers
0
0
2
0
12
255
6,120
$
0
$
0
$
263,160
$
0
$
263,160
$
0
$
0
$
263,160
vi.
Containers
Inspect
covers
0
0
0.5
0
12
260
1,560
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
vii.
Surface
impoundments.

Inspect
covers
0
0
2
0
12
5
120
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
viii.
Oil/
water
separators
Inspect
covers
0
0
2
0
12
5
120
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
ix.
Transfer
systems
Inspect
covers
0
0
0.5
0
12
260
1,560
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
x.
Leal
detection
and
repair
program
0
16
100
0
1
10
1,160
$
0
$
10,400
$
43,000
$
0
$
53,400
$
0
$
10,000
$
63,400
d.
Develop
record
system
0
16
100
8
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
286,000
$
0
$
286,000
e.
Time
to
enter
information
0
0
2
0
52
286
29,744
$
0
$
0
$
1,278,992
$
0
$
1,278,992
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,336,192
f.
Time
to
train
personnel
0
4
120
0
1
286
35,464
$
0
$
74,360
$
1,475,760
$
0
$
1,550,120
$
0
$
28,600
$
1,578,720
TOTAL
251,933
$
11,064,581
$
286,000
$
1,187,800
$
12,538,381
E
Labor
Costs
per
Labor
Category
per
Year
(
AxBxCxRate)

A
Labor
Hours
per
Activity
per
Labor
Category
Clerical
B
Activities
per
Respondent
per
Year
C
Total
Number
of
Respondents
D
Total
Hours
per
Year
Information
Collection
Activity
Legal
Managerial
Not
applicable
to
this
rulemaking
Not
applicable
to
this
rulemaking
I
Total
Costs
per
year
(
F+
G+
H)

Technical
F
Total
Labor
Costs
per
Year
G
Annualized
Start­
up/

Capital
Costs
H
Annual
O&
M
Costs
Table
2.
Site
Remediation
NESHAP
­
Second
Year
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
16
Legal
Managerial
Technical
Clerical
$
86
$
65
$
43
$
22
1.
Applications
2.
Surveys
and
studies
3.
Acquisition,
installation,
and
use
of
technology
and
systems
a.
Control
device
operating
parameter
monitoring
system
0
4
40
0
1
286
12,584
$
0
$
74,360
$
491,920
$
0
$
566,280
$
0
$
572,000
$
1,138,280
4.
Reporting
requirements
a.
Read
instructions
8
8
16
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
b.
Required
activities
c.
Create
information
i.
Conduct
control
device
performance
test
0
16
120
0
1
286
38,896
$
0
$
297,440
$
1,475,760
$
0
$
1,773,200
$
0
$
286,000
$
2,059,200
d.
Gather
existing
information
e.
Write
reports
i.
Initial
notification
4
8
0
2
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
ii.
Performance
test
notification
0
2
0
1
1
286
858
$
0
$
37,180
$
0
$
6,292
$
43,472
$
0
$
57,200
$
100,672
iii.
Initial
compliance
determination
4
8
40
8
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
iv.
Performance
test
reports
4
8
80
16
1
286
30,888
$
98,384
$
148,720
$
983,840
$
100,672
$
1,331,616
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,388,816
v.
Compliance
report
4
4
40
8
2
286
32,032
$
196,768
$
148,720
$
983,840
$
100,672
$
1,430,000
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,487,200
vi.
Startup/
shutdown/
malfunction
report
0
1
8
1
2
286
5,720
$
0
$
37,180
$
196,768
$
12,584
$
246,532
$
0
$
57,200
$
303,732
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
a.
Read
instructions
8
8
40
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
b.
Plan
activities
0
8
100
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
c.
Implement
activities
i.
Prepare
startup/
shutdown/
malfunction
plan
8
16
80
8
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
ii.
Prepare
documentation
for
exempted
sources
8
16
80
8
1
26
2,912
$
17,888
$
27,040
$
89,440
$
4,576
$
138,944
$
0
$
5,200
$
144,144
iii.
In­
situ
treatment
process
vents
Monitor
control
device
parameters
0
0
0.5
0
365
26
4,745
$
0
$
0
$
204,035
$
0
$
204,035
$
0
$
0
$
204,035
iv.
Ex­
situ
treatment
process
vents
Monitor
control
device
parameters
0
0
0.5
0
365
260
47,450
$
0
$
0
$
2,040,350
$
0
$
2,040,350
$
0
$
0
$
2,040,350
v.
Tanks
Inspect
covers
0
0
2
0
12
255
6,120
$
0
$
0
$
263,160
$
0
$
263,160
$
0
$
0
$
263,160
vi.
Containers
Inspect
covers
0
0
0.5
0
12
260
1,560
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
vii.
Surface
impoundments.

Inspect
covers
0
0
2
0
12
5
120
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
viii.
Oil/
water
separators
Inspect
covers
0
0
2
0
12
5
120
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
5,160
$
0
$
0
$
5,160
ix.
Transfer
systems
Inspect
covers
0
0
0.5
0
12
260
1,560
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
67,080
$
0
$
0
$
67,080
x.
Leal
detection
and
repair
program
0
16
100
0
1
10
1,160
$
0
$
10,400
$
43,000
$
0
$
53,400
$
0
$
10,000
$
63,400
d.
Develop
record
system
0
16
100
8
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
286,000
$
0
$
286,000
e.
Time
to
enter
information
0
0
2
0
52
286
29,744
$
0
$
0
$
1,278,992
$
0
$
1,278,992
$
0
$
57,200
$
1,336,192
f.
Time
to
train
personnel
0
4
120
0
1
286
35,464
$
0
$
74,360
$
1,475,760
$
0
$
1,550,120
$
0
$
28,600
$
1,578,720
TOTAL
251,933
$
11,064,581
$
286,000
$
1,187,800
$
12,538,381
E
Labor
Costs
per
Labor
Category
per
Year
(
AxBxCxRate)

A
Labor
Hours
per
Activity
per
Labor
Category
Clerical
B
Activities
per
Respondent
per
Year
C
Total
Number
of
Respondents
D
Total
Hours
per
Year
Information
Collection
Activity
Legal
Managerial
Not
applicable
to
this
rulemaking
Not
applicable
to
this
rulemaking
I
Total
Costs
per
year
(
F+
G+
H)

Technical
F
Total
Labor
Costs
per
Year
G
Annualized
Start­
up/

Capital
Costs
H
Annual
O&
M
Costs
Table
3.
Site
Remediation
NESHAP
­
Third
Year
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
17
Legal
Managerial
Technical
Clerical
Legal
($
86/
hr)
Managerial
($
65/
hr)
Technical
($
43/
hr)
Clerical
($
22/
hr)

1.
Report
review
a.
Initial
notification
0
1
4
0
1
286
1,430
$
0
$
18,590
$
49,192
$
0
$
67,782
$
0
$
0
$
67,782
b.
Performance
test
notification
0
1
2
0
1
286
858
$
0
$
18,590
$
24,596
$
0
$
43,186
$
0
$
0
$
43,186
c.
Initial
compliance
determination
0
4
24
0
1
286
8,008
$
0
$
74,360
$
295,152
$
0
$
369,512
$
0
$
0
$
369,512
d.
Performance
test
reports
0
4
24
0
1
286
8,008
$
0
$
74,360
$
295,152
$
0
$
369,512
$
0
$
0
$
369,512
e.
Semiannual
summary
report
0
2
8
0
2
286
5,720
$
0
$
74,360
$
196,768
$
0
$
271,128
$
0
$
0
$
271,128
2.
Site
compliance
inspections
(
a)

a.
Pre­
inspection
review
of
facility
information
0
4
16
0
1
26
520
$
0
$
6,760
$
17,888
$
0
$
24,648
$
0
$
143,000
$
167,648
b.
Travel
to
and
from
facility
(
b)
0
0
16
0
1
26
416
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
17,888
c.
Inspection
of
air
control
equipment
used
to
comply
with
rule
requirements
0
0
16
0
1
26
416
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
d.
Review
site
records
0
0
16
0
1
26
416
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
e.
Prepare
inspection
report
0
8
40
8
1
26
1,456
$
0
$
13,520
$
44,720
$
4,576
$
62,816
$
0
$
2,600
$
65,416
3.
Enforcement
actions
(
b,
c)

a.
Inform
facility
of
noncompklinace
40
40
80
20
1
3
540
$
10,320
$
7,800
$
10,320
$
1,320
$
29,760
$
0
$
0
$
29,760
b.
Follow­
up
site
inspection
0
40
200
16
1
3
768
$
0
$
7,800
$
25,800
$
1,056
$
34,656
$
0
$
0
$
34,656
c.
Litigation
1000
100
1000
100
1
1
2,200
$
86,000
$
6,500
$
43,000
$
2,200
$
137,700
$
0
$
0
$
137,700
TOTAL
30,756
$
1,464,364
$
0
$
145,600
$
1,592,076
Information
Collection
Activity
B
Activities
per
Respondent
per
Year
I
Total
Costs
per
year
(
F+
G+
H)

E
Labor
Costs
per
Labor
Category
per
Year
(
AxBxCxRate)
F
Total
Labor
Costs
per
Year
G
Annualized
Capital
Costs
H
Annual
O&
M
Costs
C
Total
Number
of
Respondents
D
Total
Hours
per
Year
A
Labor
Hours
per
Activity
per
Labor
Category
Table
4.
Site
Remediation
NESHAP
­
First
Year
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
(
a)
Assumes
10%
of
the
facilities
are
inspected
by
EPA
annually.

(
b)
Assumes
$
500
in
travel
expenses
per
site
visit.

(
c)
Assumes
10%
of
the
inspected
facilities
are
in
non­
compliance
with
one
or
more
provisions
of
the
rule.

(
d)
Assumes
litigation
required
on
average
for
1
facility
per
year.
18
Legal
Managerial
Technical
Clerical
Legal
($
86/
hr)
Managerial
($
65/
hr)
Technical
($
43/
hr)
Clerical
($
22/
hr)

1.
Report
review
a.
Initial
notification
0
1
4
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
b.
Performance
test
notification
0
1
2
0
1
286
858
$
0
$
18,590
$
24,596
$
0
$
43,186
$
0
$
0
$
43,186
c.
Initial
compliance
determination
0
4
24
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
d.
Performance
test
reports
0
4
24
0
1
286
8,008
$
0
$
74,360
$
295,152
$
0
$
369,512
$
0
$
0
$
369,512
e.
Semiannual
summary
report
0
2
8
0
2
286
5,720
$
0
$
74,360
$
196,768
$
0
$
271,128
$
0
$
0
$
271,128
2.
Site
compliance
inspections
(
a)

a.
Pre­
inspection
review
of
facility
information
0
4
16
0
1
26
520
$
0
$
6,760
$
17,888
$
0
$
24,648
$
0
$
143,000
$
167,648
b.
Travel
to
and
from
facility
(
b)
0
0
16
0
1
26
416
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
17,888
c.
Inspection
of
air
control
equipment
used
to
comply
with
rule
requirements
0
0
16
0
1
26
416
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
d.
Review
site
records
0
0
16
0
1
26
416
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
e.
Prepare
inspection
report
0
8
40
8
1
26
1,456
$
0
$
13,520
$
44,720
$
4,576
$
62,816
$
0
$
2,600
$
65,416
3.
Enforcement
actions
(
b,
c)

a.
Inform
facility
of
noncompklinace
40
40
80
20
1
3
540
$
10,320
$
7,800
$
10,320
$
1,320
$
29,760
$
0
$
0
$
29,760
b.
Follow­
up
site
inspection
0
40
200
16
1
3
768
$
0
$
7,800
$
25,800
$
1,056
$
34,656
$
0
$
0
$
34,656
c.
Litigation
1000
100
1000
100
1
1
2,200
$
86,000
$
6,500
$
43,000
$
2,200
$
137,700
$
0
$
0
$
137,700
TOTAL
21,318
$
1,027,070
$
0
$
145,600
$
1,154,782
Information
Collection
Activity
B
Activities
per
Respondent
per
Year
I
Total
Costs
per
year
(
F+
G+
H)

E
Labor
Costs
per
Labor
Category
per
Year
(
AxBxCxRate)
F
Total
Labor
Costs
per
Year
G
Annualized
Capital
Costs
H
Annual
O&
M
Costs
C
Total
Number
of
Respondents
D
Total
Hours
per
Year
A
Labor
Hours
per
Activity
per
Labor
Category
Table
5.
Site
Remediation
NESHAP
­
Second
Year
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
(
a)
Assumes
10%
of
the
facilities
are
inspected
by
EPA
annually.

(
b)
Assumes
$
500
in
travel
expenses
per
site
visit.

(
c)
Assumes
10%
of
the
inspected
facilities
are
in
non­
compliance
with
one
or
more
provisions
of
the
rule.

(
d)
Assumes
litigation
required
on
average
for
1
facility
per
year.
19
Legal
Managerial
Technical
Clerical
Legal
($
86/
hr)
Managerial
($
65/
hr)
Technical
($
43/
hr)
Clerical
($
22/
hr)

1.
Report
review
a.
Initial
notification
0
1
4
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
b.
Performance
test
notification
0
1
2
0
1
286
858
$
0
$
18,590
$
24,596
$
0
$
43,186
$
0
$
0
$
43,186
c.
Initial
compliance
determination
0
4
24
0
1
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
d.
Performance
test
reports
0
4
24
0
1
286
8,008
$
0
$
74,360
$
295,152
$
0
$
369,512
$
0
$
0
$
369,512
e.
Semiannual
summary
report
0
2
8
0
2
286
5,720
$
0
$
74,360
$
196,768
$
0
$
271,128
$
0
$
0
$
271,128
2.
Site
compliance
inspections
(
a)

a.
Pre­
inspection
review
of
facility
information
0
4
16
0
1
26
520
$
0
$
6,760
$
17,888
$
0
$
24,648
$
0
$
143,000
$
167,648
b.
Travel
to
and
from
facility
(
b)
0
0
16
0
1
26
416
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
17,888
c.
Inspection
of
air
control
equipment
used
to
comply
with
rule
requirements
0
0
16
0
1
26
416
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
d.
Review
site
records
0
0
16
0
1
26
416
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
17,888
$
0
$
0
$
17,888
e.
Prepare
inspection
report
0
8
40
8
1
26
1,456
$
0
$
13,520
$
44,720
$
4,576
$
62,816
$
0
$
2,600
$
65,416
3.
Enforcement
actions
(
b,
c)

a.
Inform
facility
of
noncompklinace
40
40
80
20
1
3
540
$
10,320
$
7,800
$
10,320
$
1,320
$
29,760
$
0
$
0
$
29,760
b.
Follow­
up
site
inspection
0
40
200
16
1
3
768
$
0
$
7,800
$
25,800
$
1,056
$
34,656
$
0
$
0
$
34,656
c.
Litigation
1000
100
1000
100
1
1
2,200
$
86,000
$
6,500
$
43,000
$
2,200
$
137,700
$
0
$
0
$
137,700
TOTAL
21,318
$
1,027,070
$
0
$
145,600
$
1,154,782
Information
Collection
Activity
B
Activities
per
Respondent
per
Year
I
Total
Costs
per
year
(
F+
G+
H)

E
Labor
Costs
per
Labor
Category
per
Year
(
AxBxCxRate)
F
Total
Labor
Costs
per
Year
G
Annualized
Capital
Costs
H
Annual
O&
M
Costs
C
Total
Number
of
Respondents
D
Total
Hours
per
Year
A
Labor
Hours
per
Activity
per
Labor
Category
Table
6.
Site
Remediation
NESHAP
­
Third
Year
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
(
a)
Assumes
10%
of
the
facilities
are
inspected
by
EPA
annually.

(
b)
Assumes
$
500
in
travel
expenses
per
site
visit.

(
c)
Assumes
10%
of
the
inspected
facilities
are
in
non­
compliance
with
one
or
more
provisions
of
the
rule.

(
d)
Assumes
litigation
required
on
average
for
1
facility
per
year.
