STANDARD
FORM
83­
I
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
FOR
OMB
REVIEW
OF
ICR
NO.
2071.02
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
REQUEST
FOR
THE
PRINTING,
COATING,
AND
DYEING
OF
FABRICS
AND
OTHER
TEXTILES
SOURCE
CATEGORY
U.
S.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
EMISSION
STANDARDS
DIVISION
RESEARCH
TRIANGLE
PARK,
NORTH
CAROLINA
27711
February
3,
2003
1
PART
A
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
1.
IDENTIFICATION
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
1(
a)
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection.

A
supporting
statement
was
prepared
for
"
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
Requirements
for
the
Information
Collection
Request
(
ICR)
for
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
Printing,
Coating,
and
Dyeing
of
Fabrics
and
Other
Textiles
Source
Category."
This
is
a
new
information
collection
request
and
the
tracking
number
is
EPA
ICR
No.

2071.02.

1(
b)
Short
Characterization.

This
ICR
was
prepared
for
a
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
rulemaking
being
promulgated
under
authority
of
section
112
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA).
The
rulemaking
amends
title
40,
chapter
I,
part
63
of
the
Code
of
Federal
Regulations
(
CFR)
subpart
OOOO
­­

National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
NESHAP):
Printing,
Coating,
and
Dyeing
of
Fabrics
and
Other
Textiles
(
hereafter,
this
subpart
is
referred
to
as
the
"
fabric
NESHAP").
The
fabric
NESHAP
includes
standards
for
major
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAPs).
Respondents
are
owners
or
operators
of
source
category
affected
sources
regulated
under
the
fabric
NESHAP.

This
ICR
is
for
HAP
emission
sources
in
the
printing,
coating,
and
dyeing
of
fabrics
and
other
textiles
source
category
subject
to
the
monitoring,
inspection,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
(
MIRR)
requirements
of
the
fabric
NESHAP.
The
source
category
consists
of
an
estimated
700
existing
nationwide
facilities
with
fabric
coating,
printing,
slashing,
dyeing
and/
or
finishing
operations.
One
hundred
and
thirty­
five
of
these
facilities
are
considered
to
be
potential
major
sources
and
may
be
subject
to
the
major
source
provisions
specified
under
the
fabric
NESHAP.

An
estimated
565
facilities
are
not
major
sources
and
will
not
be
subject
to
the
major
source
provisions
specified
under
the
fabric
NESHAP.
Thus,
the
estimated
135
existing
major
sources
were
used
for
estimating
MIRR
costs.

The
estimated
nationwide
number
of
new
facilities
is
three
for
fabric
coating
and
printing
operations
during
the
three­
year
period
after
promulgation
of
the
fabric
NESHAP.
No
new
2
facilities
are
expected
in
slashing,
dyeing,
and
finishing
operations
during
the
three­
year
period
after
promulgation
of
the
fabric
NESHAP.

All
existing
major
sources
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
the
fabric
NESHAP
within
three
years
of
the
effective
date
(
promulgation
date)
of
the
standard.
The
ICR
was
developed
based
on
data
in
the
MACT
database
showing
that
12
percent
(
2
floor
facilities
out
of
17
facilities)
of
the
existing
facilities
will
demonstrate
compliance
in
the
first
year
after
promulgation
of
the
fabric
NESHAP.
Facilities
that
would
have
to
reformulate
coatings
or
add
emission
control
systems
were
assumed
to
come
into
compliance
in
year
3.
All
facilities
will
be
in
compliance
at
the
beginning
of
the
fourth
year.
The
costs
for
the
first
three­
year
period
after
promulgation
of
the
NESHAP
are
detailed
in
Tables
3
through
6
of
Attachment
1
and
discussed
throughout
this
document.
Tables
1
through
6
are
collected
in
Attachment
1
for
the
convenience
of
the
reader
and
hereafter
are
referred
to
by
table
number
only.

All
new
sources
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
the
fabric
NESHAP
no
later
than
the
effective
date
if
startup
of
your
affected
source
is
before
the
effective
date
of
this
subpart.
If
startup
of
your
affected
source
is
after
the
effective
date
of
this
subpart,
you
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
the
fabric
NESHAP
upon
initial
startup
of
your
affected
source.

This
ICR
includes
135
existing
fabric
coating,
printing,
and
dyeing
facilities
that
we
anticipate
will
conduct
all
MIRR
requirements,
including
testing
activities.
MIRR
costs
per
facility
to
conduct
all
MIRR
activities
were
estimated
to
be
$
31,190
for
the
three­
year
period
following
promulgation
of
the
rule.
This
gives
an
annual
average
MIRR
costs
per
facility
to
conduct
all
MIRR
activities
of
$
10,400.
This
gives
total
MIRR
costs
of
$
4,211,000
for
existing
sources
under
the
printing,
coating,
and
dyeing
of
fabrics
and
other
textiles
source
category
during
the
first
three
years
after
promulgation
of
a
NESHAP
for
this
source
category.

This
ICR
includes
3
new
fabric
coating,
printing,
and
dyeing
facilities
that
we
anticipate
will
be
constructed
during
the
three­
year
period
following
promulgation
of
the
rule.
New
sources
must
conduct
all
MIRR
requirements,
including
testing
activities,
recordkeeping,
monthly
compliance
calculations,
and
semiannual
reporting,
upon
startup.
MIRR
costs
per
facility
to
conduct
all
MIRR
activities
were
estimated
to
be
$
37,920
for
the
three­
year
period
following
3
promulgation
of
the
rule.
This
gives
total
MIRR
costs
of
$
113,770
for
new
sources
under
the
printing,
coating,
and
dyeing
of
fabrics
and
other
textiles
source
category
during
the
first
three
years
after
promulgation
of
the
NESHAP
for
this
source
category.
See
section
6
for
more
details.

2.
Need
For
and
Use
of
the
Collection
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection.

We
have
been
directed
by
section
112
of
the
CAA
to
regulate
the
emission
of
HAPs
from
stationary
sources.
The
printing,
coating,
and
dyeing
of
fabrics
and
other
textiles
source
category
contains
major
sources
of
HAP
emissions
and
is
included
on
our
list
of
categories
scheduled
for
regulation.

Section
114
of
the
CAA
gives
us
authority
to
collect
data
and
information
necessary
to
enforce
standards
established
under
section
112
of
the
CAA.
Certain
records
and
reports
are
necessary
to
enable
the
Administrator
to
(
1)
identify
existing
and
new
sources
subject
to
the
fabric
NESHAP
and
(
2)
ensure
that
the
requirements
specified
for
an
affected
source
subject
to
the
fabric
NESHAP,
which
are
based
on
MACT,
are
being
achieved.

2(
b)
Use/
Users
of
the
Data.

The
information
will
be
used
by
our
enforcement
personnel
to
(
1)
identify
existing
and
new
affected
sources
subject
to
the
fabric
NESHAP,
(
2)
identify
the
emission
control
devices
and
methodologies
(
i.
e.,
add­
on
control
devices,
product
substitution
and/
or
reformulation)
being
applied,
and
(
3)
ensure
that
the
emission
control
devices
and
methodologies
are
being
properly
operated
and
maintained
on
a
continuous
basis.

Records
and
reports
are
necessary
to
enable
us
to
identify
facilities
subject
to
the
fabric
NESHAP
that
may
not
be
in
compliance.
Based
on
reported
information,
we
can
decide
whether
to
inspect
a
facility
and
which
records
or
processes
to
inspect.
The
records
that
facilities
maintain
must
indicate
to
us
whether
facility
personnel
are
operating
and
maintaining
emission
control
devices
and
methodologies
properly.

3.
NONDUPLICATION,
CONSULTATIONS,
AND
OTHER
COLLECTION
CRITERIA
3(
a)
Nonduplication.
4
A
search
of
our
existing
standards
and
ongoing
ICRs
revealed
no
duplication
of
information
gathering
efforts
with
the
exception
of
the
New
Source
Performance
Standards
(
NSPS)
for
the
Polymeric
Coating
of
Supporting
Substrates
(
40
CFR
part
60,
subpart
VVV).

The
NSPS
and
certain
reports
required
by
State
or
local
agencies
may
duplicate
information
required
by
the
standard
(
e.
g.,
records
of
performance
tests).
In
such
cases,
a
copy
of
the
report
submitted
to
the
State
or
local
agency
may
be
sent
in
lieu
of,
or
as
a
part
of,
the
report
required
by
the
standards.

3(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB.

Since
this
is
a
rule­
related
ICR,
it
was
not
necessary
to
solicit
public
comments
prior
to
submittal
of
this
ICR
to
OMB.

3(
c)
Consultations.

The
ICR
handbook
states
that
OMB
regulations
require
periodic
consultation
with
respondents
and
data
users
such
as
members
of
industry
and
State
and
local
governments.

Consultations
with
numerous
representatives
of
companies
and
government
agencies
involved
with
fabric
coating,
printing,
and
dyeing
operations
were
conducted
throughout
the
NESHAP
development
process.
Table
1
presents
a
list
of
the
names,
affiliations,
and
telephone
numbers
of
persons
that
were
consulted
during
rule
development.

3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection.

If
the
requirement
to
submit
relevant
information
to
demonstrate
compliance
were
collected
less
frequently,
we
would
not
be
reasonably
assured
that
a
source
is
in
compliance
with
the
NESHAP.
In
addition,
our
authority
to
take
administrative
action
would
be
significantly
reduced.

Section
113(
d)
of
the
CAA
limits
the
assessment
of
administrative
penalties
to
violations
which
occur
no
more
than
12
months
before
initiation
of
the
administrative
proceeding.
Since
administrative
proceedings
are
less
costly
and
require
use
of
fewer
resources
than
judicial
proceedings,
both
we
and
the
regulated
community
benefit
from
preservation
of
our
administrative
powers.

3(
e)
General
Guidelines.
5
The
fabric
NESHAP
would
require
owners
or
operators
of
an
affected
source
to
retain
records
for
five
years,
which
exceeds
the
three­
year
retention
period
contained
in
the
guidelines
in
5
CFR
1320.6.
The
five­
year
retention
period
is
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
General
Provisions
of
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
A,
and
the
retention
requirement
in
the
operating
permit
program
under
title
V
of
the
CAA.
All
subsequent
general
guidelines
have
been
followed
and
do
not
violate
any
of
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
guidelines
contained
in
5
CFR
1320.6.3(
f).

Confidentiality.

All
information
submitted
to
us
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
our
policies
set
forth
in
title
40,
chapter
1,
part
2,
subpart
B,

Confidentiality
of
Business
Information.
See
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;
amended
by
43
FR
3999,
September
8,
1978;
43
FR
42251,
September
28,
1978;
and
44
FR
17674,

March
23,
1979.
Even
where
we
have
determined
that
data
received
in
response
to
an
ICR
is
eligible
for
confidential
treatment
under
40
CFR
part
2,
subpart
B,
we
may
nonetheless
disclose
the
information
if
it
is
"
relevant
in
any
proceeding"
under
the
statute
[
42
U.
S.
C.
7414
(
C);

40
CFR
2.301
(
g)].
The
information
collection
complies
with
the
Privacy
Act
of
1974
and
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB)
Circular
108.

3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions.

Information
that
would
be
reported
consists
of
emissions
data
and
other
information
that
are
not
expected
to
be
of
a
sensitive
nature.
Therefore,
this
section
is
not
applicable.

4.
THE
RESPONDENTS
AND
THE
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
4(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
and
NAICS
Codes.

Respondents
are
owners
or
operators
of
all
existing
and
new
HAP­
emitting
affected
sources
in
the
printing,
coating,
and
dyeing
of
fabrics
and
other
textiles
source
category.
The
source
category
and
affected
sources
regulated
with
the
promulgation
of
the
fabric
NESHAP
are
classified
under
the
Standard
Industrial
Classification
(
SIC)
codes
for
fabric
manufacturing
and
the
North
American
Industrial
Classification
System
(
NAICS)
codes
for
fabric
manufacturing
listed
in
Table
2.

4(
b)
Information
Requested.
6
The
fabric
NESHAP
would
allow
the
use
of
product
substitution
and
reformulation
as
well
as
add­
on
control
devices
to
comply
with
the
promulgated
standards.
Based
on
information
obtained
from
the
industry,
we
expect
that
nearly
all
existing
facilities
will
use
product
substitution
and
reformulation
or
add­
on
controls
to
comply
with
the
standards.

4(
b)(
i)
Data
items,
including
recordkeeping
requirements.

Attachment
2,
Table
8,
Source
Data
and
Information
Requirements,
summarizes
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements.
These
requirements
are
described
in
the
following
paragraphs.

Respondents
are
required
to
submit
one­
time
reports
for
the
(
1)
initial
notification,
(
2)

initial
compliance
demonstration,
(
3)
start
of
construction
for
new
facilities,
(
4)
anticipated
and
actual
start­
up
dates
for
new
facilities,
and
(
5)
physical
or
operational
changes
to
existing
facilities.

An
affected
source
with
an
initial
startup
date
before
the
effective
date
of
the
standards
must
submit
a
one­
time
initial
notification.
This
initial
notification
must
be
submitted
within
120
days
after
the
promulgation
date
of
the
standards.
An
affected
source
with
an
initial
startup
date
on
or
after
the
promulgation
date
of
the
standards
must
submit
the
initial
notification
within
120
days
after
becoming
subject
to
the
standards.

Affected
facilities
using
add­
on
controls
must
conduct
an
initial
performance
test
and
report
results
back
to
EPA.
Performance
test
results
(
as
applicable)
must
be
included
as
part
of
the
initial
compliance
status
report.
These
facilities
will
also
have
to
submit
a
startup,
shutdown,

and
malfunction
(
SSM)
plan
for
their
capture
and
control
systems.

For
sources
constructed
or
reconstructed
after
the
effective
date
of
the
relevant
standard,

the
General
Provisions
of
40
CFR
part
63
require
that
the
source
submit
an
application
for
approval
of
construction
or
reconstruction.

The
information
in
the
initial
notification
and
the
application
for
construction
or
reconstruction
will
enable
enforcement
personnel
to
identify
the
number
of
sources
subject
to,
or
are
already
in
compliance
with,
the
standards.

Affected
sources
subject
to
standards
under
the
fabric
NESHAP
must
submit
a
semiannual
notification
of
compliance
status.
Each
subsequent
compliance
report
must
cover
the
semiannual
7
reporting
period
from
January
1
through
June
30
or
the
semiannual
reporting
period.
The
notification
of
compliance
status
must
be
submitted
no
later
than
the
end
of
the
next
month
following
the
semiannual
reporting
period.

The
General
Provisions
require
owners
or
operators
of
affected
sources
to
develop
SSM
plans,
which
document
procedures
that
will
be
taken
in
the
case
of
any
of
these
events.
SSM
reports
detailing
the
actions
taken
by
an
owner
or
operator
in
the
event
of
a
SSM
are
required
to
be
submitted.
Reports
are
required
semiannually
when
actions
taken
are
consistent
with
the
plan,

and
can
be
included
in
the
semiannual
notification
of
compliance
status.
If
actions
taken
are
not
consistent
with
the
source's
plan,
an
immediate
report
must
be
submitted.

The
fabric
NESHAP
will
require
owners
or
operators
of
an
affected
source
to
retain
records
supporting
the
reports
described
above
for
five
years,
which
exceeds
the
three­
year
retention
period
contained
in
the
guidelines
in
5
CFR
1320.6.
The
five­
year
retention
period
is
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
General
Provisions
of
40
CFR
part
63
and
the
retention
requirement
in
the
operating
permit
program
under
title
V
of
the
CAA.

4(
b)(
ii)
Respondent
activities.

The
respondent
activities
that
will
be
required
by
the
fabric
NESHAP
in
the
first
three
years
after
promulgation
for
existing
major
sources
are
presented
in
Tables
3A
through
3C
and
5A
through
5C
in
Section
6(
a).
Separate
tables
are
presented
for
fabric
coating
and
printing,
and
for
textile
dyeing,
finishing,
and
slashing.

The
annual
burden
estimate
for
new
major
sources
is
based
on
the
assumption
that
there
will
be
3
new
sources
subject
to
the
fabric
NESHAP
in
the
first
three
years
after
promulgation.
It
has
been
further
assumed
that
these
new
sources
will
be
added
evenly
throughout
the
three­
year
period:
1
new
source
will
be
added
each
of
the
three
years.
These
facilities
will
use
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices
to
comply
with
the
emission
limitations.
These
facilities
use
add­
on
control
devices
in
recognition
of
the
fact
that
some
product
types
cannot
be
produced
with
available
low­
HAP
containing
coatings.

The
labor
hours
associated
with
and
costs
of
MIRR
activities
for
existing
and
new
sources
are
summarized
in
Tables
3­
6.
8
5.
The
Information
Collected­­
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management.

5(
a)
Agency
Activities.

A
list
of
our
activities
is
provided
in
Tables
4A
through
4F
and
6A
through
6C
and
introduced
in
Section
6(
c).

5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Information
Management.

Information
contained
in
the
one­
time
only
reports
will
be
entered
into
the
Aerometric
Information
Retrieval
System
(
AIRS)
Facility
Subsystem
(
AFS)
that
is
maintained
and
operated
by
our
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards
(
OAQPS).
Information
contained
in
the
periodic
reports
submitted
to
us
will
be
reviewed
for
accuracy
and
completeness.
Data
obtained
during
periodic
visits
by
our
personnel
from
records
maintained
by
the
respondents
will
be
tabulated
and
published
for
internal
use
in
compliance
and
enforcement
programs.

5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility.

Minimizing
the
information
collection
burden
for
all
sizes
of
organizations
is
a
continuing
effort
on
our
part.
We
have
reduced
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirement
respondent
burden
to
include
only
the
information
needed
by
us
to
determine
compliance
with
the
fabric
NESHAP.
The
fabric
NESHAP
is
applicable
to
only
major
sources.

By
definition,
a
small
business
is
any
business
that
is
independently
owned
and
operated
and
not
dominant
in
its
field
as
defined
by
the
Small
Business
Administration
(
SBA)
regulations
under
Section
3
of
the
Small
Business
Act.
For
the
SIC
codes
that
define
the
printing,
coating,

and
dyeing
of
fabrics
and
other
textiles
source
category,
the
small
business
threshold
ranges
from
500
to
1,000
employees.

5(
d)
Collection
Schedule.

The
fabric
NESHAP
is
scheduled
for
promulgation
in
February
2003.
Collection
of
data
will
begin
after
promulgation
of
the
standards.
The
schedule
for
reports
that
will
be
required
by
the
fabric
NESHAP
is
summarized
in
Section
4(
b)(
i)
of
this
document.

6.
Estimating
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
6(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden.
9
The
existing
major
source
annual
burden
estimates
for
recordkeeping
and
reporting
for
the
first
three
years
after
promulgation
are
presented
in
Tables
3A
through
3C
for
fabric
coating
and
printing.
The
existing
major
source
annual
burden
estimates
for
recordkeeping
and
reporting
for
the
first
three
years
after
promulgation
are
presented
in
Tables
5A
through
5C
for
slashing,

dyeing,
and
finishing
operations.
The
new
major
source
annual
burden
estimates
for
recordkeeping
and
reporting
for
this
period
are
presented
in
Tables
3D
through
3F
and
Tables
4D
through
4F.

The
estimates
of
annual
total
technical
labor
hours
per
source
and
the
annual
number
of
activities
per
respondent
listed
in
each
table
are
based
upon
experience
with
similar
information
collection
requirements
in
other
standards
development
efforts
and
the
number
of
emission
points
in
each
source.
Activities
that
are
one­
time
only
activities
are
noted
in
the
tables.

6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs.

Since
this
rule
does
not
require
any
continuous
emission
monitoring
or
electronic
data
submittal,
the
only
capital
costs
associated
with
reporting
and
recordkeeping
activities
are
expected
to
be
associated
with
performance
testing
by
outside
parties.
It
is
assumed
that
all
fabric
coating/
printing
facilities
will
contract
a
testing
company
to
provide
sampling
and
analytical
services
required
to
demonstrate
that
emission
control
systems
achieve
the
required
emission
reductions.
Estimates
for
these
costs
were
taken
from
the
ESD
Regulatory
Procedures
Manual
(
Volume
X,
Sec.
2.2,
Table
4.
Burden
of
Performance
Tests
and
Continuous
Monitoring
System
(
CMS)
Demonstrations.
October
1990.)

The
only
continuous
monitoring
requirements
for
fabric
printing,
coating,
and
dyeing
facilities
are
for
parametric
monitoring
of
control
device
operating
parameters
at
coating/
printing
facilities
achieving
compliance
through
the
use
of
control
devices.
These
systems
are
either
already
in
place
or
would
be
included
in
new
emission
control
systems
to
monitor
operating
parameters
for
process
control;
therefore,
no
new
equipment
will
be
required
by
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements.

The
information
collection
activities
for
existing
sources
subject
to
the
standards
are
presented
in
Tables
3A
­
3C
and
5A
­
5C.
Separate
sets
of
tables
are
provided
for
textile
coating
10
and
printing
(
Tables
3A
­
3C)
and
textile
slashing,
dyeing,
and
finishing
(
Tables
5A
­
5C).
The
information
collection
activities
for
new
sources
in
coating
and
printing
subject
to
the
standards
are
presented
in
Tables
3D
­
3F.
No
new
facilities
are
expected
in
slashing,
dyeing,
and
finishing
operations
during
the
three­
year
period
after
promulgation
of
the
fabric
NESHAP.
Because
much
of
the
data
are
already
collected
by
respondents
or
required
by
existing
law,
minimal
respondent
development
costs
are
associated
with
the
information
collection
activities
for
the
standards.

Labor
rates
and
associated
costs
are
based
on
the
U.
S.
Department
of
Labor
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
(
BLS)
report
"
1999
National
Industry­
Specific
Occupational
Employment
and
Wage
Estimates"
for
SIC
Major
Group
22
­
Textile
Mill
Products,
and
estimated
hourly
rates
are
as
follows:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.
The
BLS
costs
include
fringe
benefits
and
a
multiplier
of
2.1
has
been
used
to
account
for
overhead/
profit.

6(
c)
Estimating
the
EPA's
Burden
and
Cost.

Because
the
information
collection
requirements
were
developed
as
an
incidental
part
of
standards
development,
no
costs
can
be
attributed
to
the
development
of
the
information
collection
requirements.
Because
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
on
the
part
of
the
respondents
are
required
under
the
General
Provisions
for
the
MACT
standards,
no
operational
costs
will
be
incurred
by
the
Federal
Government.
Publication
and
distribution
of
the
information
are
part
of
the
Compliance
Data
System,
with
the
result
that
no
Federal
costs
can
be
directly
attributed
to
the
ICR.
Examination
of
records
to
be
maintained
by
the
respondents
will
occur
incidentally
as
part
of
the
periodic
inspection
of
sources
that
is
part
of
EPA's
overall
compliance
and
enforcement
program,
and,
therefore,
is
not
attributable
to
the
ICR.
The
only
costs
that
the
Federal
government
will
incur
are
user
costs
associated
with
the
analysis
of
the
reported
information,
as
presented
in
Tables
4A
­
4C
and
6A
­
6C
for
existing
sources
and
Tables
4D
­
4F
for
new
sources.
Separate
tables
are
provided
for
textile
coating
and
printing
and
textile
slashing,

dyeing,
and
finishing.
Labor
rates
and
associated
costs
are
based
on
the
U.
S.
Department
of
Labor
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
Employment
Cost
Trends
report
(
June
1999,
Table
4),
and
estimated
hourly
rates
are
as
follows:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

6(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
11
The
EPA
estimates
that
135
existing
facilities
will
provide
the
one­
time
notifications
and
semi­
annual
reports
during
the
period
covered
by
this
ICR.
Details
on
the
number
of
existing
respondents
affected
by
each
individual
burden
item
are
provided
in
the
footnotes
of
Tables
3A
­

3C
and
5A
­
5C.
The
total
labor
burden
is
provided
in
Tables
3A
­
3C
and
5A
­
5C
and
is
estimated
as
213
hours/
year
per
facility.
The
total
cost
of
reporting
and
recordkeeping,
given
in
Tables
3A
­
3C
and
5A
­
5C,
is
$
10,400/
year
per
facility.

The
EPA
estimates
that
3
new
facilities
will
provide
the
one­
time
notifications
and
semiannual
reports
during
the
period
covered
by
this
ICR.
Details
on
the
number
of
new
respondents
affected
by
each
individual
burden
item
are
provided
in
the
footnotes
of
Tables
3D
­
3F.
The
total
labor
burden
is
provided
in
Tables
3D
­
3F
and
is
estimated
as
262
hours/
year
per
facility.
The
total
cost
of
reporting
and
recordkeeping,
given
in
Tables
3D
­
3F,
is
$
12,640
/
year
per
facility.

6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Costs/
Master
Tables.

The
EPA
estimates
that
135
existing
facilities
will
provide
the
one­
time
notifications
and
semi­
annual
reports
during
the
period
covered
by
this
ICR.
Details
on
the
number
of
respondents
affected
by
each
individual
burden
item
are
provided
in
the
footnotes
of
Tables
3A
­
3C
and
5A
­

5C.
The
total
labor
burden
is
provided
in
Tables
3A
­
3C
and
5A
­
5C
and
is
estimated
as
213
hours/
year
per
facility.
The
total
cost
of
reporting
and
recordkeeping,
given
in
Tables
3A
­
3C
and
5A
­
5C,
is
$
10,400/
year
per
facility.

The
EPA
estimates
that
3
new
facilities
will
provide
the
one­
time
notifications
and
semiannual
reports
during
the
period
covered
by
this
ICR.
Details
on
the
number
of
new
respondents
affected
by
each
individual
burden
item
are
provided
in
the
footnotes
of
Tables
3D
­
3F.
The
total
labor
burden
is
provided
in
Tables
3D
­
3F
and
is
estimated
as
262
hours/
year
per
facility.
The
total
cost
of
reporting
and
recordkeeping,
given
in
Tables
3D
­
3F,
is
$
12,640
/
year
per
facility.

6(
e)(
i)
Respondent
tally.

The
bottom
line
respondent
burden
hours
and
costs,
presented
in
Tables
3A
­
3C
and
5A
­

5C
for
existing
sources
and
Tables
3D
­
3F
for
new
sources,
and
summarized
in
Table
7
for
all
affected
sources,
are
calculated
by
adding
person­
hours
per
year
down
each
column
for
technical,

managerial,
and
clerical
staff,
and
by
adding
down
the
cost
column.
The
estimated
total
nationwide
12
burden
for
regulated
existing
major
sources
in
the
first
three
years
of
the
Printing,
Coating,
and
Dyeing
of
Fabrics
and
Other
Textiles
NESHAP
would
be
an
estimated
28,705
total
labor
hours
per
year
at
a
cost
of
$
1,403,670
per
year
for
major
sources.
The
estimated
total
nationwide
burden
for
regulated
new
sources
in
the
first
three
years
of
the
fabric
NESHAP
would
be
an
estimated
786
total
labor
hours
per
year
at
a
cost
of
$
37,920
per
year
for
new
sources.
The
total
annual
hours
for
regulated
existing
and
new
facilities
are
29,491
hours.

The
total
annualized
capital
and
startup
cost
reflects
the
estimated
capital
costs
for
equipment
required
to
comply
with
recordkeeping
and
reporting
activities
associated
with
the
major
source
provisions
of
the
promulgated
standards.
There
are
not
expected
to
be
any
capital
costs
resulting
from
this
rule
for
existing
major
sources
except
those
associated
with
performance
testing
by
outside
parties
(
as
described
in
Section
6b),
because
operating
parameter
monitoring
devices
are
an
integral
part
of
the
emission
control
devices,
and
there
are
no
capital
costs
associated
with
the
recordkeeping
used
to
demonstrate
compliance
through
the
use
of
compliant
coatings.
Because
there
are
no
requirements
in
the
rule
for
continued
performance
tests
after
the
initial
one,
costs
associated
with
performance
testing
were
distributed
over
the
expected
life
of
the
control
equipment
(
15
years)
at
7
percent
interest.
This
resulted
in
annualized
capital/
startup
costs
of
$
126,970
for
existing
sources
and
$
8,860
for
new
sources.
The
total
annualized
capital/
startup
costs
for
existing
and
new
sources
is
$
135,830.

The
total
annual
estimated
operating
and
maintenance
costs
were
calculated
based
on
the
estimated
storage,
filing,
photocopying,
and
postage
costs
for
the
222
estimated
total
annual
responses
associated
with
the
provisions
of
the
Printing,
Coating,
and
Dyeing
of
Fabrics
and
Other
Textiles
NESHAP.
Two
hundred
and
nine
annual
responses
were
estimated
for
existing
sources
and
thirteen
annual
responses
were
estimated
for
new
sources.
The
average
number
of
facility
responses
was
adjusted
from
270
to
222
based
on
when
the
facilities
actually
respond
within
the
first
three
years
after
promulgation.
Storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
costs
per
response
were
estimated
as
0.5
hour
of
clerical
labor
at
a
rate
of
$
21.27/
hr
per
response
for
multiple
copies.
First
class
postage
was
estimated
at
$
10.35
per
response
for
mailing
of
a
one
pound
package
and
two
half­
pound
packages
to
regulatory
agencies.
The
postage
rates
were
based
on
data
from
U.
S.

Postal
Services
Internet
web
site
(
http://
www.
usps.
com/),
accessed
September
4,
2001.
Thus,
the
13
total
storage,
filing,
photocopying,
and
postage
cost
per
response
was
$
21.00,
for
annual
estimates
of
$
4,570
for
existing
sources
and
$
280
for
new
sources.

6(
d)(
ii)
The
EPA
tally.

The
bottom
line
Agency
burden
hours
and
costs,
presented
in
Tables
4A
­
4C
and
6A
­
6C
for
existing
sources
and
Tables
3D
­
3F
for
new
sources,
are
calculated
as
in
the
respondent
table,

by
adding
person­
hours
per
year
down
each
column
for
technical,
managerial,
and
clerical
staff,

and
by
adding
down
the
cost
column.
In
this
case,
total
cost
is
the
sum
of
this
total
salary
cost
and
total
travel
expenses
for
tests
attended.
The
total
annual
hours
are
3,993
hours/
year
for
existing
sources
and
197
hours/
year
for
new
sources.
The
total
annual
cost
is
$
93,730/
year
for
existing
sources
and
$
4,560/
year
for
new
sources.
The
total
annual
hours
for
existing
and
new
sources
are
4,190
hours/
year
and
the
total
annual
cost
for
existing
and
new
sources
is
$
98,290.

6(
e)(
iii)
The
complex
collection.

This
collection
is
a
simple
collection,
therefore,
this
section
does
not
apply.

6(
e)(
iv)
Variations
in
the
annual
bottom
line.

Variation
in
the
annual
bottom
line
for
this
regulation
may
occur
due
to
the
fact
that
certain
one­
time
activities
may
occur
any
time
during
the
three­
year
period
following
promulgation
of
the
rule.

6(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden.

This
section
does
not
apply
because
this
is
a
new
collection.

Burden
Statement:
The
annual
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
of
information
is
estimated
to
average
213.7
hours
per
response.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
14
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15.

To
comment
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques,
EPA
has
established
a
public
docket
for
this
ICR
under
Docket
ID
No.
OAR­
2002­
0014,
which
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
Air
and
Radiation
Docket
and
Information
Center,
in
the
EPA
Docket
Center
(
EPA/
DC),
EPA
West,
Room
B102,

1301
Constitution
Ave.,
NW,
Washington,
DC.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566­
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
Air
Docket
is
(
202)
566­
1742.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA
Dockets
(
EDOCKET)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.
Use
EDOCKET
to
submit
or
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
Once
in
the
system,
select
"
search,"
then
key
in
the
docket
ID
number
identified
above.
Also,
you
can
send
comments
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,

NW,
Washington,
DC
20503,
Attention:
Desk
Office
for
EPA.
Please
include
the
EPA
Docket
ID
No.
(
OAR­
2002­
0014.)
15
PART
B
OF
THE
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
Not
applicable.
No
sampling
or
other
methods
are
used
to
select
respondents
because
all
owners
and
operators
of
facilities
subject
to
the
fabric
NESHAP
are
required
to
collect
information.
ATTACHMENT
1
A1­
2
TABLE
1.
FABRIC
COATING,
PRINTING,
AND
DYEING
OPERATIONS
CONSULTATIONS
NAME
AFFILIATION
TELEPHONE
NUMBER
Julie
S.
Flemming
American
Textile
Manufacturers
Institute
(
202)
862­
0580
Bill
Bailey
Duro
Industries
(
508)
675­
0101
Chuck
Brooks
National
Association
of
Hosiery
Manufacturers
(
704)
365­
0913
Barbara
Burdick
Kenyon
Industries,
Inc.
(
401)
364­
3400
Steve
Byrne
Cytec
(
973)
425­
8406
Arthur
Capper
NCDEHNR
(
704)
663­
1699
Sam
Calouche
Firestone
(
704)
734­
2151
Dan
Cochran
Holliston
Mills
(
423)
357­
6141
Jim
Conner
American
Yarn
Spinners
Association
(
704)
824­
3522
David
DeWulf
AMOCO
Fabrics
and
Fibers
(
770)
941­
1711
Ramon
DiMascio
The
Goodyear
Tire
and
Rubber
Company
(
330)
796­
4744
John
Finn
GenCorp,
Inc.
(
330)
869­
4335
Tom
Flynn
AlliedSignal
(
608)
791­
2276
Susan
Francesco
L.
W.
Packard
&
Company
(
603)
968­
3351
X314
Donald
Greene
Cranston
Print
Works
Company
(
704)
684­
6411
Herbert
Grey
The
Gates
Rubber
Company
(
303)
744­
5849
TABLE
1.
(
Continued)

NAME
AFFILIATION
TELEPHONE
NUMBER
A1­
3
C.
Tucker
Helms
ETAD
(
202)
721­
4154
Mike
Heth
AlliedSignal
(
608)
791­
2265
Peter
Mayberry
INDA
(
202)
828­
2327
Gary
Moore
Institute
of
Textile
Technology
(
804)
296­
5511
Carol
Nieme
CMA's
Solvents
Council
(
517)
631­
4923
Tracey
Norberg
Rubber
Manufacturers
Association
(
202)
682­
4839
Michael
Oberlander
Carleton
Woolen
Mills,
Inc.
(
207)
377­
2291
Fred
Parry
DyStar
L.
P.
(
704)
561­
3013
Jim
Pruitt
John
Boyle
and
Co.
Inc.
(
704)
872­
6303
Lamont
Powell
Clariant
Corporation
(
704)
331­
7717
Mark
Richardson
The
Freudenberg
Nonwovens
Group
(
978)
454­
0461
X611
Dr.
Alexander
Ross
RADTECH
(
703)
534­
9313
Marcia
Rounsaville
Industrial
Fabrics
Association
International
(
202)
861­
0981
Andrew
Shimko
Seaman
Corporation
(
330)
262­
1111
Jon
Schimpf
Dayco
(
417)
881­
7440
Rick
Scott
Textileather
Corporation
(
419)
729­
7557
Table
1.
(
Continued)

NAME
AFFILIATION
TELEPHONE
NUMBER
A1­
4
Eleanor
Sun
PGI
Nonwovens
(
919)
894­
6236
Tommy
Thompson
Sarah
Lee
Hosiery
(
910)
519­
2715
Marty
Trembly
Goodyear
Tire
&
Rubber
Co.
(
330)
796­
1837
David
Trumbull
Northern
Textile
Association
(
617)
542­
8220
Nicholas
Vasile
Brownell
&
Co.
(
860)
873­
8625
Tom
Wood
Cooper
Tire
&
Rubber
Co.
(
419)
424­
4345
Charles
Yang
The
University
of
Georgia
(
706)
542­
4912
Kay
Gilmer
Ohio
EPA
(
740)
380­
5257
Jimmy
Johnston
Georgia
DNR
(
404)
363­
7127
Bob
Kossow
Toledo
Environmental
Services
(
419)
936­
3015
Mike
Landis
NCDEHNR
(
704)
663­
1699
Peter
Lloyd
NCDEHNR
(
919)
715­
6238
Steve
Maynard
NCDEHNR
(
704)
251­
6208
Kim
Melvin
NCDEHNR
(
704)
251­
6208
Dana
Nickel
Massachusetts
DEP
(
508)
767­
2772
Venkata
Panchakarla
Florida
DEP
(
850)
488­
0114
Mona
Pedersen
Virginia
DEQ
(
804)
582­
5120
Bill
Reamy
Maryland
DE
(
410)
631­
3504
NAME
AFFILIATION
TELEPHONE
NUMBER
A1­
5
Craig
Richardson
TNRCC
(
512)
239­
1309
Danuta
Royes
New
Hampshire
DES
(
603)
271­
1987
Eric
Sanderson
Alabama
DEM
(
334)
271­
7861
Marzieh
Shahbazaz
Georgia
DNR
(
404)
363­
7121
Stephanie
Shealy
SC
DHEC
(
803)
898­
3432
Dave
Skelly
Virginia
DEQ
(
804)
582­
5120
Jim
Southerland
NC
DEHNR
(
919)
715­
7566
Mon
Wong
Massachusetts
DEP
(
978)
661­
7677
John
Yntema
Georgia
DNR
(
404)
363­
7117
A1­
6
TABLE
2.
FABRIC
PRODUCT
DESCRIPTIONS
AND
CORRESPONDING
SIC
AND
NAICS
CODES
PRODUCT
DESCRIPTION
1987
SIC
CODE
EQUIVALENT
1997
NAICS
CODE(
S)
EQUIVALENT
1997
NAICS
PRODUCT
DESCRIPTION
Broadwoven
Fabric
Mills,
Cotton
2211
31321
Broadwoven
Fabric
Mills
Broadwoven
Fabric
Mills,
Manmade
Fiber
2221
31321
Broadwoven
Fabric
Mills
Broadwoven
Fabric
Mills,
Wool
(
Including
Dyeing
and
Finishing)
2231
31321
Broadwoven
Fabric
Mills
Textile
Goods,
NEC
(
broadwoven
fabrics
of
jute,
linen,
hemp,
and
ramie
and
handwoven)
2299
31321
Broadwoven
Fabric
Mills
Narrow
Fabric
and
Other
Smallware
Mills:
Cotton,
Wool
Silk,
and
Manmade
Fiber
2241
31322
Narrow
Fabric
Mills
and
Schiffli
Machine
Embroidery
Textile
Goods,
NEC
(
narrow
woven
fabric
of
jute,
linen,
hemp,
and
ramie)
2299
31322
Narrow
Fabric
Mills
and
Schiffli
Machine
Embroidery
Knitting
Mills
NEC
(
finished
articles
of
weft
knit
fabric)
2259
313241
Weft
Knit
Fabric
Mills
Broadwoven
Fabric
Mills,
wool
(
wool
broadwoven
fabric
finishing
only)
2231
313311
Broadwoven
Fabric
Finishing
Mills
A1­
7
Finishers
of
Broadwoven
Fabrics
of
Cotton
2261
313311
Broadwoven
Fabric
Finishing
Mills
Finishers
of
Broadwoven
Fabrics
of
Manmade
Fiber
and
Silk
2262
313311
Broadwoven
Fabric
Finishing
Mills
Broadwoven
Fabric
Mills,
Wool
(
wool
finishing
only,
except
broadwoven
fabric)
2231
313312
Textile
and
Fabric
Finishing
(
except
Broadwoven
Fabric)
Mills
Knit
Outerwear
(
dyeing
and
finishing
only)
2253
313312
Textile
and
Fabric
Finishing
(
except
Broadwoven
Fabric)
Mills
Knit
Underwear
and
Nightwear
Mills
(
dyeing
and
finishing
only)
2254
313312
Textile
and
Fabric
Finishing
(
except
Broadwoven
Fabric)
Mills
Weft
Knit
Mills
(
finishing)
2257
313312
Textile
and
Fabric
Finishing
(
except
Broadwoven
Fabric)
Mills
Lace
and
Warp
Knit
Fabric
Mills
(
finishing)
2258
313312
Textile
and
Fabric
Finishing
(
except
Broadwoven
Fabric)
Mills
Finishers
of
Textiles,
NEC
2269
313312
Textile
and
Fabric
Finishing
(
except
Broadwoven
Fabric)
Mills
Thread
Mills
(
thread
finishing)
2284
313312
Textile
and
Fabric
Finishing
(
except
Broadwoven
Fabric)
Mills
Textile
Goods,
NEC
(
finishing
hard
fiber
thread
and
yarn)
2299
313312
Textile
and
Fabric
Finishing
(
except
Broadwoven
Fabric)
Mills
A1­
8
Coated
Fabrics,
Not
Rubberized
2295
31332
Fabric
Coating
Mills
Fabricated
Rubber
Products,
NEC
(
rubberizing
fabric
or
purchased
textile
products)
3069
31332
Fabric
Coating
Mills
Carpets
and
Rugs
2273
31411
Carpet
and
Rug
Mills
Rubber
and
Plastic
Hose
and
Belting
3052
32622
Rubber
and
Plastics
Hoses
and
Belting
and
Manufacturing
Gaskets,
Packing
and
Sealing
Devices
3053
339991
Gasket,
Packing,
aand
Sealing
Device
Manufacturing
Fabricated
Rubber
Products,
NEC
 
Rubberizing
Fabric
or
Purchased
Textile
Products
3069
31332
Fabric
Coating
Mills
A1­
9
TABLE
3A.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)
­
EXISTING
SOURCES
FIRST
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
80
0.11
b
8.8
7.4
c
65.12
3.256
6.512
3665
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
4
1
4
61
244
12.2
24.4
13731
B.
Required
activities
Initial
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
7.4
d
227.92
11.396
22.792
12826
Repeat
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
1.5
e
46.2
2.31
4.62
2600
Initial
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
15
f
354.75
17.7375
35.475
19963
Repeat
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
3
e
70.95
3.5475
7.095
3993
Solvent
recovery
system
compliance
determination
16
12
192
0
0
0
0
0
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
plan
40
1
40
7.4
c
296
14.8
29.6
16657
Coordination
with
suppliers
40
1
40
0
0
0
0
0
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
10
Initial
notification
2
1
2
61
122
6.1
12.2
6865
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
actual
startup
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Compliance
status
notification
4
1
4
61
244
12.2
24.4
13731
Performance
test
notification
2
0.11
b
0.22
7.4
c
1.628
0.0814
0.1628
92
Performance
test
report
40
0.11
b
4.4
7.4
c
32.56
1.628
3.256
1832
Report
of
monitoring
exceedances
16
2
g
32
0.74
h
23.68
1.184
2.368
1333
Report
of
no
excess
emissions
8
2
g
16
6.7
i
107.2
5.36
10.72
6033
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
8
2
g
16
0.74
j
11.84
0.592
1.184
666
Report
operating
and
maintenance
0.5
2.51
k
1.26
61
NA
l
NA
l
76.58
l
3214
m
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
information
Records
of
all
info.
required
by
standards
4
52
208
7.4
c
1539.2
76.96
153.92
86617
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
N/
A
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
11
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25
2
0.5
7.4
c
3.7
0.185
0.37
208
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
3391
170
416
194030
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.

b
Occurs
one
time
during
first
3
years
of
standard.
Results
in
one­
time
start­
up
costs
associated
with
initial
compliance
determination
and
acquisition,
installation
and
utilization
of
technology
and
systems
needed
to
support
record
keeping
and
reporting.
The
one­
time
start­
up
costs
are
amortized
over
the
15­
year
life
of
control
equipment
at
7%
interest.
For
computational
purposes,
the
number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
is
amortized
over
15
years.

c
Represents
number
of
facilities
already
reporting
compliance
with
promulgated
emission
limits.

d
Assumes
facilities
already
reporting
97
percent
overall
control
efficiency
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
initial
oxidizer
performance
tests
during
the
first
year
after
promulgation,
requiring
performance
tests
on
7
oxidizers.
Assumes
facilities
requiring
replacements
or
upgrades
will
act
in
year
three.

e
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
respondents
repeat
performance
test.

f
Assumes
facilities
already
reporting
97
percent
overall
control
efficiency
will
chose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
initial
capture
performance
tests
during
the
first
year
after
promulgation,
requiring
performance
tests
on
15
coating
rooms.
Assumes
facilities
requiring
replacements
or
upgrades
will
act
in
year
three.

g
Assumes
semiannual
reports
are
required.

h
Assumes
10
percent
of
respondents
for
first
year
after
promulgation
fail
to
meet
the
standard.

i
Assumes
90
percent
of
respondents
for
first
year
after
promulgation
meet
the
standard.

j
Assumes
10
percent
must
file
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report.

k
Average
number
of
reports
submitted
per
respondent
in
the
first
year.

l
Assumes
storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
of
reports
are
performed
by
clerical
staff.

m
Cost
includes
clerical
labor
and
first
class
postage
of
$
10.35
per
response.

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
A1­
12
TABLE
3B.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)
­
EXISTING
SOURCES
SECOND
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
80
0.11
b
8.8
7.4
c
65.12
3.256
6.512
3665
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
B.
Required
activities
Initial
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
7.4
d
227.92
11.396
22.792
12826
Repeat
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
1.5
e
46.2
2.31
4.62
2600
Initial
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
15
f
354.75
17.7375
35.475
19963
Repeat
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
3
e
70.95
3.5475
7.095
3993
Solvent
recovery
system
compliance
determination
16
12
192
0
0
0
0
0
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
plan
40
1
40
0
0
0
0
0
Coordination
with
suppliers
40
1
40
0
0
0
0
0
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
13
Initial
notification
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
actual
startup
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Compliance
status
notification
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
Performance
test
notification
2
0.11
b
0.22
7.4
1.628
0.0814
0.1628
92
Performance
test
report
40
0.11
b
4.4
7.4
32.56
1.628
3.256
1832
Report
of
monitoring
exceedances
16
2
g
32
0.74
h
23.68
1.184
2.368
1333
Report
of
no
excess
emissions
8
2
g
16
6.7
i
107.2
5.36
10.72
6033
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
8
2
g
16
0.74
j
11.84
0.592
1.184
666
Report
operating
and
maintenance
0.5
4.21
k
2.11
7.4
NA
l
NA
l
15.58
l
654
m
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
information
Records
of
all
info.
required
by
standards
4
52
208
7.4
c
1539.2
76.96
153.92
86617
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
N/
A
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
14
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25
2
0.5
7.4
c
3.7
0.185
0.37
208
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
2485
124
264
140480
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.

b
Occurs
one
time
during
first
3
years
of
standard.
Results
in
one­
time
start­
up
costs
associated
with
initial
compliance
determination
and
acquisition,
installation
and
utilization
of
technology
and
systems
needed
to
support
record
keeping
and
reporting.
The
one­
time
start­
up
costs
are
amortized
over
the
15­
year
life
of
control
equipment
at
7%
interest.
For
computational
purposes,
the
number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
is
amortized
over
15
years.

c
Represents
number
of
facilities
already
reporting
compliance
with
promulgated
emission
limits.

d
Assumes
no
facilities
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
initial
oxidizer
performance
tests
in
year
two;
includes
amortized
costs
for
initial
oxidizer
performance
tests
conducted
in
year
one.

e
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
respondents
repeat
performance
test.

f
Assumes
no
facilities
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
initial
capture
performance
tests
in
year
two;
includes
amortized
costs
for
initial
capture
performance
tests
conducted
in
year
one.

g
Assumes
semiannual
reports
are
required.

h
Assumes
10
percent
of
respondents
for
second
year
after
promulgation
fail
to
meet
the
standard.

i
Assumes
90
percent
of
respondents
for
second
year
after
promulgation
meet
the
standard.

j
Assumes
10
percent
must
file
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report.

k
Average
number
of
reports
submitted
per
respondent
in
the
second
year.

l
Assumes
storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
of
reports
are
performed
by
clerical
staff.

m
Cost
includes
clerical
labor
and
first
class
postage
of
$
10.35
per
response.

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
A1­
15
TABLE
3C.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)
­
EXISTING
SOURCES
THIRD
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
80
0.11
b
8.8
61
c
536.8
26.84
53.68
30208
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
B.
Required
activities
Initial
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
39.4
d
1213.52
60.676
121.352
68290
Repeat
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
7.9
e
243.32
12.166
24.332
13693
Initial
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
79
f
1868.35
93.4175
186.835
105140
Repeat
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
15.7
e
371.305
18.56525
37.1305
20895
Solvent
recovery
system
compliance
determination
16
12
192
14.3
2745.6
137.28
274.56
154506
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
plan
40
1
40
53.6
2144
107.2
214.4
120651
Coordination
with
suppliers
40
1
40
14.3
572
28.6
57.2
32189
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
16
Initial
notification
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
constr./
rrconstr.
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
actual
startup
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Compliance
status
notification
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
Performance
test
notification
2
0.11
b
0.22
46.7
10.274
0.5137
1.0274
578
Performance
test
report
40
0.11
b
4.4
46.7
205.48
10.274
20.548
11563
Report
of
monitoring
exceedances
16
2
g
32
4.8
h
153.6
7.68
15.36
8644
Report
of
no
excess
emissions
8
2
g
16
42.1
i
673.6
33.68
67.36
37906
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
8
2
g
16
4.8
j
76.8
3.84
7.68
4322
Report
operating
and
maintenance
0.5
3.23
k
1.61
61
NA
l
NA
l
98.4
l
4130
m
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
information
Records
of
all
info.
required
by
standards
4
52
208
61
12688
634.4
1268.8
714005
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
N/
A
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
17
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25
2
0.5
61
30.5
1.525
3.05
1716
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
23533
1177
2452
1328430
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.

b
Occurs
one
time
during
first
3
years
of
standard.
Results
in
one­
time
start­
up
costs
associated
with
initial
compliance
determination
and
acquisition,
installation,
and
utilization
of
technology
and
systems
needed
to
support
record
keeping
and
reporting.
The
one­
time
start­
up
costs
are
amortized
over
the
15­
year
life
of
control
equipment
at
7%
interest.
For
computational
purposes,
the
number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
is
amortized
over
15
years.

c
Assumes
facilities
requiring
replacements
or
upgrades
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
during
the
third
year
after
promulgation
of
the
standard;
includes
costs
for
demonstrating
continuous
compliance
from
years
1
and
2.

d
Assumes
facilities
requiring
replacements
or
upgrades
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
initial
oxidizer
performance
tests
during
the
third
after
promulgation,

requiring
performance
tests
on
39
oxidizers;
includes
amortized
costs
for
initial
oxidizer
performance
tests
conducted
in
year
one.

e
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
respondents
repeat
performance
tests.

f
Assumes
facilities
requiring
replacements
or
upgrades
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
initial
capture
performance
tests
during
the
third
year
after
promulgation,
requiring
performance
tests
on
79
coating
rooms;
includes
amortized
costs
for
initial
capture
performance
tests
conducted
in
year
one.

g
Assumes
semiannual
reports
are
required.

h
Assumes
10
percent
of
respondents
for
third
year
after
promulgation
fail
to
meet
the
standard.

i
Assumes
90
percent
of
respondents
for
third
year
after
promulgation
meet
the
standard.

j
Assumes
10
percent
must
file
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report.

k
Average
number
of
reports
submitted
per
respondent
in
the
third
year.

l
Assumes
storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
of
reports
are
performed
by
clerical
staff.

m
Cost
includes
clerical
labor
and
first
class
postage
of
$
10.35
per
response.

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
A1­
18
TABLE
3D.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)
­
NEW
SOURCES
FIRST
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
80
0.11
b
8.8
1
c
8.8
0.44
0.88
495
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
4
1
4
1
4
0.2
0.4
225
B.
Required
activities
Initial
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
1
d
30.8
1.54
3.08
1733
Repeat
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
0.2
e
6.16
0.308
0.616
347
Initial
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
1
f
23.65
1.1825
2.365
1331
Repeat
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
0.2
e
4.73
0.2365
0.473
266
Solvent
recovery
system
compliance
determination
16
12
192
0
0
0
0
0
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
plan
40
1
40
1
c
40
2
4
2251
Coordination
with
suppliers
40
1
40
0
0
0
0
0
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
19
Initial
notification
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
actual
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Compliance
status
notification
4
1
4
1
4
0.2
0.4
225
Performance
test
notification
2
0.11
b
0.22
1
c
0.22
0.011
0.022
12
Performance
test
report
40
0.11
b
4.4
1
c
4.4
0.22
0.44
248
Report
of
monitoring
exceedances
16
2
g
32
0.1
h
3.2
0.16
0.32
180
Report
of
no
excess
emissions
8
2
g
16
0.9
i
14.4
0.72
1.44
810
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
8
2
g
16
0.1
j
1.6
0.08
0.16
90
Report
operating
and
maintenance
0.5
9.2
k
4.60
1
NA
l
NA
l
4.6
l
193
m
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
information
Records
of
all
info.
required
by
standards
4
52
208
1
c
208
10.4
20.8
11705
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
N/
A
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
20
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25
2
0.5
1
c
0.5
0.025
0.05
28
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
362
18
41
20590
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.

b
Occurs
one
time
during
first
3
years
of
standard.
Results
in
one­
time
start­
up
costs
associated
with
initial
compliance
determination
and
acquisition,
installation
and
utilization
of
technology
and
systems
needed
to
support
record
keeping
and
reporting.
The
one­
time
start­
up
costs
are
amortized
over
the
15­
year
life
of
control
equipment
at
7%
interest.
For
computational
purposes,
the
number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
is
amortized
over
15
years.

c
Assumes
there
will
be
three
new
sources
subject
to
the
fabric
NESHAP
in
the
first
3
years
after
promulgation
and
that
these
new
sources
will
be
added
evenly
throughout
the
3­
year
period.

d
Assumes
1
facility
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
an
initial
oxidizer
performance
test
on
one
oxidizer
during
the
first
year
after
promulgation.

e
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
respondents
repeat
performance
test.

f
Assumes
1
facility
will
chose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
an
initial
capture
performance
test
on
one
coating
room
during
the
first
year
after
promulgation.

g
Assumes
semiannual
reports
are
required.

h
Assumes
10
percent
of
respondents
for
first
year
after
promulgation
fail
to
meet
the
standard.

i
Assumes
90
percent
of
respondents
for
first
year
after
promulgation
meet
the
standard.

j
Assumes
10
percent
must
file
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report.

k
Average
number
of
reports
submitted
per
respondent
in
the
first
year.

l
Assumes
storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
of
reports
are
performed
by
clerical
staff.

m
Cost
includes
clerical
labor
and
first
class
postage
of
$
10.35
per
response.

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
A1­
21
TABLE
3E.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)
­
NEW
SOURCES
SECOND
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
80
0.11
b
8.8
2
c
17.6
0.88
1.76
990
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
4
1
4
1
4
0.2
0.4
225
B.
Required
activities
Initial
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
2
d
61.6
3.08
6.16
3466
Repeat
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
0.4
e
12.32
0.616
1.232
693
Initial
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
2
f
47.3
2.365
4.73
2662
Repeat
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
0.4
e
9.46
0.473
0.946
532
Solvent
recovery
system
compliance
determination
16
12
192
0
0
0
0
0
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
plan
40
1
40
1
40
2
4
2251
Coordination
with
suppliers
40
1
40
0
0
0
0
0
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
22
Initial
notification
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
actual
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Compliance
status
notification
4
1
4
1
4
0.2
0.4
225
Performance
test
notification
2
0.11
b
0.22
2
0.44
0.022
0.044
25
Performance
test
report
40
0.11
b
4.4
2
8.8
0.44
0.88
495
Report
of
monitoring
exceedances
16
2
g
32
0.2
h
6.4
0.32
0.64
360
Report
of
no
excess
emissions
8
2
g
16
1.8
i
28.8
1.44
2.88
1621
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
8
2
g
16
0.2
j
3.2
0.16
0.32
180
Report
operating
and
maintenance
0.5
6.7
k
3.35
2
NA
l
NA
l
6.7
l
281
m
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
information
Records
of
all
info.
required
by
standards
4
52
208
2
c
416
20.8
41.6
23410
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
N/
A
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
23
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25
2
0.5
2
c
1
0.05
0.1
56
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
669
33
74
37920
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.

b
Occurs
one
time
during
first
3
years
of
standard.
Results
in
one­
time
start­
up
costs
associated
with
initial
compliance
determination
and
acquisition,
installation
and
utilization
of
technology
and
systems
needed
to
support
record
keeping
and
reporting.
The
one­
time
start­
up
costs
are
amortized
over
the
15­
year
life
of
control
equipment
at
7%
interest.
For
computational
purposes,
the
number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
is
amortized
over
15
years.

c
Assumes
there
will
be
three
new
sources
subject
to
the
fabric
NESHAP
in
the
first
3
years
after
promulgation
and
that
these
new
sources
will
be
added
evenly
throughout
the
3­
year
period;
includes
costs
for
demonstrating
continuous
compliance
from
year
1.

d
Assumes
1
facility
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
an
initial
oxidizer
performance
test
on
one
oxidizer
in
year
two;
includes
amortized
costs
for
initial
oxidizer
performance
test
conducted
in
year
one.

e
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
respondents
repeat
performance
test.

f
Assumes
1
facility
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
an
initial
capture
performance
test
on
one
coating
room
in
year
two;
includes
amortized
costs
for
initial
capture
performance
test
conducted
in
year
one.

g
Assumes
semiannual
reports
are
required.

h
Assumes
10
percent
of
respondents
for
second
year
after
promulgation
fail
to
meet
the
standard.

i
Assumes
90
percent
of
respondents
for
second
year
after
promulgation
meet
the
standard.

j
Assumes
10
percent
must
file
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report.

k
Average
number
of
reports
submitted
per
respondent
in
the
second
year.

l
Assumes
storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
of
reports
are
performed
by
clerical
staff.

m
Cost
includes
clerical
labor
and
first
class
postage
of
$
10.35
per
response.

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
A1­
24
TABLE
3F.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)
­
NEW
SOURCES
THIRD
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
80
0.11
b
8.8
3
c
26.4
1.32
2.64
1486
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
4
1
4
1
4
0.2
0.4
225
B.
Required
activities
Initial
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
3
d
92.4
4.62
9.24
5200
Repeat
oxidizer
performance
test
280
0.11
b
30.8
0.6
e
18.48
0.924
1.848
1040
Initial
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
3
f
70.95
3.5475
7.095
3993
Repeat
capture
performance
test
215
0.11
b
23.65
0.6
e
14.19
0.7095
1.419
799
Solvent
recovery
system
compliance
determination
16
12
192
0
0
0
0
0
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
plan
40
1
40
1
40
2
4
2251
Coordination
with
suppliers
40
1
40
0
0
0
0
0
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
25
Initial
notification
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
constr./
rrconstr.
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
actual
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Compliance
status
notification
4
1
4
1
4
0.2
0.4
225
Performance
test
notification
2
0.11
b
0.22
3
0.66
0.033
0.066
37
Performance
test
report
40
0.11
b
4.4
3
13.2
0.66
1.32
743
Report
of
monitoring
exceedances
16
2
g
32
0.3
h
9.6
0.48
0.96
540
Report
of
no
excess
emissions
8
2
g
16
2.7
i
43.2
2.16
4.32
2431
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
8
2
g
16
0.3
j
4.8
0.24
0.48
270
Report
operating
and
maintenance
0.5
5.86
k
2.93
3
NA
l
NA
l
8.79
l
369
m
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
information
Records
of
all
info.
required
by
standards
4
52
208
3
624
31.2
62.4
35115
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
N/
A
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
26
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25
2
0.5
3
1.5
0.075
0.15
84
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
975
49
106
55260
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.

b
Occurs
one
time
during
first
3
years
of
standard.
Results
in
one­
time
start­
up
costs
associated
with
initial
compliance
determination
and
acquisition,
installation,
and
utilization
of
technology
and
systems
needed
to
support
record
keeping
and
reporting.
The
one­
time
start­
up
costs
are
amortized
over
the
15­
year
life
of
control
equipment
at
7%
interest.
For
computational
purposes,
the
number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
is
amortized
over
15
years.

c
Assumes
there
will
be
three
new
sources
subject
to
the
fabric
NESHAP
in
the
first
3
years
after
promulgation
and
that
these
new
sources
will
be
added
evenly
throughout
the
3­
year
period;
includes
costs
for
demonstrating
continuous
compliance
from
years
1
and
2.

d
Assumes
1
facility
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
an
initial
oxidizer
performance
test
on
one
oxidizer
during
the
third
after
promulgation;
includes
amortized
costs
for
initial
oxidizer
performance
tests
conducted
in
years
one
and
two.

e
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
respondents
repeat
performance
tests.

f
Assumes
1
facility
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
by
conducting
an
initial
capture
performance
test
on
one
coating
room
during
the
third
year
after
promulgation;
includes
amortized
costs
for
initial
capture
performance
tests
conducted
in
years
one
and
two.

g
Assumes
semiannual
reports
are
required.

h
Assumes
10
percent
of
respondents
for
third
year
after
promulgation
fail
to
meet
the
standard.

i
Assumes
90
percent
of
respondents
for
third
year
after
promulgation
meet
the
standard.

j
Assumes
10
percent
must
file
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report.

k
Average
number
of
reports
submitted
per
respondent
in
the
third
year.

l
Assumes
storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
of
reports
are
performed
by
clerical
staff.

m
Cost
includes
clerical
labor
and
first
class
postage
of
$
10.35
per
response.

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
TABLE
4A.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)
A1­
27
FIRST
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
­
EXISTING
SOURCES
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)

Hours
per
plant
per
year
(
C)
Plants
per
year
(
D)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
BxC)
(
E)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.05)
(
F)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.1)
(
G)

Cost,
$
a
Initial
performance
test
495
495
0.74b
366.3
18.315
36.63
9678
Repeat
performance
test­
Retesting
preparation
4
4
0.74c
2.96
0.148
0.296
78
Repeat
performance
­
Retesting
495
495
0.74c
366.3
18.315
36.63
9678
Litigation
2080
2080
0.074d
153.92
7.696
15.392
4067
Excess
Emissions
Enforcement
Activities
120
120
0.74e
88.8
4.44
8.88
2346
Report
Review
Notification
of
applicability
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
Notification
of
actual
startup
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
Notification
of
initial
performance
test
Notification
of
compliance
status
Review
of
initial
performance
test
report
Review
of
repeat
performance
test
report
Review
of
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
no
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
Review
of
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
2
2
2
2
N/
A
2
2
8
8
8
2
N/
A
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
8
8
2
2
61
0
0
0
7.4
61
7.4
0.74
0.74
6.65
f
1.48
g
122
0
0
0
14.8
122
59.2
5.92
5.92
13.3
2.96
6.1
0
0
0
0.74
6.1
2.96
0.296
0.296
0.665
0.148
12.2
0
0
0
1.48
12.2
5.92
0.592
0.592
1.33
0.296
3223
0
0
0
391
3223
1564
156
156
351
78
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
1324
66
132
34993
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
0.74
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
0.74
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
333
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
34993
+
$
333
=
$
35330
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

b
Assume
EPA/
State
personnel
will
attend
10
percent
of
the
performance
tests
at
the
total
of
7.4
plants
(
0.1
x
7.4
=
0.74).

c
Assume
20
percent
fail
the
initial
performance
test
and
half
repeat
the
performance
test
(
0.2
x
7.4/
2).

d
One
plant
in
100
will
be
involved
in
litigation
(
0.01
x
7.4
=
0.074).

e
Assume
10
percent
of
the
7.4
plants
(
0.74)
have
excess
emissions.
A1­
28
f
Assume
90
percent
of
the
7.4
plants
(
6.65)
do
not
have
excess
emissions.

g
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
plants
per
year
(
1.48)
will
report
a
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
incident.

TABLE
4B.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)
A1­
29
SECOND
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
­
EXISTING
SOURCES
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)

Hours
per
plant
per
year
(
C)
Plants
per
year
(
D)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
BxC)
(
E)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.05)
(
F)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.1)
(
G)

Cost,
$
a
Initial
performance
test
495
495
0b
0
0
0
0
Repeat
performance
test­
Retesting
preparation
4
4
0c
0
0
0
0
Repeat
performance
­
Retesting
495
495
0c
0
0
0
0
Litigation
2080
2080
0.074d
153.92
7.696
15.392
4067
Excess
Emissions
Enforcement
Activities
120
120
0.74e
88.8
4.44
8.88
2346
Report
Review
Notification
of
applicability
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
Notification
of
actual
startup
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
Notification
of
initial
performance
test
Notification
of
compliance
status
Review
of
initial
performance
test
report
Review
of
repeat
performance
test
report
Review
of
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
no
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
Review
of
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
2
2
2
2
N/
A
2
2
8
8
8
2
N/
A
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
8
8
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.74
6.65f
1.48g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.92
13.3
2.96
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.296
0.665
0.148
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.592
1.33
0.296
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
156
351
78
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
265
13
26
6999
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
0.74
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
0.74
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
333
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
333
+
$
6999
=
$
7330
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

b
Assume
EPA/
State
personnel
will
attend
10
percent
of
the
performance
tests.

c
Assume
20
percent
fail
the
initial
performance
test
and
half
repeat
the
performance
test.

d
One
plant
in
100
will
be
involved
in
litigation.

e
Assume
10
percent
of
the
plants
have
excess
emissions.
A1­
30
f
Assume
90
percent
of
the
plants
do
not
have
excess
emissions.

g
Assume
20
percent
of
the
plants
per
year
will
report
a
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
incident.
A1­
31
TABLE
4C.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)

THIRD
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
­
EXISTING
SOURCES
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)

Hours
per
plant
per
year
(
C)
Plants
per
year
(
D)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
BxC)
(
E)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.05)
(
F)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.1)
(
G)

Cost,
$
a
Initial
performance
test
495
495
3.94
b
1950.3
97.515
195.03
51531
Repeat
performance
test­
Retesting
preparation
4
4
3.94
c
15.76
0.788
1.576
416
Repeat
performance
­
Retesting
495
495
3.94
c
1950.3
97.515
195.03
51531
Litigation
2080
2080
0.394
d
819.52
40.976
81.952
21653
Excess
Emissions
Enforcement
Activities
120
120
3.94
e
472.8
23.64
47.28
12492
Report
Review
Notification
of
applicability
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
Notification
of
actual
startup
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
Notification
of
initial
performance
test
Notification
of
compliance
status
Review
of
initial
performance
test
report
Review
of
repeat
performance
test
report
Review
of
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
no
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
Review
of
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
2
2
2
2
N/
A
2
2
8
8
8
2
N/
A
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
8
8
2
2
0
0
0
0
39.4
0
39.4
3.94
3.94
35.4
f
7.9
g
0
0
0
0
78.8
0
315.2
31.52
31.52
70.8
15.8
0
0
0
0
3.94
0
15.76
1.576
1.576
3.54
0.79
0
0
0
0
7.88
0
31.52
3.152
3.152
7.08
1.58
0
0
0
0
2082
0
8328
833
833
1871
417
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
5752
288
575
151988
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
3.94
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
3.94
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
1773
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
1773
+
$
151988
=
$
153760
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

b
Assume
EPA/
State
personnel
will
attend
10
percent
of
the
performance
tests
at
the
total
of
39.4
plants
(
0.1
x
39.4
=
3.94).

c
Assume
20
percent
fail
the
initial
performance
test
and
half
repeat
the
performance
test
(
0.2
x
39.4/
2).

d
One
plant
in
100
will
be
involved
in
litigation
(
0.01
x
39.4
=
0.394).
A1­
32
e
Assume
10
percent
of
the
39.4
plants
(
3.94)
have
excess
emissions.

f
Assume
90
percent
of
the
39.4
plants
(
35.4)
do
not
have
excess
emissions.

g
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
plants
per
year
(
7.9)
will
report
a
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
incident.
A1­
33
TABLE
4D.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)

FIRST
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
­
NEW
SOURCES
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)

Hours
per
plant
per
year
(
C)
Plants
per
year
(
D)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
BxC)
(
E)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.05)
(
F)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.1)
(
G)

Cost,
$
a
Initial
performance
test
495
495
0.1b
49.5
2.475
4.95
1308
Repeat
performance
test­
Retesting
preparation
4
4
0.1c
0.4
0.02
0.04
11
Repeat
performance
­
Retesting
495
495
0.1c
49.5
2.475
4.95
1308
Litigation
2080
2080
0.01d
20.8
1.04
2.08
550
Excess
Emissions
Enforcement
Activities
120
120
0.1e
12
0.6
1.2
317
Report
Review
Notification
of
applicability
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
Notification
of
actual
startup
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
Notification
of
initial
performance
test
Notification
of
compliance
status
Review
of
initial
performance
test
report
Review
of
repeat
performance
test
report
Review
of
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
no
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
Review
of
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
2
2
2
2
N/
A
2
2
8
8
8
2
N/
A
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
8
8
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.1
0.1
0.9
f
0.2
g
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
0.8
0.8
1.8
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.02
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.8
0.08
0.08
0.18
0.04
53
53
53
53
53
53
211
21
21
48
11
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
156
8
16
4122
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
0.1
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
0.1
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
45
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
4122
+
$
45
=
$
4170
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

b
Assume
EPA/
State
personnel
will
attend
10
percent
of
the
performance
tests
(
0.1
x
1
=
0.1).

c
Assume
20
percent
fail
the
initial
performance
test
and
half
repeat
the
performance
test
(
0.2
x
1/
2).

d
One
plant
in
100
will
be
involved
in
litigation
(
0.01
x
1
=
0.01).
A1­
34
e
Assume
10
percent
of
the
plants
(
0.1)
have
excess
emissions.

f
Assume
90
percent
of
the
plants
(
0.9)
do
not
have
excess
emissions.

g
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
plants
(
0.2)
will
report
a
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
incident.
A1­
35
TABLE
4E.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)

SECOND
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
­
NEW
SOURCES
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)

Hours
per
plant
per
year
(
C)
Plants
per
year
(
D)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
BxC)
(
E)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.05)
(
F)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.1)
(
G)

Cost,
$
a
Initial
performance
test
495
495
0.1b
49.5
2.475
4.95
1308
Repeat
performance
test­
Retesting
preparation
4
4
0.1c
0.4
0.02
0.04
11
Repeat
performance
­
Retesting
495
495
0.1c
49.5
2.475
4.95
1308
Litigation
2080
2080
0.01d
20.8
1.04
2.08
550
Excess
Emissions
Enforcement
Activities
120
120
0.2e
24
1.2
2.4
634
Report
Review
Notification
of
applicability
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
Notification
of
actual
startup
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
Notification
of
initial
performance
test
Notification
of
compliance
status
Review
of
initial
performance
test
report
Review
of
repeat
performance
test
report
Review
of
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
no
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
Review
of
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
2
2
2
2
N/
A
2
2
8
8
8
2
N/
A
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
8
8
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.1
0.2
1.8f
0.4g
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
0.8
1.6
3.6
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.04
0.08
0.18
0.04
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.8
0.08
0.16
0.36
0.08
53
53
53
53
53
53
211
21
42
95
21
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
171
9
17
4518
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
0.1
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
0.1
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
45
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
45
+
$
4518
=
$
4560
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

b
Assume
EPA/
State
personnel
will
attend
10
percent
of
the
performance
tests
(
0.1
x
1
=
0.1).

c
Assume
20
percent
fail
the
initial
performance
test
and
half
repeat
the
performance
test
(
0.2
x
1/
2).

d
One
plant
in
100
will
be
involved
in
litigation
(
0.01
x
1
=
0.01).
A1­
36
e
Assume
10
percent
of
the
2
plants
have
excess
emissions.

f
Assume
90
percent
of
the
2
plants
do
not
have
excess
emissions.

g
Assume
20
percent
of
the
2
plants
will
report
a
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
incident.
A1­
37
TABLE
4F.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
COATING
AND
PRINTING)

THIRD
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
­
NEW
SOURCES
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)

Hours
per
plant
per
year
(
C)
Plants
per
year
(
D)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
BxC)
(
E)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.05)
(
F)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.1)
(
G)

Cost,
$
a
Initial
performance
test
495
495
0.1
b
49.5
2.475
4.95
1308
Repeat
performance
test­
Retesting
preparation
4
4
0.1
c
0.4
0.02
0.04
11
Repeat
performance
­
Retesting
495
495
0.1
c
49.5
2.475
4.95
1308
Litigation
2080
2080
0.01
d
20.8
1.04
2.08
550
Excess
Emissions
Enforcement
Activities
120
120
0.3
e
36
1.8
3.6
951
Report
Review
Notification
of
applicability
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
Notification
of
actual
startup
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
Notification
of
initial
performance
test
Notification
of
compliance
status
Review
of
initial
performance
test
report
Review
of
repeat
performance
test
report
Review
of
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
no
excess
emissions
report
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
Review
of
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
report
2
2
2
2
N/
A
2
2
8
8
8
2
N/
A
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
8
8
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.1
0.3
2.7
f
0.6
g
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
0.8
2.4
5.4
1.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.04
0.12
0.27
0.06
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.8
0.08
0.24
0.54
0.12
53
53
53
53
53
53
211
21
63
143
32
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
186
9
19
4914
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
0.1
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
0.1
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
45
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
45
+
$
4914
=
$
4960
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

b
Assume
EPA/
State
personnel
will
attend
10
percent
of
the
performance
tests
(
0.1
x
1
=
0.1).

c
Assume
20
percent
fail
the
initial
performance
test
and
half
repeat
the
performance
test
(
0.2
x
1/
2).

d
One
plant
in
100
will
be
involved
in
litigation
(
0.01
x
1
=
0.01).
A1­
38
e
Assume
10
percent
of
the
3
plants
(
0.3)
have
excess
emissions.

f
Assume
90
percent
of
the
3
plants
(
2.7)
do
not
have
excess
emissions.

g
Assumes
20
percent
of
the
3
plants
(
0.6)
will
report
a
startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
incident.
A1­
39
TABLE
5A.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
SLASHING,
DYEING,
AND
FINISHING)

FIRST
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
80
0.11
b
8.8
4
c
35.2
1.76
3.52
1981
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
4
1
4
163
d
652
32.6
65.2
36691
B.
Required
activities
Emission
rate
limit
compliance
determination
16
12
192
4
768
38.4
76.8
43218
Coordination
with
suppliers
40
1
40
74
2960
148
296
166571
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Initial
notification
2
1
2
163
326
16.3
32.6
18345
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
actual
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Compliance
status
notification
4
1
4
74
296
14.8
29.6
16657
Report
of
compliance
deviations
16
2
e
32
0.4
f
12.8
0.64
1.28
720
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
40
Report
of
no
compliance
deviations
8
2
e
16
3.6
g
57.6
2.88
5.76
3241
Report
operating
and
maintenance
0.5
3.24
h
1.62
74
NA
i
NA
i
119.88
i
5034
j
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
information
Records
of
all
info.
required
by
standards
4
52
208
4
c
832
41.6
83.2
46820
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
N/
A
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25
2
0.5
4
c
2
0.1
0.2
113
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
5948
297
715
339730
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.

b
Occurs
one
time
during
first
3
years
of
standard.
Results
in
one­
time
start­
up
costs
associated
with
initial
compliance
determination
and
acquisition,
installation
and
utilization
of
technology
and
systems
needed
to
support
record
keeping
and
reporting.
The
one­
time
start­
up
costs
are
amortized
over
the
15­
year
life
of
control
equipment
at
7%
interest.
For
computational
purposes,
the
number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
is
amortized
over
15
years.

c
Represents
number
of
facilities
already
reporting
compliance
with
promulgated
emission
limits.

d
Eighty­
nine
facilities
are
permitted
as
synthetic
minors
and
therefore
are
not
subject
to
the
emission
limits
in
the
standards.

e
Assumes
semiannual
reports
are
required.
A1­
41
f
Assumes
10
percent
of
respondents
for
first
year
after
promulgation
fail
to
meet
the
standard.

g
Assumes
90
percent
of
respondents
for
first
year
after
promulgation
meet
the
standard.

h
Average
number
of
reports
submitted
per
respondent
in
the
first
year.

i
Assumes
storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
of
reports
are
performed
by
clerical
staff.

j
Cost
includes
clerical
labor
and
first
class
postage
of
$
10.35
per
response.

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
A1­
42
TABLE
5B.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
SLASHING,
DYEING,
AND
FINISHING)

SECOND
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
80
0.11
b
8.8
4
c
35.2
1.76
3.52
1981
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
B.
Required
activities
Emission
rate
limit
compliance
determination
16
12
192
4
768
38.4
76.8
43218
Coordination
with
suppliers
40
1
40
74
2960
148
296
166571
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Initial
notification
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
actual
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Compliance
status
notification
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
Report
of
compliance
deviations
16
2
d
32
0.4
e
12.8
0.64
1.28
720
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
43
Report
of
no
compliance
deviations
8
2
d
16
3.6
f
57.6
2.88
5.76
3241
Report
operating
and
maintenance
0.5
0.75
g
0.375
4
NA
h
NA
h
1.5
h
63
i
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
information
Records
of
all
info.
required
by
standards
4
52
208
4
c
832
41.6
83.2
46820
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
N/
A
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25
2
0.5
4
c
2
0.1
0.2
113
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
4674
234
469
263070
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.

b
Occurs
one
time
during
first
3
years
of
standard.
Results
in
one­
time
start­
up
costs
associated
with
initial
compliance
determination
and
acquisition,
installation
and
utilization
of
technology
and
systems
needed
to
support
record
keeping
and
reporting.
The
one­
time
start­
up
costs
are
amortized
over
the
15­
year
life
of
control
equipment
at
7%
interest.
For
computational
purposes,
the
number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
is
amortized
over
15
years.

c
Represents
number
of
facilities
already
reporting
compliance
with
promulgated
emission
limits.

d
Assumes
semiannual
reports
are
required.

e
Assumes
10
percent
of
respondents
for
second
year
after
promulgation
fail
to
meet
the
standard.

f
Assumes
90
percent
of
respondents
for
second
year
after
promulgation
meet
the
standard.
A1­
44
g
Average
number
of
reports
submitted
per
respondent
in
the
second
year.

h
Assumes
storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
of
reports
are
performed
by
clerical
staff.

i
Cost
includes
clerical
labor
and
first
class
postage
of
$
10.35
per
response.

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
A1­
45
TABLE
5C.
ANNUAL
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
REPORTING
AND
RECORDKEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
SLASHING,
DYEING,
AND
FINISHING)

THIRD
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
1.
Applications
N/
A
2.
Survey
and
Studies
N/
A
3.
Acquisition,
Installation,
and
Utilization
of
Technology
and
Systems
80
0.11
b
8.8
74
c
651.2
32.56
65.12
36646
4.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
B.
Required
activities
Emission
rate
limit
compliance
determination
16
12
192
74
14208
710.4
1420.8
799541
Coordination
with
suppliers
40
1
40
74
2960
148
296
166571
C.
Create
information
See
4B
D.
Gather
existing
information
See
4B
E.
Write
report
Initial
notification
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Notification
of
actual
startup
2
1
2
1
2
0.1
0.2
113
Compliance
status
notification
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
Report
of
compliance
deviations
16
2
d
32
7.4
e
236.8
11.84
23.68
13326
Burden
item
(
A)

Personhours
per
occurrence
(
B)

No.
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
(
C)

Personhours
per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
AxB)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
personhours
per
year
(
E=
CxD)
(
F)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Ex0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
personhours
per
year
(
Ex0.1)
(
H)
Cost,$
a
A1­
46
Report
of
no
compliance
deviations
8
2
d
16
66.6
f
1065.6
53.28
106.56
59966
Report
operating
and
maintenance
0.5
0.75
g
0.375
74
NA
h
NA
h
27.75
h
621
i
5.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
instructions
See
4B
B.
Plan
activities
N/
A
C.
Implement
activities
N/
A
D.
Develop
record
system
N/
A
E.
Time
to
enter
information
Records
of
all
info.
required
by
standards
4
52
208
74
15392
769.6
1539.2
866169
F.
Time
to
train
personnel
N/
A
G.
Time
to
adjust
existing
ways
to
comply
with
previously
applicable
requirements
N/
A
H.
Time
to
transmit
or
disclose
information
0.25
2
0.5
74
37
1.85
3.7
2082
I.
Time
for
audits
N/
A
TOTAL
LABOR
BURDEN
AND
COST
34557
1728
3483
1945260
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
50.51,
management
at
$
72.74,
and
clerical
at
$
21.27.

b
Occurs
one
time
during
first
3
years
of
standard.
Results
in
one­
time
start­
up
costs
associated
with
initial
compliance
determination
and
acquisition,
installation,
and
utilization
of
technology
and
systems
needed
to
support
record
keeping
and
reporting.
The
one­
time
start­
up
costs
are
amortized
over
the
15­
year
life
of
control
equipment
at
7%
interest.
For
computational
purposes,
the
number
of
occurrences
per
respondent
per
year
is
amortized
over
15
years.

c
Assumes
that
facilities
not
already
in
compliance
will
choose
to
demonstrate
compliance
during
the
third
year
after
promulgation
of
the
standard.

d
Assumes
semiannual
reports
are
required.

e
Assumes
10
percent
of
respondents
for
third
year
after
promulgation
fail
to
meet
the
standard.

f
Assumes
90
percent
of
respondents
for
third
year
after
promulgation
meet
the
standard.
A1­
47
g
Average
number
of
reports
submitted
per
respondent
in
the
third
year.

h
Assumes
storage,
filing,
and
photocopying
of
reports
are
performed
by
clerical
staff.

i
Cost
includes
clerical
labor
and
first
class
postage
of
$
10.35
per
response.

N/
A
=
Not
Applicable.
A1­
48
TABLE
6A.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
SLASHING,
DYEING,
AND
FINISHING)

FIRST
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)

Hours
per
plant
per
year
(
C)
Plants
per
year
(
D)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
BxC)
(
E)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.05)
(
F)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.1)
(
G)

Cost,
$
a
Litigation
2080
2080
0.04b
83.2
4.16
8.32
2198
Compliance
Deviations
Enforcement
Activities
120
120
0.4c
48
2.4
4.8
1268
Report
Review
Notification
of
applicability
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
Notification
of
actual
startup
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
Notification
of
compliance
status
Review
of
compliance
deviations
report
Review
of
no
compliance
deviations
report
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
2
2
2
2
N/
A
2
8
2
N/
A
2
2
2
2
2
8
2
74
1
1
1
74
0.4
3.6
d
148
2
2
2
148
3.2
7.2
7.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
7.4
0.16
0.36
14.8
0.2
0.2
0.2
14.8
0.32
0.72
3910
53
53
53
3910
85
190
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
443.6
22.2
44.4
11720
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
0.4
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
0.4
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
180
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
11720
+
$
180
=
$
11900
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

b
One
plant
in
100
will
be
involved
in
litigation
(
0.01
x
4
=
0.04).

c
Assume
10
percent
of
the
4
plants
(
0.4)
have
excess
emissions.

d
Assume
90
percent
of
the
4
plants
(
3.6)
do
not
have
excess
emissions.
A1­
49
TABLE
6B.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
SLASHING,
DYEING,
AND
FINISHING)

SECOND
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)

Hours
per
plant
per
year
(
C)
Plants
per
year
(
D)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
BxC)
(
E)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.05)
(
F)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.1)
(
G)

Cost,
$
a
Litigation
2080
2080
0.04b
83.2
4.16
8.32
2198
Compliance
Deviations
Enforcement
Activities
120
120
0.4c
48
2.4
4.8
1268
Report
Review
Notification
of
applicability
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
Notification
of
actual
startup
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
Notification
of
compliance
status
Review
of
compliance
deviations
report
Review
of
no
compliance
deviations
report
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
2
2
2
2
N/
A
2
8
2
N/
A
2
2
2
2
2
8
2
0
1
1
1
0
0.4
3.6d
0
2
2
2
0
3.2
7.2
0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0.16
0.36
0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0
0.32
0.72
0
53
53
53
0
85
190
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
147.6
7.38
14.76
3900
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
0.4
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
0.4
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
180
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
180
+
$
3900
=
$
4080
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

b
One
plant
in
100
will
be
involved
in
litigation.

c
Assume
10
percent
of
the
plants
have
excess
emissions.

d
Assume
90
percent
of
the
plants
do
not
have
excess
emissions.
A1­
50
TABLE
6C.
ANNUAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
TO
THE
FEDERAL/
STATE
GOVERNMENT
OF
THE
FINAL
STANDARD
(
SLASHING,
DYEING,
AND
FINISHING)

THIRD
YEAR
AFTER
PROMULGATION
Activity
(
A)

Hours
per
occurrence
(
B)

Hours
per
plant
per
year
(
C)
Plants
per
year
(
D)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
BxC)
(
E)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.05)
(
F)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
Dx0.1)
(
G)

Cost,
$
a
Litigation
2080
2080
0.7
b
1456
72.8
145.6
38470
Compliance
Deviations
Enforcement
Activities
120
120
7
c
840
42
84
22194
Report
Review
Notification
of
applicability
Notification
of
constr./
reconstr.

Notification
of
anticipated
startup
Notification
of
actual
startup
Notification
of
special
compliance
requirements
Notification
of
compliance
status
Review
of
compliance
deviations
report
Review
of
no
compliance
deviations
report
Review
of
NESHAP
waiver
application
2
2
2
2
N/
A
2
8
2
N/
A
2
2
2
2
2
8
2
0
1
1
1
0
7
63
f
0
2
2
2
0
56
126
0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
2.8
6.3
0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0
5.6
12.6
0
53
53
53
0
1480
3329
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COST
(
SALARY)
2484
124.2
248.4
65632
Travel
Expenses
for
Tests
Attended
(
1
person
x
7
plants/
yr
x
1
day/
plant
x
$
50
per
diem)
+
($
400/
round
trip
x
7
round
trips/
yr)
=
$
3150
TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST
$
3150
+
$
65632
=
$
68780
a
Costs
are
based
on
the
following
hourly
rates:
technical
at
$
22.88,
management
at
$
35.08,
and
clerical
at
$
17.88.

b
One
plant
in
100
will
be
involved
in
litigation
(
0.01
x
70
=
0.7).

c
Assume
10
percent
of
the
70
plants
(
7)
have
excess
emissions.

d
Assume
90
percent
of
the
70
plants
(
63)
do
not
have
excess
emissions.
A1­
51
TABLE
7.
SUMMARY
OF
INDUSTRY
BURDENa
FOR
THE
PROMULGATED
STANDARDS
FOR
FABRIC
COATING,
PRINTING,
AND
DYEING
(
YEARS
1
THROUGH
3
AND
AVERAGE)
Non­
Labor
Costs
Year
Technical
Hours
Management
Hours
Clerical
Hours
Total
Hours
Labor
Costs
Capital
Costs
O&
M
Costs
Total
Costs
Year
1
9,701
485
1,172
11,358
502,966
51,384
8,441
562,791
Year
2
7,858
391
807
9,056
385,655
55,815
998
442,468
Year
3
59,065
2,954
6,041
68,060
3,028,639
300,311
5,120
3,334,070
Average
Burden
29,490
1,305,750
135,840
4,850
1,446,440
a
Represents
the
burden
for
135
existing
facilities
and
3
new
facilities.
The
average
number
of
facility
responses
was
adjusted
from
270
to
222
based
on
when
facilities
actually
respond
within
the
first
three
years
after
promulgation.
ATTACHMENT
2
A2­
2
TABLE
8.
SOURCE
DATA
AND
INFORMATION
REQUIREMENTS
Requirement
Regulation
citation
General
Provisions
citation
NOTIFICATIONS
Applicability
63.4281
63.9(
b)(
1)­(
3)

Anticipated
startup
63.4310
63.9(
b)(
4)

Commencement
of
construction
63.4310
63.9(
b)(
4)

Actual
startup
63.4310
63.9(
b)(
4)

Intention
to
construct/
reconstruct
63.4310
63.9(
b)(
4)­(
5)

Compliance
dates/
extension
63.4283
63.9(
c)

Performance
test
63.4310
63.9(
e)

Compliance
status
63.4310
63.9(
g)

Continuous
emission
monitoring
system
N/
A
63.9(
h)

REPORTS
Initial
performance
test
report
63.4311
63.10(
d)(
2)

Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
plan/
reports
63.4311
63.6(
e)(
3),
63.9(
d)(
5)

Excess
emissions
or
no
excess
emissions
reports
63.4311
63.10(
e)(
5)

Recordkeeping
General
Provisions
general
requirements
63.4301
63.10(
b)(
2)

Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Plan
63.4311
63.10(
b)(
2)

Documentation
of
corrective
action
procedures
63.4311
63.10(
b)(
2)
